Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 01121993 - H.11
H. 11 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on January 12 , 1993 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Smith, Bishop, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Hearing On Appeal By Winton and Nathalie Jones On Land Use Permit 2042-92, Valley Waste Management and MGM Construction In the Concord Area. This is the time heretofore noticed for hearing on the appeal by Winton and Nathalie Jones from the decision by the Contra Costa County Planning Commission on the request (LUP 2042-92 ) of Valley Waste Management (applicant) and MGM Construction Company (owner) for approval for a Land Use Permit to operate a truck maintenance and parking facility for its own refuse disposal trucks on a 4. 334 acre parcel of land in the Concord area. Dennis Barry, Community Development Department, described the location of the request site and the uses for the site. Mr. Barry commented on the Planning Commission' s added conditions of approval and the appeal before the Board today. He also commented on a letter from Ellman, Burke, Hoffmann and Johnson, dated January 8, 1993 , requesting on behalf of the appellant that the hearing be rescheduled since they have not had adequate time to prepare their client' s presentation. Mr. Barry commented on the staff recommendation that the hearing be held and he commented on the two options presented by staff for Board consideration. The public hearing was opened and the following persons appeared to testify: Desi Reno, 1990 N. California Suite #20, Walnut Creek, representing Valley Waste Management, commented on material he had presented to Board members (not presented to the Clerk) , spoke in concurrence with the conditions, and requested that the Board deny the Jones' appeal. Supervisor Bishop asked how quickly Valley Waste Management would occupy the site if the Land Use Permit were approved. Mr. Reno responded that vehicles could be on the property by the end of the month. Ben Castro, 45 Winding Glen, Danville, MGM Construction Company, submitted a card in favor of the project. Jeff Johnson, One Ecker Building, San Francisco, Ellman, Burke, Hoffman & Johnson, representing Winton and Nathalie Jones, requested more time to prepare a presentation and he proposed that the Board take testimony and continue the matter. Mr. Johnson advised that there were specific concerns about the operation including noise, odor, increased traffic and health and safety issues. Mr. Johnson commented on various environmental impact issues including creation of objectionable odors, discharge into surface waters, exposure of people or property to water related hazards, increases in existing noise levels, generation of substantial vehicular movement, increase in traffic hazards, creation of health hazards or potential health hazards, exposure of people to potential health hazards, and he advised that he did not see how a Negative Declaration is supported based on the record he has seen. Winton Jones, 1949 Arnold Industrial Way, Concord, presented pictures for Board consideration and spoke in opposition to the Land Use Permit and he requested further time to study this matter. Supervisor Bishop commented on a traffic study by Abrhams and Associates. Mr. Jones commented that he had not seen a traffic study. Mr. Johnson commented that if the matter were continued for two weeks that perhaps they could satisfy themselves that proposed language in the conditions on the traffic issue would be acceptable. Mr. Barry commented that there was a traffic study in the file. Supervisor Bishop inquired if Mr. Jones resided on the property adjacent to the subject property. Mr. Jones responded that he did. Supervisor McPeak clarified that it was a residence in a light industry area. Supervisor McPeak commented on the condition of approval relative to on-going traffic monitoring. Mitch Avalon, Public Works Department, responded on the impacts of the operation and the traffic monitoring study. Supervisor McPeak indicated a need to look at the traffic circulation in the North Concord area, the past conditions on signalization, and the enforcement of traffic conditions. Supervisor McPeak commented on yards where packer trucks are parked in existence in Contra Costa County and she inquired as to whether staff had visited one. Mr. Barry responded that he did not know. Supervisor Smith requested clarification on the reason for the appeal being an objection to Valley Waste Management wishing to have a transfer station on the site. Mr. Johnson responded that the CEQA objections had been raised before, and he clarified the reasons for the Jones ' appeal. The Board discussed the use of Mr. Jones ' 25 acre parcel at the present time. Desi Reno spoke in rebuttal. Supervisor McPeak inquired as to whether Mr. Reno had objection to conditioning the Land Use Permit approval with the prohibition of a transfer station at this site. Mr. Reno responded that there was no objection to that at this site. Supervisor McPeak inquired as to the reason for moving the corporate yard further north from the service area. Mr. Reno responded that there were no sites available in Walnut Creek and Danville. Supervisor Bishop inquired as to the possibility of landscaping or a row of trees for odor and noise reduction. Mr. Reno responded that the noise study would address this issue. Supervisor McPeak recommended that the decision be continued for two weeks and that the conditions should be amended to include the prohibition of a transfer station on this site and landscaping for a visual impact separation on the east side of the property, and that staff, the applicant and the appellant should do a walk around of at least two other corporate yard sites and do an odor test. Victor Westman clarified that if the Board were going to approve the Land Use Permit that the findings now before the Board were not adequate and additional findings would have to be prepared and that the hearing should be left open for comment on those or the hearing could be left open entirely. Supervisor McPeak moved to continue the public hearing to January 26, 1993 , and she requested that the staff prepare additional conditions for Board consideration at that time that would include a prohibition on transfer station at this site, additional landscaping on the eastern border for a visual buffer, and she requested that Public Works review any other traffic studies or conditions that had been done on other projects in the North Concord area and determine if any of those improvements should be called out and she requested staff, the applicant and the appellant to visit at least two other existing corporate yards where packer transfer trucks are kept. Supervisor Bishop seconded the motion. The Board discussed whether or not to leave the hearing open. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the hearing on the appeal of Winton and Nathalie Jones from the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission on the request of Valley Waste Management and MGM Construction Company for a Land Use Permit (LUP 2042-90 ) is CONTINUED to January 26 , 1993 at 2: 00 p.m. in the Board Chambers; and staff is DIRECTED to address concerns raised today and to prepare additional conditions and findings for Board consideration on January 26, 1993 ; and staff, the applicant, and the appellant are REQUESTED to visit two other corporation yards where packer transfer trucks are kept. I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct oopy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Su rvisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: PHIL TCHELOR,Qerk of the Board upe i and Cou T minletrator By .Deputy Orig. Dept. : clerk of the Board cc : Community Development Dept. County Counsel MGM Construction Winton Jones Development Co. Public Works-Mitch Avalon A P P E A L - LAND USE PERMIT 92042-92 VALLEY WASTE MANAGEMENT (APPLICANT) MGM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (OWNER) WINTON & NATHALIE JONES (APPELLANTS) THE APPLICANT REQUESTS APPROVAL TO OPERATE A TRUCK MAINTENANCE AND PARKING FACILITY FOR ITS OWN REFUSE DISPOSAL TRUCKS. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS DESCRIBED AS. BEING A 4.334 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 700-FT., NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF ARNOLD INDUSTRIAL HIGHWAY AND LAURA ALICE WAY, IS ADDRESSED AS #1781 ARNOLD INDUSTRIAL HIGHWAY, CONCORD AR EA. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 12 JANUARY 1993 - 2:00 P.M. i N.._-....a�._.O� Contra To: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ''-�{ Costa n: Camry FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON i DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: January 12, 1993 SUBJECT: Appeal of December 8, 1992 Planning Commission Decision to Deny Appeal by Winton Jones Development Company of Land Use Permit 2042-92 (valley Waste Management:Applicant; MGM Construction: Owner), in the Concord Area. (Parcel /159-090-043) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) i BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Deny the appeal and sustain the Planning Commission decision to deny the appeal and approve LUP 2042-92 in accord with the Option A actions listed below. OPTION A- Sustain the Planning Commission Approval Decision 1. Deny the appeal of Winton Jones Development Company. 2. Accept the environmental review documentation as being complete and adequate. 3. Approve LUP 2042-92. 4. Approve the findings contained in the resolution of the December 8, 1992 Planning Commission as the basis for the Board actions. OPTION B- Reverse the Planning Commission Decision 1. Grant the appeal of Winton Jones Development Company. 2. Accept the environmental documentation for this project as being adequate. 3. Deny LUP 2042-92. 4. Direct staff to prepare findings for review and ydoption of Board. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE _ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMM DAT N O 8 D COMMITTEE _ APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN. AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact:Michael Enright-646-2091 ATTESTED cc: Community Development Department PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF Valley Waste Management THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MGM Construction AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Winton Jones Development Co. Public Works-Mitch Avalon BY , DEPUTY ME:df FISCAL IMPACT None BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The background for this project is reviewed in the December 8 and November 10, 1992 staff report to the County Planning Commission. The Commission reviewed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of the application filed by the adjoining property Winton Jones Development Company (Winton S Nathalie Jones) . The Jone's own seven nearby parcels including one with their residence. The Jones current appeal is based on the objection that Valley Waste Management will use the site for a transfer station. The Jone's raised additional concerns when they appealed the Zoning Administrator's decision. Those concerns were addressed by the Planning Commission when they added additional conditions to the project approval. On September 28, 1992, after taking testimony, the Zoning Administrator approved the application for LUP 2042-92. The Zoning Administrator modified Conditions of Approval based on testimony from Winton and Nathalie Jones. On October 6, 1992, Winton and Nathalie Jones, adjacent property owners.appealed the Zoning Administrator's decision to the Planning Commission. On November 10, 1992, the Planning Commission continued the appeal hearing to December 8, 1992 in order to obtain additional information. On December 8, 1992, the Planning Commission denied the appeal by added additional condition of approval to the project. On December 14, 1992, Winton Jones Development Company, appealed the Commission's decision to the Board. The appeal states that the applicant wants a transfer station at the site. The applicant has not requested to use the site as a transfer station. An additional permit would be required to allow use as a transfer station. The Winton Jones Development Company appeal contains no information that was not available to the Commission. Valley Waste Management MGM Construction Co. Tosco Corporation 1990 N. California Blvd. 140-A Town & Country Dr. Avon Refinery #2.0 Danville, CA 94526 Attn: James M. Clearly Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Martinez, CA 94553 Lonestar California Mrs. Helen Lowe Lloyd & Mildred Riggs 11555 Dublin Canyon Rd. 94 Frederick #6 880 Hawthorne Drive Pleasanton, CA 94566 Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Peter & Kirsten Bedford Winton & Nathalie Jones Jonathon Winslow P.O. Box 1267 1949 Arnold Industrial 3470 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Lafayette, CA 94549 Way Concord, CA 94520 Lafayette, CA 94549 Ben & Judi Castro Desi Reno 45 Winding Glen Valley Waste Management Danville, CA 94526 2658 N. Main St. Walnut Creek, CA 94596 BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONTRA COSTA COUNTY STATE OF CALIFORNIA A P P E A L - Land Use Permit #2042-92, Valley Waste Management (Applicant) , MGM Construction Co. (Owner) - Concord Resolution No. 76-1992 Area. (S.D. IV) WHEREAS, on July 8, 1992, the applicant, Valley Waste Management and the owner MGM Construction Co. , filed an application requesting approval to establish a truck maintenance and parking facility for its own refuse disposal trucks on a 4.334 acre parcel; and WHEREAS, the subject parcel is located approximately 700-ft. , north of the intersection of Arnold Industrial Highway and Laura Alice Way; is addressed as 1791 Arnold Industrial Highway, in the Concord area; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was posted for this project on September 4, 1992; and WHEREAS, the project was scheduled for public hearing before the County Zoning Administrator for September 28, 1992, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, at said Zoning Administrator hearing of September 28, 1992, the applicant appeared and explained his request; and WHEREAS, Winton and Nathalie Jones appeared and spoke in opposition to the requested use of this land and; WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator closed the public hearing and after having reviewed, considered and evaluated all the test- imony and evidence submitted in this application, APPROVED the re- quested us of this .land with revised and added conditions; and WHEREAS, on October 6, 1992, Winton and Nathalie Jones appealed the Zoning Administrator's decision to the County Planning Commission for public hearing and determination; and WHEREAS, on Tuesday, November 10, 1992, the County Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Appeals, conducted a public hearing whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the applicant appeared and explained his request and Winton and Nathalie Jones appeared and spoke in opposition; and WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals having fully reviewed, 2. Resolution No. 76-1992 considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Appeals DENIED the appeal of Winton and Nathalie Jones, upholding the decision of the County Zoning Administrator with revised and added conditions; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reasons for this recommendation are: 1. The general plan designates this site as being appropriate for light industrial uses. 2. The zoning of this area is Light Industrial (L-I) . 3. The proposed use of the property is a light industrial use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the foregoing order was given by the Board of Appeals in a regular meeting on Tuesday, December 8, 1992, as follows: AYES: Commissioners — Clark, Gaddis, Sakai, Frakes, Accornero, Terrell. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - Wallace D. Woo. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appellants, Winton and Nathalie Jones have appealed the decision of the Board of Appeals to the County Board of Supervisors for public hearing and determin- ation. Marvin J. Terrell Chairman of the Planning Commission, jConC to C unty - State of Calif. 23 December 1992 ATTEST Bragdon, Secretary of the ommission, Contra Costa County - ate of California. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR LAND USE PERMIT 2042-92 (VALLEY WASTE MANAGE- MENT-Applicant)AS APPROVED BY THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 8, 1992 1 . The request for a land use permit for truck maintenance and parking facility at 1781 Arnold Industrial Way as depicted on the site plan dated received July 28, 1992 by the Community Development Department. The following conditions of approval require compliance prior to use of the site unless otherwise indicated. 2. The term of this use permit is until March 1 , 1995 unless the Parcel Map for MS 35-91 is recorded. In the event that the Parcel Map is recorded, the terms of the use permit shall expire 30 days after the date of recordation of the Parcel Map. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed TDM Plan for review and approval of the Zoning Administrator (unless otherwise required by a TDM Ordinance). 4. No solid or liquid waste originating off the subject site shall be brought on site, stored or transferred on the subject site. 5. No solid or liquid waste, or recycled or other material, not related to the development of the site or the maintenance of its facilities and equipment, shall be sorted, composted, or otherwise processed or stored on the subject site. 6. Landscaping: A. Submit a landscaping plan for the frontage along Laura Alice Way to continue the landscaping scheme installed along the other properties fronting the roadway. B. Submit a landscaping plan for on site planting. Landscape plan shall provide landscaping within the front setback area in order to provide partial screening of the site from off-site views. C. Said plans shall be submitted for approval by the Zoning Administrator with 30 days of the use permit approval. Bonding shall be provided for the installation of the landscaping within six months of the Zoning Administrator's approval of the landscape plans. Plans shall comply with the County Water Conservation Guidelines. 7. Submit an implementable plan for complying with the intent of EPA Clean Water Act (NPDES) for reducing pollutants entering into off-site drainage systems. Said plan shall be submitted to the Flood Control District within 30 days of the use permit approval. 8. Storage of containers, roll off boxes and carts shall only be allowed in the area shown on the site plan for their storage. Fencing shall be provided between the truck parking area and the storage area. 2. 9. Prior to the issuance of building or grading permits, the applicant shall submit verification to the Zoning Administrator that the Contra Costa County Consolidated Fire District has determined that the site plan adequately accommodates the Fire District's need for access to all portions of the site. .r:<:::: imiij n ixii.. �I. in. :<:> . r:::i:; >::::. r: in rmi r:::: mama n. . .m :f::::: h: : TSr�.o..:::to ssua :ce:::tj.#::bu::d::::. :pe.:m,tS. : :oda:::. pe :: .ts:::o.:::ct�.:::::::e. c .:..e.:: .:.. .:.e ............................................. ....9............:... ........ .. ...... 9...................................... ecation: >:t::e> :a : icant:>s:.>a::;:<arr:an a:::.or>>a>:Wer:.i.n :;;:connect:on:>: rv�.t; is:e>: e:ntra. p:. . ...... . .... . p..p .. 9.. 9 ... . ....... S2:rti:;.0 Dis;tr#fit sa 8r;;$ystam .................................................................... ................................................................................................................... ............................... Tfte s8v�ter:system Shall be odes gn..ed t�assu e t a:t 1 truck washy g aCtiv ty.occurnng .. : .. pn;tl-e;i'ice„►n I.....::utilize;:a;.closed.loo:p:systermwiiichy prevents:anY.ru 4f#::rofn:;the: :uck >uash�ng aCt�vity frorrn entering the sewer System septic tank:;,ground areas, storrri' drains or othe...... propriate way tc leave the:property The system ha ibe designed ............................................,.......................................:....:...:............................................ ...........................................,..::....,.................:.. ............................... ............................................. .................................................:................................... .................................................... .:.: rt.. >i:n: r, 1::1a:.': `i:..rir'.. <ii::# ::;nvi. nme.rt ...1:: =1::...I:<h i<>::vi i :ra: ::f:: l ...:>H.;...I h 1Y:.:a:::ace.........:ed.: dust..::a..:::::.y9.e.:::st,... .:e..:. ....:::::::o....::.:::.::to.::::.:::es..t.:::..::.:::...:s:.o......p.:.......:e.....a:a....:t.:. ...............................:..............:........................ ................................................... ................ ........................ .................................................. Services ©epar#rrient (646.. 521} s a,.l be.,..prov�ded an.:. pp.o tumty. to rev>ewar3d. .... n.i >:;:�: � > r`:: >: cJ :' vsr . r. v h ..Z .nin ,cam:::e.t:c.:.:t::e::.p.:o.pose:;.;syste:.; :< p.;::<o:;;;to:: ::a::;.;e;.::e.::;: .::d::< .pp::o..:a...::b.Y t:::e: .:p.:.:::. ...................................... . .. . . . ..... ... .. ........ 9 A "rninist"rator .............................:0.... ...................................... ...................................... i . : . :.,,>..r. din ::: , r :r r f:: : :i:o .,..,.. : : ;Frior;;to:issuancs.ttf.tau d ng or.g a g pe m is o cainmencement:Q the npermtted ..... ........ ....... ......: ..... .... ...... ltruGfc. .a..rtl..t5 .er:a.tion: a r1o.:se.::a.::a:.ys:s::a.:..d...eue..u...at.o.:..::p.;.. rant.:. .r...... .tl.::faa.:l�.esnse.d .Y....:::::::.::::P:::::.:.:::::::.:...::...........:.,.:......::..,..:.,............:..:.::..::.::::::..:::...:::.......:.:::.:0.9:: :...::. .......... ...::::::::::.:Y . a11';�a si bz itte fer <:e'>rev ewn iAb,;, ;<::::>«:r::<;v ,,,,>:>, ' ';; ?: :<ing: agbusti`e :en�rj .,sh.:.:.: .:. .. .....:...:.t .:: .:... ..th.::: :....... ..::.,,.. ..d...appa....:a� of the:..tonin . 9.............. .................... .... ................... ....: .. ........ 9 .: ;The..a.::a.I s.:s.,,ait...:�dd.re:s..s„the:b...a,se.:;�tnpa:cts..that..w tl.;.be: erti8ra.#ed 9.:.::.::::::.:: .: during t}i. early morn ng:.. u s. T e:a a,ys s shat dentify those measu es which ...................................... ............................................................................ ..... .................................... ................................................. ... .................................................................................................................. ........ . ........................................................................ . .. 1:.. r < > >' m 'a i wi. ...n r . ..r l 11 ..r ' i1 :if:i' v..PU.d:a.ssu:e.acoust::c.aCO p. .t.b. .t.y::: .:.t.::::.:e.a::by.. es,.de.<.ce:s. : ::::e de..:t.:.ed,:rne.a:sur:e:s ................................................................................................................................................ .......................................................................... ....................................................................................... ........................................ .. .............................................................................. shall be incorporated;into tfie design of the. ucicyard at ttrne of:cornrnencement of the >::...:...................................:::...........:.:.:........................................................................................................................................ Q:f Oration: :.: :<: v i::, :<.:.` `noon r> r;::;:::>:: .:.::::>::11> :;::: >:: :::::,::::::_, ::: .......:;<,; .. >:: 'the purpose t� the rio see a uat:o .;p og am,shy be to mvnrtvr.tru.c. rd rio se leyels during the #first 6-sno.nt sof ope at on, 1IVit n 21�days t7 months? of the cgmmence ttient of the truckyard op8r8ti0n; an ad0ustic repvr; prepared by'a Crt�#ied, ind.uStriai sorrow...::;.....:>::h;:<:i,. ;: »::. .;.;:.; �; h`::,,;:;::;h;:<:>...............; : ::,:.:+>::;<::;:r: :: hygienist oracotistic.eng nee s.;a. besubmitted#o t e Zq ing Am mst ator s.reuiew 66d.1:00pr4v I..;.The Zoning Ad St atv may puSe add::t o m:use reStractl.on5 0 the tckyartl operation so as to.assu e t at the ape at o will be a:caustically,eornpatible Jnrith;ne;arb..y:,aionrg;uses,,.Vic.:ud...:g.. .e...s dent.:al,uses., : 1Ni'thin.;1:$.0:days:.;of:tfie;:;co. e.;ce: e.:too. ;the truc,kyartl.;op.eratror�s. .tvvp G.....0.....0.....0.. S::ofa. s: ..