The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 02141995 - 2.2 2 . 2 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this order on February 14, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: (See text of Board Order for vote) NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Solid Waste Collection Franchise Issues in the Unincorporated Areas of the County The Board considered the report and recommendations of Val Alexeeff, Director of the Growth Management and Economic Development Agency, relative to solid waste collection franchise issues in the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County. A copy of the report is attached and included as a part of this document. All persons desiring to speak on the issues were heard. Board members discussed the recommendations and proposed amendments for consideration. Therefore, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Recommendation "a" set forth in the report is APPROVED as amended to exclude the North Concord area in the Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority. The vote on the motion was: AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Smith, DeSaulnier NOES: Supervisors Torlakson, Bishop IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Recommendation "b" set forth in the report is APPROVED as amended to exclude North Concord, unincorporated Antioch, and Ironhouse Sanitary District. The vote on the motion was: Ayes: Supervisors Rogers, Smith, DeSaulnier, Torlakson NOES: Supervisor Bishop IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Recommendation "c" set forth in the report is APPROVED as amended to include the areas of Alhambra Valley and Morgan Territory. The vote on the motion was: AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Smith, DeSaulnier, Torlakson., Bishop NOES: None IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Recommendation "d" set forth in the report is APPROVED with a report to the Board on March 14, 1995. The vote on the motion was: AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Smith, DeSaulnier, Torlakson, Bishop Noes: None Solid Waste Collection Issues Board Order Page 2 February 14, 1995 ADDITIONALLY, IT IS ORDERED that Recommendation "e" set forth in the report is CONTINUED to August 1995 The vote on the motion was: AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Smith, DeSaulnier, Torlakson, Bishop NOES: None I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN . ATTESTED: _February 14, 1995 Phil Batchelor,Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator By `209 Deputy 61 cc: Director, GMEDA County Counsel I TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: VAL ALEXEEFF, DIRECTOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1995 SUBJECT: SOLID WASTE COLLECTION FRANCHISE ISSUES IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF THE COUNTY SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICA"I'ION RECOMMENDATIONS: Consider report from Director, Growth Management and Economic Development Agency, on unincorporated area solid waste collector franchises as follows: a) Joining Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority, rescinding request to franchise Pleasant Hill BART independently, appointing two Supervisors to sit on CCCSWA Board; b) Authorizing revised or new collection franchise agreement arrangements with Garaventa Enterprises for the Bay Point, Discovery Bay, North Concord, unincorporated Antioch, Ironhouse Sanitary District, and related areas, 1) Determine boundaries for franchise areas; 2) Determine changes in franchise language; 3) Determine terms of franchises; 4) Staff may be directed to return with specific franchise details; CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: x YES SIGNATURE: V RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED— OTHER VOTE OF SUPER VIS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TILL JS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPT OF AN ACTION TN AND ENTERED ON THE _UNANIMOUS(ABSENT MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. AYES: NOES: ATTEST,' ABSENT: ABSTAIN: L BATCHELOR,CLERK OF TILE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR VA:dg ,DEPUTY swfebl4.bo Contact: Val,,Uexeeff(646-1620) CC: County Administrator County Counsel GMEDA Departments F SOLID WASTE ISSUES FEBRUARY 14, 1995 PAGE 2 RECOMMENDATIONS (continued: C) Authorizing collection franchise agreement arrangements with BFI in the Clyde, Pacheco, and any other areas specified in item b) as appropriate, 1) Determine boundaries for franchise areas, 2) Determine changes in franchise language, 3) Determine terms of franchises, 4) Staff may be directed to return with specific franchise details; d) Directing staff to compare and report on other franchise agreements with other haulers in the County, including Rodeo, Ironhouse Sanitary District, Mt. View Sanitary District, Kensington Community Services District, and e) Determining whether there should be further changes in County solid waste site fees or other factors related to site and collector rates. FISCAL IMPACT: There is a potential for both an increase and a decrease in the County General Fund and/or solid waste program funds. Unincorporated areas franchised by sanitary districts currently have franchise fees; specifically, a 3%franchise fee is paid to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District for Pacheco and Clyde; a franchise fee is paid to Ironhouse and to Mt. View Sanitary District. If these fees are maintain, an increase to either the County General Fund or to solid waste program funds would be experienced. Reductions may occur to revenue from the Keller Canyon Landfill resulting from alternative transfer and disposal proposals. Some financial impact information is provided additional information nay be needed depending upon course of action taken. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS: a) On January 24, 1995, the Board of Supervisors voted to join the Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority with a series of conditions: z Recognition of sole franchising authority of the County for the unincorporated area. Equal membership status for the County to other members. Exclusion of the Clyde, Pacheco, and North Concord areas from the RFP. a Special services' designation established within the agreement. n Any Pleasant Hill BART unincorporated area disposal subsidy to remain within County discretion. a Direction of waste to specific locations to be under authority of the JPA. Each jurisdiction can balance commercial and residential rates. Removal of Pleasant Hill BART from the CCSWA RFP with sole franchising discretion given to the County. The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District and Central San agreed to all of the conditions except removal of Pleasant Hill BART. SOLID WASTE ISSUES FEBRUARY 14, 1995 PAGE 3 Central San further identified issues necessary to be resolved prior to conclusion of franchise takeover. D The effective dates of the transfer of franchising authority to the County and the County's membership in the Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority. �- Allocation of this year's franchise fees for the North Concord, Pacheco-Clyde areas and for the franchise fees up to the Spring of 1996 for the unincorporated areas to be franchises by the JPA after 1996. D Responsibility for potential liability in the Acme lawsuit for areas subject to the transfer to the County. Delegation of franchise administration responsibilities and direction of wastestream to the Authority. > Responsibility for and transfer of other administrative and AB 939 activities. Expenses associated with County membership in the Authority. These items should be referred to County Counsel and not prevent seating of Board members on the JPA. It is staffs understanding that by rescinding the request to withdraw Pleasant Hill BART from the RFP(it is agreed to be within the franchise authority of the County) and agreeing to work on Central San franchise issues, conditions of the County and of the Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority have been met. b) The action entails authorizing the GMEDA Director, or his designee, to prepare revised or new franchise agreements to the current solid waste collection franchise between the County and Garaventa Enterprises to incorporate into one solid waste collection franchise the unincorporated areas presently served by Garaventa Enterprises under County franchise for Bay Point and Discovery Bay, and including language, as adopted by the Board in the Franchise with Richmond Sanitary Services, requiring compliance with the County's Materials Diversion Ordinance and indemnification for any failure to meet AB 939 diversion requirements providing that the County has allowed for program costs within the rate structure, and including the language approved by the Board on November 1, 1994, providing for control and direction of the wastestream but allowing proposals from the hauler for alternative transfer and disposal which allow the lowest costs. (See issues below.) C) The action entails authorizing the GMEDA Director, or his designee, to prepare a collection franchise agreement between the County and Pleasant Hill Bayshore Disposal/Browning Ferris Industries(BFI)for Bay Point to incorporate into one solid waste collection franchise the unincorporated areas presently served by BFI, namely, areas of Bay Point, Pacheco, Clyde, Alhambra Valley, Franklin Canyon, and Morgan Territory, and to include language, as outlined above, for compliance with the Materials Diversion Ordinance, indemnification for any failure to attain the AB 939 diversion goals, and for alternative transfer and disposal proposals which allow the lowest costs. (See issues below.) Territory Issues for Garaventa and BFI Determine under which of the above franchises the following areas should be included: a, the California Skyline subdivision b. the "neutral" area in Bay Point SOLID WASTE ISSUES FEBRUARY 14, 1995 PAGE 4 C. the undeveloped redevelopment area in Bay Point planned for industrial development d. the commercial area of North Concord e. the unincorporated area outside of Antioch. Determine whether the Board should establish a method of resolution of boundary disputes and it is noted that some of these areas are not within the Board's authority at this time. There is contention between the undesignated franchise areas between Garaventa and BFI. Both companies are interested in expanding and securing service area boundaries. Certain claims of one company are disputed by the other. Presently, a number of areas in Bay Point, the area near Clyde, unincorporated North Concord, and unincorporated areas around Antioch are served by Garaventa Enterprises and have been for some years. In Bay Point, three areas remain unfranchised: (1) California Skyline which is a new subdivision in which Garaventa Enterprises provides over 90% of the homes collection service with Pleasant Hill Bayshore Disposal/BFI providing service to only a few homes; (2) the "neutral area" in which Garaventa Enterprises provides about 90% of the homes collection services and Pleasant Hill Bayshore/BFI provides about 10% of the homes collection services; and (3) a fairly large and relatively vacant area which is intended to be developed for industrial and light industrial uses as part of the County Redevelopment efforts. Garaventa Enterprises would like to include California Skyline and the "neutral area" within their franchise; they are willing to relinquish the intended Redevelopment area to BFI. Both California Skyline and the "neutral area" are contiguous with the existing area under franchise to Garaventa Enterprises. If the Board of Supervisors intends to maintain earlier County policy that current service providers be allowed to maintain their existing service areas under franchise, it would be consistent to extend the current Garaventa Franchise to include California Skyline and the "neutral area," and to extend BFI's franchise to include the proposed Redevelopment area. BFI objects to this contention and also claims contiguity, and requests an alternate process to staffs proposal. In the incorporated North Concord area, Garaventa Enterprises has been providing services to a number of businesses. Recently, the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District and BFI approached Garaventa Enterprises advising them that this North Concord area was within Central San's service area and under exclusive franchise. No prior claim with regard to this matter had ever been made. Since Central San appeared to agree, in the Ad Hoc Committee meeting, to relinquish its franchise within its northern boundaries, if the Board's policy continues to be to give current service providers the same areas they are servicing, Pacheco and Clyde should be included in the existing Franchise with BFI, and North Concord should be included in the Garaventa Franchise. BFI objects to this contention and fees they should be the provider in this area. Lastly, two other areas need to be considered. One area lies between Clyde, North Concord, and the California Skyline and is presently undeveloped flatland and an undeveloped hill--this area is bounded by Evora Road on the south and the waterfront road on the north. Since this area would be contiguous to areas currently served by Garaventa Enterprises, it may allow for greater efficiency in providing service to include it, as requested by the Garaventas, within their franchise. The other area is an unincorporated pocket outside the city boundaries of Antioch. This area is presently served by Garaventa Enterprises and should be included in their