HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02111997 - C67-C80 G6.4 7
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS _ ontra
FROM: Barton J. Gilbert, Director of General Services ->.
osta
ounty
DATE: February 11, 1997
SUBJECT: LEASE RENEWAL - 3981 WALNUT BOULEVARD, BRENTWOO
SPECIFIC REQUESTS OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION /
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION
APPROVE a Lease renewal, commencing February 1, 1997, with Patricia A. Casey, Carl B.
Casey, Bearl Casey, and Willo D. Casey for the premises at 3981 Walnut Boulevard,
Brentwood, for use by the East Diablo Fire Protection District, under the terms and conditions
more particularly set forth in said Lease, and AUTHORIZE the Director of General Services
to EXECUTE said Lease on behalf of the District.
DETERMINE that the above project is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
IL FINANCIAL IMPACT
Payments required are to come from the budget of the East Diablo Fire Protection District.
The term is eighteen months with no cancellation provision.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONSIBACKGROUND
Provide office space as required by the East Diablo Fire Protection District.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT:`YES SIGNATURE: &&,"&
—RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR —RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
`APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON — APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
Y UNANIMOUS 1ABSENT I
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
MEDIA CONTACT: BARTON J.GILBERT(313-7100) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. c?
CC: County Administrator(via LIM) ATTESTED. ..e..Q.�-�•��-�L-(� q/ 7
County Auditor-Controller(via UM)
County Counsel(via LJNI) PHIL BATCHELOR, RK O THE BOARD OF
Risk Management(via UM) SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
East Diablo Fire Protection District(via LIM)
Lessor(via LIM) y(,
Ong.:General Services Department-UM BYlu fig
�.�r r .�a.,.. DEPUTY
CGB:dp 3961WIM.BO M382 (10/86)
c.�q
LEASE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3981 Walnut Boulevard
Brentwood, California
EAST DIABLO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
SECTION A: BASIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS PAGE
A.1. PARTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A.2. LEASE OF PREMISES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A.3. TERM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A.4. RENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A.5. UTILITIES AND JANITORIAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A.6. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
A.7. NOTICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
A.S. EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
A.9. WRITTEN AGREEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
A.10. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
A.11. SIGNATURE BLOCK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
SECTION B: STANDARD PROVISIONS
B.1. HOLDING OVER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
B.2. USE OF PREMISES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
B.3. HOLD HARMLESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
B.4. ALTERATIONS FIXTURES AND SIGNS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
B.5. DESTRUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
B.6. QUIET ENJOYMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
B.7. DEFAULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
B.8. SURRENDER OF PREMISES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
B.9. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
B.10. SEVERABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
B.11. INSPECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
SECTION C: SPECIAL PROVISIONS
C.1. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBLEASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
C.2. PROPERTY TAXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
C.3. TERMINATION OF PRESENT LEASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT A: LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CO
LEASE
FOR
EAST DIABLO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
3981 WALNUT BOULEVARD
BRENTWOOD, CALIFORNIA
SECTION A: BASIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS
A.l. PARTIES: Effective on FEB 1 1 1997 , PATRICIA A. CASEY,
CARL B. CASEY, BEARL CASEY AND WILLO D. CASEY, hereinafter called
"LESSOR", and the EAST DIABLO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, a political
subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called 'DISTRICT", mutually agree and
promise as follows:
A.2. LEASE OF PREMISES: LESSOR, for and in consideration of the rents, hereby
leases to DISTRICT, and DISTRICT leases from LESSOR those certain premises consisting
of an approximately 1,800 square foot wood frame and metal commercial building, together
with the .21 acre paved lot commonly known as 3981 Walnut Boulevard, Brentwood,
California, more particularly described as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
A.3. TERM: The term of the Lease shall be one year and six months, commencing
February 1, 1997 and ending July 31, 1998.
A.4. RENT: DISTRICT shall pay to LESSOR as rent for the use of the premises a
monthly rental of NINE HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($950.00), payable
in advance on the tenth day of each month during the term of this Lease. Payments shall be
mailed to: Casey and Casey, 721 Oak Street, Brentwood, CA 94513.
A.5. UTILITIES: DISTRICT shall pay for all gas, electric, water, sewer, and refuse
collection services provided to the demised premises.
- I -
A.6. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS:
a. LESSOR shall keep the roof and exterior of the building in good order,
condition, and repair and shall maintain the structural integrity of the building,
including the exterior doors and their fixtures, closers and hinges.
b_ DISTRICT shall keep and maintain the interior of the premises in good order,
condition, and repair, but LESSOR shall repair damage to the interior caused
by failure to maintain the exterior in good repair, including damage to the
interior caused by roof leaks and/or interior and exterior wall leaks.
C. LESSOR shall repair and maintain the electrical, lighting, ventilating, water,
and exterior plumbing systems in good order, condition, and repair.
d. DISTRICT shall maintain the parking lot and exterior lighting system in good
order, condition, and repair, replace lamps, and clear plumbing stoppages
within the building perimeter.
e. DISTRICT shall not suffer any waste on or to the demised premises.
f. LESSOR shall be responsible for the correction of any code violations which
may exist in the premises, provided LESSOR shall not be liable for correction
of code violations which arise out of and are directly related to a change in
DISTRICT's occupancy or use of said premises.
A.7. TI 'E : All notices given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed to
have been given if personally delivered or deposited in the United States mail postage
prepaid, certified or registered, return receipt requested, and addressed to the other party as
follows or as otherwise designated by written notice hereunder from time to time:
To LESSOR: Casey and Casey
721 Oak Street
Brentwood, CA 94513
To DISTRICT: Contra Costa County
General Services Department
Lease Management Division
1224 Morello Avenue, Suite 104
Martinez, CA 94553-4711
- 2 -
A.8. EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS: Section B, Standard Provisions, Section C,
Special Provisions, and Exhibit A - Legal Description are attached to this Lease and are made
a part hereof.
A.9. WRITTEN AGREEMENT: Neither party has relied on any promise or
representation not contained in this Lease. All previous conversations, negotiations, and
understandings are of no further force or effect. This Lease may be modified only by a
writing signed by both parties. The headings of the paragraphs are for convenience only and
shall not be considered in construing the intent of this Lease.
A.10. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE of each and all of the terms and provisions of this
Lease.
A.11. SIGNATURE BLOCK
DISTRICT LESSOR
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a
political subdivision of the State of By
— &4j-"
California $ Bearl Casey n
By n n " �"
Director of General Services By C�s� /lX - —O' '
Willo D. Casey
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
1 / �By
Patricia A. Casey
By. l/
Deputy County Administrator
Carl B. Casey
By.
Deputy G eral rvices Director
By O
Lease anager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
VICTOR J. WESTMAN, County Counsel
3981 wIiu.Lse
Ccn
3 -
LEASE
FOR
EAST DIABLO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
3981 WALNUT BOULEVARD
BRENTWOOD, CALIFORNIA
SECTION B: STANDARD PROVISIONS
B.I. HOLDING OVER: Any holding over after the term of this Lease as provided
hereinabove shall be construed to be a tenancy from month to month, subject to the terms of
this Lease so far as applicable.
B.2. USE OF PREMISES: The premises shall be used during the tern for purposes of
conducting various commercial, DISTRICT or other governmental functions.
B.3. HOLD HARMLESS: DISTRICT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the
LESSOR from the DISTRICT's share of any and all claims, costs and liability, including
attorney's fees, for any damage, injury or death of or to any person or the property of any
person, arising out of negligent acts, errors or omission of the DISTRICT, its officers or
employees. DISTRICT shall not be liable in the case of any structural, mechanical or other
failure of equipment of building owned and maintained by the LESSOR or for liability which
is attributable, in whole or in part, to the negligence or willful misconduct of LESSOR,
which results in damage to any person or property.
LESSOR agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the DISTRICT from the LESSOR's share
of any and all claims, costs and liability, including attorneys fees, for any damages, injury
or death of any person or the property of any person, arising out of negligent acts, errors or
omissions of the LESSOR, its agents or employees.
BA. ALTERATIONS, FIXTURES,AND SIGNS: DISTRICT may make any lawfiil and
proper minor alterations, attach fixtures and signs in or upon the premises, which shall
remain DISTRICT property and may be removed therefrom by DISTRICT prior to the
termination of this Lease. Any such alterations, signs or fixtures shall be at DISTRICT's
- 4 -
sole cost and expense and all signs shall meet with existing code requirements and LESSOR's
approval.
B.5. DESTRUCTION:
a. In the event of damage causing a partial destruction of the premises during the ten"
of this Lease from any cause, and repairs can be made within sixty (60) days from the
date of the damage under the applicable laws and regulations of governmental
authorities, LESSOR shall repair said damage promptly and within a reasonable time,
but such partial destruction shall not void this Lease, except that DISTRICT shall be
entitled to a proportionate reduction of rent while such repairs are being made, such
proportionate reduction to be based upon the extent to which the portion of the
premises unusable by DISTRICT bears to the total area of the premises.
b. If such repairs cannot be made in sixty (60) days, LESSOR may, at his option, make
the same within a reasonable time, the rent to be proportionately reduced as provided
in the previous subparagraph. In the event LESSOR does not so elect to make such
repairs (which cannot be made in sixty <60> days), or such repairs cannot be made
under such laws and regulations, this Lease may be terminated at the option of either
party.
c. A total destruction of the premises shall terminate this Lease.
B.6. QUIET ENJOYMENT: LESSOR covenants that DISTRICT shall at all times during
the said term peaceably and quietly have, hold, and enjoy the demised premises without suit,
trouble or hindrance from or on account of LESSOR as long as DISTRICT fully performs
hereunder.
B.7. DEFAULTS: In the event of DISTRICT's material breach of any of the covenants
or conditions herein, LESSOR may re-enter and re-possess the premises and remove all
persons and property therefrom after giving DISTRICT written notice of such default and
in accordance with due process of law. In the event of such a breach by LESSOR,
DISTRICT may terminate the Lease and quit the premises without further cost or obligation
or may proceed to repair the building or correct the problem resulting from the breach and
- 5 -
e �7
deduct the cost thereof from rental payments due to LESSOR, provided that DISTRICT has
given LESSOR written notice of said breach and provided that LESSOR has not made a
substantial effort to correct said breach.
B.8. SURRENDER OF PREMISES: On the last day of the said term, or sooner
termination of this Lease, DISTRICT will peaceably and quietly leave and surrender to
LESSOR these premises with their appurtenances and fixtures (except signs and fixtures
referred to hereinabove) in good order, condition, and repair, reasonable use and wear
thereof and damage by earthquake, fire, public calamity, by the elements, by Act of God, or
by circumstances over which DISTRICT has no control excepted. DISTRICT shall not be
liable for painting the interior of the demised premises upon termination of this Lease.
B,9, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The terns and provisions of this Lease shall
extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, and assigns
of the respective parties hereto.
B.10. SEVERABILITY: In the event that any provision herein contained is held to be
invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity of any such provision does not
materially prejudice either the DISTRICT or LESSOR in its respective rights and obligations
contained in the valid provisions of this Lease.
B.11. INSPECTION: The LESSOR reserves the right to enter the premises by prior
appointment only between the hours of 9:00 a.m, and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
holidays excepted, and to employ the proper representative or contractor in order to see that
the property is being reasonably cared for, that no waste is being made, and that all things
are done in the manner best calculated for the preservation of the property, and in full
compliance with the terms and conditions of this Lease.
- 6 -
LEASE
FOR
EAST DIABLO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
3981 WALNUT BOULEVARD
BRENTWOOD, CALIFORNIA
SECTION C: SPECIAL PROVISIONS
C.I. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBLEASE: DISTRICT shall have the right to assign this
Lease or sublease the premises or any part thereof at any time during the term of this Lease.
C.2. PROPERTY TAXES: DISTRICT shall pay to LESSOR within thirty (30) days after
being requested to do so by LESSOR, as additional rental, a sum equal to one hundred
percent (100%) of the increase, if any, in the City and/or County taxes levied against
Assessor's Parcel 012-090-002, in any year during the term of this Lease which exceed
ELEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY ONE AND 121100 DOLLARS (9;1,132.12) which are the
taxes for fiscal year 1993-94, except DISTRICT shall not pay any increase resulting from
a change in ownership of the property. If said taxes decrease, DISTRICT may deduct one
hundred percent (100%) of the decrease from the rental due LESSOR.
