The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 02231999 - C6-C10 TIDE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on February 23, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Gioia, Uilkema, Gerber, DeSaulnier, and Canciamilla NOES: None ABSENT: done TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. 3888 ABSTAIN: None Supervisorial District 4 SUBJECT: Pursuant to Section 22597 of the California Vehicle Code, declaring parking to be prohibited on the south side of CENTER AVENUE (Road No.4074A), Pacheco. The Contra Costa Board of Supervisors RESOLVES that: On the basis of a traffic and engineering survey and recommendations thereon by the County Public Works department's Traffic Engineering division, and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Sections 45-2.002 - 46-2.012, the following traffic regulation is established (and other action taken as indicated): Pursuant to Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code parking is hereby declared to be prohibited at all times on the south side of Center Avenue (4074A) Pacheco, beginning at the westerly curb line of Willow Street and extending westerly a distance of 50 feet. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and enured on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. If SK:eh VTE TED: g:\transeng\9999\bobr99tr\3888.doc Pipit- BA`I`CHELOR, Cleri f the Board of Rupervisors and Gp4jnty Administrator Orig. Dept.: Public Works (Traffic) y Ceputy Contact: Steve Kersevan, (313-2254) cc: Sheriff California Highway Patrol a TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: February 23, 1999 SUBJECT: 1998/99 Transportation for Livable Communities Grant Applications Project No.: 0676-6P1049 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIF;CA70N 1. Recommended Action: APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director to submit 1998199 the Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) Grant Applications for the following capital improvement projects: Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE .' `' �•- �,m RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE —APPROVE —OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ONcfi ? 7-3,191PPROVED AS RECOMMENDED SOWo� VOTE OF SUPERVISORS ° UNANIMOUS(ABSENT --MOLE } AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JY:jy:e.h g:\transeng\19991bobr99to\TLCGrantApp;ications.doc I hereby �' € that #hES i true hod CorPec# copy of an action taken and entered or. ne Orig.Div: Public Works(TE) mutes of the Board of Supervisors or, the Contact: Joe Yee—Tel.313-22518 date shown. c: Public Works Accounting ATTESTED2z-,/Ivy PHIL BATCHELOR, ark of ;I.e Board of Supervisors and County Adrninistrator By Deputy 1998/99 Transportation for Livable Communities Gant Applications. February 23, 1999 Page 2 1. Recommended Action: (Continued) • North Richmond —Third Street Beautification/Pedestrian Enhancements • Pleasant Hill BART Station: Area Iron Horse Trail Overcrossing • Pacheco Boulevard —Vine Hill Area Sidewalk and Street Lighting • Clyde Area Sidewalks and Bike Path • North Broadway Area Revitalization 11. FinanciralImDact: There will be no financial impact to the General Fund. All of the projects will be funded through Transportation for Livable Communities Grant Funds, Road Funds, and/or Redevelopment Agency Funds. 111. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: Applying for and obtaining grants allows the County to construct more improvements than would be possible without obtaining grants. 1V. Consequences of Negative Action: Failure to approve the submittal of these applications will eliminate a potential funding source and possibly delay the construction of the projects. 1r TIDE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on February 28, 1999 by the following vote: APES: Supervisors Gioia, Uil erra, Gerber, DeSaulnier, and Lancia ilia NOES: None ASSENT: None ABSTAIN: Torre RESOLUTION NO. 99/ 70 SUBJECT: Application for Federal Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program Projects. Project No.: 0676-6P1049. This resolution authorizes the Contra Costa County Public Works Director to file applications for Federal Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funding. The resolution commits the necessary local match for the projects and also states the assurance of the Public Works Department to complete the projects. Whereas, Contra Costa County Public Works Department has the authority for the exercise of certain powers to build and maintain public roads within the unincorporated sections of Contra Costa County; and Whereas, the Transportation Equity Act for the 21"'Century (TEA 21) (Public Law 105-178, June 9, 1998) and the TEA 21 Restoration Act (Public Law 105-206, July 22, 1998) continue the Surface Transportation Program (23 U.S.C. s 188) and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) (23 U.S.C. s 149); and Whereas, pursuant to TEA 21, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, eligible project sponsors wishing to receive Surface Transportation Program or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program grants for a project shall submit an application first with the appropriate metropolitan transportation planning organization (MPO), for review and inclusion in the MPO's Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and Whereas, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the MPO for the San Francisco Bay region; and Whereas, Contra Costa County is an eligible project sponsor for the Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funds; and Application for Federal Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program Projects. February 23, 1999 Page 2 Whereas, Contra Costa County wishes to submit grant applications to MTC for funds from the Surface Transportation Program or the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program in fiscal year 1993/99 for the following projects: A) Overlay of Taylor Boulevard from Pleasant Hill Road to the Pleasant Hill City Limits. B) Overlay of San Pablo Dam Road from Bear Creek Road to approximately 4.8-km north. C) Overlay of Byron