Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11071995 - D5 D.5 THE BOARD OR SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on _ November 7, 1995_ by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Rogers, DeSaulnier, Torlakson NOES: Supervisors Smith, Bishop ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUBJECT: Shapell Request to Separate Wendt Property from the TVPOA The Board this day considered the recommendations of the Community Development Director dated October 13 , 1995, relative to Shapell's request for the Wendt Property to be processed separately from the TVPOA's (Tassajara Valley Property Owners Association) request. The following persons spoke: Tom Koch, representing Shapell, 2682 Bishop Park, #206, San Ramon; Mark Armstrong, representing TVPOA, Law Firm of Gagan, McCoy, and Armstrong; Joe Calabrigo, Town of Danville, 510 Lagonda Way, Danville; Gordon Rasmussen, 6000 Highland Road, Pleasanton; Joan and Joe Case, 8651 Camino Tassajara, Pleasanton; Nolan Sharp, TVPOA, (no address) ; James Tong, 6601 Owens Drive, Suite 100, Pleasanton; Gloria Hing, 229 Choss Road, Danville. All persons desiring to speak were heard. The Board discussed the request and the recommendation presented by TVPOA. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Shapell Industries is APPROVED for a separate study and application process with a separate Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a General Plan Amendment for the Wendt Property only, which may be accompanied by concurrent applications for rezoning and tentative subdivision, subject to the following directions and with the following understandings: 1. The Tassajara Valley General Plan and Zoning Study and application process will continue in its present form and with its present study boundary area. No changes to the Tassajara Valley General Plan and Zoning Study, applications and environmental review will be reviewed, with one exception only: the Tassajara Valley draft Master EIR project description may identify a lower residential density General Plan land use designation for the Wendt Property as now preferred by Wendt and Shapell. 2 . The Danville Liaison Committee and the Tassajara Valley Citizens Committee established by the Board should continue, without delay or disruption, their review and consideration of the Tassajara Valley General Plan Study and the TVPOA applications in their present form. It is suggested that the Danville Liaison Committee be restructured as the Tassajara Valley Oversite Committee, consisting of two Danville councilmembers, two San Ramon councilmembers and two Board of Supervisors members, plus appropriate staff. It would be desirous for the Tassajara Valley Oversite Committee to provide a process to formulate an outline of a multi-jurisdictional agreement on the Tassajara Valley before the Board of Supervisors hears any Tassajara Valley applications. 3 . The Board discourages any other separate general plan studies for other properties in the Tassajara Valley. 4. County staff will continue to process and review the Tassajara Valley Property Owners Association applica- tions in an expeditious manner and will take those steps necessary to assure that the separate Wendt Property study and applications will not delay or interfere with that process. The Director of Community Development is requested in processing the Wendt Property applications in an expe- ditious manner to assign additional county staff to the extent possible so as not to delay or interfere with review and processing of the TVPOA applications. County staff assigned to the Wendt Property applications will be instructed to take those steps necessary to avoid delay and interference with the Tassajara Valley General Plan and Zoning Study and TVPOA applications and review processes. Taking into account the foregoing, County staff is to use best efforts to avoid delay or interference between the TVPOA applications and the Wendt Property applications. 5. County staff should use its best efforts to provide that the public infrastructure and cumulative impact analysis in the separate Wendt Property environmental review and application processes, including circula- tion, utilities, parks, schools and biotics, be consistent with the analysis in the Tassajara Valley draft EIR, which is expected to be released first. If the Tassajara Valley draft EIR is not released first, County staff should use its best efforts to provide for public infrastructure and cumulative impact analysis in the draft EIRs for the smaller projects that is consistent with that anticipated for the Tassajara Valley draft EIR. The same direction applies to completion of the final EIRs for the Tassajara Valley project and the two smaller projects. 