HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01161996 - C36 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: VAL ALEXEEFF, DIRECTOR
GROWTH MANAGEMENT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DATE: JANUARY 16, 1996
SUBJECT: COWELL RANCH PROJECT
r
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
ENDORSE the attached Cooperative Planning Memorandum of Understanding as an appropriate
mechanism to cooperatively involve the City of Brentwood in the County's consideration of development
entitlements for the proposed Cowell Ranch Project.
FISCAL IMPACT: No impact due to this document.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS:
The attached document, prepared by the City of Brentwood, should include the following understanding:
1. With the advice, assistance and cooperation of the City of Brentwood, it is the
County's planning agency that has the sole independent discretion according to law
to approve, conditionally approve or disapprove of County entitlements for those
portions of the proposed Cowell Ranch Project coming before the County's
planning agency for consideration; and
2. There may be mandatory time periods in which it will be necessary for the County's
planning agency to conduct and conclude its proceedings as required by law; and
3. By endorsing this cooperative agreement, nothing in it limits the discretion of the
County as to the terms and conditions which it will enter into or not enter into
annexation agreements or similar agreements with the City of Brentwood, and in
particular concerning the provisions of Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 99 et
seq. or any similar or subsequent provision of law.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: —YES SIGNATURE: Vjte \s
,:Z�"
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
_APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE(S).
ACTION OF BOARD ON January 16 , 1996 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER X
On recommendation of Supervisors Tot•lakson and Rogers , IT IS BY THE BOARD
ORDERED that the above recommendations are APPROVED: and Recommendation
4 vvis ADDED to read by endorsing this proccepsse, the County does not imply
aVOTEOF�, PERVISORS opposition t0 the Cowlilcllu;I#1rCEI 'II IIT THIS ISA TRUE AND CORRECT
COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
>UNANIMOUS(ABSENT�� MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE
DATE SHOWN.
AYES: NOES:
ATTESTED January 16 , 1996
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
PHIL BATCHELO ,CLERK E BOARD OF
SUP ORS COUNT PINISTRATOR
VA:dg
BY ,DEPUTY
cowell.bo
Contact: Val Alexeeff(646-1620)
CC: County Administrator
County Counsel
ORIGINALso.3 of 3
COOPERATIVE PLANNING MEMORANDUM
OF UNDERSTANDING
This COOPERATIVE PLANNING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
("Memorandum") is made and. entered into by and between S.H. Cowell
Foundation ("Cowell") , a. California Benefit Corporation and Private
Foundation and the . City of Brentwood ("City") , a California
municipality, (collectively referred to as the "parties") , and shall
be effective as of ' , 1995. In consideration of the mutual
promises set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Memorandum is made and entered into taking into
account the. following facts:
(A) Cowell is the owner, in fee, of approximately 4, 907
acres of real property in eastern Contra Costa County adjacent to
the City's southwest boundary. Cowell has filed with Contra Costa
County. and - the County is currently processing development
applications for approximately 4, 277 acres of this property
_("Cowell Ranch" or "property") . The property is generally located
in unincorporated Contra Costa County south of the present City
limits, generally located west of Walnut Boulevard, south of
Concord Boulevard and Briones Valley Road, east of Deer Valley Road
and north of Marsh Creek Road/Camino Diablo. A map depicting
Cowell Ranch is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated
herein by this reference.
1
ORIGINAL No.3 of3
(B) Cowell desires to develop the property and is
seeking certain land use approvals from Contra Costa County. The
County has authorized and is undertaking a Cowell Ranch General
Plan Amendment and Zoning Study and is in the process of preparing
an environmental impact report ("EIR") , as the lead agency. for the
Cowell Ranch project. The parties acknowledge that as of the date
of .execution of this Memorandum the project plans must be prepared
and processed consistent with the County's General Plan and all
other applicable County rules and regulations.
(C) City is an incorporated general law city existing
under the laws of the State of California.
(D) The Contra Costa County Local Agency Formation
Commission ("LAFCO") recently made a decision to include within the
City's sphere of influence for the probable, ultimate physical
boundaries and service area of the City, that portion of the
property inside the County Urban Limit Line. Said portion is also
depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
(E) City and Cowell desire to enter into this
Memorandum to formally affirm the cooperative approach presently
undertaken by the parties, relative to discussing the appropriate
long term land. uses for the .property, its timely and appropriate
development and its timely and appropriate annexation to the. City.
This is consistent with the letter from Nathaniel H. Taylor to Jay
M. Corey dated December 6, 1994 , attached hereto as Exhibit "B,"
incorporated herein by this reference.
2
ORIGNAL No.3 of3
(F) The City has determined that this Memorandum does
not constitute a "project" under the California Environmental
Quality Act ("CEQA") . This Memorandum is a formal acknowledgment
of the desire of the parties to cooperate together as the County
planning process moves forward. This Memorandum is not a
development agreement as provided for by statute nor a pre-
annexation agreement. The parties agree that the appropriate
environmental review as required by CEQA will be completed before
adoption of a pre-annexation agreement and/or development agreement
between Cowell and City, at Cowell's expense.
2. The parties shall cooperate in good faith in carrying out
the terms of this Memorandum. Such cooperation includes meeting
and conferring on , a regular basis to discuss the project in
accordance with the provisions of Sections 3, 5 and 6 herein,
. .participating in the County planning process for Cowell Ranch,
considering timely changes* to the City General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance to accommodate - future land uses at Cowell Ranch, and
attempting to negotiate the terms and conditions of a pre-
annexation .agreement and/or development agreement. If the parties
cannot agree on a particular issue after meeting and discussing the
issue in good faith, such a disagreement does not constitute a
breach of this Memorandum. As long as the parties cooperate in
good faith in trying to resolve such a disputed issue through the
term of this Memorandum, as it may be extended pursuant to- Section
4 , it shall not constitute a breach of this Memorandum.
