The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 10261993 - H.2 H.2 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on October 26, 1993 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Bishop, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Smith ABSTAIN: None --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Hearing on the appeal of Clyde Hill This is the time heretofore noticed by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors for hearing of the appeal of Clyde Hill from the General Assistance Evidentiary hearing decision. Jewel Mansapit, General Assistance Program Analyst, Social Service Department, submitted a memorandum at the request of the appellant to continue the hearing to November 9 , 1993 . IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the hearing on the appeal of Clyde Hill from the General Assistance Evidentiary Hearing decision is continued to November 9 , 1993 at 2: 15 P.M. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: October 26, 1993 Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator By Deputy 1 cc: County Administrator County Counsel Social Services Appeals Division J. Mansapit, Program Analyst C. Hill UV 1-'GJ-177J 1J•G( I'ICUI'I JUS,1 NL- "DMMV 1 k-r- LCr 1 . I U t5C1F7J7 t',1�� " r-e,: P , Z CONTRA CC I TA COUNTY RECEIVE OCXAL 6=V10E DEPARTMM OCT 2 519M CLERKCONTRA SITA-RDOF ONT AOF STA CO. - 1 October 26, 1993 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORJS FROM: JEWEL MANSAPI ERAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ANALYST SUBJECT: APPEAL OF GEN ASSISTANCE EVIDENTIARY HEARING DECISION BY CLYDE HILL At the request of the appellant, Sociai Service Department is requesting continuance of the Board Hearing to November 9, 1993. Jewel Mansapit General Assistance Program Analyst i i i i 1 1 I r FROM: Perfecto Villarreal, Director Social Service Department DATE: November 2, 1993 SUBJECT: APPEAL OF GENERAL ASSISTANCE EVIDENTIARY HEARING DECISION BY BETTY MORGAIN SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS AND BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: That the Board grant Betty Morgain's appeal of the General Assistance Hearing decision. BACKGROUND: Claimant filed request for Hearing on August 15, 1993. The Hearing was scheduled for September 9, 1993. The claim was denied. Signature: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS: UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AD ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ATTESTED PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY , DEPUTY Signature: ase Social Service Department 1 V_ontra Ple1305Mlyto: ❑ 1305 Macdonald Avenue PerfectoVnllarreal Richmond.California 94801-3120 Director Costa Vosta CO u n 1� 0 3630 San Pablo Dam Road t EI Sobrante. CA 94803-2730 ue SOCIAL SERVICE DEPARTMENT CONTRP=cdoo�=94805-2184 t WELFARE FRAUD 3045 Research Drive Richmond,California 94806-5206 INVE PORT 4 fT1 cbuK'r' Subject: MORGAIN,BETTY SS Field No. 329926 Invest. Type: Field Investigation Household comp. ----------------------- ----------------------------------------- COPIES OF REPORT TO: Investigation Requested By: Sirmons,E Ext: 6-3647 Date of Request: 7-08-93 Date Investigation Begun: 8-05-93 ------------------------------------------------------------------- INVESTIGATION SUMMARY: On 8-05-93 I made an unannounced visit to 567 South 30th Street, Richmond, Ca. The resident, who verbally identified himself as Larry Simonton, came to the door and informed me that Betty Morgain was not there at the moment. I then asked Simonton if Morgain was presently living at this address and he replied "Yes, she lives here" . I i Reported By: JAMES W. BEANE, HAA- le Welfare Fraud Investigator Date: August 5, 1993 Y 0 0 Cuntra Costa County Suual Service Department GENERAL ASSISTANCE ALTERNATE MAILING ADDRESS REQUEST CASE NAME 1 CASE NUMBER EW PCN I request that my General Assistance checks and all other mail from the Social Service Department be sent to: r-- ❑ My home address is: I have no home address. REASON FOR REQUEST: T�� 1'!t Wit= i 1 understand that it is my responsibility to pick up my mail