The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 11022004 - C68 TO: BOARD OF Contra FROM: Lionel D. Chatman, County Probation Officer ;» Costa DATE: November 2, 2004 ' SUBJECT: Fourth Annual Report on the Juvenile Justice Crime //''' County Prevention Act Probation Department Programs SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: Accept the fourth annual report on the County Probation Department programs funded through the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act. BACKGROUND: The statutes governing the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act funds requires in Section 30061(4)(E)(i) of the Government Code that each county shall annually report to the County Board of Supervisors and the Board of Corrections on outcome measures and expenditures for programs approved in the comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plans. The penalty for failure to report the required data is forfeiture of subsequent allocations from the fund. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT YES SIGNATURE fir' --- — =,- ------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------,,.___—r—' - v +_.! _ `F 4-RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE --- -OPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE , ACTION OF 8 D ON (: JtE, f .- APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED. OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE ACTIONAND CORRECT COPY OF AN EN UNANIMOUS(ABSENT } } '1` ` ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES THE '} � BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE AYES: NOES: SHOWN. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: VN A,ATTESTED r ��. '" V(f ;A. F " CONTACT: Jim Heiser,6-8984 JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CC: County Probation Officer County Administrator Board of Corrections via Probation ' BYkili _' _ DEPUTY ,. 'Probation Department Lionel cr,atman Contra a Chief Probatfor,Officer 355 E.'eland Road Pittsburg, California 94565-4911 Cosia ,9:25)427-836' County FAX(925)427-8368 It r� CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT (JJCPA) JULY 2003 THROUGH JUNE 2004 Submitted: October 26,2004 By: Jim Heiser,Probation Manager JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT SUMMARY OF ACTIVIITES 2403-2004 BOARD REPORT: The Act requires that the comprehensive multi-agency juvenile justice plan be developed annually by the local Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council to be chaired by the County Probation Officer. With approval from the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, the Probation Department has operated this plan during the fours years of program implementation. Contra Costa County's allocation for FY 2003-2004 was $3,258,037. The funds allocated by this legislation have allowed our County to maintain funding for significant services to children and families. During FY 2003-2004 the following programs were in place: • Community Probation Orin Allen Youth rehabilitation Facility--Aftercare Program • School-Based Deputy Probation Officer Programs • Volunteers in Probation(VIP) • Summit Center • Fee for Service Funding COMMUNITY PRORATION PROGRAM Eight Deputy Probation Officers were assigned to police departments throughout our County. Our probation officers remain out-stationed in East County at the Brentwood, Antioch and Pittsburg Police Departments; in West County at the Richmond and San Pablo Police Departments; in South County at the San Ramon Police Department and in Central County at the Concord, Martinez and Walnut Creek Police Departments. Our Probation Officers work closely with police officers to share information and deter youth from further penetration into criminal and anti-social activities. Youth are assigned to the probation officer teamed with the police agency in the community where the minor resides. Youth attending continuation or alternative schools, a local school not serviced by a school-based deputy probation officer, those who have committed serious offenses or have been identified by the local police agency as in need of intensive supervision, are appropriate candidates for supervision by the Community Probation Unit. The goal for the youth placed on these caseloads is to redirect them, through intensive supervision, 3 ORIN ALLEN YOUTH REHABILI'T'ATION FACILITY—RANCH AFTERCARE The Ranch Aftercare program was developed to assist residents adjust upon their return to their home, school and community after completion of their commitment to Orin Allen. During FY 2003-2004 the five deputy probation officers assigned to the aftercare program interacted with 147 youth that had been sentenced to the ranch. When the residents complete their commitment period they begin 90 days of intensive supervision under the watch of ranch aftercare deputies. The aftercare deputies meet with the former resident at least one time each week in their homes, at their school or elsewhere in the community, consistently reminding the minor of his obligation to comply with the courts order and to engage in pro-social activities. The court may have ordered the minor to make restitution to their victims), attend counseling focused on management of their anger or their use of alcohol or drugs, complete volunteer community service, attend school or a number of other requirements. As the aftercare deputy monitors and assesses the minors' progress in complying with the order of the court, the aftercare deputy will typically matte referrals to community based organizations that are able to provide the direct services needed by the minor in meeting his obligations. The aftercare deputy will also maintain regular and open communication with the parents of the minor and others in the community with whom the minor has regular contact, such as other family members, his teacher(s) or police officers with knowledge of the minor and/or his family situation. For those minors who fail to comply with the order of the court the aftercare deputy notifies the court and sanctions are imposed. Typically, minors failing to comply with the conditions of parole face a return to the ranch to complete their commitment plus 30 additional days of confinement imposed as a consequence for their poor behavior. The youth participating in the aftercare program showed improvement in several areas studied during FY 2003-2004. The youthful offenders were less likely to be arrested and spent significantly fewer days detained in out of home placements than before the intervention. They were also more likely to make restitution to the victim(s) of their crime, and complete court ordered community service in the period of program participation compared with the period before program participation. These findings suggest that the aftercare program is an effective tool in the successful transition of youth released from Orin Allen in avoiding further delinquency. The opportunity available to the youth provided aftercare services can be illustrated by the accomplishments of a young man who had been sent to the ranch in the winter of 2003 for a series of crimes against persons committed while he was in possession of a firearm. This young man obtained his high school diploma while at the ranch and subsequently secured employment and enrolled in junior college. His aftercare deputy reports he is doing well and has established reasonable and attainable goals for his future. Some of the other notable results reported on the progress of minors supervised by aftercare deputies include a reduction in drug problems (56 percent), alcohol problems 4 (68 percent) and school attendance problems (49 percent); many of these young men also experienced gains in educational success. Among those who did not cam the expected amount of school credits in the period