HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01111994 - X.1 X. 1
THE BOARD OR SUPERVISORS OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on January 11, 1994 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Smith, Bishop, McPeak, Torlakson and Powers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: Youth Fair Chance Grant Application Opportunity
As recommended by Supervisor Powers, THE BOARD HEREBY APPROVES the
submission of a Youth Fair Chance Grant Application to the U S Department of Labor for a
demonstration project to provide comprehensive employment and training services to youth
and young adults in high poverty areas of urban and rural communities.
77,
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the matter is REFERRED to the Private
Industry Council and the County Administrator, and they are REQUESTED to assemble the
necessary project team and work with appropriate staff to identify areas of the County that
could benefit from the grant.
I hereby certify th--t this is a true and correct co;,y :it
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown. �L
ATTESTED:
PHIL BAT ELOR,cierf of the 3oard
of Supervisors and county Administrator
r
cc: County Administrator
Private Industry Council
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL
2425-BISSO'LANE, SUITE 100
CONCORD, CA 94520 646-5239
DATE: January 6, 1994 cc: CAO
Board Members
J. Kennedy-Redevelopment
TO: Tom Powers, Chair
Board S per ors
FROM:
Yl� , !lF
Arthur C. Miner, Executive Director
Contra Costa County Private Industry Council
SUBJECT. Youth Fair Chance-Grant Application pp ' Opportunity
Attached is an informational packet for a Youth Fair Chance Grant application.
Such a project might be attractive for the North Richmond or Bay Point area, and
perhaps other areas as well.
If there is County interest, an application would require the immediate assembly of
a project team. Although I would be pleased to participate in the effort, my small
department lacks the resources to be the lead agency for planning and developing
the grant application. I also suspect it would require the personal involvement of
the Board members representing the targeted area to provide the political leadership
necessary to initiate the process.
ACM:pk
Attachment
U
#lA:POWERS.LET
991071.
JAN
JAN 1994
M Received at
District 1 �+
1'a 't"Prvisor
&ate@/
� @
& », a
.CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL
PIC ADMINISTRATIVE BULLETIN
PAB #: 33-94
DATE: January 6, 1994 SUBJECT:
TO: Contra Costa County Administrator Admin
Contra to qty Wagers Planning
r Marketing
FROM: Arthur C. xecutive Director EEO/AA
Contra Costa County Private Industry Council MIS
Fiscal
SUBJECT: Youth Fair Chance Grant Operations
REF:
SPECIAL FILING:
US DOL is soliciting grant requests for demonstration projects that will provide
comprehensive employment and training services to youth (14-21 years) and young adults
(22-30 years) in high poverty areas of urban and rural. communities.
Application will require a memorandum of commitment from a project team consisting of local
educational agencies, community youth service agencies, employers and others;
applications are to be submitted by the City and/or County with jurisdiction for the project
area.
Twenty five Youth Fair Chance Grants will be awarded in FY 1994, each grantee will receive
$3 million for an 18 month period; thereafter, subject to availability of funds and effective
program operation, $1 to $2 million dollars of funding per year will be available for up to
3 1/2 additional years.
Applications are due no later than 22 March 1994.
The application requirements and the detailed guidelines for use in applying for the
demonstration grants, along with the DOL selection criteria are attached.
A 30% funding match is required, at lease one third of the match must be from non federal
funds and apparently at least two thirds of the match must be from other federal sources.
The program must be targeted to all the youth/young adults in a high poverty area with
a total population of not more than 25,000 (up to 50,000 in certain circumstances - but
requesting the larger area could weaken the proposal).
Suggested project design is to include: A) an in school youth component that includes a
school to work program including (1) Work-based learning, (2) School based learning, and
(3) connecting activities plus B) an out of school youth component with a center for
continuing education and training core program for the out of school youth and young
adults.
The Contra Costa PIC is interested in cooperating with any entity willing to pursue a Youth
Fair Chance Grant.
P
0
Retention Period: Obsolete on 3/22194 -
Special SOP Filing:
tev: 7/93
)isk: #9:FORMS\ADM2
If you have any questions regarding this grant application, please contact Ms. Brenda M.
Banks, US DOL, Division of Acquisition and Assistance. Questions concerning possible
cooperative efforts should be addressed to me or Bob Whatford at 646-5239.
ACM:pk
Attachment
cc: Linda Patton-Finch, SDA Monitor
PIC Interested Party RFP Mailing List
Members, County Board of Supervisors
#23:33-94
A technical report for employment and training executives
nechrilca!RaBusinessCurre ts
Technical Report No. 7,Dwmbw 291, 1993
AVAILABILITY OF YOUTH FAIR CHANCE GRANTS ANNOUNCED -
The Department of Labor has announced the availability of grant funds for Youth Fair
Chance (YFC) demonstration projects that will provide comprehensive employment and
training services to youth (14-21 years) and young adults (22-30 years) in high poverty
areas of urban and rural communities. The announcement appears in the December 22
Federal Register, which is attached. The program was created by Congress in August
1992 under Title IV of the Job Training Partnership Act. The YFC program is intended
to provide youth living in designated target areas improved access to available services
and support necessary to succeed in the world of work and to participate fully in society.
The Department of Labor will award 25 YFC grants in Fiscal Year 1994. Grants will
be awarded on a competitive basis only. Each YFC program grantee will receive $3
million for an 18 month period. Thereafter, depending on the availability of funds and
effective program operation, up to three and a half additional years of support at between
$1 to $2 million per year will be provided.to each site. Additionally, the Department of
Labor is requiring a 30% match from grant recipients.
The competition for YFC awards is limited to cities and counties with the highest
concentrations of poverty. A ranking of the cities according to poverty rate is included
in the attached Federal Register notice. Eligible Service Delivery Areas (SDAs) with
Youth Opportunity Unlimited (YOU)projects may also apply; however, such SDAs may
not apply to operate YFC projects in the YOU target area. Applications for grant awards
are being accepted from the date of announcement in the Federal Register through March
22, 1994. The application requirements and the detailed guidelines for use in applying
for the demonstration grants, along with the selection criteria the Department of Labor
will use in reviewing applications, are all contained in the attached Federal Register
notice. ****
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
For further information on this Technical Report, please contact Michele Cahn or Tom
Lindsley, NAB Policy Department, 202/289-2909. Distribution inquiries should be
submitted to the National Alliance of Business, Sales Support Department, 1201 New
York Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC, 20005, 202/289-2910. One year
subscription to Technical Report - $90; with Business Currents biweekly newsletter -
- $160. Individual copies of Technical Report are $10.
o National Alliance of Business, 1993
NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF BUSINESS
6M4 FerdexW Register. t Val:. 58, No,. 244 l Wednesday-, December 22, 19W / 11Toticvs
the asbestos .Ral�mtxvista zoductk=costs), abfstothe and Assistance:Attetrdon:Ms.Brende
Associates.I , f whish Robert L. C enc Decree Library. RL Berks,Reference-SGA/DAA 94-M.
Brandon is the partner,was the John. den.. 2011 Constitutfort Avenue NW.,room�
owner of the buildin bersthealleged Qlkef g �aenta wameme on, 4203,Washizrgtan,DC 20210.
violations occurred asr D. Envimnaren Natara?Rrn rrres ' 'sioa: FOR FURTHER 1MPORMXXOR CONrdCr
BEt�enuti Company,Inc., as the (FR Doc.27-31Z Filed I2 21-B3,8 45 L Ms.Brenda M.Banks.Division of
con or fu charge of the de litforr e1LUNa CODE 4410••01-Y. AcgtnsWon and/assistance,telephone.
that re ted in.the alleged vio ens. (2DZ)219-7984(this is not a toll-flee
The Se ento Valley Environin tal n��•
Waste Comp y transporxed.the DEPART)UiENrOFLABOR SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:ThLs
asbestos waste et was removed ftnm announcement consists of three pazts.
thasite. Errrpfotrrten!and 7rairThzg Part provides the background and
1)ader alae CoaseatXn
con Adminfstratfort purpose of tba demonstration.projects.
Vista Associates,Robn Bard Job Training Pssinevs6fp Act:Youttr Fart IL provides(2)the application
the D.Beaverruti Comill Fair Ctlance Demonstration Projects Process.(2j detailed guidelines for use
j in applying,far the demonstration grants
ptiy pay a civil pen000. APENOY:Employment and Training (3j the government's requirements for
Each f those three de�' Administza3iorr,I.abOLthe demonstration projects,and(4)the
required.by the ConseAmour_Notice of availability of funds selection criteria used by the
petfnrm diligent inspection prior to any dad Solicitation for.Grant Applications Department in reviewing applications.
future demolition or renovation ac'evity'. (SGA? Fart LII describes the reporting
to immediately`stvpall work at any site requirements.
a suspect regulated asbestos SUMMARY:The U.S.Department of Table of Contents
ccztaining materialNito
CM-1 Labor,Employment and Training
discovered.duringar Administration(DOUETA),.under Title Pant Backgrouarf
re ovation until the been IV of the job Training Partnership Act A•P Authorization
orixatiolr
s ad.an ed; o be (j' A)as amended in 1992,isB.PurrpoaePart II-Application Process
RA movedby s arrao=cing Youth Fair C b=ce MC) A.Eligible Applicants
abatemen mockers. t demonstration projects that wz'll provide S.FundlIng
Valley Enviro mental Waste Company comprehensive employment and C.Applications Procedures
will e acivt alt of S,25,000 trainingservicestoyouuth(14-21years)• LSubmission ofFroposals
is not sulijeQ to the' juaetions =and young adults(ZZ-3Q yearsl is high.• Z.Hand Delivered Proposals
the conse decree poverty areas of urban and rural 3.Lata Proposals
provided-by 4.Period of the Performance
comrnunit5es..The YFCprogram
The Department of jus will conceatratas resaumes in small S.D Optica to Extend
receive,for period of thirty D)days areas de an D.Matching RequircLuire .
geographic �� E.Government's Regnirements/SZatement
!rota the date of this publicetisn, integrated:array of sewnces and thereby. of work Solicits tiaa Specifications
comm�ents relating to the proposed increases the chances that bi�gb:xhk F.Rating Criteria for Award-
consent eaee.Comments should be youth will find jobs,davelop careers. Part 0--Reporting Requirements
addressa Y the AssistaatAttorney and leadprodnztivelives IL Quarterly FinandatReports
General for t$s7Enviroament end Up to twanty-five 0l-YFC'giants will' B,QuaztedT Progress Reports
Natural, Divisigm Department be awarded this year and will operator ; C.Special Repam ..
ofjustice .DC=W,and •'for11ru tths.-Tb-ejMM1&r�n'llbe Appendices-
should refer to U fates v.ftbmkon awarded on a competitive besis,.E mEr No.1—Application far Federal Assistance
Vista Associa3es,LP el 'DO Rei: YFC>? �@��aril)m ky_ (Standard Form 4241
No.2—tVon�onstruction Bridget Form
#90.5-Z-1-1648. receive an ares®of$3 stti2lion for 28 (Standard Form 424A7
The ptvgosed consent daces ay be moat"Based on the evailabili y of No.3—�4,Listisg of U.S.cities(Ranked by,
11%
mined at the offlt;e of the IInite fid°'effective Dom=op°�oa and r Below Poverty)
the needs of the Department,up to 3W Nc.4- 41amorandum of Committnent
Stn. Attorney.555 Capitol W 'S 'ta additional years of support will be No.5-2990 Census Data(Listing of
1550.11� amento.California 95814.at provided to each site. Counties).
the R*o?t,IX aMce of the This notice describes the process that Part I—Background
EnvironmartlProtection Agency,75 eligible entities must use to apply foe
Hawthorne �San Francisco, demonstration.funds.the subject areas A.Authorizolion
California 94105:an at the Consent for which applications shall be accepted. Truth who live in impoverished rural
Decree Library,11206 eet,NW,4th for funding,how grantees.are.to be and urban communities around the
Floor.Washington.DC 2 5.(204 selected.and.the reapmaibiilitaes of country face greet chall mges became:of
624-08&2.A copy of the pro ed grantees. the limited economic.fiscal and social
consent decree may be,obt ' DATES:Applications furgrant.aiaards! capital availab}eto them.Existing
person or by mail from.theConw= will be accepted r mneniing.Decembes family and community resources are
Decrek Library, 2220 G Street NW_4th 22, 2993'
2, 1993:The closing date for receipt of often severe If strained.Complicating
Floor,Washingt=DC 20005.hi applicadans shall be March 22;19913,at this are the high rates of joblessness and
Te4195ti4a,,c0Py please refer to the- . 2 p.nL(EastaxnTima;a4the aedrms.• dependency among adultswfrich in torn
reier'enaed case and enclose s check in below. - Emit the number of positive role models
the amount of 39411(25 cents per page ADDRESSES:Applications sb&17 be for youth and reduce their access to jobs
mailed to:U.S.Departurent of Labor.: obtained by more middle class youth
Employment and Training through informal brokering networks.
Adinisristatiorv.T)fvfsfon ofAcqubftion Families and other community residentF
Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 22, 1993-/ Notices . .67815
often lack effective strategies on how to The purpose of this solicitation is to be between S1-32 million per year,if all
support youth and encourage positive award grants that will work toward grant conditions are met and based on
behavior to enhance rather than restrict achieving these objectives in the the available funds and the needs of the
their futures. targeted areas.While there are specific Department.Giant award amounts will
To address these concerns,in August core components comprising the YFC depend on the size of the community, _
1992,Coraress passed legislation model,local decision-maldng plays an numbers of youth living in the target
authorizing the Secretary of Labor to integral role.The planning,design,and ccmir=ity,and the comprebensives of
establish a national program of Youth implementation of a YFC project should services proposed.
