Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 10142003 - C77
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 8__... .°� Contra ;. -)M: FAMILY AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE _Y` I Costa DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2003 oo��A`cavix'' ��� V�I 1 t SUBJECT: HEAD START INCOME ELIGIBILITY C-77 Y SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION Recommendation: ACCEPT report from the Community Services Department on the current status of Head Start income eligibility in Contra Costa County. Background: The Head Start program is currently being considered at the Federal level for reauthorization. The attached Community Needs Assessment demonstrates the need for Congress to make changes to over income eligibility for Head Start. H.R. 1201, which would have increased eligibility to 150% of poverty guidelines, died in committee last year. Due to the Administration's priorities this year and changes in the composition of the House and Senate, recommendations to increase the number of over income slots from 10% to 25% went unheeded. Z N, CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: x YES SIGNTURF: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF SOAR COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): DERAL D. GLOVER JOHN C71A ACTION OF BOARD ON CICS 11, 2003 APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS g I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENTONE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD AYES: NOES: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED OG'1C7BM 14, 2003 JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Contact Person: Tony Coign(6-5990) CC:CAO CSD r � . BY'r DEPUTY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT + rr ommun ty Services Department SR Produced by: Applied Survey Research P.O. E3�x 1927 Watsonville, A J5077 831-728-1356 www spgliedurueursrchr� Cont et: iC 111y Ple .as r Contra Costa Cour:ty, 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Table of Contents TABLE OF FIGURES 3 CONTRA COSTA DEMOGRAPHICS 5 DISABILITY STATUS 8 HEAD START 9 SELF-SUFFICIENCY 13 UNEMPLOYMENT 14 EMPLOYMENT 17 FREE AND REDUCED COST MEALS 18 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 19 POVERTY STATUS 21 POVERTY STATUS BY SELECTED CENSUS TRACT 22 HOUSING 27 TRANSPORTATION 30 IMMUNIZATIONS 31 CONTRA COSTA BIRTHS 32 TEEN BIRTHS 34 ASTHMA 35 HEALTH INSURANCE — CHILDREN 36 HEALTH INSURANCE -- ADULTS 37 SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES 38 PHYSICAL FITNESS 39 STAR SCORES 40 DROPOUT RATES 41 ENGLISH LEARNERS 43 TEACHERS WITH EMERGENCY PERMITS 44 CHILD CARE AVAILABILITY 45 FOSTER CARE 53 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 54 CHILD ABUSE 55 JUVENILE ARRESTS 56 ADULT ARRESTS 57 APPENDIX 1: FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES BY CENSUS TRACK 59 APPENDIX 2; CONTRA COSTA COUNTY POVERTY AND INCOME DATA BY ALL CENSUS TRACTS 62 2 Contra, Costa County 20013 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT am IN Table of rigure Table 1 - Population by Ethnicity 5 Table 2 - Household Characteristics 6 Table 3 - School Enrollment 7 Table 4 - Educational Attainment (ages 25 and over) 7 Table 5 - Disability Status of Civilian Non-Institutionalized Population 8 Table 6 - Countywide Special Education Enrollment by Age and Selected Disability, 2001_ 8 Table 7 - Age of Head Start Enrollees, 2001-2002 9 Table 8 - Ethnicity of Head Start Enrollees, 2001-2002 10 Table 9 - Percentage Enrolled Families by Family Type, 2001-2002 10 Figure 1 - Actual Enrollment of Early Head Start Children (ages 0-3) by Type of Eligibility, 2001-2002 11 Figure 2 - Actual Enrollment of Head Start Children (ages 4-5) by Type of Eligibility, 2001-2002 11 Table 10 -- Number of Disabled Preschool Students in Head Start by Type 12 Table 11 - Annual Self-Sufficiency Wage for Various Family Types, Contra Costa County, 2000 13 Table 12 - Annual Income for Family in 1999 13 Figure 3 - Unemployment Rates 14 Table 13 - Annual Unemployment Rates by Sub-Area, Contra Costa County 15 Table 14 - Top 10 Cities in Contra Costa County with Highest and Lowest Unemployment Rates, April 2003 16 Table 15 - Employment by Industry Sector, Contra Costa County 2001 17 Table 16 - Percentage of Students Receiving Free and Reduced Cost Meals 18 Table 17 - Public Assistance Recipients by Program, Contra Costa County 19 Table 18 - CalWORKs Recipients Aged 16 and over by Ethnicity, Contra Costa County 19 Table 19 - Percentage of Students Receiving CaIWORKs 20 Figure 4 - Percentage of Children Ages 0-5 in Families Participating in CalWORKs, Contra Costa County, 2000 20 Table 20 - Poverty Status in 1999 21 Table 21.1-21.5 - Poverty Status and Median Income in 1993 for Selected Census Tracts with Family and Children's Services Centers 22 Table 22 - Percentage of Homes Affordable to Median Income Households 27 Table 23 - Median Sale Price of Single Family Residences, Condos, and New Homes, Contra Costa County, 2002 28 Table 24 - Median Monthly Rents, Fiscal Year 2002 29 Figure 5 - Monthly Income Spent on Housing, Contra Costa County, 1999 29 Table 25 - Clustered Modes over Time, Contra Costa County 30 Table 26 - Workers 16 Year and Over Commuting to Work, 2000 30 Table 27 - Immunization Levels of Kindergarten Entrants 31 Table 28 - Number of Births by Ethnicity, Contra Costa County 32 Table 29 - Percentage of Births that are Low Weight 32 Table 30 - Percentage of Women Receiving Prenatal Care in the First Trimester 33 Figure 6 - Percentage of Women Receiving Prenatal Care in the First Trimester, by Ethnicity, 2001 33 Table 31 - Percentage of Births That Are to Teen Mothers (Aged 15-19), Contra Costa County 34 Table 32 - Teen Births by Ethnicity, Contra Costa County, 20011 34 Table 33 - Low Weight Births to Teen Mothers (aged is-19), Contra Costa County 34 3 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Table 34 - Percentage of Teen Mothers (aged 15-19) Receiving Prenatal Care in the First Trimester, Contra Costa County 34 Table 35 - Asthma Hospitalizations Rates, 1959 35 Table 36 - Persons Diagnosed with Asthma, 2001 35 Table 37 - Persons Diagnosed with Asthma by Federal Poverty Level (FPL), Contra Costa County, 2001 35 Table 38 - Health Insurance Coverage of Children, 2001 36 Figure 7 - Health Insurance Coverage of Nonelderly Adults (Ages 18-64) 2001 37 Table 39 - Health Insurance Coverage of Nonelderly Adults (Ages 18-64) 2001, by Federal Poverty Level (FPL) 37 Table 40 - Sexually Transmitted Disease Incidence Rates for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea, All Ages 38 Table 41 - Percentage of Students who are Physically Fit 39 Table 42 - Percentage of Third Grade Students Scoring Above the 50th NPR in Reading by Districts with Elementary Students 40 Table 43 - Percentage of Students who Dropout of High School, 4-year Derived Rate— 41 Figure 8 - Percentage of Students who Dropout of High School by Ethnicity, Contra Costa County, 4-year Derived Rate, 2000-01 42 Table 44 - Percentage of Students who Dropout of High School by Ethnicity, Contra Costa County, 4-year Derived Rate 42 Table 45 - Number and Percentage of Students Who Are English Learners 43 Table 46 - Top Languages Spoken by English Learners, Contra Costa County 2001-2002 43 Table 47 - Percentage of Teachers with Emergency Permits 44 Figure 9 - Total Population of Children Ages 0-23 Months, Contra Costa County, 2000 — 46 Figure 10 - Total Population of Children Ages 2-5 Years, Contra Costa County, 2000 46 Figure 11 -- All Licensed Care: Total Capacity per 100 Children Ages 0-5, Contra Costa County, 2000 47 Table 48 - Child Care Supply and Demand 48 Table 49.1-49.2 - Subsidized Child Care Centers in Contra Costa County by Zip Code 2002 49 Table 50 -- Child Care Statistics, Contra Costa County, 2000 51 Table 51 - Child Care Statistics, Contra Costa County, by Fiscal Year 52 Table 52 -- Rate of First Entry into Foster Care 53 Table 53 - Rate of First Entry into Forster Care, by Ethnicity, 20101 53 Table 54 - Rate of Domestic Violence Calls for Assistance 54 Table 55 - Rate of Substantiated Child Abuse Cases 55 Table 56 - Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrest Rate 56 Table 57 - Juvenile Felony Arrest Rate 56 Table 58 - Number of Juvenile Arrests by Age, Contra Costa and San Mateo Counties, 2001 56 Table 59 -- Adult Misdemeanor Arrest Rate 57 Table 60 - Adult Felony Arrest Rate 57 4 Contra Costa Counly 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Contra Costa Demographics Contra Costa County's population in 2000 was 948,816.In Contra Costa County,65.50/o of the population is Caucasian compared to 59,50/o in California.The percentage of Latino residents in Contra Costa County is about half that of the state(17.0%vs. 32.411/0,respectively). CENSUS 2000 TABLE 1 — POPULATION BY ETHNICITY ITO WA, 1 One Race ; 900,102 900,102 94.9 ------ ----- Caucasian 621,490 F- African American 88,813 r 9.4 6.7 1 American Indian and Alaska Native 5,830 0.6 1.01 Asian 103,993 11.0 10.9 Pacific Islander and Native Hawaiian 3,466 0.4 s 0.3 Some other race 76,510 8.1 16.8 1 Two or more races 48,714�u S.1 4.7 Hispanic or Latino 167,776 17.7 i 32.4 1 Total population y 948,816 33,871,648 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002, 5 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Contra Costa Demographics CENSUS 2000 The household characteristics of Contra Costa County and California are similar. Family households account for about 7011/b of the households in both Contra Costa County and California.Female- headed households (with no husband present) account for 11.5%of the county's households compared to 12.6%in California. TABLE 2 — HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS _7 7 7 Family households (families) 242,233 i 70.4 i 68.9 With own children under IS years 121,884 35,4 35.8 Married-couple family 187,613 M�m54.5 With own children under IS years 91,975 26.7 Female householder, no husband present 39,683 11.5 12.6 with own children under 18 years 22,363 6.5 1, 7.3 Nonfamily households 101,896 1 29.6 Householder living alone 78,759 2291 23.5 1 8,n� , Householder 65 year and over 27,559 7.8 i Households with Individuals under IS years 133,372 38.8 39.7 Households with Individuals 65 years and over 76,255 22.2 22.3 Total households 344,129 11,502,870 Source: 'U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. 6 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Contra Costa Demographics Almost eighty-seven percent of the Contra Costa County population ages 25 and over are high school graduates,compared to 76.811/o of California residents.Thirty-five percent of Contra Costa County residents ages 25 and over have a bachelor's degree or higher,while 26.6%of California residents ages 25 and over have a bachelor's degree or higher. CENSUS 2000 TABLE 3 SCHOOL ENROLLMENT �W Nursery school, preschool 5.4 1 Kindergarten I Elementary school (grades 1-8) i119,161 4. 20.9 1 42.9 High school (grades 9-12) 56,052 1 20.7 College or graduate school 61,975 1 22.9 J 25.2 Total population 3 years and over enrolled In school —------ 270,131iu` 100.0 10,129,990 TABLE 4 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT (AGEs 25 AND OVER) F, 'I X '77 R, 0 j-; _W Less than 9th grade 32,804 5.2 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 49,063 7.8 11.7 1 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 123,956 j 19.8 20.1 Some college, no degree 152,680 24.4 22.9 Associate degree 48,090 7.7 7 Bachelor's degree 142,909 22.8 17.1 Graduate or professional degree 76,139 12.2j 9.5 Li?�Total population 25 years and over �—_625,641 1 1000 21,298,900 ----------I ____; . Percent high school graduate or higher 1 8 6.9 76.8 Percent Percent bachelor's degree or higher 35.0 26.6 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. 