before program entry, most (59 percent) did earn the expected amount of school credits while in the program. The youth supervised by our aftercare staff may also benefit from many of the programs available to them at the ranch, including a new Video Program funded through JJCPA. This program teaches youth incarcerated at Orin Allen the basic fundamentals of filming, digital editing using computer software and language skills. Seven residents have completed the program and twelve residents are currently enrolled. Participants receive a minimum of 12 hours of training in subject areas of digital and video camera operation, computer editing and event coverage. The minors have been involved in photographing various events within our County including five sporting events, two retirement banquets, a Juvenile Justice Awards presentation, swearing in ceremonies for newly hired probation counselors and officers, three birthdays parties at the ranch, and staff appreciation day. The participants have edited and produced DVD's and CD's of the above events and are currently scheduled to attend a field trip to Contra Costa Television to learn more about career opportunities available in this field. SCHOOL BASED DEPUTY PROBATION OEEICERS PROGRAMS MIDDLE SCHOOLS PROGRAM. The Middle School Probation Program included eight deputy probation officers providing intensive supervision to students in ten middle schools across our County. Each deputy probation officer was assigned one or more middle schools where s/he had an office to meet with students referred by school staff or the local police agency. The middle school based probation officer established a relationship with the student and their parent(s) and worked with them to improve the Childs school attendance and deportment. Efforts of the JJCPA Middle School Program are focused on reducing the rate of recidivism, reducing the rate of delinquent offenses, improving individual attendance and performance and to enhancing the overall safety of the school environment. In the later category our officers support school staff, teachers and campus supervisors, assisting in conflict resolution and intervening in activities that are pre-delinquent, such as, bullying behavior, tagging or other violations of school rules. During the reporting period 243 middle school students participated in the program and those participating showed improvements in several areas measured. The students were less likely to be arrested and were more likely to complete probation, pay restitution to crime victims and complete court ordered community service during program participation compared with the period before program participation. These findings suggest that the middle school program effectively supported the children's efforts to avoid further delinquency. Among these participants drug and/or alcohol problems were 5 uncommon, but for those with drug and/or alcohol problems, there were significant reductions in use. The data showed drug problems were reduced by 94% and alcohol problems by 100%. School attendance problems were reduced by 97% for those whore school attendance problems were an issue. Unfortunately, as a result of reduced funding the middle school program has been scaled back for FY 2004-2005. The Probation Department has met with administrators from several school districts in an ongoing effort to find funding to continue or expand this program.. HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM. Initiated with Challenge I Funding, the High School Program focuses on placing probation officers in selected high schools and special necessary schools to provide supervision and specified services to juvenile offenders and other at-risk youth experiencing problems ranging from truancy to major criminal offenses. The program seeks to reduce delinquent offenses, provide for higher rates of successful completion of probation and restitution requirements, and improve participating students' school attendance and performance. During the FY ending June 30, 2004 a total of 178 youth participated in the high school program. The research showed that the participants were less likely to be arrested and spent fewer days detained in juvenile facilities. They were also more likely to complete probation, pay victim restitution and complete court ordered community service during their period of program participation compared with the period before program. participation. Participants also had fewer arrests for felony crimes and fewer arrests for crimes of violence. These findings suggest that the high school program was effective in helping these students from further delinquency and deeper penetration into the criminal justice system. In addition, program participants earned slightly higher grade point averages while in the program, and there were notable reductions in drug problems (40 percent) and alcohol problems(45 percent). VOLUNTEERS IN PROBATION (VIP) VIP has been funded under the JJCPA grant since October 2001. The goal of the program, since its inception, has been to fortify and supplement the efforts of juvenile supervision provided by the Probation Department, through one on one mentoring and other projects and endeavors. From October of 2001 through June of 2004 (the end of VIP funding through JJCPA) a total of 41 mentor/mentee matches were established. At the end of June 2004 a total of 20 of these matches remained active. In addition to one on one mentoring the VIP program coordinator collaborated with the County Library system to bring learning tools and skills to youth detained at each of the juvenile facilities in our County. This program, Technology for Teens in Transition, 2 away from activities and associates that may lead to their placement outside of their home and/or a lifetime of involvement in the criminal justice/social service systems. Probation and police officers work in concert with the schools, local service providers and the youths' parents in supporting the child's pro-social behaviors, while holding the youth accountable for negative ones. Additional goals for program participants include reducing violence, substance abuse, recidivism and truancy and increasing academic success and other pro-social activities. In addition to their work with specific youth, the probation officers out-stationed at police departments may participate in a number of collaborative activities, including: truancy sweeps with the local police agency, school district personnel and community based organizations; student attendance review boards, diversion panels; sharing gang information at joint agency meetings; and augmenting security at school events, and at County wide events such as the Fair, Corn.Fest and Safety Fest. During the reporting period we received a letter from one of our police partners illustrating one of the benefits this collaboration provides. The letter commended one of our probation officers out-stationed at their agency for "his professionalism, initiative, determination and cooperation with an allied agency in assisting our Department in identifying five suspects responsible for a gang-motivated murder of one of our citizens." During FY 2003-2004 program participants experienced improvements in several areas. Participants were less likely to be arrested and they spent a significantly fewer amount of time detained at the juvenile hall. In addition, they were more likely to complete probation, pay restitution to a victim and complete court ordered community service in the period of program participation compared with the period before program participation. During this FY program staff supervised two hundred & fifty youth. Of this number 214 were male (84 percent) between the age of twelve and nineteen with a mean age of sixteen years and eight months. A plurality of clients was European American, 112 (45 percent) were self-identified or identified as such. There were 57 (23 percent) African American clients; 51 (20 percent) Latina clients; three (1 percent) Native American clients; two (>I percent) Filipino clients and two (>1 percent) Pacific Islanders. Eight clients(3 percent) reported or designated as "other". During this FY we observed an increase in probation violation rates, a result of stepped up supervision efforts. However, our findings suggest that the Community Probation Program effectively supported probationer's efforts to avoid further delinquency. Some notable findings were reductions in drug problems (53 percent), alcohol problems (71 percent) and school attendance problems (44 percent) among participants. Program participants also experienced gains in educational achievement. Among those who did not earn the expected amount of school credits in the period before program entry, most (53 percent)did eam the expected amount of credits while in the program. 