The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 02231999 - D2 �Q Contra Vista TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County FROM: Denny M. Barry, AICP Community Development Director DATE: February 9, 1999 SUBJECT: Ordinances Amending Redevelopment Plans for Pleasant Hill BART, North Richmond, Bay Point, Oakley, and Rodeo SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION REQMMENDATIONS 1) ADOPT Ordinances amending the following Redevelopment Plans: A. The Redevelopment Plan for the Pleasant Hill BART Station Project Area adapted by Ordinance No. 84-30 on July 10, 1984, as amended by Ordinance No. 88-58 on July 19, 1938, and Ordinance No. 94-62 on December 6, 1994; (CONTINUED ON SECOND PAGE) CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRAT7, 0 RE'COM ENDATION O BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE HER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON Fnhr�,ar3r2.3 ,� 1999 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED xx OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE xxUNANIMOUS (ABSENT - -- - - ) MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF AYES: NOES: SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SHOWN. Source: Jim Kennedy 335-1255 cc: Community Development ATTESTED__Eahx_Uaz,y 2 9 PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR i B4 # , DEPUTY } fffr B. The Redevelopment Plan for the North Richmond Project Area adopted by Ordinance No. 87-50 on July 14, 1987, as amended by Ordinance No. 94-6 on December 6, 1994; C. The Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point (formerly West Pittsburg) project Area adopted by Ordinance No. 87-102 on December 29, 1987, as amended by Ordinance No. 94-64 on December 6, 1994; D. The Redevelopment Plan for the Oakley Project Area adopted by Ordinance No. 89-89 on December 21, 1989, as amended by Ordinance 94-65 on December 6, 1994; and E. The Redevelopment Flan for the Rodeo Project Area adopted by Ordinance No. 90-50 on July 10, 1990, as amended by Ordinance No. 94-66 on December 6, 1994, 2) DIRECT the Deputy Director - Redevelopment to publish the Ordinanaces within 15 days in the Centra Costa Times, a newspaper of genera'! circulation in the County of Contra Costa; and ) DETERMINE that the activity is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 1061(b)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, DIRECT the Director of Community Development to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk, and DIRECT the Director of Community Development to arrange for payment of the $25.00 handling fee to the County Clerk for filing of the Notice of Exemption. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed amendments do not raise the fiscal limits of the redevelopment pians, therefore no fiscal impact to the general taxing entities results. The Redevelopment Agency's cost of borrowing is enhanced due to longer time frame for repayment of debt. BACKGR ? dD/REASONS FOR RE- OMMENDATIUNS A) AB 1290 Redevelopment Reform Act (AB 1290) context A major redevelopment reform bill, Assembly Bill 1290 ("AB 1290), was enacted in 1994 by the State Legislature, which among other things imposed certain time limits on all existing redevelopment plans, including a time limit for the repayment of debt and receipt of tax increment. Pursuant to the requirements of AB 1290 (codified as Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6), the Board of Supervisors adopted ordinances on December 6, 1994 which adopted certain time limits including the following time limits for the repayment of debt and receipt of tax increment for the Plans: Qakle Proiect Area - Ordinance No. 94-65: December 21, 2029 Noah Richmond Project Area - Ordinance No. 94-63: July 14, 2027 Rodeo Project Area - Ordinance No. 94-66: July 10, 2030 Bay Point Project Area - Ordinance No. 94-64: December 29, 2027 Pleasant Hill BAIT Station Project Area - Ordinance No. 94-62: July 10, 2024 This past legislative session, the State Legislature passed AB 1342 (codified as Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2)). This section permits the Board of Supervisors to amend the Plans to extend the time limits of the Plans to the maximum time limits otherwise permitted under Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(the "Time Limits Amendments"). The time limits for repayment of debt and receipt of tax increment may be extended to the following dates under the new legislation: Oakley Project Area: December 21, 2039 oarp2.boo North Richmond Project Area: July 14, 2037 Rodeo Project Area: July 10, 2040 Bay PointPro#ect Area: December 29, 2037 Peasant HiII BART Station Project Area: July 10, 2034 Section 33333.6(f)(2) permits the Board of Supervisors to bypass most of the procedures normally required for redevelopment plan amendments. The Board of Supervisors may adopt the proposed Ordinances in accordance with the normal procedures for the enactment of ordinances. Unlike the process for most redevelopment plan amendments, the Board of Supervisors is not required to hold a public hearing or provide notice to Project Area property owners or affected taxing agencies prior to the adoption of the proposed Ordinances. Adoption of the Ordinances will not cause a change in financial arrangements with affected taxing entities or affect the ability of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") to repay previously incurred debt. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(2), (4) and (5), adoption of the Time Limits Amendments is not a "project", and is therefore exempt from CEQA review and staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve a CEQA Notice of Exemption for the Ordinances and the Time Limits Amendments. B) Proposed Amendments to Extend Repayment of debt and Receipt of Tax Increment Limits The deadlines for repayment of debt and receipt of tax increment currently contained in the Plans are not at the maximum time limit permitted by the provisions of Section 33333.6. Therefore, the Time Limits Amendments make the following change to the Plans: Deadline to Receive Tax Increment. Currently under the Plans, the last day to repay debt and receive tax increment revenue is set at 40 years from the date of adoption of the Plans. Pursuant to Section 33333.6(f)(2), the Board of Supervisors may amend the Plans to set the last day to repay debt and receive increment at a date which is 10 years after the last date for effectiveness of the Plans. Since the Plans fix the last day for effectiveness of the Plan at 40 years from the date of adoption of the Plans, the Time Limits Amendments then set the last day to repay debt and receive tax increment under the Plans as follows: Oakley Project Area: December 21, 20139 North Richmond Project Area: July 14, 2037 Rodeo Prolect Area: July 10, 2040 BayPo#nt Project Area: December 29, 2037 Pleasant Hill BART Station Proiect Area: July 10, 2034 oarp2.bos CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TATE: February 18, 1999 TO: Board of Su �sors FROM: Jim may, e Director- Redevelopment SUBJECT: em D.2 uesday, February 23, 1999; Ordinance Amending County Rede prrient Plans Extending the Time Limit for Repayment of Debt Concerns have been expressed that extending the time limit for the repayment of redevelopment debt will be detrimental to other County functions. With respect to those concerns,the following should be considered. I. REVENUE IMPACT IS NEUTRAL While the County has a one-time opportunity to extend the AB 1290 time limits for the repayment of debt for each of its five redevelopment project areas,the Redevelopment Agency would not be increasing the maximum amount of tax increment that can be collected in each project area. For example, in the Pleasant Hill BART' Station Project Area,the tax increment limit is $125 million. Based on the very conservative projection of tax increment growth for that project area(Appendix A), the$125 million cap will be achieved within the term of the existing limitof 2024. The logical question would therefore be, f6Why does the time limit need to be extended?" The answer lies in meeting the requirements of the Bond market, which exact a severe interest rate penalty for structuring bonded indebtedness with anything other than level debt service based on the existing demonstrated tax increment. If the Agency were to structure its debt to the 2024 time limit, it would be required to structure escalating debt service in order to take full advantage of the tax increment growth that is expected in the Pleasant Hill BART project area. A consequence of that escalating debt service schedule would be that the Agency's bonds would not qualify for an investment grade credit rating and would therefore produce fewer capital project dollars for every dollar of tax increment collected. According to the February 8, 1999 edition of the Bond Buyer,the interest rate penalty could be as much as 75 basis points(.75%),as shown on Table 1. This interest rate penalty could lower the amount of bond proceeds by as much as$1.5 million. As additional tax increment dollars are collected in the future, there will be a time when the Agency will be required to sequester most of those funds for debt repayment. As a consequence,it is likely that the Agency's tax increment debt will be paid off prior to the existing time limits; and when the debt is repaid, all of the taxes will revert to the affected taxing entities. In summary,extending the time limit for repayment of the debt does not and cannot'increase the total dollar limit established for each project area. What it will do is allow the Agency to leverage its limited tax increment dollars more efficiently by selling investment grade bonds at a lower interest rate than would be required if the shorter time limit must be retained. This would also be the case for subsequent issues of Bonds sold by the Redevelopment Agency prior to expiration of the Agency's ability to establish debt for Pleasant Hill BART in 2004. TABLE 1 Municipal Bond Market Yields/ Achievable New Money Band Proceeds- Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Interest Rate on Maximum Achievable 30 Year Bonds New Money Bond Rating Maturing in 2029 Proceeds($000J=* AAA 4.95% $ 1.1.5 AA 5.10% $ 11.1 A 5.30% $ 10.7 BBB 5.50% $ 10.4 Unrated 5.70% $ 9.9 * Assumes funds available for level debt service of$574,000 Source:Bond Buyer;February 8, 1999;Stone&Youngberg II. FISCAL AGREEMENT FOR FIRE DISTRICTS The County Redevelopment Agency has five(5)adopted Redevelopment Plans. The status of fiscal agreements for fire districts is shown on Table 2 below. TABLE 2 Fiscal Agreement for Fire Districts - Contra Costa County Redevelopment Projects Fiscal Agreement/ Redevelopment Area Fire District __Rass Thru ON la. Pleasant Hill BART Contra Costa No/--- lb. Pleasant Hill BART Contra Costa Yes/100% Amendment Area 2. North Richmond Contra Costa No/--- 3. Bay Point Contra Costa Yes/100% 4. Oakley East County Yes/100% 5. Rodeo Rodeo-Hercules Yes/100% 2 Mate Redevelopment Law dues not provide for fiscal agreements to be renegotiated after plan adoption. The 1994 Redevelopment Reform legislation eliminated these previsions. The legislation permitting the 10 year extension for repayment of debt for pre-1994 Redevelopment Plans does permit a 20%pass-through of tax increment revenues computed from the year 40 Assessed Value Base during the 10 year extension period. This further reduces the loss to taxing entities. JK:Ih@ Attachments sc: County Administrator County Counsel Community Development Director Fire Chief File B2.16(a) 0199/bos.mem 3 FA BMY=FISCAL CAP PRC.7ECTION "SE CME SCENARIO I SCENARIO T: Conservative Growth Moderate Growth High Growth Tax Increment Tax Increment Tax$Incrament e.:ae:a.ms� FY Aeceiveable % Growth Receiveable % Growth Receiveabla ! Growth 1986 $216,705 $214,706 $214,706 1987 $386,108 79.8% $386,108 79.80 $386,100 79.8% 3988 $736,735 90.8% $736,735 90.8% $736,735 90.9% i989 $150,387 1.9% $750,387 1.9% $750,387 1.9% i990 $913,537 21.7% $913,537 21.7% $913,537 21.7% 1991 $1,580,874 73.0% $1,580,874 73.0% $1,580,876 73.0% 1992 $2,017,054 27.6% $2,017,054 27.6% $2,017,054 27.6% 1993 $2,386,$90 18.3% $2,386,590 18.3; $2,386,590 18.3% 1996 $2,516,554 9.6% $2,616,$64 9.6% $2,616,564 9.6% 1995 $2,301,458 -12.0% $2,301,458 -12.0% $2,301,458 -12.0% 1996 $2,550,822 15.2% $2,650,622 15.2% $2,650,822 15.2% 