It is understood that during the last year of occupancy, said taxes shall be prorated
between LESSOR and DISTRICT according to the number of full months the DISTRICT
shalt have possession of the demised premises.
C.3. TERMINATION OF PRESENT LEASE: It is understood and agreed that
DISTRICT now leases the premises under the terns of a Lease dated July 12, 1994. Upon
commencement of this Lease, said Lease shall terminate.
- 7 -
EXHIBIT "A'
Portion of Lot 116, map of Subdivision Number Three of Brentwood Irrigated
Farms, filed September 11, 1917, Map Book 16, page 324, Contra Costa County
records, described as follows:
Beginning on the south line of Road No. 8, as designated on said map, which
road is also known as Dainty Avenue, at the east line of the parcel of
land described in the deed to Francis J. Medina, et ux, recorded May 11,
1953, Book 2121 , Official Records, page 202 ; thence from said point of
beginning, North 890 58' east, along the south line of said road, 32.25
feet to the west line of Road No. 8, as designated on said map and which
road is also known as Walnut Boulevard ; thence South 350 37' East, along
said west line, 134.07 feet to the north line of the parcel of land described
in the deed to Arthur C. Christensen, et ux, recorded May 15, 1957, Book
2982, Official Records, page 89; thence along said north line, South 770
21 ' West, 102. 94 feet and South 870 25 ' West, 9.39 feet to the east line
of said Medina parcel extended southerly; thence North 00 08' East, along
said extended line and along said east line, 132.50 feet, more or less,
to the point of beginning.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM: The mineral rights reserved in the deed from Ben
Peterson, et ux, recorded January 12, 1970, Book 6042, Official Records,
page 181 , lying below a depth of 500 feet from the surface thereof with
no right of surface entry.
C lob
Contra
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
%'
CoJla
�,. CVs
FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon County
Director of Community Development �J
DATE: February 11 , 1997
SUBJECT: Allocation of HOME Funds and Execution of Required Project Agreement
and Loan Documents for the Church Lane Project
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
( 1) APPROVE the allocation of $50, 000 in FY 1996/97 HOME Investment
Partnership Act (HOME) funds to Rubicon/Church Lane Partners, Inc . ,
for the Church Lane Project to provide affordable rental housing for
very-low income households in West County; and (2 ) AUTHORIZE the
Deputy Director, Redevelopment, or his designee to execute a Project
Agreement and related loan documents for this purpose.
FISCAL IMPACT
No General Funds are involved. Funds for this project will come from
the FY 1996/97 HOME Housing Development Assistance Fund. HOME funds
are provided to the County through the U. S . Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) .
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE:
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMEND4TI OF nAARD COMMI EE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON Dot - // - /9q 7 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
✓ UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Kathleen K. Hamm
335-1257 ATTESTED 7F
cc: County Administrator PHIL BATCYiELOR, CLERK OF
County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Auditor-Controller (N. Garnett) AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Community Development
Church Lane Partners via B , DEPUTY
Community Development
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
On March 12, 1996, the Board of Supervisors approved the allocation
of $568,555 to the FY 1996/97 HOME Housing Development Assistance
Fund (HOME/HDAF) for use in funding affordable housing projects as
they develop during the program year. Including carryover from
prior year allocations , the current balance of the HOME/HDAF is
$646, 385 .
On January 15, 1997, the Affordable Housing Finance Committee voted
unanimously to recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve an
allocation of $50,000 in FY 1996/97 HOME/HDAF funds for the Church
Lane Project . The purpose of this project is to increase the long-
term supply of multifamily rental housing affordable to very-low
income households through the new construction of 22 apartments
located at 2560 Church Lane in San Pablo. Previously approved
County funding for this project includes the following: $245,000
in FY 1994/95 CDBG funds; and $445, 000 in FY 1994/95 HOME funds .
The Church Lane Apartments were completed December 30, 1996 and are
currently providing affordable housing opportunities to extremely-
low and very-low income households, including large families and
mentally disabled previously homeless persons . The project will
remain affordable to the target populations for 55 years .
Unforeseen problems relating primarily to additional engineering
studies and construction required by the City of San Pablo to
ensure stability of the adjacent creekbank to City standards
ultimately caused project costs to increase by approximately
$240,000, resulting in a substantial funding gap. Rubicon/Church
Lane Partners has attempted to close this gap by contributing its
entire development fee to the project ($100,000) and requesting
additional funds from the California Equity Fund (CEF - LIHTC
investor and limited partner) , the City of San Pablo, and the
County. Given the desired level of affordability, the project
cannot support additional private debt. The City has refused
financial assistance, while CEF has approved an additional equity
investment of up to $80, 000 . Approval of the requested FY 1996/97
HOME/HDAF funds will help to ensure the long-run feasibility of
this project by eliminating the remaining development deficit.
The total cost of this project is $3, 180, 700 . Funding sources
include the following:
FY 1996/97 HOME/HDAF $ 50,000
FY 1994/95 County CDBG $ 245,000 approved
FY 1994/95 Consortium HOME $ 445,000 approved
LISC $ 50,000 approved
LIHTCs (CEF) $1,690,700 approved
Citibank $ 487, 500 approved
LIHF $ 112 , 500 approved
Rubicon $ 100,000 approved
TOTAL $3, 180, 700
All County CDBG and HOME funds are provided to Rubicon/Church Lane
Partners in the form of a loan. The County interest is secured
through recordation of a Regulatory Agreement and Deed of Trust
against the property naming the County as Beneficiary.
In addition to the proposed additional funding for the Church Lane
Project, the Affordable Housing Finance Committee has recommended
the following allocations of FY 1996/97 HOME/HDAF funds :
o $199,000 to Ecumenical Association for Housing for the Oakley
Main Street Apartments Project to provide affordable housing
for very-low income disabled persons; and
0 $342 , 000 to Resources for Community Development for the Riley
Court Project to acquire and rehabilitate 48 apartments for
very-low income households in Concord.
If all three projects are approved by the Board, the FY 1996/97
HOME/HDAF will have a remaining balance of $55, 385 .
kh/k14/130SC1
�- Contra
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Colla
FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon
County
Director of Community Development "
DATE: February 11, 1997
SUBJECT: Allocation of CDBG Funds and Execution of Required Project Agreement
and Deed of Development Rights for the Central County Homeless
Shelter
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
( 1 ) APPROVE the allocation of $266, 000 in FY 1996/97 Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to the Housing Authority of the
County of Contra Costa for the rehabilitation and conversion of the
Central County Homeless Shelter; and (2 ) AUTHORIZE the Deputy
Director, Redevelopment or his designee to execute a Project Agreement
and Deed of Development Rights for this purpose.
FISCAL IMPACT
No General Funds are involved. Funds for this project will come from
the FY 1996/97 CDBG Housing Development Assistance Fund. CDBG funds
are provided to the County through the U. S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) .
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE:
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ RECOMMENDI OF B RD COMMI EE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON oa -//- /997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
✓_ UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES : NOES : ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Kathleen K. Hamm
335-1257 ATTESTED) ,
cc: County Administrator PHIL BATC ELOR, CLERK OF
County Counsel THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Auditor-Controller (N. Garnett) AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Community Development
HACCC via Comm. Developmt. BY , DEPUTY
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
On March 12, 1996, the Board of Supervisors approved the allocation
of $948, 555 to the FY 1996/97 CDBG Housing Development Assistance
Fund (CDBG/HDAF) for use in funding affordable housing projects as
they develop during the program year. Including carryover funds
from prior years, the current balance of the CDBG/HDAF is
$1, 342, 978 .
On January 15, 1997, the Affordable Housing Finance Committee
(AHFC) voted unanimously to recommend that the Board of Supervisors
approve an allocation of $266,000 in FY 1996/97 CDBG/HDAF funds to
the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa (HACCC) for
rehabilitation and conversion of the Central County Homeless
Shelter. Previously approved County funding for this project
includes the following: $225,500 in FY 1991/92 and $84,500 in FY
1992/93 CDBG funds expended for Shelter acquisition and emergency
repairs; and $120, 000 in FY 1995/96 CDBG funds reserved for Shelter
rehabilitation and conversion.
The Shelter currently provides emergency shelter and related
support services for 60 extremely-low income homeless County
residents, including seniors and disabled persons . The Shelter
initially opened on an emergency basis in 1991 with temporary
renovations pending resolution of litigation concerning facility
location and environmental issues . These issues have now been
resolved, clearing the way for the County to permanently locate the
Shelter at its current site. The shelter facility requires
substantial rehabilitation in order to complete its conversion to
a permanent, cost-effective facility with space appropriate for the
provision of emergency shelter and related services . Phase I of
the rehabilitation plan includes replacement of the heating and
ventilation system, installation of permanent bathroom facilities,
and construction and improvement of office, program, and dormitory
space. These improvements are needed for increased operational
efficiency, health and safety reasons, and the need to provide more
habitable and appropriate dormitory and service space. Phase II
will be separately funded and will include construction of a
commercial kitchen, dining and multipurpose room, classrooms and
other improvements .
The total cost of Phase I is $446,733. If approved, CDBG funds
will be used for rehabilitation and conversion of the shelter
facility. A Deed of Development Rights will be recorded against
the property in order to ensure use of the facility as a shelter
for a minimum of 15 years as required by HUD.
Funding sources for Phase I rehabilitation of the Central County
Homeless Shelter include the following:
FY 1996/97 County CDBG/HDAF $266,000 requested
FY 1995/96 County CDBG $120,000 approved
FY 1993 County CDBG $ 12,518 approved
FY 1995 Concord CDBG $100,000 approved
FY 1995 Walnut Creek CDBG $ 20, 000 approved
State EHAP $ 20,000 approved
County funds $ 5,978 approved
TOTAL - Phase I Rehabilitation $544,496
In addition to the proposed Central County Emergency Shelter
Project, the Affordable Housing Finance Committee has recommended
an allocation of $205, 000 in FY 1996/97 CDBG/HDAF funds to
Ecumenical Association for Housing for the Oakley Main Street
Apartment Project to provide 24 units of newly constructed
affordable housing for very-low income disabled persons . If both
projects are approved by the Board, the FY 1996/97 CDBG/HDAF will
have a remaining balance of $871, 978.
xxixi4/Hosccs
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN File: 212-9501/C.1.1
TO CLERK, BOARD OF RE ORDEDT REQUEST OF OWNER
SUPERVISORS at o'clock r
Contra Costa County Recorder
37 024921 Stephen L. Weir, County Recorder
Fee $ Official
FEB 13 m
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of Acceptmv and Giving RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTANCE
Notice of Completion of Ktract witl, and NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Mori Hatsushi & Associates (C.C. §3086, 3093 97/83
Budget Line Item No. 7496-4760 RESOLUTION N .
Authorization No 0929-WH760B
The Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT:
The County of Contra Costa on July 23, 1996, contracted with Mori Hatsushi & Associates for
Blackhawk Road Median Landscaping and Lighting for Comity Service Area M23, Blackhawk,
Budget Line Item No, 7496-4760, Authorization No. 0929-"760B, with United States
Fidelity and Guarantee Company as surety, for work to be performed on the grounds of the
County; and
The Director of General Services reports that said work has been inspected and comVics with
the approved pians and specifications, and recommends its acceptance as compTete as of
February 11, 1997;. and recommends the withholding of$3,500.00 pursuant to a ltter dated
February 3, 1997.
Therefore, said work is accepted as recommended above, and the Clerk shall file with the
County Recorder a copy of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Completion for said
contract; and the Director of General Services is directed to withhold monies otherwise due
pursuant to the letter dated February 3, 1997.
Time extension to the date of acceptance is granted as the work was delayed due to
unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor.
PASSED BY THE BOARD on February 11, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla and DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
Page t of 2
' d
97 024921
CERTIFICATION and VERIFICATION
I certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution and acceptance duly
adopted and entered on the minutes of this Board's meeting on the above date. I declare under
penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated: FEB 11 1997 Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the
at Martinez, California. Board of Supervisors and
County Administrator
Bye—._
Originator: General Services Department - Architectural Division
cc: General Services Department
Architectural Division
Accounting
File 212-9501/A.5
County Administrator's Office (Via A.D.)
Auditor-Controller (Via A.D.)
Contractor (Via A.D.)
Consulting Architect (Via A.D.)
County Recorder
2DOIs12o.WPn
GB:Is
Page 2 of 2
END OF DOCUMENT
t/. 171
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Contra
FROM: Alfred P. Lomeli, Treasurer-Tax Collector :: 4
Costa
January 30, 1997 Count
s�.
GATE: � r"'t^I'iiic'
SUBJECT: TREASURER'S INVESTMENT REPORT THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1986
SPECIFIC REOUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT the report from the Treasurer-Tax Collector on County investments as
of December 31, 1996.
BACKGROUND/REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION(S):
Government Code section 53646 requires the County Treasurer to prepare
quarterly reports to the Board of Supervisors describing County investments
including type, cost, par value and market value, Attached please find the report
covering the period through December 31, 1996. Section 3, the balance of the
report, is an appendix with financial data which is available for reference at the
Clerk of the Board's office.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: —YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR —RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON EpbruaU 11 , 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED Y_ OTHER ,.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT _—• j AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT:—ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Clarissa V. Javier- 646-4115
ATTESTED February 11, 1997
Contact: Treasurer PHIL BATCHELOR.CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
cc: County Administrator SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Auditor-Controller �[�jt/"J
BY—C, v le�2/-A ,DEPUTY
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERLA.L
ADVISEMENT :FARM
AGENDA DATE: &111il' mmi NQ: 7l
® ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AVAILABLE IN THE MINUTES
❑ ITEM CONTINUED TO:
❑ ITEM DELETED
❑ PUBLIC COMMENT - NONE
❑ CONSIDERED CONSENT ITEMS PREVIOUSLY REMOVED -
SEE SUMMARY FOR CHANGES; OTHERWISE APPROVED AS
LISTED ON TETE AGENDA
TM SECTION FM PL4NNING T U"S ONLY
❑ ADDITIONAL MATERIAL AVAILABLE IN FILE (NAME):
Contra
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Costa
FROM: TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE County
DATE: February 3, 1997
SUBJECT: Concerns Expressed by Board of Supervisors Members in Adopting the Central County
Regional Transportation Mitigation Program
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Accept report.
FISCAL IMPACT
None directly. The concerns expressed also relate to the County's compliance with
the provisions of Measure C (1988), potentially impacting the County's eligibility for
return-to-source funds, which currently amounts to approximately $1 .5 million
annually.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
On November 19, 1996 the Board of Supervisors adopted the Central County
(TRANSPAC) Regional Transportation Mitigation Program. The Board's action included
direction to advise the 1997 Transportation Committee and Board of Supervisors
about the following concerns which were raised by Board members during the
discussion of this item.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_APPROVE _ OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): Donna G rb r Joe Canciamilla
ACTION OF BOARD ON: February 11, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
g UNANIMOUS (ABSENT) "— TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Orig Dept: Community Development ATTESTED February 11, 1997
Contact: Ernest Vovakis, 335-1243 PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
cc: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY (/, �J ��iSJ DEPUTY
Board Concerns Regarding Central
County Transportation Mitigation Program
February 3, 1997
Page 2
- The Board must provide policy direction to its representatives on the regional transportation
planning committees and to staff attending the meetings.
- It is important that Board members make an effort to attend the regional transportation planning
committee meetings.
- The Contra Costa Transportation Authority and the regional transportation planning committees
should establish a process for addressing land development issues that cross regional boundaries.
- TRANSPAC and Transplan should meet to review issues related to the Cowell Ranch project.
- Establishment of a July 1 , 1997 deadline for the adoption of regional transportation mitigation
programs would impose a hardship on the Lamorinda area.
A discussion of each of these concerns follows:
1. Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPC's) have been established in four areas to
provide a forum for representatives of city councils and the Board to discuss regional transportation
issues. At times, these Regional Committees advise the Contra Costa Transportation Authority on
transportation issues of countywide significance. The composition of these Regional Committees and
the Board's representatives are listed below. Other transportation-related committees on which the
Board participates are listed in Attachment A.
Regional Participating Board
Committees Agencies Representatives
West Contra Costa County, EI Cerrito, Gayle B.
Transportation Hercules, Pinole, Uilkema
Advisory Committee* Richmond, San Pablo Jim Rogers,
BART, and AC Transit Alternate
Transportation Clayton, Martinez Mark DeSaulnier
Partnership and Concord, Pleasant Donna Gerber,
Cooperation* Hill, Walnut Creek, Alternate
County
TRANSPLAN Committee* County, Brentwood, Joe Canciamilla
Antioch, Pittsburg
Southwest Area County, Danville, Donna Gerber
Transportation Lafayette, Moraga,
Committee* Orinda, San Ramon
Tri Valley Contra Costa County Donna Gerber
Transportation Alameda County,
Council Danville, Dublin,
Livermore, Pleasanton
San Ramon
(* = established as part of Measure C-1988)
The following are some of the more significant issues to be addressed by these Regional Committees
this year:
a. 1998 State Transportation Improvement Program Update
b. Grant applications for State and Federal Transportation Funds;
C. 1997 Measure C-1988 Strategic Plan Update
d. 1997 Congestion Management Program Update
e. MTC's Regional Transportation Plan - Track 2 Investment Strategy;
0,74
Board Concerns Regarding Central
County Transportation Mitigation Program
February 3, 1997
Page 3
f. Subregional Traffic Fees in the Tri Valley, West County, and Lamorinda areas;
g. Carquinez Bridge and Benicia Bridge projects; and
h. State and Federal Transportation Legislation (e.g. bridge toll increase and ISTEA reauthorization)
Individual Board members and staff can obtain policy direction from the Board by scheduling these items
for discussion on the Board agenda. If time permits, the Board's Transportation Committee is available
to evaluate an issue in more detail if referred to by the Board.
2. The Contra Costa Transportation Authority recently revised its compliance requirements for the
Growth Management Program to require regular attendance of the elected officials appointed to the
various Regional Committees. Failure to attend regularly could be a basis to withhold a jurisdiction's
annual allocation of Measure C-1988 funds. The County's receives about $1 .5 million annually in
Measure C-1988 revenues which is used primarily for road maintenance purposes.
On January 7, 1997, the Board appointed its representatives to the various Regional Committees and
informed them of the meeting schedules. Please be aware that County staff sends summaries of each
meeting to all Board members.
3. Regional Committees currently meet on an ad-hoc basis of a variety of issues, included to address
major development proposals. The Transportation Committee will look into existing procedures in more
detail and report to the Board of Supervisors as appropriate.
4. Prior to preparing the Final EIR for the Cowell Ranch Project, county staff will inform the Board
of the outcome of the joint meeting between the TRANSPLAN Committee and TRANSPAC.
5. Measure C (1988), the Contra Costa Transportation Improvement and Growth Management
Program imposed an additional 1/2-cent sales tax for specified transportation improvements. The
Measure also established a growth management program so that new development would provide the
infrastructure needed to accomodate the growth. One requirement of the growth management program
was the establishment of regional transportation mitigation programs by each of the four regional
transportation planning committees in the County. To date, programs have been adopted by
jurisdictions in East County, Central County, and the San Ramon Valley. The Board of Supervisors has
scheduled a public hearing for the West County program in March. Lamorinda jurisdictions began work
on their program last month.
�?72
Attachment A
TRANSPORTATION-RELATED COMMITTEES
IN WHICH THE COUNTY PARTICIPATES
Boards and Particioating Board
Committees Agencies Representative
Central Contra Costa Clayton, Concord, Danville, Gayle B. Uilkema
Transit Authority (CCCTA) Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Bob Schroder, Alternate
[also known as "County Orinda, Pleasant Hill, San Ramon
Connection"] Walnut Creek, County
Contra Costa All cities of Contra Costa Joe Canciamella
Transportation Authority and the County Donna Gerber
(OCTA) Mark DeSaulnier, Alternate
CCTA Administrative Each RTPC and County
& Projects Committee
CCTA Planning Comm. Each RTPC and County
East Contra Costa Antioch, Brentwood, Joe Canciamella
Regional Fee & Pittsburg and the County
Finance Authority
Metropolitan Bay Area Counties and Cities, Mark DeSaulnier
Transportation ABAG, BCDC, USHUD, USDOT, Cal.
Commission Business, Trans, & Housing Agency
Pleasant Hill BART BART, Concord, Contra Costa Centre Mark DeSaulnier, Chair
Steering Committee Assn., Pleasant Hill, Walnut Creek, Donna Gerber
Walden District Improve. Assn.
State Route 4 Antioch, Brentwood, Joe Canciamella
Bypass Authority and the County
680/24 Task Force Concord, Pleasant Hill, Walnut
Creek and the County
Eastern Contra Costa Antioch, Brentwood, Pittsburg
Transit Authority and the County
(Tri-Delta Transit)
West Contra Costa Hercules, Pinole and the
Transit Authority County
(WestCAT)
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 1997
SUBJECT: REFER 1-80/CARQUINEZ BRIDGE PROJECT DRAFT EIS TO THE TRANSPORTATION
COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Refer the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Statutory Exemption for the I-
80/Carquinez Bridge Project to the Transportation Committee to coordinate the County's
review and comment on this environmental document.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The Community Development Department has recently received from Caltrans a copy of
the Draft EIS for the 1-80/Carquinez Bridge Project. Caltrans is proposing to retrofit or replace
the westbound bridge on Interstate 80 (constructed in 1927) which spans the Carquinez Strait
between Crockett and Vallejo. They have prepared an EIS to analyze the potential environmental
and socia-economic impacts of several possible replacement bridge alternatives, as well as seismic
retrofit and "no-build" alternatives. The EIS comment period extends from January 24, 1997 until
March 28, 1997. A public hearing will be held on February 26, 1997, from 5:00 p.m. until 9:00 p.m.
at the Carquinez Middle School, 1099 Pomona Street, Crockett, CA.
Due to the potential impact on the Crockett community and the surrounding area, it is
recommended that the 1-80/Carquinez Bridge Project EIS be referred to the Board's Transportation
Committee to coordinate the County's review and comment on this environmental document.
r�
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE 8y JAG
ACTION OF BOARD ON February 11, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE
SHOWN.
Contact: Patrick Roche, CDD-TPD (510/335-1242) ATTESTED February 11, 1997
cc: M. Walford, Public Works Dept. PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
Crocket Improvement Association THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
L. Hogeboom, WCCTAC AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
R. McCleary, CCTA
BY I�J4644� , DEPUTY
fl3 e . 14
TO 1. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: Phil Batchelor, County Administrator ('�,1(.'�/losntra
By: Rhonda Dunne, Director Costa
Office of Revenue Collection
DATE: February 11, 1997 COLM
SUBJECT: Initiate Legal Actions to Recover and Secure
Costs of Services
SPECIFIC REQUESTS) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND J1.1S'I IF ICA[ ION
I. RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize and direct County Counsel to determine if it is appropriate to
initiate Legal action to recover monies owed for outstanding debts and costs
of suit and when appropriate to initiate legal detion, as to the following
parties:
BURGESS, ROBERT & CINDI R. $ 7,888.16
BOMARC, LENA $ 8,214.59
$ 16,102.75
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This action will increase Contra Costa County's ability to execute on the
judgments obtained pursuant to the Board of Supervisors authorization.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION:
To secure Contra Costa County's interest on debts owed.
IV. BACKGROUND:
Parties involved have demonstrated an unwillingness to reimburse Contra Costa
County for services provided. It is necessary for the County to preserve our
interest by filing action against the individuals who are responsible.
CONTINUED ON ATTAG MM ENT: --__.. YES SIGNATURE'
___ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISI-RAIOR ,IEGUMMCMIAIIUN OF UUA1111 .tMMl Ilea"
APPROVE --- OTHER
SIGNATURE 9 :
ACTION OF BOARD ON �, 1i<-- � -- APPROVED AS HECOMMENOfII . O'111ER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I FIEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1141S is A TRUE
UNANIMOUS (ASSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: AND ENTERED ON TI-IE M1NIITES OF 'I'IIE HOARD
ABSENT: � ABSTAIN*._-- � M.-T__ OF SUPERV ISCR?S ON TI-IE OAIF St$OWNN,
CC:Office of Revenue Collection ATTESTE C J/j / r ry�J
Auditor PIM HAICHEI_Of? CI tHK Of IHE HOARD OF
GAO SIIPtl?VIS()RS AND CIHIN1'Y AIIMINISIRATOR
County Counsel � {
HY 'e. /" .DEP,ITY
TD BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
l ' -
FRDM. Finance Committee Costa
County
.:..I. e
DATE. February 11, 1997 "'
rr+ cti r�
SUBJECT: BOYCOTT OF BRI DGESTONE/FIRESTONE PRODUCTS
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
1. REMOVE the referral on the Boycott of Bridgestone/Firestone Products from the
Finance Committee.
BACKGROUND:
On October 8, 1996 the Board referred to the Finance Committee and General Services
Department the task of analyzing the fiscal impacts of a boycott of Bridgestone/Firestone
products in support of the United Steelworkers of America. Since the General Services
Department indicated that the County does not purchase Bridgestone/Firestone Products,
this referral should be removed from the Finance Committee referral list.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _YES SIGNATURE:
—RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR —RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_APPROVE k
SIGNATURE(S): Olam] GaB.�U3. 1�emaema
ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED February 11, 1997
Contact: PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
CC: General Services SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
County Administrator - T. Enea
Finance Committee
BY � ,DEPUTY
E. -E -... Contra C •� 5
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS `
� `� Costa
^i
FROM: Supervisor Tom Torlakson " "' `s County
cO--- •'CS'
DATE: October 8, 1996
SUBJECT: CONSIDER SUPPORT FOR THE EFFORTS OF THE UNITED STEELWORKERS OF
AMERICA TO RESOLVE THE LABOR DISPUTE WITH BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Consider action by the Board of Supervisors to support the
United Steelworkers of America in their efforts to resolve the labor dispute with Bridgestone/Firestone
including: (1) the adoption of a resolution and (2) referring the matter to the Finance Committee and
General Services for consideration of a boycott of Bridgestone/Firestone products by the county.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The United Steel Workers of America has been involved in
an ongoing labor dispute with Bridgestone/Firestone. The National Labor Board has issued a
directive to the company to rehire all of the union members but Firestone has failed to comply.
(Please reference the attached correspondence from the United Steelworkers of America.) The
Finance Committee should analyze any fiscal impacts of the proposed boycott.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S)
ACTION OF BOARD ON October 8, 1996 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED: X OTHER:
See Resolution No. 96/542 Attached.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS:
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ---------- )
_ AYES: NOES:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY
OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED&tEPUTY r 8, 1996
ELOR,CLERK OF TH OA K OF
RS A COUNTY INI RATOR
BY
cc: Robert LaVenture, United Steelworkers of America
Tony Enea,County Administrator's Office
Bart Gilbert,General Services Department
THE BOARD OR SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on _October 8, 1996 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Bishop, De$aulnier, Torlakson, Smith
NOSE: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution No.
SUBJECT: Bridgestone/Firestone Labor Practises 96/542
Whereas four thousand Union members at Bridgestone/Firestone,
Inc. , were devasted in a 1994-95 unfair labor practice strike;
and
Whereas after the unfair labor practice strike ended, the company
retained temporary replacements and refused to let hundreds of
union members return to work; and
Whereas the National Labor Relations Board has issued a massive
complaint against the company seeking reinstatement of the
strikers and tens of millions of dollars in backpay for the
victims of the company's unfair labor practices which included
discharging strikers, refusing to reinstate unfair labor
practices strikers, cutting off accident and sickness benefits to
sick and injured non-strikers, and refusing to grant full pension
credits to unrecalled strikers; and
Whereas Bridgestone/Firestone claims to have "permanently
replaced" its employees, which has inflicted untold misery on its
American workers; and
Whereas Bridgestone/Firestone, while insisting that its American
workers take wage and benefit cuts, granted wage increases to its
Canadian workers at a plant in Quebec; and
Whereas it appears that Bridgestone/Firestone has no intention of
negotiating an honorable contract with the Union;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors,
County of Contra Costa, SUPPORTS the United Steelworkers of
America in their efforts to resolve the labor dispute with
Bridgestone/Firestone.
1 hereby certify that this Is a trueandcor<ectcM Of
taken and Wsotha
Board of on On nn
A
TCMELOR ClerkN�tie ist�nro
cc: County Administrator
Finance Committee (via CAD)
General Services Director
0,75
GEORGE BECKER LEO W. GERARD RICHARD H. DAVIS LEON LYNCH
PRESIDENT SECA ETARY-TR EASU R ER VICE-PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT
IADMINISTRATIONI $HUMAN AFFAIRS)
`�mxxi slkrri
Uniteb Wteeiworkers of America
?� DISTRICT No. 12 Wi fly
'09 $ue-aiSTRICT NO. 3
+I..am4 1820 GALINDO STREET. SUITE 240 ���$•Clr
CONCORD. CALIFORNIA 94520
JACK R. GOLDEN (510) 798-7050
DISTRICT DIRECTOR fojw' FAX (510) 798-4945
August 27, 1996
RECEIVED AUG 2 8 1996 I)
Tom Torlakson
Contra Costa Supervisor, District 5
300 East Leland Road, Suite 100
Pitsburg, California 94565
Dear Supervisor Torlakson:
A most dramatic and important challenge faced by the Labor Movement in many
years is the dispute with Bridgestone/Firestone. Bridgestone/Firestone, a Japanese
owned company, decided to break the traditional pattern of bargaining that had marked
civilized negotiations in the Rubber Industry for many years. To force its will on loyal
employees, it announced that it was permanently replacing them. It then hired scabs.
Thousands of our members at Bridgestone/Firestone still do not have their jobs
back, although the strike was called off in May of 1995. The National Labor Relations
Board has issued at least two complaints which it alleges the company fired workers
illegally. The complaints also allege that the company engaged in a variety of unlawful
conduct that prolonged the strike and converted it into an unfair labor practices strike.
Some takeaway proposals put forth by the Bridgestone/Firestone negotiators are,
as follows:
(1) Company proposes to eliminate daily overtime payment and double time
payment for work on Sunday.
(2) Company proposes to eliminate traditional American holidays like the 4th
of July and Memorial Day.
(3) Company proposes mandatory 12-hour workdays.
(4) Company proposes the elimination of Joint Labor-Management Committees
and Employee Assistance Programs.
(5) Company proposes major takeaways in health care coverage.
Ob
Tom Torlakson
Contra Costa Supervisor, District 5
August 27, 1998
The above items do not represent a list inclusive of the company's proposed
takeaways. There are many more, however, these represent some more major
concessions.
Bridgestone/Firestone has repeatedly dragged its corporate feet at every attempt
by the Union to resolve this matter and declined to respond to Union proposals,
maintaining its "take it or leave it" posture. This company's use of strikebreakers is
possibly the worst in American Labor since the firing of the Air Traffic Controllers in the
early 1980s. Bridgestone/Firestone has clearly demonstrated its blatant disregard for the
dignity and security of its American employees.
1 have enclosed a resolution that I am requesting be read before the Contra Costa
Board of Supervisors, and further requesting that the governing body take action to refuse
purchase of Bridgestone or Firestone tires by the Contra Costa County. We must send
out a message loud and clear, "We won't tolerate any foreign-owned company running
over American working families and breaking U.S. Labor Laws."
I appreciate any cooperation and help you can provide.
Sincerely yours,
Robert LaVenture
Legislative-Education Coordinator
RL:js
Enclosure
cc: Jack R. Golden, Director, USWA, District 12
Rudy Garza, Staff Representative, District 12
11- 74
TO; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Contra
�� _N..,._.....8
FROM: Phil Batchelor, County Administrator
Costa
Y s
February 11, 1997 . �Duni��
DATE: County
�..YY
Merrithew Memorial Hospital Refunding Certificates of Participation
SUBJECT:
SPECIFIC REOUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(Sj S.BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECONN[IMATIONS:
1. Adopt resolution ratifying and approving execution and delivery of the
Certificates of Participation and approving final forms of the documents for
the refunding of the Merrithew Hospital Replacement Project.
2. Authorize the Chair of the Board of Supervisors, the County Administrator
and other appropriate County Officials to execute the closing documents and
other agreements necessary for the closing of the transaction.
3. Approve C. M. de Crinis & Co. Inc. as the financial advisory firm for the
refunding issue.
FINANCIAL. LVACT:
The Certificates of Participation for the Merrithew Hospital Replacement Project have
been refunded with a new issue of $143,375,000 with a lower interest rate and lower
debt service costs. The refunding of the debt for the Merrithew Hospital
Replacement Project meets the established goal of net savings of at least $3,750,000.
BACKGROUND:
The refunding of the 1992 Certificates of Participation used to fund the Merrithew
Hospital Replacement Project was approved by the Board of Supervisors on February
13, 1996. The County Administrator was directed to take the necessary actions to
position the County to take advantage of favorable market conditions in order to
maximize the benefits from the new issuance. Just after the Board approved the
issue last February the interest rates spiked up. A decision was made to defer
action until the interest rates appeared more favorable for the refunding.
After last
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _,.,.YES SIGNATURE:
-RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR -RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
-APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURES : p
ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED = OTHER _
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
/ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
`UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
ATTESTED P.MIL�TCHE - I E�_
Contac;: PH4l BATCHEI CLERK"JO-PT'HE BOARD OF
CC: SEE PAGE 2 SUPERVISORSAND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
8'�J DEPUTY
U
-2-
February the interest rates moved up further and then gradually down to the point
where the issue is now economically feasible. Some changes in the structure of the
issue have been incorporated to further enhance the savings advantages for the
County. The refunding meets the established savings goal for the County while
lowering the debt service. Some additional funds will flow into the construction fund
to cover contingencies and additional capital improvements as part of the project.
The Co-Special Counsels (Bond Counsels), as part of the original authorization were
directed to prepare a final resolution for Board approval at the time the issue was
sold. The resolution recommended for adoption meets that requirement.
Since the original authorization, the Financial Advisor has been changed to the C.
M. de Crinis & Co. , Inc as a result of the death of one member of the advisory team
and the relocation of the other member to the new firm. Jean Buckley with the de
Crinis firm has worked with the County for several years and has been working on
the Merrithew refunding for the past year. Ms. Buckley is very knowledgeable
about the County and the refunding in particular. She and the de Crinis firm are
well qualified to assist with the completion of the transaction.
The Underwriters for the issue are Smith Barney, Bank of America and Bear
Stearns. The three firms were selected after review of proposals by the Board in
February 1996. They have been working with the County staff and consultants for
the past year in preparing the issue for sale at the most appropriate time.
Contact: De Bell (5-1093)
cc: County Administrator
Auditor-Controller
Treasurer-Tax Collector
Health Services
General Services
County Counsel
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
C. M. de Crinis & Co. Inc.
x . 760
RESOLUTION NO. 97/73
OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND APPROVING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (MERRMIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
REPLACEMENT PROJECT), REFUNDING SERIES OF 1997; RATIFYING AND
APPROVING FORMS OF A FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL TRUST AGREEMENT, A FIRST
AMENDMENT TO FACILITY LEASE (MERRITHEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
REPLACEMENT PROJECT), A 1992 CERTIFICATES LETTER OF INSTRUCTIONS, A
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT;
RATIFYING AND CONFIRMING THE CONTRACT OF PURCHASE; APPROVING THE
BASE RENTAL UNDER SAID FIRST AMENDMENT TO FACILITY LEASE;
RATIFYING ELECTION TO GUARANTEE RENTAL PAYMENTS WITH MOTOR
VEHICLE LICENSE FEES; AND AUTHORIZING THE TAKING OF ALL NECESSARY
ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREOF.