7 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Disability status The Contra Costa population ages 5 to 20 with a disability is 6.9%,while those ages 21 to 64 with a disability account for 16.4%of the population. Fifty-eight percent of those ages 21-64 with a disability are employed while 77%of those ages 21-64 without a disability are employed. Children with speech or language impairment disabilities account for most of the children ages 2 through 5 enrolled in Special Education. Other common disabilities of Special Education students include mental retardation and orthopedic impairment. TABU 5 DISABILITY STATUS OF CIVILIAN NON-INSTITUTIONALIZED POPULATION d ..h; e Population 5 to 20 years with a d€sabiiity 15,112 6 9 , Tota# popufation 5 to 20 years 218,776_1...... 1 8,172, 459 Popu#atFan 21 to 64 years with a disability 91,254 � 16.4 1 20,0 Percent employed (with a disability) I N/A 1 57.8 ! 54.9 j Population 21 to 54 years with no disability 463,892 $3.6 ' _ $i#.p Percent employed (with no disability) - tY) ( �N�IA-!r---- 77.4 3 --73—.1 Total population 21 to 64 years Ti 555,146 - 19,210,794 Population 65 years and over with a disability i 41,206 ` 39.6 _ --- _ _ ___ ___ ___ __ ___ _ --. _ f ___ T__42.2-� Total population 65 years and over _ I _ 103,969 3,469,810 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. TABLE 6 - COUNTYWIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION ENROLLMENT BY AGE AND SELECTED DISABILITY, 2001 �s - �{��� ' � �� 3 #' t y# 4.r "*y7 7 x4k �`--T-�•ri ��.'3} i -'� .j 2L Mental retardation 0 0 2 ' 22 _ 26 1 32 Hard of hearing 0 2 1 6 5 i 3 ' 3 _ _ Deal __- 5 6 _ 10 Speech or ianguage --- - - i------ --- - - — II I impairment _ _ 1 10 ; 71 i 406 I 6"73 1 617 i _ Visual impairment _ 21 3Impairment 7 �-� i Orthopedic imie3 ; 14 � 1$ 1 19 0 25 26 Other health ! I r_—_------ _ � Impairment 0 $ i 8 i 6 Speclflc (earning 'i 0 disability _ .4.___.. �{._._._.__ 0 ` 7 i 2 i 7 Deaf-blindness I 01 00 —0i 0 1 0 Multiple disability i_.__ 01 0 7 12 5 I 9 _.._ 0 0 0 21 32 1 33 _ _..— �._O Traumatic brain Injury f 0 i 0 3 0 1 0 T # L.ota__--___.- 7, - 35 ! 1_16 511 _ 785 754 Source: California Department of Education,Special Education Division,2003. Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Hce-ad Start Early Head Start programs serve children ages 0-3 years,while Head Start programs serve children ages 4-5.There were 226 Early Head Start enrollees ages 0-3 in 2001-2002 while there were 2,177 Head Start enrollees ages 4-5. HEAD START DEMOGRAPHICS Enrollee Demographics }'FABLE 7 AGE OF HEAD 'START ENROLLEES, 2001-2002 ,,... ,i f 4 f } ( f. " Under 1 year 56 24.8 MOI 0.0 1 year old 55 24.3 0 r 010 2 years old62 - W—_.—__ _ 27.4 0 0.0 !-- _ 3 years old 1t�.� 805' '41 ! 37.0 j 4 years old 0 0.0 1,016 i 46.7 S years and older 0 _ J 0,0 356 16.4 ._ Total enrollees -_ 226 140.4 2,177 ; 144.4 Source: Contra Costa County Head Start,2002, Note: Table does not include"other"or-unreported/unspecified-"ActuaI enrollment includes turnover. 9 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Head t r t Most Early Head Start and Head Start enrollees are Latino(43.80/o and 42.0%,respectively), followed by African American (27.40/o and 33.011/o,respectively)and Caucasian (9.311/o and 10.0%, respectively).Three-quarters (74.8%)of families of enrolled Early Head Start children are single- parent families,while 69.0%of Head Start enrollees are from single-parent families. HEAD START DEMOGRAPHICS Enrollee Demographics TABLE 8 — ETHNICITY OF HEAD START ENROLLEES, 2001-2002 i re € i, � z � �( �. i f}{tU"Si' ke 'b`� �1 it a4 . $ £���,�R,y# �hTM� '+ x"'+ ,• '� y�; __.-..— —.� ,.....su... .e._ 42.0 Afr#can Anter#can � 52 ; 27.4 718 � 33.0 Caucasian____ 21 1 9.3 2181__ _10.0 j Bl- or Multi-racial � 15 —_ 7.1 152 7,0 Asian 5 2.2 87�~i--- $.0 , I Pacific Islander/ Native Hawaiian I 1 � 0.$ 22 __ 0 j American Ind#an Alaska Native 1 0.4 12 " 0.1 Tots#enrollees 226 1 100.0 _ 2,177 Note: Table does not include`other"or"unreported/unspecified."Actual enrollment includes turnover. FAMILIES OF ENROLLED CHILDREN TABLE 9 PERCENTAGE ENROLLED FAMILIES BY FAMILY TYPE, 2001-2002 y"�r��" G� s� i n'' d�€ri k t � '+m�' f�� r���3`x �,y F"� f••,r 1't'�'}�q x, } a i t 3 z r s z � rc� N` x _..�a'+4�����'-:t•�.x a.��'_i Two-parent families �i 41 1 25.2 520 i 31.0 Single-parent families 122 { 74.8 1 155 _69.0 Total families - r _ 1_63._1._-- 100 0 1,676 1 100.0 Source: Contra Costa County Head Start,2002. -- �— --` 10 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Head Sart of those children enrolled in Early Head Start, 88%were enrolled based on income eligibility(below 100%of the federal poverty line),while 1011/a were enrolled based on receipt of public assistance. Comparatively,22%of children enrolled in Head Start were enrolled based on income eligibility,and 680/a were enrolled based on receipt of public assistance. FAMILIES OF ENROLLED CHILDREN FIGURE 1 -- ACTUAL ENROLLMENT OF EARLY HEAD START CHILDREN (AGES 0-3) BY TYPE OF ELIGIBILITY, 2001-2002 2% MEnrolled based on receipt of public assistance ®Enrollment based on income eligibility (below 100% of federal poverty linea DEnroliment based on over-income eligibility(above 100% of federal poverty line) Total actual ill enrollment, 214 FIGURE 2 -- ACTUAL ENROLLMENT of HEAD START CHILDREN (ACES 4-5) BY TYPE OF ELIGIBILITY, 2001-2002 M Enrolled based on receipt of public 1811/0 :Y �y assistance .14 WEnrollment based on income eligibility (below 100%of federal poverty line) ©Enrollment based on over-income eligibility (above 100% of federal poverty line) Total actual enrollment: 2,177 Source: Centra Costa County Head Start,2002, Note: Actual enrollment includes turnover. 11 ',',or-,tra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Head Start DISABILITY STATUS The types of disabilities among preschool students in Head Start have increased in number from 163 to 182 in 2001-02. Speech or language impairment has been the top disability of preschool age students in Head Start(132),followed by multiple disabilities including deaf-blind(15), and emotional/behavior disorders(10)and learning disabilities(10).There were 21.disabled children in 2001-2002 in the Early Head Start(ages 0-3)program,however,data on their specific disability are not available. TABLE 10 — NUMBER OF DISABLED PRESCHOOL STUDENTS IN HEAD START By TYPE 7 7" ----2, '1 tfl'-Z Rif �2" FP—eech or language Impairment 116 132 i Multiple disabilities (including deaf-blind) N/A 15 Emotional / behavioral disorder 2 i 10, Learning disabilities 8 10 Health Impairment 10 7 Orthopedic Impairment 3 Non-categorical / developmental delay I 3 2 Autism 2 2 Visual impairment(including blindness) Mental retardation 2 C) j IL Hearing Impairment(including deafness) 7 Traumatic brain injury N/A I Total 165 I 182 —---------- Source: Contra Costa County Head Start,2002. Note: All of the preschool program students received special services.There were 21 children in 2001-2002 in the Early Head Start(ages 0-3)program receiving services under part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act(IDEA),however,data on their specific disability are not available. 12 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Self-Sufficiency The annual self-sufficiency wage for various family types in Contra Costa County in 2000 ranged from$38,221 for a family with 2 adults and 1 infant,to $41,568 for a family with 2 adults and 2 school age children, and to $47,724 for a family with I adult and 2 infants. In 1999,30.9%of Contra Costa County families earned less than$49, 999 per year(approximately the annual salary necessary for self-sufficiency). In 1999,the median family income in Contra Costa County was $73,039,which was about $20,000 greater than the median family income in California overall. TA13LE 11 - ANNUAL SELF-SUFFICIENCY WAGE FOR VARIOUS FAMILY TYPES, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2000 ( - € -7 a 3 ; Housing - $921 _ 921 y - $921 Child Care j 1,440 i 720 x 873 1 Food ! 317 1 394 j 549 j Transportation 49 ! 98 i -� 98 Health care _ 311 1 325 Mlseeilar►eous �____..-_ --_-____ _ _______.____ 276 324 �__-.,....._,._..._.�....� _...._...____..._.._..-- _...._...____ i s 3Q4 246 } ( Taxes 798 - 563 i 586 j Earned Income tax credit (�) 1 0 - w. d _ 0 1 Child care tax credit -80 -40 _8011 Child tax credit( } 83 -42 -83 Hourly seif�sufflcrenc wage � - 9.84 j Y _-_ Y 9 (per adult) 22 60 j 9.05 L Annual self-sufficiency wage $47,724 $38,221 $41,568 Source: Californian's for Economic Self Sufficiency and Equal Rights Advocates,The Self-Sufficiency Standard for California,2000. TABLE 12 ANNUAL INCOME FOR FAMILY IN 1999 % .mss`''.. . «---.-..:a�-.::.,._,.-w._.....�_...-.......,....._ _._..._�._._.._...._�...j..._. .r ......._.__..u..»r.. u: d .:^ r.2 .'�1,,r5. Less than $10,000 7,788 ,K --- _ 3.2 5.7 $10,000_to$14,999 1 2.4 4.6 t} , 5,817 $15, tJ0 to$24,999 ; 14,033 5.8 10,4 1 -_ ! $25,000 to $34,999 17,235 i 7.1 , $35,000 to$49,999 30,256 � 12.4 # 15.1 _ _-_-------------- $50,000 to $7'4,999 -- __ 50,014 20.5 ! 20.2 $75,000 to$99,999 4Q 142 16.5 _ 13.0 $100,000 to$149,99944,270 F 18.1 12,0 ; $150,000 to 1_99,999 15,5_22 € 6.8 $200,000 or more� �7-893 _ _ 7.3 4A Median $73,039 73 family Income _ __.._ � Total tar»lues 0 g j $53,025 243,971 !- 100.0 1 7,985,489 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. 13 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Unemployment In 2000,the unemployment rate in Contra Costa County was almost half of the state's unemployment rate(2.7 vs. 4.9,respectively). However,the unemployment rate in Contra Costa County increased over 93%from 20401 to 2002 from a low of 2.7 in 2000 to 5.2 in 2002. During the same time period,the unemployment rate in California increased 370lo from 4.9 in 2000 to 6.7 in 2002. Specific areas in the county experienced greater increases in unemployment from 2000 to 2001 than others. San Pablo and Richmond cities,which have both had historically higher unemployment rates than the county overall,had higher net increases in unemployment than other areas in Contra Costa County. FIGURE 3 r.. UNEMPLOYMENT RATES 8 6.7 6.3 519 5 5.2 4.9 5.3 5.2 4.1 3.6 3.0 3 3 scontrra Costa k 2.7 €]Callfornia 2 S: fl 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Contra Costa County 4.1 3.6 3.0 2.7 3 3 , 5.2 rcallfornia6-3_ � 5.9 4.9 5.3 6.7 ___.--y._�._.___ 5.2 Source: California Employment Development Department,Labor Market Information Division,2003. 14 Ccnatra Ccssta County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Unemployment TABLE 13 - ANNUAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATES BY STUB-AREA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Not4i �' .-c .-.�-. ._........_......__......_ . ,rte... Alamo CDP Y4 1.3 1.5 1 2.4 0.9 Antioch city 4.4 6 9 , _ 3 6 2.51 Bayview Montalvin - CDP 4.0 + 4.8 7.5 2.7 _ - Bethal Island -CDP 3.5 4.2 ; 6 6 i 2,4 _. - Blackhawk CDP -- 1.0. -1 ---__2.0 ---0.7 Clayton - cit 4'2 5.0 7 8 2.8 Brentwood -cit y_ - y 101 121 18 , 0.6 ; Concord -city 2.5 3.0 4,8Cro1.8 2.4 Da vdiet- YP -- 1.3-�..-. 1.6 -- 2.5 j 0.9 I 4 r Discovery Bay- CDP 1.0 i 1 2 1 1.9 __.--0.7 r ------- East Richmond Heights - CDP 1,9 I 2.2 3.6 , 1,4 - -- -- El Cerrito -. city 2.0 2.4 3.8 1.4 El Hercules t city DP - 2.9 '. ---4.6 1.67 Kensington- +CDP- Lafayette - city 1.2 1.S 2.3 0.8 1 i Martinez-city 2.2 - 2.7 4,2 ' 1.5 Moraga Town - city 0 9 1.1 j - --7-- 1.8 0.7 l_ Oakley GDP - - 2.8 -- 3 3 S.3 12.0 Orinda - city 1.6 I 1 9 3.1 - 1.2 _- i Pacheco- CDP201 3.9 1.4 25 _ _ Pinole - city 2.4 2 9 4.6__[ 1.7 - -- Plsant Hill i- city_ _ - V1.7 j 2. j _.Pittsburg + 39 46 73 27 1 l 3.3 1 1.2 Richmond - city -- - - - - - 53L_. 63 98 3.5 Rodeo - CDP 2.8 5.2 1 9 1 -�- San Pablo - city 5.7 6 8 10.5 ' 3.7 San Ramon - cit 1.1 _ - y L15 18 29 --------- Tara Hills CDP - 3 3 . 4.0 i 6.3 1 2.3 - - - Vine Hili GDP 2.8 3.3 2 1.9 _ ' Walnut Greek -city � 1.8 1---- 2.1 3.4 I 1 3 ' West Pittsburg CDP 4.6 5.5 8.5 3.0 _ _. Source: California Employment Development Department,Labor Market Information Division,2003. Note: CDP stands for Census Designated Place. 