#i >; :::ud::::>:. roe. a.r:ed::;::b: a:.::tr.:a:f#ic:::bn,,ane:e:c:..::shall #�e:subrni:tt:e:d:<f:or`tfie:review t;;a:f.:::c:.:st. :::Y.P ::P:, :: . :Y 9.::;:;:.;:.; .;:e:..:e:.::.::.:;and ,<,::>: r >< t approval of the ZQnir g Adr��n�st;oto a purpose.;of the$tud..y shall be t0::assess the.: irmpacts flf.the:truckyard operatio on.. :. road system The report shall recommend "`"v m' 'n a eedei �m <.<� ; .:�� : itr r e is c e o a e ac` ::h.< a.....app::9.P::.ate.;;<.;:p::p.... :..:p....... ....::.;:; t; ;:: . t 9 :t.:: p;;.; ;ts caus.ed b;Y:t e. tr..uck and:<o erati;on ;;<<; e;: nu ie:;:.. or.:.'s;:::e. a:�t{ie:ri;t :;;:;oa:;:.::n ineein Division: :shaft .... ..Y :.;:;;;p;:.:: ::. .:.::.: ... :::. :.:: .: : :.:p..: :.: .: 9 : :9. ..:.......:. ............ ...:<:.::.;::.:::.;:: e: .r:o.vi .e an::::o : .or:tunit:::::>tr�;:;:Conn:Mention: t:.:.:ea: .e.: uac:::'::.0:.::;t:;::e>s:tu ::°:::::::::::The:>Z:onin <.: ::::d. pp y.;;<.;.;;;;; Q .: y y:: .; 9. ....:..... n.....:.:;.:.......::.:.::.....::<.:;: ............... _.............. Administrator sh:all ;;re. uire:;;t;;e;;;:; .ro:.v�s�,on o::;;t a>reciimme,n,;,e'd: :traffc rr�ti .ation q P 9.::: h ...... r .:: : ;.;:::..,.. ,.:, ::: measures and ;may ainpose of er mea,su es,deemed necessa y_tq mitigate the traffic .. ..... ... ..... .. ....................................:....... .. ...... ...... . Impacts:of ;this;: rolect 3. 13. The following requirements pertaining to drainage, road, and utility improvements will require the review and approval of the Public Works Department: A. Unless exceptions are specifically granted, this development shall conform to the requirements of Division 914 (Drainage) of the Subdivision Ordinance. Conformance with Division 914 includes the following requirements: 1) Conveying all. storm waters entering or originating within the subject property, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage facility, to a natural watercourse having definable bed and banks or to an existing adequate public storm drainage facility which conveys the storm waters to a natural watercourse. 2) Designing and constructing storm drainage facilities required by Division 9 14 in compliance with specifications outlined in Division 914 and in compliance with design standards of the Public Works Department. The ordinance prohibits the discharging of concentrated storm waters into roadside ditches. B. Unless exceptions are specifically granted, comply with the requirements of Division 1006 (Road Dedication and Setbacks) of the County Ordinance Code. Compliance with the Ordinance includes the following: 1) Conveying to the County, by Offer of Dedication, additional right of way on Laura Alice Way as required for the planned future width of 92 feet. 2) Relinquishing abutter's rights of access along Laura Alice Way, including curb. returns. C. Perform a truck-turning analysis for the entrance to the site and perform any modifications to the entrance which are necessary to facilitate truck turning movements into and out of the site, subject to the review and approval of the Public Works Department. D. Perform a signal warrant analysis to determine if a traffic signal is now required at the intersection of Arnold Industrial Way and Laura Alice Way. If a signal is warranted, the applicant shall be required to pay the "fair share" of the cost of installation of the signal based on the project's trip generation or as determined by a traffic study subject to the review of the Public Works Department, Road Engineering Division. 4. ADVISORY NOTES A. Comply with the requirements of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. B. Comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. C. Comply with the requirements of the Health Services Department, Environmental Health Division. D. Comply with the requirements of the Building Inspection Department. Building permits are required prior to the construction of most structures. E. The applicant will be required to comply with the requirements of the Bridge/Thoroughfare Fee Ordinance for the Central County Area of Benefit as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. } . :. i f ri> .: tl i rti' >:> n# rr5 >wi F > h >. ff P rkii'i' <............e... :te.p:a:. .:s..a: :be::�d.es, ::e.::.tQ:co:::::0. t ::t:::e. :: .St.eet.....r.. .. cd.�.....we 9 ...................................................... .... .:...,.:..:::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::: :.. ::..:::.:::......:::::::.: �Cha.pter$2-1 fi)inc udi g p o �s ons that(11; estrict.design:ofi, iarkin� so that bacic.,up not .aura A►�Ei3'.... iS,not perm fitted; and (21 prpvid8.,fpr rnrrtiiraurrr 4 fart iar��dscap 01,00 erA:ri.g the L aura Alike;Way;frontage ; . ....... :.. MF/RD/aa LUPXXXIV/2042-92C.ME 9/16/92 9/28/92 -Z.A. Rev. (v) 12/8/92-PC (a) -Community Contra Harvey E. Bragdon Development Director of Community Development Department COSta County Administration Building County 651 Pine Street 4th Floor, North Wing Martinez, California 94553.0095 L �r Phone: 646-2031 � � �.� December 17, 1992 V. spa-cbo�'r Winton Jones Development Co. 1949 Arnold Industrial Highway Concord, CA 94520 Dear Mr. Jones: This letter acknowledges receipt of your letter of appeal dated December 14, 1992 for application #2042-92, which was denied by the County Planning Commission on December 8, 1992. Your appeal will be heard by the Board of Supervisors. You will be notified by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors when the appeal has been scheduled for hearing before the Board. You should be aware that you or your representative should be present at the hearing. Also, please note that in order to proceed promptly with the scheduling of this appeal, you should submit a list of names and addresses for the applicant and owner of the application and all properties within 300 feet of the property along with stamps and mailing labels for each individual property owner, no later than January 7. 1993. Please direct the labels, stamps and list to: Community Development Department, Attention: Rose Marie Pietras, 651 Pine Street, North Wing - 4th Floor, Martinez, CA 94553-0095. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Rose Marie Pietras at 646-2031. Sincerely` yours, Mary Fleming Chief of Land Development :df L3:2042-92.bos cc: File Valley Waste Management MGM Construction Co. Leonard Vecchi Public Works Attn: Mitch Avalon WINTON JONES levet ment CO. 1949 ARNOLD INDUSTRIAL HIGHWAY CONCORD, CALIFORNIA December 14, 1992 Contra costa County RE: County File B'-ard of Supervisors and 2042-92 Community Development Dept. flartinez, CA 94553 We request and appeal to the Board of Supervisors to the denial of our request to the Planning Commission* on December 8, 199.2. RE: Valley Waste Management for a garbage truck repair shop, wash rack and storage of truck and containers at old MGM site next door to us. The fact is that Valley Waste Management wants a transfer station here and we object to this. Sincerely. n �0� 0 Nathalie Jones' -32 7J 44- .ri OCTf [ - October 6, 1992 L : vrD`O' NOTICE OF APPEAL Community Development Department County of Contra Costa 651 Pine Street Martinez, California 94553 Re: Valley Waste Management Application File No. : 2042-92 Land Use Permit to Operate Truck Maintenance and Parking Facility on Property Located at 1781 Arnold Industrial Hwy; APN 159-090-043 Gentlemen: We, Winton and Nathalie Jones, are the adjacent property owners to the above proposed project. We. hereby request that the decision of the Zoning Administrator be appealed to the Planning Commission. Enclosed herewith is our check in the amount of $110.00 for purposes of the appeal. We are residential owners who live on the property adjacent to the site. Some of the reasons for the appeal are set forth in Attachment A to this Notice of Appeal and are incorporated herein by reference. In addition thereto, the basis of the appeal will also include failure to appropriately address environmental impacts caused by the project. Those impacts include such items as noise and odor. In addition thereto, the site plan appears to have been designed by an engineering firm of Leptein, Cronin & Cooper. However, this appears to be a false representation. We believe Leptein, Cronin & Cooper originally performed an ALTA land survey which apparently Valley Waste Management has now taken and drawn a site layout in an attempt to distort the actual feasibility of the site. The existing application by Valley Waste Management states that the property is currently "being used" for a similar purpose. In fact, nothing could be further from the Community Development Department County of Contra Costa October 6, 1992 Page 2 truth. The current site has been used to park approximately ten trucks for the last 1-1/2 years. At no time has that use been permitted by the County. No current land use permit is issued for this site. Valley Waste Management's application is for approximately 1180 vehicles". There is no limitation on the number of vehicles that can be operated out of this facility. This site has never been used to store, house, wash or maintain garbage trucks or waste disposal bins. At the time of hearing, we reserve the right to present additional matters to the Planning Commission to demonstrate that this project may have a significant affect on the environment and that an environmental impact report may be required in order to allow the land use permit to issue. Respectfully submitted, WINTON JONES NATHALIE JO ESQ 0009400W September 28, 1992 Contra Costa County Zoning Administrator We object to a land use permit for Valley and Chemical Waste Management for the following reasons: 1 . Odors and filth from garbage trucks and container bins (20-30 yard sizes) will attract birds (sea gulls-Hawks ) and rodents (rats - mice - possums) and flies and mosquitoes which will affect the environment of 150-200 people who work and live downwind of this lot. 2. Human sickness and disease from chemicals and pesticides especially during temperature inversions and industrial acid rain periods will affect the human environment in this area. No EIR has been prepared. 3. Excessive noise and noxious orders will affect allergy and sinus irritations and nausea day and night to area workers and increase workers compensation insurance costs. 4 . Discharge of pollutants from the truck wash rack of Hazmat certified refuse container and hauling vehicles will create the run off of hazardous materials into nearby Walnut Creek since No flood control plan is available . 5 . We are disinclined to believe that Chemical and Valley Waste Management will not transport medical and hospital waste along with service station and commercial and industrial contaminated hazardous material in their vehicles. 6 . We cannot determine the drainage pattern of oil & diesel surface pollutants into contained remediation facilities before entering Walnut Creek Channel. 7 . The negative declaration compares 80 trucks and 80 employee vehicle and 80 waste container roll off boxes and bins to the current and previous tenant operation of 10 trucks and 10 employee vehicles as being a no change Situati'Iz - NO Way. 8. The cur-rent small septic tank and land field is over 30 years old and handled 10 people previously. Now it cannot handle 100 plus people without health hazards. go 9. The trucking ingress and egress is currently inadequate for 100 mixer trucks and welding yard trucks and vehicles. This poorly designed access cannot accommodate 200 additional vehicles in and out day and night. No traffic survey or report has been made. 10. The signal light at the intersection was promised us by Bedford Properties when the North Concord Industrial Park was approved. It' s still in limbo and should now be included in a detailed . traffic study to plan future growth and to avoid more of the many accidents and near misses. This should be mandated under EIR requirements. 11. Pesticides - chemicals - paper - hazardous materials and contaminated residues in trucks and roll off container bins and boxes could be inflammable and explosive and cause hazardous emissions, and airborne pollutants degrading the local environment. 12. The hours of operation have not been addressed and should be limited to 7AM to 7PM weekdays to control noise and emissions. 13. This huge operation would deteriorate the air quality in our area. The over crowding of vehicles and bins will not provide adequate access for fire and emergency equipment. The noxious vapors and .emissions and odors would be overwhelming. The contaminated run off and storm water discharge would contaminate the aquifer and many wells in this area. 14. A trashy rubbish operation in this location could impede and upset the orderly growth of commercial and light industrial development in North Concord. No increased property taxes are proposed. Due to a significant effect on our environment we object to the usage of this site for operating a chemical waste and garbage truck terminal and recycling center and storage and equipment washing facility without an EIR. Since. this is not compatible with the current and past usage of this property we request denial of this land use permit. The air quality is marginal now due to heavy heavy freeway traffic . 15 . The Alta survey for. this property shows a "clouded" access from Lowe Lane and the entrance to property may be illegal . lb . The attached "boot 1f_:; drawling by _ivii. Engineer Cooper is altered an,:- is not a ieg.ai drawing of Leptien Cronin and Cooper as z:tamped. Ylint�ii•ion y -_-_ '' Nathalie Joiie.s CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NOTICE OF DETERMINATION CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 651 PINE STREET 4TH FLOOR NORTH WING MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-0095 Telephone: (415) 646-2031 Contact Person: Michael Enright Project Description, Common Name (if any) and Location: VALLEY WASTE MANAGEMENT (Applicant) - MGM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (Owner), County File #2042-92: The applicant requests approval for a Land Use Permit to operate a truck maintenance and parking facility for its own refuse disposal trucks on a 4.334 acres parcel located approximately 700 feet north of the intersection of Arnold Industrial Highway and Laura Alice .Way. Subject property is addressed #1781 Arnold Industrial Highway, in the Concord area. (L-I) (ZA: G-14) (CT 3150) (Parcel #159-090-043) The project was approved on Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act: An Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified. Q The Project was encompassed by an Environmental Impact Report previously prepared for 0 A Negative Declaration was issued indicating that preparation of an Environmental Impact Report was not required. Copies of the record of project approval and the Negative Declaration or the final EIR may be examined at the office of the Contra Costa County Community Development Department. Q The Project will not have a significant environmental effect. Q The Project will have a significant environmental effect. Mitigation measures were made a condition of approval of the project. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted. Findings were adopted pursuant to Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Date: By: Community Development Department Representative AFFIDAVIT OF FILING AND POSTING declare that on I received and posted this notice as required by California Public Resources Code Section 211521c►. Said notice will remain posted for 30 days from the filing date. Signature Title Applicant's Department of Fish and Game Fees Due: Name: Valley Waste EIR - $850 Total Due: $ Address: 1990 N. CA Blvd.#20 X Neg. Dec. - $1,250 Total Paid: $ Walnut Creek, CA 94596 DeMinimis Findings - $0 X County Clerk - $25 Receipt #: Agenda Item # 2- Community Development Contra Costa County CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. I. INTRODUCTION _VALLEY WASTE MANAGEMENT (Aaalicant)- MGM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (Owner), County File #2042-92: The applicant requests approval for a Land Use Permit to operate a truck maintenance and parking facility for its own refuse disposal trucks on a 4.334 acres parcel located approximately 700 feet north of the intersection of Arnold Industrial Highway and Laura Alice Way. Subject property is addressed #1781 Arnold Industrial Highway, in the Concord area. (L-1) (ZA: G-14) (CT 3150) (Parcel #159-090-043) This report provides supplemental information requested by the Planning Commission at their November 10, 1992 meeting. II. RECOMMENDATION A. Distance to Residences: The Jones residence is on Parcel #159-090-032. There are additional residences, mobilehomes, on the property. These living units are 800± feet from the Valley Waste Management parcel. The Jones own the four parcels between their residential parcel and the project site. B. Sewer: The applicant had originally proposed to utilize the existing septic system due to the cost associated with obtaining a sewer connection. The applicant has decided to connect to the sewer system. C. Drainage: Approved Condition #7 requires the applicant to submit a plan to comply with EPA requirements. The EPA requirements become mandatory on January 1, 1993. The plan will require the applicant to identify sources of potential pollution and implement a plan to control and reduce pollutants leaving the site. EPA requires that the plan be submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board as an Industrial Permit. Condition #7 is more restrictive because it requires local review and approval in addition to the EPA requirements. The washing area effluent and drainage from the storage bin and truck parking areas must be part of the pollutant reduction plan. W Win OAS—64 V ct r .•Z t �•..: v:�+�jj 1U f m _.l � ; •:cad�w m �` f a � • . n �o opo r 'ti'ti 1 h WC1 VIA ZIP- - t�✓✓'� � �►� �, '� �ate_-� ': s �s r.uas it i gpYfr toTI N O N • o � .-- � ':tt1���.��`.«.,,yah �� . �+.• � 99y�. 'u�;��'• sSq .?:.... - f'Ctb ►�1Y ar+ra ro.sr � Agenda Item #S Community Development Contra Costa County CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. BOARD OF APPEALS I. INTRODUCTION VALLEY WASTE MANAGEMENT (Applicant)- MGM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (Owner), County File #2042-92: The applicant requests approval for a Land Use Permit to operate a truck maintenance and parking facility for its own refuse disposal trucks on a 4.334 acres parcel located approximately 700 feet north of the intersection of Arnold Industrial Highway and Laura Alice Way. Subject property is addressed #1781 Arnold Industrial Highway, in the Concord area. (L-I) (ZA: G-14) (CT 3150) (Parcel #159-090-043) II. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission sustain the decision of the Zoning Administrator to approve LUP 2042-92 with conditions. III. REVIEW OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING The Zoning Administrator hearing was held on September 28, 1992. Mr. Winton Jones (appellant) provided the testimony against the proposed project (letter attached). The Zoning Administrator took his testimony into consideration and added two conditions to the project, new 9 and 10, concerning noise and fire safety. The Zoning Administrator believed that the other concerns expressed by Mr. Jones had been addressed in the proposed conditions of approval. IV. APPEAL Mr. & Mrs. Winton Jones filed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of LUP 2042-91 on October 6, 1992. The filing of the appeal was within the statutory time limits. Winton Jones Development company owns 23.22 acres in seven parcels (APN #159- 090-013, -015, -028, -030, -032, -034, -036) located easterly of the proposed LUP 2042-92. Parcel #159-090-015 is the only parcel that adjoins the proposed project. The Jones' residence is on Parcel #159-090-032 and that property is approximately 800 feet from the easterly property line of the proposed project. The appeal contains 16 specific items listed on Attachment A of the Notice of Appeal and the appeal states: failure to appropriately address environmental impacts caused by the project such as noise and odor, use of drawings not prepared by the engineer who prepared the original drawings, that the existing use of the property is not similar to the proposed use, and that there is no limit to the number of vehicles that can use the facility (only the number that can stay overnight). Response to the objections in the order listed on the appeal's Attachment A: A. Odors and Filth: Conditions #4 and #5 impose requirements on the applicant to not bring waste material back to the storage site. It is not in the applicant's best interest to allow the storage containers to accumulate debris in between uses. B. Sickness and Disease Exposure: See response A. above. C. Noise and Odors: Condition #9 was added by the Zoning Administrator requiring a noise attenuation study prior to the issuance of any building permits (this condition would apply to tenant improvements too). D. Pollutant Discharge: Conditions #4 and #5 limit on-site material storage. Condition #7 requires pollutant reduction plan for drainage system. E. Use by Valley and Chemical Waste Management for Transport of Medical and Hospital Waste: Chemical Waste Management does not have permit to use site. F. Drainage Pattern: See response for D. above. G. 80 Trucks vs. 10 trucks in Environmental Assessment: Current use does have fewer vehicle trips but increase in use was not considered significant when compared to other traffic generators in area (e.g., Ready Mix Plant to the north). H. Septic System: Health Department is required to approve adequacy of the system. If system is inadequate, applicant will be required to connect to sewer system. I. Truck Access: Condition #1 1.C. requires truck turning study and any recom- mended modifications. J. Signal Light: Condition #1 1.D. requires applicant to provide determination of warrant for signal at the intersection. If the signal is warranted, applicant will be required to pay fair share of cost. K. Fire Hazard: Conditions #4 and #5 restrict storage. Zoning Administrator added Condition #10 to require Fire District to review site access. L. Hours of Operation: Appellant.has requested 7:00 A.M. - 7:00 P.M. weekdays. Applicant has requested 4:30 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. due to franchise service requirements. A new condition should be added. M. Site Overcrowding: Site plan shows adequate room for proposed use. Condition #7 addresses concerns about run-off/discharge. N. Impact on Future Land Uses: Proposed use conforms with zoning and general plan permitted uses for Light Industry. 0. Access Rights: Assessor's records show owner also owns adjoining property (APN #159-090-039) that has actual frontage on Laura Alice Way. P. Engineer's Drawings: Applicant did not have Leptien-Cronin-Cooper, Inc. prepare drawings submitted with application. The engineer's drawings were used as a base for the applicant's descriptive notes. Issues stated in the body of the appeal letter were restated in Attachment A and have been responded to in the above analysis. V. OTHER CORRESPONDENCE No other correspondence has been received since the filing of the appeal. VI. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DECISION Approved with all recommended conditions and added conditions on September 28, 1992. VII. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS A. Require additional conditions to further control applicant's use of the property. B. Reduce the allowable number of trucks for the site. C. Grant the appeal and require additional environmental review: If actions A or B above were taken by the Planning Commission, then staff has prepared appropriate conditions. The conditions would clarify the proposed use for the property not further restrict it uses. 4 Potential Conditions to Augment Approved Conditions A. Hours of operation for the facility shall be from 4:30 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. No arrivals or departures will be allowed outside of those hours. B. Only those trucks parked (based) at the facility can be serviced at the facility. A maximum of 80 trucks can be based at the facility. C. The facility is solely for the use of Valley Waste Management. No affiliated companies can use the facility. D. If additional wash-up (showers, etc.) areas are added for the employees, then the applicant shall connect the plumbing to the public sanitary sewer system. VIII. FINDINGS Staff proposed that the following findings be used as the basis for denying the appeal: A. The project as proposed satisfies the purposes of the light industry district by bringing in a low intensity industrial use that is buffered from residential districts by other light industrial uses. B. The project complies with the intent of the County General Plan and the County Zoning Code. C. The project utilizes existing structures and does not require the construction of intrusive new structures. D. Mitigation condition of approval will increase the amount of landscaping in the area. E. No variances are requried for this project. Approval of the land use permit would not constitute a grant of special privileges. IX. CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the decision by the Zoning Administrator 'and deny the appeal by Mr. & Mrs. Winton Jones. Although the approved conditions adequately regulate the use of the property, staff has presented new conditions which may be used to clarify the intent of the application and the Zoning Administrator's approval. ME/aa LUPXXXV/2042-92.ME 9/16/92 10/29/92 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR LAND USE PERMIT 2042-92 AS APPROVED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 1. The request for a land use permit for truck maintenance and parking facility at 1781 Arnold Industrial Way as depicted on the site plan dated received July 28, 1992 by the Community Development Department. The following conditions of approval require compliance prior to use of the site unless otherwise indicated. 2. The term of this use permit is until March 1 , 1995 unless the Parcel Map for MS 35-91 is recorded. In the event that the Parcel Map is recorded, the terms of the use permit shall expire 30 days after the date of recordation of the Parcel Map. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed TDM Plan for review and approval of the Zoning Administrator (unless otherwise required by a TDM Ordinance). 4. No solid or liquid waste originating off the subject site shall be brought on site, stored or transferred on the subject site. 5. No solid or liquid waste, or recycled or other material, not related to the development of the site or the maintenance of its facilities and equipment, shall be sorted, composted, or otherwise processed or stored on the subject site. 6. Landscaping: A. Submit a landscaping plan for the frontage along Laura Alice Way to continue .the landscaping scheme installed along the other properties fronting the roadway. B. Submit a landscaping plan for on site planting. Landscape plan shall provide landscaping within the front setback area in order to provide partial screening of the site from off-site views. C. Said plans shall be submitted for approval by the Zoning Administrator with 30 days of the use permit approval. Bonding shall be.provided for the installation of the landscaping within six months of the Zoning Administrator's approval of the landscape plans. Plans shall comply with the County Water Conservation Guidelines. 7. Submit an implementable plan for complying with the intent of EPA Clean Water Act (NPDES) for reducing pollutants entering into off-site drainage systems. Said plan shall be submitted to the Flood Control District within 30 days of the use permit approval. 8. Storage of containers, roll off boxes and carts shall only be allowed in the area shown on the site plan for their storage. Fencing shall be provided between the truck parking area and the storage area. >. . :...... :::.......:..:.... J: : ;::::::::Prior:;;to the;:issuance of::any::>bu�Ldtn >or::; radin. permits tl�e ;a I�cant ishatl subiiiit to 9 9 9 p PQ . t.;:e>; .........Administrator . or:ireview an anpcova;; ;a;;nose :aftenaa:tion.:.stud .xiThe Y .. .:.. stud...'..:.Mhich::must.be prepar,ed.;by;an acoustical;ex ert'sl all;identif:' tf e noise>)evels p -2- createdy the nperat�on on the seta which tray a##ect res�dentiai�arceis Ttte ana]ysrs atlatitriciude'<th.e'f�' ,......, .. •:: > . > .. ; . ,. . ,:::,::. .;;:.;<:.: •: ;....:>:::>::::;::: . olse which may tae generated during the early morning.hours The tu<IyShalt id,Sri#t.fy;�ne�.sures...;whi;C.h;;would.:ceduc.B.;th.�.�a%Se::.f...or::resit#.erlti.ei,: .a.r.Cei&>:A>f. rneast�res approved: by the Zoning Adrniri�stratar:.:must :be :completed,: prior:::to titcup;arc 'lfl :€....... or to the rssuance:of bui(d,ng or grading permits .the:applrcant sMatt subrrlat:ver�#� «. cai:ontot;;:eZ'ocfn' ;= dmin:istrator:that>:the:Cflntra Oosta Consoiidated.Fire:Di ri #� date !,.n rled that the;,s�te pian ad.equa.t acc. mm-odates,i'Mb l=are. Dfstrfcx:s:rfe.:ed:.:#>or access io alt portions of the site': 1 1. The following requirements pertaining to drainage, road, and utility improvements will require the review and approval of the Public Works Department: A. Unless exceptions are specifically granted, this development shall conform to the requirements of Division 914 (Drainage) of the Subdivision Ordinance. Conformance with Division 914 includes the following requirements: 1) Conveying all storm waters entering or originating within the subject property, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage facility, to a natural watercourse having definable bed and banks or to an existing adequate public storm drainage facility which conveys the storm waters to a natural watercourse. 2) Designing and constructing storm drainage facilities required by Division 9 14 in compliance with specifications outlined in Division 914 and in compliance with design standards of the Public Works Department. The ordinance prohibits the discharging of concentrated storm waters into roadside ditches. B. Unless exceptions are specifically granted, comply with the requirements of Division 1006 (Road Dedication and Setbacks) of the County Ordinance Code. Compliance with the Ordinance includes the following: 1) Conveying to the County, by Offer of Dedication, additional right of way on Laura Alice Way as required for the planned future width of 92 feet. 2) Relinquishing abutter's rights of access along Laura Alice Way, including curb returns. C. Perform a truck-turning analysis for the entrance to the site and perform any modifications to the entrance which are necessary to facilitate truck turning movements into and out of the site, subject to the review and approval of the Public Works Department. D. Perform a signal warrant analysis to determine if a traffic signal is now required at the intersection of Arnold Industrial Way and Laura Alice Way. If a signal is -3- warranted, the applicant shall be required to pay the "fair share" of the cost.of installation of the signal based on the project's trip generation or as determined by a traffic study subject to the review of the Public Works Department, Road Engineering Division. ADVISORY NOTES A. Comply with the requirements of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. B. Comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. C. Comply with the requirements of the Health Services Department, Environmental Health Division. D. Comply with the requirements of the Building Inspection Department. Building permits are required prior to the construction of most structures. E. The applicant will be required to comply with the requirements of the Bridge/Thoroughfare Fee Ordinance for the Central County Area of Benefit as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. ME/aa LUPXXXIV/2042-92C.ME 9/16/92 9/28/92 -Z.A. Rev. M •-tea rw-� •- -' • -. . RD, FEE . i2 p21-i! ?V9 9 `:::.:::.......... Sze-SP SRW �} /9.4-70 r 166-73 44 256-63 erm-75 :.'•dLL-14'7 IS 77 �. 3/P- 7Z ;: 1175 57,»+;'. 4577 E42 72 163-47 82-GBG/ i i foB4-8T J20c a r i T M !JU nr 1 N V (Li -.14,17-77,11- toss -^� X1 be j° *1161 ✓� ...� ►r•�nb �a quern. �„ c�fl�%51 :::'�y f/9�1 e 7439 �n-lbl aabul }V'747 � 42 ,..�.� 4v 1101%,�MIp� t. tp'J9• '^xie Fi(•Elt�ter!v«n n 4m i.t�� M F•14 0Ito OCT 21 O90 S i GOT o 1'1ASF �' 12-OC- 17 1 ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK 159 PAGE 09 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY.CALIF. 7-a ' i+ � �. a•�1 � 1 1 �i 1 1 i 1 Z J f'•'`.r� 1- ' r.Z 1 r ti ~ ,, ►� T19VE Rocs OFF BOXel F I r P,�avaL frHoparr�a2 It -��,a,ca•orfca � ��/ , ' ti: — 1..�..i.'•.f:'..:a`+i!�. ... 1.r.�... r as MM , d' T '{ T T T .. w+w... •9 � �1—: �-.' "++�� r I � �,.. � Lane-aiaa•.oee.acaa- o. olm 80-S Rd 8Z W?,6 .{ ::��y yy'L:;i;l ` . . Agenda Item ' Community Development Contra Costa County COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 - 9:30 A.M. LINTRODUCTION VALLEY WASTE MANAGEMENT-JApplicant) - MGM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (Owner), County File #2042-92: The applicant requests approval for a Land Use Permit to operate a truck maintenance and parking facility for its own refuse disposal trucks ona4'334acres parcel located approximately 70Ofeet north of1hain1ersecdon of Arnold Industrial Highway and Laura Alice Way. Subject property is addressed #1781 Arnold Industrial Highway, in the Concord area. (L-\) <ZA: G'14> (CT 3150> (Parcel #159'O9(}'O43) U. RECOMMENDATION Approve with conditions. UL GENERAL INFORMATION A. Light-Industrial.. B. Light-industrial. C. A Negative Oydara1ml for this project was posted on Septem- ber 4' 1992. D. The subject parcel is flat and gravel surfaced except for various metal and concrete buildings. E. MS 35-91 was approved by the Zoning Administrator to divide subject parcel into four lots on March 9' 1892. A parcel map has not been submitted for filing. |V. DISCUSSION The applicant iorequesting touse the site for parking of 80 refuse disposal vehicles ' and storage of various size containers. The property is currently being used by trucking company for asimilar purpose. The main change is the type ofmaterial that the trucks will carry. . . 2 . _ ' The tentative map approved for this parcel iastill active. |tdoes not expire until March, 1985 (or as late as 1888 if an extension is granted). Staff recommends that the term of the use permit end 30 days after the recordation of a parcel map or the expiration ofthe tentative map. The project site iSadjacent 10the City ofConcord. The applicant has not expressed an interest in annexing the property to Concord. The site inaddressed on Arnold Industrial Way even though the property has frontage on Laura Alice Way. Staff shares the concerns of the-other.commenting agencies that the property needs landscaping and that nowaste material shall beallowed toremain on site. Staff has recommended conditions ofapproval addressing these concerns. V. .AGENCY COMMENTS A. County Conservation Programs They commented that the use will replace a parking site at /\orne Landfill. The new site is not to function as transfer station' no waste mnmteria| should be allowed on site. The site would benefit from landscaping. B. The City commented that the site should be landscaped within a continuation of the frontage landscape design and that the aooagm roadways to this site and the two adjoining properties should be reduced in coverage. ' C. Comments are attached. D. No comments. E. 'Nocomments. F. No ommrnmnta. G. Study #5-13422 identified no archaeological resources. H. Department of Fish & Game: Did not respond to the agency request but their response to MS 35'81 recommended that the project be exempt from AS 3158 ($1 ,250 fee). i Regional Water Quality Control Board: Did not respond to the agency request. J. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District: Did not respond to the agency request. 3 VI. ROAD AND DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS The attached conditions of approval based on the June, 1990 site plan include road . and drainage requirements. The applicant should be fully aware of the County Subdivision Ordinance Code requirements as they pertain to this development. MWE/aa LUPXXXIV/2042-92.ME 9/16/92 . . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR LAND USE PERMIT 2042-92 " 1. The request for a land use permit for truck maintenance and parking facility at 1781 Arnold Industrial Way as depicted on the site plan dated received July 28, 1992 by the Community Development Department. The following conditions of approval require compliance prior tmuse ofthe site unless otherwise indicated. ` 2' The term ofthis use permit iountil March 1. 1B95unless the Parcel Map for MS35'S1 is recorded. |nthe event that the Parcel Map iarecorded, the terms ofthe use permit shall expire 30 days after the date of recordation of the Parcel Map'. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a detailed TDM Plan for review and approval ofthe Zoning Administrator (unless otherwise required by TDM Ordinance). 