HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11041997 - D7 D.7
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DATE: November 4, 1997 MATTER OF RECORD
SUBJECT: Public Comment
Steve Roberti, Department of Labor, 1834 Del Rio Drive, Lafayette,
commented on the Bay Area Partnership; and
Ray Davis, 1900 Best Friends of Orinda, 20 Zander Drive, Orinda,
commented on the Lamorinda Recycled Water Project.
THIS IS A MATTER FOR RECORD PURPOSES ONLY
NO BOARD ACTION TAKEN
t RECEIVED
LAM X97
REa W. T7 FACT SHE T
P-,-ROctober 19
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OOSTA QO,
PROJECT SUMMARY At the close of the comment period, work will begin on
The proposed Lamorinda Recycled Water Project is a the Final EIR which will address and respond to public
joint project of the East Bay Municipal Utility District comments. EIR certification and project approval by the
(EBMUD) and Central Contra Costa Sanitary District EBMUD Board of Directors is scheduled for,December
(CCCSD).The project would deliver up to 1,900 acre-feet 1997.
per year of highly treated recycled water generated at COMMUNITY MEETINGS
CCCSD's treatment plant in Martinez to EBMUD custom-
ers in Lafayette, Moraga, Orinda, Walnut Creek and attended the September public hearing to ask questions
Pleasant Hill. This water is intended for irrigating land- and submit comments, which will be addressed in the
stapes such as golf courses, parks, schoolyards, Final EiR. Cornmerts raised were associated with the
greenbelt and median landscaping within homeowners'
associations and commercial areas. The recycled water proposed pipeline routes and construction impacts, siting
of facilities in residential neighborhoods and health
would be delivered through a separate delivery system at
a cost similar to potable water. concerns with recycled water.Additional community
meetings to inform the public about the safety and
This project would be operated under a permit issued appropriate uses of recycled water, how recycled water is
by the Regional Water Quality Control Board which regulated and how this project fits Into EBMUD's overall
regulates all water projects to ensure protection of the water supply plan will be held in October (see box
public health and the environment. below). We also plan to conduct neighborhood meetings
WHAT IS THE CURRENT PROJECT STATUS? with residents near proposed facility sites.
As required by the California Environmental Quality HOW CAN YOU BE INVOLVED?
Act (CEQA), a draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) if you would like more information on this project, a
for the project was issued on August 22, 1997.This copy of the draft EIR, to request a neighborhood meeting
document addresses all phases of the project, emphasiz- or to provide Input prior to release of the final EIR, please
ing impacts on the communities and environment.A contact:
CEQA-required public hearing to solicit comment on the
draft EIR was held at St. Mary's College, Moraga, on Henry Tsang or Mary Lou Lucas
September 15, 1997.The official comment period on the Project Manager Community Affairs
draft EIR continues to 5:00 p.m., November 7, 1997: (510)287-1090 (510)287-0144
The comment period for the draft EIR has been extended to 5:00 p.m. November 7th, 1997
1997 Community Meetings:
10/21, 7:00-8:30pm, Easter Hill United Methodist Church,3911 Cutting Boulevard, Richmond,
10/27, 7:00-8:30pm, Stanley intermediate School, 3477 School Street,Lafayette
Lamorinda Project schedule 1996: 1997 1998 1999 2000
: 4Q I IQ 2Q 3Q 4Q IQ : 2Q i 3Q 4Q` IQ 2Q 3Q:: 4Q:: ICI: 2Q i 3Q 4Q
Commiunky Meetings t j
Draft EIR Comment Period
Final EIR Preparation
x Board Certification
Project Design
Project Construction (phased)i .. � .. ... ..
Begin Operation (Phased) € I
i
A Joint Project of East Bay Municipal Utility District ]
anef Central Centra Costa Sanitary District EB1t?4[]
Recycled paper
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigatio,u 1amorinda Recycled Water Project
Laguna Creek and Moraga Creek are located,within the drainage area of the Upper San V�
Leandro Reservoir, which is part of the EBNTUD water supply system (discussed below). .
These creeks generally flow south through Rheem Valley and the Moraga area and would
drain portions of the pipeline alignment and users in these areas, including the western part
of the proposed Palos Colorados development. In addition to the western portion of the Palos
Colorados development,the major proposed recycled water users in this drainage area include .
the Moraga Country Club and Miramonte High School.
San Pablo Creek is located outside the proposed pipeline alignment, although one major
recycled water user would be.located within this watershed. San Pablo Creek drains west
through Orinda at the southwestern edge of the project area into San Pablo Reservoir,
another reservoir in the EBMUD water supply system (discussed below). The major recycled
water user would be the Gateway Valley residential development and golf course.
FLOOD ZONES
In nearly all cases,the 100-year flood zone for all the creeks in the project area is contained
within the creek channel. The two areas where the 100-year flood zone extends beyond the
creek channel are as follows: (1) in the vicinity of Olympic Boulevard and Tice Valley
Boulevard where flows from Las Trampas Creek may result in shallow flooding with depths
between 1 to 3 feet;and(2)along the Laguna Creek drainage from its headwater, about 300
feet south of the proposed north Moraga reservoir site, to.the area along Moraga Road 9*3
between Buckingham and Campolindo Drives (Tlood Insurance Rate Maps, 1981,1983,
1987).
WATER SUPPLY RESERVOIRS AND WATERSHEDS
The primary water supply source for EBMUD is the Mokelumne River in the Sierra Nevada,
which provides over 90 percent of the raw water for EBMUD. There are also five local
reservoirs in the East Bay that are part of the EBMUD water supply system. Three of the
local reservoirs store water from the Mokelumne River, and all of the reservoirs collect runoff
from the local watershed. Local runoff from all. of the reservoirs comprise less than ten
percent of the total EBMUD raw water sources. All raw water for the East Bay water supply
system is treated at one of the EBMUD water treatment plants prior to distribution to its .
customers(Montgomery Watson, 1995). '.
a.. ,., .:.',4'rpv.X•'l..K•Y •r••'� .y�;; Kew^y, r •.• }yo•d:2wr •!,,• �K, .
k^?.., 'tS'•<.4'Y!,'.Y?f :0.?y+`�:L•.::::..•.t•:�"h..•N'°:p..•r:x•..•r• •.m£�:. .CM;:>}.,,'Jl'fi' .`7.•.SKG::'C.!.• :2'S;• ¢.w'7?::.
.:t+•...:.,. ..5..'Ctt^,,'y.t:•:Y.'.;m;,;'q :•.;..,.::>n:.,•::::r:::.:c•:::.:::a.<•:.:.:r.:.: ..:L:.. `..::�:::::.......:•:::•>:..:..fir.:... .. ::,�•r','.Q%<t?'•'°E;... .r'".,"'...
.:•.>..:•'•.ib::o•:�»::.�r:.. '::::`•;:'•%•;:o;cf..:s.:::sf•>•.c::r. /...• ,.,c•:..�uJ�,•• ,:•:•;R^.:::.•.> .•:.<.•;:;.:,.y,., ;,;.�jf...f.,;....,.. .:rK:x:.:<:;... :S��,"q.9,•'•:2
' :..:,.r... .. .:,::. ::::•:.:.. •.:. ::..: / :.:•. Yo-
<w:xrw::u:S4.:;aS;r:u•.�,;::�a..o.,�.•w.f. aw.N...:,.<.rr�r::;V.,Y'aw.�...•.,a:....C..c•f:,fi•:va::.vc.�•suwwsr^cwx�S:.k:;.:Swc:wtaw•3u;.Y.a:3cC6.ak.;,1'd/.wssr:.:<do:•.aS:
RNWP\ST\97JSS-007 Page 3=30 August 22,19s7 ;'�.
s !a V, 7
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Lamorinda Recycled Water Pro%ect
Upper San Leandro and San Pablo reservoirs are two of three reservoirs in the East Bay
which contribute to the EBMUD raw water supply source. A portion of the Proposed Project
is located within the watersheds of these two reservoirs. San Pablo Reservoir has a capacity
of 38,600 acre-feet and receives runoff from a 24-square mile(15,360 acres)watershed. The
San Pablo watershed includes,San Pablo Creek, Lauterwasser Creek, Siesta Valley and
Gateway Valley drainage, and runofffrom the City of Orinda and Highway 24. The reservoir
can also receive Mokelumne River water that has been spilled into San Pablo Creek from the
Lafayette Aqueduct or from Briones Reservoir. On average, about 52 percent of water stored
in San Pablo Reservoir is imported water from the Mokelumne River.Raw water is treated
either at the Sobrante water treatment plant or the San Pablo water treatment plant. Discharge
from the San Pablo Dam enters San Pablo Creek, which flows out to San Pablo Bay
(Montgomery Watson, 1995).
Upper San Leandro Reservoir has a capacity of 41,440 acre-feet and receives runoff from a
29-square mile(18,560 acres)watershed.The Upper SanLeandro watershed drains the Town
of Moraga and community of Canyon as well as numerous creeks (Kaiser,Buckhorn, Indian,
Rimer,Kings,Moraga, San Leandro and Redwood creeks). The reservoir also receives water
from the Mokelumne River that has been conveyed from the Sierra to the Mokelumne
Aqueduct. About 35 percent of the stored water is from the Mokelumne River. Raw water
from the Upper San Leandro Reservoir is treated at the Upper San Leandro water treatment
plant.Excess water from the dam is released into San Leandro Creek which flows into Lake
` Chabot(Montgomery Watson, 1995).
GROUNDWATER
No significant groundwater resources exist in either the San Pablo Reservoir watershed or the
Upper San Leandro Reservoir watershed (Montgomery Watson, 1995). Similarly, no
significant groundwater resources are identified in the Walnut Creek.watershed, based on
major groundwater basins identified by the California Department of Water Resources in 1980
(California Department of Water Resources, 1980). The 1995 Basin Plan does not indicate
any Significant groundwater basins in the project area(California RWQCB, 1995).
Approximately 70 wells have been drilled at various locations throughout the project area
since 1981, according to the database of the California Department of Water Resources that
lists all wells drilled or modified since about 1980 (California Department of Water
.xis;::.�<w•::...,: :;;a..•r.R;:..,::.4?•:�bcri;Y:K;;;: ,.ero�. ,e�Y{;V:x,^;,:S9;mreiC•r.:>.::w::::?.:{^x�'•"vg�.'�"•'•rY)'•:_<oxc•::•:;:?".?:: :ya..
,,..•..;':,Y<• .^•?',7.C•?::::.•; •.•.•,.>..:;i.;:....... .:.•rvc:;:..::•:::::.::f.?`..i: ,d..o£k.,.,: .wxy;,..,.^ '�•• .�:.....\�•::.• ..�: /i.
. :.?c'2:#YrkG:ta.:vr.•C•i?:taau`�Sr RS°wY:c� 'S�.'•i:`s:�..iiii::;N'isw�.::�}ui:'v3i:ro..•a:...•,•„3.:b,Gw:dw�iW�:7.'•c `isi;;wcran':riSJX`ow��k}.v.Y'i��.}`i.E�/./.�CGhtnw:.3.8fc5c::�.,iJ.!L'Y.�'' .r1. .
R.\WP1ST\97JSS.007 Page 3-31 August 22,1997
" Draft Environmental Impact Report
Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Lamorinda Recycled Water Project
i
Resources, 1997). The majority of these wells were drilled primarily for observation and
monitoring of groundwater. Approximately ten of the wells were drilled to extract water for
household or irrigation use, but no information is available regarding the current use of the
wells.Data on the amount of water that these wells extract is also not available. Wells drilled
since 1983 are generally sealed from 0 to 50 feet below ground sur;.ce, and the few
household wells are typically deeper than 100 feet (Schmidtbauer, Terry, 1997).
In the Pleasant Dill area of the Proposed Project,there are approximately 20 wells which are yy
primarily used for groundwater monitoring and observation.Less than five of the wells are i
used for irrigation. These 20 wells vary in depth from 30 to 300 feet. In the Reliez Valley area
west of Lafayette, there} are approximately ten wells used primarily for groundwater j
t
monitoring and observation. Two were drilled as household water supply wells; these two
wells are 150 and 300 feet deep.Immediately south ofH'ighway 24,near the eastern Lafayette '
and Tice Valley portions of the project area, there are approximately 20 wells. These wells
are mostly water monitoring wells with the exception of three wells drilled for household use
and a.few for irrigation. The household wells were drilled between 60 and 415 feet deep.
Drainage wells are present on the Rossmoor Golf Course in this area. They passively collect
drainage from the shallow groundwater away from residences; the drainage water is
discharged to the storm drain and is not used for water supply(Clark, 1997). In the Moraga- .
Orinda area of the alignment there are about 20 wells which are used for groundwater j
monitoring and irrigation. These wells vary in depth from 30 to 400 feet.
WATER QUALITY !
Various water quality data are collected periodically throughout the project area by different
agencies.EBMUD maintains a raw water monitoring program for San Pablo and Upper San
Leandro reservoirs as well as several stream sampling stations at various locations in the
project area,including locations on San Pablo Creek, San Leandro Creek,Moraga Creek and
Laguna Creek. These stations are identified on*Figure 3.2-1. This sampling is conducted as t
part of the EBMUD Watershed Program, and sampling occurs monthly in seven to eight `
locations in each watershed for various parameters. The Contra Costa Clean Water Program
has been conducting stormwater quality monitoring as part of its NPDES permit
requirements, including one station on Walnut Creek in Concord. In addition, the San
Francisco Estuary Institute is conducting a Regional Monitoring Program for Trace
' .r y:a:;>r;rg::.`;w't'::.•fi;..... ..'.x.4;:0:�;,:h rtoriy.ri:;,"•"t.;:ly,•9:,: 'i1R:•sw:i:»:;:;:a+,eq+: .:.7cr.;y.yK.,.r,,e.•.;.:,w;{r;{>�.wh.:::ior�>:.a,,;. rna>Y•:.z+k..+.qv;..;..i,...;.y>;:'.:•:'2':�^:L^'
S::.:aF:?:"•;°."•;crc"yri.•.'L..c;..:::•f•: •::.:•::;.?;400•":;'y�•.o;::..6::.•:�::.::. f � a....,.�....:i;>,::>.:.w.:..;. Fav .: ., 1 . 1
.$<..... }...: :..v, .nh..;.ivff.::...}.;^.�.:...:...T.:...::1::;.•::•:•.:r.:..,..::.�r.:. .. ...:... v•.-'•n±-: -:::v•ni.:n. •::}+ivnii•�^:i:::iv}vii:::i:'.v..G::+l.:i'.i. i4:i�rrvi;:j:{ti i::i: I
"•�.'Y`'s•3.'•.;:»:�:�;:�:a.:c?,:a?Vr.•.�:c<w'•:;;Sn't:,;:.C:cC6:<o:,:.<cak..:v.c.•�,....•.,...•:.u.S.wwaM:�J,c:w:a:w�:�;•c:»�->::;;.. ...,w'G:oo.::cw::liiw::w«skocccuaE3:a:::M1t$::;•�:o`:.ti:3:2'>..v<6«.i,;:i;:aw:•:t.
RAWP%SrQ7JSS.007 . Page 3-32' August 22,1997 i
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Lamorinda Recycled Water Project
Substances,and it includes a water quality monitoring station at Pacheco Creek, which is at
the mouth of Walnut Creek where it flows into Carquinez Strait.
The available water quality data for selected parameters for these various water types are
presented in Table 3.2-2 along with the projected quality of recycled water for comparison.
It should be noted that these data serve for general comparison only, since analytical methods,
reporting protocols and detection limits may differ between the various information sources.
The table also includes water quality objectives for municipal water supply established by the
RWQCB in the Basin Plan for the San Francisco Bay Region. These objectives are presented
to serve as a referende point for acceptable receiving water quality and not for regulatory
compliance. These water quality objectives are also generally consistent with the California
Drinking Water Standards (primary and secondary maximum contaminant levels) in Title 22
f of the.California Code of Regulations for the parameters listed, except for pH, lead, and
silver. The objectives for pH, lead and silver were based on the 1986 Basin Plan.
Upper San Leandro and San Pablo reservoirs are water supply reservoirs for the EBMUD
system, and water quality data can be compared to water quality objectives presented.
Pacheco Creek and storm Water runoff measured in Walnut Creek represent background
conditions in the Walnut Creek watershed;these water bodies are not water supply sources
and water quality data are not intended to be compared with the water quality objectives
,presented in the table. The table also includes EBMM potable water as a basis of
comparison of the recycled water quality with quality of existing irrigation water.
Based on the data presented in Table 3.2-2,the existing water quality of Upper San Leandro
and San Pablo reservoirs appears to be well within the Water Quality Objectives for Municipal
Supply and the California Drinking Water Standards.Pacheco Creek and storm water are also
within these water quality objectives for those parameters shown, even though these waters
are not intended for domestic water supply uses. These general conclusions apply primarily
to metals data, for which the most data are available at the various locations. The recycled
water quality data indicates that it is also high quality, since it is generally within the Water
Quality Objectives for those parameters shown, even though it is not intended to be used for
municipal supply.
{ WYY,.M ^YMC. ..VJ,P. �.;},Y,.,, fro• Y YM:C !AJT .0 `YH
.?a'{s%Q?s9'+.agK,:'fd:: {<QyM?;L:^^;.} �'w}:{ ..:.,•'t.%+:Y•Nt•i.�v.:•,�'./,�. p1^.S�W�`�?.�.P•,..L •:•`.Mf''`•Fil.;�??.: .:Y?'13fSY,:kYQ 7YG a� `Yf•.. Y!:�'+��!RS
.r::??....;;:.::'�..,�.,:.. ,.::.? .•:i..:l•:.Y•:;,•.:::ry.:•;v.}:•.. ,a; - v`• � ..::E::. ?'`.:nr:vt+y,.S;?;w..:r�",rl:..`, >Frb't�.< '•.;??ai:?<H.t :S7:i�
'r.31.:.,•.��h's•«•?.:,`Ya;ica.��CaC:>:c.;,:?:o''G..�:''''>7'GrE•;M•''Y:c:•f:::`n .•.:Li:.•:::.:::..:...::f�..'rwv`�%28:a:.•Y��`c.i�•.. ..�N :.? n�awx3.k�?:h•.:.i.•.uaf a�...c
R:\WP\ST\97JSS.007 Page 3-33 August 22,1997
n act Report
Draft Environmental imp p rt ,
Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Lamorinda Recycled Water Project
Table 3.2-2
Water Quality Of Reservoirs,Creeks,Stormwater,and Project Recycled Water
(all units mg/L unless otherwise noted)
Water
Storm Water Quality
Project Upper San Runoff, EBMUD Objectives,
Recycled Leandro San Pablo Pacheco Walnut Drinking Municipal
Parameter Water() Reservoir() Reservoirs') Creek(4) Creek0) Water(') Su 1
Total Dissolved Solids 510 190 110 5,500 NA 73 500
Specific Conductance, 795 260 • 225 NA NA 118 90
umho/cm
H;units 6.9 7.4 7..4 7.7 7.5 8.5 6.5
ITotal Coliform, 4.2 11 2.2 NA NA ND . N
N/100 ml(8)
Turbidity,NTU 4 2.9 4.8 NA 380 0.05 5.
Giardia(9) ND ND ND NA NA ND N
ryptosporidium(9) ND ND ND NA NA ND N
alcium 35.5 32.3 17.4 NA NA 10 N
agnesium 16.5 13.6 6.6 NA NA 2.8 N
odium 96 18 10.6 NA NA 7.3 N
Chloride 134 9.8 9.7 NA NA 7 250.
Hardness(as CaCO3) NA 101.5 77.9 NA NA 42 N
Bicarbonate 136 93.5 69.1 NA NA 37 N
Ammonia-Nitrogen 14.2 0.07 0.017 0.075 NA NA N
Nitrate(as NO3) 10.1 1.41 0.45 0.84 NA ND 45.
Phosphate 0.86 0.12 0.05 0.2 NA NA N
Adjusted SAP,no 3.4 0.64. 0.45 NA NA 0.34 N
units('O)
Arsenic 0.0012* 0.001 0.0005 0.0022 0.0037 <0.001 0.05
Boron 0.5 0.124 0.053 NA NA 0.026 N
admium 0.0001* 0.00004 0.00006 0.00004 0.00087 <0.00006 0.005
hromium 0.0012* 0.0009 0.0012 0.0036 0.0066 <0.001 0.05
opper 0.0075* 0.0016 0.0032 0.0029 0.0193 0.0042 1.
<0.001* <0.0004 <.0005 0.00053 0.0257 <0.0004 0.05
Mercury 0.00004* <0.00005 <0.00005 0.000007 0.000113 <0.00005 0.002
Nickel 0.0062* 0.002 0.0036 0.00303 0.0217 0.001 0.1
Selenium <0.0004* 0.0002 0.0002 0.00009 0.0002 0.0005 0.05
Silver x0.0003* x0.0035 x0.0035 0.000008 <0.0002 0.002 0.05
Jljinc 0.026* 0.005 0.0111 0.00381 0.077 0.0091 5.
f
• :Kfi}3}:.v Yv•.:.A+±'.wt!M.. M:pY..A,M:.6, •C<,^�'F�±r'^.i•.`;�x:±w.LrM:Yr:� Yx. .,v,::S'... TY<y?:. /r'
.a!Fl.5::..... • F.. "5,.., ?}`.. F L16r.Y,.?:'H»,.±ycrvim;arargc...y^<,r,.;.�3•:;>rw,!::;,r,.t.^.`.'?F,r,;Rwaw:FY!; r.: :±,:t:c.:Y xK,eeFF;cew.?Y. ...^F
;{:....•:ri..r:.±..:..:...... .r. ::. r......r..:,.fi:±?.:>:.o->;:;'•:•,.:,.....?.:::....:•: s:x?•r:-:::,:.:±:.....w.........,.......:...:: :„±:,?�.>F::,:.,,:.;rz•.t..,. ,..:t..r•:..:.,...:..>......?.,..t:. .±.<±•CY±.
6'E:^M,.,w:::.:v.vx::?v.v/4:vA.;.y„ ..•.n.•:::.: :..:.::..:...r ..........,.•:::fi::' vµ. hr.Sf•`p..•'L {r \
x:..v .v r..v:-r..•,v::v..p•.,-:.:vv:-:: v•;:.v.,....x..
.v.x,•...w.Yw.,•rcw.,,c....,?w,•.a±±rrnanv)..,•r.,�3r7.,.o-a,•...,xr•.,..,...,•...n,:t•:,u;::H.w.o.a.w-..r:,.•...v....,,-,,.w.aw:;•:±.••ifu,Ynrx r..,.c:wvar Y;.S:•iiiiii.`,•�FiGr:w..r..w..,;.;;:'s.£:'?;wviw:`rMC:±'C:dc:
R:\WP1STl97JSS.007 Page 3-34 August 22,1997
Cd IM (". u r cu
1` Li .0.
i
CD \
10
V
N ^�
cn �
Q
K.
y
�� �, � ♦oft -�
�,,. �,. h y o ,.♦��� fir, c
G`
M6roy,y»p o � � •;�
•• SY, �e°' � 4
r �. o rn 4,
♦ . r�0
g O
cl
D
•, •r• ,Lf
—
• ••� L L L �Q CSO
�10 e
1
` • n (D yw�
0
� N y
fS. C
' 0 i.