WHEREAS, this Board of Supervisors by resolution no. 96/84 adopted
March S, 1996, has heretofore authorized the sale of Certificates of Participation (Merrithew
Memorial Hospital Replacement Project), Refunding Series of 1997 (the "1997 Certificates")
for the purpose of refunding outstanding Certificates of Participation (Merrithew Memorial
Hospital Replacement Project), Series of 1992 (herein called the 01992 Certificates"), which
were issued to finance the construction, acquisition and equipping of the county hospital in
Martinez, California, together with site development, equipment and improvements (the
"Project");
WHEREAS, there has been presented to this meeting a report of the sale of
the 1997 Certificates;
WHEREAS, this Board desires to ratify the sale of the 1997 Certificates and
its approval of the following documents:
art�vsm.i
1. First Supplemental Trust Agreement, dated as of February 1, 1997, by
and among U.S. Trust Company of California, K.A., as trustee (the
"Trustee"), the Contra Costa County Public Facilities Corporation (the
"Corporation") and the County (the "First Supplemental Trust
Agreement");
2. First Amendment to Facility Lease (Merrithew Memorial Hospital
Replacement Project), dated as of February 1, 1997, by and between
the Corporation and the County (the "First Amendment to Facility
Lease");
3, 1992 Certificates Letter of Instructions, dated as of February 1, 1997,
from the Corporation and the County to the Trustee (the "Letter of
Instructions");
4. Continuing Disclosure Agreement, dated the date of execution and
delivery of the 1997 Certificates, by and between the County and the
Trustee (the "Continuing Disclosure Agreement);
5. Official Statement relating to the 1997 Certificates (the "Official
Statement"); and
6. Contract of Purchase, by and among the Corporation, the County and
Smith Barney Inc., as representative of the underwriters (the "Contract
of Purchase").
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County has been presented with
the form of each document referred to herein, and this Board has examined and approved
each document and desires to ratify its approval of the execution and delivery of not to
sr2�syszo.i 2
exceed $160,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the 1997 Certificates and the execution
of such documents and the consummation of such financing; and
WHEREAS, the County has full legal right, power and authority under the
Constitution and the laws of the State of California to enter into the transactions hereinafter
authorized;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the
County of Contra Costa, as follows:
Section 1. All of the recitals herein are true and correct and this Board so
finds.
Section Z. The action of this Board in heretofore authorizing the execution
and delivery of the 1997 Certificates is hereby ratified and confirmed, and the terms of the
1997 Certificates shall be as set forth in the First Supplemental Trust Agreement.
Section 3. The execution and delivery of the First Supplemental Trust
Agreement, on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, is hereby authorized, ratified
and confirmed, and the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the First Supplemental
Trust Agreement in substantially said form, with such changes therein as such officers may
require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery
thereof.
Section 4. The execution and delivery of the First Amendment to Facility
Lease, on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, is hereby authorized, ratified and
confirmed, and the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the First Amendment
srll ava�oa 3
to Facility Lease in substantially said form, with such changes therein as such officers may
require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery
thereof.
n„5. The execution and delivery of the Letter of Instructions, on file
with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, is hereby authorized, ratified and confirmed, and
the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors are
hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Letter of Instructions in
substantially said form, with such changes therein as such officers may require or approve,
such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof.
Section ¢. The execution and delivery of the Continuing Disclosure
Agreement, on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, is hereby authorized, ratified
and confirmed, and the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement in substantially said form, with such changes therein as such officers
may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and
delivery thereof.
Section 7. The form of Official Statement describing the 1997 Certificates, on
file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, is hereby ratified and confirmed, and the
County Administrator or his designee is hereby authorized and directed to execute and
deliver the Official Statement in substantially said form, with such changes therein as such
officer may require or approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution
and delivery thereof.
sr2-69M.1 4
Section-S. The action of this Board in heretofore authorizing execution of the
Contract of purchase, on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, is hereby ratified
and confirmed.
jSection 9. The schedule of base rental payments set forth in Exhibit B of the
First Amendment to Facility Lease is approved and is hereby determined to be the schedule
of base rental payments to be paid pursuant to the Facility Lease.
Section 1Q. The Board hereby ratifies its election, pursuant to Government
Code Section 25350.55, to guarantee rental payments to be made by the County under the
Facility Lease and authorizes and directs the County Administrator or his designee to notify
the Controller of the State of California of such election, which notice shall include a
schedule of lease payments to be made by the County under the Facility Lease and shall
identify a trustee appointed by the County to effectuate the payment provisions pursuant to
such guarantee. For purposes of effectuating the payment provisions pursuant to Government
Code Section 25350.55, the Board hereby ratifies its appointment of the Trustee for the 1997
Certificates as trustee.
Section 11. The officers and supervisors of the County are hereby authorized
and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any
and all documents and certificates which they deem necessary or advisable in order to
consummate the execution and delivery of the documents mentioned herein and any other
documents necessary to consummate the financing, and otherwise to effectuate the purposes
of this Resolution and the transactions contemplated hereby.
sn ssszo.i 5
Sectio. All actions heretofore taken by the officers and agents of the
County with respect to the sale, execution and delivery of the 1997 Certificates are hereby
ratified and confirmed.
axt sae7o.i 6
Sectio". This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of February, 1997.
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
County of Contra Costa, California
[Seal]
ATTEST: Philip J. Batchelor, Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors and County Administrator
February 11, 1997
By
Deputy Cl of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of
Contra Costa, State of California
sr2-6"70J 7
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
I, aljr4 casillac. , Deputy Clerk and Chief Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
of the County of Contra Costa, hereby certify as follows:
The foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a
regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of said County duly and regularly held at the
regular meeting place thereof on the 11th day of February, 1997, of which meeting all of the
members of said Board of Supervisors had due notice and at which a majority thereof were
present; and at said meeting said resolution was adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, DeSaulnier
NOES: None
An agenda of said meeting was posted at least 72 hours before said meeting at
651 Pine Street
Aartinez, California, a location freely accessible to members of the public,
and a brief general description of said resolution appeared on said agenda.
I have carefully compared the same with the original minutes of said meeting
on file and of record in my office; the foregoing resolution is a full, true and correct copy of
the original resolution adopted at said meeting and entered in said minutes; and said
resolution has not been amended, modified or rescinded since the date of its adoption, and
the same is now in full force and effect.
e�easa�o.�
WITNESS my hand and the seal of the County of Contra Costa thisu,j,day of
February, 1997.
eputy Clerk
Of the Board of Supervisors
of the County of Contra Costa,
State of California
[Seal]
sez s9sro.i 2
SUPPLFA MAL MATERIAL
ADVISFNVIEW FORM
AGENDA DATE: TIEM NO.: 0 . 76
® ADDITIONAL MATERIALS AVAILABLE IN THE MINUTES
❑ ITEM CONTINUED TO:
❑ ITEM DELETED
❑ PUBLIC COMMENT - NONE
❑ CONSIDERED CONSENT ITEMS PREVIOUSLY REMOVED -
SEE SUMMARY FOR CHANGES; OTHERWISE APPROVED AS
LISTED ON THE AGENDA
TETIS SECTION FOR PLANNING HEW ONLY
❑ ADDITIONAL MATERIAL AVAIL ABLE IN FILE (NAME):
01 77
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 1997
SUBJECT: Determine the Need to Continue the Emergency Action Regarding the Repair of"Hill 310"
Land Creep, Bay Point
Project No.: 4500-6G5094
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. Recommended Action:
DETERMINE that there is a need to continue the emergency action taken by the Board of
Supervisors on June 4, 1996 pursuant to Public Contract Code Sections 22035 and 22050, to
repair the "Hill 310" Land Creep, Bay Point.
If. Financiallmpact:
Total cost of repairs cannot be fully determined at this time, but staff is developing an estimate
for completion of the repair.
III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background:
A. On February 26, 1996, Public Works and Building Inspection were notified that cracks
were occurring in Beaulieu Court. The County hired a geotechnical firm to identify the
cause of the slide, and recommend and direct remedial actions to mitigate land movement.
B. On March 19, 1996 the Board of Supervisors concurred in the County Administrator's
proclamation of a local emergency.
C. On June 4, 1996 the Board of Supervisors declared an emergency and authorized the
Public Works Director to proceed in the most expeditious manner to repair the area subject
to creep.
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE;,/ --
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
_RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): /
ACTION OF BOARD ON fly-11- 17-17 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_OTHER
VOCE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT )
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
JPM:tt
9\const\BO\H310-28.t1
Ong.Div: Public Works(Construction)
Contact: Joseph P.Murphy(313-2320) l lh=aMy tMt Mle Is a�e and Om ed�'ppy of
Irl eMlon taken end entered on the minutu Ol-dy
cc: CAO Bosh of Supewamnif.on the con drown.
Auditor/Controller ATTESTED: 9�
County Counsel PHIL BATCHELOR,C--u f,.:o1 oard
GMEDA of Supervlson and Coun AJministrefor
Design Div.
Construction Div. b DW*
Maintenance Div.
-Determine the Need to Continue the Emergency Action Regarding the Repair of"Hill 310"Land Creep
February 11, 1997
Page Two
III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background (cont'd):
D. Repair status:
Judd Drilling is under contract to complete the second phase of the repair consisting of a
drainage gallery. This work began September 25, 1996 and about ninety -five percent (95%) of
the work has been completed. Due to inclement weather and the unavailability of specialized
equipment, the completion of this project will be delayed.
IV. Consequences of Negative Action:
Repair work would not be completed before next winter.
S F..
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
�:• CONTRA
FROM: Ken Corcoran, Auditor-Controller
B COSTA
. Paul Abelson Principal Accountant '°- �y'z
By: P �... COUNTY
DATE: January 29, 1997
SUBJECT: Accept Monthly Report on Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund Activity.
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S)& BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Accept the Auditor-Controller's December Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF)
activity report.
BACKGROUND/REASON(S) FOR RECOMMENDATION(S):
Government Code Section 60063 requires the County Auditor-Controller to file a public report each
month with the Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee and the Board of Supervisors
detailing allocations from the SLESF. Other than interest earned, there were no new allocations this
month.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR_RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON / / APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT 1 TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ON MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Paul Abelson,(646-2275)
ATTESTED '4) 1997
PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
BAND OU DMINISTRATOR
cc: CAO �c./ PUTY
Contra Costa Count
v
Office of _ Kenneth J.Corcoran
Auditor-Conholler
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER y Stephen J.roerre
625 Court Street �1�1
Martinez, California 94553-1282
Telephone(510)646-2181
Fax(510)646-2649 -
,.ti tiiury-.�
January 29, 1997
To: Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds Oversight Committee
Government Code Section 60063 requires the County Auditor to file a public report with
you monthly detailing and summarizing allocations from the County's Supplemental Law
Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF).
Please accept the attached allocation report for the fiscal month ended January 13, 1997.
The report consists of the revenue and expenditure detail reports for each of the 4 budget
units set up within the County's SLESF. Other than interest earnings, there were no new
allocations this month.
Sincerely,
Kenneth J. Corcoran
Auditor-Controller
By Paul Abelson
Principal Accountant
cc: County Board of Supervisors
Treasurer - Tax Collector
A n
dP
O\ Q N N n P
> O+
O O O
6 f W 6 h
m p H N
Z N N • m p
J N W ]N
2 N Z N
W
W Y
rD O V O
ss 1 ao
m
W P
P •° Z N n
d J 1 C
t O
W
u 4 4 4
> Q
O O O
O O O
W 7
,+Z
•�W P P P
J> •° O O
<W ♦ ♦ ^
W i n n
a n N n
a r n N
P °
O
'•1
< >
O J f 7 O O O O
t Z w O P P Q u=l
Zpt W< N ^ V1 �. Sw•
N Vz n n N N r O F
wti Q
O w P O w O
6
> r ^ F<
♦ z 2
0
W °
z '
o v �
o �
p y
W W
W 2 p
7 Z
O V J 2
J
2 J10 �
V< 1
W O 1
N W J N
7 <
Z r
o O N
N V W
O > r W J h N
2� s 2 J io
°L •W Y O N ~
<JN S O < r
tJ!
GNY / W J 6Nf
Wq< W W Z V
w W O J W V• r
O 2 W
O < 2 Z p
O •< W W O �
ro_Y r > u not
+z:
Q t
OOu yw O N O 00�
26N p O r'1 O
�s
o.ol No-tee aea
A n
W R A
a P
r N N N A P
N r i N
H N^
r S
rr
WS G rf'
0 O ti N N N W S
S N N N 0 O
J N W i
Zyl JN
S N
W V W
m O
<r O O O V O
d d W O O O <r
r G 4
O
L z P P P
P a i a a a A
1 O J< P a
a V J A 1 O
P Z< H H H a
^ Z P O
J ^
> W
W 6
W L
r
0
J
W
p P
r • P
H
t ^ r ^
� J T
O•"�J n.� z N J S
r< O u^
sa s
J
A VJti VI O Ort
O O u�r
OOP O O O O O �` a
2 P < O=P
7WN r 2 xr
o � s o
r H n r H
0
m s
z
W
0 0
e o
r s P
J Y
Z^
W <
r O
a o
� u
.L. Z
Wr
r LW
J m <
1 u L
of
os
N O ^ ^ O O O O O J
<V N N N N O
W <
O r
N N J J O N N
O S < < O
W h
^W Z 0 O J •+ O J f
r
H J + 6
W W r L J F N f < H J
O V W0 z00 V W
< 4 N N O W 2 W O W O
N •< W � 1 � r
Y 1 < LL
00 W O
N 6
Oil• O Z J O J < OOW
WN N 2 a
16N J r r Y
b
^W N < W W W r J n H
Y-01 I110-Ilf Isd
A A
A P N O
0� W
r o o
0 0 �
sr W LH
W< n
0 p F N N W<
Z N N 0 p
J N W J N
S N 2 N
W
W V W V
b O V O
<L <L
ns 1 nn
s
W p
n pW
d J 1
P L< a
P O W W P
r >L P
O �
f W
W n ,•
O O O
p W O O O
W J
w_2
P P P
J Y < V <
i W
W L A A A
P n n n
P
n
< f F
N L n O O O f
< Z W P P P 0 V y
rWJ �
zuL iuL n n n F ice,
O W P u i
2 M r
y u �
mp
0 .z. O
o y
0 1
r =L
L im
2 y J
V O S J
p
..r 2
J � O
< J1D L
O s
J W J
N J
S N
O O
a r > < r o
N W
O 6 L W J f N
S f <
O
f O O J F h S
zaN < o J 1-
Wo
Wo
L u N
< IN Z O t O L
< J
6M6 N R W J yyl
Wq< W W S y F lyq
O n J p Y < < p H
bW O J W N y.
O L L W I Op
O •t W V W i
O
<2f 2 ✓'� W R J
2 6 N p
L u <V P P P u a
�.m nle-Lee 'iea
A
n Wx
A P
N N N
N r >
p W H
V V
W x K
W( G M
Z N N N N
�N W
zN
W
W V
b 4
<z D O O O
4 O W O O 4
K
Y J ^
P 4 Wpb M M M
.- .. s
K a
Y W
u 4
i
<
m
x
z
aW
P
t
M
K r Y
K 7 t-
J< 2
wFz � O
(
+f W 1 w U
R n >
5 <
O W J h O
O 02P e o O o o <
Z P Q
", o M M M •+
is M ✓t e'1 M
w v
m >
x <
N W
< 4
O w
4 V
t ti
s D
Z P
O
4
.l S
W K
< xw
�m
1 V z
O O
« Dx
w
N vw o 0 0 0 0 o No
++ p 0 0 0 4 0
ti <V N N N N 4
C N J
I- (
W J J Y
0 2 K N <
r6 2 m 4 J O J F
♦N W C Y Z
+P < N 4 z o w 4
pOW D H m m x O m 1�
xY N S 'J O w N 4 N
W W N
p<K < < x
MOW ( Z > <
<G N J < s b
ra mous ^re.
-- y.o�. _au9-zee ose
� .�
n
as a In ,,.!
'O`* " n n
dN i
H
~ Z O O
O W) O 4
W IIC t � )
a 1- w
W< O. N N
0 p ) N N
Z
�N W
.E N
W
W M
N O 1
<MP
P P O
6 a � N N O N
a w P P �- O
o a.. � n»
a J
P P Mt � �
o ww
s >s
o
r< n
ry n P 4 O O P
pW n N N N O O N
W� n P P P P O
M Z P V V, .� V P
Ji O O ; ; < O N
<W ^ •� •6 < O
�L O O N
p M M M
P
M
� a >
p O O O
< W W
O J MJ �
urJi< S'.W N M N
<<� �••> O CM W
Y 1+ W .p < O +S
1-W'J NK < O �O h
x pe[ w M M M N
O v 2 C
.a wl-
wZ�O
O W P K
}P Z
Y W�-
�L z
: c O
7 N u
V r �
W
t H O
W K
!D 6
O Z O
1 V
zP r a
W x: a
W�u 4
_ L_0_ 'Q
u� s
� a2 p
O
2
O J N
J V
O a O
t V O O
JW J
N H +7 'S
� W w O
a r s x .- > < Y^
W ' W
p 6 o Z O J f W J h
2 O F M K ) S
1- O O e[ N 1 J S � Z
ZION 4 W N O K 1' O ?
W O 1� Y � r- r N '-
r 6 + w W N t
)rtW w ) N
M S N i 7 2
K.IN 4 w 2 I K x o K .0,.
6NC N Z O J L W J
WN{ W O C 4! W 2
PMJ P Z N V P S V ry
wW N W O J
i ppc O ++ O 2 L W
�4W W K r } h „ > b
♦2) N t M W ry W fC
� W K Z Z O
�I�J
POu f-w N O
4w« u0 r O O Q + r
PCW +[u P d P P P P
f�Ot fNf-L6e 04G
e P
M y S N N N
N r Y N J
F N i
Z
O p
w a<
R F y M
W< a W<
0 O h N N N
Z N N N N 0 p
i N i N
W
Wu
uo uo
<R n o 0 0 <m
ad C! C! o da
0 o e
M1 e V N N N M1
b O i Z e e e P
P n 2K e e e O
P O w0 n n n P
P �
.[ J
T
Y 6 r 1
<
m_
J
M1 W
P
a
r
n
� r
T t
SW-{
F 7 Y[
ZWR W f iWj
Oxi N n 00[:
O e VFI
f
opa o o a O o on<
ZP S XI
TWr F O O „ r Q w
�1 W� R • O }Y
V O e O O O V V
s r n N n ++
md
d
i < i
4 w
I W N I I
p �
K z
Z Y
K< W
Z <n Z
f
J J
f ti
X Z Z
O W R o
< zW <
om
00
N 6 Y
W
N un O O O O O 6 O N
u0 O O O O O O N
L N J
t
NN W J J O lye
O i < NI K • O
w h
rp Z 0 O J O J
J•W O h f J h <
lOW i J r N 1 h < aPa
nn W < 0 p Z m X Yp
O R N N O W Z W O W O Q
OOW p F 0 0 >K 0 0 F 001
W N W N
O R< 6 S w M Z O F
t z rw�
r6w N d N O O �R�
v-m u3v-t6e osd
n Wx n
rp R r N w +P
N 1 K N+F
Nr F! .-
P P n
> a+
r _
z
O V V O O O O
2< r n r W
tf W
W< G 6 r
m p h N N W t
W 2 N
t9 O
<p[ YO
GL 1` O O P fr
W p
n p W r r P
P a SN ^ n
P p K< r
>O P O
O �
W
w L
•� 4
O O O P
O O O N
W�
N I n n
P P P
J!
<W
P P P II
n s N n o
p a a <
P 4'
n
� N
< r
0 0 0 o r < r
N < W W O O O O r r <
y•"•< iJI fW2 a a a O O J
Yh hW U «�I
W 7 P P P r < h W J
2 Y R W N M N O r i u k
N O Z a a a n
a yWI• N pl O Z
WIa u
oWP •. za
>p f O W P
h f r h 6
2 S 2
O
V W Y O r
r <
L Z 0
U W Z i
I �
J
Z O >
W hlW O p
L O
Z 7i L
0 z
J O Z
p
h
i N
O J
a J 4'J
O a
I V O
W O
J J h
I O <
+ • W � O P
a h > < 1-
N O
O i K J h O
Z t O n
h O O J < h 2
W O h h
it 6 Z J ZO
h�0 r• W N N f rC
dC •W I i � N Z
<+N V Z O < M <+V
W O< W W 2 h < W p
017J O > < < h pN
bpW O J W N O OV
O r K V
O •< W W < O O �
noW 0 '•
J2T � •-• W 6 � Z�
�h J
pOu yW O N p a•
26N p O N O 00�
7Ww VO N + N
..s•. <V P P P �w�
rc•
9-01 Wo-Zed I9d
A w.t
N+ < N+
Nem > N�-
S •"
O W M O O O ^O
p p o 0
a< r r r
ah W
w K 4 a
mD r N N N Y1 w<
Y N N N N M mtl
Z N W x
J N
2 N
W O I I 1 b 0
44 O O O O 46
A m u In A
P a zz
1 O J< P
a uJ N a t
P D 2t a P
O P
a 3 r r I
W w
6 r �
S
m
z
J
n W
P I
P • t
• • I
n
O O O O O
< Y s r
J< ti P P P P P h NJ♦
Oy-
u�2 6
< z P P P P P p u<1
a<iDO i a a 0 a a y aW•
O D
ti
4 t z W r r r r r H x W e
,Ip yJh N oaa
p m uo•
0"nx
S P < O t
W -pr O a O S 2 t
hi^ y N P P P h YW•
JW' a N N N p JWf
4 O 1/1 •n }} 17 p �
6 a a a O
i
•h+ W <
u 2 "
D J
w N
zr
w <K W
r
Y
Z I N
O Wa
< SW
J m
u Z <
W e J x
N n
W
N D o 0 0 0 o m J
uo P o o N N O n <
a N J r t
W < t
NN J M J O N"
O N < S K h
rW 2 M O J P O J h
♦N 4 Y 5. 2 +1
N6 h 4 f O 6' Y O J J NI
'm< i y 4 h W y H K <�•
IMJ ^^ W W $ W J h ✓1-
PW a N y N -. h < o b•
< a E O W V O W O P D
Zr N W m m < h 0 m h 4 001
J O Z O O H Z x I
W N V m N J
y-
Oa<
ooi
!4N s s Y b i,
row N O P V O ral
p-pl Yu9-dEi$4
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS C•79 Contra
-'
FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Costa
County
DATE: February 11, 1997
A fOI
REFERRAL TO THE FAMILY AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
SUBJECT: REGARDING THE PUBLIC SERVICE PORTION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)8 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
REFER to the Family and Human Services Committee the subject of the Public
Service portion of the Community Development Block Grant, AUTHORIZE the
Family and Human Services Committee to serve as the body to recommend the
allocation of the Public Service portion of the Community Development Block Grant,
and REQUEST the Family and Human Services Committee to report this matter
back to the Board of Supervisors by March 4, 1997.
BACKGROUND:
We do not have another suitable body to review and recommend allocations of funds
for the 1997 program year for the Public Service portion of the Community
Development Block Grant. Therefore, we are recommending that staff undertake
this review and make preliminary decisions regarding allocating these funds. The
Family and Human Services Committee can then review the preliminary decisions
made by the staff and make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: `YES SIGNATURE:( f}�j/ O �' � `
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR —RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_._APPROVE �jOTHER // /y
SIGNATURE(S): L .i(f///�///f z� A �
ACTION OF BOARD ON rabi Uzi y i 1, 1
APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTEF SUPERVISORS
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS{ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS
�O+N.THE DATE SHOWN. 9
ATTESTED 4�'4_ 'I'i'`ta' "—��-��`T
Contact: PHIL BATCHELO ,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
cc: County Administrator SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Belinda Smith, CDD f /J
BY DEPUTY
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
'FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: FEBRUARY /i) 1997
SUBJECT: NOTICE AND RESOLUTIONS APPOINTING OFFICERS,ADOPTING ANNUAL BUDGET
APPROVING REPAIR, MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND
SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR ADOPTION OF ASSESSMENT, HILLCREST HEIGHTS
GRAD, EL SOBRANTE AREA,
Specific Request(s)or Recommendation(s)&Background&Justification
I. Recommended Action:
1. ADOPT the Resolution appointing officers for the Hillerest Heights Geologic Hazard Abatement
District (GHAD). Resolution 97/70.
2. ADOPT the Resolution approving the Hillcrest Heights Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GRAD)
budget for Fiscal Ye r 1997-1998 and approving GHAD Repair, Maintenance and Improvement Program.
Resolution NO. 9 /71.
3. ADOPT the Resolution declaring it's intention to order an assessment for the Hillcrest Heights
Geologic Hazard Abatement District (CHAD) Subdivision 7582 and SET a public hearing to consider all
protests against the proposed assessment for Tuesday, April 1, 1997 at 10:30 a.m. in Room 107 of the
Board of Supervisors' Chambers, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California. Resolution No. 97/72.
4. DIRECT the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to complete the required Public Notification in
accordance with Section 6061 of the Government Code.
II. FinancialIm�aci:
There will be no financial impact on the County General Fund. All costs will be covered with revenue
generated through parcel assessments from the Geologic Hazard Abatement District (CHAD).
II1. Reasons for Recommendations and Baftround:
On July 23, 1996 the Board of Supervisors approved the formation of the Hillcrest Heights Geologic
Hazard Abatement District (GHAD) for Subdivision 7582 and appointed itself to act as the Board of
Directors. The conditions of approval for the development required that a GHAD be for d to mitigate
the potential for soil movement in this development.
Continued on attachment. iY_Yes SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON: February 11, 1997 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
x UNANIMOUS (ABSENT )
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
SE:cs
g:\EngSvc\SpDist\BOU9HGHAD 2S.tl
Contact: Skip Epperly, (510)313-2253
Oris.Div._ PW(Special Districts)
cc: Auditor-Controller _
Accounting
Engineering Services
D. Curtin,McCutchen,Doyle,Brown&Enerson
A.Lindgren,McCutchen,Doyle,Brown&Enerson
J. Wollman,Wollman&Associates
I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED. _ _. 11,1997
PHIL BATCHELOR, CI-rk of t,,c ".oard
f Figx:rvls and
C,'am' Aqr„mi,;2rator
s, /Yvn il ... . Deouty
HILLCREST HEIGHTS GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT.
FEBRUARY 11, 1997
PAGE 2
The purpose of this action is to now adopt the Resolution approving the FY 1997-98 budget, appoint
the officers for the GHAD and to initiate the process of authorizing an assessment to finance the
activities of the CHAD.
IV. Consequences of Negative Acton•
This project will not be able to proceed.
C.80
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Resolution on February 11 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla and DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT:None
ABSTAIN: None
RESOLUTION NO. 97/ 70
SUBJECT: Appointing Officers for the Hillcrest Heights Geologic Hazard Abatement District
Subdivision 7582.
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, acting as the Board of Directors of
the Hillcrest Heights Geologic Hazard Abatement District Subdivision 7582, RESOLVES as
follows:
A. On July 23, 1996 the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, adopted
Resolution No. 96/329, approving the formation of a geological hazard abatement district
(GHAD) for the Hillcrest Heights area and appointing itself to act as the Board of Directors.
B. Pursuant to a Public Resource Code sections 26584 and 26585, the Board must
appoint a Clerk and a Treasurer of the District and, pursuant to Section 26586, the Board may
appoint other officers of the District and delegate thereto such powers as may be appropriate
in the circumstances.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HEREBY RESOLVES, FINDS,
CERTIFIES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Board appoints the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors as Clerk;
2. The Board appoints the County Treasurer as Treasurer;
3. The Board appoints the County Counsel as General Counsel; and
4. The Board appoints William Wiggington as District Geologist/Manager pursuant to
the terms of an employment contract to be approved by the Board.
5. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
BY A00a --c—, C�
Chair, Board of Directors
Attest:
J
CI rk of the District
SE:cs
9:tEngSvctSpbistiHGHADApt28.t1
Orifi.Dept: Public Works Department(Special Districts)
Contact: Skip Epperly,313-2253
cc: County Administrator
Assessor
Auditor-Controller
County Counsel
Community Development
Accounting
Mccutchen,Doyle,Brown&Enerson,LLP
RESOLUTION NO. 97/ 70
C.80
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Resolution on FPbri,ary 11 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla and DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RESOLUTION NO. 97L71
SUBJECT: Approving Hillcrest Heights Geologic Hazard Abatement District Subdivision
7582 Budget for First Fiscal year 1997-1998 and Approving GHAD Repair,
Maintenance and Improvement Program
The Board of Directors of the Hillcrest Heights Geologic Hazard Abatement District
Subdivision 7582 RESOLVES:
A. On July 23, 1996, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County adopted
Resolution No. 96/329, approving the formation of a geologic hazard abatement district (the
"GHAD") for the Hillcrest Heights area and appointing itself to act as the Board of Directors of
the CHAD.
B. On February 11, 1997, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No.97 70 ,
appointing officers for the CHAD.
C. In order for the GHAD to proceed to efficiently implement the GHAD plan of
control and to undertake repair, maintenance and improvement projects and related operations,
it is necessary to approve an annual budget and a repair, maintenance and improvement
program.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HEREBY RESOLVES, FINDS,
CERTIFIES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Board hereby APPROVES the GHAD budget for the first fiscal year, 1997-
1998, which budget is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. The Board hereby APPROVES the GHAD Repair, Maintenance and Improve-
ment Program, which program is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this
reference.
3. Effective Date: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
By
Chair, Board of Directors
Attest:
a
CI rk o the District
SE:cs
g:\Eng Svc\Sp Dist\.HGHADApv28.t1
Ong.Dept.: Public Works Department(Special Districts)
Contact: Skip Epperly,313-2253
cc: County Administrator
Auditor-Controller
County Counsel
Accounting
McCutchen,Doyle,Brown and Enerson,LLP
RESOLUTION NO. 97/ 71
EXHIBIT A
Hillcrest Heights Subdivision 7582
Geologic Hazard Abatement District
Projected Budget 1497-1948 Fiscal Year
A. Projected Income
Assessment
$875 per parcel per year X 66 parcels = $57,750
B. Projected Ex en nses
General Manager/Geologist $ 8,500
Support Services $ 3,000
Repair, maintenance and improvements $18,250
(as provided in the approved,
Repair, Maintenance and
Improvement Program)
Legal, accounting and insurance $ 8,000
County staff services $ 0
Reserve $20,000
TOTAL $57,750
RESOLUTION NO. 97/ 71
EXHIBIT B
Hillcrest Heights Subdivision 7582
Geologic Hazard Abatement District
Repair,Maintenance and Improvement Program
A. On a periodic basis during each year, the GRAD will perform the following:
1. Monitoring and maintenance of the following items:
a) interceptor ditches
b) piezometers and hydraugers
C) survey points and benchmarks
d) subdrains
2. Mitigation measures, including the following items:
a) sandbagging
b) hydroseeding
3. Other items included within Plan of Control
B. During each year,the GRAD will perform repair and improvement projects as and
when necessary, within the budgetary limits.
RESOLUTION NO. 971 71
C.80
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Resolution on February 12 , 1997 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciami.11a and DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RESOLUTION NO. 97/_72
SUBJECT: Resolution of Intent to Order an Assessment for Hificrest Heights Geologic
Hazard Abatement District Subdivision 7582, and Setting a Public Hearing to
Consider All Protests Against Said Assessment.
The Board of Directors of the Hillcrest Heights Geologic Hazard Abatement District
Subdivision RESOLVES THAT:
L On July 23, 1996, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County adopted
Resolution No. 96/329, approving the formation of a geologic hazard abatement
district (the "GHAD") for the Hillcrest Heights area and appointing itself to act as
the Board of Directors of the GHAD.
2. In order to defray the costs and expenses of maintaining and operating the GHAD
improvements, it will be necessary to provide for a reliable source of GHAD
funding.
3. Public Resources Code sections 26650 et seq. authorize, after a noticed hearing,
the levy and collection of an assessment upon benefitted property within the GHAD
to pay for maintenance and operation of GHAD improvements. Article XIII D of
the California Constitution imposes additional requirements for the levy and
collection of such an assessment.
4. The property within the GHAD is identified in the map attached as Exhibit A.
5. The assessment report/engineer's report (the "Assessment Report") attached as
Exhibit B was prepared by the District Geologist/Manager and by a registered
professional engineer certified in the State of California of the GHAD. The
Assessment Report sets forth the estimated budget for the 1997-98 fiscal year, the
total assessment that will be chargeable to the entire GHAD in the fiscal year 1997-
98 and in subsequent fiscal years, the proposed estimated assessment to be levied
against each parcel of property within the GHAD in the fiscal year 1997-98 and in
subsequent fiscal years, and a description of the method used in formulating the
estimated assessments.
Wherefore, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa FINDS, CERTIFIES AND ORDERS
THAT:
i. The Board hereby declares, its intention, consistent with the requirements of
Article XIII D of the California Constitution, to order that the cost and expenses
of maintaining and operating the GHAD improvements shall be assessed against
the property within the GHAD.
2. The Board further declares its intention to assess against the property within the
GHAD, for the 1997-1998 fiscal year and for subsequent fiscal years, all or a part
of the amounts set forth in the Assessment Report.
3. Notwithstanding paragraph 2 immediately above, the Board shall not order this
assessment if a majority protest exists as defined in Section 4, Article XIII D of the
California Constitution.
RESOLUTION NO. 97/ 72
{Y
O
j ASSESSMENT ROLL
4 4 CEL SfIlEUTADDRESS ASSESSMENT
AM41ll1I
1 WB BRIOGEtiYAY CIRCLE ELSOBRANTE,G WN3 TBD'
�y�p 199 10i002 10 BRiDGEWAY CIRCLE ELSOBRANTE.CA%W3 TBD
0403 30 BRlDGEWAY CIRCLE ELSOBRANTE,GWA4D IUD
0-008 XI70RIDOEWAYCIRCLE ELSOBRANI6GWM3 TBD
�UM5 9171HUDOEWAYCIRCIE EL SOBRANTE.CA WWI IDD
LIa4 921 BRIDGEWAYCIRCLE EL SOBRANTF_CA WWO TBD
230.0K17 .175 RKIDGEWAY CIRCLE FL 508RANTE,CA Y1903 TBD
DOXMI 9298RIDDEWAYCIRCIS EI.SOBRANTf:,G WBuI TRU
2304X19 933 BRIDMWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,CA 94903 TBD
2304110 137 BRIDGEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRA2OE.CAM03 TOD
T('�7 T { 230-011 M I OWDGEWAYCIRCLE EL SOORANTE,G 94903 TOD
VICINITY MAID 2304112 N58NIDG6*AY CIRCLE ELSOBRANTE,CAW803 TBD
,330413 9499PJDGEWAY CIRCLE EL SOEJAWK CA W903 TOO
N.T.S. ?30-0u 179 BR1DOEWAY CIRCLE ELSOBRANTF_CA94803 TBD
/ 230-015 11,1 BRIDGEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTL CA W WO IUD
,230416 l97BRIDGEWAYCIRCSE ELSOBRANTE,GN903 TOD
, 230-017WI-SRIOGEWAYCIRCLE EL SODRANTE.G N803 TBD
230419 M5 BRIDGEIYAY CIRCLE EL SOBRAID E,CA W 903 TOD
/ %,,, 230-019 9999R3DGEWAYCIRCE ELSORRANTE.CANN3 TBD
r230-020 W30RIDOEWAY CIRCEL ' ELSOBRANTE694843 TBD
-2)04121 %7BRIDGLWAYCIRCLE ELSOBRANTE,CAWW3 TOD
4;a j DO-033 911 BRIDGEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE CA 94803 TOD
�-'230-023. 915BRIDGEWAYCIRCLE ELSOBRANTE,CA9803 TBD
DO-024 926 BRIDGEWAY CIRCLE E1,SOBRANIL,G94803 TRD
.210-025 922BRIDC&VAYC3RCLE EL SOBRANTE,G 94903 TOD
Q G 230026, 919 RIUDGEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,CA 94803 TOO
230-027 914 BRIDGEWAY CIRCLE. EL SOORANTE,G NN3 IUD
RO.MC4C -2104128 910 BRIDLEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,CA 94MI TOD
PRJ9AT OPEN SPAQ 230429 906 BRIDLEWAY CIRCLE EI.SOBRANTE CA WR03 TDD
-230430 902 BRIDLEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,CA 9480) TBD
'230.3)1 999 BRI.DGEWAY CIRCLE. FI,SOBRANTE,G94803 TBD
230-032 AN BRIDGEWAY CIRCLE ELSOBRANTE;CAN903 TBD
.231"33 190 BRO)(4!WAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,CA WX03 TBD
-2)04134 AM BRJDGEWAY CIRCLE ELSOIRANTE.;CAWVO TOO
C' f Q o�Q 230435 882 BRIDLEWAY CIRCLE ELSOBRANTE,G 94903 TBD
J pG"Pi-230.036 ITA BRIDLEWAY CIRCLE FLSORRANTC.CAW903 TBD��S ----- -- __�__ 123"37 BA BRIDLEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,CA W903 I'BU
N 89.06'09' W 296-23044118 AM BIUDGEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,CA 94803 TBD
N 36'45'21" E -2.40439 RW BRIDGEWAY CIRCLE EL SOORANTE,CA 94903 TBD
13.59' 0330-040 '862 RRIDGEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE.,CA 94403 TBD
N'
h'v �-230441 RSR BRIDLEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBMNTE,CANMI TBU
ry o mry BAILEY PROPERTY "-D3 2 BN BRIDGEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,CA 9480 TRD
N EXCEPTION 230443 950 BRIDGEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,CA 94W3 TBD
2 2 (8120-OR-397) 3-230-044 916 BRIDLEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,G W903 TBD
1-230-04S' M2 BMMEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,CA 94903 TBD
99.15 NJJJ9',T9. r-2 6 939 BRIDLEWAY CIRCLE ELSOBRANTE.GN91D TBD
N 7374-9. W 1-230-017 934 BRIDGEWAY CIRCLE ELSOBRANTE,C'AW803 TBD
W 29p 0p, /.230448 R30 BRIDGEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRANTE,CA NR03 TBD
/
PS, 1.230-0.19
3.210-W9 926 BRIDLEWAY CIRCLE EL SOBRAN CA WW3 TBD
/ 7T R,Aos 4 -23"50 9229RIDGEWAY CIRCLE ELSOBRANTE,CAWXQ IDD
110 4130,03-DO-051 857 RIDGEDALE COURT EL SOBRANTE,CA 94803 IOU
pA"'I' \ �'P 5✓3-230-052 952 RIDGF.DALE COURT EL SOBRANTE CA 94801 TDD
PRwAlE OPEx SPAR "pj 40124 1230-051 936 RIDGEDAI.E COURT EL SOBRANTE,CA 94901 IBD
\
420,NO ADW4E58 \ `% 0 836%O, y02, , 0-POa141 VW RIDGEDALE COURT EL SOMANTE,CA 94 RIO TBD
A' QIC01,Pa055 IW RIDGEUALE COURT EL SOBRANTE,CA 94901 TBD
J Uo� 0.210-056 968 RIDGEDALE COURT EL SOBRANTE,CA Yana) TRD
YYY 0.230-057 972 RIDGEDALE.COURT EL SOBRAWE.CA WIG) TBD
0.2304158 876 RIDGEDALE COURT F.I.SOBRANTE G 9490) TBD
0-2X1459 AN RIDGEDALE COURT EL SOBRANIE,CA 94"3 TBD
I„ 0.230-0(4 114 RIDGEDALE COURT ELSOBRANTECA94903 TBD
9"n-wo BIR RIDGEDALE COURT EL SOBRANTE,CA WWI TBD
\\,_0810.1162 992RIDGEDALECOURT ELSOORANTE,CA94803 IED
0.014"3 9W RIDGEDALE COURT' EL SOBRANTE CA 94 IN TBD
m-23n4K4 MCI RIDGEDALE COURT EL SOBRANIT CA 94MA TBD
0-219.065 9(6 RIDGEDALE COURT EL SOBRANTF CAWR01 TBD
o = 01'71]9g 10330-W 39W LA CIMA ROAD FL SOBRANTF.CA 94910 TOD
R = 44.00 —.� 'n-230-n67 NO ADDRESS EL SOBRANIE.CA WWII NIA
L = 92.68 M-210.4169 NO ADDRESS EL SOBRANTE,CA WWI NIA
0 - DOLL 12 M1DU.IK.9 NO ADDRESS EL SOBRANT E.CA WWU NIA
R = 40.00 Oil 'N 111:19-0710 NO ADDRESS EL SOBRANTE,I AM3 N/A
DETAIL A ,n-•l9-u]i NO ADDRESS EL SURRANTFG W9u3 N/A
N.TS 211P9-072 NO ADDRCS.S EL SOBRAN TE CA 94"1 NIA
3. JOBS\930"\:�A^I AwO 10-3-Y
c gD
EXHIBIT B
Assessment Report/Engineer's Report for
Hillcrest Heights Subdivision 7582
Geologic Hazard Abatement District
A. Hillcrest Heights Subdivision 7582 Geologic Hazard Abatement District
Estimated Budget 1997-1998 Fiscal Year
A. Projected Income
Assessment
$875 per parcel per year X 66 parcels = $57,750
B. Projected Expenses
General Manager/Geologist $ 8,500
Support Services $ 3,000
Repair, maintenance and improvements $18,250
(as provided in the approved,
Repair, Maintenance and
Improvement Program)
Legal, accounting and insurance $ 8,000
County staff services $ 0
Reserve $20.000
$57,750
B. Total Assessment on the GHAD
The total assessment to be levied on the Hillcrest Heights Subdivision 7582 Geologic
Hazard Abatement District (the "GHAD") is $57,750 in fiscal year 1997-1998. This amount
shall be adjusted annually to reflect the percentage change in the Consumer price Index (CPI)
over the previous twelve month period.
C. Assessment on each Parcel
Each parcel within the GHAD shall be assessed $875 in fiscal year 1997-1998. This
amount shall be adjusted annually to reflect the percentage change in the CPI over the previous
twelve month period.
D. Methodology Used in Formulating the Assessment
The purpose of the Hillcrest Heights Subdivision 7582 Geologic Hazard Abatement
District (the "GHAD") is to maintain an extensive network of drainage facilities to prevent
geologic hazards, and to help finance mitigation, abatement and control measures in the event
that geologic hazards occur. The basic costs of maintaining the drainage system and
preventing geologic hazards are the expenses for: General Manager/Geologist; support
service; repair maintenance and improvements; legal, accounting and insurance; and County
staff services. In addition, based upon the existing geologic conditions and information about
the GHAD drainage system contained in the Plan of Control, the County and the applicant
determined that a $60,000 reserve should be accumulated the District to help finance
mitigation, abatement and control measures in the event that geologic hazards occur. The
reserve will be built up in the first three years of operation of the GHAD, $20,000 per year.
There are 66 lots in the GHAD which will all be benefitted by the District. The
project EIR on file with the Department of Public Works recognized a potentially significant
geologic hazard for Hillcrest Heights Subdivision 7582. As detailed in the Plan of Control, on
file with the Department of Public Works, the drainage system that will be maintained by the
GHAD includes subdrains and other drainage improvements equally spaced throughout the
project. All the components of the drainage system will be maintained and monitored with
similar intensity. Each parcel in the GHAD will thus receive approximately the same benefits
from the GHAD. Accordingly, the $57,750 total assessment on the GHAD will be evenly
divided between the 66 parcels in the district and each parcel will be assessed $875. The
automatic CPI adjustment to the assessment is justified because it will correct the assessment
to approximately reflect changes in actual cost of operating the GHAD.
E. Engineer's Report
This Assessment Report contains all of the items included in engineer's reports prepared
by the Contra Costa County Department of Public Works. The Assessment Report, therefore,
constitutes an engineer's report. The Assessment Report has been reviewed and approved by the
undersigned registered professional engineer certified by the State of California
California Engineers Certification No.
EXHIBIT C
Notice of adoption of resolution by the Board of Directors
of Hillcrest Heights Subdivision 7582
Geologic Hazard Abatement District
On July 23, 1996, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County adopted Resolution
No. 96/329, approving the formation of a geologic hazard abatement district for the Hillcrest
Heights area(the "GHAD") and appointing itself to act as the Board of Directors of the CHAD.
The GHAD was formed pursuant to State Public Resources Code Section 26500 et seq. for the
proposed of prevention, mitigation, abatement and control of geologic hazards.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that:
On February 11, 1997 the, Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution 97/72 setting a
public hearing to consider adoption of an assessment for the GHAD. The amount of the
assessment will be $57,750 per year for the entire GHAD, of which$875 per year will be
chargeable to each parcel you own in the GHAD. The assessment shall continue to be levied in
perpetuity. The assessment will be adjusted annually to reflect the percentage change in the
Consumer Price Index over the previous twelve-month period.
The attached Assessment Report/Engineer's Report for Hillcrest Heights Subdivision
7582 Geologic Hazard Abatement District(The "Assessment Report") was prepared by the
District Geologist/Manager of the GHAD and describes in detail the reason for the assessment
and the basis upon which the amount of the proposed assessment was calculated. The
Assessment Report specifically sets forth the yearly estimated budget of the 1997-1998 fiscal
year, the total assessment that will be chargeable to the entire GHAD, the proposed estimated
assessments to be levied each year against each parcel of property, and a description of the
method used in formulating the estimated assessment. A copy of the Assessment Report is also
available for inspection at the office of the Clerk of the GHAD, Room 106, County
Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California.
The Board will conduct a public hearing (the "Hearing") on Tuesday, April 1, 1997 at
10:30 a.m. in Room 107 of the Board of Supervisors' Chambers, 651 Pine Street, Martinez,
California 94553 to tabulate ballots and hear any protests on the proposed assessment.
The following paragraph provides the procedures for returning and tabulating the ballots:
A ballot is attached to this notice. A copy of this notice, ballot and Assessment Report have been
sent to each of the owners of property within the GHAD. The ballot may be completed and
mailed to the Elections Clerk, 625 Court Street, Martinez, CA 94553. At the Hearing, the
Elections Clerk will deliver the ballots it receives to the Board of Supervisors. The Board of
Supervisors will then consider all protests and tabulate the ballots. The Board of Supervisors will
O.g�
not impose the proposed assessment if there is a majority protest A majority protest exists if,
upon the conclusion of the Hearing, ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the
ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots will be
weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property.
Inquiries regarding the proposed assessment may be made to Mr. William Wiggington,
District Geologist/Manager of the GRAD, telephone(408)662-0609.
EXHIBIT D
1997 BALLOT PROPOSITION - BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ADOPTION OF A
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE A ASSESSMENT TO FUND THE HILLCREST
HEIGHTS GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT SUBDIVISION 7582
Shall Resolution 97172 of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors be
enacted to authorize a benefit assessment of$875 per parcel per year to be levied each year on
property within the Hillcrest Heights Geologic Hazard Abatement District Subdivision 7582
("the GRAD"). The amount of this assessment will be automatically adjusted annually to
reflect the percentage change in the consumer price index ("CPP') over the previous twelve
month period. The specific activities that the GHAD will perform include: (1) maintaining an
extensive surface and subsurface drainage facilities to prevent geologic hazards within the
GHAD, and (2) establishing a reserve fund to, mitigate, abate or control minor landslides,
erosion and other geologic hazards within the GRAD.
Send completed ballots to:
Elections Clerk
625 Court Street
Martinez, CA 94553
[Elections Clerks to insert address of all parcels
belonging to the record owner who will receive
this ballot]
Vote on the Proposition (circle one): Support Oppose