HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01111994 - 1.63 • Contra
-�:
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS n. - - _ t Costa
ridioii s County
FROM:
HARVEY E. BRAGDON
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
'
DATE: January 11, 1993 a �ouri`►�
SUBJECT: Amended Development Agreement for Bishop Ranch
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Adopt a finding that the proposed activity is not a project
subject to the California Environmental Quality Act.
2 . Approve the recommendation of the County Zoning Administrator
with respect to proposed modification of the Bishop Ranch
Development Agreement.
3 . Introduce ordinance giving effect to the agreement as amended,
and set January 18, 1994 for adoption.
4. Direct the Community Development Department to file a Notice
of Exemption with the County Clerk.
FISCAL IMPACT
None. The proposed amendment provides for the developer to pay all
costs incurred by the County.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The development agreement entered into between the County of Contra
Costa and Granada Sales, Inc. , Annabel Investment Company and
Alexander Properties Company on February 27, 1987 contains
provisions for extension of building permits on a year to year
basis, through year six of the agreement.
Due to the unanticipated poor performance of the economy, and
depressed nature of demand for the types of space contemplated at
the Bishop Ranch, the developers have not moved toward completion
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE ,
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMIT EE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON January 11 , 1994 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
x UNANIMOUS (ABSENT II TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED January 11 , 1994
CONTACT: Dennis M. Barry 646-2091 PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
CC: Granada Sales, Inc. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
County Counsel DCO
DMB/df Y ADMINISTRATOR
File DA# 105
BY , DEPUTY
r
-- Page Two
as quickly as the parties had expected when the agreement was
entered into. As a result, building permits which had been secured
cannot be further extended under the original terms of the
agreement, and the developer is desirous of amending the agreement
to so provide, through the remaining term of the agreement.
In order to avoid any adverse fiscal impact on the County,
provisions have been incorporated into the proposed amendment for
payment of costs to the County which may arise in the future.
Furthermore, the amendment provides for conformance of the proposed
buildings with current state adopted uniform building codes.
Staff finds that the amendment is purely an administrative change.
As such, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility
that the approval of the amendment could have a significant effect
on the environment. Therefore, pursuant to Section 15061 (B) (3) of
the State CEQA Guidelines, staff concludes that the activity is not
a project subject to CEQA.
Given the unanticipated economic climate, the developer's
continuous good faith performance, and the lack of any negative
fiscal impact on the County, staff is recommending approval of the
proposed Amendment to the Bishop Ranch Development Agreement, and
that the Board of Supervisors introduce the Ordinance, waive
reading and set January 18th for adoption.
r
AMENDMENT TO BISHOP RANCH DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF CONTRA. COSTA
AND GRANADA SALES, INC. , ANNABEL INVESTMENT COMPANY,
AND ALEXANDER PROPERTIES COMPANY
RELATIVE TO THE DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS BISHOP RANCH
1. PARTIES
The DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Recorded Book 13504, pages 1-86,
County Recorder's Office, Series No. 87-55702) entered into on
February 27, 1987, by and between the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a
political subdivision of the State of California ("County") , and
GRANADA ALES, INC. , a California corporation ( "Granada".) , ANNABEL
INVESTMENT COMPANY, a limited partnership ( "Annabel") and
ALEXANDER PROPERTIES COMPANY, a limited partnership ( "Alexander")
and jointly referred to as "Owners, " pursuant to the authority of
Sections 65864 through 65869 .5 of the Government Code of the
State of California, is hereinafter amended by the aforesaid
parties as provided in paragraph 2 below.
2. AMENDMENT
Subdivision (b) of paragraph 9 . 1 of part 9 entitled
"COOPERATION - IMPLEMENTATION" (at pages 25 and 26) is amended
effective February _, 1994 to read as follows:
" (b) The processing and approval of all maps,
plans, land use permits, building plans and
specifications, and other plans relating to the
development of the Project Site, filed by Owners,
including, but not limited to, all General Plan and
Specific Plan amendments, zoning, final development
plans, tentative maps, parcel maps, final maps,
subdivision improvement agreements, building permits,
lot line adjustments, encroachments and related
matters as necessary for the completion of the
development of all lots and parcels comprising the
Project Site. In this regard, Owners will, in a
timely manner, provide County with all documents,
applications, plans and other information necessary
for the County to carry out its obligations hereunder
and cause Owners' planners, engineers, and all other
consultants to submit in a timely manner all required
materials and documents therefor. All outstanding
and/or any new building permits issued by the County
for the Project shall have an initial term of one
year and, when requested by Owners, shall be
extended, on an administrative basis, on a year to
year basis during the remaining term of this
agreement. In addition to those fees and charges
otherwise required by this Development Agreement and
1
the County and the City of San Ramon's Joint Exercise
of Powers Agreement (dated April 12, 1988) , for any
County staff inspection or related processing
services provided concerning extended outstanding
building permits, the Owners shall pay to the County
compensatory fees or charges established as by the
Community Development Director with the assistance of
the Chief Building Inspector and the Owners. Such
compensatory fees and charges shall not exceed those
required on a County-wide basis for similar projects.
Any dispute concerning the rate or amount of such
fees or charges may be submitted to the Board of
Supervisors for resolution. In the event that during
the pendency of a building permit under which no work
has commenced, there are California State adopted
changes in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform
Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code and National
Electrical Code, the Chief Building Inspector of the
County, at his discretion, shall have the right to
apply such changes to the pending building permit.
It is the express intent of this Agreement that all
parties cooperate and diligently work to approve and
implement any General Plan and/or Specific Plan
amendment, zoning, final development plan and/or
other land use or building permits or approvals which
are reasonably necessary or desirable for development
of the Project Site in accordance with this
Agreement, the Development Plan and Conditions of
Approval."
3. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Except as hereinabove amended, the (Development) Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, County and Owners have executed this
Amendment to Agreement as of its effective date hereinabove
written.
COUNTY: OWNERS:
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a GRANADA SALES, INC.
political subdivision of a California corporation
the State of California
By: By:
Director of Community Its :
Development
2
j r..
ANNABEL INVESTMENT COMPANY,
a limited partnership
By•
Its:
ALEXANDER PROPERTIES COMPANY,
a limited partnership
By:
Its:
3