Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10242000 - D7 g. D.7 7 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ':. : ".: • f Contra FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICD Costa COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR County DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000 SUBJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE 789 ACRE QUIMBY ISLAND FROM A-2 (GENERAL AGRICULTURAL)TO A-4(AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE DISTRICT),RZ#3011,AND APPROVAL OF A LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT WITH ELLIS STEPHENS (APPLICANT), CEO, ELLIS ISLAND FARM, INC. (OWNER). SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. FIND the Negative Declaration prepared for this project to be appropriate environmental documentation. 2. ADOPT the findings contained in East County Regional Planning Commission Resolution No. 28- 1997 as the basis for the Board's action. 3. ADOPT the recommendation from the East County Regional Planning Commission, as contained in their Resolution No. 28-1997, to approve the rezoning of the 789 acres from A-2 (General Agricultural) to A-4 (Agricultural Preserve District). CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMM EE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON. October 24, 2000 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _�_OTHER This is the time heretofore noticed by the Clerk of the Board for hearing on the above matter. No one appearing to speak, the public hearing was CLOSED. JT 1S BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the above recommendations are APPROVED and Ordinance No. 2000-36, giving effect to the rezoning, is INTRODUCED, reading waived and November 14, 2000 is SET for adoption of same; and Resolution No. 20001501 approving Land Conservation Contract (AP# 3-2000) is APPROVED. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT 1&5 ? CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND AYES: NOES: ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN Contact: P. Roche,CDD-AP(925-335-1242) ATTESTED cc: Community Development Dept. PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF CAO SUPERVISORS ND COUNTY ADMININISTRATOR County Counsel County Assessor(via CDD) Mr. Ellis Stephens BY � DEPUTY October 24, 2000 Board of Supervisors File# RZ 3011 Page 2 4. DIRECT the Community Development Department to post the Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. 5. APPROVE a new Land Conservation Contract(AP#3-2000)with Ellis Stephens for APN#023-110- 014 and 023-110-015 (Quimby Island), and AUTHORIZE Chair to sign and execute Land Conservation Contract (AP#3-2000). FISCAL IMPACT None. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION Mr. Ellis Stephens(Applicant and Owner)is requesting to rezone a 789-acre island in the Delta region of Contra Costa County from General Agricultural District (A-2)to Agricultural Preserve District(A-4) and to enter into a Land Conservation Contract (Williamson Act). The subject property is named Quimby Island and is comprised of APN #023-110-014 and 023-110-015. The East County Regional Planning Commission on November 1, 1993 had recommended approval to rezone the subject property from A-2(General Agriculture)to A-80(Exclusive Agriculture).Following the recommendation of the Commission, staff met with the applicant and determined the appropriate zoning designation for the property is A-4,Agriculture Preserve District. On January 10, 1994,the Commission recommended approval to the Board of Supervisors to rezone the subject property to A-4.Subsequently, the applicant requested the property be placed within a Land Conservation Contract(Williamson Act). The request to place the property within the Williamson Act required the matter be returned to the Commission for recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. On September 8, 1997,the Commission recommended approval to rezone the subject property to A-4 and place the property within the Williamson Act. Resolution No.28-1997 from the East County Regional Planning Commission contains the findings and recommendations to rezone Quimby Island to an A-4 (Agricultural District), and it is attached as Exhibit"A"to this Board Order. A copy of the staff report to the East County Regional Planning Commission,dated September 8, 1997, which provides more background information on this matter, is attached as Exhibit "B" to this Board Order. Attached as Exhibit"C"to this Board Order, is a copy of the proposed Land Conservation Contract(AP# 3-2000) with Mr. Ellis Stephens for approximately 789 acres of Quimby Island. Mr. Stephens has reviewed the contract and has agreed to the terms. The Land Conservation Contract(AP#3-2000) is now ready for approval by the Board of Supervisors and execution by the Chair, Board of Supervisors. Attachments Exhibit"A": East County Regional Planning Commission Resolution No. 28-1997 Exhibit"B": Report to East County Regional Planning Commission, dated 9/8/97 Exhibit"C": Proposed Land Conservation Contract(AP#3-2000) PR/h:prochlla ndcon/stephensrz3011.bo 1 Exhibit "A" East County Regional Planning Commission Resolution No. 28-1997 RESOLUTION NO. 28-1997 RESOLUTION OF THE EAST COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE REQUESTED CHANGE IN ZONING IIY ELLIS STEPHENS(APPLICANT&OWNER),IN THE ORDINANCE CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO THE PRECISE ZONING FOR THE QUIMBY AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, a request by Ellis Stephens (Applicant& Owner), County File#3011-RZ, to rezone 789.3± acres of land from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Exclusive Agricultural Preserve District(A-80), was received by the Community Development Department on August 5, 1993; and WHEREAS, the application was amended to rezone the property to Agricultural Preserve District(A-4) and place the property under a Land Conservation Contract(Williamson Act); and WHEREAS, the subject property is described as Quimby Island and consists of Parcels A and B of Minor Subdivision 43-84 located in the extreme eastern delta area of Contra Costa County; and WHEREAS, a legative Declaration of Environmental Significance was posted and notices sent to neighboring property owners and occupants for the rezoning,request; and WHEREAS,after notice was lawfully given, a public hearing was scheduled before the East County Regional Planning Commission on Monday, September 8, 1997, where all persons interested might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, on Monday, September 8, 1997, the East County Regional Planning; Commission having fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the East County Regional Planning Commission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, that the rezoning request of Ellis Stephens (Applicant& Owner)in the Ordinance Code Section pertaining to the precise zoning for the Quimby island area of said County be APPROVED and rezoned to Agricultural Preserve District(A-4); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reason for this recommendation is: 1. The proposed zoning is consistent with the County General Plan. r PAGE TWO RESOLUTION NO.28-1997 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of the East County Regional Planning Commission shall respectively sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the same to the Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Planning Laws of the State of California. BE IT FURTHER.RESOLVED that the instruction to prepare this resolution was given by the East County Regional Planning Commission at its meeting of September 8, 1997 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - Sobalvarro, Anderson, Andrieu,Hanson,Wagner, Wetzel DOES: Commissioners - None ABSENT: Commissioners - Nunn ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None ATTEST: { �A�- Dennis M. Barry, Secretary East County Regional Planning Commission, County of Contra Costa, State of Califomia 3:3011-rz.res ' t Findings Ma TRAC0 +1 A,3 •.,..._�,,..,,,,..,tff Fye, A•3 REE Q•Zq Rezone From ALL—To tG -1 ,5 Area Regional PlanningCamra ,Contra cyst ntY.Stat Chairman e East County da hereby certify that this is a true and correct ca PY of a' indicating thereon the decision of the ,East County Region Commission in the matter of 12Z 'q3 Bt�l al Planning ATTEST: Secretary of the East Count41— Planning Commission,State y Regional California 3 Exhibit "B" Report to East County Regional Planning Commission, 9/8/97 Agenda Item Community Development Contra Costa County EAST COUNTY REGIONAL,PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY SEPTEMBER 8 1997 - 7:00 P.M. I. INTRODUCTION ELLIS STEPHENS (Applicant& Owner), County File #301 I-RZ: The applicant requests approval to rezone a 789.3 acre Delta Island from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Agriculture Preserve District (A-4). Subject property is described as Quimby Island. The property consists of Parcels A and B of MS 43-84. (A-2) (ZA: F-28m, J--28m) (Ct 3010) (Parcel #023-110014 & -015) II. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the East County Regional Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending that the Board of Supervisors approve the rezoning of this island from A-2, General Agricultural District, to A-4, Agricultural Preserve District. III. GENERAL INFORMATION A. General Plan: The site is designated Delta Recreation on the 1990 County General Plan, 20 acre parcel size minimum. B. Zoning:Present zoning is General Agricultural - A-2. Original requested zoning was for Exclusive Agricultural District A-80. Applicant has changed request to the Agricultural Preserve District (A-4). Staff is recommendation is for the A-4 Agricultural Preserve District. C. CEOA Status: A Negative Declaration has been posted for this project. IV. DESCRIPTION OF SITE The subject property is known as Quimby Island. It is an irregularly shaped island at the extreme eastern border of Contra Costa County. Land and water to the east is in San Joaquin County. The island itself is at this time farmed and has some wetlands and lakes. Approximately 600 acres of the land is farmed with corn being raised in 1993. There is a commercial agricultural dock as well as a private dock on the island. A barn and a A-frame building which is used as an office and part-time residence are also located on the island. r t , ' ' 7 S-2 V. AGENCY COMMENTS A. Comprehensive Plgnnina:Rezoning to A-4 would be