1997 $2,695,385 1.7% $2,695,385 1.7% $2,695,385 1.7% 1998 $2,727,008 1.2% $2,727,008 1.2% $2,727,008 1.2% 1999 $2,816,616 3.3% $2,816,614 3.3% $2,816,614 3.3% 2000 $2,901,I12 3.01k $2,929,279 4.0% $3,041,943 8.0% 2001 32,968,146 3.0% $3,046,450 4.0% $3,205,299 8.0% 2002 33,077,790 3.0% $3,166,308 4.0% $3,546,122 8.0% 2003 $3,170,124 3.0% $3,295,040 4.0% $3,761,010 6.0% 2004 $3,265,226 3.0% $3,426,842 4.0% $3,986,670 6.0% 2005 $3,363,184 3.0% $3,495,376 2.0% 34,066,404 2.0% 2006 $3,442,922 2.37090750% $3,565,286 2.0% $4,147,732 2.0% 2007 $3,524„351 2.37090750% $3,636,592 2.0% $4,230,687 2.0% 2008 $3,608,115 2.37090750% $3,709,324 2.0% $4,315,300 2.0% 2009 $3,693,660 2.37090750% $3,783,510 2.0% $4,401,606 2.0% 2010 $3,781,233 2.37090750% $3,859,180 2.0% $4,489,638 2.0% 2011 $3,870,863 2.37090750% $3,936,364 2.0% $4,579,431 2.0% 2012 $3,962,658 2.3709075016 $4,015,091 2.0% $6,671,020 2.0t 2013 $4,056,609 2.37090750% $4,095,393 2.0% $4,764,440 2.0% 2014 $4,152,787 2.37090750% $4,177,301 2.0% $4,859,729 2.0% 2015 $4,251,246 2.37090750% $4,260,647 2.0% $4,956,924 2.0% 2016 $6,352,039 2.37090750% $4,345,064 2.0% $5,056,062 2.0% 2017 $4,455,222 2.37090750% $4,432,985 2.0% $5,157,183 2.0% 2018 $4,560,651 2.37090750% $4,521,645 2.0% $5,260,327 2.0% 2019 $4,668,984 2.37090750% $4,612,078 2.0% $5,365,533 2.0% 2020 $4,779,682 2.37090750% $4,704,319 2.0% $5,472,866 2.08 2021 $4,893,004 2.370907504 $4,796,406 2.0% '� $-,56x,3,1 2.0% 2022 $5,009,012 2.37090750% $4,894,374 2.0% $1,205,952 2023 $5,127,771 2.37090750% $4,992,261 2.0% 2024 $5,249,346 2.37090750% 44,503,846 -9.6% 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 20J1 2032 2033 2034 Total Tl- $125,000,000 $125,000,000 $125,000,000 NPV s $25,561,004 $25,747,940 $26,867,015 C. ticapph 2/9/99 When Recorded Return to: Goldfarb &Lipman One Montgomery Street Telesis Tower,23rd Flour San Francisco,CA 94104 Attn: Isabel Brown NO RECORDING FEE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 ORDINANCE NO. 9 9-0 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PLEASANT HILL BART STATION REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(f)(2),AND AMENDING A RELATED ORDINANCE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Pleasant Hill BART Station Redevelopment Project Area by Ordinance No. 84-30,dated.July 10, 1984, as amended by Ordinance No. 88-58, adopted on July 19, 1988 and Ordinance No. 94-62, adopted on December 6, (the"Redevelopment Plan") establishing the Pleasant Dill BART Station Redevelopment Project Area(the"Project Area"). The legal description of the Project Area is set forth in Exhibit of the Time Limits Amendment described and incorporated in this Ordinance by reference below? and WHEREAS,the Redevelopment flan,as amended, contains time limits for conducting certain redevelopment functions meeting the requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law(the "CRL") for such time limits in effect as of the date of adoption and amendment of the Redevelopment Plan, and WHEREAS,AB 1342 amended the CRL effective January 1, 1999. AB 1342 adds Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(#)(2)to the CRIT,which allows the Board of Supervisors to amend the Redevelopment Plan to extend certain time limits for conducting various redevelopment functions, and WHEREAS,the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the"Agency")has analyzed the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan and the time limit requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2), and has determined that the Redevelopment Plan may be amended to extend certain time limits in the manner and to the extent set forthin the staff report prepared in connection with this Ordinance and on file with the Clerk of the Board; and 3201011117104.1 WHEREAS,the Agency has prepared an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan to extend the time limits as permitted by Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2)(the"Time Limits Amendment"), a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors desires to amend the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with the terms of the Time Limits Amendment as authorized pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2); and WHEREAS,the Agency has prepared and submitted and the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the staff`report on the Time Limitations Amendment,and WHEREAS, the Agency staff has prepared and submitted to the Board of Supervisors for review and approval a CEQA Notice of Exemption for the Time Limitations Amendment. WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2) states: In adopting this ordinance,neither the legislative body nor the agency is required to comply with Section 33354.6 or Article 12(commencing with Section 33450)or any other provision of this part relating to the amendment of redevelopment plans. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA: Section 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby finds and declares that the above recitals are true and correct. Section 2. The Time Limits Amendment is hereby incorporated in this Ordinance by reference and made a part of this Ordinance as if set out in full in the Ordinance. Section 3. It is hereby found and determined that the proposed amendments embodied in the Time Limits Amendment are necessary and desirable. The Redevelopment Plan, as adopted by Ordinance No. 84-30,dated July 10, 1984, as amended by Ordinance No. 88- 58, adapted on July 19, 1988 and Ordinance No. 94-62, adopted.on December 6, is further amended in accordance with the proposed amendments set forth in the Time Limits Amendment. Section 4. The Time Limits Amendment is hereby adopted, approved, and designated as part of the official Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. it is the purpose and intent of the Board of Supervisors that the Time Limits Amendment be implemented as part of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. The Executive Director of the Agency may prepare a document that incorporates the provisions of the Time Limits Amendment into the existing text of the Redevelopment Plan, and such document shall then constitute the official Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. 320\0111 1 71 04.1 Section 5. To the extent of the amendments set forth in the Time Limits Amendment, this Ordinance amends Ordinance No. 84-30,dated July 10, 1984, Ordinance No. 88-58, adopted on July 19, 1988, and Ordinance No. 94-62, adopted on.December 6, 1994. Section 6. In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(h), the Time Limits Amendment shall not be construed to affect the validity of any bond, indebtedness,or other obligation,including any mitigation agreement entered into pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33401,authorized by the Board of Supervisors or the Agency prior to January 1, 1994. Mor shall the Time Limits Amendment be construed to affect the right of the Agency to receive property taxes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670,to pay the indebtedness or other obligation described in this Section 6. Section 7. The Board of Supervisors hereby approves the CEQA Notice of Exemption and directs the Clerk of the Board to file the Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk of Contra Costa County. Section 8. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to file a copy of the Time Limits Amendment with the minutes of this meeting. A copy of this Ordinance and the Time Limits Amendment shall be transmitted to the Agency and the Agency is vested with the responsibility of implementing the Time Limits Amendment. Section 9. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby directed to record the Ordinance and the Time Limits Amendment in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 27295. Section 10. if any provision, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or the Time Limitations Amendment is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or portions of the Ordinance or the Time Limitations Amendment. Section 11. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after thirty (30)days from the date of its final passage. 32olt3111171 06.1 i r t i j PROJECT BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION PROJECT AREA } PLEASANT HILL B.A.R.T. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT s t ALL THAT CERTAIN AREA SITUATE IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF TETE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING +AT A POINT MARKING THE INTERSECTION OF TEE EASTERN LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 100.00 FOOT WIDE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT—OF-WAY WITH THE SOUTHERN LINE OF TREAT BOULEVARD, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING HAVING A COORDINATE OF X-1551930.86, Yi523100.15 (TETE BEARINGS AND COORDINATES OF THIS DESCRIPTION BEING REFERENCED TO THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM ZONE 3) f THENCE, ALONG SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE, NORTH 890 09' 52" EAST, 224.98 FEET; THENCE, ALONG TETE ARC OF A TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 99° 13 ' 08" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 34.64 FEET TQ THE WESTERN DINE OF MAYWOOD DRIVE•, THENCE, LEAVING SAID WESTERN LINE NORTH 840 20' 22" EAST 51.54 FEET TO THE EASTERN LINE OF SAID MAYW'OOD DRIVE; THENCE, ALONG TETE ARC OF 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM WHICH THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 81" 37 ' Oft" EAST, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 82° 03 ' 07" , AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.64 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERN LINE OF TREAT BOULEVARD; THENCE, ALONG SAID SOUTHERN LINE TETE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: (1) SOUTH 89" 33' 53" EAST, 290.06 FEET., (2) ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 1068.96 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO TETE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06" 07' 33*, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 114.29 FEET, (3) SOUTH 830 26' 20" EAST, 93 .78 FEET, AND (4) ALONG TETE ARC OF A TANGENT 1945.14 FONT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05° ' 12' 54" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 177.04 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE; THENCE, ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 690 44 ' 10", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24:34 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 81° 30' 44" EAST 3.00 FEET TO THE WESTERN LINE OF CHERRY LANE; THENCE, ALONG SAID WESTERN LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: (1) SOUTH 08° '29 ' 16" EAST, 64.49 FEET, AND (2) ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 175.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04° 48' 55" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 14.71 FEET, THENCE, LEAVING SAID WESTERN LINE SOUTH 82° 29' 39" IF-ART 50.75 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERN LINE OF SAID CHERRY LANE; HENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN LINE OF THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND RECORDED IN .BOOK 6541 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT DACE 40, BOOK 6852 OF OFFICIAL CORDS AT PAGE 389, BOOK 6568 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PACE 320., AND OOK 6783 OF OFFICIAL. RECORDS AT PAGE 482 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CORDER OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES (1) SOUTH 82° 29' 39" FAST, 119.59 FEET, (2) SOUTH 71:x' 32' 37" EAST, 274.01 FEET, AND (3) SOUTH 56° 57 ' 42" EAST, 123.10 FEET TO THE WESTERN LINE OF THE WALNUT CREEK CHANNEL AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORDED -IN BOOK 6383 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE, 482; THENCE, ALONG THE WESTERN LINE - THEREOF THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) . COURSES: (1) NORTH 27* 28 ' 49" EAST 121.00 FEET, (2) NORTH 25" 00' 22" EAST, 11.3.21 FEET, AND (3) NORTH 368 00 ' 37" EAST 6.01 FEET TO' THE NORTHERN LINE OF TREAT BOULEVARD; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERN LINE AND ALONG THE ARC OF A EXHIBIT B-1 i a f $45.