4' Nosolid mrliquid vvaata originatingmffthesubjexctmiteshaUbobrouohtonmbo, a1orad or transferred on the subject site. 5. Nosolid orliquid waste. or recycled orother material, not related to the development of the site or the maintenance of its fooUideo and equipment, shall be sorted, cornposted, or otherwise processed or stored on the subject site. 6. Landscaping: A. Submit alandscaping u|anforthehnntagaa|onQLauraAhceVVayto continue the landscaping scheme installed along the other properties fronting the roadway. B. Submit alandscaping plan for onsite planting. Landscape plan shall provide landscaping within the hunt setback area in order to provide partial screening of the site from off-site views. C. Said plans shall bmsubmitted for approval bvthe Zoning Administrator with 3O days of the use permit approval. Bonding shall beprovided for the installation of the landscaping within six months of the Zoning Administrator's approval of the landscape plans. Plans shall comply with the County Water Conservation ' Guidelines. 7' Submit an irnp|ernantob|a plan for complying with the intent of EPA O9anVVatar /\Ct (NPDES) for reducing pollutants entering into off-site drainage systems. Said plan ahoU be submitted to the Flood Control District within 30 days of the use permit approval. 8. Storage of containers, roll off boxes and carts shall only beallowed inthe area shown Onthe site plan for their storage. Fencing shall beprovided between the truck parking orba and the storage area. g. The following requirements pertaining to drainage, road' and utility \rnpr0varnCnts will require the review and approval of the Public Works Department: . , . 2' A. Unless exceptions are specifically granted, this development shall conform tn the requirements of Division 914 (Drainage) of the Subdivision Ordinance. Conformance with Division 914 includes the following requirements: 1) Conveying all storm waters entering or originating within the subject property, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage facility, to a natural watercourse having definable bed and banks or to an existing adequate public storm drainage facility which conveys the a1omn waters to a natural watercourse. 2> Designing and constructing storm drainage facilities required byDivision B 14 in compliance with specifications outlined in Division 914 and in compliance with design standards ofthe Public Works Department. The ordinance prohibits the discharging of concentrated storm waters into roadside ditches. B. Unless exceptions are specifically granted, comply with the requirements of Division 1006 (Road Dedication and Setbacks) ofthe County Ordinance Code. ^ Compliance with the Ordinance includes the following: ' 1) Conveying to the County' by Offer of Dedication, additional right of way on Laura Alice Way aorequired for the planned future width of 92 feet. 2) Relinquishing abutter's rights of access along Laura Alice Way, including curb returns. C. Perform atruck'turning analysis for the entrance to the site and perform any modifications to the entrance which are necessary to facilitate truck turning movements into and out of the site, subject tothe review and approval of the Public Works Department. O. Perform a signal warrant analysis 1odetermine if traffic signal is now required atthe intersection ofArnold Industrial Way and Laura Alice Way. |fasignal is warranted, the applicant shall be required to pay the "fair share" of the cost of installation ofthe signal based onthe project's thpgenorationormsdetorrningd by a traffic study subject to the review of the Public Works Department, Road Engineering Division. ADVISORY NOTES A. COrnn|y with the requirements of the Cent/a| Contra Costa Sanitary District. B. COnlo)y with the requirements of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. 3. C. Comply with the requirements of the Health Services Department, Environmental Health Division. D. Comply with the requirements of the Building Inspection Department. Building permits are required prior to the construction of most structures. E. The applicant will be required to comply with the requirements of the Bridge/Thoroughfare Fee Ordinance for the Central County Area of Benefit as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. ME/aa LUPXXXIV/2042-92C.ME 9/16/92 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY � FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 2010 GEARY ROAD , PLEASANT HILL. CA 94523-4694 (510) 930-5500 t/ BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION August 28, 1992 Contra Costa County Community Development Department 651 Pine St. , 4th Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Attn: Mike Enright Subject: 2042-92 1781 Arnold Industrial Way Dear Mr. Enright: We have reviewed the land use permit application to establish parking for approximately 80 vehicles and storage for various size containers at the subject location. This project is regulated by codes and ordinances administered by this Fire District relative to Contra Costa County Ordinance 89/68 and the State Fire Marshal' s Regulations. If approved by your office, the following shall be required: 1. The developer shall submit two ( 2) complete sets of plans and specifications of the subject project indicating container construction, size, stored commodity and location of containers on property, including built-in fire protection systems (when required) , to this office for review and approval prior to construction to insure compliance with minimum requirements related to fire and life safety. Plan review fees will be assessed at that time. (2. 206 )C.C.C. Ord. 89/68 2. The developer shall provide an adequate and reliable water supply for fire protection as set forth in the Uniform Fire Code. This determination shall be made upon review of requested information. ( 10. 301c)UFC 3 . Provide access roadways with all-weather driving surfaces of not less than 20 feet unobstructed width, and not less than 1316" of vertical clearance, to within 150 feet of travel distance to all portions of the exterior walls of every. building. Access roads shall not exceed 20% grade, shall have a minimum inside turning radius of 35 feet, and must be capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus ( 31 tons) . ( 10. 207)UFC C.C.C. Comm. Dev. Dept./Mike Enright RE: 2042-92 August 28, 1992 Page 2 4. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 feet long shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire department apparatus. ( 10.207h)UFC 5. Access roads and hydrants (when ,required) shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction. (10. 301e)UFC b. Approved premises identification shall be provided. Such numbers shall contrast with their background and be readily visible from the street. (10.208)UFC 7. The developer may be required to provide traffic signal pre-emption systems (Opticom) . Final determination pending review of requested information. 8. A pro rata fee of 20t per square foot. shall be assessed to partially offset initial expenditures for additional necessary fire service resources. (CCC Ord. 87/98) 9. No flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks are to be located on the construction site until obtaining approval and necessary permits from the Fire District. ( 4. 108)UFC It is requested that a copy of the conditions of approval for the subject project be forwarded to this office when compiled by the planning agency. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincer ,ly, Ste en K. April Fire Inspector SKA:vw cc: C.C.C. Public Works Department Attn: Road Engineering/Mitch Avalon Valley Waste Management MGM Construction File SKA/2042-92.92 E. Community Contra Harvey of Bragdon Director of Community Development Development Costa Department County County Administration Building 651 Pine Street 4th Floor, North Wing Martinez, California 94553-0095 4r.: Phone: 646-2031 October 7, 1992 Ru `o COUr Winton & Nathalie Jones 1949 Arnold Industrial Way Concord, CA 94520 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Jones: This letter acknowledges receipt of your letter of appeal dated October 6, 1992 for application #2042- 92, which was approved by the Zoning Administrator on September 28, 1992. Your appeal will be heard by the County Planning Commission Board of Appeals. This office will notify you, by letter, when the appeal has been scheduled for hearing before the County Planning Commission. You should be aware that you or your representative should be present at the hearing. Also, please notethat in order to proceed promptly with the scheduling of this appeal, you should submit 9 full sized maps for the Board of Appeals, a list of names and addresses for all properties within 300.feet of your property along with stamped, self-addressed envelopes to each individual property owner, but do not include a return address, no later than October 28, 1992. Please direct the maps, envelopes and list to: Community Development Department, Attention: Michael Enright, 651 Pine Street, North Wing - 4th Floor, Martinez, CA 94553-0095. If you have any questions regarding this matter, pl a call Michael Enright at 646-2091. Sin ours, Byron Turner Chief of Land Development :df L2:2042-92.ap1 cc: File Valley Waste Management Public Works Attn: Mitch Avalon � L OCT -6 P19 L: 26 DDr'7 October 6, 1992 NOTICE OF APPEAL Community Development Department County of Contra Costa 651 Pine Street Martinez, California 94553 Re: valley Waste Management Application File No. : 2042-92 Land Use Permit to Operate Truck Maintenance and Parking Facility on Property Located at 1781 Arnold Industrial Hwy; APN 159-090-043 Gentlemen: We, Winton and Nathalie Jones, are the adjacent property owners to the above proposed project. We hereby request that the decision of the Zoning Administrator be appealed to the Planning Commission. Enclosed herewith is our check in the amount of $110.00 for purposes of the appeal. We are residential owners who live on the property adjacent to the site. Some of the reasons for the appeal are set forth in Attachment A to this Notice of Appeal and are incorporated herein by reference. In addition thereto, the basis of the appeal will also include failure to appropriately address environmental impacts caused by the project. Those impacts include such items as noise and odor. In addition thereto, the site plan appears to have been designed by an engineering firm of Leptein, Cronin & Cooper. However, this appears to be a false representation. We believe . Leptein, Cronin & Cooper originally performed an ALTA land survey which apparently Valley Waste Management has now taken and drawn a site layout in an attempt to distort the actual feasibility of the site. The existing application by Valley Waste Management states that the property is currently "being used" for a similar purpose. In fact, nothing could be further from the Community Development Department County of Contra Costa October 6, 1992 Page 2 truth. The current site has been used to park approximately ten trucks for the last 1-1/2 years. At no time has that use been permitted by the County.. No current .land use permit is issued for this site. Valley Waste Management's application is for approximately 1180 vehicles". There is no limitation on the number of vehicles that can be operated out of this facility. This site has never been used to store, house, wash or maintain garbage trucks or waste disposal bins. At the time of hearing, we reserve the right to present additional matters to the Planning Commission to demonstrate that this project may have a significant affect on the environment and that an environmental impact report=may be required in order to allow the land use permit to issue. Respectfully submitted, WINTON JONES _ NATHALIE JO ES' 000940OW September 28, 1992 Contra Costa County Zoning Administrator We object to a land use permit for Valley and Chemical Waste Management for the following reasons: 1 . Odors and filth from garbage trucks and container bins (20-30 yard sizes) will attract birds (sea gulls-Hawks) and rodents (rats ' - mice - possums) and flies and mosquitoes which will affect the environment of 150-200 people who work and live- downwind of this lot. 2. Human sickness and disease from chemicals and pesticides especially during temperature inversions and industrial acid rain periods will affectthehuman environment in this area. No EIR has been prepared. 3. Excessive noise and noxious orders will affect allergy and sinus irritations and nausea day and night to area workers and increase workers compensation insurance costs. 4. Discharge of pollutants from the truck wash rack, of Hazmat certified refuse container and hauling vehicles will create the run off of hazardous materials into nearby Walnut Creek since No flood control plan is available. 