Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 02152000 - C129
. Contra. TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Costa FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP bounty COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: February 8, 2000 SUBJECT: Annual Compliance Checklist for Measure C-1988 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS APPROVE the completed Annual Compliance Checklist(Exhibit A); AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to sign the completed Annual Compliance Checklist(Exhibit A); and FIND that the County's policies and programs conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Program. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the Annual Compliance Checklist (Checklist) qualifies the County to receive its 1999/00 allocation of Measure C-1988 "return to source" revenues, estimated to be approximately $1.6 million. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE t , RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMIT EE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON February 15 . 2 o o o- APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED xx OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE xx, UNANIMOUS (ABSENT - - ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Daniel J. Pulon, AICP (925/335-1241) ATTESTED Fat r u a r yam, 2 o a o Orig: Community Development cc: Public Works Department PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF Sheriff's Office THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OCTA (via CDD) A C LINTY IVIS RATOR B A , DEPUTY sAadv-translmclmeasc99.lis Annual Compliance Checklist for Measure C-1988 February 8, 2000 Page 2 BACKGROUNDIREASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The County annually submits a compliance checklist to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Authority) to receive the County's portion of the 18 percent of sales tax funds available for local street maintenance and improvements. Of the $9.4 million in "return to source" funds available county wide for Fiscal Year 1999/00, the County is eligible to receive $1.6 million. The County General flan provides the policies and program that enable the County to comply with the Measure C-1988 Growth Management Program. The Checklist (see Exhibit A)was completed based on these policies and programs. The Authority requires that the Board review and approve the completed Checklist, and finds that the County's policies and programs conform to the Measure C-1988 Growth Management Program. The Checklist covers actions and decisions taken by the County during the 1999 calendar year. The Checklist covers the following areas; - Complying with Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance; - Participating in the regional traffic mitigation program; - Providing housing options and job opportunities; - Complying with performance standards for traffic and other urban services; - Participating in cooperative multi-jurisdictional planning; - Maintaining a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program; - Implementing a Transportation System Management ordinance; - Meeting minimum expenditures for street and road maintenance; and - Posting signs for construction projects receiving more than $250,000 in Measure C funds. The County has satisfied all Checklist requirements during 1999. All traffic level of service standards and performance standards for other urban services in the unincorporated area were maintained. The Checklist requirements also include the recently incorporated City of Oakley, since the County is continuing in providing services to the City of Oakley. The County implemented all the required plans, programs and ordinances for mitigating local and regional impacts of development projects, providing housing and job opportunities, and constructing necessary capital improvements for urban services. County road projects and expenditures have met the Measure C-1988 requirements. The Board of Supervisors has participated in or taken other actions during the year consistent with the multi-jurisdictional transportation planning process established by Measure C-1988. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION Failure to approve the Checklist will prevent the County from qualifying for its Fiscal Year 1999/00 allocation of "return to source" funds. Funds will be available for allocation beginning April 1, 2000. Because of the Authority's review process, the Board must submit the Checklist to the Authority now in order to receive "return to source" funds when they become available April 1, 2000. Annual Compliance Checklist for!Measure C-1988 February 8, 2000 Page 2 BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The County annually submits a compliance Checklist to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Authority) to receive the County's portion of the 18 percent of sales tax funds available for local street maintenance and improvements. Of the $9.4 million in "return to source" funds available county wide for Fiscal Year 1999100, the County is eligible to receive $1.6 million. The County General Plan provides the policies and programs that enable the County to comply with the Measure C-1988 Growth Management Program. The Checklist (see Exhibit A)was completed based on these policies and programs. The Authority requires that the Board review and approve the completed Checklist, and finds that the County's policies and programs conform to the Measure C-1988 Growth Management Program. The Checklist covers actions and decisions taken by the County during the 1999 calendar year. The Checklist covers the following areas: - Complying with Action plans for Routes of Regional Significance; - Participating in the regional traffic mitigation program; - Providing housing options and job opportunities; - Complying with performance standards for traffic and other urban services; - Participating in cooperative multi jurisdictional planning; - Maintaining a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program; - Implementing a Transportation System Management ordinance; - Meeting minimum expenditures for street and road maintenance; and - Posting signs for construction projects receiving more than $250,000 In Measure C funds. The County has satisfied all Checklist requirements during 1999. All traffic level of service standards and performance standards for other urban services in the unincorporated area were maintained. The Checklist requirements also include the recently incorporated City of Oakley, since the County is continuing in providing services to the City of Oakley. The County implemented all the required plans, programs and ordinances for mitigating local and regional impacts of development projects, providing housing and job opportunities, and constructing necessary capital improvements for urban services. County road projects and expenditures have met the Measure C-1988 requirements. The Board of Supervisors has participated in or taken other actions during the year consistent with the multi jurisdictional transportation planning process established by Measure C-1988. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION Failure to approve the Checklist will prevent the County from qualifying for its Fiscal Year 1999/00 allocation of "return to source" funds. Funds will be available for allocation beginning April 1, 2000. Because of the Authority's review process,the Board must submit the Checklist now to the Authority in order to receive "return to source" funds when they become available April 1, 2000. Compliance Checklist Reporting ,Jurisdiction: Qontra Costa Qounty Fiscal Year: 1999-2000 Reporting Period: Calendar 1999 12. Review and Approval of Checklist This checklist was prepared by: Signature: Date: �C D Name and Title: n i M B AICD m ni i n n it r 'hone: 925-335-1276 The councillboard of C Chair, has reviewed the completed checklist and found Board of Supervisor that the policies and programs of the jurisdiction as reported herein conform to the requirements for compliance with the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Program. Certified Signature: abruary 2000 Name and Title: Donna Gerber,Chair Attest Signature: Date: February 15._2000 City/Town/County Clerk Name: Barbara S. Grantti Deputy Clerk roots C sta County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Issued January,2000 Compliance Checklist Page 5 EXHIBIT A CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Allocation of 18% Local Street Maintenance S Improvement Funds For Fiscal Year 1999-2000 Reporting Period: Calendar Year 1999 Compliance Checklist Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County I. Auction Plans YES NO a. Is the jurisdiction implementing the actions called for in the applicable 181 Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance for all designated Regional Routes within the jurisdiction? b. Has the jurisdiction implemented the following procedures as outlined in ❑c the applicable Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance? i. Circulation of environmental documents, ii. Analysis of the impacts of proposed General Plan amendments and recommendation of changes to Action Plans,and iii. Conditioning the approval of projects consistent with Action Plan policies? c. Has the jurisdiction followed the procedures for RTPC review of General (M ❑ Plan Amendments as called for in the attached flow chart?(Attachment B to Authority Resolution No. 95-06-G,adopted July 19, 1995). 2. Regional Transportation Mitigation Program YES Na a. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a local development © ❑ mitigation program to ensure that new development pays its fair share of the impact mitigation costs associated with that development? b. Has the jurisdiction adopted and implemented a regional transportation ❑ mitigation program,including regional traffic mitigation fees, assessments,or other mitigation as appropriate? Issued January,2000 Compliance Checklist Page I Compliance Checklist Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County Fiscal Year: 1999-2000 Reporting Period: Calendar 1999 3. Housing Options and Job Opportunities YES NO a. Has the jurisdiction adopted a Housing Element that has been found byj ❑ the State Department of Housing and Community Development to comply with State Law? b. Has the jurisdiction adopted a Housing Element that complies with the ® ❑ requirements of¢65583 et seq.of the Government Code,by: ■ Identifying local responsibilities for meeting regional housing needs, • Establishing,goals and policies for meeting those needs,and • Outlining a 5-year program of actions to implement the Housing Element? c. Does the jurisdiction's General Plan--or other adopted policy document ® ❑ or report---evaluate the effects of planned land uses on local,subregional and regional travel patterns and propose land use policies and a pattern of land uses that would promote more efficient use of the transportation system.? 4. Growth Management dement: Performance Standards YES NO a. As part of its General Plan,has the jurisdiction adopted a Growth ® ❑ Management Element which is in substantial compliance with the Authority's Model Growth Management Element? b. Does the jurisdiction now comply with adopted performance standards, W ❑ or expect to comply with the standards within the next five years through implementation of its Capital Improvement Program? 5. Growth Management Element: Traffic Level-of Service Standards YES NO NIA a. Using the Authority's Technical Procedures,have traffic impact studies 0 ❑ ❑ been conducted as part of development review for all projects estimated to generate more than 100 peak-hour vehicle trips? Issued January,2000 Compliance Checklist Page 2 Compliance Checklist Reporting Jurisdiction: Centra Costa County Fiscal Year: 1999-2000 Reporting Period: Calendar 1999 S. Growth Management Element: Traffic Level-of Service Standards (continued) YES NO N/A b. Roes the jurisdiction maintain a list of Reporting Intersections on non- ® ❑ ❑ regional routes,and measure the level of service at those intersections every two years? c. Do all Reporting Intersections meet LOS standards through actual 0 ❑ ❑ measurement,or after assuming implementation of five-year capital improvement program and accounting for changes in travel demand? d. Does a request for Findings of Special Circumstances for those 11 ❑ 0 intersections that do not and will not meet LOS standards,accompany this checklist? e. Has the jurisdiction ever been granted a Findings of Special ❑ ❑ 0 Circumstances by the Authority? 