consistent with the General Plan intent. B, BuildinLy Insvection Department: No comments on this application. C. Public Works Department - Special Districts Division: No comments on this application. D. California Archaeological Inventory: The proposed project area has a possibility of containing archaeological resources. A study is recommended for a portion of the site. Staff has contacted the California Archaeological Inventory and discussed this matter with them. Inasmuch as no entitlement to construct any structures is being granted, it is in stafrs opinion not necessary at this time to conduct an archaeological study. This is simply a request to rezone the site from A-2, which would allow 5 acre parcels, to Aa4, which limited further development and has a 20 acre parcels size minimum. E. Comments were requested from the following agencies: State Lands Commission, Health Services Department -Environmental Health Division, State Department of Fish& Game, and San Joaquin County. None of the above agencies submitted any �- comments regarding this application to this office. VI. ROAD AND DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS The Public Works Department has reviewed 3011-RZ and has no comments. VII. DISCUSSION As mentioned above, this project is a request'to rezone Quimby Island from General Agriculture -A-2 to Agriculture Preserve District A-4. The applicant has requested to put the island within the Williamson Act, which would require that the island remain in fanning activities. The approval of the rezoning of the island from A-2 to A-4 would not give entitlement to construct any structures on the site. The applicant has indicted that he does not plan to develop the island and would prefer to see it remain as is. This applicant has languished and needs to be completed before the Board. To that end we are requesting the adoption of an updated Planning Commission Resolution. S-3 VIII. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the East County Regional Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending that the Board of Supervisors approve the rezoning of Quimby Island from General Agriculture District A-2 to Agricultural Preserve District A-4. AB/aa Rzi/3 011-RZ.AB 10/15/93 1/3/94 7/17/97 8-20-97:df w.- Exhibit "C" Land Conservation Contract (AP#3-2000) THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adapted this Order on October 24, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Gertner, DeSaulnier and Uilkema NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisors Gioia and Canciamilla ABSTAIN: None RESOLUTION NO. 2000/501 SUBJECT: LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT (AP# 00-0003) ? ) ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES that: 1. Parties. BY THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 24th day of October, 2000, ELLIS ISLAND FARMS, INC. hereinafter referred to as "OWNER, "and the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY, ►" do mutually agree and promise as follows : 2 . Property Description. Owner possesses certain real property located within the unincorporated County, which property is presently devoted to agricultural and compatible uses and is particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part of this contract. 3. Purpose. Both Owner and County desire to limit the use of said property to agricultural uses and to compatible uses specified in this agreement in order to discourage premature and unnecessary conversion of such lands from agricultural uses, recognizing that such land has definite public value as open space and that the preservation of such land in agricultural production constitutes an important physical, social, aesthetics and economic asset to County to maintain the agricultural economy of County and the State of California. 4 . Intent of Parties: Enforceable Restriction. Both Owner and County intend that the term, conditions and restrictions of this Contract be in accordance with the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, as amended, so as to be an enforceable restriction under the provisions of Division 1, Part 2, Chapter 3, Article 1. 5 of the California Revenue and 'Taxation Code (Rev. & Tax Code § 421 et. seq. ) . 5 . Intent of Parties: Effect on Property Value. It is the intent of the County and Owner that this Contract is conditioned upon the continued existence of legislation implementing Article XIII, § 8 of the California Constitution so the effect of the terms, conditions and restrictions of the Contract on property values for taxation purposes is substantially as favorable to Owner as the legislation existing on the last renewal date. I 6. Governing Statutes and Ordinances. This Contract is made and entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Chapter 7 of Part l of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Government Code commencing with Section 51200) . This Contract further is made pursuant to and subject to Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, Chapter 84-42 and Chapters 810-2 through 810=-4, and Resolutions of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Numbers 169/763 through 20001536. 