5. We are disinclined to believe that Chemical and Valley Waste Hanagement will not transport medical and hospital waste along with service station and commercial and industrial contaminated hazardous material in their vehicles. 6. We cannot determine the drainage pattern of oil & diesel surface pollutants into contained remediation facilities before entering Walnut Creek Channel. 7. The negative declaration compares 80 trucks and 80 employee vehicle and 80 waste container roll off boxes and bins to the current and previous tenant operation► of 10 trucks and 10 employee vehicles as being a no change situation - NO Way. 8. The current small septic tank and land field is over 30 years old and handled 10 people previously. Now it cannot handle 100 plus people without health hazards. 9. The trucking ingress and egress iscurrently. inadequate for 100 mixer trucks and welding yard trucks and vehicles. This poorly designed access cannot accommodate 200 additional vehicles in and out day and night. No traffic survey or report has been made. 10. The signal light at the intersection was promised us by Bedford Properties when the North Concord Industrial Park was approved. It's still in limbo . and should now be included in a detailed traffic study to plan future growth and to avoid more of the many accidents and near misses. This should be mandated under EIR requirements. 11. Pesticides - chemicals - paper - hazardous materials and contaminated residues* in trucks and roll off container bins and boxes could be inflammable and explosive and cause hazardous emissions. and airborne pollutants degrading the local environment. 12. The hours of operation have not been addresseCand should be limited to 7AH to 7PH weekdays to control noise and emissions. . 13. This huge operation would deteriorate the air quality in our area. The over crowding of vehicles and bins will not provide adequate access for fire and emergency equipment. - The noxious vapors and emissions and odors would be overwhelming. The contaminated run off and storm water discharge would contaminate the aquifer and many wells in this area. 14. A trashy rubbish operation -in this location could impede and upset the orderly growth of commercial and light industrial development in North Concord. No increased property taxes are proposed. Due to a significant effect on our environment we object to the usage of this site for operating a chemical waste and garbage truck terminal and recycling center and storage and equipment washing facility without an EIR. Since this is not compatible with the' current and past usage of this property we request denial of this land use permit. The air quality is marginal now due to heavy heavy freeway traffic. 15. The Alta survey for this property shows a "clouded" access from Lowe Lane and the entrance to property may be illegal. 16. The attached "boot leg" drawing by Civil Engineer Jasper Cooper is altered and is not a legal drawing of Leptien Cronin and Cooper as stamped. Win n _J6�nd s NathalieNe Jon'e's - . '..��. ,-._..."m,-;�---;"i��,47W-:�,:,�,*�*i,' 'L.�:.!t.. f,.� .- . . . . .- .f !. ::.,.,:.l. t�. ;�.t...%.--..,.!.��'��.,.- -.1 , .. .... -. , ... ...: ...;I . .. * • - .. . . m ��_-.. ,m.!. ... ...- - .f . :i.-.... �,* % .. .. -- -;:,-,.t, '�',%,-!-��'�-I.'.- '%r.." .., , ...�. !:!::.: I.% '... _.... - ... . :�...... ... ..'t'�"1, _. , .. . ,r. -...:, '... ..... . .",:, -.,.' . .. . . .�. .- . - : .. . --- - .: , .. - .. .. -..7�:,;:.. 7, .. a 4 "' ....i.., ., .. . .. . , �-.w'-vl� - _. k.'.* i- 7.. . . . . .., .�: .:.`t: t . .1. . .: ..!. , • . . . :...-... ' .. .��. .. -,4, -...., ., . .... - - .-.. ...!... "', - . .. _.. .1 ,- . . . - ....._. .. ..% . .!.' - .; .. ..:. -. I :.--.., ..-. I , .,;�:,, - .7.r �.,:-.� -:,'. .. . .� ..,.. �. ;:�� - - -. � . .�. I. -: : ... . -. I - ...�:.w�, -: --. .� ,. . . ^ . '... 6'- , .... , . m . . . ... , a -.. ... -: . . .% . ... . -, - - -:!�-.,, ., �...:.,�-..��-.�-:'.�?.,'.__.. ,,;.-iL`--- - m . : *... � C .,_. - --- . , , ... '.. . . . . . *, , �. . .. I..,;�*..'- . ... .. , .:.. ..'. .�� '!.".. . , ,- . . .::*-" %'. %.�..,�. 0 . ; : ,� I....'...K-1 . - . _... : �.. .. . ...: . .� :..�: . .. I.. ... I. : . � -- � � �..�... : -,": :.-- _.! a: t .... :.,; . v , t .":".. .- - ,. . .. . ...:..*'. , .."'.-,--m.:...... .. .� ,. . . ---:..�x . . :. I " . .�.. .. I- . '. _. . . ..., .:.:!.:. ... .-:. . I...:. m . . . . . . .. . , ,.. - . . . ... . - . .. . . . .. . _ 4 . '....�k.:. ,, .. ,. �: ....-,."...... . ,. . :� ...., ,�,... . . . . . ...... . . - . .......m. .. , , �.--.: - - - - , ,* .: . : ...4 .. , i . ... . . ., . . - Z., ,--- .-..-..� ::.,. : fi . . ►. . . . . . . �: . . . .. " ... .�. . - : . .. 1. .... .. .. .- --, .:.-,"."',. ..�..,., ...- . .. ;, - . . - - , . - . . .:.- . . . - . �,. . .. , . 1 - .. , . . . . . .:- .. . .. .. . . .. .. 1�� . .: �-- . . . . .I .. ...... . .. , .: . ... %.'... .. .. . ... . . . - . - . . . . ..: . . . i: # '.9%..,. .: . * . .. .. 1. ..:. . .. .:%, ..:--1 . ... i _.-I ....- , . . - ....:,, .. - � , . -....* -* _. . : ...4 .. I .I . . .. .-. . . ... . ... . .... .. . . :....: I . . . .. .��'.- -. -.... ...:. ... I.: . � v. .. . .. . . . . ..�. . . .. . -. . - . . . . . . . . .... :.., .. .. . . ;a . . . . .. . .!1. O m ._.. ...'..:.... . ...., -: , . . .0 ... .. � .. . . .. .-,. V ..,-.7-�..,'' :ic c � , = as lb a . �-t%:.. . . . ... . w . , .. ...: ".� I ..i .. . . .? lb � - Li:Vrb Fr V,0 . . . . . - .! " .0 ... .1� . .. _. , ..... ; .:. . 0 01; . .� .. OW ... . 4 . ,---. ..;, -.f . . I I . ' . ...... . - a.. . . . ,:.* .. , a - '"'- ,- , .. - .0 " " V � . t� I .. . I - , " cr 0-ev e o. P MV o :. ':I r < plft'g 11 6* . .. �..", , .. . . , m • , .�. _.. ! . 04 , , rr to n -M" . M. a .� • . ..: " n. . .. . l... 4 - -C .. o) 0 :r rr rt 9) 0 1 1 . " . . .. . . 6;.: -.t.. ., . .., ., . .. ..:, , so th* (A 4 .0 . .. . . .. . rt " - to 0 =* :r , .m 1. . 0 m n ... I ;fD 01-0 . a A.:3 ".H , O-rt rt ..On .m i . . _12. . x "0 F . I w . .. . .. .. . . . - ......�: . •0.1-k t14 , v- 0 rt z �, :s 0. -- rA 1 . ..l. I •I .. . . 1. 2: � '- ti ., .. . . . . . M..; .-ww. .. w . ph. r . . 4s P J. - . . .11 9 .fit .w . , ft ..: %D. -: :3 to �. W, N; -... . �...-.. _:9'.. : , a ;* . . . '-.44 . . . 1%rt r .. . -: . .. . .- c to. H !,....a 04m .0.10 im . . "- .. .- " "Q _. s. 4. 1.V 0to ' .. -4- 6 0-0 6. OV Krl.n -� .. -.si - I rt .. .CAC ... lb� ....- ... � :: i.a ; .....'.... I"C o =, :n :3 :3 Z. ' - rt " o *o W.. � . ... _._ ... ..•,.- -0 , -, , - a. - -*.,a a . .. .1�'i _ . .. . - cl I - A... ......... o . . _ I- .-a. A. t-to -AD . .. .. . . . .�.. ',� o rt V O . .. �. - .. r .?= . ...'..' :*: - a , -� ",13 %.��..I ,� ;..b:..A , . . ,0 . 0 3W, :3,ft = L4 . ... .- I-% � , , .r. . (0,i ..m . -.I- = a.ip *-.'. . ... .n. �,,t'--',..; ... . . . ... m. ...- . rt : -.,r.-s � : :0.14 1 rt V" -, -11 M.,,.I, ::j t�.:'.' I. . ..�I ........'.:.14 R " V3 . ." rr.0 - 0 %, .0. rr a 'O n .i CL.-- ., , :, .- . . * . 14 .t ... .0 ID-" to A:i . - . .P1 .. . .,. ..... ..:.,. ��! on-:-'-. 1 :'.-`l'.7...�'.. . :; ...n M - P- ... ol .-. I- :s _. 0. * ... . so X;..'-.' . ., & . m7�-',T�..'�;. .-x . 9) PC M: . .- ....... ::- .'" 0-vt m . 101 P"= .,.,.. .I %D .. n... p 0 *. ".0 nv ".. - .---. 10 . . .- , .. . .! . .. - m ': v .- . r.W--_.!- -,. '.... 1"Cr rip I . :3... . .10 rt 1. . . . � : I"— ,-%O., " :--:C) 03 ft 6. 9) .*..,- - " 0 I& ... 'i I- .4soo.0 g ....: , , Al.. . . . , . , . , ..... . 13 0 13 . .," n P" v '.... ...�so 0 n 0 .. ....... w .�:P....r.-0.?-.::. O...a .-� , 0 :3 w.r., :--,!.P'- ..M"".'.- -," . .. ... . 9 ...O. .. I . . ... . .. ..-rt no v .. 0 rl m• .. .n_" . .00.. . *a.� .. ' n n . . ..0 "" P& . ....v n:;.. 0'__� a ..:" 'o .. . . ..s- . _. j - . .... . :. . •........o. O ... . . Ln . . --, 9-�- .-O . . .. .wm v * -n a) - m "a .. 0 r? o.. - , , a m . V 16 -., -W%n n ... .. lb .� . . . ... :._ '..-.�. - , , , . . * ,.:, .. . .. ...'.."1� , !m A. lb_�,:- 0 .�,ft.,.-,,.l:.' ,-14 .l,.;. . . - -$D. .10. .0 ...:: :" , ., . c - in . .. . . . , . r%....=... ..01.0.4.0. i.t7i� " � . .. _. 1. .. .. - rp", Q.�,.. . 'a r . - Ott. 14 ":lb a 0 . . - . . .. 03 '.- cr" .91. ,* - r .. . ....A *W. �.. * ,, . . .- . ..-.1.%;-.:%" '. .--.,:.,.,j-*,-":1� . a - , ..-,-`_t.. ic,Cr", ... - a I- %a �-...." a P-M,w_.,-l-.-:,.. OQ. Am- -�:w M*;:.ma - '., so c,6-Ift ..- -.':a -,_,.".-.,:�i .. _ . : -C2 1 . _.. ..:. :..:":.,. . . . - . ..�l - - . . .....l.. . . 0 . ..".. .m... ...�- . e - "," ." .;�;' ..*-:,..'- _.I.S.....,.;.�. .. . :_. 0. . t .-1 - .. , ..,.,:,'..-. . . - . *0 . - .. ..:.-- . . . a .: . - ....- �... .-�...,.;..!:. FA r;IC6. P-S . " J0- - 01 -:1. . . tv to 0 .: I.VvI.C.,", , . .1 rr I I "-'cr. M..t. . . I V 0 a'..,. 9 ; - -a 9' .:-_:, ft-..,; tl 06 0 1 � :.,�_ �rp 4-I a , - .L 0. :,. "-,.,. - �;,.,."f!;�. .7,.: . .. .• . % . 0 a - .:--� . " - .. I -_. . 4,�z .. . . - :_ ," -_ .-"'.. . :!�;., ..'.i . . ka.;p. ,-. .- �. , - . . ,, -, - .]..".. . . . '. so in C a - rt n". m;- I 0 rr . ...... a) " .. . . '. .C):s� C.," .;.;: . .. . *0 ai ': - � co - . . .. . . . . . . ..o .I., .. . .. ... . . . 4 ........M.:..,�.. #?.$A -- - " .A a .j_ ..... . --' . . � :..9_- , , .. N lb #ft ' !•0) o 0) " =::,�'...00.91 M.., -� .1 m. I., M . . ph... . . a .- 4 . .. .:. .. . , -. .• a orto "I" s 92 td .0 ...lb:P-a.I-a 0) -, -W..* r4"6L. a 0 ".m.,- t',- *a' , , "-;-� %'..a,'-,'�:'!�..,.: . . . . - .:. - , ..:: .. -: . .- .:-.. � .. pft. •.ja. ..... ." v ... - . . . m-rl M P%0 rt-90.m-'.1. .;--'. .j�-:. .`ve_,,:7.� .%--i.. ..-;'-�:..�, . .w a ..n w " ... .. .4 1, I. . , �. ..." -,�i, - !.;.i- ..%:.l.-': . 0%. I� =..� i . . . .,owl. .. W.n cb I .. . . ... -., � �.n .: :--:m ...I , , .-�-,;w� . P&IM tr n..__ . c %, m . ,j...-��.!�O-.., :s w .1. T _. 1- ..-... , , .. - . , * ` . *%.QQ : - 4_4 O ... ., ,"to. ". ;,:. -,.-%-_p4 .:�(• , ::.a 0. 0) .�%a'.-o -W M.a. 0 :1.43 - ... ... . . Fft, .. R.*... :.:'o P.a 4D . �0. , I - ; ` . ... .... 0 9 .. �-'. ":.: -.: .. .t.,.. ... _.!`.�, I rv.•�.. 0i 2.;.. �d--_.., . 0 . . . .A.:(b ft. . . . p.s .. .. .. .I . . . , , , -!. ..:,-.. ��- :. .- -': ......'....40 : _. . -• ,-�` t* .. ,.... . . .. , . -..I a 2 fD � '.O:-.; . 1: -C a !. o . 0 t .;-...- * 4c ... . %O .0 rt C. , 0 m- . , -".:..., .= - I :3. .. . .cr . r � pq,-., --p ra F " .r . O'm a ' to �,.: - ..; . . �_ - 1. M'v 0*16 v ' r :. . 1% ., .. _. - .I.? ", ., ..." Pa.O.Vt .!V rt O"#? M,.. .@%cb 5 - a . ...V.6" at lb -1� 10 , G . . . - . . .'.�, .!...!. . .. ..:..IN _.. .. .. .... . . .A. .... ... . I . . �.t..... ... .. . . ... . . ..'.. j. N . . wo- ,ft , a a , . .. - Pa .. .. 6-��.�;. - .::.,..: :. 0 .. .,:,;. . 0.00 a " . o o i.� "'wo - rt wo - . . - .. . . .... I . . - -.�. . -. : - -__ . . .: . .. ..... - : a gr t-03. : oft 0-.0 0. 0 ..... ..ts-it n 9-11 lb *, - -. I%. .a P% .. 0 n-�4.V2. .. ..; .,� �o . ."a.- . .. . � - ." ft - -..:, : . ' O .:. ....... .-.. . . -- .. .) - -, -.....,._.,:...-,-.,.. . :. .r.._".0.1". ... _. . _GQ- . . . 0) 0 �1; . .P..,i- . . .;I. -... J . . . :3 I-& Pk ev _.. 06 t . . I * Ix .; ..I w-_ .� _W . ..... -. :".. . ..� :� .:�_. ... - ' IL M " .m. .:. ... .. -♦. * .,.-- , a 9 n . . - fb M . :... :-'s) n 2 �. .. . .. - t_ ..:,. . m QQ pft-.... � . - .50 " T .. " .. -*�'-: .. .� ;.. , .:-, ._ ..,-:-, .-`---.7....� . cl... .._; " A Is. it' - 4 ., .. : . . . Ix.m. rt.,. .l..- T-.,.---.,-�;.. ��'6,':_.. _... . 41 ''- �_,:- " -- ;, . . - . ;-7---- ,-",-; 4�_ . . , .. •- .. . .. ... . I. .. * 1-6 CD .. . . . . . ., - .. -.,. . -. . A - t I 11 . V . c - -1 v n lb . ,..-. .:',� `.: - . . . 0 -cr rr CA . . - - . . �. 'I - . ' . ... . - . . -,.. -":. �. t,3.. 'm a 0- : -, . .. .. . . � ... . . . %4 . _%4 ;3-.:. - �, .1 ...- . .: rr =. rr P - _- - ;r . .ro, -n 's- . ,�", o" '.. a - r6 ... . . " * ... -11, - . .. , , 2 . ...il, "., .:�i5 -...:,- . , . .05 0*:96. : ...-..,.-- w . ....,t.-W.e., .. . . ...... . .. . '.". .,a . -, . ... . a - " ... ..- . . to `-7 - a 0 ,, '. ... - I& .- m- .-. .: .!,.. 8 .. . . . . .. . . . . - . . cr -' s 0-rt-:2 W..'.... I 0 ff . . ._. ,; .. .. n ,--m cr O. � . - - .. Cp%.C- : ...._m.. 0...a..�. - . . ..W. ,� , 'Zi . : -.. ft -M.- . .. Ir._ .. . . -%c . .. . - . 2 0 M ma:% ,.-.* .�,-.:. ..-..- :-.,.. . ... . . . .: :.t: , - rt m 6 --�,n c6 o a R � 1,.1 ., "-"-' .. . . . 7�.: '.. r.,, %z�: ., ..,. , • I . I . . . . ...- ..'--L,;---, . . ...1- -0 W. . ft.-m-- . 4, .07. - I& .- -.*., .'.*8 -!m A.,T.'.. .-.-,r ,:-�.-'--I".-� : I • -.'_...v. ..,.I.:!:'n- R --.m "09 : , .,O - , . ".".I*.'.; ....- .;I 04 . -0 . - .: .,... . O. ... .-.,:", lm - %4 * .:, -- -- .';t....