6. Participation In Cooperative, Multi-Jurisdictional Planning YES NO a. Over the past year,has the jurisdiction's Council/Board member ® ❑ regularly participated in meetings of the appropriate Regional Transportation Planning Committee,and have the jurisdiction's local representatives to the Regional Transportation Planning Committee regularly reported on the activities of the Regional Committee to the jurisdiction's council or board? (Note:Each RTPC should have a policy which defines what constitutes regular attendance of Council/Board members at RTPC meetings.) b. As needed,has the jurisdiction made available,as input into the 9 0 countywide transportation computer model,data on land use and traffic patterns? Issued January,2000 Compliance Checklist Page 3 ell,lw Compliance Checklist Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County Fiscal Year: 1995-2000 Reporting Period: Calendar 1999 7. Five-Year Capital improvement Program YES Na Does the jurisdiction have an adopted five-year capital improvement ❑ program(CIF)that estimates project costs and includes a plan that outlines general mechanisms for financing transportation and public facilities,including fire,police,parks,sanitary facilities,water and flood control? 8. Transportation Systems Management Program YES NO Has the jurisdiction adopted a transportation systems management [l]s ordinance that incorporates required policies consistent with the updated model ordinance prepared by the Authority for use by local agencies? (Note: The Authority's model TSM ordinance was updated on December 18, 1996) 9. Maintenance of Effort YES Na Has the jurisdiction met the maintenance of effort requirements of (� ❑ Measure C as stated in Section 6 of the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management Ordinance? 10. Posting of Signs YES NO N/A Has the jurisdiction posted signs meeting Authority specifications for all ® ❑ ❑ projects exceeding$250,000 that are funded,in whole or in part,with Measure C funds? 11. Other Considerations YES N/A If the jurisdiction believes that the requirements of Measure C have been 0 Q satisfied in a way not indicated on this checklist,please attach an explanation. Issued January,2000 Compliance Checklist Page 4 c" V r� CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Allocation of 18% Local Street Maintenance & improvement Funds For Fiscal Year 1998-2000 Reporting Period Calendar Year 1999 Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County (Note: This form is available in electronic media in Word OD or WordPerfect Q}format.) Information Requested by Checklist Questions 1. Action Plans a. Please summarize steps taken during last year to implement the actions,programs, and measures called for in the applicable Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance: See Attachment A,Actions,programs,and measures that do not include Contra Costa County are not listed. b. Attach, list and briefly describe any General Pian Amendments that were approved during the reporting period. Please specify which amendments affected ability to meet the standards in the Growth Management Element andlor affected ability to implement Action Plan policies or meet Traffic jic Service Objectives. Indicate if amendments were forwarded to the jurisdiction's RTPC for review, and describe the results of that review relative to Action Plan implementation: See Attachment B 2. Regional Transportation Mitigation Program b. Describe progress on development andlor implementation of the regional mitigation program. If under development, what is the anticipated date of adoption of the program? Contra Costa County has been implementing regional mitigation programs in West, Central,East,and South County Areas. 3, Housing Options and Job Opportunities a. Please list the date of State Department of Housing and Community Development(HCD) compliance finding for the jurisdiction's Housing Element and attach the HCD letter: 04/03/93,See Attachment C Issued January,2000 Checklist Attachments Page 1 r Compliance Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County Fiscal Year: 1999-2000 Reporting Period: Calendar 1999 b. If the Housing Element was not found in compliance,please list the date of adoption and resolution number of the jurisdiction's resolution finding that the Housing Element complies with State law. Also state what actions have been taken during the reporting period to contribute toward achieving the housing allocations established by ABAO for all income levels. N.A. 4. Growth Management dement: Performance Standards a. If the jurisdiction does not currently meet its adopted performance standards,please describe what actions the jurisdiction intends to take to bring it into compliance within the next five years, including actions contained in the adapted five year capital improvementprogram: N.A. 5. Growth Management Element: Traffic Level of Service (LOS) Standards a. Please list all projects that generated more than 100 peak hour trips, indicate whether a traffic impact study was conducted, and indicate if a Findings of Consistency with Standards was made(include resolution number): The County has not approved any projects generating more than 100 peak hour trips, during the 1999 calendar year. b. Please list Reporting Intersections, dates of counts and LOS monitoring results. Also attach LOS calculations. Explain reasons for any LOS exceedances and proposed mitigation through implementation of the 5-year CIP or other mechanism. See Attachment D C. Please list intersections for which the Authority has adopted Findings of Special Circumstances and describe actions taken over the past year to carry out required conditions of compliance: N.A. Issued January,2000 Checklist Attachments Page 2 Compliance Attachments Reporting Jurisdiction: Contra Costa County Fiscal Year: 1999-2000 Reporting Period: Calendar 1999 7. Five Year Capital Improvement program (CIP) Please list resolution number and date of adoption of most recent five year CIP. If CII' implementation is required to meet standards(see 4.b and S.b above)state the number of years for which this condition has prevailed. CIP for Parrs and Sheriff Facilities, 1998-2004,Adopted 213/98(C.48) County Road Improvement Program, 1997/98-2003/04,Adopted 3/17198(D.8) These CIPS,although adopted in 1998,cover a seven-year period and satisfy the CIP requirement this year. Since the County is continuing in providing service for the recent incorporated City of Oakley,the above CIP's include the City of Oakley. 8. Transportation Systems Management Program Date of Ordinance Adoption May 0, 1997 Resolution Number Ord.No.97-12 9. Maintenance of Effort (MoE) Please indicate thejurisdiction's MoE requirement and MoE expenditures for the past fiscal year. MoE Standard=$420,064 WE Expenditures=$321,315,which is$98,749 less than the 199811999 MoE standard.The County,however,will appropriate for the 1999/2000 cost plan an amount that will satisfy the 1998/1999 and 199912000 MoE requirements,consistent with Contra Costa Transportation Authority policy. 11. Other Considerations Please specify any alternative methods of achieving compliance for any components for the Measure C Growth Management Program. Issued January,2000 Checklist Attachments Page 3 as Bei v 0 0 ir If � r3 . -4 ge ^f iii y�� •y�y� OOQ � y�� q 1I ylir y�i5+,��`.�� �.,4}� -Wu CD rn co CA V CIO w, �„"p � � b•e GtS� CD coo m o CD --4 .. 3 3 0 ° OD ue W 0 C. rn s gaaFi7 S7. 5 f� jg CL Ch1 CL 9 . 0 14.CLy {j• 0.i 5. 47 fe/,!} 0 5. 21 0 30. aA w go st Me 79 r.L Cl) 0� c = � c � lt ��a0 C df $ � . 2. cn 3 ac p 2L po `` 0 C) , I ® � 75t 6 St f v CL ivto jo co pr 00 to la, ns _ ea 03 co j -. acs $CD iv 3 4 ll 8. 0 a � ► v, 0) "� C � 8a 1:1470 a ' lib 3 nn n 0 72. 3n ' ' ' % Ir � 4 MiSijiti 7R 3 c 0 -0 c " a► $ ^„ 50. E o a 8 cy 8 t7 � C`) co �, s= UJ crs � 1 � �o .... 1 B'� e� Z; Cf d► O W b n N -' W C C �gyTl t�D go O C G = 7 _ - s � C S.- .�, O r O Cp CL m X � 'o coif m m ` �j, s� of ai 3 $ rrrn :::::{ :::::::: y�► 4. rrTC 3 ^J tp O �-+ r•� �+ — oo 0 'er as — e > > �+• �+ &Tm "m stsa` 0 -� ' mw. o ai cc co n � o Mgr CL� roN - S o f �a ° MKS _ 1 0 � � � O cl �•' M o � � a o o oin � � ern = CA 0> n n n 0n o m ` g or o. ar V1 cm . ` ' o ° o � �Dc b : oc � c co Z . 0 Co X 1o . 30 rn r« mar o ... .:. 00 0 sa. c� o � (A �` t�1� 0 -30 � � Cl) o 0FS o m ttt 3 h IOU h ` : CL m i= ::�:::ppl 1 5r 1 .2 © IWOC7Is ' WEn 9. St ° m C3 K ° d yr ° 0 0 a is 03 q qt o 0 _ cc m yr m '" S'.« x. to � - .moi^'. cs wit 0 2. 2 0tss o it tt= 0 CA _ m 3: 8 �3 mei �, $ o n 23 CO oa 3 4 `c > e > c � C7 > o 0 00 0 _ , y ° ee Mca "� � cm � zZ m mar+ CD Cl) ° ° m m 0 �. m -8m m m m < m m o m . CL C m FL m rnca m oa � CAP, o m n ° N o S. rA tTj 0-.4 r-+ s; •r"Y p'1 tit:"..^�.u�#.its�' rA � "am ; (� h,Yy � �Gy, /.� � .°„�`v � l`J �1�• phi � .,^,'„�4."�',i; Im Olt Mff � �OC t'�9' Ga � ih r� Ch lV"D riz:.�•: ��;.F LA a V p+ b 1 u�: �li rA o A I[!; yy k 2N , tw rA � , 17 � � o it A C fix: :Y .,fYbk: x . C1 4 CL y H. ..Im.,,.,,. r~ r.s •. cs v, . qq 81 148 400, �++ h �k R�NMWMM R,1. vl ' cm 44 44 '. FA �oa 0 00 a b ' ''7+ 1 �iHu.:� �ffff ppq 11 . ,1z7 go FFG �• � � �'p' �+ Ss'„: '%�`„�.'�:; 1'rJ 't1 "rJ Oxy w�.'!v td r r r lig O H O ' 01 r.LCT & N 4 pr go ILO, CL M� ,—. ��•� ;ter: (D =r �c CD CL CL A W © lD � � � � i'i �C�J) 'x` Mt.V�, � y• �D Q� y � ,"rss K r`. ..Y:': V (ii '' ((Q `, it .. lP i 00 ` oho P. crn a3 , f:u co CL Ilk S1i SS1 �► G r 3 fi 05. g ; 3 plox - : • �µ�u��vvwiMy^ur. �r iTfi �• N o, Oil- tA � u • w 'ci,..E 4.w Cites! 53• Lh WE > y > f�4 T h 1 rA to 0 ice.. V... L.. �... V. V. D 5 5t � t Iz W � 0 2s- > v ' P yr ter` t�4• '�" gm ppyyF \PJ � Fty J CA CA :% aa• I t,. F21 . 10 a Y to Pt llQ' € °' 00 wi p v ID VI w . rL a ; c •�Y�. a CL °., d b " o° � d �fS xff. f-;..:. ` �p '� dS^f yCj y u5. of?F'rg? �1 r�-+ �. n'a ►� r"'f n'. ;y;;'#,?<°.�kf fig;. 1D 00 p �.1 �i dl wwy'f�k IN, �'�`�j /''`��j //gyp h•Fj ff'"h rA © yqy �• r+ .;.,I��,�{ rff,� rile d a { "iiRm , �. � '✓ FFF+++ yo' 011 : 3 Iry (] � Vj !ICY�J Yr+ f[SryY+] YY�1 '4.C:�.�.• :^�,�� p,,��/ •f1�+C'1. � hw. (gyp � � � (� $1¢' "}S,''b� '�r.�"�:',. p qxm W. �pPy� �• j� a wV�t yv 1{1yyW jr, p'. (~ C) c ro .. ar CD ro y� �n £.::,,:: coo 00 10 '::;' � 'roc;. �✓ N o y 10. _. RE u z ..r tU � u � R F .0 GJ °, e. mak::•: zr .w.k' y r>% m m o o 0 0 n °c CD ONCL M.C':.' cY d N 0) f V > :; 00 :gfi IN //z�� / /q -� � � � W j i4 `� Z '� 0 —1 �. ; a $-} ct O sr- CL < tCf y eus^" _ µ<i r m co CL FL w o H cm c a co = H � C © � O o 0 0 30 0 o o x �wr 0 0 C o (D A1 D GC�Q�7 lQC 7 c c c ax:,�Y a�?.•,: ;err; C ^ raw rn rn 0 0 c7 CL m Ll a 121 -, , W N Ca at e aF tiD V r%) 8 N i ^; fJ 0 CA � /yam 00 C o /l 0 CO 0. ro S cn co i s `' El 0 cc CD l< _ 0 cCO ow w CD 3 ro ro IAF f Hl 1 1 ro ro 14 0 Cr 0 0 � 0� C7 � 0 � a m g m €6i 00 00 00 St 30 0Vi" c o m �` � � me is GrL � (D9$ m (Dro c so ro ro to to 22. t� 3 ' A � a M IM, ro ro ro ,Y SL :fix r; ,. Am � a 0, d O CL CL C C 00 do o c� eo C? co yW' iv CL m G ate°. 3 4D o co 0 e ro r< CO co ar ° H � � p �C;�' cr � cc o y �► xoo m 0 0 030 03 0 0 acao go goo 0 10 M 4k < 4, 30 5. rm �. of 0 0 C tD o J Ale ,e. to M. EL CL RL rw �. m �• � Y. :.f� rka.S� �D Zu 01 O o O C3. �. o m r 0 r � ..:a : O z V Q ' 74 g co m m is w o n ,� :• ! m Oi "i i3 "� CSi `C7 -a CO) �y Vi CL a m � cam` 2 5 $ 3 RL c� ,0 m m ° m 3: NL ..a m � � � m �' c�' �• � m� m � m o � �'. t" x h SL m ° 0 IF o _. CDto _. 0 � 0) 0 0)0 00 0 (130 so 00 , o o © O O m VE CL A3 0 3:. o 09 � o K 5: 3. m ;0 m (A d' m m C3z , s ' gm a d' 0 w. r ro �► as z ,' Cr0. CA � �_ '�° go o cvct° not ; cn J7. j -8 . ; 9 cco st T. �pj 3 G tD � I o '�[r, lei ifi o Ry o_ o st 9 0 ym ��,, Qu 0 fl Thi � �rj lD 4 8, �+ 0 l t� m tD 2. 