HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11122002 - C1-C5 j
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: MAURICE M. SHIU, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: November 12, 2002
SUBJECT: Approve Project Contingency Fund Increase for the Port Chicago Highway Overlay &
Widening Project, Project No. 0662-6R4251-01 & 0662-6R4262-02, Bay Point area.
(District V)
Speck is Request(s)or Recommendatlon(s)&Background&Justlflcation
1. Recommended Action:
APPROVE project contingency fund increase of $10,000 for a new total of $68,874 effective
November 12, 2002 in order to compensate the contractor, B&B Grading & Paving, Inc. for
unforeseen extra work and existing item increases.
11. Financial Impact:
The project contingency funds are currently insufficient to cover the increased cost.The increase in
contingency funds will be funded by 58.2% Measure C,22.5% Navy Mi igation, 7.8% Road Funds,
6.7% Redevelopment Agency, & 4.8% Area of Benefit. °
Continued on attachment: X yes SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
�'APPROV OTHER
SIGNATURE (S):
ACTION OF BOA D : Nqve r- 12, 2002 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED xx OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
xx UNANIMOUS (ABSENTNone)
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an
action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of
Contact: Mike Carlson,(925)313-2320 Supervisors on the date shown.
Crig.Div.: PW(Constr)
cc: County Administrator
Auditor-Controller ATTESTED: November 1.2, 2002
Pudic Works JOHN SWEETEN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and
Accounting County Administrator
- Construction,R.Bruno
- Design
Contractor ,
�'iz Deputy
RBAb BY -. , De ut
G:\GRPDATA\CONST\BO\2002\11-NOVEMBER\APPROVECONTINGENCYPORTCHIDAGOOVERLAY.DOC
C.
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on November 12, 2002_, by the following vote:
AYES• Supervisors Uilkema, Gerber, Desaulnier, Glover, and Gioia
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Agreement to Provide Consulting Services to the City of Livermore
Project No. 4580-6X3012
RELISTED: Continued by Supervisor Gerber On December 3, 2002
1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct
copy of an action taken and entered on the
minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the
date shown.
Attested: November 12, 2002
John Sweeten, Clerk of the Board
Of Supervisors and County Administrator
By:
Dep*Clerk
A
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: MAURICE M. SHIU,PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: November 12, 2002
SUBJECT: Agreement to Provide Consulting Services to the City of Livermore
Project No. 4580-6X3012.
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATIONS)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
1. Recommended Action:
APPROVE the agreement to provide consulting services by the County to the City of Livermore for their
Vasco Road/1-580 Interchange Project, in the amount not to exceed $50,000.00 effective November 12,
2002, The agreement extends through the completion of all assigned tasks.
AUTHORIZE the Chair,Board of Supervisors to sign the agreement on behalf of the County.
II. Financial Impact:
The City of Livermore will pay the actual costs for Real Property staff right of way services.
111. Reasons for Recommendations and Back round:
The City of Livermore requires a variety of right of way services to be performed by a certified agency and
desires to contract with the County for these services on their Vasco Road/1-580 Interchange project.
IV. Consequences of Negative Action:
Less efficient government because the City of Livermore would have to contract with another certified
agency at greater expense.
Continued on Attachment:— SIGNATURE: &=LL—b—Aa
e-I(ECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
—APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(
ACTION OF BO T ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct
AYES: —NOES: copy of an action taken and entered on the
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:— minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the
KAL:db date shown.
G:1GrpData\RealProp\2002-Files\BOs&RES\1301ivermom.doc
ATTESTED:
Orig.Div: Public Works(RIP) JOHN SWEETEN,Clark of the Board of
Contact: Karen A Laws(313-2228) Supervisors and County Administrator
cc: County Administrator
Auditor-Controller(via RIP)
P.W.Accounting By Deputy
Board Orders Senior Clerk,Adm.
7. Term. The term of this agreement shall commence on the effective date hereof and
shall end upon termination by either party upon 30 days written notice. The rights
and obligations of Paragraph 5"Indemnification"shall survive any such termination.
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CITY OF LIVERMORE
BY By '- tct , j,_,
Chair, Board of Supervisors City Manager
ATTEST:
John Sweeten, ATTEST: City Clerk
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
and County Administrator
By By
Deputy
Recommended to the County Recommended for Approval:
Board of Supervisors for Approval:
B Ae5ilaB AA11fiAl ) 11,1'Aa
"ropal Real Property get -pr-ojledt' Man
By
J,-
Pub fklgrks Director
Approved as to Form:
City Attorney
[Form A DDroved by County Counsel
2/15/941 By
KL:dm
G:\GrpData\RealProp\2002-Files\02-2\AG17 Livermore.doc
2
lz3-a.?.