Fair Chance grants aimed at providing " involve those who are closest to the C.Application Procedures
comprehensive services to youth living target community,including local
in high poverty areas in urban and rural residents.To the extent feasible,the I.Submission of Proposals
communities. local target community should be An original and three(3)copies of the
In stating the purposes of the empowered to decide which services are proposal shell be submitted.The
program,the Congress pointed to the needed and who can best provide them. ro osal shall consist of two(2)
conditions of poverty and need that put Planning and implementation of a YFC separate and distinct parts;Part I shall
the targeted group of youth at risk of project should take place"from the contain'the Standard Form(SF)424,
j dropping out of school,becoming ground up"with the active involvement "Application for Federal Assistance:"
teenage parents,and unemployed. and participation'of local entities. (See Appendix No.1)and SF 424A.
( B.Purpose : Pari II—Application Process "Budget"(See Appendix No. 2).Also,
f The ase of the YFC program is to A.Eligible Applicants the budget shall include on a separate
p p pp page(s)a detailed cost analysis of each
t provide a) youth living in designated The competition for these awards is line item in the budget,as well as an
1 target areas with improved access to the limited to cities and counties with the allocation of costs for school-to-work
_ types of services and support necessary highest concentrations of pgverty.The and other activities.
to help them acquire the-skills and definitions being used to identify the Part II shall contain a technical
knowledge they need to succeed in the cities and counties with the highest proposal that demonstrates the offeror's
world of work and to participate fully in concentration of poverty are:(a)Those capabilities in accordance with the
society.Such services inclu a cities with at least 25,000 residents Statement of Work in part IL E of this
employment,training,education,child living below the poverty level ora solicitation.No cost data or reference to
care,transportation,and assistance in poverty rate of 30 percent or greater,as price shall be included in the technical
resolving personal or family.crises.To determined by the 1990 U.S.Bureau of proposal.In order to assist offerors in
achieve its objectives.YFC encourages Census,(See Appendix No.5)and(b) the preparation of their proposals and to
the active involvement in the effort of those counties with at least 10,000 • facilitate the expeditious evaluation by
local employers,labor unions,junior residents living below the poverty levels the panel,proposals should be -
and senior high schools,two-and four• as determined by the U.S.Bureau of organized and presented in the same
year post secondary institutions,and> Census;or(c)those consortia of - sequential order as the Rating Criteria in
community agencies.The YFC counties with at least 25.000 residents part II.F.of this solicitation.
legislation,specifies six broad objectives: living below the poverty level and an Applications shall be limited to 250
• To satiriate small neighborhoods or overall poverty rate of at least 40 single side pages,doubled-spaced.
communities(YFC target areas)of not- - percent.(See Appendix No.3.)Eligible The proposal should be submitted on
more than 25,000 residents,or in SDAs with Youth Opportunity - behalf of the community by(1)the
appropriate cases not more than 50,000 Unlimited(YOU)projects may ap ly; mayor of a city or the chief elected
except that:tri the event that the.... however,such SDAs may not appy to official in a metropolitan statistical area,
population of an area from which a high operate YFC projects in the YOU target after the Governor of the State has had
school draws a substantial portion of its area. an opportunity to comment on the
enrollment exceeds either limit.the Additionally,Indian Reservations or application;(2)the chief elected official
target area may encompass such Alaskan Native villages designated of a nonmetropolitian county or the
boundary.. -. - ; under subsections(c)and(d)of section designated chief elected official of
• To-guarantee access to appropriate 401,Title IV of the Job Training and contiguous nonmetropotitan counties..
education,training,and supportive-- ' partnership Act(DTPA)or a consortium after the Governor of the State has had
services for all youth residing in the of such grantees and the State,and an opportunity to comment on the
target community; migrant or seasonal farmworker grantees application(Evidence that the Governor
• To guarantee access W designated under subsection 402(c)of has commented on the application shall
comprehensive services combined with Title IV of MA or a consortium of such be submitted in a form of a letter signed
outreach and recruitment efforts to grantees and the State,are eligible to by the Governor or his Designee;(3).
increase participation of previously apply for YFC grants, Indian Reservations or Alaskan Native .
unserved or underserved youth residing - B Funding villages designated under subsection(c)
in the target community;•.. ,, and(d);of section 401 or consortium of
• To Integrate'service delivery in the - Initial funding for this solicitation such grantees and the State;and(4)
target community,including systems of will come from the Youth Fair Chance migrants or seasonal farmworkers
common intake,assessment,and case program authorized as part of the Job communities designated under
management;; Training Partnership Act MA)1992 subsection 402(c)or a consortium of
• To increase the rates of school-- Amendments.Funds for the YFC. such grantees and the State,are eligible
completion,enrollment in advanced program may also be provided from for grants.
education or training,and employment; other sources,pending availability.Each While a proposal will be submitted b)
and YFC program grantee will initially the SDA to the Mayor or Chief Elected
• To determine the feasibility of receive an average of S3 million for 18 Official,the prospective project operato
offering these services nationwide. -- months.Funds per site,thereafter,will should be closely identified with the
67816 Federal Register L Vol 58, Nn. 244 I Wednesday. December e,2. 1993 I Notices -
target community and able to reach and 4.Period of Performance • Proivfdaa rationala for whythe
serve its residents This can include Tha•pedodofperformance-imde=this partituIaztar&starsawss.selectedcver.
community b8 org®niza�ons that grant will be.18 months from.the date other poverty areas is t5e city or
bMM experiencesae g in the local of grant wamutiamcounties.Offerors that wfsb to have a
community youth,employers; target area of more than 25,000 should
social service providers and local school 5•OWorr tot Extend subrmt ajustifi'cation.in their proposals.
systems Thu organizatiorr should have: Hasecion the 1wailabimy offiuuls, With approval ofthe Secaetarp.the.
demonstrated ability to operate a effective program aapemdon,and the, maximum size of a et area is 50,000`
comprehensive and ext rarnei'y earmplex needs of the Department.options for. However.tha ofFerar should not assume
program.A Memorandum:of annual:fund"ing,of up to 31A arlfitinnat that the larger target area will be
Commitment(See Appendix No.41 years support maybe provided to each approved•
should be signed by local officials wino- site. 2.YFC Project Design
have pais an over resources to be
contributed orprogremsto.be offered. D_Mateharg Re 4uiremrats Based an the experience of the Youth
Any agreements sigpedtby the. DOE Funding under these award's Opportunities Unlimited program and
appropriate offirials and representatives. shall equal 70 percent of the total grant Istftude•permitted the DOL under the
of participating service provider... cost.The.awardee shall provide,2& YFC legistatfoa,the Department
agencies shallbedricluded.as pail of the percent from other federal sources and recommend&that the YFC project design
technical preposal.T'heproposal.should 10 percent fmrrrnon-federalsotaces: (modeljfnclude in-schoof youth and
cover items discussed is part U.ZE_ out-of-school youth core components.
E. to a nt o f Wok Solre atian The recommended core component for
- Offerors should make sure.that.their Statement o Work Solicitation p
pproposerrefleettheintentofthe Specifications in-schoaiyouth•is aschoofto-work
legislation asdescribedinpartL B� (STWItransition program.
2.IiaudDeliveret£Prm Deals �leestablishing;core,components AIn-schoorpoath:School-to-work
P for in-school and.outrofrschoolyouth is core component.Offerors can propose a
Proposals mustbe mailed at Ieast five essential-,local target area needs will variety of in-schoot youth programs as
days prior to the closing.date.However, determine,the extent to•which.other part of the YFCproject.However,the
if proposals are.hand delivered,they ' , options for serving youth ars schoal-to-worh transition program
must bereceivedatthe designated place incorporatedinto aYFC project. should be the cents),or con:component
by2pm.-Easterntirnaby,Marrh22, Offerorsare aotlimited.to.the ofTFC in-school youth.initiatives,
1994.All ovemigbL mail will be. information requested and can add say School4o-work programs enable
considered to be hand delivered.and information in which they feel provides localities to transform high,se:haols and
mrJstbe.received at the designated place: a marwcompleto picture.of the•proposed' improve•the educative.,training and
by the specified cloi#gdate. IYFC project in their.target ares. employment opportunities of youth in
Telegraphed andlor faxed proposals will To enable offeromtabeaefit from targeted areas.It is important that the
not be honorel Failure to adhere to-the some of tha experiences of the Youth YFC school to-work programs be .
above instructionswillbe abasia fora"' Opportunities Unlimited demonstration consistent and in accord with arty'local
determination of-nonresponsiveness.. (which.is a.prototype ofthe.YFC. and State plans developed.under the
3.LateProposals progjamj a handbook on useful lessons �t of 1993 sect School-to-Work mOpp lunities
learned is available upas requestby proposed.
Proposals received atthe office callin&the contact person identified is- 2000:Educate America Act.The STW
designated in the solicitation atter the the salicftation_The following, requirements under YFC are modeled to
exact time specified for receipt will not specifications cover target area. a great extent upon the proposed
be considered unless it is.recefved selectfon.YFC,pzoject design.and School-to-Work Opportunities:Act of
before award is made and it— linkages: 1993:Under:this pending legislation.
fil Was seat byreestered or certified Target Area Selection the STW concept integrates academic
mail not later than the fifthcalendazday 1. arg and vocational technicalleaming,to
before tire date speuafied fartacefpt of Offerors should select a gsographic prepare youth for high-wage,high-skill:
applications Ce.gg-err oflfar-snbmftted in target arse within the dtylcounty employment.
tor s
response tsvlieitatioa a egnnarg characterized by high raters of poverty. Programs are to eontalm three,main
receipt afapgfftaGarisbythe 20th ofthe school db-opaut team pregpancy..and components:(11 Work-based learning.
morrtfl rarest hhsavve been mails Rost aims.Mrom are.requested to: (2)school-based learning,and(3)
marked by the-15tbrk - • Provide a description ofthe•target connecting activities such as(al
(21 iris seat by-U.S.Postal Service area.The proposal mayindlnde a brief' matching students with employers'
Express Mail Next Day Service—Pbstal history;the schools,cormamiity work-based learning opportunities.(b).
Office to addressee trot Faterthen 5 p.m. develvpu lent corporatfoas.and social serving as.a gafsmn among tha employer
at the place of mailiing twa working days service agerrefes that serve the area; school.teacher,parent,and student:(cl,
prior to the,date-specified for-receipt of relevant locally based public or private provi&ng,technicalassistance and
proposals.'rhe terra"vmrking days" non-profit agencies;educational.sports, services to empployars and others in
excludes weekends and-U.S Federal employment..and cultural opportunities designingwork.basecilearning
holidays. available to youth fn.the target area. components%qd counseling and case
The terra-post marked"means a • Describe youth reemployment, management services,and in tra'
printed.stamped,or otherwise placed crime,school dropout and teen: teachers,workplace mentors and
impression(exclusive of a postage meter pregnancy rates in the target area from counselors;(d1 providing assistance to
machineeimpressfoulthat is readily dzta avgilable.Forpuaposesofthis students who have completed tha,
identifiable without further acti;rn as procurement.the youtir age range is 14 program in finding as appropriate,job.
having beensupplied or affixed airthe to 30 years old.Available local data continuing their education,or enterirg
date of malting by employeee of the U.S. which may encomam slightly different into as addltiorial training program:(el
Postal Servfce. age ranges foryoutb.areaccagtable- collectingandanalyzinpinformation
Federal Rsgfster I VoL.S8. No: 244.1 Wednesday, December 22. 1903 !.Nodces. 67817
outcomes of • Provide a desQi
regarding postgrogram ptfon of the steQs to centers.Various yodel service agencies
students who partletpate in the School• be taken to deternsfne customer need . ' .can be coIloeated at such centers.
to-Work Opportunities program and customer satisfaction. Offer%m-sboald be able to attract out-
component,and(1)linking youth - Establish and formalize a SFW of-school youth and young adult to the
development activities under this - "pamership"among those who will be Care psograrn through outreach and
program with employers'strategies for primarily fespoesible for the school-to- recruitment actMtfes:Students between
upgrading the skills of their workem work program In the public and private the ages of 17 and 30 enrolled full-tirma-
Successful school-to-work pro It sectors. in a training and education program at
require the active involvement of a Provide evidence of agreement by these centers may receive stipends of up
business.community and labor leaders. local schools to partidpate in the STW . to$1200 a week for up to one year or
and educators.Employers.in . demonstration and their willinpess to until they become employed,whichever
partnership with labor,define the skill make the changes needed to enhance occurs fust.If a youth is employed but
requirements for Jobs,participate jointly the learning experiences for youth.. does not earn S1 00 per week,the
in the governance of the program,offer engage the employer community in the difference can be paid through stipend&
quality learning experiences faribe - training process,and achieve the goals Offerors are asked to
students at the worksite,and provide of the STW program.This is important • Descabe such s center and its -
(obs for students and graduates, because of this critical role of the school measurable goal/outcomes and
Businesses share information with system in MY. strategy,hwluding services.to
schools • Provide the'estimated annual cost • accomplish the goals-
manage on the ocessaS �'es; • Identify where the center will be
mane anent rocessas,business and a time-phased worJcplan/work
B p located,how it will be staffed,and who
practices.ane structure of work is schedule covering the planning: will be responsible for it.
today's organization.STW arse development.and imp ameatatioa of a • pnna�
Y � pry STW program for the first three ears_ �`'lde a description of the steps to
require agreement from partners to work • Describe how the 5"IW a oral be taken to recruit out-of-school
together to develop auricula that will p p participants and to determine customer
prepare students to enter and succeed in Telates to other education reform being need and customer satisfaction..
the workplace of tomorrow.ST%Y undertaken in the community- C.YFCProjec t Design and
prognuns are more likely to work if In discussing othm in-school Implementation.Offerors are
there is-ongoing community ownership programs.besides schoaWo-work, encouraged to develop a YFC project
of the program and if the system is offerors are requested.to describe the which meets the requirements of the
flexible enough to fit IocBI programs.how they are to be - governing Iegfslation and best serves the
dret-yr stancea and needs As pari of this Implamenteti.by whom and the interests and needs of the target
procurement,offerors are expected measurable goals and objectives. cominuaby. -
where feasible to implement-STW B.Out-of-school youth:Center for YFCCenter.In considering the design.
programa in two(2)secondary s600ls continuirgg education and training care and implementation of the project.
in which residents of the community are component.Offerors are encouraged to offerors should give special attention to
enrolled.with at least one school establish a center for continuing the feasibility of operating the YFC
h located in the et education and occupational training for
physically tang program(except school-to-work)out of •
community.F.xcepti,oas to this apply to out-of-school youth and young adults, a single building.
rural and Indian Reservation are". ' of s similar type of facility.The center A-central YPC facility should help to
where there may be only one secondary should be identifiable and may be • ensure that grant funds are used to start
school serving the target area.To the collocated with or separate from other neer programs.rather than simply
extent feasible,the STW program design programs-The center does not have to displace existing local projects It
should correspond to that contained inbe a newly built facility but may be should also make it easier to track the
the brief description of examples of houtsed within en existing facility by progress of participants,An identifiable
complementary national programs(See modifying.improving,and expanding physical site'strengthens community
below). existing property perceptions of the program,gives YFC.
