HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11171992 - 2.2 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
FROM: i
Phil Batchelor County AdministratorCosta
�q,:�..::. .:._...... � County
ail\... -..��y`
DATE: +'�q� "N'c'a
November 17, 1992
SUBJECT:
FIRST QUARTER BUDGET REPORT
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1 . ACCEPT this report and direct the County Administrator to
continue to monitor the budget and implement corrective plans,
where necessary.
2 . ACKNOWLEDGE the current and continuing state bedgetary
problems and their potential negative impact on Contra Costa
County' s fiscal integrity.
3 . ACKNOWLEDGE the $1 . 6 million state allocation reduction for
child welfare services, and AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of
Supervisors to send a letter to the County's legislative
delegation urging their support of the County request for
reconsideration of the allocation.
4 . DIRECT County Administrator to continue to monitor Sheriff-
Coroner expenditures and revenues and to develop budget
reduction plans if required to maintain a balanced budget.
5 . AMEND Resolution No. 92/718 with respect to the Sheriff-
Coroner' s Office (Attachment A) regarding the termination of
certain positions in that department.
6 . DIRECT the County Administrator to continue to monitor the
Probation Department budget and to work with the County
Probation Officer to develop a corrective action plan and
identify additional revenues to ensure a balanced budget.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: l 4N_9_e_
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON November 17, 1992 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER X
APPROVED recommendations as amended to refer to the Finance Committee
funding for the Rape Crises Center and Battered Women ' s Alternatives, the
Sheriff Department ' s Budget , and the revenue stream for the County Budget ;
and REQUESTED the County Administrator to prepare a press release
encouraging people to make monetary contributions to various County programs .
(See attachment for list of speakers on this matter . )
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
X ----- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS ATRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
cc: County Administrator ATTESTED November 17, 1992
Auditor-Controller PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY�• CD DEPUTY
M382 (10/88) U
-a-
BACKGROUND:
Since 1984, the County Administrator' s Office has prepared
quarterly reports which analyze the status of the budget and
highlights the budget units which deviate from the budget plan in
terms of expenditures and revenues . Actions which are necessary to
ensure a health budget by the end of the year are recommended as
part of the quarterly reporting process . Other items which have
major fiscal impacts are also reviewed as part of this periodic
report.
State Budget
California is now in its third year of unprecedented economic
downturn. Last week, the unemployment rate was reported at 9 . 8%,
up from 9 .4% in October. UCLA Business Forecasting has predicted
an 11% unemployment rate by 1993. At the same time, U.S.
unemployment has stayed steady at 7 .5% .
Since mid-1990, the State has lost over 800,000 jobs . The
Commission on State Finance (COSF) has stated that the total loss
could be over one million by early 1993 . In comparison,
California lost only 280,000 jobs during the worst post-World War
II recession ( 1982) . The State is now acknowledging that "many of
the problems ailing California are not going to disappear anytime
soon" (COSF) . California' s economy is projected to remain stagnant
through 1994 .
The State' s budget problems are being solved through reductions in
county revenue. Health and welfare programs comprise approximately
28% of the State' s budget; Education is 42% and All Other is
approximately 30% . With the State making education a priority,
health and welfare have become targets for reductions . At the same
time, program needs are spiraling. Statewide welfare cases
increased 10 . 3% from 1991-92; Medi-Cal increased 8.5% and prison
populations increased by 3 . 7% . All increases were significantly
higher than the overall population increase of 2 . 1% .
In October, the State budget deficit was estimated at $2 - $4
billion for 1992-93 and increasing to $3 - $7 billion for 1993-94 .
The latest figures from the State indicate a $10 million shortfall
fox` FY 1993-94 .
STATE REVENUES
r
$48.0--
$46.3
$46.0
$44.0 $43.4
$41.9 'F $41.9 $41.6
$42.0
0
40.3
UDGE
ca0
B T
4 .0
38.8
38
_ $38.2
y
VIS
_o
.0
® RE E
8
$36.0--
........
34
0
32.0
$30.0
1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93
Source: Commission on State Finance
Overestimating revenues and underestimating expenditures is not a
new phenomenon of the State as seen in the above chart. Contra
Costa County took a strongly proactive position this fiscal year in
analyzing the state' s budget situation, assessing the impact to the
County and acting expeditiously to minimize budget cuts . Next
fiscal year, we will need to continue this policy, particularly in
light of the high probability that the state will seize local
property taxes .
-3-
General Countv Revenue
Early indications are that overall revenues are on target for the
first quarter. Property taxes revenues derived from the secured
budgeted amounts, of revenue
stingf orand unsecured roll are within budgredevelopment agency and no and low city losses.
Supplemental property taxes are lagging behind budgeted thresholds,
owing to an inordinate nber f negative assessmeearningsMotorare
Vehicle Registration feesumsaleso taxes and interest
keeping pace with the budget forecast.
All the major revenue accounts have been u2-93isgetd 19
elow th1991-92due in
fiscal year levels. The lower budgeted level in T99
large part to the continuing deep recession.
A $2 million consumer fraud settlement has been received from
Sears . A total of $1,250,000 will be distributed to the State
while the remaining $750,000 willbe transferred trealize
ictAttorney. The District Attorneywill stillneed to an
additional $250,000 to meet budgeted revenues in the consumer fraud
area.
Social Service
nce (GA) aid expenditures rose from $4 .9 million in
General Assistance 1991-92 . At 1991-92 growth rates,
1985-86 to $17 .3 million in
expenditures were projected at $20 .8 million in FY 92-93. The
Board adopted a budget of $15.4 million and directed the Department
to institute a vigorous cost containment programl includiand
ng
increased SSI/SSP advocacy, increased workfare opportunities,
an expedited hearing process .
GA aid expenditures are projected to decline to budgeted are levels
fully
during FY 92-93 if all cost containment measures
implemented.
Oberland—
.......... ..........
4>x ax
r.
A
2.
yn.
zl�-�g�
s-
4,
Grants Lowered
El 91-92 92-93 rh
............ .... ..
Administrative costs for General Assistance are projected higher
than budgeted. In part this is due to response to community
concerns that GA not be fully centralized but allow for receipt of
initial applications in East and West County. In addition, salary
costs are higher than projected due to lower turnover (and
consequently additional higher level staff) and delay in the
centralization from October to January.
In October, 5 months into the budget year, the Department received
notice of a $1 .6 illion reduction in the state aocation for
Child Welfare Sermvices and a $200,000 reductiolln for Adult
-4-
Protective Services . Many California counties were similarly
shorted on their allocations . The California Welfare Directors
Association will be meeting with the State Department of Social
Services to discuss appropriate allocations . More information
should be available by the end of November. In the interim, the
County Administrator has expressed concern about this dramatic
funding reduction directly to Russ Gould, Secretary, State Health
& Welfare Agency..