APPENDIX"A"
(Rates Effective October 1, 2002)
REGULAR TIME OVERTIME
From TO From To
Prinical Real Property Agent 119.00 165.00 122.00 170.00
Supervising Real Property Agent 99.00 135.00 100.00 140.00
Senior Real Property Agent 88.00 125.00 89.00 130.00
Associate Real Property Agent 79.00 115.00 79.00 120.00
Assistant Real Property Agent 68.00 95.00 67.00 95.00
Senior Real Property Tech Asst. 63.00 90.00 62.00 90.00
Real Property Tech Asst. 54.00 80.00 52.00 80.00
Assistant County Surveyor 105.00 135.00 108.00 140.00
Eng Tech Supervisor-Land Survey 79.00 115.00 80.00 115.00
Engineer Tech Senior 75.00 105.00 75.00 105.00
Engineer Tech Journey 66.00 90.00 65.00 90.00
Engineer Tech Entry 49.00 75.00 47.00 80.00
CARD Operator 61.00 85.00 60.00 85.00
Senior Civil Engineer 115.00 160.00 118.00 165.00
Engineer-Journey 92.00 135.00 93.00 140.00
Account Clerk Advanced 52.00 75.00 52.00 75.00
Note: Rates will change periodically due to contracted salary Increases and overhead changes.
Rates for Individual employees vary because of steps within each classlflcation.
G:kGrpData\Rea[Prop\FormskAgents Rates October 2002.x1s
Recording Requested By:
Contra Costa County Public Works Dept. �1 1 #'�
Construction Division CONTRA COSTA Co Recorder Office
255 Glacier Drive STENN L, WEIR Clerk-Recorder
Martinez, CA 94553 DOC— 20&-0422069-00
Return to: Wodnosday, NOV 13, 2002 12:44:14
FRE $0.00
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO CLERK Ttl Pd $0.00 W4861149688
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Irc/RS/1-1
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Accepting and Giving RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTANCE
Notice of Completion of Contract for and NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Port Chicago Highway (C.C. § 3086, 3093)
Overlay & Widening
Project No.0662-6R4251-01 &
0662-684262-02 RESOLUTION NO. 2002/ 708
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES that:
The County of Contra Costa on June 19, 2002 contracted with B & B Grading & Paving, Inc., for
constructing curb and gutter,widen existing asphalt concrete roadway, place AC leveling course, install
drainage inlets and drainage pipe,overlay and restripe Port Chicago Highway from Willow Pass Road to
Nichols Road in the Bay Point area, with Great American Insurance Company as surety, for work to be
performed on the grounds of the County; and
The Public Works Director reports that said work has been inspected and complies with the approved
plans, special provisions and standard specifications and recommends its acceptance as complete as of
October 30, 2002.
Therefore, said work is ACCEPTED as completed on said date, and the Clerk shall file with the County
Recorder a copy of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Completion for said contract.
PASSED BY THE BOARD on November 12, 2002 by the following vote:
AYES: SUPERVISORS UIIXEMA, GERBER, DESAULNIER, ,GLOVER, AND GIOIA
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
CERTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an
action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of
Contact: Mike Carlson (925)313-2321 Supervisors on the date shown.
Orig. Dept.:Public Works(Const.)
cc: Record and Return
Auditor ATTESTED.- NCVEMBER 12, 2002
Public works- Accounting JOHN SWEETEN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and
- Construction,R. Bruno
- Env.,C.Sellgren County Administrator
- Traffic,R.Tavenier
Contractor
RB:kj By -,Deputy
GAGrpData\Const%B0\2002\1 I-NovembeMCCEPTANCE-PottChicagoOverlay.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2002/ 708
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS`
FROM: MAURICE M. SHIU, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: November 'fit, 2002
SUBJECT: APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of Supervisors to execute Amendment No. 1
to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with the City of Richmond.
