HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11122002 - SD7 V5D.7
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
FROM: Steven L. Bautista, County Probation Officer .j �•
Costa
DATE: November 5, 2002
SUBJECT: Second Annual Report on the Juvenile Justice Crime County
Prevention Act Probation Department Programs
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the second annual report on the County Probation Department programs funded
through the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act.
BACKGROUND:
The statutes governing the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act funds requires in Section
30061(4)(E)(i) of the Government Code that each county shall annually report to the County
Board of Supervisors and the Board of Corrections on outcome measures and expenditures
for programs approved in the comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plans. The penalty
for failure to report the required data is forfeiture of subsequent allocations from the fund.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: -Z—YES SIGNATURE:
_ ZkECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR � RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE�+W-
,PROVE OTHER
SIGNATUR*ON
_ -----__-__--ACTION JRO MB 12, 2002 APPROVE AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT NONE ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
AYES: NOES: SHOWN.
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
ATTESTEDNOVEMBER 12, 2002
CONTACT: Dave Grossi,315-4199 JOHN SWEETEN,CLERK OF THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
CC: County Probation Officer
County Administrator
Board of Corrections via Probation
BY 4 C ,DEPUTY
RNENI:LE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
PROBATION DEPARTMENT
REPORT SEPTEMBER 2001 THROUGH OCTOBER 2002
fir.`
• Community Probation
• School-used Deputy Probation Officer Program
• Family Intervention Program
• Summit Center
• Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility-Aftercare Program
• Volunteers in Probation (V.I.P.)
• Fee for Service Funding
INTRODUCTION
The Contra Costa County Probation Department received funds allocated
through the California Board of Corrections under the Crime Prevention Act
2000 (AB 1913). The Probation Department initial allocation for the fiscal
year 2000/2001 was $3,285,543.
With approval from the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, the
Probation Department implemented its comprehensive multiagency juvenile
justice plan. Program implementation required the establishment of
Memorandum of Understanding-with various collaborative partners such as
school districts and police agencies. Moreover,the Department embarked on
an intensive recruitment drive for professional staff to establish the reported
units of service. Additional office space required the Department to work
closely with other county agencies to locate adequate office.space to support
the expansion of services. The east county region was selected to bring
services close to the community where the majority of the growth has
occurred. It is noted that these programs have been operational for only one
year, save the high school program. None the less, the programs did not
become fully operational until September 1, 2001, save Family Intervention
Unit. However, the Probation Department was required to meet the
mandated reporting by State Legislature to the Board of Corrections on data
outcomes on August 15, 2001. The Department met its mandate but had no
data-information to report but was in progress which the Board of
Corrections approved the first report. Meanwhile, The Probation staff move
into the east county office on November 2, 2001.
The Probation Department has received its second year of funding for the
juvenile justice programs in the amount of 3,247,153. Furthermore, the
Department hassubmitted its second report.to the Board of Corrections as
required by.the State Legislature on October 15, 2002. The following
summarizes the status of the various:programs funded under the Juvenile
Justice Crime Prevention.Act.
Community Probation Program
The Community Probation portion of JJCPA began September 1, 2001. The
program deploys eight(8), Deputy Probation Officers to various Police
Departments throughout the county. Focus is on high-risk youths, at-risk and
chronic offenders. These Deputy Probation Officers are out-stationed and
work non-tradition hours. The officers collaborate not only with their
respective police agency, but also with alternative/continuation schools, and
community-base organizations to help prevent continued criminal behavior.
The original police agency collaborations were with Martinez, Walnut
Creek, San Ramon, Brentwood, San Pablo, Richmond, Pittsburg, Concord
and Antioch. As part of the agency agreements they provide the Deputy
Probation Officers with office space supplies and equipment. Each Deputy
supervises twenty-five to thirty-five probationers. This is an intensive
supervision program.
As noted, this is the second report on data outcomes submitted to the Board
of Corrections. The information procured during the first fiscal year
indicated that 390 youth clients were provided services. Of that number, 172
completed the program, 115 are in progress, and 103 did not complete the
program. The average length of stay for clients who completed the program
was 152 days. The data indicates there were positive changes in behavioral
outcomes for the client when reviewing six(6)month period's prior and
after program entry. Clients were less frequently expelled from schools,
arrested and given sustained petitions. There was an increase in successful
termination of probation and status offenses (probation violations). Although
the program has increased the amount of status offenses,through the
judicious use Home Supervision and Community Service we have
minimized the use of Juvenile Hall, OAYRF, out of home placement and the
California Youth Authority. These differences are statistically significant at
the .05 levels when evaluated with nonparametric procedures; the
differences were not due to random chance.
School-Based Deaaty Probation 001cer Program
Initiated with Challenge Grant I demonstration project funds, the High
school Challenge team program was created and implemented, By placing
Deputy Probation Officers in selected high schools and special necessary
schools to provide supervision and specified services to juvenile offenders
and other at-risk youth experiencing problems ranging from poor attendance
to major criminal offenses,the school challenge teams are able to maintain
high visibility within the school community and emphasize inter-agency
collaboration.
Program goals include reducing delinquent offenses; provide for higher rates
of successful completion of probation and restitution requirements; improve
participating students' school attendance and performance and enhance
overall school safety. The collaboration among school personnel, resource
officer and the Deputy Probation Officer create the school safety team that
employs a variety of preventive strategies design to deep youth from
entering or re-entering the formal juvenile justice system. These strategies
include the utilization of police diversion programs, school attendance
review boards, and conflict resolution groups. Deputy Probation Officers
also participate in programs such as "every fifteen minutes" and school life
skills programs. The outcomes for participants, includes increase attendance,
reductions in delinquent behavior and the seriousness of offenses for youth
who re-offend. The model has proven to be successful and under the
Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act(JJCPA)the program has been
extended to select middle schools throughout the county.
Currently there are eighteen(18)Deputy Probation Officers out-stationed at
various high schools and middle schools in eight(8) school districts.
The second data report to the Board of Corrections indicates that 2225 youth
clients were provided during the first fiscal year. Of that number, 78
completed the program, 120 are in progress, and 27 did not complete the
program. The average length of stay for clients who completed the program
was 129 days. Data outcomes revealed a change in the behavior of High
School Program.clients. On average, clients have fewer days of missed
school, days with one or more of class cuts, formal school referrals, and
arrests during the intervention period as compare to the period before
program entry. Parametric testing revealed that the difference in days with
cuts and school referrals were statistically significant at the .001 levels.
