HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10221996 - C3 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: OCTOBER 22, 1996
SUBJECT: OAKLEY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION
Project No.: 0662-6R4235
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. Recommended Action:
A. APPROVE Amendment to Right of Way Contract with Ben S. Romiti and AUTHORIZE Public
Works Director to execute said contract on behalf of the County.
B. APPROVE payment of$1,050 and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller to issue a check payable
to Ben S. Romiti, 1092-2100 Oakley Road, Oakley, CA 94561, to be forwarded to the Real
Property Division for delivery.
II. Financial Impact:
Payment totaling $1,050 from Oakley/N. Brentwood Area of Benefit funds.
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: ;
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
_RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON OCT 2 2 1996 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
,/ UNANIMOUS(ABSENT )
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
NW:gPP
\real ro \tem \BOa22.t10 t na action take that a to a true e�corre�x Cly d
g• p P � an acdon taken and entered on the minutes p1 Me
Orig. Div: Public Works(R/P) Board of Supery mr
?re
Contact: Nancy Wenninger(313-2227) ATTESTED:
PHIL cc: County Administrator of supervisors BATCHELOR,county of the eta
Auditor-Controller(via R/P)
P.W.Accounting By put,
c,3
Oakley Road Reconstruction
October 22, 1996
Page Two
III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background:
On March 23, 1993, the Board of Supervisors approved the acquisition from Mr. Romiti of certain
property rights necessary for the horizontal and vertical realignment of Oakley Road. After
completion of the project, Mr. Romiti complained that the new raised grade of the road and
shoulder eliminate access to a portion of his property and have resulted in the loss of twenty-one
additional vines. Pursuant to the above-referenced Amendment to Right of Way Contract, the
compensation is for additional damages to Mr. Romiti's property resulting from the project.
IV. Consequences of Negative Action:
The property owner would not be fairly compensated for damages which resulted from the project.
Further, the County could suffer additional costs associated with legal action undertaken by Mr.
Romiti.