The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 11021993 - 1.67 f 1.59 through 1.70 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on November 2, 1993, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Smith, Bishop, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Correspondence Item No. 1. 59 LETTER dated October 15, 1993, from J. Corgiat, 2001 Oakmont Way #7 , Walnut Creek 94595, commenting on the cutbacks in the Walnut Creek Library. ***REFERRED TO COUNTY LIBRARIAN AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1. 60 LETTER dated October 12, 1993 , from Art Agnos, Regional Administrator-Regional Housing Commissioner, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, San Francisco Regional Office, Region IX, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco 94102-3448, regarding HOME funds for affordable housing projects. ***REFERRED TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 1. 61 LETTER dated October 71 1993 , from William R. Locke, Chief, Risk Studies Division, Federal Insurance Administration; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. 20472 , transmitting a revised Flood Insurance Rate Map and commenting on minimum floodplain management criteria established in accordance with provisions of the National Flood Insurance Program. ***REFERRED TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1. 62 LETTER dated October 15, 1993 , from Paul E. Payne, Supervisor, Inyo County Board of Supervisors, P.O. Box N, Independence 93526, requesting the Board to oppose the "California Desert Protection Act" introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein. ***REFERRED TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1. 63 LETTER October 14, 1993 , from Director, Katherine McKinney, Board of Directors, East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) , 375 Eleventh Street, Oakland 94607, proposing that the EBMUD Board and the County Board of Supervisors meet to discuss workable methods for maximizing opportunity to ensure appropriate coordination between land use and water supply decisions. ***REFERRED TO DIRECTOR, GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, COUNTY COUNSEL, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND THE WATER COMMITTEE, TO ESTABLISH A TIME AND AGENDA FOR THIS MEETING. 1. 64 LETTER dated October 20, 1993, from Richard Porterfield, 2869 Via Dominguez, Walnut Creek 94596, commenting on the need for EBMUD to develop a more sustained water source before additional major housing developments are considered for the Dougherty Valley. ***REFERRED TO DIRECTOR, GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 1. 65 LETTER dated October 15, 1993, from Nancy Michel, Appointments Consultant, Senate Rules Committee, California Legislature, State Capitol - Room 500, Sacramento 95814, advising of the Governor-'s appointments to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. ***REFERRED TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR 1. 66 LETTER dated October 15, 1993 , from Raymond H. Hawkins, 249 Lake Drive, Kensington 94708, objecting to the granting of any Memorandums of Understanding and Transitional Permits to the Kensington Community Services District/Bay View Refuse Service garbage and recycling services. ***REFERRED TO COUNTY COUNSEL FOR RESPONSE 1. 67JLETTER dated October 14, 1993, from Nancy Gore, Mayor, City of Concord,, 1950 Parkside Drive, Concord 94519, advising that a majority of the City Council has expressed support for the passage of Proposition 172 on the November 2 , 1993 ballot, and requesting that funds received as a result of the passage of Proposition 172 be allocated for public safety purposes. ***REFERRED TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1. 68 LETTER dated October 21, 1993, from James E. Gingrich, 1104 Via Roble, Lafayette 94549, advising of his experience in trying to dispose of a small amount of household waste at the Health Department's temporary waste collection site located at the Lafayette BART parking lot. ***REFERRED TO HEALTH SERVICES DIRECTOR FOR RESPONSE 1. 69 LETTER dated October 4, 1993 , from Jonothan Dumas, Chair, Advisory Council on Equal Employment Opportunities, C/O Community Services Department, 2425 Bisso Lane, Concord 94520, commenting on the need to commit adequate resources for the full implementation of the County's Affirmative Action Plan. ***REFERRED TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR I 6 . 