Nonparametric testing revealed that the differences in day's cuts, school
referrals, arrests, and sustained petitions were statistically significant at the
.05 level or lower.
AS to the middle school program, there are nine (9) Deputy Probation
Officers assigned to the program. This program is based on the high school
model to provide intensive supervision for offenders and early intervention
services for at-risk youths. During the first fiscal year, 491 youth clients
were provided services. Of that number 202 completed the program, 174 are
in progress, and 115 did not complete the program. The average length of
stay for clients who completed the program was 129 days. Data outcomes
revealed a positive change in behavior among Middle School Program
clients. On average, clients had fewer arrests and sustained petitions during
the intervention period as compared with period before program entry.
Nonparametric test results indicated that the difference in arrests was
statistically significant at the .001 level; similar tests revealed the difference
in sustained petitions was statistically significant at the .05 level.
Family Intervention Program
The Family Intervention Program consists of One Probation Supervisor and
five (5)Deputy Probation Officers. Their goal is to reduce the need to
remove probation clients' children from their homes and place them
elsewhere. The parent's use of drugs or abuse of alcohol contributes to the
risk of their children being removed from the home,usually by Child and
Family Services. While the parent is on probation, drug related offense or
domestic violence that involve drugs/alcohol or any felony offense where
drugs/alcohol is involved, the Deputy's intervention is made possible
because of the authority carried bythe grant of probation. Intervention
means working with all members of the family with service to the children
being focal of our efforts.
Services are twofold; client oriented and family oriented. As to client-
oriented services, adult clients are held accountable to the grant of probation
they have accepted. All terms and conditions are enforced on the level of
maximum supervision. This entail two to-face monthly visits with the
client and two monthly contacts with the family. Compliance with the
requirements of any term or condition of probation is expected without
compromise. Successful completion of probation may entail some practical
benefits to the client's legal and social status. Services to the family include
a full range of providers, both community-based and private. Individualized
case planning includes the use of departmentally based funding for services
under the fee for service funds. The overall goal of the program is to reduce
the risk to and need for out-of-home placements for children whose risk are
heightened by their parent's involvement in the justice system and with
substance abuse.
Our data outcomes for the first fiscal revealed that service was provided to
115 families that were made up of 115 drug offending parents, 40 partners,
and 275 children who range in age from new born to young adult with an
average age of about six years old. Eighteen youth have completed the
program and 257 are in progress. The average length of stay for those who
completed the program was 149 days.
Summit Center
The Summit Center Program is a twenty(20)-bed residential treatment
facility for boys with placement orders. Although it is technically a
placement itself,the Summit Center seeks to reduce placements by
providing more intensive interventions that can shorten the length of time in
out-of-home,placements. Youths placed in Summit are serious offenders or
chronic placement failures with serious mental and emotional disorders,
requiring intensive services in a secure environment. A treatment team,
including a therapist, deputy probation officer, teacher, and probation
counselors evaluate each minor and develop treeftent plans. Upon
graduation for the program, minors and their families are involved in
aftercare and wraparound services for approximately one(1)year:The
average length of stay in the program is nine (9)months. Probation, Mental,
and County Office of Education jointly operate the Summit Center; it is
funded by JJCPA, Medic-Cal, and General Fund dollars.
During the first fiscal year, 11 youth clients were provided services now that
JJCPA requires data collection. Of that number, 1 completed the program
and 10 are in progress. It is noted that funding for the Summit Center did not
begin until September 2001. Reporting on minors in the program has been
delayed because of concerns from mental health staff`regarding
confidentiality. Parental consents to participate in the evaluation have been
refused in some cases. And although the program has been operating at
capacity, lengths of stay have been increasing hence turnover of residents
have decreased.
Orin Allen Rehabilitation Facility-After Care Proaram
The grin Allen Rehabilitation Facility-Aftercare program provides for
continuity of care after release from the boys ranch. Deputy Probation
Officers provide intensive supervision for at least ninety(90) days, assisting
youth with their readjustment to the community and school. Deputy
Probation Officers collaborate with community organizations, employment
agencies, schools and local law enforcement agencies. Four(4)Deputy
Probation Officers have been added to this program.
Data collection reveals 109 youth clients were provided services. Of that
number, 12 completed the program, 93 are in progress, and 4 did not
complete the program. The average length of stay for clients who completed
the program was 150 days. The number of youth in the Ranch Aftercare
program is below expectations for three primary reasons.
• Commitments to the Ranch are down for recent years.
• JJCPA funding for the Ranch aftercare started in waves (July and
October 2001)
• Data collection was not initiated until minors had completed their
commitment terms (150 to 180 days) and begun the aftercare
supervision period.
Thus,the data collection for this program did not start until after the
beginning of 2002.
Volunteers in Probation W.M.)
The V.I.P. program attempts to meet the needs of Probation by assisting the
Department and individual officers through working with and mentoring
youth on probation. One Deputy Probation Officer, funded through JJCPA,
is the director of this program.
Data for the first fiscal year is collected only on those youth in V.I,P. who
are in one-on-one mentoring pairs. In addition, the program has coordinated
the efforts of 91 volunteers during the course of the year. These volunteers
have provided a variety of services for youth including the publishing of a
newsletter at Juvenile Hall,tutoring, internet mentoring, a choir at the Orin
Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility, relaxation technique instruction and
117V
helping with the Boy Scouts troop at the Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation
Facility. Approximately 250 youth in the County have received services
through these volunteer.
During the first fiscal year, 24 youth clients were provided one-on-one
mentoring services through the program. All 24 are currently receiving
services with none having completed the program and none having not
completed the program.
Fee for Service Funding
Fee for Service fund has been established as an alternative to the Department
entering into contractual arrangements with a limited number of community-
based organizations. Under this service program, the Department purchase
services on an as needed basis, rather than entering into blanket contracts
with various non-profit entities. The goal has been and continues to be to
purchase services on demand that gives the Department the greatest
flexibility in effectively addressing the needs of the client on an
individualized basis.
Conclusion
This has been the first full year that the JJCPA programs have been fully
operational. The data submitted to the California Board of Corrections has
yield promising outcomes for,all the programs. During the first fiscal year of
the JJCPA funding, 1525 youth clients, 115 adult probationers, and 40
partners of adult probationers received services through the grant funding.
We have reported these numbers and outcomes to the California Board of
Corrections. The local evaluation team will provide further analysis of
mandated and local outcomes.
Lionel Chatman.
