HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11071995 - C3 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS G.3
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, Public Works Director
DATE: November 7, 1995
SUBJECT: Approve the Pacheco Blvd. - Second (2nd) Ave. South Signal Project,
Pacheco Area. Project No. 0662-6U4177, CDD-CP # 95-53
Specific Request(s) or Recommendation(s) & Background & Justification
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
APPROVE Project, and
DETERMINE that the project is a California Environmental Quality Act Class 2c
Categorical Exemption, and
DIRECT the Director of Community Development to file a Notice of Exemption
with the County Clerk.
DIRECT the Public Works Director to arrange for payment of the $25.00
handling fee to the County Clerk for filing of the Notice of Exemption.
Continued on Attachment: SIGNATURE:
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
_RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON 197S APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_OTHER_
V7E OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT )
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
Jef
c:lbo\pacheco.117
Orig.Div: Public Works(Design Division)
Contact: Lyle Burks 313-2263
cc: County Administrator
PW Accounting
Design-V.Germany
Construction
Community Development-G.Slusher I hereby certify that this Is a to and Correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: e, 1 7
PHIL BATCHELOR,Clerk of the doard
Of Supervisors and County Administrator
Deputy
Approve Pacheco Blvd. - Second (2nd) Ave. South Signal Project, Pacheco Area
November 7, 1995
Page Two
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funded by road funds.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND:
The project includes replacing existing stop signs with a traffic signal.
It is needed to assign right-of-way to vehicles...
The project has been determined to be in compliance with the General Plan
because it consists of minor alterations of existing public facilities involving no
expansion of use per Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines.
IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Delay in approving the project will result in a delay of design and construction
and may jeopardize funding.
-^ , .
V. .
CONTRA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ,'
COSTA INITi,AL.STUDY :,0 . I.
COUNTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE
ti , A
z _
.
l
�yw
f.` '� if
PROJECT#06624U4177
. .
s'
..
r
.
,- `b
PROJECT NAME: Pacheco.Blvd. &2nd Ave °South , Signal
3 , l ft,
:, ,�_��'L��'__ _jI � . V . � , ,� . . .:, � I . I
_
f a PREPARED BY. Janet Fratti p
C.
'. . t 7,
ATE. Augus 1 1995
REVIEWED BY: _ bPJ�IGz�.� DATE. :��$1 `
f ..
I.
RECOMMENDATIONS: � ,-
',: '4 `
5 . � J3
r
(✓) Categorical Euemption (Class 2c) O Negative Declaration
O Environment Im act Re ort Re uired
p P q O Conditional Negative Declaration
e�x, a
The project` wilt ;not have a ig'niflcant effect on the'`environment bThe ,
recommendation is based on the following Z,,x `� ,
a The proposed project consists of the replacing"an existing traffic control system. ,The new
system will be located on the same site as the system replaced and will have substantially
the e'rr's purpose %��° r
g�
. t '� .,t d 4 ..
rc " e
What changes to the project would mitigate the identified impacts (hst mitigation
measures for any significant Impacts and conditional•.negative declaration).
N/A1 .
'.:' : `
4'
�.. e -� i I
z ,.z.�. -F..
USGS Quad Sheet Walnut Creek Base Map Sheet# H13 Parcel #. 'Book 125
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS: 1, I
.. - q' t n It, z ' C �, ..
1.
1 Location: The project site isMlocated at tfe intersection of Second Avenue South
and Pacheco Blvd. in the Pacheco area of Central Cou1.nty(Figures1& 2)
2 Project Descnpbon The proposed pro�ect'consists'of replacing existing stop signs
with a traffic signal to control circulation of vehicles Installation of the signal will ,.
involve mirror trenching for conduit,, installing .detector loopsaand pullboxes,`and
other related activities All work will be completed within existing right of-way
(Figure 3). 7
3.._ Does it a11 ;
ppear that any feature of the project will generate significant public'"
concern? [] YeS [✓] no F
. [] maybe` (Nature of concern)
.
4..: , Will the project require�approval or permits by other than a County agency? .
] yes [✓] no Agency Name(s)
5. Is the project within the Sphere�of Influence of any city?,,Yes, Pleasant Hill.
,' h '
.. _ fi ? \ f f rr4 0
,. ,. 7. ....
,
k
'" J 4 s t ST 1 x v�
F .'iN r t
_AL Y (. t
, a
,.5 ,- �11 �h3 -.f t f
9
! Lt }�- t C f 1� t. Xt''^t'y ,�, q J 'q i FtLY. y, j.
11 . i r t
1 % ay.: - a ,1
� } � z r ,
:n 4 lE14 ..
f % f t h
P N
! d11 , D a. 4 f 'F`3 J ' M
. l D r,F b 51-Y �1
.., .- }L
,: ,.
.
:. .. - - f,t - -
h p t
Xl c:�catexmpttpacheoo.(n1
w( rt . ' '
_
. ,:�, ,-�,. . , I .- �:I 1,::,',:,�A : "I:� :.� � � ._ , , , �, �...�.,
.
FIGURE
Li
z
0
C) <
Z Lo LTJ MEMO
FZLi
cr.
