HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10242000 - C40-C45 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: William Walker, M.D. , Health Services Director .' - Contra
By: Ginger Marieiro, Contracts Administrator
October 11, 2000 Costa
DATE: County
SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #24-540-14 with
Bi-Beit Corporation
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)A 13ACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION(S) :
Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Chuck
Deutschman) to execute on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement
#24-640-14 with Bi-Beta Corporation, effective September 1, 2000, to amend
Contract #24-640-13, to include detoxification services, with no change in
the Payment Limit of $397, 540 .
FISCAL IMPACT:
None, there is no change in the original Contract Payment Limit .
BACKGROUND/REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATIQN(S)_ :
The California Department of Corrections (CDC) through the State Department
of Alcohol and Drug Programs, funds substance abuse treatment services for
CDC-approved parolees, referred to as the Bay .Area Service Network (BASN)
Project.
Can June 20, 2000, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract
#24-640-13 with Bi-Bett Corporation, for the period from July 1, 2000
through June 30, 2001, for the provision of residential alcohol and drug
abuse treatment for County clients referred through the Bay Area Service
Network, (BASN) Project .
The Contractor and County have determined that the social needs of County' s
population would be better met by replacing the "Sober Living" services
specified in Contract #24-640-13 with Detoxification services for parolees.
Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #24-640-14 will allow the
Contractor to provide detoxification services through June 30, 2001 .
t
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: y1d
T
41-- ECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
PROVE OTHER
ACTION OF BOARD 0241 - APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT,/ t AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE.DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED C 't" .2wc)
PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Contact Person: Chuck Deutschman 31.3-6350
CC: Health Services(Contract)
Auditor-Controller
Risk Management By
L "tom DEPUTY
Contractor
� l
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: William Waller, M.D. , Health Services Director ������
By: Ginger Marieiro, Contracts Administrator
DATE: October 11, 2000 �OS��Costa
County
SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #74-0729-2 with
John Kady
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATiON(S)S BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RSCOMM$1PAT1QN(S)
Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee
(Donna Wigand, LCSW) to execute on behalf of the County, Contract
Amendment Agreement #74-029-2 with John Kady, effective September
1, 2000, to amend Contract #74-029-1, to increase the Contract
Payment Limit by $2, 355, from $61, 720 to a new total payment limit
of $64, 075 .
FISCAL, IMPACT:
This Contract is 100k Mental Health Realignment funded.
bAC1C RQUND/REAS N(S} FOR RLCOMMRNDATION($) :
On July 25, 20003, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-
029--1 with John Kady, for the period from July 1, 203030 through June
30, 2001, to provide consultation and technical assistance to the
Department with regard to vocational rehabilitation services for
Mental Health Clients and their families.
Due to a recent resignation of one Vocational Services Coordinator,
County has requested and Contractor has agreed to provide additional
services as the Vocational Services Coordinator for the Mental
Health Division.
Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #74-029--2 will allow the
Contractor to provide additional services, through June 30, 2001.
CONTINUED ON AT TC Y S G ATUR �` i >E:
LI-RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
PPROVE OTHER
D
ACTION OF BOARD O ooh APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _ ,Xo__ OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
r` UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED p ?X0
PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Contact Person: L.C.S.W. (313-6411)
CC: Health S�I��(�� �)
Risk Management
Auditor Controller BY -� DEPUTY
Contractor
TO' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: Warren E. Rupf, Sheriff-Coroner - Contra
DATE: September 12,20010 Costa
County
SUBJECT: Contract Amendment with CorrLogic(formerly BI,Inc.)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff or designee to sign a contract amendment with
CorrLogic, Inc, (formerly BI, Inc), for the period May 18, 2000 through May 17, 2001, to upgrade
the booking/mug shot component of the Jail Management System, increasing the contract
amount by $5,859, to a total of$108,453.69.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE. Funds for this contract are within the budget appropriations of the Sheriffs Office.