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT FROM WHICH THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 01° 35' 05" EAST, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 010 00' 57", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 14.98 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERN LINE OF SAID WALNUT CREEK CHANNEL; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERN LINE THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: (1) NORTH 36° 001 37" EAST, 49.75 FEET, ( NORTH 46e 15' 37" EAST, 16.19 FEET, (3) WORTH 36° 50 ' 36" EAST, 20.09 FEET, (4) NORTH 32" 41 00" EAST, 110.29 FEET, AND (5) NORTH 366 50' 35" EAST, 13.74 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL C AS SAID PARCEL C IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 9 OF PARCEL HAPS AT PAGE 4 IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE, ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE THEREON THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: (1) NORTH 73" 45' 55" WEST„ 145.94 FEET, (2) NORTH 70` 37' 23" WEST, 55.76 FEET* (3) ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 100.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12" 10' 44" , AN ARC DISTANCE OF 21.26 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE, 4 ) ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 100.00 `FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT TH40UGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12° 10' 44", AN ARC DISTANCE 21.26 FEET, AND 53 NORTH 70° 37' 23" WEST 107.05 FEET TO THE EASTERN LINE OF ALDERWOOD DRIVE; 'THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERN LINE, NORTH 70° 37' 23" WEST 40.043 FEET TO THE WESTERN LINE OF' ALDERWOOD DRIVE; THENCE,'. ALONG SAID WESTERN LINE, SOUTH 190 22' 37" 'NEST, 61.67 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN BOOK '11100 AT PAGE 851 IN SAID OFFICE ' OF THE COUNTY RECORDER; 'THENCE, ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF SAID CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND ;AND ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THOSE CERTAIN DEEDS RECORDER IN BOOK 7331 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 352, AND BOOK 10713 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 324 IN SAID OFFICE .OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, NORTH 70° 34 ' 55" WEST, 392.44 FEET TO THE: EASTERN LINE OF CHERRY LANE; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EASTERN LINE, NORTH 700 3'4 ' 55" WEST, 40.11 FEET TO THE WESTERN LINE OF CHERRY LANE; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERN LINE SOUTH 15" 13' 43" WEST 49.86 FEET; AND SOUTH 01° 48 ' 43" WEST 12.1.2 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF -THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 6793 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT . PACE 71 IN SAID OFFICE OF, THE COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE 'THEREOF AND ALONG THE NORTHERN LINE OF THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THOSE CERTAIN DEEDS RECORDED IN BOOK 10964 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 135, BOOK 10882 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 287, BOOR 1.0273 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 92, BOOK 10635, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 693, BOOK 10752 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 369, AND BOOK 8772 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 325 IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES: (1) NORTH 89° 23 ' 53" WEST, 226.45 FEET, ( ) NORTH 08° 35' 54" FAST, 93.04 FEET, (3) NORTH 89" 23' 53" WEST, 99.91 FEET'', (4) SOUTH' 08* 37' 40" WEST; 74.68 FEET, (5) NORTH 89" 33' 53" WEST, 11.8.91. FEE'S`, (6) SOUTH 08 37' 40" WEST, 19.78 FEET, (7) NORTH 89° 35' 32" WEST, 289.65 FEET, (8) SOUTH 080 37 ' 37" WEST, 13.2.3 FEET, AND (9) NORTH 87" 40 ' 21" WEST, 208.55 FEET TO SAID EASTERN LINE OF SAID SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT--OF—WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID EAS'T'ERN LINE NORTH 08" 44' 37" EAST, 3594 .27 FEET TO THE BOUNDARY COMMON TO `SAID COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA AND TO THE CITY OF PLEASANT DILL; THENCE ALONG SAID COMMON BOUNDARY 2 .. t ' iwoRTH 89° 34 ' 360 WEST, 101.06 FEET" TO THE WESTERN LINE OF SAID SOUTHERN !08* P'ACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; 'THENCE, ALONG SAIL) WESTERN LINE SOUTH ° 44 ' 37" WEST, 1289.04 FEET TO THE NORTHERN LINE OF COGGINS DRIVE; ENCS, ALONG SAID NORTHERN LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: (1) NORTH 890 18' 50" WEST, 11.16 FEET, (2) ALONG THE THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT 30.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO- THE RIGHT FROM WHICH THE CENTER F SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 57° 13 ' 37" WEST THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE F 79° 46' 35", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 41.77 FEET, AND (3) NORTH 670 25 ' 58" WEST 14.47 FEET TO THE NORTHERN EXTENSION OF THE WESTERN LINE F SAID COGGINS DRIVE; THENCE, ALONG SAID NORTHERN EXTENSION AND SAID TERN LIME SOUTH 08` 45' 24" WEST, 462.67 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST RNER OF IAT 1 AS SAID LOT IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON THE OFFICIAL OF DIABLO VILLA FILED IN BOOR 251 OF MAP'S AT PAGE 59 IN SAID OFFICE F THE COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE, ALONG THE SOUTHERN LIME THEREOF NORTH 89* 21' 39" 'WEST, 178.03 FEET TO THE WESTERN LINE OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERN LINE NORTH 060 40' 04" EAST, . 239.78 FEET T6 THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTHERN LINE OF PARCEL TWO AS SAID PARCEL O IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 24 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE 47 IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER; HENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND ALONG SAID SOUTHERN LINE, NORTH 890 20' 29" WEST, 274.88 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST: CORNER OF ESTRELLA RANCHO UNIT NO. 2 FILED IN BOOK 53 OF MAPS AT PAGE 15 IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN LINE THEREOF AND ALONG THE EASTERN LINE OF ESTRELLA RANCHO UNIT FILED IN BOOK 50 OF HAPS AT PAGE 48 IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER SOUTH 060 38' 45" WEST, 683.00 FEET TO THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 2 AND 3 OF SAID ESTRELLA RANCHO (50 M. 48) ; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN LINE OF SAID LOT 3, NORTH 83" 21' 14" WEST, 125.14 FEET TO THE EASTERN LINE OF ELENA DRIVE; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERN LINE, NORTH 83° 21' 14" WEST, 5,0.19 FEET TO THE WESTERN LINE OF SAID ELENA DRIVE: THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERN LINE AND ALONG THE ARC OF 280.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT FROM HICH THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 87° 49' 49* EAST, THROUGH CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06° 31« 26", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.88 FEET; THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERN LINE, SOUTH 04° 21' 14* EAST, 157.39 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 20.00. FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A' CENTRAL ANGLE OF 94" 05' 12" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 32.84 FEET TO A POINT ON . THE NORTH LINE OF LAS JUNTAS WAY: THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES; (1) SOUTH 890 43' 58" WEST, 150.44 FEET, (2) ALONG THE ARC OF A '!TANGENT 470.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 180 16 ' 45" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 149.95 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE, AND (3) ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT 530.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT 'THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE. Or 08" 08' 31" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 75.32 FEET TO THE WESTERN LINE OF SUBDIVISION 6284 AS SHOWN ON OFFICIAL MAP THEREOF FILED IN BOOR 268 OF MAPS AT PAGE 1: THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERN LINE NORTH 01` 59' 22" EAST, 311.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHERN LINE OF SAID ESTRELLA RANCHO (50 M. 48) ; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN ANIS WESTERN BOUNDARIES THEREOF AND ALONG THE WESTERN LINE OF SAID ESTRELLA RANCHO UNIT 2 (53 X 15) THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: (1) NORTH 8$° 14' 24" WEST, 15.80 FEET, (2) NORTH 134" 01' 20"' WEST, 99.88 FEET, - 3 (3) NORTH 73" 51' 10" WEST, 49.09 FEET, (4) NORTH 18° 20' 27" WEST, 71.93 FEET, AND (5) NORTH 06" 37' 10" FAST* 445.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID ESTR.ELLA RANCHO UNIT NO. 2 (53 A 15) AND TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERN LINE OF PARCEL A AS SAID PARCEL A IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 35 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE 14 IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER; 'THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERN LINE THEREOF NORTH 89" 20' 29" WEST, 74.35 FEET TOO THE EASTERN LINE OF BUSKIRK AVENUE; 'THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERN LINE THE .FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: (1) NORTH 89° 21' 33" WEST, 10.10 FEET AND (2) ALONG THE ARC OF A 580.04 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TOO THE RIGHT FROM WHICH THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 820 33' 51" WEST THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 32° 54' 34" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 333.1.6 FRET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER Or LOT 41 AS SAID LOT 41 IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON THE OFFICIAL MAP OF TRACT 2027 FILED IN BOOK 56 OF MAPS AT PAGE 51 IN THE OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERN LINE OF BUSKIRK AND ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF'=SAID LOT 41, NORTH 88$ 52' 58* WEST, 364.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02° 02 ' 29" WEST, 662.54 FEET TO THE WESTERN LINE, OF SAID BUSKIRK AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERN LINE SOUTH 02" 02' 29" WEST, 1153.09 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERN LINE OF BUSKIRK AVENUE* SOUTH 02° 02' 29" WEST, 743.39 FEET TO THE EASTERN LINE OF THAT- CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 9865 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 49 IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE SAID- EASTERN LINE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: (1) SOUTH 25° 24' 0l« WEST, 16.92 FEET AND (2) SOUTH 204* 30' y11'" WEST, 37.52 FEET; THENCE: LEAVING SAID WESTERN LINE SOUTH 89" 50' 54" EAST, 152.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHERN CORNER OF PARCEL A AS SAID PARCEL A IS SHOWN AND SO DESIGNATED ON THAT CERTAIN RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 73 OF LICENSE SURVEYOR'S MAPS AT PACE 27 IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER AND TO THE WEST LINE OF JONES ROAD; 'T'HENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE SOUTH 89° 50' 54" EAST, 74 . 86 FEET TO THE BAST LINE OF SAID JONES ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERN LINE THEREOF THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES: (1) ALONG THE ARC OF 270.02 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT FROM WHICH .THE CENTER OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 48° 36' 20" EAST THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 48° 45' 26'" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 229.78 FEET* (2) SOUTH '894* 50' 54" BAST, 216.81 FEET* (3) ALONG THE ARC OF A `.TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE 'RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 984* 37' 17"" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 34.43 FEET, AND (4) SOUTH $1" 13' 37" BAST, 10.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERN LINE OF OAK ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERN LINE SOUTH 08` 46 ' 23" WEST* 36.08 FEET,- THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY PROJECTION OF THE SOUTHERN LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 9950 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AT PAGE 182* SOUTH 894* 04' 15" FAST, 78.74 FEET TO THE EASTERN LINE OF OAK ROAD; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERN LINE AND ALONG SAID SOUTHERN LINE OF SAID CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND (9950 O.R. 182) SOUTH 89° 04' 15" EAST, 691. 85 FEET TO THE WESTERN LINE OF SAID 100 FOOT WIDE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; 'THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERN LINE, SOUTH 89* 04' 15"' EAST, 100.94 FEET TO THE EASTERN LINE OF SAID SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERN LINE, NORTH 08- 4 4' 37" BAST, 634.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4 .. • ay r First Addition to Project Area Pleasant Hill SART Redevelopment Project All that . real property situate in an unincorporated area of Contra Costa County, California, described as follows: References are to Subdivision Maps filed at the Recorder's Office of said County. All of that portion of "Estrella Rancho" recorded ,lune 17, 1953 in Map Book 50 at page 48, that lies outside of "Pleasant Hill BART Redevelopment Project" boundary adopted January 31, 1984 by County Board of Supervisors` Resolution # 84/74. And all of Tract No. 539-2 "Estrella Rancho - Unit No. 2" filed March 12, 1954 in Map Book 53 at page 15. Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 5 (50 M 48); thence along the east line of Lots 5, 4, and 3 (50 M 48) , South 060 38' 56" 'West 277 feet, to the southeast corner of Lot 3; thence along the south line of Lot 3 and its westerly prolongation, North 830 21' 04" West 1.75.37 feet, to the west line of Elena Drive (50 M 48); thence along said gest line in a general southerly direction 71 feet, more or less, to the southeast corner of Lot 6 (50 M 48) being a point on the boundary. of "Estrella Rancho" ; thence along said boundary South 850 38' 56" West 37.2 feet, North 230 20' 34" West 58.53 feet, North 490 49' 12" West 64.45 feet, North 590 20' 55" `rest 211.3 feet, North 880 09' 35" West 94.87 feet, north 840 01' 10" West 99.88 feet, North 730 51' West 49.09 feet, North 180 20' 17" West 71.93 feet, and North 060 37' 20" East 177.48 feet, to the northwest corner of "Estrella Rancho" , being also the southwest corner of "Estrella Rancho - Unit No. 2 (5� M 15)" ; thence along the boundary of "Estrella Rancho - Unit No. 2" , North 060 37' 20" East 268.02 feet, South 890 20' 19" East 753.54 feet, and South 060 38' 56" West 406 feet, to the southwest corner (53 M 15) , being also the point of beginning. Containing 10.37 acres, more or less. LB:sj LB:Desc.BART 8/04/87 EXHIBIT B-2 The foregoing ordinance was introduced and read before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra. Costa held on F e b r u a r y 2 , 1999,and the second reading was held at a regularly held meeting on February 23 _ , 1999,where it was finally adopted. Said Ordinance was passed and adopted and ordered published within fifteen(15)days of the date of adoption in the Contra Cost.Times, a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Contra Costa,by the following vote: AYES: Boardmembers: Gioia, Uilkema, Gerber , UeSaulnier and Canciamilla NOES: Boardmembers: None ABSENT: Boardmembers: None ABSTAIN: Boardmembers: None . � I < Chair of the o�r{dofSupersors Y f`# 3 ATTEST: Clerk. of the Bo APPROVED AS TO FORM: 320\01\117104.1 TIME LIMITS AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BA's'POINT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Adopted February 23 , 1999 Ordinance No. 9 9®o 5 I. INTTRM TION The Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa has adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point(formerly known as"West Pittsburg")Redevelopment Project Area by Ordinance No. 87-102,dated December 29, 1987, as amended by Ordinance No. 9464, adopted on December 6, 1994(the "Plan") establishing the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the"Project Area"). The Project Area is described in the attached E . The Plan, as amended, contains time limits for conducting certain redevelopment functions meeting the requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law("CRL")in effect as of the date of adoption and amendment of the Plan. Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2), effective January 1, 1999,permits an amendment to the Plan to extend specified time limits for conducting various redevelopment functions including the deadline for repayment of debt and receipt of tax increment. This Amendment has been prepared by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the "Agency") staff to comply with the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2)relating to the extension of time for repayment of debt and receipt of tax increment. II. MODIFICATIONS ()PLr Part X. 3. is modified such that the date after which the Agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670 with respect to the Project Area is changed from December 29, 2027 to December 29, 2037. III. FF OF ANfENDMF3�'T All provisions of the Plan not specifically amended or repealed in this Amendment shall continue in full force and effect. 3201071117099.1 When Recorded Return.to: Goldfarb &Lipman One Montgomery Street Telesis Tower, 23rd Floor San Francisco,CA 94104 Attn: Isabel Brown. NO RECORDING FEE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 ORDINANCE NO. 9 9-0 5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE BAY POINT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(l)(2),AND AMENDING A RELATED ORDINANCE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the Board.of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Bay Point(formerly known as "West Pittsburg")Redevelopment Project Area by Ordinance No. 87-102, dated December 29, 1987, as amended by Ordinance No. 94-64, adopted on December 6, 1994(the"Redevelopment Plan") establishing the Bay Point Redevelopment Project Area(the"Project Area"). The legal description of the Project Area is set forth in Exhibit of the Time Limits Amendment described and incorporated in this Ordinance by reference below; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, contains time limits for conducting certain redevelopment functions meeting the requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law(the "CRL") for such time limits in effect as of the date of adoption and amendment of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS,AB 1342 amended the CRL effective January 1, 1999. AB 1342 adds Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2)to the CRL,which allows the Board of Supervisors to amend the Redevelopment Plan to extend certain time limits for conducting various redevelopment functions; and WHEREAS,the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the "Agency")has analyzed the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan and the time limit requirements of health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2), and has determined that the Redevelopment Plan may be amended to extend certain time limits in the manner and to the extent set forth in the staff report prepared in connection with this Ordinance and on file with the Clerk of the Board; and 320\0711 17108.2 WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan to extend the time limits as permitted by Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2) (the"Time Limits Amendment"), a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board; and WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors desires to amend the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with the terms of the Time Limits Amendment as authorized pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.60(2); and WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared and submitted and the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the staff report on the Time Limitations Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Agency staff has prepared and submitted to the Board of Supervisors for review and approval a CEQA Notice of Exemption for the Time Limitations Amendment. WHEREAS,Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2) states: In adopting this ordinance, neither the legislative body nor the agency is required to comply with Section 33354.6 or Article 12(commencing with Section 33450) or any other provision of this part relating to the amendment of redevelopment plans. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA: Section 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby finds and declares that the above recitals are true and correct. Section 2. The Time Limits Amendment is hereby incorporated in this Ordinance by reference and made a part of this Ordinance as if set out in full in the Ordinance. Section 3. It is hereby found and determined that the proposed amendments embodied in the Time Limits Amendment are necessary and desirable. The Redevelopment Plan as adopted by Ordinance No. 87102,dated December 29, 1987, as amended by Ordinance No. 94.64, adopted on December 6, 1994, is further amended in accordance with the proposed amendments set forth in the Time Limits Amendment. Section 4. The Time Limits Amendment is hereby adopted, approved, and designated as part of the official Redevelopment Picn for the Project Area. It is the purpose and intent of the Board of Supervisors that the Time Limits Amendment be implemented as part of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. The Executive Director of the Agency may prepare a document that incorporates the provisions of the Time Limits Amendment into the existing text of the Redevelopment Plan, and such document shall then constitute the official Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. 3201071117108.2 Section 5. To the extent of the amendments set forth in the Time Limits Amendment, this Ordinance amends Ordinance No. 87-102 adopted on December 29, 1987, and Ordinance No. 94-64 adopted on December 6, 1994. Section 6. In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(h),the Time Limits Amendment shall not be construed to affect the validity of any bond, indebtedness,or ether obligation, including any mitigation agreement entered into pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33441, authorized by the Board of Supervisors or the Agency prior to January 1, 1994. Nor shall the Time Limits Amendment be construed to affect the right of the Agency to receive property taxes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670,to pay the indebtedness or other obligation described in this Section 6. Section 7. The Board of Supervisors hereby approves the CEQA Notice of Exemption and directs the Clerk of the Board to file the Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk of Contra Costa County. Section 8. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to file a copy of the Time Limits Amendment with the minutes of this meeting. A copy of this Ordinance and the Time Limits Amendment shall be transmitted to the Agency and the Agency is vested with the responsibility of implementing the Time Limits Amendment. Section 9. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby directed to record the Ordinance and the Time Limits Amendment in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 27295. Section 10. If any provision, section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordinance or the Time Limitations Amendment is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or portions of the Ordinance or the Time Limitations Amendment. Section 11. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after thirty (30)days from the date of its final passage. 320\07\117108.2 a� West Pittsburg Redevelopment Project W.O. #5509 - Boundary Description C.x3 EXHIBIT A (teal property in the unincorporated area of West Pittsburg, California . Document and map references are to records of Contra Costa County. a h@ginfling dt thn rlorthw@§t cornor of SAction 13, Towi-Mip 2 Horth f RAngij 1 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (shown as the southeast corner of Section 11 on the map of Bella Monte Subdivision No. 1 filed 1larch 22, 1927 in Map Book 20 at page 545); thence along the west line of Section 13, South 010 25' West 30 feet, to the south line of Willow Pass Road; thence along said south line, East 1,466 feet , to the northeast corner of Lot 2 , Pittsburg Home Acres Addition recorded March 22, 1938 in Map took 22 at page 662; thence along the east line of Lot 2, South 000 40' East 12 feet, to the north line of Triond parcel recorded February 1, 1985 in Volume 12168 at page 412; thence along the north line of Triond parcel and its easterly prolongation, East 267 feet, to the northwest corner of Lot 16, Subdivision 4137, Willows Landing, recorded February 25, 1972 in Map Book 144 at page 14; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 4137, South 000 09' 26" :,lest 477.46 feet, South 890 06' 38" East 384 feet, and South 000 09' 20" West 781.89 feet, to the north line of Hanlon Way; thence along said north line, North 890 06' 3$" West 651 feet, to the northerly prolongation of the west line of Lot 252 (144 M 14); thence along said prolongation and west line, South 000 10' 03" Test 127.98 feet, to an angle point; thence South poo o9' 1 600K .141 6 74: 24" asst 55963 feet to An arigl a puiht art the gest 1 int: of Lot 281 (I44 "I 14)•, thence along said west line and its southerly prolongation, South. 000 d9' 3,04 West 8zs feet, more or less , to the south line of State Freeway Route 4 thence along said south line in a general westerly direction 1,490 feet, more or less; to the east' line of Section 14 (T2N, RIW); thence along said east tine; South Od0 30' East 780 feet, more or less; to the northeast corner bf Lot 57, Subdivision 5346, Hillsdale Unit III , filed September 22, 1878 in kap Bonk 217 at page 20, tieing a point on the south line of Contra Costa Canal; thence along said south line; South 890 42' West 92 feet, South 4130 39' West 138.5 feet, South 660 351 West 435.2 feet, North 480 34' West 414.4 fest, South 890 42' West 28.8 feet, and North 480 34' West 535.7 feet, to the most northerly corner of Subdivision'4731,. Hillsdale, filed April 19, 1976 in Map Book 183 at page 28; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 4731] South 126 47' 01" West 609.44 feet and North 890 251 37" West 438.39 feet; to the northeast corner of Frank D: and Carolyn A. Briggs PARCEL TUO recorded July 7, 1977 in Volume 8407 at page 531; thence along, the boundary thereof, Noirih 890 25' 37" West 270.65 feet and South 00o 331 32" East 90,70 feet; -to the iibetl east corner of Pittsburg Terrace Unit No. 1 filed November 5, 1930 in Map Book 21 at page 604; thence along the north line thereof, South 890 46' 'West 245 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 6 (21 14 604); thence South 000 45' East 98,28 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 4 (21 14 604}; thence along the boundary of Lot 4, South 000 45' East 25 feet, s6 uthuestenly 39.27 feet along the arc of a 25 feet radius curve concave to the horthw8ti and South 8010. 15' West 75 feet, t0 the southeast corner of 2 Cx Lot 3 (21 14 604); thence along the south line of Lot 3 and its westerly 4 prolongation, South 890 15' West 1.25 feet, to the centerline of Bailey Road C (shown- as Dante Road in 21 M 504) being the east line of the west half of C Section 14 (T2N, R1W); thence along said east line, North 000 45' West 1,475 C feet, more or less, to the north line of State Freeway Route 4; thence along said north line in a general westerly direction 7,250 feet,. more or less, to s the southeast corner of PARCEL C of Minor Subdivision 192-68 filed April 22, 1969 in Parcel Map Book 8 at page 121 thence along the east line of PARCEL C, North 120 45' West 77.61 feet, to the easterly prolongation of the south line of Bruce W. and donna G. Parley parcel recorded August 5, 1974 in Volume 7290 at page 737; thence along said prolongation and south line, North .770 131 05" West 418.81 feet, to the southwest corner; thence along the west line of said Farley parcel and its northerly prolongation, North 000 171 20" West 120 feet, more or less, to the north Zine of Camino Andres (8 PM 12); thence along said north line in a general northeasterly direction 900 feet, more or less, to the northeast line of Contra Costa Canal ; thence along said northeast line in a general northwesterly direction 1,130 feet, more or less, to the most southerly corner of Subdivision 4663 filed October 20, 1977 in Map Book' 203 at page 31; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 4663, North 630 37' 26" East 484.20 feet and North 5880 331 46S4 West 104.95 feet, to the south line of Riverside Drive (203 M 31); thence along said south line, North 660 06' 32" East 2.89 feet, Northeasterly 57,39 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the northwest with a radius of 778 feet and a central angle of 040 13' 35", Northeasterly 21.94 feet along the 3 80OK1410OP9 76 at'c of a eeversi tueve concave to the southeast with a radius of 722 feet and a central angle of 010 441 29" , and north 630 37' 26" l=ast 35.25 feet, to the northeast line of East Bay Munici pal Utility District parcel recorded August N. 1926 in Volume 57 at page 69; , thence along said northeast line, -South 580 33' 55" East 1,469.1 feet, to the north line -of Camino Andres; thence along said north line, North 890 541 26" East 49.36 feet, to its intersection with the west. line of Port Chicago Highway as shown on the snap of Subdivision 3885 recorded- October 23, 1969 in Map Book 128 at page 29; thence crossing Port Chicago Highway, Easterly 270 feet, more or less , to a pbiht ori the north line of Willow pass Road shown as the easterly terminus of a 150 feet radius Curve on the map of Minor Subdivision 11-84 filed December 26, 1984 in Parcel Clop Book 113 at page 42; thence along the north line of Willow Pass Road , South 890 07' 28" East 569.98 feet and South 000 521 32" West 4.81 feet, to the north line of "Willow Pass Road Widening" parcel shown on the map of Subdivision 5695 filed March 20, 1984 in Map Book 277 at page 18; thence along said north line, South 890 05` 14" East 790.69 feet, to the north line of "Willow Pass Road Widening" parcel shown on the .nap of Subdivision 5534 filed March 20, 1984 in Map Book 277 at page 11.; thence along said north line, South 890 05, 14" East 67.11 feet, South 890 121 06" East 924.80 feet, and South 896 07' '21" East 0.16 feet, to the east line of Subdivision 5534; thence along said east line and its northerly prolongation, North '010 101 36" East 2,538.13 feet, to the northeast corner of Subdivision 5354 filed March 14, 1979 in Map Book 223 at page 3; thence along the north line of Subdivision 5354, North 886 50' 18" best 2,633.04 4 feet, to the north corner of Lot 12 (223 tot 3); thence along the west line of � Lot 12, .South Otto 55" 16" West 160 feet, more or less, to the easterly C prolongation of the south line of Earl W. Smith Developers Ltd. .563 acre parcel (Assessor Parcel dumber 098-340-001) recorded January 6, 1969 in Volume 5784 at page 611; thence crossing Port Chicago Highway along said prolongation, North 880 581 20" West 84 feet, .to said south line; thence along said south line, North 880 58' 20" West 145 feet, to the southwest corner; thence along the west line of said .563 acre parcel , North 000. 55' East 170 feet, to the south line of Pacifica Avenue; thence along said south line in a general westerly direction 5,100 feet, more or less, to the-west line of Driftwood Drive; thence along said west line, North 0010 20' West 2,718.46 feet, to the north line of Section 9 (T2N, RIg); thence along said north line, Easterly 1,390 feet, more or less, to the south line of Sacramento Northern Railroad right of way; thence along said south line in a general southeasterly direction 1,3502 feet, more or less, to the east line of Section 9; thence along said east line, North 0010 54' 45" West 386.36 feet, to the northeast corner; thence along the west line of Section 3 (T2N, RIW), North 000 01" 52" West 2,610.96 feet, to the northwest corner of PARCEL I filed may 22, 1985 in Licensed' Surveyors' flop Book 77 at page 2; thence along the north line of PARCEL 1, South 880 01' 52" East 1,255.98 feet and North 860 58" 08" East 750.18 feet, to the northwest corner of PARCEL 2 (77 LS14 2); thence along the boundary of PARCEL 2, Borth 860 58" 08" East 650.87 feet, and South -000 06' 30" West' 150.30 feet, to the northwest corner of 99 acre American dredging Company parcel recorded 5 - Boos 141OOPC 7.8 FOruary 244, 1,961 JA Volume 381.1 at page 287:, thence along the boundary of said 99 acre parcel , North 850 11' 30" East 250.04 feet, South 770 53' 30" East 132 feet, North 560 55' 30" East 122 feet, North 700 51' 30" East 139 feet, North 750 16' 30" East 201 feet, North 550 31' 30" East 191 feet, North 150 51' ail" East 195 feet, South 160 35' 52" East 534.37 feet, and .South O(p 301 45" West 3,708.74 feet, to the north line of Contra Costa County Water District parcel recorded February 17, 1961 in Volume 3807 at Page 369; thence Southerly 300 feet, more or less , to the northeast corner of Interlake Steel Corp. parcel as shown on Record of Survey filed June 1, 1966 in licensed Surveyors' Map Book 42 at page 45 (said northeast corner being a point tin the south line of Sacramento Northern Railroad right of way recorded in Book 187 of Deeds at page 360); thence along the south line of Sacramento Northern Railroad right of way in a general easterly direction 5,92$,22 feet. to the northeast corner of Poinsettia Land Company West Pittsburg Tract Unit No. 1 filed June 8, 1926 in Map Book 19 at page 506; thence along the east line of said Tract, South 000 50' West 531.64 feet, to the north line of Horace and Theresa Siino PARCEL TWO recorded October 24, 1944 in Volume 796 at page 488; thence along said north line and its easterly prolongation, South 890 48' East 485.48 feet, to the northwest corner of Bella Moate Subdivision Pio. 2 filed April 2, 1929 in I4ap hook 21 at page 584, thence along the boundary thereof, South 890 43' East 847.87 feet and South 010 25' Fest 644.50 feet, t0 the northeast corner of Bella Monte Subdivision No. 1 (20 M 546), thence along the east line thereof, South Cil° 25' Test 455.11 feet, to the point of beginning. 6 Excluding therefrom: All of Willow Glen Subdivision 5064 recorded October. C 25, 1978 in Map Gook 218 at page 31 except that 55 feet gide strip of land c shown as "Bailey Road Widening" (218 M 31). tt LB:sj - DescWPitt 1/08/87 6/03/87 7/09/87 8/10/87 8/17/87 7 The foregoing ordinance was introduced and read before the.Beard of Supervisors of the County of Contra.Costa at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa held on February 2 , 1999, and the second reading was held at a regularly held meeting on February 2 3 , 1999,where it was finally adopted. Said Ordinance was passed and adapted and ordered published within fifteen(15)days of the date of adoption in the Contra Costa Tines, a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Contra Costa,by the following vote: AYES: Boardmembers: Gioia, Uilkema, Gerber , DeSaulnier and Canciamilla NOES: Boardmembers: None ABSENT: Boardmembers: None ABSTAIN: Boardmembers: None Chair of the card of Supervisors ATTEST: YZ k"'t &, Clerk (001M, e Boar APPROVED AS TO FORM: 3201071117108.2 When Recorded Return to: Goldfarb &Lipman One Montgomery Street Telesis Tower, 23rd Floor San Francisco,CA 94104 Attn: Isabel Brown NO RECORDING FEE PURSUANT TO GOt1ERNNIENT CODE SECTION 27383 ORDINANCE NO. 9 9-4 6 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTH RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT PROTECT AREA.PURSUANT TO HEALTH ANIS SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(f)(2),AND AMENDING A RELATED ORDINANCE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE BOAR OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS. WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the North Richmond Redevelopment Project Area by Ordinance No. 87- 50,dated July 14, 1987,as amended by Ordinance No. 94-63 adopted on December 6, 1994,(the "Redevelopment Plan")establishing the North Richmond Redevelopment Project Area(the "Project Area"). The legal description of the Project Area is set forth in Exhibit of the Time Limits Amendment described and incorporated in this Ordinance by referencebelow; and WHEREAS,the Redevelopment Plan, as amended,contains time limits for conducting certain redevelopment functions meeting the requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law(the "CRL") for such time limits in effect as of the date of adoption and amendment of the Redevelopment Plan;and