6. Shapell Industries is strongly encouraged to participate in the Tassajara Valley General Plan Amendment and Zoning Study public planning processes to address common planning issues. Shapell representa- tives shall not delay the TVPOA application processes and vice versa. 7 . Shapell Industries is directed to work with Danville and San Ramon in its County application process, for various reasons including fulfillment of the early consultation guidelines of the Transportation Authority. 8. Shapell Industries conceptually supports additional roadway connections between Tassajara Valley and Dougherty Valley (e.g. , Johnson Road to Lawrence Road or a direct Lawrence Road connection) , subject to review of the updated Tassajara Valley traffic analysis to confirm it does not degrade traffic level of service to unacceptable levels in the Dougherty Valley and provided any such connection is supported by Danville and San Ramon officials. TVPOA representatives previously supported the southern link to Camino Tassajara (i.e. , Windemere Parkway) to accommodate Dougherty Valley traffic. 9. Shapell Industries will publicly represent that it accepts and agrees with these directions and understandings, including its conceptual support for roadway connections as stated above. With those public representations, TVPOA will support this Board Order. In voting against the motion, Supervisors Smith and Bishop advised of their concern that proper planning procedures for the entire area were not adherred to. 1 hereby cartify that this is a true and correct eMof art action taken and entero' rinutes of the Board of Supervisors on the ;Siiown. ATTESTED: - 7 PHIL BATCHELOR, E^' "^Board of Sup e rvisors and Cour„,- ar±ministrator By lam' .Deputy cc: Community Development Mark Armstrong (TVPOA) County Counsel Public Works Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .,,, ._ Costa FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON vourit DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: October 9, 1995 SUBJECT: SHAPELL REQUEST TO SEPARATE WENDT .PROPERTY FROM THE TVPOA STUDY SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS The Board needs to make a decision on Shapell's request for the Wendt Property to be processed separately from TVPOA's request. Among the policy choices: 1. Approve the request for a separate study and exclude from the TVPOA proposal (but use in cumulative analysis of TVPOA) ; OR 2. Deny this request and leave the site within the TVPOA boundary area; OR 3. Approve the request for a separate study, but modify the boundaries to include the other lands to the west between Danville and the Kaufman & Broad 44 acre site (the Corrie Property also on this agenda for separate study) . FISCAL IMPACT Should a separate study be authorized, the applicant will pay a new general plan and EIR fees to cover the staff cost to review the proposal. All fees previously paid to TVPOA will remain with that project. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A 'UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact: Jim Cutler, (510 646- 34) TESTED cc: Community Development partment PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF CAO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County Counsel AND --IT ADMINISTRATOR Public Works TVPOA (via C ) BY , DEPUTY Shapell ( 'a CDD) JWC\d JW 95\drb\bo\Shapell..sty Shapell Request to Separate Wendt Property October 9, 1995 Page Two BACKGROUNDIREASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS On October 4, 1995, Shapell Industries submitted a request to staff (copy attached) requesting that the 165 acre Wendt Property be separated from the TVPOA proposal and that they wished to pursue their own General Plan Amendment, Rezoning to Planned Unit District and Environmental Documentation. Since the Board of Supervisors had originally determined the study area boundaries for TVPOA, and the Wendt site is located internal to that project, the Board would need to provide direction on how it wished to have this general plan amendment come to public hearing. Nolan Sharp, representing TVPOA has also communicated with our Department. They are strongly opposed to the separation of the Wendt property from TVPOA and feel it would lend to fragmented planning. A copy of their letter is attached. Our Department indicated to the applicant the need to bring this policy issue forward so that the Board could further direct staff on how the plan review of the Wendt Property should proceed. The Board's actions originally establishing TVPOA's boundaries is also enclosed for reference. The issue here is NOT whether the Wendt Property should be authorized for General Plan Study. Direction to that effect occurred as part of the TVPOA proposal. The policy issue before the Board of Supervisors is shall the Wendt Property continue to be an integral part of the TVPOA proposal or will it be authorized as a