Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10241995 - C63 iY y, w Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ;� Costa .. . County FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON °sq_� DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: September 27, 1995 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR A GENERAL PLAN REVIEW FOR WLM COMPANY PROPERTY SPECIFIC REQUEST(P) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Authorize a General Plan Amendment Study for the 100 acre WLM Company property in Alamo. 2 . Granting authorization of this request does not imply any support for this application, but only that this item is appropriate for study. FISCAL IMPACT The applicant shall pay an amendment fee to cover the County's cost of this study. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS Wright Real Estate, Inc. has requested` a General Plan amendment study be authorized for an approximately 100 acre area in east Alamo across from Monte Vista High School. The request was made on behalf of the WLM Company which owns the property. The site is currently designated as Singde Family Residential Low Density and Agricultural Lands. They have requested a redesignati q;lg:le Family Residential Low Density and Open Space. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATUR RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECO ON O ARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _ OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A Y UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVIISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Jim Cutler (510) 646-2034) ATTESTED cc: Community Development Department PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF Public Works THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CAO AND OUNTDM STRATOR County Counsel WLM Company (via CDD) BY , DEPUTY JWC:drb JWC1995\drb\bo\WLM.GPR General Plan Review for WLM Company Property September 27, 1995 Page Two Their request is to have the areas designated for development be reconfigured to better suit the topography of the site. Staff feels the request for study is reasonable and the study should be authorized. Staff may adjust the study area boundaries to provide for a more logical amendment study boundary. Authorization of the study does not imply any concurrence with the request but is limited to the issue that the concept is worthy of study.