Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 10191999 - D4
__ _.. _.. _.... ......._. ......... ......... ......... ........_...._..... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ....... 8 Contra TO: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY t �� Costa FROM: Phil Batchelor County Executive Director DATE: October 19, 1999 SUBJECT: Joint Public Dearing by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency on the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan Amendment - Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS HOLD public hearing on the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan amendment. ADOPT Resolution approving and adopting the Negative Declaration,snaking the findings as required by the California Environmental Quality Act C CEQA"), and certifies its review of the Negative .Declaration in consideration of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment. ADOPT Ordinance for adopting and approving the Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area and making certain findings pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California. FIND the Redevelopment Plan Amendment will not affect Tax Increment for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area. FISCAL IMPACT No General Fund money will be used on this project. All associated legal and staff costs will be provided by the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area as part of the administrative budget in the adopted Fiscal Year 1998-99 budget.The proposed amendment does not add territory,increase fiscal, caps, or-extend the life of the Redevelopment Plan, CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTORCO- M ENDATION AGENCY COMMITTEE �APPROVE �OTHER � 1 SIGNATURE(S). ACTION OF AGENCY ON or b e r 19, 19 9 9 .APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED xx OTHER SEE THE ATTACHED LIST OF SPEAKERS VOTE OF COMMISSIONERS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENT , g 3 -- ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN APES: NOES: ACTION TARN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT, ABSTAINa MINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Raba.l Shah 335-1255 ATTESTED— QctQbpr 1 9 €rig: Redevelopment Agency PHIL BATCHELOR, cc: Community Development AGENCY SECRETARY CAG County Counsel Auditor-Controller , B �,DEPUTY BACKO`ROLNI D/R.BASON,S FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The Bay Point Redevelopment Plan seeks to facilitate economic development, stimulate and attract private investment,create employment opportunities for area residents,improve public facilities and infrastructure, and to expand and improve the supply of affordable housing in the Project Area. .Eminent domain may be necessary to attain the Project Area goals and facilitate improvements.The Bay Paint Project Area Committee (PAC) and Bay Point community shall always be consulted in the development of projects and prior to the initiation of any eminent domain action. The provision for eminent domain will expire in December 1999 without amendment to the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan. To effectively continue to redevelop the Bay Point community, an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan is necessary and appropriate to extend the deadline to commence eminent domain proceedings by twelve years. The amendment will not add territory to the Project Area, nor grant new authority to Agency. Agency staff met with the Bay Point PAC on July 28, 1999,and they unanimously voted to support the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment. A copy of the Bay Point PAC support letter is attached to the Report on the Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area. Subsequent to Board approval, a notice of the joint Board and Agency public hearing will be published once a week for four successive weeks in the Contra Costa County Times and Ledger Dispatch. A notification will also be sent by first class I.T.S. Mail to each property owner,business, community institution and resident, within the Project Area boundaries and by certified mail to taxing agencies,Agency staff will hold a public workshop in the Bay Point community on October 13, 1999, to discuss the proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for Bay Point. Notification of the community workshop will be sent along with the notice of the joint public hearing to all property owners,businesses, community institutions and residents,within the Project Area boundaries. The Affidavit o Publication and Declaration of wiling to Clerk of the Board will be made part of the record at the October 19, 1999,joint public hearing. The Negative Declaration for the proposed Third Plan Amendment was distributed by first class U.S. Mail to members of the Board of Supervisors, Redevelopment Agency, Contra Costa County Planning Commission,Bay Point Project Area Committee, and other interested parties.Notification that a Negative Declaration was prepared for the Third Plan Amendment will be included in the Notice of the joint Board and Agency public hearing publication. Agency staff presented the 'Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area to the Contra.Costa County Planning Commission on September 13, 1999. The County Planning Commission shall transmit a copy of their report and recommendation on the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendments to the Agency and the Beard for consideration as part of the Agency's Report to the Board, :\DATAIRABAIL\BAYPOiNTieminent domainlagorcy ointnear.BOS.doe ......... ............ ......... . ........ .... .. _... ......... ....._......._.__.... ........... .._.._._................. ......................_...... ..........__............ ..................... ADDENDUM ITEM October 19, 1999 Agenda On this day, the Board of Commissioners heard the recommendations presented by Janes Kennedy, Redevelopment Agency Deputy Director, on the Joint Public Hearing by the Board of Supervisors and Redevelopment Agency on the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan Amendment— Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area. The public hearing was opened, and the following people offered comments: Debra Mason, PAC (Project Area Commission) 36 Sandview Drive, Bay Point; Sonya Kreiden, 23 Wharf Drive, Bay Point; Bonnie Smith, 428 Levee Road, Bay Point, Richard Benevides, Bay Point; Chere Benevides, Bay Paint; Paye Linton, 73 Wharf give, Bay Point; Sylvia Sears, Bay Point Organizing Cte., 66 Anchor Drive, Bay Point Gloria McLaughlin, 96 Alves Lane, Bay Point; Linda Endicott, 98 Pacifica Avenue, Bay Point; Eric Rouse, 71 Ambrose Avenue, Bay Point; Leonard Tyler, 6 Inlet Drive, Bay Point; Anita Moore, 99 Beach give, Bay Point; °Porn Stewart, 3355 Benton Street, Concord; Carol Dees, 2892 Clearland Circle, Bay Point. The hearing was closed and the Board discussed the matter. (See the Board Order for the Board's action.) ......... ......... ......... ....._._......__. . ..........._........... ......... .............__.._................._...........__...........__.............._. ......... THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on October 19, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: SEPERVISORS GIOIA, UI KEM-A, Ue sAULNIER and GANCIAMIELA NOES: NONE ABSENT: SUPERVISOR GERBER ABSTAIN: NONE Resolution No.: 3Ag-10 SUBJECT: A Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Making Findings and Approvals Required by the California Environmental Quality Act in Connection with the Negative Declaration Prepared :for the Adoption of the Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Red velopment Project Area. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: The County of Contra Costa(the "Board"), serving as "lead agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act and the applicable state and local implementing guidelines ("CEQA"), has prepared a negative declaration(the "Negative Declaration.")that has evaluated the proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Placa for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the "Plan Amendments;); The Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the "Agency") has served as a "responsible agency" under CEQA in connection with processing and consideration of the Negative Declaration. The Negative Declaration,a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board and Agency Secretary,has served as the CEQA documentation for consideration and approval of the Plan Amendment; The Board has reviewed the Negative Declaration and the proposed Plan Amendment; By staff report accompanying this Resolution and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference (the "Staff Report"),the Board has been provided with additional information upon which the findings and actions set fortis in this Resolution are based, including any public comment received on the Negative Declaration. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board certifies its review and consideration of the"Negative Declaration, and any public comments receivedthereon, in accordance with CEQA, and states its intention that the Negative Declaration serve as the environmental documentation for the Board's consideration of the Plan Amendment in compliance with CEQA. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED Haat the Board hereby finds and determines, based on the whole record before it(including the Negative Declaration, the initial study and any comments received) that there is no substantial evidence that the Plan Amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and that the Negative Declaration reflects the County's independent judgement and analysis. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board approves and adopts the Negative Declaration. 32M07t123895.a 1 Resolution 9-10 EE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Board shall be the custodian of the record upon which the Board's findings and approvals herein are used; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the.Agency Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with 14 Cal. Code of Regulations, Section 15075, evidencing the Boars use of the Legative Declaration in connection with its consideration of the Llan Amendment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall tale immediate effect upon its adoption. €htreby ce'lify 4 at true ar-d correct ropy of &.1 actor €a ��. terg the rdi°utas Of tea Board of spa isys or,the data shown, ATTESTED. October I of Supervisors and Courity Adrliriflstrator By !'Deutj 320\07\1233951 2 Je Resolution 99®10 . a ... .... ..... THEDEVELOP I'�,"T AGENCY OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTS', CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on October 19, 1999, by the following vote. AYES. COMMISSIONERS GIOIA, UILKEMA, DeSAULNIER and CANCIAMILLA NOES: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONER GERBER ABSTAIN. NONE Resolution No.; i 99-12 SUBJECT: Resolution of the Contra Cosh County Redevelopment Agency(i)Making Findings and Approvals required by the California Environmental Quality Act in Connection with the Negative Declaration Prepared for the Adoption of the Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Pian for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area.; and (ii)Making Finings Regarding the Effect of the Proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment on Tax:Revenues to the Redevelopment Agency The Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency RESOLVES THAT. The County of Contra Costa(the "County"), serving as "lead agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act and the applicable state and local implementing guidelines ("CEQA"), has prepared a negative declaration(the "Negative Declaration") that has evaluated the Third Arrrendmerit to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Paint Redevelopment Project Area (the "Plan Amendment"); The Redevelopment Agency of the County of Contra Costa(the "Agency ")has served as a "responsible agency" under CEQA in connection with the processing and;consideration of the Negative Declaration; The Negative Declaration, a copy of which is on file with the Clerk.of the Board and Agency Secretary,has served as the CEQA documentation for consideration and approval of the Plan Amendment, and for the Agency's subsequent actions to implement the Plan Amendment; The Agency has reviewed the Negative Declaration and the Proposed Plan Amendment; The sole purpose of the Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve(12) years; the Plan Amendment does not effect the boundaries or land uses of the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area, or otherwise reduce the tax revenues available to the Agency to repay Agency loans or pay debt service on tax allocation bonds supported by tax revenue to the Agency. By staff report accompanying this Resolution and incorporated into this Resolution by this reference (the "Staff Report"), the Agency has been provided with additional information upon which the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution are`used; NOW THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency certifies its review and consideration of the Negative Declaration, and any public comments received thereon, in accordance with CEQA. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Agency hereby finds and determines that the Negative Declaration adequately addresses the environmental issues pertaining to the Plan Amendment and property concludes Haat the Plan Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment. 3201071123897.1 Resolution RA 99-12 EE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Agency approves and adopts the Negative Declaration, BE IT FURTHER.RESOLVED that the Agency Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with 14 Cal. Code of Regulations, Section 15075, evidencing the Agency's use of the Negative Declaration in connection with the Ilan Amendment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Agency finds that the flan Amendment will not reduce the amount of tax revenues otherwise available to the Agency to repay its loans or pay debt service on tax allocation bonds supported by Agency tax revenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall take immediate effect upon its adoption. _ €h#MbY COMM th9t thIS 16 a Jr.*and e0rr f Copy of MUWof ATM _ 1 f 320N07\123897.1 2 Resolution Rte 99-12 RECORDED AT REQUEST OF: THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Goldfarb &Lipman One Montgomery Street Telesis Tower,23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94144 Attention: Phuong Y. Lam NO RECORDING FEE PURSUANT TO GOVERNNEINT CODE SECTION 27353 ORDINANCE NO.&E=3 r AN ORDINANCE OF TBE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA.APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE THMD AM[ENDM[ENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TBE BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA,AND MAKWG CERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CONWJNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DOES ORDAIN AS .� FOLLOWS: SFCT'Iox, i. Si ARV. This Ordinance amends the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent dorrgain proceedings by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency for an additional twelve(12)yew. SECTIONIC. B By Board of Supervisors Ordinance No. 87-102, adopted on December 29,-1987,the Board of Supervisors ofthe County of Conte Costa(the "Board")adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the "Pmject Asea)and by Board of Supervisors Ordinance No. 94-64,adopted on December 6, 1994,and Ordinance Nes. 99-45,adopted on February 23, 1999,the Bow adopted amendments to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(as amended,the "Redevelopment Plan!); and Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (the -Redevelopment Law"),the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the"Agency")has recommended an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan that would extend the Agency's deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by twelve years; and ORDINANT NO, 29 x 5 4 32MIA123901.1 1 The.agency has prepared and submitted to the Board for review and adoption s proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area (the"Plan Amendment"), a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board of the County of Contra Costa; and The Agency has made studies of'the impact of the proposed Plan Amendment and has determined that the proposed amendment will promote the proper redevelopment of the Project Area in accordance with the goals,objectives, and policies of the County of Contra Costa's General Plan,the Redevelopment Pian,and the Redevelopment Law; and The,Agency has prepared and submitted, and the Board has reviewed and considered,a written report on the proposed amendment(the"Report on the Plan Amendment")pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33457.1,a copy of which is on file with.the Clerk sof the Board; and The purpose of the Plan.Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve years. This amendment will not change the uses permitted within the Project Area; and The Planning Commission,which is the duly designated and acting official planning body of the County of Contra Costa.,has submitted to the Board its report and recommendation dated September 13, 1999,recommending approval and adoption of the Plan Amendment and approval and adoption of the Negative Declaration prepared for the Pian Amendment,and has certified that the Plan Amendment conforms to the General Plan; and Pursuant to the Planning Commission recommendation and Section 15474 of the Guidelines to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1974,as amended("CP:QA Guideline0),the Negative Declaration completed by County staff and dat6d June 9, 1999,may serve as environmental documentation for the flan Amendment;and By resolution adopted prior to the adoption of this Ordinance,the Board and the Agency have adopted and approved the Negative Declaration in compliance with Section 15 774 of the CEQA Guidelines; and On October 19, 1999,the Board and the Agency conducted a joint public hearing which was duly noticed in accordance with the requirements of the Redevelopment Law. CIM M. EMEMS. In accordance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 33367 and 33457.1,and based upon the evidence contained in the Report on the Plan endment and on the evidence presented at the joint public hearing,the Bbard ids and determines with respect to the Plan Amendment that; a IA1239 1.1 2 9 a) The project Area is a blighted area,the redevelopment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes of the Redevelopment Law(see particularly part 11 of the Report on the Plan Amendment regarding evidence for this finding). b) The plan amendment would redevelop the Project Area in conformity with the Redevelopment Law and would be in the interest of the public peace„health,safety, and welfare; and the implementation of the Ilan Amendment would promote the public peace, health,safety and welfare of the County of{contra Costa,and would effectuate the purposes and policy of the Redevelopment Law(see particularly the Introduction and farts 1,II,and I.II of the Report on the plan Amendment regarding evidence with respect to this fording). c) The adaption and implementation of the Plan Amendment are economically sound and feasible(see particularly Part IV of the Report on the PIS Amendment regarding evidence with respect to this finding). ) The Ilan Amendment is consistent with.the General Ilan of the County, including but not limited to the Housing Element of the General plan(see particularly Barts I,VI and.VVI of the Report on the plan Amendment regarding evidence with respect to this finding). e) The condemnation of real property,if any, is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment plan:and:adequate provisions Dere been made for payment for property to be acquired as provided by law(see particularly farts I and IV of the Report on the plan Amendment regarding g evidence with respect to this finding). f) The Agency has a feasible method or plan for the relocation of families and persons which may be displaced from the project.Area if the Plank Amendment may result in the temporary or permanent displacement of any occupants of housing facilities in the Project Area(see particularly Parts V and M of the Report oar the Plan Amendment regarding evidence with respect to this finding). g) There are,or shall be provided,in the Project Area or in ether areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons who may be displaced from the Project Area,deet,safe and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of,and available to,such.displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment(see particularly parts V and M of the Report on the flan regarding evidence with respect to this finding). Families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation plan:pursuant to Sections 33411 and 33411.1 of the Redevelopment Law. Dwelling units housing persons and families of lour or moderate income shall not be removed or destroyed prior to the adoption of a replacement housing plan pursuant to Sections 33334.5, 33413, and 33413.5 of the Redevelopment Law. h) 'The Board is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will he available wig three years from the time occupants of the Project Area,if any,are displaced and that, pending the development of such facilities,there will be available to such displaced occupants AT 99 54 as n$2s901A 3 housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the community at the time of their displacement (see particularly part V and of the Report on the Plan regarding evidence with respect to this finding). i) The maters set forth in health and Safety Code Section 33357(d)(9), (d)(14),(d)(11),d(12)and (d)(13) are not applicable to or affected by the.plan Amendment,and consequently no f n Cher findings with respect to such matters are required(sec particularly the Introduction and Parts Iand 11 of the Report on the plan.Amendment regarding evidence with respect to this g)° S ECTM . CC}N"1" JI" °. It is the continuing purpose and intent of the Board that the Redevelopment plan Amendment be implemented in order to continue to: a) Eliminate the conditions of blight; b) Ensure, as far as possible,that the causes of the blighting conditions will be either eliminated or protected against, c) Encourage and ensure the redevelopment of the project Area; d) Encourage and foster the economic revitalization of the Project Area,as necessary,and e) Provide and improve affordable housing. °ICI X41. QYEE -LTIJNQ O OBOECLO . All written and oral objections to the amendment incorporated in the plan by this Ordinance are hereby overrule.. SEC; ON M. o2noN QE PLAN �� �°t'. It is hereby found and determined that the plan Amendment is necessary and desirable. The Redevelopment plan, all amendments and restatements of the Redevelopment flan,and all ordinances,adopting or previously amending the Redevelopment Plan are hereby amended in accordance with the Plan Amendment. The Flan Amendment is hereby adapted and approved and the Redevelopment flan, as amended by the flan Amendment is designated as the official redevelopment plan for the Project Area. The plan amendment,consisting of one page and one exhibit,is incorporated in this Ordinance by reference and made a part of the Ordinance as if set out in dill in the Ordinance. 17he Clerk of the Board of the Counter is hereby directed to file a copy of the plass Amendment with the minutes of this meeting. The Agency is vested with the continuing responsibility to implement the Redevelopment plan,as amended by the Plans Amendment. SECUDN VIL RECORDATIC} The Executive Director of the agency is hereby directed to record the Plass Amendment in compliance with the provisions of health and Safety Code Section 33456 and Government Code Section 27295. ORDMANCE 03. 94-54 LTi 8�3f#%3 f. 4 __ SES yM. jMRAH.IT'Y. If any provision, section, subsection,subdivision, sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordnance or the Fiat Amendment is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional,such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or portions of the Ordinance or the plan Amendment. CMM IXo EffEC=DAM. This Ordinance becomes effective 30 days after page,and within 15 days mer passage shall be published once in the Cm&a CQ9& and newspapers of general circulation printed and published and circulated in the County of Contra Costa. PASSED on October 19, 1999,by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Gioia, Ui.1ke-ma , De_Saulnier and CanciamailAa NO ES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Gerber STAIN: None ATTEST: PIRL BATCHELOR,Clerk of the Board and County Administrator, By: ° Dc suty $01,44. chair ORMLANCE NO,99m54 t 5 140 RECOMMG FEE PURSUANT TO GOVEWNPENT CODE SECTION, .27383 MCORDED AT TIM REQUEST QST OP: V111' 111111 Ill 11111 THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MTRA COSTA Co Recorder Office REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STEPHEN Ls UEA Cterk=Recorder DOC- 0276005-00 RECORDED MAIL TO: W, OCT 20, 3999 10:50:28 FRE $6.ee Tt& Pd Nbr-606 7033'7 r Goldfarb :d Lipman Counsel to the Contra.Costa County Redevelopment Agency One Montgomery Street, Telesis Tower, 23rd Floor. San Francisco, CA 94104 Attn: Phuong Y. Lam STATEME IST �iC3 QE RED ����p� PLAM 1�SM1. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the"Plan Amendment") (attached hereto as Attachment A)has been adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa(the "Board"')pursuant to California Community Redevelopment Law,Health and Safety Code Sections 333000 gl Beg., and.Ordinance No. 99-54 adopted on October 19, 1999(attached hereto as Attachment E). Please note that the Plan Amendment mends the original Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project adopted by Board Ordinance No. 87-102,dated December 29, 1987,as amended by Ordinance No.94-64, adopted on December 6, 1994, and as further amended by Ordinance No 99-05,adopted on February 23, 1999 and does not modify the Project Area boundaries as established in the original flan. The Project Area, which is the subject of the Plan Amendment,is situated in the County of Contra Costa.,State of California,and is more particularly described on xhi it A attached to the Statement of Institution of Redevelopment Proceedings recorded in Book 141€0 at page 31 on December 30, 1987 with:the County Recorder of the Country of Contra Costa.. This Statement is made and filed pursuant to health and Safety Cade.Section 33373 and 33456. Dated: October 20, 1993 Contra Costa County Redeve oprneht Agency I es needy gepu Director- evelopment 32t3k A1231M.1 ......... _........ _......._ ......... .._............... .......... ........ ......... ........ ... STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS COUNTY€ F CONTRA COSTS � O � � befiggre me, personally appeared personally kt6vn.to rage o wd to be the person hose narne(s}is/ sgbscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that Wsh executed the same i his#he ir authorized capacity(ies)—, and that by hisAaed4heir signature}on the instrument the person: or the entity upon behalf of which the person"acted, executed the instrument. SS my hand d official seal. a da Al UNDAHOOVER commisfion#1154215 :z Notary put-Ac-cartfornia Contra Cosec County evYCOMM.bp1res Sep 320\07\123886.1 ATTACHMENT A THRID AMENDMENT THE TO TWE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN;'g;�v FOR SIE .�DY POINT PROJECT AREA Adopted O-ctober 19, 1999 Ordinance No. 99--54 The Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa has adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point(formerly blest Pittsburg)Redevelopment Project Area by Ordinance No. 87-102,dated December 29, 1987, as amended by Ordinance No. 94-64, adapted on December 6, 1994,and as further amended by Ordinance No. 99-05,adopted can February 23, 1999(the "Plan")establishing the Bay port Redevelopment Project Area, as.shown on the attached project area boundary map( aibit fi) and as described in the attached legal description(Eachibit B), (the "Project Area"). The Plan, as amended, contains a time limit of December 29, 1999 for commencement by the Agency of eminent domain proceedings with respect to property within the Project Area. This tante limit may be extended only by amendment of the Plan. This .Amendment has been prepared by Agency staff to extend the Agency's power of eminent domain for an additional twelve(12)years. 11. AMENDMEN7 TO PLAN Part V1 13 1 of the Plan is hereby amended so that the third to the last paragraph in that section reads in its entirety as follows: "The Agency must commence eminent domain proceedings with respect to any property which it intends to acquire by not later that the following. (a)December 29, 2011,with respect to property included in the Project Area by Ordinance No. 87-102, dated December 29, 1987; or(b)twelve years after the date of adaption of a subsequent ordinance adding territory to the Project Area, with respect to any property added to the Project Area by such subsequent ordinance. This time limit for commencement of eminent domain proceedings may be extended only by amendment of the Plan."' lll. EFFECT OF AMENDMENT All provisions of the Plan.not specifically amended or repealed in this Amendment shall continue in full force and effect. 32=7\120178.2 RaNpV#$PRR=:Nt¢�y, 4 a $ �iCsFY>!C`�448 ° .��)►1st � fill I RAN;.; �: 833t6�4 t$";18l �!#+&x#S#�3yRtli yfwtv at _ tv 3Ax * *i. y;asr *1� a'e!'s��F� *fiX`ts"�:T�, t3s`it' •: y.Rapsyr p,���ARpY ctSsifi'�'a'i°+,rs•"'"" '. q' W>#�CujexeMp ,�, i3 ; f s+ss wl7iP5�f 1�C� " ,. J,�ti`4�ig�$ d�'ri'+,t'Ri a4 x~. paM4'pri:Tt33R . sa asr _.... ._...... . .._.._... ......... ......... ......... ......... .............._._.. _. ...... . ........__.. ...._._..... ........ ........ ........... ........ ........ ........ ........ ...._ West Pittsburg Redevelops{Fent Project W.G. 1115509 - Boundary Description EXHIBIT B Real property in the unincorporated area of West Pittsburg, California . Document and map references are to records of Contra Costa County. Beginning at the northwest •corner of Section 13, Township 2 north, Range I West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (shown as the southeast corner of Section 11. on the map of Bella Monte Subdivision No. 1 filed March 22, 1927 in Map book 20 at page 546); thence along the gest line of Section 13, South 010 256 Fest 3€3 feet, to the south line of Willow Pass Read; theme along said south line, East 1,466 feet , to the northeast corner of Lot 2 , Pittsburg Home Acres Addition recorded March 22; 1938 in Map Bonk 22 at page 652; thence along the east line of Lot 2, South 000 40` East 12 feet, to the north line of Triond parcel recorded February 1, 1985 in Volume 12168 at page 412; thence along the north lane of Triond parcel and its easterly prolongation, East 267 felt, to the northwest corner of Lest 16, Subdivision 4137, Willows Landing, recorded February 25, 1372 in Map Book 144 at page 14; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 4137, South 000 096 26" West 477.46 feet, South 890 066 38" East 384 feet, and South 000 ', 89' 20" Wiest 781.89 feet, to the north line of Hanlon lay; thence along said north line, North 890 €166 38" West 651 feet, to the northerly prolongation of the west line of Lot 252 (144 14 14); thence along said prolongation and west line, South 000 106 03" West 127.98 feet, to an angle point; thence South 000 096 i 24" West 599.63 feet to an angle point on the gest l ine of Lot 2SI (144 ,•1 14); thence along said 'west line and its southerly prolongation, South £180 09' 30" West 825 feet, more or less , to the south line of State Freeway Route 4; thence along said south line in a general westerly direction 1,490 feet, more or less, to the east line of Section 14 (T26 RIW); thence along said east line, South 000 30' East 780 feet, more or less , to the northeast corner of Lot 57, Subdivision 5346, Hillsdale Unit 111 , filed September 22, 1978 in Map Book 21.7 at page 0, being a point on the south .line of Contra Costa Canal ; thence along said south line, South 890 42' West 92 feet, South 480 39' West 138.5 feet, South 660 35' West 435.2 feet, North 48034' blest 410.4 feet, South 890 42' Vilest 28.8 feet, and North 480 34' Test 535.7 feet, to the most northerly corner of Subdivision 4731, Hillsdale, filed April " 1.9, 1976 in trap Book 1.83 at page 28; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 4731., South 1.20 47' 131" test 689.44 feet and North 890 25' 37" Vest 438.39 feet, to the northeast corner of Frank D. and Carolyn A. Briggs PARCEL TWO recorded July 7, 1977 in Volume 8487 at page 531; thence along the boundary thereof, North 890 25' 37" West 2743.65 feet and South 000 33' 32" East 90.70 feet, to the northeast corner of Pittsburg Terrace Unit No 1 filed November 5, 19343 in Map Book 21 at page 604; thence along the north line thereof, South 890 46' West 245 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 6 (21 14 6434); thence South 4380 45' East 98.28 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 4 (21 M 604)a thence along the Wundary of Lot 4, South 880 45' East 25 feet, Southwesterly 39.27 feet along the arc of a 25 feet radius curve concave to the northwest, and South 890 15' lest 75 feet , to the southeast corner of 2 Lot 3 (21 14 604); thence along the south line of Lot 3 and its westerly prolongation, South 890 151 West 125 feet, to the centerline of Sailey €toad (shown- as Dante Road in 21 M 604) being the east line of the west half of Section 14 (T21i, RIW); thence along said east line, North 000 45' hest 1,475 feet, more or less, to the north line of State Freeway Route 4 thence along said north line in a: general westerly direction 7,250 feet, more or less , to ` 4 the southeast corner of PARCEL C of Minor Subdivision 192-68 Bled April 22, 1969 in Parcel Map Book 8 at page 12, thence along the east line of PARCEL C, North 120 45' West 77.61 feet, to the easterly prolongation of the south live of Sauce W. and Donna G. Farley parcel recorded August S. 1974 in Volume 7290 at page 737; thence along said prof ongati ern and south line, North 770 13' 05" West 418°81 feet, to the southwest corner; thence along the west line of said Farley parcel and its northerly prolongation, forth 000 17' 20" West 1:20 feet, more or less , to the north line of Camino Andres (8 Pik 12); thence along said north line in a general northeasterly direction 900 feet, more or less , to the northeast line of Contra Costa: Canal thence along said northeast line in a general northwesterly direction 1,130 feet, more or less, to the most southerly corner of Subdivision 4663 filed October 20, 1977 in trap Book 203 at page 31; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 4663, North 630 37' 26" East 484420 feet and North 580 33' 4£11 West 104.35 feet, to the south line of Riverside Drive (203 VI 31); thence along said south line, North 660 06' 32" East 2.89 feet, Northeasterly 57.39 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the northwest with a radius of 778 feet and a central angle of 040 13' 35" , (northeasterly 21.94 feet along the 3 .... .......11.11. ...... ........ .......... ............................. ......... ........... arc of a reverse curve concave to the southeast with a radius of 722 feet and a central angle of 010 44' 29" , and Horth 630 37' 26" East 35.25 feet, to the northeast line of East Bay Municipal Utility District parcel recorded August 313, 1926 in Volume 57 at page 69; thence along said northeast line, South 580 33' 55" East 1,46 9.1 feet, to the north line -of Cas;aino Andres; thence along said north line, North 890 548 268/ East 49.36 feet, to its inters& tion with the west line of Fort Chicago Highway as shown ,on the map of Subdivision 38$5 recorded- October 23, 1969 in Map Book 128 at page 299 thence crossing Port Chicago Highway, Easterly 2713 feet, more or less , to a point on the north line of Willow Pass Road shown as the easterly terminus of a 158 feet radius curve on the snap of Minor Subdivision 11-84 filed December 26, 1984 in 'Parcel Map Book 113 at page 42; thence along the north line of Willow Pass Road, South 890 07' 28" East 669.98 feet and South 000. 