Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09091997 - D5 D-E .Off, ' - Contra `t Costa. TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ;S County FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDONy;;� !' •,��`` DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT °SrA covK�•� DATE: July 16, 1997 SUBJECT: Appeal of the County Planning Commission Decision by Save Mount Diablo on Chevron (Applicant) - State of California (Owner) , County File #LP972015 to Renew the Land Use Permit for an Existing Communication Facility on the North Peak of Mount Diablo SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Adopt the findings contained in Resolution No. 22-1997 as the Board's own. 2 . Uphold the decision of the County Planning Commission and deny the appeal of Save Mount Diablo. FISCAL IMPACT None. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The background for this project is contained in the May 27 , 1997 staff report to County Commission ("Commission") . At the May 27, 1997 hearing, the Commission took testimony and closed the hearing and approved the permit with a modification to Condition of Approval #2 , reflecting assignment of the application. Testimony during the hearing focused on the County' s current Communications Tower Policy, advances in new technology and length of the permit. The decision of the Commission was appealed by Save Mount Diablo. The appeal letter is included with this Board Order. The issues of appeal are summarized below with staff response. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: x YES SIGNATURE wl �' RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD CO TEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON September 9, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x_ OTHER x _ See the attached Addendum for the Board's-action. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A _X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT - - - - - TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact:Debbie Chamberlain - 335-1213 Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED September 9, 1997 cc: County Administrator PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF Public Works THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Applicant (via CDD) AND COUNTN ADMINISTRATOR B (� , DEPUTY 2 . Issue #1: "While changes in the structures were not proposed, neither was current technology allowing more visually sensitive design considered. Staff Response to #1: The application as proposed did not include any modifications to the existing tower. The applicant testified that Chevron is currently working toward the installation of satellite technology that could reduce the number of antennas on the existing tower and consolidate users. Chevron does not plan this installation until the end of 1997 and continuing through the determined that Chevron wasm attempting to®consolidate thedvarious users through the installation of new technology that could make the towers more "visually sensitive". Additionally, the findings made by the Commission in approving the application stated that while the towers are visible to the surrounding area, they do not detract from the visual quality. Issue #2 : "County's Communications Tower Policy is out of date. . . " Staff Response to #2 : The 1997 Communications Tower Policy is the current policy of the County. To reflect the concern of Save Mount Diablo, the Commission by Resolution 23-1997 is requesting the Board of Supervisors study appropriate modifications to reflect current and anticipated trends in the communications industry. The Commission determined based on information in the record that absent any changes in the Tower Policy, to reduce the term of the permit ' to less than standard 20 years granted to other communication sites throughout the County would be arbitrary and capricious. Issue #3 : "Like the Tower Policy, the permit conditions are not appropriate to the current situation and the permit period is far too long. " Staff Response to #3 : The issue of appeal is extremely vague and does not identify which of the conditions of approval are not appropriate nor does the appellant recommend any modifications. The conditions as presented, include a 20-year term, the requirement for a five-year review to ensure compliance, maximum overall height, intensity of use and parameters for replacement equipment. Additionally, the Commission at any five-year review can add, delete, or change conditions based on evidence submitted at time of the review. Save Mount Diablo has continuously requested that the term of the permit be limited to one-year while other information is collected, with the overall term of the permit not to exceed 10 years. The applicant testified that they are working toward consolidation of users but would not be reducing the overall height of the tower. Additionally, conditions of approval for this land use permit and LP752203 does not limit the number of users that can locate on the tower. The Commission in approving the application acknowledged that advances in technology would allow the consolidation of users. However, absent any evidence of a non-compliance by Chevron and changes in the current policy this does not warrant reducing the term of the permit below the consistent 20-year term granted to other communication site throughout the County. Issue #4 : "Permit renewals are the County's opportunity to improve existing impacts (General Plan Policy 9-24) and improvement and update of the County's Communication Towers Policy would be an opportunity to provide guidance when structures are proposed on peaks and scenic ridgelines (General Plan Policy 9- C) . " 3 . Staff Response to #4 : The applicant testified that Chevron is currently working towards satellite technology that would reduce the number of antennas on the existing tower and consolidate users, but would not eliminate or reduce its overall height. The Planning Commission determined that no physical change to the environment was occurring with approving this application and while the tower is visually apparent, it does not detract from the visual quality of the surrounding area and provides significant communication benefits. Additionally, the Planning Commission by Resolution #23-1997 recommends the Board of Supervisors review of the Policy to determine if appropriate modifications can be made to reflect current and anticipated trends in the communications industry. Based on the evidence in the record and review of the appeal letter, staff finds that there is no new information which was not presented to the County Planning Commission at the time of their decision. Staff recommends that the Board uphold the decision of the County Planning commission and deny the appeal . DJC/aa BD/2015-97 .DJC Addendum for Item D.5 Agenda September 9, 1997 This is the time noticed by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors for hearing on the appeal by