HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10051993 - 1.13 /1/3
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: October 5, 1993
SUBJECT: Flood Control District Maintenance Funding
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. Recommended Action:
APPROVE the transfer of Flood Control District funds from the Flood Control Revolving Fund
in the amount indicated to the following entities for system maintenance:
ENTITY AMOUNT
1. Flood Control Zone 2 (Byron) $1,000
2. Flood Control Zone 6A (San Pablo) 23,000
3. Flood Control Zone 9 (Pinole) 20,000
4. Flood Control Zone 11 (Antioch) 30,000
5. Flood Control Zone 12 (Antioch) 5,000
6. Flood Control Drainage Area 127 (San Pablo) 10,000
7. Flood Control Drainage Area 290 (Oakley) 10,000
8. Flood Control Drainage Area 300 (Oakley) 4,000
$103,000
II. Financial Impact:
The amount of Flood Control District funds in the Revolving Fund will be decreased which will
reduce available funding for capital improvements.
Continued on Attachment YES SIGNATURE: X/
144v
_ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
_ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON OCT 51993 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
I hereby certify that this is a true and Correct COPY 01
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors
n date shown.
ATTESTED: —OCT!_ 1 1993
PHIL BATCHELOR,Clerk of the Board
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS of Supervisors and CTAnty Administrator
t� UNANIMOUS (ABSENT )
AYES: NOES: By ��
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
M FK:ly
c:BO\5.t10
Orig. Div: Public Works(FC)
Contact: Phil Harrington(510)313-2271
cc: CAO
County Counsel
GMEDA
PW-Flood Control
z
FCD Maintenance Funding
October 5, 1993
Page Two
III. BACKGROUND FOR RECOMMENDATION
For some time the above entities have relied on the Special District Augmentation Fund
(SDAF) for funding their system maintenance costs. SDAF funds are no longer available.
The maintenance responsibility for the existing facilities must be met. Failure to meet this
responsibility would expose the District to claims for flood damages exceeding the cost of
maintenance. It is recommended that the District fund a minimal maintenance effort on the
facilities in these entities to continue their functioning as designed.
IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Required maintenance will not be performed in the above entities resulting in degradation of
the system and ultimately flooding of adjacent lands.