Project Number 0676-6P1008
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
i. Recommended Action:
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of Supervisors,to execute Amendment No. 1 to the
Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with the City of Richmond, effective November 12, 2002, to
define the responsibilities for completion of portions of the Richmond Parkway, North Richmond
area. (district i)
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
,-APPROVE i_OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOA N NOVEMBER 12, 2002 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED- xx _OTHER
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an
action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS of Supervisors on the date shown.
xx UNANIMOUS (ABSENT NONE _ )
AYES: NOES: -
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
ATTESTED: NOVEMBER 12, 2002
JYje JOHN SWEETEN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
O:1GrpOsta\TransEng12002,SO-TE\BO for Mchmond Parkway Amendment#I.doc and County Administrator
Orig.Div:Public Works(TE)
Contact: Jori Yee(313-2258)
c: J.Gregory,CAO
J.Bueren,Deputy PWD By_ - , Deputy
PW Accounting ,
I / '
SUBJECT: APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of Supervisors to execute Amendment No. 1
to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with the City of Richmond.
Project Number 4676-6P1008
®ATE: November 12, 2002
PAGE: 2
11. Financial Impact:
There will be no impact to the General Fund. The County's share of the costs will be funded with
Road funds.
III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background:
Contra Costa County and the City of Richmond entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers
Agreement on June 25, 1991, to define the responsibilities of the County and the City relative to
the design, construction, and maintenance of those portions of the Richmond Parkway located
within the unincorporated area of the County. The City and County had differences of opinion on
how the project should be designed. The difference was resolved by agreeing that the City would
use their design standards in the County's portion of the project and that the City would then
agree to maintain the County's portion of the project once it was completed. There was a
difference of opinion on what that maintenance would entail and have not been able to come to
closure on the issue.
In the fall of 2000, discussions resumed and it was agreed that the County's main concern with
the City's design was potential problems due to settlement such as drainage maintenance and
major pavement failures and that those should be the responsibility of the City. However, it was
also agreed that all routine maintenance, including traffic signals, striping and signage, routine
pavement maintenance, streetlights and sweeping should be the responsibility of the County.
Amendment No. 1 formalizes this understanding between the County and City.
IV. Consequences of Negative Action:
Failure to approve the agreement will delay the maintenance of the County's portion of the
Richmond Parkway.
AMENDMENT No. 1
Y•, vr,rrc POWERS AGREEMENT
Y AND THE CITY OF RICHMOND
PORTIONS OF THE
SWAY PROJECT
> WITHIN
4TRA COSTA COUNTY.
day of ,2002,is by and between the
CIT' - )f the State of California,hereinafter"CITY,"and
the t subdivision of the State of California,hereinafter
`°CC
COBion 6500,
;jam .
t ed into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement,
here 1 define the responsibilities of CITY and COUNTY
: D
relaCaY Eu urs va aaE'.z, .V..� .. __ r mce of those portions of the Richmond Parkway,
hereinafter"PROJECT,"located within the unincorporated area of COUNTY; and
WHEREAS,CITY and COUNTY now desire to amend said AGREEMENT in accordance
with the provisions of Section 11, "Agreement Modification," of said AGREEMENT.
NOW, THEREFORE, CITY and COUNTY hereto mutually agree to amend said
AGREEMENT as follows:
A. Add to Section 4., "Responsibilities of CITY and COUNTY"under subsection(a) "CITY
shall be responsible for the following:"
(10) Accept responsibility for all items related to roadway settlement and major pavement
failure, including, but not limited to, modification to drainage facility and interim
maintenance of drainage facility as a result ofroadway settlement within that portion
of the PROJECT within COUNTY's jurisdiction.
B. Add to Section 4., "Responsibilities of CITY and COUNTY," under subsection (b)
"COUNTY shall be responsible for the following:"
(6) Review the appropriateness of requiring full abandonment of abutter's rights along
Richmond Parkway for the ColorSpot property when and if this property applies for a
land use entitlement.
(7) Pursue a mechanism to fund the maintenance of landscaping for that portion of the
PROJECT within COUNTY's jurisdiction and look for opportunities to reimburse
CITY for any prior landscaping maintenance cost.
AMENDMENT NO, I-JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND
CITY OF RICHMOND FOR COMPLETION OF PORTIONS OF
THE RICHMOND PARKWAY PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN
UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
C. Revise Section 5.,"Authorized Roresentatives, 'to change the Authorized Representative
of CITY to:
RICH MC COY
City of Richmond
2600 Barrett Avenue
P.O. Box 4046
Richmond, CA 94804
And to change the Authorized Representative of COUNTY to:
MAURICE M. SHIU
Public Works Director
Contra Costa County
255 Glacier Drive
Martinez, CA 94553
D. Delete Section 8., "Acceptance.," A
, . and add as Section 8., "Acceptance":
a_
8. Accotance. CITY shall accept all PROJECT construction work performed by the
contractor when CITY has determined that the work has been satisfactorily
completed by the contractor. When the PROJECT construction work is accepted by
CITY, CITY and COUNTY shall do the following:
(a) CITY shall maintain and assume total responsibility for that portion of the
PROJECT within CITY's jurisdiction and accept responsibility for all items
related to settlement within the road right-of-way,including,but not limited
to, drainage facility maintenance and major pavement failures that occur
within that portion of the PROJECT within COUNTY's jurisdiction. CITY
shall defend,indemnify,save,and hold harmless COUNTY and its governing
body,officers,and employees from any and all claims,costs,and liability for
any damages, sickness, death, or injury to person(s) or property, from any
cause whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from or connected with
CITY's portion of the Project and COUNTY's portion of the PROJECT
related to roadway and major pavement failures(including drainage problems
related to the roadway settlement)after CITY accepts the PROJECT,whether
relating to the design, construction, use, operation, or maintenance of the
PROJECT, save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the COUNTY,its governing body,
officers, and employees. The CITY shall reimburse COUNTY for any
expenditures,including reasonable attorney's fees,COUNTY may make by
reason of such matters that are the subject of this indemnification and, if
requested in writing by COUNTY, shall defend any claims or litigation to
2
AMENDMENT NO. I -JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND
CITY OF RICHMOND FOR COMPLETION OF PORTIONS OF
THE RICHMOND PARKWAY PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN
UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
which this indemnification provision applies at the sole cost and expense of
CITY.
(b) COUNTY shall maintain and assume total responsibility for that portion of
the PROJECT within COUNTY's jurisdiction,except for all items related to
roadway settlement and major pavement failure,including,but not limited to,
modification to drainage facility and interim maintenance of drainage facility
as a result of roadway settlement within that portion of the PROJECT within
COUNTY's jurisdiction. COUNTY shall defend,indemnify,save,and hold
harmless CITY,its governing body,officers,and employees from and against
all claims, suits, actions, or liabilities that arise after CITY accepts the
PROJECT within COUNTY's jurisdiction, whether relating to the design,
construction,use, operation,or maintenance of said COUNTY portion.
(c) Should any part of COUNTY's portion,as described in subsection(b)of this
Section 8,be annexed by CITY,the annexed part shall thereafter be subject to
the provisions of subsection (a) of this Section 8 and shall no longer be
subject to the provisions of subsection(b)of this Section 8.
(d) Section 12., "Ageement Expiration,"shall apply to this Section 8.
BE IT FURTHER agreed that all other provisions of the AGREEMENT not specifically
modified herein remain in full force and in effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,CITY and COUNTY hereto execute this AMENDMENT the day
and year first above written.
3
AMENDMENT NO. I -JOINT EXEERCISE OF POWERS
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND
CITY OF RICHMOND FOR COMPLETION OF PORTIONS OF
THE RICHMOND PARKWAY PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN
UNINCORPORATED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CITY OF RICHMOND
By BY
Chair,Board of Supervisors Mayor
ATTEST: ATTEST:
John Sweeten, Clerk of the City Clerk
Board of Supervisors
and County Administrator
By BY
Recommended for Approval: Recommended for Approval:
Maurice M. Shiu Rich Mc Coy
Public Works Director Public Services Director
By BY
Form Approved: Form Approved:
Silvano B. Marchesi, County Counsel Malcolm Hunter, City Attorney
By BY
Deputy
G:\GrpData\TransEng\YEMchmond ParkwayVEPA Amendment#I Revision 5.doc
Revision—14125/42
4
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: Silvano B. Marchesi, County Counsel
By: David F. Schmidt, Deputy County Counsel
DATE: November 7, 2002
SUBJECT: Correction of Resolution No. 2000/476 levying assessments and annexing Subdivision
8002 (Wendt Ranch) into Countywide Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District
1979-3 (LL-2) Zone 68, Danville area.
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION(S)
APPROVE correction of Resolution No. 20001476 levying assessments and annexing Subdivision
8002 (Wendt Ranch) into Countywide Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District 1979-3 (LL-2)
Zone 68, Danville area.
DECLARE that the correction of Re,,:41ution No. 2000/476 shall be effective nuns pro tunc as of
October 10, 2000.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
No financial impact.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
On October 10, 2000, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2000/476 levying annual benefit
assessments on the lots in Subdivision 8002 (Wendt Ranch)for landscaping, irrigation, lighting, and
appurtenant facilities and annexing the subdivision into Zone 68 of Countywide Landscaping and
Lighting Assessment District 1979-3 (I-L-2). The benefit assessments and annexation were required
under the subdivision conditions of approval.