Save Mount Diablo (Appellant) from the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission on the application by Chevron (Applicant), and the State of California (Owner), County File #LUP 2015-97, for approval to continue the use of an existing communications facility at the top of the north peak of Mount Diablo. Debbie Chamberlain, Community Development Department, presented the staff report and recommendations on the matter. She advised the Board that a tentative agreement had been reached between the parties. She also noted that Condition No. S was modified so that the tower permit term would be for 10 years and would be considered for renewal every 3 years at a public hearing. Ms. Chamberlain advised that an additional condition could be imposed that would require Chevron to remove equipment within a reasonable time that was no longer needed at the tower site. She commented that the Community Development staff will prepare a report for the Board's consideration to review the County's tower policies. The public hearing was opened, and the following people presented testimony: Jeff Truskey, Esq., 555 Market Street, San Francisco; Seth Adams, Save Mount Diablo, P.O. Box 5376, Walnut Creek; Mary Delamater for Lucy E. Viera Trust, 9495 Marsh Creek Road, Clayton. All those desiring to speak having been heard, the hearing was closed and the Board discussed the issues presented. Supervisor Uilkema moved the staffs recommendations with modifications relative to this permit application. Supervisor DeSaulnier seconded the motion. Dennis Barry requested clarification whether the motion was intended to grant the appeal in part and deny it in part, and approve the Land Use Permit with modified conditions. Supervisor Uilkema concurred that was the intent of the motion. Supervisor Gerber moved that the Board consider the discussion of tower policies as an item that was not posted on today's Board agenda. Supervisor DeSaulnier seconded the motion. Following Board discussion, and the Community Development Department's affirmation that a review of tower policies would come before the Board in the coming weeks, Supervisors Gerber and DeSaulnier withdrew their motion and second. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the hearing is CLOSED; staffs recommendations 1 and 2 are APPROVED as amended; the appeal of Save Mount Diablo (Appellant) from the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission,on the application by Chevron (Applicant), and the State of California (Owner), County File # LUP 2015-97 is DENIED in part and granted in part with amended conditions; and the Community Development Department is DIRECTED to prepare the appropriate documents for the Board's consideration relative to tower policies. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPROVED PERMIT APPLICANT: Chevron APPLICATION NO. LP972015 6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd., #2160 San Ramon, CA 9 4583 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 078-110-002 OWNER: State of California ZONING DISTRICT: A-2 1416 - 9th Street , Sacramento, CA 95814 APPROVED DATE: 9/9/97 EFFECTIVE DATE: 9/9/97 This is to notify you that the Board of Supervisors has granted your request for a land use permit, subject to the attached conditions. DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP Interim Community Development Director PLEASE NOTE THE EFFECTIVE DATE, and be aware of the renewing requirements as no further notification will be sent by this office. it CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR LAND USE PERMIT 2015-97 AS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON SEPTEMBER 9 1997 1. This application is approved for one communication tower and equipment shelter, subject to the following conditions. 2. This permit is granted to Chevron, its successors and assign only for Site#2. 3. Approval is granted specifically for: A. Site#2(Chevron):Microflect guyed tower(or similar), not to exceed 70-feet and an approximately 10'x 26'x 9' equipment shelter. 4. The overhead power lines approved with this application shall be subject to further evaluation (undergrounding, relocation, removal or retention) at the required reviews. 5. Any additional generator/transformer shall be subject to review and approval by the Zoning Administrator prior to placement. 6. Location of all power lines from existing or proposed generators/transformers shall be subject to Zoning Administrator review and approval. 7. Any expansion of the facilities beyond the limits of this permit will require the filing of a new land use permit. 8. This permit shall expire June 1, 2007, and shall be reviewed every three years at public hearing before the County Planning Commission for the purpose of determining the need to add, delete or change conditions. The next review shall occur in June, 2000 and shall be initiated by the permittees submitting statements as to continued compliance with the conditions of approval to the County Community Development Department no later than May 1, 2000. The statement shall be accompanied by a complete set of dated photographs of each permittees improvements and appropriate filing fee. 9. All structures shall be removed upon termination of this use. A qualified biologist/botanist, or resource specialist shall supervise the removal of any structure. 10. The conditions contained herein shall be accepted by the permittees and their agents, lessees, assignees, survivors or successors for continuing obligation. 11. The sites shall be maintained in an orderly manner. �r 2 12. Transmitting and receiving antennas, including microwave dishes, may only be located on approved towers. No such equipment shall at any time be located even temporarily, on buildings, poles or vegetation, except during an emergency for the purpose of restoring communication services. Should such an emergency occur the permittee shall immediately advise the Community Development Department by letter stating the nature of the emergency, the nature of the temporary relocation, and the anticipated repair time. 13. Replacement equipment shall not exceed in size that currently on site(excepting the tower maximum height defined in Condition#3) except as required by FCC for technical reasons or building codes for structural safety reasons subject to approval by the Zoning Administrator. 14. Antenna height shall be limited to a maximum 20-feet above tower height. 15. Non-compliance with any condition by a permittee may be cause to revoke this permit as related to the non-conforming permittee only, after due notice and public hearing. 15. The area around all facilities shall be kept free of all extraneous material. Clearing of the sites shall only be allowed to the degree necessary to prevent fire hazard. 17. Chevron shall remove equipment no longer needed on the tower within a reasonable period of time that such use ceases. DJC/aa LPVIW2015-97c.DJC 4/7/97 5/27/97 - CPC (a) 9/9/97 -BS (a) err