BAQKGROUND:
On September 22, 1998, the Board of Supervisors approved executing a contract with BI,
Incorporated (now CorrLogic, Inc) to provide an upgrade to the Sheriffs Office Jail Management
System. The full amount of the initial contract is financed through a five-year lease-purchase
agreement and the upgrade to the Jail Management System is almost complete. In September,
2000, the Board of Supervisors approved an amendment to the contract, allowing the Sheriff s
Office to replace the jail booking/mug shot component of the Jail Management System. This
amendment will allow the Sheriffs Office to add fields to the Pre-Booking Personal Data Screen for
the benefit of the mug shot interface. CorrLogic can provide this service for an additional $5,859.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: NO SIGNATURE
*�RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR — — RECO MENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): 95,��
ACTION OF BOAR "CLfr— 4 CJc APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS (ABSENTz9____) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact Person:Captain Rich Woolard 313-2420
CC: CAO,Justice Administration ATTESTED 01C 1' it` a 06 0
Auditor/Controller PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
Sheriff(for distribution) SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
�
BY / f� I . �;1 GCLC-• DEPUTY
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR
County Administrator
DATE: October 24, 2000
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION CONTRACTS
Specific Request(s) or Recommendations(s) & Background & Justification
RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or his designee, to execute contract amendments with
California Community Dispute Services and Battered Women's Alternative to increase the payment limit by
$6,667 and $2,500 to new payment limits of $46,667 and $17,500 respectively, to provide dispute
resolutions services, and extend the contracts through December 31, 2000.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The Dispute Resolution Program is fully revenue offset by funds generated from an eight dollar filing fee on
civil actions in the Superior Court. No County general funds are involved.
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND:
The Dispute Resolution Program Act of 1986 (Business and Professional Code Sections 465, et seq.) provided
for the establishment and funding, at County option, of local dispute resolution services as an alternative to
formal court proceedings. The Act authorized participating counties to increase Superior, Municipal and
Justice Courts filing fees from one to three dollars for the purpose of funding the local dispute resolution
programs.
Currently, the County funds five dispute resolution programs. Three of the current contracts expire on
December 31, 2000, and two of the contracts expire on October 31, 2000. The extension of these two
contracts will provide a common expiration date for all of the contracts and provide a more efficient
contracting process.
CONTINUED ON A TACHMENT:,,�-- ES
Signature:
recommendation oZunty Administrator
Recommendation of Board Committee
Approve Other
Signature(s):
Action of Boi?on: ZIO/ Approved as Recommended
4 >< Other
Vote of Supervisors: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
Unanimous (Absent AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
Ayes:— Noes: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN.
Absent: Abstain: Attested: 0 C-40�e-r- -;? q
, :?, 00o
cc: CAO-Justice System Programs Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of
(for distribution) of Supervisors and County Administrator
County Dispute Resolution
Advisory Committee By: DEPUTY
Contact: Jennifer Deadman 335-1055
1"0: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS P . Contra
Costa
FROM: Dennis M. Barry,AICP County
Community Development Director
DATE: October 24,2000
SUBJECT: Contra Costa County Emergency Shelter Grant Program,FY 2000/01
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. ALLOCATE $137,000 in FY 2000/01 Emergency Shelter Grant(ESG) funds to the following:
A. Contra Costa Crisis Center for the 24 Dour Homeless Hotline($10,000),
B. SMELTER, Inc for the REACH Plus program($15,200),
C. Battered Women's Alternatives for operation of the Rollie Mullen Center($15,000),
D. Health Services Department for operation of the Central County and Brookside Shelters
($90,000), and
E. Community Development Department for ESG administrative costs($6,$00); and
2. AUTHORIZE the Deputy Director—Redevelopment or his designee to enter into FY 2000/01 ESG
contracts for the above ESG projects.
FISCAL IMPACT
No General Funds are involved. ESG funds are allocated to the County by formula through the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD).
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE:
s COMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR MMEATION OF OARD
COMMITTEE
A
PPROVE OTHER
1
1
1
7
SIGNATURE(S)
ACTION
OF BOARD ON a000 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT } TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Kara Douglas, 335-1253 ATTESTED ��r I U# u
Orig: Community Development(CDD) PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK
cc: County Administrator OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
County Counsel AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Auditor-Controller
Project Sponsors via CDD BY q . V-1,-A DEPUTY
BACkGROUNDIREASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
Contra Costa County receives federal Emergency Shelter Grant (ESG) funds on an entitlement basis for use in
funding renovation,major rehabilitation,or conversion of buildings for use as emergency shelters for the homeless;
provision of essential services for the homeless;emergency shelter operations and related services;and homeless
prevention activities. The County's FY 2000101 allocation is $137,000, including five percent for program
administration.ESG funds are allocated through a competitive application process administered by the Community
Development Department(CDD).Projects are evaluated and funding recommendations are developed using criteria
consistent with federal regulations and County policies.