528 32" West 4.87 feet, to the north line of "billow Pass Road 14idening" parcel shown on the map of Subdivision 5696 filed March 20, 1984 in Map Book 277 at page 18; thence along said north line, South 890 05' 1411 East 7917.69 feet, to the north line of ."Wil lost Pass Road Widening" parcel shorn on the map of Subdivision 5534 filed march 20, 1984 in Map Book 277 at page 11; thence along said north line, South 890 875' 1481 East 67.11. feet, South 890 121 46" East 924.80 feet, and South 890 07' 21" East 81.16 feet, 'to the east line of Subdivision 5534; thence along said east line and its northerly prolongation, Norte 0910 10' 36" East 2,538.13 feet, to the northeast corner of Subdivision 5354 filed March 14, 1979 in trap Book 223 at page 3, thence along the north line of Subdivision 5354, North 880 50' 18" hest 2,633.04 4 _... _. feet, to the north corner of Lot 12 (223 14 3); thence along the west line of Leat 12, South 000 55'' 16" West 160 feet, more or less, to the easterly prolongation of the south line of Earl W. Smith Developers Ltd. .563 acre parcel (Assessor Parcel Number 098-341 -001) recorded January 6, 19 9 in Volume 5784 at page 611; thence crossing Port Chicago Highway ',along said prolongation, North 880 58' 20" West 84 feet, to said south line; thence along said south line,, North 880 58' 2011 West 145 feet, to the southwest corner; thence alors9 the gest l ine of said .563 acre parcel , N :rth boo 55' East 170 feet, to the south line of Pacifica, Avenue; thence along', said south line in a general westerly direction 5,100 feet, more or less, to the gest line of Driftwood Drive; thence along said west line, North 000 201 West 2,71.8.46 feet, to the north line of Section 9 MN, R11v); thence; along said north line', Easterly 1,390 feet , more or less , to the south lire of Sacramento Northers' Railroad right of spay; thence along said south line in a general southeasterly direction 1.,350 feet, more or less , to the east line of Section 9.; thence along said east. line, Norte 000 54' 45" }lest 386.35 feet, to the northeast corner; thence along the gest line of Section 3 (T2N, R1N`) , North 000 01 ' 52" hest 2,610.96 feet, to the northwest corner of PARCEL 1 filed may 22, 1985 in Licensed Surveyors' (Rap Hook 77 at page 2; thence along the north tine of PARCEL 1, South 880 01' 52" East 1.,255.98 feet and North 860 58' 08" East 750.18 feet, to the northwest corner of PARCEL 2 (77 LSM 2); thence along the boundary of PARCEL 2, North 860 586 08" East 650.87 feet , and South -000 06' 30" West* 1.50.30 feet, to the northwest corner of 99 acre American Dredging Company parcel recorded 5 _._. ..... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ._._..... ........ .... .__._.._. ........... ......... ..__....__........_.. ............. .......... ......._. ..._....._..._........ .......... February 24, 1961 in Volume 3811 at page 237; thence along the boundary of said 99 acre parcel North 850 11' 30" East 250.04 feet, South 770 58' 30" East 132 feet, North 560 56' 30" East 122 feet, North 700 al' 30" East 1.39 feet, North 750 161 30" East 201 feet, North 550 31' 30" East 191. feet, North 150 51' 30" East 196 feet, South 160 35' 52" East 534.37 feet, and South €300 30.' 45" gest 3,708.74 feet, to the north line of Centra Costa County hater District parcel recorded February 17, 1961 in Volume 3807 at page 369; thence Southerly 300 feet, more or less , to the northeast corner of Interlake Steel Corp. parcel as shown on Record of Survey filed June 1, 1966 in Licensed Surveyors' Map Book 42 at page 45 (said northeast corner being a point on the. south line of Sacramento northern Railroad might of way recorded in Book 187 of Deeds at page 360); thence along the south line of Sacramento Northern Railroad right of way in a general easterly directio 5 ,928,22 feet, to the northeast corner of Poinsettia Land Company %lest Pittsburg Tract brit No. 1 filed June 8, 1926 in Map Book 19 at page 506; thence along the east line of said Tract, South 000 50' West 531 .64 feet, to the north line of Horace and Theresa Si ino PARCEL T140 recorded October 24 , 1944 in Vol acme 796 at page 488; thence along said north l ine and i is easterly prolongation, South 890 48' East 485.48 feet , to the northwest corner of Bella Monte Subdivision No. 2 filed April 2, 1929 in trap Boot: 21 at page 584; thence along the boundary thereof, South 890 43' East. 847.87 feet and South 010 25' West 644.50 feet, to the northeast corner of Bella Monte Subdivision No. 1 (-20 M 546); thence along the east line thereof, South 01.0 25' nest 455.11 feet, to the paint of beginning. 6 €:xchding therefrom: All of Willow Glen Subdivision 5064 recorded October 25, 1978 in flap Book 218 at page 31 except that 55 feet wide strip of land shown as "Bailey Road Widening" (218 M 31) . LBesj 8esc Pitt 1788 '87 6/03'87 7/09/87 8110/87 8/17/87 7 AAM1,M7 B RECORDED AT REQUEST OF: THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY" REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Goldfarb&Lipman One Montgomery Street Telesis Tower,23rd Floor San Francisco,CA 94104 Attention; Phuong Y.Lin C RECORDING EEE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD CP SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA APPROVING AND ADOPTING RTS ANffi1qDNffi-NT To THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR.THE BAY PCS'° REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA,AND MAYJNGCERTAIN FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CONMIU1,=REDEVELOPMENT LAW OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA THF-CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECILOeil. t R '. lius Ordinance amends the Redevelopment Pia for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domam proceedings by the Conti Costa County Redevelopment Agency for additional helve(12)years. N E. BACK 1P pi . Ey Board of Supervisors Ordinance No. 7-102, adapted on December 29i 1987,the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra,Costa(the "Board")adopted.the Redevelopment flan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the "Project.reg')and by Board of Supervisors ter ° o.94-64,adopted on December 6, 1994,and.Ordinance No.99-05,adopted on February 23,1:999,the Board adopted amendments to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(as amended,the "Redevelopment Plan");and Pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Lav of the State of California(the "Redevelopment Law"),the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the"Agency")has recommended an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan that would extend the Agency's deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by twelve years;and SSRI Ea NQ-_29_-5 320\01A1239011 1 ................... ......... ........ ....... ........ ........_._......_......_.. ...._..... ............. .._...._. ......... ......... ......... ......... ..............._... Se Agency has prepared and submitted to the Board for review and adoption a proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area (the 'Plan Amendment"),a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board of the County of Contra Costa;and The Agency has made studies of the impact of the proposed Flan Amendment and has determined that the proposed amendment will promote the proper redevelopment ofthe project Area in accordance with the goals,objectives, and policies of the County of Contra Cost as General Plan,the Redevelopment Plan, and the Redevelopment Law;and The Agency has prepared and submitted, and the Board has reviewed and considered,a written report on the proposed amendment(the"Reporton the Plan.Amendment")'pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33457.1,a copy of which is on file with the Cleric of the Board; and: The purpose of the Flan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve years. This amendment will not change the uses permittedwriffiffi the Project Area, and The Planning Commission,which is the duly designated and acting official pla-m ng body of the County of Contra Costa,has submitted:to the Board its report and recommendation dated September 13, 1999,recommending approval and adoption of the Plan Amendment and approval and adoption of the Negative Declaration prepared for the Plan Amendment, and has certified that the Plan Amendment conforms to the General Ulan;and Pursuant to the Planning Commission recommendation and Section 15074 of the Guidelines to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,as amended C",CFF Guidelines"),the legative Declaration completed by County staff and dated Juni,9, 1999, may serve as environmental documentation for the PlanAmendment; and By resolution adopted prism to the adoption of this Ordinance,the Beard and the Agency have adopted and approved the Negative Declaration in compliances with Section 15074 of the QA Guidelines; and On October 19, 1999,the Board and the Agency conducted a joint public hearing which was duly noticed in amordanoe with the requirements of the Redevelopment Law. E . In accordance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 33367 and 33457.1,and based upon the evidence contained in the Report on the Plans Amendment and on the evidencepresented at the joint public hearing,the Bbard finds and determines with respect to the Plan Amendment that. -ORDI N . , ai �ot. 2 8 a) The Project Area is a blighted area.,the redevelopment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes of the Redevelopment Law(see particularly Part II of the Deport on the plan Amendment regarding evidence for this finding). b) The.Plan Amendment would redevelop the Project Area in confortnity with.the Redevelopment haw and would be in the interest of the public peace,hlt€z,safety,and welfare;and the implementation of the Plan Amendment would promote;the public peace, health,safety and welfare of the County of Contra Costa,and would effectuate the poses and policy of the Redevelopment Law(see particularly the Introduction and Parts I,1 ,and III of the Report on the Plan:Amendment regarding evidence with respect to this finding). c) `f`he;adoption and implementation of the Plan Amendment are economically sound and feasible(see particularly Part IV of the Report on the Plan Amendment regarding evidence with respect to this finding). d) The Plan Amendment is consistent with the General plan of the County, including but not limited to the Dousing Element of the General Flan:(see particularly Parts I,V and VM of the Report can the Plan Amendment regarding evidence with respect to this finding). e) The condemnation of real property, if any,is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment Plan and adequate provisions have been.made for payment for property to be acquired as provided by law(see particularly.Pmts I and IV of the Report on the plan Amendment regarding evidence with respect to this finding). f) The agency has a feasible method or plan for the relocation of families and persons which may be displaced from the Project Area if flan Amendment may result in the temporary or permanent displacement of any occupants of housing facilities in the Project Area(see particularly Pmts V and XI of the Report on the Plan Amendment'regarding evidence with respect to this finding). g) °I"here are,or shall be provided,in the Project Area or in other areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons who may be displaced from the Project Area,decent,safe and_sanitary dwellings equal m number to the number o f,and available to,such displace families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment(see particularly Parts V and M of the Report on the Plan regarding evidence with respect to this finding). Families and:persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation plan,pursuant to Sections 3341.1 and 33411.1 of the Redevelopment I w. Dwelling units housing persons and families of Lour or moderate income shall not be removed or destroyed prior to the adoption of replacement housing plan pursuant to Sections 33334.5,33413,and. 33413.5 of the Redevelopment I aw. h) The Board is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will be available within tree years from the time occupants of the Project Area,if any, are displaced and that, pending the development of such faeiiitiea, there will be available tan such displaced occupants D N 54 3WWT%1 setf_1 3 t housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the community at the time of their displacement (see particularly Part V and 3a of the Report on the Plan regarding evidence with respect to this finding). i) The natters set forth in Health and Safety Code Section.33367(d)(9), (d)(l0),(d)(I 1),d(12)and(d)(1:3)are not applicable to or affected by the Plan Amendment,and consequently no father findings with respect to such matters are ream (see particularly the introduction and Parts i and 11 of the Report on the Plan Amendment regarding evidence with respect to this finding). SEMON '. COEMMUQ EIMO E AND I I"lf"lt `, 1t is the continuing g pose and intent of the Board that the Redevelopment Plan Amendment be implemented in order to continue to: a) Eliminate the conditions of blight; b) Ensure,,,&s far as possible,that thecauses of the blighting conditions will be either eliminated or protected against; c) Encourage and ensure the redevelopment of the Project Area; ) Encourage and foster the economic revitalization of the Project Area,as necessary;and e) Provide and improve affordably;housing. t N-Y. QYFIRM BMMO—NS. All.Witten and oral objections to the amendment incorporated in the Plan by this Ordinance are hereby overruled. F PLAN AMEM it is hereby found and determined that the Plan Amendment is necessary and.desirable. The Redevelopment Plan..,all amendments and restatements of the Redevelopment Plan,and all ordinances.adopting or previously amending the Redevelopment Plan are hereby amended in accordance with the Plan Amendment. 'Me Plan Amendment is hereby adopted and approved and the Redevelopment Plan,as amended by the Plan Amendment,is designated as the official redevelopment plan for the - Project Area. no Plan Amendment,consisting of one page and one exhibit,is incorporated in this Ordinance by reference and made a part of the Ordinance as if set out in full in the Ordinance. The Clerk of the Board of the County is hereby directed to file a copy of the Man Amendment with the minutes'ofthis meeting. The Agency is vested with the continuing responsibility to implement the Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the Plan Amendment. S F IC31VIL R C3RtDA'1'T 31 . The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby directed to record the Plan Amendment in compliance with the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 33456 and Government Code Section 27235. ORDINANCE N .RS--5 4 �2e} 3 t33z!f.g 4 ON V111. 5EYER AB I`4'. If any provision,section,subsection,subdivision, sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordnance or the play Amendment is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional,such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or portions of the Ordinance or the platy Amendment. Z,D °I`E. This Ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage,and within IS days after passage shall be published once in the Cm=C`.�A T=.and m Dj ,�newspapers of general circulation printed and published:and circulated in the County of Contra Costa- PASSED on October 1:9, 1999,by the following este: AYES: Supervisors Gioia, Dilkena, DeSauinier and Gancianiiia NO < None . SEN`: Supervisor Gerber S`fAIN: Non e ITEST: PML 13A`I`CHEI.OF,Clerk of the Board and County Administrator By a ` azL� eaar air t31RD14AN ,E NO,-q,-q 4 32MA123901.1 ........................................................... . ............................... SUPPLEMENTED REPORT ON THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN POR THE BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency October 6, 1999 32M07\1212993 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Lave, the following reports and analyses are submitted by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the"Agency")to the Contra Costa County Board.(the"Board")as the Report on the Third Amendment to the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan(the "Report"). The original Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point(formerly known as West Pittsburg) Redevelopment Project Area was adopted by the Board on December 29, 1987,by Ordinance No. 87-102, was subsequently amended on December 6, 1994,by Ordinance No. 94-64, and was further amended on February 23, 1999,by Ordinance No. 99-05 (collectively,the "Plan"). A Report on the Plan was prepared for its initial adoption in 1987(the"Original Report"). The Plan and the Original Report are incorporated hereinby this reference. This Report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Community Redevelopment Law(Health and Safety Code Section 33000-d oq.). All Code Section references used in this Report are to the California Health and Safety Code unless otherwise specified. This Report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Code Section 33457.1,which states in relevant part, "To the extent warranted by a proposed amendment to a redevelopment plan, the reports and information.required by Section 33352 shall be prepared and made available to the public prior to the hearing on such amendment." The purpose and reasons for the proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the"Plan Amendment") are set forth in detail in Part I of this Report. As noted in Part I,the purpose of the Plan Amendment is limited. Because of the narrow scope of the proposed amendment to be implemented through the Plan Amendment,only a few of the reports and analyses required by Health and Safety Code Section 33352 are relevant and merit discussion in this Report. The reports and analysis described in Code Section 33352(4), (e),(g), (1), and(n)were deemed irrelevant to the proposed amendment and were therefore not included in this Report. Parts VI and VII of this Report are not yet complete since certain scheduled meetings have not occurred at the time of preparation of this Report. This Report will be supplemented prior to approval of the Plan Amendment, as the additional information becomes available. PART I. DESCRIPTION AND REASONS FOR AMENDMENT The Bay Point.Redevelopment Plan was adopted December 29, 1987, and subsequently amended on December 6, 1994, and on February 23, 1999. The 1994 amendment imposed certain time limits on the Plan as required by redevelopment reform legislation enacted in 1993 (AB 1.290). The February 1999 Plan Amendment extended plan time limits for the repayment of 32=7\121299.3 1 . ......... _.. ..... _ .__... ... _.... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ......... debt and the receipt of tax increment by tern years pursuant to legislation enacted in 1938 (AB 1342) At this time, the Agency is,proposing for consideration by tate Board of Supervisors a Third Amendment to the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan to extend the deadline for commencement by the Agency of eminent domain actions. The Plan currently grants the Agency the purer of eminent domain,under specified circumstances,through December 299 1999. The proposed amendment would extend the authority to commence eminent domain.' actions twelve years to December 29, 2011, for land included in the existing Project Area. If the Plan is ever amended to include additional land, the Agency's authority to acquire property within the added area will extend for twelve(12)yeas from the date the new area is added. Following the proposed amendment, all Flan and state law safeguards and requirements with respect to property acquisition and relocation benefits would continue to apply. This extension of time to exercise the pourer of eminent domain is necessary to enable the Agency to continue to acquire property to an orderly fashion when necessary over the corning decade, without having to retake precipitous decisions that may adversely affect property owners in order to meet a premature acquisition deadline.The Agency has no current plaits for the exercise of the power of eminent domain on,any specific parcels in the Project area. It is important to note that the Agency's use of eminent domain ppwer would be limited and only as a last resort toward a project of greater community benefit. The proposed flan Amendment will not expand the project Area,change any of the financial provisions of the Plan(e.g. limits on allocation of tax incrementrevenue to the Agency limits on the time to incur debt,undertake activities or collect tax increment and limits on the amount of outstanding bonded indebtedness), or modify the basic purpose of the original Plan and powers of the Agency. Thus, the proposed amendment is not of the type described in Health and Safety Code Section 33354.6 which would require observance of the procedures set forth in theCommunity Redevelopment Law for the adoption of an initial redevelopment plan. Tice Agency and the Board of Supervisors will comply with all requirements for adaption of an amendment of a redevelopment plans as set forth in Health and Safety Code Sections 33450-33458. PART II, DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL,SOCIAL,AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EXISTING IN THE PROJECT AREA This paw of the report on a plan for a new redevelopment pian typically describes the conditions of a project area which qualify the area for redevelopment(blight analysis). This analysis was completed for the deport prepared for initial adoption of the Plan and served as the basis.for the Board of Supervisors' Ending in the ordinance adopting the initial Ilan, mandated by Section 33367(d)(1),that the Project Area was a blighted area,the redevelopment of which was necessary to effectuate public purposes. 320\aA121299.3 2 The basis for the blight finding was definitively established by the initial adoption of the Plan in 1987. Since 1987, the Agency has pursued an active redevelopment program in the Bay Point Project Area. In particular.,the Agency has focused its efforts on affordable housing development which includes a fourteen(14)unit affordable multifamily housing development, and a first time homebuyers program for purchase and rehabilitation. The Agency has also pursued economic development activities in the Project Area, which include commercial/retail development and the creation of marketing materials and programs. The Agency has also constructed infrastructure improvements in the Project Area to bath stimulate economic development and to improve the residential area. A major focus of the Agency's activities has been on the seven(7)block area bounded by North Broadway Avenue, Willow Pass Road, Crivello Avenue and Suisun Bay,where construction of infrastructure improvements are underway. The Agency is anticipating the development of about 100-124 residential units and some commercial uses(the"North Broadway Mixed Use Development")on the 8-acre site that sits at the center of this target area (referred to as the Siino Property). In addition., the Tray Point/Pittsburg DART Station Specific Plan is expected to be adopted in late 1999. The plan provides for the development of commercial,office and residential uses that will enhance the portion of the Project Area near the Pittsburg/Day Point.BART Station. The remaining portions of the Project Area,however, remain significantly blighted and the conditions described in the 1987 Report on the Plan are largely unchanged in these areas. Part II of the Original Report,which documented the significant physical and economic blighting conditions of the Project Area, is hereby incorporated by reference into this Part II. Major portions of the Project Area continue to include significant physical plighting conditions,including dilapidated and deteriorated buildings and buildings with severe building code violations,incompatible uses, inadequate public improvements,open space and recreation facilities. The.Project Area also continues to suffer economic blighting conditions, including depreciated and stagnant property values, vacant and abandoned buildings,a lack of necessary neighborhood'services and commercial facilities,and high unemployment and crime rates. While the Agency has developed and implemented successful programs to promote redevelopment of blighted properties and alleviate blighting conditions that remain in the Project Area, the use of eminent domain remains necessary as a last resort to deal with those blighting conditions that remain in the Project Area. In order to allow the Agency maximum ability to revitalize the Project Area, the law provides redevelopment agencies with certain techniques to overcome blighting conditions in redevelopment areas. One of the techniques is the Agency's power of eminent domain.. Although eminent domain would only be a"last resort" solution to acquisition of properties in the Project Area,the Agency is moving into the implementation phase of several of its remaining redevelopment programs. The Agency is now implementing various public improvement activities and is planning for longer-tears land development transactions with interested property owners and developers. The process of planning for,negotiating,and implementing a land development transaction or a public improvement project typically is a multi-year endeavor. It often involves discussions 3241f3r�'1121299.3 3 with,or solicitation of proposals from, existing property owners of parcels that are critical to the overall redevelopmentprogram.,to determine if they are interested in and,capable of participation in the redevelopment of their oven properties or if they are willing to voluntarily sell their properties at fair value to the Agency or a designated developer. text, the process involves negotiations of detailed development contracts,with property owners or selected non-property owner developers, followed by preparation of detailed architectural plans,procurement of all necessary governmental permits and approvals,and procurement of development financing. Only when all these activities have been completed is it typically possible to proceed with land assembly or a public improvement project,using condemnation as,a last resort to achieve such assembly. This laird development and public improvement process can require a number of years to complete. Because the Agency's current,eminent domain power under the Plan expires in approximately six(6)months,there is no cushion for orderly,implementation even of those land developments that the Agency commences in the coating years. The Agency envisions that it may need to initiate several land development transactions for key parcels in the Project Area throughout the first decade of the 2000s. Given the limitations on Agency financial and staff resources.and the fluctuating mature of the general real estate market, it is not passible or even: desirable for the Agency to try to farce commencement of all its laird development transactions into the next few months,so as to ensure that it can complete all necessary land assembly for such transactions within the current deadline for exercise of its eminent domain power. Indeed,, some transactions will become feasible and advantageous to the Agency only later in the next decade, after improvements and actions undertaken in the next few years have :nrther>.enhanced the physical and economic environment for Project Area redevelopment. For all these reasons, it is necessary that the time period for the exercise>of the power of eminent domain be extended as provided,in the proposed Plan Amendment. PART III. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The Agency adapted an Implementation Plan in December of 1994,which describes specific goals and objectives of the Agency,specific projects proposed by the Agency,homer these projects will alleviate the documented blight conditions in the project area,and'a,program of actions and expenditures proposed for the following five years. As required by law, an updated Implementation Plan will be adopted by December of 1999. The existing Implementation Plant is incorporated into this Deport by reference. PART IV, PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCII•GTHE REDEVELOPMENT AREA This part of the report can a plan for a new redevelopment plan typically considers the costs and potential revenue of redevelopment actions in order to determine if there is a financially feasible method to finance the redevelopment project. This analysis,was complete for the Report for the initial adoption of the Plan and served as the basis for the Board°s finding 320%0'AI21299.3 4 ........................... ........................................ ............. in the ordinance adopting the initial Plan,mandated by Section 33367(d)(3), that the adoption of the initial Plan and the carrying out of the Plan were economically sound and feasible. Since the proposed amendment to the Plan contained in the Plan Amendment does not add any new redevelopment activities,no further analysis of the overall economic feasibility of the Project Area is required at this time. The proposed extension of the Agency's eminent domain power will enable the Agency, under specified conditions,to assemble properties with marginal economic utility into larger sites or to install needed public improvements,both of which will promote more intensive modem uses,thus,over time, allowing the Project Area to generate additional tax increment revenue for redevelopment activities. Although such acquisition may also involve cost to the Agency, the Agency will work closely with property owners and developers to insure maximum private sector involvement in any acquisition project,so as to minimize the use of eminent domain and the use of public funds. On balance,the extension of the Agency's eminent domain power is expected to have a neutral or positive impact on the financial feasibility of the Project. PART V. METHOD OR PLAN FOR RELOCATION OF FAMILIES AND PERSONS TO BE DISPLACED FROM HOUSING FACILITIES IN THE PROJECT AREA When the Plan was first adopted in 1987, the Agency prepared a General Relocation Plan,which set forth the Agency's general policies for the administration of the relocation program and the provisions of services and benefits to displaced families,individuals, businesses, and community institutions. The General Relocation Plan also provided information about housing stock conditions and availability of housing units to support the anticipated relocation caseload from redevelopment activities. The General Relocation Plan was included in the Original Report and is incorporated herein by this reference. The General Relocation Plan adopted in 1987 serves as a general plan for relocation services and housing stock availability. The Agency has performed more detailed relocation analyses, and,where appropriate,adopted specific relocation plans,as individual projects have been implemented. Although no specific project requiring relocation is currently proceeding at this time,the Agency anticipates that up to an additional ten(10)households may require relocation as part of the North Broadway Mixed Use Development. The Agency intends to continue the practice of performing detailed relocation analyses at the time of project implementation. The Agency reaffirms its policies that no persons or families of low or moderate income shall be displaced unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy. The Agency is currently setting aside 20%of its tax increment revenue for affordable low and moderate income housing and is undertaking various activities to stimulate the production and rehabilitatiori of the affordable housing stock,using both tax increment revenue and other 320VA121299.3 ... .. . ...... handing sources. The Agency currently has an option,to purchase an 8-acre site,where it anticipates facilitating a mixed-use development,including approximately 100-120 units of multifamily and single family residential units. The Agency will work with the developer to ensure that a portion of the units will serve very low,low,and moderate income households, at affordable housing coast. Thus,the Agency possesses the resources to ensure affordability of the available housing stoop for any limited number of households that may be displaced by future redevelopment activities. Based on the information set forth above,the Agency is satisfied that there is a` comprehensive basis for the Board to find`.that: (a) The Agency has a,feasible method or plan for the relocation of families and persons displaced from the Project Area,if the plan may result in the temporary or permanent displacement of any occupants of housing facilities in the Project Area.; and. (b) There are,or are being provided, in the Project Area or in other areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial:facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons displaced from the Project Area,decent,safe,and sanitary dwellings,equal in number to the number of and available to the displaced:families and;persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (c) Permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time occupants of the Project Area are displaced and that pending the development of the facilities,there will be available to the displaced occupants adequate temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the community at the time of their displacement. PART'FIs REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission prepared and adopted a report and recommendation regarding the proposed amendment, as required pursuant to health and Safety Code Section 33453. The Planning Com issioWs report and recommendation is attached to this Report as Attachment A. PAIN VII. SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY MEETINGS AND CONSULTATIONS REGARDING P ROP OSED AMENDMENTS The Bay Point Project Area Committee("PAC")was,formed in 1987 in connection with the adoption of the original Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area and has continued to meet regularly and advise the Agency since that time. Agency staff' consult extensively with.the PAC regarding the redevelopment process and.programs. Code Section 33385.5 provides Haat the PAC shall be forwarded<a copy of any proposed Redevelopment Plan amendment at leash thirty 30)days prior to the Board of supervisors' hearing on the proposed Plan Amendment. Accordingly,Agency staff forwarded the proposed Plan Amendment to the PAC on June 2, 1999. 32OW7%1212 .3 6 _... _ Notice of the proposed intention to rely on the Negative Declaration was incorporated into the notice of the public heating for the Plan Amendment, which was published in the C o to Timcs and .�j japa and was mailed to all property owners, businesses, community organizations and residents within the Project Area., and all affected taxing entities as described' in Parts V11 and'X of this Report. PART X. CONSULTATIONS WITH AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES As described in Part I of this Report,the proposed amendment to the Plan dues not add any territory to the Project Area or change any of the other fiscal parameters or time limits of the Plan. Consequently,no formal consultation was conducted with affected taxing,'agencies. However,consistent with the Agency and Board of Supervisors'desire for input,the Agency sent each taxing agency,by certified mail,a copy of each of the following documents on June 9, 1999: I Statement of Preparation.of Plan Amendment(including notice of the County's and Agency's intent to rely on a negative declaration for adoption of the Pian. Amendment); 2) Negative(Declaration; and 3) (Draft Amendment. Each affected,taxing agency was sent on September 15, 1999, by certified mail, notice of the public hearing on the Plan Amendment. A copy of this notice and declaration of mailing are attached to this Reportas AMohnioLU. PART X1. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT REPORT Part XII of the Original Report on the Plan included an extensive Neighborhood Impact Report describing in detail the impact of the project on the residents of the project area and surrounding areas. The information included.in Part XII of the Original Report remains largely unchanged and that part of the Original Report is included herein by this reference,with the following updates I) Number of dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income expected to be destroyed'as a part of the redevelopment project. As of the date of this Report,twelve(12)units housing low or moderate income households have been destroyed by Agency activities. The units have been replaced with the construction of the fourteen.(14) unit Elaine Null Court Apartments,which were completed in 1996. The Agency anticipates approximately ten(10)additional units may be destroyed to accommodate the North Broadway Mixed Use,Development. 320M1212199.3 8 _... ............... _.. _ ........ ........ ......... ........ ........ ............ _..._.. _...._..... _. ... # e Dennis ma f3arryy,AICD Community Contra � ra Crommusr.y Deveiopmen? Oi eeler Devel rnent Gaeta Department Count County Administration Building 651 Pine Street ti 4th Floor,North Winn � Martinez,California 94553-0095 Phone: X325)335.1290 ATTACHMENT A September 14, 1999 Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency , Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor,earth Wing Martinez,CA 94553.1229, Honorable Agency and Board Members: This letter transmits East County Regional Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-99 to the Contra Costa.County Redevelopment Agency and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa for consideration as part of the Agency's Report to Board pursuant to Section 33352 of the California Redevelopment Law. Resolution No. 24-99 is deemed the report and recommendation of the East County Regional Planning Commission concerning the proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area. Sincerely= ` t Secretary of the Planning Commission - Attachment: Resolution ATTACHMENT A PAGEl; OF 4 Office lours Monday-Frday:8:00 a-m.