0 � :Iiijr -1. �b �p 3 Cl hW (D o cn am c 0, m 00 cn omjI � o m lad . FL � y � o RCL � o M_ thSig 10,co e s � ;a v c z Rim =u=` �: �: � � ;fix .,{��• : o< n R. V ATTACHMENT"B" INFORMATION REQUESTED BY CHECKLIST QUESTION 1.c MEASURE-C COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST: CALENDAR 1998 (CPAs Only) Affect the Ability To: Meet Growth Implement Meet RTPC Results of Management Action TSOs Reviewed RTPC General Plan Amendments&Projects Element Plan Review Consistent with General Plans Standards Policies (GPAs) (GPAs) 1 Rodeo Area:Willow Avenue General Plan Amendment Change Land Use Designation from Commercial to Multi-Family; amends the Bicycle Trails Map to reflect the Rodeo Creek Trail existing location; and amends the Hiking Trails Map to reflect the Rodeo Creek Trail. Net Increase in Trips Does Not Exceed 100 Peak Hour Trips Resolution#15-1998; Yes Yes N.A. N.A. N.A. 2 Walnut Creek Area ±:7� Whyte Park General Plan Amendment Change Land Use Designation from Public/Semi-Public to Single Family High equating to 3 dwelling units Resolution# 14-1998 Yes Yes N.A. N.A. N.A. 3 East County Area:Carol Lane General Plan 'Amendment Change Land Use Designation for two parcels from Single Family High to Commercial Net Increase In Trips Does Not Exceed 100 Peak Hour Trips Resolution# 11-1999 Yes Yes N.A. N.A. N.A. 4 San Ramon Valley Area: Stone Valley Oaks General Plan Amendment Change Land Use Designation from Agriculture to Single Family LowNery Low equating to 47 dwelling units Resolution# 13-1999L JYes JYes IN.A. N.A. N.A. Mea99 Page 1 1/26/2000 los -wAJCr► or sffpfxVZson costa "Wt qW Director of Community Development rims: way age 1902 ATTACHMENT C sr&nVI, XCD Review of County Sousing tlesent amowLT. z xt=zp`t' of letter from the state Department of Sousing and Community Development, finding that the County's adopted Mousing xlamant complies with state Sousing tyrant Lay. zrscaz, x�r •ono. . �Ycxdleo�1�saa�s �x arz�a�*dtrg ` Article 10.6 of the California Government Code requires Cities and counties to adopt a Sousing tlemant of the Genaral plan. On December 15, 1002, the County adopted an Amendment to its General plass Rousing Zlement. the state Department of Rousing and Community Development has found that the December 16, 1002 Rousing dement complies with the statutory raquiremants. COXTroDiDON ATZLCZXZXTi mss •ZGiLT=s ISCORRMUZZU a 555M IWITINIVOIL as AT151 OF 30127TT11 . BMW=(S)s os W02 or sv7xRTzwu timsm 8 CLU327 1 t'xsi arra Ooxxici copy Or AN xzWVns or w Ban or 90iiinuas ox mm uis sxm. Jia rannady, 046-4076 oss Community Development County mainistrator sSftstsD niz, SITS11-31, MW 1W county Counsel Rousing Authority V= s uOr ssITISO Contra Costa Transportation Authority AND C*VVW 7=X287 iTU xd*WAWLA+ iY r titp4TT A f NSA• tN ffiNSP A ONAND MOUSINO A N N ewr?+e r)VARMENT OF xoustxG AND COMMUNITY mr DEVELOPMENT 6L DMSION OF NOUSINQ POLICY tiEMOPMENT Iwo TffiF=XM=,%"a 40 !.0 sox lt2= (lid)=413i ffi'itiX crit)3:3."u _ April ,30, 1993 Mr. Phil Batchelor County Administrator Contra Costa County County Administration Building 551, Pine Street Martinez, California 94553 Dear Mr. Batchelors AES Review of the County of Contra Costa's Adapted Rousing Blsment Thank you for submitting the County of Contra Costa's housing element,- adopted on December 15, 1992, and received for our review on December 31, 1992. As you kgOW, we are required to review adopted housing elements and report our findings to the locality (Government Code Section 65583 (h) ) . we congratulate the County for establishing an ambitious schedule of program actions to facilitate the development of housing in Contra Costa County. As you know, our December 14, 1992 review letter found the County's draft element adequately addressed the statutory requirements of housing element law, provided certain revisions necessary to acc=modate the County's new construction need for lower-income households were included in the element. The adopted element includes the necessary changes. we are therefore pleased to find that the County,'s. adopted housing element also complies with State- housing element law (Article 10.5 of the Government Code) , including requirements regarding the preservation of assisted multifamily housing at, risk of converting to non-low-income uses pursuant to Chapter 1431, statutes of 1989. our finding of compliance is based on the County's continued co=i.tment to acco=odete its share -of the regional housing seed for lower-income households. The County is planning to achieve this objective by the .following methods. by permitting multifamily construction at densities suf'f'icient to Mt. Phil Batchelor Page 2 -facilitate the development of lower-income housing need, by the County's continued facilitation of the development of some -11,000 total units, including some 2,308 high density multifamily units in the Dougherty Valley, and by application of the County's inclusionary ordinance to the Dougherty Valley so that 21750 units will be affordable in at least the following ratios 10 percent very low-;,,- 25 percent low- and 65 percent rzderate- ncome. we strongly encourage the County to promote the early development of lower-income units in the Dougherty Valley, F&ilure by the County to facilitate the availability of the Dougherty Valley high density sites would leave the County with a lack of sites for lower-income households. -if thes3 sites do not become available asplanned, the Count should amend the element to include additional sites for lower-income housing sufficient to meet Contra Costa County's regional share need. , • We look forward to following the County's progress in implementing the housing program when progress repe,:ts are filed with the Department pursuant to Government Code Se .tion 65400. As you may know, Chapter 889, Statutes of 1991, now requires an annual submittal of these reports to this Department. We wish you continued success in implementing your housing program. If we can assist the County in this effort, please contact Robert Maus of our staff -at (916) 327-26.0. in accordance with their requests pursuant to the Public Records Act, we are forwarding a copy of this letter to the individuals listed below. Sincerely, Thi-mzs 8: Cook Deputy Director Mr. Phil Batchelor Page 3 cc: James Kennedy, Contra Costa County . Dennis Barry, Contra Costa County Matt .Tomas, Contra Costa County Laura Blair, Sedway and Associates Miye G0i2be, Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation Nancy Strohl, Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation Gen FuJioka, Asian Law Caucus Charles Klinger, Attorney at Law David Booher, California sousing Council Sue Restor, Attorney at Law Gary Aambly, ,Building Industry Association Rolf Pendall, Bay Area Council Ravin A.F. Tranter, Association of Day Area Governments Kathleen Mikkelson, Deputy Attorney General Bob Cervantes, Governor's Office of Planning and Research Dwight Hanson, California Building Industry.Association Kerry Harrington Morrison, California Association of Realtors Marc Brown, California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation Rob Wiener, California Coalition for Rural Rousing Susan DeSantis, The Planning Center All AWACHMENT D Tnf2r,rnattan Req gted for ^hecklist MID TIST OFRFPC)E= Z=SF-MQNS A=LZ-RE LIST OF REPORTING INTERSECTIONS AND LOS RESULTS 1999 LOS Central County AM 1. Solano/lmhoff/Amold Industrial way A A 2. Solano Avenue/olivera/Marsh Drive A ._ A 3. Oak Road/Las Juntas Way A A 4. Oak Road/Jones A A 5. Oak Road/BAkT Station Entrance' A .A 6. Oak Road/Wayne.Drive s A: A. 7. Buskirk Avenue/Wayne Drive A A 8. Newell Avenue/Olympic Boulevard A A 9. Tice Valley boulevard/Olympic Boulevard A A Southwest County 10. Blackbawk Road/Blackhawk Plaza A A 11. Blackhawk Road/Silver Maple A A 12. Port Chicago Iiighway/Riverside A A 13. Cypress Road/Sellers Avenue A A West County 14. Willow Avenue/Hawythorne Drive A A J 15. Parker Avenue/41 Street A A 16. Parker Avenuee Street A A 17. Pomona Avenue/2nd Avenue A A CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 _ 07/22/99 INTERSECTION 1 Solano Ave/Arnold/Imhoff Contra Costa County Count Date 7/21/1999 Time 630-830 Peak Hour 630-730 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 4-PHASE SIGNAL ------------- 3 16 9 1 1 1 A 1 I I h I <_-- v ---> I Split? Y LEFT 5 --- 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 --- 73 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 57 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 155 THRU Arnold/Imhoff RIGHT 47 --- 1.7 1.0 2.0 1.9 1.0 --- 93 LEFT I <--- A ---> I v I I I v N I I I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 72 90 146 Urb-N, Rur=N S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Solano Ave ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 146 146 1650 0.0885 THRU (T) 90 90 3300 0.0273 LEFT (L) 72 72 1650 0.0436 0.0436 SB RIGHT (R) 3 3 1650 0.0018 THRU (T) 16 16 1650 0.0097 LEFT (L) 9 9 1650 0.0055 T + R 19 1650 0.0115 0.0115 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 47 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 57 57 1650 0.0345 0.0345 LEFT (L) 5 5 1650 0.0030 T + R 57 1650 0.0345 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 73 73 1650 0.0442 THRU (T) 155 155 1650 0.0939 LEFT (L) 93 93 1650 0.0564 T + R 228 1650 0.1382 0.1382 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.23 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A �e Yn-tli4-�6l aYAta�t@mi ie 5e-mt'-'naffi-9ffiC��-tli�-Ss`.�53t--3mt�xi-��-�sr --m3t--��-�t�a---fs a09-tm�aau mt�--- * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT-SOLANO.INT,VOL-SOLANO.AMV,CAP- CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJECM Transportation Consultants aajsas�amrt�mraasc�a�eaaa��sasaat�taa�easaaas��aamaaataaaaaassa�aaaataaaasasm«asasaamz¢a Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/22/99 a�,M=raa=a.aa=aaa=a=a���=aaa===a=aaaaa���=aa=aaaaaaa==aaU�ra=aa��-a���=a-aa INTERSECTION 1 Solana Ave/ArnoldJlmhoff Contra Costa County Count Date 7/12/1999 Time 1515-1715 Peak Hour 1515-1615 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 4-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 8 76 45 I I I v - .-> I Split? Y LEFT 2 --- 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 --- 16 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 102 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 126 THRU Arnold/Imhoff RIGHT 119 --- 1.7 1.0 2.0 1.9 1.0 --- 264 LEFT I <--- " ---> I v I I I v N ( f f SIG WARRANTS: W + E 58 14 149 Urb=N, Rur=N S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Solano Ave ssaaaassassaassaeaarsaaat:a:lr�aassaaastasaaaazaxs7aarsaaaaaasrsaaaaaraarocaaaaacaaaaaasaascaara ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ----------------------- NB RIGHT (R) 149 149 1650 0.0903 THRU (T) 14 14 3300 0.0042 LEFT (L) 58 58 1650 0.0352 0.0352 -------------------------------------- _______ _________ SB RICHT (R) 8 8 1650 0.0048 THRU (T) 76 76 1650 0.0461 LEFT (L) 45 45 1650 0.0273 T + R 84 1650 0.0509 0.0509 ------------------------------------------------- EB ----------------------EB RIGHT (R) 119 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 102 102 1650 0.0618 0.0618 LEFT (L) 2 2 1650 0.0012 T + R 102 1650 0.0618 ------------------------------------------------------ --------- WH RICHT` (R) 16 16 1650 0.0097-___ .____ THRU (T) 126 126 1650 0.0764 LEFT (L) 264 264 1650 0.1600 0.1600 T + R 142 1650 0.0861 aasaaaaearrsraaa�aaacaaaaarraaaaax:arraaaaaaaaaaarsaaamsss;�aaaaa�aa�erraacaaaa�aa�msr TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.31 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A ��=��aaa:��a���r��aa�aaar��,�aaa��aaaa;gra:a�r�aa��aa���aaa��r�aar�aaa9��r��a�as=�a� * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INTaSOLANO.INT,VOL-SOLANO.PMV,CAP= CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants .����mm�a�:n�aeua�mc�mem��aass�asmaoi��:�rtaaa���ati�aaeaasaat�as��masaarc�e�:mree�t.t�st�as:��aaaa�maY Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/2,2/99 INTERSECTION 2 Solano Way/Marsh Dr City of Concord Count Date 6/23/1999 Time 730-930 Peak Hour 745-845 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 4-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 74 53 69 <___ v ___> I Split? N LEFT 30 --- 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.9 --- 123 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 105 ---> 1.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0<--- 142 THRU Marsh Dr RIGHT 51 --- 1.0 1.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 --- 128 LEFT <--- --_> v v N # SIG WARRANTS: W + E 59 85 36 Urb=N, Rur=N S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Solano Way ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C --______-__..__-..______________..____-_--_-_-__-________-_-___--___-______ NB RIGHT (R) 36 36 1650 0.0218 THRU (T) 85 85 3300 0.0258 LEFT (L) 59 59 1650 0.0358 T + R 121 3300 0.0367 0.0367 SB RIGHT (R) 74 0 * 16500.0000__-_"_____. _____ ._ THRU (T) 53 53 3300 0.0161 LEFT (L) 69 69 1650 0.0418 0.0418 T + R 53 3300 0.0161 - EB RIGHT (R) 51 0 * 1650 0.0000__________________ THRU (T) 105 105 1650 0.0636 0.0636 LEFT (L) 30 30 1650 0.0182 ___ WB RIGHT (R) 123 123 1650 0.0745---_____________ ._ THRU (T) 142 142 1650 0.0861 LEFT (L) 128 128 1650 0.0776 0.0776 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.22 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN" ON RED INT-MARSHSOL.INT,VOLAMARSHSOL.AMV,CAP- CCTALOS Software -ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants �aaa-aa�-a-aaa"a-aaa--a-a�aa4aaaaaa0-Baa-2as�a�a��..�aa$a�a-�;��a��-�aa�a�a Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/22/99 aaaaaaaa�samaaxeasaaaameaa�aam�a�ar�aa��aa�a���aa�a���a���.�aa���g��a�a,�a��ama INTERSECTION 2 Solano Way/Marsh Dr City of Concord Count ;Date 6/28/1999 Time 1545-1745 Peak Hour 1630-1730 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 4-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 67 116 181 v ___, I split? N LEFT 63 --- 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.9 --- 94 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 233 ---> 1.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0<--- 120 THRU Marsh Dr RIGHT 91 --- 1.0 1.0 2.1 1.1 1.0 --- 135 LEFT <--- -_-> v v. N t # SIG WARRANTS: W + E 84 100 44 Urb-N, RuraY S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Solan Way ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C __________________ NB RIGHT (R) .44 44 1650 0.0267 THRU (T) 100 100 3300 0.0303 LEFT (L) 84 84 1650 0.0509 T + R 144 3300 0.0436 0.0436 _ _____________________ SB RIGHT (R) 67 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 116 116 3300 0.0352 LEFT (L) 181 181 1650 0.1097 0.1097 T + R 116 3300 0.0352 __ ti __________________ EB RIGHT (R) 91 7 * 1650 0.0042 THRU (T) 233 233 1650 0.1412 0.1412 LEFT (L) 63 63 1650 0.0382 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 94 94 1650 0.0570 THRU (T) 120 120 1650 0.0727 LEFT (L) 135 135 1650 0.0818 0.0818 -aaaaaaaaaamaaaa:aaeaoaasaaaamaamaoa:manaaaaaaaaarsaaaa:se�eaaa�¢a�caasnarmaammaassa TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.38 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A �a=�astaa a.�aseaaaaaamoaasa�sasaarem�eaaassaaaaaassa vzsaaoa s,�aaaamva¢a as ra amisa aytia aae�atxajms y� * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT-MARSHSOL.INT,VOL=MARSHSOL.PMV,CAP= CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 -by TJKM Transportation Consultants aammaamamsaa assa�amamasaaaaammmamaa stamamm-amama-mmmaams aamam3:eaaaamaaaamaaata Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1599 07/29/95 a-anzam-a3-e=amasses-aaxaaaam-etas-amamaa-maeam-aa-mm:maaamamaaroe yomammmamaaaeaaa INTERSECTION 3 Oak Rd/Las Juntas Way Centra Costa County Count Bate 7/23/1999 Time 700-900 Peak Hour 730-830 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 5-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 0 474 153 v __ , Split? Y LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 145 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 0 THRU Las Juntas Way RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 1.0 2.1 1.7 1.1 - 118 LEFT <-__ _ . > v v N ! SIG WARRANTS: W + E 0 151 70 UrbmN, RuraY S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Oak Rd smasaaasaaasaataaaaasemasmmr+taamamammmama�massammamaasfmmrssamaammarsa:mmapmmr�zaa:a ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 70 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 151 151 3300 0.0458 LEFT (L) 0 0 1650 0.0000 0.0000 T + R 151 3300 0.0458 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB THRU (T) 474 474 3300 0.1436 0.1436 LEFT (L) 153 153 1650 0.0927 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 145 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000 LEFT (L) 118 118 1650 0.07 .5 0.0715 T + L 118 1650 0.0715 aaaamaaesaammaasem:mca msemaaammaamtsaaaamaamaaa-maam-a-aemaaaaemamaaaessamaaasam TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.22 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A aaaaaaaaas-seams-xeaasam:ffia-ma ateaaae-sem-a--ma-m-amaa-amass-aamamaaama�e�am�� * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT-OAKLASJ.INT,VOL-OAkFLASJ.AMV,CAP- ev R CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants �aa�a��aaa��a�aaa�a�a�a��saaaaaa�$a�a�a���aa�a�sa���,��aa��aa�aaa�aaaa�aa Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/29/99 asasaaaasass aasaaaamsaxeaaaaaaaaztaaaaaaasaasasmxsaaaaarmsaaaaamrcaaasaa�a asa oeasama INTERSECTION 3 Oak Rd/Las Juntas Way Contra Costa County Count Date 7/22/1999 Time 1645-1845 Peak Hour 1715-1815 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 5-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 0 334 36 A <--- v ---> 1 Split? Y LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 239 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO, OF LANES) 1.1<--- 0 THRU Las Juntas Way RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 1.0 2.1 1.7 1.1 --- 81 LEFT y v v N ( SIG WARRANTS: W + E 0 683 125 UrbaY, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Oak Rte �ag���a�ma��aa�a�a.�aa�:aaaaa�a,�a�aaa�aaaa��aaa�a�aa�a�aaaa�a��aaaa�.�gaa� ORIGINAL ADJUSTER V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT" VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R), 125 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 683 683 3300 0.2070 0.2070 LEFT (L) 0 0 1650 0,0000 T + R 683 3300 0.2070 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB THRU (T) 334 334 3300 0.1012 LEFT (L) 36 36 1650 0«0218 0.0218 WB RIGHT (R) 239 203 * 1650 0,1230 0,1230 THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000 LEFT (L) 81 81 1650 0.0491 T + L 81 1650 0.0491 aa�aa�a�a�aaaa.:aaaa��a�aaa�aa�a:�=����sa���a��a�ssa��aaa�aaa�=a�asa��as TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACI'T'Y RATIO: 0.35 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A stamaaaa�aasmasssaamaaaaaasaamam:astsasaaaaas$aaaaasaaaasas�aaaamana:s¢aseaasamtsssa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INTaOAKLASJ.INT",VOLaOAKLASJ.PMV,CAPa el/ CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants aaaaaaaaaaataaaaaaa�zm aatasa sesaaaaaa rmaaa�aaamamasaaamssa�aaaamaaaaae xsaasaa:�saaaaa Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/20/99 aamam�aarsaar�maa;roa�ameaao�aa�aaa�ass�ammeamaaaaa��mamx�aaaaaa�omo�mYsaaaasrffimtazassma INTERSECTION 4 Oak Rd/Jones Rd Contra Costa County Count Date 6/1511999 Time 730-930 Peak Hour 730-830 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RICHT THRU LEFT 6-PRASE SIGNAL ----------- 347 879 6 <--- v ---s ( split? Y LEFT 38 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 0 RIGHT STREET NAME THRU 26 ---> 1.1 (NO. ,OF LANES) :1.0<--- 61 THRU Jones Rd RIGHT 6 --- 1.1 1.0 2.1 1.4 1.0 --- 206 LEFT (. <.--- A } v v N ! SIG WARRANTS: W + E 23 326 123 Urb=Y, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RICHT Split? N STREET NAME: Oak Rd ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R) 123 33 * 1650 0.0200 ---------------- THRU (T) 326 326 3300 0.0988 LEFT (L) 23 23 1650 0.0139 0.0139 T + R 359 3300 0.1088 -------------------------------------------------------------- - SB RIGHT (R) 347 309 * 1650 0.1873 -- ------- THRU (T) 879 879 3300 0.2664 0.2664 LEFT (L) 6 6 1650 0.0036 __________________ EB RIGHT (R) 6 6 1650 0.0036 THRU (T) 26 26 1650 0.0158 LEFT (L) 38 38 1650 0.0230 0.0230 T + R 32 1650 0.0194 ______________________ WB RIGHT (R) 0 0 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 61 61 1650 0.0370 LEFT (L) 206 206 1650 0.1248 0.1248 azea aaraaaa�xaa�aaa.aa�me aasaaaaaaaaaac�aaama maaaaaaffiaantssaaaase ax�amsaoaaasaaasmaama TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.43 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A asea�aaa�aaaa:xsase�aaaaaa�a3Ca�rr84aasaaa53�aaaa3ax¢aaaC�,9a�aaasa�aRaaiEaa��aCaaaZa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INTaOAKJONES.INT,VOL-OAKJONES.AMV,CAP= CCTALOS Software ver. 2.3.5 by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/20/99 INTERSECTION 4 Oak Rd/Jones Rd Contra Costa County Count Date 6/14/1999 Time 1515-1815 Peak Hour 1700-1800 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 88 619 7 I <--- v ---> ( split? Y LEFT 198 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 5 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 74 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0<--- 18 THRU Jones Rd RIGHT 24 - -7 1.1 1.0 2.1 1.4 1.0 --- 86 LEFT v 1 I I v N I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 5 581 434 Urb=Y, Rur-Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Oak Rd ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R) 434 344 * 1650 0.2085 THRU (T) 581 581 3300 0.1761 LEFT (L) 5 5 1650 0.0030 T + R 925 3300 0.2803 0.2803 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 88 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 619 619 3300 0.1876 LEFT (L) 7 7 1650 0.0042 0.0042 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 24 24 1650 0.0145 THRU (T) 74 74 1650 0.0448 LEFT (L) 198 198 1650 0.1200 0.1200 T + R 98 1650 0.0594 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 5 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 18 18 1650 0.0109 LEFT (L) 86 86 1650 0.0521 0.0521 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.46 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT-OAXJONES.INT,VOL-OAKJONES.PMV,CAP= CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants aaaamamsaaaam:maamaasasmaatr masaaasmxea aasaseamaea a mta aaa azaamame mesaaasmsaammsasasaaaa Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1959 08/04/99 rer m¢s ammaazeaaaaaamea mae aod:s mt a:maem aesasas amsa aeaamm�ar�ameaaae mea aim ms asem<zea ae am a ass ata mem xxm amsm INTERSECTION 5 Oak Ftd/BART Entrance Contra Costa County Count Date 7/15/1999 Time 630-830 Peak Hour 645-745 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 5 576 9 { I <--- v ---> split? Y LEFT 2 --- 1.1 1.1 3.1 1.0 1.7 --- 1.07 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 1 > 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 2 THRU BART Entrance RIGHT 19 --- 1.1 1.0 2.1 1.4 2.1 --- 213 LEFT v v N SIG WARRANTS: W + E 61 276 175 UrbmB, RuraY S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Oak Rd ma ase maa mamasaa meaama mme sas a me ae atamamatamameaaamaeea otaaa:amamzsm amaaemaaaammsaiaaaamamasasae ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 175 85 * 1650 0.0515 THRU (T) 275 276 3300 0.0836 LEFT (L) 61 61 1650 0.0370 0.0370 T + R 351 3300 0.1094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 5 5 1650 0.0030 THRU (T) 576 576 4950 0.1164 LEFT (L) 9 9 1650 0.0055 T + R 581 4950 0.1174 0.1174 --------------..___..__--___-_---_-_--_-_-------------------_-----_-_----- EB RIGHT (R) 19 19 1650 0.0115 THRU (T) 1 1 1650 0.0006 LEFT (L) 2 2 1650 0.0012 T + R 20 1650 0.0121 T + L 3 1650 0.0018 T + R + L 22 1650 0.0133 0.0133 -_-__--_-__..------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 107 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 2 2 1650 0.0012 LEFT (L) 213 213 3000 0.0710 T + R 2 1650 0.0012 T + L 215 3000. 