franchise if the Board intends to allow existing service providers to maintain their existing service areas. BFI objects since they serve Antioch. For efficiency, it might make sense to incorporate areas served by one company into one franchise so that by consolidating, reductions could occur in staff costs for monitoring and future costs for rate reviews, customer service surveys, and so forth. SOLID WASTE ISSUES FEBRUARY 14, 1995 PAGE 5 Franchise Language for Garaventa and BFI As part of amending the existing franchises, the County needs to assure that AB 939 diversion goals are met. Garaventa Enterprises has said they would agree to include both compliance with the County's Materials Diversion Ordinance and indemnification for any failure to meet AB 939 diversion based upon the language used in the Franchise Agreement with Richmond Sanitary Services which assures the pass-through in the rates of program costs. If these amendments were made to the Garaventa Enterprise, making the same amendments to the BFI franchise would make all County franchises consistent. Additionally, to allow for the rate reduction proposed by Garaventa Enterprises, the franchise should be amended to include the language approved by the Board on November 1, 1994, providing for alternative proposals from the hauler for transfer and disposal of waste at the lowest cost. To provide consistency in all County franchises, this language should be included in other franchises; similar language already exists in the franchise with Richmond Sanitary Services. Terms of the Franchise for Garaventa and BFI Presently, the Garaventa Franchise for Bay Point is for 10 years with a five-year extension; under this term, the current franchise expires in 2000 with the five-year extension bringing the expiration to 2005. Garaventa Enterprises would like a franchise covering all the unincorporated areas they serve that is consistent with the franchise they have with Ironhouse Sanitary District, which is for 20 years and expires in 2013. Given that the County would be obtaining AB 939 compliance and indemnification, and consistency with the Ironhouse franchise term would allow the County either (1) to more readily assume the Ironhouse franchise or(2) to more effectively coordinate programs with Ironhouse, extending the current term of the franchise with the County seems reasonable. If the County extends the current franchise term for an additional 10 years bringing the expiration to 2005 and maintains the five-year extension option, then the franchise between the County and Garaventa Enterprises would expire in 2015 which is only two years beyond the expiration of the Ironhouse franchise. To provide consistency among all County franchises, similar terms should be provided for in any franchise with BFI. Determine whether the existing term of the franchises with Garaventa Enterprises and BFI should remain at 15 years with an option for a five-year extension or be extended to 20 years with an option for a five-year extension which would be consistent with the terms of franchises under sanitary districts. Rates Garaventa Enterprises has proposed to the Board an immediate rate reduction of $2.00 and an unspecified amount for an additional rate reduction at the time their Transfer Station opens. This proposal would be allowed under the language for alternative proposals approved by the Board on November 1, 1994. Board action to accept and approve this rate reduction is necessary before any lowering of the rates can be effected. Authorize the $2.00 rate reduction proposed by Garaventa Enterprises for all areas included in the Garaventa Franchise to be effective upon execution of the amendments to the franchise. SOLID WASTE ISSUES FEBRUARY 14, 1995 PAGE 6 d) Direct the GMEDA Director, or his designee, to work with the Rodeo Sanitary District to obtain inclusion of the Rodeo area within the County's franchise with BFI. Direct the GMEDA Director to prepare a report of status and options regarding the direct franchising or negotiating Memoranda of Agreements for collection service with regard to the areas presently franchised by the (1) Ironhouse Sanitary District; (2) Mt. View Sanitary District; and (3) Kensington Community Services District. The Board may wish to direct staff to work on other franchise arrangements that have not been identified in the previous items. e) Attachment A indicates the previous action that the Board took on County fees. Attachment C provides information regarding different rates as they come out per month and per year. Attachment D indicates County fees and expenditures. Attachment E indicates differences in direct-haul mileage. The Board may have further direction to staff on this item. LLST OFATTACHMENTS: 1. Franchise issues pertaining to the BFI and Garaventa Enterprises. Implementation of Ordinance 91-31. (January 31, 1995 Board Order.) 2. County fees, fee options, and current programs funded by fees. (Attachments A, B, C, D) 3. Direct-haul mileage cost comparison. (Attachment E) 4. Monthly residential rates for BFI and Garaventa Enterprises service areas. (Attachment F) 5. Staff direction for franchises and permits. (Attachment G) 6. Correspondence from Central Contra Costa Sanitary District and Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority. (Attachment H) Attachment A 2.4 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VontrG FROM: VAL ALEXEEFF, DIRECTOR Costa GROWTH MANAGEMENT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGE, ClYjrt r DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1994 SUBJECT: REPORT FROM GMEDA DIRECTOR TO CONSIDER TIPPING FEES (THEIR AMOUNTS AND LEVELS) AND OTHER LANDFILL RELATED ACTIONS SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Accept Report from GMEDA Director and confirm September 13, 1994 fees/surcharges and any changes thereto. FISCAL IMPACT Reductions to the General Fund will occur. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS On September 13, 1994, the Board of Supervisors referred a number of issues back for further consideration on September 27, 1994. Primary consideration was given to comparing the proposals from BFI, Garaventa, RSS, and Waste Management. In considering available information, staff had some unanswered questions so a questionnaire in matrix format was devised and sent to the companies. The results of this quick survey are. provided as Attachment 1 . Further direction to staff may be given based upon review of information provided. The Board wished to discuss the history of the Acme Transfer Station and the report Is provided as Attachment 2. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: cx YES SIGNATURE . = RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMI�EE, APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER �y r VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE —UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE°MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS OWTHE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Val Alexeeff (510/646-1620) ATTESTED cc: County Administrator PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE County Counsel BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND GMEDA Departments COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 939w%b0\Swtompu BY , DEPUTI Attachment A continued TIPPING FEES (THEIR AMOUNTS AND LEVELS) AND OTHER LANDFILL RELATED ACTIONS Page Two - Continued The Board action taken on September 13 is provided along with the transcript as Attachment 3. The charge, as understood by staff, is as follows: a)- Charge the following separately: At Keller (Eastin Bill fee).................. $ 1.34 At Acme (LEA and AB 939)".......... 1.15 TOTAL ..::............................................................................... $ 2.49 V* charged at Keller for direct haul) b) Couple cost of all current programs, including HHW and host mitigation fee at Keller and Acme Transfer Station, into a flat, combined 25% surcharge, of which 5% is to be deposited in a trust fund for closure and post-closure, or related litigation expenses. At a $39.00 proprietary rate, the County's surcharge will total ...... $ 9.75 GRANDTOTAL ...............................................................................$12.24 c) After six months, the Board will re-evaluate all fees, including HHW ($2.12) and 5% ($1.95) component of surcharge (1.95) to determine whether any should be modified, reduced, or eliminated. The Board may wish to provide additional clarification in fees in light of the LUP 2020.89 consideration (Item H-1) and take action as appropriate. Additionally, the Board may wish to direct staff to allocate surcharge amounts. The staff report, prepared by Fred Davis to the Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority (CCCSWA) for September 22, is provided as Attachment 4. Staff will provide an update on the actions of the CCCSWA. The Board may wish to direct further action with regard to the CCCSWA. The Citizens United letter dated September 6, 1994 will be responded to in the LUP staff report. Attachment B Ln LO N N 4& 4* MLo M r C) Q ch O O L6 N N to N N H f>V C W LL cc p w.l. LL M < U ..t H G ai a C CF o cca� c_ m l0 y H c Guj Q > y a i m LL LL ° L LI LL 0 a 67 V v Q f- LL J H J Q N O ° N c m c Q e w m to Ln E c E � (� Ou LOc> N OaU')i N c o c LL O C O c NNN N gfNNN N N N 46 m ox C N N � C J N LL M d C > a w �, 3 �L = o � ZALI _G H �. 8 U y Uo Q d v O C mo o ° ° H r Mcc N M Q O O u '`0o O •a = ani M a o u Q d d � LL O CD _ .0 "D O m cc ~' > O O Z 10 y r N d o•M O !O 7 W y G >0 p Y O r _ v� Eu. = am J d nEooE o G Nm LL LL `o mt ; Hr d C 0 ° d To aLLa mea o w o 0 LL J F- - • m O GO V M O LO Q r Ln h N N i O ggo a o O LC) a � o � N g NI- Q oo epi — o a o a � J N N N N N , N N N N N N N N •• O o N C O A LL N M f QQpp > ::Uj C LL C v _ G V "�' o O •MH N + h ~ u O r C U S CMir r to Ln o _ _ LOLL L a ° N d .y C .O. o >• �+ FO- > O O O W CC V e0 Q d VUJ Co Q io u ui Co y H d (� O U i Q J LL U J Q h LL >a f w N V ID u LL '► V J ' G Q N o c O ai o ai O w U. J J LL ATTACHMENT C (1 ) >` ONO g v N M M M M M 64 64 69 b9 63 64 63 Itj OONO O W) O) Ntt N N M M m M 64 64 64 64 Ict tn r— 00 N N N N Mm M 64 64 63 64 64 69 64 64 X .o o U o Vis: tei N N r- 0N0 o N N N N Cr1 M n �1 ':4r9;::: 69 64 6R 69 69 69 N 'Ict tn Or- ONO O NN N N N M 69 69 64 64 64 64 6'i N C7N N I:t VV) Ct- ONO w >`59: 64 64 69 64 64 69 69 64 � g .0 O O O O O O O tn 000 � N .4 r-+ '-+ —4 N N N O 64 69 64 69 64 69 64 XX i>:.>:Q:<: :::> »'4T» «::' tit V 7 . . . �O I`^ OO 63 . 64 b9.; 64 4/3 b4 69 'b � 8 W � � U ? P � a .-• 69 6R 6R � � rs3 �> �- � CA fCD fD �j C CD 0 W pW N QNQB� N N pN O O O C7 O O S �• O O � d O O O A� 0 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 + W pW� Og Og O Og S Og n O O O O O O .......... '. 6+4 69 64 69 (A 6469 6/i 8 O O O w oNo 00o � fz r o 64 64 6969 6% 69 69 64 mak: v w o 8 o s o o 8 S 64 69 69 69 64 64 6i4 6R 7 Cy4 J •tom .A w w w w 0 0 � o � o 0 0 69 64 69 69 69 64 69 64 A .P -4- 00 � o o ''�►r 64 69 69 69 64 69 � P P P w wrn A o g o o g o S (Z) 0 ZNHNHDVIT ATTACHMENT C (3) _:;... S O O N 0 r 6f1;: 6q 69 64 6A 69 64 6H 69 Ot r 69 69 69 69 69 64 69 69 tn S N r S N VI) 6A 6q 6) 69 64 64 6R 69 C� O U V3. N r O N r O N to all Ff3;: 69 64 6A 64 6R 64 6A 6H V p� O O O rpJ � r O NCD r O O ztlz + M M Kt +n {;f}: 69 69 69 64 64 Eft 69 69 V3 ' O O O O � N r 8 N r w h M M M * + 64 64 6H 69 60 69 69 69 O O p tn S S 64 6q in � 6MR 64 6E9 O O C. ..:. N is:i ii:i%(i%>;ifi iiii>E.>i... ii2 '3 ...!! C t., 2Xi f3. . .::.. •� a 0 ATTACHMENT C (4) 000 N ?C)E? N M e� 64 69 69 69 69 64 64 pp pp p�j 000 «;1f5i;i; N O #arl;: •� M M M M M M et .. 69 69 64 64 V1 00 O moo 69 69 69 64 64 69 69 64 O ' 0 « 8 8 0 N00- 669 rw oo O N et h <'.C N N M M M M M 69 69 69 69 6A. a N8 Nr- 000 O N N N N M M M M (S] if3;:: 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 to ?< N 8 000 �p 'O�' N + zV' M N t- 00 O N �t 0 N N N N M M M 69 6% 69 69 69 69 64 � 00 � � V s00 N N N 69 69 64 69 64 69 64 N y ��w V ;:;: :::;:fry;: ::%::::::::;:;:i':';:::':;''::':::::::::::::::::::::::;':`:::� :::�?':;:'.:'::::;:�::<:;r:`;i::::::: :: •`:i:::i V .moi .......... h+-1 i. ,vt j 4 i:'ice}%:i•i':�•'•';iii:�•�•��.••;? 'i; �:�� i::�'� ' :: ........... .... :.>:::..:..:.:.:..�,:,:.:::�.:::::��,'�,i?` 2�79E> r:i'i:it'i :E;i.�..:.;:'•I: :E�i;is:;i:f'•'i ilii%iit7U!'�'ii::::'.`?"i,:' :; ,:;:, .sa; :;.:'>i: E;tSLI#�i st./�i::•: :. ::;:�::;:::>:•>iA.:•.:::.,...Y..::.::::f,..::•.::.:.::.............. �}:.�.'f:?`iii .......::. tD CSD W W W W N00 yN N fA 164 QQ 55�� QQ 5� 25 �5 �5 2S . w w w <: 00 �V110' . (A 454 so tA 0a c� y N Q 00 Ln w00 Q (� M 464 t4 tJl N 00 t!1 W00 00 O cTti O O ��4J\ 1/(yx��J{ V ':::•:ti•:is pJ t.►t N 00 O O Q O S O O ATTACHMENT C (6) s gg $ cn 6s 601). 6s 64). 6q 64 6q `` gess gg 64 6R 64 64 64 ff3 64 64 8 8 8 8 8 $ N to to to 10 I'D %0 >: Gf3 64 64 d9 6R 64 64 d9 p O <> 8 8 00 8 8 8 $ 8 <:ar: to to ao .•� v t- cn U >ac� i �-+ � �t ►n vi to �o �o 4r% a S 8 8 8 g ``C7f N N to w .r l^ O >4f3:: 69 64 64 64 64 GIA A A U N in 00 M to in to .+. ffl: GA b/? 69 69 69 69 64 O g S g cd 8 8 N S 8 M M M M :: b4 EA 69 GA 69 6R E/-1 � U F, H .>:.>::�.�.:: ::..�wF;.;: " <:%: :i: :::!.:1`r+{:: i+:ii is :':i:i:y:l;:::;;:v`•'�i::%i::::. ...... ...:: y�� ..:.M.. W U c W ATTACHMENT D cc 0 c o N E S 04 69 619. 609 04 W M Q o 0 0 0 U 0 N { N 604 0 N OL y LO M Q64 64 6NA m O � U00 0 a) 00 O O O 00p ECL) O 00 O E a0 O O O O N to M Y N Q CD CD COO c00_ 'Q 0) O Wcl� 04 v � v � 64 r 69 N 0) O O O p O m o vz O O 0 co I- c0 p CO Cn O 60- W � � c*4 '0 00a) C_ ON O `- O N O O Op p O c f9 O O E O O O O CDO .L, N CMO Y ¢ r- � O cn ..