15 �`.ont"a Costa Coon ty 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Unemployment TABLE 14 -- TOP 10 CITIES IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WITH HIGHEST AND LOWEST UNEMPLOYMENT RATES, APRIL 2003 +5 ry San Pablo f ' _-711ichmand _. _ Moraga Town 1.9 L2 -10.3 2 Clayton Pittsburg � � West � - Pi 9 _ 9.0 2 Discovery Bay 2.0 �4 _ Brentwood 8.3 3 B#ackhawk 2.1 S j Sayview-Montalvin 7.9 4 Lafayette _ 2.5 5 ; Pittsburg 7.7 5 Alamo —_ i 2.6 j 7E#5obrante 7.4 6 Danville 2.7 8 ; Antioch 7.3 7 San Ramon 3.0 9 ' Bethel Island 7.0 $ Orinda 3._ 3 10 i Tara Hills -—__�---__- 6.6 9 Pleasant Hill _ , 3.5 10 _ Walnut Creek 3.6 •I Source: Contra Costa County Worfcforce Investment Board,2003. 16 _ _ Contra Costa COLMty 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT EM tmployment Many industry sectors experienced slight increases in employment from 2000 to 2001. Some of the sectors with the largest growth in employment from 2000 to 2001 were the finance,insurance,and real estate sector,which grew by 1,700 new jobs,and the construction and mining sector,which grew by 800 jobs.The largest employment sector in Contra Costa County is the services sector, which employees 32.10,16 of the workforce,followed by the retail trade sector,which employs 18.1%of the workforce. TA13LE 15 EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY SECTOR, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 2001 y. a'i J Y +Seen-N-f§ �S s* a�,:'' ✓ }' S" x` y r 'S ''� sNMPNAX11 Manufactur#ng 400 25 7.5 ! 25,500 I 7.4 { _ _� - --- j Wholesale trade 12,300 3.7 ' 12,200 it 3.6 ; i Retail trade62 62,000 18.4 000 18.1 -- I— — a! Finance, insurance and I real estate _ 28,400 8.4 30,100 i ^8.8 i Transportation and public __ _. utilities 20,500 } 6.1 20 00 , 6.1 !' Seryices i 109,800 326 109,900 ? 32.1 i Government 48'200 14.3 ' 49 600 14.5 - - -- ; ._ Farming i 2,220 0.7 ; 21400 0.7 Construction and mining ; 8.7 — 28,000 8 3 1 29,800 Total employment, all - Industries 536,500 i 342,300 I Total civilian employment 490,440 ! - 493,100 I - Source: California Employment Development Department,Labor Market Information Division,2002 17 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT ram ree and Reduced Cost Meals The percentage of Contra Costa County students receiving free and reduced cost meals was slightly higher in 2001-02 than the previous year(27.1%vs,26,6010,respectively).Almost thirty percent (27.19/6)of Contra Costa County students received free or reduced,cost meals in 2001-2002 compared to 47.1%of California students.The top three districts with the highest percentage of students rece"iv"ing free or reduced cost meals were Pittsburg Unified(56.80/6),West Contra Costa Unified (51.6%),and John Swett Unified(35.5%). TABU 16 - PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS RECEIVING FREE AND REDUCED COST MEALS t Acalanes Union High 1.9 ' 1.3 0.7 I 0.4 1 0,6 Antioch Unified 34.4 ' 30.5 30.9 1 30.9 30,0 Brentwood Union Elementary _.20.1._1.. _ 29.8 26,6 _ 28.1 ! 25.2 Byron Union Elementary 163 } 14.7 15.6 ' 11 6 Canyon Elementary 10.1 513 5.1 � 2.7 14 Contra Costa Co. Office of f Education N/A N/A N/A 010 0 0 Sohn Swett Unified 27.8 2&7 2? 7 24.7 35 5 Knightsen Elementary 34 5 i 3311 34 9 32 0 1 31.5 Lafayette Elementary 0 1 0.2 0,2 0.1 0.0 1 Liberty Union High a _ 7.8 6.9 5.5 i 8 3 8.4 Martinez Unified 21.4 ' 18.1 179 16.5 17 2 Mora a Elementary 0.1 1 0.3 0.3 0 6 �..._ . __ 0.2 Mt. Diablo Unified 24A 4 22.2 23.0 23.7 ( 23.7 Oakley Union Elementary 29.5 1 23.4 25.1 20.3 2.5.7 Orinds Union Elementary 0 0 0.1 0.1 0 2 , 0,3 Pittsburg Unified 62 5 59 5 f 57.3 56.5 , 56,8 San Ramon Valley Unified 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.0 1.2 ; Walnut Creek Elementary 9 9 7.9 7.9 1 7.5 6.3 West Contra Costa Unified 49.3 53.6 50,6 ; 49 6 51.6 j _...._ _ - Contra Costa County 2821 27.5 26.8 26.6 f 27.1 California 47.4 i 47.6 47.3 46.8 47.1 j Source: State of California,Department of Education,Educational Demographics Unit,2002. 18 Cant'ra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Public Assistance From 1999 to 2001, the number of Ca1WORKs, Food Stamps,General Relief, and Welfare to Werk recipients declined in Contra Costa County. Refugee Cash Assistance recipients remained fairly consistent from 1999 to 2001. In 2001,almost half of CalWORKs recipients aged 16 and over were African American(44.4%)followed by Caucasians(31.50/0)and Latino(16.9%). TABLE 17 — PUBLIC ASSISTANCE RECIPIENTS BY PROGRAM, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 71 df `CaiWtiRlCs 31 275 20,448 21.1 General Relief 913 11 603 1 513 -14 9 ------ f Refugee Cash Assistance 18 14 15 - 17.1 3 _ ._.. - Welfare to Work 9,750 i 4,783 1 3,345 -30.1 Note: Data is from July of each year;2001 General Relief data is from March 2001 and Refugee Cash Assistance data are for the third quarter and exclude CalWORKs recipients. TABLE 18 — CALWORKs RECIPIENTS AGED 16 AND OVER BY ETHNICITY, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CaucasFans 3 760 �— 2,930 2,230 23.9 African American 4,640 3,920 3,140 ; -19.9 Latino 1,650 1,440 ' 1,200 _ -16.7 Asian / Pacific Islander 1 750 670 490 i 25.9 Total recipients aged 16 - - Land over _....------------- ----__10,830 8,980 7,080 -21.2 j Source: California Employment Development Department,Labor Market Information Division reporting data from the California Department of Social Services,2002. Note: Data is from July of each year. 19 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Public Assistance The percentage of students receiving CaIWORKs i Contra Costa irounty 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Poverty Status Contra Costa County ranks 55`n out of 58 counties (with one having the highest percentage in poverty)for their percentage of the population below the federal poverty level.' However, the percentage of families living in poverty in Contra Costa is about half the percentage of families in California (5.4%vs. 10.6%,respectively). A higher percentage of families with a female head of householder with no husband present lived in poverty(16.8%)than families or individuals (5.41/10 and 7.6%,respectively). The percentage of children living in poverty is higher than the percentage of the general population;almost 100/o of children live below=the federal poverty level.' While 7.6%of Contra Costa residents overall lived below the poverty level in 1999, there were many census tract areas in the county that had much higher poverty. Brookside,Las Deltas, Silver Verde had the highest percentage with 38.8%of residents living below the poverty level followed by Greater Richmond at 31%. TA13L r 20 ® POVERTY STATUS IN 1999 h hk S Tam€lees 13,068 ?. . 5.4 10,6 i W€th related children under 18 years 10,565 7.9 1 15.3 _With related children under 5 years 5 114 �_� . _ __...__f v- u _ 9.7 f 15.0 FamliEes with female householder, no husband -- -- - present _ 6,83316 8 1 25.0 With rel_ated children uer nd16 years 5 586 22.2 _ 32.5 _ _�..u With related children under 5 years 2 416 31.3 44.0 i Individuals 71,575 7.6 ` 14.2 ± 18 years and over _ ------ { 46,471 6.7 1 12.3 tis years and over 6,224 It 6.0 8.1 With related children under 1a years 23'980 9,8 19.0 -- - _-- - - With related children 5 to 17 years 17 162 f___ 9.4 18.5 j Unrelated individuals 15 years and over _ 23,661 i 15.7 23.1 1 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. 1 Medi-Cal Policy institute,Medi-Cal County Data Book,2002. Children Now."The Children of Contra Costa County."California County Data Book,2001,taken from Contra Costa Child Care Council,The Economic Impact of the Child Care Industry in Contra Costa County,2002. 21 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Poverty Status by Selected Census Tract TABLE 21.1 -i POVERTY STATUS AND MEDIAN INCOME IN 1939 FOR SELECTED CENSUS TRACTS WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE'S CENTERS 1:.x.y,r '� ^�J'p j x 1. f y�t . w,yy - !, a :4 •� ,tn t 4 Mti �s;s I i s•N .. a Number of Individuals with income ". In 1999 below poverty level: 636 1 862 912 1,277, 427 71,575 Under 5 years 57 t 103 104 158 541 6,818 5 years 9 10 Q 44• 23 1,418 6 to 11 years 69' 145 150! 148 75 i 1 9,249 12 to 17 years 111 90 156 147 48 71619`' 18 to 64 years 344 471 375 6931 1.98 40,247 65 to 74 years 15 32 70 57 12 2,501 75 years and aver I 31 11 : 57 ' 30 171 3,723 i lNumber of Individuals with income in 1999 at or above Poverty level: ,7831 7,442 20,621 5,189 i 7,067 866,735 Under 5 years 630, 678 2,000 492 i 429 57,229 5 years 203 : 147, 384 85 , 65 128201 6 to 11 years _ _ 975 8451 2,351 554 777 78,669 i2 to 17 years 4 713 735 1,869 365 ' 719 73,1721 I... to 64 years 4,694 4,467 12,132 3,147 4,461 547,100' 65 to 74 years 374 379 1,216 ; 225, 371 51,776 r 75 years and over 194. 191 669 221 245 45,969 Total population In Census i tract: 8,411 8,304; 21,533 : 6,466 7,494! 938 310 'Percent of individuals in Census tract below the poverty level 7.6' 10.4 4.2 19.7 5.7 706 Medlan household income $58,769 $50,449 $73,622 $31,692 '$64,172: $73,039 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,2003;Contra Costa County Community Services bepartment,2003. Please see Appendix I for a list of Family and Children's Services Centers by Census tract number.To view poverty and median income data for all Census tracts in Contra Costa County,please see Appendix II, 22 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Poverty :status by Selected Census 'bract TABLE 21.2 - POVERTY STATUS AND ('+t1EDIAN INCOME IN 1999 FOR SELECTED CENSUS TRACTS WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES CENTERS h,?' a'k•a s ,c i 3 s:. Yf 3.., s t )' f C sti'' r '`.u,. X�' £ e x 5n k a t .� a; 3 t_. 'W k r4.�rv�a is ,� E: n. s Nf''s 1 }'sk' "+ .a g n Number of Individuals with Income In 1999 below poverty levet: r 5201 304 j 1,756 254 254 71,575 Under 5 years 7411 24 299 21 0 6,818 5 years 8 8: 27! 01 8 1,418 6 to 11 yearns 113 11 ! 317 61 4 9,249 12 to 17 years 49 17 148 i--.10-1 19 7,619 18 to 64 years 197 224 879 179194 40,247' 65 to 74 years 29 13 55 221 7 2,501 75 years and over 501 71, 31 16 22` 3,723 [N--umber of Individuals with I i Income to 1499 at or above 1 poverty level: 1 2,057 3,501 5,397 1,849 3,151 866,735 Under 5 years- - 127. 232 374 891 164. 57,229 5 years 741 60 91 9 46 12,820 6 to 11 years 213 376! 519 i 151 170 78,669 ! 12 to 17 years 227 390 467 103 256 73,172 18 to cot years 1,143 2,291 3,469 1,306' � 2,059 547,100 6j0 74 years 182 113 269 r 791 204 51,776 i�75 years and over ! 91 , 39 208 112' 252 45,969 Total population In Census 33 tract: 2,577 3,805 7,1531 2,103 3,405 938,310 Percent of Individuals In Census i tract below the poverty level 20.2 8.0 24.5 t 12.1 i 7.5 7,6 Median household income $27,399 $51,667 $31,850 $40,052 $45,647 $73,039 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,2003;Contra Costa County Community Services Department,2003. Please see Appendix I for a list of Family and Children's Services Centers by Census tract number.To view poverty and median income data for all Census tracts in Contra Costa County,please see Appendix II. 23 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Poverty Status by Selected Census Tract TABLE 21.3 - POVERTY STATUS AND MEDIAN INCOME IN 1999 FOR SELECTED CENSUS TRACTS WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES CENTERS '�a� 'fir� �f t 4f �S k inn # cy, f 1 te. , �n rvi r�� tib,. -� .�;. ° D'Y`,�y'C.�'sg,��� >A• Number of Indlvidnals with itx+ptne � ,, ,- 'I In 1999 below poverty levet: 7061 336 420 764, 766 4` 71,575 Under 5 years 52 19 36 561 79 6,818 5 years 35 0 0 i 15 5 1,418 Sto years i 41 11 56 143 120 9,249 1 [127 years 101 14 33 86 77 7,619 j IS to 64 years 429 f 234 279 455 448 40,247 65 to 74 years 9 23 01 031 2,501 75 years and over 39 35 16` 91 6 3,723, Number of Indlvidualswith -; Income In 1999 at or above_ poverty level: 6,238 i 5,292 7,113 4,399 3,557 866,735 Under 5 years 377 374 416 460 302 57,229 5 years 52 61 ' 681 75 106 12,820 6 to 21 years ' 523 j 434 585 394 378 i 7$,669 j 12 to 17 years _I 474 479 643 3021 3.33 73,172, 18 to 64 years 3,819 3,353 4,393 2,978 i 2,093 547,1011 65 to 74 years 524 311 604! 