67 CITY OF CONCORD CITY COUNCIL 1950 Parkside Drive,MS/01 Concord,California 94519-2578 Nancy Gore,Mayor FAx: (510) 798-0636 � Mark DeSaulnier,Vice Mayor Byron Campbell Colleen Coll OFFICE OF THE MAYORg'8®� Lloyd D.Mashore Telephone: (510)671-3158 ®�J� Farrel A.Stewart,City Manager October 14, 1993 RECEIVED k OCT 2 21993 Board of SuContra pervisors ervoisors untyC CO�OrAg COS q�p�SORS p 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Supervisors: On behalf of the City Council I wish to express a majority of this body's strongest support for the passage of Proposition 172 on the November 1993 ballot. I also request that the Board of Supervisors pledge that all funds received as a result of the passage of Proposition 172 will be allocated for public safety purposes. Public safety is this City Council's highest priority and yet budget constraints have required reductions in this area. Balancing the 1992-93 budget required the elimination of sixteen positions in the City's Police Department. This comes at a time when the need for increased resources to fund public safety activities has never been higher. Proposition '172 brings the possibility of restoring some of the reductions. Passage of Proposition 172 will not implement a new tax, but simply keeps the current tax rate in effect. Since this will result in new funds targeted for public safety, the City of Concord strongly supports the passage of Proposition 172. Sincerely, Nancy Gore Mayor S03186.R113 n Tvrr=:Z� BOARD OF DIRECTORS ' Jocelyn Combs,President FRECEIVE,".,111 Ted Backe,Vice President Oliver Holmes,Treasurer October 28, 1993 John OSusan Smartt,Secretary Douglas Siden 19-% Jean Siri �7.7J Pat9Brien General Manager UPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO, Board of Supervisors County of Contra Costa County Administration Building 651 Pine Street, lith Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Attached is a Resolution passed by the East Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors endorsing the extension of the 1/2 cent sales tax contained in Prop 172 . Although the District is not designated to receive these revenues, the Board believes that passage of this measure is essential to local government funding stability. Sincerely, all- ;10 Pat O'Brien General Manager POB:sv Attachment 0 2950 Peralta Oaks Court•P.O.Box 5381•Oakland CA 94605 0381•510.635.0135•FAX 510.569.4319 �y EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 1993-10-289 October 19, 1993 APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING BOARD SUPPORT FOR A PERMANENT EXTENSION OF THE 1/2 CENT SALES TAX WHEREAS, State funding of local government services has been significantly reduced during the last two budget years; and WHEREAS, the passage of an extension of the 1/2 cent sales tax contained in Proposition 172 on the November 2 , 1993 special election :ballot is projected to generate $714 million for FY 93- 94 and approximately $1.5 billion in revenue beginning in FY 1994-95; and WHEREAS, the East Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors has previously supported legislative measures providing for the extension of the 1/2 cent sales tax; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District hereby reaffirms its support for the permanent authorization of the imposition of an additional 1/2 percent rate of sales and use tax included in Proposition 172 . Moved by Director Jean Siri seconded by Director Ted Radke and adopted this 19th day of October 1993 , by the following vote: FOR: Directors Jocelyn Combs, Oliver Holmes, John O'Donnell, Ted Radke, Douglas Siden, Jean Siri, Susan Smartt AGAINST: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None CERTIFICATION I,Debra L Fassier,Clerk of the Board of Directors of the East Bay Regional Park District,do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full,true and correct copy of Resolution 1993-10-289 adopted by the Board of Directors at a regular meeting held on October 19, 1993 CITY OF SAN PABLO One Alvarado Square, San Pablo, CA 94806 (510)215-3000 Fax#(510)235-7059 Of CA�� Office of the City Clerk October 26, 1993 -6- ; RECEK'4'° Ll NOV - 11993 CLERK BOARQ OF SUPERVISORS CO�RRA COSTA CO. Mr. Tom Torlakson, Chairman Board of Supervisors 651 Pine Street, Room 106 Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Chairman Torlakson: Pursuant to your request, attached is a copy of Resolution No. 93-112, adopted by the City Council of the City of San Pablo during a special meeting of the City Council held October 21, 1993. Resolution No. 93-112 supports Proposition 172 on the November 2, 1993 ballot. Sincerely, Charlotte Maggard ?��e/ :,-VClerk rc. Enclosure jk Recycled Paper j RESOLUTION NO. 93-112 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN PABLO SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 172 ON THE NOVEMBER 2, 1993 BALLOT. WHEREAS, the Legislature enacted Senate Constitutional Amendment #1 (SCA 1); and, WHEREAS, the Legislature placed SCA 1 on a Special Election ballot on November 2, 1993; and, WHEREAS, SCA 1 would provide for a permanent extension of the half cent sales tax which was extended temporarily by the Legislature only through December 31, 1993; and, WHEREAS, SB 509 (Chapter 73, Statutes of 1993), the implementing legislation for SCA 1 requires that all of the proceeds of the sales tax be spent on public safety services; and, WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has made it clear that it intends to dedicate all of the proceeds of the sales tax imposed by Proposition 172 and all future increases in that portion of the sales tax imposed by Proposition 172 to the Sheriff and District Attorney, if Proposition 172 is approved by the voters statewide; and, WHEREAS, the City of San Pablo recognizes that adequate law enforcement and criminal prosecution are essential services which benefit all of the residents of Contra Costa County; and, WHEREAS, we recognize that adequate law enforcement and public safety are essential elements of the type of community which we as elected officials are striving to maintain in our communities and that the passage of Proposition 172 is essential to the safety of the citizens we represent. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Pablo, that we support Proposition 172 on the November 2, 1993 ballot, and that we urge all voters in the City of San Pablo to vote in favor of Proposition 172 in order to maintain and improve the level of law enforcement services which are being provided in this community. The foregoing Resolution was PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of October, 1993, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Brown, Vigil, Wysinger, Angela, Gomes NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Charlotte Maggard /s/ Joseph M. Gomes Charlotte Maggard, City Clerk Joseph M. Gomes, Mayor r 'Y�- :K1 7 CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Governing Board Contra Costa College Lee R.Winters,President Diablo Valley College Maria T.Viramontes,Vice President Los Medanos College William P. Moses,Secretary Eugene H. Ross William M.Corey Chancellor RobertD.Jensen October 28, 1993 RECEIVED Mr. Tom Torlakson, Chairman The Board of Supervisors1993 Contra Costa County �� County Administration Building 651 Pine Street, Room 106 CLERK BOARD OF Sl3PERVISQRS CONTRA COSTA CO. Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Supervisor/Tort son: I'm pleased to advise you that our Governing Board, at last night's regular meeting, adopted a resolution in support of Proposition 172. Enclosed is an copy of the official Board action. Sincerely, lRob D. Jensen Chancellor RJ J Enclosure 500 Court Street, Martinez, California 94553 (510)229-1000, Ext. 210 FAX(510)370-2019 GOVERNING.BOARD CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT OF. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA REPORT NO. 31-C DATE October 27, 1993 PURPOSE Resolution in Support of .Proposition 172 TO MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BOARD It is recommended that the attached resolution in support of Proposition 172 be adopted. APPROVED OCT 2 1993 Disposition- Date Governing Board Secretary CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 172 WHEREAS, the Legislature enacted Senate Constitutional Amendment #1 (SCA 1), and WHEREAS, the Legislature placed SCA 1 on a Special Election ballot on November 2, 1993, and WHEREAS, SCA 1 would provide for a permanent extension of the half cent sales tax which was extended temporarily by the Legislature only through December 31, 1993, and WHEREAS, SB 509 (Chapter 73, Statutes of 1993) , the implementing legislation for SCA 1, requires that all of the proceeds of the sales tax be spent on public safety services, and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has made it clear that it intends to dedicate all of the proceeds of the sales tax imposed by Proposition 172 and all future increases in that portion of the sales tax. imposed by Proposition 172 to the Sheriff and District Attorney, if Proposi- tion 172 is approved by the voters statewide, and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Community College District recognizes that adequate law enforcement and criminal prosecution are essential services which benefit all of the residents of Contra Costa County, and WHEREAS, we recognize that adequate law enforcement and public safety are essential elements of the type of community which we as elected officials are striving to maintain in our communities and that the passage of Proposi- tion 172 is essential to the safety of the citizens we represent; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Board of the Contra Costa Community College District that we support Proposition 172 on the November 2, 1993 ballot, and that we urge all voters in our District to vote in favor of Proposition 172 in order to maintain and improve the level of law enforcement services which are being provided in this community. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Governing Board of the Contra Costa Community College District of Contra Costa County, State of California, this 27th day of October, 1993. Secretary, Governing Board !F"{' `DN HIGH SGyOo ��c�► Wnim • 4 S&O I Tisbid, J m 20 Oak Sired u � .: Trent►vood, cq 94513 Phone:(SIO)634-2166 Sfax(SIo)634-1687 ABLISHED 19� 'RES.OLUTION 93-39 SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 172 WHEREAS, the Legislature enacted Senate Constitutional Amendment # 1 (SCA 1), and, WHEREAS, the Legislature placed SCA 1,on a Special Election ballot on November 2, 1993, and WHEREAS, . SCA 1 would provide for a permanent extension of the half cent sales tax which was extended temporarily by the Legislature only through December 31, 1,993, and WHEREAS, SB 509(Chapter 73,Statutes of 1993),the implementing legislation for SCA 1 requires that all of the proceeds of the sales tax be spent on public safety services, and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has