��• N >O W 64 v d3 66g � 6N9 Q. Z � y 0 0 0 O O O O 0 C� a. c ro o 0 0 0 °' ` N C `• N (ND �} `cY Oa 00 m cu A iq v- _ W b�9 � r 3 n N C w o rd '2 E LO� co E O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) N 1. ca 0 0 0 O O O0000000 000000 0 0 0 N •E c m O O O O O O O N N g 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O g O O O O O O O a v a o o m 0 o co 0 0 0 0 I m c 0 - U7 U) O O O O CO O N N 00 CD O c1 O O U) 0 0 1`- m O sN} a- CD O r O V O CD a CsA� 00 I �- N a0 N CO O O O " CO N O 0 69 � � � � 69 64 69 EA 6969 EA b469 � E96964E96964 o d � N c c � c c 'n 0 c 0 0+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 � c m C m ro p O O O O U) O0000O O O m o O O O p O U) 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ( c m �- O O p 0 p O 0 C N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 6 00 0 co N U 0- o ' o co o o (D o 0 o O O O O O CD O N N a0 CD O O O O an 0 0 ti d p`_ cL N CD O �" p cam- CD CO Q�t}y a0 �., r- N 00 �• N e- t0 O� p •-- CD e N O of i6 : E p r � (0 '0 —61.� 4 ER 69 69 69 69 64 64 64:) H 969 64 64 N 0 m U 69 L Y ¢ V c o E td ,, c c 0 :3N lL CL co E o D o 0 Eo o v C N UCD ro L N o `o ¢ a a O N C (� c U 7 a a) E2 E2c > cu � CU c o E ccl) m N N a C N O CD O a) O a m w E a a> Z U "o U w U (D .. J d c O >, C d E C (`6 N _ Co N a) cu y U '•, Q i9 d C 03 U > o o °' ` E � - c = m is '� c :? 0 'U ¢ > O ca @ m o 0 U U O ° E J m °� o m 'o c c L m .5 ro cn ~ 'in' c 3 c C 0 J c c o � J O a �- Lm J ro a ro a "0 C C !•--j 0 N Z' -o ¢ ro W U 0 ¢ v v� �- u� 4 m e g c W > 9Q Z E E o d) cu in 0 o aa) 0 0 � FO o c o 0 o c 0 0 0 CL c a� � � ,N OfUcn (9 CL L) � w � a � 0 cnrYal- O � 0 ¢ aa O o a axi o E c m o �, c O E a E C C C c C c c C M m p o i 0 U c E CL o o. n a aao, a o ro o a) m o ro m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENU 0 > > N > > > > c m > W m > NN 1= U o E aaaaC n Z _� a� Z E0 Z E E00 0 Z 0000 E c 0 0 _ E CD � m D •n � ,w N � � y 3 c o y y m ¢ ¢ Q > > w m 0 vroi > > > o m 0 a G 0 @ � E ` E E E o ` 4 E E E E c U a c .� E c > > E E E c c cr n E E E E o ro o — m c 0 0 a) - 0 0 0 0 o m m m E o 0 0 0, a, o C7 a- co C� cnUU LO U) UQc� wQUUUU rn �, m o Y N c c c c cc £ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) a) N a) m ro 0 � � IT is is c is iv c� v U U C� c� Cai c� U rn z a) m N O N a) � � � .0 C ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro o N L mai mrnm0) c c c c c aaaaaaaaa N F- o ,, 4 > > > 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cncnc� cocnvJcncncn a Q 2 cp ro ro m ro a a a a a 0. N d L E E E E E N N N c c 'c c c c c c c E E E E E c c c c c c o 0 0 o a) a) ID a) a) a� 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 @ @ a a a a a a a a a o 0 0 c� c� c� c4 UUUUU F- F- F- F- I- l- 000000000I I I IZIZIz ATTACHMENT E DIRECT HAUL MILEAGE COST COMPARISON KELLER PORTRERO HILLS ALTAMONT Walnut Creek Miles 17 37 30 Cost per ton to site $8.50 $18.50 $15.00 San Ramon Miles 27 46 20 Cost per ton to site $13.50 $23.00 $10.00 Antioch Miles 8 33 i 34 (Vasco Rd.) Cost per ton to site $4.00 $16.50 $17.00 Martinez Miles 12 36 41 Cost per ton to site $6.00 $18.00 $20.50 1. Miles are one way. 2. Rate is per roundtrip mile per ton at $.50 per roundtrip mile per ton. 3. These distances do not include transfer stations which will change the numbers depending upon point of origin and transfer vehicles. VA:dg direc1hL11 (V31/95) ATTACHMENT F a CA a y U a c� O oo 0 cl _ T Ut% x ss -4 y 00 rn o U 3 +� t� b-0 O L7 cel O UQU Cl CA 3 $ 06 cd U�l � 0. p N t, \ cd K > bio b4 b4 bq y bQ E- 0ko cl E Ecz 0. 0 Qq 0 o o o cn O U U U g o o o o 0 O O cD OD cz op M co ca M M M Q 69 U W cn 00 " 00 0 O a cl N .o a n .c .n .c too o 0 O Qw U c`d c`d `c� c� c`cl 'c� c� c'"d 4 O . b4 b4 b4 bq b4 b4 b4 b4 p ,,, •-, Cj .. p c� o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 No U O v cv v v v O U C b O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..* y T ate+ ate-+ ate+ f'n n U c C� CV C� cl Cd CCJ C� CI 4•� 69 {.. F., ti.,. a. � b4 b4 b4 b4 b4 b4 b4 b4 N � � O O C O •-. N N N N N N N N M � w+ I cd «f �} a M M M M m M M M y t0 P. U U U oa 00000000E-1 .:� �" 0. '': 0000 a [ >N .– b •� ct N O O Cla s9 yyOy CA. yg o .• N M t •/1 10 1` 00 01 .d ATTACHMENT G r0: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Sara Hoffman Solid. Waste Manager Contra DATE: �- l DATE: August 6, 1991 _ Costa 3UBJECT: Implementation of Ordinance 91-31, Solid Waste C OXIty Collection, Disposal and Recycling Agreements. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) h BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION 2EC0MMENDATIONS L. ADOPT resolutions granting transitional permits to Richmond'Sanitary Service, SAWDCO dba Valley Waste Management, Pleasant Hill Bayshore Disposal, Pleasant Hill Bayshore Disposal Inc. , Martinez Disposal, ' Orinda Moraga Disposal, Crockett Garbage Company, Bay View Refuse and Silvio Garaventa, Sr. (dba Concord Disposal, Oakley Disposal, Brentwood Disposal) to allow continued operation of solid waste collection and recycling services in the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County. 2 . ADOPT resolutions granting transitional permits to Byron Sanitary District, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, Crockett-Valona Sanitary District, Kensington Community Services District, Mt. View Sanitary District, Oakley Sanitary District, Rodeo Sanitary District and West Contra Costa Sanitary District to allow their continued franchising of solid waste collection and recycling services in the unincorporated areas of the Contra Costa County. 3. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to transmit notices to Richmond Sanitary Service, SAWDCO dba Valley Waste Management, Pleasant Hill Bayshore Disposal, Pleasant Hill Bayshore Disposal,Inc. , Orinda Moraga Disposal, Bay View Refuse, Crockett Garbage Co. and Silvio Garaventa, Sr. (dba Concord Disposal, Oakley Disposal, Brentwood Disposal) that exclusive solid waste handling services, including recycling services, are to be authorized or provided by Contra Costa County, pursuant to Public Resources Code, Chapter 6 (Section 49520) 2ONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE• /--11 G� _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OFABOARD C ITTEE APPROVE OTHER 3IGNATURE(S) : d ACTION OF BOARD ON I APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A _ UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: VL ,-1Z Q +,r NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: IL MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF Supervisor Fanden advised that she abstained SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. because she did not vote for the ordinance. ATTESTED 1,LA6 / y PHIL B CHELO , CLERK OF THE BOnn nr SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR cc: Community Development County Counsel h20:imp91-31.bo9 BY , DEPUTY 'T66T 'T£ aagmsOOa Aq Agun03 atm gqTM gueMaaibg astgau92; pagnoaxa ug aneq SASTngq TQOOT agg ;T 30 'aoTgou agq ;o 84UP anTgoa;;s aqq uo anTgEiedo ST LION ug ;T pTon