HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 12171996 - C121 C. 1199 C.1209 C. 121
and C.122
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on December 17, 1996 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Bishop, DeSaulnier, Canciamilla and Smith
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Con espondence
C.119 LETTER dated December 2, 1996, from Guy S. Houston, Mayor of the City of
Dublin, P.O. Box 2340, Dublin, CA 94568, advising that the Dublin City Council has
agreed to fund the $116,760 shortfall in local match funds for construction of the I-
580/I-680 interchange, with the expectation of recovering these funds through the
proposed Tri-Valley Regional Transportation Fee.
****REFERRED TO DIRECTOR, GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
C.120 LETTER dated December 4, 1996, from Darrel "Jay" Tucker, Mayor, City of
Hercules, 111 Civic Drive, Hercules, CA 94547, expressing support for an
audit of the rates of the Richmond Sanitary Service.
****REFERRED TO DIRECTOR, GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
C.121 LETTER dated December 2, 1996, from Deedee Jenson, Interim Executive Director,
Battered Women's Alternatives, P.O. Box 6406, Concord, CA 94524, requesting to be
a participant in discussions on issues pertinent to the new welfare law.
****REFERRED TO SOCIAL SERVICE DIRECTOR
C.122 LETTER dated December 6, 1996, from Mary Frances Draper, 100 Devon Avenue,
#1, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523, expressing concern with a suggestion to close the Central
Library located in Pleasant Hill.
""REFERRED**REFERRED TO THE COUNTY LIBRARIAN
THE BOARD APPROVED the above recommendations as noted
1 hereby certify that this Is a true and correct spy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of"fh0
Board of Sup sora on�Clerk
ATTESTED:PHIL BATCHELOard
Of Supervisors and Cou
AM,J, ,% .7&.,
10
c.c.Correspondents
County Administrators
Director,G MEDA
Social Service.,Director
County Librarian
REQFIVFn
BDEc 4
P.O. Box 6406
W� Concord CA 94524
Battered Women's Business: (510) 676-2845
\� CLERK C�G�si�.vF SUPERVISORS Fax: (510) 676-2326
1 Alternatives C 0 N 1"A -,Q.CO. Crisis: (5 10) 930-8300
S pervisor Mark Desaulnier December 2 , 1996
651 Pine Street
Martinez, Ca 94553
Dear Supervisor Desaulnier,
Throughout the last few months, Battered Women's Alternatives has
been working in coalition with health, human service & immigrant
rights organizations to address the impact of welfare legislation
on communities we serve. We are concerned that many provisions
within the new law are potentially detrimental to battered women's
ability to leave violent relationships.
Much of the impact of the legislation on communities will depend on
decisions at the state level about implementation. In the coming
weeks and months as the bill continues to be interpreted and
regulations are promulgated, public hearings at the local level
will be held to inform the decision making process. Although the
only state sponsored public hearing scheduled in the Bay Area was
held in Santa Clara County, we hope that local awareness &
responsible education about the needs of our communities can make
a difference. Toward this end, BWA shares the following
information with you in a spirit of raising awareness about the
needs of the over 101, 300 battered women in Contra Costa County.
As the California Alliance Against Domestic Violence recently
stated, public assistance can be a lifeline to safety for women
attempting to leave an abusive relationship. While domestic
violence cuts across all socioeconomic categories, 70% of women who
enter BWA's shelter for battered women utilize AFDC as a bridge out
of their abusive relationships. Women and children who enter
shelter are in serious danger -- and have the fewest resources.
Battered women with children may need more time receiving benefits
than the two to five year cap outlined in the law, may have
difficulty seeking employment if their partners are continuing to
stalk or harass them in the workplace, and may have no other
recourse than public benefits to leave a battering relationship.
The exclusion of battered legal immigrant women from receiving
benefits effectively traps them in battering relationships. This is
a problem recognized in federal legislation providing a legal
remedy for battered women depending on US citizen or permanent
resident spouses to petition for residency on their own behalf if
they can prove they are battered.
Within section 103--402(a) (7) of the new welfare law, each state
has the option to adopt a "Family Violence Amendment" . This would
set up a system to screen all applicants for public,.assistance for
family violence, and refer them to appropriate resources. In
24 Hour Crisis Line Counseling Services Legal Advocacy Program Teen Program
Shelter/Safe Homes Support Groups Men's Program Workplace Program
Transitional Housing Employment Assistance Children's Program Speaker's Bureau
_2-
adopting this amendment, waivers for battered women could be made
available to women in the areas addressed above. Proof of battering
to receive such a waiver or exemption might include personal
affidavits or statements from service providers, as well as_ police
or medical records. Placing a significant burden of proof on
battered women would be problematic, since battered women in these
situations are often threatened by their partners, isolated,
fearful & unlikely to have thorough documentation of abuse.
Each state also has the option to exempt 20% of recipients from the
lifetime (60 month) cap, based on hardship, battering or extreme
cruelty. In adopting this exemption, the state would acknowledge
the barriers and struggles faced by battered women and children in
poverty, including ongoing contact with batterers who often
escalate their abuse after the woman leaves the relationship.
Another problematic area of the law is the requirement of TANF
recipients to assist child support enforcement agencies in
establishing paternity. This has already been a problem for women
clients of BWA, who often face retaliation from their ex partners
for establishing paternity & seeking enforcement of support orders.
Training TANF workers to screen for good cause waivers to this
requirement would maximize safety for battered women and their
children.
A Family Violence Amendment, with waivers in the areas outlined
above, maintenance of the full 20% exemption capability, and
waivers for battered women in the area of paternity & child support
enforcement are a few of the remedies available to the state to
help battered women and their children survive and flourish.
Unfortunately, there was little testimony at the regional public
hearing about what this legislation will mean for battered women.
We welcome the opportunity to address these issues with you in
further detail, and would like to be an active part of any effort
to hold public hearings or forums on welfare reform in Contra Costa
County. At a time when federal and state domestic violence laws
reflect increasing awareness and sophistication about the needs of
battered women, it is important that we not take a step backward by
failing to act.
Thank you for your consideration of these issues. Please contact
me should you like to discuss these issues in greater detail. I
can be reached at 676-2845.
Sincerely,
Deedee Jens 9nn
Interim Executive Director