Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 12201994 - 1.81 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JContra , y... FRS: Sheriff Warren E. Rupf Costa nu►Ts: December 5, 1994 5 . County 3IIBJECT: Finding of "Social Need" as required by Government Code Section 26227, justifying the Sheriff's Office contract for security ser- vin with Al m _da- _en SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION Find that there is a "social need", as required in Government Code section 26227, justi- fying the Sheriff or his designee to execute a contract, on behalf of Contra Costa County with Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District. FINANCIAL IMPACT There is no detrimental impact on the County in executing this contract. All costs in- curred under the terms of this contract proposal will be paid by the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District. (No County General Funds) . REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND On October 25,1994, the Board authorized the Sheriff to execute a contract, on behalf of Contra Costa County, for Mobile Security Services with Alameda-Contra Costa Transit Dis- trict (Board action #2.1) . County Counsel has determined that the legal authority for the execution of this contract is Government Code section 26227, which requires a finding of "social need" by the Board. The services provided by the Sheriff's Office under this contract will enhance the safety of Contra Costa County residents who utilize the services of Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District. The graffiti abatement and violence prevention training components in this contract will allow the Sheriff's Office to address issues of particular importance to Transit District patrons. All County residents will benefit from the addition of eleven uniformed officers to the west end of Contra Costa County, and the de" terent effect that these additional Deputies will provide. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION Failure to approve this finding will result in the Sheriff's Office terminating and not renewing the contractual services to the Alameda-Contra /osta Transit District. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF B ARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON DEC 2 0 INI APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_Z OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD AYES: NOES: OF SUPERVISORS ON THEQATS�TOWN ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTESTED DEC 2 U i CC: CAO— Justice Systems Programs PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Sheriff-Coroner SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Auditor-Controller M382 (10/88) BY e DEPUTY