3
ORIGINAL.No.3 of 3
3 . Cowell and City agree to meet and confer on the Cowell
Ranch project according to the schedule of meetings set forth in
Exhibit "C," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference. This schedule may be amended in writing by the parties
from time to time. The scheduled meetings are to be- con ducted by
and between Cowell's authorized representatives and City officials
(City Council members, planning commissioners, members of the
City's Cowell Committee, and/or staff members)- and shall be open to
members of the public. The parties agree to treat these meetings
as public meetings and . abide by the provisions of the Ralph M.
Brown Act (Government Code Subsection 54950, et seq. ) with respect
to these meetings, as applicable.
A . The term of this Memorandum shall be eighteen (18) months
from its effective date, or upon execution of a pre-annexation
and/or development agreement, whichever comes first, unless the
term is extended by mutual written consent of the parties. A
decision by either party not to extend the term of this Memorandum
shall not constitute a breach .of this Memorandum.
5. The. topics to be discussed 'by and between the parties
over the course of the meetings, in an order to be determined by
the parties through the, joint preparation of an agenda for each
meeting, shall include policy, technical and community interest
matters such as and without limitation:
(A) The present and planned uses of the property by
Cowell, including the status of Cowell ' s land use planning process
4
ORIGINAL No.3 of 3
and entitlement requests with Contra Costa County and any future
entitlement requests by Cowell for the property.
(B) The need for public facilities and services for
Cowell Ranch, including without limitation; extensions of sewer and
water lines, streets., roads, highways, regional transportation
facilities, and other infrastructure and community facilities such
as schools, parks, day- care centers, fire and police stations,- and
general municipal operating and maintenance costs.
(C) The present and planned capacity of the City's
public facilities and services which may serve the property,
including without limitation, wastewater treatment, water supply
and treatment, and storm water facilities.
(D) The potential impacts which may arise from the
present and planned uses of the Cowell Ranch project, including
without limitation, environmental impacts and impacts of social and
economic interest to the residents of Brentwood, along with the
Joint. efforts of the City and Cowell to evaluate, mitigate or
reduce such impacts.
(E) The City' s General Plan, as most recently amended
and effective on or about June, 1993 , its relationship to the
present and planned uses of the property, and the potential
amendments to the General Plan that may be necessary to address
future uses of Cowell Ranch (it is presently identified as special
Planning Area J in the City General Plan) .
(F) A determination of the appropriate land uses,
5
ORIGNAL No:3 of
densities, development standards and design guidelines for the.
property taking into account the City's General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance, among other planning considerations, and the
consideration of potential amendments to the City's General Plan
and Zoning Ordinance that may be necessary to provide for future
desired uses on Cowell Ranch in anticipation of its annexation.
(G) The development of a Capital Improvement Financing
Plan and applicability of public finance mechanisms for development
of the property, including without limitation, assessment districts
-and bond funds. The discussion should also focus on specific
finance responsibilities and mechanisms to ensure adequate funding
is available for the timely construction of infrastructure in
advance of demand related negative impacts and the amount and
timing of fees to be collected by the City for development review
and facilities
(H) The anticipated annexation of the property to the
City and the joint efforts of the parties to effectuate annexation
in accordance with the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization
Act (Government Code Subsection 56000, . et seq. ) ,. working in concert
with Contra Costa County officials. —
(I)
fficials. '(I) Land use options reflecting all three State Route 4
Bypass Alignments. Also, the discussion and consideration of an
alignment for the State Route 4 Bypass that is compatible with the
scope and location of the desired land uses for Cowell Ranch and
properties to the east, consistent with Supervisor Tom Torlakson' s
6
t
ORIGNAL No.3 of
letter to Mayor William Hill dated January 19 , 1995 and the Board
of Supervisors Order dated December 20, 1994, attached hereto as
Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by reference.
6. The parties intend to execute a pre-annexation agreement
and/or development agreement prior- .to the - termination of this
Memorandum. This. agreement(s) can include, without limitation, the
permitted uses of the property, the density or intensity of the
use, project timing and phasing, financing mechanisms for public
improvements and infrastructure coordination and planning. The
parties acknowledge that a. pre-annexation agreement and/or
development agreement cannot be executed until the Cowell Ranch
Environmental Impact Report is certified or other appropriate
environmental review is conducted. The parties acknowledge that a
pre-annexation agreement and/or development agreement shall be
- executed within fifteen (15) days after the Cowell Ranch Final
Environmental Impact Report is certified by Contra Costa County.
7.. During the term of this Memorandum as• it may be extended,
the City shall be notified in writing by Cowell within thirty (30)
days of any and all successors in interest to Cowell's legal or
equitable title in Cowell Ranch. Any such successor shall
acknowledge i•n writing to the City its commitment to this
Memorandum within 30 days after receipt of said notification.
Absent such timely acknowledgment by a successor in interest, the
City may unilaterally terminate this Memorandum.
t
ORIGINAL No.3 of3
8 . This Memorandum constitutes the entire integrated
understanding of the parties and supersedes any prior oral or
written understanding of the parties relative to the subject matter
contained herein. This Memorandum may not be amended unless in
writing signed by both parties.
9. It is understood by the parties that a breach of this
Memorandum shall be defined as a failure by either party to
cooperate in good faith as outlined in this Memorandum. The
parties recognize that it will be extremely difficult to determine
.an amount of damages if a breach of this Memorandum occurs.
