HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02041997 - C55-C68 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
. Contra
FROM: Barton J. Gilbert, Director of General Services f Cost
- Coun
DATE: February 4, 1997 '"`�"
SUBJECT: LEASE FOR THE HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
SPECIFIC REQUESTS OR RECOMMENDATION(S)8 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDATION
APPROVE a Lease, commencing October 15, 1997, with Riverhouse Hotel for the premises at 710
Alhambra Avenue, Martinez, for occupancy by the Health Services Department, under the terms
and conditions more particularly set forth in said Lease, and AUTHORIZE the Director of General
Services to EXECUTE said Lease on behalf of the County.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT
Payments required are to come from the budget of the Health Services Department.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND
Provide for use of office space as requested by the Health Services Department.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT' VES RIGNATLIRE v
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR —RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): Q r�
ACTION OF BOARD ON �r�. -�� \q 1 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED V/ OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT 1
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
MEDIA CONTACT: BARTON J.GILBERT(313-7100) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF O SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. �I
CC: County Administrator(via UM) AnESTED�.L,kl rm�., I q 1�
County Auditor-Controller(via UM) PHIL BATCHELOR,CLOK OF THE BOARD of
Lessor(via UM) SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Health Services Department(via L/M)
County Counsel(via UM) /
Risk Management(via UM)
Ong:General Services Department-UM BY .iA . a Al n ca . lJ ��:DEPUTY
Buildings and Grounds(via LIM)
710130.197 PB:dp M382 (10/88)
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS �OCI C
FROM: Barton J. Gilbert, director of General Services
'' Co
Go ty
DATE: February 4, 1997
SUBJECT: LEASE OPTION FOR THE HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
SPECIFIC REQUESTS OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
L RECOMMENDATION
Board of Supervisors to EXERCISE, on behalf of the County, its first option to extend the Lease,
dated December 20, 1994,with Margaret M.Morgan for the premises at 2400 Sycamore Drive, Suite
33, Antioch, for continued occupancy by the Health Services Department, under the terms and
conditions more particularly set forth in said Lease Option.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT
Payments required are to come from the budget of the Health Services Department.
III. REASONS FOR RFCOMMENDATIONBACKGROUND
Provide for continued use of office space as requested by the Health Services Department.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT:_YES SIGNATURE:
—RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR —RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): y
ACTION OF BOARD ON f)a�- Q� {�-t APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT t
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
MEDIA CONTACT: BARTON J.GILBERT(313-7100) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS
1j ON THE DATE SHOWN.
,I
CC: County Administrator(via L/M) ATTESTED 7J� T 19 97
County Auditor-Controller(via UM) N`"r'L`�
Lessor(via LIM) PHIL BATCHELOR,CLOK OF T4 843OOF
Health Services Department(via UM) SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
County Counsel(via UM)
Risk Management(via LIM)
Orig:General Services Department-UM BY*> A. AR.n..K-x.yt o--�_ ,DEPUTY
Buildings and Grounds(via LIM) -
PB:dp 33BOOP1.197 M382 (10/88)
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra, ./� .�
Costa
FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon County
Director of Community Development ^ "'
DATE: February 4, 1997
SUBJECT: Hookston Station Lease
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE Deputy Director - Redevelopment to enter into a Lease
Agreement with Helix and Associates for the Hookston Station property.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Redevelopment Agency will receive 78% of the Net Revenues from the subleasing of the
property, currently estimated at $60,000 annually. The tenant will receive 22% of the Net
Revenues. The tenant is required to deposit funds into a Reserve Fund for major
maintenance or improvements to the property.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
In 1989 the County, using Redevelopment Agency funds, acquired the Hookston Station
property. The property is a portion of the former Southern Pacific right-of-way. The property
was acquired to provide for future circulation improvements in the sub-region. The property
contains improvements of a general commercial nature. Current tenants are Ashby Lumber
and Tri-Cities Concrete. The former owners - Helix and Associates - continue to own and
manage an adjacent property with similar general commercial uses. Significant efficiencies
can be maintained by continuing the current lease arrangement. The lease allows the County
to terminate with 90 day notice. The lease also allows the County to provid for the
establishment of the Iron Horse Trail through the property.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR R OMMENDA ION OF BOA"
COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER /
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON ZJ-01/ -/G97 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDEDOTHER
Supervisor DeSaulnier noted that this is a five (5) year lease.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
/ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
✓ UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Source: Jim Kennedy
335-1255
cc: Community Development ATTESTEDv� ._
County Administrator PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF -
County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
via Community Development AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
B
JK:Ih , DEPUTY
m25/helix2bos
6.51
THE BOARD OR SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on February 4, 1987 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla and DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
xzzzzaaxazaaxazzzaaxaszssaasaz:zvseas::naaaacvaaaaxzzasaaszzxszssxszzzssxxasz
SUBJECT: Special Election
As requested by the City of Pittsburg, IT IS BY THE BOARD
ORDERED that the County Clerk, Registrar of Voters, is AUTHORIZED
to conduct a special election on April 22, 1997, on a measure
concerning cardooms with all costs associated with the election
to be paid by the City of Pittsburg.
r r Brf eds b.bw aw Carso
M Md M0gfy w
kcft" mks" drM an dN mkon ,
Baud dr BupWv W to d b s�gwn.
�rrEs.Bu�.Y.rd;1=. c X997
cc: County Clerk
Elections asuo:k+owans Ci r
Auditor-Controller
;icy of Plasbl.1rg,
Civic Center • P.O. Box 1518 • Pittsburg, California 94565
RECO V ED
January 22, 1997 j'a�
�:J L 2 1997
t uUARD OF SUPERVISORS
The Honorable Board of Supervisors cC»vrRA cosTn co.
Contra Costa County
County Administration Building
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Supervisors:
The City Council of the City of Pittsburg, on January 21, 1997, approved Resolution No. 97-
8401, calling a special election on a measure concerning Cardrooms with the election to be held
on April 22, 1997. A certified copy of this Resolution is enclosed.
Your favorable consideration of the City's request for an election would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Lillian J. Pride,
Deputy City Manager/City Clerk
r
LJP:km
enclosure
cc: Steve Weir,County Clerk
Barbara Lee, Election Services Dept.
California Healthy Cities P+oject
ivational Center for Public Productivity Exemplary Award - 1993
City of New Horizons
State of California
County of Contra Costa
City of Pittsburg
I, Lillian J. Pride, City Clerk, in and for said City Council, City of Pittsburg, County of
Contra Costa, State of California, do hereby certify that the hereto attached and foregoing
document is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution 97-8401 on file in this office of said
City.
WITNESS, my hand, and Official Seal
this 22nd day of January, 199 .
/ J
Lillian J. Pride, City Clerk
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:
A Resolution Calling a Special Election on )
a Measure Concerning Ordinance 97-1124 )
Amending Pittsburg Municipal Code ) Resolution No. 97-8401
Chapter 5.24 entitled "Cardrooms"; )
Authorizing the Issuance of a Cardroom )
License for the San Marco Casino Site; )
Approving a Tax Rate Structure and Fees > RECEIVED
for a Cardroom License; Approving a )
General Plan Amendment for the San ) JAN 2 21997
Marco Subdivision Village "A" Property; )
Amending the Planned Development Plan ) CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
for the San Marco Subdivision; and ) L CONTRA COSTA CO.
Approving an Amendment to the San Marco )
Development Agreement. )
The City Council of the City of Pittsburg does hereby FIND, DETERMINE and
DECLARE as follows:
A. In 1995, Section 19819.5 was added to the California Business and Professions
Code and enacted a three-year moratorium on the expansion of cardroom gaming in any city
beyond those levels permitted as of January 1, 1996.
B. Business and Professions Code section 19819 requires voter approval of
cardroom gaming in any city where those activities were prohibited before January 1, 1984.
The City of Pittsburg is exempt from the voter approval requirement of Section 19819, as the
City permitted cardroom gambling before January 1, 1994.
C. In 1995, the Pittsburg City Council adopted an amendment to the City's
Cardroom Ordinance, Pittsburg Municipal Code Chapter 5.24, that expanded the maximum
number of cardroom tables permitted in the City and imposed comprehensive regulations for
new cardrooms.
D. On May 29, 1996, Seecon Financial & Construction Company, Inc., submitted
an application to the City Planning Department proposing to construct a 56,750 square foot
convention center/casino and related development on a 32.2 acre portion known as Village
"A" of Seecon's previously approved 639 acre San Marco Subdivision. The proposed site is
located on the south side of State Highway 4 just east of the Bay Point interchange at the
northeast corner of the extension of West Leland Road and Willow Pass Road (San Marco
Boulevard), Pittsburg, California, APN 097-150-009 and 097-150-011 (the "Site"). The
RESOLUTION NO. 97-8401 PAGE 1 OF 6
proposed convention center/casino would contain a 68 table cardroom, conference facilities
for 850 people, a restaurant, sports lounge and snack bar, a beauty salon/barbershop, gift
shops, parking area for 800 vehicles, a mini market, a service station/car wash,
administrative offices, security and maintenance areas and related commercial uses (the
"Project").
E. Seecon's May 29, 1996 application included requests to amend the City's
General Plan from Residential Medium Density to Community Commercial (GP 96-04);
revise the 1990 San Marco Development Agreement between the City and Seecon; and
rezone the San Marco Planned Development Plan from 76 single-family homes currently
approved for Village "A" to community commercial all in an effort to accommodate the
proposed convention center/casino and related commercial development.
F. To operate a cardroom on the Site, a Cardroom License must be issued by the
City Council pursuant to Pittsburg Municipal Code Chapter 5.24.
G. On November 12, 1996, the Pittsburg Planning Commission conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the
Project. Many Pittsburg residents attended the public hearing and testified about the Project.
H. The public comments, received by the Planning Commission, were
incorporated and discussed in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the
San Marco Subdivision (FSEIR) for the Project.
1. On December 17, 1996, the Pittsburg Planning Commission held a public
hearing on the FSEIR and the applicant's requests for a General Plan Amendment,
amendments to the San Marco Development Agreement and Planned Development Plan and
considered all the evidence and testimony presented at the hearing. On that same date, the
Planning Commission took the following actions:
(i) By Resolution Number 8953, the Commission recommended that the
City Council certify the FSEIR and adopt the Mitigation Measures and Statement of
Overriding Considerations for the Project;
(ii) By Resolution Number 8956, the Commission recommended that the
City Council approve the Amendment to the Planned Development Plan for the San
Marco Subdivision to allow the San Marco Convention Center/Casino Project on the
32.2 acre site (RZ-96-04);
(iii) By Resolution Number 8957, the Commission recommended Council
approval of the Amendment to the Development Agreement between the City and
Seecon Financial & Construction Co., Inc. for the San Marco Convention
Center/Casino Project.
RESOLUTION NO. 97-8401 PAGE 2 OF 6
Section 5. Identification of Process Concerning Expenditure of Tax Revenues.
The attached ballot measure contains a general revenue tax provision which would
require the operator of the San Marco Casino/Convention Center to pay the City up to 15%
of gross gaming revenues. The Council wishes to receive the community's advice on how
such revenues should be expended, if the ballot measure is approved by the voters. Toward
that end, the City Council hereby determines to conduct a series of community forums or
public hearings constituted as specified by the Council, on the advice of the City Manager, to
be conducted in different geographical areas of the City, in order to receive broad-based
community input on the recommended expenditure of the referenced tax revenues.
Section 6. Effective Date.
This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
Passed and adopted on the 21st day of January, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: s
NOES: 0
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT: 0
Robert T. Lewis, Mayor
ATTEST:
L
4Lill1' . Pride, CVk
PIT7SBUMAS1WRESINTT.CAS(CNL 113)
RESOLUTION NO. 97-8401 PAGE 6 OF 6
EXHIBIT "A"
BALLOT MEASURE
Shall the ordinance approving the San Marco
Casino/Convention Center by amending Pittsburg Municipal
Code Chapter 5 . 24 entitled "Cardrooms" ; authorizing a
Cardroom License for the San Marco Casino site; approving
a tax rate structure and fees for a Cardroom License;
approving a General Plan Amendment for the San Marco
Subdivision Village "A" Property; amending the Planned
Development Plan for the San Marco Subdivision; and
approving an amendment to the San Marco Development
Agreement be adopted?
Yes No
Exhibit "A"
Res . No. 97-8401
In the Matter of:
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SAN )
MARCO CASINO/CONVENTION )
CENTER BY AMENDING PITTSBURG )
MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 5.24 ) ORDINANCE NO. 97-1124
ENTITLED "CARDROOMS"; )
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A )
CARDROOM LICENSE FOR THE SAN )
MARCO CASINO SITE; APPROVING A )
TAX RATE STRUCTURE AND FEES )
FOR A CARDROOM LICENSE; )
APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN )
AMENDMENT FOR THE SAN MARCO )
SUBDIVISION VILLAGE "A" )
PROPERTY; AMENDING THE )
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR )
THE SAN MARCO SUBDIVISION; AND )
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE )
SAN MARCO DEVELOPMENT )
AGREEMENT )
The people of the City of Pittsburg do ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. TITLE.
This ordinance shall be known as "AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SAN
MARCO CASINO/CONVENTION CENTER BY AMENDING PITTSBURG MUNICIPAL
CODE CHAPTER 5.24 ENTITLED "CARDROOMS"; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE
OF A CARDROOM LICENSE FOR THE SAN MARCO CASINO SITE; APPROVING A
TAX RATE STRUCTURE AND FEES FOR A CARDROOM LICENSE; APPROVING A
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE SAN MARCO SUBDIVISION VILLAGE
"A" PROPERTY; AMENDING THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SAN
MARCO SUBDIVISION; AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE SAN MARCO
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT."
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND.
A. In 1995, Section 19819.5 was added to the California Business and Professions
Code and enacted a three-year moratorium on the expansion of cardroom gaming in any city
beyond those levels permitted as of January 1, 1996.
B. Business and Professions Code Section 19819 requires voter approval of
cardroom gaming in any city where those activities were prohibited before January 1, 1984.
The City of Pittsburg is exempt from the voter approval requirement of Section 19819, as the
City permitted cardroom gambling before January 1, 1984.
C. In 1995, the Pittsburg City Council adopted an amendment to the City's
Cardroom Ordinance, Pittsburg Municipal Code Chapter 5.24, that expanded the maximum
number of cardroom tables permitted in the City and imposed comprehensive regulations for
new cardrooms.
D. On May 29, 1996, Seecon Financial & Construction Company, Inc., submitted
an application to the City Planning Department proposing to construct a 56,750 square foot
convention center/casino and related development on a 32.2 acre portion known as Village
"A" of Seecon's previously approved 639 acre San Marco Subdivision. The proposed site is
located on the south side of State highway 4 just east of the Bay Point interchange at the
northeast corner of the extension of West Leland Road and Willow Pass Road (San Marco
Boulevard), Pittsburg, California, APN 097-150-009 and 097-150-011 (the "Site"). The
proposed convention center/casino would contain a 68 table cardroom, conference facilities
for 850 people, a restaurant, sports lounge and snack bar, a beauty salon/barbershop, gift
shops, parking area for 800 vehicles, a mini market, a service station/car wash,
administrative offices, security and maintenance areas and related commercial uses (the
"Project").
E. Seecon's May 29, 1996 application included requests to amend the City's
General Plan from Residential Medium Density to Community Commercial (GP 96-04);
revise the 1990 San Marco Development Agreement between the City and Seecon; and
rezone the San Marco Planned Development Plan from 76 single-family homes currently
approved for Village "A" to community commercial, all in an effort to accommodate the
proposed convention center/casino and related commercial development.
F. To operate a cardroom on the Site, a Cardroom License must be issued
pursuant to Pittsburg Municipal Code Chapter 5.24.
G. On November 12, 1996, the Pittsburg Planning Commission conducted a duly
noticed public hearing on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the
Project. Many Pittsburg residents attended the public hearing and testified about the Project.
H. The public comments, received by the Planning Commission, were
incorporated and discussed in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the
San Marco Subdivision (FSEIR) for the Project. The FSEIR is on file with the City Clerk.
I. On December 17, 1996, the Pittsburg Planning Commission held a public
hearing on the FSEIR and the applicant's requests for a General Plan Amendment,
amendments to the San Marco Development Agreement and Planned Development Plan and
considered all the evidence and testimony presented at the hearing. On that same date, the
Planning Commission took the following actions:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-1124 PAGE 2 OF 6
(i) By Resolution Number 8953, the Commission recommended that the
City Council certify the FSEIR and adopt the Mitigation Measures and Statement of
Overriding Considerations for the Project;
(ii) By Resolution Number 8956, the Commission recommended that the
City Council approve the Amendment to the Planned Development Plan for the San
Marco Subdivision to allow the San Marco Convention Center/Casino Project on the
32.2 acre Site (RZ-96-04);
(iii) By Resolution Number 8957, the Commission recommended Council
approval of the Amendment to the Development Agreement between the City and
Seecon Financial & Construction Co., Inc. for the San Marco Convention
Center/Casino Project;
(iv) By Resolution Number 8955, the Commission recommended City
Council approval of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map from
Residential Medium Density to Community Commercial for the Site.
J. Reserved.
K. The City Council held a public hearing on January 13, 1997, to consider the
Planning Commission's recommendations on the Project and to take public testimony on the
FSEIR and the applicant's request for a General Plan Amendment, revisions to the
Development Agreement and the Planned Development Plan. Many Pittsburg residents
testified concerning the Project.
L. After considering all of the evidence and testimony presented at the January
13, 1997 public hearing, the City Council certified the FSEIR for the Project and directed
staff to prepare a ballot measure placing the San Marco Convention Center/Casino Project
approval, and other matters deemed necessary by the City Attorney, before the electorate.
M. In deciding to place this matter before the electorate, the Council has
determined that the Project, once operational, could provide from $1.2 million to $5.0
million to the City of Pittsburg in general annual tax revenues as required by Chapter 5.24 of
the Municipal Code, as amended herein.
ORDINANCE NO. 97-1124 PAGE 3 OF 6
SECTION 3. PURPOSE.
The purpose of this ordinance is to:
(i) amend Chapter 5.24 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code to prohibit the
issuance of a license for a new cardroom, unless the electors of the City have first
approved a ballot measure authorizing the issuance of the license for a site specific
location that must appear on the ballot; and revising the regulatory requirements, tax
rate structure, fees and reporting requirements for cardroom licenses;
(ii) authorize the issuance of a cardroom license for the San Marco Casino
Project located on the south side of Highway 4 just east of the Bay Point interchange,
at the northeast corner of the extensions of West Leland Road and Willow Pass Road
(San Marco Boulevard), Pittsburg, California, APN 097-150-009 and 097 150-011,
pursuant to the provisions of Pittsburg Municipal Code Chapter 5.24 and the
amendments thereto contained in this ballot measure in effect on the effective date of
this ordinance;
(iii) approve a tax rate structure for cardroom licenses that requires the
licensee to pay the City (a) a monthly tax on gaming revenues of ten percent (10%) of
the total monthly gross revenue of the first $0 to $1,000,000; (b) a monthly tax of
12.5% of the total monthly gross revenue for the next $1,000,001 to $2,000,000; (c)
a monthly tax of 15.0% for revenues over $2,000,000; and an application fee of ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) for a cardroom license; and (d) a minimum monthly
payment of at least one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) by the licensee following
the first twelve (12) months of operation regardless of the licensee's total monthly
gross revenue;
(iv) approve an amendment to the Pittsburg General Plan Land Use Map
from the land use classification Residential Medium Density to Community
Commercial for the 32.2 acre Site to accommodate the San Marco Convention
Center/Casino Project;
(v) approve an amendment to the Planned Development Plan (PD-1057) for
the San Marco Subdivision to allow the San Marco Convention Center/Casino Project
on the 32.2 acre Site; and
(vi) approve an amendment to the development agreement between the City
of Pittsburg and Seecon Financial & Construction Co., Inc. allowing for the
construction of the San Marco Convention Center/Casino Project.
ORDINANCE NO. 97-1124 PAGE 4 OF 6
SECTION 4. AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S CARDROOM ORDINANCE.
MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 5.24.
Pittsburg Municipal Code Chapter 5.24 is amended as described in Exhibit "A".
SECTION 5. APPROVAL OF A CARDROOM LICENSE FOR THE SAN MARCO
CASINO.
Pursuant to Chapter 5.24 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code and those amendments
contained in Section 4 of this ordinance, the electors of the City of Pittsburg authorize the
issuance of a cardroom license for the San Marco Casino, located on the south side of State
Highway 4 just east of the Bay Point interchange at the northeast corner of the extension of
West Leland Road and Willow Pass Road (San Marco Boulevard), Pittsburg, California,
APN 097-150-009 and 097-150-011.
SECTION 6. APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE PITTSBURG GENERAL
PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE SAN MARCO CONVENTION
CENTER/CASINO PROJECT ON THE SITE.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65358(a), the People hereby determine that
amendment of the General Plan as contained herein is in the public interest. The Pittsburg
General Plan Land Use designation for the San Marco Convention Center/Casino Site, is
changed from Residential Medium Density to Community Commercial as indicated on the
attached Exhibit "B" and incorporated here by reference.
SECTION 7. AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PD-1057)
FOR THE SAN MARCO SUBDIVISION TO ALLOW FOR THE
CONVENTION CENTER/CASINO PROJECT.
The San Marco Subdivision Planned Development Plan (Ordinance No. 93-1057) is
amended to allow for the construction of a 56,750 square foot convention center/casino on
the Site, as fully described in the attached Exhibit "C" and incorporated here by this
reference.
SECTION 8. AMENDMENT TO THE SAN MARCO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAN MARCO
CONVENTION CENTER/CASINO PROJECT.
An amendment to the Development Agreement between the City of Pittsburg and
Seecon Financial & Construction Co. to accommodate the San Marco Convention
Center/Casino Project on the Site is approved as set forth in Exhibit "D".
ORDINANCE NO. 97-1124 PAGE 5 OF 6
SECTION 9. PROJECT CONSISTENCY.
The Project and each and every approval contained herein are consistent with the
City's General Plan as amended and the Amendment to the Planned Development Plan for
the Site as contained in this Ordinance 97-1124.
SECTION 10. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall be considered as adopted upon the date that the vote is declared
by the City Council and shall go into effect 10 days after that date.
SECTION 11. SEVERABILITY.
If any section or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unenforceable by a
court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining sections or provisions shall not be affected.
PITTSBUR\CASINO\OCASINO.REV(CNL 113)
ORDINANCE NO. 97-1124 PAGE 6 OF 6
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG REVISING
CHAPTER 5.24 OF THE PITTSBURG MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING CARDROOMS.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
That Chapter 5.24 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code, entitled "Cardrooms", be and
hereby is amended as follows:
Section 1. License Fees: Taxes.
Section 5.24.070 is amended to read:
"5.24.070 License Fees; Taxes.
A. Each applicant for a license shall pay to the City, contemporaneously with the
filing of an application for a license pursuant to this Chapter, a filing and processing fee of
Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), which shall be utilized by City to defray the cost of
processing and investigating the application. No part of the fee shall be refundable.
B. Commencing on the first day of operation, the Licensee shall pay to the City a
monthly business license tax as follows: (a) Total monthly gross revenue of the first $0 to
$1,000,000 shall pay a monthly tax of 10.0%; (b) Total monthly gross revenue of the next
$1,000,001 to $2,000,000 shall pay a monthly tax of 12.5%; (c) Total monthly gross
revenues over $2,000,000 shall pay a monthly tax of 15.0%. For a license of an existing
and operational cardroom in effect before August 1, 1995, the annual cardroom license fee
shall be limited to: one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) for the first card table in a cardroom;
fifty dollars ($50.00) for the second cardroom; and twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for three (3)
or more card tables in a cardroom provided there is no increase in the number of tables or
other units played, employed or used in an existing cardroom.
C. In the case of a new applicant, a deposit for the first six (6) months license fee
in the amount of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000.00) shall be paid in advance to the City
upon issuance of the license. The sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) shall be
credited each month against the payment due under subsection (B) of this section. The
advance license fees shall become the absolute property of the City and shall not be refunded
to any such applicant when such license is issued, and such fees shall not be prorated in any
manner whatsoever, and in the event of the cessation of such business, whether voluntary or
involuntary, no refund of the advance fees shall be made.
EXHIBIT
1 Ord. No. 97-1124 '
D. Following the first twelve (12) months of operation, regardless of the total
monthly gross revenue, the minimum monthly amount paid by Licensee to the City shall be
at least One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00).
E. In the event any tournament is held at the cardroom, Licensee shall pay to City
ten percent (10%) of the total entry fees in addition to the total monthly fee specified herein.
F. For any non-card club business operation on the premises, to which a license
relates including, not limited to, food and beverage service or rental of facilities, Licensee
shall pay to City a monthly business license tax as set forth in Municipal Code Chapter 5.04,
as may adjusted or amended, for fixed places of business, or as set forth in any other
applicable section, as determined by the City's Finance Director. All procedures set forth in
Chapter 5.04 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code relating to business licenses shall be applicable
to such non-card club operations.
G. Each Licensee shall file with the City, before the 10th day of each calendar
month, a reporting form under penalty of perjury showing the true and correct amount of
gross revenue derived from the card club business licensed for the preceding calendar month.
Such statement shall be in a form approved by the City Manager and shall be accompanied
by payment of the correct amount of license fee due and owing in accordance with this
section. Such sums correctly reflecting the fees payable for the preceding month shall be
accepted by the City, subject, however, to the future right of the City to audit the matters
referred to in any such statement and to determine the correctness of the figures and the
amounts payable to the City pursuant to the provisions of subsections (H) and (I), below.
H. Each Licensee shall arrange, at its own expense, on an annual basis, for a
certified public accountant approved by the City Manager to audit the books, documents,
records and accounts relating to the gross revenue of the Licensee at the end of the
Licensee's fiscal year. The report of such accountant and all work papers utilized in the
preparation of such audit shall be submitted to the City Manager. The City Manager shall
review the report and work papers and may require any further information from the
Licensee. The City Manager may submit such documents and information to a second
certified public accountant for review. The expense of such second review shall be shared
equally between the City and Licensee.
I. In addition to the required annual audit of the books, records and accounts of
any card club may be audited by the City at any time. Upon request of the City Manager,
the Licensee shall provide to the City Manager copies of Licensee's state tax returns, which
shall be kept confidential and shall not be disclosed other than as necessary to carry out the
purposes of this section. In the event a City conducted audit discloses an underpayment to
the City in excess of two percent (2%) in any one month, the full cost of such audit shall be
borne by the Licensee. Any information obtained pursuant to the provisions of this section
or any statement filed by the Licensee shall be deemed confidential and shall not be subject
to public inspection unless otherwise required.
-2-
J. Any failure or refusal of Licensee to timely make and file any required
statements, or to pay any such fees or tax when the same are due and payable in accordance
with the provisions of this chapter, or to permit inspections of such books, records and
accounts of such Licensee, shall constitute full and sufficient grounds to revoke or suspend
the license as provided in this chapter. Penalties for a late payment shall be assessed in
accordance with any provisions or regulations enacted under the Municipal Code, including
but not limited, to Chapter 5.04, or such other provisions governing business license
delinquencies.
K. The amount of any business license tax or fee, penalties and interest imposed
by the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed a civil debt to the City. The City may
pursue any available legal remedies against licensee for the collection of any delinquent
business license taxes or fees, penalties, interest and all administrative costs incurred in
connection therewith.
L. In the event of the cessation of business by a Licensee, whether voluntary or
involuntary, no refund of any such fees or tax shall be made whatsoever.
M. The City Council may by a 4/5ths vote adjust any and all fees and amounts
imposed under this chapter after a licensed Cardroom has been in effect for five (5) years.
N. Where the City determines that litigation is required to enforce the provisions
of this Chapter, if the city prevails, in such litigation, civil or criminal, the City shall recover
its attorneys' fees.
O. The City Council may specify a different rate for any of the fees imposed
under this chapter if it finds that doing so is necessary to be competitive with other
jurisdictions or to be consistent with current practices in other jurisdictions where cardrooms
operate."
Section 2. Rules and Regulations.
Section 5.24.230 is amended to read:
"5.24.230 Adoption of Additional Rules and Regulations.
The City Council may adopt by resolution further rules and regulations for the
purpose of implementing this Chapter, including without limitation additional requirements
for the conduct of investigations related to the issuance of a license; and operational rules for
the conduct of a card club business, such as rules for employee work permits and the
regulation of cheating or other improper practices. Such rules and regulations shall have the
force of law, and any violation thereof shall be considered a violation of this Chapter, and a
ground for suspension and/or revocation of a License, permit or approval. The Council
further reserves the right to impose additional conditions on any permit or license issued
-3-
under this chapter where those conditions are necessary to protect public health, safety and
welfare."
Section 3. Voter Approval: Amendments.
Section 5.24.270 is added to read:
"5.24.270 Voter Approval; Amendments.