0.0717 0.0717 T + R + L 215 3000 0.0717 ae mssassssmaasmmteaamm:aaam aasaaammmem mtamammtmaaae mea mr mecamaaemaai.m saa a sa as amees ata ss msamassm TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.24 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A xemsam:sa mts a:amse:a aemaamsamamaaasaasmsmsaaaaaa mea aea asam:m smrr sass aeas¢amae me sz aam rsaasaasamsa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants aaz maaaaasaaamae aaaaasaaaaaaasxaaaaaaaaasaaa=amaaaaaaaa=zmaaaamaaa=aaaaaas a.a aamamaaas Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/04/99 aaaamaaaaaaasamasseat:aaa�asaa:aasaaae�aaa=aaasaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaa INTERSECTION 5 Oak Rd/BART Entrance Contra Costa County Count Date 7/19/1999 Time 1600-1800 Peak Hour 1700-1600 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 9 494 9 I v ---> ( Split? Y LEFT 9 --- 1.1 1.1 3.1 1.0 1.7 --- 111 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 0 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 3 THRU BART Entrance RIGHT 114 --- 1.1 1.0 2.1 1.4 2.1 --- 132 LEFT I < " -- > I v I I I v N I I I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 62 540 111 Urb=N, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Oak Rd aaaasmaaaacraaaaa:aaaaaaaaaaaauaa�aas�oaataaaaaaffaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaeatiaaaraaaaaa==aaaaaasx$a ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 111 21 * 1650 0.0127 THRU (T) 540 540 3300 0.1636 LEFT (L) 62 62 1650 0.0376 T + R 561 3300 0.1700 0.1700 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 9 9 1650 0.0055 THRU (T) 494 494 4950 0.0998 LEFT (L) 9 9 3.650 0.0055 0.0055 T + R 503 4950 0.1016 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 114 114 1650 0.0691 THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000 LEFT (L) 9 9 1650 0.0055 T + R 114 1650 0.0691 T + L 9 1650 0.0055 T + R + L 123 1650 0.0745 0.0745 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 111 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 3 3 1650 0.0018 LEFT (L) 132 132 3000 0.0440 T + R 3 1650 0.0018 T + L 135 3000 0.0450 0.0450 T + R + L 135 3000 0.0450 aaaaa3aaaaaaxaaffiaaaa=aa=aaaaxaaaaaaaaasamaaaaaa a.aa as aseaaaaaaaaaa=aa zKa eases=mnaaaeaa TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.30 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A asaaaaaaaaataaaaaaaSSaaamaxe�aaaa�aaasaa:�aaaaaaaaaaaasaaaXaaS�aaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaas�a-aa�°Js * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJRM Transportation Consultclnts 3=2w x286"33'603'3�10i3m�d��m�i�t�`:d 53m mSE 1�3����S763i�3t'.�3���a'�3'h5�m�mZS�SE�Sffi��m9�3m�'�m���7Ca Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/27/99 a=a=a3mm=¢=a�aaw2mammmm3==m�aasimmm6amm2mtssmmm�awawea===3amw:3mamew6ra3mma61<=a==s INTERSECTION 6 Oak Rd/Wayne Dr Contra Costa County Count Date 7/6/1999 Time 715-915 Peak Hour 715-815 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 83 463 66 A I <--- v --_> split? Y LEFT 43 --- 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 10 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 19 ---> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 2 THRU Wayne Dr FLIGHT 22 --- 1.7 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 4 LEFT E <--- h > I v I J I v N SIG WARRANTS: W + E 35 191 69 Urb-N, Rur=N S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Oak Rd amain=:=�6affi=a6aaea=a=3seaaaamaiee3aae6m3aaaraaemx zsma=m=m6�mm3seamamaaa9rSSiSa=aaSa.6wa=3 ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C -----------------------------------------------------------.._-_-_----__- NB RIGHT (R) 69 65 * 1650 0.0394 THRU (T) 191 191 3300 0.0579 LEFT (L) 35 35 1650 0.0212 0.0212 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SE RIGHT (R) 83 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 463 463 3300 0.1403 0.1443 LEFT (L) 66 66 1650 0.0400 T + R 463 3300 0.1403 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 22 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 19 19 3300 0.0058 LEFT (L) 43 43 1650 0.0261 0.0261 T + R 19 3300 0.0058 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 10 10 1650 0.0061 THRU (T) 2 2 1650 0.0012 LEFT (L) 4 4 1650 0.0024 T + R 12 1650 0.0073 0.0073 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO. 0.19 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A �m�m�mmase=m=ieama$aa m6s3smm=a=a=mmaa6�ms6:==mss=asmama36a ss=aa=m6a mea=a=3=6m m6at o66zta mae6a * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=OAKWAYNE.INT,VOL=OAKWAYNE.AMV,CAP= CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/27/99 INTERSECTION 6 Oak Rd/Wayne Dr Contra Costa County Count 'Date 6/30/1999 Time 1615-1815 Peak Hour 1645-1745 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PRASE SIGNAL ----------- 13 290 36 <--- v ---> ( Split? Y LEFT 65 -- 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 71 RICHT STREET NAME: THRU 31 ---> 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 21 THRU Wayne Dr RICHT 133 --- 1.7 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 40 LEFT v v N SIG WARRANTS: W + E 35 534 47 Urb=N, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N. STREET NAME: Oak Rd ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 47 7, * 1650 0.0042 THRU (T) 534 534 3300 0.1618 0.1618 LEFT (L) 35 35 1650 0.0212 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RICHT (R) 13 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 290 290 3300 0.0879 LEFT (L) 36 36 1650 0.0218 0.0218 T + R 290 3300 0.087.9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 133 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 31 31 3300 0.0094 LEFT (L) 65 65 1650 0.0394 0.0394 T + R 31 3300 0.0094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 71 71 1650 0.0430 THRU (T) 21 21 165,0 0.0127 LEFT (L) 40 40 1650 0.0242 T + R 92 1650 0.0558 0.0558 :���=m=�am�rs:as�aa�a�aaass=seass�e�==��e�a��sz=amaa�z=a�=�=mcasu�=�aasa=�satssasasc���v�ans�= TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.28 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON REI} INT=OAKWAYNE.INT,VOL=OAKWAYNE.PMV,CAP= CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants escaseamasasxaaammaaaaaseaaaaaaasaaa�asaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa:anaaaaamaaaaaama Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/04/99 asaamaaaaaaassaaaaaaaasaaasaaaaamasaa•aaasausaaaaaa�eaaaaaasaaaaassaaases aaaa INTERSECTION 7 Buskirk Ave/Wayne Dr Contra Costa County Count Date 7/13/1999 Time 630-830 Peak Hour 700-800 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 3-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 0 0 0 I ! I " <--- v ---> split? N LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 --- 8 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU Wayne Dr RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 --- 0 LEFT v v N SIG WARRANTS: W + E 0 1097 177 UrbaN, RuraN S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Buskirk Ave aamamaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamscamsaaasaasaaaaaesaaaaaaa aasaas:aaaaaaeaaaaamsa ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 177 177 1720 0.1029 THRU (T) 1097 1097 3440 0.3189 0.3189 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 8 8 1720 0.0047 0.0047 maaaaaaaaaaaaas:amaaaaaaaa>saaaaamaasaasaasaaaaaaaaasaaaaamaa:aaaaamaaaas TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.32 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A aseaaaasaaasaaasaaaaaaaasaaaaaearaaseaseaaeaaaamaasaaamaaeaasaaaaataaaaasaaaasa�ar+am * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INTaBUSKIRK.INT,VOLaBUSKIRK.AMV,CAPa CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultant4 Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/04/99 ammaaaaaammmeaas�assraa3aaassaasas�aaaoamaaaaamaaraamaaammtaaaaaamssaaaasasasasaeae INTERSECTION 7 Buskirk Ave/Wayne Dr Contra Costa County Count Date 7/29/1999 Time 1530-1730 Peak Hour 1615-1715 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 3-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 0 0 0 I i I I i I A I <--- v ---> i Split? N LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 --- 39 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU Wayne Dr RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 --- 0 LEFT I t___ n ___> I v N i i I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 0 1434 77 Urb$N, Rur-N s LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Buskirk Ave aasasaaa�aamxmaaaaaaasasmmaammamammmaaaaammaammaaaam¢mxmsmaxasaaasamms�aassameaaaamaa ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUM.F:* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 77 77 1720 0.0448 THRU (T) 1434 1434 3440 0.4169 0.4169 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 39 39 1720 0.0227 0.0227 aaaaemmmmsmaammmmxam:mmaammammaaa=aaam=asaasaaaeaaaaammammaaaagmm:aaamm�aa�mmae�aaaaa:aaaaa�a TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.44 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A. agaaaamsaaaaaamammaaaaaaamaaammamaaaaaaasasaaasrssam;-eaaaaammsaammmmammamass�mmsreaaaa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INTaBUSKIRK.INT,VOLaBUSKIRK.PKV,CAP- CCTALOS Software ver. 2.25 by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 _ 07/29/99 INTERSECTION 8 Newell Ave/Olympic Blvd Contra Costa County Count Date 7/14/1999 Time 730-930 Peak Hour 830-930 -- OCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT - 2-PH - ASESIGNAL ----------- 0 0 0 <--- v -> Split? N LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 --- 0 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 619 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 2.0<--- 479 THRU Olympic Blvd RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 --- 0 LEFT I <--- " ---> I V v N SIG WARRANTS: W + E 129 0 38 Urb-N, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RICHT Split? N STREET NAME: Newell Ave ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 38 38 1800 0.0211 LEFT (L) 129 129 1800 0.0717 T + R + L 167 1800 0.0928 0.0928 ---------------------------- EB THRU (T) 619 619 2600 0.1719 0.1719 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB THRU (T) 479 479 3600 0.1331 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.26 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=NEWELLOL.INT,VOL$NEWELLOL.AMV,CAP= CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants aaaaaaasaat=aaa=stcsasaaram=saataassmtsasssaaassaaaaaastasaaaammaaarssaasasas$aaamaaaa Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/29/99 W aas.saaasays:sas=aaasoaaaaauaaaam~sass7acantocaama�sassaamaaaa.raaasaat.asasasasstaaaaasasaa INTERSECTION 8 Newell Ave/Olympia Blvd Contra Costa County Count' Date 7/5/1999 Time 1430-1630 Peak Hour 1515-1615 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 0 0 0 fi I " . I t--- v ---> fi Split? N LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 --- 0 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 700 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 2.0a--- 631 THRU Olympia Blvd RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 --- 0 LEFT I " � I _- _> V fi fi fi V N I I I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 177 0 25 Urb=Y, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Newell Ave aas=mtaaasarts vsaaassaaasaaaaaaaa=mt sa:aasaaaasaam=sosa:aaaaaaesaasmsa aaasasaaz ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 25 25 1800 0.0139 LEFT (L) 177 177 1800 0.0983 T + R + L 202 1800 0.1122 0.1122 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB THRU (T) 700 700 3600 0.194.4 0.1944 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB THRU (T) 631 631 3600 0.1753 :saaaaaaaa=suaaaaa=mea saaaaaamaaa�aaassaaaaas mcaaaxera sa:aam�aaaamaaaaaaama�aaa TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.31 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A :as=aasaameaa�taaareaaaamaaasssaaaea5esamtaat3mats�cxataaaameaxttmamaaazsaaaaaaasa:aas;sa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=NEWELLOL.INT,VOL=NEWELLOL.PMV,CAPa CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants aaaasaaaata maaansnsasa�csaamsrsa ann ssaaasaaaaaaaaaasaasn:saasamssaaaaasasasaaasaxs Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/13/99 asaatesaossaaasas�ssana�eaassstam�¢aasaaaaaasaaas�taasamsaassaaasaoaaas3+namaaasae�tasm�aaa INTERSECTION 9 Tice Valley Blvd/Olympic Blvd Contra Costa County Count Date 6/16/1999 Time 830-1030 Peak Hour 930-1.030 CCTA-METHOD- RIGHT THRU LEFT 8-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 19 103 46 1 1 I f 1 C I <--- v -_-> Split? N LEFT 33 --- 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.4 --- 62 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 210 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 175 THRU Olympic Blvd RIGHT 306 --- 1.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 --- 328 LEFT I <--- " ---> v v N SIG WARRANTS: W + E 348 83 385 Urb=Y, RuraY S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Tice Valley Blvd �amsem�sesssaaaassaasssstaaaasamase�ssa�sasxaaasaaat®sassy:usmtaasaasm+aa�esasamraas+e= . ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 385 - 205 * 1650 0.1242 THRU (T) 83 83 1650 0.0503 LEFT (L) 348 348 1650 0.2109 0.2109 SB- RIGHT (R) 19 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 103 103 1650 0.0624 0.0624 LEFT (L) 46 46 1650 0.0279 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 306 • 306 1650 0.1855 THRU (T) 210 210 3300 0.0636 0.0636 LEFT (L) 33 33 1650 0.0200 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 62 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 175 175 1650 0.1061 LEFT (L) 328 328 3000 0.1093 0.1093 T + R 175 1650 0.1.061 aaaaaaaa$>ffisaaassasssaaaa:aaa:a arstiaaa�esaaaamxsmaataaameszaaaaaaaaaaaaaanxasaa TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.45 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A aaaxsaaseaaasanotaaxamaaaaaesxs:aasaaasa:aasaaaaaangaiasaassaroxaasaasyxaazaaassaa�ranaa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT-TICEOLYM.INT,VOLaTYCEOLYM.AMV,CAP= CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants aasaaaaaaaaaaxxaaaaaa a.a amaaaasxa aaea:aaaaaaa aas seaxaaam veaaaameaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/13/99 aaaaxmmtaaaaasa.�aaaaaaasaaxmza asaaa5xx axsaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaa:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa INTERSECTION 9 Tice Valley Blvd/Olympic Blvd Contra Costa County Count Date 6/23/1999 Time 1600-1800 beak Hour 1630-1730 - - CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 8-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 56 113 53 I I I I I I I <--- v ---> I Split? N LEFT 64 --- 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.0 1.4 --- 99 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 230 ---> 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 364 THRU Olympic Blvd RIGHT 248 --- 1.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 --- 375 LEFT I <--- A ---> v I I I I N I I I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 433 117 360 Urb-Y, RuraY S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Tice Valley Blvd aaaaaaasaaaaaaaaa3aaaaaaasaaaaxaaaaaaassa aaanea aaxaaaaa=aaaaaeaaaaaaaaa�eaaa ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ----------------------- NB RIGHT (R) 360 154 * 1650 0.0933 THRU (T) 117 117 1650 0.0709 LEFT (L) 433 433 1650 0.2624 0.2624 ------------------- SB RIGHT (R) 56 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 113 113 1650 0.0685 0.0685 LEFT (L) 53 53 1650 0.0321 -------------------- EB RIGHT (R) 248 248 1650 0.1503 THRU (T) 230 230 3300 0.0697 LEFT (L) 64 64 1650 0.0388 0.0388 --------------------- WB RICHT (R) 99 9 * 1650 0.0055 THRU (T) 364 364 1650 0.2206 LEFT (L) 375 375 3000 0.1250 T + R 373 1650 0.2261 0.2261 aaaaaaasaaaaaaamcaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarsaasaaaaaaaaaxaaaaxaaaaaaaaxaaaaaa TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO; 0.60 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A amaaaaaaaaaaaaoaasaaaaaaaaaataaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaarasexaaaaa=aaaaaaao * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT-TICEOLYM.INT,VOL-TICEOLYM.PMV,CAP- CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants masssaasiamaaaaaa:�aaaaaaaaaaacmaaaaaamaaaaasaaaaasa assaa�aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa3 Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1959 07/12/99 a=aaaaa.�ataasaaaaa�aaaaaaaxas�aaaaataaaaascaaaaasra=aaa=ease=a��.=x�ta araaaaaa�a INTERSECTION 10 Blackhawk Rd/Blackhawk Pl Contra Costa County Count Date 7/7/1999 Time 900-1100 Peak Hour 900-1000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 4-PHASE SIGNAL -w---------- 9 505 71 ( I I i I " v ---> split? N LEFT 5 --- 1.1 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 35 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 5 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 6 THRU Blackhawk-P1 RIGHT 21 --- 1.4 1.0 2.0 1.8 1.1 --- 100 LEFT I < I I I v N I I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 33 305 164 Urb=N, Rur-Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Blackhawk Rd aaaaamtamrsamYaaaa�aaaaaaaaaaaa�aaa=xeaaaaa-�aaaaaaa�aaaaaaaaxaa�aeaasaaaasaa�a ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 164 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 305 305 3300 0.0924 LEFT (L) 33 33 1650 0.0200 0.0200 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 9 4 * 1650 0.0024 THRU (T) 506 506 3300 0.1533 0.1533 LEFT (L) 71 .71 1650 0.0430 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 21 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 5 5 1650 0.0030 LEFT (L) 5 5 1650 0.0030 0.0030 T + R 5 1650 0.0030 T + L 10 1650 0.0061 T + R + L 10 1650 0.0061 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 35 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 6 6 1650 0.0036 LEFT (L) 100 100 1650 0.0606 T + L 106 1650 0.0642 0.0642 ria�axsa�a�aaaaammaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiaaaaaaaa�anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaamamta a=aa TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.24 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICES: A aaaaarzaaaaaaasaaaaaaaamaaaaaaaa aaas�amaazas.-aazeaaaaaaa-aaaaaa_aa=aaasaa agar s.- * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=BHAWKPL.INT,VOL-BHAWKPL.AMV,CAP= 61!A ' CCTALOS Software vet. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants seats aaaaaaaaaaaasaammaaaa-aaaaaaxaaaaaaaaa:aaaaaaaaa aaaaaa--- -- aaaaaaaaa Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/12/99 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa=eases=aaaaaaaaaasaaa a,aaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa INTERSECTION 10 Blackhawk Rd/Blackhawk PI Contra Costa County Count Date 7/7/1999 Time 1600-1800 Peak Hour 1600-1700 ----------------------------------------------------- CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 4-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 3 486 59 I I A I I I A I <--- v ---> ( Split? N LEFT 5 --- 1.1 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 80 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 9 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 4 THRU Blackhawk P1 RIGHT 23 --- 1.4 1.0 2.0 1.8 1.1 --- 231 LEFT I <--- A ---> I v I I I v N I I I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 15 551 181 UrbaY, RuraY S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Blackhawk Rd aaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaxsaaaaaasaaa:aaaaaaaasaatsaaa:s3aaaaaamaaataaaaasaasaeeaaaaaaa ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R) 181 0 * 1650 0.0000 -------------- THRU (T) 551 551 3300 0.1670 0.1670 LEFT (L) 15 15 1650 0.0091 ----------------- SB RIGHT (R) 3 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 486 486 3300 0.1473 LEFT (L) 59 59 1650 0.0358 0.0358 -------------------- EB RIGHT (R) 23 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 9 9 1650 0.0055 LEFT (L) 5 5 1650 0.0030 T + R 9 1650 0.0055 T + L 14 1650 0.0085 0.0085 T + R + L 14 1650 0.0085 -------------------- WB RIGHT (R) 80 21 * 1650 0.0127 THRU (T) 4 4 1650 0.0024 LEFT (L) 231 231 1650 0.1400 0.1400 T + L 235 1650 0.1424 aaaaaxsasa araaaaaxassaaaaasamaaaaaaamaaa a.a axaaa�aaat s¢a5xaaammaaaaaaaaataaaasaaa TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.35 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A aaaaaaaasaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaasaaaa:a CCTALOS Software Ver. 2.35 by TJXM Transportation Consultants a$�,Q,aa;aam�,aaa;aaseaaa�ersaaansaaaaaaaxaaaaaaaamaa=aasaaaaa¢a�ncsam«acaarrassaaasasama Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/03/99 assets=ememaamaaasaa=aaseata¢aa�eaessass�mt�aastaoaaaa�aaxansaataaaaaasaaraaa:aaa�aetaa�a INTERSECTION 11 Blackhawk Rd/Silver Maple Contra Costa County Count Date 6/17/1999 Time 730-930 Peak Hour 730-830 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RICHT THRU LEFT 6--PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 4 797 12 ~ { { A v ---> { Split? Y LEFT 3 --- 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 9 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 0 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 0 THRU Silver Maple RIGHT 38 --- 1.4 1.0 2.1 1,1 1.1 --- 69 LEFT { <--- A > { v ( { { v N { ( ! SIG WARRANTS: W + E 8 327 19 UrbaN, Rur=B S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Blackhawk Rd asaaaamaaamasamammwea aoaaaapaseea anaaaaaa�aaa�t aeaammaaaaaaaaaaaaa�aaaaaaIDaamma ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C NB RIGHT (R) 19 19 1650 0.0115 THRU (T) 327 327 3300 0.0991 LEFT (L) 8 8 1650 0.0048 0.0048 T + R 346 3300 0.1048 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 4 4 1650 0.0024 THRU (T) 797 797 3300 0.2415 LEFT (L) 12 12 1650 0.0073 T + R 801 3300 0.2427 0.2427 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 38 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000 LEFT (L) 3 3 1650 0.0018 0.0018 T + R 0 1650 0.0000 T + L 3 1650 0.0018 T + R + L 3 1650 0.0018 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WE RIGHT (R) 9 9 1650 0.0055 THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0000 LEFT (L) 69 69 1650 0.0418 T + R 9 1650 0.0055 T + L 69 1650 0.0418 T + R + L 78 1650 0.0473 0.0473 aam�xeamaaaama:aaaamaaamaaaaaraaaaaaaxssaasraaasaarsmaaaa�aaffi�eaaaaaa���tmma:assess TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.30 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A osis�3 a�aa@aaaaaaaaa�maza-3aaSaam�m a'�aSaamaaa�aaaG�iaaa�saaaaasaagcaaaaa.��;2�aa�ta * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants naa,-asstaxaas�aa:aasaamssa�aaaaassssaxsaassassamaaaasasassm.�-sgaaaaxasaamts�tas,:saamas Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/03/99 sansrmeaanaa=naaaaaseasaaaraaasaaanaaasaaesass:aasasssisa,saasaasaanaasauaaaaaaasn=a INTERSECTION 11 Blackhawk Rd/Silver Maple Contra Costa County Count Date 6/16/1999 Time 1615,-1815 Peak Hour 1645-1745 - --- CCTAMETHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 0 439 9 I � I E E I <--- v ---> I split? Y LEFT 3 --- 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.1 --- 15 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 0 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) l.1<--- 0 THRU Silver Maple RIGHT 16 --- 1.4 1.0 2.1 1.1 1.1 --- 30 LEFT A -> I v ( I E V N E I I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 31 853 46 Urb=N, Rur=N S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STR'E'ET NAME: Blackhawk Rd aasaaaanaa=aasaaszaa:aaaaas�saaaaassaaassaa ss�n�aaaaaansaaaaaaasaaasstaaaasasna ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 46 46 1650 0.0279 THRU (T) 853 853 3300 0.2585 LEFT (L) 31 31 1650 0.0188 T + R 899 3300 0.2724 0.2724 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 0 0 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 439 439 3300 0.1330 LEFT (L) 9 9 1650 0.0055 0.0055 T + R 439 3300 0.1330 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 16 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 0 0 1.650 0.0000 LEFT (L) 3 3 1650 0.0018 0.0018 T + R 0 1650 0.0000 T + L 3 1650 0.0018 T + R + L 3 1650 0.0018 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 15 15 1650 0.0091 THRU (T) 0 0 1650 0.0.000 LEFT (L) 30 30 1650 0.0182 T + R is 1650 0.0091 T + L 30 1650 0.0182 T + R + L 45 1650 0.0273 0.0273 'assn®as=sn�ea seaseas:aassaa=sass::Ossa:seas=assaasaanaassaaanasesaa aasaa.xnasa:a TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO' 0.31 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A ssssaassas�a;as sssssaaasasaaasssssssssasamass=ansa s=a sssassosszsaasssss sm assaasaassa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants aaaasaaaaaaaaaaaa:maaaaaaaaaasaaaaaasaa ata aasaanaaaamaassaa a:xaaaaaaaaaaxaaaaaa Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/27/99 am=aaaaaaaaaaaaacaaaaaasaaaaaaaa�saaaaaaaaaaaaaaamaaaeaaaamaaaaaaaaamaaaaaa INTERSECTION 12 Port Chicago Hwy/Riverside Dr Contra Costa County Count Date 6/9/1999 Time 715-915 Peak Hour 715-815 CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT -----6-PHASE SIGNAL ------------ 6 612 13 { A <--- v ---> I Split? N LEFT 7 --- 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.0 --- 8 RICHT STREET NAME: THRU 11 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 12 THRU Riverside Dr RIGHT 103 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.1 --- 59 LEFT v ( I N I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 50 428 10 UrbaN, RuraB S LEFT THRU RICHT Split? N STREET NAME: Port Chicago Hwy aaxsmmaaamammmnaaa a„s aamaammmaaaammaaaasmaaaaaaamaxaaaaaaamsaaa=ammaaaaaama ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 10 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 428 428 3300 0.1297 LEFT (L) 50 50 1650 0.0303 0.0303 ----------------- SB RIGHT (R) 6 6 1650 0.0036 THRU (T) 612 612 3300 0.1855 LEFT (L) 13 13 1650 0.0079 T + R 618 3300 0.1873 0.1873 ------------------- EB RIGHT (R) 103 53 * 1650 0.0321 0.0321 THRU (T) 11 11 1650 0.0067 LEFT (L) 7 7 1650 0.0042 T + L 18 1650 0.0109 ----------------- WB RIGHT (R) 8 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 12 12 1650 0.0073 LEFT (L) 59 59 1650 0.0358 0.0358 T + L 71 1650 0.0430 aa=aaacaa�����aaaa=artaaasassaaaa�aaaaata aaaaa�aaaaaaaaaaaam�aaasaaaaassa awe TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.29 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A, aaaaaaaaa�naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaasaaaaaa�saaaaaaaac:maa a.m�amsa ossa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON REIT INT=PCHRIVER.INT,VOLaPCHRIVER..AMV,CAP= Se CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants a aazxaffimaxaaneaaaaxsaaa=aaaanaxaaaxaxaaaaxaaam=axaaaa:x.�a=xaaaaxxxaaxaaxxa Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 07/27/95 axaagxasasasasaaaaasxsam`�xaxxaxa=aaa=axmsaxatxaaxaxaaxaxxaaaxaxaxaxaaxaasaxxa INTERSECTION 12 Port Chicago Hwy/Riverside Dr Contra Costa County Count Date 6/9/1999 Time 1530-1730 Peak Hour 1615-1715 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ OCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 6-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 15 386 19 tt� I A v ---> I split? N LEFT 12 --- 1.1 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.0 --- 7 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 13 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 16 THRU Riverside Dr RIGHT 84 --- 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.1 --- 27 LEFT <--_ __> v v N SIC WARRANTS: W + E 97 544 47 Urb=N, RuraB S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Port Chicago Hwy asaasmaaaaaaaaassaxaeaaas:ssa�txetrmxaaaaaaaaamaxstaxaaamaaaszasamaaexas�aaasaaaxa ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 47 20 * 1650 0.0121 THRU (T) 544 544 3300 0.1648 LEFT (L) 97 97 16.50 0.0588 0.0588 ------------------..-_-..__..-___- ----_---__-_--_-_-_-_-_----_-_--_-_-__-- SB RIGHT (R) 15 15 1650 0.0091 THRU (T) 386 386 3300 0.1170 LEFT (L) 19 19 1650 0.0115 T + R 401 3300 0.1215 0.1215 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RICHT (R) 84 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 13 13 1650 0.0079 LEFT (L) 12 12 1650 0.0073 0.0073 T + L 25 1650 0.0152 __--______.._____________________________________________ __________..__-- WB RIGHT (R) 7 0 * 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 16 16 1650 0.0097 LEFT (L) 27 27 1650 0.0164 T + L 43 1650 0.0261 0.0261 x:8xaaaa xa a as C xa=ax a aaaaaas a=xtaa aaaxa����a S a ra ixaza xa�x xxx a=aa".�a xaa x a a x a a a TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.21 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A axe..oxaxax�z=xasaaaxxaaaaaxaaaaamfa=axaaaaaaa=xaaaxaassxxaaaxaxaaxasxaaoataxa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=PCHRIVER.INT,VOL=PCHRIVER.PMV,CAP= CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM 'Transportation Consultants saaaa�nta�a�saa aa3ssaaaaaraaaaaaaaaassaaaanea as:asaaaanea nes see ns a=assess ass acs ssaaazsaa�an: Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/05/99 sass a ra mtaaaaaawn�saaa�ta mss ssaaata:aaaasaaaae�aasaaaaaasaa sea��asaassaaas anea�aaaaaaa:a INTERSECTION 13 Sellers Ave/Cypress Rd Contra Costa. County Count Date 7/29/1999 Time 645-845 Peak Hour 645-745 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 5-PRASE SIGNAL ----------- 9 2 0 t�t A <--- v ---> I split? N LEFT 4 --- 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 0 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 160 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1a--- 315 THRU Cypress Rd RIGHT 76 --- 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 --- 56 LEFT ---> v v N ( SIG WARRANTS: W + E 62 1 25 UrbaN, RuraN S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y STREET NAME: Sellers Ave ��ea�eaaa�aa=�asaaaaaa�a:aaa�a�aaaansaaa���aaa.�aaaaaaaaa:a�aaa�aa��a�aa�ea�a=saasaa� ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 25 25 1650 0.0152 THRU (T) 1 1 1650 0.0006 LEFT (L) 62 62 1650 0.0376 T + R 26 1650 0.0158 T + L 63 1650 0.0392 T + R + L 99 1650 0.0533 0.0533 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 9 9 1650 0.0055 THRU (T) 2 2 1650 0.0012 LEFT (L) 0 0 1650 0.0000 T + R. 11 1650 0.0067 0.0067 T + L 2 1650 0.0012 T + R + L 11 1650 0.0067 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 76 76 1650 0.0461 THRU (T) 160 160 1650 0.0970 LEFT (L) 4 4 1650 0.0024 0.0024 T + R 236 1650 0.1430 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 0 0 1650 0.0000 THRU (T) 315 315 1650 0.1909 0.1909 LEFT (L) 56 56 1650 0.0339 T + R 315 1650 0.1909 Se�aia."...a a2a"..b'aa�aa.`SaaaaaaaaaSse aaa�aas amasscaa�aa3aaaaaaaaa,a 3aaaii�a aae:a aSa��Santlaaa� TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.25 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A a=aas:aaaaasnsaa�a��ssaaaaasaaazaasamaamaaaaaaeaaaaema:Basan¢mac�n:aa_aeaamaa�eaansz:aaeaasaa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants s:ma=sasazsaxraamaaaa�[sszssesaasasaa�cassaasaaasssssseassssassssssssasaaassaaass Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1995 08/05/99 smasassss�a sores aaaaaara asaaasasaaaa+mmassasssssaamsm mawmsassaaaaaasat aeaaasffiaxs assess INTERSECTION 13 Sellers Ave/Cypress Rd Contra Costa County Count Date 8/2/1999 Time 1545-1745 peak Hour 1615-1715 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 5-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 10 1 9 1 1 1 A I A I <-- - v ---> I Split? N LEFT 3 --- 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 4 RICHT STREET NAME: THRU 354 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 195 THRU Cypress Rd RIGHT 64 --- 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 --- 25 LEFT I <--- A ---> I v v N SIG WARRANTS: W + E 63 2 75 Urb=N, RuraN S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? Y STREET NAME; Sellers Ave sampe'xsssvassmsssssasssasssasmessssssrsu�assssaszas��ss�s#sassasasssaasssss=ease ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 75 75 1650 0.0455 THRU (T) 2 2 1650 0.0012 LEFT (L) 63 63 1650 0.0382 T + R 77 1650 0.0467 T + L 65 16.50 0.0394 T + R + L 140 1650 0.0848 0.0848 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 10 10 1650 0.0061 THRU (T) 1 1 1650 0.0006 LEFT (L) 9 9 1650 0.0055 T + R 11 1650 0.0067 T + L 10 1650 0.0061 T + R + L 20 1650 0.0121 0.0121 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 64 64 1650 0.0388 THRU (T) 354 354 1650 0.2145 LEFT (L) 3 3 1650 0.0018 T + R 418 1650 0.2533 0.2533 WB RIGHT (R) 4 4 1650 0.0024 THRU (T) 195 195 1650 0.1182 LEFT (L) 25 25 1650 0.0152 0.0152 T + R 199 1650 0.1206 =asaaasaaaaaaasa ass assesses.::aaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaz as xssaasaiT a as=aaai,aaaaaaaaaaaaaSYa53�a�� TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.37 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A eases=saeasesaas mteaaaesasasaassaeaaaaa=saaseaa=aassasa��as=asssasassasaaasasssa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJItM Transportation Consultants Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1989 08/05/99 " aaaaa�ea=stasaamssaszssaaaaaaame.-aaaaaaeaas=aaac�eaa=a�tmaasaarmsaamaa:=aasmsaaa�ts INTERSECTION 14 Willow Ave/Hawthorne Dr Contra Costa County Count Date 7/28/1999 Time 715-915 Peak Hour 715-815 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RICHT THRU LEFT 3-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 0 292 18 I I I I <--- v ---> I Split? N LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 16 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 0 •--> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU Hawthorne Dr RICHT 0 --- 0.0 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.0 --- 147 LEFT I < " > I v I I I v N I I I SIC WARRANTS: W + E 2 285 64 Urb=N, Rur=N S LEFT THRU RICHT Split? N STREET NAME: Willow Ave ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO IV/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RICHT (R) 64 0 * 1720 0.0000 THRU (T) 285 285 3440 0.0828 LEFT (L) 2 2 1720 0.0012 T + L 287 3440 0.0834 0.0834 SBTHRU (T) 292 292 3440 0.0849 LEFT (L) 18 18 1720 0.0105 0.0105 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RICHT (R) 16 0 * 1720 0.0000 LEFT (L) 147 147 1720 0.0855 0.0855 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.18 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A saaaaavasa�mmeaassm=smsaaaotaaaaataa:c:aaaaaasamssrsasatsasesaasa�aasaasaaaaasaaasra¢aaa * ADJUSTED FOR RICHT TURN ON RED INTaWILLOWHA.INT,VOL=WILLOWHA.AMV,CAP= CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants Condition. CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/05/99 s4A' Yi�'�Y29m s'JR Li SOSS�i'�$'&L�'�ffi'i�SC'JW S S#ffiZiC3 s8$s'JiO9SY 39i�'$i16�'3[SCS YI[��s"J•�'ffi92 i'i i`i s'�1R Sibs it]¢SYiv3�"i INTERSECTION 14 Willow Ave/Hawthorne Dr Contra Costa County Count Date 7/26/1999 Time 1500-1700 Peak Hour 1545-1545 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 3-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 0 463 15 I <--- v ---> fi Split? N . LEFT 0 --- 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 --- 28 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 0 ---> 0.0 (NO. OF LANES) 0.0<--- 0 THRU Hawthorne Dr RIGHT 0 --- 0.0 1.1 2.1 1.0 1.0 --- 110 LEFT I <--- A ---> I v v N SIG WARRANTS: W + E 0 498 147 Urb=N, Rur=Y S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Willow Ave :mmees as ss:�sses smcs a:x�ssss sees ersmms ssms�ssa:sagas srs:snmsarts s:?s osaarsssmcs asamsasaSsss�aess ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 147 37 * 1720 0.0215 THRU (T) 498 498 3440 0.1448 0.1448 LEFT (L) 0 0 1720 0.0000 T + L 498 3440 0.1448 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB THRU (T) 463 463 3440 0.1346 LEFT (L) 15 15 1720 0.0087 0.0087 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 28 13 * 1720 0.0076 LEFT (L) 110 110 1720 0.0640 0.0640 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.22 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A * ADJUSTER FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT-WILLOWHA.INT,VOLuWILLOWHA.PMV,CAP- CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by T KM Transportation Consultants ammaaaaaxaeaxzsea assaaaaxaaaaaxasxaaxxsxaaaaaxaaaaaax8saasaa a;�xaxaaaasaastaaan Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1955 08_/05/99 aaaasa�aaasaasxsaaassxxaamaasaaaaaaxaaamsaaasaa5r:as�sataasmamsaxotxabeaaxaaaaxaa INTERSECTION 15 Parker Ave/4th St Contra Costa County Count pate 6/24/1999 Time 700-900 Peak Hour 730-830 ---------------------------------------------------------------..__-_-__- CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 3 161 30 {FI 1 I �_-- v ---> Split? N LEFT 1 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.4 --- 26 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 18 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 9 THRU 4th St RIGHT 41 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 89 LEFT v v N SIG WARRANTS: W + E 17 149 36 UrbxN, RuraN S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Parker Ave asaavasaffesxeaaaaaaaaaaaaaamaaaa�asasascaaaaamsaaaxssa9sasxaaasaaaassxsaaaaasaassaaa ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 36 36 1800 0.0200 THRU (T) 149 149 3600 0.0414 LEFT (L) 17 17 1800 0.0094 T + R 185 3600 0.0514 T + L 166 3600 0.0461 T + R + L 202 3600 0.0561 0.0561 SB RIGHT (R) 3 3 1800 0.0017 -_- THRU (T) 161 161 3600 0.0447 LEFT (L) 30 30 1800 0.0167 0.0167 T + R 164 3600 0.0456 T + L 191 3600 0.0531 T + R + L 194 3600 0.0539 _-_---_- EB RIGHT (R) 41 41 1800 0.0228 THRU (T) 18 18 1800 0.0100 LEFT (L) 1 1 1800 0.0006 T + R 59 1800 0.0328 T + L 19 1800 0.0106 T + R + L 60 1800 0.0333 0.0333 - ------------- WB RIGHT (R) 26 0 * 1800 0.0000 THRU (T) 9 9 1800 0.0050 LEFT (L) 89 89 1.800 0.0494 0.0494 T + R 9 1800 0.0090 T + L 98 1800 0.0544 T + R + L 98 1800 0.0544 aaasaxmasaaa.a aaaaa�xaa3szsaa�aaaxam aaaaas�azxaasaassmasaaaaaaxaxas atsaaastaaasaaaxS 1-4 TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO. 0.16 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A * ADJUSTED FOR RICHT TURN ON RED INT=PARKER4T.INT,VOL-PARKER4T.AMV,CAP= CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants na�caaamiaaamaaaetm aamx aeamaaaasaaxBaasasaaaaamaasaaaaaaamamas:raaaaasa�es as:amaazx Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/05/99 maamamsdamaassmam¢zaaaaaamaamamaaaa:maammaaamaaaaa�svaaaaa:maamaamaasrmarmmeara INTERSECTION 15 Parker Ave/4th St Centra Costa County Count Date 7/14/1999 Time 1615-1815 Peak Hour 1700-1800 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 7 296 29 �tF it� A <--- v ---> split? N LEFT 5 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.4 --- 48 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 20 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LAMES) 1.1<--- 13 THRU 4th St RIGHT 62 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 65 LEFT v N ( ( SIG WARRANTS: W + E 100 637 78 UrbaN, RuraY S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Parker Ave aaaaaaaaamaa:mmeaamao:satamcsiscmarimaas¢aa:aaaaaamaaaasaa:maaaamaaaammaaamaaamaa ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RIGHT (R) 78 78 1800 0.0433 THRU (T) 637 637 3600 0.1769 LEFT (L) 100 100 1800 0.0556 T + R 715 3600 0.1986 T + L 737 3600 0.2047 T + R + L 815 3600 0.2264 0.2264 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 7 7 1800 0.0039 THRU (T) 296 296 3600 0.0822 LEFT (L) 29 29 1800 0.0161 0.0161 T + R 303 3600 0.0842 T + L 325 3600 0.0903 T + R + L 332 .3600 0.0922 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 62 62 1800 0.0344 THRU (T) 20 20 1800 0.0111 LEFT (L) 5 5 1800 0.0028 T + R 82 1800 0.0456 T + L 25 1800 0.0139 T + R + L 87 1800 0.0483 0.0483 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RICHT (R) 48 0 * 1800 0.0000 THRU (T) 13 13 1800 0.0072 LEFT (L) 65 65 1800 0.0361 0.0361 T + R 13 1800 0.0072 T + L 78 1800 0.0433 T + R + L 78 1800 0.0433 aoaaasaaaaaaaa5essaaaaasta m:z:ma.maaaaaarssamaaaaamaa.-aaaaaaaamaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO. 0.33 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: +A a=aaaisomt:aaasaaaxsa=a msEa aaaa3aaaarctamtaa a=aaaa3t rs�:iaaaaasseaaaa aasasamaamc sanaaaama.a * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TORN ON RED INT=PARKER4T.INT,VOL-PARKER4T.PMV,CA.Pa CCTALOS Software ver. 2 .35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants aaaaaaaaaaamamsam aaaaaaaamasmaaaamamaaaamaaaaaamaammmaaamasaamaamaamaxaaaaa€a Condition: OCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/04/99 ammssaaasaamomamaaaaaa:m�msammmmaaaaammaaamaammaaaaaamscammmmamammmaaammmaaa INTERSECTION 15 Parker Ave/2nd St Contra Costa County Count Date 7/27/1999 Time 615-815 Peak Hour 700-800 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 8 119 6 V _-_> split? N LEFT 4 --- 1.0 1.4 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 5 RIGHT STREET NAME: TARU 0 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 0 THRU 2nd St RIGHT 9 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.4 1.0 --- 7 LEFT ( _ v v N SIG WARRANTS: W + E 3 220 1 UrbaN, RuraN S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Parker Ave zemmamaoaamam:ammamaamaaaaasamaaaammasamaammaaammmaammmaammuaammaasmaamaama ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB ----- - -NB RIGHT (R) 1 0 * 1800 0.0000 THRU. (T) 220 220 3600 0.0611 LEFT (L) 3 3 1800 0.0017 T + R 220 3600 0.0611 T + L 223 3600 0.0619 0.0619 T + R + L 223 3600 0.0619 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 8 0 * 1800 0.0000 THRU (T) 1.19 119 3600 0.0331. LEFT (L) 6 6 1800 0.0033 0.0033 T + R 119 3600 0.0331 T + L 125 3600 0.0347 T + R + L 125 3600 0.0347 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 9 9 1800 0.0050 . 0.0050 THRU (T) 0 0 1800 0.0000 LEFT (L) 4 4 1.800 0.0022 T + R 9 1.800 0.0050 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 5 5 1800 0.0028 THRU (T) 0 .0 1800 0.0000 LEFT (L) 7 7 1800 0.0039 0.0039 T + R 5 1.800 0.0028 a a m a a a a a�m a moa as a m m a a a a a a m mm a a a a ma�s a amm a as a as a a a a a as xtaa m amaa aaa a as a saama m TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.07 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A maaaasaaaaamaaamaaaaasamamaaasaamaaaaaamamsasaaaaaaamaaaamaaaaaaamaaasa * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJRM Transportation Consultants Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/04/99 INTERSECTION 15 Parker Ave/2nd St Contra Costa County Count Date 7/27/1599 Time 1530-1730 Peak Hour 1600-1700 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 3 318 2 i }I h v ---> I Split? N LEFT 8 --- 1.0 1.4 2.2 1.1 1.1 --- 4 RICHT STREET NAME: THRU 2 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 8 THRU 2nd St RIGHT 14 --- 1.1 1.1 2.2 1.4 1.0 --- 28 LEFT I <-- --> I v I I I v N I I I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 21 293 16 Urb=N, Rur=N S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: Parker Ave ssa'�sae�src:aa�:a� am�esme:w:�:scemmasa�aaca�aamia�=amz�aaama=acme ssa��anaaasea a'aca�:me�sta ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C -_------------------------------------------------------------------------ NB RICHT (R) 16 0 * 1800 0.0000 THRU (T) 293 293 3600 0.0814 LEFT (L) 21 21 1800 0.0117 0.0117 T + R 293 3600 0.0814 T + L 314 3600 0.0872 T + R + L 314 3600 0.0872 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 3 0 * 1800 0.0000 THRU (T) 318 318 3600 0.0883 LEFT (L) 2 2 1800 0.0011 T + R 318 3600 0.0883 T + L 320 3600 0.0889 0.0889 T + R + L 320 3600 0.0889 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 14 14 1800 0.0078 THRU (T) 2 2 1800 0.0011 LEFT (L) 8 8 1800 0.0044 T + R 16 1800 0.0089 0.0089 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (R) 4 4 1800 0.0022 THRU (T) 8 8 1800 0.0044 LEFT (L) 28 28 1800 0.0156 0.0156 T + R 12 1800 0.0067 me�5sxa�=aaa�ma xae�m�=ama�a3 ma��ss.aasa�3�zna�=ma��aa=�a��ms�a��aaaa���na�m=as��®amaa TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.13 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants aaaaaaaax¢aaaaaaaaaasaamraasaam,aaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/05/99 aaaaaaaaaaaseaasaa5eaaaaaaazasasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'aaaaaaamaaaaa INTERSECTION 17 2nd Ave/Pomona Ave Contra Costa County Count Date 8/4/1999 Time 630-830 Peak Hour 700-800 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 28 4 17 1 I 1 I I I <--- v ---> I Split? N LEFT 1.10 --- 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 4 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 180 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 230 THRU Pomona Ave RIGHT 4 --- 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 5 LEFT I <--- A ---> I V I I v N I I I SIG WARRANTS: W + E 26 8 32 Urb=N, Rur-N S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: 2nd Ave aamsaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaamaa�saaaaaaaaaaaaaaars�� ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C -------------------------------------------------------------_----------- NB RIGHT (R) 32 32 1800 0.0178 THRU (T) 8 8 1800 0.0044 LEFT (L) 26 26 1800 0.0144 T + R 40 1800 0.0222 T + L 34 1800 0.0189 T + R + L 66 1800 0.0367 0.0367 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB RIGHT (R) 28 28 1800 0.0156 THRU (T) 4 4 1800 0.0022 LEFT (L) 17 17 1800 0.0094 0.0094 T + R 32 1800 0.0178 T + L 21 1800 0.0117 T + R + L 49 1800 0.0272 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EB RIGHT (R) 4 4 1800 0.0022 THRU (T) 180 180 1800 0.1000 LEFT (L) 110 110 1800 0.0611 0.0611 T + R 184 1800 0.1022 T + L 290 1800 0.1611 T + R + L 294 1800 0.1633 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WB RIGHT (lt) 4 4 1800 0.0022 THRU (T) 230 230 1800 0.1278 LEFT (L) 5 5 1800 0.0028 T + R 234 1800 0.1300 T + L 235 1800 0.1306 T + R + L 239 1800 0.1328 0.1328 amaaaa-aaaaaaa�ramaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasSsaaaa�caa=aaa=seas=aaaaaaaxmaaaaaxaaassaa 1v TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.24 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICR: A mammtaa�ammeasmaaaaia meaataasas:sassmaa�c�aaaaa�assaaaaaaysaaaaa�aaaaaaamraa�aaac�am� * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INTaPOMONA2N.INT,VOL-POMONA2N.AMV,CAPa CCTALOS Software ver. 2.35 by TJKM Transportation Consultants a=aa=aa=a=aaaaa==i=aaa=aaasaa�aaaaaxaa;aamxa=a=anaraaa�saaaaaamtaaaaasa�tamraaaaa= Condition: CCTA Intersection LOS Analysis 1999 08/05/99 aaaaazsaaaaaaa ameaa�aaamaoeasraa�taaaasca�esaaaasmaaaamangaaaaaaaaaisr�aaamesmamaaaa INTERSECTION 17 2nd Ave/Pomona Ave Contra Costa County Count Date 7/21/1999 Time 1530-1730 Peak Dour 1600-1700 ________________________________________________________________________ CCTA METHOD RIGHT THRU LEFT 2-PHASE SIGNAL ----------- 79 20 21 <--- v -_-> split? N LEFT 36 --- 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 9 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 228 ---> 1.1 (NO. OF LANES) 1.1<--- 297 THRU Pomona Ave RIGHT 15 --- 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 --- 10 LEFT <--- " > v v N SSG WARRANTS: W + E 15 4 15 Urb=N, Rur=N S LEFT THRU RIGHT Split? N STREET NAME: 2nd Ave masa aaazta S�aaaaae=aaa=a:assaaaaa=aaa==aaraaa�asaaa==�=m=aa=masaaasm s=aaaaaaa ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME* CAPACITY RATIO V/C - NB RIGHT (R) 15 15 1800 0.0083 _ `__________ THRU (T) 4 4 1800 0.0022 LEFT (L) 15 15 1800 0.0083 0.0083 T + R 19 1800 0.0106 T + L 19 1800 0.0106 T + R + L 34 1800 0.0189 SB RIGHT (R) 79 79 1800 0.0439 '________ THRU (T) 20 20 1800 0.0111 LEFT (L) 21 21 1800 0.0117 T + R 99 1800 0.0550 T + L 41 1800 0.0228 T + R + L 120 1800 0.0667 0.0667 _________________ EB RIGHT (R) 15 15 1800 0.0083 THRU (T) 228 228 1800 0.1267 LEFT (L) 36 36 1800 0.0200 0.0200 T + R 243 1800 0.1350 T + L 264 1800 0.1467 T + R + L 279 1800 0.1550 ------------------- WB RIGHT (R) 9 9 1800 0.0050 THRU (T) 297 297 1800 0.1650 LEFT (L) 10 10 1800 0.0056 T + R 306 1800 0.1700 T + L 307 1800 0.1706 T + R + L 316 1800 0.1756 0.1756 seas=aaaaaaatx asR asses=aaaraas=a=aza�aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa=aaasas�aa�aasa�a=aaaaaxasaaaaa TOTAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 0.27 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE: A * ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURN ON RED INT=POMONA2N.INT',VOL-POMONA2N.PMV,CAPa