The following projects are recommended for funding:
1. 24 Hour Homeless Hotline---As proposed,Contra Costa Crisis Center will use$10,000 in
ESG funds to support the 24-hour homeless hotline. This hotline facilitates access by
homeless households to a variety of services, including emergency shelter and food,job
training,health care,and transportation.The hotline has served as a first point of contact for
homeless populations in Contra Costa's Continuum of Care since 1995. Crisis Center
conducts intake, assessment, and referral of homeless households to County shelters,
provides emergency lodging vouchers and crisis counseling;maintains a resource database
for the homeless; and provides free voice mail boxes.
2. REACH Plus--As proposed, SHELTER, Inc will use $15,200 in ESG funds to provide
rental assistance in connection with intensive case management and supportive services to
homeless families and individuals. To be accepted into the REACH Plus program, the
individual or family must be homeless, and must demonstrate the potential ability to
maintain housing without assistance within 12 months of entering the program. After
acceptance into the program, the household finds housing and pays 30 percent of their
income in rent. The REACH Plus collaborative provides rental subsidies and services
appropriate for each household.
3. Rollie Mullen Center Erner egency Shelter—As proposed, Battered Women's Alternatives
will use $15,000 in ESG funds for operating expenses of the Rollie Mullen Center
emergency shelter for battered women and their children.For 23 years,Battered Women's
Alternatives (BWA) has provided services and emergency shelter to victims of domestic
violence. BWA annually provides approximately 7,000 emergency shelter bed-nights for
women and their children who are homeless because they are in peril due to violent
relationships. BWA strives to provide shelter for these women and children while they
reconstruct their lives and find safe and stable housing. BWA provides up to six weeks of
emergency shelter and services per household,including food,clothing,case management,
employment assessment,counseling and housing referrals.
4. Homeless EmgMencv Shelters--As proposed,the Health Services Department(HSD)will
use $90,000 in ESG funds for operating expenses for the Central County and Brookside
Homeless Shelters. HSD, through a contract with Center Point, operates two emergency
homeless shelters for single adults---the Central County shelter in Concord with 60 beds and
the West County shelter in Richmond with 56 beds.(The Brookside shelter is being rebuilt
and will have 100 beds when completed in Spring 2001.)The shelters are the main points of
entry for the homeless into the continuum of homeless and housing services.These 24-hour
facilities provide meals, laundry facilities, mail, telephones and a wide array of on-site
support services.
5. Administrative costs--the Community Development Department will use $6,800 in ESG
funds for program administration.
The Saint Vincent de Paul(SVdP)Rotating Shelter program and Phoenix Program's (Phoenix)
Emergency Shelter Rehabilitation project are not being recommended for funding. SVdP requested
$11,050 in ESG funds for transportation services,but did not demonstrate a clear need for funds for this
purpose. Phoenix requested$7,138 in ESG funds to help renovate its East County shelter for mentally ill
adults. The County provided$10,000 in FY 2000101 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)
funds for this project,which together with other approved funding, is adequate to correct the most
critically needed repairs.
a a a c Ch 0)CA �
Gi �,} Y •o
am a
cis 5
2. �
SO- stn a 2 -• r)
c eon TJ '+ � cu 1 0.1 C3
5. Cp
CD CD
0' c 4 N (D g 7 CD
� 6t
m is 'Q m
im
c»
c_a. +� a w a o ORM csacnc nQ
yr rn r.3 0
�' � b
cB Tr w cu` C-03Yrs �s
CD 'D f^" cacs a c3 � ` °
C3 a m 0 cc 5• mCL
.
ro -W
g CL
� ? � m �
-L — _
c9 yq v°, ei rs
Q.
n7
R.
CD c (a 0 ro o�
40 4A
v v V W
CA
IN
§I!", - to
�
CL a X00 2r 0 00 - F
CD
400 cc° � � ca a c � fin+ �
� o � y
y C W t!! C 014
1 t3 ..i V r•n w►
tQ�34 pQ tL57
i
C3 C! C? O m CL
"sc a '
0
4N 4A
•� c�r"F � ca � a .., � � rC"}
V n e m C
0 a
40 wCL ba w is s
(Aw CL
�?Cp1
N t7y C�71 Cn V y a
Q 'E t71 LD i 'C
4A tag
1 W N
� EA
4
$ 40 �, ,
m 49
a
wo 44
CCL
r
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS►
CONTRA
FROM: Phil Batchelor •' a —' COSTA
County Administrator COUNTY
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2000
SUBJECT: CONTRACT AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONAL CONTRACTS FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF SAFEFUTURES YEAR FIVE
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)S BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator or his designee to execute
contract amendments with the West County Youth Service Bureau, Opportunity West,
Richmond YouthBuild, the International Institute of the East Bay, Families First, and
Mark Morris Associates, extending the contract periods of each from September 30,
2000 to November 30, 2000, and increasing the payment limits to $441,945 for the
West Contra Costa Youth Service Bureau, to $59,808 for Opportunity West, to$18,400
for Richmond YouthBuild, to $32,000 for the International Institute of the East Bay, to
$100,253 for Families First, and to $175,000 for Mark Morris Associates.
2, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator or his designee to execute a
contract with Resource Development Associates for local evaluation services from
August 1, 2000 through November 30, 2000 with a payment limit of$70,000.
3. DIRECT the County Administrator to notify each project that should funding approval of
SafeFutures not be received from the U.S. Department of Justice, each project will
terminated as of the close of business on November 30, 2000 and will not be continued
with County funds.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _X) YES SIGNATURE: ,
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF'POARD COMMITTEE
PPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): (a4 ,
_„ACTION OF BOARU ON r9Y, Q06.0- APPROVED AS
RECOMMENDED THER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
r I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
t` UNANIMOUS(ABSENT 1 TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ON MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Mark Morris(826)336-1030
CC: CAO-Justice Systems Programs ATTESTED OC �er 2 q, .LQ d'C;
Auditor-Controller PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF
JSPAC THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
County Probation Officer AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY •f' G @.Cn _ ,DEPUTY
FISCAL IMPACT:
The extension and increase in payment limits are needed in order to insure these programs
continue without interruption pending approval of fifth year funding by the U.S. Department of
Justice. The new contracts are focused primarily on getting an early start on activities related
to finding continuation funding for SafeFutures activities after the expiration of the fifth year.
The fifth year application has been submitted and reviewed by the Department of Justice, and
we have every expectation that funding will be forthcoming. However, it should be noted that
should such funding not materialize, the County would be obligated to pay for the expenditures
of the above-cited projects for the months of October and November. It is also likely, although
not assured, that funds unspent from the County's prior federal fund award could cover the
above costs.
The above recommendations will increase contract payment limits as follows:
Original contract Proposed Now
Agency amount and period Increase Contract
W,C.C. Youth Service Bureau $356,945 $85,000 $441,945
(12/99 —9/00)
Opportunity West 43,808 16,000 59, 808
(4/00—9/00)
Richmond YouthBuild 14,400 4,000 18,400
(10/99— 9/00)
Internfl. Inst. Of the East Bay 2,000 10,000 32,000
(4/00 —9/00)
Families First 85,253 15,000 100,253
(10/99 - 9/00)
Mark Morris Associates 130,000 45,000 175,000
(10/99 — 9/00)
Resource Development Associates new 70,000 70,000
(8/00-11/00)
TOTALS: $652,406 $245,000 $897,406
BACKGROUND:
SafeFutures is a five-year grant with requirements for reapplication each year. The fourth year
authorization ended on September 30, 2000. The fifth year grant will be dated October 1,
2000.
Federal funds for the fifth year are already appropriated. The delay in authorizing renewed
funding for the fifth year is caused by time required at the Federal level to process our
application. There have been similar delays in each of the prior transition periods to a
subsequent year's funding.
When it became clear that Federal authorization for fifth year funding would not be received by
October 1, 2000, the County Administrator's Office began discussions with each of the listed
agencies regarding the level of funding needed to keep these programs operational. When
Federal authorization for year five is received, the County will be able to recoup any outlays of
County funds incurred during October and November.
Resource Development Associates (RDA) was selected as the new local evaluator. Based in
Lafayette, RDA is already working with the County to develop the County Data Bank through
the Policy Forum and CC Futures. This experience positions RDA to provide a particularly rich
local evaluation. The initial evaluation phase (from August through November 2000) will focus
on work with SafeFutures programs to clarify and fine-tune goals and program operations as
we start the fifth year of SafeFutures. We anticipate requesting a second phase evaluation
contract, (for the period from December 2000 through September 2001) dedicated to
generating the detailed outcome information required for funders and other decision-makers to
determine whether to provide funds after SafeFutures is over.