A. No license shall be issued or renewed or have any effect under this Chapter
5.24 or any successor ordinance unless and until the electors of the city have authorized the
issuance of a license for a site specific location. Approval by the electorate of Ordinance 97-
1124 shall constitute the necessary approval under this section for the project described
therein.
B. The issuance or renewal of a license for the ownership or operation of any
cardroom licensed in the City of Pittsburg as of August 1, 1995, is exempt from the
provisions of this section, provided that the license or renewal does not authorize a change in
the location or an increase in the number of authorized tables from that authorized as of
January 1, 1996.
C. Section 5.24.270(A) may only be amended with the approval of the electorate.
Any other provision of Chapter 5.24 may be amended by a majority vote of the City
Council."
PITTSBUR\CASINO\ORD524.REV(CNL 113)
-4-
++++++
=: ++++++++.
i ":: = = ++++++++++++
++++++++++++++t
_ . • ��{. 1111 wy�}}+++++
��:::}++a'+++}}}}
:•.
_ ++t+++t+++t t+
_ '':::::::::::::: ++++++t++++t+
-"• +++++++++++t
_.. :: Y:::::::::::::::-
.....::::::
..._...... ':::::::::::::: tt+++t+tttttt
J' YY
+}+++tt}++tt+
++tt+ +
n
.II _
_ .....�
l
�.
00
. .:.. ...;.........�:::n:.. :.:...:.:•i:
. ...--...-.
.s... ...:.:::r
`� .. ........................ .:i::_iii:;-.:-:i-::i•:
.-' .-....G •.'.. -'� ;?::R:it:C: '::}:,::{{2i;:�.riia>i::';;c;:;;;:::: ::`�::::.... ...::.::... ...::::.::::::iiicici: i%`:%;;Y;:
[:=tt............:.... .... •::::: :i::i_: ::r <::iii: i::
................::::::::::::::
..............Ali%
IM
.))l. \
F
r. .
. i.
_ ..-... .- .- ._ i
4 J.�.
•,-.':•:. _��'is is
Pittsburg General Plan
:::::-::::::...:::w... i
S �
®�011NLM0WONR Sl W `, I '
San Marco Convention Center/Casino
v.a GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
m a�a o
GP-96-04
Ord. No. 97-1124
.�K EXHIBIT "g ►'
The People of the City of Pittsburg do Ordain as follows:
In the Matter of Approving an )
Amendment to the Planned Development )
Plan for the San Marco Subdivision )
to Accommodate the San Marco Convention )
Center\Casino Project )
SECTION I. BACKGROUND
A. On February 1, 1993, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 93-1057
rezoning the 639 acre San Marco property south of Highway 4 (the "Property") from a
zoning classification of Temporarily Unclassified ("S") to Planned Development ("PD") and
approved a PD Plan for the San Marco Subdivision Project (Z-90-04).
B. On May 29, 1996, Seecon Financial & Construction Co., Inc. ("Seecon" or
the "Applicant") filed RZ-96-04 in accordance with Chapter 18.48 of the Pittsburg Municipal
Code requesting Planning approval to amend the PD Plan of the San Marco Subdivision (PD-
1057) to allow a 56,750 square foot convention center/casino on a portion of the 32.2 acre
site located on the south side of State Highway 4 just east of the Bay Point interchange and
shown as Village "A" on the previously approved San Marco Subdivision Project. The
proposed site is located at the northeast corner of the extensions of West Leland Road and
San Marco Boulevard (Willow Pass Road) Pittsburg, California, APN 097-150-009 and 097-
150-011. The rezoning application (RZ-96-04) required to accommodate the San Marco
convention center/casino and related commercial development is hereafter referred to as the
"Project".
C. On November 12, 1996, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the
Project.
D. On December 6, 1996, notice of the December 17, 1996, public hearing on
the Project to be held before the Planning Commission was mailed, published and posted.
E. On December 17, 1996 the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on RZ-96-04 and adopted Resolution No. 8956 recommending that the City
Council approve the Project.
F. On December 23, 1996, notice of the January 13, 1997, public hearing to be
held before the City Council was mailed, published and posted.
G. On January 13, 1997, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing and
directed staff to prepare a ballot measure to submit to the electorate the amendment to the
It t
I EXHIBIT C
Ord No. 97-1124
Planned Development Plan for the Site.
SECTION II. CONSISTENCY.
1. The proposed Project will be consistent with the amendment to the Land Use
Element of the General Plan as adopted by Ordinance 97-1124 and specified policies
and guidelines of the General Plan.
2. The proposed Project is consistent Chapter 5.24 (Cardrooms) of the Pittsburg
Municipal Code (the "Municipal Code"), as adopted by Ordinance 97-1124.
3. The proposed casino operation is consistent with Chapter 5.24 of the
Municipal Code (Cardrooms) as adopted by Ordinance 97-1124.
4. Amendment of the PD Plan (RZ-96-04) will not endanger the safety and
general welfare of the City.
5. The public necessity, convenience and general welfare require that the PD
Plan be amended for this portion of the San Marco Subdivision Project and that the
zoning map be amended as indicated in the exhibit attached and incorporated here.
SECTION III. APPROVAL.
The People of the City of Pittsburg (the "People") hereby approve RZ-96-04
and the amendment to the San Marco Subdivision PD Plan (Ordinance No. 93-1057) subject
to the following conditions:
1. The site shown as "Village A" on the plans approved by Ordinance No. 93-
1057 (PD-1057) shall be developed substantially as shown on the drawings dated May 28,
1996, except as may be hereinafter modified.
2. Conditions of Ordinance No. 93-1057 referenced in this section are amended
as follows:
a) The PD Plan shall consist of 1,336 single family detached dwelling
units and 1,526 multi-family and townhouse units with a maximum total of 2,862
dwelling units. (Condition No.2)
b) Single family detached lot sizes shall substantially conform with the
tables on the San Marco "Development Plan" except for Village "A."
(Condition No. 3)
C) Condition No. 20 shall be eliminated.
2
d) The Seecon financial & Construction Co., Inc. ("Seecon" or
"Applicant") shall request/petition to include the Project in the City-wide Lighting and
Landscape District (Condition No. 37), or in a separate lighting and landscape district
for the San Marco Subdivision, as determined by the City Engineer.
3, The Applicant shall obtain design review approval from the Planning
Commission for all building, grading, sign programs, and landscaping development on the
Project site. The plans submitted by the Applicant to date are conceptual only and may be
modified by subsequent conditions and final design review approval.
4. The proposed grading plan shall be revised to preserve some existing
topography and include contour rounding, as determined by the City Engineer. Parking
areas shall be stepped, where practical, around the convention center/casino building and
future development areas, as determined by the City Engineer.
5. The Applicant shall design on-site building and parking lot lighting to focus
illumination on the site and/or building only and so that it shall not spill over to adjacent
sites. Light intensities shall be high enough only for safety/security purposes or to provide
subtle architectural enhancement.
6. The Applicant shall modify the architectural design of the convention
center/casino building to break up the massive scale and height of the walls to be more
compatible with future residential scale development in the vicinity. The design, colors, and
siting shall also reflect an appropriate entryway feature to the City as viewed from Highway
4.
7. The Applicant shall submit a sign program for the convention center/casino
with the design review application.
8. The freestanding sign shall be reduced in height and size in order to provide
adequate visibility from Highway 4 at the Bay Point interchange off-ramps, but to also be in
scale with the surrounding San Marco neighborhood and to not overpower the western
gateway aspect of the site. The sign's design shall be simplified in detail and its location
shall be reviewed to provide adequate off-site visibility without the necessity of it being too
massive in size.
9. Electronic or other type readerboard, or any moving elements shall only be
allowed on any sign or building as approved by the Planning Commission.
10. Building signs shall comply with the provisions of Title 19 (Sign Code) for
retail and service businesses.
11. The service station/car wash shall comply with the use and development
regulations of the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district. All signage for the service
3
station/car wash shall comply with Title 19 regulations for service stations.
12. The Applicant shall design Villages "B", "M" and the village immediately
southwest of the Project site (the "Adjacent Villages") so as to create a buffer between
residential units and the commercial uses in Village "A". Residential buildings in the
Adjacent Villages shall be setback at least 50 feet from the right-of-way of West Leland
Road to the face of a living area of a residential unit. Additional buffering shall be
considered by differences in vertical pad elevations from the adjacent street grade, sound
walls, architectural treatment and orientation, and/or extensive landscape screening and
mounding. The driveway entry to Village "M" from West Leland Road shall be located as
far to the east as practical to separate it from the nearest driveway to the convention
center/casino.
13. The restaurant and other food service within the convention center/casino shall
be in operation prior to or commensurate with the cardroom operation. Food service shall be
open and available any time the cardroom/casino is open for business.
14. The cardroom shall be limited to sixty-eight (68) tables.
15. The cardroom shall comply with all regulations of Title 5.24 (Cardrooms) of
the Municipal Code.
16. The "Standard Conditions of Development" as adopted by Pittsburg Planning
Commission Resolution No. 5087 shall apply as conditions of approval for the Project.
17. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Pittsburg,
its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or
its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, or void or annul this approval, or any
other city approval of the proposed casino development, including without limitation,
environmental approval and general plan and development agreement amendments. In the
event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City shall
promptly notify the Applicant and shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to
promptly notify the Applicant, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the
Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.
The City may elect to tender defense of the litigation to the Applicant, or may elect to have
the matter defended by the City Attorney or special counsel. The Applicant shall reimburse
the City for all defense fees and costs. The Applicant shall not be required to pay or
perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by the Applicant.
18, The Applicant shall comply with all requirements of the City Building
Division, City Engineering Division, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District and all
local, state and federal agencies, as applicable to this Project.
19. It is the responsibility of the Applicant to check with each local, state and
4
federal agency to determine any and all applicable requirements that may pertain to the
Project. All approvals by the Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Fish and Game
and the Water Quality Control Board shall be obtained by the Applicant and copies shall be
provided to the City for filing.
20. All site development shall comply with Title 12 (Streets, Sidewalks and
Utilities), Title 13 (Water and Sewers) and Chapter 15.88 (Grading, Erosion and Sediment
Control) of the Municipal Code as determined by the City Engineer. Issuance of a site
development permit shall be required and specific engineering requirements shall be imposed
as conditions of approval.
21. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable requirements of Title 15
(Building and Construction), and Title 18 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code.
22. All applicable fees, deposit and sureties in amounts approved by the City
Engineer shall be paid and deposited as required by the Municipal Code and as set forth in
all policies of the City.
23, The Applicant shall reimburse the City for any and all staff time and legal fees
incurred by the City in connection with its approval of the Project, including without
limitation environmental approval, the amendment to the 1990 Development Agreement
between the Applicant and the City, and the General Plan amendment (GP-96-04).
24. The Applicant shall minimize reliance on the proposed exaggerated Greco-
Roman architectural "theme" to provide visual interest by using an architectural style that is
more compatible with surrounding residential development, that draws from the distinctive
elements of existing architectural styles in the community, and that supports the desired
community image.
25. The Applicant shall reconfigure the convention center and casino building to
provide a more visually interesting, less "boxy" building form by breaking up the massive
bulk of the building and the solid planes of the building walls and roof line, and by reducing
the degree of building mass exposed to Highway 4 and to the adjacent planned residential
uses in Village "M" of the San Marco Subdivision and on the adjacent Alves property.
26. The Applicant shall avoid having extensive blank walls exposed to view from
Highway 4, West Leland Road and the anticipated residential subdivision on the adjacent
Alves property by creating architectural interest and reducing the perceived mass of the
convention center and casino building by incorporating additional relief and play of light and
shadow through the use of articulated facades, recesses, overhangs, bays and other features,
and the use of textured building materials.
27. The Applicant shall minimize reliance on features that are "applied" to the
exterior of the building to achieve architectural interest and shall use forms and features that
5
are integral elements of the building itself.
28. The Applicant shall select building exterior colors that are muted and
harmonious with the Project hillside and grassland surroundings and shall avoid harsh,
glaring bright white or primary colors on large building surfaces, including gas station
canopies.
29. The Applicant shall screen any roof-top mechanical or electrical equipment.
30. The Applicant shall prepare and submit a detailed landscape plan and
associated ongoing irrigation and maintenance provisions to the City for approval. The
landscape plan shall address landscaping of all components of the Project and all parts of the
Project site, including the proposed convention center and casino building, gas
station/convenience store/car wash, automobile and recreational vehicle parking areas,
service and delivery areas, future development areas, Project sign and perimeter slopes.
31. The Applicant shall use landscaping to soften the artificial appearance of the
perimeter slopes of the property after grading of the site and shall specify a planting palette
which is integrated with the overall San Marco Subdivision landscape plan and provides a
cohesive and unified future community.
32. The Applicant shall use consistent plant materials throughout the Project to
define the site boundaries and roadway frontages, principal building entries, parking areas,
pedestrian routes, etc.
33. The Applicant shall use harmonious landscape treatments to effectively screen,
shade, articulate and add visual interest to the expansive Project parking areas.
34. The Applicant shall use drought tolerant, native vegetation for landscaped
areas, minimize the use of turf and shall use drip irrigation to the greatest extent possible.
35. The Applicant shall provide a separate water meter for publicly landscaped
areas on the Project site.
36. The Applicant shall minimize the use of non-plant materials (e.g., crushed
rock, pavers, etc.) in lieu of live plant material and shall use native species that enhance the
on-site habitat values of the reconstructed Shore Acres creek corridor and the future
development areas.
37. The Applicant shall select plant species that tend to complement the
architectural character of the Project.
38. The Applicant shall use taller trees to break the single, consistent roof line of
the proposed convention center and casino building and lend greater scale to the proposed
6
main Project sign.
39. The Applicant shall prepare and submit a detailed signage plan to the City for
review and approval.
40. The Applicant shall modify the design of the main Project sign to the
satisfaction of the Planning Commission by providing a smaller, more simplified, less
extravagant design style that is more consistent with the predominately single-family
residential character specified in the City's General Plan, and that provides a more
appropriate element to mark this entry to the San Marco Community and the western
"gateway" to Pittsburg. The Applicant shall use a design style that is more compatible with
surrounding residential development, that draws from the distinctive elements of existing
architectural styles in the community, and that supports the desired community image.
41. The Applicant shall make appropriate use of vegetation to complement, lessen
the imposing scale, and soften the visual incongruity of the main Project sign.
42. The Applicant shall consider the signage needs of the proposed gas
station/convenience store/car wash and of planned future commercial development on the
Project site in the design of Project signs, particularly the main sign.
43. The Applicant shall provide consolidated and harmonious signage designs for
multiple commercial uses on the site and shall avoid the use of freestanding signs on the
Project site.
44. The Applicant shall provide only the lighting necessary for safety and security
within the parking areas and other areas of the site, reasonably similar to the lighting at other
commercial centers in Pittsburg and shall provide complementary lighting of the building's
landscaping and architectural features.
45. The Applicant shall equip lighting fixtures with shrouds which direct light
away from adjacent freeway and residential areas and the riparian corridor along the
reconstructed Shore Acres creek.
46. The Applicant shall contribute fair share funding towards the City's
establishment of a separate police beat for the San Marco Subdivision and other future
development (with adequate staffing and facility levels) to serve the Project and cumulative
development and up to one (1) additional sworn police officer and two (2) additional clerical
workers to service the convention center/casino, as deemed necessary by the City.
47. The Applicant shall include crime deterrent features in the Project design, as
deemed necessary by the Chief of Police.
48. The Applicant shall provide an on-site spill-over parking area for at least 250
7
vehicles during periods of peak parking demand. The Applicant shall also use valet parking
to increase on-site vehicle storage during convention center events when more than 600
attendees are expected.
49. The Applicant shall increase by one foot (1') the height of the sound barrier
along San Marco Boulevard adjacent to "Village B" and along West Leland Road adjacent to
"Village M."
50. The Applicant shall implement all Bay Area Air Quality Management District
("BAAQMD") dust control measures for the Project.
51. The Applicant shall emphasize achievement of development designs which are
sensitive to existing and planned adjacent and surrounding residential uses (e.g., incorporate
adequate setbacks, building height and scale transitions, signage and exterior lighting
controls, parking area screening, noise buffering, etc.) in the additional design and
environmental review required prior to City approval of any future use of the future
development areas.
52. The Applicant shall install a second left turn lane to the southbound San Marco
Boulevard/West Leland Road intersection approach and construct an exclusive right turn lane
to the westbound West Leland intersection approach.
53. The Applicant shall contribute fair share funding in the reasonable judgment of
the City Engineer (currently estimated at five to ten percent) to implement a second left turn
lane to the westbound West Leland Road/Bailey Road intersection approach and restriping of
the existing westbound approach lanes to provide an exclusive right turn lane and a shared
through/right turn lane.
54. The Applicant shall signalize the Project access driveway as determined by the
City Engineer.
55. The Applicant shall prepare and submit to the City for approval, detailed
acoustical studies as part of any future Project-specific environmental evaluation for any
noise-sensitive commercial lodging uses proposed for the future development sufficient to
achieve the City and state interior noise standard of 45 dBA Community Noise Equivalent
Level.
56. The Applicant shall provide shuttle service on a "will call' basis between
BART and the Project site.
57. The Applicant shall provide transit amenities; provide secure bicycle parking
for employees; and shall implement a car pool matching program for employees; all to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
8
58. The Applicant shall submit all remaining documentation for the Project
required by The United States Bureau of Reclamation ("USBR") and shall obtain approval
from USBR for use of CVP water in this Project.
59. The Applicant shall pay for this Project's fair share contribution toward
construction of improvements listed on page 4 of the City's Water Master Plan Update, as
reasonably necessary to provide adequate water service for the Project. All final water
system design specifications and constructed improvements will be subject to review and
approval by the City. The specifications shall include adequate provisions for maintenance
access to these facilities. Improvements deemed necessary by the City Engineer shall be
constructed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Project.
60. The Applicant shall revise the overall San Marco landscape plan and refine it
to include drought-tolerant plant species whenever possible. Future subarea landscape plans
and guidelines for Villages "C", "D" and "M" shall include similar provisions.
61. The Applicant shall comply with Delta Diablo Sanitation District's ("DDSD")
pretreatment requirements, including obtaining and maintaining a Waste Water Discharge
Permit; payment of any and all applicable DDSD annexation fees; and payment of any and
all applicable DDSD connection and development fees before building permits are issued.
62. The Applicant shall not be allowed to obtain a certificate of occupancy from
the City until the City and DDSD have established: (i) a sewer extension construction
schedule consistent with Project timing; and (ii) an agreement for operation and maintenance
responsibilities for the waste water collection system.
63. The Applicant shall pay any and all applicable sewer development fees for
DDSD Zone 1 as per the DDSD "Schedule of Fees" identified in the West Pittsburg Sewer
Model Update.
64. The Applicant shall complete a sewer capacity study to determine the size of
the Project sewer extension lines and the points of connection to the DDSD main facilities.
65. The Applicant shall enter into a Fire Protection Mitigation Agreement with the
City and the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (the "Fire District") prior to
issuance of building permits that establishes special developer fees that may be warranted to
meet the special equipment and training needs of the Project occupancy and structural type.
66. The Applicant shall comply with the site design requirements established by
the 1995 California Fire Code.
67. The Applicant shall construct a fire station at a location to be established by
the Fire District that will meet conventional response time standards. This location may be
on the San Marco site or elsewhere within the response time standard. The Project's
9
contribution toward the construction of this fire station shall be collected via established Fire
Facilities Reserve Fees and any additional charges as determined in consultation with the Fire
District.
68. The Applicant shall provide to the satisfaction of the Fire District its fair share
of those local fire capital improvement and operating expenses that would not adequately be
covered by Fire Facilities Element Fees or Benefit Assessment Fees from the Project.
69. The City and Contra Costa County have recently approved agreements
providing for the construction of Station 87 on West Leland Road. That station will provide
adequate fire protection service to the Project, and is anticipated to be in service before the
Project is operational. If Station 87 is in service before a certificate of occupancy is issued
for the Project, then compliance with Condition Nos. 67 and 68 shall not be required, except
for payment of the existing Fire Facilities Fee. If Station 87 is not in service by that time,
then the Applicant, City and Fire District officials shall meet and confer on the feasibility of
interim measures pending the opening of Station 87. If such measures are feasible in the
reasonable
discretion of the Fire District, the Applicant shall implement them under the City's and Fire
District's supervision.
70. The Applicant shall provide water storage and pressure for the Project as
required by the 1995 Uniform Fire Code, Appendix Chapter 111.
71. The Applicant shall install fire sprinkler protection in all Project structures,
use fire retardant roofing, and provide adequate emergency vehicle access as required by the
1995 Uniform Fire Code and the Fire District.
72. The Applicant shall ensure that the storm drainage system downstream of the
Project site has adequate capacity to convey the peak discharge from the proposed Project.
If the Project does not discharge more storm water than is currently discharged from the
Project site, this condition and Condition No. 73 shall be deemed satisfied.
73. The Applicant shall prepare and submit to the City and CCCFCWCD for
approval, a hydrology report which confirms, to the written satisfaction of CCCFCWCD,
that the Project storm drainage system on-site and at the Highway 4 crossing meets their
criteria.
74. The mitigation, monitoring and reporting plan for the "San Marco
Convention Center/Casino Project," as approved by the City Council shall be incorporated
with this Project and included as conditions of approval as though fully set forth herein.
75. All new utility lines including, but not limited to, PG&E, cable TV, telephone,
cables and transformers shall be undergrounded by the Applicant in accordance with Title 18
of the Municipal Code.
10
76. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall pay to the
Community Development Department the City's traffic mitigation fee (Chapter 15.90 of the
Municipal Code) and the City's regional traffic mitigation fee (Chapter 15.100 of the
Municipal Code) in the amount established by City Council Resolution.
77. Noise-generation activities, including truck traffic to and from the site, are
allowed only during the daytime, weekday (non-holiday) hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and
8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Saturday.
78. The Applicant shall comply with any and all conditions of approval imposed
on this Project including, but not limited to, those conditions contained in City Council
Resolution No. 97-8399 and Ordinance No. 97-1124.
79. In the event of any inconsistency in any term or condition of approval in the
PD rezoning ordinance, amendment to Development Agreement, or other approval document
for the Project and related entitlement, the more restrictive provision shall control.
SECTION IV. AMENDMENT.
The Planned Development Plan for the San Marco Casino Site, as approved herein,
may be amended by a vote of the City Council, after a public hearing and recommendation
of the Planning Commission, and upon the request or with the concurrence of the Applicant.
PITTSBUR/CASINO/OPD.EXH(CNL 113)
11
r
(Amended PD Pian) -
'
Y
(105 )
Er•
rT�
stm�oc vrscxrcc
iE
ss -
<o• m�vc aE
CC OVVL:CT['lVV-
�CS Y,IM-fS MVVSNJ
9 P]C!Yu�NY.
LL lVIT1C X11.CSTiJ:
�e
�= San Marco Convention Center/Casino
PD PLAN ZONING AMENDMENT
9 v lc t!H
• ;J4 T
-` >�• RZ-96-04
AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
AND
SEECON FINANCIAL AND CONSTRUCTION CO. , INC.
This Amendment to the Development Agreement ( "Amendment" ) ,
dated for reference purposes only as April 22, 1997, is made and
entered into by the City of Pittsburg, a municipal corporation
organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State
of California ( "City" ) and Seecon Financial and Construction Co. ,
Inc . , a California corporation, ( "Seecon" ) (collectively the
"Parties" ) .
THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS :
Section 1 . Recitals . This Amendment is based upon the
following facts :
a. On April 3 , 1990, the Pittsburg City Council pursuant to
Government Code Sections 65864 et seq. , adopted Ordinance Number
90-990, which approved a Development Agreement ("Agreement" )
between the Parties that allowed Seecon to develop approximately
639 acres within Contra Costa County now located within the City
generally known as the San Marco project, in accordance with those
uses designated in the Land Use Element of the City' s General Plan,
adopted September 26 , 1988 .
b. Section 15 of that Agreement provides for the amendment
of that Agreement, in whole or in part, by mutual consent of the
Parties, provided the City complies with the notice provisions of
ki
1 EXHIBIT J
Ord. No. 97-1124
Government Code Section 65867 . Any amendment to the Agreement
shall be first approved by ordinance of the City Council, in
accordance with Government Code Section 65867 . 5 .
C . The Parties have reached an accord on and desire to
express the terms of an amendment to the Agreement that will permit
Seecon to develop that portion of the site described in Exhibit "1"
( "Site" ) , in accordance with the General Plan Amendment approved by
the voters on April 22 , 1997 and the concurrent revision to the
Planned Development zoning Ordinance . By this Amendment, the City
intends to grant Seecon certain development rights in the Site that
vary from those originally allowed by the Agreement, and to
obligate Seecon to provide certain public benefits in the form of
environmental mitigation, community benefit, monetary payments,
fees and on-site and off-site public improvements .
d. Currently, the property subject to the Agreement is zoned
Planned Development ( "PD" ) . The PD zoning allows for the
construction of two thousand nine hundred and thirty-eight (2 , 938)
units of residential housing in 13 Villages in the San Marco
Subdivision. Village "A" (the Site) was expected to accommodate 76
single-family homes .
e . Seecon submitted a proposal to the City for the
development of the San Marco Convention Center/Casino Project
( "Project" ) as an alternative to the "Village All proposal for the
Site .
f . The Project will be located at the northeast corner of
the extensions of West Leland Road and Willow Pass Road. The
2
building on the Site will contain a 68-table cardroom, conference
facilities for 850 people, a restaurant, sports lounge, and
beauty/barber and gift shops . A parking area for approximately 800
vehicles and a service station/car wash are also proposed for the
Site .
g. Seecon has applied for various land use and building
approvals in connection with this Amendment to the Agreement,
including a General Plan Amendment and a revision to the Planned
Development Zoning ordinance for the San Marco Subdivision (PD-
1057) .
h. Development of the Project Site in a comprehensive
fashion, as contemplated by the Agreement and this Amendment, will
result in substantial public benefits to the City, its residents,
and surrounding communities . Among other public benefits, the
Project will expand the City' s employment base by creating
temporary jobs during Project construction and approximately 525
new employment opportunities when the Project is operational,
generate significant tax assessments and revenues, create a
landmark facility for the City by providing a premier entertainment
center and conference/reception facilities for local and regional
events and result in the installation of both off-site and on-site
public improvements . Those benefits would not be available for
the foreseeable future, except through a development agreement .
i . The Planning Commission, on December 17, 1996 , held a
duly-noticed public hearing to consider Seecon' s request for an
amendment to the Agreement . The Planning Commission recommended
3
approval of the Amendment .
j . At that same meeting, the Planning Commission also
considered making recommendations to the City Council concerning
(1) Seecon' s requests for a General Plan Amendment and a revision
to the Planned Development Zoning Ordinance for the San Marco
Subdivision (PD-1057) , and (2) the adoption of a resolution of
findings certifying review and consideration of the San Marco
Convention Center/Casino Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report . The Commission recommended approval of the Project .
k. Following a duly-noticed public hearing held on January
13 , 1997, the City Council directed staff to prepare a ballot
measure for submission to the electorate, after reviewing and
considering all of the following documents :
(1) Seecon' s application for an amendment to the
Agreement and its requests for a General Plan Amendment
and a revision to the Planned Development Zoning
Ordinance for the San Marco Subdivision (PD-1057) ;
(2) The Planning Commission' s recommendations for the
Project ;
(3) The staff report and presentation; and
(4) All other testimony and evidence heard and submitted
at the public hearing.
1 . Also on January 13 , 1997, the City Council certified the
adequacy of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for
the Project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
( "CEQA" ) and adopted Resolution Number 97-8399, on file with the
4
City Clerk.
M. The City, through the adoption of Ordinance 97-1124 , has
adopted a General Plan Amendment which designates the Site for
commercial uses, and approved the PD zoning revisions to the Site .
Ordinance 97-1124 is on file with the City Clerk and incorporated
here by reference .
n. The City hereby finds that this Amendment furthers the
public health, safety and general welfare and is consistent with
the City' s General Plan as well as the land use designations
contained in the City' s Planned Development Zoning Ordinance for
the Site . In addition, the City further finds that the City has
undertaken all necessary proceedings in accordance with the City' s
ordinances, rules and regulations for the approval of this
Amendment .
o. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Amendment
relates only to the Project Site .
Section 2 . Amendment .
In consideration for this Amendment, the Parties agree that :
a.. Development of the Project Site : Seecon shall have the
vested right to develop the Project on the Site and the City shall
have the right to regulate development and use of the Site in
accordance with the provisions of this Amendment . The total number
of units allowed for residential development under the Agreement is
reduced to 2 , 862 .
b. Applicable Rules: The ordinances, resolutions, rules,
regulations, codes, including but not limited to, Chapter 5 . 24 of
5
the Pittsburg Municipal Code, and policies governing the permitted
uses of land, the density and intensity of such uses, design,
improvement and construction standards and specifications
applicable to the Project Site (the "Rules" ) shall be those in
effect at the time of the effective date of this Amendment
( "Existing Rules" ) . This Amendment, the Existing Rules and the
approved development plans shall govern the permitted uses of the
Project Site, the density and intensity of such uses, the maximum
height and size of the proposed buildings and the requirements of
the installation of improvements .