made it clear that it intends to dedicate all of the proceeds of the sales tax imposed by Proposition 172 and all future increases in that portion of the sales tax imposed by Proposition 172 to the Sheriff and District Attorney, if Proposition 172 is approved by the voters statewide, and WHEREAS, the Liberty Union High School District recognizes that adequate law enforcement and criminal prosecution are essential services which benefit all of the residents of Contra Costa County, and WHEREAS, Liberty Union High School District recognizes that adequate law enforcement and public. safety are essential elements .of the type of community which we as elected officials are striving to maintain in our communities and that the passage of Proposition 172 is essential to the safety of the citizens we represent, and WHEREAS„ safe schools requires responsive and supportive law enforcement and criminal justice support system; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LIBERTY UNION.HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LIBERTY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: THAT the Liberty Union High School District supports Proposition 172 on the November 2, 1993 ballot, and that we urge California, especially those voters in the Liberty Union High School District to vote in favor of Proposition 172 in order to maintain and improve the level of law enforcement services which are being provided in this community. - Ana + . RECEO ED Clerk, Liberty. .nion-High School District Governing Board of Trustees,: NOV Contra Costa County, State of California CLERKCB NTRAOCOSTA CO.SUPERVISORS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION.EMPLOYER ,0 . CITY OF SAN PABLO • One Alvarado Square, San Pablo, CA 94806 + (510)215-3000 • Fax#(510)235-7059 Office of the City Clerk October 26, 1993 : RECEIV NOV - 1 1993 CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. Mr. Tom Torla.kson, Chairman Board of Supervisors 651 Pine Street,Room 106 Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Chairman Torlakson: Pursuant to your request, attached is a copy of Resolution No. 93-112, adopted by the City Council of the City of San Pablo during a special meeting of the City Council held October 21, 1993. Resolution No. 93-112 supports Proposition 172 on the November 2, 1993 ballot. Sincerely, Charlotte Maggard City Clerk Enclosure 0 �: /4.�.,.c_ 71 Rwyded ftp- RESOLUTION NO. 93-112 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN PABLO SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 172 ON THE NOVEMBER 2, 1993 BALLOT. WHEREAS, the Legislature enacted Senate Constitutional Amendment #1 (SCA 1); and, WHEREAS, the Legislature placed SCA 1 on a Special Election ballot on November 2, 1993; and, WHEREAS, SCA 1 would provide for a permanent extension of the half cent sales tax which was extended temporarily by the Legislature only through December 31, 1993; and, WHEREAS, SB 509 (Chapter 73,Statutes of 1993), the implementing legislation for SCA 1 requires that 0 of the proceeds of the sales tax be spent on public safety services; and, WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has made it clear that it intends to dedicate all of the proceeds of the sales tax imposed by Proposition 172 and all future increases in that portion of the sales tax imposed by Proposition 172 to the Sheriff and District Attorney, if Proposition 172 is approved by the voters statewide; and, WHEREAS, the City of San Pablo recognizes that adequate law enforcement and criminal prosecution are essential services which benefit all of the residents of Contra Costa County; and, WHEREAS, we recognize that adequate law enforcement and public safety are essential elements of the type of community which we as elected officials are striving to maintain in our communities and that the passage of Proposition 172 is essential to the safety of the citizens we represent. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Pablo, that we support Proposition 172 on the November 2, 1993 ballot, and that we urge all voters in the City of San Pablo to vote in favor of Proposition 172 in order to maintain and improve the level of law enforcement services which are being ,provided in this community. The foregoing Resolution was PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of October, 1993, by the following, vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Brown, Vigil, Wysinger, Angela, Gomes NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Charlotte Maggard /s/ Joseph M. Gomes Charlotte Maggard, City Clerk Joseph M. Gomes, Mayor 1-6 7 CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Governing Board Contra Costa College Lee R.Winters,President Diablo Valley College Maria T.Viramontes,Vice President Los Medanos College William P.Moses,Secretary Eugene H.Ross William M.Corey Chancellor Robert D.Jensen October 28, 1993 ECE1��EI? Mr. Tom Torlakson, Chairman The Board of Supervisors NOV — I Contra Costa County ` County Administration Building CCK BOARo of suPERwsoRs 651 Pine Street, Room 106 CONTRA cosTA co. Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Superviso forl son: I'm pleased to advise you that our Governing Board, at last night's regular meeting, adopted a resolution in support of Proposition 172. Enclosed is an copy of the official Board action. Sincerely, Robert D. Jensen Chancellor RJ:j Enclosure 500 Court Street, Martinez, California 94553 (510)229-1000, Ext. 210 FAX(510)370-2019 GOVERNING BOARD CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA REPORT NO. 31-C DATE October 27, 1993 PURPOSE Resolution in Support of .Proposition 172 TO MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BOARD It is recommended that the attached resolution in support of Proposition 172 be adopted. CV OCT 2 71993 � � Disposition APri�'C JED Date Governing Board Secretary CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 172 WHEREAS,, the Legislature enacted Senate Constitutional Amendment #1 (SCA 1), and WHEREAS, the Legislature placed SCA 1 on a Special Election ballot on November 2, 1993, and WHEREAS, SCA 1 would provide for a permanent extension of the half cent sales tax which was extended temporarily by the Legislature only through December 31, 1993, and WHEREAS, SB 509 (Chapter 73, Statutes of 1993), the implementing legislation for SCA 1, requires that all of the proceeds of the sales tax be spent on public safety services, and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has made it clear that it intends to dedicate all of the proceeds of the sales tax imposed by Proposition 172 and all future increases in that portion of the sales tax imposed by Proposition 172 to the Sheriff and District Attorney, if Proposi- tion 172 is approved by the voters statewide, and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Community College District recognizes that adequate law enforcement and criminal prosecution are essential services which benefit all of the residents. of Contra Costa County, and WHEREAS, we recognize that adequate law enforcement and public safety are essential elements of the type of community which we as elected officials are striving to maintain in our communities and that the passage of Proposi- tion 172 is essential to the safety of the citizens we represent; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Governing Board of the Contra Costa Community College District that we support Proposition 172 on the November 2, 1993 ballot, and' that we urge all voters in our District to vote in favor of Proposition 112 in order to maintain and improve the level of law enforcement services which are being provided in this community. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Governing Board of the Contra Costa Community College District of Contra Costa County, State of California, this 27th day of October, 1993. Secretary, Governing Board �\ONwOH Syoo 045%h'Union &Iwol Tisfi� 20 Oak sked Tredwwd, Gq 94SI3 -- - 96=($10)634-2166 fax(¢O)6341687 geLISHED 19� RESOLUTION 93-39 SUPPORT OF PROPOSITION 172 WHEREAS, the Legislature enacted Senate Constitutional Amendment M 1 (SCA 1), and, WHEREAS, the Legislature placed SCA 1 on a Special Election ballot on November 2, 1993, and WHEREAS, SCA 1 would provide for a permanent extension of the half cent sales tax which was extended temporarily by the Legislature only through December 31, 1993, and WHEREAS, SB 509(Chapter 73,Statutes of 1993),the implementing legislation for SCA 1 requires that all of the proceeds of the sales tax be spent on public safety services, and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has made it clear that it intends to dedicate all of the proceeds of the sales tax imposed by Proposition 172 and all future increases in that portion of the sales tax imposed by Proposition 172 to the Sheriff and District Attorney, if Proposition 172 is approved by.the voters statewide, and WHEREAS, the Liberty Union High School District recognizes that adequate law enforcement and criminal prosecution are essential services which benefit all of the residents of Contra Costa County, and WHEREAS, Liberty Union High School District recognizes that adequate law enforcement and public safety are essential elements of the type of community which we as elected officials are striving to maintain in our communities and that the passage of Proposition 172 is essential to the safety of the citizens we represent, and WHEREAS, safe schools requires responsive and supportive law enforcement and criminal justice support system; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LIBERTY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LIBERTY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: THAT the Liberty Union High School District supports Proposition 172 on the November 2, 1993 ballot, and that we urge California, especially those voters in the Liberty Union High School District to vote in favor of Proposition 172 in order to maintain and improve the level of law enforcement services which are being provided in this community. -----�__ _. - RECEIVED � Clerk, Liberty Union High School District Governing Board of Trustees, W3 Contra Costa County, State of California CLERK BOARD OF Sy;P RvJSORS CONTRA COSTA CO. • AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER