HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01142003 - SD3 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP b Contra
Costa
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ="`
County
DATE: JANUARY 14, 2003
SUBJECT: HEARING ON THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ON
THE PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE,
County File #ZT0200 5 All Districts
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. OPEN the public hearing, RECEIVE testimony, and CLOSE the hearing.
B. For the purposes of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act,
DETERMINE that the project is Categorically Exempt(Minor Alterations in Land Use
Limitations--Class 5).
C. FIND that the proposed ordinance is consistent with the General Plan.
D. INTRODUCE the ordinance amending County Ordinance Code Chapter 82-32 and
repealing other Transportation Demand Management requirements(see Exhibit A),
WAIVE first reading, and SET January 21, 2003 for adoption.
FISCAL IMPACT
None to the General Fund. This ordinance revises an existing ordinance. Applicants for
projects that are subject to the ordinance pay the County's costs to administer its
requirements through application fees.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
On May 6, 1997 the Board approved the revision of the County's transportation demand
management ordinance and adopted Ordinance 97-12. The revision of the ordinance was
designed to strengthen the County's transportation demand management(TDM)program
in order to comply with the Measure C Transportation Improvement and Growth
Mangement Program as well as the state's Congestion Management Program. Staff have
recently reviewed this ordinance and revised the language and format of the ordinance so
that it is consistent with the code requirements and the TDM policies of the General Plan.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: / YES SIGNATURE ' L, 1
;7 RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION'OF BOARD COMMI EE
„"APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURES .�;, '
ACTION OF BO ON January 14, 2003 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _x„OTHER
L
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
x UNANIMOUS (ABSENT „ } AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
SHOWN.
Contact: Hillary P. Heard 925-335-1278
Community Development Department(CDD) ATTESTED January 14. 2QO3
Cc: County Counsel JOHN SWEETEN, CLERK OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR.
GATransportation\Hiilary\Board Orders and Greenies\Draft\TDM_Board_Order.doc BY DEPUTY
_Adopt the Revised County`transportation Demand Management Ordinance
JANUARY 14, 2002
Page 2
Following review by County Counsel, the ordinance hes been revised as follows:
1. The code requirements are now consistent with the most recent TDM
Ordinance adopted by the Board in 1997.(Ordinance No.97-12,Sections I and
11.
2. The language and organization of the Code was revised to reflect the intent and
purpose of the ordinance as well as to define what circumstances and types of
projects are subject to the ordinance (see Section 82-32.004); and
3. Text was added to provide guidance to the Department for addressing
improvements for pedestrian, bicycle and transit access during the review of
development applications, pursuant to the TDM section of General Plan's
circulation element(see Sections 82-32.010(b)(c)(d)and 82.32-012(b)(c)(d)).
To comply with CEQA, Department staff has found pursuant to adopted County CEQA
Guidelines,that the TDM Ordinance is Categorically Exempt(Class 5—Minor Alterations in
Land Use Limitations)from CEQA (see Exhibit C).
On November 19, 2002 the County Planning Commission considered the most recent draft
of proposed ordinance and recommended adoption of the ordinance by the Board of
Supervisors. A copy of the Planning Commission Resolution and the staff report to the
Planning Commission are attached and provide additional background information.
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit A: Transportation Demand Management Ordinance
Exhibit B: Planning Commission Resolution
Exhibit C: Staff Report to the Planning Commission
EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE NO. 2003- 0 2
(AMENDING COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE CHAR 82-32
AND REPEALING OT13ER TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
R.EQ IREM[E11.i S)
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa ordains as follows (omitting the
parenthetical footnotes from the official text of the exacted or amended provisions of the County
Ordinance Code):
SECTION I. REPEAL OF.TDM ORDINANCE. Sections 1, H and IV of Ordinance No. 97-
12 are repealed.
