Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02231993 - H.1 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Adopted this Resolution on February 23, 1993, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Smith, Bishop, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Powers ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 93/82 (West's Water Code App. Ch. 13, Sec. 12.2 and 12.3) y SUBJECT: Repeal of Drainage Fee Ordinance No. 83-21, and the Adoption of a new Drainage Fee Ordinance for Drainage Area 29G, Antioch Area. Project No. 7568-6D8223. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, as the Governing Body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, RESOLVES THAT: On January 12, 1993, this Board set a public hearing to consider the repeal of the existing Drainage Fee Ordinance 83-21 and the adoption of a new drainage fee ordinance to increase drainage fees in Drainage Area 29G. On February 23, 1993, pursuant to the Board's Resolution of January 12, 1993, this Board held a hearing to consider the repeal of Drainage Fee Ordinance 83-21 and adoption of a new drainage fee ordinance. At which time all written and oral objections presented concerning these actions were considered. This Board FINDS that any valid written protests filed do not represent more than one-half of the assessed valuation of real property contained in Drainage Area 29G. This Board also FINDS that no written petition for an election, signed by at least twenty-five percent of the registered voters within Drainage Area 29G, has been filed. It appears from the affidavits of publication on file with this Board that all notices required to be given for such a hearing have been duly and regularly given and all procedures to be followed have been followed, all in accordance with Sections 11 and 12.3 of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act and in accordance with the provisions of the Board's Resolution of January 12, 1992. No resolution or ordinance protesting this action was received from the City of Antioch. The purpose of the drainage fees described in this resolution is to generate monies to finance drainage improvements in Drainage Area 29G. The fees will be used to finance the drainage facilities listed in the drainage plan and described in the engineer's report. As discussed in more detail in,said report and in the Report of Impervious Surface Drainage Ordinance Dated January, 1982, the types of development that are subject to the fees will generate additional impervious surfaces and stormwater runoff within said drainage area and watershed, thus creating a need to expand or improve existing drainage facilities and a need to construct new drainage facilities. Use of the fees paid by each type of development will provide necessary infrastructure to mitigate adverse drainage impacts that would otherwise result from such development. Resolution 93/82 Repeal Drainage Fee Ordinance No. 83-21 Adoption of Drainage Fee Ordinance for Drainage Area 29G February 23, 1993 Page Two This Board hereby FINDS that the repeal of Drainage Fee Ordinance No. 83-21 and adoption of a new drainage fee ordinance for Drainage Area 29G is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the Act's guidelines. This Board also DIRECTS the Director of Community Development to file a Notice of . Exemption with the County Clerk. This Board further AUTHORIZES the Chief Engineer of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District to arrange for payment of $25 to the County Clerk for filing the Notice of Exemption. This Board hereby further FINDS that good cause exists for the adoption of a new drainage fee ordinance for Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Drainage Area 29G, and this Board hereby ENACTS Ordinance No. 93/ 19. This Board hereby also REPEALS the existing Drainage Fee Ordinance No. 83-21. hereby certity trtJt this is a true ano correct copy o! an action taken and entered on the minutes of tre 3oard of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: F -hrt ary 23, 1991_,._ PHIL BATCHELOR,Clerk 611 the Board of Supervisors and Coun Administrator BY Deputy SC:kd C:BO\BORES29.t11 Contact: P. Harrington, 313-2285 Originator: Public Works (FCE) cc: County Administrator Community Development Building Inspection County Counsel County Assessor County Treasurer - Tax Collector County Auditor - Controller Chief Engineer Flood Control Engineering Accounting Engineering Services Building Industry Association P.O. Box 5160 San Ramon, CA 94583 David Lennon Hofman Company P.O. Box 907 Concord, CA 94522 Dennis J. Razzari Davidon Homes 1600 S. Main Street #150 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Richard W. Jensen Braddock & Logan Assoc. 4155 Blackhawk Plaza Circle #201 Danville CA 94526 ORDINANCE NO. 93/_L9_ AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 83-21 OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND ENACTING A NEW DRAINAGE FEE ORDINANCE FOR THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT DRAINAGE AREA 29G The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County as the Governing Body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 83-21 of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. The Board hereby enacts the following as the Drainage Fee Ordinance for Drainage Area 29G: SECTION I. DRAINAGE PLAN. The drainage plan and map entitled "Drainage Area 29G, Boundary Map and Drainage Plan", dated December, 1982, on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, is adopted as the drainage plan for the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Drainage Area 29G pursuant to Sections 12.2 and 12.3 of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act (Chapter 63 of West's Appendix to the Water Code). SECTION II. FINDINGS. This Board finds and determines that said drainage area has inadequate drainage facilities; that future subdivision and development of property within said drainage area will have a significant adverse impact on existing and future developments; that development of property within the drainage area, with its resultant increase in impervious surfaces, will require the construction of facilities described in the drainage plan; that the fees herein provided to be charged are uniformly applied on a square foot of impervious surface basis and fairly apportioned within said drainage area on the basis of benefits conferred on property upon which additional impervious surfaces in said drainage area are constructed; that the estimated total of all fees collectible hereunder does not exceed the estimated total costs of all drainage facilities shown on the drainage plan; or included in the Engineer's Report; and that the drainage facilities planned are in addition to existing drainage facilities already serving the drainage area at the time of the adoption of the drainage plan. -IIA u01109S ui y1.1o11as se aq lleys lunowe sal 9yl -siseq Sol lenpinlpul ue uo peleinoleo eq lleys suoisrnipgns .19y10 lie .1ol sal ayl 'anoge palou se ldaox3 •6uipinipgns of .1oi.1d azis fol ay19q Ileys „Alun .1ad puel to teal a.1enbs„ ayl 6uluiw.1alap ui pasn ezis fol 9y1 pue leiluapisa.1 AliWeiillnw se palea.1l aq il12ys teal 9.1enbs 000' u12y1 ss 91 slol lenpinlpul 6u11e9.10 suoisinipgns 9dA4 Buisnoy .1alsnio pu12'wniuiwopuoo '9snoy umol -dew pies to uoilep.1ooa.1 of .1oi.1d paid sl dew leo.1ed .10 ieug a yoit4m .1ol Alun lenpinlpul yoea uo .10 uoisinipgns pesodo.1d a.111ue 9141 uo sal a612ui12.1p ay} Aed Il12ys .19pinipgns 9141 'Al pue Ill suoiloaS .1apun pagpied se ldeox3 'SNOISIAI(ionS 'V1 N01103S 'iln u01109S .1apun pa.1inba.1 lunowe ay1 paaoxe of lou 1nq 'loot a.1enbs aad Zb•O$ l0 991 a of loafgns aq lleys eoepns snowadwi ui esea.1oui tau 10 lunowe a41 '•319 soiled 's�{lenn 'SAeMeAlip of peliwil lou 1nq 6uipnlour 'eoepns snoin.1adwi ui esea.1oui ue asneo 1e141 ,(lil►oel 6uilsix9 ue of sluewaoelda.1 .10 suoileoilipow 'uoilon.1lsuoo .1ay10 .1od *food aad 09£$ aq lleys eel ay1 'pled uaaq lou sey sal a6eule.1p ay1 yolynn .1o1 slot uo slood 6uiww!ms leiluepisa.1 Aliwel 9l6uis .1od •Iln uoiloaS ui y1.1ol las se eq Ileys eel ay1 uoilon.1lsuoo leillui .1od ped uaaq sey sal 96eule.1p pa.1inba.1 eqj pun e9.1e 96eui12.1p ay1 ulyl!m uoilon.1lsuoo .1ol 1lw.1ad 6uipiinq Aue 9nssi lou Ileys uoiloipsi.1nf 61.11ney lelogo ,ip ay1 .10 X4uno0 elso0 a.1luo0 ayl 'Al pue ill uoiloaS .1apun pal pied se ldeox3 'S1IW133d JNIQlins 'A N01103S ped sl eel 9141 se ewil vans pun gal pa.1.1alep to ea.1e ples .1ol s.1osuuadnS to p.1eog ayl of sly6u luewdol9n9p 91.41 '112.191121103 se '6u1lue.16 s.1aumo A:pedo.1d ayl uo leuoilipuo3 sl sal to luaw.1alap .1141 •luawdolanap 6uipued 9141 to :ped pa.1inba.1 a lou sl 112141 sa.1oe oml to ssaoxa ui 1ol 9141 to uoil.1od 9141 uo sal a14l to luawAed 9141 J919p ue3 .19um0 Apedo.1d .1141 'ezis ui S9.1oe onnl ueyl .19189.16 slol 1­10 '1N3W83=I30 33d 'Al N01103S -Alsnoina.1d pled Alln1 uaaq eney seal 96eule.1p yolynn .1ol Apeclo.1d .10 fol Auy (t, .10 :93UeAanuoo ayl 10 linsa.1 a se pales.10 lou si alis .10 lol 6uiplinq mau a ejegm .1aumo Aliedo.1d 6uilinge .10 'A!I!in oilgnd '41ua oilgnd 'Aue6e lu9wu.18no6 e 01 puel A9AUo3 0l (E :1991 a.1enbs 001, ueyl a.1ow Aq p9se9.13u1 lou si e68.18no3 puno.16 10 lunowe 941 p9pino.1d 'sooel.1ns snoiMedwi .1aylo .10 sa.1nlon.1ls 4Pow of (Z :9.1nlonils IeUibi.10 ay1 se eoepns snoiMedwi ssel .10 'awes ayl sey a.1nlon.1ls luellnsei ay1 papino.1d 'po010 pe .1aylo .10 spuim 'pooh 'eig Aq pe6ewep .10 pe4oilsep emlonils e eoeida.1 of (I. :6uimollol ayl.1ol pa.1inba.19q lou Ileys 991.1141 -SN0IldW3X3 -III N01103S OMI abed LETT 'ON aoueuiplp Suileadab aoueufpio .d Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 83-21 Page Three SECTION VII. FEE SCHEDULE. Development Type Building Permit Subdivision Commercial/Industrial/Downtown Office $17,270 /acre $18,550 /acre Office (Medium) $14,800 /acre $16,540 /acre Office (tight) $12,385 /acre $13,960 /acre Multifamily Residential (Includes Mobile Home Parks) Less than 2,500 sq. ft. of land per unit $13,610 /acre $13,610 /acre 2500 to 2999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 805 /unit $ 805 /unit 3000 to 3999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 925 /unit $ 925 /unit 4000 to 4999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,075 /unit $ 1,075 /unit 5000 to 5999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,230 /unit $ 1,230 /unit 6000 to 6999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,380 /unit $ 1,380 /unit 7000 to 7999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,530 /unit $ 1,530 /unit 8000+ sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,605 /unit $ 1,605 /unit Development Type Building Permit Subdivision Single Family Residential 4000 to 4999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,130 /unit $ 1,810 /unit 5000 to 5999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,180 /unit $ 1,885 /unit 6000 to 6999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,230 /unit $ 1,960 /unit 7000 to 7999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,280 /unit $ 2,035 /unit 8000 to 9999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,355 /unit $ 2,145 /unit 10000 to 13999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,510 /unit $ 2,365 /unit 14000 to 19999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 1,760 /unit $ 2,720 /unit 20000 to 29999 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 2,175 /unit $ 3,265 /unit 30000 to 39000 sq. ft. of land per unit $ 2,700 /unit $ 3,900 /unit 40000+ sq. ft. of land per unit $ 3,240 /unit $ 4,490 /unit Agricultural Under 10% of lot impervious EXEMPT More than 10% of lot impervious $16,465 /acre of developed portion On single family lots, barns and sheds in excess of 400 square feet and tennis and sports courts shall not be considered as incidental residential facilities included in the above fee schedule. The drainage fee for the portion of these facilities in excess of 400 square feet IIA uoipaS aapun elgeAed seal 943 isuie6e pa}lpaao eq Ile4s uollsenb ul aus juawdolanap 943 aol pled eel ay} to junowe jellop ayj 'eoueuipio eel a6euleap paldope ue of juensind ueyj ja4lo pled uaaq aney seal 96euleap aja4M (o 'ease eoepns snoinuadwl leuoijippe Aue aol IIA uolPaS japun algeAed eq 11e4s seal 'JanannoH -pled seen eel ayI 4o14nn .rol eaae eoe:pns snolnaadwl 18303 ay} Jol IIA uojpeg japun paalnbai eq jou Ileys seal 'aoepns snolnaadwl uo paseq eoueuipio eel ebeulejp aaU3oue ao eoueuipio si43 japun pied uaaq aney seal 96eulejp aaa4M (q 'uolslnlpgnsai Te to eseo 943 ul 3deoxa 'pled sena eel a43 4oiynn jol eaje 1e3o3 e43 to :red Aue Jo} IIA uoipaS aapun pailnbai aq jou Ile4s seal 'e6ea.roe uo paseq eoueurpio eel 96euleap jawiol a japun pled uaaq aney seal a6euleap aJayM (e :snnollol se pa3lpajo eq ileus pled Aisnolnaad seal ebeuleJ(] '1I03d0 :XI N0I103S 'ease a6euleip a43 to sseupa3gepul papuoq Aue l0 3saja3ul jo ledloulad e43 eonpai of pesn jo eame 96euleap e43 ul43lnn sal}llloel a6euleip pauueld to 'lied ul ao 9lo4nn ul 'awes ay; jol 3uawasmgwlaa ao 'uoijejado pue aoueua3ulew 'aleda.r 'uoileilqulwpe 'buljaaul6ue 'uoijongsuoo 'uol31slnboe puel aol Alalos pepuedxa eq Ile4s punt ples ul saluolry •ease 96euleap 943 jol paysllge3se punt s9!3!I!oel e6eulejp ay3 l0 3un000e a43 03 tinseajl 44uno0 ay3 ul pausodep eq Ileys .rapunajau papelloo seal IIV 'ledloupd sly jo 3ueolldde ay3 Aq sa!3!I!oel 96euleap pauueld ay3 to fed a to uoipni3suoo lenpe se yons u013ea9plsuoo 1a430 'a99ul6u3 ONO s,3ouis10 9y3 Aq pezuo43ne uaynn 'jo 'MONO JO 4seo 3deooe Aew uol3olpsljnf 6ulney lelo_Wo 941 '1N31NAVd 33=1 'IIIA NOUO3S •30l a43 uo eq o3 pasodoid s31un 6uillannp to jagwnu ay3 Aq 3aal aienbs ul azls 301 943 6ulpinlp Aq paule3go 3ual3onb ay} eq Ileys ,4lun .rad puel l0 3aal ajenbs„ e43 (sM.ied awoy ellgow 6uipnloui) leilueplsa,r AIlwell31nw jo.1 '3lun 6u!ilannp euo Aluo 6ulule3uoo s3ol of Aidde (legs„lel3uaplsaH Allwe=l 916uls„aapun s3unowe eel 9U1 '30l a se dew iaoied jo leurg ay3 uo unnoys puel 3e43 's3ol uolslnlpgns nnau jol (Z) jo :jol a se Iloi 3uewssesse pezryenbe 3sa3el ay} uo unnous puel 3ey3 's3ol 6ui3sixe aol (�) :eq Ileys azls l0l 'IA uolloaS of 3oafgns 'aoueulpio s143 to esodmd e43 io.1 's3unowe aal anoge ay3 of uol31Ppe ui eq Ileys 1! pue 'A U01 9S ul eel loot ajenbs ay3 6ulsn pa3elnoleo eq lieys mod abed lZ-M 'ON aouewpJp 6uijeed% eoueuipio :i Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 83-21 Page Five SECTION X. EFFECTIVE DATE.This ordinance becomes effective 60 days after passage, and within 15 days of passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting for and against it in the"Antioch Daily Ledger,"a newspaper published in this area. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON February 23 , 1993 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Smith, Bishop, McPeak and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Powers Chair of the Board ATTEST: PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator By Deputy SC:kd C:DA\DA29GA.tt 2 ' I