104, 238 51,776 75 years,and over 4691 280 404 86 117 45,969 1 Total population in Census tract: 6,944 5,62$ 7,533 5,1153 4,333 938,310 Percent of Individuals In Census tract below the poverty level 10.2 6.0 5.6 14.81 17.7 7.6 Median household income $42,0631 $5$,943 $61,053 $38,2711 $36,213 $73,039 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,2003;Contra Costa County Community Services Department,2003. Please see Appendix I for a list of Family and Children's Services Centers by Census tract number.To view poverty and median income data for all Census tracts in Contra Costa County,please see Appendix Ii. 24 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Poverty Status by Selected Census 'bract TABLE 21.4 - POVERTY STATUS AND MEDIAN INCOME IN 1999 FOR SELECTED CENSUS TRACTS WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES CENTERS i z. � ,w a S3 k +s ' �x r Yr ✓ Number of individuals with Income In 1999 below poverty Levels 11564 1751 1,578 ` 2,3221 71,575 Under 5 years 4i 205 1!51 157 _ 311 6_ 6,818 5 years - 61 0 i 44 _ 75 1,418 6 to 11 years 193 91;. 256 418 9,249 12 to 17 years 126 9 286; 240 7,619 18 to 64 years 924 111 802' 1,165 40,247 65 to 74 years 0 0 15 47 2,501 75 years and over 11 55 31 18 66! 3,7231 Number of Individuals with f -- - Income In 1999 at or above � - poverty level: 7,390 2,917 2,491 ' 5,158 866,735 Under 5 years 678 83 285, 456 57,223 5 years 1 1661 34 67 119 12,820 s to 11 years 645; 164 290 534 f 78,669 12 to 17 years 531 202 205 370 73,172 j 18 to 64 years 4,8811 2,0181 1,386 3,359 f 547,100 65 to 74 years �- _ i 314 202, 141 207 51,776 75 years and over 175 214 116 113 45,969 Total population In Census tract, 8,954 3,092 4,069 7,480 i 938,310 Percent of Individuals In Census tract below the poverty Ievel 17.5 5.7 38.8 31.01 7,6 Median household income $39,3521 $49,364 $22,650 $30,389 $73,039 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,2003;Contra Costa County Community Services Department,2003. Please see Appendix I for a list of Family and Children's Services Centers by Census tract number.To view poverty and median income data for all Census tracts in Contra Costa County,please see Appendix Il. 25 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Poverty status by selected Census Tract TABLE 21.5 •- POVERTY STATUS AND MEDIAN INCOME IN 1999 FOR SELECTED CENSUS TRACTS WITH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES CENTERS r R*c C�. r r"rf Sad 1 r tsf Number of of Individuals with Income In 1999 below poverty level: 1,8251 1,679 280 71,575 Under 5 years i 252 220 .25,' 6,818 5 years 33 20 17 1,418 ; 6 to 31 years 260 398: 30 9,249 12 to 17 years 209 20925 7,619 'iF 8 to 64 years 924 721 1761 40,247 6-45 to 74 years 74 54 0 2,501 75 years and over 73 571 7 3,7231 : Number of individuals with income in 1999 at or above i Poverty level: 4,391 5,531 4,195 866,735 Under 5 years , 410 277 177 57,229 5 years 109 52 78 12,820 6 to 11 years 428 482 208 78,669 12 to 17 years 387 491 147 73,1721 18 to 64 years 2,576 ,- 3,634 2,957 547,100 65 to 74 years 262 3631 252 , 51,776 75 years end over _ 219 232T 376 45,9691 Total population In Census tract, 6,216 7,2101 4,475 938,31�0-1i Percent of Individuals In Census tract below the poverty levet 29.4 23.3 6,3 7.6 j Median household income .,$27,207 $37,396 $47,786' $73,039 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,2003;Contra Costa County Community Services Department,2003. Please see Appendix I for a list of Family and Children's Services Centers by Census tract number.To view poverty and median income data for all Census tracts in Contra Costa County,please see Appendix Il. 26 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Housing Hume ownership has become increasingly difficult in Centra Costa County with less than one- fourth of median income households able to afford a home in 2002. Further,the percentage of homes affordable to median income households decreased by fifty percent from 48.6%in 1996 to 23.9%in 2002, In:December 2002,the median sale price of single-family residences,condos,and new homes in Contra Costa County was$364,000.In November 2002,the median sale price varied greatly throughout the county from.$978,000 in Alamo(zip code 94507)to$222,0100 in Richmond(zip code 94801). TABLE 22 — PERCENTAGE OF HOMES AFFORDABLE TO MEDIAN INCOME HOUSEHOLDS Oakland DMSA 48.6 48.5 32.1 26.1 � 23.9 ? San Francisco PMSA _ — � 24.8 I 21.3 10.3 7.3 _9.2 San lose DMSA 41.7 41.0 18.3 14.5 ; 20.1 Santa Rosa PMSA ! 41.9 40.0 21.9 13.9 15.3 r Vallejo- Fairfield - 1 Napa DMSA 1 59.2 57.4 36.1 27.7 17.9 --�._. Source: National Association of Builders,Housing Opportunity Index,2002. Note: Oakland PMSA includes Contra Costa and Alameda Counties;San Francisco PMSA includes Marin,San Mateo and San Francisco Counties;San Jose PMSA includes Santa Clara County;Santa Rosa PSMA includes Sonoma County;Vallejo- Fairfield-Napa PMSA includes Solano and Napa Counties.Data is from 1"quarters. 27 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Housing TABLE 23 r MEDIAN SALE PRICE OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, CONDOS, AND NEW HOMES, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2002 77 xl- 011 4507 $978,000 24.6 Alamo _ 9.. __. _ _ Antioch 94509 274,000 0.0 _. _ _ _ Brentwood 94513 383,000 17.8 Syron 94514 374,250 } 18.1 j Clayton 94517 484,000 3.8 Concord 94518 ; 333,000 71 � 1 Concord 94519 1 314,250 21.6 7.5 Concord __---_. 94520 1 1 359,500 _ __...._.___ 9.9 Concord Danville 94506 760,000 9,8� Danville 94526 5641250 11 5 Et Cerrito 94530 430,000 143 El Sobrante I 94803 1 362,500 1 27.2 -Hercules 94547 370,000 39.4 Lafayette 94549 622,500 { 4_ i Martinez 94.553 338,000 ._ ._...17_.0 Mora a 94556 675,000 5.5 Oakley94561 287,750 12 1 _ Orinda 94563 700,000 -10.1 Pinola 94564 319,000 7.4 i Pittsburg 94565 260,000 ( 13.8 1 _ Pleasant Hill 94523 415,000 22.2 Richmond 94801 222,000 8.8 ! Richmond __ 94804 .__ 270,000 _. _ 5.9 Richmond 94805 298,00 16.4 1 Rodeo 94,572 307,500 2.5 San Pabto __ } 94806 ------._ __289,50.0 _. ^33.1 San Ramon 94583 619,000 35.6 Walnut Creek 94595 458,000 2.2 f Walnut Creek 94596 540,000 74.2 Walnut Creek 94598 �_. $364,f100 �_ _ _.___... _184_1 Source: Contra Costa County* N/A Source: Data Quick Information Systems,San Francisco Chronicle Charts for the month of November 2002,2003. * Data from December 2002;percent change from December 2001 to December 2002. 28 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Housing HUD defines affordable housing as that which casts no more than 30%of household income.In 1999, the percentage of owners spending more than 300/o of their income on housing in Contra Costa County was 29.90,1b,while 40.60/o of renters spent more than 30%of their income on housing. The median rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Contra Costa County{in the Oakland IMSA}was $1,243 in 2002 compared.to Santa Rosa IMSA at$1,066 and San Francisca DMSA at$1,848. TABLE 24 -- MEDIAN MONTHLY RENTS, FISCAL YEAR 2002 j Oakland PMSA $829 $991 $1,243 $2,704 $2,035 San Francisco DMSA $1,129 $1,464 $1,848 1 $2,535 ` $2,683 San Jose DMSA $1,131 $1,289 ` $1,592 $_2,282 $2,451 Santa Rosa PMSA $725 $823 $1,06 $1,482 $1,749 Vallejo- Fa #rf#e#d - v _ r �. �YNapa PMSA $735 $836 $11018 ; $1,414' ! ',669 Source: Department of Housing and Urban Development,HUD User,50`x'Percentile Rent Estimates,2002. Nate: Oakland PMSA includes Contra Costa and Alameda Counties;San Francisco PMSA includes Marin,San Mateo and San Francisco Counties;San Jose PMSA includes Santa Clara County;Santa Rosa PSMA includes Sonoma County;Vallejo- Fairfield-Napa PMSA includes Solano and Napa Counties. FIGURE 5 -- MONTHLY INCOME SPENT ON MOUSING, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 1999 50% 40% - 31.9 c 30% - 27,4 21.4 ■Owners a 20% 15.1 14.914.315.0 14.5 0 Renters 12,211.4 0% Less than 15.0 to 20,0 to 25,0 to 29,9 30.0 to 35,00/o or 15.00/0 19.90/0 24,9% 34.90/a more Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Profile of General Demographic Characteristics,2002. 29 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Transportation The number of people carpooling to work in Contra Costa County increased from 17%in 1996 to 23%in 2002. However,during the same time period,the percentage of people using transit (includes busses,trains and ferry boats)decreased by almost half from 50/o in 1996 to 811/0 in 2002. However,in 2000 more people used public transportation in Contra Costa County than California overall(90/o vs. 5.1%, respectively). In 2000,almost half(42.4010)of Contra Costa residents worked outside of the county compared to 17.1%statewide. Further,the mean travel time to work was higher in Contra Costa County at 34.4 minutes vs. 27.7 minutes in California. TABLE 25 - CLUSTERED MODES OVER TIME, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Drive alone 67% 66% 666% � 70% ' 66% carpool 17% 13% , 16% 19% 23% Transit 15% 16% 16% ; 9% $°1° Ather - Y 2% 5% 3% E 2% 4% I----- ---- — -- -----1-.- -----------i----- ------ Source: RIDES for Bay Area Commuters,Inc.,Commute Profile 2002:A Survey of San Francisco Bay Area Commute Patterns,October 2002. TABLE 26 -- WORKERS 16 YEAR AND OVER COMMUTING TO WORK, 2000 i. t t j Percent using carpools 13.5% 14.5% Percent using public transportation 9.0% - _ 5.1% Percent worked outside of county of residence _ i 42.4% --- 17.1°lo -- Mean travel time to work In minutes I (lf worked outside of home) 34.4 1 27,7 Source: U.S.Census Bureau,Census Summary File 3,2001 30 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Immunizations Historically, the percentage of fully immunized kindergarteners in Contra Costa County has been higher than the percentage of fully immunized California kindergarteners. From 1998 to 2000 in Contra Costa County,the percentage of kindergarteners with all required immunizations increased from 92.411/o in 1997 to 94.5%in 2000 and then decreased slightly to 94.10/0 in 2001. TABLE 27 -- IMMUNIZATION LEVELS OF KINDERGARTEN ENTRANTS 464 c uEyl 't 4 Number of students 13,413 , 13,702 13,282 1 13,666 ------------- Percent with Personal Medical Exemptions (PME) 0.2 ? 0.3 0.2 0.2 Percent with Personal Belief _ Exemptions (PBE) 0 2j 0.6 0.9 ' N/A ` Percent requiring one or more Immunization ' 6.7 4.9 j 4.4 4.6 j Percent with all required immunizations, Contra Costa County 92.4 94.2 i 94.5 94.1 s--- - ._ _ Percent with all required ( j Immunizations, California i 89 3 i_--._,,._ 91.9.. j 92.2 901.9 ._ .___.__ — ._.,.._. _ __L. ._ — ..._________,_, Source: State of California Department of Health Services,Division of Communicable Disease Control, Immunization Branch,2002. 31 Cont"a Costa county 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT L 11-a Births Contra A"*osAL The number of overall Contra Costa births decreased slightly by 0.6910 from.2000 to 2001. Further, the number of births by all ethnicities except by Latinos also decreased during the same time period. The total number of African American births decreased by 5.3/0,while the total number of births by Asian/Pacific Islanders and Caucasians decreased 2.3%and 1.6%,respectively. A baby is considered to be low weight if it weights less than 2,500 grams (51b.8oz.).The percentage of low birth weights in Contra Costa County has been slightly higher than the state from 1997 to 2001.In 2001,the percentage of births that were low weight was 6.6%in Contra Costa County and 6.30/c)in California. The Healthy People 2010 Objective is that no more than 5%of births will be low weight. TOT L BIR`T`HS TABU 28 — NUMBER OF BIRTHS BY ETHNICITY,, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ' Pi IW4 ��.Y.�.is...:_I Afr1c.,n American 1,337 1 1,401 ! 1,431 _1,339 1,268 'S.3 i Caucasian N/A 1 1,573 1,816 ! 1,775 '1 Aslan Pacific Islander ._ N A -2.3 6,556 6,645 1 6,225 1 6,346 6,244 i 1.6 E Latino 2,934 3 2,998 1 3,317 ; 3,664 ! 3,839 4.8 i Nature American i NfA__ NjA_,¢._ 39 1. 39,. .___..___. 0_.�..._ -1000 J Other Total _.. 12,294 i ..__._12,506_i 12,586 -Y^13,204.i_ _ 13,126 '. 0.6_ Note: From 1997 through 1998,the"Other"category includes Asian,Pacific Islander and American Indian. LOW WEIGHT BIRTHS TABLE 29 -• PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS THAT ARE LAW WEIGHT _ 4 conga Costa County PT, 6.3 63 1 6.4 1.. 