Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02281995 - D.1 D. I TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS j Contra . Costa FROM: - HARVEY E.- BRAGDON 0', County DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTy,- �O• T_ 1t DATE: January 12 , 1995 STa'�ouri r'� SUBJECT: Decision on Jerry Loving Associates (Applicant) - Wickland Properties (Owners) on a Recommendation by the County Planning Commission to Amend the County General Plan (County File #4-91-CO) , to Rezone the Subject Property from Preliminary Development Plan (County File #2958-RZ) and Approve a Final Development Plan (County File #3018-91) for 100 Single Family Residential Units. An Appeal by the Applicant on the County Planning Commission's Decision to Subdivide the Property (SUB 7558) and Recommendation by the County Zoning Administrator on a Development Agreement (DA940122) Proposed by Wickland Properties, in the Crockett Area. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Accept the environment documentation as prepared for this project as being adequate. 2 . Adopt the mitigation monitoring program as prepared for this project. 3 . Approve the request to amend the General Plan (4-91-CO) from Agricultural Lands to Single Family Residential-High Density. 4 . Approve the request to rezone the site from A-2 (Agricultural Lands) to P-1 (Planned Unit Development) with Preliminary Development Plan (2958-RZ) . 5. Approve Final Development Plan (3018-91) . 6. Deny the applicant's appeal and approve subdivision (SUB 7558) with all the conditions approved by the County Planning Commission. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMIT EE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) ACTION OF BOARD ON Fe ruary 28, 1995 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER See Addendum for Board action. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: 2,4,5 NOES: 1,3 ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact:Debbie Chamberlain - 646-2031 Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED February 28, 1995 cc: PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS D COU T ADMINISTRATOR BY ° , DEPUTY 1 2 . 7 . Adopt the findings contained in the County Planning Commission's Resolution as the Board's own and the findings previously provided, with the modifications provided in the Board's packet. 8 . Introduce the Ordinance, giving it effect, waive reading, set for adoption of same. 9 . Find that the Development Agreement is consistent with the County General Plan and Conditions of Approval for the development known as Pointe Crockett, County Files 4-91-CO, 2958-RZ, 3018-91, and SUB 7558. 10. Adopt the Ordinance previously provided for the Wickland Properties relative to the development known as Pointe Crockett. 11. Authorize the Director of Community Development to sign and execute the Agreement after it has been duly signed by Wickland Properties. FISCAL IMPACT None. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION The background information for this item was provided to the Board in their December 13 , 1994 packet. On December 13 , 1994 the Board, after receiving all the testimony and evidence presented, closed the: public hearing and continued this matter until December 20, 1994 . On December 20, 1994 the Board certified the environmental impact report and continued the remaining items for decision until January 31, 1995 . A Modification to the Statement of Findings and Over-riding Considerations is provided. The modification deletes Statement #5 under the Statement of Over-riding Considerations, and is reflected on page 86 of the Findings. DJC/aa BDIX/7558 .DJC As part of this Project, Wickland has amended its previous offers of dedication to include substantial additional acreage on the water side of San Pablo Avenue. EBRPD further wishes to establish a trail across the land southeast of the Project site. This land is owned by Wickland, and is under a Williamson Act contract until 1996. As part of this Project, Wickland has further offered an additional trail to EBRPD, following the future Cummings Skyway alignment as referenced above, to connect other planned trails in the area. The specific land dedication offers and acreage are set forth in Wickland's letter of February 26, 1993 to Mr. Bob Doyle, the Land Acquisition Division of EBRPD, and the maps attached to such letter. The letter and maps are contained in the Draft EIR. The Board finds that any remaining unavoidable impacts of the Project are acceptable in light of the environmental, social, economic and other considerations set forth herein, because the benefits of the Project outweigh any significant, unavoidable environmental impacts of the Project. 86 ADDENDUM TO ITEM D.1 FEBRUARY 28, 1995 On February 14, 1995, the Board of Supervisors continued to this date the decision on General Plan Amendment Request 4-91-CO, Rezoning Application 2958-RZ and Development Plan 3018-9, Jerry Loving Architect (applicant) and Wickland Properties (owner) in the Crockett area, and the decision on the appeal by Wickland Properties on Subdivision 7558, and the decision on the property known as "Pointe Crockett" in the Crockett area. Debbie Chamberlin, Community Development Department, presented the staff report on the matter and commented on the recommendation by the Public Works,Department to delete the Condition 58e which called for a restricted left turn at Vista Del Rio, having reanalyzed the sight distance, that left turns could be allowed at Vista Del Rio. Chair Bishop commented on the correspondence received from the Hazardous Materials Commission received this morning and from Milton Feldstien at the Air Board. Dr. Walker, Health Service Department, commented on the risk management prevention program being carried out by Health Services under state legislation involving an analysis of facilities in Contra Costa County that handle acutely hazardous materials. He also commented on the recommendation that the Board assure if the development goes forth that there are assurances in place that the Pointe Crockett development is encompassed by the proposed Community Warning System which is now being developed by industry in Contra Costa County and that there is a'siren in place that will reach the residents of Pointe Crockett and tie them into that warning system. Supervisor Smith requested clarification and discussion of H2S monitors. Laura Brown, Health Services Department responded with an explanation on the operation of fence line monitors and issues including monitoring. Supervisor Rogers requested clarification on the timing of the siren system and people actually moving into the area. Dr. Walker responded that the Board would need to be explicit in its recommendation that if development goes forth that the siren system be in place before people lived there. Chair Bishop commented that if the development were any place else in this County, it would be appropriately supported but that it is in harms way. Supervisor Rogers commented that a project which is residential should not be this close to a facility such as UNOCAL which has a history of on going problems and indicated he cannot support this decision here but expressed the need as a County to take a look at to try and figure out how to deal with industry and having land that people would like to build homes or businesses on. Supervisor Smith moved approval of the project with some added conditions specifically not to have any occupancy of the homes until after the siren is in place and after the chlorine is no longer used at UNOCAL and that a H2S monitor be installed immediately adjacent to the homes and that that be monitored by the County so that there would be no risk of any release of significant amounts of H2S that went unnoticed and he also asked that a General Plan study be done for a General Plan modification to deal with potential risks. Supervisor Torlakson seconded the motion. Chair Bishop indicated that the Board was late for a luncheon meeting with the Court and suggested that Supervisor Smith put the motion into written form for clarity so that the Board could vote on it after the luncheon and commented that the General Plan process amendment was not agendized for today. Supervisor Torlakson suggested a condition that this developer help pay for whatever staff work would be necessary to develop a General Plan amendment with the involvement of the industrial committee and hazardous materials committee. The Board discussed the motion. The vote on the motion was as follows: AYES: Supervisors Smith, DeSaulnier and Torlakson NOES: Supervisors Rogers and Bishop ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Following the luncheon recess, Supervisor Smith clarified for the record that the motion was to accept the environmental documentation as prepared, adopt the mitigation monitoring program as prepared, approve the request to amend the General Plan from Agricultural to Single Family Residential High Density, approve the request to rezone the site from A-2 to P-1 with a preliminary development plan, approve the final development plan, deny the applicant's appeal, approve the subdivision with the conditions approved and three other conditions, number one was no occupancy until after the sire system is installed and functional, number two was no occupancy until after the expiration of the three year window during which UNOCAL will be eliminating chlorine and number three was siting one H2S monitor near or at the property line connected to the Health Services Department for monitoring of H2S in the region of the residences and adopt the findings contained in the County Plan with the modifications as in the packet, introduce the ordinance giving effect, waive the reading, adoption of the same, find that the Development Agreement is consistent with the General Plan and conditions of approval, adopt the ordinance previously provided and authorize the Community Development Director to sign and execute the agreement with Wickland Properties and separately not as part of this motion request staff to return back to this Board with information on how to initiate a General Plan process to look at modification of the General Plan to deal with these balancing issues in the future. Supervisor Torlakson clarified his addition was direction to staff to return by March 21, 1995, with recommendations for a work plan to address the issue of separation between industry and residences including a general plan text amendment, ordinance changes or other actions and that staff recommendations would include costs or a budget for such an effort and that Wickland would pay for that effort or a reasonable share. Supervisor Smith concurred. Dennis Barry requested clarification of the clarification that the motion included the deletion of condition 58e recommended by staff at the beginning of the meeting, and that Supervisor Torlakson's direction was to put the General Plan Study authorization on a future agenda. Supervisor Smith concurred. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on February 28, 1995 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Smith, DeSaulnier and Torlakson NOES: Supervisors Rogers and Bishop ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: In the matter of approval of the) Pointe Crockett Project General ) RESOLUTION NO. 95/86 Plan Amendment ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES that: There is filed with the Clerk of this Board a copy of Resolution No. 42-1994, adopted by the Contra Costa Planning Commission on November 15, 1994, certifying the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) with respect to Subdivision Map No. 7558, approving such Map, and recommending approvals of the Pointe Crockett General Plan Amendment and related approvals. The Subdivision Map approval was thereafter appealed to this Board, giving this Board authority over the Project approvals set forth below. On December 13 and 20, 1994 and February 14 and 28, 1995, this Board held meetings and considered the amendment of the General Plan from AL to SH (File No. 4-91-CO) as considered by the Planning Commission, as well as the following related approvals: rezone of the site from A-2 to P-1 (File No. 2958-R2) ; Preliminary and Final Development Plans for 100 single-family units (File No. 3018-91) ; Subdivision Map No. 7558; and certification of the EIR for each of the listed approvals. The Pointe ,Crockett General Plan Amendment was one of the subjects of the referenced EIR. On' February 28, 1995, the Board certified the EIR with respect to the General Plan Amendment and related Project approvals, approved the Project and adopted findings thereon as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . The Board's Order of February 28, 1995 certifying the EIR, - approving the Project and adopting findings thereon is -incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED as follows: The Board, having fully considered this matter, hereby. APPROVES the referenced amendment to the County General Plan as recommended by the County Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution 42-1994. Orig. Dept: Clerk of the Board cc: Director of Community Development Director of Public Works County Administrator Director of Growth Management and Economic Development County Counsel I certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. Attested: February 28, 1995 PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk Of the Board of Supervisors and County Admini rator 4 By: ° J , Deputy ORDINANCE NO. `95=15 , The Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa ordains as ; follows: Section I: The Board hereby finds that the provisions of the Development Agreement (Development Agreement) between the County of Contra Costa and Wickland Properties, relating to a residential development for up to 100 units on approximately 28 acres located in the unincorporated portion of the County west of the community of Crockett (project or Pointe Crockett project) , which is on file with the Clerk of the Board, and which has been recommended for approval by the County Zoning Administrator, is consistent with the County's General Plan. Section II: The Board hereby finds that adoption of this ordinance and approval of the Development Agreement complies with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . A. The Board hereby finds that no further environmental review is required for the Development Agreement. The Environmental Impact Report for the Pointe Crockett project (EIR) assessed the environmental impacts of the Development Agreement. The environmental impacts of the project, including the Development Agreement, are addressed in the CEQA Findings and project findings for the project, which are incorporated herein by reference, and the Board makes these findings in part based upon all such prior findings, as well as the entire administrative record for the project. Further, the Development Agreement merely implements the project as set forth in the EIR, with no new significant impacts. As further set forth below, no conditions exist herein for additional environmental review. 1. No substantial changes are proposed in the Development Agreement which will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. 2. No substantial changes have occured with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which require major revisions to the EIR, due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. 3. No new information of substantial importance has been brought forth. B. Pursuant to CEQA at PRC §21083 . 3 (a) , the EIR was certified for the zoning for the project, the Development Agreement is consistent with such zoning, which allows for a residential development, and there are no new effects upon i� the environment peculiar to the project, ' project site or Development Agreement not addressed as significant effects in the EIR, and there has arisen no substantial new information showing any such effects will be more significant than described in the EIR. C. Pursuant to CEQA at PRC §21083 . 3 (b) , the EIR was certified for the General Plan Amendment for the project, including the Development Agreement, and the Development Agreement is consistent with such General Plan as amended, and there are no new effects on the environment which are peculiar to the project, project site or Development Agreement not addressed as significant effects in the EIR, and there has arisen no substantial new information showing any such effects will be more significant than described in the EIR. Section III: The Board hereby approves the Development Agreement pursuant to the authorization provided in sections 65864 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California. The Board hereby authorizes the Director of Community Development to sign the Development Agreement on behalf of the County of Contra Costa. Section IV: If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such a decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The Board hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance irrespective of the unconstitutionality or invalidity of any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase. Section V: This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage, and within 15 days of passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting for and against it in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper published in this County. PASSED on February 28 , 1995 by the following votes: AYES: Supervisors Smith, DeSaulnier and Torlakson NOES: Supervisors Rogers and Bishop ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ATTEST: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: IL b Board Vair