CO 0
0 LL z 7 <
0Q
0
< < CI
< 0
Oct c)
< < Fq
rr C)
:Z-j 0 <
Nj Ln
z LJ < 0
u
LLJ
0
< <
Z
0
LO
ci LLJ Q
L
i —jL.J*
C)
0
<
<
uj
0
rr"
FIGURE Z
z }
n
A
fu
%TER A ¢ Q R a R }
� N »
BUCHAV W FIELD
} SELO�D AVEE SpVJV4
s R
A
A
WCHANAN FIELD GOLF COURSE ••�+•�
{ --
��,. �• a
m »•
toy
tI{ • �
1 VV
X%Xk AVE
+
i Q \U\1•l l i�_. � �o � �ptt
\j\t\111V
1
VO
OP
H iV • \ '��\\\ y �
f
LOp
a I /
Vicinity Map
Pacheco Boulevard
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LHB August 1995
FIGURE
I I I
I^ I
" i I
� I
Signal StandardFJ1
Signal Standard with luminaire
To be installed To be installed
Signal Standard
To be installed --� �� 4 _ Signal Standard_
— ^`T _ To be installed
Signal Mast Arm o D o
To be installed
El 0 1:1 F-1
El F1 1:1 F]
El El D
R F Signal Mast Arm
To be installed
a a a
PACHECO BLVD
Signal Standard _
To be installed=gip _-Signa tandard-
�� To be nstalled
Signal tandard with luminaire
To be installed 1 Signal Standard
1 I i To be installed
I V1 I
I � I
• � I
Pacheco Boulevard I _
TRAFFIC SIGNAL Q
LHB August 1995 N
I �
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE:
TO: Development Engineer/Architect
FROM: James W. Cutler, Assistant Director of Comprehe sive I"
By: Catherine Osterman Kutsuris, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: MANDATORY REFERRAL'FOR GENERAL PLAN'CONFORMANCE
Community Development staff has reviewed the attached project, CP 95-!55 to determine
if mandatory referral for General Plan Conformance, as required by Section 65402 of the
Government Code, is necessary.
The project needs no further mandatory referral clearance from County staff subject to the
following actions:
t< This project has been determined to be exempt from 65402 review.
( ) This project has been determined to be exempt from 65402 review in
accordance with the Board of Supervisors Resolution 81/522 because the
project involves a road alignment project of a minor nature.
( ) This project should be referred to the City of for 65402 review.
( ) Community Development staff makes the following attached recommendation
which should be incorporated into the staff report on this matter.
The project needs mandatory referral and County staff will process this project in the
following manner:
( ) 65402 review is required. Community Development staff will carry this matter
before the appropriate Planning Commission.
( ) 65402 review must be withheld until completion of an Environmental Impact
Report on this project.
( ) Other procedures.
JWC:gms
c;sh1\MR4gpc
Community Contra Harvey E. Bragdon
Director of Community Development
Development Costa
Department County
County Administration Building
651 Pine Street
4th Floor, North Wing �,.�- sent
Martinez, California 94550095
3
Phone: 646-2026 !,� September 11, 1995
i •�,y
COLT
County File#CP 95-53
Attention: Public Works Department
Janet Frattini - Design Division
Dear Applicant:
The Contra Costa County Community Development Department has completed an initial study of the environmental
significance of the project represented by your pending application bearing County File Number CP 95-53(Pacheco
Boulevard and Second Avenue South - Signal). In conformance with Contra Costa County Guidelines for
implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970(CEQA), it has been determined that your project
will not have a significant effect on the environment. Your project falls within the following category:
(✓) AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) IS NOT REQUIRED.
(11) The project is categorically exempt (Class 2c ►.
( ► The CEQA requirements are accommodated by the EIR previously prepared for
1 1 A statement that an EIR is not required (Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance has
been filed by the Community Development Department [unless appealed]).
( ) Other: General Rule of Applicability (Section 15061(b)(3))
( ) AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) IS REQUIRED.
( ) The complexity of your project requires your submission of additional special reports or
information (as outlined on the attached sheet) (which will be outlined in a forthcoming letter).
( ► A consultant will be hired to prepare the environmental impact report. This procedure is
explained on the attached sheet.
Preparation of the EIR cannot be started until the fee and additional information requested is
received by the Community Development Department.
If you have questions concerning this determination or desire additional information relative to environmental
impact report regulations, please call (510) 646-2093 and ask for Dennis Barry.
Sincerely yours
Harvey E. Bragdon
Director of Community Development
11 By: _
:gms
shl\t
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Notice of Exemption
Contra Costa County Community Development Department
651 Pine Street, 4th Floor - North Wing, McBrien Administration Building.—A
Martinez, CA 94553-0095
Telephone: (510) 313-2296 Contact Person: Vickie Germany - Public Works Dept.
Project Description, Common Name (if any) and Location: PACHECO BOULEVARD AND SECOND AVENUE
SOUTH -SIGNAL County File #CP 95-53: The project consists of replacing existing stop signs with a traffic
signal to control circulation of vehicles. Installation of the signal will involve minor trenching for conduit,
installing detector loops and pullboxes, and other related activities. All work will be completed within
existing right-of-way. Subject project is located as follows: The project site is located at the intersection
of Second Avenue South and Pacheco Boulevard, in the Pacheco area of central County.
This project is exempt from CEQA as a:
Ministerial Project (Sec. 15268) _ Other Statutory Exemption, Section_
Declared Emergency (Sec. 15269(a)) _ General Rule of Applicability(Section 15061(b)(3))
Emergency Project (Sec. 15269(b) or (c))
Categorical Exemption, Class 2c Section 15302
for the following reason(s): The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
The project consists of replacing an existing traffic control system. The new system will be located on the
same site as the system replaced and will have substantially the same purpose.
Date: By:
Community Development Department Representative
AFFIDAVIT OF FILING AND POSTING
I declare that on I received and posted this notice as required by California Public
Resources Code Section 21152(c). Said notice will remain posted for 30 days from the filing date.
Signature Title
Applicant:
County Public Works Department
255 Glacier Drive
Martinez, CA 94553
Attn: Janet Frattini County Clerk Fee $25 Due