Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02032004 - SD4 TC BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ] FROM: TRANSPORTATION, WATER, & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE [SATE: February 3, 2004 SUBJECT: Capital Road Improvement Program, Countywide W O##1030 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION 1. Recommended Action: APPROVE and ADOPT the Capital Road Improvement Program(GRIP)for fiscal year 2003/2004 through 200912010. 11. Financial lmpact: There is no impact to the County General Fund. Approval and Adoption of the CRIP will provide a planning document that will outline the anticipated expenditures of road related capital funds in the next seven years. The CRIP is a programming document that programs funds for capital road improvement projects within the County. Continued on Attachment: \ SL*vlsor John Gioia Supervisor Millie Greenberg ECOMMENDATION OF C LINTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE PPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON FEniARY i, gnry, APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT jam', ) action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board AYES: NOES: of Supervisors on the date shown. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: As'3e ATTESTED:I .� 3, 2004 G:1GrpDatalTransEng12003 CRIP180 20133 CRIP.doc John Sweeten, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and Orig.Div: Public Works(TE) County Administrator Contact: Ai Schaal-Tel.313-2234 cc: County Administrator Community Development-G.Slusher County Counsel Auditor/Controller J Lytle,PW Accounting BY .. , Deputy SUBJECT: Capital Road improvement Program DATE: February 3, 2004 PAGE: 2 Ill. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: Approval of the CRIP by the Board does not automatically approve each individual project listed in the CRIP. Each project must undergo its own public review, engineering feasibility analysis and environmental assessment before the Board of Supervisors will consider its approval.As this is a planning level document, adoption of the CRIP will not preclude construction of projects that have not been identified. On May 19, 1989,a County Road Improvement Policy was adopted to guide the development and continuation of the Capital Road Improvement Program. On April 17, 1990, the Board of Supervisors approved the first annual CRIP. This is the fifth annual Contra Costa County Capital Road Improvement Program.The CRIP plans road improvement projects forthe next seven years to conform with the Congestion Management Plan which is also a seven year planning document. Adopting a CRIP to guide our capital improvements will do several things for the County: - Increase public awareness of how and where funds will be spent on our road system. - Enhance public image and publictrust by showing thatfunds are programmed in detail and will be expended in accordance with a bona fide program. - Encourage more public involvement in the programming and expenditure of our capital funds. - Provide accurate"accountability"of whether our transportation system will meet acceptable levels of service to satisfy our growth management policies. - Provide a basis for projecting staffing needs over the next seven years. - Provide a budget tool to track expenditures of each type of funding utilized for capital improvements. On October 6, 2003, the Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committee held a Public Hearing on the 2003 CRIP and recommended its approval and adoption. IV. Consequences of Neaative Action: Failure to approve the CRIP could adversely affect the schedule for road improvements for the next seven years as this document provides direction for project planning and staff requirements in the coming years. Measure C and the County's proposed growth management policy also require a CRIP be enacted to meet the anticipated needs of new development impacts on the roadway systems. Without an approved CRIP program,the County will not be able to fulfill this requirement,which would jeopardize our Measure C return to source funding. Contra Costa County 2003 Capital Road Improvement Program C - ° 0 .� cw FISCAL YE 00 ��x 4r F B°�'•�, x KII �ix 3a�° �� i, �er�.��,MG ? �' '�� ?` .fir�,✓ ��-aS�.�'� - � ' P N e r meat 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553-4897 (925) 313-2000 www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/depart/pw SUMMARY On May 19, 1989,the Board of Supervisors adopted the Capital Road Improvement Policy to guide the development and continuation of the Capital Road Improvement Program (GRIP). On April 17, 1990, the Board of Supervisors approved the first CRIP. This is the eighth Contra Costa County Capital Road Improvement Program. The 2003 CRIP plans road improvement projects for the next seven years (Fiscal Years 2003/04 through 2009110) to conform to the Congestion Management Plan, which is also a seven-year planning document. It should be noted that the CRIPis a programming document that,once approved,will constitute a directive to and a schedule for the Public Works Director to program the engineering work on these projects. Approval of the CRIP by the Board does not automatically approve each individual project listed in the GRIP. Each project in the GRIP must undergo its own individual engineering feasibility analysis and environmental assessment. Some projects may have unexpected cost increases and/or project scope changes after thorough environmental studies. The CRIP,therefore, is expected to change as we learn more about each project. The CRIP is organized in two components. Section I shows capital outlays and revenues for each of the County's main road-related revenue generation sources over the next seven years. Section lI contains the project descriptions for each individual project identified in Section I. The tables showing the anticipated capital outlays for each individual project are included with the individual project descriptions,giving the user of the CRIP a complete picture of each project all in one place in the document. Section I shows the anticipated revenue and fund expenditures for all road-related funding sources for the next seven years. There is a table for each funding source, showing the estimated expenditures broken down by project,the year when the expenditure is expected to occur,and the projected yearly revenue for the fund. Projects with multiple funding sources are listed under more than one funding source. Section II provides detailed information on each of the projects that are programmed to receive funding in the next seven years. The information provided for each project includes a location map,project name,project justification,the estimated cost,a brief project description, sources of funding, the Supervisor District, and the anticipated expenditure plan. Two tables of contents are included, the first lists all projects by funding source, and the second lists all projects alphabetically. This will enable the user to find a project either by itself or in the context of its funding sources. As:as G:\GrpData\TransEng\2003 CRIP\summary.3oc CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Table of Contents Projects Listed by funding source PAGE # GRIP Introduction & Background Table A Summary of Projected Annual Revenue 6 Table B Summary of Projected Annual Project Expenditures 7 Table C Acronyms for Grant Programs used in the CRIP 8 Funding-Sources 11 Federal and State Funds 12 Bailey Road Bridge Relpacement 52 Bethel Island Bridge Replacement 58 Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Phase I 62 Camino Tassajara Road Shoulder Widening: Johnston Road to County Line 70 Canal Road Bridge Replacement 74 Delta DeAnza Trail Gap Closure 98 I-80 Bikeway Inlet Grate Retrofit 108 Iron Horse Trail Over-crossing 110 North Richmond Improvements—Third Street Enhancements Phase I 122 Olinda Road Pedestrian Bridge and Sidewalk Gap Closures 124 Olympic Boulevard Pedestrian Path 126 Orwood Road Bridge Replacement 128 Pomona Street Bike Lanes and Sidewalk Phase I 148 Reliez Valley Road Pedestrian Path Phase I 150 Local Funds 14 Bailey Road Bridge Relpacement 52 Byron Highway Extension 60 Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Phase II 64 ClydeRoad Extensions 78 County-wide Curb Ramp Projects 80 County-wide Pavement Management Projects 84 County-wide Safety Projects 86 County-wide Traffic Betterment: New Signs 88 County-wide Traffic Betterment: New Striping 94 Country-wide Traffic Signal Modifications 92 Eden Plains Road Widening- Sunset Road to Marshall Court 100 Orwood Road Bridge Replacement 128 ........................... I,.,..,.............-................ : ....................... ........ Measure"C" Funds 16 County-wide Measure C Roadway Overlays and Reconstruction 82 Goodrick Avenue Widening and Drainage Improvements 106 Iron Horse Trail Over-crossing 112 Olympic Boulevard Pedestrian Path 126 Pacheco Boulevard Realignment 132 Pacheco Boulevard Widening Blum Road to Arthur Road 134 Pleasant Hill Road Overlay 144 Pleasant Hill Road/Taylor Boulevard Realignment 146 Navy Mitigation Fund 18 Evora Road Extension 102 Rodeo/Crockett Transportation Improvement Fund 19 Parker Avenue Reconstruction 140 Tosco/Solano Mitigation Fund 20 Pacheco Boulevard -Blum Road Intersection Improvements 130 Pacheco Boulevard Realignment 132 Redevelopment Agency Funds 21 Iron Horse Trail Over-crossing 110 North Broadway Infrastructure Improvements Phase 111 114 North Richmond Improvements—Third Street Enhancements Phase 1 122 Parker Avenue Reconstruction 140 Unfunded 22 Bethel Island Bridge Replacement 58 Byron Highway Extension 60 Byron Highway Widening at Byron Elementary School 66 Cummings Skyway Truck Lane Extension 96 Delta DeAnza Trail Gap Closure 98 Eden Planes Road Widening: Sunset Road to Marshall Court 100 Evora Road Extension 102 Evora Road Widening 104 North Richmond Improvements - 7th Street Extension 116 North Richmond Improvements—Market Avenue Pedestrian Over-crossing 118 North Richmond Improvements -Pittsburg Avenue Extension 120 Olinda Road Pedestrian Bridge and Sidewalk Gap Closures 124 Pacheco Boulevard Realignment 126 Pacheco Boulevard Widening-Blum Road to Arthur Road 132 Pacheco Boulevard Widening- Morello Avenue to Arthur Road 136 .................................... Pacifica Avenue Curb Ramps and Bike Lanes 138 Parr Boulevard Widening and AC Overlay 142 San Pablo Dam Road Pedestrian Improvements 152 State Route 4/Byron Highway Intersection Improvements (Phase 2) 154 Stone Valley Road/Danville Boulevard Intersection Improvements 162 Alamo Area of Benefit 25 Stone Valley Road Improvements: High Eagle Road to Roundhill Road 156 Stone Valley Road Improvements: Roundhill Road to Glenwood Court 158 Stone Valley Road/Danville Boulevard Intersection Improvements 162 Bay Point Area of Benefit 26 Canal Road Bridge Replacement 74 Evora Road Widening 104 Bethel Island Area of Benefit 27 Bethel Island Bridge Replacement 58 Central County Area of Benefit 28 Bales Drive -Mountain View Intersection Improvements 54 Pleasant Hill Road/Taylor Boulevard Realignment 132 Discovery Bay Area of Benefit 29 Byron Highway Widening and Byron Elementary School 66 State Route 4/Byron Highway Intersection Improvements (Phase 2) 154 East County Area of Benefit 30 Balfour Road Shoulders: Deer Valley Road to Brentwood City Limit 56 State Route 4/Byron Highway Intersection Improvements (Phase 2) 154 Hercules, Rodeo, Crockett Area of Benefit 31 Parker Avenue Reconstruction 140 Pomona Street Bike Lanes and Sidewalk Phase 1 148 Marsh Creek Area of Benefit 32 Marsh Creek Road Realignment 112 Martinez Area of Benefit 33 Alhambra Valley Road Realignment 46 Alhambra Valley Road Safety Project at the Pig Farm Curve 48 Pacheco Boulevard Realignment 132 Pacheco Boulevard Widening: Morello Avenue to Arthur Road 136 North Richmond Area of Benefit 34 Third Street/Goodrick Avenue Realignment 164 Pacheco Area of Benefit 35 Center Avenue Widening 76 Richmond/EI Sobrante Area of Benefit 36 Appian Way/La Paloma Road Traffic Signal 50 South County Area of Benefit 37 Camino Tassajara Road Shoulder Widening: Johnston Road to County Line 70 SCC Dougherty Valley Area of Benefit 38 Crow Canyon Road/Dougherty Road Intersection Improvements 94 SCC Subregional Fee 39 Camino Tassajara Road Widening: Windemere Parkway to County Line 72 South Walnut Creek Area of Benefit 40 Reimbursement for Olympic Boulevard Widening 40 Tassajara Area of Benefit 41 Camino Tassajara Road Widening: Windemere Parkway to County Line 72 West County Area of Benefit 42 Reimbursement for Appian Triangle Reconstruction 42 Appendices 169 Appendix A: County Road Improvement Policy 171 Appendix B: Guidelines For Expenditure of Gas Tax Revenue 179 Appendix C: Board Order Approving the 2003 GRIP 191 Appendix D: Area of Benfit Maps and Project Lists 195 CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS Table of Projects Listed Alphabetically PROJECT NAME PAGE## Alhambra Valley Road Realignment 46 Alhambra Valley Road Safety Project at the Pig Farm Curve 48 Appian Wary/La Paloma Road Traffic Signal 50 Bailey Road Bridge Relpacement 52 Bales Drive-Mountain.View Boulevard Intersection Improvements 54 Balfour Road Shoulders: Deer Valley Road to Brentwood City Limit 56 Bethel Island Bridge Replacement 58 Byron Highway Extension 60 Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Phase I 62 Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Phase 111 64 Byron Highway Widening at Byron Elementary School 66 Camino Diablo/Vasco Road Intersection Improvements 68 Camino Tassajara Road Shoulder Widening: Johnston Road to County Line 70 Camino Tassajara Road Widening: Windemere Parkway to County Line 72 Canal Road Bridge Replacement 74 Center Avenue'Widening 76 Clyde Road Extensions 78 County-wide Curb Ramp Projects 80 County-wide Measure C Roadway Overlays and Reconstruction 82 County-wide Pavement Management Projects 84 County-wide Safety Projects 86 County-wide Traffic Betterment: New Signs 88 County-wide Traffic Betterment: New Striping 90 County-wide Traffic Signal Modifications 92 Crow Canyon Road/Dougherty Road Intersection Improvements 94 Cummings Skyway Truck Lane Extension 96 Delta DeAnza Trail Gap Closure 98 Eden Plains Road Widening: Sunset Road to Marshall Court 100 Evora Road Extension 102 Evora Road Widening 104 Goodrick Avenue Widening and Drainage Improvements 106 1-80 Bikeway Inlet Grate Retrofit 108 Iron Horse Trail Over--crossing 110 Marsh Creek Road Realignment at selected curves 112 North Broadway Infrastructure Improvements Phase 111 114 North Richmond Improvements—7th Street Extension 116 North Richmond Improvements—Market Avenue Pedestrian Over-crossing 118 North Richmond Improvements—Pittsburg Avenue Extension 120 North Richmond Improvements—Third Street Enhancements Phase 1 122 Olinda Road Pedestrian Bridge and Sidewalk Gap Closures 124 Olympic Boulevard Pedestrian Path 126 Orwood,Road Bridge Replacement 128 Pacheco Boulevard -Blum Road Intersection Improvements 130 Pacheco Boulevard Realignment 132 Pacheco Boulevard Widening- Blum Road to Arthur Road 134 Pacheco Boulevard Widening-Morello Avenue to Arthur Road 136 Pacifica Avenue Curb Ramps and Bike Lanes 138 Parker Avenue Reconstruction 140 Parr Boulevard Widening and AC Overlay 142 Pleasant Hill Road Overlay 144 Pleasant Hill Road/Taylor Boulevard Realignment 146 Pomona Street Bike Lanes and Sidewalk Phase 1 148 Reliez Valley Road Pedestrian Path Phase 1 150 San Pablo Darn Road Pedestrian Improvements 152 State Route 4/Byron Highway Intersection Improvements(Phase 2) 154 Stone Valley Road Improvements: High Eagle Road to Roundhill Road 156 Stone Valley Road Improvements: Roundhill Road to Glenwood Court 158 Stone Valley Road West Sidewalk Extension 160 Stone Valley Road/Danville Boulevard Intersection Improvements 162 Third Street/Goodrick Avenue Realignment 164 York Street Reconstruction 166 ......... ...... ............. .......... CRIP Introduction & Background INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The Capital Road Improvement Program (CRIP) is a programming document for the funding of capital road improvement projects within Contra Costa County. It includes estimated project costs,funding source information,and scheduling information for known potential projects within the next seven fiscal years. It also includes revenue projections and a summary of estimated project-related expenditures for each funding source. Approval of the CRIP by the Board of Supervisors does not automatically approve each individual project listed in the GRIP. Each project in the GRIP is subject to a separate public review, engineering feasibility analysis, and environmental assessment before the Board of Supervisors will consider final approval of the project. As more information is gathered about a project, the Public Works Department may determine that the project will cost more than originally estimated for reasons not known at this time. In such a case the Public Works Department will study various alternatives to find a solution to the funding shortfall. The Public Works Department will adjust subsequent CRIPs to reflect any changes in project scope or cost. The GRIP does not escalate the project costs for inflation. A large portion of the funding programmed in the GRIP is from fees associated with the Area of Benefit(AOB)programs,which are adjusted yearly to provide for inflation. Since the ongoing Area of Benefit program inflates the majority of the revenue in the GRIP, and since the GRIP is updated every other year, the added complication and expense of inflating revenue and construction costs in the GRIP isnot justified. Anyone using this document, as a planning device, should adjust the project costs as appropriate. HISTORY OF THE CRIP The GRIP was establishedby Resolution 89/346 under the County Road Improvement Policy(attached as Appendix A). The Policy was authorized by Government Code Section 66002 and is required under the Growth Management Element of the Contra Costa Transportation and Growth Management Program Ordinance approved by the voters in November 1988 (Measure C- 88). Measure C-88 required that each participating local agency develop a five-year CRIP to meet and/or maintain traffic service and performance standards. In 1991, the GRIP was expanded to cover seven years to conform to the Congestion Management Plan, and in 1992 the GRIP update was changed to a biennial schedule. THE 2003 GRIP Pursuant to the County Road Improvement Policy, this 2003 CRI' schedules road improvement projects for fiscal years 2043/2004 through 2049/2010 and balances the estimated project costs with the projected revenues. The changes from the 2001 CRIP to the 2003 CRIP are: i The fallowing projects were completed prior to the start of FY 2003/04 and were removed. Briones Valley Road Bridge Replacement Castro Ranch Road Bike Lanes Cherry Lane/Canal Trail Flashers Countywide Sidewalk Gap Closure Project Las Trampas Road/Iron Horse Trail Flashers Pacheco Boulevard Sidewalk Port Chicago Highway Improvements San Pablo Darn Road Sidewalks near May Road Stone Valley Road/Monte Sereno Drive Traffic Signal 2000 Bridge Retrofits Wharf Drive Pedestrian Path The following projects were added. Appian Way/La Paloma Road Traffic Signal Bailey Road Bridge Replacement Bales Drive/Mountain View Boulevard Intersection Improvements Balfour Road Shoulders: Deer Valley Road to Brentwood City Limit Camino Diablo/Vasco Road Intersection Improvements Center Avenue Widening—Pacheco Boulevard to Marsh Drive Crow Canyon Road/Dougherty Road Intersection Improvements CummingsSkyway Truck Lane Extension Goodrick Avenue Widening and Drainage Improvements I-80 Bikeway Inlet Grate Retrofit Marsh Creek Road Realignment at selected curves North Richmond Improvements Pittsburg Avenue Extension Olympic Boulevard Pedestrian Path Pacheco Boulevard/Blum Road Intersection Improvements Pacheco Boulevard Widening -Blum Road to Arthur Road Pacheco Boulevard Widening-Morello Avenue to Arthur Road Pacifica Avenue Curb Ramps and Bike Lanes Pleasant Hill Road Overlay Stone Valley Road West Sidewalk Extension York Street Reconstruction A. REVENUE SOURCES Principal revenue sources for road improvements include local Area of Benefit(A.OB)fees (charged to new development),federal and state grants, the Contra Crista County Redevelopment Agency, Measure C funds (.Return o Source and Regional Funds), Local Funds, developer contributions, and funds from other agencies in cooperative projects. The amount of AOB funds available to the County at any given time is directly related to development. Measure C and Local Funds are largely dependent on the state of the economy, and grant sources are directly affected by federal and state budgets. 