separate plan amendment study. Until a different policy decision is made by the Board, the Wendt Property will continue to be studied under the TVPOA authorization. There appears to be three basic choices the Board has in considering this request. They are: 1. Approve the request for separate study and exclude the Wendt Property from the TVPOA proposal (except as part of the cumulative impact analysis) . The downside of this approach is that it will create a district separate project inside the TVPOA project and cause a separate set of hearings on this request. That would be somewhat offset by allowing a more detailed policy review of this 165 acre area and a separate set of fees will be payed to cover the cost of this additional work. Initiating a separate study could affect the traffic modeling analysis of TVPOA unless the Wendt Property is considered in the traffic impact analysis. 2. Deny the request for a separate plan amendment study and leave the site within the TVPOA boundary area. This would maintain the existing process which is underway. It would not reflect the differing land use intensity proposed by Shapell. Shapell is only requesting 237 units where TVPOA is studying 420 units on this site. 3. Approve the request for a separate study, but modify the boundaries to include the lands to the west between Danville and the Kaufman & Broad request area ( the Corrie Property) with the Wendt Property. ma attached) P Y (See P This would have the effect of creating a more logical plan study area. However, some of the additional properties are Shapell Request to Separate Wendt Property October 9, 1995 Page Three TVPOA members. It is possible that other logical boundaries could be created by expanding this separate study also add lands to the east. Staff needs policy direction on this request, along with the Kaufman & Broad request, so that we can proceed with completing the environmental documents on the TVPOA proposal. CD r �... CA64INp , .+ two C.1 i r�ls$ JA 7RE., N i 3 tp '� .•4 �,i--' lz .`1 J:�k.� ',• .. <:r \ � •fir '��. ,�,,.�, ��`�i f •!� -.."�� ,•, 11�``" {ems � � vi` _ � .1. �,.~ •4♦ 1 �-•!f'r•" �ham;�'��S'"�' J 1 r�:1 ',i..� jl..��:r.�/r+1.t.~.«t 1� .�•,.� ::..� .;+:'�'`' � :BOUNDARY .� ..., Lys ell if 001, �, } cc P rd KD ` ��raj �r ♦ d.. .1 � r„ �� ^�! `r 4 t � ON SHAPELL INDUSTRIES of NORTHERN CALIFORNIA A Division of ShapeU Industries, Inc. F; f i 2: October 4, 1995 Mr.Jim Cutler Community Development Dept. Contra Costa County 651 Pine Street,4th Floor, North Wing Martinez, Ca 94553 Dear Jim: This letter is sent to request authorization from the Board of Supervisors for a General Plan Amendment study for property that we have optioned. This property is owned by Mrs. Marguerite Wendt and will be referred to as the "Wendt Ranch". It is approximately 165 acres in size located on the south side of Camino Tassajara across the street from the Shadow Creek development and west of the east gate of Blackhawk. The property is in an unincorporated area, although it does have a common boundary with the Town of Danville. I've attached an area map for your convenience. Also attached is our proposal for two hundred eight (208) 8,000 and twenty nine (29) 10,000 square foot lots along with a park and recreational facilities along two branches of Alamo Creek. It is our intention to submit in the near term an application for rezoning to P-1 District, Final Development Plan and Tentative Map. Accordingly,we are also requesting that this project be assigned to a planner in your department. Furthermore,we will expeditiously provide the county with the appropriate application fees. For your information, this property is currently located within the planning area established by the County,controlled by the Tassajara Valley Property Owners Association. Mrs.Wendt had been a member of TVPOA but withdrew from participation in that organization in the spring of last year. In as much as we are working with Mrs.Wendt on this project, our request is to have the Wendt Ranch removed from TVPOA and processed by the County separately. It is our understanding that a similar request was approved by the County recently. Homes of Quality Since 1955 P.O.Box 361169,100 North Milpitas Boulevard,Milpitas,California 95035 Phone:408/946-1550 Fax:408/946-9687 1 Please schedule this matter for Board of Supervisors consideration at your earliest convenience. Of course, I'd be happy to respond to any questions you might have. On behalf of Shapell Industries we look forward to working with you and others at the County on this exciting project. Sincerely, Shapell Industries of Northern California Thomas J. Koch Assistant vice President TJK:clm Enclosures TASSAJARA VALLEY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION ENVIRONMENTALLY PLANNED GROWTH -2 Fit 6: 21 September 29, 1995 Mr. Harvey