Except as otherwise provided in the Amendment, to the extent
that any Existing Rules or ordinances, resolutions, rules,
regulations, codes and policies adopted after the effective date of
this Amendment ( "Future Rules" ) , whether adopted by the City
Council or by initiative, purport to be applicable to the Project
Site, but are in conflict with this Amendment, the Amendment and
Existing Rules shall govern, unless the Parties mutually agree to
amend or modify this Amendment, pursuant to Section 15 of the
Agreement . To the extent that any Future Rules are not in conflict
with the Amendment, the Future Rules shall be applicable to the
Project Site .
This Amendment shall not prevent the City from denying or
conditionally approving any application for a subsequent
discretionary or ministerial approval of the Project on the basis
of Existing Rules or Future Rules that do not conflict with the
applicable Rules, as set forth in this Section (2) (b) .
6
c . Limitation on Development and Processing Fees: All City
approvals, permits and entitlement relating to the Project shall be
subject to the processing and inspection fees of general
application, and to those fees imposed specifically on this Project
through the various approval documents as set forth in the Exhibits
hereto, that are in effect at the time of the effective date of
this Amendment . Seecon hereby agrees to pay each and every fee
imposed in the various approval documents set forth in the Exhibits
hereto in the amount established at the time building permits are
pulled and expressly waives the notice and protest rights contained
in Government Code section 66020 . As consideration for this
Amendment, Seecon further agrees to pay each and every license fee,
tax, and/or amount required under Municipal Code Chapter 5 . 24
regardless of and independent of the City' s authority under
Municipal Code Chapter 5 . 24 to impose any such license fee, tax
and/or amount on Seecon or the Project .
All City approvals, permits and entitlements relating to the
Project shall be subject only to those City development fees that
are in effect as of the effective date of this Amendment . As used
in this Section 2 (c) , the term "Development Fee" shall mean
monetary exactions that are charged by the City to Seecon in
connection with any approval, permit or entitlement relating to the
Project, for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost
of public facilities, programs or services related to the Project
or imposed for a public purpose to mitigate the impacts of the
Project .
7
d. Exceptions to Limitations on City' s Right to Impose Fees,
Taxes and Assessments. Notwithstanding Section 2 (c) , the
City may impose the following additional fees consistent with
Government Code § 66000, et seq. , and taxes and assessments without
protest from Seecon:
1 . a fee imposed or mandated by another governmental
agency; or
2 . a fee imposed for citywide traffic or drainage
mitigation purposes; or
3 . a fee in the form of a capital improvement facility
fee for sewer or water purposes;
4 . a facilities reserve charge, adopted by the Contra
Costa Water District ( "CCWD" ) and passed through by
the City pursuant to Pittsburg Municipal Code
Chapter 13 . 10 . Seecon is notified that CCWD, from
time to time, adopts increases in this fee . The
City suggests that Seecon contact the CCWD' s Clerk
and request notification of CCWD Board action
relating to any such increases . Seecon shall pay
the facilities reserve charge in effect as of the
date Seecon pulls a building permit for the Project .
Nothing herein prevents Seecon from paying CCWD
related fees under protest, and challenging CCWD' s
right to impose such fees, provided that Seecon
cannot challenge the City' s right to pass through
such fees .
8
e . Construction Codes: Rules establishing construction
requirements and specifications, including, but not limited to, the
Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, Uniform Mechanical Code
and Uniform Plumbing Code, which are adopted or revised during the
term of this Amendment shall apply as of the time construction and
building permits are granted for the development of the project .
f . Compliance with Conditions: Seecon shall comply with all
of the conditions of approval of the amended PD Zoning Ordinance
for the Property as fully set forth in Ordinance 97-1124 and all
conditions imposed by the City.
g. Environmental Mitigation Implementation: Seecon shall
implement all environmental mitigation measures for the Property,
approved by the City Council and based upon the Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report for the Project, as identified in
Resolution Number 97-8399 .
h. Licensure Requirement: Notwithstanding any other
provision of this Amendment, if for any reason a license under
Pittsburg Municipal Code Chapter 5 . 24 is not obtained within one
year from the effective date of this Amendment, this Amendment is
null and void. This City Council may, upon application, extend
that period in its sole discretion.
i . Future San Marco Development: Seecon anticipates future
development in other San Marco Villages, including three Villages
adjacent to and located to the south, southwest and west of the
Site (the "Adjacent Villages" ) . Seecon agrees that any
applications for development approvals for the Adjacent Villages
9
shall include a request for design review, shall provide for a
minimum buffer area of 50 feet from the nearest public right of way
boundary and any living area on the Adjacent Villages . For
example, the Adjacent Village to the south of the Site is across
West Leland. There shall be at least 50 feet from the nearest
public right of way on West Leland to the face of a living area of
a residential unit and any structure on that Adjacent Village .
Buffering from the south, southwest and west Villages may be
accomplished by the use of design elements such as elevation
differences between the Villages, mounding, landscaping, walls,
fences, parking areas, car ports, enclosed garages, the additional
set back of living areas of the affected Villages from Village A,
or a combination of these treatments . The design of that buffering
shall be subject to Planning Commission review and approval .
j . Submittal of Applications: Seecon shall submit a Design
Review application and a final set of plans for the Project to the
Community Development Department ( "Department" ) within 180 days of
City approval of this Amendment . That time period may be extended
at the City Manager' s discretion.
k. Commencement of Construction: Seecon shall commence
construction of the Project within one year after approval hereof .
The City Council may, upon application by Seecon, extend this
period in its sole discretion.
1 . Application for Annual Review: The Agreement provides for
an annual review upon application of the Developer. Within 90 days
of the City' s approval of this Amendment, Seecon shall provide the
10
Community Development Director with a written request for a
comprehensive review of the Agreement . Nothing in this Amendment
shall be interpreted in any way that would limit, control or
otherwise affect the City' s review of the Agreement . Approval of
this Amendment does not constitute any position by the City on the
status of the Agreement .
M. Hold Harmless: Seecon shall hold harmless, indemnify and
defend the City and its elected and appointed officers, agents
employees and representatives from and against liability for
personal injury, including death and property damage arising from
Seecon' s direct or indirect action or those of its contractors,
subcontractors, agents, employees or other persons acting on its
behalf, which relate to Seecon' s development of the Project Site,
pursuant to this Amendment ; the foregoing does not extend to
willful acts or sole negligence of the City, its officers, agents
or employees .
Section 3 . Adoption of Amendment.
a. The City hereby adopts this Amendment and authorizes its
execution.
Section 4 . compliance.
Seecon shall comply with every term and condition of this
Amendment and each Council and Planning Commission action approving
any aspect of the Project, including but not limited to the various
resolutions and ordinances referenced herein. Failure to so comply
shall constitute a default hereunder, which shall warrant
termination of this Amendment unless such default is cured within
11
a reasonable time as specified by the City Council .
Section 5 . Miscellaneous.
a. Consistency. This Amendment is consistent with the
City' s General Plan Amendment and the amendment to the Planned
Development Plan for the Site, both as adopted by Ordinance 97-
1124 .
b. Effective Date. This Amendment shall be effective ten
days after the City Council declares the vote on Ordinance 97-1124 .
C . Conflicts. Those provisions of the Agreement that do
not conflict with this Amendment, shall remain in full force and
effect and shall be applicable to the development of the Project
Site .
d. Amendment or Cancellation.
(1) Pursuant to the provisions of Section 15 of the Agreement,
this Amendment may be amended or canceled in whole or in part, by
mutual consent by the parties or their successors in interest .
Notice of intention to amend or cancel any portion of this
Amendment shall be given in the manner provided by section 56867 of
the Government Code . All amendments to this Amendment shall be
first approved by ordinance of the City Council in accordance with
Section 65867 . 5 of the Government Code .
(2) Notwithstanding the foregoing, an amendment to this
Amendment which does not relate to the term, permitted uses,
density or intensity of use, height or size of buildings,
provisions for reservations of land, conditions, fees for public
facilities, terms, restrictions and requirements regarding
12
covenants relating to the use of the property does not require a
public hearing before the parties may execute an amendment to this
Amendment .
(3) Any non-substantive deviation form the development plan
for the Project, as determined by the Director of the Community
Development Department, with respect to the location of buildings,
streets and other physical facilities, shall not require an
amendment to this Amendment .
e . Recordation. Not later than ten (10) days after
execution of this Amendment by all Parties, the City Clerk shall
record a copy of this Amendment with the Contra Costa County
Recorder.
CITY OF PITTSBURG SEECON FINANCIAL & CONSTRUCTION
By: BY:
ROBERT T. LEWIS, MAYOR
DATE : DATE:
ATTEST:
LILLIAN J. PRIDE, CITY CLERK
P1TTSRUR\CAS1N0\ADEVAGPJ-_AM1
13
1 604WAY=usa•
- - H 6s-s�.ss u t��• . -:
• -__ , V1LtA
ROAD
• -. c pAY
- pEtE
, - BA
.N
y1ltA`C£ 'M .
PARK
to (
W C
Y `•`1 a�
N
c . 5q
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on February 4, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, and DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None RESOLUTION NO. 97/62
SUBJECT: Transfer of Pipeline Franchise to Shell Martinez Refining Company
This Board on January 16, 1996, adopted Resolution 96/16 granting a franchise to operate
pipelines on certain County rights of way pursuant to Ordinance No. 1827 (as amended by
Ordinance No. 79/50 and Ordinance No. 92/64) to Shell Oil Company.
Subsequent to the date the Resolution was adopted and the franchise was granted Shell Oil
Company transferred this asset to a newly-formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of Shell Oil
Company named Shell Martinez Refining Company, an entity charged with the ownership and
operation of refinery assets, including the pipeline for which the franchise was granted. Shell
Oil Company has requested that the franchise be transferred to the proper entity, Shell
Martinez Refining Company.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the franchise granted under Resolution No. 96/16 to
Shell Oil Company is hereby transferred to Shell Martinez Refining Company.
I keroby a t o fhb Y•tau end correct copy of
an actlon taken end enwe0 an tM 'Wms of th
Board of SupeMko a err M O eeeea
ATM, Fe�ru�'2�
/«J newer% flr aced
By Ci ?� •�d/�1/fiy[P/��pepp
Contact Person: Cliff Hansen (5 10) 313-2341
SCH:ly
g:bdord\4.t2
Orig. Dept.: Public Works (AD)
c: County Auditor/Controller
County Counsel
Public Works - Accounting
RESOLUTION NO. 97/62
1.
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Contra
FROM: Batton J. Gilbert, Director of General Services
Costa
January 6, 1997 '`"" County
DATE:
SUBJECT: Disposal of Surplus Property
SPECIFIC REOUEST(S)OR RECOMMENOATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
1. RECOMMENDATION
Declare as surplus and authorize the Purchasing Agent to dispose of equipment
and vehicles as specifically set forth below.
If. BACKGROUND
Section 1108-2.212 of the County Ordinance Code authorizes the Purchasing
Agent to dispose of any personal property belonging to Contra Costa County and
found by the Board of Supervisors not to be further required for public use. The
items are A) obsolete, B) worn out, C) beyond economical repair, or D) wrecked
beyond repair and are appropriate for disposal.
Dept. Description County Taq# Comment
Private Industry Council (PIC)
PIC Microcomputer 9000 Victor, 105517 A
S/N M0032432
PIC Printer 620 Diablo, S/N 21286 105524 A
PIC Printer Hewett Packard, S/N 2424J58633 106608 A
PIC Printer Quietwriter III, S/N 7513599 115142 A
PIC Printer Quietwriter 111, S/N 7513602 115143 A
PIC Microcomputer IBM M50Z, S/N 7039779 115144 A
PIC Printer Quietwriter III W/Attchs, 115493 A
S/N 7511482
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _2LYES SIGNATURE: "&
-RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR -RECOMAgENDATIONOFSOAROCOMMrrrr;E
-APPROVE -OTHER
SIOWATUREIS):
ACTION Of BOARD ON February 4, 199/ APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENTS AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT*.-ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: General Services ATTESTED Februar,)L 4. 1997
Auditor-Controller PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY-e, DEPUTY
M382 (10/88)
C�o
Re: Disposal of Surplus Property
January 2, 1997
Page 2
Dept. Description County Tag# Comments
PIC Computer IBM SYS M50/20M W/ATT, 115494 A
S/N 8312139
PIC Computer IBM SYS M50/20M W/ATT, 115495 A
S/N 8312108
PIC Computer IBM SYS M50/20M W/ATT 115498 A
S/N 8309018
PIC Printer IBM Quietwriter III, 115499 A
S/N 7526728
PIC Printer IBM Quietwriter III, 115500 A
S/N 7526779
PIC Scanner IBM S/N 97-05631 118089 A
PIC Monitor IBM 12", S/N 72-0424232 A
PIC Computer IBM 386, S/N 23-1323402 A
PIC Monitor IBM 12", S/N 72-0874584 A
PIC Monitor IBM 12", S/N 72-0432162 A
PIC Computer IBM 386, S/N 78-DFWFN A
PIC Computer IBM 386, S/N 23-1303874 A
PIC Computer AT&T PC6300, S/N 2833585 A
PIC Monitor AT&T 14", S/N 024471 A
PIC Monitor IBM 14", S/N 23-AX886 A
PIC Printer C.ITOH, S/N AP240461 103910 A
PIC Monitor VICTOR 14", S/N C003231 105524 A
PIC Disc Drive IBM, S/N 86-0361945 A
PIC Disc Drive IBM, S/N 86-0322922 A
PIC Monitor IBM 14", S/N 72-0285398 A
SUPERVISOR
DESAULNIER,
DISTRICT 4 SHARP 330 FAX MACHINE, 1155802 A
S/N 95107415
Contra
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Costa
FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR '.
4°
County Administrator r,q-�,aca County
DATE: January 22, 1997
SUBJECT: EAST BAY SAFETY CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP
Specific Request(s) or Recommendation(s) & Background & Justification
RECOMMENDATIONS :
1 . AUTHORIZE expenditure of $10,000 to the East Bay Community Foundation as
the fiscal agent for the East Bay Public Safety Corridor Partnership as
the County' s 1996 contribution to the Corridor' s activities .
2 . DIRECT the County Administrator to continue to work with the East Bay
Public Safety Partnership and project staff to develop and seek sources
of funding for various Corridor public safety projects .
FISCAL IMPACT:
The $10,000 payment to the Corridor Project represents this County' s annual
contribution to pay for the basic administrative expenses of running the
project. All Corridor Council participating jurisdictions, including cities
and school districts, have been invoiced for their share.
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors agreed to participate in the East Bay Public Safety
Corridor Partnership April 25, 1995 . The Partnership is an effort of
representatives from Alameda and Contra Costa counties, 21 cities, 19 school
districts, five special districts in the western portion of both counties,
and more than a dozen representatives of federal and state government to
address common concerns over the growth of crime and violence in the East
Bay.
Continued on Attachment:—X— YES Signature:
Recommendation of County Administrator
Recommendation of Board Committee
Approve Other
Signature(s) :
Action of Board on: Approved as Recommended Other
Vote of Supervisors : I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
(/ AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
Unanimous (Absent ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
Ayes : Noes : ) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN.
Contact: George Roemer ( 335-1055) Attested: '^^' ` - g{ • t49'7
cc: CAO-Justice System Programs Phil Batc elor, Clerk of
East Bay Safety Corridor Partnership the Board of Supervisors
East Bay Community Foundation and County Administrator
District Attorney
Sheriff-Coroner By: , DEPUTY
County Probation Officer
Judge Lois Haight
Judge Harlan Grossman
East Bay Safety Corridor Partnership
January 22, 1997
Page 2
The Partnership attracted two major grants; one from the National Funding
Collaborative on Violence Prevention and one from the U.S. Department of
Justice ( $1 .9 million under Comprehensive Communities) . The four year
National Funding Collaborative grant is designed to help the Partnership
assess community needs and develop neighborhood solutions . The Comprehensive
Communities grant assists in funding several projects in Contra Costa County
including a Youth Academy presented by the Sheriff ' s Department, a drug court
in West Contra Costa, components of the aftercare program at the Orin Allen
Youth Rehabilitation Facility (bicycle repair, landscaping and painting) and
an evaluation of case management services at the Youth Service Bureau and job
training and placement at Opportunity West in West County, and a gang
prevention program operated by the Richmond Youth Academy (Richmond
Firefighters) . Partnership staff are currently developing a new crime
analysis unit for the Corridor' s law enforcement agencies, programs to combat
domestic violence and two programs in conflict resolution (one in Alameda
County and one in Contra Costa County) .
The Partnership has also offered technical assistance to members through the
production of conferences like the An Extended Day in the East Bay Team
Building Conference bringing experts to the area to discuss model after
school programs such as Beacon programs.
The Partnership has applied for a series of additional grants including Safe
Passage Home, Crime Analysis Expansion, Truancy Programs, Beacon Schools,
Reducing Gun Violence, Community Assessment Library and Safe Streets ,
Continued County participation in the Corridor Partnership increases the
likelihood of securing funding and ideas for model programs for needed public
safety and delinquency prevention projects in the western portion of the
County.
TO; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: John Cullen, Director Contra
Social Service Department Costa
DATE: January 16, 1997
------SYA---- County
SUBJECT; APPROVE and AUTHORIZE signature of updated application with
the State Department of Social Services for County Adoption
Services.
SPECIFIC REOUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of supervisors
to sign an updated application annually, or as necessary,
with the State Department of Social Services for the conduct
of a County Adoption Service.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
All positions and costs related to staffing and conduct of
the Social Service Department's Adoption Program are
included in the Department's budget as 100% State funded up
to the State/Federal allocation. The required $1,000 annual
fee is allocated as an expense within the Department's
Administrative Claim.
BACKGROUND:
The regulations for the State of California require public
and private adoption agencies to keep current applications
and to pay an annual fee for renewal of their adoption
licenses. Contra Costa County' s license enables the Social
Service Department's Adoption Program to accept
relinquishments and place children for adoption in
accordance with the California Administrative Code, Title
22, Chapter 3.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT. -YES SIGNATURE:
-RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR -RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(Sk
ACTION OF BOARD ON Eebrijary 4, 192,Z APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT--.- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES:__NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISOR$ON THE DATE SHOWN,
cc: Contact: 'Dann Fabella 3-1583 ATTESTED February 4. 1997.
SOCIAL SERVICE (CONTRACTS UNIT PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
CONIRACDOR
"382 (10/88) BY DEPUTY
• a-x-91 e . � �--
CERIMCATIQN
I accept responsibility to comply with the Health and Safety Code and administrative regulations
concerning adoption agency licensing.
Tl U*ac :.. r... Tkk Dab
S' oro m
S' mmm TiOe Date
S' moue Tide Date
Public agency renewal applications must be signed by the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
and accompanied by a copy of the Board Resolution authorizing this application and signature
by the Chairman.
Private agency renewals must be signed by the Chairman of the Board or Directors and
accompanied by a copy of the authorization by the board to its representative to make
application.
Please note that an application of renewal of license shall be filed with the Department of Social
Services not less than 30 days prior to the expiration date of the current license. Failure to make
application within the prescribed time shall result in expiration of the license.
TO: BOARD f)FSUGERVISORS C�`3 '�....FBHS-03
Contra
FROM: FAMILY AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE f
`, Costa
DATE: January 27, 1997 ° C
County
UUN
SUBJECT:
FORMAT AND CONTENT OF THE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
PROGRAM BUDGET FOR THE 1997-98 FISCAL YEAR
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. REAFFIRM the Board's interest in having the Children & Family Services
Program Budget for the 1997-98 fiscal year broken into the nine categories
outlined in the attached memo from Sara Hoffman.
2. DIRECT the County Administrator to include a new section in 1997-98 on
any program innovations which have occurred in the past year.
3. DIRECT the County Administrator to incorporate the Children's Report Card
in the 1997-98 budget.
4. DIRECT the County Administrator to ask each department to include
additional information on outcome indicators so the Board of Supervisors
and the general public can begin to see what programs are working and
can judge whether they are getting their moneys worth out of the programs
and services that are being provided.
5. DIRECT the County Administrator to highlight for the Board of Supervisors
any departments which have been able to do a particularly outstanding job
of identifying outcome indicators, the extent to which they are being
achieved and cost savings that have been identified and implemented so
the Board can express its appreciation for the responsiveness of these
department heads.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: —YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMSTEE -�
_APPROVE —OTHER
SIGNATURE (S):
MARK BeG�
ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER _
VOTE SIF SUPERVISORS
: 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.-/
ATTESTED��� LAt /-
a . 4 � /-, /q
Contact: PHIL BATCHELOR,CLLIK OF TdE BOAR OF
cc: County Administrator SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Sara Hoffman, Senior Deputy County Administrator _
BY DEPUTY
F&HS-03
6. AUTHORIZE the County Administrator to return this subject to the Family
and Human Services Committee if it is necessary for the Board to remind
departments of the importance of providing information on the extent to
which programs are achieving what they were designed to do. Otherwise,
DIRECT the County Administrator to forward the 1997-98 Children and
Family Services Program Budget to the Board of Supervisors when it is
completed.
BACKGROUND:
On December 17, 1996, the Board of Supervisors referred the preparation of the
Children and Family Services Program Budget for the 1997-98 fiscal year to our
Committee. On January 27, 1997, we met with Sara Hoffman, Senior Deputy
County Administrator. Ms. Hoffman reviewed the attached report with us.
We are generally very pleased with the format and content of the Children and
Family Services Program Budget for the current fiscal year. We agree with Ms.
Hoffman that adding additional information on innovative programs and
incorporating the Children's Report Card in the budget for the 1997-98 fiscal year
would be a valuable addition.
Supervisor DeSaulnier also asked that departments be reminded of the
importance of outcome indicators and figures which measure progress toward
those outcome indicators. He is asking that an additional emphasis be put into
this area in the 1997-98 fiscal year budget. In addition, we would like to reward
those departments which are able to be responsive to the Board's direction in the
area of outcome measures and to identify cost savings measures which have
been implemented during the past year. As a result, we are asking the County
Administrator to highlight a few instances where departments have been able to
be particularly adept at providing such information to us.
2
r ,
k
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE COUNTYADMINIS7RATOR ;
651. Pine Street, 10th Floor
Ma-tinez, California 94553
Telephone: 335-1052
Fax: 646-1353
DATE: January 22, 1997
TO: Supervisor Mark DeSaulnier
Supervisor Donna Gerber
Family &Human(Services Committee
FROM: Sara Hoffman � 4
Senior Deputy Administrator
SUBJECT: FY 97-98 Children &Family Services Budget
The FY 97-98 Children &Family Services Budget divides programs into nine categories:
■ Basic Needs
■ Economic Opportunity
■ Family Support and Parenting
■ Medical Care
■ Child Enrichment and Education
■ Developmental Support
■ Alternative Homes for Children
■ Safety/justice
■ Integrated Services
In addition, each County program includes a description, goals, number of clients, outcome
indicators,outcome data, gross expenditures, financing, net county cost, funding sources, budget
basis and program budget reference. Staff would be happy to add additional information or
categories as deemed appropriate by the Family and Human Services Committee and the Board
of Supervisors. One additional area which could be added, if desired,would be a brief section on
program innovations over the previous year. For example, the new Summit Center program brings
together Probation, Mental Health and Education to serve Juvenile Hall residents. Another
possible addition would be incorporating the results of the Children's Report Card in the budget.
Again, the Children and Family Services Budget is designed to serve the Board of Supervisors. We
would be happy to make adjustments, as necessary, to make it a better document for your use.
cc: Phil Batchelor
Attachment
1996 - 97
Children &. Family ,Services
Budget
O C36 4
/IV
'� Y Y
rA� coux'�"�
County of Contra Costa
FORWARD
The Children and Family Services Budget was prepared by the County Administrator's
Office under the direction of the Family & Human Services Committee (FHS) of the
Board of Supervisors. It is part of a continuing effort to improve the well-being of
children and families in Contra Costa County. This year's budget identifies
approximately$400 million of programs and presents initial efforts to link activities with
measurable outcomes, to move towards a system of accountability that relies on results
rather than process measures.
The Children and Family Services Budget is designed to be a guide to services and a
tool for improving services. It can be used to identify gaps and overlaps in the
continuum of care necessary to increase system efficiency and effectiveness. It is
hoped that the many advisory commissions and committees dedicated to improving
services to children and families in Contra Costa County will use it in their review of
programs and service needs. For departments, it is hoped that the Budget is a guide to
understanding the range of programs operated by other departments available to help
their clients. For the public, and for the children and families of Contra Costa County,
the Budget may be viewed as a guide to services and programs as well as a testament
to the County's efforts to improve the well-being of children and families.
DEFINITION OF PROGRAMS
The Children and Family Services Budget includes all direct service programs that
benefit youth under age 21 or their parents/guardians/care givers. If eligibility is
broader than the family, the Budget includes that portion of the program serving
children and families.
SERVICE CATEGORIES
The Children and Family Services Budget is divided into nine categories:
• Basic Needs- includes programs that provide economic stability, food and
shelter to families that would otherwise be without.
• Economic Opportunity- includes programs designed to help parents become
and/or stay economically self sufficient so that they are able to financially
support their children.
• Family Support& Parenting - includes programs designed to increase the
stability and integrity of families, such as family counseling, parenting training,
parent substance abuse prevention and child abuse prevention.
• Medical Care- includes direct medical and prevention services for children,
pregnant women and women with infants,
• Child Enrichment& Education - includes programs that enrich the lives of
children through services such as education, recreation, and substance abuse
and accident prevention.
• Developmental Support- includes programs that provide mental health and
counseling services, as well as services for developmentally disabled children.
• Alternative Homes for Children - includes programs that provide temporary and
permanent homes for children whose parents are unwilling or unable to care for
them.
• Safety&Justice - includes programs to protect children who are victims of child
abuse, to respond to children acting outside the confines of the law and to
promote adherence to the law.
• Integrated Services- includes collaborative efforts to improve the well-being of
children and/or families that cross programmatic or department lines.
MEASURING OUTCOMES
This year's Budget takes initial steps towards an accountability system based upon
outcomes rather than processes, and identifies program goals, outcome indicators,
and, where available, outcome data for each of its nearly 100 programs. Goals
represent the larger social intent of the program and are the broadest level of analysi
The seven primary goals identified in the Budget are:
* Improve the health and safety status of children and families.
* Increase the number of children who succeed in school.
* Increase the number of children and families who have adequate basic
housing.
* Enhance developmental opportunities for children.
* increase the economic stability and self-sufficiency of families.
* Support, promote and encourage the integrity of families.
* Increase physical safety and promote justice.
Outcome indicators are the more specific or targeted objective of the program. For
example, an outcome indicator for an after school program could be better school
attendance, and outcome data the change in school attendance before and after
entering the program. Outcome data is not included for all programs at this time du
lack of availability, collection costs or absence of collection mechanisms. The Cour
is working towards developing a common understanding of how best to implement
outcomes based accountability systems and develop comprehensive, cross-system,
collaborative strategies to better serve children, families, and the general public.
BUDGET DISCLAIMER
As with any new effort, the Budget undoubtedly contains errors and omissions. The
readers are encouraged to contact the County Administrator's Office at 646-1352 with
additions and corrections. Feedback would be very much appreciated to ensure that
the next year's Budget more accurately reflects the full range of children and family
programs.
The fiscal data for programs reflect the most current available information. However, it
should be noted that some programs reflect estimated 1995-96 program costs, while
others are based on the 1996-97 Recommended Budget. In some cases, financial data
is estimated based upon the approximate allocation of the program costs between
children and family services and other services.