SECTION D. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT. Chapter 82-32 of the
County Ordinance Code is amended in its entirety, to read:
CHAPTER.82-32
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
82-32.002 Definitions. As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the
following meanings:
(a)"Residential Project".means any residential development application containing
thirteen(13)or more dwelling units that roust be approved through a public hearing process and
has not received final approval.
(b)"Non-Residential Project"means any non-residential or,mixed-case development
application that must be approved through a public hearing process and has not received final
approval,. Mon-Residential project also includes an application to expand an existing office or
hxhistrial structure that has at least five thousand(5,000)square feet of gross floor area,by
twenty-five(25)percent or more of the structure's gross floor area.
(c)"Sponsor"means the owner or developer of a residential or nova-residential project.
(d)"TUM"stands for"Transportation Remand Management."
(Orris. 2003- §2,92-31 §3.)
82-32.004 Intent and Purpose. (a)The intent of this chapter is to further the
transportation goals of the County General Plan., the Measure C Growth Management Program,
Contra Costa County's Congestion Management Program, and the Bay Area Glean Air Plan,.
(b)The purpose of this chapter is to implement the provisions of the general plan to
promote a more balanced transportation system that takes advantage of all modes of
transportation by:
ORDINANCE NO. 2003- o 2
Page 1
(1)Incorporating pedestrian, bicycle,and transit access into improvements
proposed in development applications.
(2) Incorporating the overall intent and purpose of this chapter into the land use
review and planning process.
(3)Allowing requests for reductions in the off-street parking requirements for
residential or non-residential projects that have a conceptual.TDM Program.
(4)Providing information to residents on opportunities for walking,bicycling,
rideshai-ing and transit.
(Ord. 2003- §2. See Ords.97-12, 94-27, 94-26.)
82-32.006 TDM RpgWrements. The requirements of this chapter shall apply to all
development projects, residential or non-residential.
(Chds. 2003- _ § 2, 92-31 § 3.)
82-32.008 Off-street parking reductions. (a)A project may qualify for reductions in
off-street parking requirements pursuant to this section. A sponsor requesting parking reductions
shall submit a conceptual TDM program to the Community Development Department
concurrently with the application for the project. If the tenant is known,the project sponsor and
tenant shall jointly submit the conceptual TDM program.
(b)Conceptual TDM Program. The conceptual TDM program shall identify TDM
measures that can be demonstrated to attain the trip reductions necessary to qualify for the
requested parking reductions. The department shall review the project's conceptual TDM
program and make a recommendation to the division of the planning agency.hearing the project
application.
(c)The sponsor shall include in the tentative map, land use permit,or development plan
application, any improvements that will provide access to public transit,ridesharing
opportunities and non-motorized forms of travel.
(d)If the project lies within a transit service area identified in the circulation element of
the general plan, the sponsor shall consult with the transit service provider on the need to provide
infrastructure to connect the project with the transit services. Evidence of compliance with this
requirement may include correspondence from the local transit provider(s)regarding the potential
need for installing bus turnouts,shelters or bus stops at the site.
(e)Final TDM:Program. The design and implementation of the final TDM program shall
be a condition of a project's approval. The sponsor and all subsequent owners of the project
shall provide deed notification of mandatory participation in the final TDM program to all
subsequent purchasers and owners of the project.
'(Cards. 2003- § 2, 92-31 ; 3.)
ORDINANCE NO. 2003-0 2
Page 2
82-32.010_ Residential Projects. (a) A sponsor of a residential project containing
thirteen.(13)or more dwelling units shall prepare and implement a TDM program that includes at
least the following:
(1) Owner-Occupied Units. Upon a residential dwelling being sold or offered for
sale,the sponsor shall notify and offer to the buyer or prospective buyer, as soon as it may
be done, materials describing public transit,ridesharing,and non-motorized commuting
opportunities available in the vicinity of the project. Such.information shall be
transmitted no later than the close of escrow.