pug TTnu s8at008q gT 49g4 sapTnO.zd OOTgou .zgaA SAT; aqq 'Tnjss000ns you saw 9g0TX4sTP Aseq'rugs aqq ggTA snOX aggTgobau oq sgdazagqg si,Aqunoa eq-4 ;T sgoTsgsTp A294Tues aqq 04TM sasTgouE=; qusiano 2T8g4 ;o uuaq. agq gsvOT 49 10; saoTAa;s Bons buTPTnoid snuTquoo oq veav pagg.zodaoouTun agq uT OOTnsas ;o saaPFnoad gua.zano aqq MOTTV oq WOWT ;o uoT49avToap s,p.zgos 8q4 gqTM aougPJODDR uI •buTToAoa.z buTpnTouT 'saoTnsas uOTgoaTTOO agseM PTTOS azTaoggng Oq WOWT s,A4uno3 sq4 ;o .zaTngc; aqq o4 OOT40u .zeaA OAT; e buTnTb Aq 0ZS6V uOTgoaS 'g aagdgg, 'apo0 soanosau OTTgnd gqTM aougpa000g UT gT uTEggo ugo Agunoo aqq ao Agunoo aqq oq To.zquoo uigas4sO4sEM sTaga ubTssg ATTIQW6TOn AiM sasTnEq aqq 'Met 94v4s aspun •goTsgsTQ A294TuBS Tei4u93 pug AgunoO egsoo e.aWOO Aq PasTgoug.z; ATguassno asogq q.deoxe sea.zg paggiod.zoDuTun TTe uT iue824194seM Toiquoo Atqusaano sasTngq TeooT aqy 'sOTgTnTgoe buTTOAoa.z uuo;;zed TTTM gaTgA saTgTTTog; A.zanooa= Tgtaage�a o,4qnq sTTT;PugT Og ATgoa.zTp 06 J66uOT Ou TTTM agseM aouTs gueq.zodmT A3an sT IOa4uoo MV924604seM .SZOSTn.zadns ' O p2909 sq-4AqpauTggai buTaq ssTgvTDAoa.z pug area-1gsagsEM aqq ;o To.zguo6 butpnTouT 'sn0K aqq .zo; s.zagau valed sagsTTgEgsa T£-T6 aouguTPIO 9e929 gsOm uT 390Tn18s buTTOAoa.z OPTsgano buTPTA0ad ATgua.zsno saw s.zaTnEq a44 gegq pagOU sq PTnogs qI 'T66T '0E aagmagdes uEgq J942T Ou sys2v TEsnz, 9114 uT ;;o doap pug seaag pazTueq:tn aqq uT 80Tnsas aPTsgano gbnoagq e9av page.zodaoouTun aqq ;o sWOPTsa.z aqq o$ 9TgeTTEne 929 SOOTn299 buTTOAoa.z Begg' A;Tq.zao Og .zaTneg goes a.zTnbea pug T66T 'T£ .zaquiaoaa gbnOlgg TT gsnbny M0J; OATgoe;;a aq pTnoM sgTuuad TeuoTgTsuEJq agy *TC-T6 a0ueuTPI0 WE papTno.zd sa sgoTI:tSTP AaegTue9 buTstgouE.I; pug slOTneq TeoOT agg Og sgTauad TeuoTgTsue.zq ansST Oq SIOSTAaadns ;o P2908 aqq 10; Aiessaoau sq TTTM gT 'seaae pageaodioouTun aqq uT OOTAaOS pagdraaeguTun ponuTguoo 10; OPTno.zd og Pug 'uoTgdo aom agq lOPTsuoo oq 94OT24STP Aav4Tugs aqq 20; OMTg MOTTe Oy •pooMguaaa pug AaTxeO ;o sveav page.zodzoouTun sq-4 pug puETsl Taggas sansa9 goTgM TEsodsTQ pooMguass/AOTXEO sT uoTgdeoxa euo aqs •samog pS a9pun ;o sgaXood pagETOsT 'ATTeoTdAg !pasTgouva; you sag gEgq ,samog Ease pa4vaodsoouTun ;o aOgmt u TTems a an.zas slOTneq agg ;o gsoN •goT.zgsTP Aav4TuEs buTsTgouEa; ATgua.z.xno agq gqTM aom ou sT a.zagq gOTgM sO; 9eeav asogq 1o; pug Se93e pageaodaoouTun POSTgoupa;un ATgusaino 30; sasTgouE.z; OATaoa.z oq paau eqg uo sa8Tneq 94SQA PTTOs aqq ;o gaea ggTM pTag uaaq anEq suoissnostp 'uOTgTppg ul '90ueuTp20 aqq gqTM guagstsuoo snpyi dOTanaP Og g.zo;;a ue uT sgoT.zgst.n aqq gqTM buT31a0m aq TTTM ;;94S •goT.zgsTQ AJv4TueS T92W93 Pug 4oT24sTQ Azv4TueS Oepog '40TI48W Aav4Tuvs MaTA '4H '43T24sTa SSOTA19S Agtunulmo, uogbuTsuax :sgoT.zgsTP ano; MOJ; panTaoas uaaq aneq sasuodsoa Teauo;uT 'ageP Oy '940T249Tp A2v4TuEs agq ;o saafieugut Tgsaueb aqq ;o TTe Og 29449T SETTmTS 9 Buss 29bvuvlj agseM PTTOS aqy 'A;gunoo agq gqTM suOTssnos-cp OWT .zagua oq uiagq butgTnuT pug sgoTigsTp Aix gTugs agq gqTM ageaed000 oq p.zEos agq ;o SaTsap agq ;o nzagq buT=O;uT sg0Ti49TP AzEgTugs ago ;o goea ;o sguapTsead aqq oq ssaggaT Buss s.zosTnaadnS ;o P.zgog agq ;o ATeq, agg 'aouEutPao agq' ;o uOTgdope 6uTMOTTo3 •qxo;;s buTTOAoas agq uT u0T4gdT0T4aed Pug butsTgouV7; uoTgoaTToo agsEM PTTos penuTg.uoo so; Aquno, agq gqTM sguatuaa.zbg ao ,'snom) buTpuggsaapun ;o sumpuv20ma6 OWT .zagus PTnoo s43T2gsTp AxEgtuEs aqqigDTgM aspun Xaom9mvj; g POPTnoid paws atm 'AgTTTgTsuodsaa pagepugm agEgt, Mau s,pagog aqq pug AqunoO aqq ;o seeav pagEsodaoouTun aqq UT uoTgoaTToo gseM PTTOs uT OTOa oT�ogsTq sgoT.zgsTP Aa TuEs aqq buTzTubooag •sejgepueu[ 94945 asag4 anaTgoe og AgunoO agq; aO; msTuEgoaut le 9OPTnOad T£-T6 9auleuTP-10 'sTg06 uOTSa9ATp asagq gaam you ;'saop Agunoo aqq ;T Aep .zed 0o0'OT$ oq do ;o sant; so; sOPTnOid MET ageqS •000Z avaA agq Aq $05 Pug 966T AQ $SZ Aq TTT;PugT agq oq buTOb agseM sonpea o-4 seaag page.zodzoouTun agq ao; smeaboad pug suETd 4UOmsTduiT Pug doTanap og; Aguno, aqq ss2Tnbas goTgA MgT age-4S oq asuodsea uT pagdope sEM 90ueuTPA0"sTgs •squameeabt 6uTTOAoag pug TEsodsTQ 'uOTgoaTTOO agsEM PTTOS 'T£-T6 a3uEuTPI0 pagdope SIOSTnzadns ;o paws sq-4 'T66T 'TT suer up -Mal Hod SROS -1 O JROf1 fff o . Central Contra Costa Sanitary District 15019 Imhoff Place,Martinez,Califomia 94553-4392 (510) 00676-7211 R,0GER J.DOLM' General hlanager Chief Engineer KEA70N L.ALM Counsel for the District (510)938-1430 JOYCE E.MURPM' February 6, 1995 Secretary oftheDistrict Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County County Administration Building 651 Pine Street, Room 106 Martinez, CA 94553 Honorable Board Members: During its February 2, 1995 meeting, Central San's Board of Directors acted on the County's request to be in charge of the solid waste franchising for the central county unincorporated areas currently under Central San's authority. The draft minutes which will be reviewed and considered for approval at our Board's February 16, 1995 meeting, are attached. These draft minutes address our Board's position on ceding franchising authority to the County in three separate unincorporated central county areas. The general condition precedent to any such action would be that the County join the Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority on terms consistent with previous letters and discussions between District and County staff. It is our understanding that the Board of Supervisors will consider this item on Tuesday, February 7, 1995. Representatives from Central San will be present to hear your Board's discussion and provide input, if necessary, with the Board of Supervisors' approval. We are looking forward to working with the County to develop an agreement to'transition franchising authority in unincorporated central county. We believe this task is achievable without rancor or undue delay, but it will involve a concerted effort between District and County staff as there are a number of important details that must Abe addressed in some form of a transition agreement. Several issues which should be addressed include: • The effective dates of the transfer of franchising authority to the County and the County's membership in the Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority; and • Allocation of this year's franchise fees forthe North Concord, Pacheco-Clyde areas and for the franchise fees up to the spring of 1996 for the unincorporated areas to be franchised by the JPA after 1996; and BOARD OF DIRECTORS JOHN B.CLAUSEN WILLIAM C.DALTON SUSANMcNULTYRAINE'Y BARBARA D.HOCKETT MARIOM.MENESINI President ®Recycled Paper ` i- J4•ndnSloPB/VZsgooer/sa V `dMSoo-I 's!neo Paa3 'aW sJ0139a!Q 10 paeo8 `dMSOOD luawa6eueVq alseM A91len 's86Jo8 uea •JW lesodsl(3 aaogsAe8 II!H luese9ld 'uol6uu9413 uaN 'UVJ uoile!oossy luawanojdwl o!n!:) apAJO '•s9Jd 'AJON p!Ae(] SUV I!ouno:) Aaos!npy ledlo!unW ooe4oed 'a!e43 'sMiAA AlleM aW I!ouno:D umO-L 00a4oed "Said 'sauor q aoAo f, sl�l siolo9alQ }o pjeo8 lj!loleU 'Q A4d.inW •p u9sJOVq •d sgooe f 3 ueloo •H :oo q4/r3 saoloajlQ jo pjeo8 'lu9p!s9Jd 119>I00H •Q eaegae8 tj 'Alaaaou!S •seaae snon6!luoo j96jel 6UTAJaS ssaooid 9n!1!ladwoo a41 46noi4i pana!43e aq lsaq ueo sales alq!ssod lsamol a41 le ao!nJas Al!lenb 46!4 6ulp!nojd }o s9n!1091go Iejaua6 ino an91laq aM 'ease uoanS 1ae8 II!H lueseald pamodnouiun a41 6u!pnlou! 