Departmental staff have played an integral role in creating this
document and we extend much appreciation to all who contributed.
to
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Tables and Figures
Table 1 Summary of Children & Family Service Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
Table 2 Top 20 Programs by Gross Expenditure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
Table 3 Top 20 Programs by Net County Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
Table 4 Gross Expenditures and Net County Cost by Department . . . . . . . . . . . vi
Figure 1 Gross Expenditures by Service Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
Figure 2 Net County Cost by Service Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii
Figure 3 Gross Expenditures and Net County Cost by Client Target . . . . . . . . . . ix
Chart 1 Programs by Client Target . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
Basic Needs
1. Income Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. Food Stamps/Food Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
3. Women, Infants and Children Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4. Summer Food Service Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
5. Child Support Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
6. Section 8 Housing Assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7. Public Housing Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
8. Neighborhood Preservation Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
9. Child Nutrition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
10. CDBG Food and Shelter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
11. CDBG Homeless Youth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
12. Homeless Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
13. Keller Food and Shelter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Economic Opportunity
1. Independent Living Skills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2. Job Training/Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3. CDBG Job Training/Economic Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4. Summer Youth Jobs Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5. JTPA Employment and Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
6. Child Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Family SupnQrt and Parenting
1, Family Preservation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. Child Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . : . . . . . 1
3. Family Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
4. Family Reunification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
5. Refugee Social Adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
6. CDBG Family Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
7. CDBG Family Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
8 intensive Intermittent Intervention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
9. Nutrition Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
10. Family Resource Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Born Free . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12. Substance Abuse Intervention and Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13. Head Start . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14. Child Abuse Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15. Keller Violence Prevention Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16. West Contra Costa County Children's Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Medical Care
1. Ambulatory Care Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Z Hospital and Emergency Care Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Physician Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. California Children's Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Healthy Start - Pittsburg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Healthy Start - Richmond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. High Risk Infant Fallow-Up Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Lead Poisoning Prevention Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Teen Health/School Based Clinics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. ,Juvenile Medical Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Child Health and Disability Prevention Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12. Public Health Dental Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13. Child Health Screen Clinics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Chi Enrichment and Education
1. County Library . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Families for Literacy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. CDBG Child Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Cal-Learn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Youth Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Drug and Alcohol Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Keller Recreation Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Keller Youth At-Risk Prevention Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Prevention and Safety Education Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
10. Childhood Injury Prevention Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
5
5 Developmental Support
6
7 1. Central County Child & Youth Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
7 2. After School Program - George Miller Centers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
8 3. Center-based Infant Program - George Miller Centers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
8 4. Home-based Infant Program - George Miller Centers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
9 5. AB 3632 Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
9 6. Developmental Disabilities Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
'0 7. East County Children's Mental Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
11 8. EPSDT (Early Periodic Screening and Treatment) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
2 9. Youth Institutional Mental Health Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
!2 10. Young Adult Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
3 11. Contracted Children Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
13 12. Juvenile Hall Day Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
.4 13. CDBG Child Abuse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
14. Youth Interagency Assessment and Consultation Team . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Alternative Homes for Children
!6
16 1. Permanent Placement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
!7 2. Adoptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
7 3. AFDC/Foster Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
!8 4. Foster Care/Seriously Emotionally Disturbed Children . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
$ 5. Foster Home Licensing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
!9
!9 Safe /Justice
10
S1 1. Juvenile and Dependent Children Legal Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
H 2., Juvenile/Sexual Assault Team and Special Enforcement Unit . . . . . . . 58
32 3. Physical Evidence Analysis 58
32 4. Emergency Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
5. Juvenile Community Services Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
6. Juvenile Probation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
7. Juvenile Hall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
S5 8. Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
f6 9. Public Defender and Alternate Defender Office -Juvenile Division . . . . 62
36
37 Intearated Services
sa
98 1. Bay Point Family Service Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
39 2. North Richmond Family Service Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
t0 3. Safe Futures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
f
Tables and Figures
Table 1 . Summary of Children and Family Service Programs
Service Program Name Department Gross Financing Net County Cost
Category Expenditures
Income Maintenance Social Service $130,710,661 $125,163,679 $5,546,982
Food Stamps/Food Social Service $7,281,430 $6,199,639 $1,081,791
Distribution
Women, Infants and Health Service $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $0
Children Program
is Summer Food Service Health Service
$$ a
Program $13,500 $13,500 $0
Child Support Enforcement District Attorney $10,362,008 $10,362,008 $0
F Section 8 Housing Housing Authority $45,812,826 $45,812,826 $0
0 Assistance
Public Housing Program Housing Authority $2,976,627 $2,976,627 $0
a Neighborhood Preservation
Program Building Inspection $650,000 $650,000 $0
Child Nutrition Community Service $908,323 $908,323 $0
CDBG Food and Shelter Community Development $1,972,772 $1,972,772 $0
r CDBG Homeless Youth Communit Development $12,500 512,500 $0
r Homeless Program Health= $525,000 $525,000 $0
Keller Food and Shelter I Community Developmentl $15,000 1 $15,000 1EO
TOTAL $202,940,647 $196,311,874 $6,628,773
Independent LivingSkills Social Service $262,039 $262,039 $0
Job Training/Education Social Service $6,195,511 $5,438,956 $756,555
4
CDBG Job Training Community Development $465,295 $465,295 $0
• Summer Youth Jobs Program Private Industry Council $28,260 $28,260 $0
• • JTPA Employment and Training Private Industry Council $1,706,991 $1,706,991 $0
Child Development Community Service $5,186,218 $5,186,218 $0
4 •
TOTAL $13,844,314 $13,087,759 $756,555
Family Preservation Social Service $1,066,404 $746,483 $319,921
Child Care Social Service $1,741,705 $1,685,524 $56,181
Family Maintenance Social Service $2,726,755 $2,112,867 $613,888
Family Reunification Social Service $4,048,416 $3,136,976 $911,440
Refugee Social Adjustment Social Service $1,175,811 $1,170,955 $4,856
33 CDBG Family Support Social Service $30,000 $30,000 $0
a , CDBG Family Services Community Development $57,000 $57,000 $0
• Intensive Intermittent Health Service $606,000 $606,000 $0
Intervention
Nutrition Education Cooperative Extension $3,490 $0 $3,490
Family Resource Management Cooperative Extension $34,430 $0 $34,430
Born Free Health Service $480,000 $417,000 $63,000
Substance Abuse Intervention
and Prevention Health Service $2,150,000 $2,030,000 $120,000
Head Start Community Service $6,262,717 $6,216,844 $45,873
Child Abuse Prevention I Social Service I $290,226 $212,408 1 $77,818
Keller Violence Prevention Community Development $12,000 $12,000 $0
Project
West Contra Costa County Health Service $990,000 $450,000 $540,000
Children's Services
TOTAL $21,674,954 $18,884,057 $2,790,897
i'
i
I 1.
Service
Category Program Name Department Ex Gro ores Financing Net County Cost
Ambulatory Care Services Health Service $1 318,000 ;14, 27,000 $397,000
Hospital&Emergency Care Health Service
Services ;36,488,000 $35,235,000 ;1,253,000
Physician Services Health Service $14,269,000 $13,718,000 $551,000
California Children's Services Health Service $4,543,956 $3,543,078 $1,000,936
Health Start-Pittsburg Health Service $138,801 $102,680 $36,121
• Health Start-Richmond Health Service $205,686 $168,906 $36,780
High Risk Infant Follow-Up Health Service $418,400 $251,886 $166,514
Program
Lead Poisoning Prevention Health Service
Project $173,19a ;773,194 ;0
• Teen Healthy/School Based Health Service $105,300 $55,000 $50,300
Clinics
Juvenile Hall Medical Services Health Service $670,000 $670,000 $0
Child Health and Disability Health Service $1,835,500 $1,268,200 $567,300
Prevention Program
Public Health Dental Pro ram Health Service $149,000 $98,5771 $50,423
Child Health Screening Clinics Health Service $220,500 1 $185,000 $35,500
TOTAL $71,535,337 $67,390,461 $4,144,876
County Library County Library $2,306,928 $2,306,928 $0
Families for Literacy County library $30,362 $30,362 $0
CDBG Child Development Community Development $144,792 $144,792 $0
Cal-Learn Social Service $1,000,684 $929,314 $71,370
Youth Development Cooperative Extension $37,924 $0 $37,924
i Drug and Alcohol Resistance Health Service $161,200 $100,000 $61,200
Education
• Keller Recreation Pr ram Community Development $30,000 $30,000 s0
Keller Youth At Risk Prevention Community Development $2,000 $2,000 $0
As Project
• Prevention and Safety Health Service $839,270 $640,336 $198,934
Education Project
Childhood Injury Prevention Health Service $102,300 $102,300 $0
Program
- -- TOTAL - - - $4,655,460 $4,286,032 $369,428
Juvenile and Dependent
Children Legal=
egal Services County Counsel $589,435 $412,606 $176.829
Juvenile/Sexual Assault Team& Sheriff $3,229,224 $0 $3,229,221
Special Enforcement Unit
Physical Evidence Analysis Sheriff $50,000 $20,000 $30,000
Emergency Response Social Service $6,305,488 $6,435,634 $1,869,654
Juvenile Community Service Probation $289,367 $143,470 $145,897
Programs
Juvenile Probation probation $11,253,325 $4,639,340 $6,613,985
Juvenile Hall Probation $6,976,941 $3,225,123 $3,751,818
Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Probation $1,720,148 $817,430 $902,718
Facility
Public Defender&Altemate
Public Defender-Juvenile Public Defender and ADO $1,302,624 $42,125 $1,260,499
Division
TOTAL $33,716,548 $15,735,728 $17,980,821
ii.
Service Program Name Department Gross Financing Net County Cost
Category Expenditures
Central County Child&Youth Health Service $700,000 $325,000 $375,000
Services
After School Program-George
Miller Centers Health Service $360,000 $360,000 $O
Center-based Infant Program-
Geo a Miller Centers Health Service $545,000 $535,000 $10,000
Home-based Infant Program-
George Miller Centers Health Service $160,000 $160,000 $0
• AB3632 Program Health Service $1,210,000 $760,000 $450,000
' Development Disabilities
Council Health Service $50,000 $50,000 $0
East County Children's Mental Health Service $580,000 $260,000 $320,000
Health
Early Periodic Screening& Health Service $900,000 $900,000 $0
Treatment
Youth Institutional Mental Health
' Health Service $217,000 $0 $217,000
Services
•
Young Adult Services Health Service $450,000 $225,000 $225,000
Contracted Children Services Health Service $4,600,000 $1,480,000 $3,120,000
Juvenile Hall Day Treatment Health Service $459,000 $459,000 $0
CDBG Child Abuse Community Development $15,000 $15,000 $0
Youth Interagency Assessment
8 Consultation Team Health Service $740,000 $360,000 $380,000
TOTAL $10,986,000 $5,889,000 $5,097,000
Permanent Placement Social Service $5,175,296 $4,010,156 $1,165,140
Adoptions Social Service $1,919,949 $1,780,815 $139,134
' AFDC/Foster Care Social Service
• $21,785,183 $13,901,908 $7,883,275
Foster Care-Seriously
• Emotional) Disturbed Children Social Service $2,282,000 $897,000 $1,385,000
Foster Home Licensing Social Service $611,547 $611,547 $0
TOTAL $31,773,975 $21,201,426 $10,572,549
NENorthRichmond
Family Service Center Health,Probation 8 $1,050,974 $787,494 $263,480
Social Service Depts.
Family Service Health,Probation& 5686,310 $448,924 5237,386
Center Social Service Depts.Criminal Justice,
afe Futures Probation,and Mental $2,075,523 - $1,743,523 $332,000
Health
TOTAL $3,812,807 $2,979,941 $832.866
CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES TOTAL $394,940,043. $345,766,278 $49,173,765
iii.
TABLE 2. Top 20 Programs by Gross Expenditure
Rank Program Name Department Gross
Expenditures
#1 Income Maintenance Social Service $ 130,710,661
#2 Section 8 Housing Assistance Housing Authority $ 45 812,826
#3 Hospital & Emergency Care Services Health Service $ 36,488,000
#4 AFDC/Foster Care m Social Service ._ $ 21,785,183
#5 Physician Services Health Service $ 14,269,000
G #6 Ambulatory Care Services Health Service $ 12,318,000
#7 Juvenile Probation Probation $ 11,253,325
#8 Child Support Enforcement District Attorney $ 10,362,008
#9 Emergency Response Social Service $ 8,305,488
#10� Food Stamps ! Food Distribution Social Service $ 7,281,43
4 t)
#11 Juvenile Hall Probation $ 6,976,941
#12 Head Start Community Service ,. $ 6,262,717
#13 Job Training/Education Social Service $ 6,195,511
#14,...Child Development Community Service , $ 5,186,218
#15 Permanent Placement Social Service $ 5,175,296
#16 Contracted Children Services Health Service $ 4,600,000
#17 California Children's Services Health Service $ 4,543,956
#18 Family Reunification Social Service $ 4,048,416
#19 Juvenile/Sexual Assault Team and Sheriff $ 3,229,221
Special Enforcement Unit
#20 Public Housing Program- Housing Authority $ 2,976,627
GROSS EXPENDITURES OF TOP 20 PROGRAMS $ 344,804,197
GROSS EXPENDITURES OF REMAINING 79 PROGRAMS $ 50,135,846
iv.
TABLE+3. Top 20 Programs by Net County Cost
Rank Program Name Department Net County
Cost
#1 AFDC/Foster Care Social Service $ 7,883,275
F #2 Juvenile Probation Probation $ 6,613,985
f
#3 -_ Income Maintenance Social Service $ 5,546,982
V
#4 Juvenile Hall Probafion $ 3,751,818
#5 Juvenile/Sexual Assault Team and Sheriff $ 3,229,221
Special Enforcement Unit
#6 Contracted Children Services Health Service $ 3,120,000
#7 Emergency Response Social Service $ 1,869,854
#8 Foster Care-Seriously Emotionally Social Service $ 1,385,000
Disturbed Children
Public Defender &Alternate Public Public Defender and
#9 Defender- Juvenile Division ADO $ 1'260'499
#10 Hospital &Emergency Care Services Health Service $ 1,253,000
#11 Permanent Placement Social Service $ 1,165,140
#12 Food Stamps/Food Social Service $ 1,081,791
Distribution
#13 California Children's Services Health Service $ 1,000,938
#14 Family Reunification Social Service $ 911,440
#15 Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility Probation $ 902,718
#16 Job Training/Education Social Service $ 756,555
#17 Family Maintenance Social Service $ 613,888
_ Child Health and'Disability Prevention' -. ...,
#18 Program Health Service $ 567,300
#19 Physician Services Health Service $ 551,000
#20 West Contra Costa County Children's Health Service 1$ 540,0 -
00
Services
NET COUNTY COST OF TOP 20 PROGRAMS $ 43,464,404
NET COUNTY COST OF REMAINING 79 PROGRAMS $ 5,709,361
V.
Table 4. Gross Expenditures and Net County Costs
by Department
Gross Expenditures Net County Costs
Department {$) {%) ($} M)
¢Building Inspection $ 650,000 <1% <1%
CommunityDevelopment _ ..
$ 2,726,359 1°!° $ - <1%
Community Service $ 12,357,258 3% ^ry $ ._ 45,873 <1%°
Cooperative Extension $ 75,844 <1% $ 75,844 <1%
County Counsel $ 589,435 <1% $ 176,829 <1%° ,
County Library $ 2,337,290 1% $ - <1%
District Attorney $ 10,362,008 3% $ <1%
Health Service $ 90,073,607 23% $ 10,225,010 21%
Housing Authority $ 48,789,453 12% $ <1°/0
Integrated Services $ 3,812,807 1% $ 832,866 2%
Private Industry Council $ 1,735,251 <1% $ - <1%
Probation $ 20,239,781 5% $ 11,414,418 23%
Public Defender &ADO $ 1,302,624 <1% $ 1,260,499 3% ..
Sheriff $ 3,279,221 1% $ 3,259,221 7%
...----- _.-_--
iSocial Service $ 196,609,105 50% $ 21,883,205 45%
r
TOTAL $ 394,940,043 100% $ 49,173,765 100%
Vi.
Figure 1. Gross Expenditures by Service Category
Integrated Services
1%
Safety &Justice
9%
Alternative Homes
8%
Developmental
Support rn
3°l0 .9
-
Child Enrichment& " ' Basic Needs
Education — 51%
1%
Medical Care
18%
Family Support and
Parenting
5% Economic
Opportunity
4%
vii.
Figure 2. Net County Cast by Service Category
Integrated Services
2% Basic Needs
13%
Economic Opportunity
2%
Family Support and
Safety &Justice Parenting
36% 6%
* Medical Care
8%
Child Enrichment&
Education
1%
Developmental
Support
10%
Alternative Homes for
Children
22%
viii.
Figure 3. Breakdown of Gross Expenditures and Net County
Cost Targeted Primarily at Children, Families and Parents
Primarily Parents Primarily
2% Children
19%
GROSS
Primarily $395 million
Families
79%
Primarily
Parents
2%
Primarily
Families
43% ! !
• + Primarily
Children
55%
ix.
w
C t
W � 11x00 Ll
ED
m
p) Em �S €
O H f1 � �� a F•y s �:
p
V
c u
C 2 oa € m Eoc
d OCC E -d Cmr hHr LT.` M ;rN ¢ H4mrm. O3H` ..
c v pE bEm r ,° a '.'a 3 c j a: a itgL . �_g °! ' a _¢ 8.° E
4_1c •C = �. W - c m 'm e,.� o E a ; is ,y�y -'. o @ in±i°
co
{L m B a x � w S n Et
>, t,g>. a . C.
UT= H H1
r r
d N c c m rm m .. O m 3 m
LLQ s za c� s im =, cn x x zaz ata a0, a a m
U
y r V Eo c 9 y m $ m t
c
_ :3
=a c w 3 cv _o m 3 U (U� (um�. t((iryry a ��s_U H U ' 3 y J a ,n a K..
w a a OL m Oil C1 i W 00 m m L"L° . a a is rL° c d U r m .
E E E e,E
04) V) U k U U U CS O 1332 LL LL LL �LL
H Q s
1SC � gci � •co- �.: E Y � �� c H^c
qCq ° G
O li d d a 6 N U > 'T T hrc G7 : k y
g
CL
E L 41 SO _
tC L4 fE fn m m
r >0>0 y . . 5mx
0. F
In 'IlW i
vo
C' U
A. v mmy Y N t>c u y Jg J T
v E ,xUc anCa o mmm 'c e c mU:.O . c ) n wU S rS a o �A
Q m N (p w > $ R C Q 0 !6 03 dr C1 x m d m m
U S m L €.S L a N L O .Yl a• O d m J •• J m m E: m
6 4 U ',U. U R? LL U O:U U d W W N _ LL C1 M,W.. -� J->6. e� i Y Y drc<,J
Basic " d
y�
h k'.
e'r�
Basic Needs
7. Income Maintenance
Social Service Department
Description: Provides cash assistance for families with children who are
needy because of the absence, incapacity, unemployment or death of one or
more parents. Provides eligibility determination for AFDC and Medi-Cal
programs. Mandated program.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children by
providing for their basic needs; Increase the
economic stability of families.
No. of Clients: 72,000 adults and children
Outcome Indicators: Higher and/or more stable family incomes.
Outcome Data: Families served - 38,000
Gross Expenditures: $ 130,710,661
Financing: $ 125,163,679
Net County Cost: $ 5,546,982
Funding Sources: Federal, State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Services, Administration & Services, Aid,
AFDC and Medi-Cal (Administration)
2. Food Stamps/Food Distribution
Social Service Department
Description: Provides food stamps and food commodities to low-income
households. Mandated program.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children
through nutrition.
No. of Clients: 54,000 adults and children
Outcome Indicators: Increased levels of nutrition; Reductions in
chronic health problems associated with
malnutrition.
Outcome Data: 22,000 households served
1
Gross Expenditures: $ 7,281,430
Financing: $ 6,199,639
Net County Cost: $ 1,081,791
Funding Sources: Federal, State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: 100% (Budget is for program administration only;
food stamps are given directly to recipients so that
the cost of food stamp aid does not flow through
the County's budget system)
Budget Reference: Social Service, Administration & Services, Food
Stamps
3. Women, Infants and Children Program
Health Services - Public Health
Description: Provides supplemental food and nutrition education to women,
infants and children. Provides vouchers for food and infant formulas to
women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or within 6 months of delivery, as
well as infants and children aged 1-5. Very limited program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of infants,
children, and mothers through nutrition.
No. of Clients: 14,961 per month
Outcome Indicators: improved growth in children; Prolonged breast-
feeding period; Reduction of overweight children.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 1,700,000
Financing: $ 1,700,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Federal Funds
Budget Basis: 5.7% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Public Health Grants
4. Summer Food Service Program
Health Services - Public Health
Description: Campaign to increase number of USDA Summer Feeding
Program participants. Very limited program discretion.
2
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children
and families through nutrition.
No. of Clients: Not applicable
Outcome Indicators: Increase in public awareness of the program;
Increase in the number of USDA Summer Feeding
Program participants.
Outcome Data: An average of 23,000 people received
mailers/ads.
Gross Expenditures: $ 13,500
Financing: $ 13,500
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: State Funds
Budget Basis: .05% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Public Health Grants
5. Child Support Enforcement
District Attorney
Description: Provides free legal services to establish paternity, determine
fair monthly child support and medical services, and insure enforcement of
that support. No program discretion.
Goals: Increase the economic stability and self
sufficiency of families by insuring children and
families receive the financial and medical support
due to them.
No. of Cases: 70,000 cases per year (Note that cases do not
equal clients, children or family units)
Outcome Indicators: Increase in the amount of child support collected;
Increased program efficiency and compliance with
AB 1033.
Outcome Data: Amount of child support collected increased from
$27,765,295 in FY93-94 to $28,299,651 in FY94-
95; Tier II incentives are awarded to counties who
are in full compliance with the 1033 audit.
County's performance is rated in certain
categories and improvement is rewarded with up
to 3% increase in incentives. County received .5%
Tier II incentives in FY93-95 and 1.5% for FY95-
96.
3
Gross Expenditures. $ 10,362,008
Financing: $ 10,362,008
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Expenditure transfers, State Aid Support
Incentive, Federal Aid Family Support.
Budget Basis: 100% of Recommended Budget
6. Section 8 Housing Assistance
Housing Authority
Description: Rental assistance payments for very low income families in
Contra Costa County. No program discretion.
Goals: Increase the number of children and families with
adequate basic housing.
No. of Clients: 4,500 families
Outcome Indicators: More families procure housing; Fewer families
lose their housing.
Outcome Data: 600 families served off waiting list.
Gross Expenditures: $ 45,812,826
Financing: $ 45,812,826
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: U.S. Department of Housing & Urban
Development
Budget Basis: Estimated - 82% of Budget
Budget Reference: N/A
7. Public Housing Program
Housing Authority
Description: Provides subsidized rental housing for low and very low
income families in Contra Costa County. No program discretion.
Goals: increase the number of children and families with
adequate basic housing.
No. of Clients: 730 families
Outcome Indicators: More families procure housing; Fewer families
lose their housing.
Outcome Data: 95% occupancy rate
4
Gross Expenditures: $ 2,976,627
Financing: $ 2,976,627
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: U. S. Department of Housing & Urban
Development
Budget Basis: Estimated - 64% of Budget
Budget Reference: N/A
8. Neighborhood Preservation Program
Building Inspection Department
Description: Provides no interest or low interest loans for low and moderate
income families to do repairs to bring their homes up to code. No program
discretion.
Goals: Increase the number of children &families with
adequate basic housing
No. of Clients: 50 per program year
Outcome Indicators: Increase in number of homes meeting code
specifications.
Outcome Data: Average of 35-40 loans are funded per program
year; 50 loans are signed during program year.
Gross Expenditures: $650,000
Financing: $650,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Community Development Block Grant Fund
($250,000) & Program Income ($400,000)
Budget Basis: Estimated - 20% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Community Development Block Grant Fund
9. Child Nutrition
Community Service
Description: Provides food services to children enrolled in Child
Development and Head Start. Optional program.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children by
providing food service to children.
5
No. of Clients: 2,353
Outcome Indicators: Increase in nutritional level of children.
Outcome Data: 578,000 meals provided to children.
Gross Expenditures: $ 908,323
Financing: $ 908,323
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Administration for Children and Families, State
Department of Education
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Community Services Department- Child Nutrition
Division
?Q. CDBG Food and Shelter
Community Development Department- Redevelopment and Housing
Description: Provides funds for new housing construction and rehabilitation
(through low or no interest loans) and for emergency housing. Funds are
also granted to non-profit organizations to provide services to alleviate
housing discrimination and support services to households experiencing
housing and homeless problems. In total, there are 12 sub-programs
addressing basic housing needs. No program discretion.
Description: Allocates funds to non-profit organizations for 2 programs that
provide nutritionally sound meals to low-income people. No program
discretion.
Goats: Increase the number of children and families with
basic housing; Improve the health and safety
status of children and families through nutrition.
No. of Clients: Housing: 1,284
Food: 1,109
Outcome Indicators: Increase in affordable housing stock; Increase in
number of shelters for the homeless; Fewer cases
of housing discrimination.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 1,972,772
Financing: $ 1,972,772
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development
6
Budget Basis: 49% of CDBG Grant
Budget Reference: Community Development Department-
Redevelopment
11. CDBG Homeless Youth
Community Development Department - Redevelopment and Housing
Description: Issues funds to non-profit organizations for counseling services
and temporary shelter to runaway and homeless youth (1 program). No
program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of runaway
children.
No. of Clients: Unknown - no placements to date
Outcome Indicators: Fewer children living on the streets.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 12,500
Financing: $ 12,500
j Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development
Budget Basis: 0.3% of CDBG Grant
Budget Reference: Community Development, Community
Development Block Grant
12. Homeless Program
Health Services Department - Homeless Program
i
Description: Provides emergency shelter, transitional housing, shelter plus
care and case management services to the Countys homeless population.
Some program discretion.
Goals: Increase the number of children and families with
adequate basic housing.
No. of Clients: 61 families per month
Outcome Indicators: More shelters for homeless families; Reduction in
number of families living on the streets.
Outcome Data: Not available
7
f
f
i
Gross Expenditures: $ 525,000
Financing: $ 525,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, State Funds, Misc. Donations
Budget Basis: 27% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Homeless Program
13. Keller Food and Shelter
Community Development- Keller Canyon Mitigation Trust Fund
Description: Provides meals and emergency shelter vouchers to children
and families. Some program discretion.
Goals: Provide mitigation to communities affected by
nearby landfills and ancillary solid waste facilities;
Improve the health and safety status of children
and families; Increase the number of children and
families with adequate basic housing.
No. of Clients: 650
Outcome Indicators: More families with basic nutritional and housing
needs met.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 15,000
Financing: $ 15,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources Keller Community Landfill Community Assistance
Mitigation Fees
Budget Basis: 8.3% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Community Development Department/ Keller
Canyon Community Mitigation Assistance Trust
Fund
y.
8
Economic Opportunity
i
7. Independent Living Skills
Social Service Department
Description: Provides support and practical skill building for juveniles eligible
for federal foster care funds who will soon be too old to participate in the foster
care system. The program is focused on assisting children to function as adults
in the world. Optional program.
Goals: Increase the economic stability and self sufficiency of
children leaving the foster care system.
No. of Clients: 500
Outcome Indicators: Increase the number of children who possess self
sufficiency skills and are knowledgeable in the areas
of continuing education, employment and housing.
Outcome Data: Approximately 500 youth graduated from the program
in FY 1995/96
Gross Expenditures: $ 262,039
Financing: $ 262,039
Net County Cost: $ - -0-
Funding Sources: Federal & State
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Service, Administration & Services,
Independent Living Skills
2. Job Training/Education
Social Service Department
Description: Education, training and job services programs which support self
sufficiency for AFDC recipients. GAIN components include orientation and
s appraisal; training programs;job club/search; pre-employment preparation; on
' the jab training; and child care, transportation and ancillary expenses supportive
services. Very limited program discretion.
Goals: increase the economic stability and self sufficiency of
families on AFDC.
No. of Clients: 6 month average =3433
10
Outcome Indicators: Greater employability and higher rates of
employment.
Outcome Data: 941 job placements in 1995 (78/month)
Gross Expenditures: $ 6,195,511
Financing: $ 5,438,956
Net County Cost: $ 756,555
Funding Sources: Federal, State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Services, Administration & Services, GAIN
3. CDBG Job TraininglEconoink Development
Community Development Department - Redevelopment and Housing
Description: Funds are provided to non-profit, public agencies, and for-profit
businesses to increase employment through job training, and to expand
economic opportunity through technical assistance and low interest loans (11
contracts). No discretion
Goals: Increase the economic stability and self sufficiency of
families.
No. of Clients: 343
Outcome Indicators: Greater employability and higher rates of
employment.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 465,295
Financing: $ 465,295
Net County Cost: $ -4-
Funding Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Budget Basis: 12% of CDBG Grant
Budget Reference: Community Development Department -
Redevelopment
4. Summer Youth Jobs Program
Private Industry Council
Description: Youth summer jobs program, operating in conjunction with the
California Employment Development Department, local chambers of commerce
and cities. Very limited program discretion.
11
1
Goals: Increase the economic stability and self-sufficiency of
youth.
No. of Clients: 2,500
Outcome Indicators: Greater employability and higher rates of
employment.
Outcome Data: 2,500 youth employed.
Gross Expenditures: $ 28,260
Financing: $ 28,260
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Private Sector Donations
Budget Basis: 100% of Program Budget
Budget Reference: PIC
5. JTPA Employment and Training
Private Industry Council
Description: Program consists of three elements (No program discretion):
1) Adult/Out of School Youth Program: Assists participants in developing and
obtaining employment through vocational assessment counseling, training, job
search and placement, work experience, and on-the-job training.
2) Private sector youth internships: Prepares high school youths for entry into
the labor force through "tryout empioymenf internship positions.
3) Summer Youth Employment and Training Program (SYETP): Provides work
experience, basic education, skills training, labor market information, vocational
assessment, supportive services, and job development and placement to
economically disadvantaged youths ages 14-21 during the summer months.