Because of this difficulty in determining damages,. the parties
agree that, in the event of a breach, the breaching party may only
seek the sum of $1.00 (one dollar) as liquidated damages. In
addition, the parties acknowledge that the remedy of specific
performance is not realistic or .appropriate and should not be
allowed because of the reluctance of courts to order a municipality
to .-perform its discretionary governmental functions and the
inherent difficulty in framing such an order for specific
..performance setting forth the terms and provisions of a pre-
annexation agreement and/or development agreement,-)and oth. r
discretionary planning entitlements and document
(initials) ,
10. City and Cowell agree that time is of the essence with
respect to the performance of this Memorandum. A failure to timely
cooperate may be considered a failure to cooperate in good faith.
8
ORIGINAL No.3 of 3
11. Any notices or other written communication concerning
this Memorandum shall be sent or copied to:
S.H. Cowell Foundation
Attn: Nathaniel" Taylor, Vice President
120 Montgomery Street, Suite 2570
San Francisco, CA 94,104
City of Brentwood
Attn: Jay. Corey, City Manager
708 Third Street
Brentwood, CA 94513
12: The parties shall jointly request the Contra Costa County
Board of Supervisors to express its support for this Memorandum and
to work in good faith through a cooperative annexation process with
Cowell and the City. If the Board declines to express such
support,- the City may terminate this Memorandum. Such notice of
termination shall .be in writing and received within the time period
expressed hereinabove.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Cowell have caused this
Memorandum to. be executed by their authorized representatives as
follows:
Dated: City of Brentwood
By:
Barbara Guise, Vice-Mayor
ATTEST:
I .
Jay Co I-
C i
Cit Jerk
9
ORIGINAL No.3 of 3
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dated: U " %S City of Brentwood
By: •
Paul And rson, 2=90, City Attorney
Dated: ' — ( S.H Cowell Fou ation
By:
Jeo Er ckson, President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dated: Ga en, McCoy, McMahon & Armstrong
By:
Patricia E. C , Counsel for
S.H. Cowell Foundation
10
1
COWELL RANCH PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT I'L.�N
ATTACILNISN7 A
LEGAL DESCRIPIZON
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
PARCEL ONE:
POP TION OF THE RANCHO LOS MEGANOS,FILED JANUARY 9, 1913, IN
BOOK 9 OF MAPS,PAGE 202, BEING ALL OF SECTION 34,TOWNSHIP 1
NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, AND SECTION 2,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH,RANGE
l 2 EAST,AND PORTION OF SECTIONS 22,23,26,27,35 AND 36 IN SAID
TOl'rNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST,AND SECTION 1,T01ITISHIP 1
SOUTH,RANGE 2 EAST, ALL BEING EXTENDED SECTIONS N1 MOUNT
DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN; PORTION OF SUBDIVISION NO. 10'
BRENTWOOD IRRIGATED FARMS, FILED SEPTEMBER 11, 1917, IN BOOK
16 OF MAPS,PAGE 331;AND ALL OF LOT 268,AS"SHOWN ON THE
AMENDED MAP OF SUBDIVISION NO. 8, BRENTWOOD MXGATED
FARMS,FILED AUGUST 4;1920,IN BOOK 17 OF MAPS,PAGE 375,ALL IN
THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA. THE WHOLE THEREOF DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A.GRANITE POST MARKED L.M. NO. 1 BEING THE
CO LMENCEMENT POINT OF THE OFFICIAL SURVEY OF THE RANCHO
LOS NMGANOS AS DESCRIBED IN PATENT OF CONFIRMATION ISSUED
BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO ALICE MARCH, DATED
AUGUST 19,1867,AND RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,IN BOOK 4 OF
PATENTS,PAGE 371,SAID GRANITE POST BEING SITUATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PORTION OF SAID RANCHO, KNOWN
AS SECTION 34,TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO
BASE AND MERIDIAN AND RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE EXTERIOR
BOUNDARY OF SAID RANCHO,SOUTH 8904S-1/2' WEST,5256.8 FEET TO
A GRANITE POST MARKED L.M.NO.2,SAID GRANITE POST BEING A
MONUMENT OF SAID OFFICIAL SURVEY AND BEING SITUATED AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PORTION OF SAID RANCHO .
KNOWN AS SAID SECTION 34;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE
EXTERIOR BOUNDARY OF SAID RANCHO NORTH 0 13'WEST TO THE
POINT OF THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EXTERIOR BOUNDARY AND
THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF ROAD NO. 15;THENCE LEAVING SAID
_ EXTERIOR BOUNDARY—AND RUNNING IN A NORTHEASTERLY,
SOUTHEASTERLY AND EASTERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY LIME OF SAID ROAD NO. 15, AND ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF ROAD NO. 20 TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION
OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF ROAD NO.20 AND THE CENTER LINE OF
MARSH CREEK, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER Oc
LOT 268, SUBDIVISION 8,-BRENTWOOD IRRIGATED FARMS AMENDED;
artr.,;�;c�rative Draf; Scotember 10, 1993 Page 1-
CY
EXHIBIT "N'
• ���� C...SR..\�.��`v:�<•a•`4��.•...�'�--A,.�* lli.'L�:�.!Nt-'t\y.a:Vv}�
IL
,r-. /'fit •,.�.,, •` yr ,.' ♦� .P �.
.. j j��` 111 F 1�1f,llrl:�.i'=� a��.%• �,.•! � �''�'�
7z.. i
i� ���l; .fit:�t f�t�••'` .�:''�i'•�, �i.: f �• t•
CO��'E•LL kANCH PRELI\• 13NARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
POINT OF ILNTERSECTION OF SAID NORT-HERLY OF ROAD NO. 16,
WITH THE WESTERLY LINE EXTENDED NORTHERLY OF ROAD NO. 19;
THENCE IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE
OF ROAD NO. 19; EXTENDED NORTHERLY AND THE WESTERLY LINE
OF ROAD NO. 19 TO THE POINT OF INTEISECTION OF THE WESTERLY
LINE OF ROAD NO. 19 AND THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY OF SAID
RANCHO;THENCE SOUTH 89'40'WEST,ALONG THE EXTERIOR
BOUNDARY OF SAID RANCHO TO A GRANITE POST MARKED L.M.NO.
12,SAID GRAN TE POST BEING A MONUMENT-OF SAID OFFICIAL
SURVEY AND BEING SITUATED.AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER-OF
THAT PORTION OF SAID RANCHO KNOWN AS SECTION 2,TOWNSHIP
1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST,MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN,
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EXTERIOR BOUNDARY OF SAID
RANCHO,NORTH 0'3'WEST,53005 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
-EXCEPTING FROM PARCEL ONE:
1. THE INTEREST CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF CONTRA•
COSTA BY DEED FROM COWELL PORTLAND CEMENT
COMPANY BY DEED DATED NOVEMBER 19,1936,AND
RECORDED DECEMBER 28,1936, N BOOK 424 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS,PAGE 244.
2. THE INTEREST CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF CONTRA
COSTA BY DEED FROM COWELL PORTLAND CEMENT
COMPANY, DATED OCTOBER 20, 1939, AND RECORDED • '
NOVEMBER 4, 1939, IN BOOK 528 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, PAGE
184.
3. THE 3.02 ACRE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM HENRY
COWELL LIME AND CEME�t'I'CO.,TO PACIFIC GAS 4I�'D
ELECTRIC COMPANY,DATED DECEMBER 6,1949, AND
RECORDED APRIL 4, 1950, IN BOOK 1532 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,
PAGE 435.
4. THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN I THE DEED FROM HENRY
COWELL LIME AND CEMENT CO.,TO HELMUT PINKWART,
DATED DECEMBER 1, 1954,IN BOOK 2434 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS,PAGE 279.
5. THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED LSI THE DEED TO THE
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,RECORDED AUGUST 1, 1956,
—• BOOK 2817,PAGE 596.
6. THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO CONTRA
COSTA COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DATED OCTOBER 31, 1958, AND RECORDED
.NOVEMBER 17, 1953, IN BOOK 3265 AT PAGE 158.
Administrative Draft Septemb-er 1-10
10, 1993 Paoe
COWE-LL r,
LL PRE \11NAR1' DE�'ELO1'�1ENT PLAN
THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 26S OF
SUBDIVISION S BRENTWOOD IRRIGATED FAR%fS AIMENDED, SOUTH
20019'WEST 456.2 FEET;SOUT'ri 86'06' WEST 321 FEET;SOUTH 36058'
WEST 273.9 FEET;SOUTH 40'36-1/2' EAST 550.3 Fire t; SOUTH 15034' EAST
662.4 FEET;SOUTH 1931' WEST 460.6 FEET; AND SOUTH 18'0' WEST 512.3
FEET TO THE SOUT1-I1VESTERLY CORNIER OF LOT 91 OF SUBDIVISION
NO.2 OF BRENTWOOD IRRIGATED FARMS, A.S DESIGNATED ON THE
MAP THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER 30,1913,IN BOOK 11,OF MAPS,
PAGE 251, W THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE OF THE COUNTY OF
CONTRA COSTA;THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY AND
RUNNING ALONG THE.SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 91,
NORTH 89 41-1/2'EAST,2313 FEET TO WESTERLY LINE OF ROAD NO. 17,
SOMETIMES CALLED WALNUT BOULEVARD;THENCE IN A
SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF ROAD
NO. 17 TO THE POINT OF WTERSECTION OF SAID WESTERLY LINE
AND THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN LATERAL NO.7,SOUTH OF THE EAST
CONTRA COSTA IRRIGATION COMPANY, AS SAID LATERAL IS
SHOWN ON MAP OF SUBDIVISION•NO. 10 OF BRENTWOOD
IRRIGATED FARMS;THENCE LEAVING SAID.WESTERLY LINE OF ROAD
NO. 17 AND RUNNING ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID MAW
LATERAL No. 7,SOUTH AND ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF
THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED W THE.DEED. FROM SAN JOAQUIN
FARMING COMPANY, INC.,TO ROBERTS. SWIFT AND BEATRICE M.
S1N'IFT, HIS WIFE,DATED OC'T'OBER 13, 1920, RECORDED OCTOBER 23,
1920, IN BOOK 370 OF DEED,PAGE 239,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,SOUTH 53*42' EAST,81.9 FEET,
MORE OR LESS,TO A POINT DISTANT SOUTH 53042' EAST, 31.9 FEET.' .
FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD NO. 17;SOUTH 0'45'WEST
256.7.FEET AND SOUTH 17 22' EAST 647.9 FEET;THEENCE BEYOND SAID
LATERAL BUT CONTINUING ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF
THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE LAST ABOVE Ni ENTIONED DEED,
_ SOUTH 6010' EAST,260.8 FEET TO THE PONT OF INTERSECTION OF
-- - SAID CENTER LINE AND THE APPROXIMATE CENTER OF DRY CREEK;
THENCE ALONG THE APPROXIMATE CENTER OF DRY CREEK AND TIS
SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED W THE LAST.
