HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01051993 - 1.18 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on January 5, 1993 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, Schroder, Torlakson and McPeak
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: Authorizing Acceptance of Instrument.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following instrument is hereby
ACCEPTED:
INSTRUMENT REFERENCE GRANTOR AREA
Road Maintenance MS 151-90 Robert G. Rodenburg Clayton
Agreement Linda J. Rodenburg
I hereby certify trnet this is a true and correct copy �+
an action taken and enteibd on the minutes of ma
Board of Soper jv X o[+the atb shown,own,
p
ATTESTED: �p "'� ..
PHIL BATCHELOR,Cierk of the Board
of Supervisors and unty Administrator
r �
By ,0eputy
Contact: Melissa Morton - 313-2347
Originator: Public Works (ES)
cc: Recorder (via Title Co.) then PW Records, the Clerk of the Board
Director of Community Development
MM:fp
BO:S.tl
LEON DRIVE
APN 080-160-016
ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
MS 151-90
Contra Costa County, California
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this :Z�_day of P4a-,_ , 1992, by
Robert G. Rodenburg and Linda J. Rodenburg, Owners of Record of
that certain property designated as Parcels A, B and C of Minor
Subdivision 151-90. The Tentative Map of said Minor Subdivision
was approved August 13, 1991 and The Parcel Map filed in the
office of the recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of
California on 1992, in book of
Parcel Maps at page
NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The cost of maintaining Leon Drive from Morgan Territory
road for 1250 feet to the limits of Parcel B on Leon Drive shall
be shared equally by Parcel B (MS 151-90) and Parcel C(MS151-90) .
2. In the event that any of the property subject to this
agreement is divided into two or more parcels, each parcel shall
be treated for the purpose of this agreement as if it were a
separate lot and it in turn shall be responsible for its
proportionate share of the cost of maintaining said roadway.
Proportionate share in this context is meant to mean that if there
are X number of owners covered by this agreement, then each parcel
owner must pay 1/X th of the costs.
3. The question of whether the road is in need of repair and
the person or persons who shall make said repair shall be decided
by a majority vote of the parcels affected. In the event of a tie
vote, those holding the maximum proportionate interest by gross
property area shall prevail.
4. This document is not considered to be inclusive.
Subsequent revisions will be added by attachment to include
additional parcels and expand the roadway limits.
5. In the event any person owning one or more of the lots
subject to this agreement shall refuse to pay his proportionate
share of any cost of repair or maintenance, then one or more of
the remaining owners may pay said cost, which cost shall become a
lien on the lot of the defaulting owner by the filing with the
county recorder of a notice of lien within sixty days after
payment of said cost. The defaulting owner shall be responsible
for all costs of collection including reasonable attorneys' fees.
UPY
i
This agreement is intended to run with the land, and shall be
binding on the successors in interest to the parcels involved.
Executed pec -7 _ 1992.
Robert G. Rodenburg in a J. rRocferiburg