6 matched Internet mentors (adult volunteers screened and supervised by VIP) who volunteered their time to teach wards computer skills and the technical knowledge needed to go on line to seek information and visit approved web sites. VIP also matched adult tutors with youth in our institutions in need of tutoring and helped study for GED exams. Other volunteer activities facilitated and monitored by VIP include a newsletter published by and for the youth in our custody. This by-monthly publication, "The Words From The Inside" consists of original essays, stories, interviews, drawings, poems and inspirational messages submitted by youth in custody, the Discovery Bay Garden Club's work with youth at Orin Allen to grow their own vegetables and landscape the facility; and the volunteers from the animal rescue foundation who work with the residents of the Chris Adams Girls Center and Summit Center. These volunteers teach the residents how to care for and train rescued dogs and cats, and prepare these animals for adoption. As of June 2004 the VIP program had a total of 90 volunteers working with the Probation Department. Unfortunately, due to budget reductions at the State level funding for the VIP programs has been eliminated for FY 2004-2005. The administration for the program has been combined with other functions, so that the Department can continue our use of mentors for the benefit of the youth under our care. SUMMIT CENTER The Summit Center is a collaborative effort between the County Office of Education, County Mental Health and Probation and was developed to provide a safe and secure treatment environment for children whose current behavior precludes them from remaining in their home. The agencies work together with the goal of returning the resident to their home with the skills necessary for the family to remain unified, and for the minor to successfully reintegrate into their community and an appropriate school setting. The Probation Team at the Summit Center provides intensive probation supervision to the residents, an important factor in maintaining a safe and secure treatment milieu. All members of the team are trained to be alert for situations that may place residents or staff at risk and in the techniques necessary to maintain, or safely regain, control should a resident become assaultive. The County Office of Education develops educational programs appropriate for the residents, and, as many of them have special needs provides substantial individual instruction and attention. By using educational specialists and volunteers to enhance the residents' academic experience they are afforded an opportunity to achieve academically, a first time experience for many of these children. The residents of Summit Center are provided a wide array of services under the supervision and case management of County Mental Health. Mental health specialists assess the residents and provided individual, group and family therapy as needed. A unique aspect of mental health component is the concept of wraparound services. This 7 program begins early in the child's treatment and continues beyond his placement helping the minor and family successfully reunify. Wraparound incorporates as much support available to the family as can be garnered. The member of the support system may include extended family members, neighbors, members of the clergy, former or current coaches or teachers, and mental health professionals. The wraparound groups meets once a month before graduation and continue to provide support to the minor after he has returned home. As with the other components of the JJCPA programs developed in our County, the outcomes are encouraging. Program participants showed improvements in many areas as a result of the treatment provided them and their families. These children were less likely to be arrested and spent significantly fewer days detained in facilities in the period after program participation compared with the period before program entry. They also were more likely to complete probation successfully, pay restitution to the victim(s) of their criminal activity and complete community service as a result of their experience in the Summit Center program. FEE FOR SERVICE FUNDING The fee for service funding has been established as an alternative to the Department entering into contractual arrangements with a limited number of community based organizations. Under this service program, the Department may purchase services on an as needed basis, rather than entering into blanket contracts with various non-profit entities. The goal has been and continues to be to purchase services on demand that gives the Department the greatest flexibility in effectively addressing the needs of the client on an individualized basis. CONCLUSION The Contra Costa County Probation Department continues to provide needed services through the JJCPA programs developed over the past four years and targeted to the children in our communities. These programs are focused on keeping our youth away from anti-social and criminal activities by providing guidance, support and services to those at risk, and intervening with those who have already made poor choices. Our programs have enabled the Department to implement a juvenile justice strategy that provides for a continuum of responses to juvenile behaviors that put our children and communities at risk. Our responses are focused on intervening and preventing further involvement with these behaviors, so that the Probation Department along with our many partners may reduce the number of children and mitigate the intensity that they embrace activities that have the potential to lead to a lifetime of discontent for these children and their families. In preparing this report, the Probation Officers assigned to the JJCPA programs were asked to provide anecdotal information describing what effect our efforts were having on individual lives. The following stories are examples of how our County is making the lives of our children better, and our communities safer, one child at a time: • A young lady never attended school and had all F's. She was a gang member with gang tattoos and was arrested for petty theft. She did not care. I violated her probation for not attending school. I met with her weekly and worked with her to develop a case plan. I counseled her on how to stay out of court, but she refused to cooperate. She was detained at the Juvenile Hall for violating probation and spent nearly 4.5 weeks in custody. Immediately upon her release she contacted me and came to my office on campus. We discussed building her resume and how to f ll out W 2 forms, etc. She secured a job and I advised her how to navigate the school district system to earn addition credits to catch up to her class. She is now working, attending school DAILY