HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02102004 - PR2 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , - _.._:k=°� Contra
FROM: Dennis M. Barry, AICP, Community Development Director
Costa
.,hay-�tr: .� County
DATE: February 10, 20104 >A.�a Nom:
SUBJECT: Presentation on the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Annual
Community Assessment Report for the County Community Development Block Grant,
HOME Investment Partnership Program, and Emergency Shelter Grant Program for FY
2002
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
ACCEPT presentation on the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Annual
Community Assessment Report for the County Community Development Block Grant,
HOME investment Partnership Program, and Emergency Shelter Grant Program for FY
2002.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS:
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) conducts an annual
assessment of the County's performance in administering the Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG), HOME, and Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) programs. The
Community Development Department's Redevelopment and Housing Division administers
each of these programs. The FY 2002 HUD Assessment speaks very highly of the
County's program:
■ "Consistently maintaining good partnerships with...cities...non-profits...and
other private and for profit organizations";
• Exceeding our housing production goals; and
■ Efficiently administering the program and exceeding HUD standards for
timeliness and expenditure of funds.
The program staff of Bob Calkins, Kara Douglas, Kristen Alcaraz, Pat Nurre, Gabriel
Lemus, Sara Welch and Alicia Smith are to be congratulated.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES ® NO SIGNATURE
f1ECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMI TEE
-,-APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):Q
ACTION OF B't A D O in �mr. APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _ OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND
X UNANIMOUS {ABSENT iW CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND
AYES: NOES: ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Jim Kennedy(9251335-1255) ATTESTED FEMIARY it" f
cc: Community Development Department (CDD) JOHN SWEETEN, CLERK OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
DMB\JDK:gms `
d\dmb5\CAPER-CDBGetal130 BY , DEPUTY
.. _.. . ........ .....
_.. ......... ......... ......... ..............._
r�
wQ�,tMENrp U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development
* * Pacific/Hawaii
w W California State Office
Community Planning and Development Division
450 Golden Gate Avenue
JW ' San Francisco,California 94102-3448
Mr. Federal Glover
Chairperson,Board of Supervisor JAN 2 3 2004
Contra Costa County
651 Pine Street
Martinez, CA 94553-1257
Dear Mr, Glover:
SUBJECT: Contra Costa County, California
Annual Community Assessment Report
Program Year 20302
Our office has completed the review of Contra Costa County's Program Year(PY) 2002
Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). Based upon this review, our
office has drafted an assessment of the County's performance as it relates to the Consolidated
Pian, the PY 2002 Annual Action Pian (AAP), and other pertinent information and events that may
have occurred during PY 2002. This evaluation is done to assess the management of funds made
available under programs administered by HUD, compliance with the County's Consolidated Plan
and AAP, the extent to which the County is preserving and developing decent, affordable housing,
creating a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities,principally for low-
and moderate-income persons.
The County continued to make progress utilizing its HUD resources to address priority
needs and carry out the programs described in the Consolidated Plan. The Consolidated Plan/AAP
complies with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act and other
applicable laws and regulations. Based on our review of the CAPER and other available
information, we have determined that the County has the continuing capacity to implement and
administer its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG),HOME Investment Partnership
Program (H03ME), and Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) programs in a timely manner.
The County expended approximately$8 million in CDBG, HOME,ESG,HOPWA,
program income, and unexpended prior year funds to carry out its projects. Additionally,
approximately$214 million was leveraged from a variety of Federal, State,local and private
resources to carry out housing, economic development, infrastructure improvement and public
service activities that benefited low- and moderate-income persons in the County. The activities
funded were found to be consistent with the goals and objectives contained in the Consolidated
Plan. We commend the County for consistently maintaining a good partnership with the
Entitlement cities within the County, a variety of non-profit organizations, and other private and
for-profit organizations to achieve its goals.
................................................................
2
Affordable Housing
Even though high construction costs and the lack of land continue to make constructing
affordable housing difficult, the County successfully increased and preserved the supply of
affordable housing throughout the County. Projects completed during the year, funded with
CDBG, HOME, and other resources, resulted in the acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction
of 547 affordable housing units. Projects completed included Rodeo Senior Housing, Alvarez
Court in Pinole, Sycamore Place in Danville, and Grayson Creek in Pleasant Hill. Completing
these projects was significant, as these communities have limited affordable housing opportunities.
The County also used approximately$400,000 in CDBG and HOME funds to carry out three
owner-occupied housing rehabilitation programs that provided zero/low-interest loans and small
grants for owner-occupied housing. The rehabilitation loans/grants enabled 59 low-income
homeowners to bring substandard homes up to local safety codes.
In an effort to meet first-time homebuyer goals, the County currently has seven projects
underway that will provide first-time homeownership opportunities to 32 households within the
next year. Since President Bush has made homeownership a priority and has charged HUD to
create affordable housing opportunities for low-and moderate-income families, we appreciate the
County's efforts in this area. The President also recently signed the American Dream
Downpayment (ADD) Act to increase homeownership for minorities, The ADD program will be
administered under HUD's HOME program. Based upon current budget projections, the County
is expected to receive an estimated$338,000 in ADD funds in FY 2004.
In summary, as far as meeting its housing goals, the County is on track to exceed its five-
year goal (Program Years 2000-2004) to provide 480 new units of senior rental housing. To date,
401 units have been completed, with an additional 143 underway. The five-year goal to provide
1,295 new units of multi-family rental housing is also on track. To date 1,080 units have been
completed, and 534 units are currently underway. Finally, the County's five-year goal of
providing owner-occupied rehabilitation assistance and homeownership opportunities for 380 units
is also on track. To date, 296 units have been assisted, with an additional 29 units underway. The
only five-year housing goal the County may not meet is providing 150 more units of special needs
housing (i.e., housing for persons with physical disabilities or housing for persons with
HIWAIDS). To date, only 32 units have been completed. We commend the County for its efforts
to increase and maintain the supply of affordable housing.
We understand the County is working on developing a housing trust fund to develop
affordable housing. We encourage our grantees to seek additional -funds to develop affordable
housing, and it is encouraging to see the County initiate this effort. Also,the Department has
developed a HOME report, which is a snapshot of performance during a certain period of time,
and we are pleased to report that the County is number I in the State, to-date, for producing
affordable rental housing. Congratulations to County staff for its efforts in this area,
3
Continuum of Care
In recognition of the on-going need to provide housing and services for the homeless or
those at-risk of being homeless, the County carried out projects consistent with its Continuum of
Care Homeless Plan. For example, Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa expended$10,000 in
CDBG funds to provide hot meals at the Martinez dining room. Approximately$103,500 in
CDBG funds were expended by the County's Department of Health Services to provide shelter for
parents and their children in Concord and Martinez. Also, several public service activities were
funded with CDBG funds to assist/prevent homeless. Some of the projects included a 24-hour
homeless hotline, and programs that provided referrals,food, clothing, personal items, household
goods, housing counseling, and assistance in finding and maintaining housing.
Approximately$4.7 million in HUD Supportive Housing Program (SHP) and Shelter Plus
Care (S+C) funds, and approximately$1.4 million in County General Fund and FEMA resources
were allocated to maintain the existing inventory of emergency and transitional housing and
support services for the homeless. For example,Rubicon Programs received$304,279 in SHP
funds to provide supportive services for homeless adults living with mental health or HIV/AIDS
disabilities at the permanent housing complex, Idaho Apartments. The Housing Authority of
Contra Costa County received approximately$2.8 million in S+C renewal funds, which provided
tenant-based rental assistance for 1.16 homeless individuals and 69 families.
Approximately$1.8 million in HOPWA and Ryan White CARE funds were available to
address the needs of low-income persons with HIV/AIDS. HOPWA funds were awarded to
Resources for Community Development to develop 51 units, of which five will be reserved for
persons with HTV/AIDS. Funds were also awarded to Catholic Charities and Shelter,Inc. to
provide various housing advocacy services.
The County also received$138,000 in ESG funds that helped support the County's
emergency shelters, such as the Rollie Mullen Center for battered women, and REACH Plus that
provided rental assistance and supportive services to homeless families and individuals.
We also congratulate the County for successfully applying for funding under the NOFA
Collaborative Initiative to Help End Chronic Homelessness. The County Housing Authority (HA)
was awarded $1,971,000 in HUD Shelter Plus Care(S+C) funds to provide additional tenant-based
rental units for disabled homeless person. Additionally, the County has been awarded
approximately$2 million in funds from the Departments of Health and Human Services, Veterans
Administration, and from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to
carry out various supportive services. These awards should greatly increase the County's efforts to
reduce homelessness.
In conclusion, utilizing HUD funds and other resources, the County and its non-profit
partners continued to take steps to provide housing and services that reduced homelessness and
other needs of the homeless.
''I'll.--,...........................................................................................I.......................
.........................................
4
Economic Development
To spur economic development, the County utilized approximately$1.1 million in CDBG
funds to leverage approximately$2.6 million in State/local funds and private resources to assist
micro-enterprises, train low-income persons to become healthcare and childcare providers, and to
assist in training and job placement. Approximately 82 of those receiving childcare training have
been licensed, and 65 of those who received healthcare training have become certified as nurse
assistants. To date, 46 of the 147 have been placed in jobs.