Goals: Increase the economic stability and self-sufficiency of
youth.
No. of Cases: 1,220
Outcome Indicators: Greater employability and higher rates of
employment.
Outcome Data: 213 youth employed
Gross Expenditures: $ 1,706,991
Financing: $ 1,706,991
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: JTPA (Federal and State) Funds and Expenditure
12
Transfers
Budget Basis: 28.8% of Program Budget
Budget Reference: PIC
6. Child Development
Community Service
Description: Provides an array of human services for families to assist them in
caring for their children while they work towards achieving or maintaining self
sufficiency. The largest programs are General Child Care/Title IV-A and State
Preschool. The program provides 151,150 days of subsidized child care and
54,900 days of State Preschool. Optional program.
Goals: Increase the economic stability and self-sufficiency of
families; Enhance developmental opportunities for
children.
No. of Clients: 1050 children from 975 families
Outcome Indicators: Higher family incomes; Increased rate of completion
of job training by parents.
Outcome Data: Not available.
Gross Expenditures: $ 5,186,218
Financing: $ 5,186,218
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: State Department of Education, Contra Costa College
District
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Community Services Department- Child
Development Division
13
Fain i 1,y Support
and Parenting
hJ
i
t
Family Support and Parenting
7. Family Preservation
Social Service Department
Description: Intensive social work services to children and their families when
the child is at risk of out-of-home placement. This program has had an excellent
success rate in preventing children's entry into the labor intensive and expensive
out-of-home placement system. Discretionary program.
Goats: Support, promote and encourage the integrity of
families.
No. of Clients: 155 families in calendar year 1995
Outcome Indicators: Increase in the number of children who can be
maintained in their own home; Reduction in County
foster care costs.
Outcome Data: Out-of-Home placement avoided for 228 children in
1995.
Gross Expenditures: $ 1,066,404
Financing: $ 746,483
Net County Cost: $ 319,921
Funding Sources: State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Services, Administration and Services, Family
Preservation
2. Child Care
Social Service Department
Description: The child care program consists of 3 subprograms (Very limited
program discretion):
1) State Department of Education Alternative Payment Child Care -
Child care payments for children in the Child Welfare Services system.
Funded by state Department of Education funds with a required county
maintenance of effort.
15
2) Title IV-A Child Care -This is the "working poor" child care program for
those parents who are employed but at risk of going on AFDC without
child care help. Funded by state and federal funds with a required
County maintenance of effort.
3) Block Grant Child Care - This is the child care program for Teen
Parents, special needs children and former Child Welfare Services
clients. Funded by federal funds.
Goals: Improve health and safety status of children; Increase
number of children who succeed in school; Increase
the economic stability and self sufficiency of families.
No. of Clients: 675
Outcome Indicators: Not available
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 1,741,705
Financing: $ 1,685,524
Net County Cost: $ 56,181
Funding Sources: Federal, State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Services, Administration and Services, Child
Care
3. Family Maintenance
Social Service Department
Description: Social work services under Juvenile Court supervision to prevent
out-of-home placement. Some program discretion.
Goals: Support, promote and encourage the integrity of
families.
No. of Clients: 633
Outcome Indicators: Increase the number of children who can be
maintained in their own home.
Outcome Data: Increase of 41 children during 1995.
Gross Expenditures: $2,726,755
Financing: $ 2,112,867
Net County Cost: $ 613,888
Funding Sources: Federal, State &County General Funds
16
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Service, Administration & Services, Family
Maintenance
4. Family Reunification
Social Service Department
Description: Social services ordered by Juvenile Court for children in out-of-
home placement with the goal of reunifying the family. Some program
discretion.
Goals: Support, promote and encourage the integrity of
families.
No. of Clients: 620
Outcome Indicators: Increase the number of children who are returned to
the home of a parent.
Outcome Data: 122 children transferred to Family Maintenance in
1895.
i
f Gross Expenditures: $ 4,048,416
Financing: $ 3,136,976
Net County Cost: $ 911,440
Funding Sources: Federal, State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Service, Administration & Services, Family
Reunification
5. Refugee Social Adjustment
Social Service Department
Description: Provides cash assistance for eligible refugees, routine social
services, employment services (including a youth employment training program),
home health training and vocational "English as a second language" instruction.
Program partially mandated and partially some discretion.
Goals: Increase the economic stability and self sufficiency of
refugee families.
No. of clients: 300 average caseload
Outcome Indicators: Greater employability and higher rates of
! employment.
17
Outcome Data: 38 assessments per month;
10 job placements per month;
35 component completions per month.
Gross Expenditures: $ 1,175,811
Financing: $ 1,170,955
Net County Cost: $ 4,856
Funding Sources: Federal, County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Service, Administration & Services, Aid
6. CDBG Family Support
Community Development Department - Redevelopment and Housing
Description: Funds are granted to non-profit organizations to provide direct
services to low-income families that improve parenting skills, child care, and
health care support (2 programs), No program discretion.
Goats: Improve the health and welfare of children and
families.
No. of Clients: 83
Outcome Indicators: Not available
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 30,000
Financing: $ 30,000
Net county Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Budget Basis: 0.7% of CDBG Grant
Budget Reference: Community Development
T. CDBG Family Services
Community Development Department - Redevelopment and Housing
Description: Funds are granted to non-profit organizations to provide programs
that serve low-income families and children in acquiring basic services (2
programs). No program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and welfare of low income families
by helping them procure needed services.
18
No. of Clients: 1,050
Outcome Indicators: Not available
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 57,000
Financing: $ 57,000
Net County Cost: $ -o-
Funding Sources: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Budget Basis: 1.4% of CDBG Grant
Budget Reference: Community Development Department -
Redevelopment
8. Intensive Intermittent Intervention
Health Services - Mental Health
Description: Provides,long-term, periodic in-home support and crisis
f intervention to families with limited coping skills who experience cycles of
chronic instability escalating to crisis. Some program discretion
Goats: Support, promote, and encourage the integrity of
families.
No. of Clients: 120 per year
Outcome Indicators: Increase in the number of children who can be
maintained in their own homes; Increase in levels of
parent and youth satisfaction.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 606,000
Financing: $ 606,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Medi-Cal and State Funds
Budget Basis: 1.3% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Children &Adolescent Services
9. Nutrition Education
Cooperative Extension
Description: Practical nutrition and food management programs for low income
parents. Programs delivered through Cooperative Extension's USDA-funded
Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) and Food Stamp
19
Nutrition Education Program (FSNEP). Nutrition Program also assesses needs
and develops strategies to improve program delivery in allied agencies
concerned with nutrition education. Discretionary program.
Goal: Improve health and welfare of low income children
and families through improved nutrition practices.
No. of Clients: 300 per year graduated from face-to-face EFNEP and
FSNEP programs; 150 additional clients who did not
graduate.
23,000 Food Stamp recipients who viewed
educational videos in waiting rooms
Outcome Indicators: Improved food consumption patterns.
Outcome Data: According to pre & post test surveys conducted:
✓ 97.5% of EFNEP/FSNEP graduates demonstrated
food consumption improvements on 24 Hour Food
Recall measures.
✓ Food Stamp waiting room participants made
statistically significant improvements in their
consumption of vegetables and reduction of fat.
Gross Expenditure: $ 3,490
Financing: $ -0-
Net County Cost: $ 3,490
Finding Sources: General Fund
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of budget
Budget Reference: Cooperative Extension, Family Education
10. Family Resource Management
Cooperative Extension
Description: Provides training in the management of family resources to
promote and strengthen family well-being, and delivers parenting education on
topics such as communication skills, values, goals, guidance and discipline. The
program's advisor provides information to low-income families through
workshops, newsletters, videos, etc. Discretionary program.
Goal: Improve the health and welfare of low income
children and families through better parenting
practices; Increase the economic stability and self
sufficiency of low income families through better
budget management.
20
! No. of Clients: 259 families received face-to-face education
Outcome Indicators: Better parenting practices employed; Improved
budget management practices by families.
Outcome Data: In an evaluation study of parent education, 80% of
families indicated that they learned techniques for
discipline and for increasing psychomotor skills in
young children and they clarified their family values;
In an evaluation study of the family budget
management workshop, 75% percent of respondents
indicated that they increased their knowledge of
budgeting and wise use of credit.
Gross Expenditure: $ 34,430
Financing: $ -0-
Net County Cost: $ 34,430
Finding Sources: General Fund
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Cooperative Extension, Family Education
11. Born Free
Health Services Department - Substance Abuse
Description: Provides individual, group, partner and family counseling for
pregnant or parenting women. Referrals are made through Healthy Start,
Delivery at Merrithew Memorial Hospital, Parent Education groups and child
care providers. Some program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and welfare of children and
families and enhance developmental opportunities for
newborns.
No. of Clients: 225 per year.
Outcome Indicators: Fewer cases of substance abuse by pregnant or
parenting women and/or their partners; Reduced
number of substance abuse addicted newborns.
Outcome Data: Not available ,.
Gross Expenditures: $ 480,000
Financing: $ 417,000 j
Net County Cost: $ 63,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, State Funds, County General Funds,
and Medi-Cal
! 21
i
Budget Basis: 3.8% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Special Programs
12. Substance Abuse Intervention and Prevention
Health Services Department- Substance Abuse
Description: Provides residential case management, outpatient counseling,
crisis intervention and primary prevention services to pregnant and parenting
women and youth in substance abuse centers, schools and clubs. Some
program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and welfare of children and
families and enhance developmental opportunities for
newborns.
No. of Clients: 61,300 per year
Outcome Indicators: Fewer cases of substance abuse by pregnant or
parenting women and/or their partners; Reduced
number of substance abuse addicted newborns.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures : $ 2,150,000
Financing: $ 2,030,000
Net County Cost: $ 120,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, State Funds, and County General
Funds
Budget Basis: 17.2% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Prevention, Non-Residential and Special Programs
13. Head Start
Community Service
Description: Provides child and family development services to eligible families
with children ages three to five. Services are provided through 14 County
operated children's centers, two community based Delegate Agency contractors
and four home based child care homes. Very limited program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children by
providing family support; Increase the economic
stability and self-sufficiency of families.
No. of Clients: 1,183 families
22
I Outcome Indicators: Better functioning families; Greater employability and
rates of employment.
Outcome Data: On site program review by federal authorities
indicates compliance with program standards.
Gross Expenditures: $ 6,262,717
Financing: $ 6,216,844
Net County Cost: $ 45,873
Funding Sources: Administration for Children & Families, County
General Fund
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Community Services Department- Head Start
Division
94. Child Abuse Prevention
Social Service Department
Description: Provides child abuse prevention, information and direct services
(e.g., counseling, child care, homemakers) by funding community based
organizations. Authorized under AB 1733. Optional program.
Goals: improve the health and safety status of children at
risk of child abuse.
No. of Clients: 4,106 adults and 532 children
Outcome Indicators: Decreased incidence of child abuse and neglect.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 290,226
Financing: $ 212,408
Net County Cost: $ 77,818
Funding Sources: State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Service, Administration Services, State Office
of Child Abuse Prevention, Contracts
95. Keller Violence Prevention Project R
Community Development - Keller Canyon Mitigation Trust Fund
Description: Educational support, family counseling, and youth
violence/conflict prevention for at risk youth and families. Some program
23
discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children and
families; Provide mitigation to communities affected
by nearby landfills and ancillary solid waste facilities.
No, of Clients: 75
Outcome Indicators: Not available
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 12,000
Financing: $ 12,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Keller Canyon Community Mitigation Assistance Trust
Fund
Budget Basis: 6.6% of budget
Budget Reference: Community Development Department/ Keller Canyon
Community Mitigation Assistance Trust Fund
16. West Contra Costa County Children's Services
Health Services - Mental Health
Description: Provides outpatient psychotherapy, child-play therapy, family
therapy, couples therapy, medication evaluation, parent and child support
groups. Some program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for youth
requiring mental health services through family and
individual counseling.
No. of Clients: 580 per year
Outcome Indicators: Behavior changes; Diminished intensity in parenting
problems and symptoms.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 990,000
Financing: $ 450,000 $
Net County Cost: $ 540,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, Client Fees and County General
Funds
Budget Basis: 2.1% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Children &Adolescent Services
24
Medical Care
f
Medical Care
9. Ambulatory Care Services
Health Services Department- Enterprise Fund I
Description: Provides family practice oriented primary care, as well as
specialty clinic services in seven ambulatory care centers located in East, West
and Central County. Very limited program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and well-being of children and
families through direct medical service.
No. of Clients: 5,300 per year (based upon financial indicators)
Outcome Indicators: Greater number of medical conditions resolved.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 12,318,000
Financing: $ 11,921,000
Net County Cost: $ 397,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, State Funds, Client Fees, County
General Funds
Budget Basis: 6.9% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Ambulatory Care Services
2. Hospital and Emergency Care Services
Health Services Department - Enterprise Fund I
Description: Provides a full range of inpatient diagnostic and therapeutic
services, as well as emergency room services to treat urgent medical and
psychiatric problems. Very limited program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and well-being of children and
adults through direct medical service.
No. of Clients: 3,900 per year (based upon financial indicators)
Outcome Indicators: Greater number of medical conditions resolved.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 36,488,000
Financing: $ 35,235,000
Net County Cost: $ 1,253,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, State Funds, Client Fees, County
26
General Funds
Budget Basis: 20.6% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Hospital and Emergency Care Services
3. Physician Services
Health Services Department- Enterprise Fund i
Description: Provides direct patient care services at Merrithew Memorial
Hospital and Health Centers through 80 primary care physicians and more than
175 specialty care physicians. Very limited program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and well-being of children and
adults through direct medical service.
No. of Clients: 9,200 per year (based upon financial indicators)
Outcome Indicators: Greater number of medical and psychiatric conditions
resolved.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $14,269,000
Financing: $13,718,000
Net County Cost: $ 551,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, State Funds, Client Fees, County
General Funds
Budget Basis: 8% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Physician Services
4. California Children's Services
Health Services Department - Public Health
Description: Provides medical case management, diagnostic evaluations,
treatment services, physical therapy, and HIV testing & counseling. Very limited
program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and well-being of children through
direct medical service.
No. of Clients: 2,500 per year
Outcome Indicators: Greater number of medical conditions resolved;
Fewer children requiring higher levels of medical
care.
Outcome Data: Not available
27
Gross Expenditures: $ 4,543,956
Financing: $ 3,543,018
Net County Cost: $ 1,000,938
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, State Funds, Client Fees, County
General Funds
Budget Basis: 15.2% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: California Children's Service
5. Healthy Start- Pittsburg
Health Services Department- Hospital & Clinks
Description: Provides health education, prenatal care, dietary counseling and
psychosocial evaluation to pregnant women. Very limited program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children and
families by educating pregnant women to improve
their health and that of their fetuses and infants.
No. of Clients: 45/month
Outcome Indicators: Diminished intensity in pre- and post-natal health
problems in women and their offspring.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 138,801
Financing: $ 102,680
Net County Cost: $ 36,121
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, State Funds, Client Fees and County
General Funds
Budget Basis: 0.1% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Hospital and Outpatient Clinics
6. Healthy Start- Richmond
Health Services Department- Hospital & Clinics
Description: Provides health education, prenatal care, dietary counseling and
psychosocial evaluation to pregnant women. Very limited program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and welfare of children and
families by educating pregnant women.
No. of Clients: 122 per month
Outcome Indicators: Diminished intensity in pre- and post-natal health
28
i
problems in women and their offspring.
Outcome Data: Not available.
Gross Expenditures: $ 205,686
Financing: $ 168,906
Net County Cost: $ 36,780
Funding Sources: Federal, State, and General funds; Client fees
Budget Basis: 0.1% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Hospital and Outpatient Clinics
7. High Risk Infant Follow-Up Program
Health Services Department - Public Health
Description: Provides home visits to parents/care givers of fragile infants to
promote optimal hepithldevelopment outcomes for high-risk infants. Services
include in-home family support, parent teaching/training, health monitoring,
referrals. Very limited program discretion.
Goats: Improve the health and safety status of fragile or high
risk infants; Support, promote and encourage the
integrity of families.
No. of Clients: 229 per year
Outcome Indicators: Fewer children requiring higher levels of medical
care; Increased number of children safely maintained
in their own homes.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 418,400
Financing: $ 251,886
Net County Cost: $ 166,514
Funding Sources: State Funds and County General Funds
Budget Basis: 1.4% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Public Health Grants
8. Lead Poisoning Prevention Project
Health Services Department- Public Health
Description: Provides case management for children under 18 with elevated
blood lead levels, consultation to health care providers, and information and
educational materials to the general public. Very limited program discretion.
29
k Goals: Increase the health and safety status of children by
treating and preventing lead poisoning.
{ No. of Clients: 20-30/month
tE Outcome Indicators: Fewer cases of lead poisoning; Fewer children
f requiring higher levels of medical care.
Outcome Data: Not available
Cross Expenditures: $ 173,194
Financing: $ 173,194
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: State Funds
Budget Basis: 0.6% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Public Health Grants
9. Teen HealthlSchool Based Clinics
Health Services Department- Public Health
Description: Offers health services to youth (12 to 21 years) through public
health clinics and schools in West County. Services include sports physicals
and wellness examinations, immunizations, hearing and vision screening, family
planning/STD's and anticipatory guidance/heaith information. Very limited
program discretion.
Coals: Improve the health and safety status of children
through preventative and direct medical service.
No. of Clients: 160/month
Outcome Indicators: Fewer children requiring higher levels of medical
care.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 105,300
Financing: $ 55,000
Net County Cost: $ 50,300
Funding Sources: State Funds and County General Funds
Budget Basis: 0.3% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Public Health Clinical Services
30
10. Juvenile Hall Medical Services
Health Services Department- Detention Facility
Description: Provides primary care medical services to inmates in the Juvenile
Hall, including diagnostic testing, treatment and nursing care. Some program
discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children in
Juvenile Hall through direct medical service.
No. of Clients: 600 per year
Outcome Indicators: Greater number of medical conditions resolved.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 670,000
Financing: $ 670,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Source: Expenditure Transfers
Budget Basis: 9.9% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Juvenile Hall Medical Services
11. Child Health and Disability Prevention Program
Health Services Department- Public Health
Description: Provides regular preventive health assessments to infants &
youths to identify any health problems. Refer those with suspected problems for
necessary diagnosis &treatment. Very limited program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children
through preventative health care.
No. of Clients: 2,800 per month
Outcome Indicators: Reduction in number and intensity of health problems
requiring higher levels of care.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 1,835,500
Financing: $ 1,268,200
Net County Cost: $ 567,300
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, State Funds and County General
Funds
Budget Basis: 6.1% of Recommended Budget
31
4
i
I Budget Reference: Public Health Grants
12. Public Health Dental Program
Health Services Department- Public Health
Description: Provides direct dental services to children in schools including
plaque control and fluoride treatments, and educates children, teachers and
parents to help develop dental skills. Very limited program discretion.
f Goats: Improve the health and safety status of children
through dental care direct service and education.
No. of Clients: 21,906 per year
Outcome Indicators: Improvements in overall dental health (as reflected by
plaque indices, plaque control records and teacher
I evaluations as determined by pre/post tests)
Outcome Data: Not available
s
Gross Expenditures: $ 149,000
Financing: $ 98,577
F Net County Cost: $ 50,423
Funding Sources: State Funds and County General Funds
Budget Basis: 0.5% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Public Health Grants
13. Child Health Screening Clinics
Health Services Department - Public Health
Description: Provides screening for growth and development, hearing/vision,
hemoglobin, dental and nutritional, immunization, lead, child safety and TB.
Identification of health problems & referrals made. Very limited program
discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children
through preventative health care and referral service.
No. of Clients: 200-250 per month
Outcome Indicators: Reduction in number and intensity of health problems
requiring higher levels of care.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 220,500
32
Financing: $ 985,000
Net County Cost: $ 35,500
Funding Sources: State Funds, Client Fees and County General Funds
Budget Basis: 0.7% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Public Health Clinical Services
33
Child Enrichment
and Education
c
Child Enrichment and Education
1. County Library
Contra Costa County Library
Description: Provides comprehensive library service to all age groups,
including children. Services for children include access to books and other
library resources, preschool and school-age programs, class visits, reference
assistance, and volunteer services designed specifically for children and
students. Some program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for children by
providing equitable access to public library services.
No. of Clients: 72,735 children ages 0 to 14 in the County library
service area
Outcome Indicators: More children using library services; More resources
and programs for children.
Outcome Data: fib% of children have library cards;
From 1993/94 to 1994/95:
Expenditure for children's material increased 50.8%;
25,025 new children's resources added to the
collection;
Circulation of children's material increased 3.5%;
Number of children's programs increased 22%;
Attendance of children's programs increased 9%.
Gross Expenditures: $ 574,005 Central Library
$1 Y32.923 Branches and Extension Services
$2,306,928 Total
Financing: $2,306,928
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources Library taxes, fees for service, state funds and
contributions from cities and gifts.
Budget Basis: Estimated - 30% of Recommendfd Budget
Budget Reference: County Library- Central Library
County Library - Branches and Extension Services
35
2. Families for Literacy
Contra Costa County Library
Description: County-wide program that works with Project Second Chance, the
library's adult literacy program. To help break the cycle of illiteracy, program
emphasizes parent as teacher for children age 5 and under, and also works with
Head Start teachers and teen moms. No program discretion with state funds;
limited program discretion with other funding.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for children by
breaking the cycle of family illiteracy.
No. of Clients: 428 (annual total)
Outcome Indicators: Higher rate of literacy, More resources and programs
promoting literacy.
Outcome Data: 1994 1995
Families Served
Project Second Chance 147 173
Head Start 80 220
Teen Moms 35 35
Books Distributed
Project Second Chance 949 891
Head Start 400 1100
Teen Moms 245 245
Number of Proorams
Project Second Chance 5 10
Head Start 19 55
Teen Moms 6 6
Bay Point 0 3
Gross Expenditures: $ 30,362
Financing: $ 30,362
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: State grant plus other grants and gifts
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Budget
Budget Reference: N/A
4
3. CDBG Child Development
Community Development Department- Redevelopment and Housing
Description: Funds are granted to non-profit organizations to provide programs
36
in education, prevention techniques, recreation and enrichment, and counseling.
No program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for children;
Increase the number of children who succeed in
school.
No. of Clients: 15,375
Outcome Indicators: Not available
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 144,792
Financing: $ 144,792
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Budget Basis: 3.6% of CDBG Grant
Budget Reference: Community Development Department -
Redevelopment
4. Cal-Learn
Social Service Department
Description: Provides child care and counseling services to pregnant/parenting
teens who are under the age of 19 and on AFDC while they attend high school.
Mandated program.
Goals: Increase the number of children on AFDC who
succeed in school; Increase the economic stability
and self sufficiency of families on AFDC.
No. of Clients: 460
Outcome Indicators: Higher rates of academic success.
Outcome Data: In 1995, 72 youth earned high school diplomas; 296
received bonus for satisfactory progress.
Gross Expenditures: $ 1,000,684
Financing: $ 929,314 p
Net County Cost: $ 71,370
Funding Sources: Federal, State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Estimated - not included in Recommended Budget
since allocation not yet final
Budget Reference: Not applicable
37
5. Youth Development
Cooperative Extension
Description: Provides education to adults who work with youth through the 4-H
program, community based organizations, schools and other agencies. Program
also generates new knowledge about youth and issues affecting youth and their
families through a variety of applied research projects. Optional program.
Goal: Enhance developmental opportunities for youth by
broadening the knowledge base of teachers and
educators.
No. of Clients: Direct service to 867 adults who serve over 10% of
Contra Costa's youth population. Many more were
reached through published articles, media, etc.
Outcome Indicators: Greater pool of skilled educators.
Outcome Data: Each direct-service program is followed by a survey
or an interview to assess program effectiveness.
Success indicators are related to knowledge gained
on the topics delivered in the particular program, (e.g.
appropriate program delivery methods, youth
issues/needs, teaching methods). 90% of adult
respondents report use of techniques and/or
information provided by Cooperative Extension to
enhance the service they provide to youth.
Gross Expenditures: $ 37,924
Financing: $ -0-
Net County Cost: $ 37,924
Finding Sources: General Fund
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Cooperative Extension, Youth Development
6. Drug and Alcohol Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.)
Sheriff- Administrative Services
Description: Provides year-round, seventeen week curriculum to fifth and sixth
grade students in all nineteen elementary schools in the unincorporated county
area. Children in kindergarten through fourth grade are also exposed to this
program. Children are taught to stay away from alcohol, illegal drugs and
violence prior to confronting increased peer pressure in Junior and Senior High
Schools. The program also serves parents through parent participation in the
38
i
classroom and at graduations. Optional program.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children by
reducing substance abuse through education.
No. of Clients: 8,096 students
Outcome Indicators: Reduced substance abuse by children; Increased
awareness of the dangers of substance abuse.
Outcome Data: During FY 95-96, a total of 8,096 students in
kindergarten through sixth grade were taught the
D.A.R.E. Program. Graduates from fifth and sixth
grade (earlier grades do not have graduates) totaled
1,590, an increase of 100 children over FY 94-95.
Gross Expenditures: $ 161,200
Financing: $ 100,000
Net County Cost: $ 61,200
Funding Sources: State grant funds from Office of Criminal Justice
Planning. This is the last year of three year grant.
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Office of the Sheriff, Administrative Services, Drug
and Alcohol Resistance Education
7. Keller Recreation Program
Community Development - Keller Canyon Mitigation Trust Fund
Description: Provides youth sports and musical equipment, sports field
renovations, musical events transportation, and after school recreational
activities. Some program discretion.
Goals: Provide mitigation to communities affected by new
landfills and ancillary solid waste facilities; Enhance
developmental opportunities for children.
No. of Clients: 1750
Outcome Indicators: Increase youth involvement in sports and music.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 30,000
Financing: $ 30,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Keller Canyon Community Mitigation Assistance Trust
Fund
Budget Basis: 16.6% of Recommended Budget
39
I
Budget Reference: Community Development Department/ Keller Canyon
Community Mitigation Assistance Trust Fund
& Ke/ler Youth At-Risk Prevention Project
Community Development - Keller Canyon Mitigation Trust Fund
Description: Provide training to high risk youth in employment preparation, self
esteem building, substance abuse prevention and intervention awareness, and
conflict/violence management. Some program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for children;
Provide mitigation to communities affected by nearby
landfills and ancillary solid waste facilities.
No. of Clients: 150
Outcome Indicaltors: Reduce destructive behavior by at risk youth.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 2,000
Financing: $ 2,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Keller Canyon Community Mitigation Assistance Trust
Fund
Budget Basis: 1.1% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Community Development Department/ Keller Canyon
Community Mitigation Assistance Trust Fund
9. Prevention and Safety Education Programs
Health Services - Public Health
Description: Educate children on various safety and prevention issues. Some
program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children
through injury prevention education.
No. of Clients: Not available
Outcome Indicators: Increased awareness of safety prevention; Reduction
in number of accidents.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 839,270
40
Financing: $ 640,336
Net County Cost: $ 198,934
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, State Funds and County General
Funds
! Budget Basis: 2.8% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Public Health Grants
90. Childhood Injury Prevention Program
Health Services Department - Public Health
Description: Countywide coalition of organizations aimed at preventing injuries
to at-risk children under 20 years old. Very limited program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children
through injury prevention education.
No. of Clients: Not available.
Outcome Indicators: Increased awareness of safety prevention; Reduction
in number of accidents.
Outcome Data: Not available.
Gross Expenditures: $ 102,300
Financing: $ 102,300
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: State Funds
Budget Basis: 0.3% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Public Health Grants
41
Developmental Support
.:r
i
Developmental Support
1. Central County Child & Youth Services
Health Services Department- Mental Health
Description: Provides outpatient mental health services to low-income
seriously emotionally disturbed children, adolescents, families, and parenting
groups. Services include psychological testing, consultation and mental health
education in Central County. Some program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for low income
seriously emotionally disturbed children; Support,
promote, and encourage the stability of families.
No. of Clients: 450 per year
Outcome Indicators: Behavior changes in children; Diminished intensity in
parenting problems.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 700,000
Financing: $ 325,000
Net County Cost: $ 375,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, Client Fees and County General
Funds
Budget Basis: 1.5% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Children & Adolescent Services
2 After School Program - George Miller Centers
Health Services Department- Public Health
Description: Provides a social recreational day care program for adolescents
aged 11-22 years with developmental disabilities. Optional program.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for children
with disabilities.
No. of Clients: 40 per year
Outcome Indicators: Diminished intensity of parenting problems.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 360,000
44
Financing: $ 360,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: State Funds
Budget Basis: 1.2% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: George Miller Centers
3. Center-based Infant Program - George Miller Centers
Health Services Department- Public Health
Description: Provides developmental and therapeutic services to infants with
developmental disabilities, infants at risk of developing handicapping conditions
and families using multi-disciplinary team approach. Optional program.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for infants with
disabilities or at risk infants; Support, promote and
encourage the integrity of families.
No. of Clients: 52 per year
Outcome Indicators: Changes in children's developmental levels; Increase
in the number of children who can be maintained in
their own home.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 545,000
Financing: $ 535,000
Net County Cost: $ 10,000
Funding Sources; State Funds and County General Funds
Budget Basis: 1.2% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: George Miller Centers
4. Home-based Infant Program - George Miller Centers
Health Services Department- Public Health
Description: Provides in-home developmental and therapeutic services to
infants with developmental disabilities, or at risk of beveloping handicapping
conditions. Optional program.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for infants with
disabilities or at risk infants; Support, promote and
encourage the integrity of families.
No. of Clients: 60 per year
45
w
Outcome Indicators: Changes in children's developmental levels; increase
in the number of children who can be maintained in
their own home.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 160,000
Financing: $ 160,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: State Funds
Budget Basis: 0.3% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: George Miller Centers
5. AB 3632 Program
Health Services Department - Mental Health
Description: Provides individual, group &family therapy, teacher consultation,
case management, day treatment, residential treatment to students determined
to need mental health services in order to benefit from their education. Some
program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for students in
need of mental health services; Increase in the
number of children who succeed in school.
No. of Clients: 450 per year
Outcome Indicators: Improved scholastic performance; Reduced number
and intensity in parenting problems.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 1,210,000
Financing: $ 760,000
Net County Cost: $ 450,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, State Funds, Client Fees and County
General Funds
Budget Basis: 2.6% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Children & Adolescent Services=
46
6. Developmental Disabilities Council
Health Services Department - Public Health
Description: Works to improve services to people with developmental
disabilities. Provides information about community resources, offers
consultation to agencies and organizations, publishes bulletins and newsletters,
advocates for improved services, and trains parents and others. Optional
program.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for
developmentally disabled children by increase
access to services and advocating for improved
services.
No. of Clients: Not applicable.
Outcome Indicators: Greater access to services by developmentally
disabled children; Improvements in level or number of
services.
Outcome Data: Not available.
Gross Expenditures: $ 50,000
Financing: $ -0-
Net County Cost: $ 50,000
Funding Sources: County General Funds
Budget Basis: 0.1% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Public Health Grants
7. East County Children's Mental Health
Health Services Department - Mental Health
Description: Provides individual, group & family psychotherapy, crisis
intervention, diagnosis and assessment, case management, medication and
consultation. Some program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for youth
suffering from mental health disorders; Support,
promote and encourage the integrity of families.
No. of Clients: 620 per year
Outcome Indicators: Diminished intensity in parenting problems and
symptoms; Behavior changes in children.
Outcome Data: Not available
47
i
Gross Expenditures: $ 580,000
Financing: $ 260,000
Net County Cost: $ 320,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, Client Fees and County General
Funds
Budget Basis: 1.3% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Children &Adolescent Services
8. EPSDT(Early Periodic Screening and Treatment)
Health Services - Mental Health
Description: Provides comprehensive mental health services to Medi-Cal
eligible severely emotionally disturbed persons under age 21 and their families.
Some program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for youth
suffering from mental health disorders; Support,
promote and encourage the integrity of families.
No. of Clients: 4001year
Outcome Indicators: Improvement in client behavior; Satisfaction levels of
parent and youths; Increase in the number of children
that can be maintained in their own homes.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 900,000
Financing: $ 900,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Medi-Cal and State Funds
Budget Basis: 1.9% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Children &Adolescent Services
9. Youth Institutional Mental Health Services
Health Services Department- Detention Facility
Description: Provides crisis intervention, medication evaluation and critical
consultation by Mental Health Division staff. Some program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for youth
maintained in correctional facilities.
No. of Clients: 600iyear
48
Outcome Indicators: Fewer youth referred to higher levels of care
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 217,000
Financing: $ -0-
Net County Cost: $ 217,000
Funding Sources: County General Funds
Budget Basis: 0.5% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Juvenile Justice Facilities
10. Young Adult Services
Health Services Department- Mental Health
Description: Provides a full range of mental health services countywide to
persons ages 18-20. Some program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for youth
requiring mental health services.
No. of Clients: 90 per year
Outcome Indicators: More young adults maintaining normal community
living; Fewer youth requiring higher levels of care.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 450,000
Financing: $ 225,000
Net County Cost: $ 225,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds and County General Funds
Budget Basis: 3% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Children &Adolescent Services
11. Contracted Children Services
Health Services - Mental Health
Description: Services include outpatient mentaLhealth services, day
treatment, crisis residential, prevention and early intervention services. Some
program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for youth
requiring mental health services; Support, promote,
and encourage the stability of families.
49
No. of Clients: 760/year
Outcome Indicators: Behavior changes; Diminished intensity in parenting
problems and symptoms; Number of children who can
be maintained in their own home.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 4,600,000
Financing: $ 1,4$0,000
Net County Cost: $ 3,120,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, Client Fees and County General
Funds
Budget Basis: 9.9% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Children &Adolescent Services
12. Juvenile Hall Day Treatment
Health Services - Mental Health
Description: Provides multi-disciplinary assessment; individual, group and
family therapy; and a parent support group to seriously emotionally disturbed
wards of the court. Some program discretion.
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for emotionally
disturbed wards of the court.
No. of Clients: 60 per year
Outcome Indicators: Behavior changes in youth; Number of youth not
being referred to higher levels of care.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $459,000
Financing: $ 459,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Medi-Cal and State Funds
Budget Basis: 11% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Children &Adolescent Services
X
13. CDBG Child Abuse
Community Development Department- Redevelopment and Housing
Description: Funds are granted to non-profit organizations to provide support
services to children who are victims of abuse, neglect, or abandonment.
50
No program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children who
are suffering from child abuse or neglect.
No. of Clients: 25
Outcome Indicators: Not available
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 15,000
Financing: $ 15,000
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Budget Basis: 0.4% of CDBG Grant
Budget Reference: Community Development Department-
Redevelopment
14. Youth Interagency Assessment and Consultation Team
Health Services
Description: Joint effort to provide crisis intervention in juvenile institutions,
conduct psychological testing of juvenile court dependents, and provide case
management at local and state hospitals and intensive residential centers.
Some program discretion.
Goals: Improve service to children and families through
integrated delivery; Enhance developmental
opportunities for juveniles under state care.
No. of Clients: 90 per month
Outcome Indicators: Fewer youth referred to higher levels of care; More
efficiently and effectively provide and coordinate
social services.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 740,000
Financing: $ 360,000
Net County Cost: $ 380,000
Funding Sources: Federal Funds, Client Fees and County General
Funds
Budget Basis: 100% of Recommended Budget
Program Budget Ref: Children &Adolescent Services
51
Alternative Homes fot-
Children
Alternative Homes for Children
9. Permanent Placement
Social Service Department
Description: Social services to children who cannot be returned home from
placement, with the objective of adoption or guardianship. Some program
discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children who
cannot be returned home from placement.
No. of Clients: 1820
Outcome Indicators: Increase the number of children placed with legal
guardians or adoptive parents.
Outcome Data: 14% increase (220 placements)
Gross Expenditures: $5,175,296
Financing: $4,010,156
Net County Cost: $1,165,140
Funding Sources: Federal, State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Services, Administration & Services,
Permanent Placement
2. Adoptions
Social Service Department
Description: This program provides adoption services to children (free for
adoption under the Civil and Welfare & Institutions Codes) and processes step-
parent adoptions on a fee-for-service basis. Program administration optional; aid
mandated.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children free
for adoption.
No. of Clients: 560
Outcome Indicators: Increase the number of children placed with legal
guardians or adoptive parents, Reduction in foster
care costs.
Outcome Data: 126 children placed in adoptive homes in 1995.
53
Gross Expenditures: $ 1,919,949
Financing: $ 1,780,815
Net County Cost: $ 139,134
Funding Sources: Federal, State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Services, Administration & Services, Adoptions
3. AFDC(Foster Care
Social Service Department
Description: Provides cash assistance to foster families. Mandated program.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of youth under
foster care by providing for their basic needs.
No. of Clients: 2100
Outcome Indicators: Fewer foster children with basic needs unfulfilled.
Outcome Data: 80 more children served than prior year.
Gross Expenditures: $ 21,785,183
Financing: $ 13,901,908
Net County Cost: $ 7,883,275
Funding Sources: Federal, State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Services, Administration & Services, AFDC/FC
d. Foster Care/Seriously Emotionally Disturbed Children
Social Service Department
Description: Cash assistance to provide for the needs of children who are
placed into foster care through the Severely Emotionally Disturbed program.
This is a multi-disciplinary program to identify and provide services to children
who are not able to benefit from their education due to their severe emotional
disturbance. Mandated program_
Goals: Enhance developmental opportunities for severely
emotionally disturbed children in foster homes.
No. of Clients: 45 children
Outcome Indicators: Ensure that payments are issued in a timely and
accurate manner.
54
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 2,282,000
Financing: $ 897,000
Net County Cost: $ 1,385,000
Funding Sources: State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Services, Administration & Services, FUSED
5. Foster Home Licensing
Social Service Department
Description: Processes applications for foster home licenses and provides
support services to licensed foster care parents. Mandated program.
Goats: Improve the health and safety status of children
under foster care.
Outcome Indicators: Increase in the number of licensed foster homes.
Outcome Data: 102 new licenses issued in 1995, 425 in force as of
12-31-95 with capacity for 1037 children.
Gross Expenditures: $ 611,547
Financing: $ 611,547
Net County Cost: $ -0-
Funding Sources: Federal & State
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Service, Administration & Services, Foster
Home Licensing
r
55
Safety/Justice
Safety and Justice
1. Juvenile and Dependent Children Legal Services
County Counsel -Juvenile Unit
Description., Provides legal services for juvenile dependency areas (300's,
termination and abandonment of parental rights proceedings, juvenile
guardianships, etc.) Very limited program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children.
No. Of Clients: One, representing the Social Service Department
and, to the extent legally allowed, involved children.
Outcome Indicators: Provision of appropriate legal services for the care,
protection andtor control of minor children requiring
such assistance.
Outcome Data: A monthly average of 58 contested juvenile hearings
and trials are handled and a monthly average of 676
hours of legal services provided.
FUNCTION/ACTIMY FY91-92 FY92.93 FY93-94 FY94.95 Y:YR FY
95-96
JUVENILE SERVICES
A.Depend/Abandon Hearing 6,417 7,038 7,279 8,130 4,365
Appearances(hrs.)
B.Avg.No.Hearings Handled, 1,234 1,218 1,182 1,234 668
Per DCC
C. Avg. Service Hours Per 1.3 hrs 1.33 hrs 1.37 hrs 1.32 hrs 1.21 hrs
Hearing Appearance
Gross Expenditures: $ 589,435
Financing: $ 412,606
Net County Cost: $ 176,829
Funding Sources: "A-87" financing plan and County General Fund.
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget.
Budget Reference: County Counsel Program B "Social Service-Probate
(Public Administrator),"subprogram 3 "Dependent
Children (Juvenile matters)."
57
2. Juvenile/Sexual Assault Team and Special Enforcement Unit
(Narcotics and Vice)
Sheriff- Investigative Division
Description: The Juvenile/Sexual Assault Team investigates crimes where
juveniles are the victim such as child abuse, neglect and sexual abuse. The
Special Investigations Unit provides initial and follow-up investigation in crimes
involving illegal drugs or vice activities. Both often involve or target juveniles.
Both units maintain close contact with Child Protective Services and the District
Attorney's Office. Optional program.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children
suffering from child abuse or neglect by investigating
all identified juvenile cases to the point where
perpetrators can be prosecuted to the fullest extent of
the law.
No. of Clients: Varies - cases involving juveniles not separately
tracked
Outcome Indicators: Decreased incidence of child abuse and neglect;
Higher share of court cases involving child abuse and
neglect resolved.
Outcome Data: Not available.
Gross Expenditures: $ 3,229,211
Financing: $ -0-
Net County Cost: $ 3,229,211
Funding Sources: County General Fund
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Office of the Sheriff, Investigations Division,
Juvenile/Sexual Assault Team and Special
Investigations Unit
3. Physical Evidence Analysis
Sheriff- Criminalistics Laboratory
Description: Analysis of physical evidence for the purpose of establishing
physical abuse of children. Analysis of blood, urine and street samples to
establish the abuse of alcohol and/or illicit drugs by parents or exposure to
children. Services are provided countywide, primarily at the request of law
enforcement agencies, but occasionally at the request of Social Service,
58
Probation or the Courts. Limited program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children
suffering from child abuse by providing physical
evidence to help insure perpetrators of child abuse
will be prosecuted.
No. of Clients: Approximately two per month
Outcome Indicators: Not applicable - determined by requesting agency
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 50,000
Financing: $ 20,000
Net County Cost: $ 30,000
Funding Sources: Fee for service and County General Fund -
approximately $30,000.
Budget Basis: Estimated - 100% of budget
Budget Reference: None, included as part of General Criminalistics,
Alcohol Test and, Drug Analysis and Toxicology
programs
4. Emergency Response
Social Service Department
Description: Receive and assess child abuse reports and take immediate action
to protect children. Some program discretion.
Goals: Improve the health and safety status of children
suffering from child abuse.
No. of Clients: 900
Outcome Indicators: Greater protection of children from continued child
abuse.
Outcome Data: Responded to 19,500 referrals in 1995
Gross Expenditures: $ 8,305,488
Financing: $ 6,435,634
Net County Cost: $ 1,869,854
Funding Sources: Federai, State & County General Funds
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Social Service, Administration & Services,
Emergency Response
59
7
5. Juvenile Community Services Programs
Probation Department
Description: County-wide programs to teach juveniles to accept personal
responsibility and "repay" society through uncompensated community service
work. One program provides small group counseling to accept authority and to
learn positive work habits. The second program allows select minors for
volunteer work for community agencies. Optional program.
Goals: Increase physical safety of communities and promote
justice by deterring repeat offenses by juveniles
through counseling, education, and community
service.
No. of Clients: 75 supervised; 70 for orientation and tracking only.
Outcome Indicators: Fewer repeat offenses by youth.
Outcome Data: ' 80% success rate
Gross Expenditures: $ 289,367
Financing: $ 143,470
Net County Cost: $ 145,897
Funding Sources: Client Fees (10.4%), Contract Fees (39.2%), General
Fund (50.4%)
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget.
Budget Reference: Probation - Community Service Program
6. Juvenile Probation
Probation Department
Description: Provides juvenile delinquency investigations and reports to the
Juvenile Court on approximately 9,900 matters/year. Supervises juveniles on
probation, providing individualized controls, counseling and referral services to
minors and their parents. Regular deputy caseloads average 65 juveniles per
officer. To maintain manageable caseloads it is necessary to place many cases
on limited service caseloads. Investigation - No discretion; Supervision - Some
discretion.
Goals; Increase physical safety of communities and promote
justice by managing juvenile delinquency
investigations and supervising juveniles on probation.
No. of Clients: 1,600 juveniles
60
T
Outcome Indicators: Increased share of juvenile delinquency cases
resolved; Fewer repeat offenses by youth.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $11,253,325
Financing: $ 4,639,340
Net County Cost: $ 6,613,985
Funding Sources: Federal (22.9%), State (17.0%), Other (1.3%), Gen.
Fund (58.8%)
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Probation Field Services
7. Juvenile Hall
Probation Department
Description: County-wide program to secure detention for minors described in
Section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Discretion very limited.
Goals: Increase physical safety of communities and promote
justice by providing specialized care for juvenile
offenders.
No. of Clients: 2,200/month
Outcome Indicators: Not available
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $6,976,941
Financing: ' $3,225,123
Net County Cost: $3,751,818
Funding Sources: Federal (42.2%); State (3.9%), Other (0 .1%),
General Fund (54.7%)
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Probation - Juvenile Hall
$. Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility
Probation Department
Description: Correctional facility providing 74 beds for seriously delinquent
boys committed by the Court. Optional program.
Goals: Increase physical safety of communities and promote
61
justice by providing specialized care for juveniles
prosecuted for serious offenses.
No. of Clients: Approximately 375 boys are committed annually for
an average stay of four months. During any given
month, average daily population is approximately 70
boys.
Outcome Indicators: Increased safety of the physical environment.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $1,720,148
Financing: $ 817,430
Net County Cost: $ 902,718
Funding Sources: Federal Title IV-A (23.0%), State (24.5%), General
Fund (52.5%)
Budget Basis: Actual - 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Probation - Boys' Ranch
9. Public Defender and Alternate Defender Office (ADO) - Juvenile
Division
Public Defender and ADO
Description: Defense of juveniles charged with criminal offenses under W&I
Code section 602. Representation of parents accused of child abuse or neglect,
or minors who have accused parents/guardians of neglect under W&I Code
section 300. All branches combined provide county-wide service. Mandatory
program.
Goals: Increase physical safety of communities and
promote justice by providing competent
representation in defense of juvenile cases
and minor or adult clients in dependency
cases.
No. of clients: Estimated FY 95-96 juvenile clients— Public
Defender - 3,696; ADO - 1,110
Outcome Indicators: Not available
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $ 956,544 Public Defender
$ 346.080 ADO
$ 1,302,624 Total
Financing: $ 42,125
Net County Cost: $ 1,260,499
62
Funding Sources: County General Fund and State AB 90 money
Budget Basis: 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Juvenile org. no. 2917; part of ADO org. no.
2920
68
I
Integrated Services
� t
Integrated Services
1. Bay Point Family Service Center
Health Services, Probation, and Social Service Departments, County
Administrator's Office
Description: Provides integrated delivery of mental health, public health,
probation, child welfare, family maintenance, GAIN and eligibility determination
services to children and families in the Bay Point community.
Goals: Improve service to children and families through
integrated delivery; Improve the health and safety
status of children and families; increase the number
of children who succeed in school; Increase the
economic stability and self-sufficiency of families;
Support, promote, and encourage the stability of
families.
No. of Clients: 800
Outcome indicators: Greater employability and rates of employment;
Higher family incomes; Higher rates of school
attendance; Lower rate of out of home placement.
Outcome Data: Outcomes tracking began in early 1996.
Between April and June, AFDC clients with earned
incomes rose 15.9% to 18.7%, an increase of 2.8%;
in contrast, for AFDC clients in the Antioch District
Office, an increase of only .6%was registered;
As of June, 38% of GAIN clients were working more
than 15 hourstweek.
Gross Expenditures: $ 1,050,974
Financing: $ 787,494
Net County Cost: $ 263,480
Funding Sources: Federal, State, and County General Funds
Budget Basis: Estimated, staff costs only
Budget Reference: Included as part of various programs
65
2. North Richmond Family Service Center
Health Services, Probation, and Social Service Departments, County
Administrator's Office
Description: Provides integrated delivery of mental health, public health,
probation, child welfare, family maintenance, GAIN and eligibility determination
services to children and families in the North Richmond community.
Goals: Improve service to children and families through
integrated delivery; Improve the health and safety
status of children and families; increase the number
of children who succeed in school; Increase the
economic stability and self-sufficiency of families;
Support, promote, and encourage the stability of
families.
No. of Clients: 344
Outcome Indicators: Greater employability and rates of employment;
Higher family incomes; Higher rates of school
attendance; Lower rate of out of home placement.
Outcome Data: Outcomes tracking began in early 1996.
Between April and June, AFDC clients with earned
incomes rose 14.1%to 16.1%, an increase of 2%; in
contrast, for AFDC clients in the Richmond District
Office, a decrease of I%was registered;
14 of the 230 AFDC clients obtained new jobs during
the first 6 months of the year.
Gross Expenditures: $ 686,310
Financing: $ 448,924
Net County Cost: $ 237,386
Funding Sources: Federal, State, and County General Funds
Budget Basis: Estimated, staff costs only
Budget Reference: Included as part of various programs
3. Safe Futures
Criminal Justice Agency, Probation, and Mental Health
Description: Provides funding for a range of continuum of care criminal justice
programs for youth, including mental health programs, mentoring, gang
prevention, and development of community centers. Optional program.
66
Goals: Improve service to children and families through
integrated service of criminal justice programs;
Increase physical safety and promote justice;
Increase number of children who succeed in school;
Enhance developmental opportunities for juveniles
who have committed crimes.
No. of Clients: 500 youth and families
Outcome Indicators: Improve school attendance; Improve academic
performance; Reduce juvenile delinquency; Reduce
gang involvement.
Outcome Data: Not available
Gross Expenditures: $2,075,523
Financing: $1,743,523
Net County Cost: $ 332,000
Funding Sources: County General Fund, Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention, Medicaid, State AB3015
Budget Basis: 100% of Recommended Budget
Budget Reference: Title 11 Parts C, D, and G; Title IV of the JJDP Act of
1974
67
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE COUNTYADMINISTRATOR
651 Pine Street, 10th Floor
Martinez, California 94553
Telephone: 335-1052
Fax: 646-1353
DATE: January 22, 1997
TO: Supervisor Mark DeSaulnier
Supervisor Donna Gerber
Family & Human
Services Committee
FROM: Sara Hoffman !`j
Senior Deputy Administrator
SUBJECT: Staff Support for the Policy Forum
The Board of Supervisors established the Policy Forum to facilitate discussion of "common
issues, challenges, problems, opportunities, resources and priorities" regarding children and
families. The structure established by the Board of Supervisors includes an Executive
Committee with County department heads and representatives from the Office of
Education, the Mt. Diablo Unified School District, the Public Manager's Association and
the Police Chiefs Association. The larger Policy Forum includes representatives from the
County's legislative delegation, community, consumers, community-based organizations,
youth and other interested parties.
A major challenge for the Policy Forum over the next year will be to broaden ownership and
understanding of children and family issues. This effort will entail an enormous amount of
staff support.
Caroline Kelley was hired to support the Policy Forum under a one year contract. According
to the contract, service activities include the following:
A. Providing staff support to the Policy Forum, its Task Forces and committees;
B. Formulating and preparing reports on issues, programs and activities of the
Policy Forum;
C Developing work plans, strategies and action plans for further development of
the Policy Forum and its initiatives;
D. Representing the Policy Forum in relations with city, school, county, state and
federal officials and others in accomplishment of Policy Forum objectives;
E. Meeting with foundations and other funding agencies to secure support for
various Policy Forum endeavors;
F. Participating in writing proposals to support Policy Forum endeavors;
G. Facilitating relationships with communities;
H. Supporting initiatives that increase the effectiveness or efficiency of children
and family services in accordance with Policy Forum priorities;
1. Conducting surveys of providers of services to children and families to identify
service, service availability, range of services, gaps, overlaps, best practices and
other factors of concern to the Policy Forum;
J. Participating in multi-agency collaborative efforts involving county
departments, schools, community-based organizations, cities, civic groups,
community members and others;
K. Conferring with and obtaining direction from the Senior Deputy County
Administrator, Health and Welfare;
L. Performing other duties as may be required.
The contract with Caroline Kelley provides the necessary resources to adequately staff the
Policy Forum.
cc: Phil Batchelor
F&HS-02
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
FROM:
Costa
FAMILY AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE a
a County
DATE: January 27, 1997 --
cooK�
SUBJECT:
USE OF CONTRACT STAFF TO SUPPORT THE POLICY FORUM
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. DIRECT the County Administrator to schedule a meeting of the Family and
Human Services Committee with the Executive Committee of the Policy
Forum during calendar year 1997.
2. DIRECT the County Administrator to schedule a meeting of the Family and
Human Services Committee with the full Policy Forum during calendar year
1997, approximately six months away from the meeting with the Executive
Committee of the Policy Forum.
3. DIRECT the County Administrator to report to the Family and Human
Services Committee on the work of the Policy Forum and its Executive
Committee on a quarterly basis during calendar year 1997, except for those
quarters in which the Committee meets with the Executive Committee of
the Policy Forum or the full Policy Forum, so that there are two reports to
the Committee by staff, one meeting with the Executive Committee of the
Policy Forum and one meeting with the full Policy Forum on approximately
a quarterly schedule.
4. REQUEST Sara Hoffman to brief Kathy Chiverton from Supervisor Gerber's
Office on the work of the Policy Forum.
5. REQUEST Sara Hoffman to include staff from the Community Development
Department in the work of the Policy Forum so they are a part of the
process by which issues are discussed and decisions are reached.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: —YES SIGNATURE:
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE(S), �••,
ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED �� o ))A�A&A, I�q�
Contact: PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK O THE BOAAD OF
cc. SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
County Administrator
Sara Hoffman, Senior Deputy County Administrator���u Q ����
BY L p n w A DEPUTY
F&HS-02 c
BACKGROUND:
This subject matter was referred to the Family and Human Services Committee
at the request of Supervisor DeSaulnier because of his concern that we are losing
focus on the need to integrate the community into the work of the Policy Forum's
Executive Committee.
Sara Hoffman from the County Administrator's Office reported that Caroline Kelley
was hired on contract by the County Administrator's Office to provide staff support
to the Policy Forum because of the extensive staffing that is needed in order to
bring to the table the many diverse players that need to be made a part of the
process.
Ms. Hoffman noted that the Policy Forum is struggling with defining what its vision
is for family and children's services in Contra Costa County. This process takes
time and staff energy and commitment. She indicated that it is important to have
adequate staff support in order to accomplish what the Board wants to achieve.
Supervisor DeSaulnier noted his concern that there is a feeling that all of the
ownership of the issue is now in the hands of the Executive Committee of the
Policy Forum rather than with the Board of Supervisors or the community, both of
which feel that they have been left out to some extent. The difficult task is to
integrate the greater community, the department heads and ultimately the Board
of Supervisors.
Belinda Smith from the Community Development Department indicated that their
department had been involved in the work of the Policy Academy and found that
to be very useful. They feel they have been somewhat left out of the deliberations
of the Policy Forum and would like to be made more a part of the work of the
Forum.
Michele Jackson, Executive Director of the North Richmond Neighborhood House,
urged that East and West County be appropriately represented on the Policy
Forum. Sara Hoffman responded that there were specific seats included to insure
geographic representation and that much of the work of the Policy Forum is done
through Task Forces which can include other individuals not on the Policy Forum
itself.
2
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
FROM: Costa
John Cullen, Direct -
Somal Service Depat
County
OATS cOsg
n cau
January 22, 1997
SUBJECT:
AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR FAMILY AND
CHILDREN'S TRUST (FACT) CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-1998
SPECIFIC REOUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION($)E BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION•
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Social Service Director, or his
designee, to issue Request for Proposal (RFP) #1045 for the
Family and Children' s Trust (FACT) Committee for prevention and
intervention services to abused and neglected children or to
children at risk of abuse and neglect and their families.
Approximately $350, 000 is available for contracting for the
period of July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998,
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
No additional county funding is required. The $350,000 in
funding is from:
AB1733 -state child abuse intervention & prevention funds;
AB2994 - birth certificate funds;
Ann Adler Trust Fund - voluntary contributions; and
Community-Based Family Resource Funds - state funds to local
non-profit agencies
BACKGROUND:
On April 16, 1985, the Board of Supervisors established the FACT
Committee and directed the Social Services Department to provide
staff support. The charge of FACT is to make recommendations to
the Board on the allocation of funds from the above cited sources,
The FACT Committee has developed a new RFP for these funds based
on a community survey undertaken in October, 1996 and three
Public Hearings held in October/November, 1996. The priorities
for use of these funds are:
1. Parent education focused on effective parenting skills,
child development information, and creating nurturing family
environments to prevent child abuse and neglect.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: —YES (continued on rev$%RREslde)
—RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE S:
ACTION OF BOARD ON 0 D —sn!� 99 / APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
`UNANIMOUS(ABSENT�..,__T1, AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
DD, Contact: Mary K. [Miller x3-1614 ATTESTED�� aAd4 ! 997
SOCIAL SERVICE (CONTRACTS UNIT) PHIL BATCHELOR,C AK OF THEBOARO OF
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
AUDITOR-OONTROLLER
CONTRACTOR n/
M382 (101881 BY '^ f a` �'� ' 0 QDEPUTY
"� ,
(. k5
FACT RFP#1045
January 22, 1997
page 2
2. Family resource services and intervention for families
where adverse conditions such as poverty, substance abuse,
lack of traditional social support systems, language
barriers, inability to access services or other factors, may
contribute to child abuse and neglect and family
dysfunction.
3. Crisis intervention, case management, and legal services
to support abused, neglected and/or homeless children.
4. Prevention/intervention services and counseling for
adults, adolescents and children living in non-traditional
families (e.g. parenting grandparents, single parents,
adoptive or foster families, group homes,etc. )
During final deliberations, priority funding consideration will
be given to projects which;
A. Adopt a strong family-centered approach in the delivery
of services, with all family members involved as equal
participants in the problem-solving and growth process.
("Family" refers to biological, extended, adoptive or
foster. )
B. Demonstrate planning and coordination with other public
and private agencies serving the same client population.
C. Provide access to culturally appropriate, client-driven
services relevant to individual communities, neighborhoods
and specific client populations.
D. Demonstrate fresh approaches to program design,
especially in the delivery of parent and community education
programs.
