HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 12131994 - H.5 -`� Contra
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ;
Costa
Oi •�lililllllh
FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON _ n y.. ,x ,s County
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ;40
ti
DATE: December 8, 1994 osTq ------
SUBJECT: Recommendation by the County Zoning Administrator on a Development
Agreement by Shapell Industries of Northern California, Inc. Relative
to the Development Known as the Country Club at Gale Ranch, in the San
Ramon Area.
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Accept the Environmental Documentation prepared for this project
as adequate.
2. Approve the Development Agreement by Shapell Industries of
Northern California, Inc. Relative to the Property. Known as the
Country Club at Gale Ranch as being consistent with the Country
Club at Gale Ranch General Plan Amendment (5-94-SR) , Rezoning with
Preliminary Development Plan (County File 3010RZ) , Final
Development Plan (3010-92) and Vesting Tentative Map (7796) .
� 3 . Direct the Director of the Community Development Department to
sign the Country Club at Gale Ranch Development Agreement after it
has been duly signed by Shapell Industries of Northern California,
Inc.
4 . Adopt the findings prepared for this project.
5. Introduce the ordinance, giving it effect, set date for
adoption.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMIT EE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON December 1-3 1994 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER x
See Addendum for Board action
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: 2 . 4 ,5 ,1 NOES: 3 ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact:Debbie Chamberlain 646-2031
Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED December 13, 1994
cc: PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COY ADMINISTRATOR
BY
, DEPUTY
V '
Page Two
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
In accordance with the provisions of the "Agreement to Settle litigation Relating
to the Dougherty Valley Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment and
Specific Plan, " dated May 11, 1994, the Dougherty Valley Oversight Committee
("DVOC")held a public meeting on December 1, 1994 to provide comments on the
proposed development agreement. The DVOC suggested the following modifications:
(1) The structure of the Capital Facilities Fee should allow an , enhancement
contribution for construction of said facility by the City of San Ramon or other
entity without the Developer being eligible for a refund of funds paid; (2)
Section 3 . 1 (f) "Traffic Mitigation" should include language that all funds paid
by the Developer to the County for traffic impact mitigation pursuant to Project
Conditions may be spent by the County only for the specific purposes for which
it was collected; and (3) Section 3 .2 "County Service Area" should be cross
referenced to Section 3 . 3 of the Settlement Agreement.
The Zoning Administrator on December 5, 1994 held a public hearing and
recommended approval of the Development Agreement to the Board of Supervisor with
the modifications recommended by the DVOC and County Staff.
There are two outstanding issues that staff has not agreed to and are currently
being discussed with County Counsel. In their current form they are not
acceptable to staff. Section 4. 1(d) (9) (iii) of the agreement does not allow the
County to levy a tax unless said tax is levied on at least 50, 00.0 households.
This phrase in effect would create a "tax-free zone" in the Country Club at Gale
Ranch. Staff recommends that the County retain the ability to levy any new tax
or assessment on a specific area-wide basis or alternatively, the County have the
ability to levy any new tax or assessment on at least 5, 000 residential units.
Finally, staff is requesting that Section 7. 1 "Cooperation in the Event of a
Legal Challenge, " be amended to include the following language: " . .If, at any
time, County (in its sole discretion) determines it is not satisfied with the
Developer's ability or capacity to defend County, or with the Developer's actual
defense of County to date, County may file a disclaimer. " This language is
currently provided in the Wickland Development Agreement pending before the Board
of Supervisors and the Stonecastle Development Agreement pending before the
Zoning Administrator.
The Zoning Administrator also provided County Counsel the opportunity to further
discuss Section 4. 1(d) (9) , in regards to County-wide taxes and assessments and
Section 6. 1 "Legal Challenges". County Counsel will be prepared to give a report
and recommendation at the Board of Supervisors meeting.
ADDENDUM TO H.3, H.4, H.5
-DECEMBER 13, 1994
On December 6, 1994, the Board of Supervisors continued to this date the hearing
on the recommendation of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission and the San
Ramon Valley Regional Planning commission on the request by Shapell Industries
(County File 5-94-SR)to amend the County General Plan to allow up to 1,216 single and
multi-family housing units, golf course with clubhouse, church facility, parks and open
space area on 618 acres owned by Shapell Industries. The have requested that the site be
re-designated from Agricultural Lands to Single Family Residential Medium Density,
Public/Semi-Public, Open Space and Parks and Recreation; and to consider the
recommendation of the Contra Costa County Planning commission and the San Ramon
Valley Regional Planning commission on the request by Shapell Industries (applicant and
owner) County File 3010-RZ) to rezone 618 acres from A-80 (Exclusive Agriculture)to
P-1 (Planned Unit Development); and a request for approval by Shapell Industries
(applicant and owner) (county File 3010-92) to establish 1,216 single and multi-family
residential units, golf course with clubhouse, church facility parks and open space in the
San Ramon area.
Dennis Barry, Community Development Department, presented the staff report,
commenting on a memo dated December 13, 1994 (no copy to the Clerk) from Debbie
Chamberlin to himself comparing the conditions of approval recommended by the San
Ramon Valley Regional Planning Commission and the Contra Costa County Planning
Commission .
Mitch Avalon, Public Works Department, commented on a memo he presented to
the Board dated December 13, 1994 relative to changes in the Conditions of Approval.
Supervisor Bishop commented that she would like to received testimony, close
the public hearing and defer final decision on the matter until next week.
Mr. Barry clarified that H.4 and H.5 should be considered at this time also and the
Board should take testimony on all three items at the same time. Therefore the Board
was also considering the appeal by Shapell Industries (appellant) from the decision of the
Contra Costa County Planning Commission and the San Ramon Valley Regional
Planning Commission on the request by Shapell Industries (applicant and owner) for
approval of a vesting tentative map (Subdivision 7796) to subdivide 618 acres for 1,216
single and multi-family residential, public/semi-public uses, golf course with clubhouse
and open space and the recommendation of the Zoning Administrator on a request to
review and approve a Development Agreement between Contra Costa County and
Shapell Industries relative to the property known as "Country Club at Gale Ranch" in the
San Ramon area.
The following persons presented testimony:
Aram Hodess, 1308 Roman Way, Martinez;
John Cavin, 1003 Ashland Court, Danville;
Richard Lujan, 837 Arnold Drive, Martinez;
Bob Ringo, 184 Victory Circle, San Ramon;
James D. Conway, 57 Brian Court, San Ramon;
Jerry Reardon, 168 Victory Circle, San Ramon;
Michael Conklin, 2551 Arnda Drive, San Ramon;
Cynthis Jones, 9404 Cherry Hills Lane, San Ramon',-
Beverly
amon;Beverly Lane 556 Indian Home Road, Danville.
Glenn Mendell, 192 Victory Circle, San Ramon;
Ted Coggiola, 1500 Bollinger Canyon Road, San Ramon;
Jeff Ward, 34 Victory Court, San Ramon;
Martin Vitz, 2950 Peralta Oaks, Oakland;
Scott Couture, 166 Teracina Drive, San Ramon;
Michael Sipos, San Ramon;
Jim Blickenstaff, 2410 Talavera Drive, San Ramon;
Mark Armstrong, representing Tassajara Valley Property Owners Association;
Tom Koch, representing Shapell Industries, spoke in rebuttal, commenting on a
letter dated December 13, 1994, expressing their opinion on issues before the Board
today.
Mr. Barry commented on responses to Mr. Koch's letter and on various
conditions of approval.
The Board discussed the conditions and determined to amend the conditions.
The public hearing is closed. Following further discussion the Board took this
action:
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the decisions on the above matters are
DEFERRED to December 20, 1994, and INTENT is DECLARED to approve General
Plan Amendment 5-94-SR, Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan 3010-RZ and
Final Development Plan 3010-92 with conditions as amended, the Ordinance giving
effect to the rezoning is INTRODUCED; and INTENT is DECLARED to grant the
appeal of Shapell Industries from the decision of the contra Costa County Planning
Commission and the San Ramon Valley Regional Planning commission on Subdivision
7796; and INTENT is DECLARED to approve a Development Agreement as amended
between Contra Costa County and Shapell Industries relative to the property known as
Country Club at Gale Ranch in the San Ramon area.