The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 11241992 - H.1 .. • ��E_ SEAL,,\ .. r. Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS -�.' . Costa n. _ _ ' .; . FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON ', � "''� s County DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ''i 40 O•. _ y DATE: November 3, 19 9 2sra �oVU?Ni� cP SUBJECT: APPLICANT'S APPEAL OF THE SAN RAMON VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE AN EIGHT LOT SUBDIVISION (COUNTY FILE #7693) , IN THE ALAMO AREA. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) . & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Sustain the approval of the San Ramon Valley Regional Planning Commission by taking actions listed under Option A below or sustain the approval of the County Zoning Administrator by taking actions listed under Option B below. Option A: Supporting the San Ramon Valley Regional Planning Commission APPROVAL of an eight lot subdivision. 1. Approve Subdivision #7693 for eight lots subject to the attached resolution and the conditions as approved by the San Ramon Valley Regional Planning Commission including all of the shaded conditions and the rest of the_conditions which are not striken. 2 . Accept the environmental documentation as adequate. Option B: Granting the Applicant's appeal approving the subdivision. 1. Grant the appeal filed by Thomas Gingrich and approve Subdivision #7693 for nine lots, subject to the conditions approved by the Zoning Administrator on July 6, 1992 . The conditions approved by the Zoning Administrator include all of the striken conditions and all of unshaded conditions on the attached conditions of approval. 2 . Accept the environmental documentation as adequa CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMM DATIION OF ARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER i SIGNATURE(S) : .ACTION OF BOARD ON November Z4 , APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER x \Addendum for Board action VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A x UNANIMOUS (ABSENT II TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact:Candida Wensley 646-2024 ATTESTED November 24 , 1992 cc: Community Development Department PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF Public Works Department THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Thomas Gingrich COUN DMINISTRATOR DeBolt Civil Engineering rF B a , DEPUTY CW/df V_ Page Two FISCAL IMPACT None BACKGROUND/REA SONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS This project was heard and approved by the Zoning Administrator on MAY 18, 1992 for eight lots rather than the nine lots requested (originally proposed for 10 lots) . The Zoning Administrator had concerns that the configuration of lot 8 and the steepness of the driveway made the lot difficult to access and made for an inadequate parking situation. On May 22, 1992, the owner requested reconsideration because the proposal was for nine lots and should have been either approved or denied rather than reduced to eight lots. On June 8, 1992 the Zoning Administrator granted the applicant's request for a reconsideration hearing and set the reconsideration hearing date for July 6, 1992, based upon assurances that revised plans would be submitted dealing with concerns on Lot #8. A revised tentative map was received which attempted to. address the concerns regarding the steep access and configuration of lot #8. At the hearing of July 6, 1992, it was indicated that in addition to the revised map, modified conditions would be applied for the adjustment of boundaries of lots #7 and #8 and the hammerhead turnaround and to increase building setback adjacent to existing residences along the north boundary of the project. On July 16, 1992, several neighbors appealed the approval of Subdivision • 7693 . The main reason for the appeal is that the neighbor's believe the application should be approved for 8 lots rather than nine. The staff report of May 18, 1992 is also attached, which discusses and evaluates the tentative map for Subdivision 7693 . On September 16, 1992, the San Ramon Valley Regional Planning Commission granted the appeal of a number of neighbors, and approved Subdivision 7693 for eight lots with a number of revised conditions. On September 17, 1992, the owner of the property appealed the Planning Commission's decision. r ADDENDUM TO ITEM H.1 NOVEMBER 24, 1992 On November 3, 1992, the Board of Supervisors deferred to this date the decision on the appeal by Thomas Gingrich (appellant) from the decision of the San Ranson Valley Regional Planning Commission Board of Appeals on the appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of a vesting tentative map to divide 4.88 + or—acres of land into 9 lots, DeBolt Civil Engineering (applicant) and Beverly Gingrich (owner) (Subdivision 7693) in the Alamo area. Supervisor Schroder commented on a visit he had made to the site and observances on the location of the trail site, the proposed cul de sac, and a narrower road going into this parcel of property, and he moved approval of Option B. Supervisor Powers seconded the motion. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Option B is APPROVED. t7ND.2T .bNS OF:.:.APPROVAL,» OR:::<SYJBDttIS:I.GN::>769>3::»{:bebY; :CTt� L'::ENGNgER idG> > > :...:...I;f::c.a:... :: U15 ) TH... .. EVERT Y < GZNGRICH:::> ;t:.C)wmer: »:<. »:<.Per EM �39......:.SAN'":...:...:. b2�' >V.AL'Tsty'»<RE:Gx:bNL TS:S--r-ON APPROVAL ............................... .............................. ............................... 3 The regtiest te--subdivide--fie 4 . 99 aere-preperty Fd er a maximufa a nine-(�9) lets subjeet teethe Revised ment en June 22, 1992 . A. Prier tefiling the final:, ap,air-additien l: re—A« tentative ffiap shall be-submitted fe -, e Z e '-�g r dra tater-previ ding-€er at least feur #3 c avrrs,-r ��rnri�-�� (4) eptest parking spaees ... at. expanded hammerhead Freund-tegether wit -adjusted-beundar i es en :6ets6-,74 and as i'.-''.dieated en the-stoff--reeemmendat-ien--€er-a — . sed tentative-crap--dated-July 6-, 4:992 . C feet residential struetures Prier te Issuanee ef building permits fer primary B. residential struetures en Lets-rte-8, and 9, plans shall be submitted fer review and appreval by the gening z�rxnxirsatraterpr9;o�iding-€�e=--a25-fe 9 , setbAe3f-rrvmr-the i36beundary. Gensideratien shall be given to mini'mis deeking,windews and deers ems—the-Berth--side of the buildings fer these let-9- :` eve opment shah ex......be . asec :on: the �-eu sed.; ent: ve a ;:d. >date:et<reeved;:b: :«:tie:::> ommuxtt;> > Yel . ....:::.. .::>:::: :.:::.;;; >;:.:::.;:::.;:.,.::..::.: ....:::.::..:::..:....:::::. :::::: . Y = pmetDE :artlrt..e..nt.;:<or at ..:: ` :::>>2:2::>' ;:;.g. : :;::sub::::: „ .:: >:..::`:::;':`: ,:.';' . .....:.:.:. 92.... ... .sect .to. mods �.cat�ons 3 3 sted below. Reek .. . ., erices o»3 t <z fibers> n<:<:these cvrid t oris are::>t ;., ::.:.:..:.::..: :.::. ::..::::::::.................:...::... ...:..,.:.:.:::.:::::::::. .: ,.:...:...........:a...the.::.. :r... x .os d :.. ..:::..::...: .::.::::::.:. ::.:::.::: ::::::::::::,::: ::.:::::::..::. . :::.:.: ..:..::::.:::::..::::::.:: P:.::.I.::::::::::::::. :.;;:.; ot;:.:<;tsnt : v..e...;:.;:ma ::.:;:;dated: dune.;:.;:.:2: .::;;:.;:.1: .: <2.:,:<.;:<.;:.;:.,�t.:;,.<. .e:a:st:.;:.:�.L3d ...<s .. .....:..........:........ ::::,::.::.::::::.:.:.::::::::::.:::.:::::..:: .:::::::::::: .:::::.::...::..:....:..:. .:::::::.:::.:,::,::::::.:::.:. a: .;:,:>:;:>:: < :<;< > p:.,:.>:::.;:..;:...,.: o fzlang a :final map, a .revi ed...:s a plan :Te. ukiiiii` tsd flr .thy.: rev, w.:.arici .:a ovaY ti .:: e .:. cn. .. .......dm. .n s.... rat4rr. ptvdng: or. thoToiing' modifzcatox ' : . ............................................ ...... ::.......::. :::...:.. :.. :: mam cf exht lots e w�dth:and ,desir�nf.:the internal project read shall :: >sv: :s'ed€:<t <:. atc >: : e ; .::: .. .>:< :.;.:< .................X.::::,..:...::.::.:::.:....:: ...m ::: :::h '�h.::::::3 :: .40 «<: dth.::. ir:::tes:3 n;:.;:.o :.;:.' he cess read to .the site, Likely D ve, :;.fr.:;the entire .x.X.<.<>; :;::.: puxpt�se: o the oac3 d. rm m1f cat: ci .s :shall `be.: tp provide.vsa .cot. r.ut. ,::;.with :. .:. .. ..... .:..;::.:: :.;.. the:..:: oad....des : ri;::°<tai ; h<;..hhe. ::; .st:fin se.. ....et .:::cx :: e .:...........:.................... :,.::: ::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::.;:;:::::::::::::...::..............:..: .::::::::::.:.5 ::::........:.............::::: : .:.::1 M..: :::::s..::::::::::: ...:.::::..:...w. :...:..::,::::b . . :c mnt::>:»:>sha:1:3::::>:<::be civ:. ded>> `te :<n :> ::c m:> lke:: >... : .:::.:::.,::;> ...:: x..:::::: .......::.: �: id.�..:::. ::.;E� :::::::�::. ::: :�: ;::.; :::.th�:::sout�east. ::..::::::::i.::::: :::::.::::::::.. :......::::.::::::::g.:::::::.:.:::.:::::::::::::::::::: :::......:.:::.....:.:.:::.::::.::::::::. ::::....:::..::::..::::::::::::.e rner.. . f. the property. The easement shah:. generally til:. r ent::>::>:::� »::the>:>:<:: r. J. roue::»tc:;>:>the:>>:eastern:: s� ;:.. ;;:;. .;::.;:.;:.:.:.;;; at;.;.<wh .ch:: o; nt:.::.the l...tuat� ado how .the boundary between::.dots 2. :... :. ..:.to:. southern. property Sine, at..wha ch paint the 77. ... . cJn3tlet..::xa .......extend:.. ..eastw fid ' bn: ':;:the.. ..seuthe boundary of Lrit: 5 to' the. :eastern property;.;:I a Vie.>.: rhexe:_ : t Q3c `1. 1 -4Si1$ T.:. pp.:. .:.::::::.:.::::::.::::ha :J.:;:.; :<.;:' a.::.;the::::ea:<;:s:tann:. 3rr�voc�°sale»offer<<of<:<:ded .; kation as necessary f.or ...tie .. ::.:::......:..:......:.:.:..........:::::............:....................... ............................ .::.....................................:..................................................................................................... .... vise 1 ..... . . t'"" tor three copes c ......... warded:::>to: :>tYe >P:ubl c::> Tarks>:<:::De artnent >:>:toad:<:<: p: :::.:: ::: :.::::::.,::::.::::.:.::.:: En re:ern, ..:.;.:;: : d-a .: .-L.. .;:;h a: :o: o stud: ::.<,<and �'flS.S....s L�i3. ectz s......Pubs.ic .Wo.r:ks>[:shat' :>:ve :;:; : :<< ;: .;...,,». «<.: .:::::::<:::.; .:::::.::.:.::::: .:.;:.:::: rift';.:;the.:::a: curac:.; .:::::::::.::;:::;:::::::: ....,:::.:::.:::.:::::.;;::: .:.::;:::;:;.: :. ::,::Y r a>::>c a k<;;< ak:<::s ;u :; ::>; ::: >_; 'th:::::::: : '. e.: ..:.:::: ::::fix uct::ice;.::<setbeC.;;.;. re.,:::::::: he.::.resri.sed P:.;::.;:.;:.;:.;; a;<.; d:::;nt .f.y henet.;.;:lot, area:<.;outsde:.;:<o:f.;::.te r ank structure setback cn each aected... �at ................. ........ ... .........................................:...:... .....:.....::::::::::: sed :::_ .. ::: .:. ...,..:::>:::: .:....demonstrate that at least s ark ,n '>s aces <:: .er;>:. o: >;:::: " : :;: p :::. .:::: P:.: ::::::::::::p:.::::::.:: .: :. :.::::: : 31:<.;bProvided . It,.:: east::.;:f..onr f.::the requ�rsd six spaces ehal..be located: pn site. ...: ::.:.:..:. : .: "> � eeAd �.sc7r Notes be� W fca ` ar Ramon. a .e ::......... ..............::.:.::.......:::....::::::.:..:.::..: ori`a1<:>P:la:ri::.. >:; :. .. ....,s ,: ,: :...:><::: ::.:: ::::..:.:.:......::..: .:.:. V. .. : . ni .g Comma sion aducefln.: cr�nsideratiflns hat:..sh�ilcie. g given p .ricu3 ar etten ori . `r� nevi er .:..: revised..:plan.... ..... .. ... ........:....::.;::..::.:.::;:::::;:::::;::;; ::..:;:;;;;;;::.:;;.:,.... . �%yy::..::...>::;.::�...maxx:.::::;.:.:. yy.»>'.:::::>:�..:::>.> . ::::»>:>:;»:»»:>:;;;:::::�:.;�:.::: :G:::ii.':::::::::::::'::::l1t::i::: .�r. :st :::::J :::..::: s`:;:;:;.:.,.:::;': .::.�.;ii::i::. n..,...;:...:..,...:::...:.':::: :..>',.:<:::: i: :i:;.,..:x,_..,,,:;,:;:.:.;..>....:.,:....,:�:;::::::...::::i::::::.: ::>::>:: >::;: :::.: : ....:..:. play prior to .sssuance .ef. :.busldng. :perzt ..:. ar r. � .:.:. .:::.: : s r.. ..re. . .de t: ::::struetur:es:;<:.rin:»:::1r�:. ......:::::::::::. . '.:: . ::. ;.. : :: .:::. . .::::::..:::::::..:: ::::: ...:,:. :::.:::::::::: June.. 2, 1992 map. deve3opment pans for each dot ::shag...::..�e...sub�e t:::to.:::.th ev er:..and:.apprcya .:.flf.. ;th •:..: ... on3ng::.:A lmiri 'strator. . ::: I�ev �opment plans . hal'7 ' include;:;site Pian;::'.:: buy elevat�ons';::: .flcior 'plan;':and 1a'riscape p7ar' nit�al:::construct�ori .'and any subsequent ...re ovat3�n sha:ll. k�e r:ew: eaed;::::f:Qx:<:>:com ance:>:::a: :t; :::<::t fo.l: :r�w n >::>:: . ::> :> +:: <...... foot setbaok shall be csbserved a1r, 1g the . ..... .............. . north<::bauridar >:; .o <;;;_ . bdv <; :><:: »:... : ., ::::....... .::: .. .:::::::: Y.::.::..... u:. sa,on:: 7.5 3at t5> < <': ' :':< ;.:, ..................:..:.:.::.......:....................................................................................... C>.;;:.::.::.::.:: .;:<:> :.:c::;:;; :r:::>::> ..,.: .::r ::::: ::::..:n::e: :.:::3 uc:.:::::::: n::.::;:t ,ro.::;e.tor ::::eeme»:ts..:::::t a..:.:a Y .::::::::::.::: :. . :::.:� ::.::: 1::: .....n .: art::>:o ::>:: > ..e.;>:r,. . , .h. . >::; : <. .:::t e s: den61 :1.:<f:a:c n ::::the:::>::nor:thern::>::::..>::: P : :::::::::::.:::::::::::,::::,.::::::��:::::::::.;::.;<::::::::::::::.::::::::::::.:.;.;:pr.a. er.t. :::::l. ne P.::.:.::::...::::::.::.::..::::: e.ha:1: :»:::be::>:;:ds: :. n:ed>::<so: :<ta <:::>:there:::» s >:::a:»:::ci g:::::::: .::::::::..::..:::::::::::::: ,:.:: ...::::::..::.: efm :....... .:.::.:.::.:.;::<.;:.::.:::.:::.. ............ .......... �.:.�t :to arid::: ':`" t; ::::: ; ':'�'`:`°::°':; e.::..; . .. : :. . .acing.. he northern property anM. e, separating ,s:: c3>::a: :> a <:<: ro the ::t . -: >.. .:.....:...: : <><:: �h...... :a `:: :..... e::: .:: .::::m.:.....:::.:e. ::.:: o.;:<stfl. ...::.:::;e. .emeat:;:.;e. :::th:e....res de;i� ; ....................... ...................... ....................... 3 . ::..: posed : landscaping, pad elevations, anc structure heightskiall be ievierec� tp assure onpbrtl xzsti'rig resileries an adjo�nng; o :-:.°°`.'.. cirisidera `ioi :sh 1 e:<:;;. v:en :::>t:n>:::m:3r�: m> »: . :: ::: .: :::.:.::.::.::::::::....:::. ::::i ze.;dck: n w ;ridars,::, d::.:: Icar..s::::an the» i s ' :: :• :<,;,.<, :.>:.: .. :.»:. ; :::... :.north side...of: theauldsngs for those lots 3 . The zoning variance for average minimum lot width for Lot #1 and Lot #3 is approved as requested; they meet the require- ments of Section 26-2 . 226 of the County Ordinance Code. There shall be no lot size variances approved with this subdivision. Lot #1 - 120 feet required by Zoning Ordinance. 112 feet approved. Lot #3 - 120 feet required by Zoning Ordinance. 97 feet approved. 4 . Thirty (30) days prior to recording the final map or obtaining a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a hydrology study, substantiating the creek setback line, to Flood Control and the Zoning Administrator, for review and approval. 5. If, adjustment of the creek setback boundary results in a lot with a net square footage (excluding setback, rearyard, sideyard and creek setback areas) of less than 8, 000 square feet then that lot shall be eliminated and the total number of lots in the subdivision shall be reduced. 6. No structures, including fences and swimming pools, shall be allowed to be built beyond the creek structure setback line. 7. Comply with the following tree planting/tree preservation requirements: A. At least 30 days prior to issuance of a grading permit or filing a final map, submit a grading/tree preservation plan shall be submitted for review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. The plan shall identify all trees, including the walnut trees, with a trunk circumference of 30 inches or more, 4Z feet above the ground. The trunk size, species and approximately drip line of each qualifying tree shall be identified on the plan, and whether the tree is proposed to be removed or preserved. The objective of the review in part shall be to minimize the removal of existing mature trees. 4 . B. The plan shall be accompanied by a report from a quali- fied arborist, to be reviewed and approved by the Zoning Administrator, on the proposed plan recommending measures to protect trees as appropriate during the construction and post-construction stages and preserve walnut trees located on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 9 (if possible) . The arborist's report shall also include a tree replant- ing program which illustrates the exact location and species of proposed replacement trees. Replacement trees shall be at least 15 gallons in size. Each tree to be removed on Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8 shall be replaced by two 15 gallon drought resistant trees, native to the area, to be recommended by a certified arborist. Replacement trees on Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8 shall be situated in order to maintain the residents of the proposed lots. All of the trees along the northeastern property line, except for those located within the proposed cul-de-sac, shall be preserved. The recommended measures from the arborist shall be integrated into or otherwise attached to the proposed grading plan. C. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or filing a final map, the applicant shall either inform the Zoning Administrator that the approved tree replacement program has been completed and is ready for verification by staff, or provide assurance that funding exists to implement the tree planting program. Assurance shall be provided through a financial mechanism acceptable to the Zoning Administrator (e.g. , bond, letter of credit, or deposit) . 8. Should archaeological material be uncovered during grading, trenching or other on-site excavation(s) , earthwork within 30 yards of these materials shall be stopped until a professional archaeologist who is certified by the Society for California Archaeology (SCA) and/or the Society of Professional Archaeol- ogy (SOPA) has had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation(s) , if deemed necessary. 9. Comply with the following construction, noise, dust and litter control requirements: A. Noise generating construction activities, including such things as power generators, shall be limited to the hours of 7: 30 A.M. to 5: 00 P.M. , Monday through Friday, and shall be prohibited on State and Federal holidays. The restrictions on allowed working days may be modified on prior written approval by the Zoning Administrator. 5. I B. The project sponsor shall require their contractors and subcontractors to fit all internal combustion engines with mufflers which are in good condition and shall locate stationary noise-generating equipment such as air compressors and concrete pumpers as far away from existing residences as possible. C. At least one week prior to commencement of grading, the applicant shall post the site and mail to the owners of property within 300 feet of the exterior boundary of the project site notice that construction work will commence. The notice shall include a list of contact persons with name, title, phone number and area of responsibility. The person responsible for maintaining the list shall be included. The list shall be kept current at all times and shall consist of persons with authority to indicate and implement corrective action in their area of respon- sibility. The names of the individual responsible for . noise and litter control shall be expressly identified in the notice. The notice shall be reissued with each phase of major grading activity. A copy of the notice shall be concurrently transmitted to the community Development Department. The notice shall be accompanied by a list of the names and addresses of the property owners noticed, and a map identifying the area noticed. D. A dust and litter control program shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. Any violation of the approved program or applicable ordi- nances shall require an immediate work stoppage. Construction work shall not be allowed to resume until, if necessary, an appropriate construction bond has been posted. E. The applicant shall make a good-faith effort to avoid interference with existing neighborhood traffic flows. Prior to issuance of building permits, the proposed roads serving this development shall be constructed to provide access to each lot. This shall include provision for an on-site area in which to park earth moving equipment. 10. The recommendations of the Terrasearch, Inc. geotechnical report shall be carefully followed and incorporated into the plan and specifications. 11. The following requirements pertaining to drainage, road, and utility improvements will require the review and approval. of the Public Works Department: 6. A. In accordance with Section 92-2 . 006 of the County Ordinance Code, this subdivision shall conform to the provisions of the County Subdivision Ordinance (Title 9) . Any exceptions therefrom must be specifically listed in this conditional approval statement. Conformance with the Ordinance includes the following requirements: 1) Constructing a paved turnaround at the end of the proposed private road. 2) Undergrounding of all utility distribution facili- ties. 3) Conveying all storm waters entering or originating within the subject property, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage facility, to a natural watercourse having definable bed and banks or to an existing adequate public storm drainage facility which conveys the storm waters to a natu ral watercourse. 4) Designing and constructing storm drainage facili- ties required by the Ordinance in compliance with specifications outlined in Division 914 of the Ordinance and in compliance with design standards of the Pubic Works Department. 5) Installing, within a dedicated drainage easement, any portion of the drainage system which conveys run-off from public streets. 6) Relinquishing "development rights" over that porion of the site that is within the structure setback area of Miranda Creek. The structure area shall be determined by using the criteria outlined in Chap- ter 914-14, "Rights of Way and Setbacks" , of the ` Subdivision Ordinance. .7) Submitting improvement plans prepared by a regis- tered civil engineer, payment of review and inspection fees, and security for all improvements required by the Ordinance code or the conditions of approval for this subdivision. 8) Submitting a Final Map prepared by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor. B. 7. approved 32 fgot road .sha :l be paved .tri:.:serve. a13 :;.:. . . arc ]°s>:::' :>:. h:. s<>sub r »:, ` :;: ,. ,.. ::. :..>. > .. . :;... .:.:::: ::::t:::. .::::::.: :::::d .:::: s; <:ot1: wth;;;a;:3; ;..focxt: adfu...s...;:., u ;:.;:.de.:. at the terms nus of.::the..road ��.... :a: : l: c:ant::<:;: :s>;:>adv ed:; that;;;::>the;;>m n mum<::r :.. htWo .::..,, Ay ;;;: .;;..;:;;:::;:;;w h;:;,tie.;;; a it:;.;:.;w u...d.;;:.r.e.. ...: :e:; n. ;:.;such:.;;; .;;;w3r n d r':.::::.:....W y;:would.;:be;:.;; : ::.;feet: .;:<.;;:<.;Such.;;:a:;:.;r: ht;:::.c f...:;. ra rvuld:.:;be ;.........;:.::::. .:::... ...... .: ...:..::.:.....:.: :.:.;:.;::.;:.::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::.....:::�:.:: ':.::::::::.::.;:.;:::::::.::::::.:: Or .;: ble fxar sat .sy ,x�g t,he. standards.a avate .y.: ma int' < ; > .,:,. < . ,.<:. ::.: .:...; ane�d road Tf the applicant proposes a Czzunty marita'id raid w derght: ►f way :w1, :..be,., egrd Genstruet a paved eul-de sae at the end ef Likely Drive C. Prevent storm drainage, originating on the property and conveyed in a concentrated manner, from draining across driveways. D. Mitigate the impact of the additional storm water run-off from this development on San Ramon Creek by: 1) Removing 1 cubic yard of channel excavation materi- al from the inadequate portion of San Ramon Creek near Chaney Road for each 50 square feet of new impervious surface area created by the development. All excavated material shall be disposed of off- site by the developer at his cost. The site selec- tion, land rights, and construction staking will be by the Flood Control District. OR. . . 2) Upon written request, the applicant may make a cash payment in lieu of actual excavation and removal of material from San Ramon Creek. The cash payment will be calculated at the rate of $0. 10 per square foot of new impervious surface area created the development. The added impervious surface area created by the development will be based on the Flood Control District's standard impervious sur- face area ordinance. The Flood Control District will use these funds to work on San Ramon Creek annually. E. Mitigate the impact of the additional storm water run-off from this development on Miranda Creek by making a cash payment to the County Deficiency Trust Fund. The cash payment will be calculated at the rate of $0. 10 per square foot of new impervious surface area created by the development. The added impervious surface area created by the development will be based on the Flood Control 8. District's standard impervious surface area ordinance. The Flood Control District will use these funds to work on the Creeks annually. This contribution is in addition to the San Ramon Creek contribution (Fund No. 812100- 800) . F. Annex the property to Drainage Area 76A, which is a benefit assessment district to collect annual funds to maintain detention basins located within the drainage area. The request should include the metes and bounds of the property. The development must be annexed to Drainage Area 76A prior to the filing of the Final Map. H. Previde fer at least sim en site par-king spaees per let te be leeated eutside the private read easement extend' _ frem- Likely y Dr;-ore. At leasterse—(1) ef the- six spaees aeeess easement. Here than ene ejuest parking spaee shall die-prevideel-where apprepriate partieularly atthe hanme-r- u, a t , a G. Establish a maintenance agreement to ensure the mainte- nance of the private road. H. Obliterate the existing driveway on Lots 6 and 7 . Access to these lots shall be taken off the proposed private road. ADVISORY NOTES A. The applicant shall comply with the Park Dedication Fee Ordinance, which requires a $2 , 000 park dedication fee for each lot. B. Comply with the requirements of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. C. Comply with the requirements of the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District. D. Comply with the requirements of the Health Services Depart- ment, Environmental Health Division. E. Comply with the requirements of the Building Inspection Department. Building permits are required prior to the construction of most structures. F. The applicant will be required to pay a $1, 250 review fee for the Department of Fish & Game at the end of the appeal period. 9 . G. This project may be subject to the requirements of the Department of Fish & Game. The applicant should notify the Department of Fish & Game, P.O. Box 47, Yountville, California 94599, of any proposed construction within the development that may affect and fish and wildlife resources, per the Fish and Game Code. H. This project may also be subject to the requirements of the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The applicant should notify the appropriate district of the Corps of Engineers to determine if a permit is required. I. The applicant will be required to comply with the requirements of the Bridge/Thoroughfare Fee Ordinance for the Alamo Area of Benefit as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. J. The project lies within the 100-year flood boundary as designated on the Federal Emergency Flood Rate Maps. The applicant should be aware of the requirements of the Federal Flood Insurance Program and the County Flood Plain Management Ordinance (Ordinance No. 90-118) as they pertain to future construction of any structures on this property. 3'3:::.:: :. n. ..vi:sed::::::s. .te..:::.: .. an......... e:: :s. . :::::.Ra �i :;::.::::r.::::.:::::::. .::: ... :;:::::.::::.:.::::::::.::.:::::.::::::..:::::::::..:::::.::.......:::..:::.::::::.;:::.:..::::::::.::::::::::.::.::.:::..:::....:::::. :.y ate: > on . ...,..'. ': , . g. . . :al Planningommiss�on requests the.: oning.Adminlstrator ' o:.;:<g��re:.::.pror .ty cos�deratiort to the',f:rlowc = ......... :.::.:..:. :`:' ' t. ''.':.:;?;r,.:;:tea.; : �_:::::_<,;;:;:::.;2:;.>:::;;;:. u,;,: f,;; >:i,;;:�>:>,,..,:, .:::>.:; ' °' �:` :`�:.; ::::. :: '. ':=: . `:` Tk :`eht pzo�aothoud lie Kett >proportoned:::: ....::::...... :.:::.:.:... ...: n s.tent:><It t> ' c:orif . .; .,... >;'... :;:: ;:: ::«;:;::;:::> ;.....;:<.:.;;:»;:.;:;.;;>:.::::::::.::.:.::.:.:::.:.:.:::::.:.::.:::::. ::::::::::::::::.:.:..:.:gurat on.:::.::thr.:ou.. hot�.t;:.:.the :v€ on.. ............................................... i:llil .:: ::::ark f2.;: tsderaon,:.;shdu3 d:.:.:;be;;:.;. ; ven:,:.tcx::.;reth:� r nt location of the: lot .l ones n the..vacsnty:,of Lots :«.::.::.::.::.:::.:::.: :........;:.;;h.o.::::tt.:.::o ,,.:<:the:::.; uri ;;:.22:.x; .9:9;2::::te :t t ,:ve. . ::.:. p::. ...... :.::.::... :....:.. s less oncorn With: the general oo gt.rat Lots .... »:> > >: <:<>::> : >:> .:;f «;:>. ...:; :: :. : :...>: : :<:;;::>:.:::: f .an effort. �s made by.. the applicant edotf.iguie. .Lot .:1 .` o..satisfy V. :. pp a :al, then that change would not be in accord e:::. xent...o ...the Gammssaon..ac:t. t� .. CW/aa SUBIX/7693C.CW 5/6/92 5/18/92 - Z.A. Rev. (v) 7/06/92 - Z.A. Rev. (v) 7/10/92 - BT (a) 8/14/92 - BT 9/16/92 - SR (a)