ABOVE MENTIONED DEED, NORTH 5120' EAST,350.6 FEET,AND
SOUTH 61*0' EAST,375 FEET;LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY
BUT CONTINUING ALONG THE APPROXIMATE CENTER OF DRY
CREEK,SOUTH 6100' EAST,895 FEET,NORTH 7100' EAST,390.4 FEET;
SOUTH 88030' EAST,506.7 FEET AND NORTH 82020' EAST,1283 FEET;
THENCE I EAVWG THE APPROXIMATE CENTER OF DRY CREEK AND
RUNNING NORTH 008' EAST, 1498.6 FEET TO A POINT IN THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD NO. 14;THENCE IN AN EASTERLY
DIRECTION ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OT SAID ROAD NO. 14,TO
THE PONT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY LINE Al- 'D THE
WESTERLY LINE OF ROAD NO. 5;THENCE IN A SOUTHERLY
DIRECTION ALONG THE WESTERLY Lll'E OF ROAD NO.5 TO THE
POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID WESTERLY LL\TE AND THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF ROAD NO. 16;THENCE LSI A WESTERLY
DIRECTION ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF ROAD NO. 16 TO THE
Administrative Draft September 10, 1993 Page
COWE•LL RANCH PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT I'LA3�I
SOUTH 8948' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 171.64 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE
SOUTH 7937'30" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 196.S3 FEET TO A POLNIT,
THENCE SOUTH 66*1S'30" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 24630 FEET TO A
POINT;THENCE SOUTH 72"37'30" EAST,A DISTAD\'CE OF 69.09 FEET TO A
POINT;THENCE SOUTH 75 33'30" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 84.11 FEET TO A
POINT;THENCE SOUTH 8538'30" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 86.73 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 8142'30" EAST,A DISTANCE OF 728.44 FEET TO A
POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RANCHO LOS MEGANOS;
THENCE LEAVING THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE MARSH CREEK
ROAD AND RUNNING ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RANCHO
LOS MEGANOS 003'20"WEST,A DISTANCE OF 1410.11 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL THREE:
THE_NORTH 1/2 AND THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 3,TOWNSHIP
1 SOUTH,RANGE 2 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE%j\D MERIDIAN,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGR\NING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3,
WHICH 1S MARKED BY A SYCAMORE TREE AND RUNNING THENCE
NORTH 1'24' EAST,2614.44 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF
SAID SECTION 3;THENCE RUNNING NORTH 101710" EAST,253150
FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3 WHICH IS
MARKED BY GRANITE MONUMENT L.M.2;THENCE RUNNING NORTH
89048'35" EAST,5258.64 FEET TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTIO\'
3 MARKED BY GRANITE MONUMENT L.M. 1;THENCE RUNNING
- SOUTH 0003'20"EAST 2675.74 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF
SAID SECTION 3, MARKED BY A 2 BY 3 STAKE;THENCE RUNNL\'G
NORTH 86'30'20" WEST ALONG LINE BETWEEN NORTHEAST AND
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 2650.771 FEET
PONTO A POT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNIER OF THE SOUTHEAST
— QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3 MARKED BY A 2 BY 2 REDWOOD HUB L\
FENCE CORNER;THENCE RUNNING SOUTH 0036'55" WEST, ALONG
WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3,2621.;6
FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3 MARKED
BY A REDWOOD HUB AND MARKER; THENCE RUWIi IG SOUTH
89026'25" WEST,270756 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM:
THE INTEREST CONVEYED TO COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,A
POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, BY COWELL PORTLANFD CEMENT CO., A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FOR USE AS A PUBLIC HIGHWAY, BY .
DEED DATED AUGUST 2, 1933, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 1933, IN B6On
295 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, PAGE 303.
Administrative Draft September 10,1993 Page 1-1:
COWELL RANCH PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
7. THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED LN'THE DEED TO PACIFIC
GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION, DATED APRIL S, 1959, AND RECORDED APRIL
17, 1959,IN BOOK 3357 AT PAGE 259.
8. THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN I THE DEED TO CONTRA
COSTA COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,DATED APRIL 28;1960,AND RECORDED MAY 17,
1960,IN BOOK 3621 AT PAGE 181.
9. THE PARCELS OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEEDS TO CONTRA
COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION,
DATED SEPTEMBER 24,1963,AND RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1964,
IN BOOK 4544 AT PAGE 616 AND BOOK 4544 AT PAGE 645.
10. THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO PACIFIC
GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,A CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION, DATED JANUARY 18, 1968,AND RECORDED
FEBRUARY 7,1968,IN BOOK 5553 AT PAGE 14.
11. THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO PACIFIC
GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,A CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION;RECORDED FEBRUARY 13, 1974, III BOOK 7154
AT PAGE 939.
12. THE PAROL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO LEONARD
GERRY,ET AL,RECORDED JANUARY 15,19S0,BOOK 9696,PAGE
33.
13. THE PARCEL OF LAND.DESCRIBED GSI THE DEED TO THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED FEBRUARY 26,1981, BOOK 10216,
OFFICIAL RECORDS, PAGE 41.
PARCEL T1VO:
PORTION.OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:.
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RANCHO
LOS MEGANOS,FROM WHICH POINT A GRAi'�IITE MONUMENT'
DESIGNATED "I—M.NO. 1" BEARS NORTH 00320" WEST,'2675.74 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE AND RUNNING ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF THE
COWELL PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY,NORTH 86030'20" WEST,A
DISTANCE OF 2650.77 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE SOUTH 0 36'55" WEST
A DISTANCE OF 1518.77 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
THE MARSH CREEK ROAD;THENCE R NTQTG ALONG SAID LINE,
NORTH 8S*47' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1117.94 FEET TO A POLN'T;THENCE
Administrative Draft September 10, 1993 Page 1-11
1
COWELL RAI NZ PRELIMI�\t„I')' DEVE-LOPIIL•NT :-LAN
COWELL
PARCEL FOUT-,:
SECTION 33,TOWNSHFP 1 NORTH, RAINGE 2 EAST, \COUNT DL`.BLO
BASE AND MERIDIAN.
