Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01141997 - D7 D• 7 ....... 'i Contra Costa TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS °; '!"°" '� o County ®e„ �4 FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON ~ DIRECTOR- OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT oosTa'covK'� DATE: January 8, 1997 SUBJECT: REQUEST BY GREG & SANDRA MOORE TO ESTABLISH A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING SITE WITHIN A HILLSIDE AREA ON WHICH THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE HELD BY THE COUNTY AT 7400 JOHNSTON ROAD IN THE TASSAJARA AREA. (File #ZI967624) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION Approve Option A. OPTIONS Option A - Disapprove the Current Proposal, but Allow the Owners to file a Modified Proposal . 1 . The current proposal to provide a residential development site within the area of the dedication of development rights on Parcel C of MS 46-78 is disapproved. 2 . The property owner may file a modified proposal minimally consisting of the following: A. An application to modify MS 46-78 to allow for consideration of possible re-configuration of the existing area of dedicated development rights to exclude the proposed building site. B. An application for small lot review including residential floor plans -and elevations of the proposed residence: CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE� U1 RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COM---!TEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON January 14, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER x See Addendum for Board of Supervisors action. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Bob Drake (335-1214) Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED January 14, 1997 CC: Greg & Sandra Moore PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUN ADMINISTRATOR BY v DEPUTY c:\wpdoc\zi967624 .bo RD\ Proposed Moore Residential Site Tassajara Area C. Applications shall be accompanied by information required by the Rural Residential policies of the Conservation Element of the General Plan; a geotechnical report prepared by a soils engineer which identifies any unstable soils and landslides on the site. D. A waiver of the time limit in the 1982 Grant Deed of Development Rights for the County to act on the modified application. 3 . Review of the the two development permit applications are concurrently reviewed and subject to a noticed public hearing and decided by the Zoning Administrator, unless an appealed, in which case the standard Planning Agency appeal review process would apply. 4 . Staff is authorized to take appropriate enforcement action to remove the mobilehome from the site. Option B - Disapprove the Re est 1 . The current proposal to provide a residential development site within the area of the dedication of development rights on Parcel C of MS 46-78 is disapproved and authorize the Zoning Administrator to administratively disapprove any similar proposal for the next two years . FISCAL IMPACT None. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS This 5-acre property is located near the eastern end of Johnston Road in the Tassajara area. It contains an open horse arena and barn. Subdivision The origins of the subject property stem from a minor subdivision that was approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1979 . The County conditionally approved Minor Subdivision 46-78 which allowed the division of approximately 28 acres into four parcels . The subject property is Parcel "C" of that subdivision. The approval specified that the applicant would be required to dedicate to the County a grant deed of development rights (sometimes called a "scenic easement") for the hillside and ridgeline portion of the property, and to preclude more than one single family residence on each of the four parcels . The record is not entirely clear as to the reason for this restriction. However, it appears that the restriction was prompted by two factors . First, there was a soils report prepared that analyzed the site and identified existing landslides and other indications of soil instability and possible building sites . Second, it appears that there was concern that unless restricted, development might not be visually compatible with the area. In the latter instance, the approval was conditioned to prohibit any development on the higher elevations of the site (generally the southern half) . Litigation Following Subdivision Approval by Applicants -2- Proposed Moore Residential Site Tassajara Area Following the conditional approval, the