(2)Mental Units. Upon a residential gelling being rented or offered for rent,the
sponsor shall notify and offer to the tenant or prospective tenant,materials describing
public transit,ridesharing, and non-motorized commuting opportunities in the vicinity of
the development. The materials shall be approved by the Community Development
Department. The materials shall be provided no later than the time the rental agreement
is executed.
The sponsor and all subsequent owners of the project shall provide deed
notification of mandatory participation in the TDM program to all subsequent purchasers
and owners of the project.
(b) A sponsor shall include in the tentative map or development plan application, all
improvements that will provide access to public transit,ridesharing opportunities and non-
motorized forms of travel.
(c)A sponsor whose project lies within a local transit service area identified in the
circulation element of the genera plan shalt consult withh the local transit service provider on the
need to provide infrastructure to connect the project with transit services. Evidence of
compliance with this requirement may include correspondence from the local transit provider(s)
regarding the potential need for installing bus turnouts,shelters or bus stops at the site.
(d) A sponsor of a project that is estimated to generate 100 or more A.M. or P.M. peak-
hour trips (based upon the trip generation rates from the ITE Trip Generation, 6#' edition 1997,or
the most current published edition)shall prepare.a traffic study that demonstrates hove the project
will provide the necessary infrastructure to meet the traffic level of service standards and the
performance standards as outlined in the growth management element of the general plan. The
study shall be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department and shat, at a
minimum:
(1)Include a Traffic Impact Analysis if the project could cause;a signalized
intersection or a freeway ramp to exceed the applicable standards, including identifying
mitigation measures to be implemented(which may include payment of fees),as
necessary for the intersection or ramp to operate in conformance with applicable
standards.
ORDINANCE NO. 2003-0 2
Page 3
(2)Identify any Routes of Regional Significance and/or Intersections with
Fmdings of Special Circumstances that would be affected by the project. (These routes
and/or intersections will require alternate mitigation applicable to the appropriate Action
Plan in the Measure C Growth Management Program.)
(3)Identify any arterial or collector roads in the circulation element of the general
plan that may be affected by the project. Determine whether the project will adversely
impact these roads and if any mitigation measures will be required.
(Ords.2003- § 2, 92-31 § 3.)
g2-32..012 Nan-l�t.Wsidentiai Projects. Mon-residential projects will be analyzed to
ensure conformity with applicable growth management standards.
(a)A sponsor shall include in the tentative map or development plan application,all
improvements that will provide access to public transit,ridesharing opportunities and non-
motorized forms of travel
(b)A sponsor whose project lies within a local transit service area identified in the
circulation element of the general plan shall consult with the local transit service provider on the
need to provide infrastructure to connect the project with transit services. Evidence of
compliance with this requirement may include correspondence from the local transit provider(s)
regarding the potential,need for installing bus turnouts,shelters or bus stops at the site.
(c)A sponsor of a project that is estimated to generate 100 or more A.M. or P.M.peak
hour trips(based upon the trip generation rates from the ITE Trip Generation, fi'edition 1997, or
the most gent published edition) shall prepare a traffic study that.demonstrates how the project
will provide the necessary.infrastructure to meet the traffic level of service standards and the'
..performance standards in the growth management element of the General:Plan. The study shall
be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department and shall, at a minimum:
(1)Include a Traffic Impact Analysis if the project could cause a signalized
intersection or a freeway ramp to exceed the applicable standards, including identifying
mitigation measures to be implemented(which.may include payment of fees),as
necessary for the intersection or ramp to operate in conformance with applicable
standards.
(2)Identify any Routes of Regional Significance and/or-Intersections with
Findings of Special Circumstances that would be affected by the project. (These routes
and/or intersections will require alternate mitigation applicable to the appropriate Action
Ilan in the Measure C Growth Management Program.)
(3)Identify any arterial or collector roads in the circulation element of the general
plan that the project may affect. Determine whether the project will adversely impact
these roads and if any mitigation measures will be required.