E. Facilitate accessibility of services (e.g. location,
transportation, hours of operation, child care
availability, etc. )
F. Leverage FACT funds with funding from other sources.
G. Ensure geographic distribution of services.
The period of funding for these projects will be July 1, 1997
through June 30, 1998, with the option for a one-year renewal,
pending the availability of funds and the provision of quality
services with successful outcomes as determined by the FACT
Committee's on-going monitoring and evaluation of the projects.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(A Component Unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Combined Financial Statements
and Supplemental Schedule
June 30, 1996
(With Independent Auditors' Reports Thereon)
Peat Marwick LLP
One Kaiser Plaza
Oakland, CA 94612
Independent Auditors' Report
To the Directors of the Contra Costa
County Redevelopment Agency:
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheet of the Contra Costa County
Redevelopment Agency (the Agency),a component unit of the County of Contra Costa, as of lune 30,
1996 and the related combined statement of revenues,expenditures and changes in fund balance for
the year then ended. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the Agency's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Agency as of June 30, 1996 and the results of its operations for
the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the combined financial statements
taken as a whole. The combining financial statements and supplemental schedule are presented for
purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the combined financial statements of the
Agency. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the
combined financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented in all material respects in
relation to the combined financial statements taken as a whole.
November 20, 1996
MINE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Combined Balance Sheet
June 30, 1996
Governmental Fund Types General
Long-Term Totals
Obligations (Memo-
Capital Special Debt Account random
Assets and Other Debits Projects Revenue Service Grouo Only)
Cash and investments $ 13,298,870 566,060 — — 13,864,930
Cash and investments held by
County Treasurer 5,895,408 997,166 1,225,413 — 8,117,987
Restricted cash and investments 2,311,471 — 2,311,471
Accrued investment income 89,787 5,000 53,758 — 148,545
Due from Contra Costa County 807,129 2,728 — — 809,857
Prepaid expenses and deposits 100,000 75,314 — — 175,314
Investments—land held for sale — 2,189,460 — — 2,189,460
Amount to be provided for
retirement of long-term debt — — — 28,286,185 28,286,185
Amount available in debt service fund 516.277 516.277
Total assets and other
debits $ 22,502,665 3,835,728 1,279,171 28,802,462 56,420,026
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities 45,927 5,900 — — 51,827
Due to Contra Costa County 1,072,869 2,937 140 — 1,075,946
Accrued interest — — 762,754 — 762,754
Advances from Contra
Costa County 347,943 2,657,000 — 982,462 3,987,405
Note payable — — — 1,200,000 1,200,000
Bonds payable — — — 26.620.000 26.620.000
Total liabilities 1.466.739 2.665.837 762.894 28.802.462 33.697.932
Fund balance:
Reserved for:
Land held for sale — 2,189,460 — — 2,189,460
Encumbrances 33,105 1,050,894 — — 1,083,999
Prepaid expenses and deposits 100,000 75,314 — — 175,314
Debt service — — 516,277 — 516,277
Restricted cash and
investments 2,311,471 — — — 2,311,471
Unreserved:
Designated 18,591,350 871,899 — — 19,463,249
Undesignated(deficit) — (3.017.676) — — (3.017.676)
Total fund balance 21.035.926 1.169.891 516.277 22.722.094
$ 22,502,665 3,835,728 1,279,171 28,802,462 56,420,026
See accompanying notes to combined financial statements.
2
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures
and Changes in Fund Balance
Year ended lune 30, 1996
Totals
(Memo-
Capital Special Debt randum
Proiects Revenue Service Only1
Revenues:
Property tax increment $ 2,880,989 1,084,581 1,590,081 5,555,651
Aid from other governmental agencies 4,362 24,900 — 29,262
Use of money and property 1,162,068 69,600 203,428 1,435,096
Other revenue 2.346 2.472 4.818
Total revenues 4.049.765 1.181.553 1.793.509 7.024.827
Expenditures: . .
Purchase of property 11,092 401,365 — 412,457
Project improvements 1,415,334 1,345,564 — 2,760,898
Relocation and acquisition 27,418 41,765 — 69,183
Planning,survey and design 165,374 — — 165,374
Professional services 301,145 17,560 — 318,705
Administration 644,688 1,758 777 647,223
Fiscal agreement passthroughs 479,237 — — 479,237
Office furniture and equipment 3,198 — — 3,198
Operation and management of property 27,730 1,397 — 29,127
Debt service:
Principal payment — — 7,075,000 7,075,000
Interest on bonds and note — — 1,948,293 1,948,293
Bond issuance costs 166.826 — 166.826
Total expenditures 3.242.042 1.809.409 9.024.070 14.075.521
Excess(deficiency)of revenues
over(under)expenditures 807.723 (627.856) (7.230.561) (7.050 694)
Other financing(uses)sources:
Operating transfers(out)in (7,829,856) 440,194 7,389,662 —
Repaymentofadvances (160,000) — - (160,000)
Bond issuance proceeds 4.346.683 — 4.346 683
Total other financing(uses)sources (3.643.173) 440.194 7.389.662 4.186.683
(Deficiency)excess of revenues and
other financing sources(under)
over expenditures and other
financing uses (2,835,450) (187,662) 159,101 (2,864,011)
Fund balance at beginning of year 23.871.376 1.357.553 357.176 25.586.105
Fund balance at end of year $ 21,035,926 1,169,891 516,277 22,722,094
See accompanying notes to combined financial statements.
3
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
June 30, 1996
(1) Activities of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency
The Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (the Agency) was created on December 6,
1983, for the purpose of redeveloping certain areas of Contra Costa County (the County),
designated as project areas. Currently, the members of the County Board of Supervisors serve as
the Agency directors.
The principal sources of funding for the Agency's activities are:
• Property tax revenue attributable to increases in assessed valuations in the project areas.
• Proceeds from issuance of debt.
• Advances and loans from the County.
• Development fees for services provided to developers in the project areas.
The Agency has ongoing projects in Pleasant Hill, Bay Point(formerly West Pittsburg), North
Richmond, Oakley and Rodeo.
The accompanying combined financial statements are included as a blended component unit of
the County's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The significant accounting policies of the Agency used in preparation of the accompanying
combined financial statements are as follows:
(a) Basis of Presentation—Fund Accounting
The accounts of the Agency are organized into funds and an account group, each of which
is considered to be a separate accounting entity.The operations of each fund are accounted
for within a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities,
reserves, fund balance, revenues and expenditures.The following funds and account group
are used by the Agency:
Capital Projects Funds are used to account for financial resources designated for the
acquisition or construction of land and capital facilities or significant repairs or
improvements thereto.
Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the financial resources designated for
the improvement of targeted low to moderate income housing areas.
(Continued)
4
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued
Debt Service Fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the
payment of, general long-term debt principal, interest and related costs.
General Long-Term Obligations Account Group accounts for the Agency's long-term
obligations and are expected to be financed from future tax revenues anticipated to be
realized by the Capital Projects Funds.
(b) Basis of Accounting
The Agency follows the modified accrual basis of accounting whereby revenue is recorded
when cash is received, except for revenue susceptible to accrual(that is, measurable and
available to finance the Agency's operations), and expenditures, other than interest on
long-term obligations, are recorded as the liabilities are incurred, if measurable. Interest on
long-term obligations is generally recognized when paid. However, where resources have
been provided during the current year for payment of interest due early in the following
year, the expenditure and related liability are accrued.
(c) Project Expenditures
Project expenditures, including acquisition of real property, site clearance and project
improvements, are charged to expenditures when incurred.
(d) Property Tax Increment
California Redevelopment Law provides a means for financing and refinancing
redevelopment projects based upon the allocation of taxes collected within a project. The
assessed valuation of a project prior to adoption of the redevelopment plan, or base roll, is
established and,except for any period during which the assessed valuation drops below the
base roll, the taxing authorities thereafter receive the taxes produced by the levy of the
current tax rate upon the base roll. Property taxes collected upon an increase in assessed
valuation over the base roll are called tax increments. Each year the redevelopment project
receives this incremental amount. The Agency has elected to pass through a portion of its
annual tax increment to various special districts under agreements with those districts. The
annual tax increment may be pledged by a redevelopment agency for the repayment of
indebtedness incurred in financing or refinancing the project. Incremental property taxes
are recognized as revenue when claimed and available from local taxing authorities.
(Continued)
5
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Continued
(e) Encumbrances
Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders,contracts and other commitments
for the expenditures of monies are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the applicable
appropriation, is employed by the Agency. Encumbrances outstanding at year-end are
reported as a reservation of fund balance since they do not constitute expenditures or
liabilities.
(n Budgetary Data
The Agency operates on a project basis. Annual budgetary data is not presented as it would
not provide a meaningful comparison to.actual revenues and expenditures.
(g) Unreserved—Designated Fund Balance
The Agency designates portions of unreserved fund balance for all project areas except for
Pleasant Hill BART and North Richmond in the Special Revenue Fund because these
project areas have an overall fund deficit.
(h) Totals(Memorandum Only) Column on Combined Balance Sheet
The "Totals" column on the combined financial statements is presented only to facilitate
financial analysis. Data in this column does not present financial position or results of
operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles nor is such data
comparable to a consolidation since interfund eliminations have not been made.
(i) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenditures
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(3) Cash and Investments
The Agency's cash held by County Treasurer is pooled and invested by the County Treasurer for
the purpose of maximizing investment earnings. As permitted by the Government Code, the
Agency directs the County Treasurer to make specific investments separate from the pool.
Statutes authorize the County to invest in obligations of the U.S. Treasury, federal agencies,
municipalities,commercial paper rated A-1 by the Standard&Poor's Corporation or P-1 by
Moody's Commercial Paper Record, bankers' acceptances, repurchase agreements or reverse
repurchase agreements.
(Continued)
6
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(3) Cash and Investments, Continued
Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 3 requires that governmental entities
categorize their investments to give an indication of the custodial risk assumed by the entity.
Investments not evidenced by securities that exist in either physical or book entry form are not
categorized.
The Agency's cash and investments consist of the following at June 30, 1996:
Restricted Unrestricted Total
Cash and investments $ — 13,864,930 13,864,930
Cash held by the County Treasurer — 8,117,987 8,117,987
Restricted cash and investments held by.
trustee bank 2,311,471 — 2,311,471
$ 2,311,471 21,982,917 24,294,388
Carrying Market
Category 1 amount value
U.S. Government securities $ 7,427,489 7,427,489 7,492,579
State treasurer's investment pool (a) 5,516,987
Guarantees investment contracts (a) 2,311,471
Deposits (a) 9,038,441
Total cash and investments $ 24,294,388
(a)Not categorized.
The Agency's investment in securities is considered to be Category 1 which means they are
insured, or securities are held by the Agency or its agent in the Agency's name. Investments are
stated at cost or amortized cost.
The Agency also has restricted cash related to bond proceeds of$2,311,471 which represents
cash held in trust and invested in guaranteed investment contracts.
(4) Investments—Land Held for Sale
The Agency has land held for sale in the Pleasant Hill BART and Bay Point project areas. The
Pleasant Hill BART land is recorded at appraised value which is lower than original cost.
(Continued)
7
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(5) Relationship with Contra Costa County
The Agency and the County are closely related but separate legal entities. The Agency does not
have any employees and does not have facilities separate from the County.Therefore, a portion
of the Agency's expenditures represents services provided to the Agency by the County. In
addition, the County performs project improvements, provides administrative services for
projects, and provides operating transfers and advances. For the year ended lune 30, 1996, the
Agency paid$3,393,951 to the County for project improvements and administrative services
incurred by the Agency.
(6) Advances from Contra Costa County
Advances from the County recorded in the Special Revenue Fund represent$2,127,000 received
for the purchase of land held for sale and $530,000 received for specific project costs.
Repayment of the$2,127,000 is expected to be made with proceeds from the sale of such land.
Repayment of the$530,000 will be made when sufficient tax increment funds become available.
No interest is charged on these advances to the Agency.
Advances from the County recorded in the General Long-Term Obligation Account Group at
June 30, 1996 represent$982,462 received to finance operations and improvements not
associated with specific projects.This amount includes unpaid interest on those advances.
Expenditures for interest on this advance are recorded in the period in which the payments are
made. Repayment of the advance and interest will be made when sufficient tax increment funds
become available. During the year ended June 30, 1996, the Agency repaid $160,000 of the
advance out of the Capital Projects Fund and no interest. At year end, the County advanced
$347,943 to the Agency's Capital Project Fund for payment of the Agency's expenditures. This
advance was repaid to the County after year end.
The pledge of tax increment funds to the County is subordinated to any such pledge of funds that
the Agency makes in connection with the sale of bonds, notes or similar Agency obligations.
(7) Note and Bonds Payable
On March 25, 1992, the Agency borrowed$1,200,000 from a commercial savings bank to
purchase land in the project areas.The note bears interest at 9% per annum and required two
years prepaid interest at the closing of the note. Subsequent interest payments are due annually.
The note is secured by real property and is due on February 1, 1997, with the possibility of
extending this date beyond 1997.
On May 15, 1992, the Agency issued $29,315,000 in Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds with an
average interest rate of 7.02%. The proceeds were used to fund on-going project expenditures
and to defease certain tax anticipation notes, which have since been retired. Principal and
interest is due annually each August I and matures on August 1, 2023. During the year ended
June 30, 1996, the Agency paid $295,000 in principal payments. In addition, on August 1, 1995,
the Agency redeemed $6,780,000 of the Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds with proceeds held in
escrow, The redemption was made because of a delay in a project, which the proceeds would
have funded.
(Continued)
8
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(7) Note and Bonds Payable, Continued
On July 17, 1995, the Agency issued $1,645,000 in Tax allocation Bonds with an average
interest rate of 6.41% to fund expenditures for the North Richmond project. Principal will be
paid annually beginning August 1, 1996 and matures on August 1, 2025.The original bond issue
discount was $33,317.
On December 21, 1995, the Agency issued$2,735,000 in Tax Allocation Bonds with an average
interest rate of 6.66% to fund expenditures for the Bay Point project. Principal will be paid
annually beginning August 1, 1997 and matures on August 1, 2025.
Following is a schedule of debt requirements to maturity for the note and bonds payable and
excluding advances from Contra Costa County:
Fiscal year ending Note Bonds
June 30 payable payable Total
1997 $ 1,200,000 330,000 1,530,000
1998 — 390,000 390,000
1999 — 415,000 415,000
2000 — 435,000 435,000
2001 — 460,000 460,000
Thereafter — 24,590,000 24,590.000
$ 1,200,000 26,620,000 27,820,000
The Agency has complied with all significant covenants of the bonds' indentures.
(8) Commitments and Contingencies
(a) Public Liability
The Agency, as a component unit of the County, is included as part of the County's
self-insurance program for public liability. As such, the Agency is obligated to reimburse
the County for the unfavorable outcome of any claims paid on behalf of the Agency. At
June 30, 1996, there are no significant claims outstanding in the self-insurance program for
which the Agency is obligated.
(Continued)
9
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Notes to Combined Financial Statements
(8) Commitments and Contingencies, Continued
(b) Redevelopment Plan Requirements
Effective January 1, 1995, the State legislature passed Assembly Bill 1290(AB 1290). This
legislation imposes several new requirements on redevelopment agencies and permits the
establishment of new time limits for the issuance of debt, plan termination, and the
collection of tax increment.The Agency amended its redevelopment plan during the year
ended June 30, 1995 to be in accordance with these requirements.
As part of AB 1290,the Agency is required to report any "excess surplus" to the Federal
Department of Housing and Community Development. An excess surplus exists for a fiscal
year if the unencumbered balance at year-end in the Agency's Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund exceeds the greater of$1 million or the aggregate amount of tax increments
deposited into this fund during the preceding four fiscal years. If any excess surplus is not
spent or encumbered within three years it must be transferred to the County's housing
authority. The Agency did not have any excess surplus housing funds for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 1996, based on calculations by the Agency's management.
10
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Combining Balance Sheet
Capital Projects Funds
June 30, 1996
Pleasant Bay North
Assets Hill BART Point Richmond Oakley Rodeo Total
Cash and investments $ 7,005,215 2,872,983 1,099,374 2,321,298 - 13,298,870
Cash and investments held
by County Treasurer 3,254,270 805,036 183,326 1,476,121 176,655 5,895,408
Restricted cash and
investments 1,317,380 514,444 232,669 246,978 - 2,311,471
Accrued investment income 14,117 52,167 1,616 21,887 - 89,787
Due from Contra Costa
County 94,459 76,618 554,307 49,126 32,619 807,129
Prepaid expenses and deposits - 100,000 - - 100,000
Total assets $ 11,685,441 4,421,248 2,071,292 4,115,410 209,274 22,502,665
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities 19,784 15,985 6,869 1,051 2,238 45,927
Due to Contra Costa
County 113,689 45,922 836,368 49,716 27,174 1,072,869
Advances from Contra
Costa County 31,776 54,450 215,590 25,453 20,674 347,943
Total liabilities 165,249 116,357 1,058,827 76,220 50,086 1,466,739
Fund balance:
Reserved for:
Encumbrances 2,152 20,634 6,724 3,212 383 33,105
Prepaid expenses and
deposits - 100,000 - - - 100,000
Restricted cash and
investments 1,317,380 514,444 232,669 246,978 - 2,311,471
Unreserved:
Designated 10.200,660 3.669.813 773,072 3.789.000 158,805 18,591350
Total fund balance 11,520,192 4304,891 1,012,465 4,039,190 159,188 21,035,926
$ 11,685,441 4,421,248 2,071,292 4,115,410 209,274 22,502,665
11
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Cow)
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
Capital Projects Funds
Year ended June 30, 1996
Pleasant Bay North
Hill BART Eaimt Richmond Oakley Rodea Total
Revenues:
Property tax increment $ 1,138,459 513,283 140,720 764,990 323,537 2,880,989
Aid from other governmental
agencies 4,362 - - - - 4,362
Use of money and property 760,406 131,227 72,683 192,674 5,078 1,162,068
Other revenue 200 - 8 - 2.138 2.346
Total revenues 1.903.427 _ 644.510 213.411 957,66433 0.753 4.049.765
Expenditures:
Purchase of property - 11,092 - - - 11,092
Project improvements 241,099 165,235 776,413 151,781 80,806 1,415,334
Relocation and acquisition 1,674 25,744 - - - 27,418
Planning,survey and design 48,734 13,437 3,238 85,219 14,746 165,374
Professional services 192,195 19,823 18,762 7,105 63,260 301,145
Administration 187,520 124,492 107,342 138,219 87,115 644,688
Fiscal agreement passthroughs 84,530 139,303 - 206,081 49,323 479,237
Office furniture and equipment 2,738 115 115 115 115 3,198
Operation and management
of property 27,611 119 - - - 27,730
Debt service-bond issuance
costs - 82.408 84.418 - 166.826
Total expenditures 786.101 581.768 990,288 5M520 295,365 3 242 042
Excess (deficiency)of
revenues over(under)
expenditures 1,117,326 62.742 (776,877 369,144 35,388 807,723
Other financing(uses)sources:
Operating transfers out (7,193,109) (179,564) (457,183) - - (7,829,856)
Repayment of advances (160,000) - - - - (160,000)
Bond issuance proceeds - 2.735.000 1.611 683 - - 4.346.683
Total other financing
(uses)sources (7.353.109) 2.555.436 1,154,5 - - (3.643,173)
Excess(deficiency)of
revenues over(under)
expenditures and other
financing uses (6,235,783) 2,618,178 377,623 369,144 35,388 (2,835,450)
Fund balance at beginning of
year 17 755.975 1.686.713 634,842 3,670.046 123.800 23.871.376
Fund balance at end of year $ 11,520,192 4,304,891 1,012,465 4,039,190 159,188 21,035,926
12
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Combining Balance Sheet
Special Revenue Funds
June 30, 1996
Pleasant Bay North
Assets Hill BART Point Richmond Oakley Rodeo Total
Cash and investments $ - 179,990 340,442 45,628 - 566,060
Cash and investments held
by County Treasurer 32,918 452,770 43,811 130,651 337,016 997,166
Accrued investment income - - 5,000 - - 5,000
Due from Contra Costa
County - 2,728 - - 2,728
Prepaid expenses and deposits - - 75,314 - - 75,314
Investments-land held
for sale 2,000,000 189,460 2,189,460
Total assets $ 2,032,918 822,220 467,295 176,279 337,016 3,835,728
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities - - 5,900 - - 5,900
Due to Contra Costa
County 27 60 2,751 45 54 2,937
Advances from Contra
Costa County 2,127,000 - 530,000 - - 2,657,000
Total liabilities 2,127,027 60 538,651 45 54 2,665,837
Fund balance:
Reserved for:
Land held for sale 2,000,000 189,460 2,189,460
Encumbrances 725,000 222,171 51,897 51,826 - 1,050,894
Prepaid expenses
and deposits - - 75,314 - - 75,314
Unreserved:
Designated - 410,529 - 124,408 336,962 871,899
Undesignated deficit (2,819,109) - (198,567) - - Q,Q 17,676)
Total fund (deficit) balance9( 4,109) 822.1607( 1,356) 176,234 336,962 1,169,891
$ 2,032,918 822,220 467,295 176,279 337,016 3,835,728
13
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
Special Revenue Funds
Year ended June 30, 1996
Pleasant Bay North
Hill BART Point Richmond Oakley Rodeo Total
Revenues:
Property tax increment $ 525,246 166,925 76,255 235,271 80,884 1,084,581
Aid from other governmental
agencies 24,900 - - 24,900
Use of money and property 1,014 22,697 21,173 12,712 12,004 69,600
Other revenue - 2,472 2,472
Total revenues 526,260 189,622 124,800 247,983 92,888 1,181,553
Expenditures:
Purchase of property - - 401,365 - - 401,365
Project improvements 494,490 148,085 231,559 471,430 - 1,345,564
Relocation and acquisition - 187 41,578 - - 41,765
Professional services - - 17,560 - - 17,560
Administration 24 295 836 388 215 1,758
Operation and management
of property - - 1,397 1,397
Total expenditures 494,514 148,567 694,295 471,818 215 1,809,409
Excess(deficiency)of
revenues over(under)
expenditures 31,746 41,055 (569,495) 2( 23,835) 92,673 (627,856)
Other financing(uses)sources:
Operating transfers in (out) - 111,395 373,92741 5,128) 440,194
Excess(deficiency)of
revenues over(under)
expenditures and other
financing uses 31,746 152,450 (195,568) (268,963) 92,673 (187,662)
Fund(deficit)balance at beginning
of year (125,855) 669,710 124,212 445,197 244,289 1,357,553
Fund balance(deficit) at end of
year $ (94,109) 822,1607( 1,356) 176,234 336,962 1,169,891
14
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Combining Balance Sheet
Debt Service Funds
June 30, 1996
Pleasant Bay North
Assets Hill BART Point Richmond Oakley Total
Cash and investments held by
County Treasurer $ 786,577 139,760 133,659 165,417 1,225,413
Accrued investment income 32,715 9,523 5,387 6,133 53,758
Total assets $ 819,292 149,283 139,046 171,550 1,279,171
Liabilities and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Due to Contra Costa County 118 7 7 8 140
Accrued interest 456,485 146.718 73 989 85,562 762,754
Total liabilities 456,603 146,725 73,996 85,570 762,894
Fund balance:
Reserved for debt service 362,689 2,558 65,050 85.980 516,277
$ 819,292 149,283 139,046 171,550 1,2.79,171
15
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances
Debt Service Funds
Year ended June 30, 1996
Pleasant Bay North
Hill BART Point Richmond Oakley Total
Revenues:
Property tax increment $ 1,090,855 154,419 164,298 180,509 1,590,081
Use of money and property 152.626 19.528 12.186 19.088 203.428
Total revenues 124• 3.481 173.947 176.484 199.597 17. 93.509
Expenditures:
Administration 332 121 179 145 777
Debt-service:
Principal payment 6,988,064 33,188 14.750 38,998 7,075,000
Interest on bonds and note 1.275.038 269.688 209,241 195,326 1,948.293
Total expenditures 8.261434 302.99722 3.170 234.46909. 24.070
Deficiency of expenditures
under revenues (7,019,953) (129,050) (46,686) (34,872) (7,230,561)
Other financing sources:
Operating transfers in 7,193,110 68.167 83.258 45.127 7,389,662
Excess (deficiency)of
revenues and other
financing sources over
(under)expenditures 173,157 (60,883) 36,572 10,255 159,101
Fund balance at beginning of year 189,532 63.441 28.478 75.725 357,176
Fund balance at end of year $ 362,689 2,558 65,050 85,980 516,277
16
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(a component unit of the County of Contra Costa)
Statement of Changes in General Long-Term Obligations Account Group
Year ended June 30, 1996
Balance Balance
July 1, June 30,
1995 Additions Deductions 1996
Pleasant Hill BART:
1992 Tax Allocation Bonds $ 22,673,935 — 6,988,063 15,685,872
Advance from Contra Costa County 1,122,000 20,062 160,000 982,062
Note payable 1,200,000 1,200,000
24,995,935 20,062 7,148,063 17,867,934
Bay Point:
1992 Tax Allocation Bonds 2,535,188 — 33,188 2,502,000
1995-B Tax Allocation Bonds — 2,735,000 — 2,735,000
North Richmond:
1992 Tax Allocation Bonds 1,126,750 — 14,750 1,112,000
1995-A Tax Allocation Bonds — 1,645,000 — 1,645,000
Advances from Contra Costa County — 400 — 400
Oakley:
1992 Tax Allocation Bonds 2,979,127 — 38.999 2,940,128
Total Agency long-term obligations $ 31,637,000 4,400,462 7,235,000 28,802,462
17
MW
Peat Marwick LLP
One Kaiser Plaza
Oakland, CA 94612
Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance of
California Redevelopment Agencies
To the Directors of the Contra Costa County
Redevelopment Agency:
We have audited the combined financial statements of the Contra Costa County Redevelopment
Agency (a component unit of the County of Contra Costa) (the Agency) as of and for the year ended
June 30, 1996, and have issued our report thereon dated November 20, 1996. We conducted our audit
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards issued
by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free of
material misstatement.
Compliance with laws and regulations applicable to the Agency is the responsibility of the Agency's
management. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial
statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of the Agency's compliance with
provisions of laws and regulations contained in the Guidelines for Compliance Audits of California
Redevelopment Agencies issued by the State Controller's Office, Division of Local Government
Fiscal Affairs.
The results of our tests indicate that, with respect to the items tested, the Agency complied, in all
material respects, with the provisions referred to in the preceding paragraph. With respect to items not
tested, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Agency had not complied, in
all material respects, with those provisions.
This report is intended for the information of the Agency and the State Controller's Office. However,
this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited.
November 20, 1996
l8
C-64
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA
COSTA
FROM: KENNETH J. CORCORAN, Auditor-Controller COUNTY
DATE: January 28, 1997
SUBJECT: DISTRIBUTION OF STATE HIGHWAY PROPERTY RENTAL REVENUE
RESOLUTION NO. 97/58
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) &BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
Distribute the 1995-96 State Highway property rental revenue in the amount of $23,895.14 to the
County Road Fund, County Tax Collector, and to eligible cities pursuant to the provisions of
Section 104.10 of the Streets and Highways Code and as recommended by the County
Auditor-Controller, as follows:
County Tax Collector (Possessory Interest Tax Bills) $ 1,616.91
County Road Fund 11,850.25
City of San Pablo 1,377.79
City of Walnut Creek 8.039.13
City of Lafayette 1,011.06
TOTAL $23,895.14
BACKGROUND:
Section 104.6 of the Streets and Highways Code authorizes the State Department of
Transportation to lease any lands it holds which are not presently needed for State highway
purposes and provides that 24 percent of such rental revenue shall be allocated pursuant to
Section 104.10. Section 104.13 provides that all funds distributed to the County shall be
deemed to be in full or partial payment of the possessory interest taxes due on such leased
properties. The recommended distribution is in accordance with these/State laws.
CONTINUED ATTACHMENT:_YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR—RECOMMENDATION O OARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S)
ACTION OF BOARD ON February 4, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED,_OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND
AYES: NOES: CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Paul Abelson (646-2233) ATTESTED February 4 1997
Via Auditor-Controller PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
cc: County Administrator
Auditor-Controller
Public Works n
Tax Collector
BY ,Deputy
RESOLUTION NO. 97/58
C � 7
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
FROM: Phil Batchelor ► Costa
County Administrator
County
DATE: February 3 , 1997
SUBJECT: Continue Local Emergency for December/January Storms
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION
Determine that there is need to continue the local emergency with
regard to the recent winter storms/floods.
BACKGROUND
On January 7, 1997 the Board of Supervisors ratified the County
Administrator's Proclamation of a Local Emergency on behalf of the
county and all local political jurisdictions within the county in
response to wide-spread damage to public infrastructure and private
property caused by heavy storms. The incident period as
established by the State Office of Emergency Services began
December 28 , 1996 and still continues.
Public and private property damage and the cost of emergency
response is currently estimated at $18 . 3 Million. Inasmuch as
continuing storms may cause additional property damage and require
local agencies to incur additional emergency response costs, in
accordance with the State Emergency Services Act it is necessary
for the Board to determine that it is appropriate for the local
emergency to continue in effect. The Board will proclaim the
termination of such local emergency at the earliest possible date
that conditions warrant.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _YES SIGNATURE: p y
—RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR —RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE ✓
_APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE(S1:
ACTION OF BOARD ON February 4, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED-- February 4, 1997
Contact: PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
Cc: Distribution (via OES)
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
State OES
BY �� ,DEPUTY
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS &HS-0
contra
FROM. FAMILY AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Costa
County
DATE: January 27, 1997
SUBJECT:
STATUS REPORT ON WELFARE REFORM
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1 . DIRECT the Social Service Director to review with our Committee on
February 10, 1997 the draft CSAC/CWDA Welfare Reform Redesign
Proposal so the Board of Supervisors can consider taking a position on it
or portions of it.
2. DIRECT the Social Service Director to review with our Committee on
February 10, 1997, technical amendments to the Federal welfare reform
law which should be endorsed by the Board of Supervisors.
3. DIRECT the Social Service Director to present to our Committee on
February 10, 1997, a timeline for reviewing individual issues having to do
with welfare reform so we can address the entire welfare reform package
in a logical manner over the next several months.
BACKGROUND:
On January 21, 1997, the Board of Supervisors referred to our Committee all
aspects of welfare reform as it may impact or be implemented in Contra Costa
County. We had our first briefing on welfare reform from our Social Service
Director, John Cullen, and members of his staff on January 27, 1997.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: —YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE(S), MARK
BeSAULNIER
ACTION OF BOARD ON February 4, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
7UNANIMOUS
OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS
�pO�1N}/THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED— ""'�� J.._, 19
Contact: PHIL BATCHELOR,CLOK OFT /E/E/ BOARD k
cc: County Administrator SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Social Service Director � _
BY ,DEPUTY
F&HS-05 C��
Mr. Cullen noted that we will need to take up the following three areas:
+ Technical clean-up legislation at the Federal level.
♦ Attempt to influence and follow efforts to formulate State legislation to
implement welfare reform in California. This includes both the Governor's
proposal and the proposal from the Legislative Analyst's Office.
f The need to focus on actions that need to be taken at the local level to
transition the department from welfare reform to a focus on employment.
The recently completed IM Bureau Redesign document will serve as the
blueprint for welfare reform in the Social Service Department. There will
be a need to change the service system in the community to focus more on
employment and training for welfare recipients in order to make them more
self-sufficient.
Following thorough discussion of welfare reform and some of the issues involved,
we have agreed on the above recommendations which we believe will allow the
Board of Supervisors to get on record with its position on the various pieces of
welfare reform in a comprehensive manner and take a leadership position in
advocating for the type of welfare reform that is realistic and workable in this
County.
2
TAN-23-1997 17:23 FROM SOCIAL SERUICE DFPT. TO CPO It FCR. P.01
DixA t-#aa
California State Association of Gwdles
COunty Welfare Directors Aswu2tion
Warfare Reform Redesign Fliwusal
Federal welfam tefonj Pmuw is CAfifOmia watt the didltetpie of devWopkhg an Improved system
of social support which fosters personal responsibility and MR wrfflt:lsrrcy, The California Stats
Arw9ciabon of Counter (CSAC) and the County Welfare Mw10 s Associa5at (CWDA) believe
that any ref0mts to our ayS%M Of daltvetfng public social servkss must be designed in the
conhwf of the"ow"requrtrrrAnts:
Is g MtW insure ft(Children will be Cared for.
a It mast enabhr Faeroes to build the qty to care for ihotnaetyes,
w it must rKikft personal Ytrspottsibiity on the part of both parents MP support and caro:for their
ddkfran.
a k tnttst Mk ftw the rfMaga that walfas is tarMorary ONSM110"intended to help fan-Des
du"tNt"ancies when they are unable to atanptataly sUppott themsehres,
M itmust include a stored responsb tqf and acomaftbifpy among ap ravels of govemmanii and
nMn0VdmnlerdM sechlts,wKWng dho Malls,C9 m"s,sties,etlucawn gM 1he p wage and
no0vtom sectom.
e It mustptovkta wurtfies with adequate resources andfferdbiHtylo operate frrtr w*w social
aorrticos programa in a grey that meets local needs and CiramtetwiWs,
a It Mist p WAft rtdiielent toad tkrts for piannklg and re-a»gkleering Ctarent nswureas Sind a
pttase-ln parted drat is 0emmanstwate WAh avallable rawwt Ae.
VW*urs baleve;Iu mmerd has a re cn*Vi(y to p mMe support few Mo tfies,fanwas also haw
a resP01131ft to fake whataw Man Is necessary and wfWn their rapabiflias to achieve
k dePwAlI rtca_ TM%partrhotsttip between goVelnmeM and Win who are M meed of f#ewrtm It
ass istarm Is In effect a"contract'wtihdh kniudes the warsTC services*M aSsownca to to provided
and wpechftw to be met by flus mcililont
Cow&as propose no fb�policy directions for 0011browt wairore"am
EUGMEM
As it gurea tg prittidple, basic eli ity regrmwtrents anti grata favgia and struck"*MM be
established at the slats lural, Thor Martaa,hartnsvar,*odd boron tyre w to*ted tle)W ty to
dour wsif u w-b ork ay wm fhat bast moat local needs and wdiiiam.
WiM r WOO to eligAft OD MMM mcofrumand UM CaYtW"W t VrrSIMM r>9*NW shWM
a Rvdkw y skmpfry and align evgdft rales and regdisprnerft a , sa sN rr>•Ior aid
prognsrns, indudhtg TANF, Food Slam^ and other appropriam nead4ma
prvgratna. CoitarrMastrar<6fakamerimasrnadrgrotttsmaxlbiMiywtt+inorrrent
rein r
Jm.,.,r tg tsar
--------------
JAN-2:3--1997 17:23 FROM SOCIAL SERVICE DEFT, TO CAO 11 FLR. F.02
DRAFT#3s
law to simplify and align program rules. Caiifdmle should aggressively lobby for
changes to federal law or regulation when federal rules cwOct with a simplified
System,
■ Eliminate "deprivation" ti.e., the Muirwnent that a child be deprived of parental
support)as a condition of eligibility.
■ Adopt simple Income and assets tests.
■ Institute a cormion ellgh rty process fix al applkanfs:'Vrdludmg General AssiManea.
r Aid currant legal immigrants an TANF and Medi-Gal,
a The state should retain the elabilk of legal in rrdprants for in44m w Supportive
Services QHM)and provide a statedunded safety nest for indigent aged,blind, and
disabled legal immigrants who also$51.
r Ensure that the state and lecf" guvemmerd fund any cast shifts to Wurdy
programs as a fmk of benefit restrictions on legal WMft arts.
a Cstablsh at stats sponsorship erdorcement assistance pMram to assist sponsored
ienndgMn%and service provides in anloreing the sponsorship agreement
a The state and federal govenwnaMs should estaNsh a program to lderift refer, wW
pr&iWo supportive services to ilial irnmersnls subject to 351 and Food Stomp
benellt terminatbn in order to assist them in obtarMV efftentship.
r Aid kinship dare providers of children in the dsperxiw4y system in Bee Faster Care
program Mrd not in TANF. 19netdp care providers of diMan at risk
of otder6tg Ota deparowcy system should be aided Up to a d ashold booms level.- -
■ The state should opt out of ft federal TAW provision ifth precludes pemons with
a prix ii my drug offense corivictian irom erowty kN-rANF barleffts. in lbs place,
state IX"#WuW apaaty that indi f igls with felony drsta Ce YOurls for WAG$sion
or use may only be eligible to TANF it they him swcaesshft PontpEeted a drug
treabnedd propw and aro drug free or actively 9MVW and Aft comp"to a
cloody deflaed subalw"ieatmeM VNIAnl. Thi O0291ily Is necessary to assist
reravering adult to attain self4uRlaency and to provide for that drWdmn- Vtri lout
this optron,hsassarrg dwntbera d alrtdrPrr vwl costar and sosttpfrs in acedy foster rime.
BE(tEM ArM SUMST BTF=TURE
Cat rfm belove that all ditm creast be gr sad M Minimum admrAw forst of=0#wt
protects them foam manor,ondm mon and abuse. specific benefit and bww6t:suer*#*
recDonowndsSons ata as%low ,,
■ Grarda v ouW caMinue to vary on fern*sin at apoodion,but should not i1mmase
fpr asddlt M W cMdren bom While recipient is on aid,as per aslant raw
PJ 02
JytwY/e,t9o7
JAN-23-1997 17:24 FROM SOCIAL SERUICE DEPT. TO CAO 11 FLR_ P.03
DRAFT 43S
r income disregards should he simple and encourage Work. Prospective income
disregards should be used to Calculate grant adustmerds quarterly. Provisions for
Inc"loss adustmants and voluntary terminaWft must be Included for redplents
with very substantial changes in their inCame levels that occur between grant
tecakmlertiorts_
r ReglorW cost of Wk*ddterence adjustments should be Continued. CatibdrU shouM
atgttae dffferra options to Improve the ragiorrol grant smrcture, such as a regiorwl
aheRbrcare WRWMCO or other tnethods to acCOLYtt fortegfonal diNerartses-
■ CMM lapel dllltrremm bessd on "exempr and "nanexcmpr atatus under currant
orthoses would be elimiraged.
K Voudwrr,vendor,or third party payee systems must be flm lft and discretionary at
the County level.
■ ROCIO M abillljr to adxxMMU saving.such as for starling a business,pumbasing
a home,or paying for education should be continued.
a GmTd levels des not charge for recipwrts who do not get M-Subsldkod int OMMt
and are placed in public service jobs.
a A recipient who must acanpt a suttsidized job due to SIMS art of thole vraffam-to
work parlod (ase "►wltare-to-worse' section), would rest be efipfbie for me earned
inane credit or any income disregards.
WEL VARE TO K SE"CES
Catfforn a's watlata-tawak system should be designed wM n tlta ewderd of hnprwing the state's
broader Wot ftw dmdWft*M spth m- A system which helves aq jib seekers in Cstlilomfa wrttt be
Inherently stronger than one which focuses holey on welfare McIplertis. Wwidorr a development
system demllin should be integrated, taestn W-fowW. perfcamant d end tOMWattanslpe.
With nmpeot to welfare Teo p wit,we recommend the folies lrM fronewwork for mowing tedpiarft s
eom wtfts to work:
$Tera Oars-WaUM t)itapwlFOR
■ Calrlomi es wwaro-to-work system should be augmented wNh an LV* M
dfvarsiowmWeroon MNORch that would be MM cow. uniess futrttad by tate
state. Counties could daSIV a variety of dryeralon approaches, suet►as the Utah
MON,wdtltia Ippprards could q3t to mow"c4 to area tn"Aw of a groat to tasotve
the twrtd+tion that fed to the NVIcatirm Por assistattea. Pm#*Wm dsat choose lids
op*m agrao that Bmtr would not apply for 9ssistano4'10f three maatrs. if they do
appy for Mortes,they agree to repay Bre drverston'9oan"overtire nota AftW 1
torts. Counties oouid also dwdlop diversion models vespers comrrMty-Wasd
agencies 2W pewide far*support are At Omd to pmvide services to MdpW is who
dtooae to tis divedW to the camdnuNty-bssed ag8ncy in lieu of wonting on
asslstanCe.
Pape 3
Jamar 19,1967
SRN`23-1997 - 17.25 FROM SOCIAL SERVICE DEPT. TO CAO 11 FLR. P.04 O
DRAFT#3s
0 Ali uppYgnts will be required to fmmediamly cooperate with%rrdfY Support agencies,
unless they demonstrate goad cause not to, sueh as domestic violence.
Stec 7'pro-kcitiaf i'..aher�farRet Test oral Emafoya!»(JI'er eras
e Upon application, every non-09ferrad applOcant (Who does not opt for vAft e
diversion)should participate in an Initial labor market test consisting of emptoyment
orientation and yob search aoNves. Counties would have the QexUi 'Tdy to design
their individual up front labor market lest approaches,such as Job search,and on-
thayob training(0.11).
s Fut employabft evataabons and emptcyability Casa piprw would be dweakW ad for
those appfi arts needing more intensive servsxs and those unable to dAaln
employment as a result of intake job search activAles.
t 0ounfm could deatgn the employability v&wwn10rits'lar reciplants who do not got
a Job in the private sector through the Inf d upfront tabor market test, but tit
assessments must Include some accounting of a mmmintum set of fadons, such as
labor minket experience, educ:atiortat level,and local Omptoydterd opportunities.
■ glia shcukf exercise its authorW to opt out of ttvt iequirernard for calripriunity
service aftertwo monlf an aid,as it Is Incanastent wlttl the overall waffarrs to work
approach ald6rted lie e§ - thew w,oonruunhy service should be one of the optiorlal
service oomponants in a comlYs wafer-tovft astem.
a The fallowing appltanta would be o dulled tom Ura welfarato work prods(tthotryh
they could volunlea l:
a. Pregnant wor110n in the third lrimaste
b. Disabled and urudge to work(medkx*milled);
c. primary camghw for someone who Is disablod when careghdrtg preludes
char work;
d, Nonrneady owetekar relatives;
e. Ssrgle pryers 11an0as with children under tlpe ane(due to lace of affordable
k"M
t. Y�ett�domestic violence when pattidpeftn would be daMmw*&
in addrfral, comviies wouM have the authority to defer a sparifinad addtrand
permntalle of QWr caseload from the waftre-to«rofir process. This Vercentao
would vary by county based on danagtaphlc and IwW toortemic earidltians.
ag -6cecafllta�jia'�.Pfarra
a Cam6as must have the ma imwn 1wdWW to pwAde troth traftic l (*41,woric
experience, community colme training) no r niftonel wetfane4vo- work services.
MonFUraOMfarhai services might Include provision of equipment necessety for sWr
amploprrlent, repairs to an aulomobb necessary far employinent, or UMUMiortai
support servims,such as mental heatEh end substance abuse treahneM.
Pape 4
.mxmy 74.1997
SRN-23-1997 1726 FRON SOCIPL SERVICE DEPT. TO CAO 11 FLR. P.05
DRAFT OC
■ lite flaw and mix of services should be a part of the recipients'employability plan.
State law should require that countiea address certain minimally required
c oMponWAS in a aunty wslfans•M work plan(iika the GAIN plan). State law should
Ng[prescrte exocty how each county will address those components, nor shoufd
the state dictate Row and sequence of services.
a Sanctions for non-compliance and noncooperation4hould be hWrodiate, Sure,
pradttable,and prorida an opportunity for Corrective adbll.
Seen�ott- AW-LC-"
a CaNfomW* waltsre•to-wCrtc System should provide fCr;PO*tosn�tetm*OA
Servkes. COtRritles could address specific al pri;W.in their WeNm+a•TaWak plan.
pnowtaion of emplayrrom re wftn services would be a county option,unless it was
(Wry funded by to state.
r Employment Rgrentim servicas could include any lopmete aa61ty neomasty to
assist recipieft in retainrrg employmenl, such as cow4armg,crisis intecvenfian,
lrarnpartatW assistance, additional job training, mid aMid care aaaistarme.
TIME UMITS AND StOBIDIZED WORK
Counties support the ca.cap t of time-prnited welfare todp irk asmstarroe as a means of
rAtR erpng AFDC a transhlornat work-oitarded program• SpeciiRcally we rammmand'li m
failavlmp:
■ All recipients who are not defeated (See prior sectoral} and who do not fiord a job
through aha MW Nlor market test W2 have a Mntpd period of tine to receive
wagwo4waak Services that are specified In their amps iyablilty plan. 'The la�of
Gine fbrwaRaredarraAl services would be two years,with the option for the eourty
to moand services for another sec months if it is nk*'#o result In an un subsidisad
job-
s Should a mciptettt not racame an ansae Wh od jabAer Wier w&fare W work
pwW,harsh*will be OwW in same We of altdQaad warn wwal.when cembir ed
wm job Search equ■ls TO hours per week. Subildli sd work options would lrxhxle
T These aubsidizedd work gpp"may also be eorreonwfof tha�oy+ y
pian pdorlo N*0 WL
as ROC43WM In StOiCK tdvlvrkwould nol recerre EITO or income distep ids in Cider
to rnakrAn MaWWves to find unsubsid¢ed empioymant
a Recipients in subsidized Work would periodic*be regLtkW tC anyaga in a Jeb
search for unwudrsidized employment.
Peet 5
Jert,piy 1R tan
SAN-23-19W 1?=26 FROM SOCIAL SERAICF DEPT. TO CAO it FLR. P.@6
DRAFT XU
• Counties woufa have the ability to sanction recipients for failunD to accept and
maintain an appropriate subsidized or unsubsidized job.
FOOD STAMPS
• Counties me ating unemployment and job avarsoility requiremetrts may request that
the stats weir a fadw*waiver wompdng the county or hefts within file courtly from
Food Stamp reetr46"for singte adults aged 18 to 50, if aN requirements ars mat,
the state must sulxnd the waiver request to USDA,
• The irate mey 111`461e requests for waivers frnaf Food Ssteftp olga tff rresirtcftonx for
rmurtties that moot fedorat unern yment and)*avaiiabflily requ irametfts*luteol
first receiving a format request trvm a oouny. if it is eweclewrred, the counties must
know tent the welver.
a fear og A sh t wider waterer, the aorto strrwtd provide f1st for antmtfes to offer
tninin'W WOrttrare necessary for recipients to avoid the benefit cut-off.
TEFF CE PAPOM
Courses sttpw It twpra wt*e case managerneylt approo*for pragna it and pw ftirtg
MM shit to Cal Loom and AFLP programs. Giron the effyt that has been cndertakon
in 090M attd in>pttttlartt Cal Leam,the state should 0019 corttintte With the current Cat
Loom program in lieu of the new federal requirernents.
"FETY NET
• CeestNesstWrtpiy OPPtatefutlher coat sttiRs to mutftasr, hfdlgent assistetfOa stswrld
be "snducled aft part of a comptetmuive state basic pulft att►,wport program. Vile
raWmmeltd
MW caen"Pftstance(GA)beoUnte a stifle p oW"wm t3tilbtfwide
A TAW
to Possible. All unernployoWn(GA AM TAM be t�rat in
a•itrtaer fashlan,preferably In a system other tart the WONAro sysberrt, such as a
rttsbe disablah eplem. Efrtplcyabb CiA raapiaefVs tnsuld be kloapotsAbd in ft TAW
process for emptoyebla TAMP resiptettivw Olocgh to benefit levels avid avvlldbte
sermay dffw based on whether the taelplept flay dependent d>askW In the
household. Cou+tbes wgWmtsad that etch a sys�m would mquiya a col"*
cw*bgWn based at same praenkape of past. Mme. Hofrerersuch
onntibAW muss be lower than amara cocmy seri tp ibvift. Cwrlhee COW co
to srgtpte rWR t brant Ravels of eftgib"With county fends.
• weft the fatgb randw of parolees on GA,the Cotraw[ons system shoglid hegira lfptt
ceapcsts)blpty for providing for the stubslstw%ce needs or lydperM parolees for Vitae
years after release_
Ppe6
.eausy 19 7997
- - ------- - -- ---------- Q
JRN-23-1997 1727 FROM SOCIAL SERVICE DEPT. TO CRO 11 FLR. P.04 �V
DRAFT tf3s
CHILD CAKE
Counties recommend that the child Care system should include broad state-eet poky
parameters, which provide communities with local flexiWfity and conlrot to operate the
programs.The system must respect parental clwice and m"irt,support and aClvo rmedge
ifae multpe rales of efdld rare including fainly seH sufficiency,Child development,Ond Child
safety. Finally,the sysram should ensure sufficient funding to meet the naliorM and state
goals of welfare reform w"should promote family seN-euf5odancy,protect Wdren ON
preservefamfRes.
rr Counties believe plat universally available Bold care for low income farniNee v orldrtp
orseeling work Is a adkW comimetit of su ul wallahs-to-work programs.AU
TANF ero* recipients baking for work would aecehfe subsidized dliid care, as
would d fow klcame woddng families with incomes up to some ft"hold lave►, such
as 2W parcent of poverty.
r All temples snail pay a fee basad on a stid'xrg scde lamed on inrxrme,indexed by
region per dtitd,and pard directly to the provider.
■ If fundin is not made avarhbie to support the eyslem dascrtbed above,the fa8owing
should be the meUwd for localities to eotabfishhnp priofhies for ser Acs Children in
the(:laid Matecive eer*m(CPS)syMM Should oorttfnua to be the Grit priority for
drift owe. Pdofdfy lbrthe remaining famf ilm on the 19 tthould be determined locally
(saa govemeroe). Remaining eligible categories lira!would be priaritiaed focally
would be: (i)Ww4ncorne families whose pivents,Mataker,or lagd gaudtan are
working or sealing woM (Z)lean parents; (3)farrsTiss that are wiperliencing short-
tomr crtsSS that is body defcaed (Le. avwderm of homelessness or medicate
emergenciask (4) Tram low-income ferrules whaee panels, csratAW. or lager
guardian are engaged in approved acft*w heft to ampioymenf.
Gwr�rroa
a the focal gavoming strodufe ahould be asteb4idad ►hough► a j01111t-OW11611111111
between tiro CW*Bcanls of 8upervtaoa and ahaCofady Boards of EdUCO on.
}ty,Wer,County Boards or MV&visms mast hart a(y mvq rote in$***stub dw
Red govafntrfg proofs and increased ami► horny in astabtoft pCroriUas for decd
tareitsN"sag.
■ (hare shod be etdabfiahed a loch piarsiiriy Camgapalon caasi !ltd of mrrmsrrdty
atdashotde s wfa would here a bfvacHmmed advfsafy rale.counties could choose
to utriae an a d*rW community advisory body that avefaees fans'ly and dIdron
policy iasues. The lel govemhng sfnACfare should be configured to mdnlmme
cordgds Cf itatetest.
PWT
.miaq rs,iwer
JAN-23-1997 17:27 FRChi SOCIAL SERVICE DEPT. TI
CPO 11 FLR p,gg
GRAFT utas
■ The local governing structure should have flexibifity in the plang process as well
as in the pnorIftotion or resources and resource development,
■ The state must provide funding for the administration of the lomat governing
sbWura_
f?ltrer f�sxtraiy�.-.F�3 prggg
• The applicatlart process should be kept ars possible and cwtstraant
between program, Stalutters and regulations should be strltemilned to create
elfien h the Child cera tyltetn.
■ CPS dttdrsn attouid be served without regard to ittoorne but if the child is mgidatg
m th his/her paterfis. there should be a co-pay tee plaid ttkatxiy to the chid care
ptovk w.
■ Kan absor t parent etdsts,the Custodial parent must register wilt family support.
• The ,%tate should fund the ability of loc ludas to develop vdMtwy training
opportunities for famillcs in reed of child calve cell for exempt providers-
PROGRAM AWMINISTRA11ON AND FUNDING
MacrAUU wroue 4w 6nm an iurome maintenance system to a*dkK ffioianoy system Will
requiv fsds+edOn of a targe portion of our current admk tahative resorcas.t ountias.rig
need time tar tacisadttlsdc taatxxcas,re�engksear tttair buairrosa praoessse and tenpin.state
Converston win repft a pleased-in trtF%ffwnhrdon process VW to cowwrixurathr With
viable resources amt Is based on reaietie time lines.
in fight or the betnendous Changes kwdyed,we»command Ow fcmowittg:
■ Counties ata the presdrnptive deellvtverets of tite TANF Aasiista r=system.
• Counties may Wish to contract cut dtfererd aspOft of thrdr fa*9011F rE6cienc r
systems, but with no state mandate. The stets al ould not oot*ud eGrauctq with
aervias prtriMers. Thera shorAd be rw resdrk6=dh catxtly w**Mgwttt other
courtly agencFss-
• Regions;auknitistration should be permiEW 0
• him, Awbtonce and w bwodc programs must nordha to toe funded based
on the worldoed demands placed on CoWWO as a rRsnit of weitare rsforr►
• COMO&thou ld haw Ma#='bFq to blend TANF and CAM foreleg„
• $Me reglata6on should pante opportunities for dstttoNWmW program. Counties
that are iraetented In rapidly movtry to an WAoWne4fased system In mchanoe for
additionally nexibility in pmgi am dasign and funding atrouif haute the option. Tne
I'.pe e
JanunNtrt,tear'
JAN-23-1997 1'7:2F.! FPCrl SOCIAL SERVICE DEPT_
�.-- - TO fA0 11 FLR
DRAFT#3&
spehxfrc outcomes that these counties would be accountable for would be mutually
negotiated between the state and the c urntles within Parameters.set in state law.
• The state must contidue its current commfimeM to state welfare automation,
kmkAktg the expedited development of a statew;ds electronic system of deltlivatmg
benefds.
• The state must re-engnQllr Its policies and r»gttlgllions across agendas and
departments and d*Whon new.integrated approarS m to overaigtrt, rAhkrg, and
41119CA n of rasounpas to rotund ea. The 3fate must *ISO develop the automated
capability to Werfaos TAW data with CPS,dfild cite,houtring,and otter hurnan
services.
• The Mata should meet at least 100 percent of TAW WX in order to tti nWn tlfigibie
for the federal contingemy fund. Maintaining at toast the auunrnt levet of state
Spending Is essential to ensure job tgaoion nrtrnuttxs and OVW eenioes lire
available.
• Ccunty BoardS Of SUpenftOrs must continue to tw"00Omb*ty to decide width
Mi*departnitnt has Msporebilly for huM*w-,d prolpnis s.
ARSENT PAazEMTWQ*.D SUPPORT FJVF'ORCEMENT
Absent parents should be required to support Ih*vhlldtan,W d in the absence or prat,be
required to spate in wro*rwd and communitywork ixoW*=in much the wine way
we expect custodial parents to participate. We support the eslabiishment of mandatory
guldeflnas for child support and court orders not artly to fret*eels of fear NW Support tout
also to rbq ft dwrsswrfity wank and pWbdpsdm In emptaynteht pxogralraa for tlloae VJxWtt
patents unable to pay support due to their onsrctrpivynrent Tdta hletvto"would deft Mew
$one addnlsaal did support cvUeallons they ger w eta Finely, we Su pod earl MX*lg
parents for daiin luent dM auppori.
SUPPORT FOR THE WORK WG POOR
ertt •�tsdtaef15 WAM be tsastnpioyanertito ttftaMa7ila mare hka�re to �r�r
to be on rr oMm,at al*nes,so that persarrs ente tg the system vadf always be able 10
MOM the dtoka of work over wa tare. The pubes pd q gojd of ancawaft wiorid tnuat
es+pnae prat hhb6aea ixrrplvyrtrstd,at aury tnvd,well BR fantdies nut of welfare. Thi iogaVrwip
r•rxsmtrteradatlor+s w19help flarittet thtsse phi;
• A StM Anted tnoome Tax Credit - A stab VITT should bo orated to move
CaRwr is fta IW to the goat tart hell time work at dgfay wage pmvWw an Income
aulTMM to INt one out of welfare. IniMadives nNo to be unda•takea to provide
outreach and education as welt as sirtpetied rrAO%*ds far " employgra attd
apt""to provide k4tviduats with ntonptty advances of the EiTG.
■ Mem Berets-OWDA beYsves that health insuianas ptvgrems ahotM be made
Popes
revarr ta,12"
_. TOTAL P.09
JAN-23-1497 17:33 FROM SOCIAL SERVICE DEPT. TO 64098p
P-0i tiitY
OPAFT"s
available to farnfts% to work, up to a certain pemaentege of poverty,without regard
to deprivabon taquhement%
■ CM Gare for alt working poff families-discussed shove.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The ultimate su0cess of a proposal to lkne mit wattare hinqu an atu iablEttlf to Ct#nsition
most regpiwft Into wi-rabaldhed employment, The sma qO of the economy and ttte
number of t4 w jobs emt fed for welfare mdpiertts is orttleW to the sucom of tirfarfiu *Wd
walf". f2"wW vai>iffimns in enerrr "rued and avallskile resWrces further•rxttnpauhd the
dtsllenge of athiaritq fW1 emplgm+ent.
■ stame p Acy melon must eaamhte ways to spand proomms shred at job crewon,
watch must Indwis job rpaation for TANF rec"Ws,
a Lcw aoksrornic devalaprtrertt pnte6Nareens mint worlCtiussty tielih the avolvlrtg tine
stap a nw osr W"Aftms(JTPA,WD,(AIN,commuptiiy codeprs,etc,)to scows
every pomble incentive for W*esa to hire TAXF tadp arft
a t3asiltesa development ptoWwm at thn rocas and ne9t W leve!must trove dddNorW
#uruffng sett!Capacity to inset dto expectstions of aggrasstve}oh Q=*m for TAW
redpi0flis.
Par to
sa nraey to,itrlr