In discussing the STW program. To help youth acquire the knowledge an identity within the community,and
offerors are requested to:- and skills necessary to get and hold because of its visibility may help attract
• Provide a descri tion of the local.- jobs.the center should be in a position more resources within the eommuntty
p to offer youth information and and incaease.chances that the program
program envisioned and how locally intelligence on the local labor market. will continue beyond the Federal grant
elscted officials,employers.secondary occupational skills and other period.
and post secondary institutions. requirements needed forempioyment. If renovations are needed to establish
organized labor.teachers.:studeati. and local educational and training such a physical site,the use of
parents,community-based organizations resources.It should enable out-of-school Community Block Development Grants
and others will be involved in the youth to pursue a high school degree. (CBDG)or other funds should be
planning,development and and/or post-secondary education by explored.Funds provided under the
implementation. offering youth a coordinated and - YFC grant cannot be used for
- Describe how the proposed STW comprehensive renge of education cod constructing facilities.However,a
program complements existing ST%V training opportunities •. limited amount of funds may be used
programs available to students. The center should also offer youth a for alternations'for educational
• Identify the schools to be targeted variety of services such as GM purposes,such as preparations for
by the STWprogram and who will be instruction,basic skills instruction, installation of computers,etc.In some
responsible for the program design and English as a Second Language(ESL) cases,sites may choose to use the center
administration.enrollment procedures. classes,his management skids, for a dual purpose by serving in-sr-hool
numbers of youth to be served.and vocational education or training,and yob as well•as out=af-scbool Louth.
achievement of STW goals and search assistance.Referral to supportive CommunitYAMsory/Resoun:e Board.
objectives, services shauld be available at the Offerors should establish a Community
67818 Federal.Register / Vol. 58, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 22,.1993 / Notices
Advisory/Resource Board,or similar • Describe plans that specifically delivery system available to youth in the
organization,consisting of government focus on outreach and recruitment target area and are an integral part of the
and private sector leaden,as well as efforts in the target area to encourage YFC program:There are a wide range of
representatives(e.g.,residents,pa-eats, and promote maximum participation by possibilities.Examples of
business,community leaders,ministers, at-risk youth and young adults who are complementary programs include such
educators)of the target community to -currently underserved by education and as:the Youth Construction Corps,Youth
further the goals and objectives of the training programs in the target Apprenticeship Programs,Teen Parent
YFC program, community. YFC legislation cities the Programs,Summer Education and
Sports and Recreation Initiatives: importance of steps designed Training Programs(STEP),Middle
Offerors should establish a specifically to enlist the participation of College Special Programs for Dropouts,
comprehensive sports and'recreation youth,particularly males,under the Community Service Programs for Youth.
program for children and youth in the jurisdiction of the child welfare, Community Youth Centers,Alternative
target area and describe bow such juvenile justice,and criminal justice' Schools as well as linkages with other
activities might complement YFC systems. programs funded under DTPA including
program objectives. ' • Provide a description of.the Job Corps and the Job Guarantee . .
Permanent YFC Program:Offdrors common intake procedures, Program.The Job Guarantee Program is
should ensure that the community is individualized assessment,and case authorized-in YFC legislation as an
committed to.building support and management approach to be used by the option which some offerors may want to
leveraging State,local,and private program. explore.Complementary programs also
resources to continue the • Discuss the performance measures include national initiatives,such as
comprehensive program services tj be used.Identify YFC measurable Healthy Start operated by the U.S.
beyond the duration of the Federal goals and outcomes for target area youth Department of health and Human
grant which may include:high school Services(HHS),Empowerment Zones or
Recruitment,Common Intakecompletion or equivalency;youth Enterprise Communities under the U.S.
Procedure and Case Management: entering postsecondary institutions, Departrnent.of Housing and Urban
Offerors should have a viable plan for apprenticeships,or other advanced Development(HUD)and U.S.
recruitment and establish a common training programs;youth placed in jobs; Department of Agriculture,and youth
intake procedure which utilizes a case, or youth participating in education, programs supported by the U.S.
management approach.and training and employment services.They Departments of Education.Justice,
individualized assessment.Such an also may include supporting goals for Transportation,and Defense.
approach is intended to enhance the the target area such as increpsing The following is a description of
likelihood that all participating youth: security and safety,or reducing the examples of complementary program:
and young adults will receive basic number of drug-related arrests or 1. Youth Build.Program provides
services meant for everyone and teenage pregnancies. assistance for a wide range a[multi
-
customized services tailored to • Provide a description of how disciplinary activities and services to
individual needs. customer need and customer assist economically disadvantaged
satisfaction can be ascertained and youth.The opportunities are designed
Performance Measures:Offerors shall
have performance measures as a part of measured. to help disadpvantiged young adults who
YFC Provide written assurances that all have dropped out of school to obtain the
the YFC program as required s
legislation.. youth in the target area will have access education and employment skills
Ability to Get the Job Done:Offerors to:(1)a coordinated and comprehensive necessary to achieve economic self-
should be able to demonstrate on the range of education and training e of sufficiency and develop leadership
basis of past or current experience that educationitiand es train g providerm a diverse s in the development is and a n owl-income ent to community
they have the capability to implement a participating community;and(2) communities.
YFC project and achieve the goals and p
supportive services necessary for 2.Initiatives aimed at increosing rural
objectives of the program on schedule. successful participation in society, student enrollment in postsecondary
Collage Bound Initiative:Offerors. Supportive services may include:child education.Initiatives could include
should be able to establish a public/ care,transportation,and assistance in. establishing community college
private program to•assist youth from resolving personal or family crisis,such satellites,or small,two year,work-study
target areas learn about and attend as crises related to substance abuse, colleges,and last dollar opportunities
college,including providing"last homelessness,migration,or family for tuition.'.
dollar"financial aid. violence. 3. Youth Apprenticeship Programs.
Middle School Initiative:Local school . Provide evidence from past or Programs for.out-of-school youth
districts should be able to establish recent experiences which demonstrate developed in conjunction with local
initiatives to improve middle school in that the offeror will be able to trade unions to train youth in
target area,based on the Carnegie •• implement a successful YFC project. construction and.other skilled trades.
Council on Adolescent Development's, 3.Linkages to Complementary Programs 4. Teen Parent Programs.Programs
Turning Points recommendations.This 8 p �Y gr that included an employability
includes breaking up large middle Offerors are encouraged to explore the development program for teen parents
schools by using either"houses"or feasibility of linking YFC initiatives operated in conjunction with a health
block roistering. with other ongoing local community . center that serves teen parents.The
Offerors are asked to: programs.They should attempt to creato emphasis is on returning teenagers to
•. Provide§description of the YFC and maintain broad-based partnerships school and on long-term career
center,its goals,the services it will to address the needs of urban and rural development.A case management
pro-ide,its location,staffing,and youths through a system of structured,, approach to used with the aim of
programs.The Centers can include comprehensive services. ensuring that the teen parent receives a
training in mdtural activities such as: Complementary programs are intended sequence of services including
art,music,creative writing,etc. to strengthen the overall service counseling,basic education,mentoring,
Federal Register iVoL 56; No. 244 !:Weddesday, December 22, im l Notices 8?8i9
vocational training;and job search . . -for the guaranteed job.youth must in areas with severe unemployment and
assistance.Programs for both teen maintain a C average and a school low famf)y income problems;aids in the
mothers and teem fathers can be attendance rata of 9Q percent(except for development of public facilities and
developed. > doctor's excused absences). -private enterprise to help create new,
5-Sumnrer7}alning and Education Grantees offering this component permanent job&
Pmgroms fSTEP,t Programs that add a must provide participating youth with Department of Health and Human
remedial education component to additional serzices US.to assist them in Services,
traditional summer youth jobs programa remaining in school and ue—way
t and enroll students during the school enteringcol or a career-tr
age' job-. (a)Public Health Service--Stimulates
I year to ensure academic success-Such Such services can include counseling, and assists States and communities with
programs can be operated on college job development and placement,and the development of local heaith
campuses during the Summer to supportive services while attending resources and further the development
provides a.residential experience for ' - school or working(including child care. of education for the health professions;
enrolleeand transportation), assist is the delivery of health services
&itiffddle Colleges.-Alternative' The job guarantee program can also to all Americans with reinforced
schools for dropouts and potential Include a 50 percent wage subsidy to emphasis upon assisting the health care
dropouts run by community,colleges on encourage private employers to hire needs of the nation's needy populations.
the college campus. youth for the Saturday job.The duration Suchro ams include:
7.Community ServicePr+ograms for of these subsidies should be not more P �
Youth Programs that allow youth to than a year.Priority in these subsidies (1)Healthy Start—This program
participate in community service.Sua should be given to employers who maximizes the positive development of
programs can be aimed at both in-school provide advanced or specialized young children. .
I and out-of-school youth.Service corps training,or who provide a structured (2)Runaway and Homeless Youth
programs enrolling out-ofschooI youth and integrated learning experience Basic Centers--.This program addresses
should include education and training involving the school and employer. the spiraling trend toward drug
j components.These programs could also 12, Youth Construction Corps. experimentation and abuse by children
be aimed at youth offenders.with Programs in which youth are trained in and youth.espeoallq those who are
' community service offered as an construction trades while rehabilitating runaways and homeless,amd those who
alternative form of sentencing. houses.Such programs make use of became entrapped in youth gang
8.Community Youth Centers. union craftsmen as instructors and 'activities.
Community centers in which youth can foremen.Models for such programs (3)Drug Education and Prevention—
gather and receive counsetlag, include Ventures in Community This program focuses upon the specific
recreation and cultural opportunities. •102Ment MCI)and YaathbWld. needs of youth involved with drugs that
and educational and job--ricer Be of re implementing this program an communities across the nation are
information. sealys�s of the construction market in combating
9.Public-Private Colbbonatrons to iota1 labor market should be completed
Assure School Graduates Either Enter to determine the probability of U.S.Department of Housing and Urban
' - College or Obtain Career Tack Jobs. employment once the program is Development
Program such as the Boston Comped or successfully completed. (a)Community Planning and
College Bounden Baltimore in w cb The followingis a brief description of
the vale sector offers both"i:ast � Development This program builds
im examples of complementary ua4cml communities by providing decent
Dollar"college financial aide and programs; housing and a suitable living
career-trscY jobs"o��ssddu� s'cg seniors, environment and andira economic
opp
• 10.Altenuative SchoaL>r Schools U.S.Department of Agriculture ".- expanding
operated by the local school system. (a)Extension Service(State 4-H lowarttmtties principally for persons of
aimed specifically at high school Program)—Coordinates and provides low and moderate income.
dropouts or potential dropouts- administrative.technical.and other (b)ESapowermeat Zones and
11.Job Guarantee.Effort under which services to a nationwide Cooperative Enterprise Communities—This program
a target COmTm=nity with a populetiaa of Extension System.in partnership with offers local communities the fncaatives,
20,000 or Iesa reserves up to$l million State and local governments and the targeted Investments.deregulation and
of its YFC grant budget to provide a jobprivate sector.The primary function of flexibility they need to work with the
guarantee to-youth.age&16-19 who. this system is to take the research private sector to develop comprehensive
either agree to stay in school or to return ' findings of the Department of economic strategies to generate
to school.(Target communities with a Agriculture,the State Land-Grant business,create jobs„make their streets
larger population should not plan to Colleges and programs administered by safe.build community.and empower
offer such a guarantee because It will be the Department of Agriculture.and to people to get ahea&
too expensive given the number of develop and deliver informal,out-of- (c)Youthbuild Program—This
.youth in the area.)The job guarantee school educational programs. Pram offers a wide range of multi-
should be limited to an sig#rt-hoar• (b)Food and Nutrition Service• disciplinary activities and services to
Setuuday job during the 39 weeks of the Administers programs to make food ' assist economically disadvantaged
school year,and a summer job funded assistance avtilablir to people who need youth.The opportunities ase designed
under Title II-B of)TPA.The guarantee It,These programa ase operated In to help disadvantaged youngg adults whc
of a summer job should ooatinue cooperation with State and local have dropped out of high school to
through the Summer following bigb government obtain the education and employment
' school graduation,or until the youuh U.S.Department of Commerce sculls necrssasp to achieve economic
+ reaches age 19 whichever is later, eP a self-sufficiency and durelop lesdership
The wage paid for the part-time job (a)Economic Development skills and a commitment to community
during the school year should be the Administration M.ML - rates a)ong- development in low-income
minimum wage.To maintain eligibility range economic development program communities.