applicants at the time (McDonald and Duggin) filed a court challenge the requirement to dedicate a grant deed of development rights over a part of the property and other subdivision approval requirements, and proved successful in the Superior Court . In 1980, the Court partially repealed the development rights dedication requirement (the Court deleted a requirement to dedicate development rights above the 900 foot elevation) . However, ;the Court did allowed to stand the dedication requirement as pertains to landslide areas identified in the 1978 Kleinfelder soils report, and to require a dedication to restrict development on each site to a maximum of one residence. Dedication Prior to filing a parcel map, the applicants at the time (McDonald and Duggin) dedicated a grant deed of development rights over portions of each parcel, including the subject parcel . The dedication limits development within a defined geographic area roughly corresponding to the delineated area identified as within a landslide area on the Kleinfelder soils report . Relative to . Parcel C, the dedication affects primarily the southern half of the site, which happens to be the highest in elevation. The northern half of the site (approximately three acres) lies outside of the area affected by the dedication of development rights . The dedication also limits development of the entire site to no more than one single family residence. 1985 Land Use Permit for a Caretaker Mobilehome In 1985, the property was sold to another party, Carre, who applied for and obtained a land use permit to place a mobilehome for occupancy by a caretaker. The caretaker was intended to take care of thoroughbred show horses. The mobilehome was approved for a two year period, with a possible two-year extension if requested. It is staff s understanding that the mobilehome was placed on and remains on the property, though no extension or renewal request of the land use permit has been filed with the County. The mobilehome permit would have expired by May 21, 1987 . PROPOSAL On November 21, 1996, the current owners of Parcel C, Greg & Sandra Moore, filed a request to allow for the establishment of a residential building site on a hillside within the defined area where grant deed of development rights are held by the County. The proposed building site has a slope of approximately 18% . GENERAL INFORMATION General Plan: Agricultural Lands; the site also lies outside the Urban Limit Line. Zoning: Exclusive Agricultural District, A-20 . Deadline for Rendering a Decision The dedication instrument that was filed at the time of the establishment of the subdivision allows the County sixty days to decide whether or not to render a decision on a request to develop within the area where development rights are held by the County. If the County fails to act within that timeframe, , then the dedication specifies that the request is automatically approved. -3- Proposed Moore Residential Site Tassajara Area This request was filed on November 21, 1996 . Therefore, the County has until January 20, 1996 (or, for the Board, effectively January 14, 1997) to render a disapproval decision. Small Lot Review Around 1992, the County modified the small lot occupany review ordinance which would require that there be review and public notice of a proposed residential development on legal lots that are substandard in size before a building permit could be issued. The purpose of this review is to determine whether the project would have impacts on and be compatible with the surrounding area. This site is zoned Exclusive Agricultural, A-20 (min. parcel size of 20 acres) . Because the site is only 5 acres in size, the small lot ordinance will require that the applicant apply for and obtain a development plan approval . In addition to a site plan, such a review would also require provision of residential floor plans and elevations . No such review has been applied for to date, however one would need to be done before the County could issue a building permit . Minimally, the review would require notice of the owners within 300 feet of the site to provide them with the opportunity to request a hearing. If the Board were to grant some form of approval of this request, then the applicant would still have to file for a small lot review before the County could issue a building permit . Concurrent Variance It should be noted that the Moores have concurrently filed a variance application to replace an existing barn with a new and larger barn which would encroach within the required sideyard area (County File #VR961052) . The proposed barn is not