-6:00 p.m. Office is closest the 1 at,3rd&5th Fridays of each month ...................................................................................... ........................................... ................. ..... RESOLUTION NO. 24-99 RESOLUTION OF THE EAST COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED TUIRD AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA. VaMREAS, The Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") has submitted to the East County Regional Planning Commission a proposed Third Amendment (the "Redevelopment Plan Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the'Redevelopment Plan"); and I WHEREAS,Part V of the Redevelopment Plan incorporates the General Plan land uses, land use standards,development criteria, goals and objectives into the Redevelopment Plan;and VaffiREAS, Section 33453 of the Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et M.)provides that the Fast County Regional Planning Commission is to review eo the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment and make its report and recommendation ther n to the Agency and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa (the "Board"), including a determination whether the Redevelopment Plan Amendment conforms to the General Plan of the County of Contra Costa; and VaffiREAS, Section 65402 of the Government Code provides in part: "(a) If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, no real property shall be acquired by dedication or otherwise for street� square. park or other public purposes, and no real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned, and no public building or structure shall be constructed or authorized, if the adopted general plan or part thereof applies thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition, such street vacation or abandQnment, or such public building or structure have been subnfitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof.....; and WBEREAS, Section 65402 of the Government Code provides in part: "(6) A local agency shall not acquire real property for any of the purposes specified in paragraph (a) nor dispose of any real property, nor construct or authorize a public building or structure, in any county or city, if such county or city has. adopted a general plan or part thereof and such general plan or part thereof is applicable thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition, disposition, or such publio'building or structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency having jurisdiction, as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof.....; and WBF-REAS, the East County Regional Planning Commission's report and re mme dation, co 11 including matters referred to in Section 65402 of the Government Code, are to be made to the ATTACHMENT A PAGE 2 OF 4 PAGE I RESOLUTION NO. 2 9-9 ................... .............................. ............ ............ ........ ............... ................................ ................................ ....... . ........ .... ...................................................... .......................................... Agency and the Board for their consideration in acting on the adaption of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, The EatCounty Regional Planning Commission has reviewed the County of Contra Costa General Plan, the proposed Redevelopment Plan' Amendment, the Legative Declaration dated. Lune 9, 1999 prepared for the proposed Redevelopment Pan Amendment pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and the Report to the Board on the proposed Redevelopment plan Amendment. NOW, T EREFORE, BE rF RESOLVED,that the East County Regional Planning Commission: 1. PSS that the proposed Legative Declaration is adequate for the purposes of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and recommends that the Beard of Supervisors adopt same; 2. ESS that pursuant to Section 33346 of the Community Redevelopment Law, the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment conforms to the General'Plan; 3. FILLS that pursuant to Section 65442 of the Government Code, acquisition of property by the Agency, if any, pursuant to the Redevelopment ears, as amended, c€anfbrms to the General Plan; 4. RECO LDS to the Beard of Supervisors the APPROVAL, and ADOPTION of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment and in the event that prior to its adoption of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment, :the Board desires to make any minor, technical, or clarifying changes to the Redevelopment Plan Amendment, the East County Regional Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that any such minor, technical, or clarifying changes need not he referred to it for further report and recommendation, and hereby waives its report and recommendation under Section: 33455 of the Community Redevelopment Law concerning any such change; and 5. DEEMS this Resolution to be the report and recommendation of the East County Regional Planning Commission concerning the proposed Redevelopment flan Amendment and contemplated public projects and activities under the Redevelopment Plan., as amended, as required under Section, 33453 of the Community Redevelopment Law. A.TTA:GI- NT A PAGE 3 OF 4 PAGE 2 RESOLUTIONNO. 24-99 ........ ......... .. ......... ......... _. .. ........ ... _........ ......... ......... ......... .. ..... ...._.... ......... ........ ......... ....... Adopted this Order on September 13, 1999,the following votes:' AYES: Commissioners Hanson, Dell, Harper, MacVittie, Sobalvarro, and Wetzel NOES: Commissioners-- None ABSENT Commissioners-- Nunn ABSTAIN: Commissioners— None Earl Wetzel Chair of the County East County Regional Planning Commission County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: CATHERINE KTTSIS, SECRETARY East County Regional Planning Commission, County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTACHMENT A PAGE 4 GE 4 PAGE 3 RESOLUTION NO. 24-99 ATTACHMENT BAY POINT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE MEETING July 28, 199 ' Members Present: Art Chomor,George Lela Cruz, Chuck Gilson, Debra Mason,Lloyd Mason and'Sterling Stevenson Member Absent: None Staff Present: Jim Kennedy and P.ahail Shah i„ Call to Order-Bay Point Project Area Committee beating The meeting of the Bay Point Project Area Committee(PAC)was called to girder at 7:10 p.m. on July 28, 1999. IIa Public Comments. Art Chomor requested Agency staff to provide noticing in local newspapers to announce any change of bate for the PAC meetings. Jim Kennedy announced that a cussedsession was held prior to the Bay Point PAC meeting to discuss the real estate transaction for the Siino property. The PAC did not take any action at the closed session that is inconsistent with the Option and Purchase Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency and:the Siino Family. Mr.Kennedy requested that Agenda item#5,the Community Group Funding Grant Application,be beard first on the agenda to prevent delaying majority of the audience in attendance to hear this issue. Ili. Approval of Minutes of June 911999.` The minutes of June 9, 1999 were approved.[M1 1C Dela Cr lChomor . W. Consider Staff Recommendation to Approve Community Group Funding Grant for Pacifica Park Clean up. (Action Item) Connie Varner of the Bay Point Resident Association presented the application for the Community Group Funding Grant. Ms.'Warner stated that the groups,East County Youth Commission and the Resident Association plan to clean up Pacifica Park on August 2 1, 1999 from 8:00 ax-L until work is finished. The groups intend to<work with Ambrose Recreation and Park 3isiriet's landscape planner in planting the trees and shrubs,and t ..................................................................................... .......................................................... placing of the potted plants. Ms. Warner presented a letter of support from Patti Lambert, General Manger of Ambrose Recreation and Park District, on the clean-up project. George Dela Cruz stated that he supports the groups' efforts and will encourage the park district to make additional repairs at Pacifica Park. The PAC unanimously approved the grant of$3,111.74 to the Bay Point Resident Association and the East County Youth Commission for clean-up of Pacifica Park. [M/S/C Dela Cruz/Gibson]. IV. Consider Recommendation to Adopt the Third Amendment to the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan for Extension of the Redevelopment Agency's Eminent Domain Authority. (Action Item). The Bay Point Plan Amendment extends the Redevelopment Agency's eminent domain authority to December 29, 2011. Staff intends to hold a community meeting to address public questions on eminent domain during the second week of October prior to the scheduled Board of Supervisor's public hearing on October 19, 1999. PAC unanimously approved to adopt the Third Amendment to the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan to extend the Redevelopment Agency's eminent domain authority. [M/S/C Dela Cruz/Mason]. V1. Review Budget Priorities for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. (Discussion Item) Jim Kennedy provided an update of fiscal year 1998/99 budget and distributed the current and status budget reports and a list of potential projects qualified for bond proceeds. The following includes an update of the budget for FY 1998/1999. Description Budgeted TEx_pendi_tur_eto__] Date Infrastructure Program se Comm. -E,--Ellation of—the playground $60,000 $44,591.59 Center Play Structure equipment complete.Contract extended E ipment to June 2000 to renovate tennis courts. 83,982.34 N.Broadway Phase I 7ffo_nstructionof Phas�_1A complete. $1,653,030 Phase IB construction will begin August 9, 1999. —9—B—ro—adw—ay—Phases Phase IlProject Agreeme $300,000 None. IL(III for$271,00. committed I to$271,000 P. Chicago Highway Staff is wor ing with Public Works to $100,00 None. Widening Project refine project agreement.Agency portion is$54,000 of which 12,750 will committed be reimbursed by CDBG. to$54,000 McAvoy RR Crossing Union Pacific stated that earliest to $25,000 None. begin project is October 1999. Unallocated Capital $1,034,462 None. 2 ................................... ...................................................... ............................................................................................. ............................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................... . ......... ..................................................................... .......... .................. ............................................I...................... Funds ! Community Improvement Projects Abatement Revolving Expended funds to pay for abatement. $80,000 $42,228.1313 , Loan Funds Community Croup Approved two grants for FY 98199. $20,000 $11,688.26 Ponding Program Family Preservation Funds received via SocialServices $413,000. one. Support Program t contract for renovations on 2711 A&B Willow Pass Road.Renovations are: � complete and General Services will request for reimbursement. Property Holding Cost Payments for property maintenance. $2,500 $3,941.58 Housing Projects First Time Homebuyers Two loans closed for FY 98199. $251,861 $17,500 I' i N.Broadway Site Acq& ' Option agreement oasts. $1,200,000 $11,€301) N.Broadway PreAdevel. ' Predevelopa ent costs. $80,00' $5;900 Economic Development Activit es Comm.Facade Rehab No loan or rebate requests; $49,590 None. Comm4ndust.Database ! Database is complete. $2,700 $2,300 Marketing C npaign. Marketing strategy develo me nt. $2,840 1 $2,408 Marketing Design/Prod Bay Paint marketing brochures $11,500 $85.00 completed in June 1999. arinal 'trfrnt Level. Preliminary Assessment report on Bay $50,000 $3,750 Point marina completed in June~ 1999. Light industrial Staff will continue discussion with $25,4300 dune. Feasibility Study Criterion Catalyst to do a joint study. Planning Activities Bay'Point/Pitts BART Specific plan preparation costs. $15,900 $'1,707.513 SAP Bay Point/Pitts l IR KI- is complete and will be sent out for $94,000 $57,750 public;review in mid-August. Pitts&BART will reimburse(113). P-1 Reioni g Program Fit sub-committee meeting in 9}99. $32,000 None. 3 Administration , { SalarieslServlSupplies Approx. 71%expended to date. 190,194 $135,292.68 Priority projects identified for bond funds expenditures are identified in the hand out passed out at the meeting.In addition to the items listed in the handout,the PAC identified the following: 1) Remodeling ofAm:brose Cozmnunity.Center. 2) `waterfront Development Activities. 3) Site for the'west Pittsburg Historical Society and Museum. 4) Canal load Property Development. IV. Committee Reports/Committee Comments. MAC Report. MAC approved an alcohol permit for the Mc.Avoy Bait Shoe. 3 ......-...-............................ ....................... ....... ............... .................... .............................. * TAC Report. No Report. * BART Specific Plan Report.The draft EIR for the Specific Plan is complete and will be released for a 60-day public review period. Staff will recommend a joint planning commission hearing to consider plan adoption. * West Pittsburg Historical Society and Museum. No Report. * Ambrose Recreation and Park District. Ambrose Recreation &Park District acquired vacant lot adjacent to center. Ambrose is considering remodeling the current center. 0 Contra Costa Resources Devel. Corp (CCRDC).No Report. V. Staff Reports. North Broadway Infrastructure Program. Staff and Public Works met with the contractor,Cities Paving and Grading,on July 21, 1999 to discuss Phase I, Part B Ing construction. The contractor will begin construction on August 9, 1999.This phase includes improvements on Solano and Poinsettia Avenues. Project Agreement with Public Works for Phase 11 is,complete and includes design right of way engineering and property acquisition.The total cost of the contract is $271,000. Phase II improvements include streets east of Bella Monte Avenue and Crivello Avenue, P-1 Rezoning. The first subcommittee meeting for P-1 rezoning.is September 8, 1999' from 5:30 to 7:00 PM at the Ambrose Community Center. Water r Reference Check. Staff conducted preliminary reference checks on Waterfront tenter the Waterftont Center prior to their visit to Bay Point. Staff will prepare a Request for Proposals/Request for Qualifications to solicit other consultant groups for future waterfront planning activities. EBRPDIBCDC Discussions.EBRPD expressed interest on various levels for waterfront area development.BCDC stated that they are willing to enter into a dialogue on the subject but would prefer to wait for a proposal of development before entering any discussion. Budget Status Report. The budget status was given under agenda item#6. VII. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:55 PM. 4 .................... ................................... ......................... .......................... ................... ................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................... .............................. ......... ............. . ....... _. _.. _..... __ ATTACHMENT C MINUTES OF COMMUNITY TY MEETING (T BE INSERTED) ''I'll,............................................ ................................. .... .. .......................................... ....................... ATTACMENT D LEGAL NOTICE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENT TO BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County(the 'Board')and the Board of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the "Agency") will hold a joint public hearing on October 19, 1999 at 11:00 a.in. in the Board Chambers located at 651 Pine Street, Room 107, Martinez, California. The hearing may be continued from time to time until completed. Any person desiring the opportunity to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to do so. The purpose of the hearing is to consider certain an amendment described below to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project, adopted by Board Ordinance No. 87-102 on December 29, 1987, as amended in 1994 and 1999(the "Plan"). The currently proposed amendment to the Plan is incorporated in a proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the "Plan Amendment"). The purpose of the proposed Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve years. The proposed Plan Amendment will not change any of the financial provisions of the Plan(e.g. limits on allocation of tax increment revenue to the Agency, limits on times to incur debt or collect tax increment, or limits on the amount of outstanding bonded indebtedness), or the proposed activities of the Agency to promote redevelopment of the Project Area. The Project Area is situated in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, and is more particularly described in Exhibit A to the Ordinance No. 87-102, adopted on December 29, 1987, recorded in the Offices of the County Recorder of Contra Costa County on December 30, 1987. The boundaries of the Project Area will not be changed as a result of the Plan Amendment. The County has prepared a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts of the proposed Plan Amendment. A copy of this Negative Declaration is available for review at the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. Any and all persons having any comments on or objections to the proposed Plan Amendment, or the regularity of any prior proceeding, or who which to speak on any issue raised by the Plan Amendment or the Negative Declaration as it relates to the Plan Amendment may appear at the hearing and show cause why the proposed Plan Amendment should not be adopted. In addition at any time not later than the time set forth for the hearing on the Plan Amendment, any person may file in writing with the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa a statement of objections to the proposed Plan Amendment. 32=711 23044.1 ................................................... .................................................... ....................................... .. ............................................................................ ...... . ..........................................................''I'll'',....................... ..... ................ .... ............... ........................................................................................ ... .............. ..... . ............................. _ In accordance with the;California Community Redevelopment Law, the Agency has prepared a Report on the Plan Amendment. The Plan Amendment and Report on the Playa Amendment are available for inspection in the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, located. at 551 Pine Street, 4th Flour, North Wing, Martinez, California. This Notice is published pursuant to the order of the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County and the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. Bate: September 14, 1999 Contra Costa County Re evelop ent Agency For Publication on J e enney September 20, 1999 epu Director— edeveloprnent September 27, 1999 3 October 4, 1999 October 11, 1999 320\07\123044.1 2 .......................................................... ................................................... ....................................... ................................... ATTACHMENT E .99 Sep DECLARATION OF MAILING <10 41,10.. TO PROPERTY OWN-ERS AND OCCUPANTS 08 I declare that: I am citizen of the United States and employed in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and employed by the Contra Costa County ' Redevelopment Agency. My business address is 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor, North Wing, Martinez, California, I served the attached Notice to Property owners and Occupants(with attached Legal Notice) a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, by depositing a true copy thereof in the United States Mail at Martinez, California, by First Class mail, on 6 Costa 1 1999, addressed to each of those persons listed in the last equalized roll of C ntra Co a County as owning, or listed in Contra Costa County records as occupying, property within the boundaries of the Bay Point Project Area and to each of those persons, businesses and community organizations believed to occupy property within the boundaries of the Bay Point Project Area. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this Declaration was executed on 1999 at Martinez, California. ATTACHMENT E PAGE I OF 7 320\0711 23053.1 .................... ........................................... ........ ..................................................................... ............... ...........................................''I'll''................. ................. ........................................................................... ................................................................... ... .............. ................................................ _.._.. nedeveornt Ages re7r�tmissiorrs Costa Jcttrn Gioia County Administration Suitc9ing tst C<st,-ic:j 65 t Pine Stmt 4tn Floor.North wing ¢��`�� $$ �� Martmz,California 54553-1236 gad 8 5 GlYteO.Uilkema 2nd Distract Phil 1latchetor Executive rector Donna 3'd�°tSttsCt stnctGerbef Dennis M.Barry,AIMS r'- ` � �' mark Desaufnief Assistant Executive Director James Kennedy Joe cancsatnitia DeM(Director-Redevelopment sth Distriat (325)646.4076 September 15, 1999 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS Bear Property Owner or Occupant in the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area: It is a pleasure to send you this packet of information concealing the proposed"Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point(formerly West Pittsburg)'' Redevelopment Project(the "Ilan Amendment"). The Centra Costa County Beard of . Supervisors(the "Board"), County staff, the County Planning Commission, and interested members of the community have been involved in the plan amendment process and are pleased to see that the planning process is nearing completion. This packet contains a copy of the Legal Notice for a Joint Public Bearing to be held on the proposed Plan Amendment along with,a map of the property located within the Bay Paint Redevelopment'Project Area boundary. As the Legal Notice indicates, the.Board of Supervisors and the Agency will hold a joint public hearing on October 19, 1999 at 11:00 a.m. in the Board Chambers, located at 651 Pine Street, Room 107, Martinez, California. The public hearing will be held to consider the adoption of°the Plan Amendment. The purpose of the proposed .Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve years.' In preparation for this formal public hearing, a community meeting on the proposed Flan Amendment is scheduled for October 14, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. at the Ambrose Community Center, located at 3 105 Willow Pass:Roads Bay Point, California. Please plan to attend'this meeting if you have question about the proposed Plan Amendment or the redevelopment process in general. The latest equalized property tax roll of the County indicates that you own or occupy property within the Project Area boundary. In compliance with the requirements of State law, this packet is being transmitted to you by U.S. mail. The notice is also being sent to businesses, residential tenants and community organizations located within the boundaries ofthe'Project Area. ATTACMENT PAGE 2 OF 7 32007\123053.f Property Owner or Occupant September 8, 1999 Page 2 The County has prepared a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts of the proposed Plan Amendment. A copy of this Negative Declaration is available for review at the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency offices. The Plan Amendment, along with a detailed report concerning the Plan Amendment (which includes the Negative Declaration) are available for inspection in the office of the Contra Costa.County Redevelopment Agency located at 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor, North Wing, Martinez, California. In accordance with Section 33350 of the California Health and Safety Cade, you are hereby notified that all property located within the boundaries of the:Project Area is subject to acquisition by the Redevelopment Agency by purchase or eminent domain(condemnation) under the provisions of the proposed Pian Amendment. The Agency is required to formally notify property owners well in advance before making offers to purchase their property and has adopted procedures for that purpose. The Agency has no current plans to,acquire particular properties. it is important to note that the Agency's use of this toot would be limited and used only as a'last resort toward a project ofgreater community benefit. Your further inquiries, and attendance at the community meeting and public hearing, will be most welcome. Si cerely. 1 mes Kenned eputy Direc r--Redevelopme 7 Attachments. Legal Notice ATTACIMENT F PAGE 3OF7 3201137\123053.1 _. Commissioners redevelopment Agen,.^v Contra Cost #ot:rsGioia County Administration t3uiidirag tst flsSErict &41 Pine Street 4th Floor North Wing Martinez,Califor€tia 94553-92 5 � Gayte S.Vitkema tad SDistnct £'fait Batchelor Execulive Director Donna3rd District t Dennis U.Barry,AICD "� }.' Mark DeSautnier Assistant Executive Director � ,e` 4th District James Kennedy Joe,CanciaaatiFba Deputy Director-Redevelopment ' 5th District {925}646-4076 � NOTICE O COMMUNITY MEETING AMENDMENIT TO EAS!'POINT R DEVELOPME 7 PLAN The Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency is in the process of adopting a Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area (formerly Fest Pittsburg)(the "Plan Amendment'). The purpose of the proposed Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the;agency by twelve years. The proposed Plan Amendment-vill not change the boundaries of the Project Area established by the Redevelopment fiat},the financial provisions or time limits of the Flan, or proposed activities of the Agency under the Redevelopment Plan. You are invitedto attend a'community tweeting to discuss and to provide input regarding the proposed Pian Amendment. The meeting will be held at 6:00 p.m. on October 14 1999 at the Ambrose Community enter, 3105 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point, California. If you are unable to attend the meeting but desire further information on the Plan Amendment, call R.abail Shah, Redevelopment Planner of Contra Costa.County Redevelopment agency, at(925)335- 1251. We look forward to seeing you at the meeting. ATTACHMENT F PAGE 4 OF 7 32=7\123046,1 ................................................................................................. ................................................................................ ............................................... LEGAL NOTICE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING AMENTDMENT TO BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County(the "Board") and the Board of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency') will hold a joint public hearing on October 19, 1999 at 11:00 a.m. in the Board Chambers located at 651 Pine Street, Room 107, Martinez, California. The hearing may be continued from time to time until completed. Any person desiring the opportunity to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to do so. The purpose of the hearing is to consider certain an amendment described below to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project, adopted by Board Ordinance No. 87-102 on December 29, 1987, as amended in 1994 and 1999 (the "Plan"). The currently proposed amendment to the Plan is incorporated in a proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the "Plan Amendment The purpose of the proposed Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve years. The proposed Plan Amendment will not change any of the financial provisions of the Plan(e.g. limits on allocation of tax increment revenue to the Agency, limits on times to incur debtor collect tax increment,or limits on the amount ofoutstanding bonded indebtedness), or the proposed activities of the Agency to promote redevelopment of the Project Area. The Project Area is situated in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, and is more particularly described in Exhibit A to the Ordinance No. 87-102, adopted on December 29, 1987, recorded in the Offices of the County Recorder of Contra Costa County on December 30, 1987. The boundaries of the Project Area will not be changed as a result of the Plan Amendment. The County has prepared a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts of the proposed Plan Amendment. ,A copy of this Negative Declaration is available for review at the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. Any and all persons having any comments on or objections to the proposed Plan Amendment, or the regularity of any prior proceeding, or who which to speak on any issue raised by the Plan Amendment or the Negative Declaration as it relates to the Plan Amendment may appear at the hearing and show cause why the proposed Plan Amendment should not be adopted- In addition at any time not later than the time set forth for the hearing on the Plan Amendment, any person may file in writing with the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa a statement of objections to the proposed Plan Amendment. ATTACMIENT E PAGE 5 OF 7 32=7k123044.1 .............................. ............................... . .............. .................................. .......................................................... ......... ........... ..................... .. ............ .............................................................................. ............................................. ........................................................................ ...........................................- In accordance with the California Community Redevelopment Law, the agency has prepared a Report on the flan Amendment'. The Flan Amendment and Report on the Plan Amendment are available for inspection in the ofnces of the Centra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, located at 651 Pine Street; 4th Floor, forth filing, Martinez, California. This Notice is published pursuant to the order of the Board of Supervisors sof the Contra Costa County and the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. Bate: September 14, 1999 Centra Costar County Redevelopment Agency For Publication on; a lecf:�'� --/-- J e ennedy September 24, 1999 epu Director edeveloprent September 27, 1999 October 4 1999' October 11, 199 ATTACHMENT E PAGE 6 OF 7 32=7123044.1 2 a i y�af.Fi `(tom•p_A".�$y . fltt an 'e=.srr►rtrnwn3ra3r' w +n ►'_ =sof r3i f34ca'til�_ 4+F° "®' nFv-rs3}tePwrvFN�'R�r__r�u� ,�, riao3�9:NttVtF Ft.a.ta"tt � a a �.. ->atat�b• i4>> id BPSPtP1itSAnnrer#as � �� �'si3►«3 P J Uw �!tt 1'1�`atd r f �gX7iY:' 1!x1t$F!r s spa ,,"� PrP s# .3 _ i�an ���� C '1a4•. ,.,�.,, :EYre� �I[sir$t .. •. . '3 ���'$b"���.i 6",.53 :t � 3 ' r �•, 13a4 s„ OR �Mi3}Tt�►JfEJF� �� tar _ KIM n 3lfis7�tTf�►s A" Mf pig" � Mf+iff. s.. tf1MINE -P►'.# r Aijzli �# a .ud} ♦Pyf*Y.A��` M�bdt & 9st" i.♦3 f /g $ F �S 1./ °11wy� 3 tii�b.�Itl4 #;j� ,. �s+r+►t�ii tFi• uq•t y`F6uF'���{„�g�',.,t't�wxosr� � '� f w _.�} ►f!",4G"�l�J#t�T:PITS �"tr3F`f ld FtT3P3 5f 4 ' to f k s a f Ae's�PTti FIa.• `Aif •9�a4Ps'"+� P.Ti�P Ec:ry�q"IV5<• Sf+�� �A. r`ro-T.PiPk'; "s:-►us3.nFv� `7'�liss37•a�. a :P►8T4P ST#�• �O 14iT <ii6«r'!P • Z PtlgFlPs 1'S4<&3'• f y ��gg'" �sr"T3 v3s3T#e;�a• j ••, ,�o*,.i' ^�dxiTtT;3 xf9[�y`#1 �� Eir "R.� �"j�j°s� a14":i +• o-;����3,Q.f.l,P.f$y,t,�95stfiS'a4iti,.g•� � a<l�.Lt°"� ?+F <. S:S dtT:Y'$`Fk A>3N• ..L � t.'t. q}'�v w�'�' :►- � ...................................................... ATTACHMENT PROOF OF PUBLICATIONS S OF LEGAL NOTICE (TO BE INSERTED) .........1''..''....................................................................... ........... ...................................... .......... ................................................ Dennis K Barry,AICP C Community 1.ontra � -1 -...I.I... ^�nc�DevWop,rnent Diredt Development Co sta Department Coun County Administration Building fo___ 651 Pine Street • 4th Floor,North Wing Martinez,California 94553-0095 yffik cojiw y 9- K TRA OSTA NTY -Phone: BY DEPUTY (925) 335-1250 9, 1999 ATTACHMENT G NOTICE OF PUBLIC REVIEW AND INTENT TO ADOPT A PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION BAY poltqT REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN AMENDMENT County File CR 99-7 Pursuant to the State of California Public Resources Code and the "Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended to date,this is to advise you that the Community Development Department of Contra Costa County has prepared an initial study on the following project: BAY PLAINT RE I)EVELQP r AREA PROJECT DESCRIPTION- The proposed project involves amending the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Prcject Area(Project Area), extending deadline to commence eminent domain proceedings by twelve years(Plan Amendm6nt). The Bay Point Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on December 29, 1987. The plan was subsequently amended in 1994 and again in 1999. The California Community Redevelopment Law M ti n (Section 3300 et seq) of the State Health and Safety Code, which governs the adoption and implementation of redevelopment plan, provide that the authority of a redevelopment agency to employ eminent domain to acquire property in a redevelopment project area expires twelve years after adoption of the redevelopment plan or the last amendment to the plan reestablishing the eminent domain authority. The Redevelopment Agency's eminent domain authority expires December 29, 1999. PROJECT LOCATION: The Project Area is located on the northern Contra Costa County between the Cities of Concord and Pittsburg. Tice primary access to this unincorporated area is via the State Route 4,an east-west highway connecting west and east Contra Costa County. Secondary access routes to the area include Willow Pass Road and Baily Road. The Project Area consists of approximately 1,550 acres of generally flat land. Lands to the north are predominately the Delta wetlands, The south portion of the Project Area is primarily State Route 4, and developed and undeveloped areas within the City of Pittsburg. The developed areas within the City of Pittsburg are located to the east. To the west of the area is developed residential areas of Bay Point and lands owned by the Navy. No significant impacts have been identified in the initial study. A copy of the Negative Declaration and all documents referenced in the negative declaration may be reviewed in the offices of the c r Community Development Department, and Application and Permit Center at the M Bi en Administration Building, North Wing, Second Floor, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, during normal business hours. ATTACHMENT G Office Hours Monday Friday:8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. PAG E I OF 14 Office is closed the I st, 3rd&5th Fridays of each month ..................................................... ............................. ........................... .......................................................................................... ........................................................................ .. ................. ......... ....................................... . ...........................00................................. .................................................................. ..................................................... ................................. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD - The period for accepting comments on the adequacy of the environmental.docurnents extends to S.-OO P.M., Monday, July 122, 1999 Any comments should be in writing and submitted.to the following address:' Maureen Toms, Senior Planner Contra Costa County Community Development'Department 651 Pine Street,North Wing, 4th Floor Martinez, CA 9455 It is anticipated that the proposed Negative Declaration will be considered for adoption at a meeting of the Contra Costa.County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, September 14, 1999. The meeting is anticipated to be held at 9:00 am at the Board Chambers at 6.51 Pine Street, Martinez, CA. It is expected that the Board of Supervisors will also conduct a hearing on the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan at the sane meeting. Maureen Toms Senior Planner cc:couty Clews Lice(7-PI-) Public Works b Steve Wri& C:DATA\V0f'dMk 8PPdOI,WP ATTAMENT G -2- PAGE 2 BJP 14 .......................................... ................................... ...... ........................................... .................................................. Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title: Bay point Redevelopment Area Plan Amendment 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Contra Costa County Community Development Department 651 pine Street,North Wing'=4th Floor Martinez, CA 94553 3. contact Person and Phone Number: Maureen Toms (925)335-1250 4. Project Location: The Bay Point Redevelopment Area 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency 651 pine Street North Wing-5th Floor Martinez, CA 94553 6. General Plan Designation: Various (Single-Family Residential, Multiple-Family Residential, CommerciaL office, Mixed-Use Bay Paint�' Heavy Industrial, Public /Serni-Public, Parks and Recreation, Commercial Recreation, Water, and Open Space) 7. Zoning: Various (Agricultural, Single Family-Residential, Two- Family Residential, Multiple-Family Residential, T-1, Planned-Unit District, Commercial, Retail Business, Neighborhood Business and Heavy Industrial) 8. Description of Project: The proposed project involves amending the Redevelopment Plan(Plan Amendment) for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(Project Area),extending deadline to commence eminent domain proceedings by twelve years. The Bay Point Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on December 29, 1987. The plan was subsequently amended in 1994 and again in 1999. The California Community Redevelopment Law (Section 3300 et'seq) of the State Health and Safety Code,, which governs the adoption and implementation of redevelopment plan,provides that the authority of a redevelopment agency to employ eminent domain to acquire property in a redevelopment project area expires twelve years after adoption of the redevelopment plan or the last amendment to the plan reestablishing the,eminent domain authority. The Redevelopment Agency's eminent domain authority expires December 29, 1999. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The Project Area is located on the northern Contra Costa County between the cities of Concord and Pittsburg. The primary access to this unincorporated area is via the State Route 4, an east-west highway connecting west and east Contra costa County. Secondary access routes to the area include Willow Pass Road and Baily Road. The Project Area consists of approximately 1,550 acres of generally flat land. Lands to the north are predominately the delta wetlands. The south portion of the Project Area is primarily State Route 4,and developed and undeveloped areas within the City of Pittsburg. The,developed areas within the City of Pittsburg are located to the mt. To the west of the area is developed residential areas of Bay Point and lands owned by the Navy. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required:Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. ATTACHMENT G PAGE 3 OF 14 .................. ........................ ................................................. ........................... ............................................................I'll,......... ...................................... . ............. ................................... ............... .......................... ................................................. . .... ..................--I' ll, ......... __ ........ .................._....... ......... ......... ......... ......... _ ......_.. .......... ......... ......... ........................ 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected';by this project,involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist ars the following pages. Land Use and Planning - Transportation/ _ Public Services Population&Housing Circulation � Utilities & Service Magical Problems — Biological'Resources systems 'Fater Energy & Mineral Aesthetics Air Quality Resources Cultural Resources Mandatory Findings of — Hazards Recreation Significance Noise .! None Identified DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation. I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLA .TIION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requirr I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on theinvironment,,but at least one effect(1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable f egal standards, and(2)has been addressed by mitigation ximsures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets,if the effect is a"potentially significant impact"or*'potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analym only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzedl adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or rnitigatican measures that etre imposed upon the. proposed project June 9, 1999'' Signa e Bate Maureen,Torras Comrhuraity D veloprxment Department Printed Name_ For PAGE 4 OF 14 ... -,''''I'll'',........................................................ ................................... ........... ........................................................... 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Sources: In the process of preparing the Checklist and conducting the evaluation,the following references(which are available for review at the Contra Costa County COM11111111tY Development Department,651 Pirie Street 5th Floor- North Wing,Martinez)were consulted: 1. Description of Project and Setting 2. Contra Costa Resource Mapping System-Quad Sheet Panels-Honker Bay,CA 3. The(R=nsolidated)County General Plan(July 1996)and BIR on the General Plan(January 199 1) 4. General Plan and Zoning Maps 5. The Bay Point(West Pittsburg)Redevelopment Plan and EIR(1987) 6. Bay Point/Pittsburg BART Station Area Specific Plan (draft-November 1997) and ADEM (June 1999) 7. East Bay Regional Park District Master Plan(1997) 8. Field Reviews Potentially Significant Potentially unless Less alan signmeant Mitigation significant No hnpad incom2mtion im P jMpact 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with General Plan designation or zoning? (Source#1,3,4,5,6,7) b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (Source A 1,3,4,5,6,7) C. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?(Source#1,2,3,4,5,6, 7) d. Affect agricultural resources or operations(e.g.,impacts to soils or farmlands,or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (Source# 1,3,4,5,6,) C. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community(including a low-income or minority community)? (Source# 1,2,3 A5,6,7) SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to land use and planning. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. ATTACHMENT G PAGE 5 OF 14 ......................... ............................... ........................................................ ................................... .. ......................................... ...............''I'll'',........ .................................................. ........... ........................................... ... .............................................................. ........... ............................................-,''''I'll'' .... ..... .... ......__. ........ ........ ......................._. ....._....... ......... ......... ......... .._. . _.. _..._... ............_.._.. 4 P�castisll pow-dishy Unica L css 6M sipT=nt mfflga on sight!`x nt No Tsf4�att honr#s©raticaetrt_ 11. POPULATION ANIS HOUSING. Mould the proposal: a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projects? (Source# 1,3,5,6,) b. Induce substantialgrowth in an area either directly or indirectly(e.g.,through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (Source# 1,3,5,6) C. Displace existing housing,especially affordable housing? (Source# 1,3,5,0 SU IARY: Acquisition of property within the Project area by eminent'domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to population. Extending the eminent domain authority of the, Redevelopment Agency could result in the eventual displacement'of existing housing in order to redevelop the area. The Redevelopment agency is required by the California Conuilunity Redevelopment Law(CRL)to provide through rehabilitation,development or construction,an equal number of replacement dwelling units for rent or sale at affordable rags,which have an equal or greater number of bedrooms as destroyed or moved,as those currently occupied by low and moderate income households. The CRL further requires that 75 percent of the replacement dwelling units be affordable to persons and/or families of low and moderate income in the same proportion as the units lost. In addition,the acquisition of property through eminent domain will be acquired in accordance with the State of California's Relocation Assistance and Real Property I Acquisition Act of 1971 (cover rnent Code Section 7260 et seq). '`Thus impacts to housing would he less than'signilicant. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities; would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act '(CEQA), which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. III. {GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a. Fault Rupture?(Source# 1,3,5) b. Seismic ground shaking?(Source# 1,3,5) ca Seismic ground failure,including liquefaction?(Source# 1,3,5) d. Seiche,tsunami,or volcanic hazard? (Source# 1,3,5) e. Landslides or mmdllows?(Source# 1,3,5) ATTACHMENT G PAGE 6 OF 14 .,................................................................................................. ....... .............................................................-.... ....... ................... 5 potmday significant Potentially Wen LM 0M significard Midptim significant 'No Invact Incamom-don ivv_ac_t lmpj!�q f. Erosion,changes in topography or unstable — soil conditions from excavation,grading,or fill?(Source# 1,3,5) g. subsidence of the land?(Source# 1,3,5) — h, Expensive soils?(Source 4 1,3,5) — I. unique geologic or physical features? — (Source# 1,3,5) SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the Pro ject Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in geologic impacts- Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. IV. WATER- Would the proposal result in: a. Change in absorption rates,drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff?(Source# 1,3,5) b. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (Source C. Discharge into surface water or other V alteration of surface water quality(e.g, temperature,dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (Source* 1 3,5) d- Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (Source# 1,3,5) e. Change in currents,or the course or direction of water movements?(Source 4 1,3,5) V/ f Change in the quantity of ground water, either through direct additions or with- drawls,or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability?(Source# 1,3,5) 9. Altered direction or rate of flow of ground- water?(Source# 1,3,5) h. Impacts to groundwater quality? (Source 4 1,3,5) V 1, Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies?(Source# 1,3,5) SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority water and process which would not result in impacts to surface or ground water,water quality or public wa r supply. ATTAMENT G PAGE 7 OF 14 .......... ......................................... .................................... .... ............ . ......................................................................... ....... .............. ............................................................. ........................... ....................................................................................... ............. ............................... ...... ........... .......................................................... ........................ ....._. _ ........ ..................._..._.. ......... ..........._.._. _... ......... ......... ......... .. ......_....... ........_.... .............._.. 6 Potentially si fico poly unl= LZU dhan secant Mitiptim sip iics d No broad Icornor Utffl; _S—Ad I!ssssact Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activitieswould' be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. V. AIR QUALITY. 'Would the proposal: a. Violate any air quality standard or — j' contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation (Source#1,3,5) b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? _ V (Source# 1,3,5) C. Alter air movement,moisture,or temperature or cause any change in climate?(Source# 1,3,5) d. Crean objectionable odors' (Source# 1,3,5) SUNNARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by ern ent domain is an administrative authority' and process which would net result in air quality impacts. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment' activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California aviron cental Quality Act(CEQA),which may rely' an earlier environmental'impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. V1. TRAN-SPORTATIONICIRCUL.ATIO'iN. Would the proposal result in a. Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?(Source# 1,3,5,6) b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous inter- sections)or incompatible gasses(e:g., farm equipment)?(Source# 1,3,5,6) C. Inadequate emergency access or ams «� to nearby uses?(Sources#1,3,5,6) d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or oI°f=site?(Somme# 1,3,5,6) e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?(Source#1,3,5,6) f Conflicts with adopted policies supporting transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts,bicycle racks)?(Source# 1,3,5,6) Rail,watc.-bo no or air traffic impacts°?' (Source# 1,2;3,5) ATTACIMEN ' G PAGE 8 OF 14 7 Potentially significant Potentially UW= Less than significant Mitigation significant No Tract Tncoti»oratiotr itn act t SUMMARY- RY: Acquisition of property'within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to transportation and Oor circulation. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), which may rely on=her environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. 'SIE. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a. Endangered,threatened or rare species or _ their habitats(including but not limited to plants,fish,insects,animals,and birds)?(Source# 1,3,5,6) b. Locally designated species(e.g.,heritage trees)?(Source# 1,3,5,6) c. Locally designated natural communities _ (e.g.,oak forest,coastal habitat,etc.)? (Source# 1,3,5,6) d. Wetland habitat(e.g.,marsh,riparian and V vernal pool)?(Source# 1,3,5,6) e. 'Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? � T (Source# 1,3,5,6) SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to biological resources. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. Vill. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would_ the proposal: a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?(Source# 1,3,5) b. Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner?(Source# 1,3,5) C. Result in the loss of availability of a.known _ mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State?(Source# 1,3,5) SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to energy or mineral resources. Subsequent implementation of ATTACILMIENT G PAGE 9 OF 14 a�t�titcily sE�St€�YC�Sf p4teawy Unim 1.4%ftn �9 redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California,Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. € , RAZARDS, Would the proposal involve: a. A risk of accidental explosion Or'release Of hazardous substances(including,but not lied to. pail,pesticides,chemicals or radiation)?(Source# 1,3,5) b. Possible interference with an emergent — V response plan or emergency evacuation plan?(Source 4 1,3,5) C. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard?(Source 4 1,3,5) d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards?(Source 9 1,3,5) e, Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable — _ — V brash,grass,or trees?(Source# 1,3,5) L`Ia ARY: .Acquisition of property with the Project Area by emmeat domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in and increase of hazards in the project area. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), which may rely on earlier environnienW impact analysis or require additional environmental resew more specific' development concept is proposed. X NOISE. 'Mould die proposal result in: a, Increases in existing noise levels? (Source# 1,2,3,5) b. Exposure of people to severe noise? (Source#'1,2,3,5) SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within.the Project Area by erningat domain is anadministrative authority and process which would not result in noise impacts. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA.),wfikh may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed: AT ACMEN PAGE 10 OF 14 ....................................................... ............................................. .................................................. ...................... 9 pot-filay siontud potartiAlly untm Lea than sipmmd Mitigation sivacw No X1. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection?(Source 4 1,3,5) b. police protection?(Source# 1,3,5) C. Schools?(Source# 1,3,5) d. Maintenance of public facilities, V including roads?(Source 4 1,3,5) C. Other governmental services? (Source# 1,3,5) SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to public services.Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undqrtaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. X11. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for now system or supplies,or substantial alterations to the following utilities-, a. Power or natural gas?(Source# 1,3,5) A/ b. Communications systems?(Source 4 1,3,5) c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities?(Source# 1,3,5) d. Sewer or septic tanks?(Source# 1,3,5) 0. Storm water drainage?(Source# 1,3,5) V f Solid waste disposal?(Source# 1,3,5) g. Local or regional water supplies? (Source# 1,3,5) Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to utilities and service systems.Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. ATTACHRENT G PAGE 11 of 14 ........................ .................................................. ...................................................................... ........................ ...... .............................................. _.... ......................... 10 s3gnfrcet� Potentially Unit= Len than S471i&AH1 Mitazeteom S4pMcant No ifs 'xtta' Lrn II. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a. Affect a scenic vista or sic highway? (Source# 1,2,3,5,7,) bm Have'a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?(Source# 1,2,3,5) C. Create light or glare? V (Source# 1,3,5) UNMARY: Acquisition ofproperty within the Project Area by eminent domain is as administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to aesthetics. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment' activities'would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),,which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review+more specific development concept is proposed. XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. .Disturb paleontological resources? V (Source# 1,2,3,5) b. Disturb archaeological resources? (Source# 1,2,3,5) C. Af ecthistoricalresources? � (Source##1,2,3,5) d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique cultural values?(Source##1,2,3,5) e. Restrict existing religious or sacred _ V uses within the potential impact: ? (Source#1,2,3,5) Sl Y: ACquisidOn of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process wWch would not result in impacts to cultural resources.Subsequent implementation of redevelopment' activities would be undertaken pursuant to the Calitornia Environmental Quality Act(t✓EQA),which may rely l on earlier envircr ental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed, XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a. Increases the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or tither recreational facilities?(Source# 1,2,3,.5,7) b. Affect existing recreational opportunities? V (Source;# 1,2,3,5,7) ATTACHMENT G PAGE 12 OF 14 ....................................................... ............................................ ...... ........................................... ........................ 11 Potentially 5igzeif cant potmtwly UnIm LM than sidcant mitial6on sipfficant N* LnWt, rnoon 1=art SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to recreation. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),which may rely on=her environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat ofa fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or Pre-historY? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future Projects.) c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly Or indirectly? SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment (see III-Geologic Problems,rV-Water,V-Air Quality,and VU-Biological Resources. The incremental effects of the proposed project were reviewed in connection with the effects of past Projects, current projects, and the effects of probable future projects- These projects included the Bay Point Redevelopment plan,which was adequately analyzed Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan in 1987. Additional projects reviewed included the Pittsburg(Bay Point BART Station Area Specific Plan,the City of Pittsburg General plan and Redevelopment Program, Pittsburg-Antioch Corridor ATTACI-24ENT G PAGE 13 OF 14 ............................... ......................... .........''I'll'',..................................................................................... .............................................................. ................................................... ................... ................................. ................ _. _.. .. ......................................................................................................... 12 (BART)proposal, State Route bailey Road Interchange improvement Prcject,Widening and Lowering of H Orw�4 between Willow Pass Road in Concord and Bailey Road and development in the Pittsburg area. It was concluded that the emulative impacts associated with the ext=dmg the Agency's ability to acquire Fro e within the Project Area by eminent domain,an administrative authority and process, are less than significant. CADA IA\WP60 ASPRDA.I June 9,1999 ATTACIMENT C PAGE 14 OF ,14 ...................................................................... .................................................-.... .......... .......................................................... ...................... ATTAMENT H DECLARATION OF MAILING TO TAXING ENTITIES I declare that: I am a citizen of the United State and employed in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and employed by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. My business address is 650 Pine Street, 4th Floor,North Wing, Martinez, California. I-served the attached Notice to Taxing Entities of Joint Public Hearing(with attached a" 'e Legal Notice), a copy of which ch hereto as Exhibit A,by depositing a true copy thereof 'I t.&� it. receipt r '4 1999 at Martinez, California, enclosed in a in the United States Mail o sealed envelope, by certified it, return receipt requested,addressed to the governing body of each of the taxing entities which levies taxes upon any property in the Bay Point Project Area, a list of which taxing entities is attached hereto as Exhibit B. I declare under penalty 4oaery th t the foregoing is true and correct and that this Declaration was executed on 1999 at Martinez, California. ATTACIMENT H PAGE 1 OF 14 320\0M 23051.1 ................................ . . .......... ................................................................ ................................................................................''I'll............... ... ......................................... ........................................ .................................................................................... ............................. Redevelopment !" Ikf Contra corstthtssione.,,, 6oun Administration BttiWi Costa John Gioia tYtst District 651 Pine tz t4th fir,North Win 1- Wrtinez.Co ilon 94553-1296 U n Ga ate€3.Uet€tm, €3isttt Phil Batchelor Execuhe Nrector #BRKta G+rt} f Dennis M.Barry,AMP Mark C1eSacttttier Assiste.�tt x-ectowe director f C ' }� --- ¢' &d 4th District James Kennedy SEP Deputy Dir' ctr-Redevelt�¢�tr ent 7 1999, J©e anciamit a (925)646-4076 5ttt€1€st 44 September 15, 1999 NOTICE TO TAXING ENTITIES Ladies and Gentlemen: As you are aware, the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency has been in the process of preparing the Third Amendment to the Redeyelopment Plan for the Bay Point (formerly West Pittsburg) Redevelopment Project Area(the"Flan Amendment"). As the attached Legal Notice indicates, the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Board and Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County alae"Board")will hold a joint public hearing on October 19, 1999 at 11:00 a.m. in the Board Chambers, locatedat 651 Pine Street, Rooter 107, Martinez,California, to consider the adoption of the Flan Ami ndt ent. The purpose of the proposed Flan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings in the Project Area by the Agency by helve years_ The Plan-Amendment wilt not change any of the financial provisions of the Redevelopment flan(e.g. limits on allocation of tax increment revenue to the Agency, limits on times to incur debt or collect tax increment, or limits on the amount of outstanding bonded indebtedness), or the Project Area boundaries. The Flan Amendment and a Report on the Plan Amendment are on file with the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, located at 651 ,pine Street, 4th Floor, Martinez, California, and are available for your inspection. 'AGE 2 OF 14 ....................................... ................................................................................................ .....................................................................................................................-............. ..... ................ The County has prepared a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts of the proposed Plan Amendment. A copy of this Negative Declaration is available for review at the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency offices. Your further inquiries, and attendance at the public hearing, will be most welcome. Sin ly, am Ken nedy Dep ty Director — edevelopm ent Attachments: Legal Notice 320M123051.1 ATTACHMENT, H PAGE 3 OF 14 ................................................................. ............................................. ................ ................................................ ............ ........................................... ..................................................... LEGAL, NOTICE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING A ND1\4EhIT TO BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PLAINT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County(the "Board") and the Bayard of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the"Agency") will hold a joint public hearing on October 19, 1999 at 11:00 a.m. in the Board Chambers located at 651 Pine Street,Room 107, Mwtine7, California. The hearing may be continued from time to time Cantil completed- Any person desiring the opportunity to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to do so. The purpose oft e hearing is to consider certain an amendment described,below to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Paint Redevelopment Project, adopted by Board Ordinance No. 87-102 on December 29, 1987,as amended in 1994 and 1999(the "Plan'). iThe currently proposed amendment to the Mara is incorporated in a proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Placa for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the"Plan Amendment'). The purpose of the proposed Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve years. The proposed Plan Amendment will not change any of the financial provisions ofthe Plan(e.g. limits on allocation of tax increment revenue to the Agency, limits on times to incur debt or collect tax increment,or limits on the amount of outstanding bonded indebtedness), or the proposed activities of the Agency to promote redevelopment of the Project Area. The Project Area is situated in the County of Contra Costa, State of California., and shown on the map attached as Exhibit A and is more particularly described in the legal description attached as Exhibit B. The boundaries of the Project Area will,not be changed as result of the Plan Amendment- The County has prepared a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts of the proposed Plan Amendment. A copy of this legative Declaration is available for review at the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. Any and all persons hating any comments on or objections to the proposed Plan Amendment,or the regularity ofany'prior proceeding, or who wish to speak on any issue raised by the Plan Amendment or the Negative Declaration as it relates to the Play;Amendment may appear at the hearing and show cause why the proposed Plan Amendment should not be adopted- In addition at any time not later than the bine set forth for the hearing on the Placa Amendment, any person may file in writing;with the County Clerk of the County of'Contra Costa a statement of objections to the proposed Plan Amendment. In accordance with the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Agency has prepared a Report on the Plan:Amendment. The plan Amendment and Report on the Plan 320`DA12 .# ATTACHMENT H ........11...11.................................................................. ................................................... ....... ............................................................... Amendment are available for inspection in the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, located at 651 Pine Street,4th Floor, North Wing, Martinez, California. This Notice is published pursuant to the order of the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County and the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. Date: September 14, 1999 Contra Costa Count evelopment Agency For Publication on: es ennedy q1 s September 20, 1999 epu Director— evelopmentent September 27,;;1999 October 4, 1999 October 11, 1999 ATTACHMENT H 320WAI23044A 2 PAGE 5 OF 14 ............................. ....... ..................... ........................................... ................................ ................................................................................ ... ...... . ................................. �0............ .............. . ........ .............. ............. ....................................................... ........................................ r a� P JUMP % � jkll mill I . tf t. eUr iis }g i s8a swtP�t Y , _ r c.� ax'>S�gtg¢P 9r sSP+Ali' y,tC sj IMP wn a x^� t�2P�R3'Prt4sA&�a ex '�.• '�� � ¢!x84°tA`t}��IsxR ti sg+m,. fk wk- • '.AAF`fP:4*Ptx,+>,.pv'EPSP� � �• q' "� q°' a .........-...I................................................................... ....................................................................... .............................................................. West Pittsburg Redeveloptient Project Wj). ISS09 - Boundary Description EXHIBIT B Real property in the unincorporated area of West Pittsburg, California . Document and map references are to records of Contra Costa County. Beginning> at the northwest corner of Section 13, Township 2 North, Range I West, 14ount Diablo base and Meridian (shown as the southeast corner of Section 11 on the map of Bella Monte Subdivision NO. I filed March 22, 1927 hence along the west line of Section 13, South in Map Book 20 at page 546); t 010 251 West 30 feet, to the south line of Willow Pass Road; thence along said south line, East 1,466 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 2 Pittsburg Home Acres Addition recorded March 22-* 1938 in Map Book 22 at page 662; thence along the east line of Lot 2, South 000 401 East 12 feet, to the north line of Triond parcel recorded February 1, 1.985 in volume 12168 at easterly parcel and its long the north line of Triond page 412; thence a prolongation, East 267 feet, to the northwest corner of Lot 16, Subdivision 1972 in Map Book 144 at page February 25, 4137, Willows Landing, ``recorded 14; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 4137, South 000 09, 2.6" We I sr- 477.46 feet, South 890 06, 36" East 384 feet, and South 0.00 09' 20" West 781.89 feet, to the north line of Hanlon 14ay; thence along said north. line, North 690 061 38" West 651 feet, to the northerly prolongation of the west line of Lot 252 (144' 14 14); thence along said prolongation and west line , South 000 10' 03" Uest 127.98 feet,, to an angle point; thence South 003 09' ATTACHMENT H PAGE 7 OF 14 ...................... ........... ............................. ....................... .................................................................... .............. .......................................................--.-................... .......... .................... ........................................... . .......... ......_.. ................ .. .... ...................._... ......... ......._. ......... ......... . ....._......._ _..._.... ......... ......... ................................................................................... 24" Wiest 599.63 feet to an angle paint on the west l ine of Lot 281 (144 it 14); thence along said gest line and its southerly prolongation ,� o0o €19' 30" West 825 feet, more or less , to the south line of State freeway Route '4, thence along said south line in a general westerly direction 1,490 feet, more or less , to the east line of Section 14 (T2N, RIW)$ thence along said east line, South '003 '30' East 780 feet, more or less , to the northeast corner of Lot 57, Subdivision 5346, Hillsdale. unit111 , filed September 22, 1978 in Map Book 217 at page 20, being a 'point on the south 1''ine of Contra Costa Canal ; thence along said south line, South 890 42' West 92 feet, South' 400 9' Wiest 138.5 feet, South 660 5' gest 435.2 feet, North'' 480 34' gest 410.4 feet, South 890 42' lest 28.8 feet, and forth 480 34' Wiest 535.7 feet, to the most northerly corner of Subdivision 4731, Hillsdale, filed April * 19$ 1976 in Map Book 183 at page 28; thence along' the boundary of Subdivislor 4731, South 120 47' 41" West 609.44 feet and North' 890 25' 37'" Hest 438.39 feet, t0 the northeast corner of frank D. and Carolyn A. Briggs PARCEL T140 recorded July 7, 1977 in Volume 8407 at page 531, thence long'-the boundary' thereof, North 890 25' 37" West 270.65 feet and South €10() 33' 32" East 90.70 feet, to the northeast corner of Pittsburg Terrace Unit No. 1 'filed> NoveMber 5, 1930 in Map Book 21 at page 604; thence along the north'` line thereof, South '890 46' 'fest 245 feet, 'to the northeast corner of lot 6 (21` 14 604), thence South 000 45' East 98.28 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 4 (21 B 604); thence along the boundary of Lot 4, South 000 45' fust. 25 feet, Southwesterly 39.27 feet along the arc of a 25 feet radius curve concave to the northwest , and South 890 151 gest 75 feet, to the southeast corner of 2 ATTACMENT 'AGE 8 OF 14 ....................................................... ...........................................................-........... .................................................. Lot 3 (21 14 604); thence along the south line of Lot 3 and its westerly prolongation, South 89P 15, West 125 feet, to the centerline of Bailey Road (shown- ds Dante Road in 21 M 604) being the east line of the west half of Section 14 (T2N, R1W); thence along said east line, North 000 45' West 1,475 feet, more or less , to the north line of State I Freeway Route 4; thence along said north line in a general westerly direction 7,250 feet, more o I r less , to I the southeast corner of PARCEL C of Minor Subdivision 192-68 filed April 22, 1.969 in Parcel Map Book 8 at page 12; thence along the cast I ine of PARCEL C, North 120 45' West 77.61 feet, to the easterly prolongation of the south line of Bruce W. and Donna G. Farley parcel recorded August 5, 1..974 in Volume 7290 at page 737; thence along said prolongation and south line, North 770 13' 0511 West 418.81 feet, to the southwest corner; thence along the west line of said Farley parcel and its northerly prolongation, North 000 111 20" West 120 feet, more or less , to the north line of Cat iaao Andres - (8 FM 12); thence along said north line in a general northeasterly direction goo feet, more or less , to the northeast line of Contra Costa Canal ; thence along said .northeast line in a general northwesterly direction 1,1.30 feet, more or less, to the most southerly corner of Subdivision 4663 filed October 20, 1977 in [lap Book 203 at page 31; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 4663, North 630 371 26" East 484.20 feet and North 580 331 46' 'Aest 104.95 feet, to the south line of Riverside Drive (203 K 311; thence along said south line, North 660 061 32"- East. 2.89 feet, Northeasterly 57.39 feet along the arc ofa curve. concave to the northwest with a radius of >778 feet and a central angle of 040 131 35" , Northeasterly 21.94 feet along the 3 ATTACHMENT H PACE 9 OF 14 ........... . ............. ........................................................ ........... . .................................................... ......... ..... ................................. ......''I'll'', ............. ........... ............... ................... ........ ......................... . .......... .......... ................................................................. ........................................................... ...................... arc of a reverse curve concave to the southeast with ,a; radius of 722 feet and a central angle of 010 44' 29" , and North 6130 37' 26" East 35.25 feet, to the northeast line of East Bay Municipal utility District parcel recorded August 30, 1926 in Volume 57 at page 699 thence alone said, north6ast line, South 580 '`334 5" East 1,46901 feet, to the north line -of Camino Andres; thence along said mirth line, North 890 544 26" East 49.36 feet, to its interselti>on with the west line of ;Port Chicago Highway as shown on the map of Subdivision 3845 recorded-.October 23, 1969 in Map Book 128 at page 29, thence crossing Port Chicago Highway, Easterly 270 feet, more or less, to a point on the north line of Willow ;Pass Road shorn as the easterly terminus of a 1.50 feet radius curve on the reap of Minor, Subdivision 1.1-84 filed December '26, 1984 in Parcel trap Book 113 at page 42; thence along the north line of Willow Pass Road, South 890 07 28" East 569.98 feet and South 000 52` 32" West 4.87 feet , < to the north line of. "Willow Pass .Road Widening" parcel shown on the map of Subdivision 5696 filed March 20, 1984 in Map Book 277 at page 18; thence along said north, line, South 890 05` 14" East 790,69 feet, to the north line of ."Willow Pass Road Widening" parcel shown on the Map of Subdivision 5534 'filed March 28, 1984 in trap Book 277 at page l;. thence along said north line, ''South890' 058 14" East 67<11 feet, South 896 12` 06" East 924.80 'feet,' and South 830 07° 2,1" East 0.16 feet., to the .east line of Sbbdiv' sion 5534; thence along ' said ' east line and its northerly prolongation, North 010 10, 36" East 2,538.13' feet, to the northeast corner of Subdivision 5354 filed March 14 1979' in trap Book 223 at page ;.3f thence along the north line of 5ubdivisior. 