'A
67820 Federal Register ! Vol. 58, No. 244 ! Wednesday, December 22, 1993 / Notices
U.S.Department of justice. Evaluation is an integral and a central YFC facility;recruitment,
(a)National Performance Review necessary part of the YFC program. common intake and case management:
Laboratory Related to Comprehensive Offerors will be expected to cooperate pians for an advisory/resource board;
Anti-Crime and Social Delivery with and participate in a national ability of offeror to accomplish the goals
Systems—This is a comprehensive evaluation of all YFC sites.A contractor and objective of the YFC program.(25
"Weed and Seed"program designed to will be selected to conduct the points).
bring into communities of high crime 'evaluation. - 5.Linkages to complementary
services and programs that offer positive To aid in YFC program . programs.and-commitment of State and
services an to youths that offer
o implementation,a national technical local resources to the project.Extent of
these areas. assistance contractor will be available to linkages with complementary programs
(b)Community Partnerships with sites awarded grantees. and the ability of the offeror to garner
Local Police—This program involves the F.Rating Criteria for Aword support for YFC initiatives from public
communityresidents in atropin and private sectors,including Federal.
patrolling, Prospective offerors are advised that State,and local agencies;soundness of
neighborhood watch and the actual the selection of grantees for awards is to plans for linking community resources;
selection of local police who will work be made atter careful evaluation of and plans for continuing the program on
in the community. proposals by a panel of specialists. a permanent basis.Programs that
U.S.Department of Transportation Panelists will evaluate the proposals on establish linkages with the U.S.
(a)Urban end Rural Mass the basis of five(5)factors enumerated Department of Justice's local Weed and
Transportation—Programs are desi ned below: Seed program and/or that apply to be
The factors are: _
to assist in the development 8 of 1.Need in the Designated Target Area designated an Empowerment Zone or
Enterprise Community with the U.S.
improved mass transportation facilities, as evidenced by description of the target Department of Housing and Urban
equipment,techniques,and methods, community,poverty population in the Development will receive special
with the cooperation of mass . community,poverty rate,school emphasis under this criterion.(20
transportation companies both public dropout rate,teen pregnancy rate,and points)
and private.Demonstration projects are other such data.(5 points). Costst shall be rated separately.Cost
underway in several urban and rural 2.Quality of the School-to-Work YFC will analyzed t determine
areas to enhance the local services to Initiative as indicated by the offerors in- reasonabable resources
individuals residing in communities school youth projects;understanding of should bladequateeness.Available
the services
that have inadequate transportation the STW core component as reflected in proposed in the apctplication.The total
services.
. the planning.development and cost of the proje ,however,must be
implementation of a STW program:the
State and Local Programs reasonable in view of anticipated
soundness of the plan to accomplish the results.Applicants should document
(a)Local programs that encourages _ goals and objectives of the STW weir expected costs and justify why
participation by community residents to program;the extent of coordination and they consider these costs us if
be involved in programs design to serve involvement with key partners such as reasonable.
1 be
youth and build a safe,clean and the State education system,-local
supportive community. schools,employers,labor unions, Offerors are advised that discussions
As part of this section,offers are apprenticeship programs,community- may necessary in order clarify any
requested to: 'based organizations,business and trade inconss necessary
in their application.The
• Discuss how the YFC program will.- .organizations,parents,and youth.(25 Panel results are advisory f nature and
make use of the resources,expertise, points), not binding o the Grant proposals w
and commitment of programs and 3.Quality of Out-of-School YFC scores based a rating of proposals will
services from organizations such as:(1) Initiative as indicated by the offerors be used to establish a competitive range
the school system:(2)community-based plan to establish a permanent center; as determined by the Department
and related orgeniza ions serving youth; . proposed employment,education and Labor.Therefore,the final awards and
(3)youth corps programs;(4)Job Corps ' training programs;support services to selection of grantees will be based on
such factors as the overall technical
centers;(5)apprenticeship programs-,(6) be provided to meet the needs of a
other projects and programs funded diverse target population,including quality of the proposal,population
under the JTPA and other Federal young adults 22 to 30 years of age; served,and what's in the best interests
legislation. . outreach and recruitment initiatives; of the government.
• Include a description of the extent of coordination and involvement Part III—Reporting Requirements
resources available in the participating with key employment,education,and A.Quarterly Reports on the Youth
community from private,local,State, training partners;and the soundness of Fair Chance program are required.
and Federal sources that will be used to the plan to accomplish the goals and B.Quarterly Progress Reports on the
achieve the goals of the program. objectives of the YFC program.(25 Youth Fair Chance program are
• Estimate the funds required to points). . required.
ensure access to appropriate education, 4.Quality of Overall YFC Project �,Special reports,including a final,
training,and support services for all Design and Implementation Plan as' on the progress of the implementation of
youth and young adults in the target reflected in the plan for incorporating the Youth Fair Chance model may be
area to achieve YT C goals. into a YFC project the necessary required.
4.Additional Considerations elements to provide needed services to Si ned at Washing
ton,DC,this 15th day of
the target population and to achieve 6 B
' December 1993.
Offerors should identify a time- ' YFC program goals and objectives.
phased work schedule covering the Consideration will be•,given to factors . . Janice is Perry,
planning,development,and such as:organizational structuie, Giant Officer,Division ofAcquisition and
implementation of the YFC;program's program comyonents and activities, Assistance.
first 18 months. staifing and resources;establishment of siLumr.cone 4si*. -M
Federal Register 1 Vol. 58, No. '244-/ Wednesday, December 22, 1993 / Notices 67821,
APPENDIX No. 1 OMI Approval No.tll 4M.,
APPLICATION FOR s an OWUMID . , �a1i wrw
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
1. TTPE OFWI1rRIIote L DATE ltgCVM ST ETATt bate ApgRcalpl tdWWIoF.
rbo�+c+Mei Iti.odk+[�o�+- "-
❑ Carlrosaali- p C r.6b%c0Dn
• L DATE RtcOTED IT FEDERAL ADD@= fedwal ttlarwl�r -
❑ 1bnCenatnAeldl ❑ Nan CennnAylen
L AYFL1 AXTIIIFOMa1AT1OM .
Lair Near« ortlanwtwdw Last
AG&OU&M FAM.~1y.aur.rd lip cad*): ". INrna eM tNayhorr nwwDW of VW WWW to be aontaeMd an watarl'iWO,wp
this e0prcaten mMnis ardal
a EMrL01ER IOOMFICAT1011 ANMeLR M MF F.TT►[OF AOFLACAMT:(Utter approtnia AsnW i1 AM).
E= - F771 AL e4te K Matarra Sclroal OW.
a Cft"W L St.a Corr mAed tuft am r KWw Last"
G UWADDr 4 private Uni.erliTT
L Tll.t O[AreuG.nWm 0. TanWMD K ►dWl Tetra
❑ Now ❑ Cantel"con ❑ ArAwan E Wwwwo L iowidur
.F. Mwnrulcipel Y firm Orpantntlal -
■Re.4k ono r&'Wwiala Y11w(f)in b.(.t ❑ ❑ 0.som" Di[u sl K other tspedM:
A.Maear A-wd a Decrease A■Ud G neeaaa Duration
0.Decrees Dwatr n 06%w fapevb! L MAME Or FEDERAL AOEMC%
is,CATALOG OF FEDERAL 60MUT1C IS.DMUM4 TRLR OF A"%SCANM 001040.
AUMIAMtMYM&M •
WILL-
m ARW AFFECTED IT PROACT Juba%Cowrae%atalaL 01Lt .
tt poop(mO too ICT, IL COMOR[114-ML owmo II OF: -
SLA"Date EA4i11 au ♦ADD— _ b trgea .
IL LSTWAMD FLO M"& 1%.3 AFPtJCAT*M SUBJECT TO AM[M IT STATE OICWTWI 04KA 1111E FROM",
a Femoral a TES TEES PREAPPLr-ATKYVAPPLJCATION WAS MADE AVAA AME TO TK
STATE MCUTWE ORDER 12172 PROCESS FOR REVCW ON:
b Appeanl
L Stan i DO
D NO. 13.PROGRAM D NOT COVERED e1 EQ 12372
a LRcr t. .00- .
13 OR PROW"KM NOT%SEEN SELECTED eT STATE FOR REVIEW
a Other
1. Program a'(Doi11D 11 m 1}.•11%1 AIe1.IC�11a1 DELMOY[M OM AMT FEMRAI DER►
..
TOTAL E3 TM a-Lee.'attach an e,pfrwom � [3 14
e.
IL TO TMt STET OF 1111 tt1100590Ot AMD I&W.ALL DATA M TWO MfLRATI0wM9A01L1CAT1 M ARE"&A AND CORR[CT.TWA OOCUMOIT IME at[M DRAT
` AUTMOt O h T111 QOh/EMMIMQ 600F OF TM AIILIC.AMI AND THE APPUr.AMT WILL COMFL110frM TWE ATTACAED ASSURAMCtE l rot 0E34TAAICE t AWARDED
a TTPad Wnre
of ArArvhred Repmoonts" b Tice C Tetap+vr rhtnlOw ..
• t Sgnaan r Autlrwvat Repweenwaw0 a Dela.$grad
i wWS aahwha YYDIa Wrn A r a
. ►.eecrhead D1 OY!i�chl.ar A•102
Authorized for Local Reproduction
67822 Federal Register / VoL S8, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 22, 1993 / Notices
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF.424
This is a standard form used by applicants as a required facesheet for preapplications and applications submitted
for Federal assistance.It will be used by Federal agencies to obtain applicant certification that States which have
established a review and comment ptocedure.in response to Executive Order 12372 and have selected the program
to be included in their process,have been given an opportunity to review the applicant's submission.
Item: Entry. Item: Entry:
1. Self-explanatory. 12. List only the largestpolitical entities effected
2. Date application submitted to Federal agency(or (e.g.,State,counties,cities).
State if applicable)& applicant's control number 13. Self-explanatory.
(if applicable).
3. State use only(if applicable). _ 14. List the applicant's Congressional District and
4. If this application is to continue or revise an any District(s)airected by the program or project.
existing award, enter present Federal identifier . 15. Amount requested or to be contributed during
number.If for is new project,leave blank.
the first funding/budget period by each
S. Legal name of applicant, name of primary contributor,Value of in-kind contributions
organizational unit which will undertake the should be included on appropriate lines as
assistance activity, complete address of the applicable. V the action will.result in a dollar
applicant,and name and telephone number of the change to an existing award, indicate onfv the
person to contact on matters related to this amount of the change. For decreases,enclose the
application. amounts in parentheses. if both basic and
6. Enter Employer Identification Number'(EI?�)as supplemental-amounts are included, show
breakdown on an attached sheet-
assigned by the Internal Revenue Service. For multiple
program funding,use totals and show breakdown
7. Enter the appropriate letter in the space using same categories as item 15.
provided.
8. Check•appropriate box and enter appropriate 16. Applicants should contact the State Single Point
letter(s)in the space(s)provided: of Contact (SPOC) for Federal Executive Order
12372 to determine whether the application is
—"New"means a new assistance award. subject to the State intergovernmental review
—"Continuation"means an extension for an process•
additional funding/budget period for a project
with a projected completion date. 17. This question applies to the applicant organi
R.evision"meansanychangeintheFederal cation, not the persoif who signs as the
Government's financial obligation or authorized representative. Categories of debt.
contingent liability from an existing include.delinquent audit disallowances, loans.
obligation. and taxes.
9. Name of Federal agency from which assistance is
being requested with this application. 18. To be signed by the authorized representative of
the applicant..A copy of the governing body's
I0. Use the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance authorization for you to sign this application as
number and title of the program under which officiaLreprtsentative-must be on file in the
assistance is requested. applicant's office.(Certain Federal agencies may
11. Enter a brief descriptive title of the project. if require that this authorization be submitted as
more than one program is involved, you should part of the application.)
append an explanation on a separate sheet. If
appropriate (e.g...cons truction or real property
projects),attach a map showing project location.
For preapplications, use a separate sheet to
provide a summary description of this project.
SF 424 (Aly A-W aKA
Y
Federal Register / Vol..58,-.No. 244 / Wednesday, December 22, 1993 / Notices 67829
W
uj UJ '
� W
Q�
a' O OC
ir4m a
Jr. .
C4 m M m N
- � w v► � vy Z
o zoC0
z $ OOv,
xCC Jin
O.W
wQ
Z W Q: W
O
A� L.
� N
E Z WOW D
L N NaQ,
Q� a
E 0< m W
a a
C .
0
Ci a UJ a
wLq Qw .
U 0 u W O w
W �
C ON W m W
_ = C
H W N
' O Z N - C
Zen m
O �° 2 Z: CC Q o
'E P yoz .c
G J W Q W
oa
P4, W w
= W
W v1 N W }
Z: J
ZQ W W x
m a: W O w
M W ►H+
0 U. g .
0
La
°i w .; m
�go C)
w w : ac
o °w
g
p z o• OC•f0 4+ c H H V p a w F PV u-4 H Ca
V W Ca %4 Z un 7's U O
w 94
E (� W U Z w 04 S M N O N 1% O H ~
S FQ�
UJ O u W M 64 C N H H w H
Ci o[ a P at z u° _ a.c a ova
N. Ga w' E-4w 'n u o w.4
' ^ 4 (a H A H W
}G±7 N W [O+ Iii K y
• • 4 W V D W w V
rf N v v v r v v •
I
• ti
67824 Federal Register 1 Vol. 58, No. 244 /'Wednesday, December,22. 1993 / Notices
APPENDIX No. .3
U.S. Cities
Ranked By#Below Poverty
BELOW PERCENT
POVERTY. POVERTY OF U.S.