'ease 931nJ9s s,A1!aoylny a41 u!41!m seaae palejodnouiun pue palejodiooui leiluao pue 41nos snon6iluoo a41 ulelu!ew ol.lseq s! 1!le41 papnlouoo ane4 paeo8 Vdf a4i pue pjeo8 mo 'suoseai jellw!s jod •as!4ouejj leuol6aa aa6ael a4:� ulyl!M seaae apAIZ) pue '00940ed 'pJoouOO 41JON 941 apnlou! of Alunoo a41 6uimolle Aq salouapilla leuolleiedo poseanui jo} e9je snon6!luoo a aleaao of aj!sop s,Alunoo a41 slioddns pleo8 ,mo •A1!ao4lny ayl u! d!4sjagwaw Aluno:) y1!m pale!oosse sasuadx3 0 pue aa!1!n!l3e 6£6 8d pue an!leJ1s!u!wpe aa410 }o a9lsueil pue ao} Al!l!q!suodsa8 • pue IAI!joylny a41 of weailsalsem jo uo!loaj!p pue sa!1!l!q!suodsoi uo!lens!u!wpe as!4oueaj}o uo!le6alap • pue 'Aluno:) a41 of jalsueal a41 of loafgns seeie sol 1!nsmel awoy a41 u! A1!l!geil leatinod jo j Al!l!q!suodsaH • 9661 19 Aienaga3 Z abed sioloaalQ 10 pae08 Excerpt from the Draft Minutes of the Regular Board Meeting of the CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT February 2, 1995 After Discussion which covered some of the complexities involved in the transfer of franchising authority such as effective date, outstanding litigation and potential liabilities, franchise fees; and staff functions, the Board of Directors passed the following motion. It was moved by Member Menesini and seconded by Member Rainey, that contingent upon Contra Costa County (County) joining the Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority (CCCSWA), Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) cedes its franchising authority for unincorporated portions of Centra County to the County as follows: 1) For the Pacheco/Clyde/North Concord franchise area without the restriction that the area be franchised through the CCCSWA RFP process; 2) For the Pleasant Hill BART Station franchise area with the restriction that the area be franchised through the CCCSWA Request for Proposals (RFP) process; and 3) For the remaining unincorporated franchise areas of Central County with the restriction that the areas be franchised through the CCCSWA RFP process; that staff be directed to prepare a draft agreement(s) to that effect between CCCSD, the County, and possibly one or more franchisees; and that the draft agreement(s) be brought back to the CCCSD Board of Directors for final approval. There being no objection, the motion was unanimously approved on the following vote: AYES: Members: Menesini, Rainey, Dalton, Boneysteele, Hockett NOES: Members: None ABSENT: Members: None auoN :saagwaw pieog :iN3S8`d auoN :saagwaw pieog :S30N 9110M '119MOOH 'Aaulea 'sMoiH :sjagw@IN pieog :S3AV :910n Ileo IIOJ 6uinn01101 941 uo panoidde Alsnowlueun uoijow •d38 s,VMS000 ayl ui uiewaJ Ilion eaae u011elS ISYS IM Jueseald ayl legl uoilipuoo aqj of joafgns pue :eaae paoouo0 4TaoN paleaodaoouiun pue ooayoed 'ap�(10 ayl 10 uoi}isodsip eqj jo AlunoZ) eqj pue aSoOo uaam..laq uoilnlosai paaa6e Alleninw a of joafgns pue :sal[>a lellueplsai pue lepiewwoo aoueleq of paiannodwe Allenpinlpul sl uollolpsimf y3e3 •9 pue :yMS000 ayj 4jl^n Isar Ilion weaaIsaIsenn ayj 10 uolIoaaiQ •g :d3» eqj woe} sllnsai yoiynn juawaaa6e asiyoueal aqj ul paleu6isep Allioildxa aq of peau aoinaas leloods }o seaay •.v :papaau sl a6enn 6uliienaad uo uoljoe aaL41in} ou pue 'Aluno0 eqj Aq of paaa6e si d3a 941 10 uoilaod uoiloalloo alsenn phos eqj ui 96en6uel a6enn 6uillenaad jo uoisnloui a41. •£ :Maaj0 InuleM jo Al!:) ayl pue }olalsla AaejlueS elso0 e.iluo0 lealua0 ayl of lenbe sniels dlysaagwaw aneq llinn Aluno0 eiso0 eiluo0 Z :Ajuno0 elso0 eaiuo0 jo eaae paieaodaoouiun aqj jol Alpoyine 6ulsigouejl alos aqj aq ll!m Aluno0 ea.so0 ealuo0 L :6ulpuelsaapun 6ulnnollol ayl of loafgns (yMS000) Aluoglny elseM plloS elso0 eiluo0 leilua0 all of palippe aq Aluno0 elso0 eiluo0 legl lAouie8 aagwaw pjeog Aq papuooas pue s�OIH aagwaw paeog. Aq panow sena 11 966L '9Z Aienuer Jl11aOHinv 31St/M anon v1S00 VUIN00 IVUIN33 aqj jo 6uilaaw pieog aeln69a eqj jo sainuiw IleiCl woe j jda9ox3 N Y V � � ., n .. Ul (.. �� •,v\M Vitl\w��t��i 7) 6�44 '.�._s-- Y,. �, - � �✓} . _ O RN�� .C j1, ..r i F � -t0•v. .� C•r--r vtA � �. � ¢.='�'� i�ilSa� , X18• " . �� :'�� :�'� ��tf `j_^a V! ..� • v L•./ .� •.`.'s.p' �,`q•t � a fbsm ,y�aai t it,,.itHi'F JI t �Q� ;`{MOI :�, • i �j'y 1 4� "9! 1 CYN 1p / r4 , �{"ri.� o) ✓ �{.. .�' s� �ps�Ytj•"� 4'"X�g 0`MOL ::;i ./; '' ` �11 .r L\'""^--� _ � G' Q � ( � � �N�� a +m� ' t,t ept`�� •Z .�-•�• ` ^�- � (� ..a- ��•p� . '�:,.+ -'%�. Fs.�^' -tV`� .yi.��1�f� 1as'tl ,k'_5��z��rz� .rw X`..�� r',�`'a r r\ .�•�'T •" N N 9+""! ) {6�* ►V , �: �S" *4Y.S1yr"�tZ �s.. f�:tr�" •t j��Ytc k 1f`' ,��• �'a� • ro•�y mut 't Sia�ft ,� I � O �� 0 cy M *00 to ..�� C:L ..• r Vt Ys' ,� a R` .• '�-'- ''c'Mi•`bTM cd .-• '� � DA �• 1: e T �i� a1�0,t_..,,Y' �' �;�� * ;:Sa:,C k��^,. I � p} �P w U •r^��{ ! ` t ^� y}. a;-�%+� `,lc' �lN1Y\..'•F'c 1'� p�.t �"c^ � �. 7' W V .-._-----'..'".--�2,'�". ,""as+w+ ' .. w r. �,_� � •�j 1~"r Ste. � y .a a.cw K,.• t 3 G �Li " r•t'` .I nom' 7�� L n °ish »+n` 1hr I yo 03 kl) uo .01 as ,prpa" \cif. vas l.. y G- i '=•'h IA lu i i } a� kltnUMY yO1vOHLjd �; .. 40 tivHM i j�aj '�;' �'•+� ,HtlC is 4 Vol t --------------------- RECEIVED FEB 1 4 1995 CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. l V T Garaventa Enterprises 4080 MALLARD DRIVE • P.O.BOX 5397 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520 (415) 689-8390 February 16, 1993 Browning Ferris Industries P.O. Box 23164 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 ATTENTION: Patty Mehauchi Dear Patty, Pursuant to our recent discussions, listed are areas that your company appear to be servicing in our franchise areas. We are providing you streets or zones which can be checked. We acknowledge that our company may be servicing some of your franchised accounts. These areas need to be addressed and resolved. CITY OF CONCORD Contra Costa Blvd: (see attached) Clayton Road Pine Hollow. Concord Blvd Myrtle Drive Laurel Drive SCHOOLS Silverwood Ayers WEST PITTSBURG Shelter Court Beaulieu Court Beaulieu Drive Raphael Drive Azores Court Browning Ferris Industries February 16, 1993 Page 2 We look forward to working with you in resolving this matter. If you have any questions please call me or Gary Lazdowski. Sincerely, Sit Garaven Jr. VICE PRESID T SGJ/cc Enclosures t' CONTRA COSTA BLVD. NORTH OF WILLOW PASS ROAD: .605 - Exxon Service Station - Concord 617 - Prestige Car Wash - Concord 625 - .Goodyear Tire Shop BFI SOUTH OF WILLOW PASS ROAD: 1050 #A - Was Selix Tux Rentals - Concord #B - Jenny Craig Diet Center Concord 1090 - Rotten Robbies Station - Concord 1100 #A - Urgent Medical Care - Concord #B - C.C. Occupational Medicare Concord #C - Sun Valley Physical Therapy - Concord 1130 - Sun Valley Animal Hospital Concord (2 cans at rear) 1150 - Micro Age Computers - BFI 1200 - This is a small center BFI & (Unknown who services them) Concord 1200 #A - New Age Weight Loss #B Hair Studio #C - Vacant #D - Play It Again Sports #E - Packaging Store #F - Dashy's - Dashboard Covers #G - S.F. Coffee & Tea - Coffee Shop The next series of addresses are all under one roof in what appears to be a Professional Medical Center. There is a B. F. I. bin currently at this location: 1212 1214 1216 1220 1222 1224 1226 `Pleasant Will ' Bayshore Disposal, Inc. a subsidiary of Browning-Ferris Industries of Calif. March 15, 1993 Sil Garaventa, Jr. Concord Disposal 4050 Mallard Drive Concord, CA 94520 Dear Sil : In response to the information you provided concerning accounts that are serviced by both companies in franchised areas , I would like to propose the following plan. We will send a letter to the accounts listed below that service should be provided by Concord Disposal. We would appreciate you following suit for the accounts we should be servicing. I believe these areas are quite clear on the maps provided by the cities concerned in the Pleasant Hill, Pacheco and Concord areas. The letters should go out this week and service can be coordinated to change on April 1 , 1993. APPROPRIATE ACCOUNT ADDRESS SERVICE PROVIDER Goodyear Tire Shop 625 Contra Costa Blvd. Concord Micro Age Computers 1150 Contra Costa Blvd. Concord Complexes addressed 1200 - 1226 Contra Costa Blvd. Concord Residence 4701 Bailey Court Concord Silverwood School 1649 Claycord Avenue Concord Pace 1225 Concord Avenue BFI Sportsmart 1235 Concord Avenue BFI In the West Pittsburg area, it is our understanding that in the section primarily serviced by Pittsburg Disposal, we were not to begin any new services and will send letters to the following addresses : 30 Rapallo Court 2000 Rapallo Way 42 Rapallo Court 2024 Rapallo Way 2028 Rapallo Way 30 Shelter Court 1013 St. Raphael Drive 36 Shelter Court 1017 St. Raphael Drive 42 Shelter Court 1022 St. Raphael Drive 48 Shelter Court 1025 St. Raphael Drive 51 Shelter Court 1030 St. Raphael Drive 54 Shelter Court 60 Shelter Court 243 Riverside Drive 63 Shelter Court 61 Riverside Drive 81 Shelter Court 441 No.RuciuNAN CIiCI.e PACT I:Co,CA 94553 (510)685-4716 MAILING ADDRESS:P.O.Box 23164 Pl,ensAw I hu.,CA 94523 Recycled paper is In the other areas mentioned in your letter, it - is our understanding from a discussion with Belinda Smith at the Contra Costa County Community Development Department that the unincorporated.-areas are .considered open service areas at this time . If franchised, these areas would continue to use the current service provider. Some of the areas along Clayton Road and Pine Hollow Road, we have determined to be in the City of Clayton. The other areas mentioned along Myrtle Drive, Laurel Drive and Ayers School , we have determined to be in the unincorporated area of Concord. In an effort to better coordinate service, we would like to discuss these open areas as well as the remainder of the residences we serve in the area of W. Pittsburg where both companies provide service. We have exact addresses and the number of accounts for these areas and would like you to consider providing the same for the unincorporated area north of Antioch heading east to the bridge . Both of these areas certainly are within the sphere of influence of the respective cities and some type of trade could benefit both our companies by providing more efficient routing and better service to our customers . We look forward to hearing from you to set up a meeting to discuss these issues at your earliest convenience . We are hopeful an equitable solution can be reached . for all parties concerned and appreciate your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Patricia Mehaouchi °Pleasant Hill ' Ba ysh ore Disposal, Inc. a subsidiary of Browning-Ferris Industries of Calif. July 21, 1993 Sil Garaventa, Jr. Garaventa Enterprises P. O. Box 5397 Concord, CA 94520 Dear Sil: Pursuant to our conversation, please find the addresses of accounts believed to be located within the City of Antioch. I am forwarding this information to Ron Bendorff with the City of Antioch for verification. Upon receiving a current map of the city limits from Ron, I will contact you to make whatever arrangements may be necessary for changes in service. The areas are as follows: . East 18th Street: 3000, 3010 3020, 3030 3100 3120 - Riverview Motel 3200 - Ernie's Hot Dog 3215, 3225, 3235, 3245, 3255, 3257, 3261 , 3265 , 3267, 3275 , 3277, 3285 , . 3291 , 3295 Wightman Lane: 3400, 3410, 3500, 35401 3560 Holub Lane I look forward to working with you to resolve these issues and appreciate your cooperation. Sincerely, Patricia Mehaouchi Recycling & Community Relations Manager cc: Ron Bendorff 441 No.Bucl IANAN CIRCLE PACIi co,CA 94553 (510)685-4716 MAILING ADDRES.S:P.0.Box 23164 PLEASANT I hu.,CA 94523 Recycled paper 3 PNTOCN CP 94509 (510) 779-7035 CITY HALL THIRD AND H PO 130 • July 23, 1993 .Patty Mehaouchi Pleasant Hill Bayshore Disposal, Inc. 441 North Buchanan Circle Pacheco, CA 94553 RE: Address Confirmation for Properties Within the City-of Antioch Dear Patty: As requested I've researched the addresses listed in your July 21, 1993 letter to Garaventa Enterprises. It turns out that each of these properties is indeed within the Antioch City Limits. Enclosed is the portion of our Zoning Map which shows the present City Limit Line in this area (highlighted by red ink) . One correction that I would make concerns the properties on . "Wightman Lane" . The County Assessor records identify this private right-of-way as "Wrightman Lane" and the correct addresses are as follows: Parcel 051-200-004 = 1867 Wrightman Lane Parcel 051-200-007 = 1849 Wrightman Lane Parcel 051-200-008 = 1891 Wrightman Lane Parcel 051-200-012 = 1875 Wrightman Lane I could not find a specific number for Parcel 051-200-006. I hope this information proves useful and if you should need anything else, please do not hesitate to contact me. ;S,aile re1y, Ron Bendorf Associate P anner RB/pf cc: Sil Garaventa, Jr. , Garaventa Enterprises Enclosure 5 y ( , 4 , 4 t 1 1 1 ' r 4 t R 4 OD w ti q Art R r 47 I W SANTA RARWAY ,�A �r"}} 4• M-1 C3 it ,» I D 0 . TF � 4 Q+ y4 ,,�y AA m 1 ,' ^q 'J W L k. La P D j x s Q' a 88-7 � = 4 PD r` 4'4eats4 �+ J .� PD = PD-79--5.4 86-11 a Ayl PDLl sp— PD t.RO 40t ri Y w o 0+ CV > 4-) r~, rn f PWcoFC _ un U C7 rtS •, > b __ N C} } o i cv Ch Ln Pa U j cis t s` rn ! Rs +j rte. . +-) c rn Cw(nq t: Q) LO C1 t > ra i L +'' x c o -v CD > mo r Lo c w ; V) CD0- G� ♦,43 ,n ! � ti 'f• b ' C a i • N A XY M i O 4 J it a b Mm EL W LL 0 00 # - a -,z 4. ? r