within the area of the dedicated development rights and therefore is being processed separately. DISCUSSION Concerns Staff has several concerns with the proposal . • Hazards Associated with Documented Landslide - The submitted site plan contains no information about existing landslides. The site appears to lie on or within one of the slides identified in the 1978 Kleinfelder soils report. The proposed building site may prove to be impossible or highly costly to develop and pose unacceptable risks to future occupants . • Need Standard Information for Evaluating Feasibility of the Site - The site plan does not contain other information (Conservation Element Rural Residential policies) which the County typically considers prior to approval of subdivision applications (e.g. , leachfield location, driveway location, water tanks, etc . ) . • Removal of the Mobilehome - It is staff ' s understanding that the site continues to be occupied by a caretaker mobilehome the permit for which expired several years ago. The mobilehome 'should have been removed (or application filed for renewal of the land use permit) several years ago. Further, if the proposed residence were allowed on the site, the mobilehome would have to be removed in order to comply -4- Proposed Moore Residential Site Tassajara Area with the restriction in the grant deed of development rights that limits the site to a single family residence. • Risk of Undesirable Approval by Failure to Act within Time Limits of Grant Deed - The County may be inclined to allow for consideration of a building site within the restricted area but feel inhibited because failure to act in a timely manner may result in an automatic approval . Any (existing or future) proposal to consider development within the area of dedicated development rights must be acted on within sixty days or the applicant obtains the right to build on the proposed site. Recommended Approach Based on the above considerations, staff would be willing to support the possibility of allowing the proposed building site subject to the following conditions: • The Board denies the current request (stopping the current restrictions from forcing an automatic approval) . • The Moores file a new request with the County to establish a building site at the proposed site; and it is accompanied by standard information which the County presently requires in reviewing proposed building sites in rural areas; the application includes a request to modify the grant deed instrument, and a waiver of the time limits for the County acting on the proposal; • The request is accompanied by a report of a geotechnical engineer assessing the feasibility of the proposed development, and that such report is reviewed by the County Geologist for adequacy; • The Moores concurrently file (1) a small lot development plan application for the proposed residence, and (2) an application to modify the requirements of MS 46-78 which to allow development within a portion of the area where development rights are held by the County; the requests on the small lot review and placement of a residence within the area of restricted development rights would be decided by the Zoning Administrator, or if appealed, in the standard Planning Agency process; and • The Board authorizes staff to take appropriate enforcement action on the existing mobilehome. ALTERNATIVE ACTION If the applicant is unwilling to agree to this approach, then the request should be denied without any recourse to the applicant for development . -5- ADDENDUM TO ITEM D. 7 January 14, 1997 On this date the Board considered staff recommendations on a request filed by Greg and Sandra Moore to establish a residential building site within an area in which the County possesses development rights, 7400 Johnston Road, Tassajara area. Dennis Barry, Community Development Department, presented the staff report on the request and presented the options available for action by the Board of Supervisors . The Board discussed issues with staff including the mobile home and development rights held by the County. The following person presented testimony: Greg Moore, 20 Nadine Place, Danville, applicant, requested more time to respond to the documents before the Board today. Supervisor Uilkema requested clarification on the deadline for the Board to act before the request was automatically approved. Mr. Barry responded that the deadline was January 20, 1997, correcting the date specified in the staff report . Victor Westman, County Counsel, suggested that the Board deny the request today but set the matter for reconsideration next Tuesday. . The Board discussed the requested action. Supervisor Uilkema suggested that the reconsideration be fixed for. January 28, 1997 . Mr. Barry clarified that it would be set for 2 P.M. in the Board chambers . Supervisor Gerber moved to deny the request and schedule the reconsideration in two weeks in the Board chambers at 2 P.M. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Greg and Sandra Moore to establish a residential building site within an area in which the County possesses development rights, 7400 Johnston Road, Tassajara area, is DENIED; and Tuesday, January 28, 1997, at 2 P.M. is FIXED for the Board of Supervisors to reconsider its decision on this matter. 'J 1'r us22"k' i A co t 9 A' d i k } Ll 4� s a 5? 4' co C3 x a r � � t � 0 OZ LAJ p , j Llii 1Z- V Z j kb zgw >It MI ir lz ��l�er � ! � f tit -. ��.\� - /�•:� ���1\ I '4,0Pit, y A lLa � Joo //'CD a. m� Q y �Z Y'f3 n�,•O � Q a e. o h ¢ _ m F- Q W m eo in Vf wl 3 m A UIT •• D A g O W 1� J J _ m J D Dp Y 3 J a g tj X tt W W ' CC 4a :� .. �� < �1 s✓ t r 42 In the Board of Supervisors of arc Costa County, States of Californi JUL 8 1950 � r=✓ COUNTS _ r. ` July 1 19 80 F pal In the Mow of Decision on Conditions of t� ' Approval and Final Lot : for Minor S­hdivisio46-78. ij Tassaj arm The Board on June 24, 2980 having conducted a public hearing and deferred decision to this date on the conditions of approval and the final alignment of lot lines to be imposed on the application of Dennis McDonald and Daniel Duggan for,Minor_Subdivision 46-78 in the a; A. A. Dehaesus, Director of ;Planning, having submitted a July 1, 1980 memorandum .(at the 'request of the Board) responding to the applicants' objections to .certain ,proposed conditions of approval; and Harvey Bragdon, Assistant Director of Planning, having commented on the proposed conditions for a four-lot subdivision, and having advised that stuff recommends that the 900-foot height restriction be retained, that Conditions Nos. 6 and 7 relating to a soils engineer report be deleted. that Condition No. 12 be amended toprovide for a 16-foot all-weathered gravel road to serve Parcele "C" and "D" and a graveled hammerhead turnaround area, that Condition No. 14 pertaining to dedication of land for future road purposes be retained. and that original Condition No . 15 requiring paving of access driveways over 13 percent in grade be imposed; and Supervisor F. H. Hasseltine having. concurred with staff' s recommendations, and having recommended that Minor Subdivision No. 46-78 be approved for four lots subject to conditions and final alignment of lot line:; as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and by reference made U part hereof; IT IS BY THF. BOARD ORDERED that the recommendauiorl of _ Supervisor 11assE'_tine is APPROVED. g(� 0 )-�g 7�% PASSED by Clip Board on July 1, 1960 . I JUL 10 19W CONCORD Approval and Final Lot �- z for Minor S­hdivisio 46 _ ' _ 4 t. - - - - _ T8888j8ra The Board on June 24. 1980 having conducted a public hearing and deferred decision to this data on the conditions of approval and the final alignment of lot lines to be imposed on the application of. Dennis McDonald and Daniel Duggan for Minor Subdivision 46-78 in the a; A. A. Detlaesus. Director of Planning, having submitted a July 1. 1980 memorandum (at the request of the Board) responding to the applicants' objections to.;certain,proposed conditions of approval.; and 5 Harvey Bragdon. Assistant: Director of Planning, having commented on the proposed conditions for a four-lot subdivision, and havi:ig advised that staff recommends that the 900-foot height restriction be retained, that Conditions Nos. 6 and 7 relating to a soils engineer report he deleted. that Condition No. 12 be amended to provide for a 16-foot all-weathered gravel road to serve Parcele "C" and "D" and a graveled ha=erhead turnaround area, that Condition No. 14 pertnLning to dedication of land for future road purposes be retained. and that original Condition No. 1.5 requiring paving of access driveways ovar 13 percent in grade be imposed; and Supervisor M. H. Hasseltine having concurred: with staff's recommendations. and having :recommended that Minor Subdivision No. 46-78 be approved. for four lotil`, sub j act to. conditions and final alignment of lot linea as setforth in Exhibit B attached hereto and by reference made a part,. hereof; IT IS BY THE. BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Hasseltine is APPROVED. gTfgW% PASSED by the Board on July 1, 1980. JUL 10 M D CONCORD ENVIRONMENTAL. HEALTH 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order cnl"ed on the