regularly, and that failure to do will not be considered good cause for failure to keep appointments with Social Service. I understand that if I do not have a current home address, I must contact my Eligibility Worker monthly. When 1 obtain a home address,I understand that 1 must report it to my Eligibility Worker right away. I understand that if I do have a home address other than my mailing address, I must include my home address on my monthly income report,and that 1 must report any change in my home address to my Eligibility Worker right away. I understand that 1 must provide verification of my home address (such as rent receipts, utility bills,etc.)to my Eligibility Worker every six months. I UNDERSTAND MY RESPONSIBILITIES AND DECLARE THE ABOVE TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SIGNATURE DATE COUNTY USE FNLY METHOD OF VERIFICATION ❑ APPROVED TICKLER SET FOR ❑ DISAPPROVED Reason: TO REVIEW ELIGIBI IT ORKER SI TURE DA E 1 SUPERVISOR'S SIGNATURE DATE GA tl( 7) �: Ret: DM 49-501 Copy 1: IM CAse file fastener 02; Cupy 2: Applicant/Recipient -, Date of xoA: claimant Ef fective date: Filing date: ° -- Hearing date 5/�-- A.P.P.? sized Representative: ti preter: age: Stefanie Asbell Representative: Antioch.* tinez of Hearing: ___—Ylc!hmond: -)f Hearing: SCS p=UIREMENTS 2� nh ►ability �sssessaent t t_.____ Job sear sre. from,. Jot► Quit/Fired for Cause Lub_...._f / other: t'+n*m#y PtY�I_t1C1I1 g e ' �:a;nArr•s Position '• �•"'" // �.vi> ../U`-t'c--.1 -- _./'�.•� i'�'v'mac' ..-�-'-.� �, ,�. 1, �-.!-�--„�'--G-/' mac•"'`. ,J �j e-4?' ct � ti.. 4 1`-� .�'-u.-�' cam` �'s� .�.�.��-cam..,. /D ,� �� - ---.____ ___ _.__._____— _ . . . e__�_ �� i s "33I1.0N SIM 30 UVa 3H,L 30 SAW bT NIH.LIM,LN3W.LtIVd3a SgOIAjIgS 'moos mi OZ a3uami3a b0 a37IVW 3g ,LSf]W JNiHv3H Hoo.LS oau of oA,LVHi x3gW3wzm •lsanbal BulieaH JnoX uo legl alealpur oseold `Bul-mzH Qq) Ie luosa.rd uosjad jjels jaglo so jo3pom moi(aneq of gsrm no.(jl sploaas ino,( soj Ado:) xaglo 2111 daax pue lsanbai$uziea11 rno,(qUA aanoa srgl jo Ad oa auo apnlaar aseald 8906-ESS66 V3 `zaullleyS anu(l sal8no(l 06 iolsaipiaoC) slaaddd jo aalgp �9NRIV�H V.LS3aOaH OZ HSLM nOA Al •luouruedop ompom Alum) oql jo aarljo stip 1p. algrpeAe -)Iu s2ulJeaH SulumAo2 suoijuln8ag .6 •ssaulzm a se aulteaH Qq) m mosatd 2q leadde japun onssr oql 8uzp ulloi aBpajmour4 lenlJe seq Oqm lagwaw jjPls Aue to `Nets sturBoid y.jo,�% `.iaI toM Mulrgrsrl3 oql tPgl lsonbal of ig2llJ aql aneq nO,k •8 60Z8-ZL£ IM DD3 tEsluaZ) wOid 17966-££Z 11R3 DJD IsaM wO13 cM6-07 llPa DDO 1sP3 luOJ3 ,,Mbuva:tinw S3Df,\H:lg J- DIA I IS IVDJ"I VV1SOO V2J-NOD :le aayjo saawas legal lsaleou aql 2urlaeluoa Xq sa:muas pue aaznpe leSal aa.jj utelgo Am no,k -noA iol auo aprnold 1pm am lala�dlalul ue p2-)u noA jl •aaroga inoX jo (uewsa)lods laq)O Xue JO `aAzlelal `puauj e) uosiad logla Aue Jo,(aulolle ue Xq paluasoidw aq of IgSp oqI aneq nog(2urleaH a Id L -sueaw le4al laglo q',Rnolgi .co 'uocspap aqi laljP turig aaurtszssy rP1auoq lnox 8uzanpal,(q nod woij pamoam oq Aew luau rCedlanO oqI 'pied alam nog gargm pre aql of palirluo lou ajam noA leg) si uorspap aql jI •9 •SulleaH a 19j else no,( dloq llm io3pom Alanoa inoA •S •pagaeal uaaq seg aotsrrap a plun ponugaoa oq R!m pre moi(`JummaJ moa ase nog( Iegl 1ae18 d0 a jo uorleaiwra2 io uo►lanpoi a sosodoid aallou sq)ji pue `a�rlou srgl jo alep 2111 jo step yj arglrm 2 . H a joj 3138 no,(jI •y •aalloa slgl jo alep aql jo sSep fl-ulqlu& aa. ras letaoS of paaaellap so pallem aq lsnat dalreaq u roj lsanbaa no) •8arlum>n oq Isnw isanbai moA •uoisraap a pue lluueaH a lsanboi of jg2p aql aneq osle nog(`lou so aauaiajum a lsonbai nog{ raglagM •£ 'PYWM IOU sem a asneaaq io mea poo8 ioj posnm sr amlrej oql Imp mops of pappaa oq iH!m nog(pue `Aldwoo of ainlrej mof,avoid isnw luamliedaQ a11l ipigm Ie Baraeaq a o1 palltluo ate no,(`sluauialmbw f areBoid Iaaul oI a1nPe3 jo3'(ulrq!$rlaur jo poriad a io aaaenurluoasrp io leruap a sosodoad aanou srgl 3l Z •aatloU srgl jo alep atq-?(ep u-21:mglrm saliom moi( peluoa =uzjpjuoo a luem nok jI aewsa�lods:�aglo so.paau;a `la�CA►el a�q palaasa jdi�q ao';�Iasrno.0 ioj Meads,(em no.