2 Many projects are funded by a combination of AOB funds and other funding sources. Shortfalls in AOB revenues can affect scheduling for projects that include federal and state grants. Therefore,when the Public Works Department receives substantial federal and state funding for a particular AOB project,that project is given high priority to prevent the loss of the secured funding. The primary funding sources are as follows: Area of Benefit Revenues The unincorporated County is divided into Areas of Benefit. Appendix D has a page for each AOB containing the current Ordinance Number, the project list, and a map. Within each AOB,road improvement projects to alleviate known traffic congestion or traffic safety problems have been identified and prioritized. An AOB fee is charged to all developments that create additional traffic in the area to pay for these projects. The fee amount varies depending on which AOB,the property is located in,the amount of traffic generated by the development,and the cost of the projects identified on that AOB's Project List. A seven-year revenue estimate was made for each of the AOBs using the past five-year revenue history, and consulting with the Engineering Services and the Accounting Divisions. The AOB program is constantly being updated. The updates include, revising the AOB project lists, revising the fee schedules, adjusting the fee schedule for inflation, and adjusting the remaining development potential. The updates may have a significant impact on potential project funding. In addition,several AOBs are no longer needed and have been or are being dissolved or incorporated into adjacent AOBs. Current AOB fees cann be accessed on the County web site at http:lJwww.co.contra- costa.ca.usl. Access the website and follow these steps. Click on Departments, click on Public Works, click on Traffzc under Public Services(on left hand side), click on Area of Benefit Fee Table (PDF)under Planning (on right hand side). Measure C The voters, approved the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Program Ordinance(Measure C) in November 1988. Measure C provides for a 72- cent sales tax for transportation projects within Contra Costa County. Measure C had a twenty-year life and will expire in 2009. The last fiscal year of this GRIP does not show any revenue from. Measure C. Return to Source Funds: A portion of the Measure C revenue is returned to local jurisdictions to be used for maintenance of existing roadways and construction of new facilities to fix capacity and safety problems in existence before 1988 (those problems that came into existence after 1988 are presumed to be the responsibility of new development). The proposed use for these funds is outlined in this CRIP. 3 Regional Funds: A portion of the Measure C revenue is designated for projects of a regional significance. For the portion of these funds that the County has access to, the proposed use is outlined in this GRIP. Local Funds (Gas Tax) Local funds (Gas Tax) are used to enhance road operation and maintenance and, to the extent that sufficient funds are available, to improve traffic safety throughout the County. Local funds are also used to leverage funds from other sources, such as a match for federal or state programs, in order to tape full advantage of federal and state grant opportunities. Grants The Public Works Department continuously submits grant applications for projects,due at various times of the year,for projects throughout the County. Each type of grant has unique project criteria. Some of these grants and their criteria are listed in Table C at the end of this section. Most applications compete statewide for funding, from the smallest safety project to the largest road extension project. In many cases where local funds are used,the Public Works.Department looks for grants or other ways to stretch its budget and to increase the number of improvement and maintenance projects. Redevelopment Agency The Public Works Department works with the County Redevelopment Agency to fund and to construct transportation infrastructure projects that support economic development in redevelopment areas,such as Bay Point,North Richmond,and Rodeo. If a proposed Public Works project meets the funding criteria for both the Public Works funding source and the Redevelopment Agency's funding source,the two agencies will contribute toward the construction of that project. For example, the Parker Avenue Reconstruction project in Rodeo will be funded in part by the Redevelopment Agency and Public Works Department sources. The Redevelopment Agency may also work with developers in the area to help fund Public Works projects to mitigate the impacts of their developments. Regional Fees The County participates in the East County Regional Fee program to fund the construction of the State Route 4 Bypass (SR4BP), improvements to State Route 4, and the Buchanan Road Bypass. The SR4BP fee collection is separate from the AOB fee collection. A separate authority administers this fee; its projects, revenues and expenditures are not covered by this CRIP. A regional fee was added to the West County jurisdictions in 1997. This"WCC Fee"was established to fund regional improvements to west county infrastructure. A separate authority administers this fee; its projects,revenues and expenditures are not covered by this GRIP. The Tri Valley Transportation Development Fee(TVTDF) is collected in the southern areas of the County to fund projects of regional significance. Other agencies administer the projects therefore they are not cover by this GRIP. j 4 The South Contra Costa AOB fee is collected in the southern areas of the County to fund a variety of projects. The feesare split into Regional Fees and Subregional Fees to differentiate between projects that are regional in nature and others that are subregional. The regional projects are administered by other agencies and the projects are not cover by this CR.IP. The projects funded by the subregional fees are shown in this GRIP. Ad hoc Developer Fees When a large development makes a significant impact on the roadway system,the developer may be required to contribute to a road improvement fund to mitigate the 'impacts of the development. Currently,there are two active mitigation funds. Both are for mitigation of large "clean fuels" projects by local refineries. The "ToscolSolano Transportation Mitigation Fund" provides for a contribution toward Pacheco/Martinez area projects of$ 500,000 per year for until 2005. In 1995,the Rodeo/Crockett Transportation Improvement Fund provided$4,500,000 toward projects in the Rodeo/Crockett area. Both funds are listed as separate funding sources in this GRIP. B. PROJETED ANNUAL REVENUE Table A, Summary of Projected Annual Revenues, (following the text of this report) represents staff s future revenue estimate, based on historical trends and current development applications. The first part of the table shows the projected revenues for non-AOB funding sources and the second part shows the projected revenues for the Areas of Benefit. The housing market in the County has shown signs of slowing and the economy has slowed, and the AOB revenue is expected to slow also. Continued efforts to secure grants and through cooperative relationships with other public agencies will allow the County to make the best use of its financial resources for capital improvement projects. C. ESTIMATED ANNUAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES ".fable B, Summary of Projected Annual Project Expenditures, is a summary of the expenditures expected from each of the identified funding sources. This table is based on the costs of the -planned projects within each funding source, and the expected revenue for that funding source. If the revenues in Table A fall short of expectation,the expenditures in Table B will have to be adjusted accordingly. AS:as GAGrpData\TransEng12003 CRINntroduction and Background.doc 5 "C3 dl M C3 N +�1 va C� M ;e tia 'O +» ati N C- C,5 4'1. h y �a 00 N t"Q N Y! Citi n M 00 CW I 00 to 9 � C7 00 M N M WS vin C7 gyp. N N vti C r-1 +rt m �a st Ch N +n et fi M1 N v'y ... .� C �G Cst N ,—* tl;. �" .� � .^•+ W M 'Ct M C7 N v^, O ^•' M t° N O Cs hl tip 00 N C- 0 � ON h +n — Vt. M M 00 Ch N Ck3 U LD N N W, M v'� C? N •-* N ''CY 00 0% N 'S 'A m Cl M�. Atl(yl tptp" M C9 Ch C9 C- 00 <> IT 00 m 00 0 0 C1 M w tia \0 ON t- as N cn 00 (4 S M +-+ ih t7 00 v1 h 4'1 M 4D W ID � M p Ch wf3 C> C9 �i7 Cw 6 at 00 N o0. Q C> Ch N tp t n kn N N 00 v1 N t- to enCJ M !h M M M W M «w M ,MK 00. N t-00 O C1 Cv 00 O Wn Nt- '0 C It is 4O Mell 04 y1 M M M M tiO M ^^+ M M 00 0000 C> 00 �+ t` N O *•'� ""' to M It M 00 N tt C% M 00 v'1 ,Zr 0m0 T% M 0C* � O M M CONd t M b en .w N. M-. C- N,C- 'st M C, N 00 C+ N fn rn f N vti N C> v t M tel m r- h M 0a N w h �++ 40 v, M C+ CA M o0 N M M C3 '�` M VJ M N M C- M {`� `7 M 0a ;> r C? �y'K C as .-• ao M m W +n ct -^ N ati Ac^ N Ch 00 N +n N 00 C? ++'t C3 i^• 00 C7 eY' C7 v1 0M �• N G0. .-+. M .•+ k`- 0�0 0"o O `r v�h r m ``' ` ' M tip cn - N N N t `r M0000 eft ni N rn th r T. m fn vn C✓ N cT W-, C, N .�+ C?lvl�100 F. 7 CM N C3 t"• �a 00 {/'1 �"' M N 0 N N N vS py O y c t- 00 ev N v7 on vn Q -» v w c °f c � c m U V5 C- m r-Vh Ch N '+ M \0C> C) 1'd'r M M N C- tq 00 w N tp 4' N M P N rS' M N C7 C7 " CM 00 N Cn N CT Ni et ao N rn N rn N et N N vs N tia wrn rn tzN rA S o N CDlas 4 a —0 .G C C] C E > E 03 � 0x a ❑ obit } edtu R * Hca Q n o U v a o a 0 U a a a a ar w a c� H a d R3 tri UGI Gs1 a s v� co rst vs E-t 6 Table B Summary of projected Annual Expenditures (All values shown in thousands of dollars) F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. Projected Program Element 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08109 09110 7 Year Expenditures Non-Area of Benefit Sources Federal&State Funds 2,529 2,896 4,133 2,848 749 159 100 13,414 Local Fund(Road Projects) 1,135 2,379 1,218 4,828 2,523 2,325 2,335 16,743 Measure C-Regional 1,102 1,502 392 0 0 100 0 3,096 Measure C-Return to Source 1,264 1,144 1,410 1,734 1,100 1,100 0 7,752 Rodeo/Crockett Transportation Improvement 950 950 0 0 0 0 0 1,900 Fund Tosco/Solana Mitigation 0 200 0 0 3,662 0 0 3,862 Fund Redevelopment Agency 2,881 3,710 0 0 0 0 0 6,591 Navy Mitigation Unfunded 50 455 547 2,955 5,145 1,357 6,211 16,720 Subtotal 9,91113,236 7,700 12,365 13,179 5,041 8,646 70,078 Areas of Benefit Alamo 25 101 422 72825 8 170 1,479 Baypoint 0 34 58 0 38 144 99 373 Bethel Island' 38 7 7 7 8 8 8 83 Central County 20 45 439 115 925 1,150 1,335 4,029 Discovery Bay 0 7 8 154 214 0 0 383 East County 0 0 39 299 982 0 0 1,320 Herc./R6,deo/Crockett 275 0 0 0 0 0 0 275 Marsh creek 0 0 0 0 10 15 55 80 Martinez 0 0 317 135 1,163 0 0 1,615 North Richmond 0 0 0 0 0 30 47 77 Pacheco 9 91 321 0 0 0 0 421 Richmond/El Sobrante 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 200 South County AUB 0 101 47 528 0 0 0 585 SCC Dougherty Valley 0 10 60 240 0 0 0 310 SCC Sub-Regional Fee 0 100 133 67 1,000 1,334 0 2,634 South Walnut Creek 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 342 Tassajara 0 50 67 33 500 666 0 1,316 West County 31 32 32 334 34 18 0 180 Subtotal 444 734 1,998 2,388 4,949 3,424 1,766 15,702 Total 10,355 13,970 9,6198 1 14,753 1 18,128 8,465 10,412 1 85,780 7 .................................... ...... ........... ...............I.....