minutes of said Boord of Superviwrs cn the dote oforesoid. Wane= my fidand th.: scat of Ifio [bard of Supervison CC : TIcDonald & Duggan affixed this let day of July 1980 Isakson & Associates , Inc. John E. Waltz Director of Planning public Works Director gy -ra- �- _, f,r.F,t,ry Clark County Counsel '.ounty Health l:. ,) .t.L,trient 01/ Vera Nelsen CONDIMNS F'OR APMtOVAL OF MINOR SUINlMMON 46-7E 1. This regi" is approved for four (4)parcels. wihstantinlly in conformance with the Staff Study datt.414-340.:.The following conditions require compliance prior • to filing the Parcel Map unless othe rwlse Indicated. A01,:_ : 2; Applicant shall dedicate development rights to the County for: 1) more than one single family residence on each parcel; 2) above the 9W contour on each Parcel; and 3) over the Identified landslide areas (geotechnical report by Klein Felder dt AssoclatM Sept r>rt w 21, 1973). 3. The applicant shall pay $1200 for park dedication fee. 4. C imply with that requlrem+e s of the Tassajara County Fire District. • 3. Comply with the: requirements of the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Departtne nt. 6. The applicant shall submit grading plans for review and approval of the Planning Department prior to Issuance of grading permits. 7. The applicant shall submit a sol! reconnaissance: report for review and approval of the Planning Department.;:: ' ;., This m divislon Wt viii approved subject too the applicant obtaining accessary appco County Health Department for the utilization of Individual sewge disposal on each parcel. 9. The applicant shall dema><stcate that water is available to the subject property from eithen ..'1) public rvaW:supply; or 2) one well per Wt which meets the following capacity requireiv ehts to be verified through the Health Department: s (a) one gallon a minute: pumped continuously for 4 hours with 1,040 gallon storage; or (b) 3 gallons a minute pumped continuously for 4 hours with 500 gallons storage; or (c) 3 gallons a minute pumped continuously for 4 hours Eno storages required). 10. The 25, easement serving Parcels "C" grid "D" shall be developed as a 16-foot all-weather gravel road. A hammerhead turnaround area, also developed as a 16-foot all-weather gravel road, shall be establisher! at the terminus of thr easement. , 11. It archaeologic materials are uncovered during site preparation, gradin,, trcoching or other on-site excavation, earthwork within 30 meters of these materials shall be stopped until a professional archaeologist, Who is certified by the Society for California Archaeology (SCA) and/or the Society of Professional Archaeology (SOPA), has had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation measures, if they are deemed neces- sary. 12. Comply with the requirements of the County Public Works Department as • MS 46-78 d 'fit t outlined in their memo dated 3-3-78 and attached hereto. 13. Access to Parcel "A" shall be by means of a 201 non-exclusive easement locatea • across Parcel "B". All portions of the access driveway exceeding i 3% slope shall be'paved to a width of 121. The access driveway shall exceed a maximum slope of 20%. .` The following statements are clot'condhlons of approval. However, you sl aid be aware of them prly to requesting building permits on the parcels of this minor I subdivision. A. The developer shall comply with the San Ramon Valley Unified Sc',,oul District policy as it relates to contribution of fund, i;,r the developm...�: •}� school facilities wlthin the District. (The San Rac.ion Valley Unified Schkh)! District's Developer's Policy). • KGtlsw 7-2-80 L,ns i i +x.r t • �+ x ;F.' I8VA42 aRLILi 0W FOS Q STAMP(MLY) ,► � iii///aaa sit �ti1.r ai•,AITOIMIM AT RAMI t• '�P.NfM.R�1 ii r � �J � O a 4 ` SEP 17 1980 b Auornays far petitioners I..,OLSSON,CoArtay Verk CO?tftt.1 CU SI'A COUNTY 61 P"_ ■ � •, 1. 7_: + $ '` SUPERIOR;`COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF -CONTRA COSTA ' 9 DENNIS D. McDONALD and DANIEL A. DUGGAN, JR. , 10 No. 194G81 � * Petitioners, 'L n_ JUDGMENT AND ORDER fir...,. VS 321 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, et •al. , k Respondents '. .� 14 ': 15 1 •` 161 The above entitled cause came on regularly for hearing on t r 3.7 September 4 , 1980, in Department 7 of the above entitled court, 3,8; the Honorable' Martin E.. Rothexerg presiding, Dennis D. McDonald 19 and Daniel A. Duggan, Jr. appearing on behalf of petitioners and 20 victor J. Westman, Assistant County Counsel, appeared on behalf of z 21 the respondents. F 22 Evidence, both oral and documentary , was introduced cn 23 behalf of the respective parties .and the cause was argued and sub- 24 mitted for decision. The court having considered the arguments of 25 counsel, and being fully advised, makes the following judgment and 26 order: 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, •AJUDI-CATED AND DECREED that the 28 conditions- for approval of minor subdivision 46-78Vbe mo Pied in { ''•, 1.' •. '.� }i1f 1 . .,...w,•,...•.,.... . ..... i ...... ...... fo ..� 34 •• ate 7}.; rt .on}of Condition:-Nob 2 whereby, the applicants t 6 dedicate -the.d" apmeAtal rights to the . . l x} :�si.• •►'' t r' .•. styt .i y'at:t� -t..K:i �, f bOtittt�j};abO1tA the 94Q rfOQt:. Ct�ntdur b aCh•parcel i9} deleted. ■ vti. ?'_. .ems. "'`..,o, f,.,...- Thg po�ction.o�ftCondition Nq��„2„regmtring the applicants comp .yJohnston-Rroad exteriaion dedication recui re-- .. 7 i=At of tha.Countys Publim',Works Department as outlined in its . ay 5, 197 me�eo,tip: , .pa gxaph conditions A.,r 8.,R. & k4j. r .1 �r } `thereoty is�a3slot+ed. - In'its plaaa`�;tbs.:applicants ora► hereby' dedicate as portion of their- property .asoutlined in bait tt� rtio 'a "a.10:1 h access'•.+easement, contained on both they applioanta� propertyr an on the.:adiacent property. .�.. ,;- pro'Visinn of the.,��id;60..foot'..accers easement- serving Parcels 24 "C" and OD" shall satisgp Condi.ti on of:Approval. No. 10 t s t formerly .� 1.5-` aumbe. d "12"y 25`foot easem"t arca � icatit�n requirement. F.y �r to lieiog°Gonc'�3,tion No '`13.° all. dtveway4 are to avoid a 17 Adentified lanclalide areas and-follow the natural contours of 'c. 18 _14S 46-7819 yards closely, as P02-a'ible to be appzaved by the 19 Planning Department and paved wherever they exceed a 13-1 slope ' 20 21 Dated: . < •-C� 22 23 24 :MARYIN .E. ROTH E,:t 4,:) 25 Ju ge i artin .E. P..ol he Marg C 2E 27 APPROVED AS TO L'OR`I: 28 i JO" B. CLAUSEIJ' 29 County Counsel 30 31 VICTOR J. W€S i MAN 32 nv V.: 7 J. �'i8 atTil3Zi 33 As. -s tan t County Counsel 34 35 30 -2- rr;.;L WOW at vie Request oh Jff 1 � 11 ,�( � ^ OF I�'i!O ti CUNTRA.COSTA Cd1RTY r ^n Me QQT u 1 b t« PROD.'PLAR.'b SPEC.PROJ ) A gM PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. I t/' ! 151982 Ri:'i'.; _ .�ufXNS.T`c6�n-_. 4` RECORDS SECTION (:^ i + _.5�.6v<<'c_¢T�M3:_ 63 GRANT DEED AT aocK M. 2u�--• U6o - UZ3 XNTRA COF COUNTY RECORDS J. R. OLSSOt� 41 C FEES RECOiZD1�1•F L - � FEE+ V s o meet condition number 2 of Minor Subdivision-number M.S. 46-78, we, G�o/ Dennis D. McDonald, Daniel A. Duggan, Jr., and Montebello Capital Cor- ll poration (owners). hereby grant to the"County of Contra Costa, a govern- mental subdivisionof the State of California, Grantee, and its govern- C>1 mental successor or successors, the future "development rights", as defined /U herein below over those portions of that real property described in the ,Co v r attached Exhibits A and B. "Development Rights" are defined to mean and refer to the right to approve tttJJJ or disapprove of any proposed construction, development.or improvement within the areas marked "Development Rights Deeded to Contra Costa County". C The "development rights" are and shall be a form of negative easement which shall run with the said property and shall bind the current owner and any future owners of all or any portion of said property. In the event of a disapproval of proposed construction by the Grantee or its successor said proposed construction shall not be performed. Grantee or its successor may condition its approval of any proposed construction upon prior or sub- sequent performance of such conditions as Grantee may deem appropriate. Any owner or owners of all or any portion of said property desiring to develop any improvement requiring the approval of Grantee or its successor I herein shall submit,to such entity a written proposal describing the nature, extent and location of such. improvement. Grantee or its successor shall have sixty (60) days from receipt of such proposal in•which to grant its approval or disapproval.. Failure by Grantee or its successor to respond in said time period shall be equivalent to the approval of such proposal. .. G Dennis D. McDonald Daniel A. Duggan, Y" Montebello Capital Co tion Datedi cwv�rZ 16 'l 8 State of 1 Califoon County Of ame a on this i Ifo , day of Q - 1 the N, { year , befog te, r a notary puTTTc in an or sa oouty and State ( per ovally appeal°dd _ A4 nown to me t— ooe- t e person es sen are subscribed to the foregoing statement, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same. otary public In and fort e MW M. =Rn County of Alameda, State of t, .M wrmyPUBLIC __ California. }MY COMMISSION DIMS WL td,I== (Corporation) 0855r.���Sip ( STATE OF CALIFORNIA f COUNTY OF 58nta Cruz fig. June 24, 1982 I On before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said State,personally appeared Martin H._F},accaclio wknown to me to he the President,and ZiFftL k, i known to me to be Secretary of the corporation that executed the within Instrument, tr known to me to he the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bydawa or a revolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand a t sea). OFFlCIAL SEAL 1$' ' � MARSHA IC-CALIFORNIA ROSS! Signal �1.� NOTARY FDA'FIL • IN SANTA CAUL COUNTY Marsha A. Rossi MYCemmnuasEstMr«ow.».tags —..._ - - Name (Typed or printed) i I 1 44 •i"i. EXHIBIT A Portions of that parcel of land designated on that certain Record of Survey filed in the Office of the Recorder of Contra Costa County on March,8, 1977, in Book 62 of Licensed Surveyors Maps at Page 9, described in the following parcels. -- PARCEL 1 Commencing at the northwest corner of said Record of Survey (62 LSM 9); thence from said point of commencement South 45022'22" East, 118.32 feet to the true point of beginning; thence from said true point of beginning the following courses: South 51030'00" East,,225.00 feet; South 22°00'00" _... East, 170.00 feet; South W00'0011 West, 80.00 feet; North 58°00'00" West, 205.00 feet; North 11007132" West, 198.64 feet; and North 37°00'00" East, 90.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Containing an area of 57,290 square feet of land, more or less. PARCEL 2 Commencing at the southwest corner of said Record of Survey (62 LSM 9); thence from said point of commencement along the southern line of said Record of Survey (62 LSM 9) South 89°45132" East, 756.82 feet to the true point of beginning; thence from said true point of beginning leaving said southern line the following courses: North 51000100" West; 280.00 - feet; South 46000'00"West, 150.00 feet; North 12°30100" West, 90.00 feet; North 23000'00" East, 60.00 feet; North 58030'00" East 180.00 feet; North 27000100" East, 120.00 feet; South 88000100" East, 200.00 feet; South 53000'00" East, 150.00 feet; South 31030100" East. 245.00 feet; and South 56000'38" West, 197.92 feet to a point on said southern line; thence along said southern line North 89045'32" West, 170.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Containing an area of 174,171 square feet of land, more or less. PARCEL 3 Commencing at the southeast corner of said Record of Survey. (62 LSM 9); thence from said point of commencement along the eastern line of said Record of Survey (62 LSM 9) North 3056113" West. 235.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence heaving said eastern tine the following courses: South 4903010011 West, 90.00 feet; North 50°00'00" West, 180.00 feet; North 7000100" West, 195.00 feet; North 45000100" East, 80:00 feet;""Wrth 870001001" East, 120.00 feet; and South 12057147" East, 204.12 feet to a - point on said eastern line; thence along said eastern tine South 3056113" East, 115.00 feet to the true point of beginning. Containing an area of 61,680 square feet of land, more or less. i ' S�I � :�iYh#:.�4e'rll'bY✓a ,..-,y1t.s .• "� �,p:::rt';tf: ...x.iyr:': t r THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFVHPIIA Adopted this Order on July 13 198 _ by the follovrinp`yeti: AYES: SupervisorsPower%, Fanden,.Schroder, Torlakson., McP.eak,. NOES: None. ABSENT: Nano, ABSTAIN: None. 5 SUBJECT: Authorizing Acceptance of Instrument(s). IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following Instrument(s) (1s/are) hereby ACCEPTED: INSTRUMENT REFERENCE GRANTOR AREA Grant Deed of MS 46-78 Dennis D. McDonald, Tassajara Development Rights et al. t hereto e+ert�ry th st tlue h e we eM eoneat eN1►M an esgof taken Ile aM$,nd�.M_ N 1M Heard of Wpervleor}.U4^ 1 ATTAITQOt J.R.OLOSON,COUNTY CLlftK and ex eflolo Clark of the Bard J By ,Deputy Diane M.Hormar► 0/'14 I Orls t Publ lc Works (LD) �s oo: •carder (via LD) then PW Records Director of Plan0ing '. . ' END OF IDOCUMENT •I��rt 'k'e di r' . „t. .1 � { W � ' eat •.'_� �� � • r b.L% a Lk ®r: RVIN :a � 911 . z 1 _ ,. a� s� Jim IX IL 02 I A .OLL uQ Q aip� a i :1 G W W4r s. JE 1t, K _ `"�$�i ,iia � � .• vi •� "meq -�,7 F�' -`•"'•• �� � yg5b$1$w • ar �.� oto �tu� --��an i ,� �• �� �.. k £rx�e�z x. �„ x� .r i1V�1 'oaasys�o4v,hx� 2 -+moo--z t�Ys�t ffi s� i g! lozo Uri �: °` �a.��.. Hosl�fr� . • fir: �� 1 - 6. ka �� ' - �' � 1 a a�M iL atilag o . �� a ix M> . r4 v 4D�'i +�oiory & co jz pit QLD m Qa 07 � (3 oil .140 -j Wcc 4 �c • a.. " s �► fillMeg 9. }�a«�' �'• se�'0�i0 iTi�irfi - , -- CONTRA COSTA COUNTY . c COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVED PERMIT APPLICANT: Emil & Cate Carre APPLICATION N0. 