5354, North 880 501 18" .best 2,633.04 4 ATTACHKENT PALE 10 3F 14 ............................................................... ................................................................ ..................................................... ........................... feet, to the north corner of Lot 12 (223 14 3) thence along the west I i tie Of Lot 12, South 000 55' 16" West 160 feet , otore or less , to the easterly prolongation of the south line of Earl 14. Smith Developers Ltd. .563 acre parcel (Assessor Parcel Number 098-340-001) recorded January 6, 1969 in volume 5784 at page 611; thence crossing Port Chicago Highway along said prolongation, North 880 58* 2011 West 84 feet, to said south line; thence 2011 West 145 feet, to the southwest along said south line, North 680 58' corner-, thence along the west line Of said .563 acre parcel , North 000 554 East 170 feet, to the south line of Pacifica Avenue; thence along said south line in a general westerly direction 5,100 feet!, more or less , to the west line of Driftwood Drive; thence alon' g said west line, North 000 20' >West 2,718.46 feet, to the north line of Section 9 (TM R1` thence along said -uth line Of north line, Easterly 1,390 feet, more or less , to the $0 Sacramento NorthernRailroad right of Way; thence along said south line in a general southeasterly direction 1,350 feet, more< or less , to the east line Of Section 9,; thence along said cast line, . North 000 54, 45" West 386.36 feet, to the northeast corner; thence along the west line of S,ection 3 (T2N, feet, to the northwest corner of RIW), North 000 01' 52" West 2,610.96 PARCEL I filed may 22, 1995 in Licensed Surveyors 14ap Book 77 at page 2; thence along tie north line of PARCEL 1, South 880 01' 52" East 1,255.98 feet and North 860 58' 08" East 750.18 feet, to the northwest corner of PARCEL 2 (77 LSM 2); thence along the boundary of PARCEL 2, North 860 581 -000 West 150.30 feet, to the 061 30" 08" East 650.87 feet. and South northwest corner of 99 acre American Dredging Company parcel recorded 5 ATTACHMENT H pAGE n or 14 ............................................ ...................... ........................... ..................... ......................... ............................................................ ....................................................................''I'll,...................... ....................................................................................... .............................................. ... .. ........................................................................ .................................................... . ........................... ....................... ............. February 24, 1961 in Volume 3811, at page 237; thence along the <boundary of said 99 acre parcel , North 850 1'1' 30" East 250.04 feet, South 770 5'8' 301, Fast 132 feet, North 56 56, 30" East;; 122 feet, North 78e' 51' 30" East 139 feet, North 7507 16' 30" East. 201 feet, North 550 31' 30" East 191: feet,, Borth 150 511 30" East 196 feet, South 160 351 52" Fast 534.37 feet, and Seth 000 30' 45" blest 3,708.74 feet , to the north line of Contra Costa. County stater District parcel recorded February 17, 1961 in Volume 3887 at page 369; thence Southerly 300 feet, more or less , to the northeast corner of Interlake Steel Corp. parcel as shown on Record of Survey filed June 1, 1966 in licensed Surveyors' flap Book 42 of page 45 (said northeast coater being a point on the south lime of Sacramento Northern Railroad 'right of way recorded in Book. 187 of Deeds at page 360) thence along the south line of Sacramento Northern Railroad right of stay in a general easterly directio 5 ,928.22 feet. to the northeast corner of Poinsettia Land Company West Pittsburg Tract Unit No. 1 ;filed dune 8, 1926 in Map Book 19 at page 506; thence along the east. line of said Tract, South g'Clo 50' lest $31.64 feet, to the north line of Horace and Theresa Siino PARCEL T140 recorded October 24, 1944 i n Vol ume 796at page 488; thence along said north 1 ine and its easterly prolongation, South 890 48' East 485.48 feet, to the northwest corner of Bella Monte Subdivision No. 2 filed April 2, 1923 in '4ap Book 21 at ,page 584; thence along the boundary thereof, South 890 43' East 847.87 feet and South Olo 25' West 644.5€1 feet, to the northeast coater of Bella Monte Subdivision No. 1 (28 M 546) thence along the east line thereof, South 810 25' West 455.11 feet, to the point of beginning. 6 ATTACMENT Ii 'AGE 12 OF 14 ......... ......... ......... ......... _....... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......._. _.. . ... _ ..... ......... ......... ......... .............._. Excluding therefrom: A11 of Willow Glen Subdivision: 5064 recorded October 25, 1978 in Map Book 218 at ;.page 31 except that 55 feet ;vide strip of land shown as "Bailey Road Widening" (218 M31) LB:sj DescWPitt 1/08187 6103/87 7109187 8110187 817187 7 ATTAGHKENT H PAGE 13 of 14 axing Agencies in Say Point Contra Costa County Administrators Contra Costa County library District (evised June 9, 1999 0;<ffice 1750 Oak Park Blvd- %1,dataIwp6Acfbptaxing,lst 651 Pine Street 10' Floor Pleasant Mill, CA 94523-4497 Martinez, CA 94553 :antra Costa County Fire District Contra Costa Public Works kept. Contra Costa Public Works Dept. '.0310 Geary Road Service Area L-1030 Contra Costa Floud Control leasant Hill, CA 94523 255 Glacier Drive 2.55 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 dontra Costa Water Agency Contra Costa Resource Conservation Contra Costa Mosquito & °Vector 10 lox H2O 5552 Clayton Road 155 Mason Circle :oncord, CA 94524 Concord, CA 94521 Concord, CA 94520 )elta Diablo Sanitation District Delta Diablo Sanitation District !one 1 Zone 2 Los Medanos Hospital District 1500 PittsburgBAntioch fiery 2500 Pittsburg/Antioch Hwy .2311 Loveridge Road . kntiocb, CA 94509 Antioch, CA 94509 Pittsburg, CA 94565 krnbrose Recreation & Park Bay Area Rapid Transit District Bay Area Air Quality Management 3105 Willow Pass Road 8003 Madison Street District Ittsburg, CA 94565 03akland, CA 94607 939 Ellis Street San Francisco, CA 94109 wast Say Regional Park. District County Superintendent of Schools Mt. Diablo Unified School District X03 Box 5381 77 Santa Barbara Road 1936 Carlotta Drive Oakland, CA 946035 Pleasant HM, CA 94523 Concord, CA 94519 Contra Costa County Auditor- Pittsburg Unified School District Community College District Controller 2O00 Railroad Avenue 5303 Court Street 62:5 Court Street, Finance Bldg Pittsburg, CA 94565 Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 Contra Costa County Assessor Contra Costa County Tax Collector Contra Costa County Redevelopment 834 Court Street 625 Court Street, Room 100 Agency Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 651 Pine Street, 4'Floor - NW Martinez, CA 94553 to,s #-Aa L C-Cey Goldfarb and Lipman State Clearinghouse G-e k of `-eeB 3-_---d Cot,,. , Cly ATI-TN: Polly V. Marshal! 1400 Tenth Sheet, Room 121 Comty of Contra Costa One Montgomery Street, 2V Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 651 Pine Street Sar} Francisco, CA 94104 0V t& JCA L i-- Martinez, CA 94553 p- o. ion Iq2. 9°3'1 i RECEIVED 93 ?f °t FINAL SUPPLEMENTED DEPORT ON THE THIRD AMENDMENT T TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency October 19, 1999 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law, the following;reports and analyses are submitted by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the "Agency") to the Contra Costa County Board(the"Board") as the Report can the Third Amendment to the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan (the "Report"). The original Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point(formerly known as West Pittsburg) Redevelopment Project Area was adopted by the Beard on December 29, 1,087,byOrdinal-ice No. 87-142,was subsequently amended on December 6, 1994,by Ordinance No. 94-64, and was further amended can February 23, 1999,by Ordinance No. 99-45 (collectively, the"Plan"). A Report on the Plan was prepared for its initial adoption.in 1987(the"Original Report"). The Plan and the Original Report are incorporated herein by this reference. This Report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33444 gi=.). All Code Section references used in this Report are to the California Health and Safety Code unless otherwise specified. This Report has been prepared in accordance,with the requirements of Code Section 33457.1,which states in relevant part, "To the extent warranted by a proposed amendment to a redevelopment plan, ... the reports and information required by Section 33352 shall be prepared and rade available to the public prior to the hearing on such amendment." The purpose and reasons,'for the proposed Third Axrsendment to the Redevelopment Plays for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the "Plan Amendment") are set forth in detail in Part I of this Report. As noted in fart I,the purpose of the Plan Amendment is limited. Because of the narrow scope of the proposed amendment to be implemented through the Plan Amendment,only a few of the reports and analyses required by Health,and Safety Code Section 33352 are relevant and merit discussion in this Report, The reports and analysis described in Cade Section 33352(4),(e), (g),(1), and (n)were deemed irrelevant to the proposed amendment and were therefore not included in this Report. Parts VI.and V11 of this Report are not yet complete since certain scheduled meetings have not occurred at the time of preparation of this Report:. This Report will be supplemented prior to approval of the Plan Amendment, as the additional information becomes available. PART I. D SCRIPT1[ON A.: D REASONS FOR AMENDMENT The Bay Paint Redevelopment Plan was adopted December 29, 1987, nd subsequently amended car.December 6, 1994, and on February 23, 1999. The 1:994 amendment imposed certain time limits on the Flan as required by redevelopment reform legislation enacted in 1993 (AB 1'290). The February 1999 Plan Amendment extended plats time Bruits for the repayment of 320\07\12{299.3 1 debt and the receipt of tax increment by ton years pursuant to legislation enacted in 1998 (AB 1342). At this time, the Agency is proposing for consideration by the Board of Supervisors a Third Amendment to the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan to extend the deadline for commencement by the Agency of eminent domain actions. The Plan currently grants the Agency the power of eminent domain,under specified circumstances, through December 29, 1999. The proposed amendment would extend the authority to commence eminent domain actions twelve years to December 29, 2011, for land included in the existing Project Area. If the Plan is ever amended to include additional land, the Agency's authority to acquire property within the added area will extend for twelve(1'2)years from the date the new area is added. Fallowing the proposed amendment, all Plan and state law safeguards and requirements with respect to property acquisition and relocation benefits would continue to apply. This extension of time to exercise the power of eminent domain is Necessary to enable the Agency to continue to acquire property in an orderly fashion when necessary over the coming decade, without having to make precipitous decisions that may adversely affect property owners in order to meet a premature acquisition deadline. The Agency has no current plans for the exercise of the power of eminent domain on any specific parcels in the Project Area. It is important to note that the Agency's use of eminent domain power would be limited and only as a last resort toward a project of greater community benefit. The proposed Plan Amendment will not expand the Project Area, change any of the financial provisions of the Plan(e.g. limits on allocation of tax increment revenue to the Agency limits on the time to incur debt,undertake activities or collect tax increment and limits on the amount of outstanding bonded indebtedness), or modify the basic purpose of the original Plan and powers of the Agency. Thus, the proposed amendment is not of the type described in Health and Safety Code Section 33354.6 which would require observance of the procedures set forth in the Community Redevelopment Law for the adoption of an initial redevelopment plan. The Agency and the Board of Supervisors will comply with all requirements for adoption of an amendment of a redevelopment plan as set forth in Health and Safety Code Sections 33450-33458. PART II. DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL,S®CIAL, Alii) ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EXISTING IN THE PROJECT AREA This part of the report on a plan for a new redevelopment plan typically describes the conditions of a project area which qualify the area for redevelopment(blight analysis). This analysis was completed for the Report prepared for initial adoption of the Plan and served as the basis for the Board of Supervisors' finding in the ordinance adopting the initial,Plan=,mandated by Section 33367(d)(1), that the Project Area was a blighted area,the redevelopment of which was necessary to effectuate public purposes. 320\07\1,21299.3 2 _._ __ ........................................................................................ ._.... ......... ................................................................................................................. _ _ _ .................................................................................. The basis for the blight finding was definitively established by the initial adoption of the Plan.in 1987. Since 1987,the Agency has pursued an active redevelopment program in the Bay Point Project Area, In particular,the Agency has focused Its efforts on affordable housing development which includes a fourteen(14)unit affordable multifamily housing development, and a first time homebuyers program for purchase and rehabilitation'. The Agency has also pursued economic development activities in the Project Area, which include comma ercial/retail development and the creation of marketing materials and programs. The Agency has also constructed infrastructure improvements in the Project Area to both stimulate economic development and to improve the residential area: A major focus of the Agency's activities has been on the seven (7)block area bounded by North Broadway Avenue, Willow pass Road,Crivello Avenue and Suisun Bay, where construction of infrastructure improvements are underway. The Agency is anticipating the development of about 100-120 residential units and some commercial uses (thc 'F�crth Broadway mixed Use Development")on the 8-acre site that sits at the center of this target area (referred to as the Siino Property). In addition; the Bay Point/Pittsburg BART Station Specific Plan is expected to be adopted to late 1999. The plan provides for the development of commercial,office and residential uses that will enhance the portion of the Project Area near the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station. The remaining portions of the Project Area, however, remain significantly blighted and the conditions described in the 1987 Report on the Plan are largely unchanged in these areas. Part II of the Original Report, documented the significant physical and economic blighting conditions of the Project Area, is hereby incorporated by reference into this Fart II. -Major portions of the Project Area continue to include significant physical blighting conditions,including dilapidated:and deteriorated buildings and buildings with severe building; code violations, incompatible uses, inadequate public improvements,'open space and recreation facilities. The Project area also continues to suffer economic blighting conditions, including depreciated and stagnant property values, vacant and abandoned buildings, a lacy of necessary neighborhood services and commercial facilities, and high unemployment and crime rates. While the Agency has developed and implemented successful programs to promote redevelopment of blighted properties and alleviate blighting conditions that remain in the Project Area, the use of eminent domain remains necessary as a last resort to deal with those blighting conditions that remain in the Project Area, In order to allow the Agency maximum ability to revitalize the Project Area,the law provides redevelopment agencies with certain techniques to overcome blighting conditions in redevelopment areas. One of the techniques is the Agency's power of eminent domain.. Although eminent domain would only be a `last resort" solution to acquisition of properties in the Project Area,the Agency is moving into the implementation phase''of several of its remaining redevelopment programs. The Agency is now implementing various public improvement activities and is planning for longer-term land;development transactions with interested property owners and developers. The process of planning for,negotiating, and implementing a land development transaction or a public improvement project typically is a multi-year endeavor. It often'involves discussions 320\071,121299.3 3 ................ ....... with, or solicitation of proposals from, existing property owners of parcels that are critical to the overall redevelopment program, to determine if they are interested in and capable of participation in the redevelopment of their own properties or if they are willing to voluntarily sell their properties at fair value to the Agency or a designated developer: Next, the process involves negotiations of detailed development contracts, with property owners or selected non property owner developers, followed by preparation of detailed architectural plans,procurement of all necessary governmental permits and approvals,and procurement of development-financing. Only when all these activities have been completed is it typically possible to proceed with land assembly or a public improvement project,using condemnation as a last resort to achieve such assembly. This land development and public improvement process can require a number of years to complete. Because the Agency's current eminent domain power under the Plan expires in approximately six(6)months,there is no cushion for orderly implementation even of those land developments that the Agency commences in the coming years. The Agency envisions that it may need to initiate several land development transactions for key parcels in the Project Area throughout the first decade of the 2000s. Given the limitations on Agency financial and staff resources and the fluctuating nature of the general real estate market, it is not possible or even desirable for the Agency to try to force commencement of all its land development transactions into the next few months, so as to ensure that it can complete all necessary land assembly for such transactions within the current deadline for exercise of its eminent domain power. Indeed, some transactions will become feasible and advantageous to the Agency only later in the next decade, after improvements and actions undertaken in the next few years have further enhanced the physical and economic environment for Project Area redevelopment. For all these reasons, it is necessary that the time period for the exercise of the power of eminent domain be extended as provided in the proposed Plan Amendment. PART 111, IMPLEMENTATION PLAN The Agency adopted an Implementation Plan in December of 1994,which describes specific goals and objectives of the Agency,specific projects proposed by the Agency, how these projects will alleviate the documented blight conditions in the project area, and a program of actions and expenditures proposed for the following five years. As required by law, an updated Implementation Plan will be adopted by December of 1999. The existing Implementation Plan is incorporated into this Report by reference, PART IV. PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANICING THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA This part of the report on a plan fora new redevelopment plan typically considers the costs and potential revenue of redevelopment actions in order to determine if there is a financially feasible method to finance the redevelopment project. This analysis was completed for the Report for the initial adoption of the Plan and served as the basis for the Board's finding 320\07\121,2993 4 ....... .......................................o............. .... ........................ ....................................... ............. ..................... ........ ........................ ...................................................................................................................... ............................................ ......... in the ordinance adopting the initial Plan,mandated by Section 33367(d)(3),that the adoption of the initial Plan and the carrying out of the Plan were economically sound and feasible. Since the proposed amendment to the Plan contained in the Plan Amendment does net add any new redevelopment activities,no further analysis of the overall economic feasibility of the Project Area is required at this time. The proposed extension of the Agency's eminent domain power will enable the Agency, under specified conditions,to assertible properties with marginal economic utility into larger sites or to install needed public improvements,both of which will promote more intensive modem uses,thus,over time, allowing the Project Area to generate additional tax increment revenue for redevelopment activities. Although such acquisition may also involve cost to the Agency, the Agency will work closely with property owners and developers to insure maximum private sector involvement in any acquisition project, so as to minimize the use of'eminent domain and the use of public funds. On balance, the extension of the Agency's eminent domain power is expected to have a neutral or positive impact on the financial feasibility of the Project. PART V. METHOD OR PLAN FOR RELOCATION OF FAMILIES AND PERSON TO.BE DISPLACED FROM HOUSING FACILITIES IN THE PROJECT AREA_ When the Plan was first adopted in 1987,the Agency prepared a General relocation Plan, which set forth the Agency's general policies for the administration of the relocation program and the provisions of services and benefits to displaced families, individuals, businesses, and community institutions. The General relocation Plan also provided information about housing stoop conditions and availability of housing units to support the anticipated relocation caseload from redevelopment activities. The General Relocation Plan was included in the Original report and is incorporated herein by this reference. The General Relocation Plan adopted in 1987 serves as a general plan for relocation services and housing stock availability. The.Agency has performed more detailed relocation analyses,and,where appropriate, adopted specific relocation plans,as individual projects have been implemented. Although no specific project requiring relocation is currently proceeding at this time,the Agency anticipates that pp to an additional ten(1 Q)households may require relocation as part of the North Broadway fixed Use Development. The Agency intends to continue the practice of performing detailed relocation analyses at the time of project implementation. The Agency reaffirms its policies that no person or families of low or moderate income shall be displaced unless and until there is a'suitable housing unit available and beady for occupancy. The;Agency is currently setting aside 20%of its tax increment revenue for affordable low and moderate income housing and is undertaking various activities to stimulate the production and rehabilitation of the affordable housing stoop, using bath tax increment revenue and other 320e)7'k,121299.3 5 ................................................ ........................-.............. funding sources. The Agency currently has an option to purchase an 8-acre site,where it anticipates facilitating a mixed-use development, including approximately 100-120 units of multifamily and single family residential units. The Agency will work with the developer to ensure that a portion of the units will serve very low, low, and moderate income households, at affordable housing cost. Thus, the Agency possesses the resources to ensure affordability of the available housing stock for any limited number of households that may be displaced by future redevelopment activities. Based on the information set forth above, the Agency is satisfied that there is a comprehensive basis for the Board to find that: (a) The Agency has a feasible method or plan for the relocation of families and persons displaced from the Project Area, if the Plan may result in the temporary or permanent displacement of any occupants of housing facilities in the Project Area; and (b) There are, or are being provided, in the Project Area or in other areas not generally less desirable in regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to the displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment; and (c) Permanent housing facilities will be available within three years from the time occupants of the Project Area are displaced and that pending the development of the facilities, there will be available to the displaced occupants adequate temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the community at the time of their displacement. PART VI. REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission prepared and adopted a report and recommendation regarding the pro-nosed amendment, as required pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33453. The Planning Commission's report and recommendation is attached to this Report as Mach m�nt PART VII. SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY MEETINGS AND CONSULTATIONS REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The Bay Point Project Area Committee("PAC")was formed in 1987 in connection with the adoption of the original Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area and has continued to meet regularly and advise the Agency since that time. Agency staff consult extensively with the PAC regarding the redevelopment process and programs. Code Section 33385.5 provides that the PAC shall be forwarded a copy of any proposed , Redevelopment Plan amendment at least thirty(30)days prior to the Board of Supervisors' hearing on the proposed Plan Amendment. Accordingly,Agency staff forwarded the proposed Plan Amendment to the PAC on June 2, 1999. 320\07M1299.3 6 ..................................................... .... ........ ................................. ................ ....................................... ............... ............ .................................... ......................................................................... ............................... Agency staff discussed the proposed Plan Amendment with the:PAC at its May 12, 1999, meetings, and reviewed the Plan Amendment and this Report with the PAC at the PAC's meeting of July 28, 1999. The PAC unanimously recommended adoption of the Ply Amendment at the July 28, 1999'meeting. Minutes of the July 28, 1999 PAC meeting are attached to this Report as act . Agency staff scheduled a community meeting which was held on October 14, 1999, to obtain community comments and input regarding the proposed Plan Amendment. 'Notice of the meeting was published in the �ta�on September 20,September 27, October 4, and October 11, 1999, and the ger is on September 20, September 25, October 5,.and October 12, 1999, and was mailed to all Project Area property owners and residents. The minutes of this meeting are attached to this Deport as 'achmtuLC. Notices of the joint public hearing were sent by first class mail to every property ever, business, community organization and resident in the Project Area, as required by Code Section 33452,on September 15, 1999. Copies of the Notices and declarations of mailing to the property owners and to the occupants are attached to this Report ashi 1, In addition, notice of the public hearing was published in the on September 20, 1999, September 27;October 4,and October 11, 1999, and the on'September 21, September 28, October 5, and October 12, 1999, The proof of publications of the notice of the public hearing are also attached to this Report as Qbn1-JE. Or. October 19, 1999,the Board of Supervisors and Agency are scheduled to hold a joint public hearing to consider the adoption:of the Plan Amendment. All of the comments made at that hearing will be a part of the record of the adoption of the Flan Amendment. PART VIII. PORT REQUIRED BYOVER WI ENT CODE SECTION 65402 The report required by Government Code Section 65402,stating that the Plan'' Amendment conforms to the General Plan, is contained as part of the Planning Commission report: and recommendation on the Plan Amendment{see Part CJI of than Report}. PART IX. REPORTQUIRE #BY SECTION 21151 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE The County has prepared a Negative Declaration to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Plan Amendment. Pursuant to the Negative Declaration, the proposed Plan Amendment has been found to have no significant effects on the environment. The legative Declaration will serve as the principal background reference for environmental impact information for the Planning Commission,County,and Agency decision makers during deliberations pertaining to the Plan:Amendment. The Negative Declaration is attached to this Report as Atthmnr , 32=7\124299.3 7 ............ Notice of the proposed intention to rely on the Negative Declaration was incorporated into the notice of the public hearing for the Plan Amendment, which was published in the Cortr- Costa Ii=-s and Ledger Dispatch and was mailed to all property owners,businesses, community organizations and residents within the Project Area, and all affected taxing entities as described in Parts VII and X of this Report. PART X. CONSULTATIONS WITH AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES As described in Part I of this Report, the proposed amendment to the Plan does not add any territory to the Project Area or change any of the other fiscal parameters or time limits of the Plan. Consequently,no formal consultation was conducted with affected taxing agencies. However, consistent with the Agency and Board of Supervisors' desire for input, the Agency sent each taxing agency, by certified mail, a copy of.,each of the following documents on June 9, 1999: 1) Statement of Preparation of Plan Amendment (including notice of the County's and Agency's intent to rely on a negative declaration for adoption of the Plan Amendment); 2) Negative Declaration; and 3) Draft Amendment. Each affected taxing agency was sent on September 15, 1999,by certified mail, notice of the public hearing on the Plan Amendment. A copy of this notice and declaration of mailing are attached to this Report as Attachment H. PART XI. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT REPORT Part X11 of the Original Report on the Plan included an extensive Neighborhood Impact Report describing in detail the impact of the project on the residents of the project area and surrounding areas. The information included in Part XII of the Original Report remains 'largely unchanged and the,part of the Original Report is included herein by this reference, with the following updates: 1) Number of dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income expected to be destroyed as a part of the redevelopment project. As of the date of this Report., twelve(12)units housing low or moderate income households have been destroyed by Agency activities. The units have been replaced with the construction of the fourteen (14) unit't Elaine Null Court Apartments,which were completed in 1996. The Agency anticipates approximately ten(10) additional units may be destroyed to accommodate the N1 orth Broadway Mixed Use Development. 320\07\121299.3 8 .............................. .. ............................. ...... ........................................................ ................................................. ....... ............................................. .........................................................................................................................''I'll'-,........... ...... ............................................ ........................ 2) Number of lova or moderate income households expected to be displaced. As of the date of this deport, eight( )low or moderate income households have been displaced by Agency activities. The Agency anticipates up to tern(10)additional households may be displaced by future Agency activities related to the North Broadway Mixed Use Development. 3) General location of housing to be rehabilitated, constructed,or developed pursuant to Section 33413, projected financing of such units, and projected timetable to meet relocation,housing production and replacement housing requirements. To date,the Agency has satisfied a portion of its Section 33413 lousing production requirements with the fourteen(14)Elaine Null Court Apartments. The Agency is leveraging its Low and Moderate Housing Fund to provide one new 100-120 unit af'fordabl'e housing development as part of the North Broadway Mixed Use Development, and a first time homebuyers program to assist lower- income households:in purchasing and rehabilitating a Morrie. The Agency previously assisted.. twelve(12) lower-income households;with its initial first time homebuyer program and has assisted four(4) low-income households through its current first time homebuyer program, The North Broadway Mixed Use Development is anticipated to provide approximately 1€10-120 units of multifamily and single family residential units. The Redevelopment Agency has an option to purchase the site and its currently conducting an environmental assessment of the property. The agency will work with a nonprofit and/or for-profit developer to develop the site, The first time hornebuyers program provides silent second mortgage assistance to very-low and low-income households who purchase and rehabilitate a home utilizing the HUD 203k program. The agency's replacement housing obligation to date is twelve (12) units, which was the result of demolition of twelve(12)dilapidated units in 1993 at Alves sane and Water Street. The Agency met its replacement obligation with the construction of the fourteen (1 4)unit Maine Null Court Apartments on the Alves sane site, which was completed in 1996. The Agency is working with the community to develop the North Broadway Mixed Use Development,which will include 100-120 new affordable units, and also to identify future affordable housing projects that may include scattered site infill housing for low-to moderate-income households. The Agency anticipates easily meeting its future replacement housing and housing production requirements with these projects. 3e0\07\12¢299.3 9 DennisUBarry,Aims Community n . Community 0eeicpmer + DireC4o= Development Department u County Administration Building � 651 Fine Street 4th Floor,North Wing Martinez,California 94553-0095 (925)335.1290 AITACIU ENT A September 14, 1999 Contra Costa County redevelopment Agency Board of Supervisors of'the County of Centra Costa' 651 fine Street, 4th Floor,worth Wing Martinez, CA 94553o--1224 Honorable Agency and Board Members: This letter transmits East County Regional Planning Commission resolution No. 24-99 to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency and the Board of Supervisors of the County of'Contra Costs for consideration as part of the Agency's Report to Board pursuant to Section<33352 of the California ia,Redevelopment Lasa: Resolution No. 24-99 is deemed the report and recommendation of the East County Regional Planning Commission concerning the proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Flan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area. Sincerely, µmy Secretary of the Planning Commission Attachment: Resolution PAGE I OF 4 Office Hours Monday-Frdey:8:00 a.m.e 8:00 pm. Office is closed the I st, 3rd& Sth Fridays of each month RESOLUTION NO. 24-99 RESOLUTION OF THE EAST COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMMISSION, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA, WHEREAS, The Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") has submitted to the East County Regional Planning Commission a proposed Third Amendment (the "Redevelopment Plan Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the "Redevelopment Plan"); and WHEREAS, Part V of the Redevelopment Plan incorporates the General Plan land uses, land use standards, development criteria, goals and objectives into the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 33453 of the Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et�.) provides that the East County Regional Planning Commission is to review the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment and make its report and recommendation thereon to the Agency and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa (the "Board"), including a determination whether the Redevelopment Plan Amendment conforms to the General, Plan of the County of Contra Costa; and WHEREAS, Section 65402 of the Government Code provides in part: "(a) If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, no real property shall be acquired by dedication or otherwise for street, square, park or other public purposes, and no real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned, and no public building or structure shall be constructed or authorized, if the adopted general plan or part thereof applies thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition, such street vacation or abandonment, or such public building or structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof......; and WIMREAS, Section 65402 of the Government Code provides in part: "(c) A local agency shall not acquire real property for any of the purposes specified in paragraph (a) nor dispose of any real property, nor construct or authorize a public building or structure, in any county or city, if such county or city has adopted a general plan or part thereof and such general plan or part thereof is applicable thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition, disposition, or such public'building or structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency having jurisdiction, as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof..."; and WHEREAS, the East County Regional Planning Commission's report and recommendation, including matters refer-red to in Section 65402 of the Government Code, are to be made to the ATTACIRMENT A PAGE 2 OF 4 PAGE I RESOLUTION NO. 24-99on ......................................... ......... ....... ............................ .................-......................................... .......................... .............. .......................... ...... ....... . ................................................................ ...................................................................... Agency and the Board for their consideration in acting on the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment; and AREAS, The East County Regional Planning Commission has reviewed the County of Contra Costa General Plan, the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment, the Negative Declaration dated June 9, 1999 prepared for the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and the Report to the Board on the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the East County Regional Planning Commission: I. FINDS that the proposed Legative Declaration is adequate for the purposes of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and recommends that the}Hoard of Supervisors adopt same; 2. PINS that pursuant to Section 33346 of the Community Redevelopment Law, the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment conforms to the General Plan; 3. RINDS that pursuant to Section 65402 of the Government Code, acquisition of property by the Agency, if any, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, conforms to the General Plan; 4. RECOMMENDS to the Board of Supervisors the APPROVAL and ADOPTION of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment and in the event that prior to its adoption of the Redevelopment Plan Amendment, the Board desires to make any minor, technical, or clarifying changes to the Redevelopment Plan Amendment, the East County Regional Planning Commission hereby finds and determines Haat any such miner, technical, or clarifying changes need not be referred to it for further report and recommendation, and hereby waives its report and recommendation under Section 33455 of the Community Redevelopment Law concerning any such change; and 5. DEEMS this Resolution to be the report and recommendation of the East County Regional Planning Commission concerning the proposed Redevelopment Plan Amendment and contemplated public projects and activities under the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, as required under Section 33453 of the Community Redevelopment Law. ATTA.CIRMENT A PAGE 3 of 4 PAGE 2' RESOLUTION NO. 24-99 .............. ............ ............ ..................... Adopted this Order on September 13, 1999,the following votes: AYES: Commissioners—Hanson, Dell, Harper, MacVittie, Sobalvarro, and Wetzel NOES: Commissioners— None ABSENT: Commissioners— Nunn ABSTAIN: Commissioners— None Earl Wetzel Chair of the County East County Regional Planning Commission County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: c CATHERINE KUTSURIS, SECRETARY East County Regional Planning Commission, County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTACHMENT A PAGE 4 OF 4 PAGE 3 RESOLUTION NO. 24-99 ................ AITACIMENT B ]BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE MEETING July 28, 1993 Mefnbers Present: Art Chomor, George Dela Cruz, Chuck.Gibson, Debra Mason,Floyd Mason and Sterling Stevenson Member Absent: None Staff Present: Jim Kennedy and R;abail Shah I, Call to Order-Bay Poiret Project Area Committee Meeting The meeting of the Bay Point Project..Area Committee(PAC)was called to order at 7:10 gam. on July 2g, 1999 II, Public Comments. Art Chomor requested Agency staff to provide noticing in local newspapers to announce any charge of date for the PAC meetings. Jim Kennedy announced that a>closed'session was held prior to the Bay Port PAC meeting to discuss the real estate transaction for the Siino property. The PAC did not take any action at the closed session that is inconsistent>with>the Option and Purchase Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency and the Siino Family. Mr. Kennedy requested that.Agenda item 5,the Community Group Funding Grant Application,be heard first on the agenda to prevent delaying majority of the audience in attendance to hear this issue. III. Approval of Minutes of June 9, 1999> The minutes of June 9, 1933 were approved [ fStC Dela Cr z/Chomorl. IV. Consider Staff Recommendation to Approve Community Group Funding Grant for Pacifica Park Clea up. (Action Item) Connie Warner of the Bay Point Resident.Association presented the application for the Community Group Funding Grant. Ms. Warner stated that the groups,',East County Youth Commission and the Resident Association plan to clean up Pacifica Park on August 21, 1999 from.8:00 a.m. until work is finished.The gaups intend to work with Ambrose Recreation and Park District's landscape planner in planting the trees and shrubs, and t ............................ ................. .............. placing of the potted plants.Ms. Warner presented a letter of support from Patti Lambert, General Manger ofAmbrose Recreation and Park District, on the clean-up project. George Dela Cruz stated that he supports the groups' efforts and will encourage the park c' district to make additional repairs at Pacifica Park. The PAC unanimously approved the grant of$3,111.74 to the Bay Point Resident Association and the East County Youth Commission for clean-up of Pacifica Park. [MISIC Dela Cruz/Gibson]. IV. Consider Recommendation to Adopt the Third Amendment to the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan for Extension of the Redevelopment Agency's Eminent Domain Authority. (Action Item). The Bay Point Plan Amendment extends the Redevelopment Agency's eminent domain authority to December 29, 2011. Staff intends to hold a community meeting to address public questions on ermnent domain during the second week of October prior to the scheduled Board of Supervisor's public hearing on October 19, 1999. PAC unanimously approved to adopt the Third Amendment to the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan to extend the Redevelopment Agency's eminent domain authority. [M/S/C Dela Cruz/Mason]. VI. Review Budget Priorities for Fiscal Year 1999/2000. (Discussion Item) Jim Kennedy provided an update of fiscal year 1998/99 budget and distributed the current and status budget reports and a list of potential projects qualified for bond proceeds. The following includes an update of the budget for FY 1998/1999. Project Description Budgeted Expenditure to Date Infrastructure Program Ambrose Comm. Installation of the playground I $60,000 $44,591.59 Center Play Structure equipment complete.Contract extended Equipment i to June 2000 to renovate tennis courts. N.Broadway Phase 1 1 Construction of Phase IA complete. $1,653,030 $583,982.34 Phase IB construction will begin August 9, 1999. N. Broadway Phases Phase 11 Project Agreement executed $300,000 None. 11/111 for$271,00. committed to$271,000 P. Chicago Highway Staff is working with Public Works to $100,00 1 None. Widening Project refine project agreement. Agency portion is$54,000 of which 12,750 will committed be reimbursed by CDBG. to$54,000 McAvoy RR Crossing Pacific stated that earliest to 1 $25,000 None. begs project is October 1999. 1 Unallocated Capital 1: $1,034,462 None. ATTACHMENT B 2 ..................................................... ....... ...................... ................................................ .......................................................................... ..............''I'll'',.............................-,''''I'll''....... ..................................................................... ..................................................... FFunds ° Community Improvement Projects Abatement Revolving i Expended funds to pay for abatement. $g#3,€00 $42,228.60 Loan Funds Community Group Approved two grants for FY 95199; $207000 1,688.26 ty Funding Program Family Preservation Funds received via Social Services $40,000. 'None. Support Program, t contract for renovations on 2711 A &B ( Willow Vass Road.Renovations are l complete and General Services will request for reimbursement. Cost Pa eats for rape maintenance. r $2,500 $3,941.58 Property Io�c�rg yrn p I o€ising Projects a NN, a �smebuyers Two loans closed for FY'98/99. $251,861 $17,51313 <Broadway Site Acis. Caption agreement costs. $1,2f313,131311 $11,044 I .Broadway, Pre-devel. Predevelopment costs. 1 $80,4130 $5,900 Economic Development Activities n:Fag Rehab loan or rebate requests.Con ; X49,5913 ' done: Comm/Indust.Database lNataba e is complete, $2,704 jr lvlarkKeting Canpaign. Marketing strategy development. $2,890» arlcet ng Design rod Bay Point marketing brochures $11,500 ; $85.00 s COMP leted in June 1999. 3 ''larinaJ Ytrfr t Level. Preliminary Assessment report on Bay $54,€ 00 , $3,7513 .Point marina completed in June 1999. ` Light In-&u-strIal Staff $2506mill continue discussion with $25 � �Ic�n�. Feasibility Study Criterion Catalyst to do a,point study. Planning Activities eBay Point/Plits l3ARI ; Specific plan preparation costs. $15,1344 $1,7£l?,5th i SAI' � ' Bay Point/Pitts EIR EIR is complete and will be seat out for $94,000 $51,7513 public review inmid-August. Pitts &BARS will reimburse(113). I'-1 Rezoning First s5a -comrmittee meeting in 9199. $32,1311£3 �one, Administration SalaneslSe, upplies Apprax. 71°le pended to date. 1913,194 � $135,292:68 Priority projects identified for bond funds expenditures are identified in the hand out passed out at the meeting.In addition to.the items listed in the handout, the PAC ident€fled the following: 1) Remodeling of Ambrose Community Center. 2) 'waterfront Development activities. 3) Site for the West Pittsburg,Historical Society and Museum. 4) Canal Road Property Development. TV. Committee Repor°tsfCommittee Comments. ICAC Report.MAC approved an alcohol permit for the McAvdy Bait Shap. ATTACHMENT B 3 ................................. ................................... ............ ........... • TAC Report. No Report. • PART Spec ific Plan Report. The draft EIR for the Specific Plan is complete and will be released for a 60-day public review period. Staff will recommend a joint planning comm ission hearing to consider plan adoption. • West Pittsburg Historical Society and Museum. No Report. ® Ambrose Recreati©n and Park District. Ambrose Recreation & Park District acquired vacant lot adjacent to center. Ambrose is considering remodeling the current center. • Contra Costa Resources revel. Corp (CCRDO. No Report. V. Staff Reports. • North Broadway Infrastructure Program. Staff and Public Works met with the contractor, Cities Paving and Grading,on July 21, 1999 to discuss Phase 1, Part B construction. The contractor will begin construction on August 9, 1999. This phase includes improvements on Solano and Poinsettia Avenues. Project Agreement with Public Works for Phase II is complete and includes design, right of way engineering and property acquisition. The total cost of the contract is $271,000. Phase Il improvements include streets east of Bella Monte Avenue and Crivello Avenue. • P-1 Rezoning. The first subcomrnittee meeting for P-1 rezoning is September 8, 1999 from 5:30 to'7:00 PM at the Ambrose Community Center. • Waterfront Center Reference Check. Staff conducted preliminary reference checks on the Waterfront Center prior to their visit to Bay Point. Staff will prepare a Request for Proposals/Request for Qualifications to solicit other consultant groups for future waterfront planning activities. • EBRPDIBCDC Discussions. EBRPD expressed interest on various levels for waterfront area development. BCDC stated that they are willing to enter into a dialogue.on the subject but would prefer to wait for a proposal of development before entering any discussion. • Budget Status Report, The budget status was given under agenda item#6. VII. With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:55 PM. ATTACHMENT B 4 .......................... ............................... .................................. .............................................................................. ...................................................... ..... ....................... .......I--..................... .............. ............ .................................. ..........................................................111.11,11,...... ........................................................... ...................... .......................................I........... ,ATT.AGMENr C. BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA THS AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLA_' COMMUNITY MEETING INIJTES OCTOBER 1 , 1999 The community meeting on the proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area was held at the Ambrose Community Center Auditorium at 3105 Willow Pass Road in Bay Point. The meeting began at 6:0€3 PM1 . James Kennedy,Redevelopment Deputy Director,provided introductions and:explained that the current Bay paint Redevelopment Plan included the eminent domain power. ,The Bay Point Redevelopment Plan was adapted on December 29, 1987. Redevelopment is a mechanism for a comm..unity to upgrade their infrastructure,housing;,and community facilities,,including parks and senior centers, and also to enhance economic development activities. ?zany communities in the County engage in redevelopment. The County has five redevelopment communities and all of thea contain the eminent domain provisions. We include the eminent domain prevision in order to realize the goals of the community as articulated in the County General flan and Specific Plans;you may need to assemble property to redevelop in accordance with the goals of the community. In most cases the majority of the properties in Bay Point will not be affected by the eminent domain:provision since the properties are located in areas zoned for the current uses of the properties, The Agency is interested in helping the Bay feint community improve the neighborhood and quality of homes in Bay Point. There are some areas that are in transition where new land uses are contemplated. The area tis-the east of Bailey Road and south of Highway 4 is contemplated in the Specific Plan to transition to a higher intensity use. Land assembly is likely to facilitate the transition. The second contemplated use of eminent domain is for properties located on Willow Pass Road,where land assembly maybe desirable in order to realize the goals of the General Plan. These are the types of location where one might see property assembly by the Redevelopment Agency. if land;assembly is,required.,the property owner and developer are required to negotiate in good faith with the property owner for a voluntary sale of the property. The price offered is the fair market value determined through an appraisal; -however, if the property owner does not want to sell at the appraised value, then the eminent domain procedure may be used. This is the absolute last resort but the Agency may take this option to realize the goals of the community. The Redevelopment agency does not have the desire or the resources to buy up all the properties in Bay Point. The rumor circulating in the community that the Agency will be buying all the homes in Bay Point for$40,030 is not true. Most properties in Bay Point are not in transitional areas. Most of the area in Bay Point is single family residential,where there are residences. We hope that the Agency can help to upgrade som.e`of the properties to create a better living environment and better value for Bay Point residents: 3210\07\124753.2 1 ....................................... .................... Agency staff distributed copies of the adopted Bay Point Redevelopment Plan, the Report of the Third Amendment to the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area, the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Specific Plan, and marketing brochures of Bay Point. Participants were asked to sign ar~ attendance sheet and for those that did not receive copies of the information were asked to indicate if they would like the above documents provided to them. Although 152 participants signed in, approximately 300 were in attendance. A Spanish interpreter was provided to translate during the meeting. The remainder of the meeting was a question and answer format. Questions and Answers I What happens when one owner wants to sell and the other owner refuses to sell? If it is in the transitional areas, then this may be a circumstance that eminent domain may be used. The question is usually not whether the property owner is willing to sell or not,but rather the price the seller wishes to obtain. The eminent domain proceedings are a legal process,which car.get that resolved. 2. If you are a renter,can the Redevelopment Agency help to relocate you? In the event of a public agency acquisition,homeowners may receive monetary compensation for increased mortgage payments in purchasing a new house and moving costs. Renters may also receive differential rent benefits and moving costs. 3. Two weeks ago there was an article in the paper that the Agency offers silent second mortgages of up to $35,000 to purchase homes. You said that the Agency does not Dave the resources to purchase the homes,but how can you afford to give out $35,000 in loans? The Agency has dedicated funds to assist low-income families purchase homes. The County does have funds to help families rehabilitate but the Agency does not have a rehabilitation program. 4. Are you planning to take over our homes in 12 years? The eminent domain power expires every 12 years, so at this time the Agency has to do an amendment to extend the power for another 12 years. There is no hidden agenda and we hope that Bay Point residents will only be positively affected by redevelopment. 5, What are the present boundaries of eminent domain? The entire Bay Point Redevelopment Project area is subject to the powers of eminent domain. 6. Why didn't I know of redevelopment or eminent domain before? If you have bought your homes in the last 12 years, the title report and title policy for the home contains as one of the lien items the Redevelopment Plan for the community. That is a legally recorded document and it shows up in title. I understand that when purchasing a home that is sometime missed. Due to the number of duplicative questions, the minutes were condensed to group all like questions and answers together. ATTACHMNT C 3201071124753.2 2 ............................... ............................................... .................... ............................. ...............1.111,.................1.111.11,111,111,........................................... .............................................. ................................................................ ................................... .. ....................... 7. Is there a schedule of how eminent domain is anticipated to be rased? As described earlier, the areas that are in transition are where there is potential for land assembly using the power of eminent domain. The transition areas are along the Willow lass Strip and perhaps some properties in the North Broadway area adjacent to the old Siino,junkyard. What the Agency is looking to do is to use the redevelopment tools and financing to help improve the properties and raise their value. 8. What happens to<a mobile homeowner if mobile horse park is targeted for eminent domain? A mobile home park may be a large property to begin with and may not be necessary to acquire or assemble if the property owner can sell to a developer who is interested in redeveloping it. Its that case,the benefits that exist in state lav is that the park owner has to provide you assistance in helping you to move. If a public agency is involved.,then state relocation requirements would apply and relocation benefits would be providedand the responsibility would be on the Agency to find another park`where`the mobile home could be moved. There are both moving expenses and rent differential benefits available to the mobile homeowner. 9. Why is there a negative impact on the environmental report? This is a procedural act required under CQA. There was a negative declaration in the environmental report, which means that no negative environmental impacts are expected in extending the use of eminent domain. 10. What do you deo when one group of homeowners are upgrading their properties and the rather half are not? A part of what we do in the redevelopment program is to create a i environment encouraging investment by property owners, In some cases,property owners will invest because they see it as in their self interest. For others,that are not investing,what we are try to create as an investment environment that will make sense to them. in the situation where a person in not investing,we also have a code enforcement program to make the property owners keep their properties in a.safe and healthy condition. 11. 1 am retired, how can I afford to make the upgrades or to tape out loans? Some of the assistance, in fact almost half ofthe loans made in the existing housing programs are zero percent interest with deferred payments. This was set up for exactly the situation that you are describing. 12. How do you determine what are incompatible land rases where Agency acquisition ition is necessary? What we rely upon is the adopted General flan for the community. The Redevelopment Agency dors not exist to undertake projects for its own self-interest. It exists to implement the goals and policies of the General pian. In some cases,the goal of the General plan is to create a different land use in certain areas and in those circumstances we might assemble property. 13. What if there is a difference in the appraisal obtained by the property owner and theoneobtained:by the public agency? If there are big differences, we will do a third appraisal to evaluate the cause of the difference. 3201,07\124753.2 3 ........................................... .............................. 14. If I had made improvements on my home and I am acquired through eminent domain how will I get that money back? If anyone makes an improvement in a home, that improvement may be reflected as a dollar to dollar increase in value to the property. If the property has been improved,that will be reflected in the appraisal process. 15. If a property owner owns a residential property in the Willow Pass Road area that has lost value over the last few years,how can you get that value back? Two things can tum that around: 1) investment in that area can improve that value of the property located in the near-by area, and 2)direct investment in that property can increase the value. Hopefully the whole process of upgrading the community and the vicinity will be reflected in the increased value of the property. The meeting was concluded at 9:30 PM. Participants were encouraged to speak afterwards with, or call,Agency staff to further information. ATTACHMENT C 320\07\1247512 4 .......... ........... ............................................. ......... ........................................................................................... ............................. ............... .............. ............... .............-... ...................................... ................................................................................. ............................................. ATTACHMENT LEGAL NOTICE JOINT PL-13LIC HEARING AME1� MEDT TO BAS''POINT"REDEVELOPMENT PLAN NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVENT that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County(the "Board") and the Board of the Contra.Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the "Agency") will hold a joint public bearing on October 19, 1999 a1 11:00 a.m. in the hoard Chambers located at 651 mine Street, Room 107, Martinez, California. The hearing may be continued from time to time until completed. Any person desiring the opportunity to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to do so. The purpose of the hearing is to consider certain an amendment described bele to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project, adopted by Board Ordinance No- 87-102 on December 29, '1987, as amended in 1994 and 1999 (the"flan"). The currently proposed amendment for the Flan isincorporatedin a proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the "Plan Amendment"). The purpose of the proposed Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve years. The proposed Pian Amendment will not change any of the financial provisions of the Plan (e.g. limits on allocation of tax increment revenue to the Agency, limits on times to incur debt or collect tax increment, or limits on the amount of outstanding bonded indebtedness), or the proposed activities of the Agency to promote redevelopment of the Project Area. The Project Area is situated in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, and is more particularly described in Exhibit A to the Ordinance leo. 87-102, adopted on December 29, 1987, recorded in the Offices of the County Recorder of Contra Costa County on December 30, 1987. The boundaries of the Project Area will not be changed as a result of the flan Amendment. The County has prepared a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts of the proposed Plan Amendment. A copy of this Negative Declaration is available for review at the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. Any and all persons having any comments on or objections to the proposed Plan Amendment, or the regularity of any prior proceeding, or who which to speak on any issue raised by the Plan Amendment or the Negative Declaration as it relates to the Plan Amendment may appear at the hearing and show cause why the proposed Plan Amendment should not be adopted. In addition at any time not later than the time set forth for the hearing on the Plan Amendment, any person may file in writing with the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa a statement orfobjections to the proposed Plan Amendment. 32007\123044-1 ............... ...... .................... .......... ................ In accordance with the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Agency has prepared a Report on the Plan Amendment. The Plan Amendment and Report on the Plan Amendment are available for inspection in the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, located at 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor, North Wing, Martinez, California. This Notice is published pursuant to the order of the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County and the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, Date: September 14, 1999 Contra Costa County Re evelopment Agency A For Publication on: County J es: ennedy September 20, 1999 eepu Director— edevelopmen" September 27, 1999 October 4, 1999 October 11, 1999 ATTACHMENT D 320\071123®44,1 2 ATTACPMNT E DECLARATION OF MAILIN � TO PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCU-,PkN, -TS I declare that: I am citizen of the United States and employed in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, over the age of eighteen years, and employed by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. My business address is 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor,North Wing, Martinez, California. I sued the attached Notice to Property owners and Occupants(with attached Legal Notice) a copy of which is.attached hereto as Exhibit A, by depositin a true>copy thereof in the United States Mail at Martinez, California, by First Class mail, on -s' 1999, addressed to each of those persons listed in the last equalized roll ofC ntra Costa.County as owning, or listed in Contra Costa.County records as occupying, ;property within the<boundaries of the Bay Point Project Area and to each of those persons, businesses and community organizations believed to occupy property within the boundaries of the Bay Point project Area. I declare€nder penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this- Declaration was executed on 1999 at Martinez,California. ATTA^HNENT E PAS E I OF 7 3200714 23053.1 .................. ....... ...............I.......11.............I....... Commissioners Redevelopment :.., ' gency Contra John Gloia County Adn'tinistration Building Costa 651 Pine Street 4th Roor,NoM Wing Martinez,California 9455,11296Gayie S.UilkeM a County 2nd Disind Phil Batchelor Donna Gerber Executive Director arc Distnct Dennis M.Barry,AICD Assistant Executive Director Mark De 4*h SSaul James D James Kennedy Joe canci2mffla Deputy Director-Redevelopment5th Di5tricl (925)646-4076 September 15, 1999 NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS Dear Property Owner or Occupant in the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area: It is a pleasure to send you this packet of information concerning the proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point (formerly West Pittsburg) Redevelopment Project (the "Plan Amendment"). The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors (the "Board"), County staff, the County Planning Commission, and interested members of the community have been involved in the plan amendment process and are pleased to see that the planning process is nearing completion. This packet contains a copy of the Legal Notice for a Joint Public Hearing to be held or the proposed Plan Amendment along with a map of the property located within the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area boundary. As the Legal Notice indicates, the Board of Supervisors and the Agency will hold a joint public hearing on October 19, 1999 at 11:00 a.m. in the Board Chambers, located at 651 Pine Street, Room 107, Martinez, California. The public hearing will be held to consider the adoption of the Plan Amendment. The purpose of the proposed Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve years. In preparation for this formal public hearing, a community meeting on the proposed Plan Amendment is scheduled for October 14, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. at the Ambrose Community Center, located at 3 105 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point, California. Please plan to attend this meeting if you have question about the proposed Plan Amendment or the redevelopment process in general. The latest equalized property tax roll of the County indicates that you own or occupy property within the Project Area boundary. In compliance with the requirements of State law, this packet is being transmitted to you by U,S. mail. The notice is also being sent to businesses, residential tenants and community organizations located within the boundaries of the Project Area. ATTACHMENT E PAGE 2 OF 7 320\077123053 1 ................................... .......... ................................... .............................. ........................................... ............... ............................. ............................... ...................................................... ...... .............................�0000.....................................................000000.................... ................................I__...................... ............ ...............................................................................................1.11,11,11,.................. ........................................................................... ................................. _....... ..._..... ......... .._.. _... ........ ......... ....._.............__..... ..... ....._... ..._..__...._.. _. - _ _ ............ ...... __._.. Property Owner or Occupant September 8, 1999 Page 2 The County has prepareda Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts of the proposed Plan Amendment. A copy of this Negative Declaration is available for review at the Contra Crista County Redevelopment Agency offices, The Plan Amendment, along with a detailed report concerning the Plan Amendment(which includes the Negative Declaration)are available for inspection in the office of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency located at 651 Pine Street, 4th Fluor, forth Wing, Martinez, California. In accordance with Section 33354 of the California Health and Safety Code, you are hereby notified that all property located within the boundaries of the ProjectArea is subject to acquisition by the Redevelopment Agency by purchase or eminent domain (condemnation) under the provisions of the proposed Plan Amendment. The agency is required to formally'notify property owners well in advance before making offers to purchase their property and has adopted procedures for that purpose. The Agency has no current pians to acquire particular properties. It is important to nate that the Agency's use of this tool would be limited and used only as a last resort toward a project of greater community benefit. Your further inquiries, and attendance at the community meeting and public hearing, will be most welcome. Si cerely. I €res yenned eputyirec r—Redeveloprre Attachments: Legal Notice , 1 ATTACIDIENT E PAGE. 3 OF 7 320\07\923053 1 ........................................... R Commissioners edevelopment , genc y Contra John Gioia County Administration Building Costa 651 Pine Street 4th Floor,North Wing Martinez,C&Iifornia 94553-1296 Gayle S.UHken,a County 2,VJ Phil Batchelor ExecOve Director Donna Gerber Std oislrict Dennis M.Barry,AICP Assistant Executive Director Mark Desaulnier 4th District James Kennedy Joe canciarnMa Deputy Director-Redevelopment 51h-D:Sieicl (925)646-4076 A NOTICE OF COMMUNITY MEETING AMENDMENT TO BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN The Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency is in the process of adopting a Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area (formerly West Pittsburg) (the "Plan Amendment"). The purpose of the proposed Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve years. The proposed Plan Amendment will not change the boundaries of the Project Area established by the Redevelopment Plan, the financial provisions or time limits of the Plan, 0.- proposed activities of the Agency under the Redevelopment Plan. You are invited to attend a community meeting to discuss and to provide input regarding the proposed Plan Amendment. The meeting will be held at 6:00 p.m. or October 14, 1999 at the Ambrose Community Center, 3105 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point, California. If you are unable to attend the meeting but desire further information on the Plan Amendment, call Raball Shah, Redevelopment Planner',of Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, at (925) 335- 1251, We look forward to seeing you at the meeting. ATTAMENT E PAGE 4 OF 7 32007%123046.1 ................. ................................... ................................................ .............................. ................................... .............................................. ......... ......................................................................................... ................ ............................................ ............................................................................................ ............................ ................................... LEGAL NOTICE JOrNT PUBLIC'HEARING AMENDMENT ENT TC BAS' POINT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County (the "Board")and the Board of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the "Agency") will hold a joint public hearing on October 19, 1999 at 11:00 a.m. in the Board Chambers located at 651 Pine Street, Room 107, Martinez, California. The hearing may be continued fto 'n time to time until completed. Any person desiring the opportunity to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to do so. The purpose of the hearing is to consider certain an amendment described below to the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project, adapted by Board Ordinance No. 87-102 on December 29; 1987, as amended its 1994 and 1999 (the "Plan"). The currently proposed amendment to the Plan is incorporated in a proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Plat* for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the "Plan Amendment"). The purpose of the proposed Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve years. The proposed Plan Amendment will not change any of the financial provisions of the Plan (e.g. limits on allocation of tax increment revenue to the Agency, limits on tires to incur debt or collect tax increment, or limits on the amount of outstanding bonded indebtedness), or the proposed activities of the Agency to promote redevelopment of the Project .Area. The Project Area is situated in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, and is more particularly described in Exhibit A: to the Ordinance No. 7-102, adopted on December 29, 1987, recorded in °he Offices of the County Recorder of Contra Costa County on December 30, 1957. The boundaries of the.project Area will not be changed as a result of the Plan Amendment. The County has prepared a Negative Declarations regarding environmental impacts of the proposed .Plan Amendment. A'copy ofthis Negative Declaration is available for review at the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. Any and all persons having any comments on or objections to the proposed Plan Amendment, or the regularity of any prior proceeding, or who which to spew on any issue raised by the Plan Amendment or the Negative Declaration as it'relates to the Plan Amendment may appear at the hearing and show cause why the proposed Plan Amendment should not be adopted. In addition at any time not later than the time set forth for the hearing on the Plan Amendment, any person may fie in writing with the County Clerk sof the County of Contra Costa a statement of objections to the proposed Flan Amendment, ATTAMENT PAGE 5 of 7 320 �#23044.# .......................... ....................... ...... ........ ...... ........... ............................ In accordance with the California Comm.unity Redevelopment Law, the Agency has prepared a Report on the Plan Amendment, The Plan Amendment and Report on the Plan Amendment are available for inspection in the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, Iocated,at,651 Pine Street, 4th Floor, North Wing, Martinez, California, This Notice is published pursuant to the order of the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County and the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. Pei Date: September 14, 1999 Contra Costa County 7Revelopment Agency For Publication on: J e ennedy September 20, 1999 epu Director edevelopment September 27, 1999 1 October 4, 1999 October 11, 1999 ATTACILMENT E PAGE 6 OF 7 320107 123044 1 2 xx. Exhibit A Boundaries of Project Area f 9 ! a ' € C5 CL ;£ r Y' — ,,.% ,lflj ,•t ; f e. `,�.C,_,....,�,,".fit. f `Q�ix €was Yi Me 4 J TJ iii of _ — �t ; _.__�»..._._... •��:. " s t j 1:: .E5.:3.T,i`1i.IDItEi`NT E J. `( •9 17f � 4 �`� 1 i�f AITACMENT E - ROOF OF PUBLICATION (2016.6 O.O.P.) �s�a�t so STA i E Or CAl.ir"ORN#AretP"NT i ��o> r to ara County of Contra Cos;a 1 "fie Goma costa Co r Re I am a cit Zen of the United Stales and a resident of the dewa3oPrftr11 A� yus tin re Process of adopma cn,td County aforesaid; # ars over the age of eighteen years. and AManor int to the eo ver- not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. ;opment P+an far the 8ay�otn3 (pedevelop�rsent Pr6�aci A�ttea j Ifor fly V.st PiB tcq)re jSf am,,the Pr n d�al Lega Clerk csf tl e Contra Cos#a i 2 es, a #1 n nd °'r,. st t�os�s tf the praoosad Plan newspaper of gene a circulation. printed and pubiished at ;A sndrNE[r,is to extend the; 2640 Sh4deiands Drive in the City of Walnut Creek,County �ai fir don Amer aasent cl- o°Contra Costa,94598. sngs�`the Argen;y r tweive years. Ino prt5pcsed Play And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of the unclla,,s o¢ot 333c pr"- general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of .Ares estabsohect by ttw;Ae-l Contra Costa.State of Carl°ornia, Under the date of October ceet;`cwt�€Of 'e� a"` L�w'e"rons or ma Smits 22, 4934.Case Number 19764. Of Ma P,an or d ac- tvibes of t tia gl1 �cys ung !f,e Pt The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in 1 Aedeva3opmenT ion, type not smelter than r:ondarefl), has beer,prub&shed in each i You.are rnvKed to at'twnd a Cdri:rrisir!+v�r meetirt m d{e- regOar and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any s,atsd€ provide input re- supprerent thereof on the toiiowing dates,to-unit: 111 rgor4ut� "% proposed Plan, i Arnetslmertf, the "CIN wq:be heal at 6:00 v.rn.on 5Swerriber 20.27: October 4.4 t Cclotwr 1n,7993 at the Arn- orose Comm n. r' Iter, 31e5 vtwovnassaoad.Bay all it the year of 4999 unimieCc¢e� a ir`t� te but aasite hother fnfamahon ! certify (or declare) under perm ty of perjury that the ;or the Ptfir Atria-Omen.,.ea;c foregoing i5 true and correct Asbafi Shan,Redeve�optnent g P'amner of Contra os:a County Rooevetoament, Executed at Wa nut Creek,CaVornia. Ace,oy,at(925) x 257. On this 11 day of October, 1989 we cook toward to seainp you at me r;�eevr?o. c ai GCT 6728 Ois?F' S@r'ember 2Q, ?7; f I C1CtD#.'v*t G,3'E,1993 Signature Contra Costa dimes P J Box 4447 Wainut Creek,CA 94596 (510)935.2525 Prov of Publication of: (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published) ATTACHMENT E PAGE 1 OF 4 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) LEGAL NOTICE - JOINT PUBLIC HEARING i AMENDMENT TO SAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN STATE OP CALIFORNIA i NOTICE S HEREBY GIIAN that the Board of Superv#sots of Contra Costa Gounry( t"soaard')<and County of Contra Costa i tr,t Board o!Ifs Cantr Cosfa County Redeve4ogwt Agency(the`Agan%)!"}011 bald a Ietnt public i Azarng on Oclaber t 9,1€39 a°°t CC a m.in Beard Chambers WAW at 95?f t Street,Roma 1 ares a citizen of the United States and a resident of the inwfrom.tirmtorilneUnW!!smpww.AnyPerson Court aforesaid; I am ever the ane of eighteen ears, and ?o�frngt#aeaoppprnl+tyto ttreardwr;#nea#ardedanoponassytadoso. County °� Thi p+post of#fe"ear?ng is t cors!6er�rtasn an ama!dmIll describetf Now to the not a patty to or Interested In the above-entitled matter. �RedaveloFoia"f f'tara tor8se Bay fasnt Rtdava#epman€Proust,adapted by 9aard Ordiraasa No.87-102 s,ember 29;t B83 as am*riled!d 1994 asst##999 iLhe"pkrr`#:,Fe ortentP�proposed"dMent 1 am the Principal Legal Clerk of the Contra Costa Times,a t to Che r#s in*o toratad#rs a proposed ThfrJ AtnandMont to the Redewlopmen flan for ttie Bay#r*i newspaper of general circulation, printed and published at €fast#twliaFlr>g^,t stop t«Aeatme't Ansndment^}. 2840 Shadelands Dive in the City of Walnut Creek,County r ifs carcass et to„ropcsed flan Aarettdriesst Into axiand ifs deadilne for cossrrtemaniant at of Contra Costa,94598. amtrssut doola?r protaedinsts by 8fe ency by r"Iva years. i 3 fe proposed pian lmerdrnent will not cfanjo any of the tinancrsi pravisiers at the plan re¢.,limbs ar At#ocat#on of tea It mvenna to the A>#tttGy,ptntls eintimas to incrzr debt or so9lacf tax And which newspaper has been adjudged it newspaper of trrcratrfM.$uliim#tat:tfearrountofoatstmd,noboncedtndebtedw),orthtproposadad-otsesof general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of McAgsrscytopfarmtsmdsvelagltserttat f iaetkm Contra Costs,State of California,under the date of October Tm i Ares is 3,haeted in f Codnty of Gdnbs Crista,Stats of Ulfors}ia,and is mom parlicutairV 2Z,1934.Case Number 19?&4. dosraitsed in flift I A to to Ordhance No:87102,asopled as Vecarnbet 23:#387,mootded in the {t'iices of the County Racorder of CordtraCosta County on Dmn,ber 3C,1887,TIN boundatlas of the frtii}ect Arca will not be chsn*as a tasuft at the flan Amendment The notice, of which the annexed Is a panted copy (set in TSN Couo!y has pmpt:rod a Neparlve Dedualkm erfuft ersvlronmmW Wipacts of ft proposed type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each plaft Aoss;,dmsstf.A coy of this Nilpfte Dftutat m Is availae#e for MAN at the ottisos of,"untr regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any :costsEaoznyAwcy supplement thereof on the following dues,to-wit: Airy arrd ail patsotzs hhut<iQ any uisnmants onar oti;estlons ie#fe propdsad Plea Amciv mart ru doe pp �rtps#arfty at anyprior ptopeed.,,g.or vatso rrlsh to%pests an aryssue amisaf by the%+tan Artte!sdrsaant t,o Sersferrst;er 20.27; October 4.91 Nepaflva ttedara*dor.as<m?ads to tilt Ptah Amenfineai mxg appear at ata isaarin4 andsttaw caves wtry fie ptopased flan Arrsantfinenl sltousd not be aoptad.its addition e#any tithe hat la ee#sat t!te t€tne set for8t for the htafirtg an fht{clan Aniandmeat,any peYacr+asa`y flit#r roriling w8h tRe Caunfjr' all in the year of 1999 Clerk of the Codify tot Contra Crista a swemwrt at objections to the proposed fun Amendmem. in aceomance w bt the C8#Ito7ri4 f4mrw0y RedevOoptrwt taw,the Attemy baa pi**td a Report I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the Ofs PI"'AmacdlaontT4Plaz Ara ndmentr4ReW,ondtoflanAmandm.arxaraeva€tabiafor foregoing Is true and correct. Inspection Ig ftofricts of ICe Cot..*.R's Costa County Redevefopttsorst Ager4y,k ated at WPine Street, 4th Poor,Not Wifra,wrliner.Callto!nia.- Th+s Nafice is published pursoarttto Te Gtdet of the Board of Superdsom of ft Co ttm Costa Courrty Executed at Walnut Creek,California. an6 the s^alta Gose county Radavatcpment Agency. On this 1#day of October, 1999 \ ,� 1. S �•:. ..��. 641Y 0 in Projoe Arca Signature 'contra Costa Times P O Sox 4147 Walnut Creek,CA 94595 (510)935-2525 4 Proof of Publication of: ` (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that pub€fished} _ 4 1 #�• r LJ I Nis: fWtember:4,IM. Contra Costa Gout*Redavatopmeri Agoncy. James Kennedy tY Director•Redwe#apmert Lai CCT Q25,PUblish$ap#attU 20,21i October 4,11,1 M i ATTACt'DIENT F PAGE 2 OF 4 PROOF OF PUBLICATION tatrri>r�cam : (2015.5 C.C.P.) Cat�tui�rttaetrae� STATE CP CALIFORNIA BAY POINT County of Centra Costa " LOfMENTpLAN 'tie Comps Costa C un Re- I am a Citizen of the united States and a resident of the development Agency tft-" peocaaa d;adtapti a Inird County,aforesaid; I an.over the age of eighteen years, anis :Afnarximer tb t*e�adeva+- no€ "y a., to or interested in the above-en€itied r-natter. oilmen,Pianvtho Say Point PedevetoSs rsant Project Alas i$#armemy Meat Pittsburg)rihe I am the Principal Legal Clark of the Ledger Dispatch and Plan Amardmont^). 'Fee pu.posa at the proposed Plan Brentwood News.Newspapers of general circa:a€ori,printed nd^rtani sa to extend the and published at 240 Shadeland5 Drive in the City of d Uq`na fordnr58t1epr Bent Walnut Creek,County of Contra Costa,94598. ings by the Agency tyy twelve years. The proposed ftn And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of ttheeAmendment boud daries of tie cO t Qneraj crculation by the SL'perior CoU.t of the COunty of Area estadtished by tate�Ie- uOrtttB Costa, Mate of Califo nia, under the slate of March devaiopment Plan;the'man- oiat P=Astcra or time limits 26, 1870. Case Number 74637O. of the Plan,cr^Pc� ed so- I; vittes of the Agenoy Under : the Redevelopment Pian. The notice, of w'�;ch the annexed is e printed copy tse€ it type not smaller than nonparei �'i),has been ublished in each :You are ttis d a l camrnunity me meeiing to to d!s- regLgar and ensure issue of said newspaper and not in any ,cuss and 3o pRtYide;nput ro- e thereof on tie`ollourng dates,to-wit: aid n the proposed,Plan n;mens. The meeting be Meld at 6:00 p.m.on SeD'ember 21.28: October 5 2 Catober 14,19999 at.be Am- brose Cornmun3. Center, 3105 Wliow Pass flay all in the year of 1999 Paint, California. ;i you are unable to atiend the meeting tiutdesire hirthe,information : t G£{fsfy (D3 declare) under per}alty O` p£rjury that the on t4±s Plsn Amendmant,Dail Saba,Shah Redevelopment foregoi?g is true and Correct. r Ptenref of Contra Costa :.County Redevelopment Executed at s>l4tainut Greek,California. Agency.at(825)395.1231, on this 12 d y f October, 1999 Wo tusk forward to seeing rews you at the mae;ing, leas L.D8o 3281O�....... Pu Itbe Sa ..199 f 2i, 28;6Cc+abar5.#2.tQx3s ........��Ledger Dispatch and Brentwo P C Box 2299 Antioch,CA 94531-2299 (510)757-2525 Proof of Pubiicatior,of: (attached is a Copy of tree legal advert;serrient that published) ATTAChiMEN T P PAG: 3 OF 4 .......................... ................................ ..................................................................................... PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) LEGAL NOTICE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING STATE OF CA!IFORNIA AMENDMENT TO SAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN County of Contra Costa Notice is I hereby given that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa county(the soard' and the board of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agsricy.�the'Agency' ol a I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of wlith 'd jolm public hearin.-on October 19,1999 at 11:00 a.m.in the Board Chambers located at.351 County aforesaid; i am over the age of eighteen years, and I,*Street,Room,107,Martinez,California--lie hearing may be continued from time to not a party,to or interested in the above-enc tied matter. tine until completed.Any person desiring the opportunity to be heard will be afforded an opponunity to do so. . : I am the Principal Legal Clerk of the Ledger Dispatch and The purpose of I the hearing is to consider certain an amendment described below to the Brentwood News. Newspapers of general circulation,printed Redevelopment Plan for ths Say Point Redevelopment Project,adopted by Board Ordinance and published at 2640 Shadelands Drive in the City of No.87-102 on Decembe,29,1987,as amiended'in'I'W4 and 1 9*(the The currently Wainut Creek,County of Contra Costa,94598. proposed amendment to the Plan is Incorporated in a proposed Third Amendment to the And which newspaper has been adludged a newspacier of Redovoloprrient,Pian for the Say Point Redevelopment Project Area(the'Plan Amend irrnt . generai circulation by the Superior Dau t of the County of rite purpose of the proposed Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement r of eminent domain.proceedings by the Agency by twelve years, Contra Costa, State of California, under the date of March. 26, 1870. Case Number 746370. The proposed Plan Amendmert.1 will not change any of the financial provisions of the Plan (e.g.limits or.allocation of tax increment revenue to the Agency,limits or.firnes It Incur dab, The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in Or collect tax Increment,or limb an the amount of outstanding tionded indebtedness),or the type not smaller than nonpareil),has been published in each proposed activities of dee Agency to Promote redevelopment of the ProjeciAzaa, regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any The Project Area is situated in t 0110,County of Contra Costa,State of Ce-41omia,and is more supplement thereof on the following dates,to-wit: particularly described Infxhibit to the Ordinance No.87.102,adopted on December 29, December1987,recorded sit ins t?ffices of the County Raoorder of Contra Costa County on September 21,28-, October 5.12 30,1987.The boundaries of Me Project Area will not be changed as a resuit of the plan Amendment. all in the year of 1999 I certify (or declare) under penalty of periury that the foregoing is true and correct. I iA Executed at Walnut Creek,California. On this 12 da9f October, 1999 .......... Ledger Dispatch and Brentwood News P 0 Box 2299 Antioch,CA 94531-2299 (510)757-2525 The County has prepared a Negative Declaration regarding environmeni'al impacts of the proposed Plan AmandmeM.A copy of fts,Negative 09clarad'on.is available for review at the Proof of Pubiication of: offices of the Contra Costa County Radevelop.man!Agency. (attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that published} Any and all persons having any comments on or.obilaotiorls to ft proposed Plan Amendment, or the regularity of any prio.l.proceeding,or who wish to speak on any issue raised by the Plan Amendment or the Negative Declaration as It,reflitos to the Plan Arnendmert,may appear at the hearing and show cause why the Rroposed Plan Amendment should not be adopted.In addition at any time not later than the time set forth for the hearing or.the Plan Amendment, any person may file in willing with the CZ"Y Ci.*of the county of Contra Costa a statement of objections to the proposed Plan Amendment In accordance with the California Cornmunity Redevelopment Law,the Agency has prepared*a Report Doq on the Plan Amendment.The Plan Amendment and Report on the Plan Amendment are available for inspection in the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, located at 651 Pine Street,4th Floor,North Wing,Martinez,California. This Notice is pub4sned pursuant to the order or the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County and the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. Date:September 14,11999 /Warnes Kennedy Deputy Director-Redevelopment Legal LD80$292 Publish:September 21,28;October 5,12,1999. ATTACHMENT. F PAGE 4 OF 4 ...................................................................................... ................................................................................. ................................................................... .......................... Community Contra Dennis#+fit.Barry,AICD Development rnCosta Department n) l Coinw-- County Administration Building � 651 Fire Street 41h Floor, North Wing Martinez, California 94553-0095 -Phone: : TRA083A NTY QS .•� 8Y DEPUTY (925)335-1250 9, 1999 ATTACHMENT G NOTICE OF PUBLIC REVIEW AND I�TENT TO ADOPT A PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION BAS''POINT REDE'VEL0PNffi' rT AREA PLAN ANE' 11 NT County File CR 99-7 Pursuant to the State of California Public Resources Code and the "Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended to date,',this is to advise you that the Community Development Department of Contra Costa County has prepared an initial study on the following project: BA's'POINT REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN AMENDMENT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project involves mending the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay point Redevelopment Project Area(Project Area), extending deadline to commence eminent domain proceedings by twelve years(Plan Amendment). The Bay Point Re-development Plan was adopted by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on December 29, 1987. The plan was subsequently mended in 1994 and again in 1999. The California Community Redevelopment Law (Section 3300 et seq) of the State Health and Safety Code, which governs the adoption and implementation of redevelopment plan, provide that the authority of a redevelopment agency to employ eminent domain to acquire property in a redevelopment project area expires twelve years after adoption of the redevelopment plan or the last amendment to the plan reestablishing the eminent domain authority. The Redevelopment Agency's eminent domain authority expires December 29, 1999. PROJECT LOCATION: The Project Area is located on the northern Contra Costa County between the Cities of Concord and Pittsburg. The primary access to this unincorporated area is via the State Route 4, an east-west highway connecting west and east Contra Costa County. Secondary access routes to the area include Willow Pass Road and Baily Road. The Project Area consists of approximately 1,550 acres of generally flat land. Lands to the north are predominately the Delta wetlands. The south portion of the .Project Area is primarily State Route 4, and developed and undeveloped areas within.the City of Pittsburg. The developed areas within the City of Pittsburg are located to the east. To the west of the area is developed residential areas of Bay Point and lanais owned by the Navy. No significant impacts have been identified in the initial study. A copy of the Negative Declaration and all documents referenced in the negative declaration may be reviewed in the offices of the Community Development Department, and Application and Permit Center at the McBrien Administration Building, North ting, Second Floor, 551 Pine Street, Martinez, during normal business hours. ATTAt;INT G Office ears Monday- Friday:8:00 arra,-5:00 p.m. PAGE t OF 14 Office is closed the 1 st, 3rd& 5th Fridays of each month ................... .................................. .............-.... PUBLIC COTMIMENT PERIOD - The period for accepting comments on the adequacy of the environmental documents extends to S.OO P.M., ,,Vonday, July I2, 1999. Any comments should be in writing and submitted to the following address: Maureen Toms, Senior Planner Contra Costa County Community Development Department 651 Pine Street, North Wing, 4th Floor Martinez, CA 94553 It is anticipated that the proposed Negative Declaration will be considered for adoption at a meeting of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, September 14, 1999. The meeting is anticipated to be held at 9:00 am at the Board Chambers at 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA. It is expected that the Board of Supervisors will also conduct a hearing on the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan at the same meeting. Maureen Toms Senior Planner cc:County Clerk's office(2 copies) Public Works-Steve Wright C1DATA\WP6GWA\BFN01.WF-D ATTACMENT G -2- PAGE 2 OF 14 ............................................ ...... ....... ..............11.11,111.1........................................ ............... ............................... ................................................................ ........................................ . ............................ Environmental Checklist Form 1. Project Title. Bay Point Redevelopment Area Plan Amendment 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Contra CbsU County Community Development Department 651 Pine Street,North Wing-4th Flexor Martinez, CA 94553 3, Contact Person and Phone Number Maureen Toms (925)3:35-1250 4, Project Location: The Bay Point redevelopment Area 5. Project Sponsor's,Name and Address: Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency 651 Pine Street,North Wing-5th Floor Martinez, CA 94553 6. General Plan Designation- Various (Single-Family Residential, Multiple-Family Residential, Commercial, Office, Mixed-Use Bay Point; Heavy Industrial, Public 'iSerni-Public, Parks and Recreation, Commercial recreation, 'dater, and Open Space) 7. Zoning: 'Various (Agricultural, Single Family-residential, Two. Family Residential, Multiple-Family residential, T-1, Planners-Unit District, Commercial, retail Business, Neighborhood Business and Heavy.Industrial) 8. Description of Project: The proposed project involves amending the Redevelopment Plan(Plan Amendment) for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(Project Area),extending deadline to commence eminent domain proceedings by twelve years. The Bay Point Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Contra Costa County.Board of Supervisors on ra ter 29, 1987, The plan was subsequently amended in 1994 and again in 1999. The California Community Redevelopment Law (Section 33€30 et seq) of the State Health and Safety Code, which governs the adoption and implementation of redevelopment plan,provides that the authority of a redevelopment agency to employ eminent domain to acquire property in a redevelopment project area expires twelve years after adoption of the redevelopment pian or the last amendment to the plan reestablishing the eminent domain authority. The Redevelopment Agency`s eminent domain authority expires December 29, 1999. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The Project Area is located on the northern Contra Costa County between the cities of Concord and Pittsburg. The primary access to this unincorporated area is via the State Route 4, an east-west highway connecting west and cast Contra Costa County. Secondary access routes to the area include Willow Pass road and Bailer Road. The Project Area consists of approximately 1,550 acres of generally flat land. Lands to the north are predominately the delta wetlands. The sow portion of the Project Area is primarily State Route 4,'and developed and undeveloped areas within the City of Pittsburg. The developed areas within the City of Pittsburg are located to the east. To the west of the area is developed residential was of Bay Point and lands owned by the Navy. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, ATTACHMENT G PAGE 3 €3F 1-4 ..................................................................................................................... 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. — Land Use and Planning Transportation/ — Public Services — Population&Housing Circulation — Utilities & Service ® Geological Problems Biological Resources Systems — Water Energy & Mineral Aesthetics — Air Quality Resources Cultural Resources — Mandatory Findings of — Hazards Recreation Significance — Noise V None Identified DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation- V I find that the.proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant fic t ffec t on the environment,there will e not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONTwillbe prepared, — I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. — I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s)on the environment,but at least one effect(1)has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and(2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets,if the effect is a"potentially significant impact"or"potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. — I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects(a)have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and(b)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EK including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. vy? r June 9, 1999 fild 11 � Signatilre Date Maureen Toms Community Development Department Printed Name For ATTACIR4ENTI' G PAGE 4 OF 14 ............................................. ................ ... ................ ...... ....... .... ....... ................. ..................................................................................o.-. .. ....... ..........................I............................................................----............ ............... ...................................................................................----........ ........................................... ................................. 3 EVALUATION OF MNVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Sources: In the process of preparing the Checklist and conducting the evaluation, the following references (which are available for review at the Contra Costa County Community Development Department,651 Pine Street.5th Floors North Wing,Martinez)were consulted: 1. Description of Project and Setting I Contra.Costa Resource upping System-Quad Sheet Panels-Honker Bay,CA 3. The(Reconsolidated)County General Plan(July 1996)and EIR on the General Plan(January 199 1) 4. General flan:and Zoning Daps 5. The Day Point Nest Pittsburg)Redevelopment Plan and E1R(1987) 6. Bay PointtPittssburg BART Station Area Specific Plan (draft -November 1997) and ADEIR (June 1999) 7. East Bay Regional bark District baster Plan(1997) 8. Field Reviews Potentially significmt Potentially Unless i css than significant Mkigation sipificant No �n�Por�=iota ac? 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: & Conflict with General Plan designation or zoning? (Source#1,3,4,5,6,7) b. Conflict with applicable environmental plates or policies adopted by agencies with y�ce j jurisdiction $�over the project? (Sou C. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?(Source#1,2,3,4,5,6, 7) d. Affect agricultural resources or operations(e.g.,impacts to soils or farmlands,or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (Source# 1,3,4,5,6,) C. Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established conununity(including a low-income or minority community)? (Source# 1,2,3,4,5,6,7) 51s11MARY: Acquisition ofproperty within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to land use and planning. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), which may rely on earlier environnicrital impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed, AT ACHIM IST G PAGE 5 OF 14 .................... .............. ............. 4 Potentially sigafficant Potentially Lwe" Less than Sigftifficant Mitigation sipfficant No br 41—act lnq2aMu� Intoac, POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a. Cumulatively exceed official regional V or local population projects? (Source 4 1,3,5,6,) b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly(e.g.,through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (Source 0 1,3,5,6) C. Displace existing housing,especially V affordable housing? (Source 4 1,3,5,6) SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to population. Extending the eminent domain authority of the Redevelopment Agency could result in the eventual displacement of existing housing in order to redevelop the area. The Redevelopment agency is required by the California Community Redevelopment Law(CRL)to provide through rehabilitation,development or construction,an equal number of replacement dwelling units for rent or sale at affordable rates,which have an equal or greater number of bedrooms as destroyed or removed,as those currently occupied by low and moderate income households. The CRL ftuther requires that 75 percent of the replacement dwelling units be affordable to persons and/or families of low and moderate income in the same proportion as the units lost. In addition,the acquisition of property through eminent domain will be acquired in accordance with the State of California's Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1971 (Government Code Section 7260 et seq). Thus impacts to housing would be less than significant. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. Ill. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a. Fault Rupture?(Source# 1,3,5) b. Seismic ground shaking?(Source# 1,3,5) C. Seismic ground failure,including liquefaction?(Source 4 1,3,5) d. Sriche,tsunami,or volcanic hazard? V/ (Source 4 1,3,5) e. Landslides or mudflows?(Source 4 1,3,5) ATTAMENT G PAGE 6 OF 14 ..................................... .................. .................................... ........................................................ ....... ..................... .................... ................................................... ............................. .............................. .................................................................... .............. ...... 5 Fotwtislly si .f+ze.a poftntiolly [Unless Ltu thin sign f cmt Mitipt xns signffi=t No —Ct In�¢itvrt � f: Erosion,changes in topography or Mable soil conditions from excavation,grade,or fill?(Source#-1,3,5) g. Subsidence ofthe'land?(Source# 1,3,5) h. Expansive soils?(Source# 1,3,5) 1. Unique geologic or physical feat€ares? � V (Source# 1,3,5) SI-II.ARY. Acquisition of property within the project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in geologic impacts. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the Californianvirom--ental Quality.Act( EQA),which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review More specific development concept is proposed. 1V. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a. Change in absorption rates,drainage � � _. V patterns,or the rate and amount of surface rumoff?(Source# 1,3,5) b. Exposure of people or property to water _ V related hazards such as flooding? (S€urce# 1,3,5) C. Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality(e.g, temperature,dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (Source# 1,3,5) d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (Source 4 1,3,5) e. -Change in currents,or the course or ✓ direction of water movements?(Source# 1,3,5) f Change in the quantity of ground water, either through direct additions or with- drawls,or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability?(Source# 1,3,5) g. Altered direction or rate of flow of ground- water?(Source# 1,3,5) h. In'zpacts to groundwater quality? � � � J (Source# 1,3,5) 1. Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies?(Source# 1,3,5) S1 AR : Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to surfhee or ground water,water quality or public water supply. ATTMIMMI ENT G PANE 7 OF 14 6 Potentially .significant Potentially Fess Less thins $i cant Wtiptlon sipificasnt No Invact l•n000-tion hums t Subsequent implementation of redevelopment, activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a. Violate any air quality standard orV contribute to an existing or projected T _ air quality violation?(Source#1,3,5) b. Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (Source# 1,3,5) — — c. Alter air movement,moisture,or — V temperature or cause any change in climate? (Source# 1,3,5) d. Create objectionable odors?(Source# 1,3,5) V SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in air quality impacts. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. Vl. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal'result in: a. Increased vehicle trips or traffic V congestion?(Source# 1,3,5,6) — b. Hazards to safety from design features r (e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous inter- sections)or incompatible uses(e.g., farm equipment)?(Source# 1,3,5,6) C. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?(Sources#1,3,5,6) — d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or V off-site?(Source# 1,3,5,6) C. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or 4/ bicyclists?(Source#1,3,5,6) r — f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting — — transportation(e.g.,bus turnouts,bicycle racks)?(Source# 1,3,5,6); g. Rail,waterborne or air traffic impacts? V (Source# 1,2,3,5) ATTAGILMEN T G AGE 8 OF 14 .............................................................................................................................................................................. _.. . ___ 7 ?&=Wally Wou LAM th= siplfic= siVUfi nt No fim-airstibr. Srs ifsa�ci S qzof property within Area eminent i � sr�tive aul A yAcurmthority and process which would not result in impacts to transportation and/or circulation.Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to time California Environmental Quality Acct(CEQA.), which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. I. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. 'Mould the proposal result in impacts to: a. Endangered,threatened or rare species or µ® �" their habitats(including but not limited to plants,fish,insects,anis-als,and birds)?(Source# 1,3,5,6) b. Locally designated species(e.g.,heritage — V' trees)?(Source# 1;3,5,6) C' Locally designated natural communities � � V (e.g.,oak forest,coastal habitat,etc.)? (Source# 1,3,5,6) d. Wetland habitat(e.g.,marsh,riparian and vernal pooh)?(Source# 1,3,5,6) C. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (Source'# 1,3,5,6) SCA&IARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to biological resources. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to time California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), winch may rely on earlier environmental ianpact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. V11I. EINERGY AND MrINTERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?(Source# 1,3,5) b, Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient rnanner?(Source# 1,3,5) C. Result in the loss of availability of a mown mineral resource that would be of future value to time region and the residents of the State"?(Source# 1,3,5) S'�"avlMA, Y: A►cquisifion of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to energy or mineral resources. Subsequent implementation of ATTACI.24ENT G 8 Potentially siert potentially Utiles Less thaw sigeuSaarx l4itigation sipifimnt No hn act kecsMMUa —On mF MM-d- Lgnnact redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Envirorune ttal Quality Act(CEQA), which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. ix. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a. A risk of accidental explosion or release of V/ hazardous substances(including,but not limited to: oil,pesticides,chemicals or radiation)?(Source# 1,3,5) b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation — plan?(Source# 1,3,5) C. The creation of any health hazard or � potential health hazard?(Source# 1,3,5) — d. Exposure of people to existing sources of � potential health hazards?(Source 4 1,3,5) — — e. Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,grass,or trees?(Source# 1,3,5) — SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in and increase of hazards in the project area. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? — — (Source# 1,2,3,5) — b. Exposure of people to severe noise? — V (Source# 1,2,3,5) — SAY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by ernincnt,domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in noise impacts. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality.Act(CEQA),which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. AT T ACIDIENT G PAGE, 10 OF 14 9 Poteawy significant Pot, ally $anim Deis signifimt Mitigation sign4cant No PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection?(Source# 1,3,5) � � V b. Police protection?(Source# 1,3,5) C. Schools?(Source## 193:0 d. Maintenance of public facilities, including,roads?(Source# 1,3,5) C. Other governmental services? (Source## 193,5) SU" RV', Acquisition ofproperty within the Project Area by em meat domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to public services. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(EEQA),which may rely on earlier environmentalimpact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. X-M UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas?(Source# 1,3,5) b. Communications systems?(Source'" 193,5) � � � V c. Local or regional water treatment or — .! distribution.facilities?(Source# 1,3,5) d. Sewer or septic tanks?(Source## 1,3,5) — e. Storm water drainage?(Source# 1,3,5) f. Solid waste disposal?(Source# 1,3,5) _ _. _ V g• Local or regional water supplies? (Source# 1,3,5) SAcquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and prods which would not result in impacts to utilities and service systems. Subsequent implernentation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), which may rely can earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. A TAC DIENT G PAGE II OF 14 .............. ......... ..................... ........................................................................................... 10 Potentially Sigrkifi=A Potentially unlem L4=than Significam Mitigation Significant No IMact b--MMLtL'-- IMMA )all. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a. Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (Source 4 1,2,3,5,7,) b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?(Source# 1,2,3,5) c. Create light or glare? (Source# 1,3,5) SUMMARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area byeminent domain is an administrative authority ity and process which would not result in impacts to aesthetics. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),which may rely on=her environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. MV, CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a. Disturb paleontological resources? (Source# 1,2,3,5) b. Disturb archaeological resources? (Source 1" 1,2,3,5) C. Affect historical resources? V (Source#1,2,3,5} d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique cultural values?(Source#1,2,3,5) e. Restrict existing religious car sacred V uses within the potential uinpact area? (Source#1,2,3,5) 51,NVAARY: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not result in impacts to cultural resources.Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a. Increases the demand for neighborhood ms or regional parks or other recreational facilities?(Source 4 1,2,3,5,7) b, Affect existing recreational opportunities? (Source ATTACMENT G PAGE 12 OF 14 ............. ............................................ ...... .......................................................................... ............................................................... .... ........................................ ........................................................................................ ....................................................... 11 P�saa�y si Pnti�?y UuFfesa ' t �rict�'noscsac SU'Ny A Y: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority and process which would not resat in impacts to recreation. Subsequent implementation of redevelopment activities would be undertaken pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA),which may rely on earlier environmental impact analysis or require additional environmental review more specific development concept is proposed. XVI. NIANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to __ V degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to elute a plant or animal community,reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the.major periods of California history or pre-history? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the e€f'ects of past projects, the eflects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects.) C. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly? Sjb AR Y: Acquisition of property within the Project Area by eminent domain is an administrative authority, and process which does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment (see Ill-Geologic Problems,IBJ'-Water,V-Air Quality, and VU-Biological Resources. The incremental effects of the proposed project were reviewed in connection with the effects of past projects, current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. These projects included the .Bay Point Redevelopment Plan,which was adequately analyzed Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Bay Point Redevelopment Plan in 1987. Additional projects reviewed included.the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station Area Specific Mara,the City of Pittsburg General Plan and Redevelopment Program, Pittsburg,Antioch Corridor ATTIACME T G PAGE 13 OF 14 ATT.AGMENT H DECLARATION OF MAILING TO TAXING 71TIES I declare that: I am a citizen of the United state and employed in the County of Contra Costa, Mate of California, over the age of eighteen years, and employed by the Centra Costa,County Redevelopment Agency. levy business address is 6503 Dine street, 4th Floor, North Wing, Martinez, California. . 1 served the attached Notice to Taxing Entities of Joint Public Hearing(with attached Legal Notice), a copy of which ` aachedhereto as Exhibit A, by de ositing;a true copy thereof in the United states Mail o � 1999 at Martinez, California:, enclosed in a sealed envelope, by certified ail, return receipt requested, addressed to the governing body of each of the taxing entities which levies taxes capon any property in the Bay Point Project Area, a list of which taxing entities is attached hereto as Exhibit B. I declare under penalty o er" ry th t the foregoing is true and correct and that this Declaration was executed on g 1999 at Martinez, California. r' ATTACHMENT H 320107�123051.1 PAGE 1 of 14 ------------Commissioners ----' ' � Redevelopment Ariency Contra John Gioia County Adn-iinistration Building Costa Dig-,4t 651 Pine Street 4th Aw,North Wing Gayle S.Uilkems Martne?,C.Wifonnia 94S&S-1296 County 2od Dirvict Phil Batchelor Donna Gerber Executive Director Dennis M.Barry,AtCP James Kennedy SEP 1 j999 Joe canciarriffa Deputy Director-Redevelopment Sth Disinct (925)W-4076 September 15, 1999 NOTICE TO TAXING ENTITIES Ladies and Gentlemen: As you are aware, the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency has been in the la or the Bay Point process of preparing the Third Amendment to the Redevelopment P n f (formerly West Pittsburg)Redevelopment Project Area (the "Plan Amendment"). As the attached Legal Notice indicates, the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency Board and Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County(the "Board") will hold a joint public hearing on October 19, 1999 at 11:00 a.m. in the Board Chambers, located at 651 Pine Street, Room 107, Martinez, California, to consider the adoption of the Plan Amendment. The purpose of the proposed Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings in the Project Area by the Agency by twelve The Plan Amendment will not change any of the financial provisions of the Redevelopment Plan(e.g. limits on allocation of tax increment revenue to the Agency, limits on times to incur debt or collect tax increment, or limits on the amount of outstanding bonded indebtedness), or the Project Area boundaries. The Plan Amendment and a Re port on the Plan Amendment are on file with the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, located at 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor, Martinez, California, and are available for your inspection. 32607\1 230511 ATTACHMENT H PAIGE 2 OF 14 The County has prepared a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts of the proposed Plan Amendment. A copy of this Negative Declaration is available for review at the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency offices. Your further inquiries, and attendance at the public hearing, will be most welcome. Since, ly, azo Kennedy Dep Kennedy .r (edevelopment Attachments: Legal Notice � i 320107\123051.1 ATL TAGW:F'NT x PAGE 3 OF 14 LEGAL NOTICE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING A. ENDIM NT TO BAS' POINT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County(the "Board") and the Board of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the "Agency") will hold a joint public hearing can October 19, 1999 at 11:00 a.m. in the Board Chambers located at 65 1 Pine Street, Room 107, Martinez, California. The hearing may be continued from time to time Cantil completed. Any person desiring the opportunity to be heard will be afforded an opportunity to do so. The purpose of the hearing is to consider certain an amendment described below to the Redevelopment Pian for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project, adopted by Board Ordinance No. 87-102 on December 29, 1987, as lamended in 1994 and 1939(the "Plan"). The currently proposed amendment to the Plan is incorporated in a proposed Third Amendment to the Redevelopment Pian for the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area (the "Plan Amendment"). The purpose of the proposed Plan Amendment is to extend the deadline for commencement of eminent domain proceedings by the Agency by twelve years. The proposed Plan Amendment will not change any of the financial provisions of the Plan (e.g. limits on allocation of tax increment revenue to the Agency, limits on tunes to incur debt or collect tax increment, or limits on the amount of outstanding bonded indebtedness), or the proposed activities of the Agency to promote redevelopment of the Project Area. The Project Area is situated in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, and shown on the map attached as Exhibit A and is more particularly described in the legal description attached as Exhibit B. The boundaries of the Project Area will not be changed as a result of the Plan Amendment. The County has prepared a Negative Declaration regarding environmental impacts of the proposed Plan Amendment. A copy of this Negative Declaration is available for review at the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency. Any and all persons having any comments on or objections to the proposed Plan Amendment, or the regularity of any prior proceeding, or who wish to spear on any issue raised by the flan Amendment or the Negative Declaration as it relates to the Plan Amendment may appear at the hearing and show cause why the proposed Plan Amendment should not be adopted. 1n addition at any time not later than the time set forth for the hearing on the Plan Amendment, any person may file in writing with the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa a statement of objections to the proposed Plan Amendment. In accordance with the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Agency has prepared a Report on the Plan .Amendment. The Plan Amendment and Report gra the flan w 32=71123044A $ ATTACHMENT N' ?ACE 4 OF 14 Amendment are available for inspection in the offices of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency, located at 651 Pine Street,4th Floor,Forth ming, Martinez, California. This Notice is published pursuant to the order of the Berard of Supervisors of the Contra Costa.County and the Contra Costa County Redevelopment :agency. Date: September 14, 1999 Contra Costa Count evelopment Agency For Publication on. � I es ennedy September 20, 1999 eput Director— edevelopment September 27, 1999 October 4, 1999 # October 11, 1999 � l 32CN07111230441 PAGE 5 OF 14 } rata s aL�AR�sf�- #1E�t�tl�t�tt 4 s sol 044 � 343�" t r im 11trry tt er �xCB�+pA�p -j�... . �wx,oaA°iwliux,'�&i'ditxf �ti:rtrxr»� � �� >q!E �hfa t� 13� Via+ mO� � s•,,. 'K s ,� 4tt rss+rs.st fiv � m '� '^.� ♦toy ,ti ,,, � �_ P 8 �.�*� e > . w►r * '7 aTiL'^;fir' �.R"F4lr1N` ,�..� �•• fps B°s 8r.�'Eg�'I�l4irtt ' s �tirlsTH'y�yitxF�'tj�t �f+. 'ffl dtirQt iM41.N2 j'���TyyPrus�+��4 # }}pSf'Fyryt fit+ �F[NS' 'C 3N1'R a 1t1�f.4Rtl i ,%iavo. r4 w .lPPa .- It 'AT•- .fu.d'+'ttert' ?sr•�s .� c � v BONN s D • i. +riak u West Pittsburg Redevelop:vent Protect W.O. 7115509 - Boundary Description EXHIBIT H Real property in the unincorporated area of West Pittsburg, California . Document and crap references are to records of Contra Costa County. Beginning at the northwest corner of Section 13, Township 2 North, Range 1 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (shown as the southeast corner of Section 11 on the map of Bella Monte Subdivision No. 1 filed 3.-larch 22, 1927 in Map Book 20 at page 546); thence along the west line of Section 13, South 010 25` West 30 feet, to the south- line of Willow Pass Road;' thence along said sough line, Cast 1,466 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 2 , Pittsburg Home Acres Addition recorded March 22$ 1938 in Map Book 22 at page 662; thence along the east line of Lot 2, Swath 000 40b East 12 feet, to the north line of Triond parcel recorded February 1 , 1955 in Volume 12168 at page 412; thence along the worth line of Triond parcel and its easterly prolongation, East 267 feet, to the northwest corner of Lot 16, Subdivision 41.37, Willows Landing, recorded February 25, 1972 in Map Book 144 at page 14; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 4137, South 000 ' 091 26" West 477.46: feet, South '890 061 38" East 384 feet, and South €300 ' 09` 20" West 781669 feet, to the north line of Hanlon Way; thence along said north line , North 890 064 38" West 651 feet, to the northerly prolongation of the gest line of Lot 252 (144 1, 14)g thence along said prolongation and gest line, South 000 1£3` 03" West 127.98 feet , to an angle point; thence South 000 09` r ATTACHMENT H PAIGE 7 OF 14 24" West 599.63 feet to an angle paint on the west l ane of Lot 281 { 144 im 14); thence along said west line and its southerly prolongation,. South 00u 09' 30" West 825 feet, more or less , to the south line of State Freeway Route 4; thence along said south line in a ,general westerly direction 1 ,490 fee", more or less , to the east line of Section 14 (T2N, Rlrt); thence along said east line, South 000 30' East 380 feet, more or less , to the northeast corner of Lot 57, Subdivision 5346, Hillsdale Unit 111 , filed September 22, 1978 in flap Book 217 at page 20, being a point on the, south line of Contra Costa Canal ; thence along said south line, South 890 42' Hest 92 feet, South 400 39' West 138.5 feet, South 660 35' West 435.2 feet, North 480 34' test 410.4 feet, South 890 42' West 28.8 feet, and North 480 341 West 535.7 feet, to the most northerly corner of Subdivision 4731, Hillsdale, filed April 19, 1976 in Map book 183 at page 28; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 4733, South 120 47' 01" West 6€39.44 feet and North 890 25' 37" nest 438.39 feet, to the northeast corner of Frank D. and Carolyn A. "Briggs PARCEL T140 recorded July 7, 1977 in Volume 8407 at, page 533; thence along the boundary thereof, North 890 251 37" Fest 270.65 feet and ,South {100 33' 32" East 90.70 feet, to the northeast corner of Pittsburg Terrace Unit tic. 1 filed November 5, 1930 in Map Book 21 at page 604; thence along the north line thereof, South 890 461 West 245 feet, to the northeast corner of _Lot 6 (21 14 604); thence South 000 45' East 98.28 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 4 (21 M 604); thence along the boundary of Lot 4, South 000 45' East 25 feet, Southdesterly 39.27 feet along the arc of a 25 feet radius curve concave to the northwest , and South 890 15` West. 75 feet, to the southeast corner of 2 ATTACI- FNT IH PAGE, 8 OF 14 Lot 3 (21. M 604); thence along the south lire of Lot 3 and i is westerl y prolongation, South. 890 15' West 125 feet, to the centerline of Bailey Iwad (shown- as Dante Road in 21 M 604) being the east line of the west half of Section 14 (T2N, RIW); thence along said east line, North 000 45' Best 1 ,475 feet, more or' less , to the north lame of State Freeway Route 4; thence along said north lire in a general westerly direction 7,250 feet, more or less , to i the southeast corner of PARCEL C of Minor Subdivision 192-68 'filed April 22, 1969 in Parcel Map Book 8 at page 12; thence along the eastline 'f PARCEL C, North 120 458 lest 77661 feet, to the easterly prolongation of the south line of Bruce W. and Donna G. Farley parcel recorded August 5, 1974 in Volume 7290 at page 737; thence along said prolongation and south line, North 770 138 05" West 41.8.81 feet, to the southwest corner; thence along the gest line of said Farley parcel and its northerly prolongation:, North 0. 0P 1.7' 20" West 120 feet , more or less , to the north lure of Cawino Andres (8 PM 12)'; thence along said north line in a general northeasterly direction 900 feet, more or less , to the northeast line of Contra Costa Canal, thence along said northeast line in a general northwesterly direction 1,130 feet , more or less , to the most southerly corner of Subdivision 4663 filed October 20, 1977 in leap Book 203 at page 31; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 4663, North 630 37' 26" Fast 484020 feet and North 580 33' 46" West 104.95 feet, to the south line of Riverside Drive (203' M 31); thence along said south line, North 660 06' 32" East 2.89 feet, Northeasterly 57.39 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the northwest with a' radius of 778 feet and a central angle of 040 13' 35" , Northeasterly 21.94 'feet along the 3 ATTACHMENT a PAGE 9 OF 14 ............................................. ................................... .......................... .............................. arc of a reverse curve concave to the southeast with a radius of 722 feet and a central angle Of 010 441 29" , and North 630 37, 26" East 35.25 feet , to the northeast line of East Bay Municipal Utility District parcel recorder] August 30, 1926 in Volume 57 at page 69; thence along said northeast line, South 580 331 55" East 1,469.1 feet, to the north line -of Camino Andres; thence along said north line, North 890 54' 26" East 49.36 feet, to its intersection with the west line of Port Chicago Highway as shown on the map of Subdivision 3885 recorded- October 23, 1969 in Map Book 128 at page 29; thence crossing Port Chicago Highway, Easterly 270 feet, more or less , to a point on the north line of Willow Pass Road shown as the easterly terminus of a 150 feet radius curve on the map of Minor Subdivision 11-84 filed December 26, 1984 in Parcel Map Book 113 at page 42; thence along the north line of Willow Pass Road, South 890 07' 28" East 669.98 feet and South 000 52' 32" West 4.87Afeet, to the north line of "Willow Pass Road Widening" parcel shown on the map of Subdivision 5696 filed March 20, 1984 in Map Book 277 at page 18; thence along said north line, South 890 05, 14" East 790.69 feet , to the north line of OWillow Pass Road Widening" parcel shown on the Map Of Subdivision 5534 filed March 20, 1984 in Map Book 277 at page 11; thence along said north line, South 811 05, 14" East 67.11 feet, South 890 12' 06" East .924.80 feet, and South 890 071 21" East 0.16 feet, to the east line of Subdivision 5534; thence along said east line and its northerly prolongation , North 010 101 36" East 2,538.13 feet, to the northeast corner of Subdivision 5354 filed March 14, 1979 in Map Book 223 at page 3; thence along the north line of Subdivys' ioi 5354, North 880 50' 18" West 2,,633.04 4 ATTACHMENT H PAGE 10 OF 14 ................ ........... .. ....... .......................... ............................. ...................... deet, to the north corner of Lot 12 (223 M 3); thence along the west 1 Erre of Lot 12, South 000 551 16" test 163 feet , more or less , to the easterly prolongation of the south line of Earl W. Smith Developers Ltd. .563 acre parcel (Assessor Parcel Number 0398-344-001) recorded January 6, 1969 in Volur:e 5784 at page 611; thence crossing Port Chicago Highway Meng said prolongation, North 880 58' 20" 'lest 84 feet, to said south line, thence along said south lire, North 880 58, 20" test 145 feet, to the southwest corner; thence along the west Brae of said 0563 acre parcel , North 000 55, East 170+ feet, to the south line of Pacifica Avenue; thence along said south line in a general westerly direction 5,100 feet; more or less , to the gest line of Driftwood Drive; thence along said west lire, North 0Q0 20' West 2,718.46 feet, to the north line of Section 9 (M. RIS); thence along said north line , Easterly 1 ,390 feet , more or less , to the south line of Sacramento Northern Railroad right of gray; thence along said south line in a general southeasterly direction 1,350 feet, more or less , to the east line of Section 9; thence along said east line, , North 000 54` 45" West 386.36 feet, to the northeast' corner; thence along the gest line of Section 3 (T2N, R1W) . North 000 oil 52" West 2,61€8.96 feet, to the northwest', corner of PARCEL I filed nay 22, 1985 in Licensed Surveyors' Map Book 77 at page 2; thence along the north line of PARCEL 1, South 880 oil 52" East 1,255,98 feet and North 860 58} 08" East 750.18 feet, to the northwest' corner of PARCEL 2 (77 LSM 2); thence along the 'boundary of PARCEL 2, North 860 58, 08" East 650.87 feet , and South .000 06' 30" Nest 150.30 feet, to the northwest corner of 99 acre American Dredging Company parcel recorded 5 ATTAChMENT 'i PACE 11 OF 14 ............................................. ...................................... .................... ................................. ........................ February 249 1961 in Volume 3811 at page 237; thence along the boundary of said 99 acre parcel , North 850 11' 30" East 250.04 Ceet , South 770 SSI 30>` East 132 feet, North 560 564 30" East 122 feet , North 700 51' 30" East 139 feet, North 750 164 30" East 201 feet, North 550 31( 30" East 191 feet , North 150 51' 30" East 196 feet, South 160 35' 52" East 534.37 feet , and South 000 30' 45" West 3,708.74 feet, to the north line of Contra Costa County Water District parcel recorded February 17, 1961 >in Volume 3807 at page 369; thence Southerly 300 feet, more or less , to the northeast corner of Interlake Steel Corp. parcel as shown on Record of Survey filed June 1966 in Licensed Surveyors' Map Book 42 at page 45 (said northeast corner being a point on the south line of Sacramento Northern Railroad right of way recorded in Book 187 of Deeds at page 360); thence along the south line of Sacramento Northern Railroad right of way in a general easterly directio 5 ,928.22 feet. to the northeast corner of Poinsettia Land Company West Pittsburg Tract Unit No. I filed June 8, 1926 in 14ap Book 19 at page 506; thence along the east line of said Tract, South 000 50, West 531.64 feet, to the north line of Norace and Theresa SHno PARCEL TWO recorded October 24 , 1944 in Volume 796 at page 488; thence along said north line and its easterly prolongation, South E190 48' East 485.48 feet , to tile northwest corner of Bella Monte Subdivision No. 2 filed April 2, 1929 in Map Book 21 at page 584; thence along the boundary thereof, South 890 43' East 847.87 feet and South 010 25' West 644.50 feet, to the northeast corner of Bella Monte Subdivision No. 1 (20 M 546); thence along the east line thereof, South 010 25' West 455. 11 feet, to the point of beginning. 6 ATTACHMENT H PAGE 12 OF 14 . ................................. .......... Ucluding therefrom: All of Willow Glen Subdivision 5064 recorded October 258 1378 in Map Book 218 at page 31 except that 55 feet wide strip of land shown as "Bailey Road Widening" (218 lea 31) LS:sj DescWpitt 1/08/87 6/03/87 7/09/87 8/10/87 8/17/87 7 ATTACHMENT H PAGE 13 OF 14 ....''I'll,...................................... .......................................-........ ....................... .......................................... Taxing Agencies in Say Point Contra Costa County Administrators Contra Costa County Library District Revised June 9, 1999 Office 1750 Oak Park Blvd. 4 d:IdataIwp6/lc/bptaxing.lst 651 Pine Street 10" Floor Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-4497 'Martinez, CA 94553 Contra Costa County Fire District Contra Costa Public Works Dept. Contra Costa Public Works Dept. 2010 Geary Road Service Area L-100 Contra Costa Flood Control Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 255 Glacier Drive 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 9455.3 Martinez, CA 94553 Contra Costa Water Agency Contra Costa Resource Conservation Contra Costa Mosquito & Vector PO Box H2O 5552 Clayton Road 155 Mason Circle Concord, CA 94524 Concord, CA 94521 Concord, CA 94520 Delta Diablo Sanitation District Delta Diablo Sanitation District Zone I Zone 2 Los Medanos Hospital District 2500 Pittsburg/Antioch Hwy 2500 Pittsburg/Antioch Hwy 2311 Loveridge Road Antioch, CA 94509 Antioch, CA 94509 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Ambrose Recreation & Park Bay Area Rapid Transit District Bay Area Air Quality Management 3105 Willow Pass Road 800 Madison Street District Pittsburg, CA 94565 Oakland, CA 94607 939 EMs Street San Francisco, CA 94109 East Bay Regional Park District County Superintendent of Schools Mt. Diablo Unified School District PO Box 5381 77 Santa Barbara Road 1936 Carlotta Drive Oakland, CA 54605 Pleasant Hi!l, CA 94523 Concord, CA 94518 Contra Costa County Auditor- Pittsburg Unified School District Community College District Controller 2000 Railroad Avenue 500 Court Street 625 Court Street, Finance Bldg Pittsburg, CA 94565 Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 Contra Costa County Assessor Contra Costa County Tax Collector Contra Costa County Redevelopment 834 Court Street 625 Court Street, Room 100 Agency Martinez, CA 94553 Martinez, CA 94553 651 Pine Street, 4' Floor- NW Martinez, CA 94553 Goldfarb and Lipman State ClearinghouseGlerk-of--rhe-4�� Co",-t5 Cj.,r ATTN: Polly V. Marshall 1400 Tenth Street, Roon, 121 County of Contra CostLa One Montgomery Street, 23' Floor Sacrainento, CA 95814 651 Pine Street 'San Francisco, CA 94104 Martinez, CA 94553 V5Nawrue- 0,(- s DA-9-0 0 F- f5:0-," AT-TACILMIENT H 1l 5C) A]. aJ4 I C: PAGE 14 OF 14 ..................................... ............... ................. ...............0.-000000................. 000aooa0000aao....................... ....................................................................... ........................................................... ........................................... ....... ..... ROOF OF PUBLICATIONORDINAME No.90-54 sh .� Acv 49P4DINANOF OF E MARD OP SUP ayeOF OW STATE OF CALIFORNIA C eTx cCNW OFvM COSTA, County of Contra Costa At10ADOf�nNGTHETf THIRD Go AMNENDMENT TO THE€t - sa Op"Er�r�tAt�e F i am a citizen of thAe united States and a resident of the �°s�itrBT��� i- Count aforesaid; €ares ova the of eighteen ears, and �� OT Ra 0 County y =AND ivtAxtt i �TAt not a party to or interested n afia above entit:ed matter. Ar tS)iN�BB PtSAStiAf+iTT T THE C61AetbRtyAFjfY iiB�f A- Sod of the Coon�,}y Cf Cont e WLOP#AVWT tAwf OF T i Cosa,,Stay submltied to the I ai?l the Principal Local Clark of the Garrra Gaster Times, a STATE LfR CALIFORNIA scald its report and recom- newspapeer or general circulation, printed and published at THE CONTRA COSTA CCUN- mandation datedSapte 'bar 2640 Shadslands Drive III the City of Walnut Greek,County P TY SUPERVISORS 13,199%r0 ,tan ap. of Contra Costa,94598. DOES ORDAIN AS =air- pIan and sdortkan c# aha #CWS: Ian Amend pt and sp- # provai and.adoption Of the gpp Apr# \VhJC€1 newspaper haS been adjudged a nawS a err of SECTION I. SUMMARY. This 'Negative Caciaratlor p p Z Ordinance amends the Rade- pared for the Pian Amend- general circulation by the Superior Court of the County c: va,opmen? Psan for me Bey meet and has hero {rad t» Gorilla vaSta, Mate of Ca.ifarnla, under t€2a GStB 0¢FFG;o€38r Point Redevolo merit Pro'ect he �!an Amendment Area to exal the daazafiine, forms to the 3snerai ooh; 22, 1934.Case Number 19764. !Sar commencement of ami- and ren+domain proceedings by o i the Contra Costa County Re- Pursuant to the Planning The notice, of which itis annexed is a printed Copy (Sat iii deVaiopmant Agarto for an commission 16074 of the ed (12ryo", and Section 75 Californiaof the type not smaile than rranparai€),has been published in each CcIY!onal twelve t12 years; 55��uldelfrsaa to Ilse Ga regular arid. einlre issue of said newspaper and not in any S'eCTt)N it. BACKGROUND. £nvirOnmantai Quality Act of Supp ement thereof on the followingdates,to-wit: By Board of Supervisors O dl- 1970, sy amended, othe ogat;A G r de}3nas"), the NegaYve halide No, 87-102;adopted De>wiataiion Compiatau3 try on December 29, 79a7 the Coijim staff and dated June OGtaber 28 Board of SvpervfsCra of the 9, 13.,9, may serve as onvl-i County of Contra Costa(the -onmental documentation for Board")adopted the Rada- She Paan Amendment;and all in ^e year of 355 veiopmen• Pian for the ay Poin Redevelopment ProIset By resolution ado tad prior to 4 certify Cr declare) tinder shah of perjury Inat the j Area the`Project Ama")and the ado ion of this Ord! y { } penalty p ry by the Board of Surarvisors nance, a So" and the foregoing IS true and correct. Ordinance No.94-64,,adopt- Agency have adopted and ad on December 6 1994 approved the NegaYva DeC- anc Ordinance No. 99 06` Executed at Walnut Greek,California. adopted on Fain any 29, section .n 74 of theoncwith 988 the Board adopted section 15074 of the CBCA On this 28 da of October, 1999 amendments to the Radevel- Guidelines;and / opmert Plan for the Bay point an at or t9 7899, the < % Radavalopmenf Pro�act Aran Board and the Cy can o........... .. L (as amended the'Redevel- i Signa're oprarit Pian";and ducted a joint pu ti f oaring which Wes cfuiy rioticed hn ac l cordaroe with tine require- Pursuant to the Community menta of the Redave{oprnen* Lantra Costa Times Redeveiomeat Law of the Law. 0 Box 4147 State of pcaafdrria(the`Re- development Law",the Con- SECTION Illi„FINDINGS.in so - Walnut Creek,CA 94596 tra costa Cour adsver !t o1J 935 2525 iv Co' aordarca w r Cal Se a man#Agency m a R ncy„) P#eaftrs and Serfsty Coda Sec . t^ ) has rscornrssndad an tions 33367 and 38457# arrd r amendment to the Redevat- based upon the evidence a The oordemnatlon of real. Proof or Publication of: opment Pan that would ex- contansd in the Report on I ) end the Agency's deadline the Mian Amerx$arisrt and cn p"ye f any,is rssary {attached 1S a copy of the#sg3i advertisement that pilo#Jsf?ad) commencement of smh- the evidence resentedd a4 to i a exeou to^of lire Rods- fornent domain pnxesdin s h + p vatobrren Plan and ads- alone have been twelve years;and sCatd f7ndy and determines qaa With respect to the Pier, mads r�ayr5an?for prop The A enc has pre a•ed Amendment Chet: to be Acquired as orovid- yy ed b law (sea pparticularly and s milted to the card ParYay and l of the Report for ravlsW and adeplltrrs a al Tho Project Area is a on the Plan Amendment re- K pasee Third Amenolmsref b.igh?ed area,the redev�lop-r ardtn€i evidence With re- tt a Redeye opment Pian» rnani of which is neoessary to## spect to this finding'. effectuate,the public purees- sas of the Redevelopment }) 3fa Agan i "bian 3mant), a copy of Law(see partioutariy Part N Cf, ail od or an for the tato- whicrt Es ol'I:e with tisa 'a1c the Report of the Pian i canon of ieniilea and r of the Board of the County Of Amendment regarding oA- sot cation which rnav t)a diyp a 8d. Contra Goats and dards for this ffrCk g' fmm the ProJee t A as if uta Pian the may result' The Ai3anCy has made stud- b) The Piar, Amendment !n this temporary or perrrsa- as of aha Cmpaat of the pro- would redevelop the Project, hent displacement of any Cc- nrd Plan Amendment and Area in conforml . with the' cuaanYs of housing facilities has detemnlnad that the pro Radevaiop Want law and In the Pro(ect Area Ta a par- y7osed amendment will pm- would ba In the Interest, the ticulady Parts V and xt on the iso the prCS35Y redava,CP putillo peaca,heath safety, Report on the Plan Amend- menl Amend- merit of the .roject Area in and weifam; and .he t rslrle- Mont rsgardfn evidence accordance with iha goals, mentation of the Plan. with respect?o:his finding). able 98 and poiic!a9 of the Amendment would promote County of Contra Coma's the publlo peace, isaartPs, g}Them are,or shall be pro-i Genn Plan,tf a Radavaiop as eiy and waifara of the video,hl the PmJact Area or' msnt Pian And the Rsdavat- County of CCnta Costa,and !n liner areas not generally dement ;and would effectuats the�purpos- issa desirable in reQazf to The Agency ilea as and policy of the�val- public utkl?ioa and ou a and prepared aprnsnt Law(see particularly cominerctai facilities and at and a, lied end the 1 introduction and Farts 4 rents or prices within the ff- Board has rav'ewad and con- 4 err d Ili of the Report or.the nancia.means of the families sidsrad, a wntien raoorY on pier Amendment regarding and persons who may be dis- iha ig aed anerdrrent evidence with respsic to tMs' placed f; the Pro Area, (Sze R_por' on the elan ffnding). decent, safe and sanitary Mendmani") pursuant to Health and Safety Code Seo- ' o The adoption and ln'gle- the enure equal In number to i tion 33457.5,a Co of which mentation of the +.an the it ch err of and available Is on flis with the Clark of the Amendment are economical- to, siert aced families Strsrd;and iy sound and faBaibia (sae acceibble persons atheireasonably please of, oafiiculary Part lV of iha Ra employmont(see grtidmewly i The purposa of the Plan snort on ire Piar Amendment Parte V and xi of iha Report Amendment is to extend the regarding evidence with re- or. the Pian regarding avl- deadline for commencement ; spect to this finding.}, 3 dance WlYtl respect to this of enl7ent domain proeaad Sinding) Families and per- Ings by the Agency try tWa:va d) The Plan Amendment is eons shall not be displaced years Thia amendment viii t conalaian# wfitt iha General error to iha adoption of aaaio- ho Change the uses permit- z Plan of the County ,no!uding cation Adan pursuer#to Sec ted within the f'roJeci Area; butrot km'stad to 'Housing tions 3349 Y and 3345'.1 of and # Element of the General Piaci the Redevelopment law. (aaa psFtiCu:ariy Part. i, V pw8;}ing units housing per-. iha Planning Commission and V tt of the sport on the eons and famines f W,0.;r which!s the duly des# natea Pier. Amendment regarding moderate lr omo C a ahaii r.oat and Rating official p anntng evidence with respect to this be removed or destroyed ori- rinding). J cr to .Ise adoption of a re- plaaomant_.Nal ng,alar 1,' �$uant to Saotlor,s 3334.6, 33413, and 334'.3.6 of the fiadavalopment Law. h)The Soares is satisfied the,# rrmanent housing facilities i be available within these years from the t1me occu- pants of the Project Area,If any are displaced and that pending the development R t' such facifitles, there wtlf be S ava#abie to such d#splaoad occupants housin lac#flee at rents comparab a to those In the community at the time Of "IsIr die iacomenl see particularly Fart V and A of the Report art i-o Pian re- $pac !ardt 'a this tYhdkg.)fth re- !� The matters set forth In i Health and Safetycods Sec- tion 33357td,( ), d(10), )are nos apploabre to or affected by the floe'Amendment,and cones anti not fi lrther find- Ings witi9 respect to such matters are ragvirad {sea particularly the Introduction and Parts#and II of the Re- port on the Pian Amendment regarding evidence with $pact to#his finding). SECTION !V. 0ON'r-.NUNG PURPOSE AND NTENT.It Ie the conttnuir p'T ae and Intent of file Soard that the f Redevolopment Plan Amend- man-be imptamented In or- der to continuer to: a)E,Vminate the conditions of bllight; b)Ensure,as far as poesibie, that the causes of thebit ht- alp conditions Wit be of ar t ef,m#nated or prmected aga?nat; a)Encourage and ensure the redevafrapmant of the Preect Area; d)Encourage and'dater�x e economic rav!taSaation o:the Project Area, as necessary, and a) Provide and Improve af- (8Eva#014 Vii. RECOROA- fordab#o housing. {TION.The Executive Director of theAgency fa hereby d# SECTION V. OVERRULING �rested to record the Pik n OF VLECTION& Ali wrMan; Amendment In compliance and oral pbjecttons to the 'Mth the provisions of Health amendment incorporated In and Sa4ety lisle Section lila Plan by the Crd!narx a 33458 and ovornmant Code are horeby overruled. Section 27295. SEDT?CAI Vt, ACOPTii'N OF SEC-110N Vile.SEVERAS!L1TY. PLAN AiV.EIv7MESl7. It Is if a�.y provision section,aLb- hereby found and determined sealt n, aubr41vis#on, sen-i that...e Pian Amendment Is tante clause or phrase of necessary and desirable.The the C�rd?name or the Plan Elridec at©pmbnt or,, all Amendment is for any reason amenaSments as+d reetato- held to be invalid or unconsti- ments of the Redevelopmentfut#or a?, s:cn deoislbn shell Plan, and all ordinances no+afrect the vai#dlty at;the adopting or previously remaWng�pdrtfarl or rConne arnend#tt the Redovaloo-` of the Ordlnenoe or Plan Ment fan are here, Amendment, Amendment amended In aocordanoe w# the Plan Amorzdrnant SECTION !X. £FPEOTiVE DATE. This Ordinance be- The Pian Amendment is comes of ot!va 33 dr after heresy adopted and ap- passage,and within 96 days proved and the Redavo ager paeasge shall be dpuub mem Plan, as amended Ilahg once In the GONTRA i the Plan Amendment,Is dee- COSTA TIMES and LF-00ER #gnated as the official rods- DISPATCH, newspapers c1 ,,Woprnent plan for the Pro- 1101,14 a! Iroulalon Printed tact Area. Tne Plan; and pubifshed and circulated Air andMont, consisting of to the County of Contra Cos-' one page and one exhibit,Is to, Incarpdrated 3n tit la OrdP-, lance by reference and PASSED an Bctaber 19, matte a part of tit a Ordinance 989,try the fa3#owing vote: as if set out In fill in ttse Ord!- name The Clark of M Board AYES Supervisors Gals of the Canty Is hereby df-, u#kema DsSautniw ant reated b f'te a copy o,the Camiami e Plan Amendment With Lila NOES Nano minutes o th,s msetltQ. fYe ASSET#T Swoon laor Garber Agency is vested wltn the ABSTAIN:Bona la/Ann Carve!tl 342,Deputy i continuing responsibility to, /a/Josep)r Canc#emfi!a Implement the RSdeve:G ATTEST; PHIL BATCHELOR, 047 Board Chair r;cent Pan, as amen dad toy Clark of the Board and Cour.- Is October 25,1989 the Plan Amendment. ty Administrator