HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 12151998 - D13 H
D6 13
Contra
TO' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS QCoun
OStc"�'
ty
FRONT: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: December 15, 1998
SUBJECT: BRADDOCK AND LOGAN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STUDY AUTHORIZATION
GP#98-0004
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
`
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Authorize the review of the Braddock and Logan General Plan Amendment
study request to change the General Plan land use designation from
"Agricultural Lands" to "Public/Semi Public" and Single Family Residential -
Medium Density for an approximately 105 acre site in the Blackhawk/Danville
area.
2. Consider directing the Community Development Department to hold active
study of this site for 45 to 60 days in anticipation of an additional General Plan
authorization request in the same area.
FISCAL IMPACT
All staff costs are paid by fees charged to project applicants.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE De� k
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECCIMMENDATION OF BOARD CCM ITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON Dp-npmbpr. 15,1998 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
SEE THE ATTACHED ADDENDUM FOR BOARD ACTION
AND VOTE.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMO NT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
ABSENT: ABSTAi BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
SHOWN.
Contact: Catherine Kutsuris (925)335-1210 ATTESTED, December 15 , 1998
cc: Community Development Department (CDD) PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Public Works-Heather Ballenger AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Braddock and Logan
B , DEPUTY
CK/df
Page Two
BACKGROUNDIR ASONS FOR RECCIMMEN AID I!QNS
Braddock and Logan has requested a General Plan Amendment study be authorized
for an approximately 905 acre site located on the south side of Camino Tassajara
• to the east of Lawrence Road in the Tassajara/Blackhawk area. The project site is
locatedbetween the Kaufman and Broad "Tassajara Meadows" project and the
Wendt Ranch project, and is a portion of the area known as the "intervening
properties."
The site is designated "Agricultural Lands" in the County General Plan. Braddock
and Logan is requesting the land use designation be changer] to "Public/Semi
Public" for a seven acre portion located at the northwest corner of the site, and to
"Single Family Residential - Medium Density for the remainder of the site (refer to
attached map). The residential land use category would allow for a range of 220 to
350 units.
The Community Development Department staff has been contacted by Shappell
Industries, who has indicated their intention to submit a General Plan Amendment
study authorization'request for property in the same vicinity. Although no written
request has been submitted, we understand that they expect to file their request
sometime in January. Assuming such a study request is forthcoming, it seems
prudent to include the additional area as part of the same General Plan Amendment
study review. As an alternative, staff could process the two General Plan
Amendment study authorizations on the same timeline, such that the Planning
Commissions and the Board could consider the proposals at the same time. The
environmental review for each general plan amendment study must include a
cumulative analysis of impacts.
The Braddock and Logan study, when completed, will be scheduled for public
hearing before the San Ramon Valley Regional Planning ;Commission for
recommendation and the Board of Supervisors for decision. Authorization of a
General Plan Amendment study does not imply support for the requested change.
t -
t • 1
Braddock and Logan
Genera! Flan Amendment Study Area
North
i
Tassajara
4
Meadows :
Study Area
I
MH
E
r
TC)V17n Of Darwitie
ADDENDUM TO ITEM D. 13
December 15, 1998 Agenda
On this date, the Board of Supervisors considered the Braddock and Logan;General Plan
Amendment Study Authorization#GP 98-4004.
Dennis Barry, Community Development Department Director,presented the staff report
and recommendations.
The Board discussed the matter, the public was hearing was opened, and the following
people presented testimony:
Jeff Lawrence, Braddock and Logan, 4155 Blackhawk Plaza,Danville;
Tom Koch, Shapell,2682 Bishop Drive, San Ramon;
Mark Caughey, East Bay Municipal Utility District, 375 11' Street; Oakland;
David Krikorian, Tassajara Meadows, 119 Zephyr Place, Danville.'
All those desiring to speak having been heard,the Board discussed the issues.
Supervisor Gerber moved that the Board decline to authorize a General Plan Amendment
study at this time,pending the recommendations from the Ad Hoc Committee and the
Board's action on these recommendations.
Supervisor Rogers seconded the motion.
Supervisor Canciamlla noted that the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations would not
impact Braddock and Logan's General Plan Amendment study request, and the proposed
requests of intervening properties. Maybe the request could be held for 45 to 64 days so
staff could coordinate requests for additional studies. Applicants would pay the usual
costs and fees.
The Board continued to discuss the matter. The vote on the motion was as follows:
AYES: SUPERVISORS GERBER and ROGERS
NOES: SUPERVISORS UILKEMA,DeSAULNIER and CANCIAMILLA
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
Supervisor Canciamilla then moved staff's recommendation No. 1 as stated, and
amended recommendation No. 2 to read, "Consider directing the Community
Development Department to hold active study of this site for a minimum of 45 to 60 days
in anticipation of additional General Plan authorization requests in the same area and
pending completion of the Ad Hoc Committee's report."
Supervisor DeSaulnier seconded the motion. Supervisor Gerber then inquired how the
"same area"is defined in the motion.Mr. Barry noted the staff's recommendation
referred to the area within the Tassajara Valley Property Owner's Association.
After further Board consideration, the vote on the motion was as follows:
AYES: SUPERVISORS UILKEMA,GERBER,DeSAULNIER,and CANCIAMILLA
NOES: SUPERVISOR ROGERS
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Nome
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that staffs Recommendation No. 1 is
APPROVED; and Recommendation No.2 is APPROVED as amended.
........-............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................