Because the County eliminated all over-match in Child Welfare
Services during the budget reductions in July 1992, a reduction of
State funding will result in the elimination of personnel providing
direct services to children.
The Department will work with the County Administrator' s Office to
monitor this budget and to make regular status reports to the
Board.
Service Integration
The number of children in crisis is spiraling. At the same time,
County resources "for children' s program are steadily declining.
Helping children in crisis and preventing at risk children from
reaching crisis, requires new ways of thinking and new approaches
to service delivery. This effort is a top priority of the Youth
Service Board, which is comprised of representatives of the County
Board of Education, Probation Department, Community Services
Department, Social Service Department, Health Services Department
and the County. Administrator' s Office.
The Youth Services Board identified neighborhoods where households
receive multiple family and child services, up to 9
services/household in some cases . People in those neighborhoods
were then asked what services they needed and wanted; what were
their priorities and preferences . The board found that these
communities did not want probation and drug programs, but rather
safe after-school, places for their children, job training, family
training and other services to help them become self sufficient.
The board also found tremendous resources in these communities that
could, and should, be tapped to support children and families .
The Youth Services Board developed three community-based prototypes
in communities with high client populations to provide effective,
caring neighborhood-based service delivery systems . These include
the West Pittsburg Community-School Partnership Fund, the
Neighborhood Services Mall in North Richmond and the PATHS -
Pittsburg Project to Prevent Homelessness .
As a next step, the Youth Services Board will be exploring the
legal, financial and political feasibility of establishing
geographically-based, integrated service delivery systems, ie a
"family maintenance organization" that uses the HMO health model to
promote the well-being of children and families .
Health Services
At the conclusion of the Phase II budget reductions, the Health
Services Department was facing a budget shortfall of $1 .2 to $3 . 0
million. Based on the first quarter of activity, analysis of the
impact of the adopted State budget and the results of the Board-
approved expenditure reduction plan, the Health Services
Department' s projected FY 92-93 shortfall is an estimated $2 .4
million at this time.
The Department has identified a number of revenue possibilities
which could obviate or substantially mitigate the projected
shortfall . These include:
• Merrithew Memorial Hospital inpatient Medi-Cal contract
currently being negotiated with the State.
• Exploration of the continued feasibility of participation
in the SB 1255 voluntary donation program for
disproportionate share hospitals.
-5-
• SB 910/Medi-Cal administrative costs claiming process
clarification by the federal government and determination
of the consequent revenue implications for the County.
• Assessment of the impact of Health Plan open enrollment.
• Health Plan "default" enrollment for Medi-Cal
beneficiaries scheduled to be effective January 1, 1993 .
In addition, the Department is continuing its cost containment
efforts, including:
• Elimination of nonessential positions as vacancies occur
within the Department.
• Reductions in Napa State Hospital use through utilization
of community-based care options .
• Regional, multi-county contracts for mental health
services including the current joint effort with Alameda
County for children' s mental health services .
The Department will work with the County Administrator's Office to
monitor its budget including new revenue sources and cost
containment, and to make regular status reports to the Board.
Sheriff-Coroner
On October 27 , 1992 your Board directed the County Administrator,
as part of the First Quarter Report, to report on the current
status of the Sheriff ' s Budget Reduction Plan.
On September 11, 1992, a number of adjustments were made in the
Sheriff-Coroner' s Department budget involving both expenditure
reductions and revenue increases . These were made at the request
of the Sheriff ' s Department in order that certain positions could
be maintained in that Department. This Office was directed to
review the implementation of the Department' s budget reduction plan
and report back to the Board.
In Budget Unit 0255 (Patrol and Operations) , net expenditures were
approximately 26% and revenues 17% for the first quarter. Contract
city revenues, which historically lag, generate $9 . 7 million of the
$12 . 7 budgeted; therefore, it is estimated that this unit will
balance at year end. The Detention budget' s (0300) net
expenditures were 25% and revenues were 41% (although a portion of
this was accrued revenue) . In addition, the State has been billed
for in excess of $400,000 for the first quarter and it is
anticipated that between $500,000 and $1,000,000 additional parole
revenues will be generated over the $1,380,000 budgeted for the
year. The Coroner Division (0359) experienced 24% net expenditures
for the first quarter and 5% revenue generation. It should be
noted that the new Coroner Fees did not take effect until November
1, 1992 .
The Sheriff-Coroner Department has fully implemented its budget
reduction plan and appears to be maintaining a balanced budget. It
is recommended that the three dispatch and three crime laboratory
positions slated for elimination on November 17 be removed from the
lay-off resolution (Attachment A) , as the Department has
demonstrated its ability to pay for them. The County
Administrator' s Office will continue to monitor the Department on
a monthly basis .
Public Defender
As indicated in the County Administrator' s report to your Board on
the Final Budget (adopted by the Board on October 27, 1992) , the
Public Defender' s Office eliminated 4 attorney positions on August
31, 1992 and have slated nine additional positions for December 31,
1992 . In addition, positions have been transferred from the main
office to the Alternate Unit. This Office is continuing to monitor
the Public Defender caseload (including the Alternate Unit) . A
detailed report on the status of Alternate Defense Unit is
scheduled to be heard by your Board on December 15, 1992, which
-6-
will describe the staffing and funding levels required to
adequately represent indigent defendants, including those served by
the Alternate Defense Unit and Conflict Defense Program.
Conflict Defense
The Conflict Defense Budget ( 0248) has expended $1,494,808 in the
first three months of 1992-93 or 49% of the $3,050,000 budgeted.
The County Administrator' s Office is monitoring this budget in
conjunction with the Public Defender' s budget and will include it
in the Alternate Defense report on December 15, 1992 . Increased
handling of indigent defense cases by the Public Defender' s Office
through its Alternate Defense Unit will ultimately significantly
decrease the number of cases that must be referred to the Conflict
Defense Program. This in turn will significantly reduce the costs
of conflict cases handled by private attorneys .
Trial Court Funding
On October 28, 1992 the Board of Supervisors directed the County
Administrator to .work with the Municipal Court, Superior Court, and
County Clerk to further develop programs that would increase the
cost effectiveness and efficiencies of court operations . In
addition the County Administrator was to report back to the Board
in January on the effectiveness of the various steps taken to avoid
costs and to generate revenues required to ensure a balanced budget
for the courts for FY 1992-93.
Since the October 27 , 1992 report to the Board, AB 3027 has been
signed. Contra Costa County will receive $6,757,669 for the first
six months of 1992-93, $3,278,000 on January 25, 1993 and funds
accrued in the Trial Court Trust Fund during the 1992-93 fiscal
year allocated on a formula derived from actual expenditures of the
courts as reported by the Judicial Council. Contra Costa County
will receive $13,721,809 in Trial Court Funding for 1992-93,
however we will lose $2, 049,000 in civil filing fee transfers to
the State, which results in a total shortfall of $1,800,000 .