( `aaaasajaoa a gans Id•aorlae a papaglm srq>!"e )"I gi luawlaedaQ oopuoS I' o sa easald aaa a of IclBu 2111 aneq nod •T . " � 11 uaiajuo `:;• -:;'' .. ' rte. ".�?;� `.,��;�.�l4i.`.I�'d'ir• it ;� '��i�� H 6£Z IOTIOiDE OF PFOpOSED ACTON' 0 C( ULE Y OF GA 239 H 3�NERAL A$SISrTANCE PROGRA C Ot�.TCOSTA DEL 4193 _ DATE U8- 0-93 ii4.3D • . l .•.f..-'' �� .6.pqQ 3`.ro �.�MO A — � a E�f� -�f� .... a WORK ER E r _ 374-3931 5 3431 . MACJJNL AVENU _ RSM M CJ� �� 'U� KN1S?Ask W t% _ r�.. ", _ ....�1 31 white us* trNwel6s Ie Nse, iw a so er �Mer(q (ADDRESSEE, 110 eesni 1108 If*.il Th&*job 1186 e3a deb a4 veto bin d%eb r 2ErTY MORGAIN ;. 567 SOUTH . 3,;fH STtttET RIC1-!M04VJ. CALIF 94404 L J - Y itrt vt�+ btr�L -Ai;riS Tli►�ik. -fi1,1J � �:i. J ISv �, S r wi}tt:-- #=Fet,- -ti►�'. AU"- i-�� a �5►.3--.- rcCAV E Y.JU PROVIDED F:7AUJULE 'vT ItvfuK;l:�T l;►V IN UhLjcsi Tj AVOIJ f-EkNLi%A— TION J2 TO QUALIFY F-ijk A LAKuLg vAA'NT. Ttlf- INFJAMA TIE7�: YJU PKOV IOcv, Z i t LJCC iL.y� Jr- 3hIJf YkjU ilLL%- JC a-ILL1UlijLC rU,,( J I X MIji-4NiJo is YQ+J ! IJf1 11) tAPPLY FjA GENCKA,— ASjl. iI NLC- t Yi:u 6AY oc LLI .21OLL IL AID C`v OR AFTE9 23tq_�fL�_____ JPU,, YUUR CI:cLUM.;TA,.CEi AT THAT T ;'c . 1F YOU HAVE i,JLSTIGNSv vit Y6V JCLICVc [Hi:, .4LTiUi4 LJ iNLuki%Lfi ., Iuu i11tc E ; T ITLLU TJ TALK Ac3JuT THL"Si: T;i iii+.,,i vii TH YjoK ::uAK�K :JR Tfii: iJPERi1 Surt. THIS ACTION IS cEQUIREil 3Y THE FJLLOwL Pim LAWS :AN13%UK R-CljULAT vo REFERtNC.E, .:. 6CAR-9 'OF SUPERVISUR.; KESOLUTtQ- u: vlL/553 J !O *, .G pL*vgG GA >39—DISC. PROVIJEU F UOULctvT IM r0KNiATIUsSi. o Stu H NV I. (1u4— '3914(5/87) lbAZbl,t3 26 orindo way orinda california 94563 510 • 254-3900 October 21, 1993 RECEIVED Tom Torlakson, Chairman OCT 2 5 1993 and Members of the Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors CLERK COTBOARAOCOSUPERVISORS R CO. 651 Pine Street, 11th Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Chairman Torlakson and Members of the Board of Supervisors: As you know the City of Orinda and the Town of Moraga have undertaken an evaluation of fire services in our communities. The City of Orinda's goal in this effort is to ensure continuation of the highest practical level of fire protection to this community. To this end we commissioned an independent consultant to help us evaluate the relative costs and benefits of several service delivery alternatives. We have considered the County's plan to consolidate the merit system and volunteer fire districts into a single district, as well as other options such as the formation of an independent fire district in the Orinda/Moraga area. Based on this effort the City of Orinda has reached the following overall conclusions: 1. It would be feasible in both operational and financial terms to form an independent fire protection district serving the Orinda and Moraga areas. At the -present time, the City of Orinda is not proposing this option; however, our position in this matter is dependent upon assurances from the Board of Supervisors that your proposed single district consolidation will not deteriorate fire protection services in Orinda. 2. While there are cost reduction benefits to be achieved through the consolidation efforts being undertaken by the Board, it is also critical that service levels not be reduced. We do not yet see any special focus on minimum acceptable levels of service. To the contrary, we are worried that financial considerations dominate the considerations. 3. During any consolidation proceedings that your Board may initiate, there are means through which the county can assure the maintenance of acceptable levels of fire service capacity to the citizens of Orinda. We are looking to the Board for these assurances. As the Board knows, the formation and reorganization of fire districts within California is governed by statutes that are generally referred to as Cortese - Kn6,x and the Fire Protection District Law of 1987. Specifically,these statues provide the Board and the Local Agency Formation Commission with the ability to: 1. Establish separate "service zones" for providing fire services within a district service area. 2. Appoint advisory fire service commissions for the district as whole or for separate zones. 3. Set forth special conditions related to the continued provision of services upon reorganizations and consolidations. Printed on Recycled Poper .J _ Tom Torlakson, Chairman October 21, 1993 Page Two We understand from your staff that depending on the outcome of the advisory measure vote in the November election, the Board is considering the initiation of proceedings to consolidate the Orinda and Contra Costa Fire Protection Districts. If you undertake this initiative, the Orinda City Council requests that the Board condition the LAFCO application and consolidation proceedings as follows: 1. Establish an Orinda Fire Service Zone that is coterminous with the existing boundaries of the Orinda Fire Protection District. 2. Designate the Zone as a "high fire hazard area". 3. Commit that three stations and adequate equipment will continue to operate within the Zone to maintain existing emergency response times. 4. Commit to a minimum staffing level of three person engine companies, an officer in charge, and an administrative Battalion Chief (which may be shared with the Moraga Fire Protection District), dedicated to the Zone and maintain personnel in the Zone who are familiar with the special wildlands fire hazards and road network within the Zone. 5. Commit all current tax revenue and future growth in tax revenues generated in the Zone to services within the Zone. 6. Commit that personnel assigned to the Zone be EMT certified. 7. Establish an advisory commission comprised of local representatives for the service area Zone, with representatives to be recommended by the Orinda.City Council and appointed by the Board of Supervisors. The consolidation, conditioned as outlined immediately above, would permit the benefits of consolidation to be achieved and would assure adequate fire protection within the designated Z one. Without these commitments, we do not believe that the Orinda community will be assured that the single district consolidation will preserve adequate fire protection, and support for consolidation would be severely eroded. During the last ten years the tax revenues generated within the Orinda Fire Protection District have i exceeded the expenditures in the district by over $2,800,000. For the future, we are not seeking to receive special benefits over and above other parts of a consolidated district. Rather,these conditions are proposed simply to assure that the consolidation does not result in leaving a high fire hazard area at greater risk than existed before consolidation. We are certain that your Board has the same goal and that you will find these conditions consistent with your intent. Thank you for your continued efforts to assure adequate ,fire protection. On behalf of the Orinda City Council, thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, i 1 Bobbie Landers, Mayo BL/TS:nh Presentation before the Board of Supervisors Please complete this form and return it to the Office of the Clerk of the Board, 651 Pine Street, Room 106, Martinez by Wednesday Noon, prior to the Tuesday Board meeting for which the presentation is scheduled. Failure to submit the completed form as requested may necessitate the removal of the item from the Board's agenda. 1. Date of Board Meeting_October 26, 1993 Time: 9:00 a.m. 2. Who will introduce the subject to the presentation? Jonothan Dumas, Chair, of the Advisory Council on Equal Employment Opportunity. He will explain the role of the Advisory Council; why Department Heads were asked to recommend employees for special recognition; why the Advisory Council recommends to the Board employees to award Certificates of Commendation. 3. Will the Board Chair be asked to make the presentation? No, the Board Chair and Supervisors will be asked to hand the employee their certificates; however, they may chose to offer comments to the Department Head and employee regarding the recognition. (If yes, attach notes or comments which the Chair may use in making the presentation. ) 4. Will other Board Members be asked to participate? Yes How? Each Board Member will be asked to give (hand) the award to the employee(s) . 