WHEREAS,AB 1342 amended the CRL effective January 1, 1999. AB 1342 adds Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2)to the CRL,which allows the Board of Supervisors to amend the Redevelopment Plan to extend certain time limits for conducting various redevelopment functions; and WHEREAS,the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the "Agency")has analyzed the provisions of the Redevelopment.Plan and the time limit requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2), and has determined that the Redevelopment Plan may be amended to extend certain time limits in the manner and to the extent set forth'in the staff report prepared in connection with this Ordinance and on file with the Clerk of the Board; and 32=61,117109.41 WHEREAS,the Agency has prepared an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan to extend the time limits as permitted by Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2)(the"Time Limits Amendment"), a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board; and WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors desires to amend the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with the terms of the Time Limits Amendment as authorized pursuant to Health and Safety Cade Section 33333.6(f)(2); and WHEREAS,the Agency has prepared and submitted and the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the staff report on the Time Limitations Amendment; and WHEREAS,the Agency staff has prepared and submitted to the Board of Supervisors for review and approval a CEQA Notice of Exemption for the Time Limitations Amendment. WHEREAS,Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2)states: In adopting this ordinance,neither the legislative body nor the agency is required to comply with Section 33354.6 or Article 12(commencing with Section 33450)or any other provision of this part relating to the amendment of redevelopment plans. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA. Section 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby finds and declares that the above recitals ,are true and correct. Section 2. The Time Limits Amendment is hereby incorporated in this Ordinance by reference and made a part of this Ordinance as if set out in full in the Ordinance. Section 3. It is hereby found and determined that the proposed amendments embodied in the Time Limits Amendment are necessary and desirable, The Redevelopment Plan, as adopted by Ordinance No. 87-50 on July 14, 1987 and as amended by Ordinance No. 94-63 on December 6, 1994, is further amended in accordance with the proposed amendments set forth in the Time Limits Amendment. Section 4. The Time Limits Amendment is hereby adopted, approved.,and designated as part of the official Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. It is the purpose and intent of the Board of Supervisors that the Time Limits Amendment be implemented as part of the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. The Executive Director of the Agency may prepare a document that incorporates the provisions of the Time Limits Amendment into the existing text of the Redevelopment Plan, and such document shall then constitute the official Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Section 5. To the extent of the amendments set forth in the Time Limits Amendment, this Ordinance amends Ordinance No. 87-50 adopted on July 14, 1987 and Ordinance No. 94-63 adapted on December 6, 1994. 320\061,117109.1 Section 6. In accordance with Huth and Safety Code Section 33333.6(h),the Time Limits Amendment shall not be construed to affect the validity of any bond, indebtedness,or other obligation, including any mitigation agreement entered into pursuant to Health and Safety Cotte Section 33401, authorized by the Board of Supervisors or the Agency prior to January 1, 1994. Nor shall the Time Limits Amendment be construed to affect the right of the Agency to receive property taxes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670,to pay the indebtedness or other obligation described in this Section 6. Section 7. The Board of Supervisors hereby approves the CEQA Notice of Exemption and directs the Clerk of the Board to file the Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk of Contra.Costa County. Section 8. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to file a copy of the Time Limits Amendment with the minutes of this meeting. A copy of this Ordinance and the Time Limits Amendment shall be transmitted to the Agency and.the Agency is vested with the responsibility of implementing the Time Limits Amendment. Section 9. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby directed to record the Ordinance and the Time Limits Amendment in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 27295. Section 10. If any provision, section, subsection,subdivision, sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordinance or the Time Limitations Amendment is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional,such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or portions of the Ordinance or the Time Limitations Amendment. Section 11. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after thirty (30)days from the slate of its final passage. 3201061117109.1 North,Richmond Redevelopment Project Boundary Description - January, 1987 EXHIBIT A Real property in the unincorporated area of North Richmond, California. Document and leap references are to records of Contra Costo County. Beginning at the intersection of the south line of Chesley Avenue (Road No. 25) with the east line of Southern Pacific Railroad right of way, shown on Map of hall's Second Addition to the City of Richmond filed March 2, 1912 in Map Book 6 at page 140; thence along the south line of Chesley Avenue, South 890 56* hest 2,588.6 feet, to the centerline of York Street (6 M 140); thence along said centerline, South 000 04' East 100 feet, to the easterly prolongation of the north line of Lot 15 (6 M 140); 'thence along said prolongation and north line, South 890 56' West 125 feet, to.the northwest corner; thence along the west line of Lot 15 and its southerly prolonga- tion, South 000 04' East 125 feet, to the centerline of Gertrude Avenue (6 M 140); thence along said centerline. North 890 56' East 125 feet, to the Centerline of York Street; thence along the centerline of York Street, South 000 04' East 1,310 feet, to the easterly prolongation of the north line of Block 2. Map of the Andrade-Gularte Tract filed in Map Book 7 at page 175; thence along said prolongation, north line, and westerly prolongation, North 890 45' hest 970.9 feet, to the northwest corner of Block 1 (7 M 175) being t a point on the south line of City of Richmond PARCEL THREE recordeJ April 21. 1978 in Volume 8803 at page 828; thence along the boundary of said City panel, North 880 51' 40" West 5.10 feet and North 120 51' 10' East 21 f et to the southwest corner zi of Lot 18, Block 237, Mall's Second Addition {6 140); thence along the boundary of said Addition, North, 110 45' 50" East 7.65 feet, North 600 34' East 196.92 feet, North 130 02' 10" East 1,006.29 feet, North 540 East 224.4 feet, and Borth 010 45' test 98.16 feet, to the north line of Gertrude Avenue; theme along said north titre, North 880 54' 41" Nest 2,293.05 feet, to the southwest corner of Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (formerly known as Standard Oil Co. of California) parcel recorded April 26, 1961 in Volume 3854 it page 360* thence along the west line thereof. North 854.07 feet, to the northwest corner; thence along the North line thereof and its easterly prolongation, North 850 25' East 620 feet, more or less, to an angle point in the east line of Edward J. Hegarty PARCEL ONE recorded March 26, 1952 in Volume 4083 at page 354; thence along the cast line thereof, north 000 O1' 24" West 171.94 feet, to the south tine of Golden State Sanwa Bank parcel recorded June 18, 1985 in Volume 12365 at page 62; thence along said south line. South 890 45' hest 72.22 feet to the south- west corner; thence along the west line thereof and its northerly prolonga- tion, Werth 1,214.4 feet, to the south line of Garden Tract Road granted to Contra Costa County and recorded September 28. 1956 in Volume 2852 at page 423; thence along said south lige, West 30 feet, to the southwest corner; thence along the west litre of Garden Tract Road, North 000 11' East 1,937 feet, to the southeast corner of Best Contra Costa Sanitary District parcel ,r=ecorded July 17, 1953 in Volume 2162 at page 82; thence along the boundary 1 thereof, best 580:70 feet and North 733 feet, to the south line of Section 35. Township 2 Borth, Range 5 West, Mount -Diablo Base and Meridian; thence 1 Korth 60 feet; thence Hest 3,300 feet to the west line of Section 35; thence West 1.770 feet, more or 'cess, to a paint on the boundary of State of California parcel recorded April 30, 1981 as EXHIBIT C in VoWme IV04 at page 217; thence along said boundary the following courses: loath 120 52' OSB" West .132.38 feet, North 260 48' 68" East 329.02 feet, North 320 01' lg* East 94.34 feet, North 760 .42' 32' East 195.26 feet, South 880 021 57" East 485.64 feet, South 850 41' 40" East 910.51 fret, South 890 27' 21' East 375.13 feet, North 410 37' 51" East 335.88 beet, and Worth 646.04 feet; thence East 4,370 feet, more 0r less; to the most western corner of State of California parcel recorded July 18, 1978 in volume 8928 at page 164; thence along the boundary of said State parcel, North 640 30' East-105 feet more or less. North 330 00' East 290.4 fret, North 030 East 99 feet, and North 630 30' East 58.74 feet, to the north line thereof, being also the south lime of Subdivision .5754 filed June 18, 2982 in Map Book 264 at page 36; thence along said south line and its easterly prolongation, South 890 01' 124 East 2,007 feet, to the east line of Goodrick Avenue (264 M 35); thence along said east lune, South 010 02' 18* nest 704.96 feet, to the northwest corner of Minor Subdivision 758-84 filed August 24, 1984 in Parcel Map Book III at page 30; thence* South 840 48' 42" East 25.07 fret to the northwest corner of } . PARCEL 0 (111 PH 30); thence along the west lines of PARCEL 0 And PARCEL C (111 PH 30), South 010 02' 180 Wiest 618.81 feet, to a tangent curve, concave to the northeast with a radius of 50 feet; thence along the arc of said curve, Southeasterly 90.12 feet, thru a central angle of 1030 16' 20% to a Point of reverse curvature (a radial to said point bears north 120 14' 02" West 1.040 feet); thence along the arc of said reverse curve, being also the north line of Parr Boulevard, Easterly 607.91 feet, thru a' central angle of 320 29' 28% to the southeast corner of PARCEL 8 (121 PH 30); thence along the east line of PARCEL B, North 050 11' 18* East 647.51 feet, to the northeast corner thereof, being also the most southeasterncorner of PARCEL A filed January 24, 1973 in Parcel leap Book 26 at page 12; thence along the east line of PARCEL A, Borth 040 06' 30" bast 1,071.05 feet, to the south- west corner of PARCEL C filed October 3, 1984 in Parcel Map Book 112 at page- 17; thence along the west line of PARCEL C. North 040 06' 30' East 203.78 feet, to the northwest corner;, thence along the north line of PARCEL C and its easterly prolongation, South 850 53' 30" East I,230 feet, more or less, to the east line of Southern Pacific Railroad 125 feet wide right of way; thence along said east line. Southerly 2,245 feet, more or less, to the North line of Parr Boulevard, thence Southerly 82 feet, more or less, to the south line of Parr Boulevard at its 'intersection with the east line of Southern Pacific Railroad 200 feet wide right of way; thence along said east line, Southerly 2,300 feet, more or less, to the northwest corner of Southern Pacific Railroad Company parcel 872.7-9E Pcl 15; thence along the boundary thereof the following courses: South 570 15' East 23.1 feet, South 480 30' East 52.8 feet, South 710 45* East 37.5 feet, South 030 45' nest 509.14 feet, North 850 15' hest 6.5 feet, South 030 45' best 537 feet, and North 890 57' Wiest 100 feet, to the east line of Southern Pacific Railroad 100 feet wide right of way; thence along said east line, South 040 06' 10" West 630 feet and South 030 45' West,507 feet, more or less, t0 the paint of beginning. Excepting therefrom all of 8.43 acre City of Richmond parcel recorded August 4, 1972 in Volume 6717 at page 145. 