The County Administrator' s Office is working with the Superior
Court to formulate and implement budget balancing plans . This
Office has further explored court security and other changes in
court services and court operations . As was previously indicated,
a detailed report will be submitted in January 1993 .
Probation Department
The Probation Department anticipates expenditure over-runs of
approximately $800, 000 by the end of the fiscal year. The
projected over-runs can primarily be attributed to unanticipated
salaries and benefits costs resulting from the recent layoff of
over 70 employees . Unexpected costs included vacation payoffs and
higher costs resulting from higher paid employees displacing other
employees during the "bumping" process, which could not be
estimated at the time the budget reduction plans were formulated.
Additionally, savings from unplanned vacancies have not been
realized because of the immediate availability of replacement
personnel from lay-off lists .
On a positive note, the Juvenile Hall population has continued at
a level well below the budgeted level of 140 during the first
quarter. The reduced population compared to this time last fiscal
year can be attributed to population control measures exercised by
'the Intake Unit at Juvenile Hall and the cooperation of local
police agencies in making commitments at the Hall . In September of
1992, the Juvenile Court placed a cap on population of 130 . Thus
far, it has not been necessary to enforce the court-ordered cap.
The County Administrator will continue to monitor expenditures and
will work with the County Probation Officer to identify possible
sources of revenue to mitigate the projected over-runs. The County
Administrator will return to the Board with a corrective action
plan in January, if necessary.
-7-
Fee Adjustments
The Growth Management and Economic Development Agency (GMEDA) has
prepared a comprehensive revision of land development fees in close
cooperation with the Auditor' s and Administrator's Office. The
fees incorporate employee salary and benefits increases over the
last several years as well as refinements to the comprehensive
study performed by a consulting firm over a year ago. The fee
adjustments for the Public Works, Community Development and
Building Inspection Departments were discussed at the November 9
Finance Committee Meeting and several changes to the fee study were
recommended. The- fees are scheduled for Board review on December
8.
Budget Unit Reports
Attachment B contains a discussion of those budgets which deviated
in expenditures or revenues more than 10% from a straight line
projection. Many of the deviations from the budget plan were
caused by delays in transferring revenues or charging
expenditures among the Departments and between the County and State
and Federal governments . These items are noted in the attachment,
but are not expected to materially affect the budget.
ATTACHMENT - SPEAKERS LIST
Board Order Dated November 17 , 1992
Agenda Item No. 2 . 2
The following persons spoke on impact of reduced funding level
on programs:
Gloria J. Sandoval, Rape Crisis Center, 2023 Vale Road,
Suite 2 , San Pablo;
Steven P. Malloy, 2925 Monument Boulevard, Suite 78B,
Concord;
Rollie Mullen, Battered Women' s Alternatives, P. O.
Box 6406, Concord; and
Val Meredith, Battered Women' s Alternatives, 3517
Eagle Point Road, Lafayette.
ATTACHMENT A
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Resolution on by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Resolution No. 92/
AMEND attachments to Board Resolution 92/718 as follows:
Deletes from positions to be abolished positions#25-00620, 25-00304, 25-00053,
25-00545, 25-00593, 25-00639 based on funding in the Sheriff-Coroner
Department budget resulting from increased revenues.
cc: Personnel Department
County Administrator
Sheriff-Coroner
Attachment AA Revised 11/17/92
Page 1 of 3
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
POSITIONS TO BE ABOLISHED
DEPARTMENT: Sheriff-Coroner
EFFECTIVE: Close of Business on August 31, 1992 unless otherwise noted
POSITION NO. CLASS CODE POSITION TYPE
25-00555 Chief Deputy Shrf 6XB3 Full
25-00978 Lieutenant 6XHA Full (Vacant)
25-00976 Lieutenant 6XHA Full
25-00977 Lieutenant 6XHA Full
25-01008 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00884 Sheriff Specialist 64VE Full
25-00885 Sheriff Specialist 64VE Full
25-00966 Sheriff Specialist 64VE Full
25-01125 Sheriff Specialist 64VE Full
25-00039 Clerk-Senior JWXB Full
25-00092 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00701 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-01000 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00694 Lieutenant 6XHA Full
25-00492 Lieutenant 6XHA Full
25-00745 Sher Mutual Aide Coord 64SK Full (Vacant)
25-00667 Comm Center Director 64NC Full
25-00272 Sheriff Fleet Svcs Coord 6ASA Full
25-00302 Supervising Dispatcher 64HD Full (Vacant)
25-00637 Supervising Dispatcher 64HD Full (Vacant)
25-00634 Dispatcher I 64WK Full (Vacant)
25-00636 Dispatcher I 64WK Full (Vacant)
25-00286 Dispatcher II 64WM Full
25-00635 Dispatcher I 64WK Full
25-00019 Clerical Supervisor JWHF Ful l Eff 1/7/93
25-00037 Clerk-Senior JWXC Full
25-00047 Clerk-Senior JWXC Full
25-00042 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full
25-00472 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full
25-00711 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full (Vacant)
25-00002 Captain 6XDA Full
25-00544 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00903 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00095 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00102 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00857 Fingerprint Exm I 64WH Full (Vacant)
25-00321 Lieutenant 6XHA Full
25-00924 Clerk-Senior JWXC Full
25-00926 Clerk-Senior JWXC Full
25-00017 Clerk-Senior JWXC Full
Res. No. 92/498, as .amended by Res. No. 92/511, 92/532, 92/624, 92/718 & 92/
Attachment AA Revised 11/17/92
Page 2 of 3
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
POSITIONS TO BE ABOLISHED
DEPARTMENT: Sheriff-Coroner
EFFECTIVE: Close of Business on August 31, 1992 unless otherwise noted
POSITION NO. CLASS CODE POSITION TYPE
25-00923 Clerk-Specialist JWXD Full
25-00920 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00883 Sheriff Specialist 64VE Full (Vacant)
25-00771 Sheriff Dispatcher II 64WM Full
25-00702 Sheriff Dispatcher II 64WM Full
25-00630 Sheriff Dispatcher II 64WM Full
25-01006 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-01014 Clerk-Experienced JWXB PT(20/40)Vacant
25-01021 Clerk-Experienced JWXB PT(20/40)Vacant
25-01056 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full (Vacant)
25-01057 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full (Vacant)
25-01058 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full (Vacant)
25-01053 Account Clerk-Exp JDVC Full (Vacant)
25-01029 Environmental Sry Manager 1WDB Full (Vacant)
25-00322 Sergeant 6XTA Full (Vacant)
25-00330 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00410 Sergeant 6XTA Full (Vacant)
25-00296 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00485 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00503 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full (Vacant)
25-00960 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full (Vacant)
25-01022 Sheriff Aide 64VF PT(20/40)Vacant
25-01050 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01051 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full (Vacant)
25-01061 Sheriff Aide 64VF PT(20/40)
25-00271 Detention Services Aide 64WG Full
25-01059 Sheriff Dispatcher II 64WM Full (Vacant)
25-00870 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full (Vacant)
25-00877 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full (Vacant)
25-01065 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full (Vacant)