Highway from Byron Hot Springs Road to the Alameda County Line. D) Overlay of Willow Pass Road from Port Chicago Highway to Bailey Road. E) Overlay of Pacheco Boulevard from approximately 3475 Pacheco Road to the Martinez City Limits. Whereas, MTC requires, as part of the application, a resolution stating the following: the commitment of necessary local matching funds of at least 11.5%; and 2) that the sponsor understands that the Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funding is fixed at the programmed amount, and therefore any cost increase cannot be expected to be funded with the Surface Transportation Program or Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funds; and 3) The assurance of the sponsor to complete the project as described in the application, and if approved, as programmed in MTC's TIP. 4) The sponsor understands that the funds must be obligated by September 30, 2001, or the project may be removed from the program. Now, therefore, be it resolved, by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County that the Contra Costa County Public Works Director is authorized to execute and file an application for funding of the following projects under the Surface Transportation Program and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program of TEA 21: RESOLUTION NO. 99/70 Application for Federal Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program Projects. February 23, 1999 Page 3 Surface Transportation Project Title Program Funding Local Funding A) Taylor Blvd Overlay $1,354,050 $175,950 B) San Pablo Dam Road Overlay $1,062,000 $138,000 C) Byron highway Overlay $1,016,865 $132,135 D) Willow Pass road Overlay $759,330 $98,670 F) Pacheco Blvd Overlay $373,470 $48,530 Be it further resolved, that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors by adopting this resolution does hereby state that: 1) Contra Costa County will provide the above listed amounts in local matching funds for each projects and 2) Contra Costa County understands that the Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funding for the projects is fixed, and that any cost increases must be funded by Contra Costa County from local matching funds, and that Contra Costa County does not expect any cost increases to be funded with Surface Transportation Program or the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funds; and ) The listed projects will be built as described in this resolution and, if approved, as programmed in the MTC Transportation Improvement Program (TI P). 4) The program funds are expected to be obligated by September 30, 2001, Be it further resolved, that a copy of this resolution will be transmitted to MTC in conjunction with the filing of this application, and Be it further resolved, that MTC is requested to support the application for the projects described in the resolution and to program the projects, if approved, in MTC's TIP. BMS:bmb:eh € hereby certify that this is a true and correct gAtranseng119991bobr99te1BR23TEA241.dcc copy of an action takes nd entered on t€,e Orig. Dept.: Public Warks (T/E) minutes of the Board of supervisors on the Contact: Brian Ba€bas, 313-2284 date shown. fi cc: M. Shlu, Deputy PWD ATTESTED: PHIL BATCHELOR, (. Iark -f the Board of supervisors and CO my Administrator By Deputy RESOLUTION NO. 99/70 STA COUNTY CALIFORNIA THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA Adapted this Order can February 23, 1999 by the following vete: AYES: Supervisors Gioia, Uilkema, Gerber, DeSaulnier, and Ganciamilla NOES: NNone ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None RESOLUTION NO. 991 71 SUBJECT: Adoption of the Tri-Valley Transportation Council Strategic Expenditure Plan. Project No.: 0676-6P1032 Whereas, a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JEPA) was executed in August, 1997 by the cities of Pleasanton, Dublin, Livermore, San Ramon, the Town of Danville, and the Counties of Alameda and Contra Costa for the purpose of administering a development mitigation fee program for regional transportation improvements in the Tri- Valley Area; and, Whereas, the NEPA requires unanimous approval of the Strategic Expenditure Plan (SEP); and Whereas, the Tri-Valley Transportation Council has prepared and updated the SEP at their January 27, 1999 meeting. Now, therefore, be it resolved: (1) that the Board of supervisors APPROVES the Tri- Valley Strategic Expenditure Plan dated January 27, 1999; and (2) that this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. ML.:eh G:ltranseng\l 999tbobr99te1B R23Tri-Valley.doc Orifi. Dept.: Public Works(TE) Contact: Martin Lysons, Tel. 313-2295 ; hereby certify that this is a ;rue and correct cc: M. Shiu, deputy Public Works Director copy of an action. taken and entered or; the € mutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown, ATTESTED. PHIL BATCHELOR, Cle of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator By Deputy RESOLUTION NO. 99/71 TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL STRATEGIC EXPENDITURE PLAN I. Introduction II. Project Descriptions and Status Reports III. Project Priorities TV. Project Funding V. Project Sponsors Table I -TVTDF Strategic Expenditure Pian Table 2 -Project Revenue Sources January 27, 1999 I. 07RCIDUCTION The "Tri-Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan for Routes of Regional Significance," which was adopted by the Tri.-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC) in 1995, determined the"High Priority Regional Transportation Projects." In the summer of 1998, the seven member agencies of the TVTC signed the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Pertaining to the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fees for Traffic Mitigation (JEPA), which established the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee (TVTDF) and identified eleven projects from. the "High Priority" list to be funded by the TVTDF. Subsequently, each member agency adopted an ordinance or resolution authorizing collection of the TVTDF in its jurisdiction, and fee collection began in September 1998. It is estimated that the TVTDF will collect approximately $70 million over the next fifteen years. 1t is recognized that the TVTDF revenue will fund only a portion of the cost to implement the eleven projects. Additional funding from state and federal funds, local traffic impact fees, new regional gas taxes, half-cent sales tax programs, developer contributions, and other local or regional funds will be needed to fully implement the eleven projects. The document describing project priorities and the implementation schedule is the Strategic Expenditure Plan (SEP). The initial SEP, which was identified in the JEPA, was to find one project -the local share of the 1-580/1-680 Interchange Flyover project at $5.5 million. This subsequent SEP describes project priorities and the implementation schedule for funding the other projects on the TVTDF list over the next 15-year period. According to the ,TEPA, this SEP must be approved unanimously by all of the member agencies. This SEP is the policy document that guides expenditure of the TVTDF revenue. It represents a statement of priorities for transportation projects for the Tri-Valley area agreed to by the seven TVTC member agencies. The SEP should make the Tri-Valley agencies more competitive in securing additional funding for these projects because it identifies specific high priority projects for the Tri-Valley area, it indicates how TVTDF funding is to be used to help fund these projects, and it specifies individual project priorities. Key elements of this SEP are: 1) project costs, 2) TVTDF revenue estimates, 3) a list o other possible funding sources for each project, 4) a prioritization plan, 5) a phasing plan/time line for project delivery, and 6) identification of agency sponsors to oversee project implementation. Two separate administrative documents will be used in conjunction with the SEP. They are: 1) the guidelines governing credit and/or reimbursement for entity-constructed projects and developer-constructed projects, which has been prepared and approved by the TVTC; and 2) the guidelines for implementation of the TVTDF, which is still being developed. These administrative documents, along with reasonable requirements for 1 indemnification and insurance as appropriate for individual projects, requirements that Project Sponsors or other entities which construct any of the TVTDF projects defend and indemnify the Parties to the JEPA, and requirements that appropriate capital improvement procedures shall be followed in project implementation, will be included in a separate SEP "Guidelines" section that will be attached to the SEP. It is envisioned that the SEP "Guidelines" will remain static over the years, while the project priority and funding section of the SEP will be updated periodically. Implementation of projects in the SEP will be initiated with a funding agreement between the TVTC and the Project Sponsor or implementing entity. The scope of work for the project and the portion of the project to be funded with TVTDF funds will be described in the agreement. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS AND STATUS REPORTS 3 TVTDF EXPENDITURE PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS The eleven projects included in the TVTDF are described on the following pages. These descriptions include the lead agency, the current cost estimates, the status of the project, the current funding situation for the project, the schedule, and a synopsis of the need for the project. This information has been obtained from a variety of sources and represents the most current available information on each project. The locations of these projects are described in Figure A. Maps_ showing the location and limits of each project area are included for reference. The TVTDF projects are as follows: 1. 1-580/I-680 FLYOVER AND HOOK RAMPS 2A. STATE ROUTE 84 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS - I-580 TO 1-680 28. ISABEL ROUTE 84/1-580 INTERCHANGE 3. 1-680 AUXILIARY LANES BETWEEN BOLLINGER CANYON ROAD AND DI ABLO ROAD 4. WEST DUBLIN-Pi EASANTON BART STATION 5. 1580 HOV LANES FROM TASSAJARA ROAD TO VASCO ROAD 6. 1-680 HOV LANES FROM STATE ROUTE 84 TO Top OF ST-TNOL GRADE 7. 1-580/FOOTHILL ROAD-SAN RAMON ROAR INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS 8. 1680/ ALcoSTA BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE MODIFICATIONS 9. CROW CANYON ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 10. VASCO ROAD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 11. FxPREss Bus SERVICE g 3. 1-680 Auxiliary 4 Lanes 00. aa. 10. . x,VaSco Rd. 1.680/Alcosta Crow Interchange P �. Canyon ' 7. 1.5$0lFoothllllSan'�-`"y ' Flyover 1.580 HOV g Ramon Interchange l r EASTAVE- 4. TAVE.4• BART Station 2. g Rt. 84 ---y, Corridor 6. 1-580 HOV g r� North LEGEND Not to Scam Project Looat#on TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure Index MapAmIk _........................ . .......... ........................................._.._........................................... ........ ...... ............... ........ ........ ........ ........ ..._... Pro ect_No.1 I.580/1-680 Flyover and ook Ramps Lead Agency Caltrans and the Alameda County Transportation Authority Description The project consists of the construction of a southbound to eastbound flyover, a northbound to eastbound director connector, southbound on and off hook ramps and a northbound on ramp. Cost Estimate The total project is expected to cost in excess of$120 million. Status The project is currently under construction. It is expected to be completed by 2003. Funding Most of the project is funded by Measure B, which has a requirement for local matching funds. The final portion of the local match, 55.55 million, is funded from TVTDF as the top priority project. Schedule The project is currently under construction. It is scheduled for completion by 2003. Need The project was approved by the voters of Alameda County as a portion of the Measure B sales tax program. 1 E Construct Hook Ramps 3 Previous improvement � E s Remove Ramp i zs Construct Flyover ii ,...�.. Remove Ramp ' � J • � i �M......�N i Remove Ramp Construct Direct Connector E I € s i I i i r o LEGEND north j Not to Scale ; a,mmoMM Project Locations i TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure 1-580/1-680 Flyover and Nook Ramps 1 W202.J/W•C% -_............... ............................................................................................... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ..... - -....._ ......... ......... ......... ......... ............... ......... ...... -_ ... ......... ......... ......... ......... .._.... ....................... -_ - ............. ............ 111.1 _ - ely Project No. 2A State Route 84 Corridor Improvements: 1-580 to 1-680 Lead Agency Caltrans, Livermore, Pleasanton and Alameda County Description This road improvement project is expected to be built in several stages with a variety of funding sources. The ultimate configuration is expected to consist of six lanes on Isabel Avenue from 1-580 to Vineyard Avenue and four lanes from Vineyard Avenue to 1-680. The total length of the project is about 10 miles. Cost Estimate $120 million for the roadway portions. (See project 213 for the companion 1-580 interchange portion of the project.) Status A two-lane project on Isabel Avenue from 1-580 at the Airway Boulevard interchange to Vallecitos Road will be completed by 2000. It will include a grade-separation at Stanley Boulevard. Completion of a PSR for all remaining portions of the roadway project is the logical next step. This will result in definitions, phasing and revised cost estimates for future stages of the project. Funding The TVTC allocates $24 million in future TVTDF funds for this project. Partial funding for this project may be included in the new Alameda County Measure B sales tax program. Schedule The initial two-lane project - Vallecitos Road to 1-1580 via Airway Boulevard—is currently under construction and will be complete in 2000. Project Need The project would provide improved access to/from southwest portion of Livermore, including the Ruby Hill development in Pleasanton. It would also relieve traffic congestion on portions of 1-680 and 1-580. The projected 2010 PM peak hour volumes (one-way) range from 2,000 to 3,200 vph, which exceed the capacity of the existing two-lane roadway. Segment Stage 1: Construct initial interchange 1 j with 2 lane overpass;extend Portola See Project 2b j to Isabel and remove Portola ramps. description i Stage 2: Construct 6 lane overpass I / and ultimate interchange. , PleasantOn E STANLEY aLVD. { Livermore I � _ Segment I Stage 1: Construct 2 lane roadway and grade separation y at Stanley. (Measure B) It i Stage 2: Construct 4/6 lane expressway. Segment Stage 1: Developer construct 2 lane roadway. Stage 2:Construct 4/6 lane expressway. i 1 Segment Stage 1: Construct uphill truck lanes: improve deficient curves. Stage 2:Construct 4 lane expressway. Nate: Segment(7)is TVTDF Project 2B Segments�D,�2)and Qt)are TVTDF Project 2A North LEGEND ! Not to Scale 6 1 r�rt Project tocStion TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure NIS State Route 84 Corridor Improvements 1-580 to 1-680 2a 84202.vW-LH ................................................... ..... ........ ........ ........ ....._. ........ ............ ............................... ...... ....... ........ ........ ....... ............ ..... ........ ............. . .... ... ....................... ....... ........ ................................... ........ ................... Project No. 2B Kabel Route 844-580 Interchange Lead Agency Caltrans and Livermore Description This project consists of a new partial-cloverleaf interchange on Isabel Avenue at I-580. The ultimate configuration includes a six-lane overcrossing and signalized off-ramps. It will be built in stages. The project includes the removal of ramps at the adjacent Portola Avenue interchange and construction of a new roadway connection on the north side of I-580 between Portola Avenue and the new interchange. Cost Estimate 860 million for the I-580 interchange. (See project 2A for the companion roadway portion of this project.) Status A Project Study Report (PSR) for the Isabel Avenue Route 84CI-580 interchange has been completed and approved by Caltrans; a Project .Report is expected to be initiated soon. Funding Current funding includes $9.9 million in TEA-21 Binds. Partial f-anding for this project may be included in the new Alameda County pleasure l sales tax program. No TVTDF funds are included in this portion of the Route 84 program. (See project 2A for the TVTDF-funded portion of this project.) - Schedule Construction of the Isabel Avenue Route 84/1-580 interchange is not scheduled at this time. Project Need The interchange project would provide direct access to the Isabel AvenueNallecitos Road planned improvements. With the completion of the interchange, State Route 84 will be able to be relocated from roadways in downtown Livermore to the planned improved roadways in the IsaheINallecitos corridor. This will improve traffic conditions in the downtown area and partially relieve traffic conditions in the I-580 and I- 680 corridors. I i f i t I I I i N.CANYON PKWY. 0 3 O � t Construct x New Interchange i \ To N.Livermore Ave. t c � \ I -4--To Airway Blvd.Interchange O . t i i t i AIRWAY SLVO- m t t i i LEGEND ? Noah Not to Buie MOMMans F — Proft Location TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure Isabel Route 8411-580 Interchange 2b 89.202•i 2798-LH ............................. ............................................................................................................... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......._._.. ......... ........... ........... _ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ............ ......... ......... ......... ........ ........... .. ... .. ...................... __........._...... .......................... ....... ......... Project No. 3 1-680 Auxiliary Lanes between Bollinger Canyon Road in San Ramon and Diable Road in Danville Lead Agency Contra Costa Transportation Authority Description This project will construct both northbound and southbound auxiliary lanes in the 1-680 corridor from Bollinger Canyon Road in San Raman to Diablo Road in Danville. These improvements include an additional 12-foot lane between interchanges in the northbound and southbound directions, retaining walls, and soundwalls in the corridor. Also included are ramp improvements and structure widening over Laurel Drive between Sycamore Valley Road and Diablo Road. Cost Estimate $40 million Status A corridor planning level study was completed in September 1992. A Caltrans Project Study Report (PSR) is scheduled to be prepared in FY 2001. This project can be done in phases and the PSR is needed to identify usable segments and costs. Funding The 1998 CCTA Strategic Plan has programmed $1 million in existing Measure C funds in FY 2000 and FY 2001 for preliminary project development. The project will be funded with a variety of sources, including Measure C and the SCC JEPA, with full funding expected over a 15 year period. An additional $8 million in future Measure C funds is anticipated after 2005. $8.5 million should be available from the SCC JEPA fee in the same time period. The TVTC allocates $12 million in future TVTDF funds for this project. Schedule See above. The project is not contemplated for construction in the immediate future. Project Meed Traffic studies of future conditions along 1-680 indicate that peak hour traffic volumes on the existing six mixed flow lanes and two HOV lanes will exceed capacity in the near future. The auxiliary lane project is not intended to increase freeway capacity per se, but will mitigate operational problems caused by merging and diverging vehicles at interchanges. TYPICAL AUXILIARY LANE SCHEMATIC o r►»-ranee auxiliary Bans DIAHL E 3 i c off-ramp i { SYCAMORE VALLEY AA — I a g � a Construct t Auxiliary Lanes 0 c*a` c R e� O rxD. North Not to Scale LEGEND E » Project Location NTC Expenditure Plan Figure 1-680 Auxiliary Manes 3 89.202.11198-LH Project No. 4 West Dublin-Pleasanton BART Station Lead Agency City of Pleasanton Description Construction of the West Dublin-Pleasanton BART Station, parking, and access facilities. Cast Estimate $43 million Status Included in the MTC 1998 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Track 2. The current activitty by BART is to examine the possibility of a joint venture with convention center interests who would combine the Station with Hotel and meeting facilities, which have direct service to both Oakland and San .Francisco Airports. A joint venture might fund all or a portion of the station. Funding Until the private sector potential funding is resolved, there is no progress on the station construction, and TVTDF funds are not needed for the first five years. This station may be eligible for Regional. Cas Tax funds and may be included in the next Alameda County Measure B sales tax program. Schedule To be determined. Project Need Construction of the proposed Nest Lublin BART Station is needed to ensure that BART is accessible and convenient for riders. This will provide important parking relief for the current Dublin-Pleasanton BART station. If the ridership forecasts for this BART Station are not achieved, traffic volumes could increase above contemplated levels on the freeways serving the Tri-Valley area and exacerbate congestion. 1 � 3 E E 1 ' E i i E ( 9 Existing Dublin-Pleasanton BART 1 ANN" STONERIOGS oFL E Construct W. Dublin-Pleasanton BART Station € a r a E 4 1 � iVorth i Not to scale 1 LEGEND Project Location TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure West Dublin-Pleasanton BART Improvements 4 W -t„M-LH v Project No. 5 I-580 HHV Lanes From Tassajara Road to Vasco Road Lead Agency Caltrans Description Construction of approximately 8.2 miles of High Occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on 1-580 from Tassajara Road to Vasco Road. After addition of these lanes, 1-580 would have a total of four mixed lanes and one HOV lane in each direction in this segment. Widening of I-580-and additional right-of-way may be required. Cost Estimate $40 million Status A PSR is needed to define the project, determine usable segments, and refine project costs. The PSR should consider the entire corridor, which includes HOV lanes in each direction, BART in the median, and auxiliary lanes between interchanges. There are current or recent PSRs in process for nearly all 1-580 interchanges within the proposed project limits; the main line PSR. would resolve and combine traffic issues related to the individual PSR projects. Funding The TVTC allocates $8 million in future TVTDF for this project. This project may be eligible for regional gas tax funds and may be included in the new Alameda County Measure B sales tax program. Schedule This project is not presently scheduled. Because of growing congestion on I-580, completion of the PSR is a very high priority. Project Need This project is needed to increase overall person-trip capacity in the freeway corridor. Traffic forecasts show a demand for travel on 1-580 of up to approximately 10,600 vph (vehicles per hour) in the peak direction. This exceeds existing capacity. Added lanes would encourage HOV's, potentially reducing SOV (single occupancy vehicle) trips as well as increasing overall capacity. Added capacity would also complement added capacity related to 1-58011680 interchange improvements. Project No. 5 I-580 HOV Lanes from Tassajara Road to Vasco Road Lead Agency Caltrans Description Construction of approximately 8.2 miles of High Occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on I-580 from Tassajara Road to Vasco Road. After addition of these lanes, I-580 would have a total of four mixed lanes and one HOV lane in each direction in this segment. Widening of I-580-and additional right-of-way may be required. Cost Estimate $40 million Status A PSR is needed to define the project, determine usable segments, and refine project costs. The PSR should consider the entire corridor, which includes HOV lanes in each direction, BART in the median, and auxiliary lanes between interchanges. There are current or recent PSRs in process for nearly all 1-580 interchanges within the proposed project limits; the main line PSR would resolve and combine traffic issues related to the individual PSR projects. Funding The TVTC allocates $8 million in future TVTDF for this project. This project may be eligible for regional gas tax funds and may be included in the new Alameda County Measure B sales tax program. Schedule This project is not presently scheduled. Because of growing congestion on 1-580, completion of the PSR, is a very high priority. Project steed This project is needed to increase overall person-trip capacity in the freeway corridor. Traffic forecasts show a demand for travel on 1-580 of up to approximately 10,600 vph (vehicles per hour) in the peals direction. This exceeds existing capacity. Added lanes would encourage HOV"s, potentially reducing SOV (single occupancy vehicle) trips as well as increasing overall capacity. Added capacity would also complement added capacity related to I-58011680 interchange improvements. .. loop VASCO Ro. 's I �w N.UVERMORE.AYE. 3 ttS a F'Aa�a�'R° mf m C as rrrasswa s Cc SANTA a��-" � 4) a x LU co Project No, 6 I-680 HOV Lanes from. State Route 84 to Top of Sunol Grade Lead Agency Caltrans Description Construction of approximately 3.5 miles (seven total lane-miles) of HOV lanes on I-680 from the SR 84 ramps to the top of Sunol Grade at Mission Pass. After adding these lanes, I-680 would have three mixed lanes and one HOV lane in each direction of this segment. Cast Estimate Construction of the southbound I-680 HOV lanes between Route 84 and Calaveras Boulevard in Milpitas is expected to cost approximately $90 million. The portion within the Tri-Valley (Rt. 84 to the top of the Sunol Grade constitutes about 35 percent of the total mileage, or approximately $29 million. Status This project to construct the highest priority southbound HOV lanes has committed funding from other sources. It is likely the northbound HGV lane will receive outside funding also. This is a regional project that involves three counties, the CMAs, Caltrans, and MTC. In addition, the I-680 Phase II Corridor Study will address future needs of the corridor. Funding Almost all of the southbound HOV lanes project funding is now committed ($84 million) from outside sources. The northbound HOV lanes are currently unfunded. No TVTUP funds are included for this project. Schedule A PSR has been completed for the project. Environmental studies and preliminary engineering are underway. Project Need The southbound lanes of I-680 through the Sunol Grade constitute the second most congested commute in the Bay Area. Congestion occurs for a three to four hour period each week day. r Q" • c� 3 R 3 R i I s R 1�NILES CAN 7 Construct MOV Lanes R f3 V i R LEGEND Nort#� Project Location Not to Seale TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure 1-680 NCV Lanes From SR 84 to Top of Sunol Grade (Tri-Valley Portion) 80-20 •1fM-4.44 \....... yam," Froiect No. 7 I-580/Foothill Road/San Ramon Road Interchange Modifications Lead Agency Dublin Description To provide increased capacity and safety at the interchange, the design of the existing I-580/Foothill Road/San.Ramon Road four-quadrant cloverleaf interchange will be modified, replacing the westbound and eastbound off loops with diagonal ramps. The two remaining off ramps would be signalized at their intersections with the local street. The project is located within Dublin and Pleasanton. Cost Estimate $2.4 million Status No improvement project has been scheduled. Funding The City of Pleasanton has included its portion of this project in its recently adopted traffic impact fee program. The TVTC allocates S1.6 million in future TVTDF funds for this project. Schedule The project is not scheduled; however because of its relationship to the planned West Dublin-Pleasanton BART Station, it should be constructed by the time the station is completed (to be determined). Project Deed The project is needed to ensure adequate access to/from West Dublin- Pleasanton BART station. In addition, both the Pleasanton and Dublin sides of the freeway currently experience safety issues related to traffic weaving from the diagonal off-ramps to make a left turn at the first intersection removed from the interchange. The project would create a signalized off-ramp intersection, which would eliminate the weaving problem. 9 i S } � i 5 Install Relocated Ramp Install Traffic Signals ! i,f ,,,,�`•. Remove Ramps SAN RAMON Rd. eepM F f y�+ Remove Ramps j install Traffic Signals 3 l (t Install Relocated Rarnps Jrn�lyd► l 1 i North Not to Scale TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure 1-580/Foothill Boulevard Interchange Modifications 7 Promo ect_N o. 8 I-680/Alcosta Boulevard Interchange Modifications Lead Agency Caltrans, San Ramon Description Reconstruct the southbound off ramp and add a new on ramp at the I-680/Alcosta Boulevard interchange to improve operations at the interchange. This project includes closing the existing southbound off ramp and removing a traffic signal, building new southbound on/off ramps to the north of Alcosta Boulevard, and connecting to San Ramon Valley Boulevard with a new signalized intersection. Cost Estimate $9.6 million Status The PSR for this project, which was funded by ?'Measure C, is complete. This project currently is in the San Ramon CIP program for FY 99 and FY 00. The SCC JEPA designates $2.3 million for the project, with funds available in 2001. TVTC made a preliminary commitment of$2.0 million for the project, with the remainder to come from local sources. The project is ready to proceed to design in FY 99 and to construction in FY 00. The TVTDF funding for this project should be made available to coincide with the planned construction. Funding $2.3 million is identified in the Southern Contra Costa JEPA for this project. The TVTC allocates $1.6 million in future TVTDF funds for this project. The remaining $5.7 million would be from local funds. An application for 1998 STIP funding for this project is pending. Schedule See Status above. Project Need The current interchange is a tight diamond with a busy intersection of two arterials immediately adjacent to the interchange. Reconstruction of the southbound ramps into a buttonhook design will remove the middle of three closely spaced traffic signals on