HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01231996 - C49 . C0
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - Contra
FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON, Costa n` ' "'
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR �u /
o 't11
DATE: JANUARY 23 , 1996
SUBJECT: COMMENTS TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (MTC) ON THE
ALTAMONT PASS CORRIDOR STUDY OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Authorize the Chair of the Board of Supervisor to sign and transmit
to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission the attached letter,
stating the following comments on the Altamont Pass Interregional
Corridor Study Operational Analysis :
1 . I-680/580 INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION. Support that future
reconstruction efforts to improve travel movements through the
interchange should be in collaboration with Alameda, Contra
Costa, and San Joaquin Counties .
2 . METERING. Support further analysis of ramp and mainline
metering along the I-580/205 Corridor to address local
concerns, with local jurisdictions and Caltrans as principals
of the analysis . This analysis should also discuss
complementary efforts proposed by Contra Costa jurisdictions
for I-680 .
3 . MASS TRANSIT. Support the study' s recommendations for a Major
Investment Study (MIS) that comprehensively examines mass
transit in the corridor in terms of Rail/BART connections,
complementary express/subscription bus services, HOV lanes,
and the potential for increasing transit use in the area.
4 . TRACY-BRENTWOOD EXPRESSWAY. Support the creation of the inter-
jurisdictional task force to ensure that land use and
transportation planning activities do not preclude the
viability of the Tracy-Brentwood Expressway.
5 . MITIGATION CONCEPTS. Support the " Mitigation Tool Box "
concept for future developments to include the strategy of
preserving right-of-way for:
• major arterial roads parallel to I-580; and
• transit routes to serve major new tra fic enerators
planned in the Tri-Valley area.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: XYES SIGNATU -
vey E . a on
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE _ OTHER
SIGNATURE (S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON _ (p APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I -HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF .THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Daniel J. Pulon (510/646-2378) ATTESTED z3 .
Orig: Community Development Department (CDD) PHIL BATCH OR, C RK O#
cc: Public Works Department (PWD) THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
_ AND C LINTY ADM NISTRATOR
BY ,DEPUTY
ALTAMONT PASS CORRIDOR STUDY
JANUARY 23 , 1996
PAGE 2
FISCAL IMPACT
NONE.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
I-580 at Altamont Pass is an inter-metropolitan corridor that primarily connects
the Bay Area with the Central Valley, providing: local and long distance travel,
passenger and freight traffic, and work, shopping, and recreational trips .
Current East Bay and Central Valley employment and housing growth trends
indicate that this corridor will have increasing traffic congestion.
Several transportation organizations -- Caltrans, MTC, and Alameda Congestion
Management Agency -- have entered into a formal agreement to conduct an Altamont
Pass Interregional Transportation Corridor Study. The objective of the study is
that to identify and evaluate options to ameliorate traffic congestion on the
I-580 Altamont Pass Corridor before it becomes an unmitigable reality in the
future.
Contra Costa County has a vested interest in this effort since any policy and
implementation decisions regarding this corridor may have ramifications on
future land use planning and circulation improvement policies in East County and
Tri-Valley Areas .
In May 1995, the County appointed Supervisor Tom Torlakson to the Altamont Pass
Policy Advisory Committee . Since then, County staff has reviewed the Altamont
Pass Interregional Corridor Study Operational Analysis, published November 1995;
this document is an evaluation of proposed operational improvements for the I-
580 Corridor. The following are pertinent County concerns stemming from that
document :
I-680/580 INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION. Alameda County Transportation Authority
(ALTA) , using Measure-B and local match funds, is currently coordinating the
first phase of the reconstruction efforts of the interchange, involving the
construction of the flyover ramp for the southbound to eastbound travel
movements . The Analysis indicated that ACTA and Caltrans are conceptualizing
additional flyovers for the interchange that could amount to several hundred
million dollars . Recent transportation studies have indicated that the major
users of the interchange have origins in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Joaquin
Counties .
METERING. The Analysis briefly discussed the viability of mainline and ramp
metering along the Corridor. Ramp metering has the potential to reduce
bottlenecks and minimize stop and go traffic on the freeway; reducing travel
time from I-5 to I-680 to 52 minutes, compared to 2 . 5 hours. However, more
specific analysis is needed regarding:
• corridor implementation process for existing and future conditions;
• impacts on freeways and local arterial roads; and
• system wide metering coordination, since Contra Costa County
jurisdictions in Central and East County are proposing similar efforts
for I-680, which could complement metering along the I-580 corridor.
MASS TRANSIT. The Analysis discussed the proposed Altamont Rail Project,
Express/Subscription Bus Services, and Livermore BART Extension. The estimated
cost of all these future projects is approximately $690 million -- quite an
investment in mass transit in the area. To date, there has not been a
coordinated analysis of mass transit needs assessment to substantiate the
effectiveness of these projects .
TRACY-BRENTWOOD EXPRESSWAY. The Analysis summarized that significant growth is
anticipated for both Eastern Contra Costa County and San Joaquin Valley,
necessitating improved transportation connections between the areas --
especially with the likelihood that economic linkages will strengthen. The
Analysis proposed serious consideration of a future four lane facility from I-
580 at I-205 to Route 4 southeast of Brentwood. The Analysis proposal is similar
to Caltrans' previous proposal indicated in the State Route 239 Concept Report .
The Analysis advocated the creation of an inter-jurisdictional task force to
ensure that land development and transportation planning activities in the area
do not preclude the viability of this future road project .
0, 119
ALTAMONT PASS CORRIDOR STUDY
JANUARY 23 , 1996
PAGE 3
MITIGATION CONCEPTS . The Analysis proposes a " Mitigation Tool Box, " consisting
of transportation strategies, negotiated among jurisdictions, that can reduce
the traffic impacts of major new developments . The Analysis indicated that
future growth in the area will require more transportation capacity. To address
the transportation needs of future growth, the " Mitigation Tool Box " should
include the transportation strategy of preserving right-of way for:
• major arterial roads parallel to I-580; and
• transit routes to serve major new traffic generators planned in the
Tri-Valley area.
The inclusion of this right-of-way strategy would foster transportation
coordination of major developments north of I-580 in Alameda and Contra Costa
Counties and in the Cities of Dublin and Livermore.
This strategy would also support the recently adopted Tri-Valley Sub-Regional
Planning Strategy.
0_ 41
EXHIBIT A
Phil The Board of Supervisors Contra Clerk oaheBoard
and
County Administration Building County Administrator
651 Pine Street, Room 106 Costa (510)646-2371
Martinez,California 94553-1293 County
Jim Rogers,list District s e L
Jeff Smith,2nd District r
Gayle Bishop,3rd District =
Mark DeSaulnter,4th Districtg .s January 23, 1996
Tom Torlakson,5th Districts
9�o•: -_ •'cS
srd coi N t
Mr. John McCallum
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA 94607-4746
Dear Mr. McCallum:
SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON THE ALTAMONT PASS- INTERREGIONAL CORRIDOR
STUDY OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Contra Costa County has a vested interest in the Altamont Pass Interregional Corridor
Study since any policy and implementation decisions regarding this corridor may have
ramifications on land use planning and circulation improvement policies in East County
and Tri-Valley Areas.
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors is transmitting the following
comments, based on the Evaluation of the Operationa/Analysis, for the Policy Steering
Committee consideration:
1 . 1-680/580 INTERCHANGE RECONSTRUCTION.
The Analysis indicated that the Alameda County Transportation Authority
is currently leading the effort to reconstruct the 1-580/1-680 Interchange.
The Analysis indicated that this reconstruction effort will cost several
hundred million dollars to complete.
Recent transportation studies have indicated that the major users of the
interchange have origins in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Joaquin
Counties. The Analysis was reticent about this fact and the need to
develop a collaborative relationship among the three counties to
reconstruct this interchange.
Contra Costa County supports the collaborative efforts of Contra Costa,
Alameda, and San Joaquin Counties to reconstruct the interchange to
improve travel movements through it.
Mr. John McCallum, (? 9
January 23, 1995
Page 2
2. METERING.
The Analysis briefly discussed the viability of mainline and ramp metering
along the Corridor. Ramp metering has the potential to reduce
bottlenecks and minimize stop and go traffic on the freeway; reducing
travel time from 1-5 to 1-680 to 52 minutes, compared to 2.5 hours.
However, more specific analysis is needed regarding:
• corridor implementation process for existing and future
conditions;
• impacts on freeways and local arterial roads; and
• system wide metering coordination, since Contra Costa
County jurisdictions in Central County are proposing similar
efforts for 1-680, which could complement metering along
the 1-580 corridor.
Contra Costa County supports further analysis of ramp and mainline
metering along the 1-580/205 Corridor to address local concerns, with
local jurisdictions and Caltrans as principals of the analysis. This analysis
should also discuss complementary efforts proposed by Contra Costa
jurisdictions for 1-680.
3. MASS TRANSIT.
The Analysis discussed the proposed Altamont Rail Project,
Express/Subscription Bus Services, and Livermore BART Extension. The
estimated cost of all these future projects is approximately $690 million -
- quite an investment in mass transit in the area. To date, there has not
been a coordinated analysis of mass transit needs assessment to
substantiate the effectiveness of these projects.
Contra Costa County supports the study's recommendations for a Major
Investment Study (MIS) that comprehensively examines mass transit in
the corridor in terms of Rail/BART connections, complementary
express/subscription bus services, HOV lanes, and the potential for
increasing transit use in the area.
4. TRACY-BRENTWOOD EXPRESSWAY.
The Analysis summarized that significant growth is anticipated for both
Eastern Contra Costa County and San Joaquin Valley, necessitating
improved transportation connections between the areas--especially with
the likelihood that economic linkages will strengthen. The Analysis
proposed serious consideration of a future four-lane facility from 1-580
at 1-205 to Route 4 southeast of Brentwood. The Analysis proposal is
similar to Caltrans' previous proposal indicated in the State Route 239
Concept Report.
Mr. John McCallum,
January 23, 1995
Page 3
The Analysis advocated the creation of an inter-jurisdictional task force
to ensure that land development and transportation planning activities in
the area do not preclude the viability of this future road project.
Contra Costa County supports the creation of the inter-jurisdictional task
force to ensure that land use and transportation planning activities do not
preclude the viability of the Tracy-Brentwood Expressway.
5. MITIGATION CONCEPTS.
The Analysis proposes a " Mitigation Tool Box, " consisting of
transportation strategies,negotiated among jurisdictions,that can reduce
the traffic impacts of major new developments. The Analysis indicated
that future growth in the area will require more transportation capacity.
Contra Costa County supports the " Mitigation Tool Box " concept. To
address the transportation needs of future growth, the " Mitigation Tool
Box " should include the transportation strategy of preserving right-of
way for:
• major arterial roads parallel to 1-580; and
• transit routes to serve major new traffic generators planned in the
Tri-Valley area.
It is Contra Costa County's understanding that these comments will be
considered with other comments obtained from the Policy Forum meeting,
scheduled in February 1996, for developing transportation policies along the 1-
580 Corridor.
erely u ,
J Sm , Chair
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
cc: Millie Greenberg, TVTC Chair