HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02251997 - D4-D7 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
J� h�
\
FROM: Barton J. Gilbert, Director of General Services o is Costa
County
DATE: February 12, 1997 "OWN
SUBJECT Approve Agreement with Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) to Replace the County
Analog Microwave System with Digital as Part of FCC Radio Frequency Reallocation
SPECIFIC REQUESTS OR RECOMMENDATION(S)8 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. APPROVE an agreement with Pacific Bell Mobile Services (PBMS) to replace the County analog
microwave system with a digital system, as part of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
reallocation of public safety radio frequencies at a cost not to exceed $6,387,438, of which the County
will be responsible for 63% and PBMS will be responsible for 37%; and wherein PBMS, as part of this
agreement, will provide a turnkey, state-of-the-art digital microwave system to the County, with the
County's share of the cost payable over a 10-year period with no interest; and
2. DELEGATE authority to sign the PBMS agreement to the Director of General Services or his
designee; and
3. FIND that a Negative Declaration pertaining to this Project was published and no protests were
received, and CONCUR in the finding that the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment
and Direct the Community Development Director to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The change-out of the microwave system from analog to digital will cost the County $4,024,086, payable
over 10 years. PBMS will pay $2,363,352 of the total cost based on the fact that PBMS and Sprint won
the right to acquire eight of existing County microwave paths, approximately (1/3), as the result of the
FCC telecommunications auction for radio frequencies. In addition, PBMS will pay $158,593 for training,
manuals, and test equipment. If the County had to pay for the entire cost of the replacement, it would
cost approximately $6,700,000, plus financing and bidding costs to continue to meet the public safety
communications needs within the County. Costs for County labor, engineering consultants, and
microwave tower analyses, with tower replacements where required, are included in this proposal.
Assuming a conservative interest rate of 6%, the County would pay approximately $1.5 million in interest
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT:_*_YES SIGNATURE: .M -
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR —RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE($):
ACTION OF BOARD ON February 25, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT 1
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
MEDIA CONTACT: BARTON J.GILBERT(313-7100) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: Office of the County Administrator
Community Development ATTESTED February 25, 1997
Information Technology PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
County Counsel SUPE �Ld
SORS AND U 1 ADMINISTRATOR
GSD -Administrative Services Division I
Purchasing Division
Telecommunications Division BY ,DEPUTY
pbmsbrd.f97 M382 (10/88)
Re: Pacific Bell Mobile Services Agreement
February 12, 1997
Page 2
Fiscal Impact: (Continued)
on a 10-year repayment schedule. The "0" % interest allows the County to save this amount. The
project would cost the County 37% more if the County had to pay 6% interest, and the interest rate would
probably be greater than that. In addition to the interest costs, there would be other costs associated
with borrowing funds and bidding out the project, that under this proposal the County does not have to
pay.
If the County does not continue with an internal microwave system, then private telecommunications
carriers would have to be used. They charge for air time in addition to equipment charges. The cost for
use of private telecommunication services would be quite expensive, with the County having limited
ability to control the rates from private companies. For $4,024,086, the County will have a completely
new digital microwave system that would cost twice that amount without this agreement with PBMS. The
County's annual payments for this project are $402,408.60.
The payments for this project can be covered through a reduction in the maintenance costs of the
system, data and voice circuits (T-1s) that can transmitted over the County's digital system instead of
paying a telecommunications carrier, the users of the system, a share of the revenue from the fiber optics
Right-of-Way project, and revenue from Radio Communication leases at the microwave sites. Additional
revenue can be derived in the future, as Telecommunications expands its services, both with additional
uses for the expanded bandwidth capacity of a digital microwave system and with projected increases
in uses of County communication sites.
Funding Sources for$402,408.60 Annual Microwave Payments:
• Reduction of annual microwave maintenance costs estimated at $40,000.
• Savings for transmission of data and voice circuits (T1s) over microwave at $115,000/year.
• Revenue from telecommunication leases of$40,000/year.
• Share of revenue from fiber optics contract with GST for use of Southern Pacific Right-of-Way,
minimum of$100,000 annually beginning Fiscal Year 1997/98.
• Assessments for users of the system: $65,000/year.
• General Services Telecommunications budget estimated at $12,409 year.
• Health Services share for use of 2 new microwave paths at $30,000/year.
BACKGROUND AND REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS:
Contra Costa County maintains a Public Safety Microwave System that consists of 18 microwave paths
that serve as the backbone for County Public Safety Radio Communications. The System provides
connectivity for the Sheriff, fire, medical, Office of Emergency Services, CCTV, Public Works, General
Services, Animal Services, and the Community Warning System. The microwave system provides
redundant connectivity between the base stations located on remote mountain tops and the various
Public Safety Dispatch Centers. The System has provided extremely reliable communications
connectivity for these vital Public Safety Services during earthquakes, storms, and last year's major
Northern California power failure. By owning its own transmission medium, the County is not reliant upon
private providers of services who might not maintain the same level of service or reliability during an
emergency or disaster, when outside competing entities may be affected by multiple outages.
In 1992, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reallocated the 1.9 GHz microwave spectrum
from "private microwave" to a new service, Personal Communications Service (PCS.) This relocation
of spectrum was auctioned to bidders in different parts of the United States, and for the Bay Area,
Including Contra Costa County. Sprint and Pacific Mobile Services (PBMS)were the successful bidders.
As part of the FCC relocation plan, the FCC mandated that the successful bidders of the 1.9 GHz
spectrum relocate the existing users of the spectrum to "equivalent systems." The FCC stipulated a time
period for negotiations for these relocation of frequencies: 3 years on a voluntary basis, plus 2 more
years for mandatory negotiations for"public safety systems," such as the County's Microwave System.
The voluntary negotiation period began on April 5, 1995. The FCC rules require that the PCS provider
replace those microwave paths that are in the PCS frequency band. For the County's System, this is
8 paths. Because the County Microwave System is a loop system, to allow for redundancy; paths cannot
easily be replaced in the middle of this System and still meet an acceptable solution for maintaining the
integrity of the County's System.
Re: Pacific Bell Mobile Services Agreement
February 12, 1997
Page 3
The minimum reallocation, that PBMS and Sprint would have to provide to the County, is for 8
replacement paths for an analog system. That solution is unsatisfactory to the County, as the County
System is part of a 20-year old analog technology that is no longer manufactured. Within a few years,
the County will have to replace its entire analog microwave system with digital to continue a microwave
communications system. Because PBMS and Sprint want to proceed quickly to implement PCS, they
want an agreement with the County that will allow them to proceed sooner than the FCC voluntary and
mandatory negotiation time frames provide. Because the carriers want to proceed now, they have been
willing to negotiate for an agreement that would benefit the County more than the minimum costs that
they would have to pay to be able to acquire the County's 8 paths. Accordingly, County staff with the
assistance of a telecommunications consulting firm, C.S.I., began negotiations over a year ago to obtain
the best deal possible for the County and to meet the interests of the companies that want to offer PCS
in 1997. A tower analysis and a complete inventory of the equipment at all sites were completed during
the negotiation period to determine the estimated costs of a new system. The proposed agreement is
for a new digital microwave system to replace the analog system, with 37% of the cost being borne by
PBMS and its separate agreement with Sprint, and 63% of the cost to be paid by Contra Costa County,
through a lease purchase agreement with PBMS at 0 % interest and a 10-year repayment schedule. The
language in this proposed agreement was reviewed by County Counsel, and changes were made by
PBMS Counsel to meet the County's lease-purchase contract requirements.
Reasons for Replacement of Analog System:
• The 8 paths that are in the PCS spectrum cannot be replaced with analog equipment operating in
another band, as only one vendor still manufactures such equipment, with a single limited frequency
range. There are no licensable frequencies available to the County in that range. Digital technology
on the other hand is manufactured in multiple frequency bands, and obtaining frequencies for an all-
digital microwave will not be difficult to achieve.
• One alternative is to "do nothing." The County would accept secondary use of the spectrum, which
means that the County must accept any interference generated by the PCS systems and the County
cannot cause interference to the PCS systems. The only way this can be solved is to discontinue
operation of the 8 microwave paths, leaving critical Public Safety Services without communications
connectivity. For example, Contra Costa Fire's headquarters in Pleasant Hill would lose all
microwave communications and connectivity to the Fire Radio System, which is an unacceptable
alternative. The County could wait until the end of the mandatory negotiation period to retain its
frequencies as long as possible; however, the PCS carriers are insistent on obtaining the County
frequencies soon to allow implementation of PCS. They want a relocation of frequencies now.
• The analog system requires more repair and maintenance due to the advanced age of the system
and delays in obtaining parts. Technicians must respond frequently to go to the sites to maintain and
repair the system, often on emergency calls, making the maintenance more expensive than a new
system.
Benefits From a Digital System:
• The County can take advantage of digital technology that will enable the County to provide sub-rate
multiplexing capabilities from 9.6 kilobits(Kbps)to multiples of 1.54 megabits (Mbps) circuits. The 9.6
Kbps is the rate of a slow modem, while the 1.54 Mbps is equivalent to a T-1. This will provide for
the ability to migrate many circuits from Pacific Bell to the County's own network and realize an
immediate savings of approximately $9,000/month. The County would not be subject to future rate
increase from Pacific Bell or other carriers.
• New applications can be implemented with the higher bandwidth of a digital system. This will enable
the County to be in a position to have the needed telecommunication infrastructure in place to
efficiently and effectively implement new applications, such as the personnel/payroll system, video
conferencing, and the existing public safety related services.
• The County would be in a position to have the needed telecommunications infrastructure in place to
support distributed client/server applications which will enhance disaster recovery and business
resumption plans in case of emergency events.
Re: Pacific Bell Mobile Services Agreement
February 12, 1997
Page 4
Failure to Approve Project:
If the Board does not approve this proposed agreement, then PBMS will build its system around the
microwave system and withdraw its offer. Negotiating with PBMS during this voluntary period is better
for the County. If the Board delays action on this proposal, then a temporary relocation of 2 paths for
Sprint cannot be met. This would mean the County would not get a $200,000 bonus offered by Sprint
to complete a temporary relocation by March 15, 1997. The current offer is for an approved agreement
now; and the County will lose the leverage it has if there is a delay. The minimum PBMS offer only has
to be for 8 analog paths, and the County would still have an obsolete analog system. At some point in
the next few years, the County would have to either convert the analog microwave system, at its own
cost, or disband it, as parts are no longer available. Public safety departments including Sheriff, fire,
medical, OES, CCTV, and the Community Warning System all use the County microwave system. If the
County microwave system fails, then they lose vital communications. If the County has to shut down its
microwave system because of obsolescence, then public safety communications connectivity will have
to be provided by private telecommunication carriers that are not controlled by the County and might not
have connectivity to the locations where County radio transmitters are located. To provide such
connectivity, since demand would be only to benefit the County, a provider can set extremely high prices
to construct such a network, especially since the County would be a captive client. The County would
also be in competition with other users, and the County might not have sole preference in a disaster.
While the cost of the PBMS proposal requires payment by the County, alternative costs that would be
required when the analog microwave system fails and cannot be repaired, could be substantial and
uncontrollable by the County. The time period to implement an alternative solution would take months,
which could affect communications for the public safety operations. The value of the current proposal
is substantially beyond the replacement of 8 analog paths.
The prudent decision is to take advantage of PBMS's offer to implement a state-of-the-art digital
microwave system that provides for modern communications for the Sheriff, fire, medical, OES, and other
departments and can take Contra Costa County into the 21st century.
pbmsbrd.f97
Ben H.Lyon 4420 Rosewood Drive,Bldg.2.Or Floor PACIFICWABELL.
SenuCnr,nsel Rleasantal Calitreia 945%3.4 WAV
Mobile Services
(510)227-9170
February 12, 1997
Kathy Brown
Deputy Director, General Services
Contra Costa County
1220 Morello, Suite 200
Martinez, California 94553
Dear Mrs. Brown:
Enclosed please find a final version of the Microwave Relocation Agreement, executed
by our President, Lyn Daniels.
This is irrevocable for 3 months pending final approval of the Board of Supervisors so
Iong as the interim work can commence next week along the lines we discussed. The
interim work authorization will be treated under separate cover.
Also please note that Sprint entered a Cost Sharing Agreement with Pacific Bell Mobile
Services on February 11, 1997.
Very truly yours,
Ben H. Lyon
Senior Counsel
Enc.
AGREEMENT NO. CPL/MWR 028
Rev 9 2/12/97
AGREEMENT FOR MICROWAVE RELOCATION
THIS AGREEMENT FOR MICROWAVE RELOCATION (this "Agreement")
effective as of the 11th day of February 1997 is between PACIFIC BELL MOBILE
SERVICES ("PBMS"), a California corporation, and CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
("Incumbent').
WITNESSETH :
WHEREAS, PBMS, on its own behalf and/or on behalf of other Personal
Communication Service (PCS) providers, and in accordance with Federal
Communications Commission Report and Order 94-303, 95-157 and 96-196, has asked
Incumbent to relocate certain of its existing microwave facilities operating in the 1.850-
1.990 GHz frequency range (the "Original Facilities"), as identified in Exhibit A hereto,
and make system and equipment modifications as set forth in Part I of Exhibit B, B 1
and B2 hereto; and,
WHEREAS, Incumbent is willing to relocate its Original Facilities and to
participate in the completion of the Work as requested by PBMS, on the condition that
PBMS perform the additional Work included in Part II of Exhibit B hereto; and,
WHEREAS, to facilitate this request, PBMS or its Contractors (as such term is
hereinafter defined) is willing to design and complete the Work, including engineering
and equipment costs, and permit, license, site and FCC fees, subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement:
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
adequacy of which are hereby specifically acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
ARTICLE 1
THE WORK• COSTS AND EXPENSES
1.1 PBMS or its Contractors shall execute and complete the Work as more
particularly described in the Contract Documents (as such term is defined hereinafter).
PBMS shall bear 37%all reasonable costs and expenses set forth in Exhibit B-1.
Agreement No.CPL/MWR 028 Page t of 9
RWM-R1015
1.2 Lease Agreement. Incumbent agrees that it will lease the new facilities
identified in Part II of Exhibit B from PBMS under the terms included as Exhibit E to this
Agreement. The specified lease payments are based on the cost to PBMS to acquire,
install, test, and provide certification for the new facilities identified in Part II of Exhibit
B, Exhibit B1, and B2 and are estimated at the time of execution of this Agreement to
total $4,024,086.00. This estimate, and accordingly the lease payments specified in
Exhibit E, are subject to adjustment downward only sixty (60) days after completion of
the Work, based on the actual cost of Work identified in Part II of Exhibit B. Actual
costs in excess of the current estimate shall be borne by PBMS.
1.3 Additional Costs. PBMS further agree to provide Incumbent with the
additional services or equipment set forth in Exhibit B-3.
ARTICLE 2
COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION
2.1 Commencement. The date of commencement is the date of this Agreement,
as first written above.
2.2 Completion. The parties estimate that the Work, limited to the frequencies as
shown in Exhibit A, shall be substantially complete on or before July 30, 1997. The
completion date may be altered upon mutual agreement between the Incumbent and
PBMS. The entire system completion date shall be December 30, 1997, which may be
altered by mutual agreement between the incumbent and PBMS. Incumbent shall have
complied with Article 4 hereof with respect to the Original Facilities no later than the
date of its acceptance of the Work.
ARTICLE 3
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
3.1 Contract Documents. The term "Contract Documents" means this
Agreement, together with any drawings, plans, designs, specifications or other documents
listed or referred to in Exhibits B, B1, B2, B3, C, C-1 and D hereto, and any
Modifications (as defined hereinafter) issued after execution of this Agreement. The
intent of the Contract Documents is to include all items necessary for the proper
execution and completion of the Work by PBMS or its Contractor. The Contract
Documents are complementary, and what is required by one shall be as binding as if
required by all; performance of the Work shall be required only as set forth in the
Contract Documents.
3.2 Performance of Work. PBMS or its Contractor shall prepare all documents
necessary to coordinate and complete the Work. PBMS or its Contractor shall be
Agreement No. CPL/M WR 028 Page 2 of 9
RWM-R1015
3.2 Performance of Work. PBMS or its Contractor shall prepare all documents
necessary to coordinate and complete the Work. PBMS or its Contractor shall be
responsible for procuring the necessary permits, licenses and equipment necessary to
complete the Work, as well as the engineering, construction and installation of new
facilities as set forth in the Contract Documents. Incumbent shall at all times cooperate
with PBMS and its Contractors in the completion of the Work, and will take all actions
reasonably requested by PBMS in connection therewith.
3.3 The Work. The term "Work" includes the equipment installation and other
services required by the Contract Documents, whether completed or partially completed,
and includes all other labor, materials, equipment and services provided or to be provided
by PBMS or its Contractors to fulfill PBMS' obligations.
3.4 Testing; Acceptance. The specifications and testing procedures for the
system and equipment modifications comprising the Work are set forth in Exhibit D
hereto. Acceptance testing shall be complete within 10 days of substantial completion of
the Work. Upon satisfactory completion of the acceptance testing set forth in Exhibit D,
Incumbent shall be deemed to have accepted the Work.
3.5 Scope. The Contract Documents shall not be construed to create a contractual
relationship of any kind between any persons or entities other than Incumbent and PBMS.
ARTICLE 4
TRANSFER OF FACILITIES
4.1 Transfer of Facilities. Upon the successful completion of the testing
procedures set forth in Exhibit D hereto, Incumbent shall promptly cease operation of
frequencies in 1.850-1.990 Ghz band and promptly modify FCC license to reflect same,
and Incumbent will thereafter be deemed to have surrendered its rights as primary or co-
primary licensee of its paths within the 1.850-1.990 Ghz band The parties agree that upon
completion of the Work, PBMS shall become the sole owner of and shall be solely
entitled to all of the transferable benefits of the Original Facilities.
4.2 Title to New Facilities. After successful completion of the Testing and
Acceptance procedures set forth in Exhibit D hereto, title to the new facilities, as listed or
referred to in Part I of Exhibit B hereto, shall vest in Incumbent together with all rights,
privileges, licenses, permits, and other assets and appurtenances pertaining thereto. Title
to the new Facilities identified in Part II of Exhibit B shall remain with PBMS until such
time as Incumbent may exercise its option to purchase as specified in Exhibit E.
4.2 Surplus. Prior to the transfer of any of the Original Facilities pursuant to
paragraph 4.1 above, Incumbent shall have determined such Original Facilities to be
surplus or no longer useful or necessary in the operations of Incumbent's business.
Agreement No. CPL/M WR 028 Page 3 of 9
RWM-R1015
4.4 Removal of Transferred E ui ment. Upon completion of testing specified in
Exhibit D, PBMS or its Contractor shall remove the equipment from the Original
Facilities and deliver such equipment to a local facility to be determined by Incumbent.
ARTICLE 5
ADDITIONAL DUTIES
5.1 Approvals. Except as specified in the Contract Documents, PBMS or its
Contractors shall secure and pay for necessary approvals, easements, assessments and
charges required for the Work. Unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents,
PBMS or its Contractor shall secure and pay for the building permit and other permits
and governmental fees, licenses and inspections necessary for proper execution and
completion of the Work. PBMS or its Contractor shall comply with and give notices
required by laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and lawful orders of public authorities
bearing on performance of the Work.
5.2 Construction Process. Unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents,
PBMS or its Contractor shall provide and pay for labor, materials, equipment, tools,
construction equipment and machinery, water, heat, utilities, transportation, and other
facilities and services necessary for the proper execution and completion of the Work.
Incumbent shall cooperate in providing utilities, transportation and other services to
PBMS or its Contractor where such services are not otherwise readily available.
5.3 Taxes. Incumbent shall pay, and shall defend and hold PBMS harmless from
and against all taxes, penalties, interest and other charges that may be levied or assessed
against Incumbent in connection with the completion of the Work.
5.4 Site Access. During the performance of the Work, Incumbent grants to
PBMS, its employees, consultants and Contractors a nonexclusive license to enter the
premises containing the Original Facilities for the purpose of conducting Radio
Frequency testing and system verification and for the completion of the Work. PBMS
and its Contractors require access to the site for ten (10) hours per day, six (6) days per
week once work on site has commenced. Incumbent shall provide an escort at all times
work is being performed on the site. If requested by Incumbent and where practicable,
PBMS shall provide Incumbent 24 hours' advance notice prior to such entry. Incumbent
shall arrange for the possessory rights to the site to which the Original Facilities are
located and where the Work is completed, and Incumbent grants a similar nonexclusive
license of entry and access to such site.
ARTICLE 6
Agreement No. CPL/MWR 028 Page 4 of 9
RWM-R1015
CONTRACTORS
PBMS shall be entitled to use Contractors to perform any or all of the Work. A
"Contractor" is a person or entity who has a direct contract with PBMS or with one of
PBMS' Contractors to perform all or a portion of the Work, including without limitation
the vendor, distributor and manufacturer of any equipment or other goods used or
incorporated in the Work. PBMS intends to contract with Harris Corporation, Farinon
Division, to perform the Work required by this Agreement.
ARTICLE 7
MODIFICATIONS
PBMS and Incumbent, without invalidating this Agreement, may order changes in
the Work consisting of additions, deletions or modifications (each, a "Modification").
Such changes in the Work shall be authorized in writing, and any amounts to be paid by
Incumbent in connection therewith shall be determined by mutual agreement.
ARTICLE 8
WARRANTIES
PBMS warrants that the Work will be performed in a good and workmanlike
manner and will comply in all material respects with the Contract Documents and
specifications in Exhibit C hereto. Contractor's warranties relating to the Work and
equipment shall be assigned to Incumbent on the completion date. The foregoing
warranties are the sole and exclusive warranties with respect to the Work and do not
extend to any defect caused by Incumbent's misuse, negligence or failure to follow
operating instructions, or to any repairs, adjustments or alterations to the Work performed
by Incumbent, or to normal corrosion, erosion or wear and tear. OTHER THAN THE
ABOVE, PBMS MAKES NO WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE WORK,
EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES
OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, PBMS shall have no liability for consequential or
special damages.
ARTICLE 9
COMPLETION
The Work shall be deemed completed upon delivery by PBMS of notice to
Incumbent of such completion. The date of completion of the Work shall be the date on
Agreement No. CPL/MWR 028 Page 5 of 9
RWM-R1015
which such notice is delivered by any reasonable means. Completion of the Work shall
constitute a waiver of claims against PBMS by Incumbent except those arising from
failure of the Work to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if within twelve (12) months of completion, the
microwave facilities installed by PBMS or its Contractors cause interference with another
microwave user(as interference is defined by applicable FCC rules and regulations), then
PBMS or its Contractors shall make such modifications to the installed facilities as are
necessary to terminate the interference.
ARTICLE 10
DAMAGE; INDEMNIFICATION. INSURANCE
10.1 Damage. PBMS or its Contractors shall promptly remedy damage and loss
to property at the site to the extent caused by PBMS, its Contractors, or anyone directly
or indirectly employed by any of them, except for damage or loss attributable to acts or
omissions of Incumbent or by anyone for whose acts Incumbent may be liable, and not
attributable to the fault or negligence of PBMS or its Contractors. PBMS or its
Contractors shall immediately report the occurrence of any damage or injury to
Incumbent.
10.2 Indemnification. Each party shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the
other party, and its officers, agents and employees, as well as its associated affiliated
companies and their respective officers, agents and employees ("Indemnitees"), from any
losses or liabilities incurred as a result of any injury or death to any persons or damage to
any property arising out of or in connection with this Agreement (regardless of whether
or not such injury, death or damage is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder),
but only to the extent caused by negligent acts or omissions of the indemnifying party.
Upon the request of a party indemnified hereunder, the indemnifying party shall, at no
cost or expense to such Indemnitee, defend any suit or legal proceeding asserting a claim
for losses or liabilities, to the extent that any such suit or legal proceeding claims a loss
covered by the terms of this indemnification provision.
10.3 Site Indemnification. Incumbent shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
PBMS and its relevant Indemnities from any losses or liabilities incurred as a result of(a)
the conditions of the site where the Original Facilities are located or where equipment is
to be installed or (b) Incumbent's failure to have secured adequate possessory interests in
any site, or (c) any defect in the license for access and entry granted to PBMS herein.
10.4 Insurance. Without in any way limiting the indemnification obligations as
set forth in this Agreement, each party shall maintain Comprehensive General Liability
(Bodily Injury and Property Damage) Insurance including the following supplementary
coverages, (a) Contractual Liability to cover liability assumed under this Agreement; (b)
Personal Injury Liability with the "employee" and "contractual" exclusions deleted; (c)
Agreement No. CPL/MWR 028 Page 6 of 9
RWM.R1015
Worker's Compensation and automobile insurance appropriate and customary in the
circumstances; and (d) any other coverage required by law or customarily maintained by
similarly situated companies in their respective industries. In particular, Incumbent shall
maintain appropriate casualty insurance covering all equipment purchased for the Work,
with such coverage effective from the time such equipment is delivered to the site until
completion of the Work, and including, without limitation, periods in which such
equipment is being tested or installed by PBMS or its Contractors pursuant to this
Agreement. The limit of liability for the insurance required above shall not be less that
$5,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence. If requested by PBMS at any time,
Incumbent shall provide PBMS with certification by a properly qualified representative
of the insurer that Incumbent's insurance complies with this section.
ARTICLE 11
DEFAULT AND TERMINATION
In the event of any material default or breach of this Agreement, in addition to all
other rights and remedies which the non-breaching party may have at law or equity, the
non-breaching party shall have the right to cancel this Agreement by giving thirty (30)
days prior written notice of cancellation. The notice shall specify the cause of
cancellation and shall give the breaching party thirty (30) days to cure and correct any
such cause. In such event, the non-breaching party shall not be liable to the breaching
party or any other person or entity for any losses, damages or claims which may arise as a
result of such termination. Any cancellation or termination of this Agreement in whole or
in part shall not release the breaching party from any liability or obligation under this
Agreement, whether of indemnity or otherwise, which may have accrued or which may
be accruing or which arises out of any claim that may have accrued or may be accruing at
the time of termination or cancellation. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that the
relocation of the Original Facilities and other completion of the Work are of significant
value to both parties and of the essence of this Agreement, and that damages would be an
insufficient remedy. Accordingly, in the event either party breaches this Agreement, the
non-breaching party shall also have the right to equitable relief, including injunctive relief
and specific performance.
ARTICLE 12
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
12.1 Assignment. Neither party shall assign this Agreement or any interest
therein without the prior written consent of the other party. Any attempt to assign or
transfer in violation of this Agreement shall be invalid. This Agreement shall be binding
upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns.
Agreement No. CPL/MWR 028 Page 7 of 9
RWM-R1015
12.2 Amendment; Waiver. The provisions of this Agreement shall not be
waived, altered or amended by any representations or promises of any party unless
consented to in writing by both parties. No waiver of any breach of any provisions hereof
shall constitute a waiver of any other breach of such provision. Either parties' failure to
object to provisions contained in any communication from the other party shall not be
deemed an acceptance of such provisions or a waiver of the provisions of this Agreement
or the Contract Documents. Any waiver of this Agreement or any of the provisions
hereof or of the Contract Documents to be effective must be in writing and signed by the
party against whom such waiver or modification is to be enforced.
12.3 Complete Agreement. This Agreement, together with the other Contract
Documents, contains the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject
matter hereof, and there are no other oral, written or implied agreements between the
parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof; neither party has relied upon any
representation or warranty concerning the subject matter hereof not contained in this
Agreement or in the Contract Documents.
12.4 Confidentiality. (Intentionally omitted)
12.5 Severability. Any term or provision of this Agreement which is invalid or
unenforceable in any jurisdiction, as to such jurisdiction, shall be ineffective to the extent
of such invalidity or unenforceable without rendering invalid or unenforceable the
remaining terms and provisions of this agreement or affecting the validity or
enforceability of any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement in any other
jurisdiction. Each party shall act solely as an independent contractor, and nothing in this
Agreement or the Contract Documents shall be construed to give either party the power
or authority to act for, bind or commit the other party. Incumbent and PBMS are not
affiliates, partners,joint venturers, agents, employees, servants or assigns of the other.
12.6 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in any
number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
12.7 Choice of Law. This Agreement and the Contract Documents shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without
regard to its conflicts of laws principles. In addition, this Agreement is subject to the
applicable rules, regulations and decisions of the Federal Communications Commission
and is also subject to changes or modification as the Commission may order.
12.8 Statute of Limitations. As between Incumbent and PBMS, any applicable
statute of limitations shall commence to run and any alleged cause of action shall be
deemed to have accrued not later than the date of completion of the Work.
12.9 Notices. All written notices or demands to be given or made under this
Agreement or the Contract Documents shall be considered given and made when
Agreement No. CPL/MWR 028 Page 8 of 9
RWM-81015
deposited in the United States mail (postage prepaid) and addressed as follows (or to any
other address identified by such party in writing), and sent simultaneously by facsimile to
the indicated numbers:
To: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
General Services Department
1220 Morello Avenue, Suite 200
Martinez, California 94553
Attention: Ms. Kathy Brown
FAX: (510) 313-7319
To: PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
4420 Rosewood Dr., Bldg. 2, 2nd Floor
Pleasanton, California 94588
Attention: Microwave Relocation Manager
FAX: (510) 227-4250
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is effective as of the day and year first
written above.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
By:
(Signature)
Title:
Dated:
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
By: 4--, o--
(Signature)
Title: �GJiticn f
Dated:
Agreement No.CPL/MWR 028 Page 9 of 9
RWM-RIOTS
Exhibit "A"
Description of Original System
The microwave links covered by this agreement are designated by the FCC as: KQY73-WEH760
(Rocky Ridge-Rainey Ridge), WEF902-KM41 (Harbor St-Kregor Pk), WNI'H435-KM41 (Delta
Fair-Kregor Peak), WAV70-WAV71 (Pine St-Glacier Dr), KN141-WAV72 (Kregor Peak-Geary
Rd.), WNEK784-KBF33 (100 38th-Bald Peak), WAV71-WEH765 (Glacier Dr-Treat Blvd.),
WAV72-KYQ73 (Geary Rd-Rocky Ridge), and WHK256- KYQ73 (Moraga Way-Rocky Ridge).
These links operate on transmit frequencies of 1945/1885 MHz, 1865/1945 MHz, 1895/1975
NfHz, 1855/1935 MHz, 1935/1865 MHz, 1905/2985 MHz, 1955/1875 MHz, 1865/1915 MHz,
and 1895/1975 N[1-Iz, respectively. The microwave radios to be replaced are Farinon Electric Co.,
96, 300, 600 Channel Analog Radio. The table A-1 shows the locations of the microwave links
within Contra Costa County, CA.
1,6mourv4 w swmwl
L60 Lk k sm Name CM sign Law. L W97 Fn9 a* Ce0• TYM Vendor C7etwr
t 1902336 1 ROCKY RIDGE KY073 3746-67.W -122-3-4,W 194 AD 600 Norw F,. Electric Co Cann Cow Canty Cmmwn -OWL
2 RAINEY RIDGE WEM60 7746-SZ00 -121.4&28.00 1666 K 96 N. Fah Electric Co Cmin Cold Cowry D"L
5 1902360 1 NAABOR ST WEF902 ]64.1e.W -121.1 W ISM AD 14"0 Naw FeMat Ekctrle Co Gran Caw canty Canwee ft--OVL.
2 KREGOA PEAK KNwt 3744136017 -121.63.24.00 194 AD We Rang F&MW EWWW Co Ca+n Cow Canty Cameeicelkne DpL
6 1902]51 1 DELTAFAK2 WN114436 360.19.02 •12141.17.00 1695 CF 602 Now FW EYe9k Co Ca1n COW CoontY CAnme6ke60na 04pL
2 KREGOA PEAK K1641 374635.02 -121-s3-24.00 1975 GF 600 N61w FtrMW Eko6k Co CWn CoRoR C"Iy C.oMnAwc66wu Dept
7 1900066 1 RNE ST WAYM wt-10.m •122.747.02 1666 A NO Naw FuVM R Co Centre COW Only C4nnuA0e9om Dept
2 GLACIER OR WAW I 3746.2102 •122-615.02 19]6 A WO Naw FWwn S -I Co em"COY Canty Ommuln6mu OWL
6 1902]67 1 KREGOA PEAK KNMt R4631W -t2t•Sl-M.02 1936 A 602 NO, Fv Electric Co caotra Co C%orf CO w--0elaw oept
2 GEARYAD WAV72 37.56-XW -1224+1.W low BE 600 Nc Femwn ElwlIk Co Lantra COW Canty Caaa6Ac66aw OwL
9 1902766 1 10236TH ST WNEK764 374646.W -122.19%W 1906 C WO Norw FW Elmirk Co Cave Caw Canty CaalterJce6one Opt
2 6ALD PEAK KaFM 3743-2W -122-13•15.W 1966 C ]W Noew Ne Dk Co Canoe Cow Canty CannedOeeone Dpi.
10 190237a f GLACIER OR WAYn 374423.00 •122.5-MOO 1956 a WO Naw FWwn Eleetrk Co Ca+n Co"Canty Canm4ai 4`"Owt
2 TREAt BLVD WEM65 3746.19.00 -122.1J1.00 1675 9 ]W Naw Femora Elecuk C9 Camra Com Canty canmwrwtron4 Dept
M 1902]69 f GEARY AD WAYM 37.6635-00 •1224a41.W ISM AD 602 Naw FeMrn Ekctrk co Ca Cow Carry COnunein6mt Dept
2 ROCKY RIDGE KY073 37.4.57.02 -122.340.00 191S U WO Naw F.&W Ekcok Co Conn Caw Caney Caaaxick.,DPL
23 tsKa]90 t MORAGAWAY WNK2% 37.604.00 •122.743.00 ISM CF 300 Naw FWw6 E60VA Ca conft Coag Canty Cann6eea9aw DePL
2 1 ROCKY RIDGE KY073 I 44647.02 1 422340.00 I 1975 I CF 302 I Naw I FeAnat Electric C9 I Conn Cow Canty cannutita6ane OWL
Table A-1 Contra Costa County 194511885 MHz, 1865/1945 MHz, 1895/1975 MHz, 1855/1935 MHz,
1935/ 1865 MHz, 1905/1985 M117, 1955/1875 MHz, 1865/1915 MH4
and 1895/ 1975 MHz Microwave System Description.
Page I of 2
Exhibit "A"
-122.0
Figure A-1 Contra Costa County 1945/1885 MHz, 1865/1945 MHz, 1895/1975 MHz, 185511935 MHz,
1935/ 1865 MHz, 1905/1985 MHz, 1955/1875 MHz, 1865/1915 MHz, and
1895/ 1975 MHz Microwave Link in Contra Costa County, CA
Page 2 of 2
Exhibit "B"
New Equipment and Frequencies
This section details the equipment and frequencies to be installed at each microwave site.
With the exception of the last three links listed, frequencies have been coordinated by
COMSEARCH and are current; frequency coordinations will be requested for Links #20
through #22 fisted herein within forty-eight (48) hours of execution of this Agreement.
Manufacturer data sheets are included as attachments to this Exhibit.
PART I
Link#1 - Rocijy Ridge CKY073 To Highland Peak CMney)OUH7601
Hams-Fannon DVM11-45 Excel Digital Radio
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Rocky Ridge - 10955.000OV
Highland Peak- 11685.00OOV
Link#2 - Harbor St. (Stoneman)CyVHF902)to Kregor Pry(KN141)
Harris-Farinon DVM10-12T Digital Radio,MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Harbor St. - 10643.1250V
Kregor Peak - 10578.1250V
Link #3 -Kregor Peak X41) to Delta Fair(WNTH435)
Hams-Farinon DVM IMT Digital Radio,MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Kregor Peak - 10563.1250V
Delta Fair- 10628.1250V
Link 44 - Pine Street (Martinez) ( VAV70) to Glacier Dr(WAV71)
Hams-Fannon DVM 11-45 Excel Digital Radio
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Agreement No. CPUMW'R 028 Page 1 of 5
Exhibit B -R 10 15
Frequencies: Pine Street - 1 1485.000OV
Glacier Dr - 10835.000OV
Link 95 - Kregor Peak (KN141) to Gea[y Road ire Alarm V72)
Hams-Farinon DVM11-45 Excell Digital Radio, MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Kregor Peak - 10875.000OV
Geary Road - 11605.000OV
Link k #6 - Service Center(h[ew) to Bald Peak(KBF33)
Hams-Farinon DVM 10-12T Digital Radio, MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Service Center- 10552.5000V
Bald Peak - 10617.5000V
Link#7 - Treat Blvd (Fire Station 10) H76 ) to Glacier Dr 71)
Hams-Fannon DVM 10-12T Digital Radio, MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Treat Blvd - 10627.5000V
Glacier Dr - 10562.5000V
Link#8 - Rocky Ridge (KY073) to G=[yRoad (Fire Alarm)(WAV721
Harris-Fannon DVM1145 Excell Digital Radio, MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc
Frequencies: Rocky Ridge - 10715.000OV
Geary Road - 11445.000OV
Agreement No. CPLIMWR 028 Page 2 of 5
Exhibit B -RIO 15
PART II
Link 09 - Nichol Knob MH764) to Cummings Pk (W H766)
Hams-Farinou DVM 11-45 Excell Digital Radio
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Nichol Knob - 11585.000OV
Cummings Pk - 11095.000OV
Link 910 - Nichol Knob (WEH764) to Bald Peak (KBF33)
Hams-Farinon DVM 11-45 Excell Digital Radio
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Nichol Knob - 11385.000OV
Bald Peak - 10895.000OV
Link #11 - Rocky Ridge Y0731 to Bald Peak (KBF33)
Hams-Farinon DVMI 1-45 Excell Digital Radio
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Rocky Ridge - 11015.000OV
Bald Peak - 11505.000OV
Link 4I2 - Pine Street (Martinez) CWAV701 to Cummings Peak (WEH766)
Hams-Farinon DVM 11-45 Excell Digital Radio
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Pine Street - 11665.000OV
Cummings Peak - 11175.000OV
Link 913 -Kregor Peak (KNI41) to Glacier Dr AV71)
Hams-Fannon DVM11-45 Excell Digital Radio
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Kregor Peak - 11175.000OV
Glacier Dr - 1 I665.000OV
Agreement No. CPUMWR 028 Page 3 of 5
Exhibit B -R1015
Link 014 - Maitland Peak (Rainey) (WEH760) to Kregor Peak N141)
Hams-Farinon DVM 11-45 Excell Digital Radio
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Highland Peak- 11325.00OOV
Kregor Peak- 11155MOOV
Link #15 - Highland Peak ft=,y) (WEH760) to San Ramon(Danville) (WHC659)
Hams-Fannon DVM IO-8T Digital Radio, MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Higbland Peak- 10623.1250V
San Ramon - 10558.1250V
Link 416 - Bald Peak (KBF33) to Lafayette CS5EG894)_
Hams-Farinon DVM10-12T Digital Radio, MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Bald Peak- 10622.5000V
Lafayette - 10557.5000V
Link #17 OHare Ave(Oakley)(WNEM285) to lighl. a_nd Peak(Rainey) &LH760)
Hams-Farinon DVNIIO-8T Digital Radio, M11SB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: OHare Ave - 10578,1250V
Highland Peak - 10643.1250V
Link #18 - Kreeor Peak (KN141) to Waterbird OMT552)
Hams-Fannon DVM 10-12T Digital Radio, MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Kregor Peak - 10572.5000V
Waterbird - 10637.5000V
Link #19.- Cummings Ptak (WEH766) to Justice Center(WNEZ3691
Agreement No. CP1 JNiWR 028 Page 4 of 5
Exhibit B - RIO IS
Hams-Fannon DVM10-12T Digital Radio, MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Cummings Peak- 10567.5000V
Justice Center- 10532.5000V
Link 920 - Glacier Dr(WAV71,) to 30 Douglas(New)
Harris-Farinon DVM I 1-45 Excell Digital Radio, MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Glacier Dr-To be determined
30 Douglas-To be determined
Link 421 - Pine Street(Martinez)(WAV70)to Glacier Dr(WAV71)
Harris-Fannon DVM 11-45 Excel Digital Radio, MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Pine Street-To be determined
Glacier Dr-To be determined
Link 922 - Pine Street(lbtartinez (WAV70)to Hospital ew)
Hams-Farinon DVM 10-12T Digital Radio,MHSB
Andrew Antennas as required by system design
Elliptical Waveguide, Connectors, Adapters, Grounding, Pressure Windows, etc.
Frequencies: Pine Street-To be determined
Hospital -To be determined
GENERAL NOTES TO EXHIBIT B
I. PBMS shall furnish a new tower at the Bald Peak.
2. PBMS will provide radio type training for five (5) Incumbent personnel at the
manufacturers' facility.
Agreement No. CPUMWR 028 Page 5 of 5
ExMbit B -R1015
M HARRISDVM1 1 Excell Digital - . . .
FARINON OMSION 11 GHz North American digital hierarchy
Worldwide supplier of high quality DVM11 Excell is the 45 Mbls medium capacity member of the Versa T pity-point-
microwave radio products and to-point digital microwave radio family operating in the 11 GHz FCC and Indus
fry
systems for over three decades. Canada frequency bands. This radio offers Highly Flexible System Design,
ISO 9001 Registered, Superior Path Refiability, Operational Ease, and Low Life Cycle Costs.
DVM 1 1 Excell offers a wide choice of features ideally suited for private/public
communication systems and cellular/PCS networks.
• Highest system gain in the industry
• Over 6000 DVM Transmitters/Receivers in service
• Built-in system-wide card-level monitor and control system
• Protected terminals or a protected repeater in a single 'r
7' rack at 6, 11, and 18 GHz
• Robust 64 DAM with Forward Error Correction (FEC)
and Digital Adaptive Time Domain Equalizer (ATDE) Y
e� e
Highest system gain in the Industry.
Superior dispersive fading counter-
meaures for a highly reliable system. U.S. Patents
115,400,348 #5,287,356 115,457,431
• Two protected terminals or one Other Patents Pending
protected repeater with multiplexer t>Z:
and built-in remote alarm unit in a
single 7' rack. • yr T_ ;-^
• Combine 6, 11 and 18 GHz or • The keypad/display on the panel and - ��-
lightwave interfaces in the same optional hand-held unit allow the
repeater rack. interrogation and control of all sites -- .-
from any site in a network.
• Built-in remote diagnostics provide
module-level troubleshooting of all • Simplified turn-up, testing and
sites from any local site. maintenance with pushbutton DADE '
alignment, built-in remote T1
• Low life-cycle cost. loopbacks, programmable time-slot
assignments and intuitive diagnostic
• In-service BER, ES, EFS and SES routines.
report from every receiver.
• Reverse Channel Switch protects
• FCC Part 15 (Subpart B. Class A) against silent transmitter, path, and
compliant design. antenna failures by allowing local
receivers to send a far-end transmitter
.''
switch command. _�� •' -
Applications
,-■
•Cost-effective, flexible and reliable
service for cellular, private, state and
local government applications. • System-wide performance
monitoring and record keeping can
• DVP1 loop (path-switched ring) be accomplished with the FarScanTM
protection option provides route Network Supervision or StarScan"
diversity for protection against Network Management Systems.
equipment, antenna, path and
infrastructure failures. • Split Transmit antennas option
provides protection against feeder and '
• Expandable Branching allows the other antenna system disruptions. v
connection of additional analog or _ _ 4i
digital radios to the DVM 11 Excell for • Optional DVSII Digital VersaTllity"' -- .
applications where a common antenna Service channel provides high quality DVM11 Excell
feed is desired. voice and data orderwires. Protected Terminal
HARRISDVM1 1 Excell • • .
North11 GHz • •
FARiNON 0110SION F
System Gain
system Characteristics
Frequency Range: 10.7 - 11.7 GHz System Gain: BER:5 104 BER S 104 `
GuerantatW Typiui Guaranteed Typical
AF Channel Bandwidth: 10 MHz NP 101.5 d8 103.5 d8 99.5 d8 101.5 dB
Modulation Type: 64-State OAM HS 99.0 d8 101.0 d8 97.0 dB 99.0 da
Transmission Efficiency: 4.7 b/s/Hz HS/SD 100.5 dB 1p2.5 dB 98.5 dB 100.5 dB
Interface: Dispersive Fade Margin: a 61 dB 0 10-3 BER
Add±Orop Integral Multiplexer, DSX-i,DSX-2.DSX-3.Optics Threshold-to-interference P Ratio
DS3 Interface Terminal* DSX•3(Formatted or Unformatted Level 1 &2) (T ) (Typical):
I i):
*A TPC ES,EFS,SES are riot avatabie wish DS3 lntertaca Tarrmtal, Like Signal CW
Co-channel 32 d If
Capacity: 672 VF/64 kb/s Channels Semi-adjacent Channel(5 MHz) 31 dB 21 dB
Adjacent Channel(10 MHz) 2 dB -38 d8
Configurations: Non-protected Tx1RX (NP), Hot-Standby Tx/
Rx(HS),HS TxtSpace Diversity Rx(SO),Split HS Tx/3D Rx
(ST), NP TxlSD Rx (NS) Regulatory Information
FCC identifier, BCK9GK OVMi t-45.1
MultiplexerFCC Type Acceptance: Granted March 26. 1996
AddtDrop Terminal: 28 DS 1.7 DS2, 1 DS3 Industry of Canada: SRSP 310.7
(Formatted for Level 1 &2).45 MWS optics Frequency Stability: x0.001%,
Add/Drop Repeaters 16116 DS or 414 DS2 Maximum Power Output: 1.26 watts (+3/ d8m)
Signal Formats:
Fully compatible with TR-NWT-00499(replaces AT&T Cat 19), Service Channel
TR-TSY-000009,and T.G.23007
DSI; AML 88ZS selectable DS2; 86ZS DS3; B3ZS Capacity: Up to 2 VF and 4 data channels
Multiplexer Protection: Terminal]Repeater
VF Extension Ports: VFt VF2 VF1 Aux,VF2 Aux rr^^
Add/Drop M23 1:1 1:2 Input Level(600 ohm) •16 dam 0 dam
Add/Drop 1;7 1;9 Output Level(600 ohm) 7 dBm p dam
Loopbacks: Remote OSI,Local OS3, or IF Frequency Response: 0.3 to 3.4 kHz(_+1.5 dB)
Data InterfaceMistortion: RS-232•C/15%max
Transmitter Characteristics I
I Environment,Power
Power Output(Gu teo0. NP/NS+25 dam HS/SDIST+24 dam
Ambient Temperature Range:Full Performance;0°to+50°C
Operational; -30°to+50°C
Receiver Characteristics I Storage and Transportation; -40'to+65°C
Humidity: 95%at+40°C (Non-condensing)
Noise Figure: 2.5 d8(LNC input} Altitude: 15,000 tt.(5000 m)AMSL
Outage Point Operating pant Standard Power Sources: x24 Vdc (x21 to 356 VdC)or
48 Vdc (-21 to-56 Vdc)
Sensitivity: BER S 10-3 BER 5114
Zustanteedl Typical Guaranteed I Typical Power Consumption*
NP and SD -76.5 dBm -78.5 dBm -74.5 dBm -76.5 dam Hot-Standby RF/IF/Modem 320 Watts
HS -75.0 dam -77.0 darn i •73.0 dam -75,0 dam 28 OS I Terminal 130 Watts
DS3 Interface 120 Watts
Residual BER: (>_5 hops) < 1V2 per hop average 7-Foot Rack Profile Accommodates: 4 TXs/RXs,Multiplexer,
Dynamic Range NPtSO : > 55 d8 (BER 10$ DVSII Service Channel,Jackfield, FusePanel,and either EVA
D
y g ( ) ) Alarm Extender or OVA Remote Terminal Unit.
Receiver Switching: Errorless, Stress Initiated Antenna Port Flange: CPR90G or CMR90(standard)
UG-39/U(optional)
Receive Signal Reacquisition/ReframeTime: 3CMmsn*Vavg) ,=era,.mane„pecoclWSg nen r,ar,a,oyy are.ec#nnu,cw~odr«a•
,POack and masf W rn061med belore mey O"Ome appr%rable m any spec'Itc sy'r m
conrcacr ar order
U.S.A.; 330 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood Shores.California,94065-1421 • (415)594.3000 • FAX:(415)594-3110
Canada; 3 Hdtel de Ville,Dollard-des•Ormeaux,Quebec,H98 3G4 - (514)421-&400 • FAX:(514)421 4222
Offices-United States •Atlanta • Chidgo - Houston Loa Angeles • Miami • New York • San Francisco • Seattle • Washington,D.C.
Offices-Other Countries - Argentina • gram • China Colombia • Germany • India • tndoneste • Malaysia • Mexico • Phitippin ut • Russia
• Spain • Sweden • Thailand • United Arab Emirates
Dam subt,cl to c^anga w,e+aut ndt<a. Rented u+Canada. May 7998 Farm 1 t1M1
HARRIS FARINON
WORLDWIDE SUPPLIER OF HIGH QUALITY i
MICROWAVE PRODUCTS AND SYSTEMS
FOR OVER THREE DECADES
DVM10-8T Expandable and DVM 10-12T
Digital VersaTl lityTM Microwave Radio
NEW FCC Part 15 Compliant for 10 GHz Applications
BENEFITS
• High system gain provides longer paths with higher path reliability.
• Built-in Remote Diagnostics provide moduet-teve{trouble-shooting of all sites
from the local site,reducing travel,test equipment,and maintenance costs. :1 21'r
• DVM 10-BT Expandable to DVM 10.12T If 2x DS 1). - - `
• FCC Part IS(Subpart B.Class A)compliarOVsign assures minimum
interference to other equipment. •=
APPLICATIONS
• 8 x DS I or 12 x DS t point-to-point co Sicationt sh mmon Carrier
and Private users m the FCC and DOO aHz m' a band.
Extensions of communications serv�ncludin tar radio D
systems, intracity PABX trunk I,o tions, rea networks,
and voice/data distribution. f ;
FEATURES +
• Coding Error Correction for,t.11��s Stem gain.
• Transmits up to 8112 DS a 3.7�AVIiz channel. e'
• Hitless receive protectit mg. _
• In-service testing without eed IlNimal test equipment, •..
• Integral DVTX TI Mytiftirprovid re to toopback on all DSI lines.
• Integral Microwave rk Sup capabilities provided by I
front panel SCAN and op FARSCAN-System for
total network Cont1014
• High Power tr - r is sta
• Full Compet - wt entiref8T
radio family. per,,, ,•, a�
� � oPtlarMr naf40..mereiisi,Supervision 5�twn ee+M X
FLEXIBLE YSTEI4ti�f'310N8
Harris Farina a wide r e of options to meet your specific
DVMi0.87 a1NeJ&Ln and systems requirements,including:
)1MN ..r..
• Monito i-St by'sSB)protection for both radio and {
muA51 uiprtt dMf
r
• Losiv nsmateyPg�w��r option provides cost-effective operation for
short pS.anrxlotyeJ power consumption
• Space Divers erver configuration. '
• Optional DVSII Digital VersaTtiity'''"Service Channel provides
high quality voice and data orderwires.
• SCAN handheld Keypadi'Display Unit.
• DS2 Interface in AddlDrop repeater assembly.
• Field Conversion Kit upgrade to 12 x DSI (DVMIO-12T)for ••v
DVTX Multiplexers.
• DVM-8T Radio Family available in five frequency
allocations...2,6, 10, 18.&23 GHz. DVM 10-8T Expandable and DVM10-12T Rack Mounted
Protected Terminal,including Multiplexer,VF drops,
Product includes one or more U.S.patents pending OSI Jacktietd and DVSII Service Channel.
1,4 0 0001 RporktaPrPri � HA►RR1S
1,11"T Expandable and DVM10-12T Digital VersaTtiity-
:rowave Radio for 10 GHz Applications ow ewweewroa ese. a.s. aw+,4 wG.e.ea. ApM,ea F w,e ,
3CIF1CATiONS (N specdxaxns an br mA¢eYiGrar spexKtni Mewed to ea aMMxu Pon.GuarsnNee wetUrroerature targe:Typx;al:at 25C)
;HNICAL SUMMARY POWER CONSUMPTION
DVMiO-ST OYM10.12T /trowel Furey Eou+Fvea f20St Cap") Low Power High Power
uemy Range FCC Part 21.94 (0,550 to 10,680 MHz 10,550 W 10.880 MHz Single Transmitter d Receiver 145 watts 170 waft
spied RF Bandwidth 3.75 MHz 21,94 5.0 MHz 21,94 (Non-protected Terminal)
)Via[Transmiauat Rate 13.1576 MI 119.473 MtYs Dual Single Transmitter 5 Receiver 285 watts 335 wafts
.station Type 49 OFFS 490PRS (Non-protected Repeater)
smissi to EIRcancy, 3.51 tils/sechlz 3.89 bdalsechiz Monitored Hot Standby Transmitters 295 watts 345 watts
40ty 192 voice Channels 288 voice ctfannefs 5 Dual Protected Receivers
(e x OSI,2 x DS2) (12 x DSI,3 a DS2) (Prolected Term nsO
1NSMITTER CHARACTERlST1CS Dual MHSB Transmitter 6 Receivors 550 watts 650 wads
(Non-protected} {FrotactedRopeatar)
er Output Guarant"OlTyp" OuaantMdtrypical SERVICE CHANNEL INTERFACE
'_ow Power .121.13 d8m .121.13 dBm
nigh Power .23/.24 d8m .23/.24 d8m Digital VersaTi fityry Service Channe)(OVS d)
uency Stability-30'10.55'C .0,001% t 0.001% Transmission Rate 130 ub/s nominal
mediate Frequency 70 MHz 70 MHz Transmission Capabilities 2 VF and up 10 4 data Channels
.EIVER CHARACTERISTICS (hion-protected) THRESHOLD TO INTERFACE RATIO(TA)dB
A Figure(Typist) 7.0 ds 7.0 de (Degradation from BER w i x 104 to i z 104 or 1 d8 at BER.i x 104)
I'" Guarameed(Typical Gfaranteednypical ST(49 OPRS) 2T(49 QPRS)
10'BER Operating Point Lace CW Like CW
'_ow Power -75/•753 dBnn -73A/-73.S dean Co-cannel(0 MHz) 28 29 29 29
High Power -741-74.5 d8rn -72.0/.72.5 dun Semi-adjacent(2.5 MHz) 27 27 26 28
i 0'BER Outage Point Ad{acent(3.75 MHz) 25 24 27 27
Low Power -78/-78.5 dem -76.0/-76.5 dBm Adjacent(So MHz) 0 -13 15 4
-ngn Power -T71-77.5 dBm -75.0/-75.5 dem
i,,ver RF Overload(Typical) ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS
For to-BER Operating Point -30 dun -30 d8m
Ambient Temperature Ran
For 10' BEA Outage Pant -27 dBor -27 deft pe 9e
mediate Fd quenry(OualCcmersia,) (Requires No Forced Air Cooling)
to IF 135 MHz 135 MHz Full Perlannnce 0'to.40'C
2-IF 2t4MHz 21.4 MHz Storage and Transportation -4o'to.65'C
des 8ER(Bit Error Rafe) Better den 1x10'° Better than l x l 0's Humidity 95%at.40'C
,arrive Fade Margin Attitude 4,572 m 115.000 feet AMSL
;TypicalO wBER) 53 as 49 axe POWER REQUIREMENTS
1NSMISSION DATA(Non-protected) Standard Power Sources -24 Vdca-48 Vdc(•21 W-56 Vde)
ani Gain(Typical? FCC INFORMATION
3ER 10'Outage Point Low Power High POwee
Low Power Output 91.5 del 89.5 dB FCC Type Number 8CK9GK GVM1041'•i BCK9GK OVM104IT4
High Power Output 101.5 aB 99.5 d8 FCC Rubs Pan Number 21,94, 21,94,
tional Branctlitg Losses Transmit Path Rsceivs Pads 115(Subput S.Clause A) 15(subpart B.C1w A)
Nat-protected Tx:5 Rx 0 dB O d8 Frequency Ranges 10.550 to 10,680 MHz 10,550 Io 10,880 MHz
MHSB TiuRx Emission Desgnator 31,475 07W 3M75 07W
(Unequal Loss Cacxser.Standard) 1 dB 1.517.0 dB Dale Granted Feb.2.1989 Feo.2.1989
MHSB TuSpace O"Irldy,Rx t 68 0 de Fraquerwy Tebrance t 0.0001% •0.0001%
FCC Maximum Power Output 0.025 W(.14 d8m) 0.398 W(.26 dBm)
:HANICAL CHARACTERISTICS Would Power Output 0,016 W(•12 dam) 0.200 IN(*23 dam)
Minimum Power Output 0.013 W I.I1 d8m) 0.158 W(.22 dem)
o Equipment Bash T/R FCC Identifier(Part 21) 270F-01 2780-01
'eight 444 mr,117.5 in.
viidth 114 mm 14.5 in. FCC Type Number BCK9GK OVM 10.127.1 BCK9GK OVMIO.12T-2
7epm 254 mm/10 in. FCC Rubs Pan Number 21,94, 21,94,
15(Subpea B,Class A) 15(Subpart S.Class A)
Power Supply Frequency Ranges 10,550 to 10,680 MHz 10,550 to 10,880 MHz
'eight 133 mm/5.25 in, Emmcn Devgata 5M00 07W SM00 07W
Width 114 mm 14.5 in. Dab Granted June 10.1993 Jun 1011993
)epth 2S4 mall 10 in. Frequency Tolerance 10.0001% t 0.0001%
FCC Maximum Power Output 0.025 W 1.14 dem) 0.398 W(.26 dun)
Irlterhxx Unit Medan Power Output oola W(.12 demi 0.200 W{.23 dBm)
Ae m 89 mm/3.5 in. Minimum Power ONpa 0.013 W(.1 t d8m) 0.158 W(.22 d8m)
g
Nidih 229 mm 19 in. FCC Iderulwr(Pan 21) 40000 40001
)epth 254 mm/IO in. CANADIAN DOC' INFORMATION
nna 'Naveguda Port CPR-90F Flange SRSP Oran 3105 310.5
Type and Modal Number DVM10.6T OvM 10,127
Frequency Rangy 10,55010 Iowa MHz 10.550 to 10.680 MHz
ecause overall System performance depends on the interaction of Type of Modulation 49 OFFS 49 OPRS
many variable factors, the specifications given here only apply to Necessary Bandwidth 3.75 MHz 5.0 MHz
Traequipment Connected back-to-back,(mess otherwise Spectfied Signalling
star"
Pas(R) 7 576 MtYa 19.473 Mos
Siftenng Effect(K) 1:0-0 0.7209
FrequencywrM81y Tv7Rtc" (0.0001% (0.000(%
Nominal Powerower '•'
Stades Power 35 mW 35 mW
High
us Power 80 dI3 so MW
dEl
Spunous Emissime 80 d8 80 d8
Now known as Industry and Science Canada Hamunlc Emissions 50 a8 50 de
•Temperattua Stabi tired Phaaa-tcckedOsattata Image Rejection Was 80 d8
"•EzGUdi Branch' Network Noise Fgure(Typical) 7.0 dB 7.0 d8
ng n9 Rx IF Frequency 135 MHz 135 MHz
Lo tunes abowirbebw
CIdlil: FMVX ~Ciirw Mrro„Aw..aMf:Yb.CY4rn.9WA330] H,S15N-100 . TU:aMI] *H:lat Sf'JM]110
Umd.:.,n.s.*e+h,.a..dewavee.Cbxwae+.L>+rvew.oweee ewe sae n+q VtaWe ILS:asmaes • FAC(alq azt.aat
Ir
HARRIS FARINON
WORLDWIDE SUPPLIER OF HIGH QUALITY •
MICROWAVE PRODUCTS AND SYSTEMS
FOR OVER THREE DECADES
DVS 11
Digital VersaT1lityTM Service Channel
^„ VIP,. . • ,ala'• ��� - x,E ;�t.k-r
•:�.:
s.
r
APPLICATIONS FEATURES
• Provides voice and data service • 1 or 2 VF and 3 or 4 data
=' channel capabilities for Harris channels.
Farinon digital microwave radio • Terminal or 2-, 3-, or 4-way
and lightwave systems. repeater configuration in a
Provides a maintenance control single assembly.
�- facility for digital transmission . 4-wire VF extensions at
1 networks. standard levels.
�: • Provides self contained loop RS232 interface on data
protection capabilities for voice channels.
and data channels. Protected terminal and repeater
options.
• Field installation without
disrupting service.
• Connectorized or wire-wrap
access.
Compatible with Harris Fannon
microwave and lightwave
equipment.
+ DTMF signalling with 2 or 3
digit address selection.
• "All Call" signalling.
• Self-contained data and voice
bridges.
• Designed for minimum AIDIA
voice conversions in multi-hop
systems.
SPECIFICATIONS
TECHNICAL SUMMARY
System Characteristics-The DVS II is switch selectable to provide 1 or 2 VF and 3 or 4 data charnels as follows:
SNectfon VF,e/ VFN2 Data ,F11 Data #2 Date A3 Data N4
1. e e 1,200 b/s 1,200 b/s 300 b/s 600 Ws
2. e e 2.400 — 300 600
3. e — 4.600 — 300 600
4. r — 2.400 2.400 3(X) 600
SERVICE CHANNEL UNIT
Type Digital -AS423 or TTL selectable interface to radio, lightwave or multiplex equipment
Transmission Rate 130 kb/3 nominal
VF INTERFACE
VFi,VF2 VF1 AUX,VF2 AUX
Input Level -16 dBm 0 dBm
Output Level +7 dBm 0 d8m
Impedance 600 ohms 600 ohms
Frequency Respnse 300 to 3.400 Hz(+'-1.5 dB)
Modulation Continuously Variable Slope Delta modulation (CVSD)
Signal To Quantizing Noise 27 dBc minimum
Front Panel Speaker 0.3 watt rated
DATA INTERFACE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS
Level RS232C Ambient Temperature Range
Oistortion 15%maximum Full Performance 0°C to +WC
Storage d Transportation -40'C to +65'C R
Humidity 95%at +40°C =
SIGNALLING Altitude 4,572 m/15,000 feet AMSL -
a
selective Standard OTMF,user selectable,
2-or 3-digit addresses MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS e
W
Non-selective 'Alt Call'permits all stations to be Vertical Mounting 90 mm/3.5 inches
signalled by pressing the Horizontal Mounting 485 mm/19 inches
'star key Depth
overall 355 mm/14 inches
Forward Projection 140 mm/5.5 inches r
Rear Projection 215 mmf8.5Inches
ALARMSICONTROLS
Remote All Call 11P Applied ground causes All Cas Weight(Maximum) 6 kg.113 tbs. o
Remote Call Reset I,P Applied ground causes Reset
Service Channel Alarm OSP Relay closure(NO NC Selectable) POWER REQUIREMENTS '
o'
Power Source -48 Vdc(-42 to-66 Vdc)
CONNECTIONS —24 Vdc(-21 to—26.Vdc)
Power Consumption
VF, Alarm 050 receptede;wirewrap E 1 MUX/DEMUX 14 watts
Oata 050 receptacle,wirewrap EW 2 MUXIDEMUX 23 watts ?
Power Screw terminals E,W 0 MUXiOEMUX 7.5 watts(Non-protected) 3
(Orderwire Extension Only) 8.5 watts(Protected)
^I.iKRll� U.eJI; rrrm d.wut ran wro°n.....s. aroF.ere°a sarromr . HrsllM<na� Tlx:aresr . Fes:NrA»r.Orre
4uea:rn++aF.amt�wl<swravr,taaasa�.elra.e.r+tssa+ • p+N az+a+oo - nx:asaz+w - Fwc drga+-dn
HARRIS FARINON
WORLDWIDE SUPPLIER OF HIGH QUALITY • .
MICROWAVE PRODUCTS AND SYSTEMS r ��
FOR OVER THREE DECADES
DVP1
DS1 Loop Protection System
FEATURES APPLICATIONS
• Automatically selects the optimum DS1 signal. • Applications requiring automatic protection of
• No loss of traffic under single failure conditions. DS1 circuits.
• Automatic protection against both equipment and • Provides loop protection for DVS service
path (line) failures. channel.
• Protects against catastrophic intermediate site • Applicable to Digital Radio, Fiber Optics, and
failures. Wireline.
• Ease of operation, fault location, testing, and • Parallel route selection applications.
maintenance. • 1 x 1 span line protection.
• Protection provided at DS1 level.
• Compatible with current Tt carrier networks.
• Accepts AMI or B8ZS Line Coding.
• Requires less transmission equipment while
increasing system reliability.
• Remote and local manual path selection.
rcn
a Harris Fannon OS1 Loop Protec- loop Protection oration or can easily be converted to t
i System allows the system planner Operation such a configuration. If these conditions
economically apply the proven ad- can be met, the benefits of loop protec-
ntages of loop protection to many There is a basic principle underlying tion merit serious consideration,
tined or existing DSI communication loop protection: if a common signal,
works. Loop protection can provide e.g.. OSI, is transported from point A Operation
r most powerful, cost effective equip- to B via distinct transmission equipment The Harris Fannon DVP1 Loop Protec-
!nt and path protection choice availa- as well as by different paths or routes,
tion System provides protection at the
Few alternativerotection schemes at least one of the signals, if not both,
p will arrive at B in a satisfactory state. DSI level. Each DS1d pr to ti loop pro-
i maintain the same communication ry tecied is assigned protection units at
]ability under system failure condi- Equipment and/or path failures affecting
os, when compared to loo or route one of the routings will not affect the the terminating circuit ends. The trans-
is, p mit section splits the DSt signal and
)tection. signal arriving at B through the other
routing. The receiving loop equipment applies those signals to transmission
equipment assigned to the normal and
e OVP1 is designed to operate Inde- will monitor the condition of the com-
ndently of the transmission equip- mon signal arriving via separate routes alternate routing.
nt transporting the OS1 signals. and will select the superior DSI signal. The DVP7 receiver section will monitor
is feature allows the OVPI to be Such a protection method can survive the signals received from the normal
egrated with networks comprised of any single and certain multiple failures and alternate routes and will then deter-
fio, fiber optics, span lines, etc. or with no loss of traffic. In fact,only a mine which signal should be selected.
n mixed systems. By its design, the catastrophic A or B site failure or simul- The selected DSI will be delivered to
'Pi requires no alarm information taneous path problems will cause an the terminal equipment.
m the transmission equipment. outage. The receive selection criteria consists
ien used with the Harris Fannon An economical advantage to the DVP1 of independently evaluating the DST's
/S Service Channel equipment, the is that transmission equipment need received from the normal and alternate
'Pt System also provides loop pro- not be protected. Significant cost reduc- routing for the following:
:5an for the DVS orderwire and alarm tions are therefore possible with loop . No or low level DSI received.
and data channels. protection. {�
• Ail Ones or Alarm Indication Signal ..
.rris Fannon has chosen to apply It must be noted that as desirable as (AIS) received,
,p protection at the OS1 level rather loop protection appears, it cannot be • Alarm input from transmission equip-
in at a higher level, e.g., OS3. Loop applied to all systems. Loop protection ment (optional).
)tection applied at the DSI level can be applied only to those systems
vides more complete equipment that either are in a closed loop config-
m
)tection and, thereby, results in more a
xible applications. A
:1ECIFICATIONS E
a
CHNICAL SUMMARY OPERATING ENVIRONMENT MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS LL
framed or framed 010-04 formatted Ambient Temperature Range a OS1 Line Shelf: inches mm
,ut. (Requires no forced air cooling)
Vertical Mounting 7 176
cal and remote switching facilities. Full Performance 0'C to +WC i
Horizontal Mounting 19 465
N Inputs and Normal XMT Output: Storage and
3 volts peak. e 6 dS. Transportation -40°C to +65'C Depth s
)0 ohms balanced impedance) Humidity 95%at +40°C Overall 14 355 Tr
II Protected RCV Output: Altitude 15.000 feet Forward Projection 6.5 165 3d
me as RCV Inputs (4572 m)AMSL Rear Projection 7.5 190 $
DRM or STDBY DIR
Weigh!(max.) 13 lbs. 6 kg.
N STDBY XMT Output: $
3 volts peak. 1= 0.5V) POWER REQUIREMENTS
)0 ohms balanced impedance) Power Source -46 Vdc(-42 to-56 Vdc) s
-24 vac (-21 to-26 Vdc)
)NNECTIONS Power s
,I Signals D50 ConnectonWirewrap Consumption 25 Watts(max/shelf)
irm Wirewrap
wer Wirewrap
+ /� ^/��■ U9.A,: rnnmaures.,M,eg
w " oo
n Mv..Sw,Cres Grm+.wmosam (At31 sa+5000 • rix�MTr rAx N,.ry SwJ,t0
!i ■ A&i1't KI� C+nW:wr,w F.,�snf+re. awwd�rM.mreerGnraflreo K8a0a t3,q.irano Rx:PtG,ep F.SX:Pui C,+Tt1
HARRIS FARINON
WORLDWIDE SUPPLIER OF HIGH CUALITY r
MICROWAVE P :DDUCTS AND S IST=`,t3
FOR OVER THREE DECADES
DVA
Digital VersaTlliWm Alarm Remote Assembly (RTU)
memo _
memo
• The DVA is an Alarm Remote Assembly (RTU) FEATURES
that provides flexible economical networking • 82 Alarm Inputs, expandable to 96
equated only by our VersaTllity"' Product Line. . 8 Control Outputs, expandable to 24
• The DVA connected to a FARSCAN'" Master . Up to 8 Analog Inputs, expandable to 24;
provides all the attributes of a conventional each group of 4 displaces 8 Alarm Inputs.
alarm system, including extensive internal
diagnositcs — all from a single vendor. • Universal Power (-20 to —60 VDC).
• FARSCAN'" can be directly interfaced via • Serial port access for interconnection to
standard serial communications port. Harris Farinon VersaTllity'" Products.
• Addressing capability for up to 255 units.
APPLICATIONS • Optional keypad/display for local and remote
• Provides interface between various sub-systems interrogation and control.
and Harris Farinon products. • Optional modem.
• Provides additional expansion capabilities for • SCAN and FARSCAN'" compatibility.
alarm and control of large system installations. • Expands the network with the VersaTt lity' of
• Provides additional points for reporting and Harris Farinon Products.
controlling site functions. • Customer selected major, minor or status alarm
• Extends application of FARSCAN" to networks priority.
with non-Digital VersaTt lity' Microwave and • Programmable Alarm Indicators (PAI) give a
Lightwave equipment, for example Urbanets control output in response to user defined alarm
and FAS radios, and other vendor equipment. input combinations.
• Controls may be programmed for latching or
momentary operation.
• Alarm Inputs have programmable delays,
eliminating the need for debounce circuits.
• Portable/Lap-top computer loaded with
FARSCAN'" can be connected into the DVA to
give access to all VersaTllity'" functions in a
network.
ISO 9001 Registered nn "A.FZMS
;PECIFICATIONS
echnical Summary — DVA Digital VersaTl lity'" Alarm Remote
YSTEM CHARACTERISTICS ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS
specify tone Monitor Control Unit) Full Performance 0'to +50'C
8Controls Storage/Transport -40'to +65'C
32 Alarms
or 24 Alarms + 4 Analog Inputs Humidity 90%at +40"C
or 16 Alarms + 8 Analog Inputs Altitude 4,572 m/15,000 feet AMSL
Expandable to 3 Monitor Control Units
24 Controls
96 Alarms MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS
or combinations of Alarms and Analog Inputs
'arm Input Interface Size Inches mm
Alarm/No Alarm Ground/Open Vertical
Programmable for opposite condition. Basic 3.5 90
Programmable alarm sensing delay up Expansion 1.75 45
to 25 seconds in 0.1 second steps. Depth 12 305
ontrol Output Interface Horizontal 19 485
On;Otl Closed/Open relay contacts.
Momentary or latching dry Contacts. Front Projection 5 125
1 Amp at 60 Vdc. Weight t.b& Kg.
Programmable control output delay Basic
(and duration it momentary)up to With t Monitor Control Unit 8.6 3.9
25 seconds in 0.1 second steps. With 2 Monitor Control Units 10.1 4.6
nalog input Interface Built-in sealing networks for Expansion
o to 60 Vdc With 1 Monitor Control Unit 3.9 1.8
0 to 30 Vdc !~
0 to 5 Vdc L
Programmable upper and lower
limit alarms. POWER REQUIREMENTS r
rogrammabls Alarm Indicators PAI 1 to PAI 8 Source -24 Vdc or-48 Vdc
Any control, alarm input,or analog (Strappabie)
limit alarm may be used in a Boolean8
expression to define a logical alarm 9 watts (Maximum)
via FARSCAN'. R
anal Pons(Selectabie data Rates)
Inter-site Communications 3 Ports. 19,200. 9,600, 2.400, 1,200 b/s W
intra-site Communications 2 Ports. 19.200,9,600, 2.400, 1,200 bis
Remote Control (For FARSCAN'") t Pon, 9.600. 2,400, 1,200, 300 b/s
:ONNECTIONS
venal 1/0 089 OTE(Female) 5
s
lemote Control 0825 OCE (Female) r4
G
darmi Control 050 or Wire Wrap (Optional) .�
Expansion Port Ribbon Connector c
'ower Screw Terminals a
9
V
r
)PTIONS
)rbanel-LOVA kit for full remote control of Urbanet"' radios from FARSCAN'"
U.S.A.; Frnm Or+"en tat e"pM�w..lrtCMs.C�nW�sU]P'vOl . Hte'M�1000 R%:rlsn fAC NtAIWIto
c.naftoo r.u.c..r arnravr mrMAKtMt+ra.a.e.r.w�ar ptq a2ta.ao nxrruxigz fAl ptq�++'�
Exhibit B2
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
DIGITAL MICROWAVE SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENT
1. Exhibit BI, dated 1/28147, lists equipment and material to be installed for each site. All
digital microwave equipment shall be Farinon, and shall be equipped with Farinon DVS-
R orderwire systems. The radio capacities are shown in Exhibit Bl. The design shall
provide for sufficient Tl's to carry Incumbent's existing telephone and data
communications traffic to designated locations.
a) Two (2) pairs of DS-3 microwave radio equipment shall be installed between Pine
Street (Martinez) and Glacier Drive utilizing a single antenna system, with
additional spurs to 40 Douglas from Glacier (DS-3) and between Hospital and
Pine (12 DS-1), as specified in Exhibit Bl.
2. A detailed material list (equipment list) shall be provided for each site. The listing shall
provide a detailed list of all materials to be provided.
3. Submittals are required for all equipment proposed. Submittals shall consist of the
following items: specifications sheet, operations manual, installation manual, service
manual.
4. Factory system testing is required, with the County and the County's engineer in
attendance. The County shall have the right to modify, review and approve the factory
test procedures. Results of all tests shall be provided to the County for final approval.
Individual product tests of the microwave terminals shall be required, for any microwave
product that has not been in production for more than 2 years to ensure compliance with
the published vendor specifications.
5. The County retains the right to modify and approve the System Acceptance Test
Procedure. The County shall have the right of final approval on all tests.
6. The County retains the right to review and approve any and all engineering for the system
prior to installation. The County requires that they shall review all preliminary
engineering with the equipment vendor at any time prior to release of the final
documentation. The County also requires that the transmission engineering be complete
and conform to industry accepted practices. The "turn-around" procedure shall allow a
minimum of 15 working days after receipt of the final documentation to review the
materials submitted.
a) The County shall also review and approve all designs, levels, calculations and all
other engineering accomplished by Farmon, and any other sub-contractor.
7. The County retains the right to request the transfer/removal from the project of any
employee of the prime contractor (Farinon) or any sub-contractor at its sole discretion.
8. All seismic bracing and equipment mounting designs shall be reviewed and approved by
the County. Seismic bracing shall be engineered for seismic zone 4 as defined by the
Uniform Building Code, latest edition.
9. The County retains all installation (construction) inspection and approval rights.
10. A detailed cut-over pian shall be jointly developed with PBMS, Farinon, and the County.
The County will have final approval of the cut-over plan.
11. All microwave terminals shall include (DSX) jackfields for testing, as identified in
Exhibit Bl.
12. A DAX (Digital Access and Cross-connect) shall be provided to allow for the assignment
of existing multidrop analog circuits, as identified in Exhibit B1.
13. A Farinon "Starsean Graphics" network management and alarm system shall be provided
with two (2) terminals, and remote access capability, as identified in Exhibit B1.
14. All sites shall be equipped with alarm remotes to report existing external (non-radio)
alarms, e.g., door open, power failure, generator, fire, tower lighting, if applicable.
15. All DS1 and DS3 cabling shall be approved by the County in advance.
16. All grounding designs shall be approved by the County.
17. All new towers shall be designed by Tower Technology, Inc. New towers shall have
additional capacity in their design to allow for 20% increase in the number of antennas to
be placed on the tower. All tower engineering data, including calculations shall be
provided in duplicate to the County. All new drawings shall also be provided in
Autocad®, Rev. 12, .DWG format. All tower work is subject to approval by the County.
All new tower grounding shall be inspected by the County's engineers prior to
backfiring.
18. All power systems (DC and AC) installation shall be reviewed and approved by the
County. Vendors and quantities are specified in Exhibit B1.
19. Waveguide shall be Andrew EWP as specified in Exhibit Bl. All antennas shall be
Andrew. Flex sections shall not be utilized to connect waveguide to the antennas,
connections shall be waveguide/connector to the antenna feedhorn flange.
20. All waveguide shall be mounted to industry standards, and shall utilize Andrew mounting
hardware.
REVISION 5 Page 2
21. All hardware shall be either stainless steel or galvanized meeting ASTM A153 and A123.
22, All antenna systems shall be pressure tested to 4 pai and shall be swept to verify
functional and operational parameters. All antenna systems shall be VSWR tested to meet
a minimum of 24dB return loss.
23. Any maintenance related test fixture or assembly (e.g., card extenders, special test
adapters, etc.) for the new equipment shall be provided. A minimum of 2 sets is
required.
24. Test equipment necessary to maintain and trouble shoot the system, as recommended by
the vendor, will be provided to the County. The test equipment list is specified in Exhibit
B1.
25. Spare equipment will be provided as specified in Exhibit B1. A minimum of 2 sets of
complete spares shall be provided.
26. Manuals shall be provided in the following quantities: i complete manual per site, and 8
composite manual sets. All radio manuals shall include equipment sohematic diagrams.
27. The loop control equipment will be located at 40 Glacier Drive,
28, The County will prepare and submit all required FCC applications required for this
project. PBMS will forward all required frequency coordination information to the
County. The County will provide PBMS copies of all FCC license applications and
licenses, when granted.
29. Training shall be provided for all equipment at the vendor's facility for a maximum of 6
technicians.
30. No work on County sites shall proceed with out the approval of the County.
31. Prior to equipment installation, PBMS shall provide to the County the general scope of
work between PBMS and Farinon outlining the project at each site. The County reserves
the right to request changes to the scope of work upon mutual agreement between PBMS
and the County. In the event PBMS and the County cannot reach agreement on such
changes, the County may direct such changes to the scope of work at its own costs.
32. Any and all approvals of the County which are required or referred to herein shall not be
unreasonably withheld without just cause.
A:COCOPR! Revised 1123197
REVISION 5 Page 3
!
■ � }t
—
I
� ca
< § \ m
06 ` � "
\ q £ _ < . ® i §
+ \
LO
g ! )
A
.
! | ! r . , a §
;
C5 6\ / \ /\ ( / CL
E / 2
�/ k ) k15 � \
LZ « %
EXHIBIT B-3
i. H.P. 85653E Spectrum Analyzer e/w Options 008, 042, W30 & W32 $48,865
2. Training (DVM 11-45, DVM IOXT,DVP) $60,000
3. Training Telco Access 50/60 $20,000
4. Training Tellabs 530 TCS $20,000
5. Schematics Manuals for DVM11-45, DVM10-8T, DVSII, DVA, SDVP $ 7,728
6. Composite Manuals for DVM 11-45, DVM10-8T, DVSII, DVA, SDVP $ 2,000
Notes
All dollar values are not-to-exceed figures
Dollar equivalent payments will not be made available
02/11/97 1 CCCNTYEx$-3
Exhibit "C"
Frequency Coordination
Included are the microwave path data and frequency coordination reports submitted by
Comsearch for this Project
Agreement No. CP1'MV;R 028 Page i of i
Exhibit C -RIO 15
Page : 5 of 10
COMSEARCH
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
02/22/96
MICROWAVE PATH DATA
STATION NAME ROCKY RIDGE CA HIGHLAND PK CA
PATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
.ALL SIGN
OWNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
LATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 48 57 . 0 37 48 52 . 0
LONGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 3 40 . 0 121 48 26 . 0
;ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 2024/616 . 9 2581/786 . 7
PATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 90 . 317 270 .473
PATH DISTANCE (Miles) 13 . 892
(Km) 22 .357
ANTENNA
2RIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
PL6-107E HP6-107G
ANT CODE A03201 A01302
GAIN (dBi) 44 . 0 44 . 0
C/L (Ft/m-AGL) 25/7 . 6 15/4 . 6
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERSITY
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EQUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1 BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1
EQP CODE TEM693 TEM693
EMISSION 10M0 D7W TOMO D7W
LOADING 672 CH DIG 672 CH DIG
STABILITY 0 . 001000 0 . 001000
POWER (dBm/Watts) *30 .0/1 . 000 *30 . 0/1 . 000
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBM) -26 .4 -26 .4
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 72 . 0/15848 . 9 72 . 0/15848 . 9
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 .0 2 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 140 .4
TRANSMIT 10955 .00000V(2P) 11685 .00OOOV(2J)
FREQUENCIES
(MHz)
* ATPC EQUIPMENT: NOMINAL POWER = 20 DBM, COORDINATED POWER 20 DBM
MAXIMUM POWER = 30 DBM
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page: 4 of 9
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 03/01/96
NATION NAME HARBOR STRT CA KREGOR PEAK CA
'ATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
:ALL SIGN
)WNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
.ATITUDE (D-M-S) 38 0 38 . 0 37 56 35 . 0
,ONGITUDE (D-M-S) 121 53 6 . 0 121 53 24 . 0
ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 90/27 . 4 1894/577 . 3
?ATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 183 . 357 3 . 354
?ATH DISTANCE (Miles) 4 . 663
(Km) 7 . 505
kNTENNA
?RIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
P4-105A P4-105A
-NT CODE A00591 A00591
3AIN (dBi) 39 . 9 39 . 9
-/L (Ft/m-AGL) 42/12 . 8 23/7 . 0
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
ANT CODE
CAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERSITY
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EQUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMI0-12T-2 BCK9GKDVMI0-12T-2
EQP CODE TEM412 TEM412
EMISSION SMOO D7W 5M00 D7W
LOADING 288 CH DIG 288 CH DIG
STABILITY (%) 0 . 000100 0 . 000100
POWER (dBm/Watts) 23 . 0/0 . 200 23 . 0/0 . 200
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -32 . 7 -32 . 7
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 59 . 9/977 . 2 60 . 9/1230 .3
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 3 . 0 2 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 130 .5
TRANSMIT 10643 . 12500V 10578 . 12500V
FREQUENCIES
(MHz)
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page : 3 of 9
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 03/01/96
TATION NAME DELTA FAIR CA KREGOR PEAK CA
aTH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
%ILL SIGN
4NER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
XTITUDE (D-M-S) 38 0 19 . 0 37 56 35 . 0
JNGITUDE (D-M-S) 121 51 17 . 0 121 53 24 . 0
20UND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 85/25 . 9 1894/577 . 3
ATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 204 . 183 24 . 161
ATH DISTANCE (Miles) 4 . 704
(Km) 7 . 570
NTENNA
RIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
P4-105A P4-105A
NT CODE A00591 A00591
AIN (dBi) 39 . 9 39 . 9
/L (Ft/m-AGL) 25/7 . 6 38/11 . 6
RIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
NT CODE
AIN (dBi)
'/L (Ft/m-AGL)
?IVERSITY
NT CODE
;AIN (dBi)
:/L (Ft/m-AGL)
:QUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMI0-8T-2 BCK9GKDVMI0-8T-2
:QP CODE 278Q01 278Q01
:MISSION 3M75 D7W 3M75 D7W
GOADING 192 CH DIG 192 CH DIG
iTABILITY (%) 0 . 000100 0 . 000100
?OWER (dBm/Watts) 23 . 0/0 . 200 23 . 0/0 . 200
ZECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -31 . 8 -31 . 8
;IRP (dBm/Watts) 60 . 9/1230 .3 60 . 9/1230 . 3
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 2 . 0
FREE 'SPACE LOSS (dB) 130 . 6
PRANSMIT 10628 . 12500V 10563 . 12500V
FREQUENCIES
(MHZ)
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
Page : 8 of 10
COMSEARCH
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
02/22/96
MICROWAVE PATH DATA
>TATION NAME GLACIER DRV CA PINE STREET CA
)ATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
ALL SIGN
)WNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
.ATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 59 23 .0 '38 1 10 . 0
.ONGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 5 15 . 0 122 7 57 . 0
3ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 170/51 . 8 13/4 . 0
?ATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 309.866 129 . 838
?ATH DISTANCE (Miles) 3 . 199
(Km) 5 .148
ANTENNA
?RIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
PL4-107E PL4-107E
XNT CODE A00711 A00711
3AIN (dBi) 40 . 5 40 . 5
^/L (Ft/m-AGL) 105/32 . 0 180/54 . 9
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
ANT CODE
3AIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERSITY
ANT CODE
3AIN (dBi)
v/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EOUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1 BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1
EQP CODE TEM693 TEM693
EMISSION TOMO D7W 10M0 D7W
LOADING 672 CH DIG 672 CH DIG
STABILITY (&) 0 .001000 0 .001000
POWER (dBm/Watts) *30 . 0/1 . 000 *30 . 0/1 . 000
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -27 . 7 -27 . 7
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 65 .5/3548 . 1 64 . 5/2818 .4
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 5 . 0 6 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 127.7
TRANSMIT 10835 .00000V(11P) 11485 . 00000V(11J)
FREQUENCIES
(MHz)
* ATPC EQUIPMENT: NOMINAL POWER - 20 DBM, COORDINATED POWSR = 20 DBM
MAXIMUM POWER = 30 DBM
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page : 3 of 10
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 02/22/96
STATION NAME GEARY ROAD CA KREGOR PEAK CA
PATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
_ALL SIGN
DWNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
1,ATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 55 35 . 0 37 56 35 . 0
-IONGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 4 41 . 0 121 53 24 . 0
ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 121/36 . 9 1894/577 . 3
PATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 83 . 558 263 . 673
PATH DISTANCE (Miles) 10 .337
(Km) 16 . 636
kNTENNA
PRIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
UHX4-107 R PL4-107E
ANT CODE A00770 A00711
GAIN (dBi) 40 . 4 40 . 5
C/L (Ft/m-AGL) 25/7 . 6 19/5 . 8
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERSITY
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EOUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1 BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1
EQP CODE TEM693 TEM693
EMISSION TOMO D7W TOMO D7W
LOADING 672 CH DIG 672 CH DIG
STABILITY (t) 0 . 001000 0 . 001000
POWER (dBm/Watts) *30 . 0/1. 000 *30 . 0/1 . 000
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -31 . 0 -31 . 0
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 68 .4/6918 . 3 68 . 5/7079 . 5
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 2 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 137 . 9
TRANSMIT 11605 . 000OOV(6J) 10875 . 00OOOV(6P)
FREQUENCIES
(MHz)
* ATPC EQUIPMENT: NOMINAL POWER = 20 DBM, COORDINATED POWER = 20 DBM
MAXIMUM POWER = 30 DBM
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
Page: 5 of 9
COMSEARCH
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 03/01/96
STATION NAME BALD PEAK CA SERVICE CTR CA
?ATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
:ALL SIGN
DWNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
:.ATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 53 2 . 0 37 56 10 . 0
LONGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 13 15 . 0 122 21 20 . 0
3ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 1913/583 .1 26/7 . 9
PATH AZIMUTH (De ) 296 .111 116 . 028
PATH DISTANCE (Miles) 8 . 196
(Km) 13 . 190
ANTENNA
PRIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
HP6-105C UHX6-105A RF
ANT CODE A01052 A03852
GAIN (dBi) 43 .5 43 .5
C/L (Ft/m-AGL) 50/15 . 2 45/13 . 7
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERSITY
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EQUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVM10-12T-2 BCK9GKDVM10-12T-2
EQP CODE TEM412 TEM412
EMISSION 5M00 D7W 5M00 D7W
LOADING 288 CH DIG 288 CH DIG
STABILITY M 0 . 000100 0 . 000100
POWER (dBm/Watts) 23 . 0/0 .200 23 . 0/0 . 200
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -29 .4 -29 . 4
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 64 .5/2818 .4 64 . 5/2818 .4
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 2 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 135 .4
TRANSMIT 10617 . 5 00 V 10552 . 50000V
FREQUENCIES
(MHZ)
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page : 8 of 9
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 03/01/96
I'ATION NAME GLACIER DRV CA TREAT BLVD CA
ATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
ALL SIGN
NNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
ATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 59 23 . 0 37 56 19 . 0
JNGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 5 15. 0 122 1 33 . 0
ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 170/51. 8 80/24 . 4
ATH AZIMUTH (De ) 136 .292 316 .330
ATH DISTANCE (Miles) 4 . 875
(Km) 7.845
NTENNA
RIMIUN TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
P4-105A P4-105A
VT CODE A00591 A00591
AIN (dBi) 39 . 9 39. 9
/L (Ft/m-AGL) 130/39 . 6 55/16 . 8
RIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
NT CODE
AIN (dBi)
/L (Ft/m-AGL)
IVERSITY
NT CODE
AIN (dBi)
/L (Ft/m-AGL)
QUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMIO-12T-2 BCK9GKDVMI0-12T-2
QP CODE TEM412 TEM412
MISSION 5M00 D7W 5M00 D7W
OADING 288 CH DIG 288 CH DIG
TABILITY (%) 0 . 000100 0 . 000100
OWER (dBm/Watts) 23 .0/0.200 23 . 0/0 .200
ECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -33 .1 -33 . 2
IRP (dBm/Watts) 59.9/977 .2 60 . 9/1230 .3
IXED LOSSES (dB) 3 . 0 2 . 0
REE SPACE LOSS (dB) 230 . 9
RANSMIT 10562 . 50000V 10627 . 50000V
REQUENCIES
MHZ)
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page : 4 of 10
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 02/22/96
;TATION NAME ROCKY RIDGE CA GEARY ROAD CA
LATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
.ALL SIGN
)WNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
,ATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 48 57. 0 37 55 35 . 0
jONGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 3 40 . 0 122 4 41 . 0
ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 2024/616 . 9 121/36 . 9
?ATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 353 . 078 173 . 067
?ATH DISTANCE (Miles) 7 . 681
(Km) 12 . 361
ANTENNA
?RIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
UHX4-107 R PL4-107E
ANT CODE A00770 A00711
]AIN (dBi) 40 .4 40 . 5
_-/L (Ft/m-AGL) 175/53 . 3 40/12 . 2
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
ANT CODE
-,AIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERSITY
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EOUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1 BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1
EQP CODE TEM693 TEM693
EMISSION TOMO D7W TOMO D7W
LOADING 672 CH DIG 672 CH DIG
STABILITY (`k) 0 . 001000 0 . 001000
POWER (dBm/Watts) •30 . 0/1. 000 •30 . 0/1 . 000
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -32 .4 -32 . 4
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 64 . 4/2754 . 2 68 . 5/7079 . 5
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 6 . 0 2 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 135 . 3
TRANSMIT 10715 . 00OOOV(4P) 11445 . 00OOOV(4J)
FREQUENCIES
(MHZ)
* ATPC EQUIPMENT: NOMINAL POWER = 20 DBM, COORDINATED POWER 20 DBM
MAXIMUM POWER = 30 DBM
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
Page: 1 of 10
COMSEARCH
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 02/22/96
TATION NAME NICHOL KNOB CA CUMMINGS PK CA
ATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
ALL SIGN
WNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
ATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 55 13 . 0 38 1 44 . 0
.ONGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 22 51 . 0 122 11 47 . 0
',ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 371/113 . 1 895/272 . 8
'ATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 53 . 299 233 .413
'ATH DISTANCE (Miles) 12 . 551
(Km) 20 . 198
ANTENNA
)RIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW COR150RATION
UHX6-107J LF UHX6-107J LF
aNT CODE TOMP02 TOMP02
!AIN (dBi) 44 . 0 44 . 0
:/L (Ft/m-AGL) 18/5 . 5 22/6 . 7
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
ANT CODE
3AIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERSITY
ANT CODE
3AIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EQUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1 BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1
EQP CODE TEM693 TEM693
EMISSION TOMO D7W TOMO D7W
LOADING 672 CH DIG 672 CH DIG
STABILITY (1) 0 . 001000 0 . 001000
POWER (dBm/Watts) *30 . 0/1 . 000 *30 . 0/1 . 000
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -25 . 6 -25 . 6
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 72 . 0/15848 . 9 72 . 0/15848 . 9
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 2 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 139 . 6
TRANSMIT 11585 . 00OOOV 11095 . 00OOOV
FREQUENCIES
(MHZ)
* ATPC EQUIPMENT: NOMINAL POWER = 20 DBM, COORDINATED POWER = 20 DBM
MAXIMUM POWER = 30 DBM
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page : 2 of 10
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 02/22/96
>TATION NAME NICHOL KNOB CA BALD PEAK CA
)ATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
:ALL SIGN
)WNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
,ATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 55 13 . 0 37 53 2 . 0
:,ONGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 22 51 . 0 122 13 15 . 0
3ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 371/113 . 1 1913/583 . 1
?ATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 105 . 965 286 . 063
?ATH DISTANCE (Miles) 9.097
(Km) 14 . 640
ANTENNA
?RIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
UHX6-107J LF UHX6-107J LF
kNT CODE TOMP02 TOMP02
3AIN (dBi) 44 . 0 44 . 0
/L (Ft/m-AGL) 14/4 .3 48/14 . 6
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
ANT CODE
3AIN (dBi)
--/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERS IT`S
ANT CODE
3AIN (dBi)
'-/L (Ft/m-AGL)
30UIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1 BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1
EQP CODE TEM693 TEM693
EMISSION TOMO D7W TOMO D7W
LOADING 672 CH DIG 672 CH DIG
STABILITY (8) 0 .001000 0 . 001000
POWER (dBm/Watts) •30 . 0/1. 000 *30 . 0/1. 000
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -23 .8 -23 . 8
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 72 .0/15848 . 9 71 . 0/12589 . 3
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 3 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 136 . 8
TRANSMIT 11385 . 00OOOV 10895 . 00000V
FREQUENCIES
(MHz)
+ ATPC EQUIPMENT: NOMINAL POWER = 20 DSM, COORDINATED POWER - 20 DSM
MABIMVM POWER - 30 DAM
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page : 6 of 10
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 02/22/96
STATION NAME ROCKY RIDGE CA BALD PEAK CA
PATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
CALL SIGN
OWNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
LATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 48 57 . 0 37 53 2 . 0
LONGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 3 40 . 0 122 13 15 , 0
GROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 2024/616 . 9 1913/583 . 1
PATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 298 . 299 118 .201
PATH DISTANCE (Miles) 9 . 916
(Km) 15 . 959
ANTENNA
PRIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
PL6-107E UHX6-107J RF
ANT CODE A03201 TOMP01
GAIN (dBi) 44 . 0 44 . 0
C/L (Ft/m-AGL) 25/7 . 6 20/6 . 1
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERSITY
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EOUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1 BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1
EQP CODE TEM693 TEM693
EMISSION 10MO D7W 10MO D7W
LOADING 672 CH DIG 672 CH DIG
STABILITY (%) 0 . 001000 0 . 001000
POWER (dBm/Watts) *30 . 0/1 . 000 *30 . 0/1 .000
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -23 .5 -23 . 5
EIRP (dSm/Watts) 72 .0/15848 .9 72 . 0/15848 . 9
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 2 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 137 .5
TRANSMIT 11015 . 00OOOV 11505 . 00000V
FREQUENCIES
(MHZ)
* ATPC EQUIPMENT: NOMINAL POWER = 20 DSM, COORDINATED POWER = 20 DBM
MAXIMUM POWER = 30 ABM
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
Page : 7 of 10
COMSEARCH
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
02/22/96
MICROWAVE PATH DATA
TATION NAME PINE STREET CA CUMMINGS PK CA
ATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
ALL SIGN
WNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
ATITUDE (D-M-S) 38 1 10 . 0 38 1 44 . 0
.ONGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 7 57 . 0 122 11 47 . 0
ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 13/4 . 0 895/272 . 8
ATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 260 . 604 100 . 565
ATH DISTANCE (Miles) 3 .546
(Km) 5 .707
NTENNA
,RIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
PL4-107E UHX4-107 R
NT CODE A00711 A00770
;AIN (dBi) 40 . 5 40 . 4
:/L (Ft/m-AGL) 170/51.8 50/15 . 2
'RIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
ANT CODE
;AIN (dBi)
./L (Ft/m-AGL)
)IVERSITY
aNT CODE
3AIN (dBi)
=/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EQUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1 BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1
;QP CODE TEM693 TEM693
EMISSION TOMO D7W 10MO D7W
GOADING 672 CH DIG 672 CH DIG
STABILITY ($) 0 . 001000 0 . 001000
?OWER (dBm/Watts) *30 . 0/1. 000 *30 . 0/1 . 000
2ECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -26 .7 -26 . 7
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 64 . 5/2818 .4 67 .4/5495 .4
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 6 . 0 3 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 128 . 6
TRANSMIT 11665 . 000OOV 11175 . 00000V
FREQUENCIES
(MHz)
* ATPC EQUIPMENT: NOMINAL POWER = 20 DBM, COORDINATED POWER 220 DBM
MAXIMUM POWER = 30 DBM
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
Page : 1 of 1
COMSEARCH
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(?03) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 03/14/96
STATION NAME KREGOR PEAK CA GLACIER DRV CA
PATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
CALL SIGN
OWNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
LATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 56 35 . 0 37 59 23 . 0
LONGITUDE (D-M-S) 121 53 24 .0 122 5 15 . 0
GROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 1894/577 .3 170/51 . 8
PATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 286 . 679 106 . 557
PATH DISTANCE (Miles) 11. 254
(Km) 19 . 112.
ANTENNA
PRIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
HP6-107G PL6-107E
ANT CODE - ' AO1302 A03201
GAIN (dBi) 44 . 0 44 . 0
C/L (Ft/m-AGL) 20/6 .1 50/15 .2
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
AUNT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERSITY
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EQUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1 BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1
EQP CODE TEM693 TEM693
EMISSION 10MO D7W 10MO 07W
LOADING 672 CH DIG 672 CH DIG
STABILITY (%) 0 .001000 0 .001000
POWER (dBm/Watts) 30.0/1.000* 30 . 0/1.000*
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -24 . 6 -24 . 6
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 72 . 0/15848 .9 72 . 0/15848 . 9
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 2 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 138 . 6
TRANSMIT 11175 . 000OOV 11665 . 00000
FREQUENCIES
(MHz)
* ATPC EQUIPMENT: NOMINAL POWER = 20 DBM, COORDINATED POWER 20 DBM
MAXIMUM POWER = 30 DSM
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page: 10 of 10
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 02/22/96
STATION NAME HIGHLAND CA KREGOR PEAK CA
PATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
CALL SIGN
OWNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
LATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 48 52 . 0 37 56 35 . 0
LONGITUDE (D-M-S) 121 48 26 . 0 121 53 24 . 0
GROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 2581/786 .7 1894/577. 3
PATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 332 . 996 152 . 945
PATH DISTANCE (Miles) 9. 958
(Km) 16. 025
ANTENNA
PRIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
HP6-107G PL6-107E
ANT CODE A01302 A03201
GAIN (dBi) 44 . 0 44 . 0
C/L (Ft/m-AGL) 15/4 . 6 36/11 . 0
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
ANT CODE
GAIN (dBi)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERSITY
ANT CODE
GAIN (dB i)
C/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EQUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1 BCK9GKDVMII-4564-1
EQP CODE TEM693 TEM693
EMISSION TOMO D7W TOMO D7W
LOADING 672 CH DIG 672 CH DIG
STABILITY 0 . 001000 0 . 001000
POWER (dBm/Watts) *30 .0/1.000 *30 . 0/1.000
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -24 . 5 -24 . 5
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 72 . 0/15848 . 9 71 . 0/12589 . 3
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 .0 3 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 137 .5
TRANSMIT 11325 . 00000V(5J) 11155 . 00000V(5P)
FREQUENCIES
(MHz)
* ATPC EQUIPMENT: NOMINAL POWER m 20 DBM, COORDINATED POWER = 20 DBM
MAXIMUM POWER a 30 DBM
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page : 1 of 9
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 03/01/96
TATION NAME HIGHLAND PK CA SAN RAMON CA
ATH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
ALL SIGN
WNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
ATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 48 52 . 0 37 48 33 . 0
ONGITUDE (D-M-S) 121 48 26 . 0 121 59 29 . 0
ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 2581/786 . 7 393/119 . 8
ATH AZIMUTH (Dey) 267 . 988 87 . 875
ATH DISTANCE (Miles) 10 . 084
(Km) 16 .228
NTENNA
'BINARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
PL6-105B UHX6-105 RF
NT CODE A02702 A03851
;AIN (dBi) 43 . 5 43 . 5
:/L (Ft/m-AGL) 25/7 . 6 20/6 . 1
'RIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
%Ni' CODE
3AIN (dBi)
:/L (Ft/m-AGL)
DIVERSITY
NNT CODE
;AIN (dBi)
--/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EQUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMI0-8T-2 BCK9GKDVMI0-8T-2
EQP CODE 27SQ01 278Q01
EMISSION 3M75 D7W 3M75 D7W
LOADING 192 CH DIG 192 CH DIG
STABILITY (%) 0 . 000100 0 . 000100
POWER (dBm/Watts) 23 . 0/0 . 200 23 . 0/0 . 200
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -31 . 2 -31 . 2
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 64 .5/2818 .4 64 . 5/2818 .4
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 2 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 137 .2
TRANSMIT 10623 . 12500V 10558 . 12500V
FREQUENCIES
(MHZ)
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page : 2 of 9
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 03/01/96
'ATION NAME BALD PEAK CA LAFAYETTE CA
1TH STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
)LL SIGN
dNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
ATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 53 2 . 0 37 53 46 . 0
)NGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 13 15 . 0 122 6 15 . 0
SOUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 1913/583 . 1 290/88 . 4
ATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 82 . 434 262 . 506
ATH DISTANCE (Miles) 6 .432
(Km) 10 . 352
VTENNA
.ZIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
P4-105A P4-105A
NT CODE A00591 A00591
AIN (dBi) 39 . 9 39 . 9
/L (Ft/m-AGL) 20/6 . 1 40/12 . 2
RIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
NT CODE
AIN (dBi)
:/L (Ft/m-AGL)
,IVERSITY
NT CODE
;AIN (dBi)
:/L (Ft/m-AGL)
:QUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMI0-12T-2 BCK9GKDVMIO-12T-2
:QP CODE TEM412 TEM412
:MISSION 5M00 D7W 5M00 D7W
GOADING 288 CH DIG 288 CH DIG
>TABILITY (k) 0 . 000100 0 . 000100
)OWER (dBm/Watts) 23 . 0/0 . 200 23 . 0/0 . 200
2ECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -34 . 5 -34 . 5
iIRP (dBm/Watts) 60 . 9/1230 . 3 60 . 9/1230 . 3
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 2 . 0
'REE SPACE LOSS (dB) 133 . 3
CRANSMIT 10622 . S000OV 10557 . SOOOOV
FREQUENCIES
(MHZ)
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page: 6 of 9
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 03/01/96
;TATION NAME OHARA AVE CA HIGHLAND CA
)ATH STA US PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
:ALL SIGN
)WNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
.ATITtUDE (D-M-S) 37 59 50 .0 37 48 52 . 0
.ONGITUDE (D-M-S) 121 42 45 . 0 121 48 26 . 0
ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 15/4 .6 2581/786 . 7
'ATH AZIMUTH (Deg) 202 . 354 22 .296
?ATH DISTANCE (Miles) 13 . 627
(Km) 21 . 931
'LNTENNA
%RIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
P6-105B P6-105B
lNT CODE A01902 A01902
3AIN (dBi) 43 . 5 43 . 5
�/L (Ft/m-AGL) 26/7 . 9 24/7 . 3
?RIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
aNT CODE
3AIN (dBi)
w/L (Ft/m-AGL)
5IVERSITY
%NT CODE
3AIN (dBi)
--/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EQUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMIO-ST-2 BCK9GKDVMI0-8T-2
EQP CODE 278Q01 27SQ01
^;MISSION 3M75 D7W 3M75 D7W
LOADING 192 CH DIG 192 CH DIG
STABILITY M 0 . 000100 0 . 000100
POWER (dBm/Watts) 23 . 0/0 . 200 23 . 0/0 . 200
RECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -33 . 8 -33 . 8
EIRP (dBm/Watts) 64 .5/2818 .4 64 . 5/2818 .4
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 2 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 139.8
TRANSMIT 10578 . 12500V 10 43 . 1 00V
FREQUENCIES
(MHZ)
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
COMSEARCH Page : 7 of 9
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 03/01/96
NATION NAME_ KREGOR PEAK CA WATERBIRD CA
?ATH TA S PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
:ALL SIGN
)WNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
,ATITUDE (D-M-S) 37 56 35 .0 38 0 0 . 0
,,ONGITUDE (D-M-S) 121 53 24 .0 122 4 10. 0
;ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 1894/577 . 3 24/7 . 3
?ATH AZIMUTH (Dey) 291 . 899 111.788
?ATH DISTANCE (Mites) 10 . 555
(Km) 16 . 987
\NTENNA
R3 IMA Y TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
P6-105B P6-105B
3NT CODE A01902 A01902
3AIN (dBi) 43 . 5 43 . 5
-/L (Ft/m-AGL) 20/6 . 1 14/4 . 3
?RIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
aNT CODE
3AIN (dBi)
'/L (Ft/m-AGL)
7IVERSITY
NNT CODE
3AIN (dBi)
=/L (Ft/m-AGL)
EQUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMI0-12T-2 BCK9GKDVMIO-12T-2
EQP CODE TEM412 TEM412
EMISSION 5M00 D7W SMOO D7W
GOADING 288 CH DIG 288 CH DIG
STABILITY 0 .000100 0 . 000100
?OWER (dBm/Watts) 23 . 0/0 . 200 23 . 0/0 . 200
RECEIVED LEVEL (dam) -31 . 6 -31 . 6
3IRP (dam/Watts) 64 .5/2818 .4 64 .5/2818 .4
FIXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 2 . 0
FREE SPACE LOSS (dB) 137.6
TRANSMIT 10572 .50000V 10637 . 50000V
FREQUENCIES
(MHz)
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
Page : 9 of 9
COMSEARCH
2002 Edmund Halley Drive
Reston, VA 22091
(703) 620-6300
MICROWAVE PATH DATA 03/01/96
STATION NAME CUMMINGS PK CA JUSTICE CTR CA
PATH—STATUS PROPOSED OR PRIOR COORDINATED
2A.LL SIGN
OWNER CODE INTPCS INTPCS
LATITUDE (D-M-S) 38 1 44 .0 37 59 35 . 0
LONGITUDE (D-M-S) 122 11 47 . 0 122 21 13 . 0
3ROUND ELEV (Ft/m-AMSL) 895/272 .8 63/19 . 2
PATH AZIMUTH (Dey) 253 . 979 73 . 882
PATH DISTANCE (Miles) 8 . 928
(Km) 14 . 369
ANTENNA
PRIMARY TX ANDREW CORPORATION ANDREW CORPORATION
P6-105B P6-105B
%NT CODE A01902 A01902
3AIN (dBi) 43 . 5 43 . 5
'/L (Ft/m-AGL) 14/4 .3 26/7. 9
PRIMARY RX
SAME AS TRANSMITTER
kNT CODE
3AIN (dB i)
'/L (Ft/m-AGL)
)IVERSITY
kNT CODE
'AIN (dBi)
'/L (Ft/m-AGL)
,QUIPMENT HARRIS CORPORATION HARRIS CORPORATION
BCK9GKDVMIO-12T-2 BCK9GKDVMIO-12T-2
3QP CODE TEM412 TEM412
:MISSION SMOG D7W SM00 D7W
,OADING 288 CH DIG 288 CH DIG
;TABILITY M 0 . 000100 0 . 000100
'OWER (dBm/watts) 23 .0/0 .200 23 . 0/0 . 200
.ECEIVED LEVEL (dBm) -30 .1 -30 . 1
:IRP (dBm/Watts) 64 .5/2818 .4 64 . 5/2818 .4
'IXED LOSSES (dB) 2 . 0 2 . 0
REE SPACE LOSS (dB) 136 . 1
'RANSMIT 10567 . 50000V 10 . 50000V
REQUENCIES
MH V
INTPCS = PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
EXHIBIT C1
TOWER ENGINEERS REPORT
The following Tower Engineer Reports as commissioned by Harris-Farinon, completed
by Tower Technology, Inc., and approved by Incumbant describes status of towers at said
sites.
SITE DATE
FIRE ALARM 4-30-96 with addendum 5-16-96
STONEMAN 4-25-96
LAFAYETTE 4-29-96
SAN RAMON 4-30-96
DELTA FAIR 4-22-96
WATERBIRD 4-23-96
PINE STREET 5-7-96
FIRE STATION 10 4-24-96
JUSTICECENTER 4-23-96
CUMMINGS PEAK 5-6-96
40 GLACIER DRIVE 5-1-96
OAKLEY 4-29-96
HIGHLAND PEAK 5-2-96
KREGOR PEAK 5-3-96
BALD PEAK New tower-No report
RICHMOND New site -No report
NICHOL KNOB City of Richmond responsible for
report
EXHIBIT "D"
Specification and Acceptance Testing
The equipment installed in this project will meet the manufacturer's specifications as
included in Exhibit B. All manufacturer's warranties will be transferred to Incumbent.
The following tests will be performed:
I. Align all microwave paths
2. Measure and record transmitter frequency
3. Measure and record transmitter power
4. Calculate and record receiver fade margin
5. Perform 24 hour BERT test and record results (I x 14-l'BER one-way,
unfaded objective.)
6. Verify operation of order wires
7. Verify operation of alarms and controls
8. Verify operation of alarm remote units to master station
Upon successful completion of acceptance testing and in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement, existing traffic will be promptly cut over to the new microwave system.
Upon successful completion of cut over, existing microwave equipment will be
disconnected from power and transmission lines.
Exhibit "E"
Lease Agreement
The attached constitutes the lease agreement between PBMS and Incumbent, which is an
integral part of this Agreement.
Agreement No. CPLMWR 028 Page I of I
Exhibit E - RIO 15
LEASE AGREEMENT
dated as of February 1997
between
Pacific Bell Mobile Services
as Lessor
and
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,
as Lessee
ARTICLE I
AGREEMENT TO LEASE
REPRESENTATIONS AND COVENANTS
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA("Lessee")requests Pacific Bell Mobiles Services ("Lessor)to acquire
personal property as more fully described on an Exhibit B hereto and incorporated by reference herein (the
"Property"). Lessee agrees to lease the Property from Lessor and Lessor agrees to lease the Property upon written
acceptance hereof signed at the Lessor's principal office by an authorized officer upon the terms and conditions of
the LEASE AGREEMENT(the "Lease"). Lessee represents, covenants and warrants, and as requested by Lessor,
will deliver an opinion of counsel substantially in the form attached as Exhibit E hereto to the effect (i) that it is a
public body corporate and politic, duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California and
has full power and authority to execute and deliver this Lease, to enter into the transactions contemplated by this
lease and to carry out its obligations hereunder, and (ii) that the Lease has been duly authorized, executed and
delivered by Lessee and constitutes a legal, valid and binding agreement enforceable against Lessee in accordance
with its terms. Lessee agrees,declares and covenants that it wilt do,or cause to be done,all things necessary within
its power to preserve and keep the Lease in full force and effect. Lessee further represents, covenants and warrants
that Lessee has complied with all bidding requirements where necessary and by due notification presented this
Lease for approval and adoption as a valid obligation on its part; that Lessee has and will have sufficient
appropriations or other funds available to pay all amounts due hereunder; that the Property is necessary and
essential to enable to the Lessee to operate, maintain, and provide governmental services; and that the Lease
Payments during the Lease Term (as such terms are defined below) are equivalent to, and do not exceed, fair rental
value for the Property for a lease/purchase of the Property by the Lessee.
ARTICLE tI
LEASE OF PROPERTY
Section 2.1. Lease. Lessor hereby leases the Property to Lessee, and Lessee hereby leases (with an option
to purchase)the Property from Lessor,upon the terms and conditions set forth in the this Lease.
Section 2.2. Possession and Enjoyment. Lessor hereby covenants to provide Lessee during the term of this
Lease with the quiet use and enjoyment of the Property,and Lessee shall during the term of the Lease peaceably and
quietly have and hold and enjoy the Property, without suit or hindrance from Lessor, except as expressly set forth in
this Lease. Lessor will,at the request of Lessee and at Lessee's cost,join in any legal action in which Lessee asserts
its right to such possession and enjoyment to the extent Lessor lawfully may do so.
Section 2.3. Lessor Access to Property. Lessee agrees that Lessor shall have the right at all reasonable
times to examine and inspect the Property. Lessee further agrees that Lessor shall have such rights of access to the
Property as may be reasonably necessary to cause the proper maintenance of the Property in the event of failure by
Lessee to perform its obligations hereunder.
ARTICLE III
WARRANTIES
Lessor has assigned to Lessee the written limited warranties from the manufacturer of the Property.
Except for such limited warranties, NEITHER LESSOR NOR ANY ASSIGNEE OF LESSOR MAKES ANY
WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS THE SAME. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED ABOVE, NEITHER LESSOR NOR
ANY ASSIGNEE OF LESSOR SHALL HAVE ANY LIABILITY TO LESSEE FOR ANY CLAIM, LOSS
2 1128/47
OR DAMAGE CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED DIRECTLY, INDIRECTLY, INCIDENTALLY
OR CONSEQUENTIALLY BY THE PROPERTY, BY ANY INADEQUACY THEREOF OR DEFICIENCY
OR DEFECT THEREIN, BY ANY INCIDENT WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
ARISING IN STRICT LIABILITY OR WARRANTEE, FROM LESSOR'S NEGLIGENCE OR
OTHERWISE, OR IN ANY WAY RELATED TO OR ARISING OUT OF THIS LEASE OR THE
PROPERTY'S DESIGN, SPECIFICATIONS, QUALITY OF MATERIALS OR WORKMANSHIP,
MERCHANTIBILITY FITNESS FOR PURPOSE,USE, OPERATION, SAFETY, PATENT,TRADEMARK
OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGMENT AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM THE SAME. All such risks, as between
Lessor and Lessee,are to be borne by Lessee. Without limiting the foregoing, Lessor shall have no responsibility or
liability to Lessee or any other person with respect to any of the following, regardless of any negligence of Lessor
(i) any liability, loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by any Equipment, any
inadequacy thereof, any deficiency or defect(latent or otherwise)therein, or any other circumstances in connection
therewith; (ii)) the use, operation or performance of any Equipment or any risks relating thereto; (iii) any
interruption of service, loss of business or anticipated profits or consequential damages; or (iv) the delivery,
operation servicing, maintenance, repair, improvement or replacement of any Equipment. If, and so long as, no
default exists under this Lease, Lessee shall be, and hereby is,authorized during the term of this Lease to assert and
enforce, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, from time to time, in the name of and for the account of Lessor and/or
Lessee, as their interests may appear, whatever, claims and rights Lessor may have against any Supplier of the
Equipment. The obligation of Lessee to pay the Lease Payments as defined in Section 4.2 below, shall not be
abated, impaired or reduced by reason of any claims of Lessee with respect to the condition, quality, workmanship,
delivery, shipment, installation,defects or other matters involving the Property.
ARTICLE IV
TERM OF LEASE; LEASE PAYMENTS;
TITLE TO PROPERTY; SECURITY INTEREST
Section 4.1. Lease Term. Following Lessee's execution of said Lease, this Lease shall become effective
upon the execution hereof by Lessor. The term of this Lease("Lease Term")shall commence and end as defined in
an Exhibit C applicable to the Property.
Section 4.2. Lease Payments.
(a) Lessee agrees to pay total lease payments ("Lease Payments") set forth in Exhibit C respecting the
specific schedules of Property to which such exhibit relates, including interest, on the dates and in the amounts
specified in an Exhibit C, for and in consideration for the right of possession of, and continued quiet use and
enjoyment of, the Property during each payment period. Said Lease Payments include the cost of installation and
testing of the Property. Said Lease Payments shall be payable without notice or demand at the office of the Lessor
specified in Section 15.1 of this Lease(or such other place as Lessor may from time to time designate in writing)on
the 15th day of the month preceding the payment dates set forth in such Exhibit C. Any notice, invoicing, purchase
orders, quotation or other forms or procedures required by Lessee as a condition precedent to payment shall be fully
explained and provided to Lessor or its assignee sufficiently in advance of payment due date for the completion
thereof by Lessor or its assignee prior to such payment date. Lease Payments shall be paid absolutely and
unconditionally in all events and without assertion of any right to any set-off,defense or counterclaim.
(b) Lessee reasonably believes that funds will be available to make all Lease Payments during the Lease
Term and hereby represents that it will do all things lawfully within its power to obtain, maintain and properly
request and pursue funds from which the Lease Payments may be made, including making provision for such
payments in budgets submitted to its board for the purpose of obtaining funding, using its bona fide best efforts to
have such portion of the budget approved and exhausting all available administrative reviews and appeal, if any, in
the event such portion of the budget is not approved. It is Lessee's intent to make Lease Payments for the full Lease
Term to the extent it has legally available funds.
3 1128/47
(c) Lessor shall notify Lessee in writing and Lessee shall cure such failure to pay within twenty(20)days.,
Any Lease payments not paid within twenty(20)days when due, shall bear interest as the lesser of 18%per annum
or the maximum rate allowed by law.
If sufficient funds are not appropriated by Lessee's Board and other funds, if any, are not legally available
for payment of the Lease Payments due during the succeeding fiscal year of Lessee and if Lessee provides Lessor
with written notice of such non appropriation ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of the fiscal year for which
funds were appropriated, the Lease shall terminate and be cancelled and Lessee shall immediately, upon the
exhaustion of the funding authorized for the then current fiscal year, surrender possession of the Property, or at
Lessor's option, return the Property to Lessor, at Lessee's expense (including all freight charges), in the same
condition as when delivered to the Lessee, reasonable wear and tear excepted, to such place or on board such
carrier, packed for shipping,as Lessor may specify.
Lease Payments which are timely made for each payment period during the term of this Lease shall
constitute the total amount due for said payment period, and shall be paid by Lessee for and in consideration of(1)
the right of possession of, and the continued quiet use and enjoyment of the Property during each such payment
period, and(2)the option to purchase the Property by payment of the amount prescribed in Article XI.
Lessor and Lessee understand and intend that the obligation of the Lessee to pay lease payments hereunder
shall constitute a current expense of Lessee, and shall not in any way be construed to be a debt of Lessee in
contravention of any applicable constitutional or statutory limitations or requirements concerning the creation of
indebtedness by Lessee.
This Lease is a net lease. Lessee's obligations to pay Lease Payments shall be absolute and unconditional.
Lessee shall not be entitled to any abatement, reduction,or set-offs against the Lease Payments, nor shall this Lease
terminate, or the obligations of Lessee be affected by reason of any defect in or damage to, or loss of possession,use
condition or destruction of any Property from whatever cause.
Section 4.3. Title to Property; Security Interest. Title to the Property is deemed to be in Lessor. To the
extent that this Lease is determined to be a sate and title passes to Lessee,Lessee hereby grants to Lessor a security
interest in any and all right, title and interest of Lessee in the Property, agrees that this Lease may be filed as a
Financing statement evidencing such security interest, and agrees to execute and deliver all financing statements and
other instruments necessary or appropriate to evidence such security interest. Lessee further agrees that, except as
otherwise waived herein, the Uniform Commercial Code shall apply as between the parties hereto and assignees of
Lessor.
Lessee shall have no right, title or interest in the Property or any additions, repairs, replacements or
modifications thereto except as expressly set forth in the Lease. Except when purchased by Lessee under Article
XI, all property shall at all times remain personal property of Lessor regardless of the degree of its annexation to
any real property and shall not by reason of any installation or affirmation to real or personal property become part
thereof.
ARTICLE V
USE;REPAIRS;ALTERATION
Section 5.1. Use; Repairs. Lessee shall use the Property in a careful manner and shall comply with all
laws, ordinances and regulations relating to, and shall pay all costs, claims, damages, fees and charges arising out
of, the Lease and the Property. Lessee, at its expense, shall keep the Property in good repair and furnish all parts,
mechanisms and devices required therefore at the place of installation. Lessee agrees that the Property shall not be
moved from the place of installation without notifying Lessor in writing.
Section 5.2. Alteration. Lessee shall not make any alterations, additions or improvements to the Property
without Lessor's prior written consent unless such alterations, additions or improvement may be made without
4 1128197
diminishing the resale value of the Property.
ARTICLE VI
LOSS; IRREPARABLE DAMAGE
Lessee shall bear the entire risk of loss or damage to the Property from any cause whatsoever, and no such
loss or damage to or condemnation of the Property nor defect therein nor unfitness or obsolescence thereof shall
relieve Lessee of the obligation to make Lease Payments or any other obligation under the Lease, except as
provided in subparagraph (b) below. In the event of damage to any item of Property, Lessee shall immediately
place the same in good repair. If Lessor determines that any item of Property is lost, stolen, destroyed or damaged
beyond repair, or condemned, Lessee at its option shall:
(a)replace the same with like Property in good repair,or
(b)pay Lessor in cash all of the following: (i)all amounts then owed by Lessee to Lessor under this Lease,
and (ii) an amount equal to that portion of the total acquisition cost of the item of Property paid for by Lessor plus
any applicable premiums, non-asset funded amounts and costs incurred by Lessor in reviewing such non-
replacement less the principal component of the Lease Payments made for such item of Property as determined by
Lessor prior to payment of such portion of the Prepayment Purchase Price (in Exhibit C) by Lessee (the
"Proportionate Purchase Price"). Upon Lessor's receipt of such payment, Lessee shall be entitled to whatever
interest Lessor may have in said item in its then condition and location, without warranty expressed or implied; and
in the event of payment of such Proportionate Purchase Price, the portion of Lease Payments relating to the
destroyed or condemned item, in the amount determined by Lessor,shall be abated.
The risk of loss and damage that the Lessee agrees to assume under this Section shall be insured against
under Article VII below respecting insurance. From Lessee's insurance proceeds(or other funds if Lessee breaches
its obligation to insure), the Lessee is obligated to repair the Property, or if repair is not possible, to either replace
the Property or pay the Lessor the value of the portion of Property not replaced pursuant to the procedure for the
Proportionate Purchase Price set forth above.
When the Proportionate Purchase Price is paid to Lessor, the portion of the Lease Payment equivalent to
the lost or destroyed Property, for which the Proportionate Purchase Price is paid to Lessor,shall be abated.
ARTICLE VII
INSURANCE
Lessee shall, during the term of this Lease, insure all Property under this Lease against casualty
occurrences, including the perils of fire, lightning, windstorm, hail, explosion, aircraft, vehicles, smoke, riot, civil
commotion, strikes, locked-out workmen or theft, burglary and water damage in an amount equal to the higher of
total unpaid balance of the acquisition cost at the time (plus any unpaid charges and expenses) or the cost of
replacement of all Property and shall insure public liability and property damage insurance sufficient to protect
Lessor from liability in all events. Insurance shall be maintained by self-insurance or with standard insurers and the
Lessee shall give the Lessor thirty days notice of cancellation or non-renewal. Lessor shall be a named additional
insured with a loss payable clause in favor of Lessor irrespective of any breach of warrantee, or act or omission of
Lessor or Lessee.
All payments for physical damage to Property shall be payable to the Lessor or other assignee as additional
insured as their interest may appear under the terms and conditions of the Lease. Upon acceptance of the Property
and upon each insurance renewal date, Lessee shall deliver to Lessor or its assignee a duly authenticated Certificate
evidencing such insurance. In the event of any loss,damage, injury or accident involving the Property, Lessee shall
promptly provide Lessor with written notice thereof and make available to Lessor all information and
documentation relating thereto.
5 1128147
ARTICLE VIII
LIENS AND TAXES
Lessee shall keep the Property free and clear of all levies and encumbrances. Lessee shall pay, when due,
all charges and taxes (local, state and federal) including, but not limited to sales, use, excise and property taxes and
penalties and interest advanced upon behalf of the Lessee which may now or thereafter be imposed upon the
ownership, leasing, rental, sale, purchase, possession or use of the Property, excluding, however, all taxes on or
measured by Lessor's net taxable income. If Lessee fails to pay said charges and taxes when due, Lessor shall have
the right, but shall not be obligated,to pay said charges and tares. In the event the Lessor has paid such charges or
taxes, Lessee shall pay immediately Lessor the amount advanced upon behalf of the Lessee.
ARTICLE IX
INDEMNIFICATION
To the extent permitted by law, Lessee shall indemnify Lessor against and hold Lessor harmless from any
and all claims, actions, proceedings, expenses, damages, liabilities, costs or similar charges of whatever nature,
including attorney's fees, arising out of or connection with the Property, including, without limitation, its
manufacture, selection, acceptance, condition, purchase, delivery, installation, possession, use, operation or return
and the recovery of claims under insurance policies thereon.
To the extent permitted by law, Lessee shall indemnify Lessor and hold Lessor harmless against any and all
claims, actions, proceedings, expenses, liabilities, damages, costs or similar charges of whatever nature, including
attorneys' fees, in connection with any property tax, sales tax or other taxes which may be assessed against the
Property or the transaction contemplated by this Lease.
Lessee represents, warrants and covenants that throughout the term of this Lease it will not take or permit
any of its officers, employees or agents to take any action which would cause the tax-exempt nature of the
obligations evidenced by this Lease to be contested, challenged or denied by applicable governmental authorities.
In the event any such action by Lessee results in the denial or revocation of the tax-exempt status of such
obligations, Lessee shall be responsible for all taxes, penalties,and interest arising in connection therewith to Lessor
or any assignee.
Lessee's promise to indemnify Lessor shall survive the expiration or other termination of this Lease.
ARTICLE X
ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLEASING
Section 10.1. Assignment by Lessor. This Lease, and the obligations of Lessee to make payments
hereunder, may be assigned and reassigned in whole or in part to one or more assignees or subassignees by Lessor
at any time subsequent to this execution, without the necessity of obtaining the consent of Lessee; provided,
however, that no such assignment or reassignment shall be effective unless and until Lessee shall have received
notice of the assignment or reassignment disclosing the name and address of the assignee or subassignee. Upon
receipt of notice of assignment, Lessee agrees to reflect in a book entry the assignee designated in such notice of
assignment, and to make all payments to the assignee designated in the notice of assignment, notwithstanding any
claim, defense, set-off or counterclaim whatsoever(whether arising from a breach of this Agreement or otherwise)
that Lessee may from time to time have against Lessor, or the assignee. Lessee agrees to execute all documents,
including notices of assignment and chattel mortgages or financing statements which may be reasonably requested
by Lessor or its assignee to protect their interests in the Property and in this Agreement. Upon assignment by the
Lessor, Lessee shall make payments only to assignee or a designated agent of assignee.
6 112%197
Section 10.2. No Sale,Assignment or Subleasing by Lessee. THIS LEASE AND THE INTEREST OF
LESSEE IN THE PROPERTY MAY NOT BE SOLD, ASSIGNED, SUBLEASED OR ENCUMBERED BY
LESSEE WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF LESSOR. SUCH CONSENT SHALL NOT
BE UNREASONABLY WITHHELD BY LESSOR AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ASSUMPTION BY THE
NEW ASSIGNEE OR SUBLESSEE OF LESSEE OF ALL TERMS OF THIS LEASE,AND COMPLIANCE
WITH THE TERMS THEREOF. ANY SUBLEASE SHALL BE SUBORDINATE TO THIS LEASE AND
SHALL NOT AFFECT ANY OBLIGATIONS OF LESSEE HEREUNDER, AND LESSEE SHALL
EXECUTE AND FILE SUCH EVIDENCES OF ASSIGNMENT AS REASONABLY REQUESTED BY
LESSOR.
ARTICLE XI
OPTION TO PURCHASE
Lessee shall have the option to purchase all the Property on a specific Exhibit or Schedule of Property
commencing on the first anniversary Lease Payment Date for such Exhibit or Schedule and on each succeeding
annual anniversary of such Lease Payment Date thereafter at the written request of the Lessee, delivered to the
corporate offices of the Lessor ninety (90) days prior the Lease Payment Date on which Lessee intends to exercise
its purchase option, at a price equal to the Prepayment Purchase Option Price set forth in Exhibit C. The
Prepayment Purchase Option Price set forth in Exhibit C assumes the Lease Payment due on the same date has been
paid. Upon payment of the Prepayment Purchase Option Price set forth in Exhibit C and any Lease Payments due,
and upon satisfaction of Lessor that Lessee is not on such date in default pursuant to any term of this Lease, Lessor
shall deliver to Lessee a full release of Lessor's right,title or interest of Lessor in and to the Property.
ARTICLE XII
EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
Section 12.1. Events of Default. An event of default ('Event of Default") under the Lease means the
occurrence of any one or more the following events:
(a) Lessee fails to make any Lease Payment (or any other payment) as it becomes due in accordance with
the terms of this Lease,and any such failure continues for ten(10)days after the due date thereof;
(b) Lessee fails to perform or observe any other covenant, condition, or agreement to be performed or
observed by it hereunder or under the Lease and such failure is not cured within thirty(30)days after written notice
by Lessor;
(c) The discovery by Lessor that any material statement,representation or warranty made by Lessee in the
Lease or in writing ever delivered by Lessee pursuant to or in connection with the Lease is false, misleading, or
erroneous in any material respect;or
(d) Lessee becomes insolvent or admits in writing its inability to pay its debts as they mature or applies for,
consents to, or acquiesces in the appointment of a trustee, receiver or custodian for the Lessee or a substantial part
of its Property; or in the absence of such application, consent or acquiescence, a trustee, receiver or custodian is
appointed for Lessee or a substantial part of its Property and is not discharged within thirty (30) days; or any
bankruptcy, reorganization, debt arrangement, moratorium, or any proceeding under any bankruptcy or insolvency
law,or any dissolution or liquidation proceedings,is instituted by or against Lessee and, if instituted against Lessee,
is consented to or acquiesced in by Lessee or is not dismissed within thirty(30)days.
Section 12.2. Remedies. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default under Section 12.1 of the Lease and
as long as such Event of Default is continuing, Lessor may, at its option, exercise any one or more of the following
remedies;
7 1128197
(a) By written notice to Lessee, declare all amounts becoming due and payable under the Lease and during
Lessee's current fiscal period to be immediately due and payable or declare all remaining Lease Payments due
during the Lease term to be immediately due and payable to the extent permitted by State law, or due and payable as
liquidated damages,whereupon the same shall become immediately due and payable;
(b) By written notice to Lessee, request Lessee to, and Lessee agrees that it will, promptly surrender
possession of the Property to Lessor and permit Lessor or any parry designated by Lessor quiet enjoyment and use
of the Property;
(c) By written notice to Lessee, request Lessee to,and Lessee agrees that it will,pack the Property and ship
it, freight prepaid and insured to any location in the continental United States designated by Lessor or its assignee;
(d) Enter Lessee's property and take immediate possession of and remove the Property;
(e) Sell or lease the Property for the account of Lessee or sublease the Property for the account of Lessee,
holding Lessee liable for all Lease Payments and other payments due to the effective date of such selling, leasing, or
subleasing and for the difference between the purchase price, rental and other amounts paid by the purchaser,
Lessee or sublessee pursuant to such sale, lease or sublease and the amounts payable by Lessee hereunder for the
remaining Lease Term;or
(t) Exercise any other right, remedy or privilege which may be available to it under applicable laws of the
State of California or any other applicable law, or proceed by appropriate court action to enforce the terms of the
Lease or to recover damages for the breach of the Lease, or to rescind the Lease as to any or all of the Property.
ARTICLE XIII
TAX COVENANTS AND EXPECTATIONS
Section 13.1,Tax Covenants. Lessee covenants that it will not take or permit any of its officers,employees
or agents to take any action with respect to the Lease or the Property as described in an Exhibit B (including
allowing such Property to be used in any private use), which would cause the Lease to be classified as a "private
activity bond" or an "arbitrage bond" or "federally guaranteed" within the meanings of Sections 141, 148 and 149
respectively of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended or superseded (the "Code"), and any regulations
from time to time adopted thereunder or which would cause the interest portion of the Lease Payments to become
includible in gross income under the Code, and the Lessee covenants that it will take all actions necessary to
maintain such exclusion from gross income under the Code. In addition, the Lessee hereby represents that it is a
public body corporate and politic and that all of the net proceeds of the Lease are to be used for local governmental
activities of the Lessee. The Lessee further covenants that it will comply with the information reporting
requirements of Section 149(e)of the Code, including filing of Form 8438-0 or 8038-GC with respect to the Lease.
Section 13.2. Expectations. Lessee represents,warrants and covenants as follows with regard to the Lease,
to its best information, knowledge and belief:
(a)Lessee has entered into a contract to lease with option to purchase the Property. The acquisition of the
Property will proceed with due diligence and all proceeds received from the Lessor will be spent within six months
of the date of this Lease.
(b)No lease payment account has been or will be established with respect to the Lease. Lease Payments
will be paid directly to the Lessor or its Assignee.
(c)No escrow fund,reserve fund or similar fund has been or will be established by Lessee with respect to
the Lease.
8 1128/97
(d) Lessee has not established and does not expect to establish any sinking fund from which Lease
Payments under the Lease will be paid or any fund for which there is reasonable assurance that amounts therein will
be available to pay such Lease Payments if Lessee encounters financial difficulties.
(e) Lessee has neither received notice that its certification may not be relied upon with respect to its
obligations, nor been advised that any adverse action by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is contemplated
with respect thereto.
ARTICLE XIV
DELIVERY OF RELATED DOCUMENTS
Lessee will execute or provide, as required by Lessor, the following documents and information
satisfactory to Lessor:
(a)Documents evidencing acceptance and delivery of the Property including a Certificate of Acceptance as
set forth in Exhibit D;
(b)Essential Use Letter regarding Property;
(Exhibit F)
(c)Uniform Commercial Code financing statements;
(Exhibit 1)
(d) Certificate of insurance or Certificate that the Lessee is self insured under its funded self insurance
program,as is acceptable to Lessor;
(Exhibit G)
(e) Invoicing instructions;
(f)Current financial statements and copies of budget showing appropriations(as available);
(g)Certificate of Incumbency;
(Exhibit H)
(h)Resolution of Lessee approving this Lease;
(i)Acknowledgment and Consent to Assignment and/or appointment of the Paying Agent;and
(j}Other documents as reasonably requested by Lessor.
9 1/28/97
ARTICLE XV
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 15.L Notices. Except where another form of notice is specifically authorized in a section of this
Lease, all notices to be given under this Lease to Lessee shall be made in writing and mailed by certified mail,
return receipt requested to: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, 1220 Morello Avenue, Martinez, CA 94553, (5 10)
313-7300; fax: 510/313-7319, or at such address as the party may provide in writing from time to time. Notices to
Lessor shall be addressed to it at Lessor's address at Pacific Bell Mobile Services, 4420 Rosewood Drive, Bldg 2,
2nd Floor, Pleasanton, CA 94588, 510/227-3187, Fax 5 101227-2211,or at such other address as Lessor or Lessor's
assignee may provide in writing from time to time. Any such notice shall be deemed to have been received five(5)
days subsequent to mailing.
Section 15.2. Section Headings. All section headings contained herein are for convenience of reference
only and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provisions of this Lease.
Section 15.3. Goveming Law. This Lease shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of Califomia.
Section 15.4. Inventory; Reeistration. Lessee shall maintain a detailed inventory of each item of Property,
which inventory shall identify the item as being leased from Lessor pursuant to this Lease.
SECTION 15.5. AMENDMENTS; MODIFICATIONS• LESSEE WAIVERS. ALL AMENDMENTS
OR MODIFICATIONS OF THE TERMS OF THE LEASE MUST BE AGREED TO IN WRITING IN
ADVANCE BY LESSEE AND LESSOR OR ITS ASSIGNEE; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT NO
AMENDMENTS OF THIS LEASE SHALL OPERATE TO REDUCE OR DELAY ANY LEASE
PAYMENTS TO BE MADE HEREUNDER WITHOUT CONSENT OF LESSOR AND ITS ASSIGNEE, IF
ANY, AT THE TIME OF AMENDMENT. THE PARTIES DO NOT INTEND THAT ARTICLE 2A TO
THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE APPLY TO THIS LEASE; PROVIDED THAT IF ARTICLE 2A
APPLIES AND TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, LESSEE WAIVES ALL RIGHTS AND
REMEDIES CONFERRED BY SECTIONS 2A-508 THROUGH 2A-522 OF ARTICLE 2A OF THE
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE(CODIFIED AS COMMERCIAL CODE SECTIONS 10508 THROUGH
10522 IN CALIFORNIA).
Lessee's initials:
Section 15.6. Entire Agreement; Waiver. This Lease and the other attachments, documents or instruments
executed by Lessee and Lessor in connection herewith, including any applicable Exhibits A through H(incorporated
by reference herein), constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the Property. There is no
understanding or agreement, oral or written, which is not set forth herein. The waiver by Lessor of any breach by
Lessee of any term,covenant or condition hereof shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach thereof.
Section 15.7. Execution in Counterparts. This Lease may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument.
Section 15.8. Severability Clause. In the event of a dispute, controversy or litigation arising under this
Agreement,the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys'fees. In the event any provision,phrase or
term of this Agreement shall be deemed unenforceable, such unenforceability shall not affect any of the other terms
hereof and this Agreement shall be construed thereafter as including all provisions hereof except the provision or
term held unenforceable.
10 1/28/97
15.09, Remedies Cumulative. All remedies are cumulative and any or all thereof may be exercised in lieu
of or in addition to each other,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Lessor has caused this Lease to be executed in its name by its duly
authorized officers, and the Lessee has caused this Lease to be executed in its name by its duly authorized officers,
as of the date set forth below.
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
as Lessor
By:
Authorized Officer
APPROVED By� c> _
PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,
LEGAL DEPARTMENT as Lessee
By:
Authorized Officer
Attest:
By:
Title:
11 1/28/97
EXHIBIT A
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,
LEASE GREEMENT
DATED AS OF
February 1997
The following list of Exhibits are made a part of this Lease.
Exhibit B Schedule of Property
Exhibit C Amortization Schedule
Exhibit D Certificate of Acceptance
Exhibit E Opinion of Lessee's Counsel
Exhibit F Certificate of Essential Use
Exhibit G Proof of Insurance
Exhibit H Incumbency Certificate
Exhibit I UCC I
Exhibit J Form 8038G
EXHIBIT B
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,
LEASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF
February 1997
SCHEDULE OF PROPERTY
The Property which is the subject of the attached LEASE AGREEMENT is as follows:
Description:
As set forth in the Exhibits to the Agreement for Microwave Relocation
Located at:
Martinez,CA
1/28/97
EXHIBIT C
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,
LEASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF
February 1997
SCHEDULE OF LEASE PAYMENTS
This Exhibit applies to Property set forth on Exhibit B.
Payments are to be made annually,net 30 from the receipt of invoice corresponding to the below maturity payment
dates as stated below:
Maturity Payment Maturing Prepayment
Payment Date Amount Principal Interest Purchase Option*
Date of completion $402,408.60 $402,408.60 -0- $3,621,67240
and acceptance in
1997
and twelve months $402,408.60 $402,408.60 -0- $3,219,268.80
thereafter in 1998
and twelve months $402,408.60 $402,408.60 -0- $2,816,860.20
thereafter in 1999
and twelve months $402,408.60 $402,408.60 -0- $2,414,451.60
thereafter in 2000
and twelve months $402,408.60 $402,408.60 -0- $2,012,043.00
thereafter in 2001
and twelve months $402,408.60 $402,408.60 -0- $1,609,634.40
thereafter in 2002
and twelve months $402,408.60 $402,408.60 -0- $1,207,225.80
thereafter in 2003
and twelve months $402,408.60 $402,408.60 -0- $804,817.20
thereafter in 2004
and twelve months $402,408.60 $402,408.60 -0- $402,408.60
thereafter in 2005
and twelve months $402,408.60 $402,408.60 -0- $1.00
thereafter in 2006
The above payment schedule assumes a final cost of$4,424,086.44. If the final cost is adjusted
the payment amounts will be adjusted in accordance with Agreement.
* Assumes payment on this date has been made.
Approved.
County of Contra Costa
Its
1/28/97
EXHIBIT D
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,
LEASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF
February 1997
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
1, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the duly qualified and acting
of the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ("Lessee"); and,with respect to the LEASE AGREEMENT dated as of
February_ 1997 (the"Lease"), by and between Lessee and Pacific Bell Mobile Services (the"Lessor"), certify
that:
1. The Property described in the Lease on Exhibit B(the "Property")has been delivered and installed, and
Lessee has inspected the Property and performed all such testing as it deems necessary and Lessee accepts the
Property for all purposes of the Lease.
2. Lessee has appropriated necessary monies sufficient to pay all Lease Payments required to be paid
under the Lease during the current fiscal year of Lessee, and such monies will be applied in payment of all Lease
Payments due and payable during such current fiscal year. Lessee will budget for,request, appropriate, provide and
otherwise obtain and make available sufficient monies to pay all Lease Payments required to be paid under the
Lease during the Lease Term(as that phrase is defined in the Lease),and such monies will be applied in payment of
such Lease Payments.
3. Lessee is exempt from all personal and real property taxes, and is not subject to sales and/or use taxes
with respect to the Property and the Lease Payments.
4. During the Lease Term, the Property will be used by Lessee to perform only the essential governmental
functions specified in the Lease.
5. The Lease Payments on a lease to purchase basis (with a nominal buyout) for the Property under the
Lease and during the Lease Term do not exceed the fair rental value for the lease/purchase of the Property by the
Lease.
Dated: 1997
LESSEE: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
By:
Authorized Officer
1/28197
EXHIBIT E
OPINION OF COUNSEL
ON COUNSEL'S LETTERHEAD
February 1997
Lessee: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
1220 Morello Avenue
Martinez,CA 94553
Lessor: PACIFIC BELL MOBILE SERVICES
4420 Rosewood Drive,Bldg 2,2nd Floor
Pleasanton,CA 94588
RE: MASTER LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT dated as of October 15, 1996, by and between
Pacific Bell Mobile Services ("Lessor")and COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA("Lessee")
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I have acted as counsel to the Lessee with respect to the LEASE AGREEMENT described above (the
"Lease")and various related matters, and in this capacity have reviewed a duplicate original or certified copy of the
Lease and the Exhibits attached thereto. Based upon the examination of these and such other documents as I deem
relevant, it is my opinion that:
1. Lessee is a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of California (the "State"),
duly organized,existing and operating under the constitution and laws of the State. The Lessee is organized under
and pursuant to the Government Code of the State of California(Sections et seq.).
2. Lessee is authorized and has the power under State law to enter into the Lease, and to carry out its
obligations thereunder and the transactions contemplated thereby.
3. The Lease has been duly authorized, approved, executed and delivered by and on behalf of Lessee,
and is a valid and binding contract of Lessee enforceable in accordance with its terms, except to the extent limited
by State and Federal laws affecting remedies and bankruptcy, reorganization or other laws of general application
relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors'rights.
4. The authorization,approval and execution of the Lease and all other proceedings of Lessee relating to
the transaction contemplated thereby have been performed in accordance with all open meeting, public bidding and
other laws, rules and regulations applicable to the Lessee.
5. The execution of the Lease and the appropriation of monies to pay the Lease Payments coming due
thereunder, do not result in the violation of any constitution, statutory or other limitation relating to the manner,
form or amount of indebtedness which may be incurred by Lessee.
1/28!97
6. There is no litigation, action, suit or proceeding pending or before any court, administrative agency,
arbitrator or governmental body,that challenges the organization or existence of Lessee;the authority of its officers,
the proper authorization, approval and/or execution of the Lease, the Exhibits and other documents contemplated
thereby; the appropriation of monies, or any other action taken by Lessee to provide monies sufficient, to make
Lease Payments under the Lease;the performance by Lessee of all its obligations under the Lease; the enforceability
and enforcement of the Lease against the Lessee; or the ability of Lessee otherwise to perform its obligations under
the Lease and the transactions contemplated thereby.
Very truly yours,
Attorney for COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
112&197
EXHIBIT F
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
LEASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF
February_ 1997
CERTIFICATE OF ESSENTIAL USE
The undersigned, as of COUNTY OF CONTRA
COSTA (the "Lessee"), hereby certifies that the Property described in Exhibit B to LEASE AGREEMENT dated
as of February _ 1997,with Pacific Bell Mobile Services (the "Lessor") is essential to the functions of the
Lessee or to the services the Lessee provides.
Further, the Lessee has an immediate need for, and expects to make immediate use of, all such
Property, the need for which is not temporary or expected to diminish in the foreseeable future. Such Property will
be used by the Lessee only for the purpose of performing one or more governmental or proprietary functions
consistent with the permissible scope of authority. Specifically, such Property was selected by the Lessee to be used
for the following governmental purposes:
I.
2.
3.
&.
This Exhibit relates to Exhibit B to the Lease.
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,
as Lessee
By:
Authorized Officer
Date: , 1997
1/28/97
EXHIBIT G
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
LEASE AGREEMENT
DATED AS OF
February i 1997
PROOF OF INSURANCE COVERAGE REOUIREMENTS
I. In accordance with Article VII of the LEASE AGREEMENT between the undersigned as Lessee and
Pacific Bell Mobiles Services as Lessor ("Lessor"), we have instructed the insurance agent named below (Please
fill in name,address and telephone number).
to issue:
(a)All Risk Physical Damage Insurance on the Property as defined in the Lease,evidenced by a Certificate
of Insurance and Long Form Loss Payable Clause naming Lessor and/or its assigns as an Additional Insured.
(b) Public Liability Insurance evidenced by a Certificate of Insurance naming Lessor and/or its assigns as
an Additional Insured.
Proof of insurance coverage will be provided to you prior to the time that the Property is delivered and
accepted. This pertains to Property set forth on Exhibit B to the Lease.
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
By:
Authorized Officer
Date: 1997
1/28/97
EXHIBIT H
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
LEASEAGREEMENT
DATED AS OF
February 1997
INCUMBENCY CERTIFICATE
(in lieu of Resolution)
1, do hereby certify that I am the duly elected or appointed and acting County of
the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,that I have custody of the records of such entity,and that,as of the date
hereof,the individual named below is the duly elected or appointed officer of such entity holding the office set forth
opposite his or her name. I further certify that(i)the signature set opposite his name and title is his or her true and
authentic signature and(ii)such officer has the authority on behalf of such entity to enter into that certain Master
Lease/Purchase Agreement dated as of February_ I997,between such entity and Pacific Sell Mobile Services.
("Lessor")and(iii)the authority is provided by a resolution of the Board of the Lessee or an internal policy of the
Lessee.
PRINTED NAME TITLE SIGNATURE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed this Certificate as of the fust day of February_ 1997..
Authorized Signature
1128197
+L Got sl ti3: .i j}i1JJ�1kIJOO N.d.�9Uh tlb(1Ufa$jj �ilii�
E%BIBIT i
TtttS SPACE FOR USE OF FILING OFRCER
FINANCING STATEMENT — FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS CAPEFVLLY
7Ni Ftiew:nS S1.to.r nt To s••e.TItH fbv 11Anp oureuint t,t)r Urifa"CprerrtoW Cod+
>rc.M.,a. tf,n. tor6 ,,,MM of 11W .
A. NAME A TEL F OF CONTACT AT FILEP(option,!) s.FLUNG OFFICE ACCT,I IopWnaQ
C.RETURN COPY TO: iNrtr Ind Me*"AlW,,,l
F 7
L J
D.Q"QNAL O"NATION Iff vao.bioL LESSORtESSEE I CtNlQCNOWCON61GNEf I NDN-OCC tiIJl1G
1. DEBTOR'S EXACT FULL LEGAL NAME•;».rt aMy ono dobtor no Ito ar Ibt
I..fyamv'i NAME
Oft I. NOIVIOVAL'9 LAST NAME FIRST NAME m'OOLF NAMC WFMX —�
Iv.MAIUNC ADORf66 CRY 9TAtC =CODE
1 C,,a,OR TAA LO, OFTIONA4 Il.,TYy%QFtKTlTY 1T,LnlOrb SIAI! lo,(W Y'i ORGANCATIONALI.C.1,R Y
ADO'NL INFO RE OR COUNTRY OF
ENTTIY DEBTOR Ommu:ATeJN NONE
2.. AOOTTIONAL DEBTOR'S EXACT FULL LEGAL NAME MF.A nMy or»d.bte,n+aM 12s or 2b)
1+.EMR'y'6 NAME
OR In,IHInvS)UK'S LAGT HAMS FRSs NAME MIDDLf HAMf CVffl%
2n.oWul`O AGOREef CrtY 6TATE COUNTRY Po67AL CDOE
]+ s.9 pR TAX i.O, OPTIONAL ].YYPEOF EMYTY Ir.ENTITY'S STATE 2a.E 111 Y'i UNGAUZAINNAL i Cl,R My
ADO'NL INFO MOR COVNTNY OF
ENTITY OE6TOR VROANIZATION N(WF
S. SECURED PARTY'S(OROtNAL SIR at ITS TOTAL AESIGNFfl EXACT FULL LEOAL NAME•Insert only one soiwmd P+rTy neuro 170 or Ob)
la.ENTITY'*NAME
OR 71.tNOtY10VAL'0 LAER NAME FIRES NAME NIpOU;NAME SUFFls
Sr.M UnG ADDRESS CF STATE COUNTRY POSTAL CODE
4. YN.AHANVI GVATfMENT ower.tM TalbMey t,o .w ns1n.1,r. 1,
6.CHECK TM FINANCING STATEMENT N"q by the GoRwW Pwty tr lcnb.e The bobne[T.Wan o o ly I o+ t ],Ir It,"1.pool"l+N+".1
fOl Lal M B4ittY MtYJT".it%i NKIRRY IMMgi In wnCyT Jyloft a wTo n bgl m NTb tME K",M W The OocuM'Itry DbFMnP".ry rtPnb
111[aallr+ble dWlp'[MfK1TIN WY CFIt+I,d TO M,ESALR IN:al M K<IX"2.Mntf IIats 1t.Rt.TaR peOvM'4U IFaaitlanY a,Y INY lM FYI/tdI ., IIX Nid TAS MT AtebN
B. awIAeD FIGNATVAEIiI 8. Tiw FINlVNCIINO 9TATEMFNT p{a..teq irw..ea.dl
M oser"d!e+nv REAL ESTATE AFCOROe
A[M,N AadeMUN til+[dlublal
a
MIBIT J
ram 8.038-G Information Return for Tax-Exempt Governmental Obligations-
(lieu.OuYoaier 1989) ►Under Section 149(e) dea6 No. l 545.0720
txoertma+t dr the Lreasv+r ►See separate imstructiona Fsp,ras g-3i-42 i.
internal ae tri ie service (Use Form 8038-GC if the issue price is unser S 100,000)
Reporting AuthorityCheck box itAmeno"Aetum ► t
1 issvef s name 2 lssuer's emaioyer idennticauon numt»r
3 Number ano street 4 Report numoer
G29
5 Cay ser town.state.and ZIP code 6 Date of issue
7 Name of Issue a CUSIP Numxr
T pe of Issue(check box(es)that applies and enter the Issue Price)
9 Check box if obligations are tax or other revenue anticipation bonds I-
to
to Check box if obligations are in the toren of a lease or installment sale 0-
11
11 ❑ Elducation .
12 Heann and hospital
13 _❑'� Transportation
14 l-J Public safety
15 7i Environment(including sewage bonds)
16 Li Housing
17 h"utilities
18 ❑'Daher.0escribe(see instructions)►
l
Descri tion of Obligations
14) ie) (e)
(e) ib) (<) S41edn Mm' n we.enhd nI Net,nte+ne
64tvr%,We Mit'"(rate ,sue W" r,re et mrtw, ive0 mamni YMd cyst
19 Final maturity %
20 Entire issue . years I % %
Uses of Original Proceeds of Bond Issues(including underwriters discount
2I Io4ireds used for accrued interest . . . . . . . . . . 21
22 issue price of entire issue(enter line 20c) 22
23 Proceeds used for bond issuance costs(including underwriters'd(scount) 23
24 Proceeds used for credit enhancement _ 24
25 Proceeds allocated to reasonably required reserve or replacement fund 125
26 Proceeds used to refund prior issues. 26
27 Total(add lines 23. 24.25.and 26) . .
27 t _
28 Nomerfunding proceeds of the issue(subtract line 27 from line 22 and enter amount here) _ 28
Mi DesCription of Refunded Bonds(complete this part only for refunding bonds)
29 Enter the remaining weighted average maturity of the bonds to be refunded ► years
30 En terthedast date.omwhichthe refunded bonds will be called ► 'i
31 Enter the tla2 s the refunded bonds were issued ►
Miscellaneous
32 Enter the amount of the state volume cap allocated to the issue ►
33 Enter the amount of the bonds designated by the issuer under section 265(b)(3X8X,Xill) (small
issuer exception) 11.
34 Pooled financings:
a Entef the amount of the proceeds of this issue that are to be used to make loans to other governmental units►
b Checkibox if this issue,s a loan made from the proceeds of another tax-exempt issue P. ❑ and enter the name of the
bsuer i► and the date of the issue ►
Jr,de,oeNR,aa Yf txrnvry.i-K,a,e lost i tyre l+aminld tole,Horn and aCComdanpnt st'Moies and stat.mems,and to fCf fent of my MOw,Ma!arvp pr',ti.
int:aro au<.<o,+rrt.ana coao•<te
Please
Sign
Here 5,4naiwe of off-re, Oat< �TYV<O,V,m nam<aM lit4
For Paper rk Reduction Act Notice,see page 1 of the Instructions. swm 8038•G (pe+
I TOTF1t, P.02
� s-
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: February 25, 1997
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. Recommended Action:
A. ACCEPT the following report on Proposition 218 and its impacts on the Special District services the
County Public Works Department provides to the citizens and communities in the County.
B. SEEK voter approval for the impacted park landscaping assessments in the County by approving on
March 4, 1997, one of the following:
Option No. 1:
AUTHORIZE a special tax election in the following communities to determine if the residents want
to continue current assessments for park landscaping and maintenance:
Landscape Zone No. Fund No.
a. Oakley LL-2 Zone 16 2842
b. Rodeo LL-2 Zone 38 2854
C. Clyde LL-2 Zone 37 2853
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: / L4ti 1
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON February 25, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED`OTHER
See the attached Addendum for Board action.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
_.,.x UNANIMOUS(ABSENT - - -_-__3
AYES: NOES: _
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
RMA:mw
g:1anpv<iboU 1 gbo-25.t2
Origlrulor.Public Works(ES) I hereby certify that this is a true
Cantacb Mitch Avalon(3t3-2371) and correct copy of an action taken
ce: County Clerk(Eleclion Division)
Publiowmks- S.Epperly,Special asuitts and entered on the minutes of the Board
Auditor/Controller of supervisors he date shown.
Assessor
coinly Counsel ATTESTED o2S/99
County Administrator
General Services /1 Batchelor,Glerk of the Board
of Supervisors an .ounty Administrator
AY __
Barbara S ra eputy Cterk
t
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -2-
I. Recommended Action (continued):
Option No. 2:
AUTHORIZE a mail-in ballot and public hearing in the following communities:
Landscape Zone No. Fund No.
a. Oakley LL-2 Zone 16 2842
b. Rodeo LL-2 Zone 38 2854
C. Clyde LL-2 Zone 37 2853
It. FinancialImnact:
The County currently collects the following annual assessments for park landscaping and maintenance in
Oakley, Clyde and Rodeo: $234,800 (Zone 16), $10,500 (Zone 37); and $81,600 (Zone 38). Under
Proposition 218, these assessments must be approved by the voters through a special tax election or a mail-in
ballot procedure. Without voter approval, the County will have to cease collecting the assessments, thus
reducing the revenue for the Special District services the County provides to its residents.
M. Reasons for Recommendations and Background:
1. BACKGROUND
Proposition 218 was approved by the electorate in November 1996. It is the latest in a series of
propositions passed by the electorate limiting government's ability to raise revenue through property
taxes. The first limitation was the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978. Proposition 13 reduced the
County's revenue from ad valorem property taxes. Since then, local governments have been funding
services for community lighting, landscaping and parks, primarily through special benefit assessments
levied under the Landscaping and Lighting District Act of 1972 (Streets & Highways Code Section
22500 and following). Proposition 218 further restricts local governments' ability to adopt or collect
certain assessments without obtaining voter approval. Aside from the exemptions discussed below,
all existing, new, or increased assessments must be approved by the voters, either through a special
tax election or a mail-in ballot procedure.
2. SERVICES PROVIDED
The County provides various unincorporated communities with the following services through Public
Works Special Districts which may be affected by Proposition 218:
a. Street lighting (CSA L-100)
b. Park landscaping and maintenance (LL-2, Zones 16, 37 and 38)
C. Street landscaping (LL-2, Zones 16, 37, and 38)
d. Street landscaping (LL-2, various zones)
e. Trail maintenance
f Water and sewer service (CSA M-25, M-26, M-27 and M-28; Sanitation Districts 5, 6, and
19)
3. EXEMPTIONS TO PROPOSITION 218
Section 5 of the Proposition 218 measure allows four exemptions to the provisions of the measure.
Three of them are applicable to some of the assessments collected to provide the services by Public
Works Special Districts described above. The three exemptions are the following:
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -3-
a. Assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation
expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector
control.
b. Assessments imposed pursuant to a petition signed before November 6, 1996, by the persons
owning all of the parcels subject to the assessments at the time the assessments were initially
imposed.
C. Assessments which previously received majority voter approval prior to November 6, 1996,
from the voters voting in an election on the issue of the assessments.
4. APPLICABILITY OF PROPOSITION 218
The following is a discussion of each of the services provided by Public Works Special Districts and
how Proposition 218 will impact the assessments, fees or charges collected to provide the service:
a. Street fighting- The League of California Cities and some local cities have determined that
assessments for street lighting are exempt from Proposition 218 under exemption a above.
Exemption a excludes maintenance and operation costs for streets and sidewalks. The
definition of"maintenance" in Streets & Highways Code Section 27 includes street lighting.
b. Park landscaping and maintenance - Park landscaping and maintenance are not exempt from
the measure. This type of assessment must comply with the measure.
C. Landscaping within the public road right of way (Community Landscaping Zones) - The
League of California Cities and some local cities have determined that assessments for
roadside landscaping are also exempt from the measure under exemption a. Exemption a
excludes maintenance and operation costs for streets and sidewalks. The definition of
"maintenance" in the Streets and Highways Code Section 27 also includes planting as a
component of the street within the right of way.
d. Landscaping within the public road right of way (Subdivision Landscaping Sub Zones) - This
portion of landscaping maintenance could also be considered exempt from the measure under
exemption a. In addition,this type of landscaping generally fronts along a subdivision and is
installed for the benefit of the subdivision. The process is for the developer to consent to the
assessments by vote or petition before the property is sold. This is, therefore, exempt under
exemption b.
e. Trail maintenance - Trail maintenance is not exempt from the measure. This type of
assessment must comply with measure.
f. Sewer and water service charges - The County collects sewer and water service charges
through the tax bills for County Sanitation Districts 5 (Port Costa), 6 (Martinez) and 19
(Discovery Bay)and County Service Areas M-25 (Knightsen), M-26, M-27, M-28 (all Bethel
Island). By far,the largest district is Sanitation District 19 in Discovery Bay, for which sewer
and water charges of$1,417,000 are collected annually. Staff is reviewing the procedures
required to comply with Proposition 218 and anticipates that the County's compliance will
be consistent with other local sewerage agencies (Central Sanitary and Delta Diablo).
Section V of this report outlines in more detail the exemption/or applicability status of each
landscaping district zone in the County.
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -4-
5. OPTIONS
Proposition 218 generally requires compliance by July 1, 1997. After reviewing which assessments
are exempt from the measure, it appears the only assessments subject to Proposition 218 are those
for park and trail landscaping and maintenance within Oakley(Zone 16), Clyde (Zone 37), and Rodeo
(Zone 38).
There are four possible courses of action for an assessment subject to Proposition 218.
♦ Conduct a special tax election to seek a two thirds approval for the assessment.
♦ Conduct a mail-in ballot to all landowners in the community and hold a public hearing to
determine if there is a majority approval based upon the ballots received.
♦ Continue collecting the assessment without compliance with Proposition 218 (do nothing)
♦ Eliminate the assessment.
A. Special Tax Election
In order to meet the July 1, 1997, deadline and to get the assessments on the tax bills for 1997-
1998, the special tax election must be held on June 3, 1997. The deadline for authorizing a special
election on the June ballot is March 7, 1997. The last regular scheduled Board meeting before the
deadline is March 4, 1997. The Board must approve the ballot measure and authorize the special
tax election. The electorate must approve the ballot measure by a 2/3 vote. If the measure is not
placed on the June 3, 1997 ballot, then the park and trail landscaping and maintenance assessments
could probably not be collected until it is put on a subsequent election and approved by the
electorate.
B. Mail-In Ballot
In order to comply with the mail-in ballot process by July 1, 1997, the ballots would have to be
mailed out to all parcels in the community by the first week in April, 1997. The Board of
Supervisors would have to approve the ballot mail-out by the end of March 1997. A public hearing
would be held before the Board of Supervisors at least 45 days after mailing the ballots out, which
would be the June 3, 1997 Board of Supervisors meeting. In addition to the mail-in ballot, a
detailed engineer's report on the Landscaping District assessments must be prepared. The report
must also determine the special benefit conferred upon the parcels that are being assessed and show
the proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in relationship to the total capital cost and
operation and maintenance expenses of the district, and show any costs determined to be of general
benefit.
It should be noted that County Counsel is concerned that, in the case of park and trail landscaping
and maintenance assessment, the methodology required to determine special benefit, to differentiate
between special benefit versus general benefit and to apportion benefit is not clearly defined in
Proposition 218. Thus, if this procedure is chosen and a timely legal challenge is filed against the
assessments, it is difficult to predict what the court may determine.
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -5-
C. Continue without Compliance
One option is to simply"do nothing" and continue to collect the assessments in violation of
Proposition 218. If the assessments are challenged through legal action we would probably
lose the lawsuit. If the assessment is not challenged, then the assessments would continue to
be collected. This option assumes a large risk and could undermine public trust.
D. Eliminate Assessments
One option, of course, is to eliminate the assessments and the services the assessments fund,
or reduce the services to match whatever revenue remains from other sources (such as
assessments which are exempt).
6. DECISIONS
There are two decisions to make:
1. Should the assessment for the landscaping be continued or eliminated? If there is a desire to
continue the assessment, then which of the following methods would the Board prefer in
seeking voter approval:
a. Special election with 2/3 vote, or
b. Mail-in ballot with majority support of the ballots received?
2. Should the assessment amount that goes to the electorate for approval remain at its current
level or should it include a cost of living adjustment, to cover future cost increases due to
inflation? If the assessment remains at the current level, then any future cost increases will
have to go back to the electorate for approval again at some future date.
Staff will be meeting with the communities before the Board meeting to discuss these issues and
will be able to provide any community comments to the Board at the February 25, 1997 Board
meeting.
7. HIGHLIGHTS AND CONSEQUENCES
The following is a list of the highlights or features of each of the two options. The list is prepared
from the perspective that the objective is to receive maximum input from the voters on the issue.
A. Option I: Special Tax Election
HIGHLIGHTS
♦ Vote by registered voters
♦ Votes weighted equally; one person, one vote
♦ Less staff hours/time/cost
♦ No special engineer's report
♦ Special election may be expensive depending on size of ballot
♦ Need %vote to pass
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -6-
♦ Less convenient for people to go to polls and to go on a specified day
♦ Voter turn-out may be low, which is often typical on special elections
B. Option II: Mail-in Ballot
HIGHLIGHTS
♦ Vote by property owners being assessed
♦ Vote weighted in proportion to assessment paid (e.g., if Smith pays twice the assessment
Jones does, then Smith's vote counts twice as much as Jones vote)
♦ Need majority support (not 2/3) of ballots returned to pass
♦ Easier for voters to vote, especially with prepaid postage on return ballot
♦ Quicker response on ballot counts due to ongoing nature of ballot counting
♦ Special engineer's report is required
♦ Cost and staff time to mail out ballots
♦ County Counsel is concerned about the lack of clarity in the methodology needed to prepare
the special engineer's report, however, at least one consultant has indicated an ability to
prepare the special engineer's report in compliance with Proposition 218.
C. Consequences of No Action
♦ General Plan Compliance-Without the ability to collect park maintenance assessments, park
maintenance will be reduced or eliminated. This would result in removing park equipment
or closing part or all of the park. If we have to scale back or close our parks, then we may
not be in compliance with our General Plan goals and policies.
♦ Measure C Compliance - Parks facilities is one of the six community infrastructure
requirements that we must maintain at a certain level of service to continue to receive our
$1,500,000 t return to source revenue each year. If parks have to be scaled back or closed,
then we may not be able to show compliance with Measure C.
IV. Consequences of Negative Action:
If the Board of Supervisors does not seek approval by the electorate for those assessments impacted by
Proposition 218, then the County may not be able to collect the assessments after July 1, 1997.
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -7-
V. Detailed Status by District
The following is a detailed status report on the exemption or applicability of each landscaping district zone
in the County. The report is arranged by supervisorial district. The status report also identifies for each
landscaping zone whether the provisions of Proposition 218 apply or it is exempt. Whether or not
Proposition 218 applies to the landscaping zone is so indicated with a number ranging from one to four.
Those numbers indicate which of the following four exemptions to Proposition 218 apply for each
landscaping zone.
1. The assessment was voted in by a majority of the voters in the community during an election.
2. The assessment was imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels
subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was imposed. This is the case for most
subdivision constructed landscaping improvements along the road fronting a subdivision.
3. Landscaping that is located within the public road right of way.
4. Maintenance revenue that is derived as part of the ad valorem property tax.
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -8-
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
PROPOSITION 218 REPORT
LANDSCAPE ZONES
Landscape Zone Scope of Work Exempt 1.996-97 Mat Amount
Revenue of Levy
Yes No Amount
LL-2 Zone I 1 Maintain road median island landscaping. 2 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 per multi
Unincorporated family parcel
San Pablo 1 Parcel
District 1
LL-2,Zone 21 Install,maintain and service road median 3 $30,560.43 $13.66 per single family
Kensington Area landscaping. parcel
District 1 8 Parcels $6.84 per multi family,
mobile home unit&
vacant parcels
LL-2,Zone 19 Maintain,service and operate all landscaping, 2 $26,000.00 $341.86 per single family
Martinez Area irrigation and related improvements. parcel
District 2 64 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 38 Develop,maintain and provide services at X $81,639.84 $32.04 per single family
Rodeo Area recreational facilities and public trails. parcel
District 2 2,466
Parcels
LL-2,Zone 64 Maintain and service landscape improvements. 2 $9,300.00
Pinole Area
District 2 31 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 17 Maintain and service landscaping and sprinkler 2 $42,900.00 $100 per parcel
San Ramon Area system and road median islands.
District 3 429 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 27 Maintain and service irrigation,landscaping and 2 $73,350.00 $150 per single family
San Ramon Area miscellaneous facilities. residential parcel
District 3 489 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 36 Provides street litter pick-up,sidewalk and 2 $50,427.32 $9.36 per single family
Alamo Area jogging path clean-up,tree care programs, residential parcel
District 3 maintenance of road median islands;provides 5,585
for future park and recreation facilities,their Parcels $4.68 per multi-family
operation,maintenance and future needs; residential parcel;mobile
provides periodic street sweeping. home unit parcel
LL-2,Zone 45 Maintain the landscaping and irrigation within 2 $1,200.00 $120.00 per parcel
Alamo Area the road way.
District 3 10 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 48 Maintain the landscaping and irrigation within 2 $21,070.00 Min. $490.00 per parcel
Danville Area the road way.
District 3 37 Parcels Max. $3,430 per parcel
LL-2,Zone 54 Maintain and service the landscaping and 2 $21,150.00 Max. $225 per parcel
Alamo Area irrigation within the road way.
District 3 18 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 7 Maintain and service lighting and landscaping on 3 $70,017.04 $16.12 per residential
Pleasant Hill BART road medians as a part of the Redevelopment parcel
District 4 Project. 196 Parcels Commercial parcels
based on potential floor
area ratios.
LL-2,Zone 18 Maintain and service road landscape,sprinkler 2 $3,870.68 $175.94 per parcel
Pacheco Area system and related improvements.
District 4 1 22 Parcels
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -9-
LANDSCAPE ZONES
Landscape Zone Scope of Work Ezempt 19%-97 Max Amount
Revenue of Levy
Yes No Amount
LL-2,Zone 37 Provides for park recreation improvements. X $10,500.00 $41.76 per single family
Clyde Area parcel
District 4 273 Parcels
$20.88 per multi-
farmly/senior citizen
parcel
LL-2,Zone 1,2,4 Maintain and service grounds,irrigation and 2,3 $61,118.40 $76.16 per single family
Bay Point Area road landscape improvements. parcel
District 5 681 Parcels $9,329.60 multi-family
parcel
LL-2,Zone 3 Maintain a.32-acre tot lot,including all 2 $14,046.24 $180.08 per parcel
Bay Point Area landscaping,irrigation,ground cover and related
District 5 improvements. 78 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 8 Maintain and service the landscaping along 2 $69,258.42 $57.86 per parcel
Oakley Area public road ways.
District 5 1.197
parcels
LL-2,Zone 9 Provides for acquisition and maintenance of road X $222,789.4 $36.72 per single family,
Unincorporated Bay landscape improvements and funding for 3 commercial,industrial,
Point Ambrose Park and Recreation District recreational,institutional
District 5 5,404 parcel.
Parcels
$18.36 per multi-family,
mobile home unit,vacant
single family parcel.
$18.36 Min.
$55.08 Max.
LL-2,Zone 10 Maintain and service the irrigation system, 2 $19,286.22 $151.86 per parcel
Bay Point Area landscaping and ground cover,a paved walking
District 5 trail and related improvements. 127 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 13 Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation. 2 $26,445.72 $198.84 per parcel
Oakley Area
District 5 133 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 14 Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation. 2 $4,534.20 $100.76 per parcel
Oakley Area
District 5 45 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 16 Provides for acquisition and maintenance of X $234,756.9 $31.88 per single family,
Oakley Area parks and road landscape. 6 commercial,industrial,
District 5 recreational,institutional
7,586 and mise.parcels.
Parcels
$15.94 per multi-family,
mobile home,vacant non-
single family residential
parcels.
$15.94 Min.
$47.82 Max.
Per vacant non-single
family residence
LL-2,Zone 20 Maintain and service landscaping and sprinkler 2 $10,041.12 $1,193.16 per acre
Oakley Area system and maintain road median islands.
District 5 8 parcels
LL-2,Zane 22 Maintain,service and operate landscaping and 2 $39,730.00 $290.00 per parcel
Bay Point Area irrigation in road ways.
District 5 1 137 parcels
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -10-
LANDSCAPE ZONES
Landscape Zone Scope of Work Exempt 1996-97 Max Amount
Revenue of Levy
Yes No Amount
LL-2,Zone 23 Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation 2 $28,500.00 $190 per parcel
Oakley Area system in road ways.
District 5 150 parcels
LL-2,Zone 24 Maintain and service road landscaping. 2 $7,668.00 $I27.80 per parcel
Oakley Area
District 5 60 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 26 Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation. 2 $9,805.00 $185 per parcel
Oakley Area
District 5 53 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 28 Maintain landscaping and irrigation and 2 $7,628.00 $152.56 per parcel
Oakley Area operation of a tot lot consisting of playground
District 5 structure,benches,tables,turf and irrigation
improvements. 50 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 32 Maintain landscaping and irrigation system. 2 $18,360.00 $40.00 per parcel
Oakley Area
District 5 459 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 33 Maintain landscaping and irrigation of a 2 $2,625.00 $125.00 per parcel
Oakley Area parkway strip.
District 5 21 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 39 Maintain,service and operate all landscaping, 2 $5,423.36 $169.48 per parcel
Oakley Area irrigation and miscellaneous facilities within the
District 5 road way. 32 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 40 Maintain,service and operate all landscaping 2 $3,502.08 $27.36 per single family
Oakley Area and irrigation within the road way. parcel
District 5 128 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 42 Maintain landscaping and irrigation system at 2 $29,900.00 $100.00 per parcel
Bay Point Area and within the road way.
District 5 299 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 44 Install and maintain irrigation and road way 2 $12,000.00 $125.00 per parcel
Oakley Area landscaping improvements.
District 5 96 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 46 Maintain road way landscaping and irrigation 2 $20,280.60 $177.90 per parcel
Oakley Area within the public right of way.
District 5 68 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 49 Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation 2 $84,870.00 $138.00 per parcel
Oakley Area system within the road way.
District 5 615 Parcels
LL-2,Zone 57 Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation 2 0 $00 at present
Discovery Bay Area within the road way.
District 5 (379 $231.00 Max.Per parcel
parcels @
buildout)
LL-2,Zone 58 Maintain and service landscaping and irrigation 2 $8,910.00 $110.00 per parcel
Oakley Area within the road way.
District 5 81 parcels
LL-2,Zone 60 Maintain and service landscape,irrigation,and 2 $31,958.55 $273.15 per parcel
Oakley Area road median improvements within the public
District 5 right of way. 117 parcels
(136
parcels @
buildout)
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -11-
LANDSCAPE ZONES
Landscape Zone Scope of Work Exempt 1996-97 Max Amount
Revenue of Levy
Yes No Amount
LL-2 Zone 62 Maintain and service landscape improvements in 2 $9,180.00 $180.00 per parcel
Oakley Area the road tight of way.
District 5 51 parcels
(91 parcels
@buildout)
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -12-
COUNTY SERVICE AREAS
Name of County Scope of Work Yes No 1996-97 Max Amount
Service Area Revenue of Levy
Amount
County Service Area Street light services,local park,recreation, 4 $272,859.10 Ad Valorem
M-8 parkway facilities and services,and street
Discovery Bay Area sweeping.
District 5
County Service Area Street lighting facilities and services and 4 $11,013.31 Ad Valorem
M-16 recreation and park services.
Clyde Area
District 4
County Service Area Park and recreation services,street sweeping, 4 $77,303.43 Ad Valorem
M-17 parkway facilities,service and maintenance.
MonTaraBay
District 4
County Service Area Street light services,street sweeping and parkway 4 $5,358.70 Ad Valorem
M-20 maintenance.
Rodeo Area
District 2
County Service Area Extended police protection services. 4 $22,000.00 Ad Valorem
P-1 Recreation and park services added 12/1!76.
Crockett Area
District 2
County Service Area Repair habitat and provide access to creeks. 4 $329,875.20 Ad Valorem
R-7A Purchase park land and improvements;Plant trees
Alamo Area along Danville Boulevard;Joint funding of school
District 3 projects.
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -13-
COUNTYWIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT'
Countywide Scope of Work Yes No 1996-97 Max Amount
Lighting District Revenue of Levy
Amount
County Service Provide over 7,000 street lights during 3 $612,611.3 $14.94 Annually
Area hours of darkness and maintenance of 6 Total per single family
L-100 these facilities benefiting all property Revenue parcel
owners within CSA
Districts 1,2,3,4 & L-100. Services primarily $14.94
5 unincorporated Contra Costa County. Annually
per single
family
parcel
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -14-
WATER DISTRICTS
Name of Scope of Work 1996-97 Max Amount
Water District Revenue of Levy
Amount
County Service Area Provide river ferry service to Delta island $17,000.00 Ad Valorem
M-1 locations.
Delta Ferry
Jersey Island Area
District 5
County Service Area Operation of a community water system. $4,320.00 $30.00/Monthly
M-25 Total per single family
Knightson Area Revenue parcel
District 5
$30.00/
Monthly per
single family
parcel
County Service Area To provide water service. $11,270.00 $490.00 Annually
M-26 Total per single family
Beacon West Water Revenue parcel
District
Bethel Island $490.00
District 5 Annually per
single family
parcel
County Service Area To provide water service. $12,000.00 $120.00 Annually
M-27 Willow Park Total per single family
Water District Revenue parcel
Bethel Island Area
District 5 $120.00
Annually per
single family
parcel
County Service Area To provide water service. $71,300.00 $71,300.00
M-28 Total (This is one parcel)
Mobile Home Park Revenue
Water District
Bethel Island Area
District 5
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -15-
SANITATION DISTRICTS
Name of Scope of Work 1996-97 Max Amount
Sanitaiton District Revenue of Levy
Amount
Sanitation District#5 To provide district a sewage system for the $55,368.50 $377.94 Annually per
Port Costa collection,treatment and disposal of sewage, Total single family parcel
District 2 benefiting all property owners in district. Revenue
$377.94
Annually per
single family
parcel
Sanitaiton District#6 To provide district a sewage system for the $35,282.90 $750.00 Annually per
Stonehurst,Martinez collection,treatment and disposal of sewage, Total single family parcel
Area benifiting all property owners in district. Revenue
District 2
$750.70
Annually per
single family
parcel
Sanitaiton District#19 To provide district a sewage system for the 51,417,200.00 $400.00 Annually per
Discovery Bay collection,treatment and disposal of sewage, Total Revenue single family parcel
District 5 benefiting all property owners in district.
$400.00
Annually per
single family
parcel
SUBJECT: Report on Proposition 218 and authorization to seek voter approval for park landscaping assessments
in the communities of Oakley, Rodeo, and Clyde
DATE: February 25, 1997
PAGE -16-
GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICTS
Name of Scope of Work Yes No 1996-97 Max Amount
Abatement Revenue of Levy
Districts Amount
Blackhawk GHAD Prevention,mitigation,abatement or control of 4 $967,000.00 Ad Valorem
Blackhawk Area land management. (via M-23
District 3 formed
6/23/77)
Canyon Lakes GHAD To pay for regular maintenance of drainage 2 $330,000.00 Single Family
San Ramon Area sytems,routine reconnaisance and timely repairs $101.22
District 3 of any slope failures. Townhouse$67.80
Condo/Rental$50.62
Commercial 0.05 per
sq/ft
Tradewinds GHAD Look for signs of slop failure accelerated erosion 2 $8.75 per year
Bay Point Area or drainage blockages to control or mitigate per Single Family
District 5 landslides and erosion. Unit
ADDENDUM TO ITEM D.5
Agenda February 25, 1997
On this date the Board of Supervisors considered the recommendations
presented by Michael Walford, Public Works Director, regarding Proposition
218, which pertains to voter approval for park landscaping assessments in the
communities of Oakley, Rodeo and Clyde. Mr. Walford requested that the
community of Bay Point be included in the Board's consideration of this matter.
The Board discussed issues including the cost of the elections and an
engineer's report.
The following person presented testimony:
John Wolfe, Contra Costa Taxpayers Association, 820 Main Street,
Martinez.
All persons desiring to speak having been heard, and after further
discussion, the Board took the following action:
1. Approved by unanimous vote, to include Bay Point with the Public
Works Director's report on Proposition 218, seeking authorization of voter
approval for landscaping assessments in the communities of Clyde, Rodeo and
Oakley, since the issue of Bay Point was brought to the Board as an exception
to the Better Government Ordinance after the agenda was posted;
2. APPROVED by unanimous vote, a mail-in ballot election and public
hearing for park landscaping assessments for the Bay Point, Oakley and Clyde
areas; APPROVED a special tax election for park landscaping assessment for
the Rodeo area; and DIRECTED County Counsel to prepare the appropriate
documents for the Board's consideration on the March 4, 1997 Board agenda.
0 /0
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: FRANK LEW
DIRECTOR OF BUILDING INSPECTION
DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 1997
SUBJECT: CONTINUE ABATEMENT PROCEEDINGS GRANTED PER BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS RESOLUTION # 96/223 & 095-053-021
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND
JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Direct the Building Inspection Department to continue the
abatement process granted by Board of Supervisors
Resolution # 96/223 that allows the removal of illegal
mobilehomes, structures and business practices on
property commonly known as Love-A-Child Ministries.
FISCAL IMPACT
Use of funds allocated through Land Mitigation fees to
remove all illegal mobilehomes, structures and business
practices and to reimburse administration expenses to
Public Works and Building Inspection.
BACKGROUND REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
Compliance has not been met by property owners who are
charged with the responsibility of legalizing
mobilehomes, structures and business practices at the
site known as Love-A-Child Ministries.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _YES SIGNATURE
40��I `'w
/
r
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
The Board APPROVED the recommendation as set forth above ;
and WITHDREW the loan offer of $25 , 000 .
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON Februarys APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_g OTHERX
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT -- TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Mickie Perez (335-1144) ATTESTED February 25, 1997
cc: Building Inspection (BID) Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the
GMEDA Board Of Supervisors and County
County Counsel Administrator
County Administrator - Attn. John Gregory
BY t a ,Deputy
�qOW........ ._..'p�'
CQNTRA CORECEIVED
STA,col'', Y
i Contra
OCT 2 81996 _ 'f� .
.� Costa
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 6UIi Count
.;ePi11Tt E tlT c+o.,, 'cT
FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon
Director of Community Development �Q ► f � �e 1► { �f G .
DATE: September 24 , 1996
SUBJECT: Land Use Permit/Development Plan Fee Waiver/Deferment)Request of
Love-A-Child Ministries in Bay Point
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS (S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1 . ACCEPT the report on the decision of the Director of Community
Development to deny the request of Love-A-Child Ministries for
waiver/deferment of application fees .
FISCAL IMPACT
The Community Development Department is fee supported. If fee waiver
or deferment were granted, the Community Development staff time spent
on this application would have to be funded through some other source.
Staff has been unable to identify such an alternative funding source.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The property owners of 2301 and 2279 Willow Pass Road (APN: 095-083-022
& 095-083-021) in Bay Point, Edward and Mary Knott, have allowed the
Executive Director of Love-A-Child Ministries, Jerome Knott, to operate
a homeless recovery program on the property. The Building Inspection
Department has sent several notices to Edward and Mary Knott regarding
compliance/abatement since the use was established without obtaining
any permits from the County. Community Development and Building
Inspection Department staff have met with Mr. Jerome Knott and informed
him about the permit process and application fees .
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: x_ YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ Tr OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE (S)
ACTION OF BOARD ON September 24, 1996 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER -X
REFERRED to the Community Development Director, the Public Works Director and the Social Services Direct the issue
of the Love-A-Child Ministries for waiver/deferment of application fees, for review and report on a process to bring
the project into compliance.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
x UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ----------- ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Aruna Bhat
335-1219
ATTESTED September 24,1996
Orig. Dept. Community Development PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
cc: Building Inspection Department THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Redevelopment Agency AND COUN ADMINI TO
Edward and Mary Knott
To date, application has not been submitted to the Community
Development Department to permit the use. In Board Resolution
96/223, dated May 21, 1996, the Board ordered abatement of the
manufactured homes and debris, declared it a public nuisance and
ordered removal within 30 days . Subsequently, Mr. Knott requested
a waiver or deferment of all planning and development fees for the
project . The Board referred the request to the Community
Development Director to investigate the possibility of a waiver or
deferment of the fees .
The Community Development Department is fee supported and generally
no reduction in fee or deferment is granted to project proponents .
When an application is filed for a land use permit/development
plan, a substantial amount of time is spent not only by the
Community Development Department but also Public Works Department.
The amount of time reviewing the application, preparing
environmental documents and staff report/recommendations is charged
against the application fee submitted by the applicant. If Love-A-
Child Ministries were granted a waiver or deferment of fees, the
time spent processing the application by the County would have to
be financed by an unidentified funding source.
Staff has investigated potential funding sources without success.
Since no alternative funding source has been identified and the
Community Development Department is fee supported, it is critical
that the project proponent pay the application processing fee of a
total of $11, 835. Therefore, the Director of Community Development
has denied the request of Jerome Knott for a waiver of these fees
as of September 12, 1996. Mr. Knott has been so advised by
telephone message left with Love-A-Child Ministeries, and sent a
copy of this proposed Board Order.
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , Contra
FROM: Finance Committee "' `' Costa
November 19, 1996 County
DATE: n�ta�w'v'���
SUBJECT: LOVE-A-CHILD MINISTRIES CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUES
SPECIFIC REGUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION($)6 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. ACCEPT the attached report from the Building Inspection Department describing
the code enforcement issues with the ministries and efforts to resolve those issues.
2. POSTPONE the abatement of properties located on the site of Love-a-Child
Ministries in Bay Point, contingent on payment of fees as described in
recommendation three.
3. REQUIRE appropriate officials from Love-a-Child Ministries to apply for required
permits and to pay permit fees at an amount of $1,000 per month to the Building
Inspection Department beginning December 1, 1996, with payments to continue
until all required fees are paid.
4. AUTHORIZE a loan of approximately $25,000 from Keller Mitigation Funds to be
paid to the Building Inspection Department for fees owed by the Ministries, and
require the Department to pay back the loan as payments are received from the
Ministries.
5. REQUEST County Counsel to prepare a deed of trust for the mobile homes to act
as colateral for the loan of funds.
6. REMIND Love-a-Child Ministries that the application does not guarantee local
community support for the use permit nor does it guarantee use permit approval.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: ___YES SIGNATURE: 2c,"` . 4^' ✓
—RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR —RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE ._,--
-APPROVE _OTHER
SMN4TURE(s): Mark DeSaulnier Tom Torlakson
ACTION OF BOARD ON November 19 1996 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X_ OTHER X
Jerome Knott, Love-A-Child Ministries, 2301 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point, and
Jack Kiner, Love-A-Child Ministries, 2279 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point, commented on the issues
presented.
All speakers desiring tc speak having been heard,
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Recommendation Nos. 1,2,3,4 and 6 are APPROVED;
Recommendation No. 5 is AMENDED by replacing the words "mobile homes" with the words "real
property" for the loan collateral; ADDED a Recommendation No. 7 DIRECTING Love-A-Child
Ministries to submit a short-tnrm .And Lona-term plan for future fiscal planning; and ADDED a
Recommendation No. 8 DIRECTING staff to verify that the collateral provided by Love-A-Child
Ministries is a real and unincumbered asset prior to the loan being issued.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
_X.UNANIMOUS(ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ASSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED November 19 1996
Contact: PHIL BATCHELOR.CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
CC: frank Lew SUPERVISORS ANCVPOUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
vol Alexeeff
John Gregory
Love-a-Child Ministries BY
Bay Point MAr
Page 2
BACKGROUND:
The Committee reviewed this item at the October 29 meeting. Testimony was taken from
two representatives from the Ministries, a representative from the Bay Point Municipal
Advisory Committee and several county staff involved with code enforcement efforts. The
Director of the Growth Management and Economic Development Agency presented the
attached report describing the issues.
The Committee recommended that the Building Inspection Department postpone
abatement procedures one month and allow the Ministries to apply for the various permits
listed in the attached staff report. The Ministries would be required to pay the permit fees
at a level of$1,000 per month beginning December 1, 1996 and if not paid by December
10, 1996, would be considered delinquent. The Committee recommended that Keller
Canyon mitigation funds be paid to the Building Inspection Department for fees owed by
the Ministries, with the monies to be paid back to the Keller Fund as payments are received
from the Ministries. The Committee recommended that staff consider some sort of security
arrangement from the Ministries for payment to the Keller Loan.
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Administration Building
651 Pine Street, 11th Floor
Martinez, CA 94553
DATE: October 23, 1996
TO: Supervisor Mark Desaulnier
Supervisor Tom Torlakson
FROM: / AlexeeB, Director of GMEDA
, tn T. Gregory, Deputy County Administrator
SUBJECT: FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON LOVE-A-CHILD MINISTRIES
This item was referred to the Finance Committee at the Board of Supervisors meeting on October 8, 1996.
It has been established by legal precedent that if a land use can be judged to be philanthropic or beneficial
to a community, it still must follow legal requirements and principles. The cause does not elevate a use above
the law or legal requirements.
In the end,the entire use must have a use permit (rather than individual permits for individual items) and the
conditions of this use permit must be fulfilled.
The code enforcement for this operation was difficult due to lack of cooperation. Significant time was
expended by code enforcement staff. The matter had to be brought to abatement before the applicant could
be induced to cooperate. Therefore, the penalty attached to the permit is fully justified based on costs
incurred.
Since GMEDA departments do not receive general funds and are pay-as-you-go, staff work that does not
receive compensation places the department into financial jeopardy. This is the case for this application.
Fees cannot be waived unless the requirements for work can be waived.
The following is a breakdown of the estimated fees to legalize Love-A-Child Ministries homeless recovery
program facility in Bay Point:
TYPE OF PERW FEE
Development Plan/Land Use Permit $11,835
Public Warks Traffic Mitigation $ 4,1$3
Sanitation District $ 2,671
Building Permit fd nvo story building) $ 6,285
Fire District $ 498
School District $ 431
TOTAL $25,903
There are two possible funding sources that can be approached for payment of fees:
1. Keller Mitigation Funds, since the location is in Bay Point.
2. Bay Point Redevelopment, which is empowered to pay fees.
A letter of request will need to be written to Jim Kennedy, Redevelopment Director, explaining the project,
benefit to the community and any local, state, federal funding it receives.
Keller Canyon requests can be turned into the Finance Committee with information similar to the
Redevelopment Agency, the request should be turned in as soon as possible since the lack of a received
application by December 1, 1996 will force resumption of abatement.
The pending abatement procedure will continue immediately on or after December 1, 1996, should no
application be made.
All illegal occupancy of mobile homes should cease and desist, effective immediately, i.e. illegal and
unauthorized utility hookups disconnected. As a result of this application, mobile homes located on the
subject property should be removed if they are not pari of the intended future facility. This needs to be
determined as a result of today's discussion.
Inability of program to fund fees does excuse need to comply. The payment of all fees does not
guarantee application approval and may stili result in abatement.
Funding cycles should not be an excuse for delay. The deadline for appropriate permit applications
should be held firm, since this project has received numerous complaints, and has a longstanding period
of noncompliance.
JTG:ogb
bvacW.m=
cc: Claude Van Marter,Assistant County Administrator
Frank Lew, Building Inspection Director
Eileen Doten, Manager, Applications and Permit Center
Micki Perez, Chief, Property Conservation
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
Building Inspection Department
651 Pine Street, 4th floor
Martinez CA 94553
RETURN TO:
Building Inspection Department
651 Pine Street 4th floor
Martinez CA 94553
FOR BENEFIT OF COUNTY
D.14
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on May 21. 19% by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Smith, De Saulnier, Torlakson and Bishop
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Rogers
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Abatement of Manufactured Homes RESOLUTION 96/�
and debris at: 2301 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point } Contra Costa County Code
Div. 712; Sec. 712-4.006
}
OWNER: Edward & Mary Knott
APN: 095-083-022
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Resolves That:
Evidence presented by the County Building Inspector has shown that the moble homes at the above referenced site have
been installed without permits and constitute a nuisance and are hereby declared a public nuisance.
The registered or legal owner/s of the moble homes and/or land are hereby ordered to remove the units within 30 days and
clear the site of all debris.
If compliance with this"Resolution' has not been obtained within the prescribed 30 days the Board grants authority to the
Budding Inspection Department to contract for the abatement and bill the registered/legal owners for all cost. If costs are
not paid within 15 days of notice, a lien acrd/or tax assessment on said property will be filed.
The Building Inspection Department is directed to post and mal notices of this resolution as required by the laws of the State
of California.
Orig. Dept.: Budding Inspection
cc: Building Inspection (8) 1hereby certify that this yatn,eandcorrWotypybf
an aCtidn taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Su ors on the dat s'i n.
ATTESTED: :
PHILBATdHE R,Clerk of iha Board
RESOLUTION 96f Supervis a Cou dmini5trat0f
By o
Deputy
2301 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point CA
APN: 095-083-022
Owner: Edward & Mary Knott
RE: History of Abatement Action - RF940683
5 Non-Permitted Manufactured Homes and Zoning Violations
Jan 10, 1994 - Complaint from Sheriff's Department regarding
mobilehomes hooked up without permits
Jan 24, 1994 - Initial letter out to owner informing them of
violation
Feb 25, 1994 - Follow up inspection*
Mar 25, 1994 - Follow up inspection
Apr 21, 1994 - Follow up inspection
May 11, 1994 - Follow up inspection
Jun 08, 1994 - Follow up inspection
Jul 06, 1994 - Follow up inspection
Aug 09, 1994 - Request 10 day letter from County Counsel
Aug 31, 1994 - Follow up inspection
Jan 12, 1995 - Pictures taken
Feb 13, 1995 - Letter requesting Land Use Permit Application
Mar 02, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Mar 08, 1995 - Pictures taken
Mar 22, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Apr 11, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Apr 17, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Apr 28, 1995 - Follow up inspection
May 04, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Jun 05, 1995 - Follow up inspection
,Jun 09, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Jun 13, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Jun 22, 1995 - Fallow up inspection
Jul 05, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Jul 10, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Jul 13, 1995 - Pictures taken
Jul 31, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Aug 21, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Sep 26, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Oct 26, 1995 - Get Board of Supervisors Hearing date
Nov 02, 1995 - Fallow up inspection
Nov 15, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Dec 21, 1995 - Follow up inspection
Jan 23, 1996 - Follow up inspection
Feb 22 , 1996 - Follow up inspection
Mar 28, 1996 - Follow up inspection
Apr 15, 1996 - Posted Notice to Abate
Apr 24, 1996 - County Counsel letter sent
May 06, 1996 - Cite hearing requested
May 21, 1996 - Obtained Resolution 96/223 for abatement of
manufactured homes and debris
May 28, 1996 - Submit Resolution 96/223 to Clerk of the Board
May 30, 1996 - Meeting with Mickie Perez, Marc Omernik and Jerome
Knott who agrees to staff proposed schedule for
compliance (see letter of June 3, 1996)
Jun 06, 1996 - Posted Resolution 96/223 and Notice to vacate
Jun 10, 1996 - Owner procures permit #208995 for electrical
disconnect work
Jun 18, 1996 - Units occupied
Jun 24, 1996 - 4 single wide units are electrically disconnected
and vacant. Jerome to proceed with demolition
Jul 01, 1996 - Partial demolition of 2 units
Jul 08, 1996 - Follow-up inspection shows slow progress
Note: Jerome Knott has requested hearing
regarding zoning application fees
(waiver) for approval of remaining double
wide unit
Aug 12, 1996 - Demolition on 3rd trailer, double wide and single
wide remain
Aug 19, 1996 - Bids for remaining demolition requested
Sep 09, 1996 - Award Bid
Sep 24, 1996 - Recommendation to the Board of Supervisors from
Community Development to deny waiver of fees sent
back to Community Development, Public Works and
Social Services for review and report on a process
to bring the project into compliance
Oct 02, 1996 - Single wide and double wide trailer still on
property. Some debris left from single wide at
rear of property
Oct 08, 1996 - Board of Supervisors sent fee issue to Finance
Committee for further review
Oct 29, 1996 - Finance Committee meeting attended by Mickie Perez.
Abatement to proceed December 1, 1996 if
application for Land Use is not submitted to
Community Development. Immediate vacation and
utility disconnect required for remaining 2
trailers
Dec 17, 1996 - Letter regarding loan documents hand delivered to
owner and site
Jan 09, 1997 - Owners did not show for meeting scheduled to sign
loan documents
Feb 03, 1997 - Letter regarding the continuation of the abatement
process hand delivered to owner and site
Feb 05, 1997 - Board recommendation prepared for February 18,
Board of Supervisor Hearing
*Follow-up inspections include a wide range of activity to include
progress monitoring, communications with owner of property,
tenants, neighbors, and other County agencies in order to gain
compliance.
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS z 0•7 Contra
FROM: William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director :' �.�' t < Costa
DATE: February 11, 1997 County•'�� �,,��r
SUBJECT: Community Substance Abuse Services--System of Care Initiative
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)8 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Accept the Community Substance Abuse Services--System of Care Initiative plan, as
attached.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Implementation of the System of Care Initiative will result in no increase in county costs.
The initiative will lead to improved quality and quantity of alcohol and drug services.
REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND
The rapidly changing health care environment requires that the delivery system for
substance abuse services become more cost competitive. The attached System of Care
Initiative is a framework for improving the services and reducing the costs of substance
abuse services.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X_YES SIGNATURE: 0A,
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(SI:
ACTION OF BOARD ON February 25, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _ OTHER X
The following persons addressed the Board of Supervisors regarding the issues: Susan Cinelli, Non-Profit
Alcohol and Drug Coalition and Albiene Becnel , Ujima Family Recovery Services.
Following discussion of Board members, the Board took the following action:
1. APPROVED the Community Substance Services-System of Care Initiative Plan with the question of the
RFP process to be decided by the Board of Supervisors at a later date; and
2. REQUESTED the County Administrator and the Health Services Director to report to the Board of Supervisors
in January 1998 on the RFP issue.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT --------' AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Chuck Deutschman 313-6368
Da County Administrator ATTESTED February 25 1997
Health Services Director PHIL BATCHELOPVCLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SU VIS D COUNTY ADMI RA R
U382 (10/88) BY
Community Substance Abuse Services
System of Care Initiative
Chuck Deutschman
Community Substance Abuse Services Division
Health Services Department
Contra Costa County
January 1997
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The rapidly changing health care environment creates both challenges and opportunities
for the substance abuse field. The challenge to communities and local government is to
respond to the skyrocketing increases in the use and abuse of alcohol and other drugs
with limited resources. Public opinion polls consistently demonstrate that the public
has a very keen interest in reducing the demand for alcohol, tobacco and other drugs.
Nowhere is the public's interest greater than when our youth and young adults are
exposed to the pernicious effects of drugs. The index of suffering caused by licit and
illicit drugs is obvious to all. Violence, homelessness, AIDS, child neglect, drug-
related mental illness, incarceration, hospitalization, unemployment, hopelessness and
despair are just some of the hallmarks of the use and abuse of drugs. Out of these
tragic circumstances evolves the opportunity for communities and the substance abuse
field to improve on the treatment, intervention and prevention of all forms of substance
abuse.
Within this context, the Community Substance Abuse Services (CSAS) Division of the
Contra Costa Health System is beginning an important and ambitious initiative to meet
both the challenges and opportunities of the changing health care environment.
Changing the ecology of health in our neighborhoods and communities is a process--not
an event. The process being implemented by CSAS is entitled the SYSTEM OF CARE
INITIATIVE.
-2-
The mission of the Community Substance Abuse Services Division is "To advocate for
alcohol and drug free communities through the promotion of individual and family
responsibility, hope and self-sufficiency. We put people first." The SYSTEM OF
CARE INITIATIVE is the blueprint for achieving the principles outlined in our mission
statement.
The SYMM OF CARE INITIATIVE'S GOALS are as follows:
1. Create an infrastructure of accountability.
2. Optimize the allocation of limited resources.
3. Identify and document measurable outcomes.
4. Establish consistent reimbursement rates.
S. Identify unmet needs.
6. Develop and integrate standard of care guidelines in order to
improve the quality, appropriateness and uniformity of care.
7. Develop and expand the integration of services.
8. Create an open and competitive contracting system through the
use of a request for proposals (RFP) process.
The SYSTEM OF CARE INITIATIVE is a collaborative effort between county and
contract providers within the CSAS service delivery system. All CSAS providers
understand that we operate in a rapidly changing health care environment and that we
must improve and refine both the quality and quantity of the services we provide.
-3-
Nothing represents this change more than the scheduled RFP process. For the first
time in Contra Costa County, the substance abuse services system will be open to the
competitive process with clients and the public being the beneficiaries of this process.
While there will inevitably be substantive changes that evolve from the RFP process, it
is important to note that Contra Costa County has many exemplary service providers.
The SYSTEM OF CARE INITIATIVE is the first step in further improving the
existing system and preparing alcohol and drug services for the 21st century.
CSAS System of Care Initiative
Timeline
ID Task Name Start Finish Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jan Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
I System Redesign 2/04/97 2/14/98
2 Advisement and updates to Board of 2/11/97 Ongoing
Supervisors
3 Develop Performance 2/04/97 2/15/97
MeasuresiTargets
4 Design of system components 2/04/97 Ongoing
5 Define continuum of care 2/03/97 Ongoing
6 Write RFP 2/17/97 3/07/97
7 Department review of Draft 2/18/97 2/21/97
8 Final RFP 3/10/97 3/10/97
9 RFP Process(entire) 3/14/97 5/09/97
10 Release RFP 3/14/97 3/14/97
11 Bidders Conference 3/24/97 3/24/97
12 RFP's due to Department 4/25/97 4/25//97
13 Review/rate RFPs 5/05/97 5/08/97
14 Panel review of RFP 5/05/97 5/08/97 _
15 Recommendations for 5/09/97 5/09/97
Department
16 Develop contracts 5/12/97 5/30/97
17 Board review of contracts 6/17/97 6/24/97
18 Screening and assessment 7/01/97 Ongoing
services
19 Implement new MIS 7/01/97 7/07/97
20 Outcome Evaluation 7/01/97 Ongoing
21 Training with Provider 11/0196 Ongoing
22 Strategic Quality Planning MTG 7/01/97 Ongoing
aaimeline
disk 1004
y $
LYutt
a r &
S� FmF � e � ya dew Q � En3 .mE � � U
m
V ax u o
0 F
C4
°
Wa $ r
H m y d g
8pp � q
14
U � v j �
+L