EXCEPTING FROM SAID PARCEL FOUR:
THE INTEREST CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA BY
DEEDS FROM J.P. MCCABE, DATED OCTOBER S, 1692,AND RECORDED
NOVEMBER 18,IS92,LAN BOOK 63 OF DEEDS,PAGE 212;AND DATED
AUGUST 12, 1896,IN BOOK 73 OF DEEDS PAGE 210,AND BY DEED FROM
COWELL PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY,DATED NOVEMBER 19,1936,
AND RECORDED DECEMBER 28, 1936, N BOOK 42S OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS,PAGE 110.
PARCEL FIVE:
RIGHT OF WAY,AS AN APPURTENANCE TO PARCELS ONE THROUGH
THREE ABOVE,AS RESERVED IN THE DEED TO LEONARD GERRY,ET
AL,RECORDED JANUARY 15,1950, BOOK 9696,PAGE33,OFFICIAL
RECORDS, AS FOLLOWS:
"A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT 20 FEET INN WIDTH FOR THE
INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF AN IRRIGATION PIPELINE.
THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EASEMENT TO BE DISTANT 20 FEET
WESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE WESTERN' L1NE.OF NVALNTUT
BOULEVARD, AS SAID BOULEVARD NOW EXISTS".
Administrative Draft Septemoer 10, 1993 Page 1-1
NEU MN111AIIAN - �-
120 Moncgomcry Succc,Suicc 2570 E\riIBIT "B"
San Francisco, California 94104
415 397.0285
December 6, 1994
O
Mr. Jay Corey DEC q
City Manager
City of Brentwood ><SE � Of IRENT�AJOOD
City Hall, 708 Third Street
Brentwood, California 94513
Dear Jay:
In my conversation with Mayor Hill last week we discussed the desirability of bringing
the City officials in Brentwood up to date as to the content and status of the Cov.,eIl
Ranch project. There has been a lapse of several months since the last County/City
working session has been held, during which time changes have been made both to
the Cowell Ranch proposal and to the composition of the City's Council and Planning
Commission. Mayor Hill felt it would be useful for those of us on the Cowell Team to
make a presentation.to the current members of these two bodies - as well as the
general public - so as to provide an update on prior discussions and to introduce
new members to the project. . Follow-up sessions may also be desirable.
I concur with the Mayor on the need for such an update and would be delighted to
arrange for such a presentation at a mutually convenient time. Mayor Hill felt
sometime in mid-January would be-about the earliest, given the holidays and the fact
that new members are just now taking office.
I look forward to hearing from you with a suggested date and time.
Very truly yours,
Nathaniel H. Taylor
Vice President Real Estate
cc: Hon. Bill Hill, Mayor
J.D. Erickson Presid—ent Max Thelon,Jr. Vice Presidenr George Hopiak Secrcarj1Treaturrr
Thoma G. David Director of Chart Programs Nathaniel H.Taylor Vice Preri2o:.Real F_s:_::
` EXHIBIT 11C.1"
EXHIBIT "C" TO COOPERATIVE*PLAiYNLNG AGREE•-f ANT
5-25-95
POLICY ADVISORY CONEVIITTEE (PAC)
Membership: City Council
City Planning Commission
Supervisor Tom Torlakson*
* Constituents from-unincorporated areas may be invited to attend.
Purpose: Seek. to provide consensus input to the Cowell Foundation and the
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) on issues as they are identified
through the DRAFT EIR and FINAL EIR entitlement process, and in the
Agreement.
This Committee shall plan on meeting, at least once every two months.
TEMNICAL ADVISORY CONE UTTEE
Membership: Brentwood Community Development Director (E. Peabody)
County Director of Growth Management and Economic Development
Agency (V. Alexeeff)
Purpose: 1. To present issues to the Policy Advisory Committee, and
recommendations regarding the same, as they are identified
__- through the DRAFT EIR and FINAL EIR entitlement process and
in the Agreement.
2. To cooperatively condition the County entitlements such that
environmental impacts are mitigated and to ensure the project is
compatible with the City of Brentwood upon annexation.
This Committee shall plan on meeting, at least once a month.
The parties recognize that the memberships consist of individual that are not parties to this
Ag,reement. Attendance by such non-parties at the meetings shall not constitute a breach of this
Agreement.
Cowell is expected to be present and participate in the meetings of the Committees. Cowell will
be notified in advance of all Committee meetings.
COW CII\4-27.dj r - '
EXHIBIT "C.2"
co
t-- X
LO
1 � X
X iii: •
X
;.
•
Y >i.
O
CD to
X X =`
A�
LO
Nr
O O <3
..::::i
" CU r w vi v ^i}( "::•'.^:i ':yid
�w-• U)
F- z
w z
W W
LLL - Z
O .1 CO W,
2 U F- O �
W
O } Z Z Z
U w Z z �`
Ow
J O O z 01
Q1
O Z w Qz
Cf) H U O Z'
J O z a_ w
Q U` W � Q per,. a
} C� O O
U 2. U z } w
i U � 1) k— (-)
>
a0 }W- w C) U Q `J o
J�JJ IIY7� t .J .V JV Ivu .VV.i r .
Fern To-dakson 300 East Leland Road
sUpQryisar,olstrlct Five " f' -�• Suite 100
Pittsburg,California 9.455
Contra Costa County � .� (510) 427-8133
Board of SUpervlsors
1 w
EXHIBIT "Ll"
January 19 , 1995 •
Mayor William Hill
City o£ Brentwood
708 Third Street
Brentwood, CA 94513 -
Deur Bill:
4.
X received my copy of the letter from Val Aloxeeff to
you concerning the North-South Alignment of the State Route
4 Bypass . I believe the subatance of the Board order on
this subject,- Item 2.7 , on. our December 20th agenda, is
consistent with my discussion with your City Manager, Jal•
Corey, the day of the Board meeting.
If you have any questions or comments, please give me .a
. ,call. I look forward to working with city officials on this
matter. Thank you, for your help.
;.. ...
Sincerely,
Tom Torlakson
- --= TT s gro
cc$ Val Alexeeff , GXEDA
Thi.:= r'.
1 ,7r„c MM 1 14 yJ !u :Jr NO .uus r .
u �1• V—oJJ—J7o�
l , GROWTH MANAUEMLNT AND c�
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY C(
s
Valentin Alexeeff, Director CC
January 17, 1995
i
William Hill, Mayor
City of Brentwood
708 Third Street
Brentwood, CA 94513
Dear Mayor. Hill:
RE: Board of Suporvisors' Decision on the Alignment for SR4 Bypass .
On December 20, 1994, the County Board of Supervisors.received a report from the Counr
Public Works Director on the actions taken by the State Route 4 Bypass Authority or
December 13. As you know, on December 13, the Authority certified the EIR for the SR-
Bypass project and adopted as the North-South alignment,the Nunn alignment. In' res.ponst
to this report, the Board took further action with respect to the North-South alignment. A
copy of the Board Order is enclosed. -
In recognizing that differences of opinion exist with resl)cct to the alignment, the Board ha!
deferred a decision on a precise alignment until it makes a decision on the Cowcll Ranch
Project Application. In addition, the Board has voted not to talc any action in response to
the Authority's decision on the precise -alignment, including any action to reduce the
agricultural core.
- Consistent with this action, the Board is requesting that your City Council defer ami land
use actions on the unincorporated lands in your City's S1lccial Planning Areas nearby to clic
east of the North-South alignments until the Cuunty and the City have made a Lina'
determination on the location of the North-South alignment. If the Council cannot nticc+
this request, in the alternative, the Board requests that tiny land use. :actions by your Counci'
include sufficient flexibility to accommodate Elm final detc rntination tin the pr:eis,! ali;�nrien
when selected,
_ In addition, tile Board is further requesting that the• Joint ('1:1n1un
Commit= nice( on a rcgukir basis to provide opportututics Ica mach ce+lnhfin;,nta>, anti
consistent planning decisions in tile. unincorporated arcas cast ;Ind wcs( of Iii: Ntlrtli-J,'•UI!
651 Pine SU cel. No, Wine, Second Fluor. Mar uncz. Cablornf;l 94553.1213
Telephone: (510) 646.1600 - FAX: (510) G46-15r�9
UnuGir i`i��t1 s .t`tl.t`it{nllit Htt t U lU bJti"�yii�
MAR 14.'95 :.0 :37 Nc .003
alignment. Such discussions would include decisions on,local and regional circulation,utility
infrastructure, and agriculture protection. We would like to schedule a .Point Planning
Committee meeting for the last week in January. Staff will be in touch with you' to
determine a mutually acceptable date.
We hope you and your Council will honor the requests of the Board of Supervisors. if you
or any members of the Council have any questions, please call me at 646-1620.
Sincerely, .
'Val Alexceff, Director
YAAj
bieetyd.ti
4nc2+a.ufe .
cc. Members-Board of Supervisors'
Members•Brcntwood City Council
Mayor of Antioch
~ County Public Works Department
2
a4GtN MLCUY MCMHHUN P i ll:J1 U-aJtf-�ytf5 KIK 1 C'yJ !U:66 NO.uU-0 r.1 y
2.7
THE BOARD OR SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,-CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on _December 20,.1994 by the following vote:
A=: Supnxvisolra Sinith, Bishop, Desaulnier, Torlak=on, rcwers
NOES: Kona
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None.
' .oa=......r...............rp..................................................
SUBJECT: Reports on the State Routo 4 Bypass Authority and the
Alignment for the State Route 4 Bypass
The Board received the report from the Public Works
Director, (copy attached) , on the actions of the State Route 4
Bypass Authority regarding the Environmental Impact Report and
the alignment for the State Route 4 Bypass. Supervisor Torlakson
reported on his participation in the vote of the state -Route 4
Bypass Authority on December 12, 1994.
supervisor Smith spoke on the alignment and tho future
development of the -Cowell Ranch. Recognizing that differences of
opinion exist with respect to the State Route 4 Bypass North-
South-Alignment and in order to have the most complete
information possible (including information on funding and
eR.yironmental constraints) before'the County makes decisions as a
.responsible agency to approve'tho precise alignment for the state
Route 4 Bypass Alignment; and to amend the Circulation Element of
the County General Plan consistent with that precise alignment,
supervisor Smith moved to direct staff to do .the following:
1.' Defer County consideration of and a Board decision on
the precise alignment and the Circulation Element
Amendment until the time when the Board makes a
decision on the Cowell Ranch General Plan Amendment and
Planned Unit Development application; and address in
further detail the relationship botween the precise
alignments and the Cowell Ranch plan as part of its
environmental review and planning process.
2. Prepare a lettar from the Board of Supervisors to the
Brentwood City council requesting that any planning and
zoning actions by the City in its special planning
areas on the unincorporated lands nearby to the east of
the Porth-South alignments be deferred until the County
and' city have'tcade final deterrlinations g3?:
o2so-tdorka-soutfi7Cecien"��rSgruaenti,�or alternatively
that any such-planning actions include sufficient
flexibility to. accommodate the final determinations on
the precise alignment.