CITY STATE LEVEL POPULATION RATE POVERTY
1 New York city New York 1,384,994 7,322,564 18.9% 4.098%
2 Los Angeles city California 643,809 - 3.485,398 18.5% 1.905%
3 Chicago city Illinois 592,298 2.783,726 21.3% 1.752%
4 Houston city - Texas 332,974 1.630,672 20.4% 0.985%
5 Detroit city Michigan 328,467 1.027,974 32.0% 0.972%
6 Philadelphia city Pennsylvania 313,374 1,585,577 19.8% 0.92r/o
7 San Jian Municipio Puerto Rico 208,319 437,745 47.6% 0.616%
8 San Antonio city Texas 207,161 935,927 22.1% 0.613%
9 Dallas city Texas 177,790 1.006,83# 17.7% 0.526%
10 Baltimore city Maryland 156,284 736,014 21.2% 0.462%
11 New Orleans city Louisiana 152,042 496'938 30.696 0.450%
12 San Diego city Calif ornia 142,382 1.110.549 12.8% 0,421%
13 Cleveland city Ohio 142,217 505,616 28.1% 0.421%
14 Phoenix city Arizona 137,406 983,403 14.0% 0.407%
15 Memphis city Tennessee 136,123 610,337 22.3% 0.403%
16 Milwaukee city Wisconsin 135,583 628.088 21.6% 0.401%
17 EI Paso city Texas 128,886 515,342 25.0% 0.381%
18 Ponce Municipio Puerto Rico 115,720 187,749 . 61.6% 0.3421%
19 Miami city Florida 109,594 358,548 30.6% 0.324%
20 Columbus city Ohio 105,494 632.958 16.7% 0.3120/6
21 Atlanta city Georgia 102,364 394,017 26.0% 0.303%
22 Boston city Massachusetts 102,092 574.283 17.8% 0.302%
23 Washington city Dist. of Col. 96,278 606,900 15.9% 0.285%
24 St. Louis city Missouri 95271 396,685 24.0% 0.282%
25 Bayamon Municipio Puerto Rico 94,381 220,262 42.6% 0.279%
26 San Francisco city California 90,019 723,959 12.4% 0.266%
27 Indianapolis city Indiarra 89,831 731,321 12.3% 0.26616
28 Cincinnati city Ohio 85,319 364,040 23.4% 0.252%
29 Fresno city California 83,108 354,202 23.5% 0.246%
30 Buffalo.city New York 81,601 .328,123 24.9% 0.241%
31 Austin city Texas 80,369 465.577 17.3% 0.238%
32 Jacksonville city Florida 80,016 635,230 12.6% 0.237%
33 Tucson city Arizona 79,287 405,390 • 19.6% 0.235%
34 Denver city Colorado 78,515 467,610 16.8% 0.232%
35 FortWorth city Texas 75,597 447,619 16.9% 0.224%
36 Pittsburgh city Pennsylvania 75,172 369,879 20.3% 0.2229'0
37 San Jose city ' cafifomia 71,676 •782,225 9.2% 0.212%
38 Newark city New Jersey 70,702 275,221 25.7% 0.209%
39 Long Beach city- California 69,694 429,433 16.20,6 0.206%
40 Oklahoma City city Oklahoma 69,096 . 444,730 15.5% 0.20490
41 Oakland city California 68.781 372,242- 18.5% 0.203%
42 Minneapolis city Minnesota 65.556 368,383 17.8% 0.194%
43 Kansas City city Missouri 65,381 435,141 15.0% 0.193%
44 Birmingham city Alabama 64,572 265,852 24.3% 0.191%
45 Nashville-Davidson Tennessee 62,497 488,518 12.80/6 1.185%
Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 22, 1993 / Notices 67825
46 Toledo city Ohio 62.426 332,943 18.7% 0.185%
47 Sacramento city California 62,232 369,365 16.8% . 0.184%
48 Portland city Oregon 62,058 437,398 14.20A 0.184%
49 Seattle city Washington 61,681 516,259 11.9% 0.182%
50 Louisville city Kentucky 59,144 269,157 220% 0.175%
51 Baton Rouge city Louisiana 54,669 219,531 24.9% . 0.162%
52 Tulsa city Oklahoma 53,768 367,193 14.6% 0.159%
53 Albuquerque city New Mexico 52,903 384,736 13.8% 0.157%
54 Tampa city Florida 52,557 280,015 18.8% 0.155%
55 Rochester city New York 52,237 231,636 226% 0.155%
56 Santa Ana city Ealifo i1i8 51,833 293,742 17.6% 0.153%
57 Corpus Christi city Texas 50,525 257.453 19.6% 0.149%
58 Shreveport city Louisiana 49,215. 198,528 24.8% 0.146%
59 Dayton city Ohio 46,480 182.044 258% 0.138%
60 Laredo city Texas 45,126 122,899 36.7% 0.134%
61 Akron city. Ohio 44,544 223,019 20.0% 0.132%
62 St. Paul city Minnesota 44,115 272235 162% 0.131%
63 Stockton city California . 43,990 210,943 20.9% 0:130%
64 Norfolk city Virginia 43,944 261,229 16.8% 0.130%
65 Jackson city Mississippi 43216 196,594 22.0% 0.128%
66 Mobile city _ Alabama 42,838 196,278 21.8% 0.1270/9
67 Brownsville city Texas 42,594 98,962 43.0% 0.1260/9
68 Jersey City city New Jersey 42,539 228,537 18.6°,6 0.126%
69 Charlotte city North Carolina 42,312 396,003 10.7% 0.125%
70 Flint city Michigan 42218 140,761 30.0% 0.125%
71 Omaha city Nebraska 41,357 335,795 12,3% 0.122%.
72 Richmond city Virginia 40,103 203,056 19.7% 0.119%
73 Wichita city - Kansas 37,321 304,011. 123% 0.110%
74 Hartford city Connecticut 36,397 139,739 26.0% 0.108%
75 San Bernardino city California 36,174 164,164 22.0% 0.107
76 Lubbock city Texas 34,593 186,281 18.60/a 0.102%
77 Syracuse city New York 34,402 163,860 21.0°•6 0.102%
78 Providence city Rhode Island 34,120 .160,728 212°,6 0.101%
79 Gary city Indiana 33,964 116,646 29.1% 0.100%
80 Hialeah city Florida _ 33,830 188,004 18.0% 0.100%
81 .Montgomery city Alabama 32,778 187,106 17.5% 0.097%
82'Knoxville city Tennessee 32,189 _ 165,121 19.5% 0.095%
83 Columbus city Georgia 31.811 178,701 17.8% 0.094%.
84-St. Petersburg city Florida 31,475 .238,629 1320/6 0.093%
85 Camden city. New Jersey 30,588 87,492 35.0% 0.090%
86 Springfield city- Massachusetts 30,241 156,983 19.3% 0.089%.
87 Lexington-Fayette Kentucky 30,108 225,366 . 13.4% 0.089'.6
88 Colorado Springs city Colorado 29,973 281,140 10.7% 0.089%
89 Honolulu ' Hawaii 29,873 365,272 8.2% 0.088%
90 Spokane city Washington 29,863 177,196 16.9% 0.088%
91 Savannah city Georgia 29,854 137,557 21.7% 0.088% '
92 Grand Rapids city Michigan 29,103 189,126 15.4% 0.086%
93 Las Vegas city Nevada 29,084 258,295 11.3% 0.0860,6
94 Madison city Wisconsin 28,640 191,262 15.0% 0.085%
95 Tacoma city Washington 28,632 176,664 ' 1621% 0.085°6
96 Anaheim city California. 27,933 266,406 10.5% 0.083%
• 67820 . . Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 22; 1993 / Notices
97 Waco city Texas 27,767 103,590 26.8% 0mno
I 98 McAllen city Texas . 27,236 84,021. 32.4% 0.081%
99 Youngstown city Ohio 27,109 95,732 28.3% 0.080%
100 Mesa city _ Arizona 27,087 288,091 9.4% 0.080%
101 Chattanooga city Tennessee 26,803 152488 17.6% 0.079%
102 Kansas City city Kansas 26,433 149,768 17.6% 0.078%
103 Riverside city California ' 26,280 716,505 11.6% 0.078%
104 Amarillo city Texas 26,058 157,615 16.5% 0.077%
105 Bakersfield city California 25,782 174,820 14.7% 0.076%
_106 Paterson city New Jersey 25,677 140,891 18.2% 0.076%
107 Salt Lake City city Utah 25,651 159,936 16.0% 0.076%
108 Tallahassee city Florida 25,518 . 124,773 20.5% 0.075%
-109 Glendale city lif is 25,484 180,038 142% 0.075%
I 110 New Haven city Connecticut 25,481 130,474 19.5% 0.075%
111' Little Rock city Arkansas 25,193 175,781 14.3% 0.075%
112 Macon city - Georgia 25,178 106,640 23.6% 0.074%
113 Fort Lauderdale city Florida 24,793 , 149,377 16.6°,6 0.073%
114 Cansing city Michigan 24,513 127,321 19.3% 0.073%
115 Compton city California 24,460 90,454 27.0% 0.072%
116 Worcester city Massachusetts 24,228 169,759' 14.3% 0.072%
I 117 Des Moines city Iowa 24,137 193,187 12.5% 0.071%
_118 Orlando city Florida 23,797 164,693 14.4% 0.070%
119 Pomona city California 23,648 131,723 18.0% 0.070%
i 120 Beaumont city Texas 23,494 114,323 20.6°,6 0.070%
.121 Bridgeport city Connecticut 23,463 141,686 16.6% 0.069%
:122 EI Monte city CaVornia 23,446 106,209 22.1% 0.069%
123 Provo city Utah 23,434 86,848 27.0% 0.069%
124 Springfield city Missouri 23,223 . 140,494 16.5% 0.069% -
:125 Newport News city Virginia 23,169 : 170,045 13.6% 0.069I%
:126 Miami Beach city Florida 22,993 92,639 24.8% 0.068% ,
X127 Raleigh cityNorth Carolina 22,942 207,951 11.0% 0.068%
:128 Virginia Beach city Virginia 22,307 393,069. 5.7% 0.0660/a
129 Saginaw city. Michigan 21,647 69,512. 31.1% 0.064%
130 Arlington city Texas 21,272 .261,763 8.1% 0.063%
131 Albany city Georgia 21,011 78,122 26.9% 0.062%
j 132 Modesto city Calffomia 20,930 164,730' 12.70% 0.062°,6
I 133 Pueblo city ' Colorado 20,778 98,640 21.1% 0.061%
134 Winston-Salem city North Carolina 20,713 143,485 14.4% 0.061%
135 Lincoln city Nebraska 20,521 191,972 10.7°6 0.061%
:136 Peoria city Illinois 20,516' 113,504 18.1% 0.061%
•137 Yonkers:city New York 20,436 188,082 10.9% 0.060%
=138 Greenstroro.city North Carolina 20,214 183,521 t 1.0% 0.060%
139 Erie city-, Pennsylvania 20,192 108,718 18.6% 0.060%
140 Lafayette.city. Louisiana 19,898 94,460 21.1% 0.059%
141 Gainesville city Florida 19,860 84,770 23.40,6 . 0.059%
142 Fort Wayne city Indiana 19,531 173,072 11.3%. 0.058%
143 Monroe.city. Louisiana, 19,241 54,909 35.0% 0.057%
144 Durham'city North Carolina 19,163 136,594 14.0% 0.057%
145 Pasadena city Cal•ornia 19,043 131,591 14.5% 0.056%
146 Lawrence city Massachusetts 18,946 70207 . 27.0% 0.056%
147 Kalamazoo city Michigan 18,621 80,277 23.2% 0.055%
Federal Register / Vol. 58.0 No. 244 / Wednesday. December 22, 1993 / Notices .6782;
148 Tempe city Arizona 18,603 141,865 13.1% 0.055%
149 Tuscaloosa city Alabama, - 18,455• 77.759 23.7% 0.055%
150 Pontiac city Michigan 18,222 71,166 25.6% 0.054%
151 Eugene city. Oregon 18,176- lIZ669 16.1% 0.054%
152 RocMordcity Illinois _ 18,127 139,426 13.0% 0.054%
153 Huntsville•c'ity Alabama 18,093 159,866 11.3% 0.054%
154 Portsmouth city Virginia 17,920- 103,907 1720% 0.053%
155 Lowell city Massachusetts. 17,900 103,439 17.3 % 0.053%
156 Canton city _ Ohio - 17,864 84,161 212% 0.053%
_ 157 Ontario city California. 17,853. 133,179 . 13.4% 0.053%
158 Evansville city Indiana 17,812 .126,272 14.1% 0.053%
159 Inglewood city _. alifo 17,806 109,602 162% 0.053%
160 Oxnard city " California - 17,608 14Z192 12.4% 0.052%
161 Elizabeth city New Jersey .17,451 110,002 15.9% 0.052%
162 Odessa city Texas 17,205 89,783 192% 0.051%
163 Albany city New York 16,903 101,082 16.7% 0.050%
164 Glendale city Arizona 16,756 148,134, 11.3% • 0.050%
165 Pasadena city Texas 16,724 119,363 14.0% 0.049%
166 Columbia city South Carolina 16,652 98,052 17.0°,6 0.049%
167 Salinas city California 16,652 108,777 15.3% 0.049%
168 New Bedford city Massachusetts 16,430 99,922 16.4% 0.049%
169 Berkeley.city California: 16,370 102724 15.9% 0.048%
170 Port Arthur city Texas .16,344 58,724 27.8% 0.048%
17.1 Aurora city Colorado. 16,288 222,110 7.3% 0.04896
172 Charleston city South Carolina 16.227 80,414 20.2% 0.048%
173 Irving city Texas 16,209 155,037 10.5% 0.0480/9
174 Lake Charles city Louisiana 16,172 70,580 22.9% 0.048%,
175 College Station city Texas 15,648 52,456 29.8% 0.046%
176 Ann Arbor city Michigan 15,624 109,592 14.3% 0.046%
177 Anchorage city Alaska 15,614 226,338 6.9% 0.046%
178 Trenton city New Jersey 15,348 88,675 17.3% 0.045%
179 Pine Bluff city Arkansas 15,283 57,140 26.7% 0.045%
180 Abilene city Texas15,244 106,665 14.3°,6 0.045°,6
181 Roanoke city •Virginia 15,238 96,397 15.8%. 0.045%
182 Muncie city Indiana 15,173. 71,035 21.4%. 0.045%
183 Reno city- Nevada. 15,085 133,850 11.3% 0.045%
184 South Gate city a'o •a 14,956 86,284 1.7.396 0.044%
185 Wichita Falls city Texas 14,896 96,259 155% 0.044%
186 Reading city' Pennsylvania 14,857 78,380 19.0% 0.044%
187 South Bend city Indiana 14,854. 105,536 14.1% 0.044%
188 San Angelo city" Texas 14,737 84,474 17.4% .0.044%
189 Garden Grove city Califomia 14,652 143,050 1020/6 0.043%
190 Bloomington city Indiana 14,462 60,633 23.9% 0.043%
191 Davenponcity Iowa . 14,452 95,333 152% 0.043%
192 Boulder city Colorado 14,393 83,312 17.3% 0.043%
193 Utica city New York 14,308 68,637 20.8% 0.042%
194 Salem.city Oregon 14,300 107,786 13.3% 0.042%
195 Topeka city Kansas' 14,292 119,883 11.9°6 0.042%
196 Tyler city Texas 14,251 75,450, 18.9% 0.042%
197 Garland city ; Texas 14,062 180,635 7.80/9 0.042%
198 Harrisburg city Pennsylvania 14,002 52,376 26.7% 0.041%
67828 Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 244.'./ Wednesday, December 22, 1993 / Notices
199 Springfield city Ohio 13,999 70;487 19.9% 0.041%
i 200 Lorain city ' Ohio 13,980 71.245, 19.6% 0.041%
4 201 Lawrence city Kansas 13,928 65,657 2120/6 0.041%
202 Fort Collins city Colorado 13,910 87,758 15.9% ' 0.041%
203,Richmond city California 13,909 87,425 . 15.9% 0.041%
204 Galveston city Texas 13,891 59,072. 23.5% 0.041%
205 Las Cruces city New Mexico 13,872 62,126 22.3% 0.041%
206 Hampton city Virginia 13,831 133,793 10.3% 0.041%
207 Merced city California 13,804 56;216 24.6% 0.041%
.208 Fayetteville city North Carolina 13,764. 75,695. 18.2% 0.041%
209 Duluth city Minnesota 13,578 85,493 15.9% 0.040%
210 Huntington Park city California 13,508 56,065 24.1% 0.040%
211 Chesapeake city . Virginia 13,329 151,976 8.8% 0.039%
212 Lynwood city California 13,291 61,945 21.5% 0.039%
213 Hollywood city Florida 13,264 121,697 10.9% 0.039%
214 North Charleston city South Carolina 13,248 70,161 18.9% 0.039%
215 Columbia city Missouri 13,195 69,101 19.1% 0.039%
216 Racine city Wisconsin 13,136 84,298 15.6% 0.039%
217 Visalia city California. 13,075 75,636 17.3% 0.039%
218 Springfield city. Illinois 13,065 105,227 . 12.4% 0.039%
219 Chula Vista city California 13,036. 135,163 9.6% 0.039%
220 Daytona Beach city Florida 13,026 61,921 21.0% 0.039%
221 Fall River city Massachusetts 13,017 92,703 14.0% 0.039%
222 Allentown city Pennsylvania 12,999 105,090 12.4% 0.038%
223 Waterbury city Connecticut 12,922 108,961 11.9% 0.038%
224 Decatur city Illinois 12,855 83,885 15.3% 0.038%
225 Oceanside city California 12,823 128,398 10.0% 0.038%
226 Midland city Texas 12,774 89,443 14.3% 0.038%
227 Lynn city Massachusetts 12,756 . 81,245. 15.7°/a 0.038%
228 East Orange city New Jersey 12,699 73,552 17.3% 0.038%
229 Champaign city Illinois 12,625 63,502 19.9% 0.037%
230 Green Bay city Wisconsin 12,607 96,466 13.1% 0.037%
231 Wilmington.city Delaware 12,598 71,529 17.6% 0.037%
232 Lawton city- Oklahoma 12,522 80,561 15.5% 0.037%
233 Brockton city Massachusetts 12,396 92,788 13.496 0.037%
234 Denton city Texas 12,273 66270 18.5% 0.036%
235 Iowa City city Iowa 12,074 59,738 202% 0.036%
236 Huntington city• West Virginia 12,021 54,844 21.90/9 0.036%
1 237 Escondido city California 12,016 108,635 11.1% 0.036%
238 Scranton city.', Pennsylvania . 11,907'. 81,805 14.6% 0.035%-
239 Bryan city Texas 11,887 55,002. 21.6% 0.035%
240 Alhambra city California 11,819 82,106. 14.4% 0.035%
241 Wilmington city North Carolina 11,780 55,530 212% 0.035%
242 Longview city' - Texas 11,637 70,316 16.5% 0.034%
243 Boise City city• Idaho 11.598 - 125,738. 9.20% 0.034%
244 St.Joseph cityMissouri 11,596 71,852 16.1% 0.034%
245 Niagara Falls city New York 11,387 : 61-840. 18.4%•.. 0.034%
246 Pompano Beach city Florida 11,295 72,411 15.69'0 0.033%
247 Hammond city .. Indiana 11,284 84,236 13.4% 0.033%
248 Norman city Oklahoma 11,221 80,071 14.0% 0.033%
249 East Lansing city Michigan 11211 50,677 221% 0.033%
• •Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 244 / Wednesday, December"22, 1993 /. Notices 6782
250 EI Cajon city California 11,184. 88,693 126A 0.0331n,
.
251 Waterloo city Iowa 11,067 66.467 16.7%. 0.0331/
252 Lancaster city Pennsylvania_ 11,05955,551 19.91/ 0.033%
253 Greeley city. Colorado 11,044 60,536 18.2% 0.033%
254 Fullerton city California 10,985 114,144 9.6% 0.032%
255.Pensacola city Florida 10,832 58,165 18.6% 0.032%
256 Sioux City city Iowa 10,801 - 80,505 13.4% 0.0320/a
257 Yakima city Washington 10,742 54,831 19.6% 0.032%
258 Baldwin Park city California 10,727 69,330 15.5% 0.032%
259 Hayward city California 10,640 111,498 9.51/ 0.031%
260 Santa Barbara,city al' 10,588 85,571 12.4% 0.031%
261 West Palm Beach city Florida 10,578 67,643 15.6% 0.031%
262 Cedar Rapids city Iowa 10,567 108,751 9.71/1 0.031%
263 Charleston city West Virginia 10,560 57,287 18.4% 0.031%
264 Independence city Missouri 10,557 112,301 9.4% 0.031%
265 Union City city New Jersey 10,513 58,012 18.1% 0.031%
266 Ogden city Utah 10,482 63,909 16.4% 0.031%
267 North Little Rock city Arkansas 10,386 61,741 . 16.8% 0.031%
268 Anderson city Indiana 10,320 59,449 17.4% 0.031%
269 Binghamton city New York 10,291 53,008 19.4% 0.030%
270 Aurora city Illinois 10,286 99,581 10.3% 0.030%
271 Victoria city Texas 10,227 55,000 18.60% 0.030%
272 Clearwater city Florida 10,203 98,773 10.3% 0.030%
273 Hamilton city Ohio 10,179 61,368 16.6% 0.030%
274 Santa Maria city California 10,172 61284 16.6% 0.030%
275 Rosemead city California 10,149 51,638 19.7% 0.030%
276 Baytown city Texas 10,148 63,838 15.9% 0.030%
277 Kenner city Louisiana 10,146 72,033 14.1% 0.030%
278 Terre Haute city Indiana 10,140 57,483 17.61/ 0.030°.6
279 National City city California 10,092 54249 18.51/ 0.0301/
280 Warren city Ohio 9,949 50,793 19.6% 0.029%
281 Kenosha city Wisconsin 9,923 80,375 12.3% 0.029%
282 West Valley City city Utah 9,913 86,976 11.4% 0.029%
283 Monterey Park city California 9,900 60,738 16.3%' 0.029%
284 Lynchburg city : :Virginia 9,889 . 66,049 15.0% 0.029%
285 Billings city Montana 9,887 _ 81,151 122% 0.029%
286 Grand Prairie city Texas .9,883 99,613 9.9°/ 0.029%
287 LaCrosse city Wisconsin 9,881 51,003 19.4% 0.029%
288.Moreno Valley city California 9,870 118,779. 8.31/ . 0.029%
289 Fort Smith city Arkansas 9,869 72.798 13.6% 0.029%
290 Fontana city California 9,867 87,535 11.3% 0.029%
291 Hawthorne city California 9,833 71,349 13.8% 0.029%
292 Eau Claire city Wisconsin 9,818 56,930 172% 0.029%
293 Owensboro city Kentucky 9,804 53,549 18.3% 0.029%
294 Danville city Virginia 9,795 53,056 18.5% 0.029%
295 Passaic city New Jersey 9,794 58,041 16.9% 0.029%
296 Battle Creek city. Michigan 9,643 53,540 18.0% 0.029%
297 Greenville.city' South Carolina 9,605 58,282 . . . 16.5% 0.028%
298 Dearborn city . Michigan ' 9,604 89,286 10.8% 0.028%
299 Fargo city North Dakota 9,603 74,115 13.0% 0.0281/
300 Lakeland city Florida 9,483 70,576. 13.4% 0.028%.
67830 Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 244-:/ Wednesday, Decembei 22";-1993 / Notices