Technical assistance was provided to micro-enterprises to increase the number of micro-
enterprises owned and operated by low-income persons and to sustain existing micro-enterprises.
As a result, six new businesses were started and 12 new jobs were created. The County's efforts in
this area are good examples of programs that have had a positive impact on the ability of low- and
moderate- income residents to achieve self-sufficiency.
Public:Facilities Improvements
The County had 17 CDBG-funded public facility improvement projects underway, 10 of
which were completed. Projects included curb cuts, replacement of old fire hydrants in a low-
income neighborhood, and conversion of office space into a child care center for low-income
clients. We are pleased to see County staff has taken a more aggressive approach to ensure
projects are completed in a timely manner. Often, slow moving projects can be a factor in an
Entitlement community not meeting the CDBG timeliness expenditure of funds requirements.
Fair Housing
The County continued to fund fair housing counseling, tenant/landlord counseling, and
legal services activities. Approximately$80,000 in CDBG funds were allocated to Housing
Rights,Inc. and Bay Area Legal Aid to'provide fair housing counseling, fair housing
investigations, education and outreach, flier distribution, and workshops. A total of 399 low-
income households were served.
Public Services
To meet its public service goals, $674,847 in CDBG funds and approximately$5.6 million
in other Federal, State, local, and private resources were awarded to 37 non-profit agencies to
assist low-income youth, seniors, families, and others with special needs. These activities
included care and counseling for victims of physical and sexual abuse, educational and health
programs, food provision services, and homeless and crisis counseling. Over 23,000 persons
received assistance. The County's goal was to ensure that a minimum of 75 percent of the persons
receiving the assistance were very low-and low-income persons. We are pleased that the County
indicated 98 percent of the persons assisted were very low-and low-income.
111.1............................................................................................
....................................I......
5
North Richmond Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area(NRSA)
14M approved the NRSA on August 18, 1996. The NRSA completed its seventh year and
is still moving forward in carrying out activities to create opportunities for economic self-
sufficiency, improving commercial areas, streets, transportation, and housing for residents within
the NRSA. We understand that the majority of the originally identified projects have been
completed or are on going, and that an updated plan identifying new benchmarks and goals should
be completed soon. Once the new plan is approved and completed, please submit a copy to this
office. Anexampleof activities that were funded for the NRSA was a program specifically
designed for persons with limited English language skills, illiterate persons, and those not eligible
for CalWORKS. The program, which carried out by Rubicon,resulted in the training of 143
persons, 78 of which were placed in full-time positions. Three programs provided services to
Verde Elementary School. The programs provided counseling to resolve conflicts, a program to
increase academic achievement and to teach students to play cooperatively, manage emotions and
solve problems by providing structured playground activities, and an after-school performing arts
project. Because of programs like these, and interest from many agencies to improve the school
overall, the absenteeism was reduced by 38 percent and monthly attendance averaged 92 percent
for the year.
We were pleased to see that the County Redevelopment Agency (RA) received a
Youthbuild grant, and currently three properties are being rebuilt/replaced by Youthbuild
participants under the guidance of a nonprofit contractor. Once completed, three homes will be
sold to low-income families. HUD staff attended the Youthbuild graduation ceremony and was
very impressed with the graduates and the support for the program in the County.
Expenditure of Funds
Each grantee may not have more than 1.5 times the annual grant amount in its line of credit
(LOC) balance 60 days prior to the end of the current program year. The County continued to
meet this requirement.
Participating jurisdictions also have to meet the requirements for committing and
expending HOME funds in a timely-manner. During the year, we reviewed information
regarding the Consortium's 2001 grant to ensure that the 24-month commitment requirement had
been met, the 15 percent CHDO set-aside requirement had been met, and that 100 percent of the
Consortium's 1998 grant was expended within five years, as required. The Consortium
successfully carried out the commitment, disbursement, and reservation requirements in
accordance with the HOME regulations.
Also, a review of expenditures for the ESG Program shows that the County expended its
2001 funds within the 24-month requirement.
We look forward to continuing our partnership with the County to assist it in achieving its
affordable housing and community development goals. If you have questions or need assistance,
.................................
6
please call me at (415)436-6597, or Cathy Thrash, Community Planning and Development
Representative, at (415)436-8005.
Sincerely,
Steven B. Sachs
Director, Community Planning
and Development Division
cc.
Mr. John Sweeten, County Administrator
Ms. Kara Douglas, Affordable Housing Program Manager
Mr. Robert Calkins, CDBG Program Manager