Staff has become aware of certain missing language and typographical errors in the filed version of
Resolution No. 2000/476. To correct these errors, it is recommended that the Board approve the
attached, corrected version. If approved by the Board, the correction would be effective nuns pro
tune as of October 10, 2000,
CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION
If the correction is not approved, Resolution No. 2000/476 will remain in its present form with missing
language and typographical errors.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE
14,u 4j L
_4,=-'RtUUMMtNL)A I 1UN V1-UJUN I Y AUMIRIS I RA I UK KtUUMMtN1JA I 1UN Ut-t5VAKU 4,UMM)I I tt!
_.,APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S)-(;�-
z
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED
OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
XXUNANIMOUS(ABSENT NONE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
AYES: NOES: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DAT SH
Nr M2
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED:JOHNovSWEETEN,CLihK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Orig.Dept: PublIc Works(Special Districts)
Contact: Skip Eppedy,313-2253
cc: Assessor
Auditor-Controiler BY
County Administrator /DEPUTY
County Counsel
P.W.Accounting
Shappell Industries,Inc.,Attn:J.Christian Truebrldge
i✓� J
,x/`1-2-4Z.
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Resolution on October 10, 2000,by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Gioia,Uilkema,DeSaulnier,Canciamilla and Gerber
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RESOLUTION NO.2000/476
SUBJECT: Tabulation of Mail-In Ballots,Confirmation of Diagram and Assessment,Levy of
Landscaping Assessments,and Annexation of Subdivision(SUB) 8002 into the
Countywide Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District 1979-3 (LL-2)Zone 68,
Danville area.
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES:
1. On May 23,2000,the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 20001276 directing the filing
of the engineer's report for SUB 8002 of Countywide Landscaping and Lighting Assessment
District 1979-3 (LL-2). As directed by the Board,the Engineer of Work has filed the engineer's
report.
On May 23, 2000,the Board adopted Resolution No. 20001276 declaring the Board's intention to
levy and collect assessments for landscaping,irrigation, lighting, and appurtenant facilities and
services within SUB 8002 for fiscal year 200012001 and setting a public hearing for October 10,
2000. Notice of the hearing was given in the time and manner required by law.
Resolution No.20001276 directed the Engineer of Work(Public Works Director)to cause to be
mailed to property owners within SUB 8002 the notices and ballots required by Section 4 of
Article XIII D of the California Constitution(Proposition 218).
The notices and ballots have been mailed to property owners and the returned ballots are ready to
be tabulated.
NOW,THEREFORE,the Board FINDS,DETERMINES and ORDERS that:
2. A public hearing was held before this Board on October 10, 2000 at 9:00 a.m.At the hearing,the
Engineer of Work presented to the Board all ballots received from property owners within SUB
8002 regarding the proposed annexation and assessments.
3. The Board heard and considered all protests against the proposed annexation and assessments and
tabulated the returned ballots according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected
properties. The Board also afforded to every interested person an opportunity to make a protest
to the engineer's report,either in writing or orally,and the Board considered each protest.
4. A majority protest, as defined in section 4(e)of Article X1II D, does not exist.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000/476
SUBJECT: Tabulation of Mail-In Ballots,Confirmation of Diagram and Assessment, Levy of
Landscaping Assessments, and Annexation of Subdivision(SUB) 8002 into the
Countywide Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District 1979-3 (LL-2)Zone 68,
Danville area.
DATE: October 10,2000
PAGE: 2
S. The Hoard hereby confirms the diagram and assessment as set forth in the report of the Engineer
of Work and hereby annexes SUB 8002 into the Countywide Landscaping and Lighting
Assessment District 1979-3 (LL-2)Zone 68,Danville area,and levies the assessments set forth
therein in SUB 8002 for fiscal year 2000/2001.
SE:JR:df
C hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
G:,GrpData�SpDistk8oard Ord l2o0\5 May\I,L2 SUB 8002.tioc an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
orig,Dept.: public works Department(Special Districts) Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
Contact: Skip Epperly,313-2253
cc: Assessor
Auditor-Controller ATTESTED: October 10,2000
County Administrator
Co
County Counsel PHIL BATCHELOR,Cleric of the Board of
P.W.Accounting Supervisors
and County Administrator
By
Deputy
RESOLUTION NO. 2000/476