5. How long will the presentation/program take? The presentation should take no more than fifteen minutes. 6. Outline the procedure or format of the presentation. The Chair of the Advisory Council will be asked to present the presentation. The Chair will give a brief background of the Advisory Council; its purpose; why it requested from Department Heads the names of employees to receive special recognition; and why the employees selected are being recommended to the Board for the Commendation. Departments Heads or their representative will present will present their employee to the Board and audience with a background of who long the employee has been with the County and in their Department; the employees job title and a description of what the employee does in the department; and why they recommended the employee to the Advisory Council for special recognition. Attach background information relative to this presentation. Attached are copies of the awards each Board member will present to the employee(s) . S. Name of person to contact and phone. Emma Kuevor, Affirmative Action Officer, County Administrator's Office, 646-4106. Date: September 17, 1993 Signature: County Department: Office of the County Administrator Contra Costa County Affirmative Action Office 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553 (510) 646-4106 fax: (510) 646-1353 Memorandum Date: September 17, 1993 To: Department Heads: Building Inspection County Counsel General Services Probation Sheriff-Coroners Social Services Treasurer-Tax Collector From: Emma Kuevor Affirmative t on Officer Subject: Certificate of Commendation Several months ago, the Advisory Council on Equal Employment Opportunity recognized employees in your department and submitted their names to the Board of Supervisors for special recognition in the form of a Certificate of Commendation. The Board will recognize your employee(s) at their October 26, 1993 meeting at 9:00 a.m. You are being asked to present your employee to the Board. In your presentation, I recommend that you advise the Board of the length of time the employee has been with the County and in your department; their job class; a brief description of what they do; and why you submitted their names to the Advisory Council for special recognition. I've attached a copy of the certificate that will be presented to them. Of course their certificate will be in a frame with the County seal, and signed by Supervisor Torlakson. I 've also enclosed a copy of the presentation format given to the Board. Please advise your employee(s) of the date and time so they can make appropriate arrangements. They may want to invite friends and relatives to the Board meeting. We anticipate that members of the Advisory Council on Equal Employment Opportunity may also attend. Call me if you have questions regarding the Commendation. EK a:Commend Presentation before the Board of Supervisors Please complete this form and return it to the Office of the Clerk of the Board, 651 Pine Street, Room 106, Martinez by Wednesday Noon, prior to the Tuesday Board meeting for which the presentation is scheduled. Failure to submit the completed form as requested may necessitate the removal of the item from the Board's agenda. 1 Date of .Board Meeting 10-26-93 Time: 9:oo AM 2. Who will introduce the subject of the presentation? Patricia Burke, Franchise Administrator 3. Will the Board Chair be asked to make the presentation? No. r (If yes, attach notes or comments which the Chair may use in making the presentation. ) 4. Will other Board Members be asked to participate? . How? No. 5. How long will the presentation/program take? 10 Minutes. 6. Outline the procedure or format of the presentation. ,-Recognize WAVE (Western Access Video Excellence) Awards Winners. Show Clips from Award Videos. -Short Update on CCTV Projects and Award Finalists. -Show Clips from "Deadbeat Parents" and Award Finalists. 7. Attach background information relative. to this presentation. (To Follow) . S. Name of person to contact and phone. Patricia Burke (510) 646-2948. Dated: Signature Countyartment