Juvenile Division Manager
Community Programs
Outcome Measure Page 1 of 4
California Horne Tuesday, October 15,2002
The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act
Contra Costa: 2002 Progress Report for Community Probation Program
In the area below,please enter program expenditures for each identified line item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2001 -2002
ALLOCATED FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 -2002 $956,664
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES FOR 2001 -2002 State Funds Interest Non-JJCPA Funds
Salaries and Benefits: (Help) 379,831 $ -
Services and Supplies: (Help) 1$,165 IF sFo
p
(Help) 1,4 64 IF
Professional Services: ( �, ,..,. .,' sF-- I�_.. ....,...
Total Non-JJCPA
Community-Based Organizations: (Help) 32,3$7 0 Funds:
247,503
Fixed Assets:(Help) 184,422 0
--JF
Administrative Overhead(Maximum=0.5%of State Funds): (Help) 3,983
Other: {Help) 99,8701F 0
Fund Totals: $770,122 $0 $247',503
Program Total for 2001 -2002Fiscal Year: $1,017,625
Enter the number of juveniles who participated In the program during the
fiscal year 2001 -2002. Provide separate counts for those completed the
program,those who were'in progress'as the end of the fiscal year(i.e.,
still'enrolled'in the program),and those who did not complete the
program(i.e.,failed to completed the program an are no longer Enter the approximate average length of time spent in the program by all
'enrolled'In the program). program participants during the fiscal year.
NUMBER OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS AVERAGE LENGTH OF TIME
Completed Program: _ 172 Average Length of Time In Program: 152 C}ays
In Progress: 115 PER PARTICIPANT EXPENDITURES
Funds Expended Per Program $2,609.29
Did Not Complete Program: 103 Participant:
Total: 390
http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?prograrn^4&view=:p&action=T&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure Page 2 of 4
Progress Report Instructions:For each outcome listed In the table,report the program results in the boxes provided.REPORT NUMBERS
ONLY.DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS("%,""pct.,""percent,"etc.). Inclusion of anything
other than numbers will result In the entry being"zeroed out."
PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,CLICK_HERFOR SPECIFIC,IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME
INFORMATION.
Juvenile Participant Outcome Measures
Outcome: Arrest Rate(Ail Arrests} � completion of Probation Rate Incarceration Rate
Outcome Measure Expressed as: A Mean or Average A Percentage A Mean or Average
Program Gaal or Expectation for Decrease(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal):
Outcome Measure: Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
Contemporaneous Group(during
Goal Expressed With Reference Program Participants at an Earlier the program period)Consisting of Program Participants at an Earlier
to: Point In Time all Juvenile Probationers In the Point in Time
County
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time
Conduct of Program Participants Prior to Program Entry N/A Prior to Program Entry
at an Earlier Point in Time,What
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conduct of Program Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants During Following Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry
Time Period:
,approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 194 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Gays Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
Number of Program Participants 13$ 42 140
for Whom Results Reported: L,_
Results For Program Participants: 0.15 . ..,!Mean/Avg. 11
49 °!o 0'1 _ Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants 1 51 115
for Whom Results Will Be
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in ReferenceJF F
Croup: 0 F-
Group:
Results for Reference Group: Mean/Avg. 0 % 0 Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Currant Year Reference Group
Subjects for Whom Results Will 100
Be Reported Next Year:
http://www.bdcorT.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program--4&view=p&action=T&period=2002 10/15/2002
' '/✓ 2, 12
Outcome Measure Page 3 of 4
Outcome: -- Rate of Completion of Rate of Completion of Court- probation Violation Rate
Restitution Ordered Community Service
i�Utcome Measure Expressed as: A Percentage A Percentage A Mean or Average
FoP_'uotg;;;e
Coal or Expectation for Increase(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal);
Measure: Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
Contemporaneous Group(during Contemporaneous Group(during
Goal Expressed With Reference the program period)Consisting of the program period)Consisting of Prior Program Participants In the
to; all Juvenile Probationers In the all Juvenile Probationers In the County
County County
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to
Conduct of Program Participants N/A N/A N/A
at an Earlier Point in Time,What
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conduct of Program Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants During Following Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry
Time Period:
Approximate Length of Time in
Clays Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
Number of Program Participants 140-7 F. 140 i_- 140
for Whom Results Reported:
Results For Program Participants: 21 44 0.17
� °Jc °fo �Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants 115 115 115
for Wham Results Will Be _..,..w.. .
Reported Next Year;
Number of Subjects in Reference
Subjects � F_7 0
Group: IF
Results for Reference Group: % � MeanJAv
g.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group ` !"
Subjects for Whom Results Will t�
Be Reported Next Year:
Progress Report Comments: Provide any additional information that further explains or is important to the interpretation of the results reported in
the progress report,including program implementation issues, pending additional program results,supplemental evaluation findings(process
evaluations,case studies,cost-benefit analysis,etc.),the results of statistical significance testing,program changes emanating from the
evaluation results,etc.
We have observed positive changes in behavioral outcomes
for the clients when reviewing six–month periods before an( ',_,
after program entry. Clients are expelled from school,
arrested, and givers sustained petitions less frequently.
(These differences are statistically significant at the .0.
ReturO to Prog�rgm$electls�n Screen
Add/Edit Outcome Measures
http://www.bdeorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=4&view=p&action=r&period=2{ 02 10/1512002
Outcome Measure Page 1 of 4
California Home Tuesday,October 15, 2002
t
The Juvenile Justice Crime prevention Act
Contra Costa: 2002 Progress Report for Expand the High School Challenge'Team Program to Middle Schools
In the area below,please enter program expenditures for each identified line Item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2001 -2002
ALLOCATED FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 -2002 $674,368
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES FOR 2001 -2002 tate Funds
Interest
� Non-JJCf'A�Funds
Salaries and Benefits: (Help) 436,329
Services and Supplies:(Help) 19,644 $f-
Professional Services:(Help) 36,432 0..
Total Non-JJCPA
7unity-Based Organizations: (Help) Funds:
283,418
[Fixed Assets:(Help) 56,982 0
Administrative Overhead(Maximum=0.5%of State Funds):(Help)
Other: (Help) $19,472 �$
Fund Totals: 5634,679 $0 $283,418
Program Total fcsr 2001 -2002Fiscal Year: $918,097
Enter the number of Juveniles who participated In the program during the
fiscal year 2001 -2002. Provide separate counts for those completed the
program,those who were'in progress'as the and of the fiscal year(i.e.,
still'enrolled'in the program),and those who did not complete the
program(i.e.,failed to completed the program and are no longer Enter the approximate average length of time spent in the program by all
'enrolled'In the program). program participants during the fiscal year.
