Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 02052002 - C11
............... ................................. ...... ........ .......... eell TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: MAURICE M. SHIU, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: February 5, 2002 SUBJECT: Fix a hearing to consider enacting an Interim Urgency Ordinance for the East County Transportation Improvement Authority, East County area. SPECIFIC REQur=sT(s)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION 1. Ree=Mended Action: I. FIX a Public Hearing for February 26, 2002 at 9:00 a.m.to consider adoption of an Interim Urgency Ordinance for the East County Transportation Improvement Authority, East County area. 2. DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to Publish the Notice of Public Hearing in compliance with Section 6061 of the California Government Code. Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: f%COMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR COMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE -_-,,*FIPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(Sj. ACTION BO DON FEB. 5 , 2002 APPROVEDAS R OM E =N OTHER I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: FEBRUARY 5 2002 VOTE OF SUPERVISORS JOHN SWEETEN, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors XX- UNANIMOUS(ABSENT j and County Administrator AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: :ie By Deputy G:\.GrpData\TransEngNFORM8NBoar,d Order.doc Orig.Div: Public works(TE) Cordaet SUBJECT: Fix a hearing to consider enacting an Interim Urgency Ordinance for the East County Transportation Improvement Authority, East County Area. DATE; February 5, 2002 PAGE 2 11. Financiallrnpact: Adoption of the interim road fees will result in the collection of potentialfees from new developments' for improvements funded by the East County Transportation Improvement Authority. There will be no impact to the General'Fund. 111. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: On December 18, 2001 the Board of Directors approved the Joint Powers of Agreement establishing the East County Transportation'Improvement Authority(ECTIA)between the County, Antioch, Bentwood, and Oakley. ECTIA was formed with the charge to improve the east county transportation network by establishing a fee authority, which will allow for an increase in East County Regional Transportation Fees to $7500 per single-family dwelling unit, and $1.00 per square foot for non-residential uses. IV. Consequences of Negative Action.; Failure to fix the hearing date to consider adoption of road fees will result in the loss of potential revenues and would be inconsistent with the intent of the Joint Powers Agreement, which established the ECTIA. a All -' 01 *00 r pT' ~ ° aye Q oat N / +�' ��� � 0,11-":♦ �.::. ){ r t%f'. a V t s, PROOF t)I' PUBLICATION t IC171CL. �!t WX Ni lttt, AND�cvruufil rf�r l7F pATtt (2016.5 G.G.P. ' � a �?0 rtret�€€�n STATE CifCALIFORNIA The Ward of I9or3Wiil ariuOncf aifn Fetstaiary25,'2Ci02atexicra,m. Sri the amrers,County Administration i alldlnp,661 Fine Street,Martin", County of Contra Costa CA tri ccr�et tk§p_an Intedr rr Crdtheme for the East County'Nnsrwr- te ion'i rpmvem Aur O% €Hm LIAkMe East County Transportation irlrprove- I am a citizen flt the United States and a resident of the ment Autnrsrity Program Area. County aforesaid;t arri over the age of eighteen years, and ewlec fromthrough de East T+r 'is r n asflon pr8 urr ntoM. e Contra not a-party to or interested in the abflVe-Ontithed matter. �s{e�urRty and Wit be collected upon the issuance of a t whiing permit. I am''ttie Principal Legal Clerk of the Ledger Dispatch and T ECTiA is fns retsuif of a new root Powers of a Counartt ba tree Cities of g p Ahtiocn,BrentWoo acrd oakley,'and Contra Costa County.Tna EL,�TiA Wtll Operate ee Brentwood News.Newspa ts''of general circulation, HiltedT'o �}andrwith 'suo tare' aistosta R aIononal siim �rieInseIiSe�d Ian and published at 2640 adelands Drive in the ity of a East County Transportation irtlprovament Authority Fee study, Walnut Creek,County of Contra Costa,94598. The proposed fees for approval by the Board of Supervisors are: And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of sand use ireppsed Fae neral circulation b the Superior Court of the Count of 5i a Family Resldarrt al 7;5p0 per dwei4ng unit general y � y � uFamihr Residentlsi E3Eio per dweill unit Contra Costa, State of California, under the date of March oC�mmerciai t:na per square of of gross floor area 26,t 870. Case Number 746370. e 1.41Q par square foot of gross floor,area Cnduatt'ial t.i�Kier agsiartx foot of gross ficror area Other 75 0 per peak Hour tri generated The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (Set in An administration fee equal to 2 percent of the Program revenue"I be assessed. type not smaller than nonpareil),has been published In each Fee contrlbttlOn to the East Contra costa regional t ee and Financing Authority shall regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any be contribute n to the payabletae necessarytrito avoid double payment. Supplement thereof on the following dates,to Wit: As with mast tee progrmrrs,the fee revenue frurn the EM—A program will not pay the cost of oil regional jenopyernents.Other fund ng must be qdnorated,i some of Which i€lai rI , incluse fees generated from the ECCRA Program,MeasureC,and State Tsnspor- tation lmprpveinent ISTM Funds;' all in the year of 2002 "rhe Program Report,which includes a description of the proposed h'rt rovement cost est mates and finding mechanism will be available by February 12,2 2 at the Clerk of the Soarer. , I certify (or declare) tinder penalty of perjury that the e Inttotnnin,contacto Halle�the county Public works 0epF rtation nlartment, foregoing is true and correct. CJoe ONTRA 09TA COUNTY Executed at Walnut Cr ek,California.,sAssistant Public Works Director .!On this 22,�1ay of Fel, afy, 2002 r` � Y.# r c er of the eoerd;of Supervisors of Contra Costa County # 1 � en oJohn�g and of supervisors and County Administrator. } t ro {t s legal LOW 9733 PUt�il�f1 F+abruai�t 2�,s�t�2 Prlature Ledger Dispatch and Brentwood News P 0 Box 2299 Antioch,CA'94531-2299 (925)757-2525 Proof of Publication of: (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published) LEGAL PUBLICATION REQUISTION' Contra Costa County From: Clerk of the Board To: Ledger Dispatch 651 Pine St., Room 106 PO Box 2299 Martinez, CA 94553 Antioch, CA 94549 Requested by: .bate /�' 'x ;-t Phone No: Reference No: 4 ' Org: 676 71; Sub Object: Task: 4 0 Activity: Publication Date (s): 1-092- ----/7 / No. of Pages: o , LEGAL.,PUBLICATION- 7`"�r� y � CG',- �,� �y ,r:►c.r�c3�, r ****Immediately upon expiration of publication,**** send in one affidavit for each,publication in order that the auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Authorized Signature: Please confirm date of publication & receipt of this fax.'Ap � / , NOTICE C 'UB SIC HEARING AN AYAI[.ABII Y OF DATA (Urgency,Ordinance for the Interim East County Transportation Improvement Authority Program Fee) The Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing on February 2;5,2002 at 9:00 a.m. in the Board Chambers, County Administration Building,653 Pine Street;Martinez,CA.to consider adopting an Interim urgency Ordinance for the East County Transportation Improvement Authority(ECTIA)for the East County Transportation Improvement Authority Program Area.: Fees collectedthrough the East County Transportation Improvement Authority will be collected only from new development Within this portion of unincorporated Contra Costa County and will be collected upon the issuance of a building permit. The ECTIA is the result of a new Joint Powers of Agreement between the Cities of Antioch, Brentwood, and Oakley, and Contra Costa County. The ECTIA will operate concurrently,with the East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority (ECCRFFA) and, will support an expanded list of regional improvements described in the East County Transportation Improvement Authority Fee Study.: The proposed fees for approval by the Board of Supervisors are: Land Use Proposed Fee' Sing Family Residential $7,500 per dwelling unit Multi-Family Residential $4,600 per dwelting unit Commercial $1.00 per square foot of gross floor area Office $1.00 per square font of grass floor area Industrial $1.00 per square foot of grass floor area Other $7,500 per peals hour trip;generated An administration fee equal to 2 percent of the Program revenue shall be assessed. Fee contribution to the East Contra Costa regional Fee and Financing Authority shall be credited against fees payable as necessary to avoid double payment. As with most fee programs, the fee revenue from the ECTIA program will not pay the cost of all regional improvements. Other funding must be generated;some of which include fees generated from the ECCRFFA Program, Measure C,and State Transportation Improvement(STIP)Funds. The Program Report,which includes a description of the proposed improvement cost estimates and finding mechanism will be available by February 12, 2002 at the Clerk of the Board. For more information,contact Mary Halle of the County Public Works Department,Transportation Engineering Division at 313-2327. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Joe Yee' Assistant Public Works Director PROOF OF PUBLICATION NtM9OFPDOLICFfEAMOANDAVAILMIK1TYOFrA CttTA (2015.5 C.C.P.} Ity Prtoy Ox ti Iru the lntertm eat t �nty rear sporiefibn lm trcauanterjt rogt��m�7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA rhe Board ofSupervit,M win hold a publto fres ' an February 28,2002 at 9100 a.m. f0v In the Board CKirnbere,Cau*,Admtnlstratlon Ildl 651 Pine Street,Martinez, County of Contra Costa CAI cons ser ado iti o ln�U;N9 ordhencss cir the Lust P000r anspor- t��lon tmprovemen A rity ha East County Transportation Improve- I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the "lent Atlthortty Program area. County aforesaid; I am river the age of eighteen years,and Fees c ar 10 cod tram a r�aettaprnerr tl` rin AI's tport ,�'o un an tsa Conbe " not a party to or interested in the above-entitled Fatter. Costa county and will be collected upon_Me Issuance of a bulidinp perm rhe EC€ia la the result of a rrew toint Powers bf Agreement between the Cities of 1 am the Principal Legal Clerk of the Contra Costa Times,a arnior�r,Brentwaodana c�akre�,ane Conus Costa County.Toe�wi!!operate newspaper of general c€rculation, printed and published at E( Gea�a t�i end will suppridtaeicp d lalatnoor rrarove ne` ascrt 'bea in 2640 Shadelands Drive in the City of Walnut Creek, County 1ne fast County rranspoRafian Improvement Atrtharlty Fee tuatc of Contra Costa,94598. The proposed fees for approval by the Board of supervisors are: And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of Singe"'gym �antial pec dwelu unit general circulation by the Superior.Court of the County of Mu -Family Residential rl per dwa, ur'lt Contra Costa,Stata of California,under the date of October Commercial ar et are orgrAss ftoor area 22,1934.Case Number 19764. IInndustrial �aqusrexoot of gr93se flooraOtherper Pak t t� aIM area The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in An administration fee equal to 2.percent of the Program revenue shall to assessed, type not smaller than nonpareil),has been published in each Fee carrtltbution to tthee seat Cor>tra Costa regional Fee and Einanaing Authority shall regular antl Mire issue'of said newspaper and not in arty t:e areditad against fees payable as necessary to avoid double payment, supplement thereof on the following dates,to wit: As with mm. t fee program%the fee rrovenue Irarim the gam i,4 program�I nQt pay the cost of art regional tmprovemants.Outer hrndtn must be generated,some of which February 22 Image teas generated from the ECCRFFA Prog am,Measure C,and State Transpor- tatloq hnprovernent(STIP)Funds. all in the year of 2002 The Program ttport,which includes a description of the proposea Irsapprovement cost sellmates and finding mechontsm will be avaitabte by Feharary 12:21342 at the Clerk of the Board. For more Information,contact Mary iia#e of the County Public Works Department,f certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury'that the Transportation Engineering DIulsion atst3-2327. foregoing is true and correct. tet,loe ye@ CONTRA COSTA OC€SMY E ut at Walnut Cre °atifornia. Assistant Public Works Director fJt t 2 7dayf�tru r 21302 By order of the Board of Suparv]sors of Contra Costa County I�� lobo ssysetan ✓r 1 Clark of the Board of supervisors and County aamin;suatar �Uat�Eabnaary1$,2442 ......... .......t,'....... ... ...'.... 9y E Sharp,Deputy Si ;ature Legal CCT 4144 r?€tbl�h Eetlruery 22,2�1O Co ra Costa Tirf€es PC: x4147 Wal t Creek,CA 94596 (925)935-2525 Proof of Publication of: (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published) EA 4 LEGAL PUBLICATION REQUISTION <w Contra Costa County L From: Clerk of the Board Too Contra Costa Tithes 651 Pine St., Room 106 PG Bax 5124 Martinez, CA 94553 'Walnut Creek, Ck 94596 Requested by: Date: A 'r !t /,f- Phone o �$POw-i . 5__ 1,6 ,3 Reference O: � 4.p Org: 'Sub Object: 1Y0 Task, (::�9 Activity: Publication Bate (s): 404r- / d -' No. of Wages: LEGAL P BLICATION-- **'•Itstmdiately upon expiration orpubHcatiott,"" i.— — sen4 In one affidavit for taut publication in order that the auditor atay be authorized to pay your bill. Authorized 5irtature: '�- Please confirm date of publication.&receipt Of thisfax. INOTICE C *IUBLIC HEARING; AND AVAILABII Y'OF DATA (UrgencyOrdinance for the Interim East County Transportation Improvement authority Program Fee) The Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing on February 26,2042 at 9:010 a.m.in the Board Chambers, County Administration Building,651 Pine Street,Martinez, CA.to consider adopting an Interim Urgency Ordinance for the East County Transportation improvement Authority(ECTIA)for the East'County Transportation Improvement Authority Program Area, Fees collected'through the East County Transportation Improvement Authority will be collected only from new development within this portion of unincorporated Contra Costa County and will be collected upon the issuance of a building permit. The ECTIA is.the result of a new Joint Powers of Agreement'between the Cities of Antioch, Brentwood, and Oakley, and Contra Costa County. The ECTIA will operate concurrently with the East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority (ECCRFFA) and will support an expanded list of regional improvements described in the East County Transportation Improvement Authority Fee Study. The proposed fees for approval by the Board of Supervisors are: Land Use Proposed Fee Single Family Residential $7,500 per dwelling'unit Multi-Family,Residential $47600 per dwelling unit Commercial $1.00 per square foot of gross floor area Offf+ce $1.50 per square foot of gross;floor area Industrial $1.00 per square foot of gross'floor area Cather $1,500 per peak hour trip generated An administration fee equal to 2 percent of the Program revenue shall be assessed. Fee contribution to the East Contra Costa regional Fee and Financing Authority shall be credited against fees payable as necessary to avoid double payment. As with most fee programs, the fee revenue from the ECTIA program will not pay the cost of all regional improvements. Other funding must be generated, some of which include fees generated from the'ECCRFFA Program, Measure C, and State Transportation Improvement(STIP)Funds. The Program Report, which includes a description of the proposed improvement cast estimates and finding mechanism will be available by February 12, 2002 at the Clerk of the Board. For more information,contact Mary Halle of the County Public Works Department,Transportation Engineering Division at 313-2327. 1 3 1. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Joe Yee Assistant Public Works Director a LEGAL PUBLICATION REQUISTION Contra Costa County From: Clerk of the Board To: Brentwood News -i 651 Pine St., Room 106 PO Box 51.7 � Martinez, CA 94553 Brentwoo 94 Requested by: 45'v-->5e cilh-oq- __ Dat . r ' . ► Phone No: l " 4646 (erg; ?`49 Sub Object: c2,/.'70 �,,� `.Tas pity: Publication Date (s): 079 No. of Pages: 0V LEGAL P ,� ( '- ,r�w�iSt3 rid' t 70 X7 0'rr ** *Immediately upon expiration of publication,*'*** send in one affidavit for each publication in order that the auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Authorized Signature: ' "` Please confirm date of publication & receipt of this fax. NOTICE C 1t1PWC HEARING ANl•J AVAILABII YOFPATA (Urgency Ordinance for the interim East County Transportation Improvement Authority Program Fee) The Board of Supervisors will hold a public hearing on February 26,2002 at 3:00 a.m.in the Board-- Chambers, oardChambers,County Ad ministrationBuilding,651 Pine Street]Martinez,CA.to consider adopting an Interim Urgency Ordinance for the Bast County Transportation Improvement Authority(ECTIA)for the East County Transportation Improvement`Authority Program Area. Fees collected through the East County Transportation Improvement Authority will be collected only from new development within this portion of unincorporated Contra Costa County and will be collected uponz the issuance of a building permit. The ECTIA is Etre result of a new Joint Powers of Agreement'between the Cities of Antioch, Brentwood, and Oakley, and Contra Costa County. The ECTIA will operate concurrently with the East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority (ECGRFFA) and will support an expanded list of regional improvements described in the East County Transportation Improvement Authority Fee Study. The proposed fees for approval by the Board of Supervisors are: Land Use Proposed Fee Single Family Residential $7,600 per dwelling unit Multi-Family Residential $4,6011 per dwelling;unit Commercial $1.00 per square foot of gross floor area Office $1.00 per square foot of gross 'floor area Industrial $1.00 per square foot of gross floor area Other $7,500 per peak hour trip generated An administration fee equal to 2 percent of the Program revenue shall'be assessed. Fee contribution to the East Contra Costa regional Fee and Financing Authority shall be credited against fees payable as necessary to avoid double payment. As with most fee programs, the fee revenue from the ECTIA program will not pay the cast of all regional improvements. Carter-funding must be generated,some of which include fees generated from the ECCWRFFA Program, Measure C,and State Transportation Improvement(STIP)Fonds. The Program Report, which includes a description of the proposed improvement cost estimates and finding mechanism will be available by February 12, 20,02 at the Clerk of the Board; For more information,contact Mary Halle of the County Public Works Department,Transportation Engineering Division at 313-2327. j.3 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Joe Yee' Assistant Public Works Director : PROOF OF Pt1 UCATION Y y ndFovaeaa tthJea1-00't tnOi�untyAvkitr n tpp !rnAen_t'A.u1"SJ ranag iiEEE 17 The Board of Sttpsrvlsors wtH(told a�u bltc heart sg On Pob— y 26,20r120,t1%0%2 .m STATE OF CALIFORNIA in the aoard Chamber$,County Adr�tktkstration utidkt ,t35i Plna strertez County of Contra Costa GA to Onslder adoptin intsetrn urger ay Ord(nan x gest Catty rranspor- ration�re�uerr�ant Avtri4rittr(1rC7SA}ft5r ttte East Countyranspartation frrrprr�ve- msnt Aur or it Pro as n Ares. I am'a citizen of the united States and a resident Of the Fessaoitectsd Fhrougttti,s EastCOun Transportation trrfKroverrtentAuthorttywlH County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years,end ootleatad only from new dsvelapmani wtttfHt this pe tion of tsr&tcorpor$tsd contra not a party to or interested in the above-entitted matter. $gala Courtly and wig be'coita0ted upon rise issuanaa of a 7auHding��rm t: The R 4e thB resort of a ne�v Joint t?Owsrs of Agreement taetweerr the Cues of I stn the Principal legal Clerk of the Contra Costa Times, a Antioorr,Brentwood and oakisy,and Contra costa county.rr, l erre writ operate newspaper of;general ctrculattctn, printed and published at tncurrentty wttr dte past contra Carta loner;Kae.and r to Autnbr#ty t t Oast~ and w1II st�Aort an e> rrctetl Het r ronflF ctrl rOuartterrts€eBcriTSed in 2,640 Shadelands Drive in the City of Walnut Creek, County he east est county TransporFatrott Improvement Autft rtty Fss sway. of Contra Costa,945913. Ths proposed fees for approval by the Board of Suparutsors are: And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of an&& is My R.kfenFfai �7�per dwelling unit general oirctllation by rite ySuperior Court of the County of luta t-Family�testdenttst Ker twaui t Contra Costa;State of CaltlotTtia,under the elate of October Commeretai l:f3Q per, arer cit of gross floor area OfftCe t.uFt per s0'cu'sreficoF Of gross floor area 22, 1X334.Case Number 19764,_ industries' f.ort ersquare foot of gross floor area Other S7,3t per peak t#Caur tri generated The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in t=ea r ontrltaution to tris;est Ctarrtra costa regional gee sna Financtrag Autttonty shalt type not smaller than nonpareil),has been published in each eredlled against foes payable as necessary t0 avoid dounie payment. regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any As with moat fee programs,the fee reverrue from the ECTIA program will not pay the supplement the on the following dates,to-wit: cost of all regional Improvements, her tundrtg must tta gsnsrsFed,some of which Include Ierfefees generate d"flP)una� ogmmr t�rissi.0M:,and State Trac aW. February 8 The t' ram Report,'whieh tnciydes a dascriptfon of the proposed improvement goat estima sand finding mechanism will bs aualtabte by Febru&ty 12,2r Q2 at the Clerk all in the year of 2002 of the Board. For more information,contact!Nary Ha of the County Publlc Wortcs Department, Transportation€ngtneering Division at 312327. l certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the a�rxtBrA Counrrr foregoing is true and correct. Aealstattt Pubna works Director' Exequted at Walnut Creek ifornia. order Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Joh{7n i d of Fe ,Vary2 C 3erk of the ggarcf Of supervi IV$and County Administratg.r . Begat COT�t133 _ 'ubHstt:tabaey 20112; 5i ure Con a Costa T lines Walnut Creek,CA 94596 (925)935-2525 Proof of Publication of: (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published) ca�C.•-_.zF _ ,a LEGAL P :T$LIC.ATION REQUISTION Contra Costa County From: Clerk of the Beard Td• br 651 Pine St., Room 1 06 ( :x 5124 Martinez, CA. 94553 "'walnut Creek, CA 94596 Requested by: fm Date: Phone blot ReferenceNo-., Org: 'Sub abject: ✓ Task: Activity. Publication Date s : � - No. of Pages: LEGAL PUBLICATION ,,"�`. -Z;p; ►- 'r t dop 6 Ed 4 r.A�64 7o r746�WEeO46"l >-a nelto ooZ71-o" w v;X- A-e OF ****hnrnediateiy t€pon expiration of pubicatim;'«�•: - _ scud orae tt#fiwavit fc�r tach pttblicatioa in order diat the auditor maybe auth©ri to pay your bill. Authorized Signature: "lease con nTi daft o publication receipt of this fay. , i ��►� ,r ,� ................ .................... ...... 01/28/02 MON 14:08 FAX 925 313 2333 CCC MLIC WORKS ............ N0T1QE QE J!USLIC HEARINQ 0 ADAILABILITY OF DATA (ilrgency Ordinance for Me.Interim Fast Co unty Transportation Improvement Authority Program Fee) The Board ofSupervisors will hold a:public heating.On February 26,.2002 at 9:00 a.m.in:the Board Chambers,County Administration SuRciing,651 Fine Street,Martinez,CA.to consideradopting an fnterim Urgency Ordinance for the East CountyTranspartation..improvement Authority(ECTIA)for the Fast County'Transportation Improvement Authority Program Area. Fees collected through the East County Transportation Improvement Authority will be collected only from new development within this portion of unincorporated Contra Costa.County and will be collected upon the issuance of a building permit. The ECTIA Is the result of a new Joint Powers of Agreement between the Cities of Antioch, Brentwood. and Oakley. and Contra Costa County. The ECnA will operate concurrent ly with,the East Contra Costa: Regional Fee and Financing Authority (ECCRFFA) and will support an expanded list of regional improvementsdescribed In the East County Transportation improvement Authorityrl Fee.Study. The proposed fees for approval by the Board of Supervisors are: Proposed Fee Single Family Residential '500:per dwe.11111na unit 101010-Family Residential $4,600 per dwelling unit Cornm4relal $4.400 por$quare:fbat of grosstloor area Offloo $1.00 per square foot of gross floor arva industrial $1'0 0 persquare foot of gross floor area Other $7,500 per peak hour trip generated Fee contribution to the East Contra Costa regional Fee and Flnanclnq Authority shall be credited against fees payable a!�necessary to avoid double payment. As with most fee programs, the fee revenue from the EC" IA program.will,not pay the cost of all regionalimprovements. Other funding must begen"ed,some of which include fees generated frem the ECCRFFA Program,Measure C.and State Transportation improvement(STIP).Funds. The ProgramReport,which includes a description of the proposed improvement cost ftftatft and finding mechanism will be available by February 12, 2002 at the Clerk of the Board. For more Informatiorif contact Mary Halle of the County Public Works Department,Transportation Engineering Division at 313-2327. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Joe yea Assistant Public Works Director By oxer of the Board of ap�rvisors of Gmtra Costa Cbmty Jchn &eeters Clerk of the Board of &verors and Comty AdTxinistratcr By: -1� rates: '4. -'e' Pd:)Ucatian dates- ............ .......... ................ PROOF OF pUSUCAT'ItJN rv€�T�a�pu�ac� Rt;��alvQ anu�liLn�mr ct'�na�a"�"" {21`11�.�{'+<Ci.la.} turea Qrdli�noe for ltaa Iritsr�r€i4est trounty Traraspartation Imprttvament Ruthori- i tS+ rogr m has) Ins Boaaxi afS n isa€s wall hold a public hgminp on Februa 26'2p02 at ,00 s,m. STATE OF CALIFORNIA nsthe Board Chambers,CountyAdm€nistration BuAdihg.851ryPfne Street,Martinez. County of Contra Costa CA to Csonss€1 adoptin an€nt8rim UrgsrieYY ordinance In? East CountyTrahspor- tation m rovemenii Au City(ECTiA)for the East Co€inty Transportation laitprove- 1 am a citizen of the United.States and a resident of the mentAratorityProgramArea. County aforesaid;1 am over the age of eighteen years, and Fees collected throe The East Coun Transportation Improvement Authority will be Collected only from hew development within this portion of unincorporated Contra not a party to or interested in the above-entitled``tatter. Costa County and will be collected capon the issuance of a bulldLnq perFtNt 1 atTi the Principal L al Clerk of the Led er Dis atch and The EC7€A is the result'of s new 3olnt Powers of AgFeemeat between the Cities of p1 p Antioch,6rant4u and{3akley,and Centra Costa Coutlty The ECTIA wiH operate Brentwood News.Newspa ors cif general circulation,printed aonCaNrentiy with t East ow'a Costa iris 'oral tae and Pinanain AEitraoriiy and ublished at 2840 Shadelands Drive in the Ci of ECCRFFA)and wilt support an expanded lista s0ianal irrrproverraents clgesa€�ad in p tY he East Courary TransportatL improvement Authority Fab Study. Walnut Greek,County of Contra Costa,94598, The proposed fees for approval by the Board of Supervisors are; And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of Land use Propased Fee general circulation by the Superior Court of the County,of singpl�e Family Residential 7,500 per dwe€ling unit SIV 4,600 per dwelling unit Contra Costa, ,State of California, under the date of March admmerclal 11.08pr 1.Ofl per square foot of gross flooF area 26,1870. Case Number 746V0. ofce 1.00 per square tootof gross Ito r area Industria€ square foot of grossfloor arse Cith9r 57,5er peak hour trip generated The notice,of;which the annexed is a printed copy (set in Fee contribution rothe fast Contra costa relorrat Fee and Financing Authority shall type not Smelter than nonpareil),has been published in each be Credited against fess payable as necessary to avoid double pay"nt. regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any as with most Ise programs the tee revenue from ma ECTIA program will not nay the supplement thereof On the following dates,t0-U�it, cost a`all tegionri improvements.other funding most be ganerafod,some of which include fees generated from the ECCRFFA Program,Measure C,and States Transpar- February 8 tation Improvement(STIP)Funds. The Program Report which includesdescription of the pgFaposed I€npprroovamerrt Cost all in the year of 2002 esthnates and finding mechanism wil be available by Fsttruary 12,2D02 at fire Clerk of the Board.%, For more€nformatlon,contact Mary Halle of the County Public Warks Department, Transportation Engineering plvision at 319-2327. 1 certify. (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the /s/JosYee foregoing is true and Correct. ///Joe iA COSTA ouNTY Assistant Public oris Director Executed at 1181nUt Creek,Cal ria. Y,Order of the Board of Supervises of Contra Costa County On this day of J eat;%, 2 2 F John sweeten ( ' � Clark of the Board of Supervisors and County AdminlStrator Le ! �\^' LagarBN$1 4$4#F PubHSh:Fab€UaryB,000 Slgnatu \1 Ledger 0 patch and Brentwood News P b Bose 99 AntiOcti,G 94531-2299 (925)757-2525 Proof of Publication of: (attached Is a copy of the legal advertisement that published) ................ LEGAL PUBLICATION REQUISTION Contra Costa County From: Clerk of the Board To: Ledger Iistcb 651 Vine St., Room .106 Po Box 2299 Martinez, CA 94553 Antioch, CA 94549 'A Requested by. Date: Phone No: 41013 Reference No: Org:.46,7ve Sub Object: Task: —Activity: Publication Date (s): at No. of Pages: .......................... ................. LEGAL PUBLICATION- " el v» _xX7 ................................ ................ .......... .......... .................... ............. *Immediately upon expiration of publication,** send in one affidavit for each publication in order that the auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Authorized Signature: Please confirm date of publication & receipt of this fax. ..................... ......... ....... 01/28/02 ON 14:06 FAX 928 313 2333 CCC PUBLIC ,WORKS im 003 J LING &J=A"fk1^ AAir% A10ALIA:A V%a 2 �Wjwl�xlwf , x1mu mv, ups NOTIgE Q I "Qf LSAT (urgency Ordinonce.for ft§IntOn East County Transp rtatl I My o� on m pr6vemen "o�' Pro&nrn Fee) The Board of Su d a perv(sors Will W public hoadrigon February 26.2002 at 9.00 am.in the Board Chambers County Administration Wilding 651 Laine Street.M amnezr CK to 6on!3Mer Wopting an Interim UrVency 0 M fnanCe for the East County Transportat to n Im provementAuthority.(ECTIA)for the East CountyTranspattation Improvement Authority Program Area. Fees collected through the East County Transportation Improvement Authority will be collected only from new development within this portion of unincorporated Contra Costa County and will be collected upon the issuance of a building permIL The ECTIA Is the result of a now Jofnt Powers of Agreement,between the Cities of Antioch, Brentwood,and Oakley.and Contra Costa County. The E0TIA will operate conn urrentlywith the East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority (FCCROFA) and will, support an e.vanded list,of regional improvetnents described in the East County Transportation Improvement Authority Fee Study. The proposed fees for approval by the Board of Supervisors are: Proposed F Sit jly Rosidontiall $-73500 dwelling unit P" Multi.-Family. Assidential UAW per dwelling unit commorclal $11.00 per sqUare f6ot of gross-floor area Offi ca $1,00per square 1041:of gross floor area Industrial $1.00 per sgcrarra foot Of gross flaor area Other $7,500 per peak hour grip generated Feb contribution to the East Contra Costa regional Fee and Rnancing Authority shall be credited against fees payable m necessary to avoid double payment. As with most 14o programs, the fee revenue from The FECTIA program will not pay the o of all regional Improve imants. Other funding must begenersted,some otwhich include fees generated from the ECCRFFA Program,Measure C.acid State Transportation Improvement STIP).Funds. The Program..Report, which includes a description of the proposed improvement cost eat mates and finding madhanl6m will be available by February 12, 2002 at the Clerk of the Board. For more Information,contact Mary Halle of the County Publfc Works Department,Transportation Sngineering Divislon at 313-2327. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Joe Yee Assistant Public Works Director By ardex of the Board of EiVervisors of Contra Closta Cbmty John %eeten Clerk of th-- Boa.rd of &Verviscrs and GoLnty Ad innistrator By: Dated: 4d-a-Z Rblication dates: ................. ..... PROOF OF PUBLICATION A1 0 (201S.5 C.C.P.) NCMC* mat rot ttt�taAnataAVAti *.FPATA.� 47 �;�AMF da STATE OF CALIFORNIA The hold a 26,2442 at County of Contra Costa GA r1car%f,80Mh=T9h Murbftflor=RWAA]Feb,V1.Pine stmt, �0= A41,66F" ia th, interim the fast County fittion lro$lrll�� I am a citizen'of the UnitedStates and a residentof the Mont Authority Frognlrr,Area. County aforesaid,I,am over the ads of eighteen years, and Feesoolleated through the Cast Court Transportallorlimprovement.Auth will be nota party to or interested in the above-entitted matter. from now development within this portion*f,urd 1M.Y"Contra %IM-12po-orvand will:be tollected upon M Issuance of 6 building==,,! A I am the Principal Legal Cie*of the Ledger Dispatch.ander T' Brentwood'News. Newspa rp of general circulation,printed "' n e @FF and published at Thaodlands.0rive in the City of Walnut Creek,Countyof Contra Costa,94598. The proposed fees for approvel'by the Board of Supervisors are, And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of Land Use Pro ad Fee of SIM rarniMesidential ! I per gwelling unit. general circulation by.the Superior Court of the County NN -Fe"Ithyl. "dents) per� u a =RIn ontra Costa, State of California, under the date of March Is 11!8,0, ar,lq 11�6�t t of grosOloor area )p ()are gross Wares upotso foot 26,1870. Case Number 746870. S*Mac 1 Lo rp r a P a Cather [71,�,50 ar=i�uoll 1011,are tof nert.1t The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in Feecontribution to the East Contra Costs regional Fed and Financing Authority shall type not smaller than nonpareil),has been published in each be credited against fees payable as,necessary to avoid double payment, regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any As with most fee programs,Ahe fee revenue from the E.CTIA program9 Pa the wi not pay supplament thereof on the following,dates,to-wit: wet of ail ragiooiN improvements.other funding..mustbe generated some of which Include fees generated.from the ECCRFFA Peooiltrft,Measure 0,and state Trahspc�r- February 1.119 Improvement(STIP)Funds. The Prograrn Report,which includes a description of thedim 2 oorovatm on t cast =y 1 2 the estimates and finding mechanism will be available by r. 2. Clerk all in the year of 2002 of the Board. For more it,,, awn co,,pg,Mary Halle of the County Public Works Department, rL.gp. or g Irti.rIg Melon at 313-2327. I Certify (or declare) underpenalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 8W0JN0TGRYAaQ0'08TA o Assistant Public Works E*cuted at Walnut Creek,California. By,a of the Board of supervisors of Contra Costa County � at I ary'092 t6 1%. I tAh oten. OP this 8 day? q),Fe f 0 a Sc6ard of supervisors and County Administrator ,P,, r E2 P , �K LOOW L 086 1. 'J oft�%200! . .......... ..... ............. .............. ........... i nature Le ger Dispatch andt4iliWbOd.,News P Box 2299 An och,CA 94531-2299 (926)757-2525 Proof of Publication of: (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published) ...................... LEGAL APUBLICATION REQUISTION Contra Costa County From: Clerk of the Board To: 651 Pine St., Room 106 PO Box 5.17 Martinez, CA 94553 Brentwood, CA 94512 Requested by: X 4�?:e Date: t./ if Phone No: 9.Z 03,r- 0,3 Reference No: Org: Sub Object: OZ11'rob Task: � 6 —Activity: Publication Date (s): 2��>IWAO.VWYas le Z.0-0 R_ 'eo' Ait No. of Pages: .......... LEGAL PUBLICATION_ 7— � A 6 6�t477�;Oi4 oo o��o Lo' ........................ ......... ........................ ........... ......... ""Immediately upon expiration ofpublication,**** send in one affidavit for each publication in order that the auditor may be authorized to pay your bill_ AuthorizedSignature: Please confirm date of publication & receipt of this fax, V7 ................... ............ ................................ .... ...... .................... ............ 01/25/02 MON 14-.06 FAIL 925 313 2333 CCC PURLIC WORKS N o -I mcF -0�p L oa IQHEARING-Aid[ AVAI". ITY OF QAIA or e I County - ty : Transportation Improvement Authority Program Fee) The Soard of Supervisors willhold a pubtle heating on February 2 6.2002at9,.Ga..m.in.the Scard ChaiibiatstdbuhtyA miniettay.. wilding,6510inestreet,Marr x, A..to consider ado an Interim Ur nancelbir the East T urgency County tandportation Imium, odty( b 11 T remontAUth E �T A)flor tholEast ty ransporta. on lrmprovernent Authority'Program.Area. Tran portation Improvement Authorityll be collected watt Fees looll.e.ded.through the East County �o only*m. new l,eveli�ment within this.portion of unincorporated t ntra Costa County and will:be collected upon the Issuance of a building permit. The ECTIA Is:the result of a now Joint Powers of Agreement between the Cities of Antioch. st,9 evortcurron th (31*Mb46W and Cialdey.and Contra.C.o C ounty The kbTtAwill operat 0Ywithe East Contra Costa Regional Fee: and Financing Authority CCR t FA) and. will support an expand fist of bohat improvements described in the Sast County TranS porta io tmprrov4irrnent Arc rity:F40 Study. The Proposed fees for approval by the Board of Supervisors are: �i:ani.. Proposed.Fee Single Farnily Residenoal $70 dw,o Ing unit W 10 &F Mill R i0dentibil swfiod I Y dwe firto unit co Uom4&6igross floor area offics S1 000 lir squares fort of o" 0or are Indus#rr al $1.00per squara fact ort` grosot It"r area Other $7,500:per peakhour trio generated Fee contribution to the East Contra Costa regional Fee and Financing Authority shall be credited against fees Payable:a4 necessary to avoid double payment. As with most fee p the fee revenue from the FECTIA program vAtt not pay the cost*fail regionarl :t`$1r08ti;i M I include provern er funding,must be someolwhich , MOO:Werated from the IL&R-FrA Program,MeasureC.and St"Trac sportationimpmvement(STIP).Funds. The Program iReport,which includes a description of the proposed improvern ent cost estimates and firtang mechanism will be avail Oible by February 12, 2002 at the Clark Of the Board. For more informatlon,contact Mary Halle ofthe County Public Works Department,Transportation Engineeting.0vislon at 313-2327. CONTRA COSTA QQUNTY Joe Yea Assistant Publit Works Director 1;y order of the Board of apmasors of Ccntra testa G=ty Jdm Sweeten CLerk of the Board of&paviscrs and Comty Addaistratcr BY: V Datfd Rblilcatim dates: peedle .............................- HIM 02 J!gd *�AxLEY CW-"Ad. a"w DOW 04 A 14-r i B RE TWOOD Not to aCale Prepared for: East County TransportationImproverye nt Authority Prepared by: RFm&PF-ERS ASSOQATES ,WC porUdion Consultanu 3685:W Diablo Blvd. Sufte:304 FAX:925-284-2691 'S TABLE OF CONTENT. Page I. INTRODUCTION................................................................... .........................I Background........ ............ ............... .............................................I Purpose. -......................................................................I StudyArea ........................................... ................................. ................ I StudyPrMess....................................................... ...................................2 Organization of the Report. ................................... ..........2 11. RELATIONSHIP TO ECCRFFA PROGRAM. ...........P.............. ..........4 Regional Improvements Encompassed by the ECCRFFA Fee...............4 Schedule of ECCRFFA Impact Fees...................... ..................... Relationship of ECrIA and ECCRFFA Programs .............. ......,..........6 III. ANALYSISTS"THODOLOGY..................................................... ...............9 Process. ..................-.......................... ....................................... ...........9 IV. ANALYSIS AESULTS....................................................................................12 Nexus Ca1c.Wation.,q.fRegional fdes.. ......... ........'...... ...... ......': .........12EC TIA FeeSchedule...... ........... .................................................. ......''.13 V. FEE PROGRAM FINANCING CONSIDERATIONS...................... ..... 14 Other Funding Sources ................................................................ ........14 Program Surplus/Deficit 15 Impact of Land Use Absorption Assumptions.... ......................'......... .16 Impact of Senior Housing Development...... ........: ........ ..........16 TECHNICAL APPENDICES LIST OF FIGURES Jurisdiction Boundaries................................................................ ...... ........-.3 ECCE Improvements................... ....................................I......................5 2 3 ECTIA Improvements .7 LIST OF TABLES I Current ECCRFFA Regional impact Fees .................................. ...... ..............6 2 Preliminary Nexus Calculation of Total Regional Fees... ........' ................. 12 �3 Calculation of EC IA Fee Schedule........................................ .................... 13 4 Financing Considerations, ................................... 15 .. ......................... Final Re ort-East County Trans porlation LTerovement AuthoELtZ Fee Pro rant I. MRODUCTION BACKGROUND The East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority (,ECCRFFA) is a regional Manning agency charged with obtaining the funding for regional transportation improvement projects in East Contra Costa County. The ECCRFFA first implemented a.transportation impact fee in 1994. The fee was designed toprovide a contribution from new development toward a series of regional transportation improvements, such as the State Route (SR) 4 Bypass and the widening of SR 4 through Pittsburg and A ntioch. Working with the member agencies and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (OCTA), the Authority has successfully utilized fee revenue to initiate the design and construction of the initial phases of the,SR 4 Bypass. More recently; the ECCRFFA considered updating the impact fee to helpfund an expanded on- transportation FFAinitiated a. 1M.ofregi altransportatio. mprovernents- In December 2000,the ECCR study to evattiate.options for expanding the program to include the additional improvements. -ore CdsM &w P The initial results.of the study were -seuted ftv the Easy centra' rogram May -ter c of e route,' R. e� Fehr Peers Associates 2W 1 After consideration th y results presented in that report, the ECCRFFA decided to move forward witha feeincrease n which all jurisdictions would� ay the same feea for an exp program i pi The City of Pittsburg disagreed with the recommendation that all jurisdictions pay the same fee. Therefore, the ECCRFFA Board decided to pursue a new Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, to be made up of the Cities of Antioch, Brentwood and OaMey, and Contra Costa County, which would assess fees to support an -expanded list of region-at iMp rovements. Thecurrent ECCw ECCRFFA remains intact; the nein agreement forms an entity called the East County Transportation Improvement Authority(ECTIA). PURPOSE The purposeof this study is to provide the technical basis for the ECTIA fee program. This report documents the analytical approach for determining the nexus between the fees and the regional impact created by anticipated development in East County. STUDY AREA Fehr&Peers Associates ............................. .. .... .. .... .. Final Rfport-East Court y Trans orlation IMprovement.Authpiity Fee Pro As shown on Figure 1, the study area includes the unincorporatedportions of eastern Contra Costa County, as, well as the Cities of Antioch, Brentwood;and Oakley. STUDY PROCESS This study was developed under the direction of the ECCRFFA/ECrIA staff. Input was obtained at key points in the study process from the Technical Advisory Committee (including staff from each member agency) and the Executive Committee (i.e., the City Managers from the affected jurisdictions and the County Chief Administrative.Officer). Input from the public and interest groups was solicited and received in a variety of ways. First, the initiative to update the fee program was discussedat a series of public,ineetirigs before the ECCRFFA Board in the:Fall of 2000., Ibis included review and approval of proposed improvement Projects. Next, the preliminary results of the fee update were presented to the Board in a, public meeting on March 8, 2001. The Board then directed that staff meet with several interest groups, , including the, Home Builders Association, : commercial developers, and theCounty Coun I'soffice Th se:meetings occurred in March se e in and April of 2001. An additional public in eetingt.workshop w as.h6l&on April-171ZUtll. Authorit. miff then presented the results ofho I Ji the.I)r ofthose meetings, a Ong with t : s o the Contra �Costa County,. Board of Supervisors an Councils the City it! f Antioch, Brentwood, Brentwood, Oakley, and Pittsburg in May and June of 2001. Further discussions between representatives of the Authority Board and officials from the City of Pittsburg took place at study sessions of the Pittsburg City Council in August and September of 2001. ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT This report contains a total of five chapters including this introductory chapter. Each is listed and briefly described below. 0 Chapter 1I— Relationship to ECCRFFA Program summarizes the status of the current ECCRFFA feeprogram and describes the relationship between the EC 171A and the ECCRFFA programs. 0 Chapter III—Analysis Methodology describes the methods used in conducting the technical analysis necessary to establish the nexus. • Chapter IV—Analysis Results describes the results of the nexus analysis. • Chapter V— Fee Program Financi ng Considerations discusses financing issues regarding the overall regional transportation improvement program. Fehr Peers Associates 2 W r� z ' err• 0' ATED EAS C0VA(r It It u 4 M ltarrr!!lrriar##rYir -C A r• {! J ! 19 ! r. r iA /Ff Ni �y,rt857 A' �� ! srarrlY�jsv u r Q ■ d � � Ls II 61a �1y ss�ef= (J�y Af' g Final Report nty East Court Tranortafion!Mprovement Author' Fee Program 11. RELATIONS111P TO:ECCRFVA PROGRAM The original. ECCRFFA fee program is documented in Response to Proposed Route 4 Bypass AuthorityDevelopment Fee Program, Korve Engineering, April 1993., The fee program has undergone some modifications in the intervening years, with the fee levels for each community being changed periodically to reflect increasing construction costs. However,the list of im provernent projects funded by the fee program has reniainedconstant. REGIONAL IWROVEMENTS ENCOMPASSED BY THE ECCRFFA FEE Figure 2 displays the location of the regional improvements encompassed by the original ECCRFFA fee Program first adopted in 1994. The fee provides a contribution toward several improvements,.including- * Widening of SR 4 to three mixed-flow lanesand one high-occupancy vehicle (H 3V) n -v o R 60 lane in each direction from Railroad-Avenue t S I * Interchangeverrients�on:SR 4 at Railroad Avenue, Loved Road,Hillcrest Road, improvements Loveridge ad, rest, and SR- 16 V anes 9:to �asw Construction of:the SR 4 Bypass,withfour I to BA fb Road and twolarve Road; • New interchanges on the SR 4 Bypass at Lone Tree Way and Laurel Road and subsequent widenings and interchanges; and, A contribution toward:the Buchanan Road Bypass. SCHEDULE OF ECCRFFA INVACT FEES Table I displays the current schedule of impact fees for each land use category in the ECCRFFA program- Fehr&Peers Associales 4 .......... ........................ 10 , � . 10 Wq - 11 11114 JZ Vi �1�11N si��iii� r �r Final Report East Co** LM Transportation rovement Authority Fee Program Current R CRFF* egi*n sl lxupact Fees Bay Otho Und,Use Unit Pittsburg Antioch OakJe.y. Brentwood Point County Sin -family DU $1,364 406 $5,406 $514a6 s �$5,400 Nhilti4amily DU $1,781 $4,324 $41324 $4,324 $1491 $4,324 commercial Sq.Pt- I $0 08 $0,63 s13.63 $0.63 $03 $9.63 Mfice Sq.Ft. $x.1'1 $0A5 $665 $665 $0.65 $13A65 Qil-sirtaf Sq.Ft. $04 $0134 $0.34 $034 $0.34 Other Pk Hr $1,364 $3,406 $51406 $5,406 $1,364 $5,406 Ttv S.(Durce:East Contra Costa Regional Fee and Financing Authority,-2001 RELATIONSHIP OF ECTIA ANDECCRFFA PROGRAMS Asdescribed in Chapter I above, the ECTIA is the result of a new Joint Powers Agreement between the Cities of Antioch, Brentwood, and Oakley, and: Contra Costa County, The I continue t � S to sup EO�kA�A.Will. remain in place and will cont o collectfe e port there gionaf irnprovernent:.projects i,described above, The.ECTIA will:operate concurrently: and will support an expanded list of regional improvements, which are shown in, Figure I he ECTIA program includes several additional,improvement projects that,are not part of the ECCRFFA program,including: Construction of the Laurel Road Connector.between the Laurel Road interchange on the, SR 4 Bypass and Laurel Read in Oakley; Construction of the Vasco-Byron Connector between Vasco Road and Byron Ilighway north of the Byron Airport Ptojectdevelopment and right-of-way protection of the Route 239 Corridor Construction of operational and safety improvements to Vasco Road south of the SR 4 Bypass; Construction of improvements to routes parallel to SR 4 in the City of Antioch and unincorporated areas, including the Northern Parallel Arterials (Pittsburg-Antioch ffighway,. le Street, Willow Pass Road, and the extension of Evora Road) and the Southern Parallel Arterials (West Tregallas Road,Fitzueren Road,Delta Fair Boulevard, and Buchanan Road in Antioch); and, Widening of SR 4/Main Street between Lone Tree Way and Vintage Parkw ay in Oakley. Fehr&Peers Associates ................... .......... ........... s LL 00 � ,'�,�,•� ~may � sky ui e i J2 z z � Midi c c U 1; IL 62 At U; m " �. Final Re' ort-East COU!q LEISRO-O&Oq.Limprovement Author"Q Fee Pro`ram U-hh ke the, ECCRFFA program, the ECTIA prograin will not provide a contribution toward the Buchanan Road Bypass. The nexus analysis presented here deterraines the total amount of regional fees that should be collecte&to support the, list of regional projects above. Some of these funds Will be collected through the ECCRFFA program, and the rest will be collected through the ECTIA program. The current fee schedule for the ECCRFFA has.been defined throu9 h earlier analysis, and was: presented in Table 1. The ECTIA, fee schedule will be set such that it encompasses the remainder ofthe regional fee arnount- that is, the: ECTIA fee will be the difference between the :total regional fee calculated through this nexus analysis and the existing ECC.RFFA fee. Fehrh Peers Associates 8 .................... ...................................................... . ........... finalPfpart gq;q County 1rrxns ortatidn Improvement Authori Fee Program 11114 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY This chapter, describes the methodology used to determine the nexus between the impact from new development in East County and,the needed improvements,. PROCESS The technical analysis,for this study was completed through a series of eight steps. Each is listed below, along with a brief description. All of the calculations are presented in the Technical Appendix. Step I - Obtain Background Information -Authority staff provided a list of improvement projects that are proposed to be included in the ECTIA fee.program. Theseprojects have beenidentifiedas needed improvements in General Plans or other regional planning documents. Staff also provided cost estimates for all. im The provements. project costs providedby staff were estimated by, the responsible 6 it spo ble al agenc .local S, and include land, acquisition, engineering, and all re-levant project::development,costs in addition to direct Construction costs. These cost estimates were first provided in early 2001. To ;account for increasingconstruction , , costs. over the intervening months, cost, estimates ha.v e been increased Y 76 as:dixected by staff. Step 2-Select Analysis Tool -The most recent version of,the East County Travel:Demand, Model was selected for use in this study. The model is maintained by CCTA and serves as the official regional model for transportation analysts in the East County area. The model uses forecasts of land uses in the region to generate vehicle:travel, anddistributes that travel to the.major roadways represented in the model's transportation network. Step 3 - Update Transportation Network - The East County model network was first updated with financially-constrained projects from the 2000 Update to the Countywide Comprehensive Transportation.Plan (Cl?), to ensure that it ad ately represented current improvement plans. Next, the improvements proposed for the ECCRFFA and ECTLA, fee programs were coded into the model network, based on project descriptions provided by Authority staff. Step 4 - Segregate Land,Use Forecasts by Jurisdiction-Land use,forecasts to 2020 were obtained from,CCTA's Land Use Information System (LUIS.), which is consistent with s Projections jections '98 (see Appendix A) and is generally representative of the land uses outlined in the General Plans of the respective jurisdictions. Total land uses were segregated Fehr&Peers Assoczates 9 ..................... ........ ................... Final 12e ort-East Co' Trans ortation Im proyement,A40re Fee 'r ram by jurisdiction within the study area, based on zone correspondence tables provided by the jurisdictions and OCTA. For purposes of this study, all unincorporated areas (including Bay 'Point) were ccinsolidated within a single category. Step 5 Determine Traffic Contributions- A series of select link analyses was performed under year 200 and 2020 evening pear hour conditions. First the relative contributions of existing (year 2000)traffic and new traffic were determined for each ECCRFA and ECTTA improvement. Then, the new traffic volumes were further split into the following categories, based on trip origins and destinations: Antioch, Oakley, Brentwood, unincorporated East County, and through travel. Because each improvement usually spans multiple links within the model, results from each segment of the improvement were averaged together. Screenl ne analysis was used for those,improvements for which;parallel routes exist, suchas the widening of SR 4 and the SR 4 Bypass. In those cases, volumes from the subject facility and from parsllel roadways were averaged together, to ensure that all future traffic affected by the improved facility was included in the calculation of fees. Step 6-Determine Cost Contributions-The jurisdiction specific percentage contributions computed from Step 5 were applied to the improvement costs to determine the total fee revenue to be paid by each jurisdiction for each improvement. - Step 7 - Distribute Costs:to the Various Land Uses -The model includes residential and non-residential land uses. Non-residential uses are,represented in the model. in terms of numbers of employees. Because the fees will be assessed on aper unit area basis, the forecasts of total employees were converted to square feet of non-residential development by applying the following factors, which have been used in other recent East County studies:' ■ Office:275 square feet/employee; ■ Retail: 500 square feet/employee-,and • Other: 400 square feet/employee. The noxi-residential uses were converted to dwelling unit equivalents (DUEs), taking into account the fact that different development types generate traffic with different characteristics. This conversion was accornapplying use-specific trip rates from lishedby ITE Trip Generation, o!n Edition] estimates of pass-by trips from SANDAL Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation gates,July 1998,and average trip lengths for each trip purpose as calculated from the East County model_ All DUE§ were then normalized to the single- family residential rate. Fehr&Peers Associates 10 ..... .... .. .... . . ........ ...... Fina! IR ort*t CO 0, WNPrvehlent AuthOri Fee Fro rum step R, Determine Fee Amounts - The total cost to be. contributed byeach jurisdicti©n (Step was then divided.by,t the total nurnbex©f new DUEs in each jurisdiction .(Step 7).to determine the appropriate fee for different landuse categories. Fehr&Peers Ass—ociates ..................... ............................................... Final Re ort-&ui county Tr" rtittion IMrovementAuthority Fee Pro ram IV. ANALYSMRESULTS This chaptersummarizes the results of the nexus analysis for the expanded list o improvements that are proposed to be included in the ECTIA program. NEXUS CALCULATION OF REGIONAL FEES Table 2 displays the computed impact fees. These fees represent an average for all jurisdictions, since it is assumed that a uniform set of fees will be adopted for all the ECTIA member agencies. As described in Chapter H above, these are the total fees required to support the list of projects in the ECTIA program the actual ECTIA fee schedule will be determined after comparison with the existing ECC PIRA fee schedule. Table 2 P'reunx nary Nem Calculation Of Total Reg ia1nal Fees Laid Use Category RionkalFe IN � role l"aarnly ttesidetial lVt�lti-Faaly i�eadeaitiai m� $4,6113.2$ Cermmercial(�F3 ', '$7.95 9(04*00 Industrial($ $5.83 r $7,49859 dudes both the l CC1'FFA and I=CTIA fce c rupenmts. Represents'an average fee for all jurisdictions in the EC l 1A program, Source:Fehr&Piers A jL4tCS,L January 20132.' As this shows,the addition of the improvement projects would increase the fee amounts for single-family residential units by roughly $2;100 per unit. FeesL far multlLIfamily residential units wouldL increase by about $300 per unit. Thi fees shown for non residential dlevelapment are exclusive of any reduction that the agenees may choose to im)lement,such LL as the reduction included when the program. was initially ado te LinI994ThdreforeIL the non-residential fees shown here are not directly ComparabjeL to those in TableLLI. Fehr&Peers Associates' 12 ............................. Final k"pq-East County Trans arration I 'rove M.,. nt,Autho!sQ Fee P"ram Please refer to Appendix B fordetailed:information regarding improvement costs, traffic contributions by jurisdiction,DUE calculations,etc. EC"AFEE..SCI'MDULE Table 3 presents a compaxison.of the ECC FFA fees and the total regional fees presented in Tables I and.2 of this report, and calculates the proposed ECTIA fee schedule. As directed by the, Board., fees for non-residential uses in the ECTIA program are set such that the total regional fee will be $1.00 per square foot. This reflects,a reduction when compared to the non-residenti.41 fees calculated in Table 2 and in the detailed tables in Appcdix B, and is roughly similar to the 90% reduction applied to nonn-residenti-Al uses in the original ECC FFA fee program. Table 3 Foe, ,.c Total hand Catg€�ry S a Fees pees �4 'U A i�*y*4ideofia_i Ob $5,406 00 �$i V llwi I IuSIdeT3ti 4 17fi 4t3 43 AtTlerGlll $ ,,63 S SO. 00M ($ $10,65 $0.3$ { fl04 $1'00 0 $ 6 mer L L(Pak Stour $5 Trip)P $ l+i ares: Fees 7 for the EC'1`IA juais tictioxts shat YLtL;ajOLpart of the Residential L fees from Table I haveL been rounded,L and non-residentialfOPS iced to O�rsquaTc foot. ECTtA FeesLLareL the L differenceLbetween L T tat ftgionaILLL tes and ECCI -Fee& o F Source: S6hrLL& L Peers, S,JanUaryLL290;4 L Fehr& Peers Associates 13 .....................................L L..............L Finat Re ort-East Ct�u Trans Irltdt ol#Y rovement Author Fee Pry ram G TIONS This chapter> describes the impact of various financing considerations on the ECTIA program. OTHER FUNDING SOURCES As with most fee programs,including the original ECCRFFA program, the fee revenue from the ECTiA program will not pay the total cost of all regional improvements. Other funding must be generated, some of which has already been identified. The following describes the estimated revenue from known sources that could be applied to improvements in the program. Projected Revenue from ECCRFFA Program Both the ECCRFFA and Efees will be TfA used to support major projects in East County, including the SR 4 Widening and the consttvction of the SR 4 Bypass. The revenue; projected to be collected through the ECCRFFA program over the next 20 years has been estimated at$194 million. Current ECOPFA Fund Bat -Approximately$22 million is expected to be available to support the improvement projects in colnrnon between the ECCRIV and ECTIA progra ns, according to Authority staff. Measure C-Approved by Contra Costa County voters in 1988, it imposed a 112 cent sales tax to help pay for transportation improvements over a 2b-year period. 'There are eight years remaining on this measure (i e., 20.00---2008) According to CC'T�i staff, a total of $137 million pf Measure C funds is currently programmed for the widening of R 4 east of Railroad Avenue, Therefore,this $131 million was assumed to be allocated to the widening project. If Measure C is re-authorized in 2008,additional funds maybe available. However, these funds were not assumed to be available to the program for purposes of this study. State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)Funds,- Generated by gas tax revenues, these funds are allocated by the State of California to Contra Costa County every two years for Programming transportation improvement.projects. Rased on recent historical revenue allocations, CCTA staff estimates that a total of $26 million per year will be available to Centra Costa County for County-wide programming over the next 20 years. It is also estimated that 25 percent of that total will be, allocatedfor improvements in East County. The total STIP funds assumed to be eligible to support improvements in the regional program is therefore$130 million by 2020. Fehr&Peers t iweiates 14 ........... ...... ...... ....................... Final Re ort-East.,Coun!2 Trannation#Vrovement Aaffio!]iX Fee Fra 'ram PROGRAM SU"LUS/DIEFICIT Table 4 shows the combined effect of the funding mechanisms describedabove on the overall regional improvement program. As this: shows. a funding deficit is.:expocte As described abbve., the re-authori zation of Measure C would provide additional funding,but it isnot assumed in this summary. Table 4 Financing Considerations .0? I Fees *gt6�Faniily Ri*entidl(D-U) $2,E104�M- Multi- I Residentiat(DLD .00 Co Oda- f} $0.17 Srnliidre :Total -!**Cost Total Fee.Revenue,Gen rated from ECHProgram $59 pro, $190 Carr ntAalinceln ECCRFFA.Program $22: ds Cu�enVl, C Puri $137 timtecl STIP P unds 20(30-20211 $130 T tal Funding $538: !otd SOOIus�eficjt 4 -4274 Itased on the amount of new development projected in each jurisdiction. 2 Cost for the SR 4 widening from Railroad through the Loveriage, interchange, 66mate assumes 25%.of total County share from 200.0-2020(25%of $26 :per year for 20 years). One potential mechanism to help reduce the deficit would be a re- authoritation of Measure C beyond 2008. An extension of the current revenue stream:could yield an estimated$132M(assumes 20%of re- authortzed Measure C from 2008-2020 at$55M peryear for 12 years). Source: Fehr&peers Associates,2!qaxy 2002. Fehr Peers Associates 15 ............ ................................... Final Re ort-East Coon -raps ortati . Inerqveinenf A.uth fity dee Pro ram lt' W&CT C)E LAND USE ABSORPTION ASSU4 '> ONS It should be noted that the land use absorption assumptions used in this study are based on ABAG's Projections' 98. If development occurs more quickly than assumed in this study, the traffic impacts would occur sooner, thereby accelerating the need for the improvement. ECTTIA fee revenue would'also be accelerated con-mensurate with the increase in the rate of development. If development occurs more slowly than assumed in this study, the traffic impacts would not occur as quickly, possibly postponing the need for certain longer-range improvements. The collections of ECTIA fee revenue would also slow proportionately. In this case,the improvements would likely occur in the 5-14 year period after 2020. IMPACT OF SMOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ENT The analysis ',presented above is based on. development assumptions from ABAG`s 1 eojections `98, which do not differentiate between conventional housing and senior housing. Research shows that senior housing developments generate fewer trips than conventional singles Iarnily residential units. n fact, according to dial Repart- 8r d Active Ar ult otcsing Tra,&c Fee Inview, Fehr 8c Peens!Associates, May, 9, 1999, traffic cotants showed that senior hciusing' units in East Contra Costa County ;generated approximately;43% of the;trips of conventional single-family units. Total trip generation reduction fora given project demands on.the type of senior housing developr nt proposed. It is difficult to determine the specific impact of senior housing units on the fee program without kmwledge of the extent and location of the development. If the senior units replaced some of the units previously assumed to be conventional,the fee revenges would be reduced. The effect on the fee program depends on whether any planned improvements could be reduced or eliminated due to the reduction in trip generation, If the senior units were in addition to those already assumed in our analysis, total fee revenues'would increase. In this case, additional improvements may or may not be required to accommodate this added development. It is recommended that the Authority not try to address the fee levels required for senior housing developments at this time. This issue should be addressed once plans for the type, extent, and location of senior housing development in East County are more clearly understood. Fehr,&,Peers Associates 16 lairial Re'art- Caen ?r arttian tm raverxentAuthriA e�Pia ram TECHNICAL.APMNDICES. Appendix A - ABAG Projev&ns `98 Data Appendix B - TechnicalCalMat ons Fihr&Peers Associates17 Final Re rt-East Coun Trans artution Im Aovement Aut onr y.Feerrqrqm, Appendix A DATA FROM ABAG'S PROJECTI NS '�►8 Table -2 Forecasted Growth in East County Year.2 00 Year 2024 E1001 E10 eQs Ern to ees ,Turxisdiction Huusel�ods Service Vtber R1ouseholds Ser*ice ( #her Retai! fI2tioC�4 : 29,182 Jrf30 $,134 5,982 43, 3i 9,417 12t278 11,36 rentwood 7,802 2,268 2,028 2,352 19,35fl 6,721 5966 7,961 OAMLeYL8,572 270 659 574 14,217 536 16443 1,447 a incorporated East Country 12,994 941 1,599 1,327 15)918 1,271LL 2;696 1)9?{3 LL t tat ECTIA Area 58,5 9 882912"420 10,235 93,W 17,945 21;983 22,747 wide EC31A Area 282,(1()7LLLL 110,606 12d,84fl 76,644 326,579 149,643 164Q23 101,451 aures:Lind Clse Iofc rtnation Sys ternA,1999. Fehr Bic Peers Assvciales Final:Re'art-gzi Cou Trues rtativn Ire "ement Author? v.Fee Pro ram Appendk B: ZTECUNICAL ALC LNO This Technical Apl endix contains the calculations necessary to complete the nexus determination, presented in a series of tables. The following describes the information represented in each table. Table B-1 This table presents the growth that is anticipated to occur between 2000 and 2020 in :East County jurisdictions,; according to AB AG's irrjectvs 'fib. This information is presented in two forms: first, the numbers of households and employees in different industries, followed) by the same information converted to bUF,s. The SIX conversion involved determining the trip characteristics of each enrtployrr�ent category from the model data. In this case, the conversion included the daily trip generation rate contained in the model for each "to. t - the aver ge trip length by putpose calculated from the model, and estimates of gals-by trips. 'Fable B-2 This table lists the improvement projects to be;supported'by the regional impact fees,and the percentage traffic contribution of each jurisdiction to each project. These relative traffic contributions for each project were determined by applying the East County Travel Demand Model and conducting a series of select link analyses. (Please see Chapter- III, Analysis Methodology,f©r additional information.) Table B-3 This table lists the estimated cost for each improvement project in the second column. The percentage traffic contributions by jurisdiction (as presented) in Fable B-2) were multiplied by, the estimated project cost to determine the appropriate financial. contributions of each jurisdiction to each project. The totals at the bottom of the table represent the total amount each jurisdiction should contribute to this list of projects through collection of regionat fees. 'fable B-4 Thais table summarizes the number of new DUEs by jurisdiction (from Table B-1), and presents the fair sham cost that each jurisdiction should bear to support the fee prograde,;as determined in Table B-3. This fair share cost is divided by the number of new I3UEs in each jurisdiction to determine the cost per new DUE. Fehr&Peers Associates Final Re ort-East Cowo Transportation.Lm rav ►nexti Authrri Fee Pro ram Table B-5 This table presents the method for allocating the cost per new DUE calculated in Table$-4 to the land use categories represented in the est bounty tee program; The uses included in the fee program are listed on, the left side. DUE rates were determined by applying use- specific.trip rates, estimates of pass-bytrips, and average;trip lengths as calcuWated from the East County model. Table B-6 This table presents the preliminary fees that were calculated from this nexus study, by jurisdiction and type,of use. The DUE per Unit figures from Table B-5 were multiplied by the Cost per,New DUE presented in 'Table 13A and the result is the schedule of fees by jurisdiction and by land use category; The average is weighted by the amount of new development expected in each jurisdiction. Petr&Peers Associates TBbIC B-I G17!1r85tCOI y Bused Ori ABAG ProJectious IS �'3lii3t8iCd i`ir � CI (3C1[f1t!i g "S - 1 Em ltt L b CCs dttrlscilction ©tool Service 4UrCr RCtaii HpusCholds SCrvice UthCr RCt ]1,5 rtiioeh 14;399 4;067: 4,t4d 3$7 14,3 51 993 1,3 9 reptwooxl 11:548 4,453 3,938 3:,609 11,348 7t2 943 2,EYi9 akley 5,645 266 384 873 5,645 43 92 314 uiucorporated East County 21924 330 1,097 643 2,924 53 263 231 oral PCTIA Area 34;516 9116 ' 4,563 12;51234,535 14591 21295 4,504 42, 7 uCside ECT iA Area 44;572 39,03 7 39,183 24;80? 44 572 6246 9;4t14 $931 e9,153 uses: st�Growth calculated firom data.in Appendix A.'D11E conversion based on model output. elauouship Irew i land use categories irl the model and the fee pr©grarn was assumsd toibe:Retail=Corn merciat; ervice=t�fftee;attd fluter�Industrial. Fehr&Peers Associates 1/10/02 asss s ass s $ Ar +O KY+R V7 N NNE�iN NN NNN NN N eta vi�'7 O Gl NO t!t c>O ow o ma -11 "IFINI tells � as 1 i x let rttXj r � �e let .r ..r�r r;r-r- •er--�+ N q N +rs u I g oN N N i^i t��E N i�^F �/R•••••�{ry{+7 '4' M '�h Cl � W N Kf1 Lam'} r � MAU tL w « 1400" «ham M a� 'R�?tx er �X�t N SV tri t'+�K+Y �Mi N+M+D th...4•C3++ *t 2T� N t.1 a+� h eA err»eNs irr e?y ? a�Rh 40R YAK»HNJNeM W3 t H '. N H I Cil NO ea o ss� r'3 I g o��+N�c �±.•.•...�ca<+,tie vnr,o. oma;na..w MC?cs �t+3 �- < No va H c4+i vis MNH NHH H HHYl S/5 H+lA h M4 X9^ 1?�H Hi�H H�H N SNR � feN! M �V yLy..O...•.i`k f+S'V i�M tea.•r..+..Y N K eR N K '^•H` M N N iep"pp��"Ob N�Y: M s C ca K H H y H Orf H H V4 H H fR HVU H H ay'n V 0.' b b m ca t.. ul if a7'+26 4i Y w yy�N 7+ i3Yii'1 u ri tail 1C+7 @ 83 iyi 'm "�'R 33.1 �C� fle y bw.fir N_��Yom" �-:_ fl'��' JR r 14 Vhf e y 006 U �6 IL Table B-4 'Cost per DUE New Fahr S#�are Cyst Cost per ardiction I1�s 0xril1100} new�3t1E tioch 171978 $ 129,56 $ 7 Of.63 alley 6,094 $ 52.19 $ 8,563.60 renu*cxxl 15,220 $ 104.58 $ 6,87 46 nincorpdrated East t aunty3,469 $ 34.33 $ 9,89 .74 o ECTIPr Area '' 42,761 $ 3211.66 7,49$.89 Table ZS Proposed DM Rags for ECTIA Fee Program Laud Ilse Faeak Hour New Average SMT I1IJE Category AR Trip Rate] T�ipsZ Trip Lengfil�3 per Uilt per Ulw ingie Family DU 1.131 1 C!0 9.4 9 7 1. t Fatnilyl DU 0.62 100 9.6 6� t}61 oat erm t SF 3.74 55 5.0 10.3 1. ce 1,000 Sl~ 1.49 80 10.7 12.8. 1,32 wstcial ,( SF 0.88 8010.7 7.5 :0.78 1.IrM Trip Generation 6t4 Edition. SANDAG:Bnef Guide ofVehieularTraffic Generation Rates,July 1998.' raver a len s for the Fast Coon area frcsm the model,in miles. Table$'-6 Total Region Fees in ECT1A Area Uttittcororated Land Itse Unit Axitioeh ©alley Bretxtrr�uod East Ctnttxty Average ingte Family Dil $ 7,2#16.63 $ 8,568.60 $' 6,871:46 $+ 9,895.74` $ 7,498.89 inti FamilyDU $ 4,423.87 $ 5,256.86 $' 4,218.12 $' 6,67*611$ 4,603.28 rcial SF $ 7.64 $ 9.08 $' 7.29 $' 10.50 $ 1.95 Office SF $ 9.48 $ 1I.26 $' 9.04 $' 13.02 $ 9.86 Industrial SF $ 5.60 $ 6.65 $ 5.34 $I 7.69 $ 5.83 r Unit $ 7,206.63 $ 8,56 .60 $ 6,8 71,46 $; 9,895.74', $ 7,498.89 Source:Fehr&Peers Ass©dates,Tan ,2€31}2. Fehr&Peers Associates 1/10/02