HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 12021997 - C149 a
C. 148, C.149, C.150, and C.151
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on December 2, 1997 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Uilkema, Gerber, Canciamilla, and DeSaulnier
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Correspondence
C.148 LETTER, dated November 5, 1997, from Federal Glover, Chair, Board of Directors,
Delta Diablo Sanitation District, 2500 Pittsburg-Antioch Highway, Antioch, CA 94509,
soliciting input regarding the County's participation in a permanent, full-range hazardous
household waste facility project led by the District.
*****REFERRED TO DIRECTOR, GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
C.149 LETTER, dated November 7, 1997, from Jonothan Dumas, Chair, Advisory Council on
Equal Employment Opportunity, 651 Pine Street, 10th Floor, Martinez, CA, in response
to Board referral regarding proposition 209, expressing opposition to the action taken by
the Board of Supervisors to suspend the Minority and Women Business Enterprise
(MBE/WBE) Contract Compliance Programs for Contra Costa county, and
recommending program activities to include outreach activities, workshops,job fair
training and development to target small businesses.
*****REFERRED TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OFFICER
C.150 LETTER, dated November 7, 1997, from Jean Lum, Deputy Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors of the City and.County of San Francisco, 401 Van Ness Avenue, San
Francisco, CA 94102, requesting support for a special interest license plate.
*****REFERRED TO HEALTH SERVICES DIRECTOR
C.P51 LETTER, dated October 24, 1997, from Kathy Hicks, Mayor, City of Walnut Creek, P.O.
Box 8039, Walnut Creek, CA 94596, advising that the City Council decided against
widening Treat Boulevard between Cherry Land and Bancroft Road, but to reconsider a
new design for adding an eastbound right-turn only lane at Bancroft Road.
*****REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AND PUBLIC WORKS
DIRECTOR
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the above recommendations as noted(*****) are
APPROVED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND
CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND
ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
�J'J
ATTESTED
Phil Batchelor,Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors and County Administrator
By Deputy
c.c. Correspondents (4)
Director,Growth Management and Economic Development Agency
Affirmative Action Officer
Health Services Director
Transportation Committee
Public Works Director
November 7, 1997
RECEIVE
Mark'De Saulnier, Chair NOV I i 1997
Board of Supervisors
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors CLERK BOARD OF SUP oRs
651 Pine Street, First Floor CONTRA COgrq CO.
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Supervisor De Saulnier:
At our October 24, 1997 meeting we discussed your referral to our Council
for comments and recommendations regarding Proposition 209 and the
Board's action to suspend the Minority and Women Business
Enterprise(MBE/WBE) Contract Compliance Programs.
On behalf of the Equal Employment Opportunity Advisory Council, I am
writing to express our opposition to the action taken by the Board of
Supervisors to suspend the Minority and Women Business Enterprise
(MBE/WBE) Contract Compliance Programs for Contra Costa County.
We believe that your decision was based on limited information and a narrow
interpretation of activities sustainable under Proposition 209 guidelines.
The reason given by the Board of Supervisors for suspending the program
was a reference to potential law suits and their threat to the general fund.
We wish that you were able to give other reasons to support your actions.
There was no pronouncement that this action was being taken to reestablish
equitable access to business opportunities for all residents of the county. No
statement citing that there was no longer a need for mechanisms focused on
establishing and maintaining fair access to business opportunities for women
and minority owned businesses. No indication that minority and women
owned businesses were achieving participation in contracting near or equal
to their availability in the marketplace.
We are recommending the following program activities:
1. Workshops, job fair training and development should be provided to
small contractors by County staff. Subjects would include `how to do
business in the county'.
2. The County should develop an outreach program to target small
businesses so they are aware of upcoming County construction projects and
professional services contracts.
3. We continue to request staffing for the Affirmative Action Office in order
to provide staff support to departments and small businesses and to monitor
construction, vendor, and professional/personal services contracts.
J 3
4. Recognize construction contractors who have subcontracted continuously
• with small businesses including minority and women owned businesses.
5. Recognize unions that increase their memberships with local residents
from low income areas and areas that include large numbers of minority and
women residents.
6. Public Works and General Services Departments should provide to
contractors at the time specifications for projects, lists of small businesses
including minority and women owned businesses. If there are several
subcontracting opportunities, the lists should reflect small businesses in
each of the those areas of potential subcontracting. Suppliers,
manufacturers and truckers should also be included. The County should
continue to use the CalTrans listing of DBE firms. DBE firms are certified
small businesses.
7. Public Works and General Services Departments should select several
contractors including minority and women owned contractors to be selected
• to work as consultants on County projects. This should be monitored by the
Affirmative Action Office.
8. The Council strongly supports the Affirmative Action Office continued
implementation of any modified program in this area. We do not agree that
the Public Works and General Services should now be given the
responsibility of implementing any revised or modified small business or
DBE Contract Compliance program.
9. Staff connected with consultants or contractors bidding on projects with
the County should not be involved with the solicitation, screening, or
selection of the contractor or consultant. This should be monitored by the
Affirmative Action Office.
10. For construction projects more than one million dollars, introduce
language in the specifications that encourage the participation of local
• trades, especially those who will commit to referring a broad representation
of County residents including minority, female, and low income.
11. Require contractors to solicit workers with trade experience from:
Unemployment rolls of the California Employment Development
Department in Contra Costa County Offices;
- welfare rolls;
trade union rolls; and
directories from other agencies with small businesses like
CalTrans firms that are DBE certified and other agencies that
certify firms as small businesses
12. Public Works and General Services Departments should monitor the
reduction of welfare rolls and unemployment rolls to determine if
employment was due to Contractors working on County projects. Their
findings should be reported to the EEO Advisory Council and the Affirmative
Action Office.
13. Require Public Works and General Services Departments to continue
submittal of three lowest bid proposals within one week of bid opening to
the Affirmative. Action Office for the purpose of monitoring patterns of
subcontractor utilization.
14. Direct County Counsel's Office to monitor other Counties (such as Los
Angeles) and Cities, and other agencies with MBE/WBE programs in order
to review how they are continuing with their programs regardless of
Proposition 209 and document the pros and cons of their approach to the
County Administrator. Copies of their report would also be sent to the EEO
Advisory Council and the Board of Supervisors.
15. Prior to decisions regarding MBE/WBE programs, request input from a
broad spectrum of participants like the EEO Advisory Council, Women's
Advisory Committee, Human Relations Commission, and other community
groups and organizations.
16. Direct the Public Works and General Services Departments to continue
to submit documentation showing their contracting participation of firms
including MBE and WBE firms on contracts less than $50,000.
We are prepared to answer any questions regarding our recommendations
and thank you for the opportunity to express our concerns and present our
views. Our county had two years of meeting and/or exceeding both goals.
We were headed toward requesting the elimination of the construction
requirements after several more years because we would have shown the
County had met its objectives. We still need to work on Purchasing and
Professional Services contracts, but even in that area there has been
improvement.
Our county must maintain and improve its ability to monitor and assess the
impact of Proposition 209 on the equitable access of all businesses in Contra
Costa County to contracting opportunities generated and paid for by the
County.
Sincerely,
Jonotha DDumas, Chair
Advisory Council on Equal Employment Opportunity
CC: EEO Advisory Council Members
Emma Kuevar