HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10261999 - D1 D.1
THE BOAR OF SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Date: October 26, 1999 Matter of Record
Subject: Public Comment
On this date, the Board of Supervisors heard comments from the following
speakers:
Joanne Best, Independent Living Resource, 3200 Clayton Road, Concord on the
proposed site for the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority, and
Paul DeMange, Independent Living Resource, Contra Costa County IHSS Task
Force, regarding concerns about the County's IHSS program, the IHSS Public
Authority and the current collective bargaining process; and
Kagey Dorosz, Elder Abuse Prevention, regarding full implementation of the IHSS
Public Authority.
THIS IS A MATTER FOR RECORD PURPOSES ONLY
NO BOARD ACTION WAS TAKEN
OCT 2 e
Board of Supervisors Meeting 5 z October 26, 1999
Proposed Location for Public Authority
2020 North Broadway, Second door, Suite #???
Walnut Creek, CA
Paul DeMange, Program Director, of Independent Living Resource
and myself conducted a site assessment of the proposedsite for the
IHSS Public Authority and prepared these comments for the board.
LEASE
ILR has been told that a "short term lease", has been signed, but we
have been unable to find anyone at the County who can provide us
with the start and end dates of the lease.
BUS STOPS
One bus stop is located across Ygnacio Valley Road the second bus
stop is located on Civic Drive near Ygnacio Valley Road. Both of
these bus stops are a considerable distance from the rented space.
Separating the Public Authority site from these bus stops are
sidewalks with severe grades.
PARKING LOT
There are 36 parking stalls with one van accessible perking stall.
ADA minimum requires one van accessible parking stall and one non
van accessible second space for 26 to 50 parking stalls. For the
IHSS Public Authority, serving people with disabilities and frail
elderly, it would be preferable to exceed these minimum
requirements.
Travel from the accessible parking space to the front door requires
navigating a steep graded driveway, as part of the side walk route.
1
FRONT DOOR
The front door is not equipped with automatic door opener. Door
width is 36 inches. Opening the front door would be difficult if not
impossible for a wheelchair user.
The front door has an opening of only 30 inches, limited by a bar,
which must be used to open the door from inside the building and
protrudes into the entrance access space. The unobstructed entry
width must be 32 inches.
ELEVATOR
The elevator is located at the front of building. The elevator door
width measures 37 inches and meets requirements. The inside
elevator measurements are 47 inches deep and 72 inches wide.
ADA requirements are 54 inches deep and 80 inches wide.
The control panel buttons span from 54 to 60 inches from the floor.
ADA requirement for the control panel buttons is 35 to 48 inches
from the floor. This is a dramatic difference from the required
standard.
The proposed Public Authority office space is on the second floor.
The accessible restrooms are located at rear of building on the first
floor.
RESTROOMS
The restrooms are not within a reasonable distance from the office
space. ADA requires that if restrooms are not within reasonable
distance there must be a minimum of one (1) unisex restroom per
floor.
The men's restroom is accessible except for the towel receptacle,
which is 57 inches from the floor. ADA requirements state that these
receptacles cannot be more than 40 inches from the floor. There are
missing tiles on the floor and the general state of the restroom
presents safety and sanitation concerns.
The women's restroom entry is through an alcove that is not
accessible. The alcove is rectangular and measures 43 inches by 97
2
inches. The area is too narrow to both navigate the turn, and open
the door. With only 43 inches and the door at an angle from the
hallway it makes opening the door from a wheelchair extremely
difficult.
The towel holder in the women's restroom is at the same height as
the men's, 57 inches from floor needs to be only 40 inches from the
floor.
There is no Braille signage for bathrooms, elevators or front doors.
The soft drink machine is located on the first floor and has 3 steps
down to its location.
There is a ramp leading to the building from the outside to a separate
door that cannot be opened from the outside and which could not be
located from within the building. It appears that it may be part of
another tenant's space.
We understand that the Public Authority office will be located on the
second floor of this building. We have no knowledge if the space
itself is accessible as we did not have access to the offices.
The entire building is extremely dirty including the restrooms and
corridors. This could cause problems with persons with
environmental sensitivities.
Has it already been decided that wheelchair users and persons with
mobility impairments will NOT be hired to work at the Public Authority,
since the location is inaccessible for them?
Has it already been decided that members of the Public Authority
Council who are wheelchair users or mobility impaired CANNOT
come to the office since the location is inaccessible for them?
Has it already been decided that consumers who are wheelchair
users or mobility impaired are NOT WELCOME to meet with staff of
the Public Authority or are NOT WELCOME AT ALL, since the
location is inaccessible for them?
3
f r
Independent
Living
FRIECEIVED
LR Resource ,
C" s IM
October 22, 1999
C?#�BOARDS aF V11E tSORS
rho',TRA COSTA CO.
,. . CQ,N
The Honorable Supervisor Jahn Gioia
10037 th St. Room 270
Richmond CA 94805
Fax (510) 374-3429
Supervisor Gioia:
We would like to make you aware of urgent and immediate concerns
we have regarding the Contra Costa County In Home Supportive
Services program, the IHSS Public Authority and the current
collective bargaining process. These concerns are prompted by the
continuing delay in seating the Consumer Advisory Board, the lack of
consumer representation at collective bargaining as indicated by
statute and recent negative experiences of the Independent Living
Resource In Home Supportive Services Registry in its efforts to
recruit providers.
The Department of Employment and Human Services Director
planned to delay appointment of the IHSS consumer advisory body
until after the Public Authority Executive Director was hired. The
Board of Supervisors, in July, recognized the urgency of those
appointments since collective bargaining with;county representatives
and SEIU negotiators had begun in April with only one county
appointed consumer in attendance, and directed that the recruitment
process begin at once. The application period closed on September
17, 1999.
Five weeks later and six months after the start of collective bargaining
no apparent action with the collected applications has been taken.
One consumer does not constitute an Advisory Beard and the
consumers as a class are not part of the decision making processes
as intended by the original legislation institutionalizing consumer input
as a mechanism for IHSS program enhancement.
3200 Clayton Read - Concord, CA 94519 •Voice/TDD (925) 363-7293 • Fax (925) 363-7296
1545 Webster Street "C" • Fairfield, CA 94533 • Voice/TDD(707)435-8174 • Fax (707) 435-8177
This week a significant number of applicants to the ILR IHSS registry
reported to staff during their interviews that:
They refuse to do any lifting or transferring of IHSS consumers
because if they dropped them they would be sued;
they refuse to do any driving for IHSS consumers;
they refuse to assist consumers with taking medication;
and that they are refusing to provide any of these services because
they could be sued and specifically because their union, S'EIU, told
them not to provide these services.
In Contra Costa County, the IHSS program operates under the
independent provider model in which the consumer, as employer,
hires and directs workers. Establishment of a Public Authority or an
employer of record legally does not change this relationship.
We are aware that a tentative wage increase to $7.02/hr has been
negotiated on behalf of workers, an effort that we have consistently
supported. This is no benefit to a consumer who is forced to enter a
skilled nursing facility because they are denied the services they
need to live safely and independently at home. For this occur in a
purportedly consumer directed program is a stunning injustice.
In faimess to SEIU, lana Simon has been open about reporting the
status of negotiations and has offered to assist in clearing up any
extant misinformation. He has also reported that consumerlworker
issues have been deferred in the current tentative agreement while
waiting for the appointment of the Consumer Advisory Board.
The Public Authority apparently will hire its first executive director
without soliciting any input from the body of IHSS consumers as a
class. Collective bargaining continues similarly without consumers.
Who is this program supposed to serve? We must remember that
from the consumer standpoint, the first reason to create an IHSS
2
M
Public Authority was to establish, for the first time, the requirement
that consumers have a voice in directing a program that is so vital to
their safety and continued independence.
Several requests to agendize these issues at a Board meeting have
not been met. I hope that the Board of Supervisors, in your role as
the Public Authority for IHSS, would now consider this matter to be
an urgent one.
Sincerely,
Kagey Dorosz, Executive Director
Elder Abuse Prevention
CCC IHSS Task Force Co-Chair
Paul DeMange,`TLR Program Director
The IHSS Registry
CCC IHSS Task Force Co-Chair
LTC/IPP Service Delivery Design Team, CoChair
%i
Joanne Best, ILR Executive Director
LTC/IPP Scope of Services Design Team, Co-Chair
cc: Supervisors, all districts
Dana Simon, SEIU
3