Bragdon Contra Costa County Director of Community Development 651 Pine Street 4th Floor, North Wing ' Martinez, CA 94553 Re: TVPOA Comprehensive Land Use Plan Dear Mr. Bragdon: As President of the Tassajara Valley Property Owners Association,1 have been informed that contacts have been made with Contra Costa County staff and with Supervisors . concerning the potential development of the Wendt property independent of the TVPOA comprehensive planning effort which has been undertaken for the last several years. The Wendt property is situated on Camino Tassajara near the east entrance to Blackhawk (APN: 206-030-006). As you are aware, the planning effort being undertaken by TVPOA involves the cooperation of many land owners who have been told by Contra Costa County that they could not separately plan their properties but rather would have to undertake a very comprehensive planning effort in coordination with the County. This is all commemorated by way of Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Action dated August 13, 1991, a copy of which I have attached for your reference. Pursuant to this Board directive which was based upon your recommendation, we have been working together with the County for several years to plan this area in a carefully coordinated, comprehensive manner. For those who may have an interest in the Wendt property to suggest that this property should be planned independent of the TVPOA planning process not only would result in piecemeal planning and potential irregular patterns of development, but would be directly inconsistent with the Action of our Board and the understandings which have been reached with the TVPOA. In addition, any.such piecemeal planning would violate the terms and conditions of the TVPOA's.Reimbursement and Expense Sharing Agreement. The TVPOA and its landowner constituents have spent millions of dollars in reliance on this understanding. In no way are we objecting to the ultimate development :of the Wendt property or any property. Rather we believe that the property should be developed in conjunction with the comprehensive planning being undertaken by the County. 4510 Camino Tassajara • P.O. Box 1083 • Danvillc,CA 94526-1083 • (510)248-3000 Mr. Harvey Bradgon September 29, 1995 Page 2. We would hope that the County would continue to endorse long range comprehensive planning in an orderly fashion as it has in the past and would reject any separate consideration of the Wendt property independent from the comprehensive planning process being undertaken with the County at this time for the TVPOA properties. Sincerely, TAf SAJARA VALLEY PROPERTN- OWNERS ASSOCIATION NOLAN C. SHA , DVM. NCS/cmb cc. TVPOA Executive Committee I TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ;;` Contra FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON _ GW a DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: August 1, 1991 SUBJECT: GENERAL ?LAN AMENDMENT REQUEST OF THE TABBAJARA VALLEY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) i BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION ZZCOMMENDATIONS 1. Authorize a Comprehensive General Plan review, as requested by the Tassajara Valley Property Owners Association (TVPOA) , to redesignate portions of their land from Agricultural Lands to various residential and urban designations. This request will involve the Land Use, Circulation and potentially all other mandatory elements of the County General Plan, and includes initiation of the rezoning of the area. 2. The granting authorization of this request does not imply any support for this application, but only that this item is appropriate for study. 3. By authorizing this review, staff will proceed by preparing an EIR. When the DEIR is prepared, staff will prepare a report which will be scheduled for public hearing before the appropriate County Planning Commission. Following this, the Commission will forward its recommendations to the Board for public hearing and final determination.' Staff may expand the planning amendment area to provide a more logical planning boundary. FISCAL IMPACT The applicant shall pay an amendment fee to cover the County's costs of this study. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The TVPOA have requested a General Plan amendment to no if the County General Plan from Agricultural Lands to resident CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: �_ YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ` RECO ON OF NOAM COMMITTEE APPROVE — OTHER SIGNATURE(B) : ACTION OF BOARD ON Aucutt 13. 