HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11021999 - SD11 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
OSta
FROM: CARLOS BALTODANO, DIRECTORs OUnt
BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT $rY
DATE: October 27, 1999
SUBJECT: Appeal of Abatement action at 711 Pacifica Ave., Bay Paint
APN # 099-110-031
Owner: George & Alberta Boeger
SPECIFIC REQUEST (S) OR RECOMMENDATION (S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS : After hearing the appeal, it is recommended to deny the appeal and
affirm the determinations of the County Abatement Officer and direct the County Abatement
Officer to proceed and perform the work of abatement.
FISCAL IMPACT: $10,000, if the County does the abatement. This amount to be offset
by Performance bonds collected in the amount of$8,789.00 on permits #167484 𨸽.
BACKGROUIM/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS: Two (2) homes were moved onto the
property and remain on blocks in an unfinished condition. A record research of the parcel
revealed permit #167484 and #167485 were issued on November 6, 1990 to move these
houses and place them on foundations. Permit#194141 and #194142 were issued on June
22, 1994 to reinstate the previous expired permits. These reissued permits expired on
November 2, 1995. On March 23, 1999 a site inspection was conducted and the inspection
revealed the following violations of the county ordinance:
Title 7. Cha tep r 712-2.002 (substandard building)
Title 7. Chapter 712-2.004_(Housing Code)
The owner of the property has been notified of the violation(s)through written correspondence
and certified mail. As of this date, compliance has not been gained.
On April 22, 1999, the Building Inspection Department declared the property a public nuisance
and posted a Notice Order to Abate under Title 1, Chapter 14-6. This appeal is being made
under the provisions of this title. The public hearing on this matter was opened on July 13,
1999, at that time, the hearing was continued to September 14, 1999 at 11:00 am in the
Board's Chambers. The public hearing on this matter was opened again on September 14,
1999 at 11:00 am in the Board's Chambers, at that time, the hearing was continued to
November 2, 1999 at 10:00 am in the Board's Chambers.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: ! YES SIGNATURE
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): _
ACTION OF BOARD ON !=r 2.1999 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _OTHER XX
The public hearing was OPENED; no one commenting on the matter, the Board took the following action:
CONTINUED to February 8, 2000, at 11:00 a.m., the hearing on the appeal.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS{ABSENT kTTT 1 AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED.ON THE MINUTES OF THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED 3MMMber 2 19'99
cc: Building Inspection Department
PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AND COUNTY ADMI ST TOR
&IMB DEPUTY
a
BUDDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
IN THE MATTER OF: )
George & Albertan, Boeger )
711 Pacifica Ave. }
Bair Point, CA 94565 }
}
)
}
Re: APPEAL DECISION )
)
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am now, and at all
times herein mentioned have been, a citizen of the United
States, over age 18; and that today I deposited with the
United States Postal Service In Martinez, California, postage
fully prepaid, a copy of the Board of Supervisors ' decision
Board Order on November 2, 1999 in the above matter to the
following:
George J. & Alberta L. Boeger
711 Pacifica Ave .
Bay Point, CA 94565
Karl W. Boeger
711 Pacifica. Ave.
Bay Point, CA 94565
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct .
Dated: November 15, 1999 at Martinez, California
' l l
C17 CLER
... SD
/1
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
OSta
FROM: CARLOS BALTODANO, DIRECTOR Cunt
BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
DATE: October 27, 1999
SUBJECT: Appeal of Abatement action at 711 Pacifica Ave., Bay Point
APN # 099-110-031
Owner: George &Alberta Boeger
SPECIFIC REQUEST (S) OR RECOMMENDATION (S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMEMATIONS: After hearing the appeal, it is recommended to deny the appeal and
affirm the determinations of the County Abatement Officer and direct the County Abatement
Officer to proceed and perform the work of abatement.
FISCAL IMPACT: $10,000, if the County does the abatement. This amount to be offset
by Performance bonds collected in the amount of$8,789.00 on permits#167484 𨸽.
BACRCROLT1 /REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS: Two (2) homes were moved onto the
property and remain on blocks in an unfinished condition.. A record research of the parcel
revealed permit #167484 and #167485 were issued on November 6, 1990 to move these
houses and place them on foundations. Permit#194141 and #194142 were issued on June
22, 1994 to reinstate the previous expired permits. These reissued'', permits expired on
November 2, 1995. On March 23, 1999 a site inspection was conducted and the inspection
revealed the following violations of the county ordinance:
Title 7, Chapter 712-2.002 (substandard building)
Title 7, Chapter 712-2.004 (Housing Code)
The owner of the property has been notified of the violation(s)through written correspondence
and certified mail. As of this date, compliance has not been gained.
On April 22, 1999, the Building Inspection Department declared the property a public nuisance
and posted a Notice Order to Abate under Title 1, Chapter 14-6. This appeal is being made
under the provisions of this title. The public hearing on this matter was opened on July 13,
1999, at that time, the hearing was continued to September 14, 1999 at 11:00 am in the
Board's Chambers. The public hearing on this matter was opened again on September 14,
1999 at 11:00 am in the Board's Chambers, at that time, the hearing was continued to
November 2, 1999 at 10:00 am in the Board's Chambers.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: f YES SIGNATURE 5994.4 �
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE —OTHER
SIGNATURES
ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _OTHER JM
The public hearing was OPENED;no one commenting on the matter,the Board took the following action:
CONTRsrUED to February 8,2000, at 11:00 am.,the hearing on the appeal.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
$UNANIMOUS(ABSENT #TTT l AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:— BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE HATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED_ _
cc: Building inspection Department _
PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AND COUNTY ADMI T TOR
B DEPUTY