Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01191993 - 2.A 2.A .t Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS S Costa FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR C_ ounty County Administrator f� M DATE: January 19, 1993 SUBJECT: Management Integration of the Moraga and Orinda Fire Protection Districts Specific Request(s) or Recommendation(s) & Background & Justification RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Approve the Moraga/Orinda Ad Hoc Task Force' s recommendation to support the continuation of the present interim arrangement for the management of the two districts based on acting chief officer assignments. 2. Direct the County Administrator and the Task Force to continue developing detailed operations and funding plans for the eventual implementation of the administrative integration and shared management plan consisting of one fire chief, no assistant chiefs, one fire marshal and three battalion chiefs as recommended by the Task Force in the December 15, 1992 report of the County Administrator. 3. Direct the Task Force and the County Administrator' s Office to continue to consider other refinements or alternatives to the recommended management integration plan. 4. Direct the County Administrator and the Acting Fire Chief to continue meeting with representatives of the United Professional Firefighter Union Local 1230 to receive their input and to identify any issues that may require meet and confer. 5. Acknowledge that the Moraga and Orinda Fire Commissions and the Moraga Town Council support the recommendations of the Task Force and that the City Council of Orinda expressed no objections to the management integration plan. Continued on Attachment: X YES Signature: *ZZLc-,,�,, k, IF Recommendation of County Administrator Recommendation of Board Committee Approve Other Signature(s) : Action of Board on: .TanuarV 1.q_ 1993 Approved as Recommended—Other-1— Commissioner Charles Blue and Moraga Mayor Sue Noe appeared and agreed with the above recommendations as the first step. Ray Davis, Citizen of Ordina, urged consolidation with the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. The Board APPROVED the above_recommendations and amended recommendation No. 3 by adding: "to be done in conjunction with and under the supervision of the Fire Coordinating Subcommittee of the Board." Vote of Supervisors: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN x Unanimous (Absent ) AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE Ayes: Noes: ) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN. Contact: Terry McGraw 646-4855 Attested: Tan„a X;r 19� iqQ1 cc: Ad Hoc Task Force via CAO Phil Batchelor, Clerk of County Administrator the Board of Supervisors Orinda & Moraga Fire and County Administrator Protection Districts 67 .Town of Moraga By: —, DEPUTY City of Orinda United Professional Firefighters Local 1230 i REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND: On December 15, 1992 the Board of Supervisors considered the report of the County Administrator which recommended the approval of the Task Force' s recommendation to support in principle the administrative integration and shared management plan for the two districts. The Board requested that the Task Force review its recommendations in relation to the "West County Management Plan" and a proposal known as "The Lamorinda Tactical Service Area" option, provided to Supervisor Powers by Willis Lamm of the Orinda Fire District. The Task Force plan outlined above in recommendation number 1, as revised by Chief Cooper, would save approximately $223,000. Under the West County Plan, the Chief of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (Con Fire) would be the administrative chief of Moraga and Orinda. This option would involve the elimination of the two fire chief positions, two fire marshal positions and a half-time dispatcher position. One fire inspector position would be added. The two assistant chief positions would be converted to battalion chiefs assigned to a 40-hour per week daytime schedule in their respective districts. Battalion chief coverage during evenings and weekend hours would be provided by the existing two battalion structure of Con Fire. The estimated savings of this option is approximately $502,000 (revised from $445,426) . The Task force did not believe this would be a workable arrangement from the standpoint of the battalion chief coverage during evening and weekend periods. Adding six additional fire companies from Orinda/Moraga would overburden the existing two-battalion structure in Con Fire and create a totally unreasonable span of control ratio of one battalion chief for each 16. 5 companies (including reserve companies) . The Standardized Incident Command System in use in California recommends a ratio of one Command Officer to each 5-7 companies. New state law requires this system become mandatory for use by all fire agencies by 1995. The "Lamorinda Tactical Service Area" option would result in the elimination of two fire chief positions, one fire marshal, one and one-half clerical/dispatcher position and the conversion of the two assistant chief positions to battalion chiefs. The Chief of Con Fire would be the administrative chief of Moraga and Orinda. Operationally, Moraga and Orinda Fire, in conjunction with Con Fire, would form a third battalion to serve the Lafayette, Moraga and Orinda areas. This plan assumes that Con Fire has an excess battalion chief and fire inspector that could be assigned to Lamorinda. This is not the case. The estimated savings of this option is $378,129 per year. However, realistically, the cost of a battalion chief and the fire inspector at approximately $203 ,000 must be offset against the proposed savings. This would reduce the savings to $175,129. Some members of the Task Force questioned the validity of the estimated cost savings of the two alternative plans because there was nothing factored in for administration by Con Fire. The feeling was that this represents a hidden cost in that the management services provided to West County Fire and proposed for Moraga/Orinda without charge diminishes the ability of Con Fire personnel to manage their district. A non-financial objection to the two alternative options would be the concerns of the community about Moraga and Orinda being managed by Con Fire. It is likely that this would create similar community opposition as was the case in the consolidation proposals. Although it is recommended that the Task Force option be approved, the Task Force and the County Administrator' s Office will continue to explore other potential management integration enhancements. The Acting Moraga/Orinda Fire Chief and representatives of the County Administrator' s Office made presentations to the Moraga and Orinda Fire Commissions and the Councils of the Town of Moraga and the City of Orinda. With the exception of the Orinda City Council, all of the agencies approved the concepts of the Task Force recommendations. The Orinda City Council did not take a position on the matter, but did not express opposition. The concept of management integration being proposed for the Orinda and Moraga Fire Protection Districts would achieve significant savings while maintaining individual District identity and the strong community support which historically these Districts have enjoyed. Such support is vital to developing a viable, ongoing, and permanent funding base which permits a high level of fire protection services. J