1991 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER 'VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS I8 A X _ UNANIMOUS (ABBENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: ] OEs: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAINS MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVIBORS ON THE DATE BROWN. Oriq: Community Development Department ATTESTED August 13, 1991 Cc: Public Works PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERIC OF CAO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS County Council CO Y ADMINISTRATOR BYT v DEPUTY ljwcl/cm/taasajor.boo BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECoNMENDATIONS - Cont. support urban land uses. Their rationale for this change ig shown in Exhibit A (attached) . The TVPOA is a grouping of 32 land owners that represent in excess of 4,000 acres in the Tassajara Valley. Much of this area is within the Urban Limit Line, though the eastern perimeter of the area is outside that line (as shown on the map attached to Exhibit A) . In addition to the land use and circulation issues a plan change would also consider substantial issues on public facility and service availability and growth management issues which need to be addressed. An EIR will be required prior to consideration of this plan amendment request. This proposal will be very controversial and will require an EIR. Authorization of a study does not imply any position on the disposition of this study. ijwcl/cm/tassajar.bos 1 , E_ TASSAJARA VALLEY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING STUDY On April 9, 19910 the Board of Supervisors referred to the Community Development Department for a report and recommendation Agenda Item 1.57, the letter dated April 2, 1991, from Nolan Sharp, President, Tassajara Valley Property Homeowners Association, Inc. (TVPOA) . That letter requested that the Board authorize the study of an Amendment to the County General Plan to provide for urban development in the Tassajara Valley area. A copy is attached. TVPOA is comprised of 34 property owners who own a majority of the approximately 4,000 acres in the Tassajara Valley adjoining Camino Tassajara on both sides from the end of Blackhawk to the Alameda-Contra Costa County line. A copy of the map is included with the TVPOA request letter. The entire planning area is designated Agricultural Lands on the 1990-2005 Contra Costa County General Plan. The entire area is included within the Urban Limit Line. In its letter, TVPOA proposes approximately 50000 dwelling units for the Tassajara Valley, with more than one-half of the area to be designated in open space use, consistent with the practical limitations on development within the Urban Limit Line in order to a►eet the County's overall 65/35 open space to urban use ratio. Both the Dougherty Valley and the Tassajara Valley represent opportunities to provide a wide range of housing near the significant and growing employment centers in the Tri-Valley. The Board of Supervisors has already authorized a General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan study for the Dougherty Valley. The 1 reasons to commence that study are equally applicable to the Tassajara Valley located adjacent to and across from Blackhawk and Shadow Creek and extending along both sides of Camino Tassajara to the Alameda County line. Camino Tassajara is an arterial link between the I-580 Dublin, Livermore and Pleasanton corridor and the I-680 Central County corridor. improvements to Camino Tassajara represent an important component to the circulation system for the entire area. Authorization of the Tassajara Valley study at this time will provide an opportunity to coordinate environmental and planning review of the Dougherty Valley and Tassajara Valley, in particular with respect to addressing off-site and regional impacts and infrastructure requirements. We believe this can be accomplished without delaying the planning process for the Dougherty Valley General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan. In order to provide for more comprehensive planning at this time, concurrent with a General Plan Amendment study, we propose that a rezoning study of the entire Tassajara Valley to P-1 Planned Unit District (Chapter 84-66) also be undertaken. P-1 zoning will provide the opportunity to implement the policies and planning direction of the General Plan Amendment study over the long term for the Tassajara Valley, providing the County with both maximum control and flexibility. Upon authorization of the studies, TVPOA indicated it is prepared to submit at its cost a planning proposal and project description for environmental review of a Tassajara Valley General • Plan Amendment and P-1 zoning, as well as preliminary, conceptual 2 plans for at least a substantial portion of the area. The TVPOA planning proposal will be reviewed and approved by its membership and made available for review and input by other property owner in the Tassajara valley prior to submittal to the County. Concurrent modifications to the underlying P-1 zoning ordinance to accommodate its