Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01051999 - C21 .......................................... ......... ............... ....................................... T( 'BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM-Victor J.Westman,County Counsel By:Dennis C.Graves,Deputy DATE: December 11, 1998 SUBJECT: Approval of Settlement of Bank of America Litigation SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION 1. RECOMMENDATIONS On behalf of the County, the County Redevelopment Agency, the County Public Facilities Corporation, and any other plaintiff agencies governed by the Board, (collectively the "Contra Costa Plaintiffs"), approve the settlement proposed in State of California ex. rel. Stull v Bank of America, San Francisco Superior Court number 968-484 (the "Stull case") and related class action; authorize filing of claims in said litigation; authorize County Counsel to sign all documentation to effect the settlement, including the Agreement governing distribution of the settlement proceeds among the plaintiffs. IL FISCAL IMPACT The rough estimate of the amount to be recovered by the Contra Costa Plaintiffs is between $500,000 and $1,000,000. Ill. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The subject action was filed by qui tam plaintiff Patrick Stull, the California Attorney General, and the City and County of San Francisco, primarily to recover unclaimed bond funds that Bank of America and Security Pacific Bank, as paying agents, failed to return to issuers or escheat to public agencies. Represented by the San Francisco City Attorney, the Contra Costa Plaintiffs and approximately 200 other California local agencies joined the Action as plaintiffs in intervention. After approximately two years of very contentious, time-consuming, and expensive litigation, in which the San Francisco City Attorney played the leading role, this extremely complex case has been settled for a total of approximately $200,000,000. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X-YES SIGNATUR RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR—RECOMMENDATION VOBOARD COMMITTEE —APPROVE —OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON 1/5Z99 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED ,,._OTHER_ VOTE OF SUPERVISORS: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A v--UNANIMOUS(ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ATTESTED: i , � /Iq PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTYADMINISTRATOR Contact:Dennis Graves(335-1833) Deputy County Counsel C:hsofflceWrworftfMsRAxp8Asetdoc C �f BackgroundfReasons continued: A class action also was filed by the primary plaintiffs, representing a class consisting of all public agency bond issuers in California that have employed the defendant;Banks as paying agents and trustees. The Court is expected to approve the class action settlement and the settlement of the subject action within three months. The amount available for distribution to the Contra Costa claimants will depend upon the claims not yet filed by agencies that are class members but that have not participated in the Stull case. Also, the amount available to the Contra Costa plaintiffs will depend upon the final accounting of the total provable amount of our issuances and our percentage of bearer, registered and mixed bonds among those issuances. Although this amount can only be estimated at present, the economists employed by the plaintiffs lead us to conclude that we may obtain;a total of $500,000 to $1,000,000. This would be in addition to the roughly $50,000 already recovered, which had covered our out of pocket expenses in the litigation. The Administrator is in the process of determining the distribution of the proceeds that may be available to the Contra Costa plaintiffs, which includes the Public Facilities Corporation, the Redevelopment Agency and the Assessment Bond Agencies. Staff of the Administrator's Office, the Redevelopment Agency, the General Services Department , the Auditor's Office and the County Counsel's Office have been involved in this litigation and jointly recommend approval of the settlement cc:Administrator Redevelopment Agency Auditor County Counsel c:\msofficekwinwordknfiles\Refexpbasep2.rtf