301 Asheville city North Carolina 9,442 61,654 15.3% 0.028%
302 Joliet city Illinois 9,419 76,836 123°,6. 0.028%
303 Schenectady city New York 9,399 65,566 14.3% 0.0280/a
304 Huntington Beach city Caifornia 9,367 181,519 5.2% 0.028% '
305 Lakewood city Colorado 9,348 -- - 126,481 7.4% 0.028%
306 Redding city California 9,343 66,462 -14.1%'. 0.028%
307 Warren city Michigan 9,303 . 144,864 6.4% 0.028%
308 New Britain city Connecticut 9,289 -75.491 12.3% 0.027%
309 Santa Rosa city California' 9,269' 113,313 8.2°/16 0.0270/6
310 Cicero town Illinois 9,269 67,436 13.7% 0.0270,6
311 Altoona city Pennsylvania 9,218 51,881 17.8% 0.027%
312 Kileen city Texas 9,146 63,608 14.4% 0.02711/6
313 Lancaster city California 9,128 97.291 -9.41% 0.027%
314 Clarksville city Tennessee 9,093 75,494 12.0% 0.02711/o
315 Arden-Arcade CDP California 9,063 92,040 9.8% 0.027%
316 Vallejo city California 9,007 109,199 8.2% 0.027°6
317 Dothan city Alabama 8,980 53,583 16.8°,6 0.0270,6
318 Suffolk city Virginia 8,864 52.141 17.0% 0.026%
319 Westminster city California 8,859 78,118 - 11.3% 0.026%
320 Cambridge city Massachusetts 8,794 95,802 9.2°/16 0.026°,6
321 Portland city Oregon 8,783 64,358 13.6% 0.0260,6
322 Rialto city Cal4ornia 8,720 72,388 12.0% 0.02646
323 Chandler city Arizona 8,701 90,524 9.611/6 0.026°,6
324 Manchester city New Hampshire 8,694 99,567 8.7% 0.026%
325 Bethlehem city Pennsylvania 8,626 71,428 121% 0.026°/6
326 Yuma city Arizona 8,621 54,923 15.7°,6 0.026%
327 Costa Mesa city California 8,614 96,357 8.9% 0.025%
328 High Point city North Carolina 8,600 69,394 124% 0.025°,6
329 Orange city Califomia 8,559 110 ,658 _ 7.7% 0.025%
` 330 Norwalk city California 8,504 94279 9.0°,6 0.025%
331 Somerville city Massachusetts -8,492 76.210 11.1% . 0.025%
332 Mansfield city Ohio 8,474 50,627 16.7%. 0.025%
.333 Troy city Now York 8,440 54,269 15.6°,6 0.025%
334 Taylor city Michigan 8,325 70,811 11.8% 0.025%
335 Montebello city California 8,246 59;564 13.8% 0.024%
336 Vista city California 8,230 71,872 11.5% 0.024%
337 Sioux Falls city South Dakota 8,227 100,814 8.2% 0.024%
338 Everett.city Washington 8,217 69,961 11.7% 0.024%
339 Bossier City city Louisiana 8,110 52.718 15.4% 0.024%
340 Bellingham city Washington 8,033 52,278 - 15.4% 0.024%
341 Santa Monica city Cal'rforn 7,979. 86,905. 9.2% 0.024%
342 Great'Falls city Montana 7,952 - 55,097 14.4% - 0.024%
343 Mount Vernon city New York 7,823 67,153 11.6% 0.023%
344 Mesquite city - Texas 7,771 .101,484 7.7% 0.023%
345 Alexandria city • Virginia 7,732 111,183 7.00,6 0.023%.
346 Burbank city California 7,723 93,643 8.2% .0.023%
347 Elyria city Ohio 7,661 56,746 . 13.5% 0.02346
348 Pawtucket city Rhode island 7,632 72,644 10.5%.. 0.023%
349 Gastonia city North Carolina 7,622 54,732 13.9% 0.023%
350 Scottsdale city Arizona 7,583 130,069 5.8% 0.022%
351 Melbourne city Florida 7,475 59,646 12.5% 0.022°/6
Federal Register /NVola 58, No. 244 / Wednekday, December 22, 1993 / Notices 6783
352 Concord city California 7349
1,348 6.6% _ 0 022%
353 West.Covina city ' California 7,347 96,086 7.6°6 O.QW1.
354 Fremont city California 7,316 173,339 4.2% 0.022%
355 Rapid City city South Dakota 7,257 54,523 .13.3% 0.021%
356 Downey city California 7,189 . 91.4441 -. 7.90/9 0.021%
357 Irvine city. . California 6,948 110,330 6.3% 0.021%
358 Torrance city California 6,791. 133,107 5.1% 0.020%
359 Pico Rivera city Californi 6,785 59,177 11.5% 0.020%
360 Stamford city Connecticut' 6,728 108,056 6.240 0.020%
361 Santa Fe city New Mexico 6,707 55,993 12.0% 0.020%
362 Daly Citycity California 6,560 92 315 . 7.1% . 0.019%
363 Sarasota city Florida 6,500 50,978 12.8% .019%
•
.364 Council Bluffs city Iowa 6,485 54,315 11.9% 0.0190/0
365 Evanston city Illinois 6,409 73,233 8.80% 0.019%
366 Waukegancity Illinois 6,404 69,392 9.2% 0.019%
_ 367 Oshkosh city Wisconsin 6,325 55,006 11.5°,6 0.019%
368 Lodi city California 6,284 51,874 12.1% 0.019%
369 Corona city California 6,278 76,095 8.3% 0.019%
370 Hesperia city Calfforni 6,246 50,418 124% 0.018%
371 Kendall CDP Florida 6,094 87,271 7.0% 0.018%
372 Palmdale city California 6077 68,917 8.8% 0.018%
373.San Buenaventura (Venter California 6,017 92,575 6.5°k 0.018%
374 Orem city Utah 6,012 67,561 8.9°,6 0.018%
375 Dubuque city Iowa 5,958 57,546 10.4% 0.018%
376 Westland city Michigan 5,928 84,724 7.0% 0.018%
377 Beltflower city California 5,862 61,815 -9.5% 0.017%
378 Elgin city Illinois 5,841 77,010 7.6% 0.017%
379 Whittier city California 5,811 77,671 7.5% 0.017%
380 Midwest City city Oklahoma 5,807 52,267 11.1% 0.017%
.381 Carson city California 5,790 83,995 6.9% 0.017%
382 Vineland city New Jersey 5,739 54,780 10.5% 0.0170/9
383 Quincy city Massachusetts 5,707. 84,985 6.7% 0.017%-
3S4 Santa Clara city California ' 5.657 93,613 6.0°,6 0.017%
385 Antioch city California -5,612 62.195 9.0% 0.017%
386 Gresham city Oregon 5,550 68235 8.1% 0.016%
387 Arvada city Colorado 5,543 89,090 6.2°, 0.016%
388 Rancho Cucamonga city Ca1•rfomia : 5,516 101,409 5.4% 0.016%
389 Fairfield city California 5,492 77,211 7.1% 0.016%
390 Buena Park city California 5,468 68.784 7.9% 0.016%
391 Sunnyvale city California 5,461 117,229 4.7% 0.016%
392 Chicopee city Massachusetts 5,455 56,632 9.6% 0.016%
393 Palm Bay.city * Florida 5,428 62,6328.7% 0.0161/9
394 Bayonne city. New.Jersey 5,391 61,444 8.8% 0.016°,6
395 Rochester city Minnesota' .5,380 70,745 7.6% 0.0161/6
.396 Redwood:City city California 5,328 66,072 8.1% 0.0160/0
397 Redlands city California. 5,232 60,394 8.7% 0.015%
398 San Mateo city California . 5,186 85,486 6.1%. 0.015%
399 Clovis city Calrf mo is . 5,173 50,323 10.3% 0.015%
400 Nashua city New Hampshire• 5,135 79,662- 6.4% 0.015%
401 Cheyenne city Wyoming 5,105 50,008 102% 0.015%
402 Lakewood city Ohio 5,043 59,718 8.4% 0.015%
• r
Z
67832 - Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 22, 1993 / Notices
403 Bloomington city Illinois 4,969 51,972 9.6% 0.015%
404 New Rochelle city New York 4,937 67265 7.3%• 0.015%
405 Westminster city Colorado 4,897 74,623 6.6% 0.014°
406 Upland city California 4,878 63,374 7.7% 0.014%
407 Bellevue city Washington 4,807 86,878 5.5% 0.014%
408 Largo city Florida - 4,788 65,690 7.3% 0.014%
409 La Mesa city California 4,765 52,931 9.09', 0.014% .
410 Cranston city Rhode Island 4,715- 76,060 6.2% 0.014%
411 Napa city Calfforni 4,693 61,842 7.6% 0.01490
412 Alameda city California 4,662 76,459 6.1% 0.014%
413 Henderson city Nevada 4,555 64,942 7.0% 0.013%
414 Encinitas city California 4,519 55,386 8.296 0.013%
415 Wyoming city Michigan 4,498 63,891 7.0% 0.013%
416 Thornton city Colorado 4,492 55,031- 8.2% 0.013%
417 Cleveland Heights city Ohio 4,482 54,052 8.3% 0.013%
418 Haverhill city Massachusetts 4,418 51,418 8.6% 0.013%
419 Cape'Coral city Florida 4,391 74,991 5.9°/6 0.013%
420 Southfield city Michigan 4,371 . 75,728 5.80/a 0.013%
421 Thousand Oaks city California 4,340- 104,352 4.2% 0.013%
422 Appleton city Wisconsin 4,333 65,651 6.6% 0.013%
423 Carlsbad city _ California 4,284 63,126 6.8°/6 0.013%
424 Plano city Texas 4,279 128,679 3.3% 0.013%
425 Meriden city Connecticut 4,266 59,479 7.2% 0.013%
426 Janesville city Wisconsin 4,262 _ 52,133 8.2% 0.013%
427 Brooklyn Park city Minnesota 4,221 56,381 7.5% 0.012%
428 Euclid city Ohio 4,201 _ 54,875 7.7% 0.012%
429 Mountain View city California 4,157 67,460 6.2% 0.012%
430 Sunrise city Florida 4,156 64,407 6.5% 0.012%
431 Sterling Heights city Michigan 4,153, 117,810 3.5% 0.012%
432 Coral Springs city Florida 4,087 79,443 5.1% 0.012910
433 La Habra city California 4,082 51,266 8.0% 0.012%
434-Warwick city Rhode Island 4,078 85,427 4.890 * 0.012%
435 Santa Clarita city California 4,045. 110,642 3.7% 6.012%
436 Norwalk city Connecticut 4,034 78,331 5.1% 0.01290
437 Malden city Massachusetts 4,029 53,884 7:5'/6 0.012%*
438 Longmont city. Colorado 3,984 51,524 7.7% 0.01296
439 Peoria city - Arizona 3,914 50,618 7.7% 0.01296
440 Vacaville city California 3,872 71,479 5.4% 0.011%
j 441 Medford city Massachusetts 3,834- 57,407 6.7% 0.011%
442 Sparks city. Nevada ' 3,797 53,367. -.7.1% . 0.011%
443 Chino city California 3.772' 59,682 6.396 0.011%
444 Broken Arrow city Oklahoma .3,761 58,043 6.5% 0.011%
445 Newport Beach city California 3,731 66,643 5.6% 0.011%
446 Edmond city Oklahoma 3,730 52,315 7.1%. 0.011%
447 Carrollton city Texas 3,695 82,169 4.596 0.011%
448 Danbury city Connecticut 3,599 65,585 5.5% ' 0.011%
449 Lakewood city Californi 3,559 73,557 4.8% 0.011%
450 Parma city Ohio 3,541 87,876 4.096 0.010%
451 Simi Valley city Calffornia 3,536 -100,217 3.5% 0.010%
I 452 Union City city California 3,461 53,762 6.4% 0.010%
453 St. Charles city Missouri 3,454 54,555 6.396 0.010%
Federal Register / Vol. -58, No. 244 J Wednesday,'December 22, 1993 J Notices -6783)
:454 Beaverton city Oregon 3,402 53,310 6.4% 0.010%
455.San Leandro city California 3,375 68,223 4.90/a 0.010%
456 Waukesha city Wisconsin 3,359 56,958 5.90/6 0.010%
457 East Providence city Rhode Island 3,356- 50,380 6.7% 0.010%
458 Redondo Beach city California__ 3,355 60,167 5.6% 0.010%
459 Tustin city California 3,339 50,689 6.6% o.010.,
460 Newton city Massachusetts 3,335 82,585 4.0% 0.010%
461 Clifton city New Jersey 3,327 71,742 4.6% 0.010%
462 Dearborn Heights city Michigan • 3,313 60,838 5.4% 0.010%
463 Waltham city - Massachusetts .3,288 57,878 5.7% 0.010%
464 Boca Raton city Florida 3,282 61,491 5.30/a 0.010%
465 Richardson city _ Texas 3,279 74,842 4.4% 0.010%
466 West Allis city Wisconsin 3,258 63,221 5.2% 0.010%
467 Pembroke Pines city Florida . -3,252 . 65,452 5.0% 0.010%
468 West Haven city Connecticut 3,190 54,021 5.9% 0.009%
469 Roseville city Michigan 3,163 51,412 6.2% C.009%
470 South San Francisco city Californqa 3,161 54,312 5.8% 0.009%
471 Bloomington city Minnesota 3,154 86,335 3.70/a 0.009%
472 Overland Park city Kansas 3,142 111,790 2.8% 0.009%
473 Sandy city Utah 3,141 75,058 4.2% 0.009%.
474 Port St Lucie city, Florida 2,995 .55,866 5.4% 0.009%
475 Royal Oak city Michigan 2,963 65,410 4.5% 0.009%
476 Livermore city California 2,915 56,741 5.1% 0.009%
477 Santee city California 2,745 52,902 5.2% 0.008%
478 Bristol city Connecticut 2,610 60,640 4.3% 0.008%
479 Livonia city Michigan 2,578 100,850 2.6/0 0.008%
480 Olathe city Kansas 2,569 63,440 4.0% 0.008%
481 Palo Alto city California 2,561 55,900 4.6% 0.008%
482 Kettering city Ohio 2,502 60,569 4.1% 0.007°.6
483 Coon Rapids city Minnesota 2,499 52,978 4.70/c 0.007%
484 Wheaton city Illinois 2,494 51,464 4.8% 0.007%
485 St Clair Shores city Michigan 2,462 68,107 3.6% 0.007%
486 Oak Park village Illinois 2,425. 53,648 4.5% 0.007%
487 Plantation city Florida 2,339 66,692 3.5% 0.007%
488 Milpitas city California 2,317 50,686 4.60/9 0.007%
489 Walnut Creek city California 2,276 60,569 3.896 0.007%
490 Skokie village Illinois . 2274 59,432 - 3.8% 0.007%
491 Camarillo city California. 2,236 52,303. 4.30/9 0.007%
492 Farmington Hills city. Michigan 2,202 74,652 2.9% 0.007%
493 Burnsville cityMinnesota 2,142 51,288 4.2% 0.006°,6
494 Cerritos'city California 2,096 53240 3.9% 0.006°6
495 Troy city_ Michigan 2,061 72,884 2.8% 0.0061/6
496 Oak Lawn village Illinois 1,902 56,182 3.4% 0.0060/1,
497 Fountain Valley city Calffornia. 1,883 53,691 3.5% 0.006%
498 Diamond Bar city California 1,860 53,672 3.5% 0.006%
499 Schaumburg village Illinois 1,826 68,586 2.7% 0.005%
500 Arlington Heights villag Illinois 1,788 75,460 2.4% - 0.005%
501 Mount Prospect village Illinois 1,732 53,170 3.3% 0.005%
502 Plymouth city Minnesota 1,681 50,889 3.30/6 0.005%
503 Florissant city' Missouri 1,657 51,206 3.20/6 0.005%
504 Rochester Hills city Michigan - 11580 61,766 2.6% 0.005%
67834 Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 244,./ Wednesday, December 22, 1993'/ Notices
505 Mission Viejo city California 1,420 72,820. 2.(No 0.004%
506 Naperville city Illinois 1,278 85,351 1.5% 0.004%
507 Pleasanton city California 1,212 50,553. 2.4% . 0.004%
508 Des.Plaines,city Illinois ;. 1,145 53,223 2.2% 0.003%
509 Yor6a-Linda city California 993 52,422 1.9°/a 0.003%
510 West Bloomfield Township Michigan 974 54,843 1.8% 0.003%
TOTAL 14,016,471 85,994,221 16.3% 41.469%
I
i
i
I
Federal Register ! Vol. 58: No. 244 ! Wednesday. December 22, 1993 / Notices 67835
APPENDIX No. 4
MEMORANDUM OF COMMITMENT
Through this memorandum or commitment, a Youth Fair Chance program will be
established In the community of
(Name Target Community)
The State, local and community officials commit to provide links with the following
programs (signatures of program heads below)
(Name the Programs that Linkages Hill be established)
State, local and community officials also commit to making a good faith effort to
continue on a permanent basis programs started under this initiative.
Additionally, the City/County of commits to increasing
in the.target area and to make the area as near as is possible a
(Identify other initiatives)
The City/County of agrees to work collaboratively with other
State, local and Federal programs and to bring other resources into the community
which will support and enhance the.services offered through the Youth Fair Chance
program. .