and is planning to transfer to a school more suitable to her educational needs. Simultaneously, she dresses different, she wears less makeup, she covers her tattoo, she is stopping in my office more regularly and she appears to be taking her future very seriously. • A young man was arrested for vandalism with a great deal of damage. He refused to discuss that matter with me during our dispositional interviews. I learned he was performing below grade level and had all Fs; he had a major attitude at home; and two of his brothers had been killed within the past year. This kid was a mess! Depressed, angry, limited foresight and confused. I began working closely with him regarding his community service,fine, etc. and counseling him regarding probation. For whatever reason he truly opened up when we would meet at my school office. He began confiding in me and asking questions unrelated to the terms and conditions of probation. In fact he brought me homework a couple of times to show me how he was improving in his classes and how he was taking it seriously. One day one of his teachers came to me to share a report that he wrote at the end of the school year in which he outlined his 10 year plan; it was very realistic and detailed. He actually began spatial and linear thought patterns, something he had not been doing before. He now up to grade level, participating in an intern program and taking tutorial and college assistance, and is participating on the football team. • I attended the faculty staff meetings and met with several faculty members individually. With a couple of new teachers I counseled them on how to work with some of my kids who were causing them trouble. I also had a conference with one teacher who exasperated her so much she began crying. As part of this process, I also counseled the kids about how I wanted them to respond to the teacher and what my expectation were. I found that working with both the student and with the teacher I was able to help modify and support her classroom management. Anyway, the youngster ended up passing both his math class and his history class. These are the kind of interactions that can evolve precisely 9 because DPO's are stationed at the schools and have the opportunity to interact with school staff. • A young man was living with his aunt and her children when he was arrested for robbery. His mother had died and his father's whereabouts is not known. Although the robbery was this minor's first offense his aunt wanted him placed outside of her home. She was overwhelmed by the minor's probation status, court hearings and normal teenage rebelliousness. We had a long family conference and a series of family meetings and were able to develop a weekly family program for all of them to use, and routine check in appointments in order to keep the minor home with his extended family and attending school. Since coming under probation supervision his grades have improved an entire grade point, he plays varsity football and track and is visiting colleges. The family reports they now have family dinners and even enjoy a family game night each week. In additions to these stories our fourth year data indicates that our County has developed strategies to address at risk youth and juvenile offenders in a way that make our communities safer and the future of our children brighter. Attached to this summery is the Fourth Annual Report to the Board of Corrections on data collection for all programs and fiscal expenditures. Outcome Measure Page 1 of S 7€ -v j # ger i 2 00 4 :::::;.;;:::.;r;:::::.<:<. :.::::.:. The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act E.ontfa Costa 004 Progre.-;;s pepot for con-L;nunify Probation Program In the area below, please enter program expenditures for each identified line item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2003-2004 t# ::% D FUNDS FO ,F'S.-CA' YEAR 2.00 - 2�'A- $979,461 Crt , ., w FOR it t,'J l,.s:J� IF I ILJ c4?.�f'..�£.:5 YYf ::af r,>:c: m3c }< g a ,;. ; n;: $532,942 $a $28,707 $a $47,336 Total Non-JJCPA ;;. :�; >:.;;x ..: .:.: ..:.`.• $76$,97$ $o Funds: $333,339 r . $0 $0 so sc $45,088 $0 $81$9391 0 f $`9339339 f # i ,<3%' s, :::ryi.. r� ••'.: .sfu .�. $79749,730 Enter the number of juveniles who participated in the program during the fiscal year 2003-2004,Provide separate counts for those completed the program,those who were'In progress'as the end of the fiscal year(i.e.,still'enrolled'in the program),and those who did not complete the program(i.e.,failed to completed the program and are no Ionger'enroiled'in the Enter the approximate average length of time spent in the program). program by all program participants during the fiscal year. Days If> is rf:3: 793 �:,.. 237.00s�, y {r£rte Rq>£'3rt.Cw?'F'i%£;rif i tai C v Z 1 ti i .-orr:.r7..: .'i :.36 ei E.Xplai?,. Or ,. i,:.i;:, Gt f. ..;Y3M 'de #:re4 ' ,i'• pr-, 9 > s w3 . _ tis. .or l L ffi fi i far£ Progress Report Instructions*.For each outcome listed in the table,report the program results in the boxes provided. REPORT NUMBERS ONLY.DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS C'%,'"pct.," "percent,"etc,). Inclusion of anything other than numbers will result in the entry being"zeroed out." PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,CLICK-HERE FOR SPECIFIC, IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME INFORMATION. Juvenile Participant Outcome Measures http://www.bdeorr.c.../outcomemeasures.asp?program=4&view=p&action=-r&period=200 10/17/2004 Outcome Measure Page 2 of 5 IFAngst Rate(Alt Arresffi) ietiRnaatoe Probation Incarceration Rate ' •` „A A Mean or Average A Percen#age A Mean or Average -_; Decrease(Relative Goal): increase(Relative Goal) Decrease(Relative Goal): >< r Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Participants at an Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Time Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Time Prior to Program Entry 'Gime Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry t :: e .� . ,; t During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard during or at End of Standard r F r.? Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 124 113 122 0.4 Mean/Avg. 15.93% 11.16 Mean/Avg. 113 113 113 si•:> a:si f 124 113 122 IF o.49 MeanJAvg. 0% 24.5 MeanJAvg. y'o- 113 113 113 Rate of Completion of Rate of Completion of Restitution Court-Ordered Community Probation Violation Rate Service A Percentage A Percentage A Percentage increase(Relative Goal): increase(Relative Goal) Decrease(Relative Goal) r M %E Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Prior Program Participants in l� Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time the County _ � http://www.bdeorr.c.../•outcome easures.asp?program=4&view=p&action=r&period=200 14/1712004 Outcome Measure Page 3 of 5 rv ,:, .z,, �3^ Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of NSA Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry e °x ` f 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days .s x 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days iof -# t r- r 64 84 123 31.25% 60.71 % 16.26% 59 80 113 R'af 64 84 1=12: 9.38% 0% 0% 59 80 113 Education-Attendance- Education-Other-Percent Other-Percent of Youth Education-Suspensions of Youth Earning with School Attendance Appropriate Number of Problems Academic Units A Percentage A Mean or Average A Percentage r t <•�;: M�ase {J� Relative Goal). Decrease(Relative Goal): increase(Relative Goal): agnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time 11,Earlier Point in Time iram Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of z3'r ar, Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry 1�<a During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry http://www.bdeorr.c.../outcomemeasures.asp?program=4&view--p&action=r&period=200 10/17/2004 _ _ outcome Measure Page 4 of 5 > ri 180 Days 180 Gays 180 Hays :r "s 180 mays 180 Days 180 Days 119 110 123 29.09% 0.16 Mean/Avg. 62.18% Add' cw,m�3t year ran, 5�:<; 85 113 100 Be N', > 4 110 123 119 47.27% 0.16 Mean/Avg. 47.9% � {stl 3uizr"2S ss �"ra� t�`�' £ 85 113 100 Other(Describe):- Other(Describe):-Arrests Education--Attendance-- _Percent Arrested for a Arrests-Violent Offenses Percent of Youth who are Felony Offense Habitual Truants A Pertntage A Percentage A Percentage Decrease(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal) Magnitude Unkown .Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Program Participants at an �.. Earlier Point in ime Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time ^ r Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of ..;4>. an <_ «r Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry During or at End of Standard During ar at End of Standard During or at End of Standard Period of Time from Point of P+ociod o#Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 110 45 45 7 7% 22% IF 8.89°lo http://www.bdeorr.e.../outcome measures.asp?program7-4&view=p&actions&period-200 10/I7/2004 Outcome Measure - Page 5 of 5 Year Y_...;c ✓r3tr u,3F 85 39 39 `i t;• r,.. 3,v` n 110 45 45 IH fere� 42.73% 46.67% ;.<, rss... , ......:.c 85 39 39 s��Y t£`is`i"C t`. }^ s•~it339"` ?t'�t ` E3£"t7E3tE'� ` m GA any iia} t`er tit? _. . .r..s£3ff, Cyi• f.;, u,fi}},vsC"s '..ir^E.F.Ck..>.,.,...''v. :. :ft 't�, isSL,f.w-.ck; u £'..�#.'E...a , E>Y... :�:,., a..,S.;�:::.:,,.w#.:krc.'>.C.,,..c..�ic3.;.f<3f::. f:k;Et33.. ,.�:..».F..a:•.r1..�-.:s. W._:�.k S.:.tk'�.�s;;�';.;.>t./-.::.'.".":... ,y. �1 ,.',s,�..€',.,;s3,`<��T .;:s�_.vriui 3's>f•,.K :,:. °f>'+ . .1�.ctE3: 3..fG' •�. .tEiat;-lg#rom,t,f; _ ...,.u.,resi,..;:5, ..... Program participants experienced improvements in several domains during Fiscal Year 2003-2004.Participants were less likely to be arrested,spent significantly fewer days detained in facilities,were more likely to complete probation,pay restitution,and complete court-ordered community service obligation In the period of program participation compared with the period before program participation.We observed an increased probation violation rate,but regard this as the result of stepped up supervision. These findings suggest that the Community Probation Program effectively supported clients`efforts to avoid further delinquency. Other notable findings were reductions in drug problems(53 percent),alcohol problems(71 percent),and school attendance problems(44 percent)among participants.Program participants also experienced gains in educational achievement.Among those who did not earn the expected amount of school units in the period before program entry,most(53 percent)did earn the expected amount of school units while in the program. Retum to_Prograra,election Screen http://www.bdeorr.c.../outcomemeasures.asp?program=4&view—p&action=:r&period=200 10/1712004 Outcome Measure Page 1 of 4 The JuvenHe Justice Crime Prevention Act Contras Costa, 2004 Progress Rop s-I for Expand. the Hio Cha€€enge Tem Program to In the area below,please enter program expenditures for each identified line item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2003-2004 $637,2880 $10,113 $0 Fu:a$ t:vf Cf...-..:. i .r.�.-•f $29,993 $0 Total Non-JJCPA $0 $0 Funds: t� $384,643 so so $41,064 $0 4..r $718,458 $0 $384,643 - {� $1,103,101 Enter the number of juveniles who participated in the program during the fiscal year 2003-2009.Provide separate counts for those completed the program,those who were'in progress'as the end of the fiscal year(i.,e.,still'enrolled'in the program),and those who did not complete the program(i.e.,failed to completed the program and are no longer'enrolled'in the Enter the approximate average length of time spent in the program), program by all prog aim pprticipsrntx during the fiscal year. L;f: N..,._ 1.•r-:�' . %,L", ,,. W _ 1 8,00 .�� ; Days PER AN, 243.00 ��C{,t�£'�.°s;f t'�}'3c'�#"•:4.`y�#'S"#>:firh?`E�;4 {'tY-SGe�i; s? ...t2:�G?3.'Y ,.... S..�c:i 1,'t .3'�:.(3(>r �n;UCf.� ,.^�i�.:....,. "S�'r.3r�.r}3 .:1`is�; SESp.:t£Z�x :,tom:�i;F f..,.._.:�:' ..... ;,/.,?i.. .,..�i;,..•....,.4.........,1.. c -vt� ..... t �i ,7 }a.. in tf:.._ser; tOn. Progme Report Instructions: For each outcome listed in the table,report the program results in the boxes provided. REPORT NUMBERS ONLY. DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS("%,""pct.," "percent,"etc.).Inclusion of anything other than numbers will result in the entry being„zeroed out." PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,CLICK HERE FOR SPECIFIC,IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME INFORMATION. Juvenile Participant Outcome Measures http://www.bdeorr.c.../outcome measures.asp7program--2&view=p&action=r&period=200 10/17/2004 Outcome Meese Page 2 of 4 Afffest Rate(A8 Arris) Completion of Probation incarceration Rate r, r; Rate x" A Mean or Average A Percentage A Mean or Average Decrease(Relative Goal): increase(Relative Goal): Decrease{Relative Goai) Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time f r; r n Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of 3r::-: nts a:s z Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry ti During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard ' Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry 180 Days 180 Gays 180 Days 3 ay u:,.;,�r C. i' '•,. 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days .,,. ::^... .5 r•: ,,. .... .._, £.;z.s 110 2 109 y� j 0.08 Mean/Avg. 5Q J° =0. n1AW 123 4 123 110 2 109 0.18 Mean A g. 0% 0 Mean/Avg. Addit z>naa C's rrAsEtPar 123 4 123 ..,4- R�,por.-�;d tet t'; Rate of Completion of Rate of Completion of Restitution Court-Ordered Community Probation Violation Rate Service A Percentage A Percentage A Mean or Average <, ;- ri increase(Relative Goal): increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(relative Goal) ti3, : Magnitude Unlcown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Exi-est ,a „ Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time JEarlier Point in Time http://u-vw.bdeorr.c.../outcome measures.asp?program=2&view=p&action=r&period=200 10/17/2004 outcome Measure Page 3 of 4 r• Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period Of W..J... ,,,a .a ...�r?{er Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry <u sry During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard r `' Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry 1$0 Days 180 Days 1$0 Days 1$0 Days 1$0 Days 1$0 Days } n h 9 3 4 66-67% 0 Mean/Avg. 7k }� y, y itrio ff ,qY, i:`. 3 4 0% 0% 1 Mean/Avg. Education-Attendance- ,., Other-Percent of Youth with a School Attendance Problem A Percentage f 3 (Relative[Mgude UnkownC�oal} Program Participants at an Earlier Point in Time #i =ss'tcZ^rAi iss ,,; N; Some Standard Period of Time Prior to Program Entry During or at End of Standard Period of Time from Point of Program Entry http://www.bdeoff.c.../outcome measures.asp?program=2&view=p&action7--r&period=200 10/17/2004 Outcome Measure _ - Page 4 of 4 180 Days °c 180 Days r't: 3a 37.84% 923 123 ^bus ;3 r "M 9,., str i Rep art C3:f£3"F#3 e-W,i� cwt£tf c, #4. ' .,. ._..w';y ,.nu<`onai nt c..3 y 4�ke ,':zr..,c�"i�.v•"`.._. :..5't£;Cw. .. .tfl.,,Ytyt' .. #.t a:.:...�. s? ... fS£"?:" ,_._£ .?"£ +ry.)i''#£:Y;i<3i:...._,...Uat: ntn.... �,4 ...�,.:r.:.,�•', .... Program participants experienced improvements in several domains during Fiscal Year 2003-2004.Participants were less likely to be arrested,were more likely to complete probation,pay restitution,and complete court-ordered community service obligation in the period of program participation compared with the period before program participation.`these findings suggest that the Middte School Program effectively supported clients'efforts to avoid further delinquency.Among the participants drug and alcohol problems were uncommon;for those with drug and alcohol problems,there were significant reductions.The data show large reductions in drug problems(94 percent),alcohol problems(100 percent).School attendance problems were also reduced significantly(97 percent)among those for whom school attendance problems were an issue. Return to Program_Selectlon Screen httpJ/www.bdeorr.c.../outcome measures.asp?program=2&view=p&action=r&period-2030 1411712004 Outcome Measure Pagel of 5 aWf;3r ;ta,..`.£3me �;1f3• �3^,'i:t7 ? , PR � >Jrt WIN ------- The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act Contra Costa, 2004 Progress Repon for High Challenge Te,�vn Progra c In the area below,please enter program expenditures for each identified line item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2003-2004 2W3 ,i: $15910" .....X:FIEi`i DP URPS RDR f...3'20,04 y.h... ... ti4 �?^�ierers1 >j.;:;i rY{ . .. r.i a..•>si,^y, <.Mt> $732,015 _ f $nom-•. Total Non-,JJCPA $405,394.Y0 f*^ ,l ic?,'• $59,148 $o $861,469 t�� $406,394 `."'erg;". $1,256,863 Enter the number of juveniles who participated in the program during the fiscal year 2003-2004. Provide separate counts for those completed the program,those who were'in progress'as the end of the fiscal year(i.e.,still`enrolled'in the program),and those who did not complete the program(i.e.,failed to completed the program gN are no tonger'enrolled`in the Enter the approximate average length of time spent in the program). program by W pr___go rami Pa-r#%1-Jp#nts during the fiscal year. GRA�#,, C ?.v ERAG-E i..tu.N'iks.H OF,71ME: E: 33. 49.00 1 Days F U, 3� '_Y de e-3 178.00 $7,061.80 ?;rt. S r5.3gm' S 'I3f_arf 'f3'Y'si'2"ss:£3'�:5 '`3'.i£:::`al. # ;'.:• ?};; s,t.tf....3.♦�. .;C,r7,': �7u2. `.iii„�-.f:?'1g'.:"f;X, ..'.,t�.f£o.t 3" ..,i"xF,?U,"Cc#f i C .''s.. . `'} C .tq..,. .e det,�;.a L. .. ?"'fi.,i:lf..e "f„„?L..,.;Gf_. .,r.,,".3Ck ., -._.... r.;w3". ;3 r.',,,r,..: .., Prognoss Report tnobve♦ons.For each outcome listed in the table,report the program results in the boxes provided. REPORT NUMBERS ONLY.DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS("Ofo,"„pct „ "Percent”etc.).Inclusion of anything other than numbers will result in the entry being„zeroed out.,, PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,CLICK SERE FOR SPECIFIC,IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME INFORMATION. Juvenile Participant Outcome Measures http.//www.bdeorr.c...;outcome measures.asp?program=l&vie p&action=r&period—200 10/17/2004 Outcome Measme Page 2 of 5 '..r r s Arrest Rate(Ail Arrests) Completion Probation Incarceration Rats A Mean or Average PPercentage A Mean or Average .,:^ Decrease(Re#ative Coni): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal): 3c<„ .. Masnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown ;ram Participants at an rogram Participants at an Program Participants at an I:'roP Point in Time Earlier Point in lime Earlier Point in Time v Y'.: ti•t?>t :s Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of f Mi {r . ; Ea e P,<rt Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Nirk During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard i ' "Y` Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of f a Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry {^ ' ". .; �`' '• 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 1801 Bays 180 Days 52 54 54 IF0.42 Mean/Avg. 3.7 la 3.8 Mean/Avg. 122 122 122 52 54 _. t :cam 0.67 Mean/Avg. war t. a .. g. 0% 6.02 Mean/Avg. �3:r v`a kVk. qtr.,,,• 122 122 122 B Next",113113f: Rate of Completion of Rate of Completion of Restitution Court-Ordered Community Probation Violation Rate Service A Percentage A Percentage _ A Percentage Increase(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative=Goal): Decrease(Re#ative Goa#) Magnitude Unkown Magnitude UnkowMagnitude Unkown Program Participants at an Program Partin assts at an og p Program Participants at ars Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time ttp://www.bd,r,orr.c..Joutcome measures.asp?program—i&-,4ew=p&,actiOn=r&period=2003 10/17/2004 ..... outcome Measure Page 3 of 5 s e �s•? r > `�?^yG'TL`€FIs r Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry F' r During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry `=RF-� 180 Days 180 Days 1$0 Days 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 3 i ;E3<s •;>'"'t; 33.33% 52% 13.21 % P, ';;c:.,,, .: ..,a?.#s:`;1; 25 22 122 Next 25 53 12 16.67% 0% � 3.77% .. _it. .e.fc- 25 22 122 .:;tis.:-` t.., 3a Education-Academic Ansate-Other Specific „ Achievement{Grade Point Education-Suspensions Type(s)of Offenses-Felony Average) Arrests A Mean or Average A Percentage A Percentage increase{Relative Goal): Decrease{Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal): Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown as r: Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Program Participants at an r.r Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time r ,eHil ".� Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period Of s# at an P,.r:� Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry 'of during or at End of Standard During or at Endof Standard During or at End of Standard Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days http://)n vw.bdeofr.c..Joutcome measures.asp?program--I&view=p&action=r&period=200 10/1712004 outcome Measure Page 4 of S r zj<r f y 180 Days 180 bays 1801 Days csi 723.£3Fn. .•,fr'i'Vs .( 54 54 1.54 Mean/Avg. 42.59% 3.7% i - �;.iz'i;•:# 3';:..�,:>,::. fC: 122 122 122 9. 1.29 Mean/Avg. 40.74% �— °lo 122 122 122 lentOffenses APercentageIF � A"Y �<�._. �.✓,�'"..: �<�< Dec►i�ase(Relative GOaI)o „< Program Participants at an Earlier Point in Time r Some Standard Period of Time Prior to Program Entry During or at End of Standard Period of Time from Point of Program Entry 180 Days .v,. ... 180 Days 54 122 i..,. P VV::;8 http://www.bdcorr.c.../outcomemeasures.asp?program--I&view=p&action=r&perird=200 10/17/2004 Outcome Measure Page 5 of 5 12.96% Vii;-a:4.;>•r..., rexl-p, rrkW;:^,.:a k 122 sY'r*,j£"`-n''%Report;`ommL"i`f'R•,O:Af„'.ti:t os� }7thSi.3!.: 3 v � ^£5�:. �, .#.�,:.;£ :ha. St{r ._.pia,.S. '; t11.Fp £f he ptogress re wl "?Z .. ,. '`"✓ aS'i";3r"..f„F; � � ^•a �.�< race w 4e Ud C4-• +.._3Y �.£>:,xui h ar*-,�y�i e?11);!rIe resu:!. 0 ..1,42,P ,c....,riN.DC Program participants experienced improvements in several domains during Fiscal Year 20M2004. Participants were significantly less likely to be arrested,spent fewer days detained in facilities,were slightly more likely to complete probation, more likely to pay restitution,and significantly more likely to complete court-ordered community service obligation in the period of program participation compared with the period before program participation.Participants experienced reductions in felony arrests and arrests for violent offenses.`these findings suggest that the High School Program effectively supported clients' efforts to avoid further delinquency,Additionally,program participants earned slightly higher grade point averages while in the program.Other notable findings were reductions in drug problems(40 percent)and alcohol problems(45 percent). Return to Prograrrr,Selection.Screen http://www.bdeorr.c..Joutcome—measures.asp?program=1&view--p&actions&period=200 10/17/2004 Outcome Measure Page l of 3 :... The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act Ccr)nt:ra Costa-, 2004 Prcgrva l ep*rt for Safi;Futurem-Surnmit °enter In the area below, please enter program expenditures for each identified line item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2003-2004 .LO .'�S„-._f L..�Y.:.J v. .., 5•�.0.{ti.YEeT S.�Jii3 G,.:.,:E.. $314,4iiV 5,3 State so ;C3`ss{ Y..<,.x: r ;,£}s �:}`• $14,490 so �j Total Non-JJCPA $o $o Funds; so so 7'...,"?