Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01162001 - D7 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ,, . . Contra FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP Costa COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR County DATE: JANUARY 16, 2001 SUBJECT: DETERMINATION OF WHETHER CAUSE EXISTS TO REVOKE COUNTY FILE #LP952061 APPROVED BY THE SAN RAMON VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION ON MAY 19, 1899. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ADDRESSED 3212 DANVILLE BOULEVARD IN THE ALAMO AREA. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. DETERMINE that the use permit (County File #LP952061) complies with all the conditions of approval for the project and that there is not cause to revoke the permit. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION 5F COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE S): ACTION OF BOARD ON .r stn u A rg 16 - 2001 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED BOTHER_„X„ The public hearing was OPENED,no one appearing the speak,the hearing was CLOSED. The Board discussed the issues and took the following action: APPROVED staff s recommendation and DIRECTED that the Applicant submit quarterly compliance reports for review by the Zoning Administrator,with the first one due on May 31, 2001. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND .UNANIMOUS(ABSENT—JL4--) CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND AYES:. __ NOES: ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN Contact: Aruna Bhat(335-1219) ATTESTED January 16 , 2001 cc: County Counsel Building inspection PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Dale Bridges SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Peter Ostrosky BY14JA-t� eputy January 16,2001 Board of Supervisors File# LP952061 Page 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION On May 19, 1999, the San Ramon Valley Regional Planning Commission approved a new land use permit to permanently establish mused car dealership on the subject property located at 3212 Danville Boulevard in Alamo. The County Board of Supervisors held the initial public hearing on April 18, 2000 to determine if cause exists to revoke the permit approved under County File #LP952061 since the applicant was not in compliance with conditions of approval for the project. At the October 24, 2000 meeting, the Board declared its intent to reject the revocation of the use permit for Bridges car dealership if Mr. Bridges complied with conditions of approval #1, #13, #16F and #30 by December 31, 2000. The Board directed staff to prepare a status report on condition compliance for the December 19, 2000 meeting. At the time the status report went before the Board, Mr. Bridges was not in compliance with COA#1, COA#13 and COA #30. COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The applicant has paid the $12,000 in fees and has executed the Statement of Obligation for deck removal as required by condition of approval #30. Mr. Bridges has forest green striping for the automobile display areas. It is not as clearly visible as a parking lot that is striped white. However, the County's parking ordinance does not specify the striping color for automobile display areas. The employees of the car lot will access the automobiles in this area for the customers. The customer parking area is striped beige and is clearly visible for the public. Condition of approval #14 for this project requires the applicant to submit a compliance report for review by the Zoning Administrator every 12 months from the permit effective date for the first three years. Mr. Bridges is required to submit a compliance report by May 31, 2001. The conditions also state that Mr. Bridges would be responsible for all costs associated with staff time required to review the compliance reports. RECOMMENDATION Mr. Bridges is in compliance with the conditions of approval for the project. Staff recommends that the Board find that there is not cause to revoke the permit.