25-00876 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01049 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01066 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01064 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-00843 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01048 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01025 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-00755 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full (Vacant)
25-01148 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full
25-00033 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full
25-00132 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00205 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full (Vacant)
25-00397 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
Res. No. 92/498, as amended by Res. No. 92/511, 92/532, 92/624, 92/718 & 92/
Attachment AA Revised 11/17/92
Page 3 of 3
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
POSITIONS TO BE ABOLISHED
DEPARTMENT: Sheriff-Coroner
EFFECTIVE: Close of Business on August 31, 1992 unless otherwise noted
POSITION NO. CLASS CODE POSITION TYPE
25-00516 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00527 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00535 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full (Vacant)
25-00731 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full (Vacant)
25-00769 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00798 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-01137 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full (Vacant)
25-01138 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00134 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00138 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00210 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00382 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00628 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00691 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00706 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-01063 Sheriff Aide-CDEP 64V1 Full (Vacant)
25-01013 Clerk-Beg Level-CDEP JWX2 Full
25-01018 Clerk -Beg Level-CDEP JWX2 Full
25-01020 Clerk-Beg Level-CDEP JWX2 Full
25-01055 Clerk-Senior JWXC PT (Vacant)
Amendment 8/4/92 An agreement was reached to fund the Director of Inmate Services
position from the Inmate Welfare Fund (cost center 8119/4994) which has allowed
that position abolished on Resolution 92/498 effective 8/31/92 to be removed from
Attachment AA. Additionally, correction was made to retain three merit system
clerical positions rather than three exempt CDEP positions.
Amendment 8/11/92 A correction was made in the effective date of the criminalist
positions to be abolished to October 31, 1992, to correctly reflect the Board's
action of July 20, 1992. Additionally, one part time, unfunded Clerk-Senior Level
was added to the positions to be abolished.
Amendment 9/11/92 Deletes from positions to be abolished positions #25-1054, 25-
65, 25-758, 25-812, .25-62, 25-670, and 25-267 and delays abolishment of six
positions until close of business 11/17/92 based on funding in the Sheriff's
Department budget resulting from increased revenues and efficiencies.
Amendment 10/27/92 Changed effective date of cancellation of Clerical Supervisor
position to January 7, 1993.
Amendment 11/17/92 Deletes from positions to be abolished positions #25-620, 25-
304, 25-53, 25-545, 25-593, and 25-639 based on funding in the Sheriff-Coroner
Department budget resulting from increased revenues.
Res. No. 92/498, as amended by Res. No. 92/511, 92/532, 92/624, 92/718 & 92/
Attachment B
1992-1993 First Quarter
Budget Status Report
GENERAL FUND
• Budget Unit 0001 - Board of Supervisors
Expenditures: Budgeted: $ 1, 166,666 Percent Expended: 37%
Expenditures are high because of one time expenditures for
memberships and contracts paid early in the fiscal year.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 15, 148 Percent Received: 18%
Historically, revenues do not materialize uniformly in this
budget unit. Charges to other agencies will increase as the
year progresses .
• Budget Unit 0002 - Clerk of the Board
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 51,868 Percent Received: 2%
Revenues are low because charges have not been made to
agencies for services provided by the Clerk. Also, one-half
of the anticipated revenue is to come from planning fees and
cannot be received unless fees are changed. The expected fee
increase will not go into effect until February. Planning fee
revenue will be less than budgeted.
• Budget Unit 0003 - County Administrator
Revenues: Budgeted: $ 1,389, 912 Percent Received: 11%
Revenues are low because charges for services provided by the
office have not been posted. Additional revenues in the
amount of $200,000 will be posted in November which will more
accurately place revenues in acceptable limits .
• Budget Unit 0015 - Treasurer-Tax Collector
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 1, 192,669 Percent Received: 8%
Generally, certain revenues for this budget unit lag such as
bad check cancellation fees which is a levy item on the tax-
roll and will not be collected until the end of the year. In
addition, revenues from the investment services program in the
amount $46,000 and tax delinquent penalties in the amount of
$50, 000 will be posted in November.
• Budget Unit 0016 - Assessor
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 140, 975 Percent Received: 113%
Revenues are showing a slight increase over budgeted levels .
The additional revenue is generated from unanticipated sale of
property characteristic information tapes . Additional
revenues are anticipated by year end such as sale of maps,
documents and commission fees for tax and assessment
collection. The revenues are 113% received and an addition
approximately $110,000+ will be collected at year end, which
will offset some of the salary expense resulting from employee
organizations negotiations which was left out of the budget.
• Budget Unit 0030 - County Counsel
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 905,456 Percent Received: 0
Billing for first quarter revenue done after finance system
cutoff . Actual revenues of approximately $237,288 or 26% of
budget are anticipated.
• Budget Unit 0043 - Elections
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 2,021,414 Percent Expended: 26%
Expenditures for the Elections Division appear to exceed the
straightline budget plan in the first quarter, but are
actually at the anticipated level for this point in the
election cycle. Election costs are dependent on the type and
timing of elections throughout the fiscal year. Expenditures
in the first quarter were high because of the purchase of
supplies needed for the Presidential election recently held.
The mid-year budget report should show continued elevated
expenditures because of presidential election costs not yet
reported.
A problem arose during the presidential election which may
cause the Elections Division to incur an unanticipated $25,000
in printing and postage costs . Thousands of ballot cards had
to be reprinted because candidate filing information on the
BART election was not received from Alameda County until just
prior to the election, after ballot cards had been printed.
The County Administrator is in consultation with Alameda
County to determine whether restitution can be obtained.
Assuming that Alameda County will provide restitution, it is
expected that expenditures should be on track as we approach
the end of the fiscal year.
• Budget Unit 0200 - Superior Court
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 6,780,247 Percent Expended: 25%
Review of this account indicates that expenditures are within
acceptable limits . See "Trial Court Funding" section of Board
Order for additional information.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 6,573,908 Percent Received: 3%
First Quarter revenues from Trial Court Funding have been
received, but have not yet been posted to this budget.
• Budget Unit 0220 - Municipal Courts
Revenues : Budgeted: $12,979,836 Percent Received: 8%
Municipal Court revenues are under-realized in the first
quarter primarily because trial court funding. See "Trial
Court Funding" section of Board Order for additional
information.
• Budget Unit 0235 - Law & Justice
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 315,435 Percent Expended: 22%
Expenditures are well within acceptable limits.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 81,861 Percent Received: 47%
Although revenues are currently above targeted levels, they
are fixed and will not generate more than the total budgeted.
• Budget Unit 0238 - Grand Jury
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 55,429 Percent Expended: 80%
Expenditures are much higher than budget. Current estimates
indicate that this unit will expend approximately $100,000
over budget. This budget, which over spent in the prior year,
was cut by 30%, no reduction plan has yet been submitted by
the Superior Court. Budget does not generate revenues .
• Budget Unit 0239 - Criminal Grand Jury
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 48,000 Percent Expended: 8%
Although this budget shown only 8% expenditure, a posting
error was made. In September, $4,760 was posted to budget
unit 0259 by mistake. This change, which should show on the
November Finance Report, .will bring expenditures up to 18% .
Budget does not generate revenues .
• Budget Unit 0240 - County Clerk
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 4,209,079 Percent Expended: 26%
Expenditures were slightly above the straightline projection
the first quarter primarily because of high salaries and
benefits expense and transcript costs . Two positions which
were to be transferred to and are budgeted in the Recorder
budget unit were erroneously charged against the County Clerk
budget, inflating reported expenses . Additionally, the County
Clerk budget did not realize any benefit during the first
quarter from employee furloughs . It is anticipated that year
end savings from employee furloughs will exceed estimated
amounts .
Of more concern are the uncontrollable costs of court
transcripts which were unusually high during the first
quarter. Transcript costs are incurred when cases are
appealed and court reporter transcripts are ordered from the
County Cler, . The Department has no method to control
transcript costs since they result from court orders . The
Department and the County Administrator will continue to
monitor these costs as they relate to the overall Department
budget.
• Budget Unit 0242 - District Attorney
Expenditures: Budgeted: $11,428,832 Percent Expended: 25%
Current expenditures are on target. The departmental budget
reduction plan is being implemented. Additional layoffs are
scheduled for December.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 2,026,476 Percent Received: 14%
Revenues in this budget unit historically lag by several
months . It is anticipated that all budgeted revenues will be
received.
• Budget Unit 0243 - Public Defender
Expenditures: Budgeted: $ 7, 162, 997 Percent Expended: 26%
Current expenditures are within acceptable limits . See
"Public Defender" section of Board Order for additional
information.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 42, 125 Received: 0%
Public Defender revenues, which are collected by the Office of
Revenue Collection, lag by several months due to collection
and posting delays,.
• Budget Unit 0245 - D.A. Family Support
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 8, 106,276 Percent Expended: 26%
Expenditures are within acceptable limits . This is a zero net
county cost budget. If expenditures exceed revenues
additional funds are available in excess SEIF (BU# 0250) .
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 8, 106 ,276 Percent Received: 1%
Revenues lag by at least one quarter. It is anticipated that
all budgeted revenues will be collected.
• Budget Unit 0248 - Conflict Defense Program
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 3,050, 000 Percent Expended: 49%
Expenditures are quite high for the first quarter. See
"Conflict Defense Program" section of Board Order for
additional information. Budget does not generate revenues .
• Budget Unit 0255 - -Sheriff
Expenditures : Budgeted: $34,726,475 Percent Expended: 26%
Current expenditures are within acceptable limits . See
"Sheriff-Coroner" section of Board Order for additional
information.
Revenues : Budgeted: $12,757,763 Received: 17%
Contract city revenues, which account for 76% of total
revenues, lag by several months . All revenues are expected to
be collected.
• Budget Unit 0300 - Detention
Expenditures : Budgeted: $26,065,752 Percent Expended: 25%
Expenditures are within acceptable limits . See "Sheriff-
Coroner" section of Board Order for additional information.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 3,065,602 Received: 41%
Department is expected to generate revenues in excess of
$500,000 over budget.
• Budget Unit 0308 - Probation
Expenditures : Budgeted: $17, 180,367 Percent Expended: 29%
Based on first quarter expenditures, salaries and benefits
expense are projected to exceed budgeted levels by
approximately $800, 000. Factors contributing to the higher
than expected rate of spending include a lower than normal
position vacancy rate, vacation payoffs for employees who were
laid off during recent budget reductions, and higher paid
employees displacing other laid off employees through the
"bumping" process . The County Administrator will continue to
monitor Probation Department spending and will work with the
Department to mitigage the projected overspending. If
necessary, a budget balancing plan will be presented to the
Board at the mid-year report.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 2,534,981 Percent Received: 72%
Revenues received exceeded anticipated levels because Federal
reimbursement for placement services was received earlier than
expected. These revenues may be included in a budget
balancing plan for the Department. Other revenues are being
received at the anticipated levels .
• Budget Unit 0330 - County Drainage Maintenance
Expenditures: Budgeted: $ 237,266 Percent Expended: 14%
This budget is following historic patterns of low activity in
the dry, summer months . Expenditures are expected to increase
during the winter and spring months when the weather creates
drainage problems.
• Budget Unit 0335 - Agriculture/Weights & Measures
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 1,519, 101 Percent Expended: 28%
Current expenditures are within acceptable limits . Salary
costs are expected to drop later in the year due to employee
furloughs .
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 990,000 Percent Received: 14%
Revenue collection lags,especially state revenues . The
department is expected to receive over 100% of its budgeted
revenues by year end.
• Budget Unit 0356 - LAFCO
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 189,561 Percent Expended: 4%
Expenditures are low because the chargeout for salaries in the
amount of $23,000 have not been credited. However, this
expense will be recovered in November. Although the reduction
for this budget unit has been implemented, LAFCO Commissioners
requested reinstatement of additional appropriations for a
position cut during budget hearings.
• Budget Unit 0357 - Community Development
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 1, 110, 140 Percent Received: 7%
Revenues appear low the first and third quarter because the
department charges the Redevelopment Agency and Community
Development Block Grant funds on a mid-year basis .
Consequently revenue lags behind by one or more quarters. By
year' s end, all the budgeted revenue is expected to be
realized.
• Budget Unit 0359 - Coroner
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 956,071 Percent Expended: 24%
Expenditures are within acceptable limits . See "Sheriff-
Coroner" section of Board Order for additional information.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 42,500 Percent Received: 5%
A new fee for body collection was implemented on November 1,
1992 . These revenues were not in effect for the first
quarter.
• Budget Unit 0364 - Public Administrator
Expenditures: Budgeted: $ 142,240 Percent Expended: 25%
Expenditures are within acceptable limits .
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 76,024 Percent Received: 17%
Revenues for this budget unit lag to some extent. Any
uncollected revenues will be made-up in salaries savings if
necessary. In combination with the main District Attorney
budget, this. budget will balance at year end.
• Budget Unit 0366 - Animal Services
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 3, 100, 154 Percent Expended: 23%
Expenditures are within acceptable limits . Budget reduction
plan has been fully implemented.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 2,551,695 Percent Received: 29%
Revenues are slightly above budget and within acceptable
limit.
• Budget Unit 0367 - Game Protection
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 32,861 Percent Expended: 0
Expenditures for this budget are made when the Fish and
Wildlife Study Committee makes recommendations to the Board of
Supervisors . No requests for expenditures were made during
the first quarter and there was no reduction plan for this
budget unit.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 6,000 Percent Received: 5%
Revenue activities for this budget are generated during the
third quarter at which time the Sheriff ' s Office collects
fines, forfeits and penalties for the enforcement of fish and
game laws .
• Budget Unit 0472 - -General Sewer Planning
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 30, 000 Percent Expended: 0
Expenditures are low because staff has concentrated on higher
priority programs, such as Keller Canyon mitigation and Water
Agency activities . Also, one planner is gone for a one month
unpaid furlough. Expenditures are expected to increase later
in the fiscal year.
• Budget Unit 0532 - General Assistance
Expenditures : Budgeted: $15,400,000 Percent Expended: 40%
Expenditures are exceeding the budget because caseloads are
higher than budgeted. At the beginning of the fiscal year
expenditures were projected to be $20 . 8 million. Only $15 .4
million was budgeted, and the Department was directed to
implement an aggressive cost containment program, including GA
centralization and expanded work programs and SSI advocacy.
Continued aggressive cost containment will be pursued to bring
General Assistance within budgeted levels .
• Budget Unit 0579 - Veterans Service Office
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 69, 173 Percent Received: 0
State revenues from the Department of Veterans Affairs are
distributed twice a year. The revenues for the first half of
the fiscal year will be posted mid-year.
• Budget Unit 0583 - Private Industry Council
Expenditures: Budgeted: $ 4,706, 133 Percent Expended: 40%
The Department normally expends more of their funds at the
beginning of the fiscal year due to the activities of the
Summer Youth Program, which is the Department' s largest
program and operates from June through August. The
expenditure levels are appropriate for the Department's budget
and activity pattern.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 4,699,055 Percent Received: 40%
The Department normally receives proportionately more of its
budgeted revenue at the beginning of the fiscal year. In
addition, $600,000 in unanticipated federal revenue for the
Summer Youth Program was received, and an appropriation
adjustment is being processed to recognize this additional
revenue.
• Budget Unit 0590 - Community Development Block Grants
Expenditures.: Budgeted: $ 2,265,546 Percent Expended: 9%
Expenditures are generally lower than budgeted levels at the
first quarter. Actual expenditures are roughly equal to
actual revenues indicating no anticipated budget problems .
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 2,253,930 Percent Received: 8%
Revenues received are generally lower than budgeted levels at
the first quarter.
• Budget Unit 0661 - Road Construction-General Fund
Expenditures : Budgeted: $12,273,600 Percent Expended: 35%
Expenditures are expected to continue at a high level as
condemnations and road construction contracts for the Bailey
Road interchange and Highway 4 widening projects progress .
Budget adjustments to increase appropriations are forthcoming.
Later in the year, the department may shift to other road
projects budgeted in Road Fund-Budget Unit 0662 .
• Budget Unit 0701- Parks Administration
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 500 Percent Expended.: 0
Expenditures were not incurred for services provided by the
Community Development department because no activities
relative to the development of an off-highway vehicle park.
There was no reduction plan for this budget.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 500 Percent Received: 100+
Revenues are collected twice each year and placed in a reserve
account until sufficient funds are available to build an off-
road vehicle park.
NON-GENERAL FUND
• Budget Unit 0101 - Justice Facility Construction
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 0 Percent Expended:
This is a non-general fund budget unit. No expenditures were
budgeted, however $74,544 was expended during the first
quarter on the West County Jail . Expenditures will be covered
from re-appropriated 1991-92 fund balance. No revenues were
budgeted for 1992-93 .
• Budget Unit 0119 - Crim Justice Facility Construction
Expenditures: Budgeted: $ 1, 083,574 Percent Expended: 29%
This is a non-general fund budget unit. Expenditures include
debt service only and are within acceptable levels.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 1,206,000 Percent Received: 23%
Revenues are within acceptable limits . Any surplus revenues
must be used to repay a loan from the general fund including
the cost of borrowing from 1991-92 .
• Budget Unit 0122 - Courthouse Construction
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 1,498, 010 Percent Expended: 35%
This is a non-general fund budget unit. Expenditures include
completion of current contract and debt service only.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 1, 106,000 Percent Received: 22%
Revenues are within acceptable limits . Any surplus revenues
must be used to repay a loan from the general fund including
the cost of borrowing from 1991-92 .
• Budget Unit 0126 - Co Law Enf Computer Cap-Project
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 80,600 Percent Expended: 4%
This is a non-general fund budget unit. Expenditures will be
made throughout the year for software replacement and
enhancement. Expenditures are made from prior year fund
balance. No additional revenues were budgeted for 1992-93 .
• Budget Unit 0161 - Survey Monument Preservation
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 135,531 Percent Expended: 2%
Expenditures are low because the department is performing
higher priority activities . When work is done on survey
monument preservation, labor and other costs are charged to
this budget unit. It is anticipated that expenditures will be
at less than budgeted levels at the end of the year.
• Budget Unit 0236 - -Court Records Automation
Expenditures: Budgeted: $ 191,287 Percent Expended: 0
It is the intent of the Municipal Courts to use court records
automation funds to maintain the ISD Corporation civil and
small claims automation systems . To date, no expense has been
incurred.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 30, 000 Percent Received: 38%
Revenue for this budget is generated from the collection of an
additional $3 filing fee on civil papers in the Municipal
Courts . The higher than expected revenues received would
indicate an increase in civil filings over previous years .
• Budget Unit 0237 - Clerk Records Automation
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 103,790 Percent Expended: 4%
Restricted funds accumulate in this budget unit each year to
finance the automation of the County Clerk' s record keeping
system. Depending on improvements to the system scheduled
each year, it is not unusual for expenditures to fluctuate
each quarter, or for fund balances to occur at the end of the
fiscal year.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 66 ,000 Percent Received: 24%
Revenue for this budget unit is generated from collections of
an additional $3 filing fee on specified filing in a civil
action or proceeding. Specified filings appear to be slightly
fewer than anticipated at this point in the years .
• Budget Unit 0244 - DA Revenue Narcotics
Expenditures: Budgeted: $ 134,250 Percent Expended: 8%
This is a non-general fund budget unit. Expenditures are
within acceptable limits .
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 134,250 Percent Received: 24%
Revenues, which are generated through narcotic asset
forfeiture, generally lag and are within acceptable limits .
6 . Budget Unit 0246 - Dispute Resolution
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 138,652 Percent Expended: 16%
This is a non-general fund budget unit. Expenditures are made
though contract to six community based organizations . All
funds are expected to be expended by year end.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 138,652 Percent Received: 20%
Revenues are within acceptable limits . In addition restricted
fund balance is available for this fund.
• Budget Unit 0250 - _DA Revenue SEIF
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 0 Percent Expended: 0%
This is a non-general fund budget unit. No expenditures were
necessary during the first quarter, see budget unit 0245 for
more information. It was not anticipated that excess Support
Enforcement Incentive Fund (SEIF) revenues would be generated
in 1992-93 .
• Budget Unit 0253 - Sheriff Narcotic Forfeiture
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 193, 119 Percent Expended: 21%
This is a non-general fund budget unit. Expenditures are
within acceptable limits .
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 193, 119 Percent Received: 18%
Revenues, which are generated through narcotic asset
forfeiture, generally lag and are within acceptable limits .
• Budget Unit 0256 - Criminalistics Lab Fund
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 44 ,381 Percent Expended: 20%
This is a non-general fund budget unit. Expenditures was
within acceptable limits .
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 44,381 Percent Received: 29%
Revenues are within acceptable limits .
• Budget Unit 0259 - Aide to Police Service Areas
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 0 Percent Expended:
This budget unit is defunct. During the first quarter, $4 ,760
was posted to this budget in error. Please see budget unit
0239 for explanation.
• Budget Unit 0260 - Automated ID Warrants
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 1,248,342 Percent Expended: 0%
This is a non-general fund budget unit. No expenditures were
made during the first quarter. Programming and implementation
of the Automated Warrant System will begin later in the year.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 288,280 Percent Received: 22%
Revenues include fund balance from fiscal year 1991-92 and are
within acceptable limits .
• Budget Unit 0352 - Community Development
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 4,013,073 Percent Received: 44%
Actual revenues are misstated. Community Development has been
credited revenue belonging to Public Works and other
departments . A journal entry has been submitted that will
bring actual revenues more in line with budgeted levels .
• Budget Unit 0353 - Recorder Micrographics/Modernization
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 2,249,798 Percent Expended: 6%
Restricted funds accumulate in this budget unit each year to
finance the conversion of recorded documents to microfilm and
the modernization of systems for locating documents .
Depending on improvements to the systems scheduled each year,
it is not unusual for expenditures to fluctuate each quarter,
or for fund balances to occur at the end of the fiscal year.
Revenues: Budgeted: $ 725,000 Percent Received: 47%
Revenue for this budget unit is generated from fees assessed
when recording a document. Higher than anticipated revenues
received in the first quarter reflect increased recordation
activity resulting from the recession and increased mortgage
refinance transactions .
• Budget Unit 0585 - Dom Violence/Victim Assistance
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 80,750 Percent Expended: 9%
This is a non-general fund budget unit, supported by
restricted revenue. Funds will be fully expended by year end
through a contract with Battered Womens ' Alternatives .
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 80,750 Percent Received: 31%
Revenues, which are generated from a fee on marriage licenses,
are within acceptable limits .
• Budget Unit 0662 - Road Construction-Road Fund
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 8,922 , 870 Percent Expended: 13%
Expenditures are historically low during the first quarter as
Public Works staff concentrate on field activity. Indoor,
engineering construction activity will increase during the
winter months and construction work by private contractors
will increase during the winter months and construction work
by private contractors will increase during the spring months.
Another reason for low expenditures is the current emphasis on
road construction projects budgeted in General Fund Budget
Unit 0661 .
• Budget Unit 0663 - Transportation Improvement
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 3, 984,256 Percent Expended: 1%
Most transportation projects in this budget unit are at the
less costly design stage. Expenditures should increase in the
last quarter when the projects move into the construction
stage. In addition, actual expenditures of over $368, 000 have
accrued and need to be charged to this budget unit. The
Public Works Department accrues the majority of the costs
while Community Development is responsible for this budget,
resulting in a lag between actual activity and is recorded in
the budget/finance system.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 1,500,000 Percent Received: 0
Revenues are low because Measure-C (sales tax) received from
the Transportation Authority is credited to this budget on a
bi-quarterly basis . It is anticipated that budgeted revenue
levels will be reached.
• Budget Unit 0672 - Road Maintenance-Road Fund
Revenues : Budgeted: $10,013, 148 Percent Received: 78%
Revenue receipts have increased because the department has
begun to perform indemnity collection in-house. Revenue
estimates have been adjusted upwards . An appropriation
adjustment is forthcoming to increase budgeted revenue levels .
• Budget Unit 0676 - Road Planning
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 808,900 Percent Received: 0
Revenues are low due to lag between time when services are
performed and charges are made to AOB funds and cities .
Charges are made on a quarterly basis with the largest portion
of revenue being received in the last quarter.
• Budget Unit 0696 - Pleasant Hill BART
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 982,823 Percent Expended: 3%
This budget incorrectly estimated expenditures at a higher
amount than is anticipated for the fiscal year. A contract
totalling approximately $286 ,000 for Transportation. Demand
Management services is the only anticipated cost.
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 200,000 Percent Received: 2%
Revenue is a development fee assessment on development
activity. This revenue has been affected by the downtown in
the economy.
• Budget Unit 0843 - Airport Fixed Assets
Expenditures : Budgeted: $ 6,041, 337 Percent Expended: 7%
Capital projects are in the less costly planning stages . The
more expensive construction activity is expected to begin in
the late spring months .
Revenues : Budgeted: $ 5, 375, 104 Percent Received: 9%
The revenue source for this budget unit is primarily Federal
Aviation Agency grants . The department budgets those revenues
it has received assurances of obtaining. Actual receipt
varies greatly according to federal government and capital
project schedules .
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Resolution on November 17 , 1992 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, Schroder, Torlakson, McPeak .
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Resolution No. 92/ 820
AMEND attachments to Board Resolution 92/718 as follows:
Deletes from positions to be abolished positions#25-00620, 25-00304, 25-00053,
25-00545, 25-00593, . 25-00639 based on funding in the Sheriff-Coroner
Department budget resulting from increased revenues.
1 hereby certify that this Is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: _i� r+��/rc J/7
PHIL BATCHELOR;Clerk of the•Board
/of Supervisors.and County Administrator
BY etaa .OeputY
cc: Personnel Department
County Administrator
Sheriff-Coroner
Resolution No . 92/820
Attachment AA Revised 11/17/92
Page 1 of 3
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
POSITIONS TO BE ABOLISHED
DEPARTMENT: Sheriff-Coroner
EFFECTIVE: Close of Business on August 31, 1992 unless otherwise noted
POSITION NO. CLASS CODE POSITION TYPE
25-00555 Chief Deputy Shrf 6XB3 Full
25-00978 Lieutenant 6XHA Full (Vacant)
25-00976 Lieutenant 6XHA Full
25-00977 Lieutenant 6XHA Full
25-01008 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00884 Sheriff Specialist 64VE Full
25-00885 Sheriff Specialist 64VE Full
25-00966 Sheriff Specialist 64VE Full
25-01125 Sheriff Specialist 64VE Full
25-00039 Clerk-Senior JWXB Full
25-00092 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00701 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-01000 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00694 Lieutenant 6XHA Full
25-00492 Lieutenant 6XHA Full
25-00745 Sher Mutual Aide Coord 64SK Full (Vacant)
25-00667 Comm Center Director 64NC Full
25-00272 Sheriff Fleet Svcs Coord 6ASA Full
25-00302 Supervising Dispatcher 64HD Full (Vacant)
25-00637 Supervising Dispatcher 64HD Full (Vacant)
25-00634 Dispatcher I 64WK Full (Vacant)
25-00636 Dispatcher I 64WK Full (Vacant)
25-00286 Dispatcher II 64WM Full
25-00635 Dispatcher I 64WK Full
25-00019 Clerical Supervisor JWHF Full Eff 1/7/93
25-00037 Clerk-Senior JWXC Full
25-00047 Clerk-Senior JWXC Full
25-00042 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full
25-00472 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full
25-00711 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full (Vacant)
25-00002 Captain 6XDA Full
25-00544 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00903 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00095 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00102 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00857 Fingerprint Exm I 64WH Full (Vacant)
25-00321 Lieutenant 6XHA Full
25-00924 Clerk-Senior JWXC Full
25-00926 Clerk-Senior JWXC Full
25-00017 Clerk-Senior JWXC Full
Res. No. 92/498, as- amended by Res. No. 92/511, 92/532, 92/624, 92/718 & 92/820
Attachment AA Revised 11/17/92
Page 2 of 3
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
POSITIONS TO BE ABOLISHED
DEPARTMENT: Sheriff-Coroner
EFFECTIVE: Close of Business on August 31, 1992 unless otherwise noted
POSITION NO. CLASS CODE POSITION TYPE
25-00923 Clerk-Specialist JWXD Full
25-00920 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00883 Sheriff Specialist 64VE Full (Vacant)
25-00771 Sheriff Dispatcher II 64WM Full
25-00702 Sheriff Dispatcher II 64WM Full
25-00630 Sheriff Dispatcher II 64WM Full
25-01006 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-01014 Clerk-Experienced JWXB PT(20/40)Vacant
25-01021 Clerk-Experienced JWXB PT(20/40)Vacant
25-01056 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full (Vacant)
25-01057 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full (Vacant)
25-01058 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full (Vacant)
25-01053 Account Clerk-Exp JDVC Full (Vacant)
25-01029 Environmental Sry Manager 1WDB Full (Vacant)
25-00322 Sergeant 6XTA Full (Vacant)
25-00330 Sergeant 6XTA Full
25-00410 Sergeant 6XTA Full (Vacant)
25-00296 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00485 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00503 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full (Vacant)
25-00960 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full (Vacant)
25-01022 Sheriff Aide 64VF PT(20/40)Vacant
25-01050 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01051 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full (Vacant)
25-01061 Sheriff Aide 64VF PT(20/40)
25-00271 Detention Services Aide 64WG Full
25-01059 Sheriff Dispatcher II 64WM Full (Vacant)
25-00870 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full (Vacant)
25-00877 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full (Vacant)
25-01065 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full (Vacant)
25-00876 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01049 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01066 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01064 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
,J 25-00843 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01048 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-01025 Sheriff Aide 64VF Full
25-00755 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full (Vacant)
25-01148 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full
25-00033 Clerk-Experienced JWXB Full
25-00132 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00205 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full (Vacant)
25-00397 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
Res. No. 92/498, as amended by Res. No. 92/511, 92/532, 92/624, 92/718 & 92/820
Attachment AA Revised 11/17/92
Page 3 of 3
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
POSITIONS TO BE ABOLISHED
DEPARTMENT: Sheriff-Coroner
EFFECTIVE: Close of Business on August 31, 1992 unless otherwise noted
POSITION NO. CLASS CODE POSITION TYPE
25-00516 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00527 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00535 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full (Vacant)
25-00731 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full (Vacant)
25-00769 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00798 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-01137 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full (Vacant)
25-01138 Deputy Sheriff-Recruit 6X7A Full
25-00134 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00138 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00210 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00382 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00628 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00691 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-00706 Deputy Sheriff 6XWA Full (Vacant)
25-01063 Sheriff Aide-CDEP 64V1 Full (Vacant)
25-01013 Clerk-Beg Level-CDEP JWX2 Full
25-01018 Clerk-Beg Level-CDEP JWX2 Full
25-01020 Clerk-Beg Level-CDEP JWX2 Full
25-01055 Clerk-Senior JWXC PT (Vacant)
Amendment 8/4/92 An agreement was reached to fund the Director of Inmate Services
position from the Inmate Welfare Fund (cost center 8119/4994) which has allowed
that position abolished on Resolution 92/498 effective 8/31/92 to be removed from
Attachment AA. Additionally, correction was made to retain three merit system
clerical positions rather than three exempt CDEP positions.
Amendment 8/11/92 A correction was made in the effective date of the criminalist
positions to be abolished to October 31, 1992, to correctly reflect the Board's
action of July 20, 1992. Additionally, one part time, unfunded Clerk-Senior Level
was added to.the positions to be abolished.
Amendment 9/11/92 Deletes from positions to be abolished positions #25-1054 25-
P
65, 25-758, 25-812, 25-62, 25-670, and 25-267 and delays abolishment of six
I positions until close of business 11/17/92 based on funding in the Sheriff's
Department budget resulting from increased revenues and efficiencies.
N
Amendment 10/27/92 Changed effective date of cancellation of Clerical Supervisor
position to January 7, 1993.
Amendment 11/17/92 Deletes from positions to be abolished positions #25-620, 25-
304, 25-53, 25-545, 25-593, and 25-639 based on funding in the Sheriff-Coroner
Department budget resulting from increased revenues.
Res. No. 92/498, as amended by Res. No. 92/511, 92/532, 92/624, 92/718 & 92/820