Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01251994 - 1.15 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: VICTOR J. WESTMAN, COUNTY COUNSEL DATE: January 25, 1994 SUBJECT: SETTLEMENT OF LITIGATION - BARBIERI v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. C93-00514 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVE resolution of action and AUTHORIZE County Counsel to sign involved documents . II . FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. This case was litigated pursuant to an agreement requiring the Subdivider of Subdivision 6610 to pay for the costs of defending the litigation filed against the. County. III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS AND BACKGROUND: Litigation was filed against the County in 1993 .(Barbieri v. County of Contra Costa, Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. C93-00514) seeking to quiet title to certain property necessary for the extension of Sandmound Boulevard, which at one time was offered for dedication to the County ( "proposed dedication area" ) . The Subdivider of Subdivision 6610 requested that the foregoing litigation (hereinafter the "Lawsuit" ) be defended by or on behalf of the County to preserve any interest the County might have had in the area offered for dedication. An Agreement, pursuant to which the Subdivider agreed to defend the lawsuit and to pay all costs associated with the Lawsuit, was approved by the Board on or about May 18, 1993 . In approving this Agreement, the County made no representation of any kind relating to its interest or potential interest in the proposed dedication area . The Board Order approving the Agreement specifically stated that such action was not intended to affect or alter any subsequent Agreement or requirements relating to the acquisition of off- site right-of-way. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: x YES SIGNATURE �Z, RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF O'OARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON January 25, 1994 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Orig: County Counsel ATTESTED cc: County Counsel Public Works Department PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF Attn: Mitch Avalon THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Paul Gavey AND COUNTYADMINISTRATOR BY DEPUTY CONTACT: S. Anderson (646-2064) It has been represented to the County that, in the course of litigating this matter all parties, including the Subdivider and the Subdivider' s attorney have become satisfied that the offer of dedication has expired. The County has been asked to sign a stipulation for entry of judgment, quieting title to the subject property in the plaintiff, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs, and dismissing with prejudice the first amended cross-complaint filed in the action by the County on July 30, 1993 . It should be emphasized that the execution of the stipulated judgment by the County does not relieve this, or any subsequent Subdivider of its obligation to comply with any and all conditions of approval required for Subdivision 6610, including but not limited to the requirement that the ,Subdivider construct or install certain off-site improvements and provide a road right-of-way for the extension of Sandmound Boulevard from its current terminus to the .boundary of Subdivision 6610 . IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION: It is likely that a summary judgment will be entered against the County quieting title to the property in the plaintiff and requiring the County to pay the plaintiff ' s costs . s1a8\a:\barbieri.set 2 l