%# >.. •• •.S.+.rrrZ c3,x. f,.. ^5 Y t.,u 4.} *: is ' y:�,. $0 �. $300,000 so 14,490 so $.3114,490 Enter the number of juveniles who participated in the program during the fiscal year 2003 w 2004. Provide separate counts for those completed the program,those who were'in progress'as the end of the fiscal year(i.e.,atil#'enro##ed'in the program),and those who dist not complete the program(i.e.,failed to completed the program and are no tonger'enrolled'in the Enter the approximate average length of time spent in the program). program by#L1ram nartdcdpants during the fiscal year. NG;TH r #.'MME, 10 ,... Days f x eq e e nm T,488.Otf 42.00 C-ipar f ofi3'Yj6t:r;ts F wea'a .Uy:f�c.s.. ;3t'# 33.:. t r•qr• £ s- ,. .. .y jrM1 __ £.... ir.c. s:}.xc.3�«i::� '_f. ,f; .od,`:f-ca;km fix',,...,.`f>e??£ov;!de' ;::.;iw ...,.2'�..... .. progress Report Instruetdons For each outcome listed to the table,report the program results in the boxes provided.REPORT NUMBERS ONLY,DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS(-%,"-pct.,- "percent"etc.).Inclusion of anything other than numbers will result in the entry being"zeroed out." PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,CLICK HERE FOR SPECIFIC,IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME INFORMATION, Juvenile Participant Outcome Measures http://www.bdcorr.c.../outcome measures.asp?program-7&view=p&action=r&period-200 10/17/2004 Outcome Measure Page 2 of 3 An"t Raul(All ) CompletlRaate Probation incarceration Rate A Mean or AverageEe _!!ntage A Mean or Average t Fur Decrease{Relative Goal); Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal): Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown : r Prcxgram Participants at an Program Participants at an Program Participants at an J, :.. Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time L: ..riart ; rx; Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of {..3 ma a; :fi .eS < ?.: Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prier to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard Yr �` Period of Time from Paint of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of CFS £' #ice Programs Each Program Exit Program Exit �' 'i i n }.d�iyiv' .... '4.4.x•U' .i..,: 180 Days 1[180 Days 180 Days ttx f.:.>tN: ,Corti ;y 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days 15 15 15 0.53 Mean/Avg. 33.33% 6.78 Mean/Avg. 27 27 27 Y .. 15 15 15 2.33 Mean/Avg. 0% — 62.35 Mean/Avg. .. . .,; '^: 27 27 27 Rate of Completion of Rate of Completion of Rarstitution Court-Orderad Community Probation Violation Rata service A Percentage A Percentage A Mean or Average --J Increase(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal): r r Magnitude Unkown [Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown t:F ; t • Pr rare Parti antsy a#a� Program Participants at an og Participants a#an Program ram Partrcip Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time http:f/www.bdeorr,c...Ioutcome measures.asp9program=7&view=p&action=r&period.=200 1011312004 Outcome Measure Page 3 of 3 Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of at t _adi : Poiis Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry r ' .c a <�) r l` During or At End of Standard During 'vor At End of Standard During or At End of Standard Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Program Exit Program Exit Program Exit t x, 7. z, 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days s i f?; tin i r 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days im4 rt r 50% 25% 0.2 Mean/Avg. 5 7 27 ai?:.xt yea,:': . c 27 }} } Ne-,<t yea N'ej� pmsz Report'�t3�E3�F�$£3t-�w�b�F�.,co mf3: Pa. v:,,,�:an_ ..;d J:I`,?:,.,.�3 r't.:;'f?.�..4�.''; c.i"�':o£..�.:;��"":'�CC tfi .`'",£`ls�_".;�£,#"t#':i;3L� `^..t.' Yi >t-iii. 's h1....:.. �`Xs-,. .,_. ,..t r `:..,.. - ^ .4 F - ;•; t{ 'c Yx i r.. ad- 3 . . _.:��i.. :..ct..} .... � .I"i,, :...s ,.'1.z#u:..c...f"{r : . �,..,..,t..c:�, "t.,•-�c"...,t.,33'.i 'x�., .,`£... . t;;f'�..._.:,.3 .nf .. g i -,g rn dhans #;, .Y# h 'S .us?. -.r5-si, ts' etc. Program participants experienced improvements in key juvenile justice domains during Fiscal Year 2003-2004.Participantss were less likely to be arrested,spent significantly fewer days detained in facilities,were more likely to complete pronation,pay restitution,and complete court-ordered community service obligation in the period of program participation compared with the period before program participation.We observed an increased pronation violation rate,but regard this as the result of stepped up supervision.These findings suggest that the Summit Center effectively supported clients'efforts to avoid further delinquency. Return tfa Presgram Selection.Screerr http.fl-vvww.bdcorr,c.../outcome measures.a `program-7&view=p,&action=r&period=2 0 10/17/2004 Outcome Measure Pagel of 3 calif°rrr#:ra HoyeFff 4 tSi;t#3y Ye i; t v: The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act ,,ontrye Clo ta, 2W4 Progress Report for S feF�Jt re-s.,Ranch Aftercairs= In the area below,please enter program expenditures for each identified line item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2003-2004 IL 11 i>..; .;,4.:.c v.:x # ; . $235,637 $a 1508 $0 � �IJ FW{ yW . _ Total Non-JJCPA d$0�G so Funds: (Fuenryd�esttr $11,069 _ ...�....$0 W�Vi7,O"t57 $17,996 so $263,361 $0 $149,W :b $ 33,2�9, : Enter the number of juveniles who participated in the program during the fiscal year 2003-2004.Provide separate counts for those completed the program,those who wers'in progress'as the end of the fiscal year(i.e.,still'enrolled'in the program),and those who did not complete the program(i.e.,failed to completed the program Aqd are no longer'enrolled'in the Enter the approximate average length of time spent in the program). program by okpi_parficipants.during the fiscal year. N.yv1? R 10F r?v'eiGE :EN$-} ' i i: 66 175.00?. geLectnof ; Days 42 FIEF xs r- C< 947.00 1,.. <. 147.00 r, i•'tsJ £"r^,b RA.;spCsi"s:C5%£,wi}e,ft v HSfi<l, 1x3:?v#i',f'e ;;i:m,that ^'.s,i z..}#P any c c fcx ,J.bct s>P i t iro Y >u of .fe:3",..,,.k'at on.S �'Y:,i#•� ?��:# far Modified budget to add$12,000 to fixed assestfequipment Sent modification on June 25,2004. Funds to be used for video equipment at OAYRF to teach minors who are incarcerated the basic fundamnetals of filming,computers,digital editing and business communications. Progmss Report Instructions:For each outcome listed in the table,report the program results in the boxes provided.REPORT NUMBERS ONLY,DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS("%,""pct.," "Percent,"etc,).Inclusion of anything other than numbers will result in the entry being"zeroed out," PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE, CLICK HERE FOR SPECIFIC, IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME INFORMATION. Juvenile Participant Outcome Measures http://www.bdeoff.c.../outcomemeasures.asp?progra 7-6&view p&action=r&period=200 10/17/2004 Outcome Measure Page 2 of 3 An"t Rate(All Al rule) Cornp#et Rats Probation Incarceration Ratey� A Mean or Average A Percentage A Mean or Average 3ZZi .<.. Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Ua ve Goa#}: Derxease(Rekown Goal): Decrease Relative Goat): Increase(file# �# g nkown Magnitude Unkown Program Participants at an Program Par#icrpants at an Program Participants at an M c: Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Tim t .- ;Z y£ Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of P.'1: ,ip,a .s ax " ;Eadir r; ,; t Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry ` During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of ;r vri. Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry t... { s= 480 Days 180 Days 180 Days r;Dae Y4 180 Days 180 Bays 180 Days ^i for i 108 108 104 t IF 0.14 MeanlAvg. 34.29°I 25.9 Mean/Avg. ��<'�:#fi�;:�<:#��r:��a?`?"shy:• R ,,. 42 42 42 �..� UR :se.Fvx d $i ; 105 104 3.16 MearVAvg. 0% 185.49 Mean/Avg. t, G E ;;x=, u. 42 42 42 Rate of Completion of Rate of Completion of Restitution Court-Ordered Community Probation Violation Rate service A Percentage Y A Percentage m A Mean or Average — Increase(Relative Goat); Increase{R:Unkown ve Goa#}; Decrease(Relative Goal) Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Magnitude Unkown Program Participants at an JProgram Participants at an Program Participants at an Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time http:/./www.bdcorr.c.../outcome measures.asp?program=6&view=p&action=r&period=200 10/17/2004 Outcome Measure Page 3 of 3 Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Time Prior#o Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard Period of"Gime from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of n " " Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days Re55ts.t':-. or ..ICX�Tar-:. 180 Days 180 Days 7180Days7= 90 21 104 ..�.`.` -1.. 1E -- v :r 33.3 /o 0 19.05% 0.0577'Mean/Avg. . a..� . _.... Yu•r 36 7 42 6.67% 0% 0.1827 Mean/Avg. »zr: 36 7 42 Ne; ye;: pcfi g-n-Ase ::`;.zd'c �;,srt"�r°•E:'mts.. ut;"Csf�es.- :-7 t e....f«a'of ::f ...:::iz••.•�: P�€i airs a, r �c. .3 # r c• F -S# S£ "' £-r?< t Yu adau �7d, :32t >s r L.. 3e ^C r-'r ,3 "Y 'Y Vis^^"•,f•z r Cc, g > }. . i'' Y f��.#i `'.t"#i £l•`.i'S#�'?,,x •):',r:f;;,,, eta.t.. ..,. �. a-3-e #.#-1#?•, cost-'= .�'�v�'#,^, v. Program participants experienced improvements in several domains during Fiscal Year 2003-2004.Participants were significantly less likely to be arrested,spent significantly fewer days detained in facilities,were more likely to complete probation, pay restitution,and complete court-ordered community service obligation in the period of program participation compared with the period before program participation.These findings suggest that the Ranch Aftercare Program effectively supported clients' efforts to avoid further delinquency.Cather notable findings were reductions in drug problems(56 percent),alcohol problems(68 percent),and school attendance problems(49 percent)among participants.Program participants also experienced gains in educational achievement.Among those who did not earn the expected amount of school units in the period before program entry,most(59 percent)did earn the expected amount of school units while in the program. return tea Program Selecdoin Screen http://"w.bdeorf.c.../outcome measures.asp?progran7=68iview=p&action=r&period-200 10/17/2004 Outcome Measure Page 1 of 3 r4u'rnitWo nia{� 513:2 S4T t .w rL.s GEY 0-1t•.iS.lie 17,20b;4 3 The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act Con&a Cos,1a, 204 Progre�s Rep,-wt for Safe-Rst rers k Vofuntefws iri Probation In the area below,please enter program expenditures for each identified line item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2003-2004 r;RO...'tRA:. ,`h.i'"Ei`i.A::;.,;}CiES >i Slate F";, 'ds 3�.,... rCt 1•.rM , I a i,•fit t"t'k 't'j $98x676 I._. ...so an- t}-j l: a n v,; =$2,846 ( � $0 $5,194 l_ Total Non-1JCPA t!;" a, HeP3 $0 $0 Funds. n $o� i V so�_ $7,113 $0 £r� 13,829 9 $0 L $0 $173,+tt20 Enter the number of juveniles who participated in the program during the fiscal year 2003-2004. Provide separate counts for those completed the program,those who were'in progress'as the end of the fiscal year(i.e.,still`enrolled in the program),and those who did not complete the program(i.e.,failed to completed the program pA are no longer'enrolled'in the Enter the approximate average length of time spent in the p > 5-' program). t program by l�f�pm5'-�gle�aW-perfi�poI ants during the fiscal year. •..}f , r.\awtri`afikL`�',I_-AP"'..v:Y`f<f}��^:i-t AVERAGE.f�GE L N S f•r 0 13 { i'r r 4 , Time, 31'J :.: '"•i Clays iT ES :,.;`•s,.".r.. .s}'3. `` w•t.Tr'c.3"3^•,. S #c S {3_' 'Y 'C}i AYS 5 4.2^C. .Y "iv,_.k. mde—d,'e -,ram c 1+ to rj• 13,[itI ?, rS } ;8,7$6.00 . ..ri"i . . . , �lC: t33. " an. :£s Fi�4:c . .;c < ' that i EXa{ };;: , >� i r 3£°'S;;;u{�.:.'`:£t.�t r..,•. t`�.f,..<t v_tirr"`3 nu.t.:^.C,;S; t,,+!'�?',,w,:,: _;:S'£a;>:... l- is}^,'r , ,rr c..,:' ....., .,ice.'.,`v< $• .ky.the {'.2r.. ; t...i.'t:',"'#t,r c. •,^+"Y .. Progress Report instructions:For each outcome listed in the table,report the program results in the boxes provided.REPORT NUMBERS ONLY. DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS('%,.,„pct.,,, "percent,"etc.).Inclusion of anything other than numbers will result in the entry being"zeroed out." PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,CLICK HERE FOR SPECIFIC, IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME INFORMATION, Juvenile Participant Outcome Measures http://�w-,A,w.bdeorr.c.../outcome—measu s.asp?program=8&vie%--P&action=r&period=200 10117/2004 Outcome Measure - Page 2 of 3 Arrest Raft(Ail Arrests) Completion,Of Probation Incarceration Rams �te -- - t` A Mean or Average A Percentage A Mean or Average Decrease(Relative Goal): increase{IslatiVe Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal} Magnitude Unkown`� Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown -- ^ < r Program Participants at an I Program Participants at an Program Participants at an j Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time c ;•, ><F r Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of yr E a e *Ioi#t Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry �` E s}f` a During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of rt i' iw i Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry 180 Days 180 gays 180 Days r: Days by 1801 Days 180 Days 180 Days 13 9 13 -Mean/Avg. 0% 0 Mean/Avg. 13 13 3 r for Ref rem� G' .; Il 2.75 Mean/Avg. 0% 0 Mean/Avg. In?ail:usrrt`r"rear Rate of Completion of Rate of Completion of Restitution Court-Ordered Community Probation Violation Rate Service A Percentage F�e�ntage A Mean or Avera e � g ; .x . ±+rs Increase(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Decrease(Relative Goal S Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Program Participants at an Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time Earlier Point in Time�� http.//www.bdcarr.c.../outcome memures.asp`Iprogralm=8&view=p&action=r&period=200 10/17/2004 Outcome Measure Page 3 of 3 Y 301.a i;;k., Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Some Standard Period of Y �cCn _:h € %°:- Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry Time Prior to Program Entry During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard During or at End of Standard 01, .1period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry 180 Maya 780 Bays 180 Days L of 180 days 780 Days 180 Days n f fi 3 i7 50% � 100% � 0 MeanlAvg. Additi-cwW 'Year 0 0 0 5 3 9 ?€'`• ..., . 4 ... #i€J:IF 0% 0% 0.33 Mean/Avg. F€diti4DrW C4'.' -'.'entrear progE "x-'+�I"'k`epp;"k'C4"r3Y#me its-outcomes"P-n ide any ad-d'•"..io _.t 3 .. 3'.2..L .i`a.. miifL9.pe� .: '.4;t?'e'"—u#;., e .r:.:Ci m, report. "g"ar's. p d,,*,; of o c-"":':a£:. ..:.0? c'..e:'na 3 Ming from,tt:ie� C-C Thirteen additional participants were added to the VIP roster of one-on-ones mentor-rnentee matches in fiscal 2003-2004. Additional work involving the provision of services to youth in groups at the Juvenile Hall,Chris Adams Center,and Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility is not recorded here as client-level data was not gathered.Data on the thirteen mentees suggest they experienced improved outcomes. Participants were arrested less frequently,violated probation less frequently,were more likely to complete restitution,and work programs.The limited sample curtails the need to explore statistically significance. Return.to Program Seleption_Screen http-//www.bd,corr.c.../outcomemeasures.asp?prograrn=8&view—p&action=r&period=200 10/17/2004