- .. . ..... , .:.:A .: . . . C6 C) ft: .... ft .. mad .1 . . .. .,:.;. -. - 0 I so cr lb-a :r , ,, ... . I ,. . . ,.:- Pa :..- "' -,.,w .,:. - ...�-.,_-:.-..:-:.-...-,-;-No. ..:..,.Ws-rr , a 0 • M 3c.- � � ou et ft .ft, .,. .rl . .............O . .�o 0,.. - . . . . a lb 40 lz .... .. 0..",.;,.. ..,; .a" .. .. . - . ....,. . :: � •t.. ... .. . . ... . . :. '. *10 `..'. .a ,rr c r. n, ". * - .. - .. . .... :.l. .. . :.-,.- ..- -- 'm ". - . 1. .... . . 10 0 so 0 - ..O.A - - 21-1. ...-.- .0 .. -..-.,. - . .. . . ......_. ... . � . m, .I"A - .. .. ...o.%a. Ar . " --: _: . ..*..� .... -1* . _ m. .@a .w..-.j. . % ( . .....,.- . . . A. , ;- n-0 Crcr O'" a- 0. .. _:r " -` n��' . - .,* X*0. .%4 . .- ... ... _ . n . , ,.. .7 .4 .... .. . ......_.•. . .1 w 'jx" ..........lb to a ft 0 99 . :;-V . . ... ..- .1m -.--�-�. > rt tr.rt - . 1- . .n... . .� .... .'�:. - ..; . � .. - .. r -..-." .. I . . . . - - P& �- . '. Si r. ' rr -n rt o-Q2. .0. M. w a .. ... .."... I .,.. . - . . ..- - . .. . :... 10 ...I.. . . . . .., . - r' 0 ` 8 1�-., 4177*O-AD .'. m .. .C%.. - - - ,. . .. . �Qg rr , :. n ID - p4a 16 O-Q.. - I - I -, . . iv . . J9 .........a Ao �:.- .ID n.0 :'t' *.'40 10 Cr.. v - . R .. ..0 *- .. . ...... I.. .Z, :3 la;..m_ .. ".. '.�: . . _- :� .::*, -.. 0*. , ' ' . . . .. . :. r ..1. , '... .;:: -- .;. . ..... . 0 n- a. o - o --... 93 C6 . 0- CL..(;6 . .. . . aro - -AM QQ A ".:w,:t: .::!..�;r.-�... .:.a: -,� -'.. . , . &-�q - ., . . . -� - , . .1.1 . ' ' . C)• . . %4 so P_ V - ...•-o� - . 93 -,- ......V-, s _...l...4..'. "._.-':P� t";,.-;:.,� ... . . ".... .. . . % O , I .. - . " I , : ., �_ V;, , r . , . -�' .. . ..:, lb a '.. - - 74 . . . .. .. .W .._. . ... ... . . . .. ... . . ... .. .. - -.... - -.. ..t.._. . ....., ... . $.w'ft . . . .. q., ..;...I - I' . .. . m ... : _ .- %.. . . . .. I . 1. I ..... ;:�`.,.%-, . .�� .! , -..:.,.-_ . . a tr 02, 1 ., *I - . . . . .. '. 11,_,i;�- .- 0 . . .. * . .... . I. . . C3 m - . .. .. -: '. .1/ . : .. .. V- .. r'..; a 03 P% �,- '' 0 ca tv . -O.. . I lw!�:.,:" .-, 1^ . ". . .cr:,: :1 .1. - - . ..:.... .0. W. .... . P n & . bw..:3 .1 , 0 " ...: .. . . m . a . . . ../.*l...l.. . . ; , - ..... .. . . . . - X rt.rt - --o . .*.l4v:.. ..O . . * - a - I '..,�.* -I .'.' 1. .�.-. ... . ...t . W" 0. -:...-, it .... I . . ,0 a ". n. . ...'ft... 0 ...Z.. ... , . o., * ..,.:.- . , , �-�.,.- ..':<- . .......:-. . . . r.:.;- w lb lb .......-I., I, ..,. Dog P"'..a .�*. z 1-ft': .'. . . ." .. .. .� - . . 0 _- .. . ft CA ...:; ��-.:_�e.:_"� . . I .. ., ...- -,'*.. .. .'....".. -.. , ... ..- `I :.: " ,-: - -.! .. .. .. : . ....... a . . . ... . .:.;� - I?-m ft - � . .I..,';�� b'. .. . 4% . . .. . . . Pk 1"'. .. . . .' ��,.:,-`�;`.-.,.-,A:., . � . ... . . .. ,. . .. ... ... . - .. ... .: ..:, . vs �...:,.,%. M.'.'.�� .. a -6-00*..... .- . I , , - - a.m , , . :'�_,.Z.-:,.-.;_... . i96.,.. .2 a. ".*.," .- ;l - , . .. w;. 114 ... ..::.... , .!.,;. ...., - -, . . D!--- -.. . .. •:i - 1 - " , - ......: - . - . . .. ... . a 0* . . . 0 .0 . .- ;-, p ..:! *�� .... ...:-,-. .. ..... . . . ill . .. .. . .d _4 ;Pa ...• 0 .mx M , '....'..'._".10-,.. ..1.. . . . . . . .. . . . ...- . ,. .. -... . , go, .as., - .. iv.. . ". ..i . .._. . . - -..... .....,, ,.-1 .. '..tIt..; . - ... .- �t6, . .. '..'. "* :f.m... . c .fb,p oo;,O.9..:,-I,la,.:--. - .'I..". AQ-.... ...1 ,. .- , , . .- ... .. .. I& .. Ofd-i. * �:� .........t. . . . . . ., ; n . .._. . . . ... a--M - . m"'. 1.I"10 . : I -.. ........ .-..� .... - . . --� .. -": .- -1 C " a , .,:-a.in 0 ... I . . ..-:.-;.I ...._,I"-_�,-. C. . .- a�-:- "m.. .. - .r... ..." .,.-..7.-.: ..,..:: .. .33 . . .. .:;- V I,% , . .. - � . : ..1. . - . . �,.' - is ..•. 0. . .. a ." .. .:.. . -W - - ..• . "' ..." - - t'. :::- .ji-�-.-::. ,.: .:... . ., . -... ,•. am- O' -.:.-..: •...a ....I% . ... - , , ft,'. ...- . . . ..�..:.�_ m.. .w - ... � . P-d�._�., rt A q A O . r-� - ." . . . .. _�r .."-.�, .... . - . . - ri 0 .o . . .J . . _. , " m .; .:'�-�., . - " .01.- ......a cr a.. . .8 . .. .. - i� .,:.-.. .q.... a.. '. .. _. ..'...1. .. .... .. -..;. . . , .. to�- .,,- :.;......,.... .. '.... I—- . .. ..."...1 . rt ilk ;.. , - . . �_... .'. . ," -- rn " .. 0 W .. I- '--.'7 -- r. CD ft 80 80 ' . . I& ;4 ,-, .. " . .. . "..� . p ". . . � - . .. . .:, :3 - " . . . - . :..... "- ... .%'...; ... - .1%.Vil p ---� ..,& a n, la..C. . . .M'.Pft-I *& Ir C... . . -, ,..`- .. 1. . .: � - . . . ..... . . .. ... .. .. -. : 1 0 . .. .:.;.. R'. �.::. :_-_...- 0 I- A. . .. .. .. .01L .1r. .. - - , .. ': n :'.W 0 0 . . . . - . . t.. . 1, .. . . . .", . , . . . :. .;:.,.,..,.-.... ....1. ..., 10 *., rt.0 n cla r.�... ID ..'e .". . 9-0 . ... .,.-a ..,,.*-.-.",.-td .; . . . . " '. . . .P .... ..�In oft., -.".l- . . . . .-* :-.� . .. ''a 0"so -- ... ".. .. ... . , ..,... ... ... .. .0 . .. . . . . : . 0 * . ..044 M -.I-6 'O.C) .- A-,A• a . . . . . =f) P" . ... - .. . . . ow - .. 0 '' . . I . - .. : lm. . a "G.a . . : . . .� . . , .• I..'" . .. .. . . . . . . . " -93 .0 , te - c. ., . . .- -... gs , .- - a 10 . - - " 40 1 . ., "... . . . I.. . IN ., . ...:, , '' ';:.. - .0. .- .- . . .r $-ft - - -, I . . � .... : 06. 0!_:� - I 0- . . ....- " , el". 4o ad n .: . .. ..�.i, . - lb l" . . . . - . . ..., ..• . -.-1:.., - . . .. .. T 9)I.- . . . O., ro .. . :.. I . .., . ....-, ':-.'-,,-.- . -.:..',-*- - , . . .. . P ID , pft •., P& . e fan . . . . 09 tft 9 ...- . - . _..-�:_ .. . ....:, . CA. . , * 9.. :..-'.- t., _. - . , , - . t:.'.:1 .:.e . .. . .. . . - - ... .. ..: _.�.--_-.z�jl'.j0'--- '.' .01 to . -0-...:�...,.--..-.',- .0 . -n. . �.. . '. , .:. - . . , , . . 6' - .. - ... '."'VA. � . 0 . -0 ,::.i.:-;. o -, IZ ,., - 0,0 . .;, . _. . . .. 0. ,, '"' p m __ - _:- . . ... - - c ft . jI..�'...._ .... .. - . ." .... . . 4D - .. - .....".. . :.... ....��_i .,,A...,.. i .......Ao - - .:. rr"�� 04 10, . , . "' * . 0 - 1 -.... .;""-;; , ..:.V;:_', ...,.IT 1. . , , . - . . . , :: .. .. . .... . .we.% . . . .. . . W --I - '" .....4 " - , , .. - '....,%-I. .. .. 1. - 66. .0 ttmm a . I.O...,..... -. ... . . - ... . ..... �- �_-...4 -,'.'.*-."..--- . .- 0 . .n . . . .' . .. .. . .. - I-1-h : -,.'.C6 a . . .... . '';' '- li " .I 1. __.. - O -- .�I. - . ....�; . , .. I � P&1%0, . . . :..:•.. . . , ct .-*.: I 'I" . -1. ... ,.a.- . - . . . .- ., . . . cr . . :....:Ilb ..: 14 4 . .,:. .:M'.1 e ,e- i'.4 .-�.�.___ - ..:...T..: 'o. a - ... .. _ .. -- . .. ...r .. -....,..a I........:,.-.._ . :;.,* . In so . . . .. v-. " .96 .. :.. '.. - .... . ... . . , .. t , ,.::,�!_.4'...1 . . ........:.. ..-...o ., :3 , 40, - $-to- m: 6 .0 .. . . . .-, .a . . . : .. .. . . . _rr In " , . ...... ., !l.. . I , . M. -CL... . .7- �:---�`�%! ...:....--...Z...-.".&O....,.:.;.... ...-... .v. ._. .. .. . . . .�'. . . . 0 1_1�:I.-- . . ..., '. , "q2 " ?; : . .--�'.: - - , , ".- r. , .:. . .... . . .r...-...: ... ... . . . n ... . .: - - .. in. . : I .. . .. 0. '. .. . . .. ... . :::. .. . . ., _.. - .. �. , - . - • : - - - - . . .... . I _. .. t. ... �,, -. _. , ��...o'., -.�.w- ,. -- ... . . .. '..t .... ; .:� ;,.,:.;..,.-. ...... -;. ,,.,�....� -�::.---, .e.: : 'f#4 :y.N ... .- .., I _i�.. . I . . .. - - . .... . .... . . ..l. . t. - , .....'.- .... . , * I .. ... ..I .. ....;. t . . .. . .. I. - . , ," �1 . . .. , v ... . .. . . . . � _. . . - . .... ..:. _.: .,?-.'. . . . :. :. . .. � ..: V77...:, -�-�.-�. ..... . . .� -- -, -';;: ..�,- .. - , , "d .;.:, .. . .��-!;��*-j - - - , �- -,, ;;;�-_ ,,-;.4�. _-.--�� ;" -z .. . ..,. . . . .W... .7.; ,' . �4 , ...�, .-/. . . ,.*.��. ... .. . .:� ., - :. ' -i ..i ;��;.-_�'.-., -, '. t;w:__. :vl-.-..'__-�-V, . . . . .�; ..., -: 14.:. -."....#t.- F-{' *.V�,.",,,.-�!---- . ... _.,;_--; .� . . . ,,w:.,. '-: ,rr;.l *...�:.:.s ! t, -� . - - --, , ' , , - :. .. ..r� ; . , - . - -i A! . , .1 , , 0_ .I , .. :�.."�� -�..j�. ..Z.�.'..�: .-... . - , - -1:1 . �:-- .���.-,k��.� -_:-i��..", .��j.�,!,, . .�%,::_.� ... ,��,,_-.- _ . -, 1:�!: _ ...t,.:: ........... .; ? . .. .. ....,-�..'. - :%;�;-l..�,., .. .. .- . . � .. .. :,17n, ..:.:" t"', - , .�..,_i!vt: ,,�- , .`._,.r_ .I I I - , - -- e:. . . _..."-.� ..... ..... . - 1. -_. '... . ,.-.. - ... ." . .. . �-,�,��.-7::-'-;-.-_!i_:--,... , -:!i-i:-..--... I . • . , , ,-.",�'�';!"':.,.'.t'.l..l:,:�'..,?,j; -4!'l2'-l',"'-,-. .:'' � t .�_ .1.. I ,.-i,!,,,,-.,�-,,.r-.-.,:.i-.-,:.,-7',, .. � __` ir. _�' , .; . 1. ,7:1 ,. - .'�,--";-.,.-,. tit -, . .. . . . - .; ....-. ., . �� . . " . . ......... . . .__. � .. .. " ,� . ...... ........ .... ...-.--. -...-..r I , .. . ,4F-.-! ..;. I, , 7, . . .-?.-. . .. .. .n,.:,.. . '... ...... . . . .. .. . . . 't_1 .�., - ..., '..._..... ....;l. _ ,-.;..�:-.-: .- .- - , .,.-:I . � - .: .. . .. .. - ..... .. .., _- �.,, . . . . . ....- - I _ ... .!: . :. . 1 . ... ..- .. , ..P.- t.;�.,...'. ` ._, .-:,7 . . z � ,-.. .� ,, -. - .- m .. . ..0 .. . , " " , , , , " , , I., - , -- - - .. - - . - - 'I , , , I •110- 0, 0 R I CA 4 Do 29 9 P. -1 13 0 p I C: p " a 60 I.- I Q. M aa • . a I -olw so so lb-" *.P-k r .: . 10 ; I _" I& J"" 0 P% : ,- .- . .I..: , , - - I - - . - .;tit ,..;,...i:..'.:-,._ ... , ,:�.�_*_:;,- ,�%?. . . .. '% .. ...f . '.,�.,... �`:.:,Z�,:l-. .!.l:_ .- ......- -, �.,�- �...�"".-...t,-,�., .: �_.:.... . .. - ... - - • , - . . . - -,'.'I-' - - , - . . ..:. ..� .• . .l....-..;..,. . . ... . ` - , , ., . ,. . � p,,;'-f..j4...Ili - . .. .r : .r...- -�.,- -- . . - - I....., ..- . .;! ;_, ..�t:� u .;..il .- _��. . .".. .).4:.:tzz,o�i P� .k...-1 ". . .j . .. . . . , ... X ,i:�*._;-;�_ ...�.,;;...., -..:.'. .. .,:,*:--& . .,-..,; .-,.t.l!!-. . . _ . ... 11 -1.",_ , I * 1 . :Z;.:... - -I ,4, . " '. *:,�. .-.,-t-.--m,�. ... ..,. .1 .�....I.. . , .. -l':7..-...--.,:.�;4�.- Z. -1 �-1,�!,!".. - fzi )m iz',,� f -...':,"..";4ii4�1.�.....- ." ::, _r .- ;P._::.�,,. �'_ . .......l.. __;'-' l-;,:.. r---.'- V`- ., .. t% '. . I.."_;,.mo.i�, .": :'� . -.. �l.,,*._ .- ,:! " '.... .. ...-T. � *, t'...": `:�n� . • 7 ,� ..... . . , . .- ,;t�f_;�r '. _Z .>� . . . . . .. - - �..M"_j_ _".... ..,.. .... .. . . . -"....."lla. -r .�f. '.1--, ... : . - --Z -� -..�.il_--: � _. . --.-.,.�� , • .�.,r�7;�4�-_,�. , . I - ,.-,,,,"..,..-.---(-.,.. ..... ' . _.. _. .,_ . 4-1'=."- -3..., . . ".1" ...I. -r -- ....."I .."', ..���l.'...--".--,�1.II.,.,. ..�L..--. ..... - . �,.,.. .!,�"--� ;-'-- ---aP�"-P.-"-.'.i...,L-�l-,..;��.,.;..;. .-, ':-�_-..". ! � - .- .-- -?"i., �_ ; :. , 1" .. . '�.'4��-j$o�,":�l.';'�7�,.,"�;'Z�-e-,.,.!- i.. . - �:::_;. "... .... ... . ._.� - . .1. ... I-_-* ....". ..... , �,..� . V . ,.. .. . .. --- � � ...;.� �� s . . _ ....l. . "' - - -1 ,.'.L:T-_ W... - ! ,�:t7_-,n- . . a . .. -:,,-::� .i ., _L�l I 1�1.. . . ! ,.. .l.,::."� -I p : 4. .. ... - . . ,..- ., ;F -�. - . � . : ..L.;... ...'. •.. - - . . .. .. .:,.:r.: ..- .- .1 .,... :7 r,m . -- - � : . f. - -- ...- I "' �_` . . .: .: . . - 10 , - .. .. ... .... . -�..�- .. - , ..;;:.,.�. ..... , i- . -I-, -�.-...- i The i Information j You Requested l Is Attached With Our Compliments E - VAI C ItAok hhft ern-ca, A , Y - , vrrt of . .7'A COVNTY I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ELLMAN, BURKE, HOFFMAN & JOHNSON A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ONE ECKEF9 BUILDING,suiTE eoo SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105 TELECOPIER (4151 495-7587 TELEPHONE f4151 777-e727 January 8, 1993 YLA_ FACSIMILE Contra Costa County Community Development Department 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553-0095 Attention; Mary Flemming & Bob Drake Re: File No. 2042-92 Valley Waste Management/ Appeal of Winton Jones Development Co.-, et al. Dear Ms. Fleming & Mr. Drake.- As you know,, the above-captioned Appeal is scheduled for a hearing before the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, January 12, 1993. The Appellants are contesting the issuance by the County of a Land Use Permit 2042-92 to Valley Waste Management ( "Applicant") and MGM Construction Company 00m;Mer1( ) based upon a Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act. Appellants have asked us to represent them in connection with this Appeal. Apparently they attempted to obtain representation by several other law firms which were unavailable because of potential conflicts of interest and/or scheduling conflicts. Our first meeting with Appellants was yesterday afternoon. Accordingly, we respectfully request that the hearing an the appeal be rescheduled so that we may have adequate time t to prepare'. We request that the hearing be rescheduled to a date t on or after January 25, 1993. Please contact me or John Roffman of this office to confirm whether you will reschedule this hearing. Very tru y yourp, , ,, 0 ° Jef IF, W. IJo. ; son t d JWJ/sts