® z -�=�-
y
0 0 0
-
a o o 0 G)
D " ° o a i
7 7 -" LA u r
N O a n y o
0 o O a
7 N rn
^' (D (D f7'1
OL IT
h
r'
r•-rt p D
Ci� (J1 fCA
Ro V
�I0 O Z
Iion
vca � 0 n
0d W=0 mZ
5- m M . D v 7e
'< 0 D D o
CM
57 2.(1) q •u D
no T v d �D 0c -P-
0
��®m
n� —a
2 --0cu cnm �m
0 � � y � o
m 0 ;u
CD 0rn O 4
w o o
OD
1O
V
N
ON r ,,
N ij♦
n
Q.
I?'
- e
1.
' Cr
FAorc
rn Y,
�.
IrID
ON
0 3
C o
I N N
O Q7 N
s
N G o .0 o n c•��'
u
o o o
CD
N 7 Q y H o
p c
p a O o 3 C
H C 0
N
rrt
h
r" O
O�
r
gl b-
I' w
w U3
1'90 tn
N V
� o
�j Z
o 3 mZ
= mo. D
oo= = 3:D
0 9 a) fn D
Nc3c � m
6i 2.IDQ
om z �
c
c� 3 d CDm
�X
w o�•.o 0
. om
N = O N Z 0
;:L = (n (n
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
CLERK OF THE BOARD
TO: Board Members DATE: November 4 , 1997
FROM: Jeanne Magli r
SUBJECT: Public Comment - D. 7
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
Included with your agenda packet was a request from Mr. Tarin to
speak before you today. Mr. Tarin advised me by telephone this
morning that he is unable to appear before you today and will
reschedule for December 2 .
jm
.� The Board of Supervisors �o5sib� �.7 tea "
P Contra Ow
and
CourgAdministmbon BuildingCOSta Co oiAdrt
651 Pine Street,Room 106
335-1900
Martinez,California 94553-1293 'County
.Itrn Roosrs.1st Distrix
Qrtft&Wftm.2nd District —_-
Do"tirbsr,ant ftwo f
No&Dot w*ftr.4th District ;<
.Ow Gsr�ohadMo.Stl�District •:" ,
•T''C iJtl'C� J
October 29, 1997
Mr. Gil Tarin
P. O. Box 85
Knightsen, California 94708
Dear Mr. Tarin:
We are in receipt of your October 29, 1997, letter
requesting time to speak at the next Board Meeting,
(November 4, 1997) .
Public comment for requests such as yours is scheduled
for 2 p.m. at the the November 4, 1997, Board Meeting.
If this time is not convenient for you, the next Board
Meeting is December 2, 1997. In order to confirm the
time for Public Comment at the December 2 meeting, you
will need to telephone this office at 335-1900 on
Wednesday, November 26, 1997.
Yours very truly,
y.:
Jeanne O. Maglio
Chief Clerk
bc: County Counsel
OQACo ec OAQ , 1`tcl7
-To co 5�a 600.rcd ov �5u rvisorS ,
I, w%s1n --o b e �O ceck on -}-he. a q 4-o s }
Pea
recgrd.%,ng code co m � a� and a ea u
� PP proceAres
,
RECEIVED
OGT 2 91997
� i ar n
CLERK BOARD OF FUPERVS,0Rs 1 O , Box $�
P
CONTRA COSTA CC � (��, r �k�
tJ
Ky); 9h�5ernj
510 - 6a5- 159