6.5 6.6 , California 6.1 6.2 6.1 6.2 6 Source: State of California Department of Health Services,Center for Health Statistics,Birth Records,2003. 32 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Contra CostaEdirth From 1997 through 2001,the percentage of women receiving prenatal care in the first trimester has been higher in Contra Costa County than in the state. In Contra Costa County in 2001,the percentage of women receiving prenatal care is higher among Caucasians (94.0%)and Asian/Pacific Islanders(91.11/0)than African Americans(84.6%) and.Latinos(82.896).The Healthy People 2010 Objective is that at least 901/0 of pregnant women will receive prenatal care in the first trimester.In 2001,Contra Costa County was close to meeting this goal with 89.4%of women receiving adequate prenatal care. PRENATAL. CARE TABLE 30 — PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN RECEIVING PRENATAL. CARE IN THE FIRST TRIMESTER s "Contra Costa County 7 7 _ 86.0 86.1 88.1 89.3 _ 89.4 �Ca`iifarnia 77- 80.8 81.1 82.2 831 84.0 FIGURE 6 w PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN RECEIVING PRENATAL CARE IN THE FIRST TRIMESTER, BY ETHNICITY, 2001 144°ln 91,1%87.5% 84.5/°a 94.4°In$8.0% 84.6°!a 82.8%80,8% u 50% iii Contra Costa r: OCalifornia 25% 4°la Asian/ Pacific African American Latino Caucasian J Other Islander '��--C--antra Costa Coit»ty 91,1 84.6 : ' 82.8 94.0 California`_._ 80.8 �.88.0 Source: Source: State of California Department of Health Services,Center for Health Statistics,Hirth Records,2003. 33 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Teen Births There was a steady decrease in teen births in both Contra Costa County and California from 1997 to 2001.Contra Costa had almost fifty percent less teen births than the state in 2001 (6.70/0 vs. 10.00/0, respectively). In 2001,Latinos in Contra Costa County had the highest percentage of teen births (48.8%),followed by Caucasians(23.2%). In Contra Costa County from 1997-2001,there was a decrease in low weight births to teen mothers (ages 15-19)from 8.4%in 1997 to 5.311/o in 2001. The percentage of teen mothers receiving prenatal in the first trimester stayed relatively the same from 1997 to 2001 and is well below the Healthy People 2010 Objective of 90%. TABLE 31 - PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS THAT ARE TO TEEN MOTHERS (AGED 15-19), CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Contra Costa Count8.6 .s.m Y 1 8 6 f 8.0 1 7.8_f.__ 7.1 6.7 , California 11.4 11.2 f 10.9 T 10.4 10.0 TABLE 32 - TEEN BIRTHS BY ETHNICITY, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2001 p� t�;p``, �t`��a..'Fv'� d'a'41�1 �^r- i 7 r r ��� a F� ��,�"w`•,. r .if African American 20.2 1 Asian/Pacific Islander 7.8 I Caucaslan 23.2 Latino 48.8 TA13LE 33 - Low WEIGHT BIRTHS TO TEEN MOTHERS (AGED 15-19), CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ,. Aftq 1 Under 1,5000 grams(2 2 ibs.) 18 i 13 { 10 12 7 1,500-2,499 grams (S.S lbs.) i 71 1 67� 61 70' ?� � 40 i Total low weight (under 2,500 grams) 1$9 j 80 7 � 7 _ 1 1 82 4 --+- ---7 1 Total teen births Y.1,055 1,004 978 j 941 . 883 s l._Percent low weight8.4 ` 8.0 S 7.3 �~ 8.7 .__ 5.3 1 Note: Low weight births are less than 2,500 grams. TABLE 34 -PERCENTAGE OF TEEN MOTHERS CAGED 15-19) RECEIVING PRENATAL CARE IN THE FIRST TRIMESTER, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY `q✓ t,, t mk kT R t, q b �t ,3 tft`� '`' x 7 S,$ Q IY". `I'- x ar^ "�' �"' F 4hi ,,: .m .- �:� •- =».:.d=>.:.� "� ._._. t...i._.__.:�s._ �i>.W<.,s.�_ q`L�� I'+�� '.v.t. _:� -w;y '� Number with prenatal care 784 728 ? 718 705 655 -- --- Totai toen births 1,055 ? 1,004 978 941 ? 883 Percent wi#h prenatal care __.__ 74 3 , _72.5 _ 73.4 ' 74.9 74.2 _L._._ i Source: Source: State of California Department of Health Services,Center for Health Statistics,Birth Records,2003. 34 Contra Costa Cc;jnty 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Asthma In 1999,the rate of asthma hospitalizations per 100,000 population was higher in Contra Costa County for children (ages 9-14) and for all ages than in California. Further,the asthma hospitalization rate for children in Contra Costa County was about one and a half times higher than the asthma hospitalization rate for people of all ages(224.3 vs.137.1,respectively). In 2001, the percentage of persons diagnosed with asthma living at 0-19911/o of the federal poverty (FPL)level was 14.4%compared to 16.5%of persons living at 200-299%percent of the FPL and 13.69/o of people living at 3000/o or above the FPL. TABLE 35 — ASTHMA HOSPITALIZATIONS RATES, 1999 f i s a `k -s rt j �t '1a,�a.i�S'�z ?$ �F,gt`}, y�p ,r.,. r _ .p ll Contra Costa County 224.3 137.1 California I 183.6 115.8 Source: California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development,Inpatient Discharges,Asthma with Status Asthmaticus and Asthma without Status Asthmaticus,2002. TALE 36 — PERSONS DIAGNOSED WITH ASTHMA, 2001 w Contra Costa County _ 131,000 14.`1 California 3,934,000 12.1 Source: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research,AskCHIS(2001 California Health Interview Survey),2003. Note: Question was"Has a doctor ever told you that you have asthma?" TABLE 37 — PERSONS DIAGNOSED WITH ASTHMA BY FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL (FPL), CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2001 0-199% of FPL 26,000 14.4 ' 200-2990/a of FPL 18,000 16.5 300flJo of FPL and =13.6above 86,000 Source: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research,AskCHIS(2001 California Health Interview Survey),2003. Note: Question was"Has a doctor ever told you that you have asthma?" 35 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Health Insurance Children Contra Costa County has more children ages 0-17 covered by their parents employment-based insurance than California children. Less than one-percent(0.4)of the population of Contra Costa County is enrolled in Healthy Families.'The county ranks 57`x'out of all California counties for their number of Healthy Families enrollees as a percentage of the county's population.' TABLE 38 — HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE OF CHILDREN, 2001 t Age 0-4 years_ Uninsured 2,2* 6.9 Medi-Cal --`-- --- 19.9 29.1 Healthy Families 1 3,5 � Employment-Erased 70.9 56.4= Privately purchased 6.4* j � 2.7 Other public coverage 1.3 Total 69,000 2,474,000 I Ages 5-9 years - - Uninsured 2,4* g Med#-Cal 9.5* 21.4 Healthy Families - 6.1 Employment-based 86.1 58.8 Privately purchased 1.9* 3.2 Other public coverage N/A _0.9 Total t �72,002,667,000 ---------------- Ages Ages Q-17 years Uninsured 4,2* 9.6 Medi-Cat 14.3 22.8 Healthy Families 0.7* 4.7 Employment-based 75.6 58.8 Privately purchased 3.8* 2.9 Other public coverage 1.5* 1.2 Total 251,000 9,203,000 Source: UCLA Center for Health Po icy Research,AskCHIS(2001 California Health Interview Survey),2003. *Statistically unstable. 'Medi-Cal Policy Institute,Medi-Cal County Data Book,2002. 4 ibid. 36 Contra Costa County 2403 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Health Insurance -- Adults The percentage of uninsured nonelderly adults in Contra Costa County(7.1%)is less than half that of California(17.7%).Further,there are more county residents covered by employment-based insurance(78.3%)than California(65.1%)and a lower percentage of residents covered by Medi-Cal or Healthy Families(6.8%)than California (10.3%). RGURE 7 -~ HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE OF NONELDERLY ADULTS (AGES 18-64) 2001 1000/a 78.3% 750}6 C 5,1$1a c W Contra Costa u 50% O Ca lifornia 25% 17.7% 7.10/4 6.8% 10.3% 0010 Percent uninsured Percent with job-based Percent with Medi-Cal or Insurance Healthy Families sa Contra Costa County 7.1 78.3 6.8 California — 1.7.7 65.1 10.3 Source: The State of Health Insurance in California:Findings from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey,UCLA Center for Health Policy Research,2002, TABLE 39 -- HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE OF NONELDERLY ADULTS (AGES 18-64) 2001, BY FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL (FPL) i ✓ 4, Contra Costa County 0-996/4 of PPL 18.6* 1 45.4 31.6 100-1996fo of FPL 22.6 38.7 24,7 4 California 0-99% of FPL 1 38.9 18.6 37.0 100-199% of FPL i 33.0 1 42.5 17.7 Source: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research,AskCHIS(2001 California Health interview Survey),2003. ' Statistically unstable. 37 Contra Costa County 2403 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Sexually Transmitted Diseases From 1996-2000,Contra Costa County has had consistently lower rates of Chlamydia than California. In 1996,the Gonorrhea incidence rate in Contra Costa County(48.5 per 100,000 population)was lower than that of California (58.3 per 100,000 population). However,from 1997 through 1999,the Gonorrhea incidence rate of Contra Costa County was higher than the Gonorrhea incidence rate of California. In 2000,this trend reversed;the Gonorrhea incidence rate in Contra Costa was 60.4 while it was 64.1 in California. TABLE $O -- SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE INCIDENCE RATES FOR CHLAMYDIA AND GONORRHEA, ALL AGES s °l s lE j vF "; +' _ *}t va r t� •h ut tzt t�k{' �. ' ^* x ry .�, ,r �' fit. k s 9 r a Y �. ✓ a a 1 a i ".- ✓>s. '� �``j"kr,f `Y 4'.: ,. ,,'t r-s y# .Y R. a� Contra ,.. Costa 136.1 48.5 J 159.$ i 62.4 ' 190.8 I 67.7 196.4 63.2 I 194.2 4; 60.6 'I State Total193.7 58.3 21.3.0 55.9 233.9 59.9 256,6 56.3 282.8 ' 64.1 Source: State of California,Department of Health Services,STD Control Branch,2000;Population based on California Department of Finance Demographic Research Unit,E-4 Revised Historical Population Estimates,March 2002. Note: Rate is per 100,000 population. 38 Contra Costa Goy^ty 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Physical Fitness Students who meet all six of the six fitness standards on the California Physical Fitness Test are considered to be fit.Contra Costa County's percentage of 7`h and 91h grade students who were physically fit was slightly higher than the state in 2001. In Grade 5,students from Contra Costa and California were equivalent in fitness scores at 21.3%. In Contra Costa County,5`h graders'fitness levels decreased from 25.4%in 1999 to 21.3%in 2001 while fitness levels of 7`h and 9`h graders increased during the same time period.The percentage of physically fit California students increased during the same times period among all three grades. TABLE 41 — PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WHO ARE PHYSICALLY FIT 7,777777777-7 Grade 5 25.4 21 3 19.9 21.3 Grade 7 25.6 : 27.1 1 22.6 24.9 Grade 9 1 27.2 i 25.O 20.4 22.6 i Source: California Department of Education,California Physical Fitness Test,2001. Note: Students meeting six of six fitness standards are considered fit. 39 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT TAR Scores Students reading at or above the 50,h National Percentile Ranking(NPR)are considered to be reading at the appropriate grade level. Several factors contribute to higher test scores,including early childhood experiences such as quality licensed child care.5 Contra Costa County has a higher percentage.of 3rd graders reading above the 501x'NPR than California(60%vs. 47%,respectively). From Spring 1998 to Spring 2002,the percentage of 3rd graders reading at or above the 501°NPR increased from 52%in 1998 to 60%in 2002. TABLE 42 — PERCENTAGE OF THIRD GRADE STUDENTS SCORING ABOVE THE SSOTH NPR IN READING BY DISTRICTS WITH ELEMENTARY STUDENTS y Antioeh Unlf�ed 44 43 54 I 56 . -- 51_i [irentwooci Union Elementary j 56 i 53 54_E 58 63 _.. Syron Union Elementary 40 !- _545969 58 I Canyon Elementary Home Smart Kids of Kni 9h_ ten_..__ N/ _ ..._ ._ N/A NIA_?_ 70 64 Sohn Swett Unified 44 42 44 53 4' y � _ _. ,.__-_ _.._ �_.__ _ 93 � 92�- 62 Kni htsen Elementary 45 58 50 71 1µLafa Lafayette Elements i 89 � 91 � 89 Martinez Unified - 57 1 64 71 i 73 ' 68 j Moraga Elementary 88 ! 89 95 94 93 Mt Diablo Unified 53 I 61 63 62 62 Oakley Union Elementary , 39 53 55 58 60 Orinda Union Elementary 88 88 89 92 i 93 Pittsburg Unified 25 ' 25 36 1 36 36 San Ramon Valley Unified 81 8o 86 88 91 Walnut Creek Elementary 79 . 82 ! 80 79 ! 84 West Contra Costa Unified 32 3.5 38 37 38 Contra Costa County 52 55 59 I 60 60 , w.._._..__...__ ...__ _._._ California i 38 41 44 46 _ 47 Source: State of California Department of Education,STAR District(School Summary Report,2003. s Contra Costa Child.Care Council,Summary of The Economic Impact of the Child Care Industry in Contra Costa County,2003. 40 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Ij 7E DrommoujL Rates In the 2000-01 school year,Contra Costa County's 4-year derived high school dropout rate (dropouts per 100 high school students)is about half the dropout rate of California(6.4 vs. 11.0, respectively).Of the nine high school districts,six had decreases in the rate of students who dropped out from 1996-97 to 2000-01,while four of them had increases in the rate of students who dropped out during the same time period.From 1996-97 to 2000-01,West Contra Costa School District's dropout rate more than doubled from 7.7 per 100 to 16.5 per 100.During the same time period,Martinez Unified School District's dropout rate decreased about 9011/o from 10.1 per 100 students to 1.0 per 100 students. TABLE 43 - PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WHO DROPOUT OF HIGH SCHOOL, 4-YEAR DERIVED RATE Acalanes Union High 1 1.8 2.8 1.1 3 0*8 03 . , Antioch Unified 3.7 2.7 2.9 18 26 , Contra Costa Co. Office of Education 84.6 77.2 ii 92J0 1 45 3 0.0 John Swett Unified 7.8 11.3 13.6 i 8.8_ 10.2 Liberty Union High 1 14.1 7.5 4,9 Martinez Unified 2.4 13.1 13.8 10.1 1.0 Mt. Diablo Unified 4.9 5,8 5,9 3.7 4 Pittsburg Unified 1 7.6 10.2 9.2 18.6 i 9.8 San Ramon Valley Unified 5.3 4.3 3.6 j 3.2 13 West Contra Costa Unified 1 7.9 1 12.5 i 15.8 1 7.7 1 16.5 Contra Costs County 6.9 8.5 8.7 5.7 6.4 1 California 13.0 11.7 11.1 11.1 11.0 Source: State of California Department of Education,California Basic Educational Data System,2003. 41 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Dropout Rakes From 1996-97 to 2000-01,Latino and Caucasian students had decreases in their high school dropout rate (per 1130 high school students),while African American,Filipino and Asian students had increases in their dropout rate.African American and Native American high school students dropout about twice as much as other ethnic groups(15.2 per 100 students,respectively)followed by Latino students at 8.6 per 100 students. FIGURE 8 - PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WHO DROPOUT OF HIGH SCHOOL BY ETHNICITY, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 4-YEAR DERIVED RATE, 2000-01 25% _ 20% _ 15.2% 15.2% IS% - (U 10% _ 8.6% 7.7% 5,9% 6.4% Sala 4,0% 4.2% 00/0 African Latino Filipino Caucasian Asian Native Pacific County American American Islander Overall TABLE 44 - PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WHO DROPOUT OF HIGH SCHOOL By ETHNICITY, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 4-YEAR DERIVED RATE African�Amevrlcan 14.7 18.6 21.3 112 15.2 Latino, 11.6 14.4 14.1 9.4 8.6 Filipino 3.3 4.6 63 3.7 7.7 Caucasian 4.7 5.6 5.0 3.7 4.0 Asian 2.8 4.7 5.5 2.8 4.2 Native American 11.3 8.7 7.7 7.4 15.2 Pacific Islander 12.5 6.0 5.6 219 519 Source: State of California Department of Education,California Basic Educational Data System,2003. Note: The 4-year derived dropout rate is an estimate of the percent of students who would dropout during a four-year period, based on data collected for a single year, 42 rContra ros a 40Unty 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT WW rng I ash Learner Historically,the percentage of students who are English Learners in Contra Costa County has been about half that of the state. In 2001-02,nearly 14%of the students in Contra Costa County were English Learners compared with 25.411/o in California.Among the languages spoken by English Learner students in 2001-02,the most common language was Spanish (76.50/0)followed by Tagalog(3.40/0). TABLE 45 — NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WHO ARE ENGLISH LEARNERS 19 Number of students who are English Learners 15,832 ; 16,517 I 17,310 19,526 21,925 Percent of students who are English Learners 10.5 I 10.7 11.0 12.2 13.6 California percent of students 1 j who are English Learners L 24.6 I 24.7 24.9 25.0 25.4 TABLE 46 — TOP LANGUAGES SPOKEN BY ENGLISH LEARNERS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 2001-2002 .; ?- F Spanish .- _ 76.5 Filipino (Tagalog) 3.4 Mein2.1 Vietnamese 2.1 ----------- _Punjabi 1. 1.9 ) Source: State of California Department of Education,California Basic Educational Data System,2002. 43 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Teachers with Emergency Permit In 2001-02,Contra Costa County and California had the same percentage of teachers with emergency permits (10.6%). From 1996-97 to 2001-02,the percentage of teachers with emergency permits increased in Contra Costa County,while in California it remained basically the same.The percentage of teachers with emergency permits varies greatly by district throughout the county. 1£nightsen Elementary(33.30/0),Contra Costa Co.Office of Education(24.1%),John Swett Unified (18.8%),and Liberty Union High (18.4%) all had high percentages of teachers with emergency permits in 2001-02. Canyon Elementary and Moraga Elementary had no teachers with emergency permits,while at Orinda Union Elementary,only 2.7%of the teachers have emergency permits. TABLE 47 - PERCENTAGE OF TEACHERS WITH EMERGENCY PERMITS t "tfiC Thi r r✓ Acalanes Union High 4 6 ' 8.$ E 9.5 6.6 5.8 1 Antioch Unified 10.2. 7.2 10.3 12.7 14.0 Brentwood Union Elementary _i_ 10.8 1 12.2 13 2 i 5.7 4.9 _ _ _:-. .-.. _ _ LL Byron Union Elementary 2 1; 3.5 12.7 10 9 S 10.2 Canyon Elementary 20.0 0.0 E 20.0 0.0 0.0 Contra Costa Co Office of # Education 12.4 1 14.6 20.7 21.4 24.1 John Swett Unified 6.9 133 14 $ 13.1 18.8 Knightsen Elementary �______ ___30 4 17.4 1 4.5 1 _ 50.0 33 3 te 1.1 _ -� . ,_ 3.9 Liberty High 9 0 9.1 12.2 ' � y g 180 1$4 i i_ ry Martinez Unified 5.5 � 5.5 7 5.3 8.8� Moraga Elementary 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 � Mt Diablo Unified... 9.0 � -- --11 3 i _._12.9 12 4 f Oakley Union Elementary ___..5 6 5 4 5 $ Orinda Union Elementary 0 7 2.0 3.5 2 8 2 7 lyittsburg Unified I 10.3 143 16.6 17*1 l y 15 5 San Ramon Valley Unified 3.1 j 6.2 8.6 10.2 10.0 - - - Walnut Creek Elementary 3.7 1 5.5 6.6 4.7 7.0 West Contra Costa Unified 12,0 ' 12.6 12.8 � 9.4 ' 7.3 _ _._ Contra Costa County10.9 _ _ ._. 10 9 13 0 � 10.6 8 1 I 9.1 I California 10.4 12.0 12.8 11.5 10.6 1 Source: State of California Department of Education,California basic Educational Data System,2002. 44 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Child Care Availability According to the Economic Impact Report published by the Contra Costa Child Care Council, parents who use licensed child care play a huge role in Contra Costa County's economy. in fact, according to the same report,the increased economic output from licensed child care: ■ Increases industry output by$4.92 million; ■ Contributes$2.66 billion value added to the gross product in the county; ■ Creates$1.58 billion total direct,indirect and induced income; ■ Generates$255 million indirect tax revenues,and a Supports approximately 35,600 jobs. Further,licensed child care centers,including centers and family child care homes,generates approximately$231.4 million in gross revenues in the county.The child care industry also directly supports 4,757 full-time equivalent (FTE)in Contra Costa County,which equates to more child care professionals than police officers or lawyers in the county. The availability of licensed child care in Contra Costa County does not necessarily match up with areas of high concentrations of children.For example,in 2000 in the zip code areas 94565 and 94506,there was a high concentration of children ages 0-5.However,while there is a high concentration of licensed child care in zip code area 94509,there is only a low concentration of licensed child care in zip code 94565.The maps on the following pages show the population of children ages 0-23 months and 2-5 years compared with licensed child care supply. 6'Contra Costa Child Care Council,Summary of The Economic Impact of the Child Care Industry in Contra Costa County,2003. 45 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Child Care Availability FIGURE 9 —• TOTAL POPULATION OF CHILDREN ACES 0-23 MONTHS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2000 wrc wit rtttba ww mm atm nw i w, r wur Nor sri�t 4o'a' saw 0.067 1604-=K p Nu Or1� N err M wMFr�Y� � tfl{ tipa�`Ybt FIGURE 10 -- TOTAL POPULATION OF CHILDREN AGES 2-5 YEARS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2000 rr wwr wa wr a+ru ws wr mm bun OWT rte�r wit �a�tn��Orwn W4 V4 6-IM 13676-ice 31m-otibt N No Oft ++V ta�yr 6"60 w auitttrErrrr wa W4. Source: California Child Care Resource&t Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2001,ww=w.rrnetwork.org. 46 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Child Care Availability FIGURE 11 — ALL LICENSED CARE: TOTAL CAPACITY PER 100 CHILDREN AGES 0- 5, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2000 rsn tttaaMr d, W uu�as-�e No Drb Source: California Child Care Resource&Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2001,www.rrnetwork.org. 47 Contra Costa co'-:n"y 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Child Care Availability According to the 2001 Child Care Portfolio,the average annual cost of full-time child care for an infant (under two years)is$8,521.The average annual cost for full-time care for one infant and one preschooler(ages 2-5) is 514,440. Licensed child care supply in Contra Costa County increased by 7.7 percent from 1998 to 2000.The percent of children ages 0-13 receiving care that need it increased very slightly from 29.4%to 29.5%while the state increased slightly from 21.1 vs.21.8 from 1998 to 2000. TABLE 48 — CHILD CARE SUPPLY AND DEMAND 77=_ 7 77777777�7 7 7, V CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Licensed child care supply ^ 32,623 '1 35,132 J Percent of slots In child care centers 63% 60% ---Percent of slots In family child care homes 37% 40% Children needing child care 110,850 199,169 Percent of children ages 0-13 receiving care that need it 29.40% 29.5% CALir-oRNIA Percent of children ages 0-13 receiving care that need it 21.1%.1 21.8 ]% Source: California Child Care Resource&Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2001, www.rrnetwork.org. Note: Percent of Supply Meeting Demand is determined by dividing Child Care Supply by Children needing care(Ages 0.13);Child care centers include Head Start programs. 48 Contra Costa Countv 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Child Care Availability TABLE 49.1 - SUBSIDIZED CHILE) CARE CENTERS IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BY ZIP COME 20102 z. 94509 - 2 centers I Infant 28 28 Preschool 78 78 94513- 1 center Preschool 40 38 94516 - 1 center I Preschool 62 57 94519 3 centers Preschool 137 122 School Age 48 48 i r 945201 - 4 centers � Ii Infant 57 57 Preschool ` 118 102 F i School age 94 ! 94 j C 4 94548 - 1 center 1 I School age _�--- -- � 30 27 94553 - 6 centers Infant 16 16 Preschool 108 107 School age 454 414 94561 - 2 centers Preschool 72 70 94565 8 centers Preschool 396 386 School age �_ ---�-- 37 32 94572 1 center Preschool 60 55 1 Source; California Child Care Resource car Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2001,www.rrnetwork.org. 49 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Child Care Availability TABLE 49.2 -- SUBSIDIZED CHILD CARE CENTERS IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BY ZIP CODE 2002 94801 - 9 centers Infant I 47 Preschool ! 375 i 331 i 94802 - 1 center Infant I 36 34 Preschool 48 44 ! E 94804 - 6 centers Infant 12 3 12� Preschool 612 550 94806- 3 centers ' Infant 24 19 Preschool-------- 133 1 Source: California Child Care Resource&Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2001,www.rrnetwork.org. 50 Contrc caste County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Child Care Availability Of the children living in Contra Costa in 2000,children ages 0-5 account for 80,169 of the population and children ages 6-13 account for 116,931 of the population.Of those children ages 0-5,fifteen percent of them live in poverty and twenty percent are headed by a single parent. Sixty percent of children ages 0-13 are children living with working parents. 1n Contra Costa the cost of annual licensed child care full time for an infant (0-24 months)is $9,727 where the minimum wage of a full time child care worker is $11,960. TABLE 50 — CHILD CARE STATISTICS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, 2000 17 7 k - i 5 F ti{ THE PEOPLE Total number of children ages 6-13116,931 Total number of children aged 00-55. 80,1.69 Percent of children ages 0-5 living In poverty' _ J _. _ _= 15% Families with children 0-5 headed by i single parent' 20% CHILDREN LIVING WITH WORKING PARENTS" Percent of children ages 0-134 60% 1 Percent of children ages 6-13 65%n } Percent of children ages 0-5 54% G I THE COSTS OR CHILD CARE Average annual cost of full-time, licensed care In a center for Infant(0-24 months) $9,727 Annual minimum wage of full-time worker $11,960 —Care for an Infant as 410 of minimum wage 81%n Source: California Child Care Resource Est Referral Network,California Child Care Portfolio,2001. i.Percentage based.on 1997 average poverty threshold for a family of four:$16,050. 2lncluded male and female head of households with own children. 3.NationaLy,151/6 of children 0-5 with working parents are estimated to be in child care. 4.Children living with two employed parents are estimated to be in child care. 51 Co:itra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Child Care Availability In 2401-02,10,116 families requested child care. of those families requesting care,6,040 requested infant care (under 2 years), 3,621 requested preschool care(ages 2-5 years, 11 months),and 2,453 requested school age care(ages 6 year and older)."Employment"was given by parents as the top reason for child care referral requests followed by"looking for work,"and"in school/training." TABLE 51 — CHILD CARE STATISTICS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, BY FISCAL YEAR f ?� i REQUESTS FOR REFERRALS Number Number Infants under 2 years 5,900 6,040 Preschoolers, ages 2-5 years, 11 months 3,761_ 3,621 School age children ages 6 years and older i _2,529 -- 2,453 Total number of families requesting referrals 10,223 1 - 10,116 E f REAS S PARENTS MAKE CHILD CARE REFERRAL Employment 8,162 8,188 Looking for work 480 604 In school / training ' 471 458 Other parental needs ( 344 ! 340 Child Protective Services (CPS) / respite referrals ' 57 6 Alternative / back-up care _ 160 79 Mildly ill child 133 78 Enrichment and / or child development 326 363 Source: Contra Costa Child Care Council,2003. 52 C•tir.tra Costa County, 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT ro ter Care From 1995 to 2000,the rate of first entry into foster care(per 1,000 children ages 0-17)in Contra Costa County was lower than the state rate. In 2001,Contra Costa County's foster care rate increased and became slightly higher than the state rate (3.3 vs. 3.2,respectively). In 2001,the rate of first entry into foster care was much higher for African American children in Contra Costa County and California(8.9 and 8.7,respectively) than for any other ethnicity. Further,in 2001 in Contra Costa County,the rate of first entry into foster care for African American children was almost three times higher than the overall rate. }}fTABLE 52 — RATE OF FIRST ENTRY INTO FOSTER CARE 1 �B + —3, . Contra Costa County_ _ 3.3 3.4 15 3.3 2.9 { 3.3 California4 3.8 4.0 3.8 Note: Rate per 1,000 children(0-17 years). TABLE 53 RATE OF FIRST ENTRY INTO FOSTER CARE, BY ETHNICITY, 2001 -A AIA Contra Costa County 8.9 2.6 1 3.1 1.0 California 8.7 0, i 2.8 3.1 - -1.0 Source: Needell,B.et all(2002).Child Welfare Services Reports for California.Retrieved April 2002,from University of California at Berkeley Center for Social Services Research website. Note: Rate per 1,000 children(0-17 years),the foster care entries in some counties were between 1 and 4 and therefore masked to protect confidentiality. 53 cor't a Costa CoLlntty 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Domestic Violence The rate per 1,000 population of domestic violence calls for assistance decreased in Contra Costa County from 6.1 per 1,000 in 1997 to 4.7 per 1,000 in 2001. Further,the rate of domestic violence calls for assistance in Contra Costa County has been lower than the rate for California from 1997 through 2001. TABLE 54 — RATE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CALLS FOR ASSISTANCE Contra Costa County 6.1 I 5.7 5.3 5.1 4.7 California - 8_ 6.0 5.6 5.8 5.7 Source: California Department of Justice,2002;Department of Finance,California County Population Estimates,July Estimates, 2003. Note: Rate per 1,000 population.San Francisco Police Department did not report a full year for 1997 and did not report at all in 1998 which would influence the California rate. 54 Contra Costa Count y 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Child Abuse Over the past four years,the rate per 1,000 children ages 0-17 of substantiated child abuse cases in Contra Costa County has been lower than the rate of substantiated child abuse in California. However,though the child abuse rate in Contra Costa County decreased from 1998 though 2000,the rate of substantiated child abuse increased in the County from 9.1 per 1,000 in 2000 to 10.1 per 1,000 in 2001. TASLE 55 ^ RATE OF SUBSTANTIATED CHILD ABUSE CASES a i j Contra Costa County 9.6 9.4 9.1� 10.1 { California 11.7 12.0 11.6 j 10.7 1 Source: Needell,B.et al(2002).Child Welfare Services Reports for California.Retrieved April 2002,from University of California at Berkeley Center for Social Services Research website. Note: Rate per 1,000 children(ages 0-17);the substantiated child abuse rate measures the number of child abuse reports that warrant an in-person investigation and are determined to have occurred. 55 Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT Juvenile Arrests Juvenile misdemeanor and felony arrest rates decreased from 1997 through 2001 in both Contra Costa County and.California.Contra Costa County's juvenile misdemeanor arrests decreased from 40.1 rates per 1,000 juveniles ages 10-17 in 1997 to 27.8 per 1,000 juveniles in 2001. Felony juvenile arrest rates also decreased in the county from 22.0 per 1,000 juveniles in 1997 to 15.3 per 1,000 juveniles in 2001. Contra Costa and San Mateo counties have a fairly similar sized juvenile population(107,972 and 80,399 juveniles aged 10-17,respectively),'however,more Contra Costa juveniles are arrested for felony level crimes than San Mateo juveniles. In 2001, 66,10-year olds were arrested for misdemeanor offences in Contra Costa County compared to 34 10-year olds in San Mateo County. Further, almost two-times as many Contra Costa County 17 year-olds(417)were arrested for felony crimes compared to San Mateo County 17 year-olds(227). TABLE 56 — JUVENILE MISDEMEANOR ARREST RATE a Contra Costa County _ 40.1 : 35.1 M 32.5 29.4 ' 27.8 California 42.0 40.9 38.1 34.9 32.6 TABLE 57 — JUVENILE FELONY ARREST RATE i Contra Costa County 22.0 19.8 17.1 15.5 14.4 ' Ca Califs o►`nra ---� 22.5 20.2 ( 17.8 i 15.9 15.3 Source: California Department of justice,2002;California Department of Finance,2002. Note: Rate per 1,000 juveniles(10-17 years). TABLE 58 — NUMBER OF JUVENILE ARRESTS BY AGE, CONTRA COSTA AND SAN MATEO COUNTIES, 20011 Contra Costa County Misdemeanor 66 63 127 250 ' 432 589 706 770 Felony 31 18 61 103 212 _ 322 ' 394 4171 _Total arrests 99 86 197 383 700 990 1,183 1,245 San Mateo County ��� — Misdemeanor 34 l 34 104 158 ' 239 332 442 I 412 Felony 26 19 50 ! 78 114 195 236 ; 227 Total arrests _72 65 172 ` 282 422 620 752 725 Source: California Department of Justice,2002. r Department of Finance,2003. 56 Coritra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT ACS a It Arrests Adult felony arrests per 1,000 adults ages 18-69 years decreased in both Contra Costa County and California from 1997 through 2001. In 2001,the adult felony arrest rate was the same in both Contra Costa County and California(18.1 per 1,000 adults).While the adult misdemeanor arrest rate decreased in California from 41.5 per 1,000 in 1997 to 34.2 per 1,000 in 2001,the adult misdemeanor arrest rate increased in Contra Costa County during the same time period. In 1997,299 per 1,000 adults were arrested for misdemeanor level crimes and in 2001, 32.8 per 1,000 adults were arrests for misdemeanor offences. TABLE 59 ADULT MISDEMEANOR ARREST RATE -- — Contra Costa County 29.9 29,7 30.0 28.6 32.8 California 41.S 40.5 38.4 35.4 34.� TABLE 60 — ADULT FELONY ARREST RATE y yy 71777777� sr�$1yrAll Contra Costa County i 19.4 18.4 17.5 18.0 .. 18.1 California -- 22.0 20.1 18.3 17.8 18.1 Source: California Department of Justice,2002;California Department of Finance,2002. Note: Rate per 1,000 adults(18-69 years). 57 Appendices ContFa Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT APPENDIX I Community Services Department FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES CENTERS AM§ROSE: 3103 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point 94565 ...._....... ........... CT#: 3141.04 Site Supervisor. Antoinette Edward-Wilson 13ALSO-A: 1001 So. 57th St,, Richmond 9480........... ............ ..........._ CT#: 3830 Site Supervisor: Aurora Ruth and Pamela Johnson SA_YQ VISTA: 2 California Street, Rodeo 94572 ....... ............. ..........._ CT#: 3580 Site Supervisor: Grace Chiu 811110-GEMONT: 801 1 Street, Antioch 94509...... ....... ...... .................. CT#: 3050 Socialization Site BROOKSIDE: 847 B Brookside Dr., Richmond 94801.........__................_ CT#: 3650.02 Site Supervisor: Vicki Carr-Lee and (VACANT) CAMBRIDGE: 1.135 Lacey Lane, Concord 94520.............. .......... .............. CT#: 3362 Head Teacher: Trinh Daly CRE$&ENT PARK: 5050 Hartnett Ave., Richmond 94804.. .......... ..........._ CT#: 3820 Site Supervisor: Melanie Carter FAIRGIR-OUtJO : 1203 West 10th St., Antioch 94509................................. CT#: 3050 Site Supervisor: Donna Harris and Ivette Nazario 0=9L.MILLER: 3020 Grant St., Concord 94520.................................... CT#: 3270 Site Supervisor: Cathy McKeever kAU: 3700 12"' St., San Pablo 94806 ................................ ......... .......... CT#: 3660 Site Supervisor: Pam Arrington LA-$. DEL : 135 West Grove, Richmond 94801......... .......... ............. CT#: 3650.02 Site Supervisor: Irma Shearrod-Owens LAMONIA ALLEN: 94 1/2 Medanos Ave., Bay Point 94565............................ CT#: 3141.01 Site Supervisor: Yvonne Timmons LOS ARBQLES: 240 Las Dunas, Oakley 94561 .......................................... CT#: 3020.02 Site Supervisor: Flora Castaneda LOS NQGALEE: 321 Orchard Drive, Brentwood 94513 ............................... CT#: 3032 Site Supervisor: Gracie Torres MARITIME: 1014 Florida Ave., Richmond 94804...... .............. ........... CT#: 3790 Site Supervisor: Leticia Orante and Eva Lane MARTINEZ CHILDREN'S CENTER: 920 Susana Street #19, Martinez 94553..CT#: 3170 Site Supervisor: Jan Ridgle-Lowe 59 ---- Contra Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT APPENDIX 7251 Brentwood Blvd., Brentwood 94513......................... [J#: 3031 Head Teacher: Mary Armstrong RUTH : 2730 Maine Ave., Richmond 94801 ............................... C7#: 3790 Site Supervisor: Denise Lybarger INTEFLNAIIONAL ; 1565 International Market Place, San Pablo 94806 -'^^''^'~—''^'''''''^''' ''''''''''''''''''''.''................... CT#: 3672 Site Supervisor: Ruth Hunter-Brown 51 : 407 Silver Ave., North Richmond 94801 ...................................... (3'#: 3650.02 Site Supervisor: Belinda Harris SUNSET: 3308 Sunset Lane, Antioch 945U9............................................. [T#: 3080.01 Head Teacher: Lillian O|an MEELDE; 2000 Giarmnmita Ave, North Richmond 94801 ................................ CT#/ 3650.02 Site Supervisor: Patricia McCall MARY KAY: 2520 Stanwell Drive #144, Concord 94520 ---.--.—.—. CT#: 3270 Home Base/Socialization Site DELEGATE AGENCIES EIRSJBAPTIS_T: 2240 Gladstone Dr. Suite 5, Pittsburg ........................... CT#: 3131.02 Executive Director, Janet Clark CHILD START PARTNERS CARE: Fremont Kids Club* 13m and [> Street, Antioch ....................................... CT#: 3050 Turner Kids Club: 115 East 16'h Street Antioch........-......................... [J#: 3060.01 Executive Director: CarokonMoksh CARE: 1187Meadow Lane, Concord...[T#; 3362 Director: Kathy Lafferty : 1368 Detroit, Conozrd......~........~-- CT#: 3361.01 Director: Judy Waggoner GREATER RICHMOND: 1210 Bissell Ave, Richmond................................. CT#: 3770 Executive Director: Ruth Bolden-Mays LfMrAA OF THE EAS1.8 : 283 South 20m Street, Richmond --.....-- CT#: 3790 Executive Director, Don Lau YWCA- 111ADELANDS IT-"T : 1860 Silverwood Drive, Concord-[7#: 3320 Executive Director: Nancy Atkinson 2750 Parkside Circle, Concord ..............................................,.,''.''^'''^'`'''''''''''^'''''''^''^''' (T#: 3300 Executive Director: Paivi Lane 60 Cont,a Costa County 2003 COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT APPENDIX I PITTSBURG PRE-SCHOOL COORDINATING COUNCIL: 1760 Chester Drive, Pittsburg .............................................................................................. CT#: 3120 Executive Director: Prances Green MARTINEZ EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: 615 Arch Street, Martinez ........ CT#: 3180 Executive Director: Cathy Roof 61 "G :� ,._ f r'•� 6 0 Liz G7 O N LL7 N N 0 N N M Kz v' tw hN i' �t• u-, O C) ft7 N M cJ O W N Lt') LO M v N M to G C5 CV `d C77 Li) tf5 tri w LO Ln t7'I N Cai a -`'- 1C7 v Lt7 C+5 O�wO ,� Gf5 L17 C, rte-- NN N f�Da LO c�i us N Lf) C5 R LUl U15N t31 tL7 LL j O N CEJ C`1 W t9 =1 to 0 In ya co f." `"f'6«; N O LOIJ LA ti L S N O�jj YJ titpp T CSO Cl) N N CA L••• M tL"_ O M M OJ Cat 9 LC7 'Q' Ct7 N tat CV w N N ti t N M O to N N -0 r, Lfi P, CD C7 s¢ t` iw3 r �p t'_ it) P• C75 O V- tX7 �t' Cil e- fi� vt M a-- M st' t`• v c6 w C7 Lt7 fR h CNry co m N N C7 v i75 CA ttS V' C+1 in t- ,¢C N M W eta- V N I: e- O til O tt7 F•y 6h �2 v,.• O Q LO 0 a N N c0 C7 N 00 v N N V CJ LI) Lf) C35 M in � O ef' N C� cd w w Cai W M Cat �' Cl L7J r w LLJ L;j @ in V3 M tfy t6 P r ch M cr ham- M CC7 � F•: tt7 N t3S i'- � M � � N Cep v LCS 69 LO N i`r w C7 M M N Pte- w h- W N M N LV 4CO N C6 fm uj .� OJ QI Q�j ! T eais ` L° c '- E E Oti to H S'+ tl1 DI ,� , • Z } s C > c '0 o 0 _ 'y m Ln o c aCL �` C 15 >01 Vspy +l'� t9 Fw C`tyy b is r' 1�. N 0 3•` �7�,i1 +�' b d C7 w w w .Q C .+1 c N ° to us w E o a Ln to r in ti `•� o u° a z +a Ir°- aa � M K7 'C3 7 lo� j Q s CS r �t 9. m :c. vt'^"�• {. G5 t%S m U) N Ill C7 sf m IN tN r" N0 1 } 1N h V i7S N O N N h Nh d'm — IhtS M N N N P. �-r:..• NtFD 3f*+ 0) � � C�7 tmp sC jl' N M O W W CEJ � CC1 "S � h r 00 't N m t1S It tti CV r CCS ? N tft `� '• N N N C��V U) r co N Cb M M r 0 C+'7 N tF N h .�n 6m9 r �p 0 O C7 C7 G rC0 O G7 C� f9 N CCS CN) a M r N Cl N CV rj tCf fH h4 m 0 0 m LO 6 0 CV m M oto CJ Y7 CA C� N r CO r m � SC3 tf) V t35 � N N 4�j 'R N ? 0 00 N h- h d 64 N �d' W C7 CA co 0) !' to h CC) w m r N LO A ID �" m mv N M V N LO co `� N N tCS V' hr h 4 't*' N ? m t71 I`•- 115 m CC) C:l 615 m CS Cl) V' I`•- It CO m N 47 V' w th-. w N W CLQ It N d N f f7 fLi 6F! O �t tYS dq N N co 'd M CCS ,CV tl' Cl CO Ch r m lV e1• N t\j 6mH 00 � e - 5gCo Cl N CNfI 1~CJ" m C5 C� '�' C7 N O h cCD o b m to !17 N N N CO r C7 C5 N M N 15 W C Lo coT 6�p h CS d> C7 Z h m N M In m M CNp N N Uh3 N c co 0 � � C7I O h CD CV N W 7 M N t�7w E9 � N C.i K � c e} yv� Gy < , 0 t� � CS � dpi M c0 N C�7 ON, is ,� N•zr. J ..i t� Ca d' ttl Ct7 h- C] N CG C�6 LO a6 't CA tom- N �f ti7 N Yf u7 C�7 vv N r N O N N •€ CY'7 r N C7 U) st r i3 CS7 O fh N tC7 ih co dY Ch a tl- N C7 r N N N w w N V• tq CS 1`� r b tt7 W i> N tvp7 C�fS CS 'd' M tL y LO C0 '�l CO Cl) I M N04 N M E9 CtS 77 C7 NCHCS O Ut-'S LD CCDO io Ln CP N C`'7 m N N N CD P7 N Cl) Cl) ti C!} 4 O r M to � dCD' � v CN � 6 � tl° N C W US tCi CD N N N O Cti C7 CD r tC5 C` tUm LO 00 Cl) flf N r sr i^` LO C"7 0) 7"- CSS co CD CC) 0 LO r- N M W M M US '? Vo N N r N CO CC5 cn h N C6 si°1 N Y N CO t'?1 CCS N �• p., V' �h 1 e+ Cc '�' r P7 t- to CA N Na N Cr3 Q' hl r LL7 r co •dJ � N C4 O SCS trilCS O u7 M Cb h• Cd f� C �- CD ItM N r ('0LLN'1 N � h" CCp Cjl USS C'7 r LO CY Ln EA o M h- - Cry M r r` C!`S N N t`, F:, C6 R moms 04 C`S p.. "t tO r CA LO Z 4J N m CDCal l:7 N CalC, co o LO M N C'J ems- LO •" 8gC m W ei,' m w 0 r CUD'S CC LA LU v CD in m to co W U7 eY r p.. wo ti Cl) N µ'j C� u m LO c 64 C3 � lJ - CC Cl) N 'r r N Cl)r i`� N 8 Ce M N r � 0 00 M t1 N Ch CD y � U') C CV O LM X ,,p O it7 O 0 Mtb �t N W 'o CS) M M tt7 LD 0) c1Y N 00 IXS Q N Lq 03 fit.,' d3 to Cl) et o NV' m N f- in N VF td v v 1 f'- co F co N F M r N N to N N N N m N b cli L N F 6 GtnS to UFS (D N gotCT t() CJ M M N N N in c�i tti ctj M r tSy 6 Ed 5 r F t� C7S t(S OG CSS N c"`) .r- N N ala U3 N v CA OS N tyS dS C7S tS5 b F ttS N V' N y_ co LO o3 Vim' i} b N b O N co co M cl 9 N CF�t M p V' N F H} V' co tC1 N Cl) LO C4 M CO s} co r �- 00 co CS CS ZA iL5 r OD CD LO N M N M CO bF} Ct'! N C3 CC; V' C7 F C3 F F tf7 Cl) t27M co V N Q tc7 F LO CO iC) CTS tt7 co C7 toi N N t7S 6 tmG_ M C#5 CbD U'5 tYF'S CSS CSF7 t4 r iCS df3 W M. .to tV C7S LO 00 O 00 y 03 co VN' Ill MLm CC5 F N1 w W Z V' N b m cam") N t�GS rn U) t6 co 00 C fin. O � RS _ C7 tCS CSS ZD Oro V• N p N U) N CFV � N O c _ sr G} tt1 b CY t� d3 N P'� N tSS M ML6 isrd's6 C„� •r= CV N M v�-� N N N N M N M N C N N UN. 2 co ;.., tiY Ln CD 0 CO d3 b N co GMU '+'� N M fid" C M M N w M &H r- N iA i+ ibCi_ N N N N 3NA {+} t?I M Q 60 in IN N r N M Vim" w) SNd Lo M 0 M N dri Cl) CD !t� d eM- b R'S CD �Ek' CD hR h- tR'9 C6 NV' N N GS LO Q h uj uj IX} t�t5 r M M £C7 M � N N rt v +t t67 N ucj Q u4 to lilt�y r' b t6 yy� N M et f�J m co t co A tdj C''i t!7 O � t3 t{ N C7 t� C7 t'N"3 r N b co N CS cn r � } V) M G3 'd' Kt C)5 M N DC7 l.7 ca t+1 cD t 4 VY C C` O � CJ x .ti M to tt7 6 t- Y4 co %n Ql C0) W to co •- M C N M m S N N ham- `t v CV V OCG~ N M rt- N N CQ ti C7f C0'S C, m N 47 N N co It I Y h m M �° N tri +Y et tt7 Otj �t LO 5 N M N N M W CMS M 71 MN LO (D tV In M t1S CS �' US CNf M st w M cD C�7f C Ch ham- to 0) � N In M r- tty M to K! V� N to CO t'9 N CV r CV C3 N M G7f N r- N r- N+� N &S Cvf GS M N r tYf M Ln �f f- Ct7 M tri t4 C7f co to itJCD 0 0 W 0 m 47 to U� h m - tJ tri M M to N � a- h4 N C+ M'l M M N co M I~- M N M sx co v Cl) C14 613, .'4 yv :•r• N 6 r U..M M 0) a t.1' w Cs t lC7 co t J to 00 .¢ LA LLS st CLf N Wr- tp in N M M 0 � � v N N Cif � to r � � N M co . vil � atf o .yu5 (� y N tD Uf N ONi M t�D rfl 3fi M th i"- M M h-. r W r qS G � x °O c u7 0 0 d o to O d cot N a C� A- r-� m N to»3•ps A, Cn N CD `as testi ".� or w �C7i, M N CSS +-, O: In LO y' a� ri r cn G � afr U') [9 CD CD C7 tN C7 N P �N yP_y tG> Im" mm C7 W N CO � CD ti M LO M in N N CD cNSS CS M1 CSS N Ihw CO Ca O CSS It M N CO 4:3 P CD C; Cp r CS tl' tU K5 CD M N CV C7 (9 Cl) CD m O c0 C5 v 00CSS h- t'N') 0 N M it7 DC7' 6 +S M N N lYi C, tt7 M CA E9 N cm N 00 — 7- (5 C i T M t� N d N er rS CSs 49 to L5 co Cc i til C6 P to tt7 69 e- CS ul)MLD CO (M co C 7 CN7 In CSS Cl! r- CS Yi. C 0000 r} O0 0 C_S N CSS P C'9 V3 CD h. P CCS S" 'Q' W Cif v th LO 0 N N c0 •' V Cl) P N co tGi t7 W ad- co BF P N O M N N M N C+7 N y V P CS 'tt Cg '4 Vt N N co rl co N Com} p) O 47 N N M Ch CL7 N ami `r N V Q) CcS Na 00 00 N N N N t M tYJ Cl) cc 00 U) N tq CS) C � d v v x .o tNtS t�3! N '� N rtt7,. " m 'n V, e ' N N N t"7 N r M M �- N N CA .t C7 64 ~ N Cr< try es C7 W r'n o) m � C��i C�75 t:5 N � LG m Iw CCs •t '� M t'� G7 A tt7 (h CD Ef3 t� 0 O 0 tCS AfN` Cp7 CCY 25 C,S 0) CO- N N Ofid`hS LASS N N M 00 r tt7 0 00 O Ct7 Cl) cc M N M N N tl' U N M t!) M it7 P 60 60 cm i!S Cts N M W r`" CV N C9 Cb S N CC7 CND M r V7 N ep 61 w 6k} t� r f'� N tX5 N 60 O ts5 to rN- *� N It 0 Cl) w Efl +J r CLS C5 �Q' � C7 CYS Cts 4� Lp M iS C+S CChh co � U7 N N ii7 M co rl N 68. m M CO37 co CS N GAS N P m (of), Vim' M O N US G� 01.1 Nt7 d LCs C',7 i'� by tt> z 0 N F� tCs F- h- a- N d` LOM hM- 'C it7j O M CATS {.j US icy v co w 00 M r CO t!j M M �3' to U) Cl) C M Lt5 W C� O iD CO CSS O t.1 N 'd ip M P C4 d N LA Lq N (7 M N r- its — tSs LVLA Cl) N Cl) P +L d9 LA W c 64 tP3 .ggyy .. CW O C9 tn CG! LL's m F, ti.'5 iMb a M 9 � 6A tty CA LLt L7 N 6A v a c i o 0 uwr ca N m y rn tis © LO N chi m ra N to w bs �+ corn CO r M CA N m Ln tL} CCD iri ri m � 10 el t N w G7 !t} N r 8 A p r !$Y C3 t�7`r co Ln Ln N tCj r C7 � w w co t} t27 m CESS rm„ '.NV N LCf F CJ V" M N tL7 V w Cd LO r CJ G ti3 !'7 N ar— ems- tip p m Ytf (ty�y C�5 m tt) til 'ep tt3 tt� tl'w N w r Y r pp m w N m cn w C4 co to 6"> m N tV tfJ N m M N M r t�"S tV N N {�i5 t6 t vw— M M tV N U Gil +�} N t!'f W w co iJ N a to hf 6t5 rrt UNi Z � � N tri t23 O Z r- to Y 1X W bNd C C? N Ok 7:7N ti'} LO h `S N r t'J .r O tF9 C N t3 x � c .;� •ti a zu- M t�0 +� R cY5 M t9 N Ct? CO V' N N th f � �` CiCI X17 C)7 FL N3 r.- C7 C3 N C6 O N N DC7 Ut, t 0tV N C6 r et CV R CO M T tl O) 0) M O Cl) to N r "�' OMU td'j M CO t�7yi !K MN LO Lo 0N 00 CV 7�J tp er CC> N rn i'• M Ci CA 4 M Cp CO tT3 CA M CS N +l) N N L7 M 0) CA 00 M r COIXS N r •Y M M fV til a M Ld R t[) v � tt7 {g ti N et M N r N h- M GS t�A co ,w eY N C3 tp r CTi to co u7 v di 47 fh (M1 b9 N N N r N N CMJ iNd C) M b e� N LL) U:1 N r i+s L M V' 'P co N M �r c0 N N M CA CS G7 �t N N N tLS t7 th N M n- _ tp CO N N r N u3 M N M ft! tt7 � N N M � CL7 � Cp CCJ M1� YND N LO 0 N M I r .p M N It til h b9 z til LA C7 r N cN '7 �t M 0, N LAM r N r M CAw uwj _ Cy _ _ ��yyLO M ter z to a Z o v U � dd C ry x c ttt " w C14 W N C7 N � N t75 Cp t!'9 r N qy t�dJ" P tC5 N i`~- °�{b C, ` t i"7 CP7 �- CS h" <- Cry CS M C� N T" CI N rri ni �r' � 00 01— t. c» m msin � � N ct, v L 00 d' M t7Y h. N N N tt- N M N co 0) C» m G3 w v m (") w Lo in 0) r 'T N to C7S rte- N '�° N r to N M E rLO C tFtS r N co in r 'G COY N N j w N r r 'a' CNf 40 LO N fi# N 0) N .maey�. � � M t�+i CCr c�'7 t�YS � •3 +p r N Y+1 N Cl) N w r r i•. LO Ul) co LO N w M ClS tl' C�3 N Mr r L Ln vi Lo C_Q M —M `tl' sty C"5 t"r3 ¢ to co 4 � r M N N '" 1- •C' N � r tNIY kC! tri N N CEJ rN sT N L' h co CV S97 tV W C> M tt7 "cP CD �C5 z LLI F. M N C7x r 0 `' r h N — aG W w w r r N Q 69 4A w r N N h N � � Z U Ch hw t�'i N tS3 �+ t8> l3 Q CV V *^ C � l} x c dg N CS tt5 C}7 M 4J '3 M 3'� t77 M Ct7 Rr�. {Van 01 CV U)i�f�•;.;<." � u7 et r. css ts�� •r N n tori N 7a, N t15 CS r .w.s N +N15 m Ca77 civ r- w o tai Ca t7p N N N CSS M V) N N N CW C,7 C7 C C3 tK3 C3 t,C7 til N co M N Lt} r J Y Cts ! cc N M b3 CO Cfi (V hk 66 r"" tltJ N N P i4 OD �' CCS S tQ 117 1`^ 4fi to r C7 0' W C', M N r c15 M P` M 0.pp'S 6S t37 0 0 C7 Y t�RgSy M C? t� t{7 LL'Ya Cl) M Q 5iJ ice°'" O tr.5' OppY.. +b3 to r 0 717 M P CNV 1- 40 tri U') ifs to tX7 Y<`l � C7 47? C3 N C7 £�•t {"3 tt7�} t17 `r C7 M d bRt L{7 M N 7fl N N C7 t17 P C7 7 Q P Y w LD T N Cl) M K,h P OIL N M COm M M M M w Lf7 O'i M M t7 M1 to M f l !{5 N M N W M ri- .y tt7 M P N M N c•? Cit st Y N M Cif � tl) y� �X 6 _ O�gy c-0 OT 5Ci yyC N ! N to tJ7 t to ! to N CVV N ! T N y}, 4✓ T ! r to Y t£3 tw7 Zw v M M W 0 1..7 r 717 C Cf? t�} 0 v �r r� x c ci at� f r r 00 rNr- CNV, N N .�— N cv m cis ea M tai uy � 'n N r r *. CD CO to WN N NC? ? P^- NMI N c+3 + N to N Ci? CsF7 F. r .N-- r r M 0 r, C7 N N M cq r N s co .r^- U7 I-- N N N N N CLO'3 tit rt7 CCs'? C�N9 to m r N C3 sN 60, { CV r r N EdT r- torp�' Cs C7 CO r- 'tl' Y' r N N C} A Q 9 N '@ C9 N Ci 06 � h5s 3�Iii ZD yj 0.t N q--^ N #'�. �. U1 3`•, i`` N r N N r- vi N W Ln fig L/S I~ g� N C7} G7 N 47 C} i'� � CNO tSs ttyyyy i+) � Z CG N C) N h tis N �t a tC CY N C m ,A tri Cl) r- e .� o � Nr N LD C3 CJD N fJ1 Q crawl co M— N t q Q 0 e1' L01 cis N M # 60. C � 1,_J Un / \ < w k tA tA $ - »r / 3 ~ ~ k co 3 � ) $ » ~ © © ¥ \ m \ a f \ § f / g 2 2 \ ~