Alcosta and improve safety and capacity in the area. The interchange traffic volumes are projected to increase as a result of growth in the area. 7 - 3 1 7 i 3 Construct New Ramps s 6 and Traffic Signal 3 Remove Ramp i Remove �--�� ALCO Traffic �I Signal i 6 f i I � � 'wiOith Not to Scale � s TVT 3 C Expenditure Plan Figure -880/Alcosta Boulevard Interchange Modifications $9-206'1I -LH eve Pro ect ,o. 9 Crow Canyon Road Safety Improvements Lead Agency Alameda County and City of San Ramon Description Safety improvements on approximately 3 miles of Crow Canyon Read (in both directions) from Bollinger Canyon Road in Contra Costa County to one mile north of Norris Canyon Road. The project will realign the roadway for a 50 mph design speed and will widen shoulders. Truck climbing lanes will be added on the two-lane segments, along with two-way left-turn lanes to provide adequate access to residential properties. Cost Estimate S 18 million Status Project is currently inactive while funding is being sought. Funding The Alameda County CMA has identified $4.8 million of Tier 1 funds for this project in the Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan. This is considered a low-priority TVTC project and no TVTDI~ funding is included at this time. Schedule To be determined. Project Meed This project is needed as a safety improvement. Although the projected 2010 PM peak hour volume exceeds desirable capacity of existing two-lane roadway, this project is not intended to address the potential capacity deficiency. i i t • i 11 Construct Safety Improvements { # Mrrpr� North Not to Scale LEGEND j a �Pranjeat Location TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure Crow Cantron Road Safety Improvements 89.202.11198-LH P'ro'e I` o. 10 Vasco Road Safety Improvements Lead Agency Alameda.County Description Realign and straighten existing two-lane road and add shoulders. No additional lanes will be constructed. Cost Estimate $30 million for a three mile segment. Status A PSR has been completed for the most northerly one-mile segment. (Tae cost estimate for this mile is $IO million.) Fending This is considered a low-priority TVTC project and no TVTDF funding is included at this time. Schedule To be determined. Project Need This project is needed as a safety improvement. The project is intended to snatch recent two lane improvements completed in Contra Costa County. It would eliminate sharp curves and narrow lanes and add shoulders. Although the projected 2010 volumes exceed desirable capacity of the existing and planned two lane roadway, this project is not intended to address the potential capacity deficiency. It is the current policy of the City of Livermore and the Tri-Valley Transportation Council to keep this section of Tri-Valley gateway as two lanes. : f 3 i 4 9 e 9 i tl . O` �,i' °°` Construct Vasco Rd. Improvements 's m i z AAVMON3 RD. i DALTON #AR FORD AV5. AVE. 0 i Sy �i rrr i • m Nortb Not to Scale LEGEND f susssssssr Project Loosttlon TVTC Expenditure Plan Figure Vasco Road Safety Improvements 10 ..................... .... 51 P'ro j ect No. 11 Express Bus Service Lead Agency County Connection/Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority/Tri Delta Transit Description Capital costs to cover express routes. Some routes are local within the Tri-Valley, with destinations at regional services. Some routes are inter- regional, with either source or destination outside the Tri-Valley boundaries. Cost Estimate $8 million, for capital costs only Status The lead transit agencies each have project descriptions, including proposed route locations, and are coordinating efforts towards developing an attractive inter-regional express route system. Funding The Alameda County CMA has identified $5.0 million of Tier 1 funds for this project in the Alameda Countywide Transportation Plan. This project may be eligible for the Regional Gas Tax, and may be included in the new Alameda County Measure B sales tax program. The express bus project can be broken into smaller fundable components. In addition to other existing transit funding sources, private sector funding from either the business or residential development community could be cultivated to match specific express route costs. A total of $4.0 million of TVTDF funds has been designated to be shared with Project 4, the West Dublin/Pleasanton BART station. Schedule To be determined. Because this project requires no PSR or preliminary engineering work, the amount of time from concept to implementation is relatively short. Project ?"Feed Express Bus Service will provide the Tr.-Valley with a flexible alternative to heavy rail or auto facilities. Flexibility is a benefit, allowing for changes in the access of successful employment centers. As development in and beyond the Tri-Valley continues, congestion and commute times will grow and frustrated commuters will continue to seek out alternate ways to get to work. Express bus routes can transport riders directly to their job sites and they can link people to existing and successful fixed transit lines such as BART and the Altamont Commute Express. Priority 4. Fund $4.0 million for public transit projects, which include the West Dublin/Pleasant BART Station(Project 4) and/or the Express Bus project (Project 11). a.) The West Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station (Project 4) benefits both the I-580 and I-680 corridors. The BART station may be a candidate for the New Measure B program, although it received no allocation in the June 1998 expenditure plan. Other potential funding sources are the Regional Gas Tax, BART itself, or private funding. More should be known about funding for the station by year 2001, so this priority will be reexamined when the SEP is revisited. Any TVTDF funds allocated to the project should be on the same timetable as other funding for the project. b.) Use a portion of the $4.4 million for purchasing buses to be used for express service provided that all of the operating costs are fully funded from other sources. Priority 5. Start accumulating funds for the initial phase (as yet undetermined) of the Route 84 Expressway project (Project 2a). Priority 6. Start accumulating funds for the initial phase (as yet undetermined) of the I- 680 Auxiliary Dane project in Contra Costa County (Project 3). Priority 7. Start accumulating funds for the I-580 HOV project(Project 5). Priority 8. Fund the I-580/Foothill/San Ramon Road interchange project(Project 7). Priority 9. The Vasco Road project and the Crow Canyon Read project are lower priority projects that are not recommended for TVTDF funding during the first 15 years of the program. IV. PROJECT FUNDING The TVTDF is projected to raise approximately $70 million over the next 15 years. Eighty percent of the TVTDF revenue ($56.75 million) will be allocated by the TVTC through the SEP, while 20% of the fee revenue ($13.25 million) may be designated by member agencies for one or more of the projects listed in the :TEPA. Each agency may designate up to 20%of the funds it collects for the specific project. 5 C. TEA-21 - Funding is available for a variety of transportation projects in the new federal transportation legislation. D. STIP - This is a State funding program that is available on a competitive basis for a variety of transportation.projects. E. Local Funds - This source includes local Traffic Impact Fee programs, developer contributions, and other local funds. F. Measure C - This funding source includes only those projects designated for funding in the half-cent sales tax program in Contra Costa County G. SCC JEPA- This is a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement in Southern Contra Costa County that provides funding from new development for transportation projects in southern Contra Costa County. Funding for TVTC projects is shown in TABLE 2. V. PROJECT" SPONSORS Agency sponsors have been assigned for each of the eleven TVTDF projects. Project sponsors are responsible for pursuing, overseeing, and monitoring development of the project. Project sponsors are listed below. Project 1. 1-580/1-680 Local Share ALTA Project 2a. Route 84 Expressway,I-580 to 1-680 Livermore Project 2b. Isabel Route 84/1-580 Interchange Livermore Project 3. 1-680 Auxiliary Lanes Danville Project 4. West Dublin/Pleasanton (DPX) BART Station Pleasanton Project 5. I-580 HOV Lanes Pleasanton Project 6. 1-680 HOV Lanes, Sunol Grade Alameda County Project 7. I-580/Foothill/San Ramon Road Interchange Dublin Project 8. 1-680/Alcosta Boulevard Interchange San Ramon Project 9. Crow Canyon Road Improvements San Ramon Project 10. Vasco Road Safety Improvements Alameda County Project 11. Express Bus LAVTA/CCCTA/ECCTA(Tri-Delta) 7 ............................... ......................................................................................... ......... ......... ................ .... ............... ....... ......... ...... ........... ........... ...... ............ .... �+ to VTev 604, 4/I P7 VT Pi �'I Y'd' vT ' 1- 1—qp _ xi ® tv V IN CD i� C7 £Si B- it3 sty C� V- u? V" 0 TW t43 Q T• t+3 40* 649, T° 473 3 stS �^ tf; i:7 a �E — swb C� C�7 C7 0% olk. fd$ 613, 0). t7S C3 L t#E 0* 1Y3 } ar7 CN fad dl3 � b*} � CJ C4 q FA i+9 401, V* ... w L� iG1 0q clq ul 61).ul CD 64 � M LU CDui csa o cis co Ul) -j Co w v I CL n I C w v W 06 C4j L6a Z CM V,d,9 cv ct� r, h" eLU V # U. " c� IN U? ci E Ci I vi 6 cc 0 C U. In �. 0vi it m C C tom!) rs VJ 20co * ..! o C fl Ct' .�J = Q1 la C W � ` sin "x m V oo ra as CO 0g� � C� � � � o 00 2 1 CL >z LU Oro) uj fl � c chi to 9L -4 c vi 1 1 =� ... p Gzr i tr cw E � i 6 69 � A 64 a �" C7C 0O W W 71, Q OWJ*„ CN C • AO i !N C7 `..� io9 ;6+ 8 b9 ar 0 r 6r964 6 4 b�9 arr � 6r-9 CN 75 cli 4r4 b4 65 619� 464 69 bio 6�4 O 00 tw cw d ri C C d ocs o >%0 w /y! .-� r� cc �t 6604 64 � (04raoq � � big 664r iA I&9 (vq 69W) CADLnO cl ^. 08 z. ba rz co oc C* S U opo w Goo C- N C14 rri et vi :Ci t` oo I Ci I✓ � �✓ ................................................. _..........................................................................................................._............... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......._. .......... ......................... ..._ ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ..............__...... ..................... _ __ C.to THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on February 23, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Gioia, C7ilkema, Gerber, DeSaulnier and Canciamilla NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the approval of the Second Extension of the Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 7838, Bay Point area, as attached, is CONTINUED to March 2, 1999. l hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. Attested; Phil Batchelor,Clerk of,,Ore Boarcf of Supervisors and County Administrator By: Deputy Clerk R THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on February 23, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SUBJECT: Approval of the Second Extension of the Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 7838, Bay Poiret area. The Public Works Director having recommended that he be authorized to execute the 2" agreement extension which extends the Subdivision Agreement between Kaufman and Broad of Northern California and the County for construction of certain improvements in Subdivision 7838, Bay Point area, through May 21, 1999; + APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE OF WORK COMPLETE: 80% + ANTICIPATED DATE OF COMPLETION: May 21, 1999 REASON FOR EXTENSION: Completing improvements IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. i hereby certify that thisis a true and correct copy of an action taker and entered on the RL:,c:m�v minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the G:\GrpData\EngSvc\BO\1999\,90 2-23-99.doc date shown. Originator: Public Wor-s(ES) Contact: Rich Lierly(313-2348) ATTESTED: cc: Public Works-R.Bruno,Construe"on PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk Cs ,"he Current ng,CormusityDevetopnent T—March 21,1999 of Supervisors nCounty Ad,, in-!strator Kaufman and Broad of NcrEnern California 3130 Crow Canyon Place,Suite 300,San Ramon.CA 94583 By Deputy American Casual'y Company of Reading,PA 21650 Oxnard Street,Suite 760,Woodland Hillis,CA 91367