2 .r, 8 The foregoing ordinance was introduced and read before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa held on February 2 , 1999, and the second reading was held at a regularly held meeting on F e b r u a r�_Z3 , 1999,where it was finally adopted. Said Ordinance was passed and adapted and ordered published within fifteen(15)days of the date of adoption in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Contra Costa,by the following vote: ASS: Boardmembers: Gioia, Uilkema, Gerber , De Saul-vier and Canciamilla NOES: Boardmembers: N o n e ABSENT: Boardmembers: None ABSTAIN: Boardmembers: N o n e { Chair of the card of Supervisors ATTEST: all Clerk &of the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: 320\0611 1 71 09.1 When Recorded Return to: Goldfarb&Lipman One Montgomery Street Telesis Tower,23rd Floor San Francisco,CA 94104 Attn: Isabel Brawn NO RECORDING FEE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CUBE SECTION 27383 ORDINANCENO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE OAKLEY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(f)(2),AND AMENDING A RELATED ORDINANCE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE HOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Oakley Redevelopment Project Area by Ordinance No. 89-89,dated December 21, 1989, as amended by Ordinance No. 94.65 adapted on December 6, 1994, (the "Redevelopment Plan") establishing the Oakley Redevelopment Project Area(the"Project Area"). The legal description of the Project Area is set forth in Exhibit of the Time Limits Amendment described and incorporated in this Ordinance by reference below; and WHEREAS,the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, contains time limits for conducting certain redevelopment functions meeting the requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law(the"CRL") for such time limits in effect as of the date of adoption and amendment of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS,AB 1342 amended the CRI.,effective January 1, 1999. AB 1342 adds Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2)to the CRL,which allows the Board of Supervisors to amend the Redevelopment Plan to extend certain time limits for conducting various redevelopment functions; and WHEREAS,the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the"Agency")has analyzed the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan and the time limit requirements of Health and Safety Cade Section 33333.6(f)(2), and has determined that the Redevelopment Plan may be amended to extend certain time limits in the manner and to the extent set forth in the staff report prepared in connection with this Ordinance and on file with the Clerk of the Board; and 320\Ml 17080.9 WHEREAS,the Agency has prepared an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan to extend the time limits as permitted by Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2)(the"Time Limits Amendment"), a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board; and WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors desires to amend the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with the terms of the Time Limits Amendment as authorized pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2); and WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared and submitted and the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the staff report on the Time Limitations Amendment; and WHEREAS,the Agency staff has prepared and submitted to the Board of Supervisors for review and approval a CEQA Notice of Exemption for the Time Limitations Amendment. WHEREAS,Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2)states: In adopting this ordinance,neither the legislative body nor the agency is rewired to comply with Section 33354.6 or Article 12(commencing with Section 33450)or any other provision of this part relating to the amendment of redevelopment plans. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA: Section 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby finds and declares that the above recitals are true and correct. Section 2. The Time Limits Amendment is hereby incorporated in this Ordinance by reference and made a part of this Ordinance as if set out in full in the Ordinance. Section 3. It is hereby found and determined that the proposed amendments embodied in the Time Limits Amendment are necessary and desirable. The Redevelopment Plan, as adopted by Ordinance No. 89-89 on December 21, 1989 and as amended by Ordinance No. 94-65 on December 6, 1994, is further amended in accordance with the proposed amendments set forth in the Time Limits Amendment. Section 4. The Time Limits Amendment is hereby adopted, approved, and designated as part of the official Redevelopment Flan for the Project Area. It is the purpose and intent of the Board of Supervisors that the Time Limits Amendment be implemented as part of the Redevelopment flan for the Project Area. The Executive Director of the Agency may prepare a document that incorporates the provisions of the Time Limits Amendment into the existing text of the Redevelopment Plan, and such document shall then constitute the official Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Section 5. To the extent of the amendments set forth in the Time Limits Amendment, this Ordinance amends Ordinance No. 8989 adopted on December 21, 1989 and Ordinance No. 94-65 adopted on December 6, 1994. 320\09\t 37080.9 Section 6. In accordance with Health and Safety Gude Section 33333.6(h),the Time Limits Amendment shall not be construed to affect the validity of any bond,indebtedness,or other obligation,including any mitigation agreement entered into pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33401,authorized by the Board of Supervisors or the Agency prior to January 1, 1994. Nor shall the Time Limits Amendment be construed to affect the right of the Agency to receive property takes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670,to pay the indebtedness or other obligation described in this Section 6. Section 7. The Board of Supervisors hereby approves the CEQA Notice of Exemption and directs the Clerk of the Board to file the Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk of Contra Costa County. Section 8. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to file a copy of the Time Limits Amendment with the minutes of this meeting. A copy of this Ordinance and the Time Limits Amendment shall be transmitted to the Agency and the Agency is vested with the responsibility of implementing the Time Limits Amendment. Section 9. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby directed to record the Ordinance and the Time Limits Amendment in compliance with the provisionsof Government Code Section 27295. Section 10. If any provision,section, subsection, subdivision, sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordinance or the Time Limitations Amendment is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or portions of the Ordinance or the Time Limitations Amendment. Section 11. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after thirty (30) days from the date of its final passage. 320\091117080.1 EXHIBIT "A" Boundary Description A portion of Sections 22 thru 27 and 36, T2N, ME, and a portion of Sections 30 & 31, T2N, R3E, Yount Diablo Base and Meridian, situated in the unincorporated area of Centra Costa County, California and gibed as follows: Reference to maps, doctmrants, boundary lines, and ownerships are to Official Records of said County. Beginning at southwest corner of Section 22, T2N, R2E at the centerline intersection of Oakley Road and Neroly Road; thence along the west line of Section 22, northerly 3,144 feet, more or less, to the westerly prolongation of the mirth line of Maurice and Ge eva lodcgeparcel. recorded February 14, 1984 in Volume 11654 at page 20; them along said prolongati0n, north 89 24' east 30 feet, to the northwest corner of said lodge parcel. (1.1654 O.R. 24) ; thence along the boundary of said lodge parcel, north 89024' east 625 feet and south 00P131 west 430 feet, to the north line of State Highway; thence along said, north lute, easterly 4,300 feet, more or less, to the northeasterly line of Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Cony right of way; thence along said northeasterly line in a genexal southeasterly direction 12,300 feet, more or less, to the wit line of Marsh Creek right of way described in PARCEL 1 to Contra Gbsta qty Flood Conal and Water Conservation District recorded Doompber 31, 1965 in Volume 5412 at page 341; them along the west line of Marsh Creek right of way (as described in Volume 50.12 at page 341 and continued in Volume 4678 at page 485) in a general southerly direction 2,400 .feet, more or less, to the south line of PARCEL "D" filed May 27, 1965 in Licensed Surveyor's Map Bonk 34 at page 40; them along said south line, nth 89054' west 481..58 feet, to the east lire: of Almond Avenue; thence along said east line in a general southerly direction 3,400 feet, more or less, to the south line of Gilda Mae Nunnal.ly parcel recorded March 24, 1960 in Volume 3583 at page 254; thence along said south line, east 1,292.49 feet., to the west line of Subdivision MS 18-81. filed January 12, 1982 in Parcel. Map Book 99, at page 21; them along said west line, South 00042145" west 670.87 feet, to the northwest corner of Subdivision MS 63-77 filed August 1, 2978 in Parcel Map Book 68 at page 25; thence along the boundary of MS 6377, south 40046111" west 652.57 feet and south 89029123" east 1,322.24 feet, to the northeast corner of PARS 1101 filed May 31, 1966 in Licensed Surveyor's Map Book 42 at page 43, them along the boundary of PARCEL "C", south 4001.2' west 505.62 feet and west 228.82 feet; them along the bounce of PARCEL "B" (42 119M 43) , 'West 21.5.7 feet and north 0002813041 east 9.85 feet, to the northeast corner -of Sub- division MS 101-70 filed. April 21, 1971 in Pam Map Book 16 at page 24; them along the north line of MS 141-70, south 89023145" gest 2,171..48 feet, to the east line of Almond Avenue; thence Wising Almond Avenue, westerly 53 feet, more or less, to the southeast corner of lawzence and loil.li,an P. Smith parcel. recorded August 7, 1967 in Volume 5426 at page 1-59; thence along the south lire of said. Smith parcel and along the prolongation thereof, west 1,565.6 feet, to the southwest corner of Melvin H. and Bobbie OAIUM D`,CM)TICK Jo Treat parcel recorded March 29, 1963 in Volume 4333 at page 652; thence along the west line of said Treat parcel and along the prolongation thereof, north 532.64 feet, to the norther corner of subdivision M 1485 filed. Octd�)e..r 21, 1585 in Parcel Map Book 11.9 at page 8; them along the north line of MS 14-85 and along the prolongation thereof, south 89028122" east 1,558 feet, to the west line of Almond Avenue; thence along g said west line in a general northerly direction 5,000 feet, more or less, to the south line of PAS "A1' Tract 6356 filed September 14, 1983 in Map Book 273 at page 3; thence along the south line and west lite of said PARCEL 1tA", westerly and northerly a total of 1,62.4.61 feet, to the south line of West Cypzess mesad; thence along said south line in a general westerly direction 6,000 feet, more or less, to the s0Uther1y prolongation of the west line of Tract 2238 filed Maw 29, 1961 in Map Book 82 at page 3; thence along said prolonga- tion and west line, north 00053145" east 165 feet, to the north line of Tract 2238; theme along said north line and along the prolongation thereof, south 8901.41551t east 1,047.81 feet, to the northeast corner of Lnnny T. and Joanne L. Byer parcel recorded February 8, 1966 in. Volume 5053 at page 81; thence along the prolongatim of the east line of said Byer parcel, north 264.96 feet, to the south line of Tract 3853 filed June 30, 1969 in Map .Bonk 1.26 at page 48; them along said south line, north 8901413011 west 30 feet, more Or less, to the most southeasterly corner of Tract 6865 filed Nave.iber 17, 1987 in Map hook 318 at page 10; them along the boundary of Tract. 6865, north. 00305315711 east 253.74 feet, north 890'07'0211 west' 482.25 feet, north 00053'5711 east 1,446.97 feet, mouth 8900710211 east 482.25 feet, north 00053157" east 156 feet, north 89007102'' west 723.76 feet, and south 00052158" west 1,858.32 feet, to the southwest corner of Tract. 6865, being also the southeast corner of Wit: Romiti parcel. recorded July 29, 1987 in Volume 13804 at page 66; them north 83014'4:4" west 282.61 feet to the southwest corner of said Rmiti parcel.; them along the wit line thereof and its prolongation, north 00052115" cast 979.92 feet, to the south line 0f Daniel D. and Bonnie V. Mclahq parcel.. recorded April 16, 1965 in Volume 4848 at page 39.3; theme along said south line, west 16.5 feet, to the east line of Tract 5500 filed. Nover 12, 1980 in Map Book 247 at page 28; theme along said est lie, north 03005313811 east 951.71 feet, to the southeast corner of Lot 85 (247 M 28) ; thence along the boundary of Lot 85, north 89006122" west 200.01 feet and north 00053'26!1 east 100 feet, to the south line of Lot 83 (247 M 28) ; theme north 89006f34" west 60 feet to the south- east corner of PAS "A" (247 M 28) ; them sow 7800014311 west 325 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of Lot 77 (247 iii 28) ; thence crossing Gardenia Avenue, westerly 65 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Lot 76 (247 .tai 28) ; thenoe north 89007141" west 353.34 feet t0 the northwest cornu' of Eat 71 (247 M 28) being a point on the east line of Tract 6055 filed Septe� 6, 1981 .in Map Book 257 at page 38; theme along the k axxIary of Tract. 6055, north 000521101f east 29.55 feet, north 89007106" west 100 feet, north 003052110" east. 201 feet, north 8900710611 west 403.6 feet, and south 00053151" west 200 feet, to the northeast corner of Tract 3932 filed. June 26, 1972 in Map book 147 at page 38; thence along the north Eine of Tract .3932, north 89009135i1 west 170 feet, to the southeast corner Of pct 4766 filed Jane 1.7, 1981 in Nap Book 253 at page 39; theme along 2 C IESCICN the boundary of Tract 4766, north 000501 061' east 199.13 feet, north 88058139" west 169.76 feet, southwesterly 31.46 feet along', the arc of a curve concave to the south with a radius of 20 feet, and south 0005311011 west 179.68 feet, to the southwest corner of Tract 4766; thence crossing Teakwood Drive, north 89009'35" west 60 feet, to the northeast corner 0f Tot 1, Tract 3932; theme along the bourxiary of Tract 3932, North 8900913511 west 200 feat, and north 0005311.0" east 5 feet, north 89009f35" west 200 feet, and south 000531101' w 648.52 feet, to northeast corner of Tract 6010 filed Jay 10, 3983 in Map Book 267 at page 50; thence along the north lime of Tract 6010, north 89003158" west 479.12 feet, to the northeast corner of Tract 4617 filed August 31, 1977 in Map Book 202 at page 9; thence along the north line of Tract 4617, north 8900315811 west 154.96 feet, south 6002615611 west 136.34 feet, and south 86014126" west 530.77 feet, to the east Line of Empire Avenue; thence south 8601412611 west 56 feet, mor: or less, to the west line of Empire Avenue; thence along said west line, north 1,000 feet, core or less, t0 the south line of Oakley Road; thence along said south line, west 5,255 feet, mare or less, to the centerline of Neroly Road on the west line of Section 27, T2N, RAE; thence along said west line, northerly 30 feet, to the soel iwest. cion-ler of section 22, the. Point of Beginning. EXMMIM ' ; Tract 4454 Ogle Park No. 1) filed in map book 195 at page 47; Tract 5674 (Walnut Estates) filed in Map book 251 at page 4, and all except Lot 134 of Tract 6634 (Oakley Rwrh) filled in Map Book 306 at gage 23. Containing 916 acres of land, more or less. LH:drg wo5561.legal mer 22, 1989 3 The foregoing ordinance was introduced and read before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa held on Febr a y a- _, 1999,and the second reading was heldat a regularly held meeting on F e b r a r y 2 , 1999,inhere it was.finally adopted. Said Ordinance was passed and adopted and ordered published within fifteen(I5)days of the date of adaption in the Contra Costa Times,a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Contra. Costa,by the following vote: AYES: Boardmembers: Supervisors Gioia, Uilkema, Gerber , Desaulnier and Canciamilla NOES: Boardmembers: N o n e ABSENT: Boardmembers: None ABSTAIN: Boardmembers: None t a � Chair of the oard of Supervisors ATTEST: f Clerk of the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: 320109\117030.1 When Recorded Return to: Goldfarb&Lipman One Montgomery Street Telesis Tower,23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Attn: Isabel Brown NO RECORDING FEF PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383 ORDINANCE NO. 9 9-0 8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RODEO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33333.6(fl(2),AND AMENDING A RELATED ORDINANCE IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS,the]Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra.Costa adopted the Redevelopment Plan for the Rodeo Redevelopment Project Area by Ordinance No. 90-50, dated July 10, 1990, as amended by Ordinance No.94-66 adopted on December 6, 1994, (the "Redevelopment Plan")establishing the Rodeo Redevelopment Project Area(the"Project Area"). The legal description of the Project Area is set forth in Exhibit of the Time Limits Amendment described and incorporated in this Ordinance by reference below; and WHEREAS,the Redevelopment Plan, as amended, contains time limits for conducting certain redevelopment functions meeting the-requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law(the "CRL") for such time limits in effect as of the date of adoption and amendment of the Redevelopment Plan, and WHEREAS,AB 1342 amended the CRT.,effective January 1, 1999. AB 1342 adds Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2)to the CRL,which allows the Board of Supervisors to amend the Redevelopment Plan to extend certain time limits for conducting various redevelopment functions; and WHEREAS,the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency(the "Agency")has analyzed the,provisions of the.Redevelopment Pian and the time limit requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2), and has determined that the Redevelopment Plan may be amended to extend certain time limits in the manner and to the extent set forth in the staff report prepared in connection with this Ordinance and on file with the Clerk of the Beard; and. 320\1 011 1 71 06.1 WHEREAS,the Agency has prepared an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan to extend the time limits as permitted by Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2)(the"Time Limits Amendment"), a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board; and WHEREAS,the Board of Supervisors desires to amend the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with the terms of the Time Limits Amendment as authorized pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(f)(2); and WHEREAS, the Agency has prepared and submitted and.the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and considered the staff report on the Time Limitations Amendment; and WHEREAS,the Agency staff has prepared and submitted to the Board of Supervisors for review and approval a CEQA Notice of Exemption for the Time Limitations Amendment. WHEREAS,Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2) states: In adopting this ordinance,neither the legislative body nor the agency is required to comply with Section 33354.6 or Article 12(commencing with Section 33450)or any other provision of this part relating to the amendment of redevelopment plans. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA: Section 1. The Board of Supervisors hereby finds and declares that the above recitals are true and correct. Section 2. The Time Limits Amendment is hereby incorporated in this Ordinance by reference and made a part of this Ordinance as if set out in full in the Ordinance. Section 3. It is hereby found and determined that the proposed amendments embodied in the Time Limits Amendment are necessary and desirable. The Redevelopment Plan, as adopted by Ordinance No. 90-50 on July 10, 1990 and as amended by Ordinance No. 94-66 on December 6, 1994, is further amended in accordance with the proposed amendments set forth in the Time Limits Amendment. Section 4. The Time Limits Amendment is hereby adopted, approved,and designated as part of the official Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. It is the purpose and intent of the Board of Supervisors that the Time Limits Amendment be implemented as part of the Redevelopment flan for the Project Area. The Executive Director of the Agency may prepare a document that incorporates the previsions of the Time Limits Amendment into the existing text of the Redevelopment Plan, and such document shall then constitute the official Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area. Section 5. To the extent of the amendments set forth in the Time Limits Amendment, this Ordinance amends Ordinance No. 90-50 adopted on July 10, 1990 and Ordinance No. 94-66 adopted on December 6, 1994. 320t101i 17108.1 Section 6. In accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(h),the Time Limits Amendment shall not be construed to affect the validity of any gond,indebtedness,or other obligation, including any mitigation agreement entered into pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33401,authorized by the Board of Supervisors or the Agency prior to January 1, 1994. Nor shall the Time Limits Amendment be construed to affect the right of the Agency to receive property taxes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33670,to pay the indebtedness or other obligation described in this Section 6. Section 7. The Board of Supervisors hereby approves the CEQA Notice of Exemption and directs the Clerk of the Board to file the Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk of Contra Costa County. Section 8. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to file a copy of the Time Limits Amendment with the minutes of this meeting. A copy of this Ordinance and the Time Limits Amendment shall be transmitted to the Agency and the Agency is vested with the responsibility of implementing the Time Limits Amendment. Section.9. The Executive Director of the Agency is hereby directed,to record the Ordinance and the Time Limits Amendment in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 27295. Section 10. If any provision, section,subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or the Time Limitations Amendment is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional,such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion or portions of the Ordinance or the Time Limitations Amendment. Section 11. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in fall force from and after thirty (30)days from the date of its final passage. 3201'10\117906.1 www • ! �Rwt z •.,♦�^ •t .! � E•• !• # 4• ♦..r .. ,.w '°� # wt- « •-. ♦..w' w • ! w tr.rK • wt. w • # ♦ •r ! Ot w lot w w � _ 4# ! • !�. • !} - b - .tel .. M ! '� "r • R `,ter -♦' wt _ • rte w •e ! we ♦ ♦ f s, • - 2.w - •• a w. • •: w' wA ^♦ ! # m -w art wwr•t. • - ".7 - • r + _ ♦ w ws r +r ws! •-_ -"•• '• EE - .r art at - .aa►w} ! 1e.••' �- •s". s•. • _ xe 4'. •- • w as rr w •w • - wr - is er#+! • .t a-. a.- �ar•r •.'a• •< • nrw • 4 :..cwt • �.,• ' ar �n ter^ w- w s w.. r.. • - rr• wt • art rsA • r •t ••.. • + w •-« •'- r • � it • ww •- :: •. '• ## • - •rw _ w � �.+ * !# - 4 n• ♦ ...mow w1 �►: ww Rw R :ww • ..# � �! !+ rel. Ik F'" r#+ ..♦'" it# # �� 116 # }.♦ - w #� # E`v #�^ :.+11.1 #�• ��..•:AIY1�i '.## # � +'"..#i# # ♦:#' *6s� A# 1 ### 4Fa6e f1j-# -11 .. a ^ ,i,,._ #, *# '. } 4'! } ♦� �..•# ate.. •.« F"" '! # The foregoing ordinance was introduced and read before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa,held on February 2 , 1999, and the second reading was held at a regularly held meeting on Z e b r � ,3 , 1999,where it was finally adopted. Said Ordinance was passed and adopted and ordered published within fifteen(15)days of the date of adoption in the Contra.Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation published in the County of Contra Costa,by the following vote: AYES: Boardmembers: Gioia, Uilkema, Gerber , DeSaulnier and Canciamilla NOES: Boardmembers: None ABSENT: Boardmembers: N o n e ABSTAIN: Boardmembers: Non.e Chair of the Board of Supervisors ATTEST: Clerk f the Board 14 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 320110N117106.1