- Table C ACRONYMS FOR GRANT PROGRAMS USED IN THE CRIP 1. TEA 21 (Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century) A. STP Funding Source:Federal funds that are programmed by MTC. (Surface Transportation Program) Purpose:Funds emphasize maintenance of the existing transportation systems including highways,local arterials,transit systems,and pedestrian/bicycle facilities. B. CMAQ Funding Source:Federal funds administered by MTC. (Congestion Mitigation and Air Purpose:To insure conformity of federal highway and transit Quality Program) projects with the Clean Air Act. D. TEA Funding Source:Federal funds administered by MTC. (Transportation Enhancement Purpose:Funds pedestrian&bicycle facilities,scenic or historic Activity) highway programs,landscaping&scenic beautification,and preservation of abandoned railways, E. RTSOP Funding Source:Federal funds administered by MTC. (Regional Traffic Signalization Purpose:Funds for controller upgrades and other traffic related Operations Program) projects which lead to improved traffic flows along arterials to improve air quality. E. HES Funding Source:Federal, (Hazard Elimination/Safety) Purpose:funds to correct specific safety problems. G. HBRR Funding Source:Federal. (Highway/Bridge rehabilitation& Purpose:For bridges in need of replacement,and for seismic Replacement) retrofit program. H. TCSP Funding Source:Federal. (Transportation Community and Purpose:For projects that improve the efficiency of the System Preservation Pilot Program) transportation system and reduce environmental impacts of transportation. 1. BTA (Bicycle Transportation Act) J. TLC Funding Source:Federal. (Transportation for Livable Purpose:Funds for transportation projects that supporta Communities) community's development and enhance theiridentity,mobility, and overall quality of life. II. CDBG Funding Sour=Federal funds administered by CDD. (Community Development Block Grant) Purpose:Funds that can be used for frontage improvements in economically depressed areas. III. STIP Pedestrian/Bike Funding Source:State funds,administered through the Contra Costa Transportation Authority Purpose:For construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. IV, SR2S(Safe Route To School) Funding Source.,State funds,administered by Caltrans. Purpose:Improve pedestrian and bike routes to school. V. TDA Article III Funding Source:State funds,administered through MTC. (Transportation Development Act Article III) Purpose:For construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, VL TDM Funding Source:Measure C funds. (Transportation Demand Management) Purpose:For carpool,vanpool,park&ride lots,and other projects that'provide and promote'the use of commute alternatives. V1. WeA Funding Source:State funds,administered through San Francisco (Transportation Fund for Clean Air) Bay Area Air Quality Management District Purpose:For projects that reduce motor vehicles emissions,and to support implementation of transportation control measures. VII. TSM Funding Source:State funds. (Transportation System Management) Purpose:To provide for effective transportation management systems in the major urbanized areas. TSM projects improve peak period highway traffic flow without increasing the number of through-lanes. G:\GrpData\TransEng\2003 CRIP\Table Cdoc ..............­ ........ ...... SECTION I Funding Sources 9 Funding Sources 11 �+ o IF rn y; c tn w � u, o . c+ 00 0 C 00 v� rn ON en -tr CN 0 o r- a m M _r 00 >; WCA v) W rev 00 � °-° H A a00 p � •cs N t, ago v*i M n oa ry ry v� u � U W � kn vZri fs7 0 o ; , o Q +tn �, It!`4 - to o p U o w -r 79 G — -I i "' (14Q o opo �'" d `` *•, Q Com? wc' c C O U p U � ova d � x p �C U `� to�, kn 00 a 12 w c °' en c a � c rs cn 4N r� to t} eCN q rt "' o 00 � � ni A c� 00 003 V C14 en C-4 CD w "4 tj » tj W a W a un con <Ot 4N t) c v u C4 o n n, 13 0 W � 0 t 00 0 rn o o rvi o � � N Qui M d 0 C4 O ct O C7 �n O Ca c� rJ O � C O O v1 CC7 C v1 C7 C7 G7 +.n U"1 rt1 L.} tf1 M M 41 U A U " ry o N N a 00 en N wl o M m c> o n N � C7 C �+} N 00 t!} MN C' 40 N tit M VI "TM ri# f^J r-. M CS cc L ccco H -3 px U per, rC �a�-i sZ Wz 43 rn t q r .,� r a .-, a � t� � --• p o Z E-H � � d � cd CJ X crs m u W u i� aj r� � � 0 v > 0 C5a a C> Q `,^ o Wo _ 06 r� ca L> u. o o p ✓ - W 00 o d o o is cis" d Q d CS t3; G .Q a 69 Q ✓ t'' �" ss �'` ts.� „-fir Ca MQ 4. ueocl J � c� 14 N C3 M Ct1 Cf 00 00 n to a ao yt7� 00 406 O «ti � tt2 GL ^et' o rt m a r�+ cp 00 en in tj c' ar cam, U ••, 43 G.t � aC �; W ° a � � a � a u Aj W Q � � c C3 `q O a� 15 ............. ......... ...._._.. ...... . .. ..................................................................................... a 0 W � a a a o � c a a o0 0 � a a a v �o all o oaa RS .-w 00 Na O rd � O r� O et 00 N G') C", 60 C\ -� ;361 w uR N 00 F c/7 cn 0 con G er o N © v W ci lu Ok w fi Q O Ucaw v, U to Og a � O � a H aC > W a chi m U W > N o O �+ o vii e� + L) O � U �' 0 Q � oo � � ONS Oho � �-' xwa U a as cu r7., U CO , y�i " U ts, ati F. a Z -' a a a o o N d �✓ N t`� v 16 ......{{{. mvriSJifk:44{ii'f.4:LL{{{{{{{{{{{{r{{r{.:{.W..rrxr ... r{{. ::v. {r.: •.u..v......... ....::• c 0 r- >; r, r� 06 cr G3 � � a cn .y � � c S az � a 17 ....................... ........... >; C7 o v7 ON ON ON 00 >; 00 >; tn CS >; N't 9z id con u z > z 18 .......... 0 a o � 0 Cf Q � � O ez r+ ►�1 � O W CSS +-r C'y. >; C ON nom• to C) ? = `' H 4n H � o W Ch U U , W o0 tu © tea 64, m d a� a. a o � t 19 G t� 0�0 M M rl C 00 C" t� otS C 00 CY F•1 `ted O a V4 en a 64 Ll {J � ✓ G � � �o ami � w d J N 20 rn c an o a`o ao n cs r, c ` o c> >' 1131 o 00 ef 00 O � 'TP 00 eq a en rNo tn 16� vi 00 ell cu p ci rtt tu H ej ms a `"' (45 IT q 0 a ski a amiO a a a Zai a O 'erCZ7trs � � a� zi ci W •c o w _w F A aG 4 04 ke) c> ------------- 21 00 �+ o 00 cv �, tr in U'1 M � zn .-+ >; O � a a � A W c 00 n cv � � U 'a w ° w 40,cn H °' w ' o - I a43 Q z 55 off„ C:U en C? w s� ° �• sx <C Via' ? . 1:4Z Via. 04 a v g G CO „4 U44 CA 0 LYS G�.� H9r y' � �t 22 �; ca ar r4 c � � b 00 Lx en to tn CIO cz� --. cn C7 0 J as r4 * -ts '�° Cjami ami .s7 to% cn 66 w ren ff C) GMI 23 c C14 r "" y: f V .•" ^» oe ra w ON C .� en 00 'n c*) en >; o a �« y; c 0 c7 ao 00 W v3 u? CN o. U G7 44 v� O o co ` c t� H � c rr� ... cn 60i 24 0 co CN o +", m c5 c co c v5 `� a N icU xn en CA n w � � o p '�! ,,,,� � '� ,� •tea as N z z 0 � Q C4 d. 25 1 � trl p0 tlC 00 00 G7 p v> in tiC M RS � C �t cn Q 00 00 � C7 O 47 � i4 in � a z � C:" �71 �i a zs .:....... ... :::::.. ........ :::....::..:.:...:.:::..::::. da cc Grs, 00 o 00W a 00 00 uo ac cro c- r-- 7 acs r- w m r t` in cl1 w o PA ,, ............... W) to .� y.; � � o 0 0 3 o cy o0 w 00 0 0 00 N N 00 00 �.t C Qr ON C ^' un to d 00 ON 0, 1 M tn tiC7 P� co tn � 4.., y 5" Z ° �Tk C7 „' MC �4 `✓ O � Q C. � U7 v) rA Q .� � O e•� e� 1 V � EA EA Z , U Q w cn O W � o a, 28 a 0 0 as ria � CC*, CN 0 � o �+ c r� CN c 00 ay ' '4 NQ to ON e°O+'s � O h o ! ,-� 00 rq z w CJ U 4z sip tr. � 29 a a rn >; *.� >; a o r a o v v, o ON -� � y; � rz >; in a fw >+ c >; o � � O � o Q H GC U , R'� <C ` z, � C 014 � to 04 °x w � E+ cv 30 � er, a w � n c tr rx 0 tzkn G, m tn r- a 4 ; :W w en rte• � � .r � � a � © Yu a az ch � O 31 �m�xsz— —.......... tn i ZA tn 32 � ~ � � ..................-... .................... C, ra w ,tl- 00 I.— M CN in o >; kn ---- ------ Tr fn ry k as ke) 14 W) 1-4 fu ILI Wt�< C) < to C3 tn Cd 601, Cd > 64 O chi 33 O C v'i AO Od M Ci c1' P P m C m tp �O m N O C+ m tz en CD O � a o O � Wcn o o CIA m x 43 O a AV y a O 2 ;� O O H o °° cn zz 34 ... >; 00 ay N � r kn � O G�4 , O toGh 4-� >! Cvt O � � O W ON a Q en CDG ;74 � y ►moi .� fs+ '� U cu � a z � cl) U cn Ll I I � w o N V' ,69.. 35 i C Cs O Q i1 f t7 V'1 z w � i tn C14 Gi a sly G 7 rA U) C14 tM 4.1 c w U V d A 16. , x 99 CdC H a a � a <C 36 a a c +� 00 ON m 00 ac �+ y; P � enm 0 in a o a tN w Z o .� W >+ in a H � � W C 00 00 U a 94 a CD zcn �' U °x - � � < � � F � cncn Cl 00 Ln U 37 ............................. ......................... ......................... c7 vti sA 00 00 tn In 00 >; p.+', � �' o � �' ca en U3 IWO > > " Z U 38 ..... ......... c r. >+ civ 0 vN a ren � yi rq ea h 00 c7 ooco o c v o cv C ti�U CN O M en C en N tn C CD y"art Com�ny W O C 00 r ^� C d rtiy G N C M W rn tin ll� a, C7 rv" estcd + ter' U � 39 ra cv al c to c t� ; ON a, to o r is. o C` 00 uM oa >; o r fn W Gr- uS ofs, t6 w � 0 cA � 41 ca 7r y � O a a � 40 ..;}?iM{{}{{{{{{rytttt,�stiVt,:ytft,.;:vi:4:4%.f.•}3i4%r{{{{{ryrxrry,{tytsly:Kv::vrs.K..srF.::.+'r:.vn:...::v.:::vs...:�vv.:rh:.:..:::r::::.:v.::.::::r:v......... 0 0 >+ n m � o W � o w 00 c t, Ch CD � c5 ' c p .� w M A�CV/ � d Z c EYz3 y ti H9 � O C7 �" c4 41 w o o � � m m O N N NM WDA QA Z cn M M L.7 0 064 W 42 SECTION II Proposed Projects 43 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY AND WARRANTIES USER UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES THAT IT IS QUITE POSSIBLE THAT ERRORS AND OMISSIONS WILL OCCUR IN DATA AUT AND/OR PROGRAMMING DONE BY COUNTY TO PROVIDE THE DATA IN THE FORM DESIRED, AND USER FURTHER UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES THAT IT IS HIGHLY PROBABLE THAT ERRORS AND OMISSIONS WILL OCCUR IN ANY RECORD KEEPING PROCESS, ESPECIALLY'WHEN LARGE NUMBERS OF RECORDS ARE DEVELOPED AND MAINTAINED,AND THAT THE DATA MAY NOT MEET USER'S STANDARDS AS TO ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS,NOTWITH- STANDING,USER AGREES TO TAKE THE DATA"AS IS,"FULLY EXPECTING THAT THERE MAY WELL BE ERRORS AND OMISSIONS IN THE DATA OBTAINED FROM COUNTY. USER FURTHER UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES THAT COUNTY MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, WHETHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, THOROUGHNESS, VALUE,QUALITY,VALIDITY,MERCHANTABILITY,SUITABILITY,CONDITION,OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF THE DATA OR ANY PROGRAMMING USED TO OBTAIN THE DATA,NOR AS TO WHETHER THE DATA IS ERROR-FREE,UP-TO-BATE,COMPLETE OR BASED UPON ACCURATE OR MEANINGFUL FACTS, USER FURTHER UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES THAT IT FOREVER WAIVES ANY AND ALL RIGHTS, CLAIMS,CAUSES OF ACTION OR OTHER RECOURSE THAT IT MIGHT OTHERWISE HAVE AGAINST COUNTY FOR ANY INJURY OR DAMAGE OF ANY TYPE,"WHETHER.DIRECT,INDIRECT,INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR OTHERWISE,RESULTING FROM ANY ERROR OR OMISSION IN DATA OR IN ANY PROGRAMMING USED TO OBTAIN THE DATA, OR IN ANY MANNER ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR TETE DATA PROVIDED HEREUNDER. USER AGREES THAT COUNTY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO USER FOR ANY LIABILITY,CLAIM,LOSS,DAMAGE,INJURY OR EXPENSE OF ANY KIND CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSER,DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY,BY THE INADEQUACY OF ANY CMS OR GIS DATA OR ANY OTHER DEFICIENCY OF THE SYSTEMS,BY ANY DELAY OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE ANY SERVICE,OR BY ANY OTHER INTERRUPTION,DISRUPTION OR LOSS OF USER OPERATIONS. USER AGREES THAT IT WILL,IRRESPECTIVE OF ANY ALLEGED LIABILITY,CLAIM,LOSS,INJURY,DAMAGE OR EXPENSE CONTINUE TO PAY ALL CHARGES IN THE AMOUNTS STATED HEREIN UNTIL THIS AGREEMENT IS PROPERLY TERMINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITS TERMS. NOTE: "THIS MAP/DATABASE CONTAINS COPYRIGHTED INFORMATION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA" 45 ............ ........ PROJECT NAME: Alhambra Valley Road Realignment PROJECT LOCATION: On Alhambra Valley Road between Deodara Way and Via Vaqueros. Martinez area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: To improve the design speed of the reversing curves. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $550,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Realign the reversing curves on Alhambra Valley Road near Wanda Way and Milthwait Drive. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $550,000 Martinez Area of Benefit Work Order: Supervisor District: 11 Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03104 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 48 11 26 11 Environmental 27 12 15 Design Engineering 55 55 Right of Way 90 90 Construction 330 330 TOTAL 550 11 38 501 A013 550 11 38 501 46 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ALHAMBRA VALLEY ROAD c- REALIGNMENT c!rr yid M�RriM$,Y ,ryS + + Ll fl' T yA + + PR ECT LIMiT + @.f,t, gg6lAYWtR ae atasauaw wrawar�ea LOCATION MAP At YH t0 abGYEi tali 10p '!Otl i00 It'fN0 ATE:02-27-97 FLE:lhultron-an Icri Jci 09.d n 47 PROJECT NAME: Alhambra Valley Road Safety Project at the Pig Farm Curve PROJECT LOCATION: On Alhambra Valley Read at the intersection of Rancho La Baca Road. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: By providing a greater sight distance,these improvements will provide a safer intersection for motorists. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $165,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of a three way stop controlled"T"intersection. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $165,000 Martinez Area of Benefit Fork Order:N/A Supervisor District: 11 .. .. .. ..... ;.. ... -.... , .,. _, ,... „..,_. ..;.,. ., ,:.. ire...r .'s !. Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06107 07/08 08109 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 16 6 10 Environmental 11 11 Design Engineering 16 6 10 Right of way 22 22 Construction 120 120 TOTAL 165 6 27 132 AOB 165 6 27 132 4$ :.....}:.n}v:{U:v:{ti'!Xx. .K;t}X {{ '.Kti{tf M} x{.x ... :x ::: r.�.: .y.i :..:.... .::v .•.:.......... ...... .� CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ALHAMBRA VALLEY ROAD SAFETY PROJECT AT THE PIG FARM CURVE i + + + + PR ECT LOC ON + + , >i.t.r. a�rccetnrx xo xeaarr«m �saa«Fna« .w ap ra w Morar r.:'•,.: ad «.«. At, LOCATION MAP OASEb3-03-97 F1Lf+lbu/tron_en lcri/crio0g.Nd 49 f.. PROJECT NAME: Appian Way/La Paloma Road Traffic Signal PROJECT LOCATION: At the intersection of Appian Way and La Paloma Road. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The intersection meets the warrants for a traffic signal. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $250,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install a traffic signal at the intersection, and install an interconnect to the Appian Way/Valley View Road traffic signal. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $250,000 Richmond/El Sobrante Area of Benefit. Work Order: 4162 Supervisor District: I Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. COST TO DATE 03/04 44/05 05/06 46/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 5 5 Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 40 40 Right of Way Construction 200 50 200 TOTAL 250 50 200 Richmond/El Sobrante AOB 250 50 200 50 :..................................................................::;...:..;.:::::..::...::<.<.<......................... i CONTRA COSTA COUNT'S x i CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I APPIAN WAY /LA PALOMA ROAD INTERSECTION MODIFICATION 6 .ora. I Mc M R j I as Ce, '0 r � � 6 f to 1.A P .zb & P JE TION MOBiI.E ME PARK h LN M uffi �i xt Qs LTi s �b gHE Rs� I i v � ' a�s o�salAi�ssx i LOCATION MAP LDaTE'10-28-03 EIIE;/bo/tran_en cri lcriq 169An ' t 1 51 N PROJECT NAME: Bailey Road Bridge Replacement PROJECT LOCATION: On Bailey Road near Laura Drive in the Concord area PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing bridge had reached its useful life and needs to be replaced. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $520,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Remove and replace the bridge over Mount Diablo Creek SOURCE OF FUNDING: $362,000 Local Funds, $953,000 HBRR Grant. Work Order: 4249 Supervisor District: IV Elm— Anticipated a. Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. COST TO 03/44 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 DATE Preliminary Engineering 28 28 Environmental 85 85 Design Engineering 248 248 Right of Way 57 57 Construction 897 204 697 TOTAL 1,315 618 697 Local Funds 362 362 DBRR Grant 953 256 697 52 j CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BAILEY ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT i 1 1, r � t 0.t,3. Cl3CLA{MfA r • � .�°°°p °° LOCATION MAP ATE�10-?8-03 Fl�f�lbultro»_en lcri/criu166.c n I 1 533 4 '•;' ,x . . PROJECT NAME: Bales Drive-Mountain View Boulevard Intersection Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: At the Bales Drive-Mountain View Boulevard Intersection in the Walnut Creek area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The improvement of this intersection will realign Bales Drive to increase the ease of drivers seeing traffic on Mountain View Boulevard. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $325,400 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project will realign Bales Drive at the intersection to create a 90-degree intersection. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $325,000 Central County AOB. Work Order: Supervisor District: III ROLE ".:<OW..' Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COSI` TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03{04 04/05 05/06 06{07 07/08 08109 09114 Preliminary Engineering 15 15 Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 45 45 Right of Way Construction 260 250 TO'T'AL 325 20 45 260 AOB 325 20 45 260 54 :..<. :. ..:.. :.:. :.<. .. -fp ;>N i•Y.H 4 ',:i:. ::•:; ::,: •.•..:• 4y;. iii ir,;. i0: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BASES DRIVE. MOUNTAIN-VIEW BLVD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS + + i it ' v i e. Y V i Vi Itf s •Ycr a� '=� � » °rat a rp" 8tva .y. i a p� aq W/1•M� ,r9 sr W n 0 i d to ,..1•�r 1 /•"` . a ty nt YA �' ptt Ya yt i rt y i �l p YM e iT iUWYda. r � •�" ,a � r t s \ Y 11 t I ......pR...ro wrniw.nn„ �}R�R asyY RRppz4Y tpI LOCATION It/Mt y TI MAP O a00 IC Map HY1 Yu aua o vpoaacc.ws 1aJjj�M/"/j11 M1. 10a app aw r+tnRa L TL06-13-03 FILE/bu/trait an Jcri/crr 156. 55 5 PROJECT NAME: Balfour Road Shoulders: Deer Valley Road to Brentwood City Limit PROJECT LOCATION: Along Balfour Road from Deer Valley Road to the Brentwood City Limit, in the East County area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is listed on the project list for the East County Area of Benefit. The widening will accommodate the increase traffic caused by the development in the area. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,115,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen the road pavement from twenty feet to thirty-two feet from Deer Valley Road to the Brentwood City Limit. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $1,115,000 East County AOB Work Order: N/A Supervisor District: III .tea Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.X. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 08/1.0 Preliminary Engineering 5 3 2 Environmental 6 6 Design Engineering 117 117 Right of Way 80 80 Construction 907 907 TOTAL 1,115 9 1 199 907 East County 1,115 9 199 907 AOB 56 i �.r. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BALPOUR ROAD WIDENING DEER VALLEY ROAD TO BRENTWOOD CITY LIMITS PROJECT LIMIT a BALFOUR RC """`""''• ff i 1 ROJ =CT L MIT `�t z z 5 O • 1 1 b.f.1. h1IIC6A1M£p i+/�''4`�� xa a6aaaa�xc saxyatiax Y� � LOCATION MAP nTL�G&13-OJ FILE�lbultran_en/erg lcri 157.tl 57 PROJECT NAME: Bethel Island Bridge Replacement PROJECT LOCATION: Bethel Island Road PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This bridge is eligible.for replacement under the Federal Highway Bridge Rehabilitation& Replacement program. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,045,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a new two-lane bridge to span Dutch Slough adjacent to the existing bridge. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $105,000 Bethel Island Area of Benefit, $4,837,000 HBRR, $1,103,000 Unfunded Work Order: 4043 Supervisor District: V z m Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03/04 04105 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09110 Preliminary Engineering 65 65 Environmental 30 30 Design Engineering 300 230 70 Right of Way 650 209 441 Construction 5,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 TOTAL 6,045 534 511 1,000 2,000 2,0300 HBRR 4,837 488 473 993 1,993 890 Unfunded 1,103 1,103 AOB 105 46 38 7 7 7 8* 8* 8* *Reimbursement for unfunded portion of project. 58 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BETHEL ISLAND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT + i PROJEC LOCATION + �tti ,b 1 � 1 � � I teas.aiaac�rrt+t 3TlIEY++1fYr�'RMt�MRTYMt � �/.�/ r`�,� OMI.VltO YD IM�VC[lMS lYY�VV44 LOCATION MAP 0 wi t DATE 03-03-96 FIIE�lbuttron�e !cr'f¢r'{{A 59 PROJECT NAME: Byron Highway Extension PROJECT LOCATION: The project begins at the Delta Road/Byron Highway intersection and goes north to the East Cypress Road/Bethel Island Road intersection. Bethel Island area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This road is shown in the County General Plan. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,181,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend Byron Highway from Delta Road north to East Cypress Road SOURCE OF FUNDING: $400,000 Local Funds, $2,781,000 Unfunded Work Order: 4093 Supervisor District: III r�,'r'x `` , z�, Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03104 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 25 2 8 5 5 5 Environmental 50 50 Design Engineering 236 136 100 Right of Way 1,046 523 523 Construction 1,824 500 1324 TOTAL 3,181 2 58 664 1,128 1329 Local 400 2 58 140 100 100 Unfunded 2,781 524 1,028 1,229 60 Th t'{IXt rvrAtA1X Hx..y.C.:{4XnXLM.{!}Yr } {{{ry �•nv: {{?? .:.; ... ::v: x:. w:: ... i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITA. ROA[ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BYRON HIGHWAY c- EXTENTION IJ I 1IN i f r fi J! / J f f f I r I i r { .�`suao o �oouvs�rw� r ws rcer LOCATION MAP DATE:5-9-01 FllE lbuJtron_en lcrl Jt( I37.d n 61 F; PROJECT NAME: Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Phase I PROJECT LOCATION: On Byron Highway at Camino Diablo, in the Byron area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project improves the safety of motorists on Byron Highway. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $554,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Byron Highway at Camino Diablo to provide shoulders on both sides. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $554,000 TEA 21 Work Order: 4240 Supervisor District: ISI -1 01"Mr ava,�s�"s s, Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03144 44/05 45/06 06107 47/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 31 31 Environmental 33 33 Design Engineering 186 186 Right of Way 0 Construction 304 304 TOTAL 554 .250 304 TEA 21 554 250 304 62 :w: ..• ii•; i4 veal Wilx i.+.i•: :.ti•: -7, .• f INTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EYRON HIGHWAY SHOULDER WIDENING PHASE I ' ss PROJECT LIMIT1 1 1 r� r i 1 PROJECT LIMIT aid,•, a<iauu�rK jj so etoex..xw .va+..na, e mo +ao +m aae wo.u* LOCATION MAP t stamiaamiaautt a+x �E7ATE:43-?tS-48 FtiE:lbulfron_rnq/cripttripfi3.Ggn i 63 _.. ........... _ s 3 4 �'k "3'4• 4 ��y�£' � r b: PROJECT NAME: Byron Highway Shoulder Widening Phase II PROJECT LOCATION: On Byron Highway from Byron Hot Springs Road to the County Line, in the Byron area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project improves the safety of motorists on Byron Highway. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,828,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Byron Highway from Byron Hot Springs Road to the County Line, to provide shoulders on both sides. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $2,828,000 Local Funds Work Order: Supervisor District:III �J r 7w H .a t„ #' t Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 10 1 5 4 Environmental 15 Design Engineering 283 200 83 Right of Way 15 15 Construction 2505 1 2505 TOTAL 2,828 10 214 98 2505 Local Funds 2,828 1 10 214 98 2505 64 i « .. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITA. ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BYRON HIGHWAY SHOULDER WIDENING PHASE 11 PROM { OLWYM RD ARMSTRyea -- . . HOLEY ttD r e t y e t r � � I \ a a /I aa.a. at.awri� r:�x LOCATION MAP 1 t x 6 [ u.Y 410 «xie ��! Up TW lro utr[M DATE 5-24.01 PILE+/bu/tron_en/cri/V*148.+1 n 65 PROJECT NAME: Byron Highway Widening at Byron Elementary School PROJECT LOCATION: Along the east side of Byron Highway north of the intersection of Byron Highway and Byer Road(approximately.1 mile south of State Highway 4) in.the Byron area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: High speed and volume of traffic will make a left turn storage lane area necessary to service the school. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $253,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen the existing pavement to provide a dual left turn lane along the frontage of the School District office and the Byron Elementary School. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $169,000 Discovery Bay AOB, $84,000 Unfunded. Work Order: N/A Supervisor District: III mp H ww tat ' „ saw aws, ,.�. .. ;>_ _ P. "a ka._�r.,;3. ,ua.:fasn: Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 16 10 6 Environmental 11 6 5 Design Engineering 33 33 Right of Way 0 Construction 193 193 TOTAL 253 10 12 231 AOB 169 7 8 154 Unfunded 84 3 4 77 66 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BYRON HIGHWAY WIDENING BYRON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL + + + + N. I PROJECT LOCATION Aff 4 q q q � I �1 f � � r� G.t.r Ot6GLAfMEf! No.atoittrw.+NfaooxntN NAftf Mtif.N 1wtvMf LOCATION MAP utt N NNtWfJ tNf DATE�2 -24-99 fILE�/twflrGrf_en it:ripfei flJ.d n 67 PROJECT NAME: Camino Diablo/Vasco Road Intersection Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: At the Camino Diablo/Vasco Road Intersection in the Brentwood area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is needed to improve the traffic capacity of the intersection. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,600,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project includes widening for left lanes and additional though lanes, and signal improvements. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $200,000 City of Brentwood, $200,000 Local Funds, and $1,200,000 ECCTIA Work Order: Supervisor District: III s € J i r x �� a t x �4gk�° Sa # �. ? r t + Sk?.'. a^-. y s •u a kas f5.".�1<¢,r'ss?, Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. COST TO 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 DATE Preliminary Engineering 15 15 Environmental 35 35 Design Engineering 145 145 Flight of Way Construction 1405 1,405 TOTAL 1,600 1405 Brentwood 200 200 Local funds 200 195 5 ECCTIA 1,200 1,200 68 rr I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY j 1 CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PIS I t� PAM � E CAMI'NO DIABLO r VASCO ROAD ! i INTERSECTION MODIFICATION I u r'p I \� CAMIN'O DIABLO LOCATION j I I I tj i I lt i ppiJiClAMIR x j LOCATION MAP E I t PROJECT NAME: Camino Tassajara Shoulder Widening PROJECT LOCATION: Along Camino Tassajara Road from Johnston Road south to the County Line PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Paved shoulders are needed on this road to improve safety. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,285,000. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project will widen the pavement to provide four feet wide paved shoulders on each side of the road that will also serve as a Class 2 bike lane. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $585,000 South County Area of Benefit, $700,000 Unfunded Work Order 4172 Supervisor District III f NO IV € 1. A Mw 5 Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03104 44/05 45/06 06/07 07108 08/09 09110 Preliminary Engineering 6 6 Environmental 4 2 Design Engineering 114 45 69 Right of Way Construction 1,159 500 659 TOTAL 1,285 10 47 569 659 AOB 585 10 47 528 Unfunded 700 41 659 70 .....v:x:rtitiii:iii:{:.-.rrn•N:4:v:r.'.'l::my..v.•,hv:•.4:{3:{{x:r::.v:}::>Yiry:{r yrx.:•.ti5ti{P:{:r-.-.v:r.sv::.::::.::._:.v::..:.:n�.:�:........:::::......... -............. --.,.... ._.. E x CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT T PROGRAM CAMINO TASSAJARA SHOULD I ER WIDENING j JOHNSTON ROAD TO COUNTY LIFE i PROJECT Hl Rol I J I ,T ! t i 1 , --� QCT �- ---� LIMIT O.I,l, DtlCtAlMl�1 LOCATION MAP I 71 r PROJECT NAME. Camino Tassajara Road Widening: Windemere Parkway to County Line PROJECT LOCATION: Along Camino Tassajara Road between the proposed Windemere Parkway south to the Alameda.County Line in the South County area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project will accommodate the increase traffic caused by the Dougherty Valley and other south county developments. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,950,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen the road from two to six lanes from Windemere Parkway to the County Line. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $2,634,000 SCC Sub-regional Fee, $ 2,316,000 Tassajara AOB Work Order: N/A Supervisor District: III Wt� w ce ,,s, w., R.�t €Omm Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 30 30 Environmental 20 20 Design Engineering 400 10 200 100 Right of Way 0 Construction 3,500 1,500 2,000 TOTAL 3,950 150 100 100 1,500 2,000 Sub AOB 2,634 100 133 67 1,000 1,334 Tass AOB 1,316 50 67 r--3;T7 500 666 72 �.• _ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAMINO T'ASSAJARA WIDENING WIN'DEMERE PARKWAY TO COUNTY LINE OJEC L IT r V� CAMW TA5SAJARA CT" "M9 + + p PR p r:cT PROJECT LO T IM'IT s + a SAN RAMO� —� '~ poNYNK A �dUMSV d )AC[N1TY MAP a.E.e. arac�Arrax ` xa:ata •w r .wexxarrox � � m bex beo oo.rvT LOCATION MAP ' Tb MOOVbt xib W XC ]bb xCIGf EATE:3 -9-98 FILE-./bu/tran_an/cri/ci 97.d n 73 PROJECT NAME: Canal Road Bridge Replacement PROJECT LOCATION: At the Contra Costa Canal/Canal Road crossing near the south end of Alves Lane PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The bridge is rated as functionally obsolete. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $500,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace the existing bridge SOURCE OF FUNDING: $ 400,000 HBRR Grant, $100,000 Bay Point Area of Benefit Work Order: 4265 Supervisor District:V q ., w �r L ro `^ �.k* Y•FW vs„�'ic 47k ;"`3 �? yet A' ,�'•�a 5,.i�.,.ice".-.r w: `s: .nC, .r f� ���.�,,€y 7 �' a��.d� rc s. msa ha Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown,in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 17 8 9 Environmental 25 25 Design Engineering 83 83 Right of Way 33 33 Construction 34.2 342 TOTAL 500 8 34 458 HBRR 400 400 Bay Point AOB loo 8 34 58 74 I I I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROA© IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ! CANAL ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT I I ��YKk K EIKNi.W( Q ttlA«Ari d. ' •fEvElFlr tMe p K 1 Q MLL ST 0 7T >.u.IT .� ae nCvswe MlfMM7Y ''"'G YE rqs AK CASTLE CT cb, ruTElgnogc oR „y~`"�e"va`°"`l i t? " 11 !I�oivwywc Lw i l i . 11 i 1! *� l^COaP �UDRlYTLR 27a��1/ jjtl Y ' awf A cwx I ; 1 bMf SiK10� 1 t'E3T � I / 101r 1� 1 li 0.1.1. OtlQS.AI1t1R LOCATION MAP DATE*5-10.01 FILE:/bu!(rpn_en/crio/cri 140.d n 75 PROJECT NAME: Center Avenue Widening PROJECT LOCATION: Can Center Avenue from.Pacheco Boulevard to Marsh Drive. In the Pacheco area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This widening is needed to facilitate traffic flow between Pacheco Boulevard and the commercial areas along;Marsh Drive and the North Concord area. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $421,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Center Avenue to four lanes with a sidewalk on each side of the street SOURCE OF FUNDING: $421,000 Pacheco AOB Work Order: Supervisor District: IV Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03144 04105 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 5 5 Environmental 4 4 Resign Engineering 49 49 Right of Way 42 42 Construction 321 321 TOTAL 421 9 91 321 Pacheco AOB 421 9 91 321 76 .... .. ,.. :.. i r/ +r 4. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL. ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CENTER AVENUE WIDENING PACH'ECO BOULEVARD TO MARSH DRIVE yaet.E >y K MA6Y Y7 I Oft ;o rn 1 � � e a �t m t s � rw I e r [ m . g YMS54 rV6 )' MWEW f� 4 e r< R a ROJE I tL R rr " wy w JECT a LIMIT y r re OMn +.r r 4 1 &ICHARAN FIELD GDLf COURSE i d u i yyyy 3 M air aiaau�A+ex LOCATION MAP ft v+YT4 a •14 .v4�S YA. tt 9 IxLOr i t KN xtl0 l50 4Y)YM {DATE 6-18.03 E11.E/bu/tran_ert/tri/CR1P158.d n j 77 __..... ........ _ ............... _. ......... ............... .......................................... ................... .......................................... .................. x „y PROJECT NAME: Clyde Road Extensions PROJECT LOCATION: On Essex and Middlesex Streets from Norman Avenue to Port Chicago Highway. Clyde area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Extending these two roads will improve the traffic circulation in the Community of Clyde and remove traffic off of narrow residential streets. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $282,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend Essex Street and Middlesex Street from Norman Avenue to Port Chicago Highway(approximately 60 feet) and construct a bicycle path from. Sussex Street to Kilburn Street. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $282,000 Local Funds Work Order: 4079 Supervisor District: IV Siy �: tt S34'"hy .w ?b� k ,.� aid ,, 3?.,..5�3, . q, �xY�,, ',1t?.• Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03104 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 7 2 3 2 Environmental 4 4 Design Engineering 28 28 Right of Way 65 8 57 Construction 178 178 TOTAL 282 14 57 3 30 178 Local Funds 282 14 57 3T7 30 178 78 :..,.. ............ i r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I CLYDE ROAD MENTIONS I � r ib4 'w R + rfl itf y � M Va yc aP ax 1° 1y� s x s+ W } m � M � H i A 9C PA rr a+R d 4 } E I O.f.L Of�CLAiMtit Silraa�.xtG xiO.M.t Sox � WO bW KCi LOCATION MAP " xw aaa xu r',w OAFE 5.10-�1 FILEvbwiron_er,Jtri;tri 135.dgn 79 t ; PROJECT NAME: County-wide Curb Ramp Projects PROJECT LOCATION: Projects located throughout the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Each year new curb ramps are constructed to meet current ADA standards. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $350,000($50,000 per year) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct ADA standard curb ramps in various locations. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $350,000 Local Funds($50,000 per year) Work Order: Supervisor District: All ON Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03104 04/05 05106 06107 07/08 08109 09/14 Preliminary Engineering 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Environmental 14 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Design Engineering 42 6 6 6 6 b 6 6 Right of Way 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Construction 280 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 TOTAL 350 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Local Funds 350 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 NOTE: This is a perpetual project and extends beyond the life of this CR1P. $U r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY r CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COUNTY WIDE CURB RAMP PROJECTS Rome KET PINOLE 4 MARTINEZ BAY,PONT L SAN b PIT71 a TIOCH • PABLO ELesoea,wrE 'CONCORD ONtlEY RICHMOND PLEASANT HILI ' KFMGNTSEN EL yi�R __ CLAYTON BRENTWOOD CE TO fl DMCOVERY WALNUT CREEK SAY OftiND A L AFAYETTE o lJ.AMO BYRON a ` 98LACKHAWK A MORAGA DANVILLE e DOUGHERTY VALLEY SAN RAMON CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA QUA. IMCLAINIR as atom aa�usn�i.Iua" r"+i LOCATION MAP a^� is ra aari,w. NOT TO SCALE ATE02.02-00 FILEJbuJtran_en Jer'/eri tOp.d 81 'j PROJECT NAME: County-wide Measure C Roadway Overlays and Reconstruction PROJECT LOCATION: Various locations throughout East,"West, and Central Contra Costa County. - PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: An overlay or reconstruction will refurbish these roads, extend the life of the road.,and reduce their maintenance costs. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,600,000($1,100,000 annually until FY 08/09) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Overlay or reconstruct designated roads throughout the County for the seven-year period. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $6,600,000 Measure C - Return to Source($1,100,000 annually until FY 08/09) Work Order: N/A Supervisor District: All Districts W, 011i Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.X. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.X. DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07108 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering Right of Way Construction TOTAL 6,600 1,100 1,100 1,1001,100 1,100 1,100 0 Measure C 6,6014 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 4 82 i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COUNTY WIDE (77::ME:ASU:RE:CROADWAY OVERLAYS AND RECONSTRUCTIONS ROOM T BAY PONT BETFIEL PINOLE ; MARTINEZ. Li ; PIT'tSBURG aNTtOCH SAN EL SOBRANTE 0 PABLO a *CONCORD a PLEASANT 6TSEN RICHMOND HILL BRENTWOOD CLAYTON CERRITO " DISCOVERY aFY"" *WALNUT CREEK BAY �LAFAYETTE ORNDA . ALAW BYRON a . oBLACKHAWK Jt MO AGA DANVILLE Wjc6TY V LEY SAN RAMON CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA U.S. DISCLAIMER «a a....,.«.,«.n...,w« LOCATION MAP rrEv««aa«..Mawr..« NOT TC! SCALE wn vua a rw.nuu refs vu. DAFE:03-53-47 fILEl/tw/tron_m Jcr'/rrio29. n 83 ....... ......... ........... . . ......... ...._.... _._.. .... ..................................._....._........._.. r PROJECT NAME: County-wide Pavement Management Program PROJECT LOCATION Various locations throughout East, West, and Central Contra Costa County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: An overlay or reconstruction will refurbish these roads, extend the life of the road, and reduce their maintenance costs. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,500,000 ($500,000 annually) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Overlay or reconstruct designated roads throughout the County during the seven-year period. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $3,500,000 Local Funds ($500,000 annually) Work Order: N/A Supervisor District: All Districts 77 Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering Right of Way Construction TOTAL 3,500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Local Funds 3,500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 NOTE: This is a perpetual program and extends beyond the life of this GRIP. 84 MJCt i{rr xn::. ... .... ::• ... .. :;. •v:. ..xxnv .. .. j f� I 1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY i CAPITAL ROACH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I COUNTY—WIDE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROJECTS FFi RODEO. OROCKET PINOLE MARTINEZ SAY,PO4NT 8ET E$ PITTSBURG ANTIOCH SAN PALO ELS oeaANTE +•CONCORD a OAKLEY J RICHMOND PLEASHILANT' KNICHTSEN EL� CLACTON BRENTWOOD t CERRITO DISCOVERY :. •WALNUT CREEK SAY I ORINpA LAFAYET TE a ALAMO BYRbN e f • •BLACKHAMK 'N MORAGA . DANVILLE DOUCHERTY VALLEY 1 i i SAN RAMON i i I I i I ' I I f CONTRA COSTA COUNTY I 1 CALIFORNIA I l i a.t.s, aI>raL,uraR ... �. v,...Aa LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE (DATE:03.13-97 FIL7rpWtrun_pnp:.,-riu�Cnp?5.dgnl I � 85 . T PROJECT NAME: County-wide Safety Projects Program PROJECT LOCATION: Potential projects are located throughout the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Each year safety upgrades to the road infrastructure must be designed and built. These numerous small projects improve the safety of the County's road network. All such projects begin with a safety investigation. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,435,000 ($205,000 per year.) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: As a result of safety investigations, necessary improvements to the safety elements of the road infrastructure (i.e. guardrails, removal of roadside obstacles, retaining walls, minor pavement projects, etc.) will be designed and constructed by the Maintenance Division of Contra Costa County Public 'Works Department. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $1,435,000 Local Funds ($205,000 per year.) Work Order: 0210 Supervisor District: All Districts Anticipated. Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09110 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering 354 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Right of Way Construction 1,085 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 TOTAL 1,435 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 Local Funds 1,435 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 NOTE: This is a perpetual program and extends beyond the life of this CRIT'. 86 •. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ! CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM c:: COUNTY�- w�aE i i SAFETY PI�OJECT5 ROOEO« ROCKET BAYa �� BETHEL Ii PfNOLE MARTINEZ, C;.T ✓' I ; « 0 P!T'T�SBURG ANTIOCH SAN EL SOBRANT£ PABLO a *CONCORD OWLEY « ,O RICHMOND PLEHILANT«LL KFAGHTSEN %` EL CLAYTON BRENTWOOD «CERRITO « DtSCUVERY 24 •WALNUT CREEK BAY « a LAF'AYETTE 0 INDA « Ay,AMO BYRON• � • «BLACKHAWK MORAGA • DANVILLE DOUGHERTYn VALLEY ✓` SAN RAMON • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA I i a.�.t. oucuFMtR f LOCATION MAP NOT TO acalE DATE0377-47 FJLE'Pou/kror._en�rcn lcripd3,d9n' i 87 .............:...................... .................... .............................. ......................._._..................._. ............... _.. PROJECT NAME: County-wide Traffic Betterment: New Signs Program PROJECT LOCATION: Projects are located throughout the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: As traffic conditions change, additional signs are necessary throughout the County. This program provides the funding for these numerous small projects. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $210,000 ($30,000 per year) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This program provides the resources to install traffic signs as the need arises. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $210,000 Local Funds ($30,000 per year) Work Order: 4202 Supervisor District: All Districts `$t ;;Tg�;�x, Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. COST TO 43/44 44!05 0S/06 46!47 47/48 48/49 49/14 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering Right of Way Construction 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 TOTAL 210 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Local Funds 210 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 NOTE: This is a perpetual program and extends beyond the life of this MR $8 ,<.. i 1r 1 r. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY i CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT P'ROGRAM'' Cou'NTY WIDE i TRAFFIC 9ETTrR ENT: NEW SIGNS FF RODEO. ROCKET. PINOLE MARTINEZ f� SAY.POINT BESHEL • • 6 • ANTIOCH SAN EL SOEitANTE ; PIT•?'SBURC PABLO . •CONCORD a OAKLEY PLEASANT RICHMOND �y+ HILL + K46HTSEN EL t�+t CLAYTON BRENTWOOD "CERRITO DISCOVERY 31 " "WALNUT CREEK BAY ORIN A LAFAYETTE e • ALAMa YRON • +BLACKHAWK MOftAGA • DANVILLE i e DOUGHERTY VALLEY SAN RAMON • i (t I 7 i I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY j I CALIFORNIA � 3.t.l. DtlClAllllYl '. vo a�oev.e„K sn+�.am, YV LOCATION MAP NOT ro SCALE uxoo o.+Duca :„�s JflATE 03-12-97 fit-6/bu/tron_ena�crip/aip53.bgn� f ' I ' 89 PROJECT NAME: County-wide Traffic Betterment: New Striping Program PROJECT LOCATION: This programextends'throughout the unincorporated area of Centra Costa County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: As traffic conditions change, additional striping is necessary. This program provides the funding for these numerous small projects. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $210,000($30,000 per year) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This program provides the resources to install the necessary traffic striping projects as needed during the year. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $210,000 Local Funds ($30,000 per year) Work Order: 4203 Supervisor District: All Districts 14"' IM141 MOM N KIMx q M 5 F Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03104 04105 05/06 06107 07108 08109 09110 Preliminary f Engineering Environmental Design Engineering Right of Way Construction 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 TOTAL 210 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Local Funds 210 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 NOTE: This is a perpetual program and extends beyond the life of this CRIP. 90 ...y.. ..vv hN• titin +Ctiti.-3. H :vK. •r:.. .... :.v i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD I'MP'ROVEMENT PROGRAM COUNTY WIDE TRAFFIC BETTERMENT: NE�If STRIPING RODEO- CROCKETT PlNOLE MARTINEZ 8AY POMT BETHEL • D � I5. PITTSBURG SAN ANTIOCH PALO EL-SOBRA1JiE 4 - • *CONCORD o OAKLEY RICHMOND PLEASANT HILL KNtGHTSEN + Et CLACTON BRENTWOOD 'CERRITO DISCOVERY r + WALNUT CREEK BAY 7r ORINDA LAFAYETTE a ALAMO SYRON- • -BLACKHAWK MORAGA . DANVILLE DOUGHERTY VALLEY SAN RAMON i i i 1 i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA ! o.t,u. auecAirin LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE � 2ATE-03-12-97 FILE-/buirdn_enoKr' /cn 54.d n 91 5 s PROJECT NAME: County-wide Traffic Signal Modifications PROJECT LOCATION: At various signalized intersections throughout the County. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: As traffic signals become obsolete and parts wear out, upgrading is needed, new parts will be replaced and improvements will be installed. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $350,000 ($50,000 per year) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improve traffic signals throughout the County as needed. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $350,000 Local Funds ($50,000 per year) Work Order: 4822 Supervisor District: N/A ?�`3' u Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Engineering 70 14 14 101 10 10 101 10 Might of way Construction 284 44 40 40 40 40 40 40 TOTAL 350 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Local Funds 354 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 NOTE: This is a perpetual program and extends beyond the life of this CRIP. 92 I . CONTRA COSTA COUNTY k CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM i COUNTY-- WIDE SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS « RODEO- ROCKET ��,� PiNOLE MARTINEZ �,SAY, POINT BETHEL ; 0- -...,, tSe PIT1'SBURG ' ANTIOCH ' SAN ELaSOMANTE ♦ + i FABLO «CONCORD OAKLEY RICHMOND f'L HILLASAKJOHTSEN « EL CLAYTON BRENTWOOD i l .. « CERRITO G' DISCOVERY 34 , *WALNUT CREEK DAY ORINDA�LAFAYETTE a ALAItO BYRON« r o BLACKHAWK MORAGA + DANVILLE + DOUGHERTY VALLEY SAN RAMON « f j I I � k CONTRA COSTA COUNTY � I i CALIFORNIA OJ.I. D!«CLAUt+N I .r LOCATION MAP 140T TO SICALE i IDATE'03-10-91 IlLf bwtrara_enQrcrgSrait<;.aQr,i k 1 93 ...........................................................I...................... PROJECT NAME: Crow Canyon Road/Dougherty Road Intersection Improvements PROJECT LOCATION: At the Crow Canyon Road/Dougherty Road Intersection PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is needed to prevent the intersection Level of Service from decreasing to an unacceptable level. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $310,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure the East Bound approach to the intersection to 3 thru lanes and one right turn lane, and reconstruct SB Dougherty south of the intersection for an acceleration lane for right turn lanes from Crow Canyon Road. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $310,000 SCC Dougherty Valley Area of Benefit Work Order: Supervisor District: III Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. COST TO 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 DATE Preliminary Engineering 5 5 Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 36 36 Right of Way 24 24 1 1 1 1 Construction 240 240 TOTAL 310 10 60 240 SCC DV AOB 310 10 60 240 94 ....................................- ...................................... i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CROW CANYON - DOUGHERTY ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ry� i DIAM VISTA t � I t; I -- JECT ATION iy•• / Y'i f (i i I 9 1 S OfSLaweMER° � w ' LOCATION MAP I ��rnu FR.Eu;tron_,_nL:— -10l 3,l-ni»I I� 4 i (� a 1`k � �.'�•'.,r R-� s;��,.+., ,_.. ...„i rm ��5ssr»�; x�:-M . ss`.e , _'» ..;<i-i.-0 n.. s ...z s,» � 4 a PROJECT NAME: Cummings Skyway Truck Lane Extension PROJECT LOCATION: On Cummings Skyway from the end of the existing truck lane to approximately 10,000 feet southeasterly, in the Crockett area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The existing truck lane ends before the trucks can match their speed to the speed of the other vehicles. Which causes the other vehicles to slow to the truck speeds. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,500,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of adding approximately 10,000 feet of truck lane in the eastbound direction of Cummings Skyway SOURCE OF FUNDING: S 1,500,000 Unfunded Worm Order: Supervisor District: II F r� �� � ' v 't ?'P .�`.��� ��, � �,e� „�ts-z „'`�. ��-Z��'�$ �3'r,."aa. "✓�� ,� �e =.�' %+�^ '�i,,»��t s x� '^ , jt Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. COST TO 03/04 04/05 45/06 46107 07/08 08/09 09/10 DATE Preliminary Engineering to Environmental 15 Design Engineering 150 Right of Way 500 Construction 825 TOTAL 1,500 Unfunded 1,500 NOTE:This project extends beyond the seven-year period of this Capital Road Improvement Program 96 x xx ,. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I ' CUMMINGS SKYWAY TRUCK LANEEXTENSION Kv%b U G; PROJECT LIMIT 1 � ey8 4 CtG��i \4 PR I�J,ECT J�µN oolk GJ.ffi. tl4SCLA4x1Efl LOCATION MAP Ai£10-28-03 EI.E4buttian_en tcr'/criolMd 97 y, 4 PROJECT NAME: Delta DeAnza Trail Gap Closure PROJECT LOCATION: On Bailey Road from.Canal Road to the Bay Point BART Station driveway. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: There is a gap in the Delta DeAnza Trail at Bailey Road that causes confusion for bicyclists using the trail. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $734,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of widening the existing sidewalk, improving the lighting in the pedestrian tunnel, modifying a traffic signal, and under- grounding utilities SOURCE OF FUNDING: $300,000 STIP Ped/Bike*, $434,000 unfunded Work Order: 4001 Supervisor District: V Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/14 Preliminary Engineering 15 12 3 Environmental 15 15 Design Engineering 90 90 Right of Way 26 1 25 Construction 588 588 TOTAL 734 13 3 15 25 90 588 STIP PED/Bike 300 13 3 10 25 90 159 Unfunded 434 5 429 " STIP Ped/Bike funding may not be available because of State of California budget problems. Project implementation is subject to the County receiving this funding. 98 i I i •, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I DELTA DeANZA TRAIL GAP CLOSURE 1 i m x{ r6 ♦ArJM, � � M $ J� it a S,aQj" _ I I p 11 P lC B F Y 1 �IJwC+19to lW $4a1fW IT CWr*A OWA 4w aySrw to w. .1 Zi- + + `._�•� ;� y�e '/�� qui' CT .Aklt J I dNr SrArM Wrl.J/10 4r. i m I it 1 % 11.6. aloe—x •:d:;.:; LOCATION MAP ..nnuu r LAT E'5 10-01 FILE;/bu, 142.agn j I 99 PROJECT NAME: Eden Plains Road Widening: Sunset Road to Marshall Court PROJECT LOCATION: Eden Plains Road, from Sunset Road to Marshall Court in the Knightsen Area. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The current road width is not adequate for the anticipated traffic flows. This project will provide a two-lane road built to arterial standards. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $275,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Eden Plains Road to provide two 12-foot lanes and 4 foot wide paved shoulders. SOURCE OF FUNDING: $125,000 Local Funds, $150,000 unfunded. Work Order: N/A Supervisor District: III 1 P S. Anticipated Project Expenditures (Amounts shown in thousands of dollars) COST I COST TO F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. F.Y. i DATE 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 Preliminary Engineering 10 10 i Environmental 5 5 Design Engineering 35 15 20 Right of Way 50 25 25 Construction 175 75 100 TOTAL 250 55 120 100 Local 125 55 70 Unfunded 150 50 100 100 r. CONTRA CO TA COUNTY � CAPITAL READ IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EDEN PLAINS ROAD WIDENING SUNSET TO MARSHAL PRO E�CI } --_ is I � LIMIT I � F € I G.i.E. 111861-XiMYR .4 aaaahsi,xro�xraxwrrw« LOCATIaN MAP aao .� >oa nova ttxr aasrui rxaex..0 awr im� .Xa uup rc nxoauer u n, wn rm wo isrrxr OAM06-17-97 FILE:/hu/tran—an/cr'/cri 64.d n 101