use on this scale have been contemplated by and will be undertaken by the Department. TVPOA representatives and the Community Development Department have discussed the proposed studies, their timing and financing. TVPOA is prepared to finance the entire cost of the General Plan Amendment and rezoning studies, including the cost of an EIR. The Community Development Department proposes that application fees for the studies be based on the number of acres proposed for redesignation to urban use. TVPOA proposes to designate representatives as contact persons with the County to facilitate and simplify County communications with TVPOA members throughout the General Plan and rezoning process. If General Plan Amendment and rezoning studies are authorized by the Board, then, prior to formal submittal of a planning proposal by TVPOA, the Community Development Department and TVPOA will complete an agreement confirming the scope of and terms of payment for these studies. That agreement will be returned to the Board for its approval on a subsequent agenda. 3 t 1 • OS e r+e um S N 04 IDS SL SLSL Q5 X Sv o5 SH �► O5 LU as 5M 5��a�le'�++�Lt1�s+�6►tril akdw� cn 51. 7�« Q t�1�l�ibe ►a1 Low) SL gr VewLO#a cS 05 SL w 04k a 4" Cb Cpw,�cticizl DS x � 05 5L. C6 N "TASS�.1NsR 1► YALE-R.Y PiLO4tR'CY OWt�RS 14SSSOCV+'x!A"�, INC- 1 G bitS&L PLA►) #A4"p+vjT sToo-I ARBA Request to Speak Form ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. Name: Phone: G 7 J-/;�y d Address: 2C f2 .1 am speaking for myself or organization: ipeaw of 'organization) - CHECK ONE: 1 wish to speak on Agenda Item # 2� ',J Date: My comments will be: general for against . I wish to speak on the subject of 1 do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider: Request to Speak Form ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. Name: macg Phone: Address: 1 am speaking for myself or organization: `T A09k - (name of oranizdkm) CHECK ONE: i wish to speak on Agenda Item #�_ Date: � Mr comments will be.- general for agai I wish to speak on the stject of 1 do not wish to speak but leave c ments for the Board to consider. '2� � - �C'U CO ��LU Request to Speak Form CZ ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. Name: cq�,Kl e�o Phone: Address:sO lW4yA),0 ' City: ✓`y'/2,/ 1 am speaking for myself or organization: � J�// (name of organization) C K ONE: 1 wish to speak on Agenda It # Date: My comments will be: for against . 1 wish to speak on the subject of 1 do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider: Request to Speak Form 3 ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. Name: 4�)� 4 t9 i 6a ufaa Phone: Address: City: 1 am speaking for myself ` ororgan ization: (name of organ' ' CHECK ONE: _ 1 wish to speak on Agenda Item #_ Date: My comments will be: general _for._�ainst 1 wish to speak on the subject of 1 do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider: Request to Speak Form ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. Name: Phone: • Address. 3�S/ 1 am speaking for myself_ or • 77 9 _s of organization) CHECK ONE: —l� �" .�_ I wish to speak on Agenda Item Date: j//7�9 My comments will be: general for against . 1 wish to speak on the subject a do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider: P Request to S eak Form ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) 0 Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. ("e) Name: 'Jae Phone: VX$ a 3A&I Address-. ,?6s'/ City: C c L2�ir 1 am speaking for myself._. Com, or organization: -----g7ate:-.- of orpnkation) CHECK ONE: Dd� 1 wish to speak on :�4em # s` // � ,2? My commenor against . 1 wish to speak on the subject of 1 do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider: Request to Speak Form ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. //t�, v Name: Phone: `/ Address: City. 1 am speaking for myself L or organization: (name of organization) CHECK ONE: I wish to speak on Agenda Item g LL Date: My comments will be: general _for -against . 1 wish to speak on the subject of do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider: Request to Speak Form ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. Name: CIA Z Phone: Address: Ldp 1 am speaking for myself` or organization: Gnome of organization) CHvF ONE: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # date: moi- -•��°� _-- My comments will be: general —for against . I wish to speak on the aject of 1 do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider: Request to Speak Form ( THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. Name: (L>�L Lt.- Address; t. -Address: 1 am speaking for myself or ization: �— (name of organization) CHECE: _ 1 wish to speak on Ag Item My comments will be: against 1 wish to speak on the subject of 1 do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider: