Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06171986 - 1.22 r L+ i Its- hot- POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST 1—Oti2 No. /3g� Date: 9/11/85 i Dept. No./ Copers Department puhl is Works Budget Unit , �,, br`nr No. Agency No. 65 .M 6jaAction Requested: Study the position of Associate Real Property Agent oslt;nn no 65-274 to properly classify the incumbent Proposed Effective Date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly classify incumbent who is working ata Senior Real Property Agent level Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No [] Estimated cost of adjustment: $ ZAP° Cost is within department's budget: Yes ® No [] If not within budget, use reverse side to explain how costs are to be fund Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment. Use additional sheets for further explanations or comments. for D Otment Head Personnel Department Recommendation Date: May 22, 1986 Establish the class of Senior Real Property Agent and allocate to the Basic Salary Schedule at level C5-1870 ($2946-3581). Reclassify person and position (R. Frost, post. #65-274) of Associate. Real Property Agent at salary level C5-1756 ($2629-3196) to Seniror Real Property Agent. Increase salary range of Senior Real Property Agent to C5-1928 ;($3122-3795) effective 7/1/86. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: Zday following Board action. C1 Date for Director ers nnel County Administrator Recommendation Date: SG Ll Approve Recommendation of Director of Personnel D Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel 0 Other: for unty Administrator Board of Supervisors Action ,JUN 17 1986 Adjustment APPROVED/ on Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of JUN 17 1986 Supervisors and County Administrator Date: By: APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL/SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. M347 6/82 I i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY C ASSMCMIGN QCW. ICNNAIRE Roger H. Frost Public Works Department Real Property_ NAME DEPARTMENT DIVISION Associate Real Property Agent Same 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez OFFICIAL JOB CLASSIFICATION WDRKING JOB TITLE PLACE OF WORK AND ASSIGNED HOURS TIME REQUIRED DESCRIPTION OF WORK: The standard County utilized classification questionnaire does not lend itself to accurately describing the work I do. To allocate my time as requested in said formate is meaningless for the most part, as my work assigrnments are so varied and non-repetitive that it becomes almost nonsensical to qualify "time required". I can make one allocation however, probably close to 95% of my work is non-supervised and passed to me in such a format that I an responsible for its direction, control and any intra/inter divisional or departmental coordination. I am also responsible for the interpretation of work assignments, that is, being required to establish the scope and nature of the work request. I will attempt to show by example in this work description that the work I've done for the last several years has been characterized by often a high degree of difficul- ty, unique in format, certainly non-routine or, repetitive, and has required a great deal of original thought and reliance on past work experiences in consummating the particular tasks. I have also been required to represent the Real Property Division in many meetings where the lowest position represented has been a division head. Current Work Description: 1. As Real Property representative on the jail site assignment team, I have had the main responsibility for locating a site for the proposed Detention Facility. This has involved helping to select location parameters and working closely with the C.A.O and Sheriff's offices, as well as the Architectural Division. Site selection strategy has involved sensitive and cm vlex relation- ships with both the process and the individuals involved. My work in this area is being done basically independently of the Division I work out of. 2. I am working on an oil and gas leasing program which will allow the County to process the leases that have been ignored in the past; working with the State Land Commission to develop a cost effective approach that will minimize the paperwork. The County currently has one oil/gas lease which was entered into over 20 years ago. This will be a new procedure with same potential of generat- ing revenues the County deserves. - I 3. I have done a lot of work in setting up acquisition procedures and other property related matters for the new Redevelopment Agency. A lot of this work has been self initiated, as before the capable Agency Director was hired, this was a going no-where program. Between myself and Paul Gavey, our Division was in a large part responsible for getting things done when nothing else had direction. _ A lot ! of my work in this area now originates directly from the Agency Director. I 4. I do a lot of work;' for the Airport Manager with respect to property acquisition and encumbrances. Most of this work was done in the past by either the Princi.pal Real Property AGent or Supervising Real Property Agent. This work often involves working with the F.A.A. in order to comply with their rather burdensome requirements. Most of the Airport work is self-directed after work requests are received from the Airport Manager. 5. Currently working with the C.A.O. to relocate the Family Stress Center, this work is fairly political and I receive direction directly from the C.A.O. Policies and procedures are established by consensus at the meetings I attend on this and I both advise the C.A.O. and implement their decisions. 6. I an currently supervising and directing the work of two others in selling County excess property. While I try to keep my involvement minimal, most time is' spent in matters of clarifying County policies involved in procedures, and identifying and solving potential problems before they became problems. 7. Another recent project is involved with the potential sale and relocation of the Martinez animal control facility. This is involving myself, Animal Services, Architectural Division, and the C.A.O. in coordinating a proposal to be made to the interested purchasing party. Going back in time, the variety and complexity of the work assignments I receive is illustrated by the following projects: 1. The appraisal in 1984 of the County Library and County Administration Building for the purpose of refinancing the County debt. This was a rush assignment from the C.A.O. which resulted in an appraisal of $19,500,000 worth of property. In various meetings, I had to justify this valuation to members of the Retirement Board and the lending bank; the results of which was an additional #3,000,000 of lending capacity vital to the County at that time. Technically, the responsi- bility for this work should have gone to either the Principal or Supervising property agent in this Division. 2. The development and sale of the Blum Road Corporation yard was another project I worked on in 84-85. Many meetings have been held on this and in most of the early meetings I was the only non-Division head or higher position participat- ing. The concept of developing the site as approved to a raw lana sale was in fact jointly developed by Milton Kubicek and myself. 3. I developed the leasing concept for the Flood Control excess on Reliez Station Road and under Kubicek's direction developed a four party lease and agreement between the City of Lafayette, the County, Flood Control and Regional Parks for use of the lands as a riding and staging area. This was a fairly complex process and involved considerable coordination amongst the parties involved, the bulk of which fell to me, '1 i I 4. Another fairly complex project I worked on in 84-85 was the sale of sand out of an Oakley detention basin. This involved one of the few sales of personal property ever handled by our Division and was further complicated by the fact it was a two-year, project with certain protections built into the eventual agreement in favr of the Flood Control District. The concept of someone paying us to develop the basin arose out of a project I was given to clear this same land of an orchard. It was determined at that time there was a market for the sand and this led to a revenue situation as opposed to spending thousands to excavate the basin. The conception, implementation and direction under which the project progressed, were basically self directed. 5. To digress: In 1984 I was invited to a meeting of ,Public Works officials to discuss how to pay $40,000 to the Pacheco Tann Council to remove "their" library from County property. As a result of the information I brought to that meeting, we paid $2,000 to the Town Council and they removed the building. To make it more interesting, I was invited to the meeting because someone made a mistake and invited the "wrong" Roger. The point I make here is the experience and exposure that comes with time seems (self-serving!) to indicate that a greater role than associate should be acknowledged. 6. A late 1984 project I worked on was a federally funded Appian Way project that was going no where due to lack of direction in processing and the timing of certain right of way related functions. While this job is now in the capable hands of others in the Division, I at least got it authorized for commencement. Again, experience and self direction got this rolling, as the basic planning organization and control of the project were delegated to me with little outside direction thereof. 7. Another 1984 project given to me and for which I had sole responsibility for direction and control was the property exchange and improvement agreement for the Pinole Animal Shelter. This involved working directly with one department head, an assistant division head, and a developer to hammer out a rather complex agreement. This was a first, with little direction given but with satisfactory results, I hope. 8. In 1982-83 I also developed two leases for communication sites. This involved working with the Sheriff's Department and Lease Management to develop the first two 99 year leases the County has entered into. Because of the long term nature of the commitment, both leases were very complex and the greater portion of both were my doing. Top officials of the C.A.O. , Planning Department, and County Counsel were all involved at one time or other with Real Property being the basic coordinator. . .to make it worse one of the nastiest lawyers in Contra Costa County represented both owners; fortunately we both liked to fish. 9. Another 1984 project that was very important to the County was the sale-leaseback of the Lafayette Corporation yard, another first of sorts that involved some sensitive P. R. work. 10. In 1983-84, I was assigned to work with the Assistant Fire Chief of Consolidated to review and evaluate for purchase/disposal some 30 existing and potential fire station sites. I essentially self-directed this study, which was to be used as the basis for a future realignment of station location, and for their budgeting process. All reports were sent directly to the Fire District without 4 'X :review in Division. 11. Over the last several years I have been asked to complete several complex appraisals, the results of which dictated the direction of capitol project acquisitions. These were not "copy jobs" but original works ranging in one case of a $1,000,000+ property on Aspen Way to $5-6 million dollar for the Walnut Creek Court complex, to a leasehold interest valuation of the Buchanan Field Golf Course - the latter valuation leading to abandonment of the ill-advised push to buy them out. As I go over past timesheets, what stands out is all the "odd-ball" transactions and situaL"ions I've been asked to face, not a lot of which were routine, and a lot of which were either complex, sensitive, or both. Most of these were handled with little or no direction and no large amount of any superior's time has been spent giving either general or specific instructions/directions. The basic difference between my level of work for the last several years and what is called for in the associate specs is the degree of difficulty in the project assign- ments; the ccxnplexity/sensitivity of various projects; and the originality in both the work situations and the thinking necessary to resolve these situations. Also prevalent is a large amount of time dealing with outside divisions, departments. and the C.A.O. 's Office. Last but not least, in mid-1981 I was given two days notice that I was to run the Division for the next three weeks, due to a vacation by one supervisor and illness of the other. This was done along with their work and mine, and since I was never thanked or complained to, I assume the work was done properly. (This was prior to Paul Gavey being made division head) I believe I am being fairly objective in stating that a good deal of what I do and have done in this Division over the last several years has transgressed into the responsibilities of both the Principal and Supervising Real Property Agents and beyond. RF:ama FrostClassQuest.t9 (September 11, 1985) I D R A F T Proposed Salary: C5-1852 ($2894-3518) Contra Costa County June 1986 SENIOR REAL PROPERTY AGENT DEFINITION: Under general direction to appraise, acquire, exchange, manage, lease, rent or sell real property or property rights for public use and improvement projects involving the most complex and responsible transactions; to obtain, analyze and use a variety of data related to property use, value, location and other aspects of real property or lease management; and to per- form other related work as required. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS: This class performs the highest level of non-supervisory technical real property or lease management work in the Real Property Division of the Public Works Department or the Lease Management Division of the General Services Department. It receives broad program direction from the Principal Real Property Agent or Lease Manager in the conduct of complex real property or lease manage- ment matters involving questions of policy which have departmental or County-wide implications not found at lower levels. An essential characteristic of this class is the complex and sensitive nature of projects undertaken which demand of the incumbent the highest degree of discretion, technical knowledge, initiative and judgement. On occasion a Senior Real Property Agent may receive direction from a representative of the County Administrator's Office. this classification is not flexibly staffed because work at this level of complexity is not assigned to more than. one position within a division. This class is distinguished from the journey level class of Associate Real Property Agent by work elements including complexity of negotiations, legal and political implications, public relations and considerations and monetary value. An incumbent in this classificaton provides technical advice and direct- ion to other staff and consultants. TYPICAL TASKS: Performs the most complex and unique appraisals, negotiations, or lease management projects; reviews appraisals conducted by professional fee appraisers; conducts site locations for major buildings and building complexes; reviews, evaluates and develops long term purchase, disposal , or Teasing pro- rams for existing and potential building sites; manages the most complex real property or lease management projects to include activities such as review of construction or remodeling plans, determination and application of related laws, guidelines or regulations, estimation of costs, preparation of contracts or lease agreements, condemnation procedures and preparation of specifications, deeds or other documents; provides lead direction and technical assistance to subordinate personnel ; prepares written reports and correspondence and makes presentations at public meetings or to the Board of Supervisors. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education: Possession of a baccalaureate degree from an accredited college or university with a major in real estate or possession of a baccalaureate degree and successful completion of courses approved by the appointing authority in the following subjects: 1) Principles of Real Estate Acquisition; 2) Communications in Real Estate acquisition; 3) Real Estate Appraisal ; and 4) any five of the following courses: Real Estate Finance, Real Estate Econo- mics, Advanced Communications Course, Advanced Appraisal , Supervision and Management, Property Management, Legal Aspects of Real Estate, Business Law and Relocation Assistance, or equivalent courses approved by the appointing authority. Experience: Four years of full-time or its equivalent experience in the appraisal and negotiation for the acquisition of real property for public use, and/or negotiating for leasing and management of properties for public use. One year of qualifying experience must have been at the level of Associate Real Property Agent in Contra Costa County or its equivalent. Substitution of Experience for Education: Additional experience as identified in the experience requirement may be substituted for up to two years of the required education on a year-for-year basis but no substitution is allowed for the required course work. I KNOWLEDGES, SKILLS AND ABILITIES: Knowledge of accepted principles and practices of appraising and negotiating for real property, property rights or leased property; laws and legal procedures pertaining to real property or lease management; data collect- ion, research and analysis. Ability to read and interpret right-of-way, engineering construction or remodeling plans, related laws, deeds, leases, contracts and applicable regulations; prepare clear and concise property descript- ions and reports for real property or lease management; prepare appraisals for real property transactions or market and investment analyses for lease management transactions; interact on a professional basis with attorneys, engineers, architects, property owners, leassees and others; analyze complex real property or lease management situations, evaluate different courses of action, and make a recommendation on the most appropriate course of action based on technical expertise and problem solving techniques; successfully interact with personnel at all organizational levels of government, non-profit private agencies, and private industry and with members of the general public; to effectively initiate, negotiate and complete real property or lease management transactions and related matters; provide technical direction to other staff and consultants; work in- dependently or as a member of a team. Class Code: 7 3 cc: HDC, 58, WGR, WPH, EK, Safety Departmental Approval Date Departmental Approval Date Departmental Approval Date Personnel Department Approval Date