NUMBER OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS AVERAGE LENGTH OF TIME
Completed Program i 202 Average Length of Time in Program: jjfj29 Days
In Progress: I #74 PER PARTICIPANT EXPENDITURES
Funds Expended Per Program $1,869.85
Did Not Complete Program: ##5 Participant:
Total: 491
http://www.bdeorr.ca.gov/j cpa/outcome—measures.asp?program=2&view--p&action=T&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure Page 2 of 4
Progress Report instructions: For each outcome listed In the table,report the program results in the boxes provided. REPORT NUMBERS
ONLY.DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS("ala,""pct.,""percent,"etc.). Inclusion of anything
other than numbers will result in the entry being"zeroed out."
PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,CLICK HERE FOR SPECIFIC,IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME
INFORMATION.
Juvenile Participant Outcome Measures
Outcome: Arrest Rate(All Arresta� Completion of Probation Rate incarceration Rate
Outcome Measure Expressed as: A Mean or Average A PercentagerA Mean or Average
[Program Goal or Expectation for Decrease(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal):
Outcome Measure: Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
Contemporaneous Group(during
Goal Expressed With Reference Program Participants at an Earlier the program period)Consisting of Program Participants at an Earlier
to: Point In Time all Juvenile Probationers in the Paint in Time
County
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to
Conduct of Program Participants Some Standard Period of Time Prior to P N/A Some Standard Period of Time
Entry at an Earlier Point in Time,What Program Ent Prior to Program Entry
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Ca of Program Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants[luring Following
Time Period; Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group;
Number of Program Participants i gg 201 199
for Whom Results Reported: _._...
Results For Program Participants: JE
_ 0.02 IFt 0 01
_,_.._�_ _<Mean/Avg. °lo Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants 17A 174 174
for Whom Results Will Be
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference
Group: F
Results for Reference Group: ]EF 0
Mean/Avg. °!o Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group
Subjects for Whom Results Will
Be Reported Next Year:
http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=2&view=p&action=r&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure �'7N' 62— l;�
Page 3 of 4
Outcome: Rate of Completion of mate of Completion of Court- probation Violation Rate
Restitution Ordered Community Service
Outcome Measure Expressed as: A Percentage A Percentage IF
A Mean or Average
Program Goal or Expectation for Increase(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal)
Outcome Measure: Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
Contemporaneous Group(during Contemporaneous Group(during
Goal Expressed With Reference the program period)Consisting of the program period)Consisting of Program Participants at an Earlier
to: all Juvenile Probationers in the all Juvenile Probationers in the Point in Time
County County
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to Some Standard Period of Time
Conduct of Program Participants N/A NWA Prior to Program Entry
at an Earlier Point in Time,What
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for OutcomeMeasure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conductctofof Program Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants During Following
Time Period: program Entry Program Entry Program Entry
Approximate Length of Time in
Gays Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
[Number of Program Participants IL200 201 Whom Results Reported: _�.� �__.. �_.: __ , ...�
Results For Program Participants: IL 10 % ]F
0.02 Mean/Av .
__.__._.;% I L g
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants 174 174 174
for Whom Results Will Be
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference
0
Group: I F91 111.111.1-111-:
Results for Reference Group: E �0`"
1 .-� °1° F 10. MeaNAvg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group
Subjects for Whom Results Will t`
Be Reported Next Year:
Progress Report Comments: Provide any additional information that further explains or is important to the interpretation of the results reported in
the progress report, including program implementation issues, pending additional program results,supplemental evaluation findings(process
evaluations,case studies,cost-benefit analysis,etc.),the results of statistical significance testing, program changes emanating from the
evaluation results,etc.
We have observed changes in behavior among the Middle
School. Program clients, On average, clients had fewer
arrests and sustained petitions during the intervention
e,
period as compared with period before program entry.
(Nonparametric test results indicated that the difference
Return to Program Selection Sc en
Add/Edit Outcome Measures
http://www.bdcorT.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=2&view°=p&action=r&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure
Page 1 of 3
California dome Tuesday,October 15, 2002
The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act
Contra Costa: 2002 Progress Report for Family Intervention in Substance Abuse Program
In the area below,please enter program expenditures for each identified line item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2001 -2002
ALLOCATED FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 -2002 $591,939
�_�s r� � A Funds
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES FOR 2001 -2002 State Funds interest N�rn-JJCP
Salaries and Benefits:(Help) 246,07$
Services and Supplies:{Help} 3,859 � $Fo-�
Professional Services:(Help) F s
31,977 ', 0[ -.... __1I
Total Non-JJCPA
0 Funds:
Corrfmunity-Based Organi�atsons:{Neap) �'"'""
Fixed Assets; (Help) 32,903 0 �'"
Administrative Overhead(Maximum=0.5%of State Funds): (Help) 2,475 � 1
Other.(Help) 67,30
Fund Totals: $384,59 $0JE $0
Program Total for 2001 -2002Fiscal Year: $384,593
Enter the number of Juveniles who participated In the program during the
fiscal year 2001 -2002.Provide separate counts for those completed the
program,those who wers'in progress`as the end of the fiscal year(i.e.,
still'enrolled'in the program),and those who did not complete the
program(i.e.,failed to completed the program and are no longer Enter the approximate average length of time spent In the program by all
'enrolled'in the program). program participants during the fiscal year.
NUMBER OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS AVERAGE LENGTH OF TIME
Completed Program: 18 [Average Length of Time In Program'. _11149 iia s
9
In Progress: 257 PER PARTICIPANT EXPENDITURES
Funds Expended Per Program $1,398.52
Did Not Complete Program: Participant:
Tt tel: 275
21
http:l/www.bdeorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=5&view=p&action=r&period.-2002 10115/2002
Outcome Measure Page 2 of 3
Progress Report Instructions: For each outcome listed In the table,report the program results in the boxes provided. REPORT NUMBERS
ONLY. DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS("%,""pct.,""percent"etc.). Inclusion of anything
other than numbers will result in the entry being"zeroed out."
PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,CLICK HERE FOR SPECIFIC,IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME
INFORMATION.