2059-85(A)- 6475 Camino Tassajara Pleasanton, CA 94566 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 204-170-003 OWNER. same as above ZONING DISTRICT: A-2 EFFECTIVE DATE: May 21, 1985 This matter not having been appealed within the time. prescribed by law, a permit for temporary caretaker mobile home, is hereby granted; subject to the attached conditions. ANTHO4 A. DEHAE S Dir d r of m ity velopment gy: r; ey EVE don,Acting Zoning Administrator Unless otherwise provided, THIS PERMIT WILL EXPIRE ONR frim he effective date, if the use allowed by this permit is not established within that time. PLEASE NOTE THE EFFECTIVE DATE, as no further notification will be sent by this office. CONDITIONS OF,APPROVAL FOR CARETAKER MOBILE HOME - LUP #2059-85(A) 1. The permit is granted to Emil and Cate Carre and is not transferable. 2. The permit is granted for the use of a mobile home for a caretaker only. The occupant of the mobile home shall be primarily employed as a caretaker of the subject property and shall be present on the site most hours of the day. 3. The mobile home shall be removed from the.premises when itis no longer needed for the above use. 4. The. mobile home shall contain not less than 220 square feet of floor area as defined by the Health and Safety Code. 5. The mobile home shall be placed on the property generally as indicated on the plot pian submitted with the application. The sideyard shall be a minimum of 20 feet from the property line. 6. The applicant shall obtain the necessary utility permits and comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa County Health Department and Building Inspection Departm ent. 7. The mobile home shall have a smoke/fire alarm system installed which shall also sound in t2ie main residence after it is constructed. 8. This permit is approved for two years at which time applicant may apply for a renewal for an additional two years. 9. State requirements on weed abatement to be met by owners, including clearance. of 30 feet around residence and 10 feet along property lines, 'in accordance with require- ments of the Tassajara Fire Protection District. ' cam► 96NOV 22 PM Is 06 1 ^ qs D�1' 4 W 1 DEI1 -- i�zi �W eWOO:.1go. J fir' p2� y o w — i V :Z:° 0010i N 9909:., OOfOf;. I � 60 -470 h I I • X31 �1 8tiu ;� �G h 3� /1 ------------ 14 ~@ ie 's .Is•.Fr 2OII y Y�^33 W v V W y V w GGG�q=666.3 1,411 3 i S lJ --;, ,.,l ,�.•',,F �✓ I't,' \ ��i T,ras aar• ka , _ �\ C-`_/app _ ', ,� - - i / i T. 2 Jsqu 6 iX t t.: `)Cl,,� . �` ` •y Tassajara '\` \� r 1 .MBM 713 Q a $0 0 /� i i / t ter` ✓ U i 7 J� r i i . / 1���� \.its\ �\ � . � •- — .\�_- \ ( - BM 616 -Q /oo r✓�/ _ J _ X''i ��g,. \ _. C "�\ 1`�;1 ��~ \� O U .i /fir_. %^\ i _\ `�"'•-r1' \ �_^\� \;'-.., �/'_� 1 ,\> -00 \ ,��, •: i� , '' /\�', / -f i / / `_ Lam`~ - t,( ���;� Jnr,`C�'\/ / ICtC� o sea 1 ' .\i.�, ) - N: RI .r'-'\'-'=", c� t 7� •i \ �. ,j' ._i:' - \i r\� �...� C l __ .l goo /.. .�- ' : � �•a{'�- , , `y �,�� l�,W :i!( :�c' \\ / ,�l___.—\ :. 1._ `\ •� a ,'o 't ,.��� �- � �� •�-�, '�, � - \ ),;ti \\ j// - �.. \�� �--v-'- ;•}�' ' r.,.�1 j Vim" J��� � i�. G.s ..�� \ i /\\ /aoo �. �, ;,`��\�r�op N nd p y3s+u.TO U s.s 'spl .1610000 FEET e02 -' -- `/1 .._`...11- - v `30 I PCEASANTON 6.6 Ml, - !04 )POGRAPHIC BASE MAP BY U.S.GEbLOGICAL SURVEY November 21, 1996 Gregory & Sandra Moore 20 Nadine Place Danville, CA 94526 County Of Contra Costa Attn: Planning Department 651 Pine North Martinez, CA 94553-1352 Re: Development Rights as recorded on April 24, .1981 in Grant deed to subdivision MS. 46-78 Parcel C 7400 Johnston Road, Pleasanton, CA Dear Planning Department: Greg and Sandra Moore are requesting to build in the area deeded Development Rights to the County of Contra Costa dated, April 24, 1981. Our request is to build approximately a 4500 square foot two story Mediterranean Style Stucco,- which will be built to blend in with the .natural surrounding environment in the requested building envelope. Enclosed are pictures of the surrounding hills from the proposed building site. As we have checked with our neighbors this building siteis not a problem to teem. Also enclosed is a copy of Parcel Map 62LSM9 showing the neighbors two-story garage and barn in the area as destinated as deeded area of Development Rights . If you have any further questions regarding this proposal please contact Greg or Sandra at 510-272-0218 days, or evenings at 510-820-1378. We would appreciate your quick response to this matter . i ely.. . g Moore attac nts