7 . Land Use Restrictions. During the term of this Contract or any renewals thereof the above described land shall not be used for any purpose, other than the production of food and fiber and compatible uses as listed in Contra Costa County Ordinance Code Chapter 84-42, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein; provided, however, that such additional agricultural or compatible uses as are set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and is hereby incorporated by reference, shall also be permitted subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein. In case of conflict or inconsistency between the uses allowed in this Contract and those specified in said zoning ordinance, the provisions of the Contract as set forth in Exhibit B shall prevail. 8 . Modification of Restrictions. The Board of Supervisors of County may from time to time and during the term of this Contract or any extensions thereof, by amendment to Contra Costa County Ordinance Code Chapter 84-42, add to those uses listed in said ordinance. Such additional uses shall be limited to commercial agriculture and compatible uses and be subject to the density restrictions of Government Code § 51220 . 5. Said Board shall not eliminate, without written consent of the Owner or his successors or assigns, a compatible use during the term of this Contract or any renewals thereof. 9. Term and Renewal. This Contract shall be effective commencing on the last day of December 2000, and shall remain in effect for a period of ten (10) years therefrom. This Contract shall be automatically renewed and its terms extended for a period of one (1) year on the last day of December of each succeeding year during the term hereof, unless notice of non-renewal is given in the manner provided by section 51245 of the Government Code. At all times during the continuance of this Contract, as from time to time renewed, there shall be a ten (10) year term of restriction unless notice of non-renewal is given in the manner provided by Section 51245 of the Government Code. Under no circumstances shall a notice of renewal be required of either party to effectuate the automatic renewal of this paragraph. 10. Cancellation. (a) Except as provided in Section 11, the provisions of this Contract whereby Owner agrees to restrict the use of the Land described in Paragraph 2 may be canceled as to all or a portion of said land by mutual agreement of the County and Owner after a public hearing has been held in the manner provided by Section 51284 of the Government Code and upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that such cancellation is not inconsistent with the purposes of the Land Conservation Act, or in the public interest, pursuant to Government Code Section 51282 . It is understood by the parties that the existence of an opportunity for another use of said land shall not be sufficient reason for cancellation of the land use restrictions imposed herein and that the uneconomic character of the existing use will be considered only if there is no other reasonable or comparable agricultural use to which the land may be put. (b) Upon cancellation of said portions of this Contract, Owner shall pay to the County Treasurer, as deferred taxes, a cancellation fee in an amount equal to the greater of twelve and one-half (12 ;1%) percent or the current fee provided by state law 2 of the cancellation value of the property being released from the terms of this Contract. Said cancellation value shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 51283 (a) and (b) . Under no circumstances shall the payment of said cancellation fee be waived, deferred, or made subject to any contingency whatever. (c) Final cancellation shall be effectuated in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 51283. 4 . 11. Cancellation Upon Substitution of New Restrictions. This Contract may be canceled by mutual agreement of County and Owner without payment of deferred taxes or public hearing if it is replaced by an enforceable restriction authorized by Article XIII, 8 of the California Constitution. 12 . Eminent Domain Proceedings. (a) In accordance with the provisions of the Government Code Section 51295, incorporated by reference herein, upon the filing of any action in eminent domain for the condemnation of the fee title of the land or any portion thereof subject to this Contract or upon acquisition of such land in lieu of eminent domain by public agency for a public improvement, the provisions of this Contract shall be null and void as to the land so condemned or acquired. (b) If, subsequent to the filing of an action in eminent domain, the proposed condemnation is abandoned as to all or a portion of the land subject to the Contract, the restrictions on land use set forth in this Contract shall, without further agreement of the parties herein, be reinstituted and the terms of this contract shall be in full force and effect, subject to the cancellation provisions of Government Code Section 51295. 13 . Remedies for Breach of Contract. (a) In the event that Owner fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Contract and the effect of said breach as to render the use of land agricultural use, thereby negating the purpose and effect of this Contract, Owner shall pay to the County a sum equal to One Hundred Per Cent (100%) of the equalized assessed value of the real property described in Exhibit A, as established by the County Assessor on the lien date next following the date of breach, as liquidated and agreed damages, it having been agreed that actual damages will be impractical and extremely difficult to ascertain and that said measure of damages is a reasonable measure of the harm which would result from such failure of compliance. If, after the date the Contract was initially entered into, the publicly announced county ratio of assessment to full cash value is changed, the percentage payment in this subdivision shall be changed so no greater percentage of full cash will be paid than would have been paid had there been no change of ratio. (b) It is understood that nothing herein contained shall constitute a waiver of any right which the County may now or in the future have to seek specific performance of this Contract or other injunctive relief. The enforcement provisions of the Contra Costa County Zoning Ordinance shall also apply if the land, which is the subject of this contract, is used for purposes other than those provided in Ordinance Code Chapter 84-42 or this Contract . 14. Effect of Division of Property. Owner agrees that division of the property described in Exhibit A into two (2) or more parcels, whether by sale, gift, by operation of law or by any other means, upon a finding by the Board of Supervisors that said division is detrimental to the ultimate preservation of said property for exclusive agricultural use, be construed by the County as notice of non-renewal by the property owner as provided in Section 9 of this Contract. 3 15 . New Contracts Upon Division, In the event the land under this Contract is divided, a Contract identical to the Contract then covering the original parcel shall be executed by Owner on each parcel created by the division at the time of the division. Any agency making an order of division or the County which has jurisdiction shall require, as a condition of the approval of the division, the execution of the Contracts provided for in this section, provided, however, that failure of Owner to execute Contracts upon division shall not affect the obligations of the heirs, successors and assigns of Owner as established in Section 16. 16. Contract to Run with Land. The within Contract shall run with the land described herein, and upon division, to all parcels created therefrom, and shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, and assigns of the Owner. 17 . Consideration. Owner shall not receive any payment from County in consideration of the obligations imposed hereunder, it being recognized and agreed that the consideration for the execution of the within Contract is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage which will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect on the method of determining the assessed value of land described herein and any reduction therein due to the imposition of the limitations on its use contained herein. 18 . Income and Expense Information. The Owner shall annually furnish the County Assessor with such information as the Assessor may require to determine the valuation of the Owner' s land. 19. Effect of Removing Preserve or Zoning Classification. Removal of any land under this Contract from an agricultural preserve or removing the agricultural preserve zoning classification thereof shall be the equivalent of notice of non- renewal by the County for purposes of Section 422 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. ATTEST: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA PHIL BATCHELOR, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: ° By: D uty Clerk hair, Bo d of Supervisors 4 OWNER r-. We the undersigned trust deed or other encumbrance holders do hereby agree to and agree to be bound by the above imposed restrictions. JL2. Approved as to Form: Victor J. Westman, County Counsel NOTE: All signatures for Owner must be acknowledged. By: Deputy 5 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of On I ' i� t? before me, f Date Nammof officer(e.g.,"Jane Doe,Nota blic") personally appeared , Name(s)of Signals) La personally known to me �Ci-proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are KJtiltitSNXSUt7YAN subscribed to the within instrument and CommWon# 1195344 y. / acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed Notary Public-p y. Son FMrK_-1SC0 County the same in his/her/their authorized my Comm.Ex> stp3, capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Piece Notary Seat Above Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not required by law,it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document 'title or Type of Document:- - � � t-%qG� Document Date: Number of Pages: i i Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer Signer's Name: Individual Tap of thumb here L� Corporate Officer--Title(s): C7 Partner—0 Limited 0 General F-1 Attorney in Fact Trustee [] Guardian or Conservator Ej Other: Signer Is Representing: 01997 National Notary Assocletion•9350 De Soto Ave.,P.6,Box 2402•Chatsworth,CA 91313.2402 y Prod.No.5907 Reorder:Call Toll-Free 1.800-876-6827 5 '90 11:36 FIR SCHEDULE I TO EXHIBIT A THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL ONE: PARCEL A AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF SUBDIVISION MS 169-79 FILED APRIL 7, 1981 IN GOOK 94 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 5, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA (APN 023-110-014) EXCEPTING THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED FIFTY PERCENT INTEREST (1/2)WI,N AL OIL, H00 THE RiGHT GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS BEGINNING 500 FEET BELOW THE SURFACE, I OF SURFACE ENTRY, AND A RIGHT TO FIFTY PERCENT (1!2) OF ANY AND ALL INCOME DERIVED FROM AND AND ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO LEASE, EXTRACTION AND ROYALTIES AS RESERVED BY ROBERT H. HIRSCH IN RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 1989 AS RECORDER'S INSTRUMENT NUMBER 89-255053 AND RE-RECORDED AS RECORDER'S INSTRUMENT NUMBER OFFICIAL RECO DS OF CONT COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL TW : PARCEL B OF SUBDIVISION MS 169-79 FILED APRIL 7, 1981 IN BOOK 94 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 5, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. (APN 023-110-015) EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL OIL, CAS AND MINERAL. RIGHTS BELOW 500 FEET AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM DONALD F. BARSTAD AND MARY ELLEN BARSTAD, HIS WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS IN A TWO THIRD UNDIVIDED INTEREST RECORDED JANUARY 3, 1984, BOOK 11596, PAGE 295, OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM BERT THEODORE BARSTAD, JR, AND BARBARA BARSTAD, HIS WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS IN A ONE THIRD UNDIVIDED INTEREST, RECORDED MARCH 28, 1986 BOOK 12805, ,PAGE 849, OFFICIAL RECORDS. NOTE. BY GRANT DEED FROM DONALD F. BARSTAD AND MARY ELLEN BARSTAD, HIS WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS IN A TWO-THIRDS UNDIVIDED INTEREST AND BERT THEODORE BARSTAD-JR. AND BARBARA BARSTAD, HIS WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS IN A ONE-THIRD UNDIVIDED INTEREST, THE OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS WERE "TED TO ELLIS M. STEPHENS, A MARRIED MAN AS HIS SOLE AND SEPARATE, PROPERTY, RESERVING THEREFROM.AN UNDIVIDED FIFTY PERCENT INTEREST (1/2) JOINTLY OWNED BY EACH IN ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS BEGINNING 500 FEET BELOW THE SURFACE, WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY, AND A RIGHT TO FIFTY PERCENT (1/2) OF ANY AND ALL INCOME DERIVED FROM ANY AND ALL OIL, GAS AND MINERAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LEASEjEXTRACTION AND ROYALTIES, RECORDED DECEMBER 15, 1989 AS RECORDER'S INSTRUMENT NO. 89-255057, AND RE-RECORDED ON AS RECORDER'S INSTRUMENT NO. , OFFICIAL RECORDS OF CONTRA COSTA COUN Y, CALIFORNIA. c. I s b-e e N a - let as am W119:40 sy 19Ot ` R � all i 461 .6 co LL � W X CL se $r � Pat j lox °- .. pi t ti y 4' L 9 i .Y�".•gtc Yw �Y�xi CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT NO. AP# 00-0003 EXHIBITA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of the Land Conservation Contract to which this exhibit is attached, the land described below is designated as the subject of said Contract. Said land is described as follows: That real property located in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, more particularly described as follows: The legal description to said property is contained in Schedule 1, consisting of 3 pages, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. X1 a ' ' ' «ci W �. ,� °1 r.si '.r::�w"�,nryui���.ri� Fri���i '�.sr ► � ww"wF�ri�s",s, . 191 dS J I I ." � .. " N p ! D.r *�it�,;> S $ RSSR�t �RSR�rt �fYftldRq iSMIX ellt I IN cc Wu< cc4 .�+iiu arw..iwwwi CA •I .x� � ■ i:wi r }s •a'arir a+"`dna ��1'+�^ ^'Sa,r w,.�.n ' 'i.«,ri ,et`,. EL— pro C6 44, Ire its ow— vi Z' I i`; CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT NO. AP# 00-0003 EXHIBIT B ALLOWABLE LAND USES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 84-42 . 402 (2) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code and Paragraph 7 of the Land Conservation Contract, of which this exhibit is made a part, the land uses and structures described below are authorized without a land use permit subject to the terms and conditions set forth below. Said uses and structures shall be in conformance to those authorized by Section 84-42 . 402 (1) and Section 84-42. 404 but shall be subject to Section 84-42 . 602 through Section 84-82 . 1402 of Chapter 8442 of the County Ordinance Code. 1 . Existing Non-conforming Structures The following non-conforming structures are permitted, subject to the provisions of County Ordinance Code Chapter 82-8 : None 2 . Existing Conforming Structures: An "All frame building used as an office, a barn or shed, and two boat docks. 3. Proposed Structures: None 4 . Existing Land Use: Agricultural-Farming Operation consistent with present A-2: General Agricultural zoning district and Delta Recreation land use designation in the General Plan. 5 . Proposed Land Use: Agricultural-Farming Operation would be consistent with the A-4• Agricultural Preserve zoning district and Delta Recreation land use designation in the General Plan. 6. Existing Use Compatible with Agricultural Use: Yes d:PR\landcon\ellisframslandcon