ORDINANCE NO. 2003-0 2
Page 4
(Ords. 2003- § 2, 92-31 § 3.)
$2-32.1314 Alteniative Studies. A sponsor who is dissatisfied with the number of peak-
hour trips as calculated pursuant to section 82-32.010(d)or section 82-32.012(c)may conduct a
study to determine the trip generation rate for the project. The study is subject to the approval of
the Community Development Department.
(Ord.2003-�§ 2.)
SECTION III. PRIOR ORDINANCES. Projects approved under any previously adopted
TDM or Transportation Systems Management ordinance shall continue to comply with and
operate under such ordinances. As to such projects,the previously adopted TDM or
Transportation Systems Management ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE IVE DATE. This ordinance becomes effective thirty days after
passage,and within fifteen days after passage shall be published once with the names of the
Supervisors voting for and against it in the Contra Costa Times,a newspaper published in this
County.
PASSED and ADOPTED on by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES: -
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: JOHN SWEETEN,
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
and County Administrator
By.
Deputy Chair,Board of Supervisors
[SEAL]
L'T :1ClRA1TUM092G[t2.wpil
ORDINANCE NO. 2003- 0 2
Page 5
EXHIBIT B
RESOLUTION NO. 38-2002
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNT'PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNT'
OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, REGARDING PROPOSED
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the proposed Transportation Demand Management Ordinance will
amend the County Ordinance Code entirely so that it fully reflects the requirements of the
existing ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisor's in 1997 (Ordinance 97-12); and
WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance would provide the County with a policy and
a framework for addressing Transportation Demand Management strategies outlined in
the County General Plan. These strategies are intended to promote the incorporation of
pedestrian, bicycle and transit access into the site plans of development applications
where appropriate; and
WHEREAS, after notice was lawfully given, a public hearing was scheduled
before the County Planning Commission on Tuesday,November 19,2002 whereat all
persons interested might appear and be heard; and
WHEREAS, on Tuesday,November 19, 2002,the County Planning Commission
fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this
matter; and
WHEREAS,the County Planning Commission discussed why the Transportation
Demand Management Ordinance would apply to non-residential project applications
proposing to expand an office or industrial structure that has at lease five thousand
(5,000)square feet of gross floor area,by twenty-five(25)percent or more of the
structure's gross floor area; and
WHEREAS, for purposes of compliance with provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act and State and County CEQA guidelines,the project is
Categorically Exempt(Minor Alterations in Land Use Land Use Limitations class 5; and
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that County Planning Commission of
the County of Contra Costa recommends for adoption to the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Contra Costa the Proposed Transportation Demand Management Ordinance.
Further the Commission finds that the proposed ordinance is consistent with the
general plan,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of the County Planning
Commission shall respectively sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and
deliver the same to the Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Planning Laws of
the State of California.
The instructions by the County Planning Commission to prepare this resolution
were given by motion of the County Planning Commission on Tuesday,November 19,
2002,by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners- Wang, Battaglia, Clark, Hecak and
Mehlman,
NOES: Commissioners- None
ABSENT: Commissioners - Caddis, Terrell
ABSTAIN: Commissioners- None
Hyman Wong,
Chair of the County Planning Commission,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
ATTEST:
Dennis M. Barry, Secretary
County Planning Commission
County of Contra Costa
State of California
EXHIBIT C
Agenda Item#4
Contra Costa County Community Development
COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday,November 19, 2002—7:00 p.m.
I. INTRODUCTION
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE,. County File
#ZT020005: A proposal to amend the County Ordinance Code to require
development applications and land use permits for Residential and Non-
Residential Applications to meet the code requirements and the Transportation
Demand Management Policies of the General Plan.
11. RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a motion:
A. Finding that the proposed ordinance is consistent with the General Plan; and
B. Recommending that the Board of Supervisors adopt the Transportation
Demand Management Ordinance.
111. BACKGROUND
The revisers ordinance is intended to address the following issues.
The proposed Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordnance repeals
section I, 11 and IV of Ordinance No. 97-12 and amends the Chapter 82-32 of the
County Ordinance Code entirely. The County code does not fully reflect the
requirements of the existing TDM Ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors
in 1997. The amended TDM ordinance revises Chapter 82-32 of the County code
to correctly reflect the requirements of this ordinance.
Portions of the language of the ordinance have been revised to include additional
efforts identified in the Transportation and Circulation Elementof the County
General Plan that promote TDM strategies. These efforts include the
incorporation of pedestrian, bicycle and transit access into site plans of
development applications. In addition staff have also been able to draw on our
past experience to better describe in the ordinance the type of development
applications that should be subject to the ordinance.
Page 1 of 5
V. OVERVIEW OF ORDINANCE
The existing TDM Ordinance 97-12 imposes requirements on residential and non-
residential development applications. The modifications to the language of the
TDM Ordinance are intended to clarify the intent and purpose of the ordinance as
well as to identify instances in which the requirements should be applied during
the review of development plans and applications. The language of the ordinance
has also been revised so that the code reflects the requirements of the ordinance
and the TDM policies in the General Plan. A copy of the Board action and the text
of the proposed ordinance are attached.
Below please find a brief summary of some key provisions of the proposed
ordinance.
• The proposed ordinance establishes new requirements and standards that
would regulate how residential and non-residential development projects
incorporate pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access improvements into their
development plans and applications.
• The requirements would apply to the following types of development;
1. Residential development applications containing thirteen (13) or
more dwelling units and must be approved through a public
hearing process. The existing ordinance requires residential
developments to provide information to residents on opportunities
for walking,bicycling, ridesharing and transit.
2. Non-residential or mixed-use development applications that must
be approved by a public hearing process. Non-residential projects
also include any existing office or industrial structure of at least
five thousand (5,000) square feet of gross floor area that applies to
expand its area by twenty five(25)percent or more.
3. Any project, residential or non-residential, requesting reductions in
off-street parking requirements. The existing ordinance requires
sponsors of projects that apply for such reductions to submit a
conceptual Transportation Remand Management Plan (TDM) to
the Community Development Department concurrently with the
application. The plan shall identify measuresthat can be
demonstrated to attain trip reductions necessary to qualify for
parking reductions.
Page 2 of 5
V. GENERAL PLAN CONSIDERATIONS
Section 65860 of the Government Code requires that a zoning ordinance be
compatible with the County General Plan. The following General Plan policies
are most pertinent to the proposed ordinance:
LAND USE POLICIES
5-18 New development (including redevelopment and rehabilitation projects)
shall provide adequate off-street parking, or contribute funds and/or
institute programs to reduce parking demand.
5-19 New subdivisions should be designed to permit convenient pedestrian
access to bus transit and efficient circulation patterns.
5-21 All efforts to use alternative transportation systems to reduce peak period
traffic congestion shall be encouraged.
5-22 Use of alternative forms of transportation, especially transit, shall be
encouraged in order to provide necessary services to transit-dependant
persons and to help minimize automobile congestion and air pollution.
5-23 Improvement of public transit shall be encouraged to provide for increased
use of local, commuter and intercity public transportation.
5-25 Planning and provision for a system of safe and convenient pedestrian
ways, bikeways and regional hiking trails shall be continued as a means of
connecting facilities, residential areas, and business districts, as well as
points of interest outside the communities utilizing existing public and
semi-public right-of-way.
VI. CEOA DETERMINATION
For the purposes of compliance with the California Environmental (duality Act,
staff has determined that the proposed ordinance is Categorically Exempt (Class 5
Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations).
V. DISCUSSION
The proposed ordinance would aid in meeting the General Plan Transportation
and Circulation Element goals, policies, and implementation measures.
Specifically, the General Plan describes TDM measures as 1) involving lower
capital costs; 2) providing incentives designed to modify travel demand; 3)
Page 3 of 5
implemented by local government or the private sector, and 4) giving all travel
modes equal consideration in providing access to development.
The County currently promotes TIM strategies with its existing ordinance. New
residential development is obligated to provide information on the various
transportation services available in the vicinity. Any development is allowed
reductions in off-street panting if specific conditions are met.
The revised ordinance institutes new development review procedures to ensure
appropriate consideration is given to pedestrian, bicycle and transit access in site
plans. This is achieved through requiring sponsors of a project to include in the
tentative map, land use permit, or development plan application, any
improvements that will provide access to public transit, ridesharing opportunities
and non-motorized forms of travel.
The revised ordinance also incorporates existing Measure C-88 traffic study
requirements. Any development subject to this requirement will need to evaluate
its impact on the transportation system, and determine if any additional efforts to
promote pedestrian,bicycle or transit access are warranted.
For these reasons, the Department recommends that the proposed ordinance
should be adopted as proposed.
Wage 4 of 5
RESOLUTION NO. 38-2002
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY
OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, REGARDING PROPOSED
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the proposed Transportation Demand ManagementOrdinance will
amend the County Ordinance Code entirely so that it folly reflects the requirements of the
existing ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisor's in 1997 (Ordinance 97-12); and
WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance would provide the County with a policy and
a framework for addressing Transportation Remand Management strategies outlined in
the County General Plan. These strategies are intended to promote the incorporation of
pedestrian, bicycle and transit access into the site plans of development applications
where appropriate; and
WHEREAS, after notice was lawfully given, a public hearing was scheduled
before the County Planning Commission on Tuesday,November 19, 2002 whereat all
persons interested might appear and be heard; and
WHEREAS, on Tuesday,November 19,2002,the County Planning Commission
fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this
matter; and
WHEREAS, the County Planning Commission discussed why the Transportation
Demand Management Ordinance would apply to non-residential project applications
proposing to expand an office or industrial structure that has at lease five thousand
(5,000) square feet of gross floor area,by twenty-five (25)percent or more of the
structure's gross floor area; and
WHEREAS, for purposes of compliance with provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act and State and County CEQA guidelines, the project is
Categorically Exempt(Minor Alterations in Land Use Land Use Limitations class 5; and
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that County Planning Commission of
the County of Contra Costa recommends for adoption to the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Contra Costa the Proposed Transportation Demand Management Ordinance.
Further the Commission finds that the proposed ordinance is consistent with the
general plan,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of the County Planning
Commission shall respectively sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and
deliver the same to the Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Planning Laws of
the State of California.
The instructions by the County Planning Commission to prepare this resolution
were given by motion of the County Planning Commission on Tuesday,November 19,
2002,by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners- Wong,Battaglia, Clark, Hanecak and
Mehlman,
NOES: Commissioners m None
ABSENT: Commissioners- Gaddis,Terrell
ABSTAIN: Commissioners- None
Hyman Wong,
Chair of the County Planning Commission,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
ATTEST:
i
Dennis M. Barry, Secretary
County Planning Commission
County of Contra Costa
State of California
f OF
j ?
1 declare voider pe-J'e---.---','tna"- arri, and at aH Am herein ruemmed A ve been, -a
6wen of the Uni red States, over age 18; and a-zl
65Fine Meet, 6rst class postage My prepaid.,
the c'o.-Je �n the above Innue;to the Moving.
A
- k
t3i5 aas�e- s�_q +esaaPP'� cA?l3At!
City of Lafayette City of Martinez Town of Moraga
3675 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Suite 210 525 Henrietta St. 350 Rheem Blvd. P.O. Box 188
P.O. box 1968 Martinez, Ca. 94553 Moraga, Ca. 94556
Lafayette, Ca. 94549
City of Oakley City of COrinda City of Pinole
3633 Main St. P.O. Box 6 26 Orinda Rd. 2131 Pear St.
Oakley Ca 04561 Orinda, Ca. 94563 Pinole, Ca. 94564
City of Pittsburg City of Pleasant Hill City of Richmond
65 Civic Ave. 100 Gregory Lane 2600 Barrett Ave.
Pittsburg, Ca. 94565 Pleasant Hill, Ca. 94523 Richmond, Ca. 94804
City of Concord City of San Ramon City of Walnut Creek
1950 Parkside Dr., M/S 50 2222 Camino Ramon 1666 N. Main St.
. 8039
oncord, Ca. 94519 San Ramon, Ca. 94583 'Box
Wal
nut Creek,
Ca. 94596
Rodeo MAC Bay Point Municipal Advisory
City of San Pablo Attention: Diane Leite, Chair Council
One Alvarado Square 457 Suisun Ave. Attention: Georgary Delacruz
San Pablo, Ca. 94806 Rodeo, Ca. 94572 3569Sharon Court
Bay Point, Ca. 94565
Bethel island Municipal Advisory Byron MAC Diablo MAC
Council Attention: Sharon Marsh Attention: Mary Ann Cella,
Attention: Marhuerite Lawry 2615 Taylor lane P.O. Box 35
P.O. Box 429 Byron Ca 94514 Diablo, Ca. 94528
Bethel island, ca. 94511
Town of Discovery Bay MAC El Sobrante MAC Kensington MAC
Attention: Gary Hess 3550 San Pablo Dam Rd Suite Attention: dames Carman
1037 Discovery Bay Blvd E533 118 Windsor Avenue
Discovery Bay Ca 94514 El Sobrante, Ca. 94803 t a itt�4 Ca. 94708-1043
Knightsen Town Advisory Richmond MAC Pacheco MAC
Council Attention: Ken Nelson Attention: Betty Wilgus
Attention: Seth Cockrell 1625 5t' St. 1230 Temple Dr.
P4 Box 170 Richmond, Ca. 94801 Pacheco, Ca. 94553
Knightsen Ca. 94548
FEDERAL GLOVER JOHN GICOIA GAYLE B. UILKEMA
315 E. Leland Rd. 11780 San Pablo Ave. Suite D County Administration Building
Pittsburg, Ca. 94565 El Cerrito, Ca. 94530 Room 108-A
Martinez, Ca. 94553
DONNA GERBER MARK DeSAULNIER
309 Diablo Road 2425 Bisso lane
Danville, Ca. 94526 Concord, Ca. 94520
009TS aoj ejeldwal asn mslaa4S Pal 410OWS
0009, IS aasel stage-I ssaippy WAUSAV
County Administrator's Office County Council County Council
IVTC OFF-rCE" Silvano Lillian Fujii
IrVI—CRO�-TICE IV7E90FL7CF
TRANSPLAN-East County Clerk of the Board Public Works
John Greitzler 11V1r£9 0,,FFICE IV7ER0,,{ICE
IWIEROFI-ICE
TVTC
Tri-Delta Transit Contra Costa County Community
3GO File 801 Wilbur Ave. Devlpoment Department
Antioch Ca. 94509 851 Pine St NW4F
Martinez, Ca. 94553
W CCTAC W ESTCAT
609 Waiter Avenue TRANSPAC-Central County
9 Alvarado Square 296 Jayne Ave.
San Pablo, Ca. 94806 Pinole, Ca. 94564 Oakland, Ca. 94690
Town of Danville SWAT Sunset Development
510 La Gonda Way Town of Moraga 1 Annabel Lane, Suite 201
Danville, Ca. 94526 P.O. Box 188 San Ramon, Ca. 94583
Moraga, Ca. 94555
Home Builders Association
The Industrial Association Eastern Division County Connection
P.O. Box 988 P.O. Box 5160 2477 Arnold Industrial Way
Martinez, Ca. 94553 200 Porter Dr. Suite 200 Concord, Ca. 94520
San Ramon, Ca. 94583
Contra Costa Transportation
Authority Contra Costa Council Citizens Land Alliance
Hookstone Square 877 Ygnacio Valley Rd. #202 105 10'' St.
3478 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 100 Walnut Creek, Ca. 94596 Tracy, Ca. 95376
Pleasant Hill, Ca. 9452:3
Central CC Transit Authority Bart District AC Transit
2477 Arnold Industrial Way 800 Madison St. 94607 1600 Franklin St.
Concord, Ca. 94520 P.G. Box 92688 Oakland, Ca. 94612
Oakland, Ca. 94604-2688
City of Antioch City of EI Cerrito City of Brentwood
3rd & H St. 10890 San Pablo Ave. 708- 3rd St.
Antioch, Ca. 94509 El. Cerrito, Ca. 94530 Brentwood, Ca. 94513
City of Clayton City of Hercules
6000 Heritage Trail 119 Civic Dr.
Clayton, Ca. 94517 Hercules, Ca. 94547
,V091S lol ateldwa;asn mslaaLIS PaaA 410OWS
PROOF OF PUBLICATION —
(2015.5 C.C.P.) NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON PLANNING MATTERS.
County of Contra Costa
COUNTYWIDE
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the
County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and NOTICE is hereby given that on Tltesday,January 14,2003 at 9;30 am.in the County Administration Buildin
not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. 651 Pine Street,(Comer of Pine and Escobar Streets),Martinez,California,the Contra Costa County Board ofg
Supervisors will hold a public hearing to consider the following planning matter:
I am the Principal Legal Clerk of the Contra Costa Times, a A recommendation of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission on a proposal to amend the County
newspaper of general circulation, printed and published at Ordinance Code to assure that the code requirements are consistent with the most recent Transportatiozr
2640 Shadelands Drive in the City of Walnut Creek, County Demand'Management(TDM)Ordinance adopted by the Board m 1997(t7rd#nance 97-12). The language of the
of Contra Costa,94595. ordinance was revised to reflect the intent and purpose of the ordinance as well as to define what circumstances
and types of development projects are subject to the ordinance(Section 82.32.004).Additional language was
And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of added to the ordinance to assure consistency with the TDM section of General Plan's circulation element.
general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of The proposed ordinance would affect the unincorporated area of the County(File#ZT020005).
Contra Costa, State of California, under the date of October For purposes of compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),staff has
22, 1934.Case Number 19764. detemained that the proposed ordinance is Categorically Exempt(Class 5:Minor Alterations in Land Use
r - .
The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in Limitations).
type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each If you challenge this matter In Courtou may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any raised at the public hearing dest -datthe public hearing described in this notice,or in written
supplement thereof on the following dates,to-wit: correspondence dei voted to the County at,or prior to,the public hearing.
Prior to the hearing,Community Development Department staff will be available on
December 23 Tuesday,January 14,2003 at 9:Ob a.m in Room 108,Administration Building,651 Pine Street,Martinez,to meet
with any interested parties in order to(1)answer questions,(2)review the hearing procedures used by the
all in the year of 2002 Board;(3)ciarifq the issues being considered by the Board;and(4)provide an opportunity'to identffy;resolve,
or narrow any differences which remain in dispute. If you wish to attend this meeting with staff, lease call
Hillary Heard,Community Development Department,at(925)335-1278 by 3:00 p.m,on Monday,}anuary 13,
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the 2003,to confirm your participation.
foregoing is true and Correct. Date: December 23,2002
Executed a#W lnUt CfC1
`� John Sweeten,clerk of the
On h s da # cbale, } Board of Supervisors and
County Administrator
... .... . ........ .......... ......................... By Gina Martin,Chief Clerk
Sig ture
Legal CCT 6609 Publish December 23,2002
Con Costa Times
P O ox 4147
Walnut Creek,CA 94596
(925)935-2525
Proof of Publication of:
(attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published)