JuvenileParticipant Outcome Measures
Outcome: Arrest Rate(Ail Arrests) Completion of Probation Rate Incarceration Rate
Outcome Measure Expressed as: A Mean or Average A Percentage A Mean or Average
Program Gaal or Expectation for Decrease(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal):
Outcome Measure: Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
Goal Expressed With Reference Contemporaneous Group Similar Contemporaneous Group Similar Contemporaneous Group Similar
to: to Group that Receives Program to Group that Receives Program to Group that Receives Program
Services Services Services
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to
Conduct of Program Participants N/A N/A NIA
at an Earlier Point in Time,What
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conduct of Program period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants During Fallowing Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry
Time Period:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 160 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
Number of Program Participants 1$ 1$ 1$
for Whom Results Reported: �_._-. _._
Results For Program Participants: IL
an/Avg. % Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants 257 257 257
for Whom Results Will Be .... __ _. .
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference n'" "
Group: 1"
Results for Reference Group: g 0,,. ,. ..,,_'°lo 1Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group
Subjects for Whom Results Will
Be Reported Next Year:
Outcome: Rate of Completion of Rate of Completion of Court- probation Violation Rate
Restitution Ordered Community Service
Outcome Measure Expressed as: A Percentage A Percentage A Mean or Average
IF
Program Goal or Expectation for Incresse(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal):
Outcome Measure: 11 Magnitude Unkown 11 Magnitude Unkown i[Magnitude Unkown
http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=5&view=p&action=r&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure Page 3 of 3
Goal Expressed With Reference Contemporaneous Group Similar Contemporaneous Group Similar Contemporaneous Group Similar
to; to Group that Receives Program to Group that Receives Program to Group that Receives Program
Services Services Services
if Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to
Conduct of Program Participants N/A N/A N/A
at an Earlier Point in Time,What
is the Earlier Time Period?
Gaal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conduct of Program Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants During Following Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry
Time Period:
Approximate Length of Time in
Bays Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
[Number of Program Participants 1S1$ 18
ham Results Reported:
Results For Program Participants: ,
p Mean/Avg.
Estimated Dumber of Additional
Current Year Program Participants 257 257 257
for Whom Results Will Be
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference
p IL p F
Group
Results for Reference Group: Mean/Avg,
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group
Subjects for Whom Results Will
Be Reported Next Year:
Progress Report Comments: Provide any additional information that further explains or is important to the interpretation of the results reported in
the progress report, including program implementation issues,pending additional program results,supplemental evaluation findings(process
evaluations,case studies, cost-benefit analysis,etc.),the results of statistical significance testing, program changes emanating from the
evaluation results,etc,
1Although it took a considerable amount of time for the
Family Intervention Program to become fully staffed, it hasty
accumulated many youth clients in a very brief period. To
date, the program includes 115 families that are made up o
115 drug offending parents, 40 partners, and 275 children
T _..
Re ur to Pt'election Screen
Add/Edit Outcome Measures
http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/jcpa/outcome measures.asp?progrram=5&view=p&action=T&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure Page 1 of 4
California Home Tuesday,October 15.. 2002
INV
The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act
Contra Costa: 2002 Progress Report for High Challenge Team Program
In the area below,please enter program expenditures for each identified line Item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2001 -2002
ALLOCATED FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 -2002 ;)!564,788
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES FOR 2001 -2002 State Funds Interest Non-JJCPA Funds
Salaries and Benefits:(Help) 523,854'
Services and Supplies:(Help) 24,78 0
Professional Services:(Help) 30,509 0
Total Non-JJCPA
Community-Based Organizations: (Help) p 0 Funds:
... 337,437
Fixed Assets:(Help) 1124,644
Admfnis#native Overhead(Maximum=0.5%of State Funds):(Help) 2,399 0
Other:(Help) 64,594 0
Fund Totals: - $770,785 $0 $337,437
Program Total for 2001 -2002Fiscal Year: $1,108,222
Enter the number of Juveniles who participated In the program during the
fiscal year 2001 -2002.Provide separate counts for those completed the
program,those who were'in progress'as the end of the fiscal year(i.e.,
still'enrolled'In the program),and those who did not complete the
program(i.e.,failed to completed the program @An ,are no longer Enter the approximate average length of time spent In the program by all
'enrolled'in the program), program participants during the fiscal year.
NUMBER OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS AVERAGE LENGTH OF TIME
L
ete d Program: ^— 78 Average Length of Time In Program: 129 Days
In Progress: 120...._,.. PER PARTICIPANT EXPENDITURES
Funds Expended Per Program
Ed
Not Complete Program: 27Participant:
54,925.43
Total: 225
http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program--l&view=p&action=r&period=2002 10/1512002
Outcome Measure Page 2 of 4
Progress Report Instructions:For each outcome listed In the table,report the program results in the boxes provided. REPORT NUMBERS
ONLY. DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS("%,""pct.,""percent"etc.). Inclusion of anything
other than numbers will result In the entry being"zeroed out."
PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,-CLICK H_RE FOR SPECIFIC,IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME
INFORMATION.
Juvenile Participant Outcome Measures
Outcome: Arrest Rate(All Arrests) J -Completlon of Probation Rats Incarceration Rate
Outcome Measure Expressed as: A Mean or Average E�'Percentage A Mean or Average
Program Goal or Expectation for Decrease(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal)
Outcome Measure: Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
Contemporaneous Group(during
Goal Expressed With Reference Program Participants at an Earlier the program period)Consisting of Program Participants at an Earlier
to: Point in Time all Juvenile Probationers in the Point in Time
County
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time
Conduct of Program Participants Prior to Program ram Ent N/A
at an Earlier Point in Time.What Entry Prior to Program Entry
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for of me
Pro Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conductct of Program 9
Participants During Following Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Time Period: Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry
Approximate Length of Time in
Clays Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Clays Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
Number of Program Participants
for Whom Results Reported: .._.. 77
Results For Program Participants: 0.11 Mean/Avg. IL 42.. . ... �/, F Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants 120 120 120
for Whom Results Will Be
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference
Group: 256
.._.._..! 277
77
Results for Reference Grou 0.33
p' w..._ Mean/Avg. 27,.. 0100 Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group 0.
Subjects for Whom Results Will
Be Reported Next Year:
http://www.bdeorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=l&view--p&action=r&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure
Page 3 of 4
Outcome: Rate of Completion of Rate of Completion of Court- Probation Violation Rate
Restitution Ordered Community Service
Outcome Measure Expressed as: A Percentage A Percentage A Mean or Average
Program Goal or Expectation for Increase(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal):
Outcome Measure: Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
Contemporaneous Group(during Contemporaneous Group(during
Goal Expressed With Reference the program period)Consisting of the program period)Consisting of Program Participants at an Earlier
to: all Juvenile Probationers in the all Juvenile Probationers in the Point in Time
County County
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to Some Standard Period of Time
Conduct of Program Participants N/A NAA ram Prior to Pro
at an Earlier Point in Time,What 9 Entry
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conduct of Program Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants During Following Program Entry Program Entry Program Ent
Time Period: Entry
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Clays Represented by Results for 180 Days 0 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
Number of Program Participants 77 77 77
for Whom Results Reported: W r,
Results For Program Participants: 10 olo 0.04 g
cMean/Av .
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants
for Whom Results Will Be
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference1E
Group: � F F 277
Group: (.-
Results for Referent e Group: �10 % 0.1 Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group
Subjects for Whom Results Will
Be Reported Next Year:
Progress Report Comments. Provide any additional information that further explains or is important to the interpretation of the results reported in
the progress report, including program implementation issues, pending additional program results,supplemental evaluation findings(process
evaluations,case studies, cost-benefit analysis,etc.),the results of statistical significance testing,program changes emanating from the
evaluation results,etc.
We have observed a change in the behavior of High School
Program clients. On average, clients have fewer days of
missed school, days with one or more class cuts, formal
school referrals, and arrests during the intervention
period as compared to the period before program entry.
,•rpt, �" s - 2.
€' a
Re urn to Program Selection Screen
Add/Edit Outcome Measures
http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=l&view--p&action=r&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measured
Page 1 of 3
California Hume Tuesday, October 15,2002
The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act
Contra Costa: 2002 Progress Report for Safe Futures-Summit Center
In the area below,please enter program expenditures for each identified line item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2001 -2002
ALLOCATED FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 -2002 $225,000 71
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES FOR 2001 -2002 State Funds Interest Non-JJCPA Funds
Salaries and Benefits: (Help) 225,000
Services and Supplies: (Help) 0..
Professional Services: (Help) 0 ;0
-- Total Non-JJCPA
Community-based Organizations: (Help) Funds:
J
Fixed Assets: (Help)
Administrative Overhead(Maximum=0.5%of State Funds):(Help) 0
Other. (Help) �... .-�..,...� 0 .
Fund Totals: 5225,000 $0 ((��
=4 50
Program Total for 2001 -2002Fiscai Year: $225,008
Enter the number of juveniles who participated in the program during the
fiscal year 2001 -2002.Provide separate counts for those completed the
program,those who were'in progress'as the end of the fiscal year(i.e.,
still'enrolled'In the program),and those who did not complete the
program(i.e.,failed to completed the program and are no longer Enter the approximate average length of time spent in the program by all
'enrolled'in the program). program participants during the fiscal year.
NUMBER OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS AVERAGE LENGTH OF TIME
Completed Program: Average Length of Time In Program: i_ [�ryyg
In Progress: jp PER PARTICIPANT EXPENDITURES
Funds Expended Per Program $20,454.55
Did Not Complete Program: 0 Participant:
Total ��1
hq://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=7&view=p&action=r&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure Page 2 of 3
Progress Report instructions:For each outcome listed In the table,report the program results in the boxes provided.REPORT NUMBERS
ONLY.DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS("%,""pct.,""percent,"etc.). Inclusion of anything
other than numbers will result In the entry being"zeroed out."
PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,Cts CN K HERE FOR SPECIFIC,IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME
INFORMATION.
Juvenile Participant Outcome Measures
Outcome: Arrest Rate(Alt Arrests Completion of Probation Rate incarceration Rate1
Outcome Measure Expressed as A Mann or Average A Percentage A Mean or Average
Program Goal or Expectation for Decrease(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal):
Outcome Measure: Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
Goal Expressed With Reference Program Participants at an Earlier Program Participants at an Earlier Program Participants at an Earlier
to: Point In Time Point in Time Point In Time
If Gaal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time
Conduct of Program Participants Prior to Program Entry Prior to Program Entry Prior to Program Entry
at an Earlier Point in Time:What
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conduct of Program Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants During Following Program Exit Program Exit Program Exit
Time Period:
Approximate Length of Time in
Gays Represented by Results for1813 Days 1813 Days 18t3 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Clays Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days JKDays
Reference Group:
Number of Program Participants 1 1
for Whom Results Reported:
Results For Pr Partici ants: �
ogram pMeanlAvg. 1- % 1' Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants10
for Whom Results Will Be
1Q 14
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference 0
Group: �
Results for Reference Group: IF tlMean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group
Subjects for Whom Results Will
Be Reported Next Year:
ro--u—tc-
ome: Rate of Completion of Rate of Completion of Court- Probation Violation Rate
Restitution Ordered Community Service
Clutcome Measure Expressed as: A Percentage A Percentage �� A Mean or Average
Program Goalor Expectation for Increase(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal):
Outcome Measure: Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
Goal Expressed With Reference Program Participants at an Earlier Program Participants at an Earlier Program Participants at an Earlier
to: Point In Time Point In Time Point In Time
http://www.bdeorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome_measures.asp?program=7&view--p&action=T&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure •
Page 3 of 3
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time
Conduct of Program Participants Prior to P
at an Earlier Point in Time,What rogram Entry Prior to Program Entry Prior to Program Entry
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conduct of Program
Participants During Following Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Time Period: Program Exit Program Exit Program Exit
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
Number of Program Participants"`""'""
for Whom Results Reported: _
Results For Program Participants: °A
100 % F--Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants 10 10 10
for Whom Results Will Be
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference ,�..,
Group : I F_ -1.. J=F
,..
Results for Reference Group: 0 W 0 {0
`A Mean/Avg,
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group
Subjects for Whom Results Will !"
Be Reported Next Year:
Progress Report comments: Provide any additional information that further explains or is important to the interpretation of the results reported in
the progress report, including program implementation issues, pending additional program results,supplemental evaluation findings(process
evaluations,case studies, cost-benefit analysis,etc.),the results of statistical significance testing, program changes emanating from the
evaluation results,etc.
Funding for the Summit Center did not begin until September`
2001. Reporting on minors in the program has been delayed
because of concerns .from mental health staff regarding 3
confidentiality. Parental consents to participate in the
evaluation have been refused in some cases. And although
Return to Program Selection Screen
Add/Edlt Outcome Measures
http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=7&view
Outcome Measure Page 1 of 3
California Hoene Tuesday,October 15, 2002
The Juvenile JusticeCrime Prevention Act
Contra Costa: 2002 progress Report for SafeFutures-Ranch Aftercare
In the area below,please enter program expenditures for each Identified line Item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2001 -2002
ALLOCATED FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 -2002 $205,847
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES FOR 2001 -2002 State Funds Interest Non-JJGPA Funds
ir
Salaries and Benefits: (Help) 160,502; 0
Services and Supplies: (Help) 4,907 0
E
fessional Services: (Help) 11,105 0
Total Non-JJGPA
Community-Based Organizations: (Help) 0 Funds:
J
[Fixed Assets: (Help) 83,897
Administrative Overhead(Maximum=0.5%of State Funds): (Help) 85�
Other: {Help) 0 0
Fund Totals: $281,270 $o ]=O
Program Total for 2001 -2002Fisoal Year: $281,270
Enter the number of juveniles who participated in the program during the
fiscal year 2001 -2002.Provide separate counts for those completed the
program,those who were'In progress'as the end of the fiscal year(i.e.,
still'enrolled'In the program),and those who did not complete the
program(i.e.,failed to completed the program wd are no longer Enter the approximate average length of time spent in the program by all
'enrolled'In the program). program participants during the fiscal year.
NUMBER OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS AVERAGE LENGTH OF TIME
Completed Program: 12y Average Length of Time In Program: JrJF50 C3ays
In Progress: 93 PER PARTICIPANT EXPENDITURES
Funds Expended Per Program $2,388.87
Did Not Complete Program: ILF77
Participant:
Total: 108
s
http://www.bdeorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program-6&viewer&actions&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure Page 2 of 3
Progress Report Instructions:For each outcome listed In the table,report the program results in the boxes provided.REPORT NUMBERS
ONLY.DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS("%,""pct.,""percent,"etc.). Inclusion of anything
other than numbers will result in the entry being"zeroed out."
PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,CLICK HERE FOR SPECIFIC,IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME
INFORMATION.
Juvenile Participant Outcome Measures
Outcome: Arrest hate(Ail Arrests) l completion of Probation RateIncarceration Rate��
Outcome Measure Expressed as: A Mean or Average
--��11 A Percentage A Mean or Average
Program Goal or Expectation for Decrease(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Gaal)
Outcome Measure: Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
Goal Expressed With Reference Program Participants at an Earlier Program Participants at an Earlier Program Participants at an Earlier
to; Point in Time Point In Time Point in Time
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time
Conduct of Program Participants Prior to Program Entry Prior to Program Entry Prior to Program Entry
at an Earlier Point in Time,What
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conduct of Program Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants During Following Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry
Time Period:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
Number of Program Participants I�
for Whom Results Reported: r r 11
Results For Program Participants: Mean/Avg�� 50 % 10 Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants 93 93 93
for Wham Results Will Be
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference
Group
Results for Reference Group:
B" . .. � d
: .. Mean/Avg.
:
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group 6g3 693
Subjects for Whom Results Will
Be Reported Next Year:
Outcome; Rate of completion of IFRate of completion of court- Probation Violation Rate
Restitution Ordered Community Service
- 11
Outcome Measure Expressed as: A Percentage � A Percentsge �LA`"jean or Average
Program Goal or Expectation forIpMagnftude
ncrease(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal):
Outcome Measure: Unkown Magnitude Unkown il Magnitude Unkown
Goal Expressed With Reference Program Participants at an Earlier Program Participants at an Earlier Program Participants at an Earlier
to: Point In Time Paint In Time 11 Point In Time
http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=6&view=p&action=r&period=2002 10/15/2002
0 7 ,i',��2-cam t
Outcome Measure Page 3 of 3
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time
Conduct of Program Participants Prior to P
at an Earlier Point in Time,What rogram Entry Prior to Program Entry Prior to Program Entry
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conduct of Program Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants During Following Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry
Time Period:
Approximate Length of Time in
Clays Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
Number of Program Participants IF7 12 12
for Whom Results Reported: r__.........
[Results For Program Participants: olo t� % Mean/Avg.
E
ed Number of Additional
Year Program Participants 93
m Results Will Sed Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference F
Group: �" .........._.., _. .,
Results for Reference Group: 0 1 Io 22 Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group
Subjects for Whom Results Will
Be Reported Next Year:
Progress Report Comments: Provide any additional information that further explains or is important to the interpretation of the results reported in
the progress report, including program implementation issues,pending additional program results,supplemental evaluation findings(process
evaluations;case studies,cost-benefit analysis,etc.),the results of statistical significance testing, program changes emanating from the
evaluation results,etc.
The number of youth in the Ranch Aftercare program is belo;�'
expectations for three primary reasons. (1) Commitments to 'i��Fai
the Ranch are down from recent years. (2) JJCPA funding fo "`z
Ranch aftercare started in waves (July and October 2001) ,
and (3) data collection was not initiated until minors had :
Return to Prograrn Selection Scroen
Add/Edit Outcome Measures
http://www.bdcorT.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program--6&view--p&action=r&.period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure g
California Home Tuesday,October 15,2002
The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act
Contra Costa: 2002 Progress Report for SafeFutures-Volunteers in Probation
In the area below,please enter program expenditures for each identified line item from each funding source incurred during Fiscal Year 2001 -2002
ALI CATER FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001 -2002 $64,957
PROGRAM EXPENDITURES FOR 2001 -2002 State Funds interest Non-JJCPA Funds
Salaries and Benefits: (Help} 92,429 0
Services and Supplies: (Help) 4,794 -- 0
Professional Services: (Help) 3,515 a -__-_Y�
...- $
Total Nan-JJCPA
Community-Based Organizations: (Help) Funds:
0 o
Fixed Assets: (Help) 0 0
Administra#ive C3verhead(Maximumµ0.5%of State Funds): (Help) 234 j
Cather:(Help}
Fund Totals: $70,972 s0 $0
Program Total for 2001 -2002Fiscal Year: $70,972
Enter the number of Juveniles who participated in the program during the
fiscal year 2001 -2002.Provide separate counts for those completed the
program,those who were'In progress'as the and of the fiscal year(I.e.,
still'enrolled'in the program),and those who did not complete the
program(i.e.,failed to completed the program and are no longer Enter the approximate average length of time spent In the program by all
'enrolled'In the program). program participants during the fiscal year.
NUMBER OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS AVERAGE LENGTH OF TIME
Compdeted Program: Average Length of Time In Program;
In Progress: 24 PER PARTICIPANT EXPENDITURES
Funds Expended Per Program 1=$2,957.17
Laid Not Complete Program: � o7 Participant:
Total: I 24
http://www.b&orr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=8&view=p&action=r&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure Page 2 of 3
Progress Report Instructions: For each outcome listed In the table,report the program results In the boxes provided. REPORT NUMBERS
ONLY.DO NOT INCLUDE ANY SYMBOLS,CHARACTERS OR WORDS WITH THE NUMBERS("%,""pct.,""percent,"etc.). Inclusion of anything
other than numbers will result in the entry being"zeroed out."
PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE TABLE,CLICK HERE FOR SPECIFIC,IMPORTANT GUIDANCE ON PROVIDING ALL REQUIRED OUTCOME
INFORMATION.
JuvenileParticipant Outcome Measures
Outcome: Arrest Rate(All Arrests) Completion of Probation Raincarceration Rate
Outcome Measure Expressed as: EA Mean or Average - A Percentage 11
A Mean or Average
Program Gaal or Expectation for Decrease(Relative Goal): Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal):
Outcome Measure: Magnitude Unkown Ma1[ gnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
Goal Expressed With Reference Program Participants at an Earlier Program Participants at an Earlier Program Participants at an Earlier
to: Point in Time Point in Time Point in Time
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time
Conduct of Program Participants Prior to Program Ent
at an Earlier Point in Time,What Entry Prior to Program Entry Prior to Program Entry
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conduct of Program Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants During Fallowing Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry
Time Period:
Approximate Length of Time in
Clays Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Gays Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
Number of Program Participants � �
for Whom Results Reported: L�._..._.�W �� tg � E�
Results For Pr ram Partici 0
°g pants: � Mean/Avg. °lo Fq Mean/Avg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants
for Whom Results Will Be
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference
Group: F77 1
Results for Reference Group: 0 IMea °�o Mean/Av
... NAvg. _._..._..._ g.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group 1n rr
Subjects for Whom Results Will
Be Reported Next Year:
Rate of Completion of � Rate of completion of Court-
[ utcom
e: Probation Violation Rate
Restitution Ordered Community Service
Outcome Measure Expressed as: A Percentage A Percentage A Mean or Average
Program Goal or Expectation for Increase(Relative Goal) Increase(Relative Goal): Decrease(Relative Goal):
Outcome Measure: Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown Magnitude Unkown
I[Goal Expressed With Reference Program Participants at an EarlierProgram Participants at an Earlier Program Participants at an Earlier
to; Point in Time Point in Time Point in Time
http://www.bdcorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=8&view=p&action=r&period=2002 10/15/2002
Outcome Measure 3Page 3 of 3
If Goal for Outcome Measure is
Expressed with Reference to Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time Some Standard Period of Time
Conduct of Program Participants Prior to Program Entry Prior to Program Entry Prior to Program Entry
at an Earlier Point in Time,What
is the Earlier Time Period?
Goal for Outcome Measure Refers During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard During or At End of Standard
to Conduct of Program Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of Period of Time from Point of
Participants During Following Program Entry Program Entry Program Entry
Time Period:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Program Participants:
Approximate Length of Time in
Days Represented by Results for 180 Days 180 Days 180 Days
Reference Group:
Number of Program Participants
for Whom Results Reported: F77 t-
Eesult
For Program Participants: , 0
� _� la % MeanlAvg.
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Program Participants
for Whom Results Will Be 16
Reported Next Year:
Number of Subjects in Reference F 0 I'
Group
Results for Reference Group: Q O0``�``��`
Estimated Number of Additional
Current Year Reference Group rr r
Subjects for Whom Results Will 1� 1 r� _ I�
Be Reported Next Year:
Progress Report Comments: Provide any additional information that further explains or is important to the interpretation of the results reported in
the progress report, including program implementation issues, pending additional program results,supplemental evaluation findings(process
evaluations,case studies, cost-benefit analysis,etc.),the results of statistical significance testing,program changes emanating from the
evaluation results,etc.
Data is collected only on those youth in VIP who are in on !'Y
on-one mentoring pairs. In addition, VIP mentors see 20 o
more youth each week in tutoring sessions and "internet
mentoring" for minors in juvenile institutionsMH
.
Return to Pragrsm Select on Screen
Add/Edit Outcome Measures
httpJ/www.bdcorr.ca.gov/jjcpa/outcome measures.asp?program=8&view=p&action=r&period=2002 10/15/2002
Contra Costa County Probation Department
Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act(JJCPA)
October 15, 2002
ProLyress Report Comments:
Community Probation
We have observed positive changes in behavioral outcomes for the clients when
reviewing six-month periods before and after program entry. Clients are expelled from
school, arrested, and given sustained petitions less frequently. (These differences are
statistically significant at the .05 level when evaluated with nonparametric procedures.)
The clients had about the same number of suspensions from school.
Middle School
We have observed changes in behavior among the Middle School Program clients. On
average, clients had fewer arrests and sustained petitions during the intervention period as
compared with period before program entry. (Nonparametric test results indicated that
the difference in arrests was statistically significant at the .001 level; similar tests
revealed the difference in sustained petitions was statistically significant at the .05 level.)
Family Intervention Program
Although it took a considerable amount of time for the Family Intervention Program to
become fully staffed, it has accumulated many youth clients in a very brief period. To
date, the program includes 115 families that are made up of 115 drug offending parents,
40 partners, and 275 children who range in age from new born to young adult with an
average age of about six-years-old.
Nigh.School
We have observed a change in the behavior of High School Program clients. On average,
clients have fewer days of missed school,days with one or more class cuts, formal school
referrals, and arrests during the intervention period as compared to the period before
program entry. (Parametric testing revealed that the difference in days with cuts and
school referrals were statistically significant at the .001 level. Nonparametric testing
revealed that the differences in days with cuts, school referrals, arrests, and sustained
petitions were statistically significant at the .05 level or lower.)
Summit Center
Funding for the Summit Center did not begin until September 2001. Reporting on minors
in the program has been delayed because of concerns from mental health staff regarding
confidentiality. Parental consents to participate in the evaluation have been refused in
some cases. And although the program has been operating at capacity(20 minors,
lengths of stay have been increasing(and hence turnover of residents has been
decreasing).
1
Ranch Aftercare
The number of youth in the Ranch Aftercare program is below expectations for three
primary reasons. (1) Commitments to the Ranch are down from recent years. (2) JJCPA
funding for Ranch aftercare started in waves (July and October 2001), and(3)data
collection was not initiated until minors had completed their terms of incarceration(150
to 180 days) and begun the aftercare supervision period. Thus, the data collection for this
program did not start until after the beginning of 2002.
Volunteers in Probation Program .
Data is collected only on those youth in VIP who are in one-on-one mentoring pairs. In
addition, VIP mentors see 20 or more youth each week in tutoring sessions and "internet
mentoring" for minors in juvenile institutions.
2