CUMDER WITH -
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
651 Pine St-eet, N. Wing - 4th Floor
Martinez, CA 94553
Telephone: 335-121 D Fax: 335-1222
TO: Board of Supervisors Members
FROM: Catherine Kutsuris
Chief of Current Planning
DATE: December I1, 1998
SUBJECT: BRADDOCK& LOGAN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT-
Item #D-13
Our Department received the attached letter dated December 11, 1998 from the Town of Danville.
One of the issues raised in this letter is the possible inclusion of an additional 51 acres of property.
Those properties are located to the south of the Braddock&Logan property, and are shown on the
attached map.
The additional request to include these 51 acres was inadvertently omitted from the board order
on this subject These properties were originally included in the first submittal received from Mr.
Jim Black. That submittal was subsequently withdrawn and replaced by the Braddock& Logan
General Plan study authorization request which did not include the 51 acres. If the Board decides
to authorize the Braddock & Logan request; we recommend that the authorization include the
additional 51 acres submitted by David M. Krikorian.
We apologize for any confusion this may have created. If you have any questions prior to the
board meeting, please call me at 335-1210.
CC: CAO
County Counsel
Braddock& Logan
David Krikorian
CK/df.b&l.mem
General Pari Amendment Study Area
Norih
A=r_=
f — �
I
• a
-7—AND Tassajara
...... ...._......
MeiIdOWS
raddock
tic Logan
.�. Request
a I
------- i
Study Area
\4\\\
.4.\444•\\ 4`C�L�'\\\4�a.\K i�
4♦ `\ A
R \* Krikorian ;4
Wendt Ut Ranch
Request '4
r' 4,
$
\\\\\
4444\44\`44`
444 \44'44\4
Town Co Demme
----...I..........................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................
DIcambe'r 11, 1998
Rr i R;6gers
C1 airmpA Board of Supervisors
Q linty of Contra Costa
651 PM" e street
CA 94553
R4: Geattal Plan Amendment Study for Interve�mig Properties
* Supervisor Rogers:
* DIcember 15, 1998, the Board of Supe6isors will be considering a request froxn
Logan to initiate a General Plan"andment Study for the so-call ed Intervening
as. As you consider Braddock & Log6ls request and provide ootnty staff with
cion for the swpe of any much Study, the `own of Danville respectfuall requests that
ru take into account the Town's concerns rc�w4ng any Potential develo;,ment of these
properties.
Town of Danville is vitally interested jn the any potential devel of the
ervetng properties. The Town's Gmeral flan has for many yews policies
rop R11
g fbr the Town to engage in comprehensi e and cooperative planning th the County
ve �n
me=
c ng th ed
_41in 6
f any urban development in the Tassajara Valley and to ensure that any development
at nuc
stud
is, directly lb*.*d to acceptable levels of service for all infmVzw=e and lic services.
e principles arc also the basis of the Daugherty Valley Settlement ent and were
or
to by both the Town and County the Tri-Valley Transpo 'on Council's
A, "on Plan was adopted. The Town is panic interested in tdhwt development
of the bmvening Propmties became they art!within the Town's Sphere of Influence, as
d#temined by LAFCO,and went specifically etoluded by the Board from the'ongoing study
O(an agrimltural Preservation area.
ith that background, the Town would like to p''sure that the following arefit are addressed
any General Pian Study authorized by the BoOd. T
The Study should address all of the Intervak"Properties, not just those ;urrently under
option to Braddock&Logan. Although the County has previously recei 'V I d a letter dated
I November 19, 1999, from David M. Krikprian, representing some of he owners not
i allied with Braddock&Logan, melting this 1,requcst, the study am depict in your staff
report limludes only the Braddock & Logso properties. Excluding the n n-'Braddock &
Logan properties defeats the goal of covjre�sivc planning.
$10 La C�v"�ftjr*DanvW CabfarWa%526-1740
1
k
The Study&DWd address the need for li k facilities to serve the Intery in Properties
and tt� Tumfl m� specifically schools sand parks,. Mm San Rmion alley wed
School T3istrict has already acquired 8 a=m4f land in the adjacent Meadows subdivision,
simmediately to the west of the Intervening iroper es, for ccuxstruction o a new middle
elmol. It is critical that the remaining laird necessary for coutplertion f the middle
gaol, which is located cin the Interven S properties, is planned for this purpose.
Likewise,the Sward should address the TmA to provide cand far a now cc mmunity perk
rather thsn relying solely on In lieu feta;to serve bath the future re ildents of the
Intervening Properties and the existing residents of uninootporste d Tas* a,who live in
subdivisions in which no parks or recteatio"facilities were provided.
• The Study should address the potential development of the Intervening P "cs m the
' context of the already apptoved Meadows'and Wendt tlsmch subdlvi Specific
issues QW should be; examined include' inWmal circulation, send other
r trfZ*structure needs.
1 'the Study should address the ongoing eta of the Fast Bay Municipal " ty District
(`*MUD")to locate an appropriate site: a new wetter storage fact in the arca of
the Intervening Properties.
You for your attention to the Town of Danville"s emcerns with the posed General
Fj6n Study for the kzterveUing Properties, She ld the Board"010 ize court.r std`to move
+,;4 with the Study,the Town will continue to work with the City in addressing the
concerns of our residents.
ry truly
in .
ayor
• Board of Supervisors
Irtemvs Berry
Cather'in'e Kutstuis
Mar in I Tome ti
1
1
t
k '
k
k
1
i 1
TOTAL P.03
TOTAL P.003