(SIGNATURES AND TITLES)
VT67836 Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 244 / Wednesday, December-22, 1993 1 Notices
1990 CENSUS DATA APPENDIX No. 5
PERCENT OF
BELOW POVERTY TOTAL US
COUNTY STATE POVERTY POPULATION RATE- POVERTY
Puerto Rico Puerto Rico 2,057,377 3,522,037 58.4% 6.087%
Hidalgo County Texas 159,216 . 383,545 41.50/6 0.471%
Orleans Parish Louisiana 152,042 496,938 30.6% 0.450%
Cameron County Texas 101,362 260,120 39.0% 0.3000/6-
Webb
.300%Webb County Texas 50,116 133,239 37.6% 0.148%
i St Landry Parish Louisiana 28,665 80,331 35.7% 0.085%
i Apache County Arizona 28,640 61,591 46.5% 0.085%
Navajo County Arizona 26,458 77,658 34.1% 0.078%
McKinley County New Mexico 26,118 60,686 43.0% 0.077%
Tangipahoa Parish Louisiana 25,950 85,709 30.3% 0.077%
Starr County Texas 24,150 40,518 59.6% 0.071%
Washington County Mississippi 22,671 67,935 33.4% 0.067%
Maverick County Texas 18,217 " 36,378 50.1% 0.054%
Bolivar County Mississippi 17,158 41,875 41.0% 0.051%
Dallas County Alabama 17,099 48,130 35.5%. 0.051%
Acadia Parish Louisiana 16,832 55,882 30.1% 0.050%
Coahoma County Mississippi 13,997 31,665 442% 0.041%
Leflore County Mississippi 13,987. 37,341 37.5% 0.041%
Avoyelles Parish Louisiana 13,817 39,159 35.3% 0.041%
Val Verde County Texas 13,790 38,721 35.6% 0.041%
x
Floyd County Kentucky 13,521 43,586 . 31.0% 0.040%
McDowell County West Virginia 13,195 35,233 37.5% - 0.039%
Washington Parish Louisiana 13,117 43,185 30.4% 0.039%
Sunflower County Mississippi 12,302 32,867 37.4% 0.036%
Phillips County Arkansas 12,229 28,838 424% 0.036%
Harlan County Kentucky 11,995 36,574 32.8% 0.035%
Pike County Mississippi 11,904 36,882 32.3% 0.035%
Natchitoches Parish Louisiana 11,594 36,689 31.60% 0.034%
Evangeline Parish Louisiana 11,471 33,274 34.5% 0.034%
Knox County Kentucky 11,289 29,676 38.0% 0.033%
Holmes County Mississippi 11,266 21,604 52.1% 0.033%
Bell County Kentucky 11,209 31,506 35.6% 0.033%
Adams County Mississippi 10,634 35,356 30.1% 0.031%
Whitley County: Kentucky .10,622 33,326 31.9% 0.031%
Mingo County West Virginia 10,370 T33,739 30.7% 0.031%
St Francis County Arkansas 10,302 28,497 36.2% 0.030%
Panola County- Mississippi 10,031 29,996 33.4% 0.030%
Yazoo County Mississippi 9,861 25,506 38.7% 0.029%
Morehouse Parish Louisiana 9,645 31,938 302% 0.029%
Perry County Kentucky 9,636 30,283 31.8% 0.029%
Clay County . Kentucky 8,656 • 21,746 39.8% 0.026%
Copiah County Mississippi 8,528 27,592 30.9% 0.025%
Letcher County Kentucky 8,524 27,000 31.6% 0.025%
Caldwell County Texas 8,010 26,392 30.4% 0.024%
Willacy County Texas 7,848 17,705 44.3% 0.023%
Macon.County Alabama 7,812 24,928 . 31.3% 0.023%
I
l
t -
Federal Register / Vol. 58, No. 244 1 Wednesday, December 22, 1993 / Notices 67832
Cbola County New Mexico 7,753 23,794 32.6% 0.023%
Pemiscot County Missouri 7,728 21,921 35.3% 0.023%
Franklin Parish Louisiana 7,500 22,387 33.5% 0.022%
Lincoln County West Virginia 7,197 21,382 33.7% 0.021%
Uvalde County Texas 7,102 23,340 30.4% 0.021% ,
McCreary County Kentucky 7,062 15,603 45.3% 0.021%
Knott County Kentucky 7,035 17,906 39.3% 0.021%
Butler County Alabama 6,815 21,892 31.1% '0.020%
Richland Parish Louisiana 6,638 20,629 32.2% 0.020/,
Wayne County Kentucky 6,446 17,468 36.9% 0.019%
'Tallahatchie County Mississippi 6,328 15,210 41.6% 0.019%
Chicot County Arkansas 6,299 15,713 40.1%. 0.019%
Concordia Parish Louisiana 6,268 20,828 30.1% 0.019%
Sumter County Alabama 6,131 16,174 37.9%. 0.018%
Lee County Arkansas 6,119 13,053 46.9% 0.018%
Shannon County South Dakota 6,118 9,902 - 61.8% 0.018%
Breathitt County Kentucky 6,072 15,703 38.7% 0.018%. .
Wilcox County Alabama 6,034 13,568 44.5% 0.018%
Zavala County Texas 6,004 12,162 49.4% 0.018%
Luna County New Mexico 5,645 18,110 312% 0.017%
Desha County Arkansas 5,621 16,798 33.5% 0.017%
Magoffin.County Kentucky 5,479 13,077 41.9% 0.016%
Humphreys County Mississippi 5,479 12,134 45.2% 0.016%
Hale County Alabama 5,420 15,498 35.0% 0.016%
Madison Parish Louisiana 5,416 12,463 43.5% -0.016°/6
Jefferson County Georgia 5312 17,408 30.5% 0.0160/a
East Carroll Parish Louisiana 5,293 9,709 54.5% 0.0160/0
Jasper County Mississippi 5,204 17,114 30.4% 0.015%
Noxubee County Mississippi 5,193 12,604 41.2% 0.015%
Frio County Texas 5,158 13,472 38.3% 0.015%
Perry County Alabama 5,154 12,759 40.4% 0.015%
Covington County Mississippi 5,137 16,527 31.1% 0.015%
Rolette County North Dakota 5,103 12,772 40.0% - 0.015%
Walthall County Mississippi 5,101 14,352 35.5% 0.015%
Dimmit County Texas 5,062 10,433 48.5% 0.015%
Duval County Texas 5,021 12,918 38.9% 0.015%
Lawrence County Kentucky 4,980 13,998 3516% 0.015%
Choctaw County Oklahoma 4,919 15,302 32.1% 0.015%
Lowndes County Alabama 4,858• 12,658 38.4% 0.014%.
Bienville Parish Louisiana 4,824 15,979 302% 0.014%
Choctaw County Alabama 4,809 16,018 30.0% 0.014%
Leslie County Kentucky 4,808 13,642 352% 0.014%
Fentress County Tennessee 4,695 14,669 32.0% 0.014%
Jefferson Davis County Mississippi 4,633 14,051 33.0% 0.014%
Tunica-County Mississippi 4,597 8,164 56.3% 0.014%
Greene County Alabama 4,575 10,153 45.1% 0.014%
Jackson County Kentucky 4,544 11,955 38.00,6 0.013%
San Juan County Utah 4;523 12,621 35.8% 0.013%
Rockcastle County Kentucky 4;498 14,803 30.4% 0.013%
Karnes County Texas 4,450 12,455 135.7% 0.013%
Martin County Kentucky 4,422 12,526 35.3% 0.013%
67838 Federal Register./ Vol: 58, No. 244 /..Wednesday, December 22, 1993-1 Notices
Dawson County Texas 4,343 14,349 30.3% 0.013%
Morgan County Kentucky 4,328 11,648 37.2% 0.013%
Quitman County Mississippi . 4,315 10,490 41.1% 0.013%
Glacier County Montana 4,224 12,121 •34.8% 0.0120A
Montgomery County Mississippi 4,153 12.388 33.5%. 0.012•/0
Todd County South Dakota 4;143 .8,352 49.6% 0.012°0
Amite County Mississippi 4,100 13,328 30.8% 0.012%
Claiborne County Mississippi 4,087 11,370 35.9% 0.012%
Jefferson County Mississippi 4,048 8,653 46.8% 0.012%
Wilkinson County Mississippi 4,033 9,678 "41.7% 0.0120.6
Monroe County Arkansas 4,022 11,333 35.5% 0.012%
Catahoula Parish Louisiana 3,989 11,065 36.1% 0.012%
Big Horn County Montana 3,949 11,337 34.8% 0.01296
Lewis County Kentucky 3,946 13,029 30.3% 0.012%
Clay County West Virginia 3,901 9,983 39.1% 0.012%
Allendale County South Carolina 3,837 11,722 32.7% . 0.011%
Ripley County Missouri 3,814 12,303 31.096 0.011%
Zapata County Texas 3,790 9,279 40.80: 0.011%
Bullock County Alabama 3,776 11,042 342% 0.011%
' Webster County West Virginia 3,700 10,729 34.5% 0.01196
Early County Georgia 3,635 11,854 30.7% 0.011%
Kemper County Mississippi 3,522 10,356 34.0°.6 0.010%
Clinton County Kentucky 3,447 9,135 37.7% 0.010%
Alexander County Illinois 3,395 10,626 31.9% 0.010%
SL Helena Parish Louisiana 3,358 9,874 34.0% 0.010%
Lafayette County Arkansas 3,305 9,643 34.3% 0.010%
Sharkey County Mississippi 3,305 7,066 46.8% 0.010%
Woodruff County Arkansas 3,239 9,520 34.0% 0.010%
Tensas Parish Louisiana 3,235 7,103 45.5% O.D10%
Red River Parish Louisiana 3,216 9,387 34.3% 0.010%
Dooty County Georgia. 3,191 . 9,901 322% 0.009%
Presidio County Texas 3,172 6,637 47.8% 0.009%
Marion County Texas 3,024 9,984 30.3% 0.009%
Brooks County Texas 2,989 8,204 36.4% 0.009%
j Wolfe County Kentucky 2,835 6,503 43.6°,6 0.008%
,I Charles Mix County South Dakota 2,785 9,131 30.5% 0.0080/.
Franklin County Mississippi 2,760 8,377 32.9% 0.008%
Randolph County Georgia 2,740 8,023 . 34.20A 0.008%
Lee County Kentucky 2,704 7,422 36.4% 0.008%
Turner County Georgia 2,694 8,703 31.0% 0.008%
Hancock County Tennessee 2,627 6,739 39.0% 0.008%
Owstey County Kentucky 2,570 5,036 51.0% 0.008%
Calhoun County West Virginia 2,514 7,885 31.90/6 0.007%
Conejos County Colorado 2,510 7,453 33.7% 0.007%
Elliott County Kentucky 2,456 6,455 38.0% 0.007%
Dewey County South Dakota 2,438 5,523 44.1% 0.007%
Gilmer County West Virginia 2,378 7,669 31.0% 0.007%
Benson County North Dakota 2,251 7,198 31.3% 0.007%
Lynn County Texas 2,179 6,758 32.2% 0.006%
Cumberland County Kentucky 2,112 6,784 31.1% 0.006%
Thurston County Nebraska 2,107 6,936 30.4% 0.006%
-Federal Register ! Vol. 58, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 22, 1993 / Notices.. �
Warren County Georgia 1,943 6,078 32.0%. 0.006..,4\
La Salle County Texas 1.918 5,254 36.5% 0.006%0.
Menominee County Wisconsin 1,860 3,890 . 47.8% 0.006%
Jim Hogg County Texas 1,798 5,109 352% 0.005%
Childress County Texas 1,798 5,953 30.20 0.005%
Wade Hampton Census Alaska 1,794 5,791 31.0% 0.005%
Corson County South Dakota 1,779 4,195 42.4% 0.005%
Menifee County Kentucky.. 1,776 5,092 34.9% 0.005%
Sioux County North Dakota 1,769 3,761 47.0% 0.005%
San Saba County Texas 1,762 5,401 32.6% 0.005%
•Stewart County Georgia 1,741 5,654 30.8% 0.005%
Guadalupe County New Mexico 1,589 4,156 38.2% , 0.005%
Calhoun County Georgia 1,558 5,013 31.1% 0.005%
Mora County New Mexico, 1,540 4,264 36.1% 0.005%
Saguache County Colorado . 1,399 4,619 30.3% 0.004%
Harmon County Oklahoma 1,236 3,793 32.6% 0.004%
Bennett County South Dakota 1,179 3,206 36.8% 0.003%
Clay County Georgia 1,170 3,364 34.81/6 0.003%
Ziebach County South Dakota 1,131 2,220 50.9% 0.00396
Costilla County Colorado 1,101 3,190 . 34.5% 0.003%
Hudspeth County . Texas 1,089 2,915 37.4% 0.003%
Jackson County South Dakota 1,077 2,811 -38.3% 0.003%
issaquena County Mississippi 939 1,909 492% 0.003%
Edwards County Texas 939 2,266 41.4% D.003%
Mellette County South Dakota 864 2,137 40.4% 0.003%
Dickens County . Texas 791 2,571 30.8% 0.002%
Buffalo County South Dakota 785 1,759 44.6% 0.002%
Quitman County Georgia 727 2,209 32.9% 0.002%
Real County Texas 724 2,412 30.0% 0.002%
Menard County Texas - 690 2,252 30.6% 0.002%
Taliaferro County Georgia 606 1,915 31.6% 0.002°/
McPherson County Nebraska 181 546 33.2% 0.001%
Kalawao County . Hawaii 48 130 36.9% 0.000%
TOTAL FROM ABOVE 3,600,307 7,771,072 46.3% 10.6520/a
ALL OTHER COUNTIES• 30,199,934 24.4,460,838 12.4% 89.348%
U.S.TOTAL`(including Puerto Rico) 33,800,241 252.231,910 13.4%- 100.0000/0
SFR Doc 93-31200 Filed 12-21-93:8:45 amt
BIWNG CODE 4SIG 30