3. Include in the letter to the City a request that ttic
Brentwood-county Planning Committee neat on a regular
bads to provide a forum to discuss and provide
opportunities to reach complimentary and consistent
planning decisions in the unincorporated areas cast and
west or the North-South alignments, including decisions
on local and regional circulation, utility infrastruc-
ture and agricultural protection.
• GHutN rlt_I_Uy Mt-MHHUN
.4 . Take* no other action at this tine in response to the
7
Authority decision on the' precise alignment, including
any action to reduce the agricultural core.
The notion was seconded by supervisor TorlaXson.
Board members being in agreement, IT IS SO ORDERD.
Further, the Board ACCEPTED the report of the. Pul-lic rv"prx's
Director and the- oral report 6f ShpervJsor Tarlak.son.
I hsrabj comity that WS It it nrua and corroct copy of
an action taken; and emerod on the rnlWas of It-'
BoAM of Survi ars on t
ATTESTED:
PHP DATCHUOR.Clot%of the Board
of:;wtsjfvlsorjL and:ounry
by
cc-, Public Works Director
Director, GMEDA
County Counsel
`UHb'�N PILLUY PILMHHUN
!11 J1U-2fJLf—Jy2f5 HX 1a -JJ !U:Jy NO.UUJ r.21
TO: BOARD.OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: December.20, 1994
SUBJECT: Actions of the State Route 4 Bypass Authority Regarding the Environmental Impact
Report and the Alignment`frr the State Route 4 Bypass.
�'iF:•:'I.+f1C:nit`;(..)GRflrr�7(ndLfvJAti�)f•i(.1513�,� 3.RCU�1lA?J0J'T^C\TION
1. Recommonded Action:
ACCEPT report from the Public Wofks.Director on the dctlons of the State Route 4 Bypass
Authority, regarding the Environmental Impact Report and the Alignment for the State Route 4
Bypass, and on the status of the State Route 4 Bypass Authority
11. FlnsnclalImpact:
No Impact to the General Funds.
III. Reasons for Recommendatlons and Back round:
The Board,when making a recommendation to their representative to the Board of-Directors of
the State Route 4 Bypass Authority, requested a report on the actions of the Authority at the
meeting of December i3, 1994. •
The Authority certified the Final Environmerrtal Impact Report for the State Route 4 Bypass
Project. This was by unanimous vote. Then after a series of failed motions and non-unanimous
votes the Authority selected the Nunn Alternative for the alignment. Based on that decision the
Authority approved the Project with all the necessary findings under CEOA. They directed stat;
to complete the Precise Alignment Maps based on the approved project. The' Authority must
unanlmously approve these (naps and,then forward the maps to the cttles of,Antioch and
Brentwood as well as the County for action. The Cities and the County must then amend
elements of their General Plans,'and adopt the Precise Alignment, The Authority will have the
final Precise Alignment Maps before them for their approval In February. Actions by the other
agencies will follow.
ContinuodonAttachment;_XXSIGNA7U
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTBATOR
_RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE —
_APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS '
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT
AYES: NOES:
-
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
LT:eh
c:BO20d.112
orig. Div: Public Work;.(rE)
Contact: Lowell Tyniion,Phono 313.2382 \,
cc: Bo4d of Directors,SR4BPA, ��
bHbtN MCCu V MUMHHUM ju ::)JU-6a
Actions Of the State Route 4 Bypass Authority ROg2rdlng the Environmental impact, Report
Alignment for the State Route 4 Bypass.
December 20, 1994
Page 2
Ill, Reasons for R000mMend§tl4ns- and packgrouad: '(Continue)
The County and the Cities of Antioch-and- Brentwood recently extended tits life of th
Route 4 Bypass Authority to the year 20*15. 711hil,, vias nacessc-4y to complete r-nrq?r1jc`,!on
pro I iect P's de: --,ribol.l In Vie Floal Elie, " '- Inat the three agencies continue
.1Dz1jjt;j,.%.Won 114 this Peject.because the Bypass Is a key element of the transport.
Inirastiucture of East County. H work on this facility Is not pursued then the three agencies
not be in corriplianco with their General- Plans anti the Impacts of current and plan.
.development (nay not be mItIgated. For this reason theCounty should continue participa
In the State ROLAS 4 Bypass Authority.
Request to Speak Form
( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT)
Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum
before addressing the Board.
610VV^0vhae,4 SKp-le..,)
Name: SCA v y k. "Icw .: 676-77 .7
/lddress: X50 ,k. g- Ucsta --- Ckr,
1 am speaking for myself or organization:
Inane of o�ntzatio u
CHECK ONE
1 wish to speak on /agenda Item # C_ Date: I
My comments will be: mal _!or_, ainsL.
1 wish to speak on the subject of .
1 Flo not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board
to consider:
Request to Speak Form
( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT)
Complete this form and place It In the box near the speakers' rostrum
before addressing the
C
1 am spealdng for f or
nr .
ane of o�nEsatioN ,
Qj= ONE:
1 wish to on Item # ' 1 b _9
mems will be: .
My oom br—j
_ i wish to speak on the subject of -
I do not wish toveak but leave these ootnnKnts for the Board
to corrsider:
I
Request to Speak Form
( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT)
.0 Wlete this form and place It in the box near the speakers' rostrum
before addressing the Board
1 am spealting for an►self_or
CHECK ONE
_ 1 wish to speak on Agenda Ilan O_
My comments will be: general_for_egai
= 1 wish to speak on the subject of -
1 do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board
to co IS